User talk:Dylan Mak Tyme/BoxyImpeachmentCase
|
Attention |
| Please do not feed the Trolls |
You have been warned --The Grimch U! 05:05, 11 September 2007 (BST)
Yo! MISCONDUCT IS THE PLACE FOR THIS:
http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct
if you want to charge Boxy Nalikill 16:07, 9 September 2007 (BST)
- It does not fall under misconduct as described on the Misconduct page. The presence of strong sysop support for the decision merely casts broader doubt on the administrative staff. --Dylan Mak Tyme 17:18, 9 September 2007 (BST)
- It's not misconduct. Other mods agreed that it wasn't vandalism. --Sonny Corleone RRF DORIS CRF pr0n 16:08, 9 September 2007 (BST)
- I agree it's not misconduct... but he seems to be saying he wants to 'impeach' boxy, and I informed him this is the wrong place to try that.Nalikill 16:10, 9 September 2007 (BST)
- I'd rather it stay here. Let the idiot think he's important on his userpage without shitting up the rest of the wiki. --Sonny Corleone RRF DORIS CRF pr0n 16:15, 9 September 2007 (BST)
- I agree it's not misconduct... but he seems to be saying he wants to 'impeach' boxy, and I informed him this is the wrong place to try that.Nalikill 16:10, 9 September 2007 (BST)
:::There is no place to try it, as is clearly stated on the page. Along with the fact that any decision is non-binding.- Unsigned comment. Four tildes ain't that hard. Nalikill 17:31, 9 September 2007 (BST)
- There is no place to try it, as is clearly stated on the page. Along with the fact that any decision is non-binding. --Dylan Mak Tyme 20:52, 10 September 2007 (BST)
- And I didn't see where you said it, and of COURSE there's a place to try it, y'twit, why is misconduct not the place, considering it fits the bill of what you're trying to do exactly? Nalikill 17:31, 9 September 2007 (BST)
- There is no place to try it, as is clearly stated on the page. Along with the fact that any decision is non-binding. --Dylan Mak Tyme 20:52, 10 September 2007 (BST)
If you take this to misconduct, you will have to take Myself and Hagnat there too, as we support Boxy's decision here. --The Grimch U! 16:18, 9 September 2007 (BST) Oh, and i almost forgot, Karlsbad too, since he didnt reverse the decision and he posted on it. --The Grimch U! 16:27, 9 September 2007 (BST)
- Is this going to turn into one of those movie cliches? You know... "I'm Spartacus!" and so on. --Sonny Corleone RRF DORIS CRF pr0n 16:20, 9 September 2007 (BST)
- Trolls versus the sysops. --The Grimch U! 16:27, 9 September 2007 (BST)
Me gets impeached... for protectin' Saromu... ah, the irony, the irony of it all >:) The preceding signed comment was added by boxy (talk • contribs) at 16:39 9 September 2007 (BST)
- Oh come now. You can't hide our love for each other from the wiki for much longer. --Sonny Corleone RRF DORIS CRF pr0n 23:33, 9 September 2007 (BST)
- This is unfair. I am far more controversial than you are boxy! I want an impeachment thing. Oh wait, nevermind, just remembered Akule is trying that on kevans talk page. I demand equal mention in this, as i supported Boxy's decision, and refused to undo it. --The Grimch U! 17:02, 9 September 2007 (BST)
- You were far to civil about it, or I'm sure you would have copped a mention :) The preceding signed comment was added by boxy (talk • contribs) at 17:09 9 September 2007 (BST)
- That does it. No more mister nice guy. --The Grimch U! 20:10, 9 September 2007 (BST)
- You were far to civil about it, or I'm sure you would have copped a mention :) The preceding signed comment was added by boxy (talk • contribs) at 17:09 9 September 2007 (BST)
