https://wiki.urbandead.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=J3D&feedformat=atom
The Urban Dead Wiki - User contributions [en]
2024-03-28T10:17:18Z
User contributions
MediaWiki 1.37.1
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DanceDanceRevolution&diff=1789412
User talk:DanceDanceRevolution
2010-10-03T10:41:24Z
<p>J3D: /* yerr */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/talkn}}<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
==Way too Evil==<br />
[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1295703 Friend of yours?] Check his real name link (NSFW). I think that's more then enough to get him on a Text Rape list. Might wanna talk to him. I'm also scarred for life now :( --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:20, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, mate in EVIL. What do you mean by NSFW? I don't want to force him out of having his own crap on his profile, he's probably had it there as long as he's been playing, which is a while. I don't really mind tbh, his loss if he's anti-text-raped. lol. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:29, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Not Safe For Work. Ring a bell? Did you follow the link? But okay, it's not like I'm going to report him, I don't really care but I know some people do and I thought I'd bring it up. Anyway, now I have accidentally bumped into you guys I'm deciding whether or not I send a surprise down there.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:35, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Lol! Just so you know, we'll run away from any PKing attacks, we are all wimps atm. Yeah, I've seen lemonparty, it's pretty common, it's like meatspin or any shock website IMO, you're going to see it one way or another and the sooner you do the sooner you can identify the link as something you're never going to click again. Either way, thanks for the heads up, I'll pass the message onto him and see what he thinks. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:37, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== First ==<br />
<br />
Since you archived the page.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 11:49, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:(diff) (hist) . . User talk:DanceDanceRevolution; 10:43 . . (-57,746) . . DanceDanceRevolution (Talk | contribs | block)<br />
:^^^ Evidence.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 11:50, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Doesn't count unless he empties it completely. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 12:12, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::It coutns for me... Also, I like where this Radioactive thing is going.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 12:19, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Don't mind me, just maintaining my page presence... ;) --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 13:55, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==I spy...==<br />
...a stalker not more than 30 seconds ago... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 14:34, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Great minds think alike! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 14:35, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::I'm completely not sure if you remember her, but [[User:Tselita|Tselita]] was in that very same building. Also, my friend, [[User:Zensaga|Zensaga]] was in there as well... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 14:52, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==ZL==<br />
Unless they go the "guilt by association" rule for GTF's fit,it should be done for sure. As for learning about it, you'd have learned about it at least as soon the first zerg hunter had PKed you. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 15:38, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:What is the guilt by association?? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 17:13, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::The powers that be generally don't like if appealers get abusive and foul-mouthed. (And I probably wouldn't like it as well, looking how they had and have to deal with the likes of Finis Valorum, Dead Bunnies and TZH.) It's some difference though if some lying scumbags like the Dead Bunnies throw out a barrage of insults while denying even basic facts, or if a single member out of several snaps slightly in a case that has been weak to begin with. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 01:22, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Yeah fair. I hoped they would overlook that since we obvs aren't zerging and I just assumed the IP was important so I didn't force the words out of any of their mouths, I just let them say whatever. And it's a ZERG LIST they maintain, if they can't handle abuse from wrongly accused people then they shouldn't be there IMO. One more question: It appears that Guy's response was moved to another thread, is that right? And why? :/ -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:29, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::The mods are running the ZL in their spare time and are basically providing a public service, at which 90% of all work _should_ already be done by Kevan (if the auto-measures were worth anything), so I grant them any right to refuse appeals on the base of "being something we don't wanna put up with". As for moving it, I have no idea if GTF's comment has been moved, and why. If it has any effect will be seen at least as soon as the next list update comes in. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 01:42, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::It buttfucks objectivity up the arsehole if they refuse 100% watertight appeals from a group who is ''absolutely'' not zerging if someone says the F word in them. Just saying. Thought we would have been 100% in the clear, ahh well. Thanks for everything. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:09, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::{{quote|3=[[User:Spiderzed|I told you so:]]|2=It's some difference though if some lying scumbags like the Dead Bunnies throw out a barrage of insults while denying even basic facts, or if a single member out of several snaps slightly in a case that has been weak to begin with.}}<br />
::::::For actual answers on that, you have to grab an actual operator (like TheHuntsman or MarcusCaesar). I'm just a lone zerg hunter and not involved with ZL maintenance. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 02:17, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Yeah fair, soz. Again, thanks for the help through this. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:42, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::Essentially, if somebody takes pains to heap abuse the ZL Mods in their removal request then we take that as a clear indication that they do not in fact wish to be removed. (Otherwise they would abide by the removal rules, in which this situation is specifically called out.) It's like someone's face giving the lie to their words, but an online equivalent. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 04:59, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Yeah, fair enough. Thanks for the clarification Rev. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 05:01, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::I suppose I should really ask what the context is <small>(in case there is something I should be doing)</small>… but I kinda don't want to <small>(in case there is something I should be doing)</small>. {{shifty}} {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 09:51, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Oh, just in the zerg liste 9 thread my new group EVIL was submitted to be added because we all defended a break-in with very quick precision and execution. To make sure there was no chance of us being actually added, I got the suspected players to post on the appeals thread so their IP's could be logged. Out of the 5 of us that were considered, the last person to post chucked a shitty over us being added (he didn't realise we had only been submitted, not added) over something so trivial in his eyes. The post itself while embarrassing wasn't anything ''too'' over the top in itself, and since I have a lack of knowledge of the zerg liste methods so I'm pretty paranoid about being added, since it would create a massive dark cloud over our groups morale etc. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:29, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::Yeah, you should be fine, mate. Suspicion is not proof, and you've definitely done the right thing in your response. If I were you, I'd do as [[Mostly Harmless]] did and view it as a badge of honour. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 16:50, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== The Wyke Hills/Wykewood confusion ==<br />
<br />
You know, those can happen when you are updating a dozen EMRs alone. And the fact that there were two reports for Wyke Hills and one for Wykewood on that particular update didn't help either. And yet when you found it, you decided to point and laugh at it instead of fixing it. I wonder how that could help. -- [[User:Kittithaj|Kittithaj]] 16:48, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:People make mistakes. I make lots. Don't go all butthurt on me for it. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 06:58, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Thought you'd like to know ==<br />
<br />
It [[User:Aichon/Sandbox/Demo10|looks like]] your DanceDance arrows sig might be one of the ones causing issues for A/VB (the current month's archive isn't showing up on it since it has too much inclusion data), since it's a decent amount larger than the norm. This isn't a warning to fix it or anything of the sort, merely a friendly notification, since I figured you'd want to be aware of something like this. What you do with this info is your call. My best guess is that it's the images causing the issues, since the other big culprit was Mis' sig with the images in it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:45, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, I've noticed that in IE both your sig and Mis's sig are appearing vertically. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 06:56, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Ah, yeah, that's an unfortunate side affect of the code that they're using to get links over their images (it's my fault, since I wrote the code). IE7 and earlier doesn't understand the "display: inline-box" stuff, I believe, so it does a "display: box" equivalent instead, which means each image gets its own line. I haven't figured out a fix yet, though I'll readily admit I haven't been looking too hard since I'm not reminded of the issue during daily use (I use something other than IE, of course). IE8 is better (so long as Compatibility Mode is disabled), in that they don't use multiple lines, but the link aspect of the code simply doesn't work in IE8 (yet? Rooster was working on it as recently as yesterday or so). {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 07:04, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Thanks heaps for that info guys. I do like the arrows sig but I've always understood there'd most likely be some sort of unfixable problem with them, so I have no issue removing it and just redirecting it to my current lemon signature. is it just affecting the inclusion ''on'' the A/VB page? Or did the signatures in the archive itself also refuse to display? If the former was the only issue, I might wait till the month is over, revert the sig back to the arrows and just continue from there on with my current sig. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:22, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Just a note on the arrows sig, you can use [[Template:ClickInternal]] for the images now. Good news is that it works (thank Aichon), bad news is that it's weighty so using it on several images is bad, mmmkay? Also you have to use it because I said so or I'll get all sig policy on your ass. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 07:16, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:K cool thanks Rooster. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:57, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== recruitment ad ==<br />
<br />
i appreciate the help in conforming my attempt at a recruitment ad. at least ya helped me with it instead of being a jerk about it. i need to brush up on my wiki. {{unsigned|Nuerotoxic2213|01:07, 1 September 2010}}<br />
:That was actually me that fixed it up for you, though DDR was kinda enough to remove a stray character from the page that was making it look a bit off. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:20, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==sup biatch==<br />
<br />
whats teh lowdown on the game updates? bellow + that scout safehouse skill is that all?? also - scout safehouse, do the actions have to be completed in the safehouse? how the frack does the game measure that? Also there should be a link of the news page to a page that explains the updates in non-zombieapoc style. Ie outlines what we know of the actual changes. if that already exists; link me and make the link more obvious for others. sick1 {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:28, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:[[Safehouses]]--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 12:07, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::dunke!{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:20, 4 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== POLGNOAK ==<br />
<br />
You realise that you just commented on the main page, not the talk page, right?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 07:59, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Haha!!! I didn't even notice :( Thanks for the heads up! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:11, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::=P Don't worry about it, I thought it was a talk at first too. Probably because they brought the votes across from the talk.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 08:13, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== hey papi ==<br />
<br />
can you move [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Quartly_Lecture_Group this] under the QSG name space? thanks?----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 14:46, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeboi -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 17:33, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::and [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Wolfgang_Puck%27s_Address_to_the_Quartly_Library#Remedial_Zombese_With_Wolfgang_Puck dis]----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 16:39, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I was directed to a header halfway down the page so I figured you meant to move the whole thing, so I did. Also, I had a dream about you last night. Yeah, I dream about UD. And you. I was in your group but I kept getting killed by people. And now you're here. You're planting Inception, I know it! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 22:29, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::yeah i meant everything. i just want to get everything cleaned up and organized before i take my leave of UD. and getting killed by stupid people is just part of being in the QSG. FUCK HOW DID YOU FIGURE OUT MY PLAN? THE ARCHITECT IS STILL SLEEPING?----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 14:22, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== RITA ==<br />
<br />
Do [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1774575 I] have all the skills I'm gonna need for the manhunt? What with Lurching Gait and Ankle grab, I think I'm about done now.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 17:40, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Vinetown scout approves of this. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:52, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::They were skeptical! They said I couldn't level a Dinosaur based character before October! They were wrong! </smug> --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 18:59, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::: I hate to point this out but my [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1776190 discosaur] gained all his XP from shooting people not zombies. No needles or FAK's either. Its not gonna be hard to get the remainder before October. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 19:32, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Hell yeah! We're gonna eat some humans!--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<font color="purple">The Big T</font>]] 22:31, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Scroll boxes ==<br />
<br />
Such as the one in your main sandpit. Can they be placed side by side? Or, for that matter, can anything be placed alongside them?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 09:41, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:I imagine if you confined each one to an (absolute?) div and specified the divs to go side by side like one would normally, it'd be possible, but you'd have to obviously smallen their set width. I haven't touched those scrollboxes in over a year pretty much and I originally got them from my ex-boyfriend op [[User:Linkthewindow]], and you can see his speakbox is easily confined within simple tables so I don't think something you're mentioning is outside of reason. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:03, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Yeah I already looked at Link's code. I'll have a crack at what you suggested now. Thanks!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:05, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::If you have troubles, come back sometime and hit me up, back then I knew so little about DIV overlays mine was practically just a steal of Links. Between us and Aichon I'd be very surprised if we couldn't make what you want to work. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:06, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Yeah, I just went to have a look, and I realised I don't actually know how to put divs side by side. I'm working up a trial at [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Stub|my stub page]], but I've pretty much hit a brick wall. If you could help get those side by side, I'd be very appreciative. :P --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:10, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::I'll be able to, but semi finals footy is on so I'll come back in an hour and a half to have a squiz. Wouldn't be surprised if either you or aichon did it that time. In the meantime, look at the divs for the INFO and TALK div boxes for [[Every Villain Is Lemons]] which I also stole from [[BB3]] page if I remember right. Play around with the positions and notice how one is relative to the other, that might help. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:42, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Just sorted it. Thanks loads!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:51, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Just checking ==<br />
<br />
To make sure you saw [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:Aichon/Sandbox/Demo12&diff=1774587&oldid=1774584 this] since I never heard confirmation that you'd seen it. It does fix the issue of centering the image, but it comes at the cost of having hidden text on the page. I offered some more explanation on my talk page a few days back. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:25, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== wiki noob needs a mentor ==<br />
<br />
Hi. I'm new to wiki editing and only know the most basic of stuff. I've wanted to learn for a while so when I found Project Mentor I figured I'd give you a shout. HAAAAAAAAAAAALP! I suck at this. Thanks [[User:Skynet Defense Network|Skynet Defense Network]] 16:18, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:I could help if DDR isn't available. Or anyone else for that matter. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 16:19, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::i'll do it! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:35, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Greetings ==<br />
<br />
Hello, Mr. Revolution. I cordially come to you to ask you a simple question regarding your edits to our screenshots. Why do you insinuate we [[zerg]]? Is it because we have screen captures of our own events? If that is the case, it can easily be explained. We do have members just waiting to record our... successes. --[[User:Dracula|Dracula]] 06:31, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Nup. It's just cause when I have a hundred or so images/pages to categorise in one sitting I just put funny edit summaries down. I'm deprived of fun or amusement in this "hobby" nowadays and want a reaction. No fault to you for enquiring either, zerging is a bad allegation and one I had to go through much stress to stomp down of my group from some butthurt zombie on the Zerg Liste forums. As for the origination of the call? I heard lots of things from Umbrella's wenches about you guys. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 09:14, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Ah, I see. Good to know it's not personal. Haha, now that you mention Umbrella, they love to throw the zerging accusations around when they're defeated/owned. They love to spread lies. Seems like they have members that partake in zerging, but I'm not going to worry about that. Just killing them. I'm grateful for the fast reply. --[[User:Dracula|Dracula]] 11:31, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::No probs, and it's great to see you didn't take it personally straight off the bat- respect. I was just being immature. Have a good one. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:36, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Passing Through ==<br />
<br />
Just thought to stop by and say hello. And ask an unsolicited personal question.<br />
<br />
On a serious note, DDR, I think you've gotten far more...eh, Cyberbobish. Grimish. Less tolerant. Looking at a random sampling of your edits, you seem a lot more prone to assuming general incompetence of the people you talk to, as compared to a year+ ago. Yes, people change, hell Grim was nice once...a long time ago, in a wiki far, far, away, true. My comment about jadedness was meant as a mild tweak at best, but your response I took to be far more virulent then I was honestly expecting. <br />
<br />
I am not your friend, so I realise this is presumptive, but I would appreciate an answer. I do think you do good work and have a pretty good record as an admin, but my memory of your seeming wiki persona a year ago is at serious odds with your present one. Has adminship caused this, or just overexposure to general asshattery and the grind of the wiki? -[[User:Wulfenbach|Wulfenbach]] 06:56, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:No prob. I think it's a mixture of things. The main one is my current lifestyle IRL, I'm having much less time I can call my own and I'm constantly strung out and burned out from work and university and I think my willingness to spend my small amount of time arguing on UDWiki is waning. I still like to come around because I'm still playing the game with IRL friends, but I no longer bother pretending that if UDWiki was a real life establishment it'd be one I'd attend in a suit and tie. My focus is on fixing up the place as a resource for players, and to stop vandalism and help users interested in coding or events. Beyond that I've been really intolerant towards extraneous arguing even if it's within these realms of my interests. You're right, I've become a lot more retarded of late, but it's a personal problem, not actually an in-wiki problem I think. I also got burned out from my reign as a bureaucrat in early 2010 and that's when I decided the wiki was something I could no longer spend hours a day on. Also, when I was a sysop a year ago there was a reason to take this place and my position seriously from a managerial point of view because between the inept ops, the inactive ones and the dickheads it was a fight to have this place running properly. At one point, for a month, Cyberbob and I were the only ops managing A/VB or any other admin pages. Now, we are (imo) a much better team and all of them have a great presence and work hard for the members, so the need to go over the top with rhetoric and arguing isn't as imperative now, especially since the wiki has been so drama free in the last month or so. <br />
:From the sysop side I still follow protocol and respect the rules in place and I don't want to leave UDWiki, op or otherwise. In the end though, any real behavioural issues on UDWiki just culminated from IRL circumstances and hopefully it's just a phase. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:36, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
::Well, here's to your recovery then. I had the luxury of a forced departure (twice now) of RL more or less demanding my absolute presence, so I suppose that's why I can still come back here and want to be productive without necessarily Grimish (I think you know what I mean by that).<br />
<br />
::You know, a while ago...a long time ago, when I was actually actively helping out here and really trying to be a better wiki-person, I gave thought to app'ing for sysop. I looked at the existing crew, looked at their postings as early as I could go back and compared them to their then-present ones. I realized that the difference mimic'd the difference I see in the LARP community among organizers. Namely: LARPer -> Organizer -> Eager -> Helpful -> HELPFUL -> Wise -> Opinionated -> Protective -> Vindictive -> Jaded -> Ex-LARPer. Since I had just reached the jaded phase with that, I figured that going back over that path with UD would mean that I wouldn't ever want to come back. Which would be sad, I think, since I do like the RRF's people. They tend, IMO, to be pretty fun and enjoyable as a web-group, and to walk away from UD would have to have me leaving them permanently. So I didn't app, which in hindsight, was for the best.<br />
<br />
::Have you thought about pulling away, yourself, now that the team is in your opinion, stable? Taking a six month break from UD to get RL sorted, maybe? -[[User:Wulfenbach|Wulfenbach]] 07:51, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I tried, I still found myself coming back daily for bugging the sysops for the small jobs I didn't think they did right, plus I was still spending just as much time here anyway so I was put back up to be sysop. I think behaviour like that indicates that I still wanted to be around the place, and now I'm more involved in the actual game than I have been in two years, so it's a weird situation at the moment for me to be in. Since I'm still convinced it's a phase, I'm just going to linger around doing the chores and helping out and being a bug to guys like you before something breaks on the wiki's side or mine ;D -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:01, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::See, that's the real infection here. It's not Necrotech fuckupery, it's this damn game. We need to find Kevan and get trenchie on this ass. Headshot RL for me, will he? >:D -[[User:Wulfenbach|Wulfenbach]] 09:31, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Lol! I still bitterly hate how he created an entire universe inside a wiki for me to be so heavily enthralled :( -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 12:38, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== User page rights ==<br />
<br />
Right, on my user and talk pages, the use of the click template (The one in Mis' sig and your old one) essentially destroys the page by making a massive white space at the bottom of the page. Do I therefore have the right to replace people's signatures with the <nowiki>{{usr}}</nowiki> template? I wanted to have a check before I did anything.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:26, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:It technically is your own page. You could edit whatever you see fit. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 18:28, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Its your page, as long as you don't alter what they have said, and make it clear they said it, I don't see a problem. I'd probably add a note explaining why though. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:28, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Alright, sounds like a plan. It's just with the recent change to my archive page, it's a little bit essential.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:34, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Also, it should be noted that neither of those sigs actually uses that template, but I would imagine that template would have the same issue anyway. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 18:35, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Its fine. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 23:28, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== I'm Interested in becoming a Sysop ==<br />
<br />
Hey Dance,<br />
<br />
We've spoken once or twice on here, and I saw that you are one so i thought it best to ask you. I rather like contributing and helping out on here, and I think I'd like to become a Sysop. I haven't quite been here 2 months, and only have 420 contribs, so not sure I can apply yet...<br />
<br />
Anyway, whats involved? Any tips? {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 15:23, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Trust me when I say this, I've went through your contribs. What you have so far is not enough to warrant a good SysOps bid. If you really, really want to be a SysOps, start by sulking around the Admin pages more often, cycling news archives and suggestions, etc. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 15:33, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:[[User talk:Jerrel Yokotory#Helpful Advice|Read this]].--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 15:52, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:We always love having interested users in becoming a Sysop, but first they need to understand the system in which they work. This includes the administration pages like [[A/MR|Move Requests]], [[A/D|Deletions]], [[A/SD|Speedy Deletions]], and others like [[A/VB|Vandal Banning]]. You have to understand the job you're asking for and we need to be convinced that you do. Besides that, it's always recommended that you know the community well and integrate well with their projects and tasks that try and make the wiki a better information resource. I'm not sure if Yonnua's link to previous advice is specifically the best thing for you to read literally because it's what ''he'' may do, but you need to be able to do your ''own'' thing on the wiki and still be able to help out in your own ways and with your own opinions. But the intention is the same- you need to exhibit your (obviously) keen interest in the community by involving yourself more in many of the wiki's facets. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:35, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Tip #1, and I don't mean this with any discourtesy or rudeness (really, I honestly don't), but research the answers yourself, rather than asking questions like "what's involved" to become a sysop (the answer is posted on [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions#Guidelines_for_System_Operator_Requests|A/PM]]). Asking questions like that is an immediate signal to all of us that you don't understand the system well enough...''yet''. Eager folks like you can and do learn the system eventually by reading through the policies, admin pages, and archives, so that shouldn't be a discouragement to you in the least. But sysops are expected (though it's not part of the official job description) to be decently knowledgeable about the way the wiki works, and that means understanding both the bureaucracy and some of the technical stuff better than the average user.<br />
<br />
::As for other advice, I'd agree with Yonn's suggestion to look for a project. There are always things that need cleaning up around here and discussions to be had where opinions are solicited (e.g. there's talk of an RP List redesign on [[UDWiki:General Discussion#hurdles|General Discussion]] right now, I've been working (very slowly) on rethinking the Suggestions system, there are always ideas on Developing Suggestions in need of thoughtful advice, Ross is working (also slowly) on redesigning the Zombie Skills pages, etc.). Getting involved on the admin pages, especially by expressing your opinion in the proper places (always be sure to do it in the proper places, since doing it in the wrong place is once again a signal to us that you don't yet understand how things work) is also a great way to let us get a feel for how you think and form opinions, which you'll be expected to do regularly as a sysop. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 04:26, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:::I Thank you all immensely for your help in this matter. I had read through the [A/PM] page, the main thing was that it wasn't quite clear where you apply to, but reading what you guys have written, I'm not quite ready just yet. <br />
:::As for a project, I wasn't quite sure what somebody who is not a sysop is permitted to do. I've noticed in a few subburbs, the "Suburb Group Listing" and "Active Groups" are very different. South Blythville, for example, has 3 groups in "Suburb Group Listing" and 12 in "Active groups". If I'm allowed to, I would like to follow up with the groups, and remove those inactive off the Active groups. I know similar has been done for Suburb Group listing. {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 13:54, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Want to run a contest for the Urban Dead Wiki ==<br />
<br />
i was wondering if i could run a contest on the Urban Dead Wiki. most notably a contest of art. i am look to put an advert for my in-game group on the UD page, via spending ten bucks. i was wondering if i could have a contest to who can come up with the best artwork for said advert. notably a prize of me spending the extra 5 bucks to make that persons in-game character immune to the IP limit seems sufficient enough. what do you think {{unsigned|Nuerotoxic2213}}<br />
:Sounds good. Just make a page for it and add it onto the Community Announcements page [[Template:Community Projects|here]], so it appears on the main page. From there you will get enough attention to hopefully have the comp succeed. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:28, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
i haven't had much of a response yet. is there anything(or anyone) i could contact, or you could contact to maybe spur this thing a bit lol. i don't actually know any of the artists that would patrol this forum [[User:Nuerotoxic2213|Nuerotoxic2213]] 16:02, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:I would suggest making the event page look eye-catching instead of it just being a wall of text. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 00:57, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Days in Urban Dead ==<br />
<br />
Aww man, I'd have liked to see a new one. This isn't because we have gaps is it? Because I can envisage some sort of crazy bot (always the best kind, the crazy sort) that could fill in the gaps. Unless you meant something else?<br />
<br />
I want a video dammit! {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 18:00, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:^This--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:42, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Mate, if you could do that, then making one more video would really be within my grasp. I have a few harrowing problems that have also come up, the biggest being that it's 80% likely that I don't even have the original 220 images anymore anymore, so I'll have to do my best to trawl through old backups to see if I still have them. Between searching for the backups and the old .avi versions I have I ''should'' be able to get a working version of the original 200 days to use. Once I've done that, I'll hit you up and see if you can make a crazy bot to help me get them images. Thanks man. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:30, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Alright, I've lost all the 220 original images and I dont have the original video but I've managed to nab the Youtube FLV that is embedded onto the video page, I should be able to make a more or less functional replacement from that. As for your crazy bot, if you're still keen, we'll need images from April 28th 2008 to whenever you see fit. See, after 200 days I didn't do ANY screencapping so I don't have any single screenshots at all from April 2008. How do you envision the bot will operate? Do you think it's possible when this many screenshots are needed? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 06:20, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Well I left the bot running today and let it slowly load each revision page, so I've got the info now. Seeing as we need like 700 images, I'll see if I can just have it fake an image that looks like a dangermap so we don't have to take screencaps from the wiki ourselves. I'll post an example if I get it to work. Also, the last purge only seems to have left us with stuff from about September 08, so... yeah. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 17:45, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Horrific time dealing with fonts. Anyway: [[:Image:DangerMap 20100919.png|yesterday's map]]. The original has nicer anti-aliased text but it's so huge on filesize I'll stick with the plainer one. I'll get around to automating the others at some point. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 11:04, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::That should be more than adequate, looks great and shouldn't look ''any'' different from the original 200 days. I've thought about the 6 month gap in images we'll have lost by the time this is through, what are your thoughts? Should I start from my old 2007 archive and go straight through to today? Or should we just start straight from Sep 2008 where your collection starts? Advantages of having them both is that that 200 day period had a lot of rich history displayed and there was a fairly significant lack of events for a year and a bit from mid-2008 too. Cons include the fact it's been seen before anyway, and it'd be hard to incorporate them into one another with a 6 month gap. Leaning towards the latter, thoughts? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:23, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::I think I'd go for a separate video given the gap. Shame really, because if you combine the wayback machine, manual coverage and current revisions, that gap is pretty much the only big gap is the history. Man if only we had those old revisions. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 11:45, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Yeah. Actually, Suburb/History ''does'' have about 20 or so. It covers the process hideously sporadically but if sped up it probably won't look that bad. But I'll see which route should ultimately be taken by trial and error once I get a few images together. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 12:59, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Well the bots working on it ''right now'', uploading as fast as pngout can compress the things down to size. Once it's done I can zip up the whole set and e-mail them if you like, less hassle than using the wiki for each and every one. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 13:17, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::And now would be a ''bad'' time to realise that there's a template called "MapDanger" which means all the old "MapVeryDanger" have been mapped wrongly. Fuuuuu - at least the more recent stuff works since the system isn't retarded anymore. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 13:24, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::Fuck. Surely no one would mind us recreating it ;D. As for the emailing option, sounds much better than doing ti via wiki. I'll email you just now so you can grab my email without me later having to go through the future hassle of eradicating my email from google search indexes. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:26, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Actually, simple redirection to the new ones could suffice... right? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:27, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Oh no, it's my fault, not the wiki's :P. Anytime a "VeryDanger" was the status in a revision it got recorded as orange not red because I didn't know of the clash. It resulted in some very orange maps as you can tell. I'll have to rebuild the revision history so that'll take the better part of a day. Gives me a chance to poke around the old templates though, that's good fun. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 13:43, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::No worries. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:58, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
E-mail sent. Expecting great things...''great things''. Actually, just a video without the crappy film grain would rock.<br />
<br />
Also, [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRRDk5jACMk Hilter Joins Escape] - Ahahahaha, awesome. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 06:50, 22 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Omg I know, classic. Anyways, now begins the task of putting them all into an animation. While I'm here, check out how Vegas makes the images appear when they are crushed together:<br />
<br />
:[[Image:Udabstract.jpg|1000px]]<br />
<br />
:It's 2 year UD Map art! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:04, 22 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
::That's cool, that gives me an idea, a graph showing the total amount of each danger level over time. Hey you could even roll it onto the relative graph on [[SZI]]. ...I need to update that graph too! {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 08:08, 22 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Can I run a small scale Suburb Massacre? ==<br />
<br />
Hey there,<br />
<br />
So I'm asking you, because I'm not sure whether I'd be allowed to or not, and I also get the impression certain other sysops don't like me...<br />
<br />
I'm thinking of running a small scale Suburb Massacre, of a 1 suburb radius around South Blythville, covering "Suburb Group Listing" and "Active Groups" (In suburbs that have that further down in their page)<br />
<br />
Can I do it? {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 01:56, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yes, I recommend it. Those pages that have second group listings further down the page on suburb pages are REALLY out of date and should be cleaned up. You really know what you should do though? Make it a project for the entirety of Malton and see if anyone is willing to help, and IN the project you can just organise and focus on the subrubs you care about but others can do the rest. That way you fix all of malton. That's just a thought, but you are free to do whatever you want from here when it comes to cleaning up suburb pages. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:16, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::If you would like to help out? [[The_Great_Suburb_Group_Massacre/2010-Round_2]] {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 07:03, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Photo Upload ==<br />
<br />
Hello DDR! Just wanted to know I saw you changing some pages on maps I uploaded. What do I miss when uploading? Where should I put categorising? --{{User:DiSm/sig}} 09:57, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Hey- A summary of what to do and how to do it is [[:Category:Images|here]]. Basically, we just have a few categories we use to file all our images under. You'll have already been familiar with [[:Category:Maps]] and [[:Category:Screenshots]] as that is what I categorised some of your images as. To do this, just add <nowiki>[[Category:XXXXXXX]]</nowiki> anywhere on the image description.<br />
<br />
:You don't need to do categorise as you upload- practically no one does, that's why I tend to do it. But if you do it saves us the trouble of doing it later. You're free to choose whether you want to do it or not in the long run, I won't mind either way. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:48, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Give it a go, then ask DDR if you did it right. He knows the system better than most of us, plus I still get flashbacks from the 9000+ images I sorted. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:54, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==wtf==<br />
<br />
hey whats the deal with your antixx on good pages? some people voted in a manner you didn't like? L2puppet or gtfo. i'll let you explain and revert until i next drop by then i'll avb and let the ops be bullied into letting you get away with it. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:13, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:fair enough I guess. I'm simply keeping a consistent high standard filter over the voting procedure that Cheese and later I attempted to keep going since the beginning- if RHO is misinformed enough to accidentally cycle it as successful and it's rightfully reverted, that ain't my fault. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:27, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Make mycock a ga and i'll pull some strings to get you into [[2CFC]].. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:34, 21 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:But.... [http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1101979] -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:38, 21 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Ghost Pages...WTF? ==<br />
<br />
What do i do about: [[7th_Fallschirmjäger_Div]], [[Fantôme_Tequila_De_Serpents]], [[St D’s Bar & Grill]] and [[La_Révolution]]? {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 14:18, 22 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Nothing. They're unrecognisable because of errors in the wiki's code. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 14:20, 22 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Bring in Max Von Sydow and see what he can do. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 15:16, 22 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::: I see dead people @_@ --{{User:DiSm/sig}} 19:11, 22 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Haha! Yeah, they are weird, huh? They are remnants of pages that have since been deleted, the wiki glitched them up and now they always appear as uncategorised and stuff. There's more documentation on their pages. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 23:28, 22 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Chick Chick BOOM! ==<br />
<br />
Yeah, uh huh, Thats right, [[Special:Uncategorizedimages]] and [[Special:Uncategorizedpages]] are cleared (except the Ghost stuff)<br />
<br />
For Future reference, using [[User:Dezonus/Storage]] as a Copy and paste reference saves lots of time. You're welcome to use it, and welcome to add to it ;) {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 10:00, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Nice idea. I know the wiki pretty well, so I won't need to use it, but I'll surely add to it when I find more examples of categories you may need to use. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:36, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Clare Weberdoff or whatever her fucking name was. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:22, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==yerr==<br />
<br />
i cbf with arbies/whatever over the whole good articles thing. But i hope someone with more energy for this old place picks up the crusade because that system is absolutely fucked! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:22, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Just so you know (because I cbf holding such lolarious evidence till an arbies case which won't happen) you kicked up the exact same stink when someone put ALIM up for GA and it was bombed for the exact same reason under the exact same circumstances, you kicked up the exact same stink and cheese gave the exact same answer as i did when this recent thing happened. the only difference was red yesman one wasn't there to cycle it as successful before cheese shat on it. You accepted it without much of a whinge and it was cycled easily. There's also a tonne (ie 90% of cases) where they are cycled as per this precedent, and also many precedents where I noted a conflict of interest between my own vote and my duties at hand and got a neutral party to cycle the proposal for me rather than "vendetta" it myself. It's just the way shit is bro. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:36, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::lol thats funny (cbf finding sincey ou didnt link me >: so i'll just assume its true) although iirc (which i probably dont) the difference was i nominated ALiM. I guess this would have passed with ZERO imput from me which made it seem all the more vendettay. THe system is stupid, you more or less admitted it and "its just the way shit is bro" is hardly a great stance to have, espeically about a system that was made up last year. Like i said, ithink its bullshit but don't much care anymore, sighhh i wish i still did. this place was/is an epic timewaster. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:41, 3 October 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Dezonus deems you Awesome. ==<br />
<br />
Thats right, you're ranked No.1 [[User:Dezonus/thumbs#Users|Dezonus' List of Awesome Users. Click here]] to check it out =) {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 03:14, 25 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:What? He's more awesome than me? The number one most linked to user? Damn, I must not be working hard enough. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 03:19, 25 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Maybe you're working too hard. :P {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 00:24, 26 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::no i think you both need to get a life.----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 02:49, 26 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Red October update ==<br />
<br />
This message is to let you know that the Red October event has changed locations. Please visit [[Talk:October_Bash/Red_October#Playing_Field|Red October Talk]] page to get details on the new location. {{unsigned|Vapor}}<br />
:Fair enough, good call too IMO. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 00:45, 27 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Yassa! ==<br />
<br />
Still in it to win it Sir. Soph & I are heading back to the playfield right now in fact and all going to plan, should be there tomorrow, Thursday at the latest. I'll go set up a wee area on the DSS forum just for us All Star celebs to brag up our tactics. Maybe you could use your Wiki Jedi skillz to find out who all our competition are, so we can add to contacts? {{User:Kempy/sig}} 08:42, 28 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Aaaaaabsolutely! You've got me all excited now! Lets do this! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:46, 28 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:: Forums all set. Go check if you can view it eh? I've not tinkered with this much, more Soph & Zipos domain, so i hope I haven't broke it. {{User:Kempy/sig}} 09:08, 28 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::: DOOOOOOOD!!! Get your arse over to the DSS forum to confirm you can see our sekrit hideout. [[Image:Tongue.gif]] {{User:Kempy/sig}} 13:51, 30 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::OMG THIS SHIT IS AWESOEM -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 15:38, 30 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::: Yah. How can we possibly '''not''' win? [[Image:Cig.gif]] {{User:Kempy/sig}} 16:03, 30 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== I love your face. ==<br />
<br />
And you know it.x --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 13:35, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:my face da best <small><3</small> -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:35, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Is there normally more to Categorize? ==<br />
<br />
Hey Dance,<br />
<br />
Listen, I'm just wondering, is there usually more pages and images to categorize than this? Like, when you gave the job to me, I got the impression that I wouldn't be able to keep up, but now it seems more like the posters can't keep up with me...? {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 10:22, 2 October 2010 (BST)<br />
:Nah, usually that's about it. When you started there was like a months worth of uncategorised images, so the workload was hard at first but nowadays it's more just a 10-minutes-a-day thing. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:40, 3 October 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==I came up with an Idea, but need your input==<br />
<br />
I thought it would be cool if we had a wiki [[User of the Month]] Competition. Now, this would probably have to be run by Sysops, so, I'm [[Talk:User of the Month|Asking for your input here]]. And dont worry, I've asked the other Sysops too.<br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
<br>{{User:Dezonus/sig}} 14:55, 2 October 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/2011_06&diff=1789409
UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/2011 06
2010-10-03T10:37:41Z
<p>J3D: /* Umbrella (Accessory) and Umbrella (Group) */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{Shortcut|[[A/D]]}}<br />
<br />
{{Moderationnav}}<br />
<br />
{| cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 style="margin-bottom: .5em; float: right; padding: .5em 0 .8em 1.4em; width: 33%"<br />
|__TOC__<br />
|}<br />
<br />
This page is for the request of page deletions within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to concerns about loss of data, the ability to delete pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a deletion from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.<br />
<br />
==Guidelines for Deletion Requests==<br />
<br />
All Deletion Requests '''must''' contain the following information in order to be considered:<br />
<br />
* '''A link to the page in question.''' Preferably bolded for visibility. Note that Category and Image links need a colon at the front to turn them into links (ie <code><nowiki>[[:Category:Category]]</nowiki></code> and <code><nowiki>[[:Image:Image.jpg]]</nowiki></code>).<br />
* '''A reason for deletion.''' This should be short and to the point.<br />
* '''A signed datestamp.''' This can be easily done by adding <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> to the end of your request.<br />
<br />
In addition to placing a request on this page, please place the '''''<nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki>''''' tag on the top of the page that is being recommended for deletion. Please make sure that the original content remains on the page, so that others can judge whether the page is worthy of deletion.<br />
<br />
Any deletion request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.<br />
<br />
Once the deletion request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be voted on for a period of two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. At the conclusion of this two weeks, the appropriate action will be taken by a system operator, and at the end of that day the request will be moved into the [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive|Archive]].<br />
<br />
Certain types of pages may be better being scheduled for deletion in order to reduce the amount of red tape and stop this page getting too cluttered. To lodge a request for scheduled deletions, go to [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling]].<br />
<br />
Deletion of pages that match a certain criteria may be better serviced by a request for a Speedy Deletion. Speedy Deletions are for removal of pages that are clearly of no value to the wiki, and do not incur the two week voting requirement. Speedy Deletion requests can be lodged at [[UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions]].<br />
<br />
{{speedydeletioncriteria}}<br />
<br />
==Guidelines for Voting on Deletion Requests==<br />
<br />
* One vote per user.<br />
* Voting should take place underneath the request, and each vote should be started with a {{CodeInline|#}} with no empty lines inbetween votes.<br />
* There are four vote types:<br />
** '''Delete'''. For agreement with the deletion request<br />
** '''Merge'''. For indication that the content on the page should be merged with another page (includes an implicit '''Delete''').<br />
** '''Speedy Delete'''. For indication that the page meets one of the [[UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions|Speedy Deletions]] Criteria (includes an implicit '''Delete''').<br />
** '''Keep'''. For disagreement with the deletion request.<br />
<br />
* The specific vote keyword should be bolded within the lodged vote. Any relevant comments are also allowed, but these should not be bolded.<br />
* At least one '''Delete''' vote must be entered by the deadline in order for a page to be deleted. System operators may not use their own vote after the deadline to delete a page.<br />
* If more '''Delete''' votes are entered than '''Keep''' votes, the page will be deleted. In any other circumstance, the page is kept.<br />
* If 3 '''Speedy Delete'''s are lodged, and there are no '''Keep''' Votes, the page will be deleted as per [[UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions|Speedy Deletions]].<br />
<br />
==Deletion Queue==<br />
<!-- Please place new requests directly below this message. <br />
If there are no requests, place the following message below.<br />
''There are no pages in the deletion queue''<br />
--><br />
<br />
===[[Umbrella (Accessory)]] and [[Umbrella (Group)]]===<br />
<br />
Obvious crit 2s, but considering an impending keep from Misanthropy, I'll put it here in the first place.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 14:08, 2 October 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
#'''Speedy Delete''' --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 14:08, 2 October 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Keep/VB''' - [[Umbrella (Group)]] is a group page which you have no claim to. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 14:16, 2 October 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Keep/VB''' - Not without crit 7, ya don't. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 23:34, 2 October 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Speedy Delete''' --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 23:42, 2 October 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Speedy''' --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:45, 2 October 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Just because something (a page) exists doesn't mean it has rights. Said pages serve no purpose whatsoever, and also a crit 2. Moving it to userspace is an option for me aswell. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:49, 2 October 2010 (BST)<br />
#::Group page for a group. Hence purpose. Has been stated already. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 23:51, 2 October 2010 (BST)<br />
#:::Group is a joke, and not real. Hence no purpose. Has been stated already.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:08, 3 October 2010 (BST)<br />
#:::Can you point to profiles in-game of people in this group? Otherwise, it looks to me like a fake group page that's entirely off-topic. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 01:28, 3 October 2010 (BST)<br />
#::::[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1516285 You mean like this one?] {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:38, 3 October 2010 (BST)<br />
#:::::Works for me. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 02:03, 3 October 2010 (BST)<br />
#::::[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1768588 Yes]. Recruitment messages have gone out on 10 radio channels, hundreds of pages link to it, there are plans for a recruitment add, and maybe even a forum. Join today! --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 02:09, 3 October 2010 (BST)<br />
#Speedy. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 23:46, 2 October 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Keep''' - Wow, that's all I can say. Fucking wow. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:34, 3 October 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Keep''' - As per comments above. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 02:03, 3 October 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Keep''' - these are great! fuck i hate seeing shit like this deleted. it only adds to the wiki. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:37, 3 October 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Umbrella,_Inc.]]===<br />
<small>Moved from A/SD</small><br />
<br />
I dont know whether this is Crit. 7 or not, but page history reads: "13:28, 23 September 2010 Wesker (Talk | contribs) (Actually, Umbrella is dead.)" {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 09:35, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:If you look at the edit history, its been edited by several people, so doesnt qualify under the author edit only rule.--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:45, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Seriously mate, I think this is best served at Deletions rather than just dismissing it outright. It's been blanked and not reverted because Whesker is "enough of a leader" of the group to not have his edits contested, and usually when that happens but the ops don't class it as crit 7, we send to deletions. Thoughts? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:35, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete''' - Close enough to crit 7 by proxy that it should be deleted, though we can't do it as a scheduled due to the exact circumstances. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 17:24, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Delete. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 17:26, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete'''. He was listed as leader at the time.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 17:40, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete''' - It would be a shame to lose such a pretty page, but if the group wants it gone, they can. I left [[Talk:Umbrella%2C_Inc.#This_Page_May_be_Deleted|a message]] on their talk page to make sure, though. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 23:46, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete''' - as Aichon. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 04:19, 24 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete''' - No vested interest here, hurrr! --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 10:28, 27 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Delete. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 23:46, 2 October 2010 (BST)<br />
==Recent Actions==<br />
===[[Mother]]===<br />
I don't know about you, but quite frankly I think this page is offensive. Maybe this is the wrong place to report this, but I don't think this sort of Content that offends people should be allowed on our Wiki... {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 08:45, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:It should be noted that the content has been manually moved by the user to [[Your Mother]]. When I finish what I'm doing, I'll delete that as a result of this vote, as it's essentially the page that was voted on below.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 20:14, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
#'''move''' - it isn't offensive, but it is bad. i suggest, if it isn't a group, move to user's userspace. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:52, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Move''' - offensive? For reals? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 09:21, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Yes I think It's downright offensive. Here's some Highlights: <br />
#:*"Your mum, in a rare sighting out of whoring" <br />
#:*"Your Mom (born roughly twelve years before you and eleven before her mom)" <br />
#:*"Your mother followed suit (Slut!)." <br />
#:*"After marrying your dad directly following getting totally wasted after her nightclub job, your mom had you and your brother." <br />
#:*"your mom progressed to become dumber, followed by massive weight gain."<br />
#:{{unsigned|Dezonus}}<br />
#::If offensive I can tone it down. It was meant as a Satire, and isn't finished. I was going to include a long list of yomomma jokes (and all info before that is to be explained in them). Nobody is supposed to take offence. It's a joke. It's not pointed at any specific person, either. --[[User:Officer Mead Sheaffer|Officer Mead Sheaffer]] 17:20, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:::Scratch that. This isn't Uncyclopedia, I'm deleting this and re-making it. --[[User:Officer Mead Sheaffer|Officer Mead Sheaffer]] 17:40, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#::::I didn't really find the yo mamma stuff very offensive but the Black Guy eating fried chicken comments was uncalled for. I see the page has been blanked now. --{{User:Vapor/sig}} 17:41, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#::Dezonus, we can read it as well as you can. No need to quote it here. Also, please format your comments so that they don't break the voting. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 17:59, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:::I hate to cause a blamestorm here but it really kind of appears that [[User:Officer Mead Sheaffer|Officer Mead Sheaffer]] created an intentionally offensive page so that he had an excuse to use his "classy disapproval" pseudo-template. I guess that's just speculative but c'mon...really? --{{User:Vapor/sig}} 18:05, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#::::Actually I made that template straight off the bat, when the page was viewed before it was finished and finessed with. The page was intentionally meant to be offensive to everyone, but not to any specific person. It had a lot of offensive content. I humbly apologize however, due to I created it with the mindset of an Uncyclopedian, something that cost me a bit of credibility on this wiki for humor. Therefore I'm re-making the article. --[[User:Officer Mead Sheaffer|Officer Mead Sheaffer]] 18:13, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Speedy Delete''' - It's Crit 2 since none of the content is relevant. This isn't a personal blog. Pages in the main namespace are supposed to have value to the regular UD player, meaning that they should either be about the game, a group, or something else of general interest. "Your momma" jokes are not pertinent, and either belong in personal namespaces or not on the wiki at all. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 17:59, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Speedy Delete''' - As Aichon --{{User:Vapor/sig}} 18:06, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Speedy''' - I'll get this some time within the hour if nobody objects.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 19:48, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Move and Keep''' I [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:MisterGame/Holland_Vs_Spain had] something similar happen to me, where my page was speedied before I had even a chance to respond. I later had to undelete and move it to my userpage. While technically a crit 2, and thus eligible for Speedy, I'd prefer a precedent where we automatically move that stuff to the userpage, or at the very least give author time to save it. I guess this nullifies the Speedy itself, but I can't say I dig crit 2. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 20:29, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Also the entire discussion about this being offensive or not is irrelevant. It also makes want to scream PURITAN!1! I have seen far worse. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 20:32, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#::::[[User:Giles_Sednik/List_of_Wiki_Puritans#The_List|Sorted]].--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 23:36, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#::Which explains why he recreated it again in the main space despite knowing full weel about namespaces.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 20:55, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:::Sorry, how do my words explain that?--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 21:07, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#::::=P Poor phrasing on my part. What I mean to say is, if he intended to have it as a userspace article within his space, such as in your case, he would have put it in his namespace either on the first time he made it or when he remade it after this deletion reuqest began.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:12, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:::::Then it should be explained to him that off-topic content should not be in the main-space. Crit 2 is true, I just don't like it's being used for speedies. Just delete the main stuff, move to his own space and give a polite warning not to do this again.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 21:26, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#::::::I would, but I'm not going to countermand a vote on Deletions, because I'm pretty sure that's against protocol (as in the case of that ridiculous scheduled deletion below).--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:31, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:::::::It was explained to him on his talk page, but he deleted that message. Check the history if you don't believe. Also, it was mentioned here on speedy deletions, and he's been a part of the discussion. --{{User:Vapor/sig}} 21:32, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:::::::I know, I'd just what I would have done if this wiki was authoritarian dictatorship, and I were it's leader, or if my name was Kevan.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 21:38, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#::::::::We need Grim back. He'd do it, and nobody would blink an eye.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:39, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Keep but Move''' - This is no more offensive than the time Mis said my mom was doing it wrong, not that offensiveness has anything at all to do with whether we should allow a page to live. Even though it's unfunny. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 23:25, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Speedy''' --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 23:45, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
'''Deleted''' by DDR a few hours back as a Crit 7 after a request on A/SD which preceded any of the Keep votes. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:02, 30 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===Bunch of unused Images===<br />
Sorting through Uncategorised images, found a lot of similar ones to [[User:Dracula]]'s name, Most unused. I asked him about it, <br>''"I am only using those which are linked either to my user page, or [[The Order of Dracula]] page. The others can be deleted."'' (Copied from [[User talk:Dracula]])<br />
<br />
Suggesting that the following be deleted:<br />
<br>[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Image:Draculasucksbloodinshearbank.PNG] [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Image:Draculasucksbloodinsticklingcompilation.PNG] [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Image:BiteInStickling.PNG] [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Image:BiteInStickling2.PNG] [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Image:Dbitestickling.PNG] [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Image:Dbitestickling2.PNG]<br />
<br />
{{User:Dezonus/sig}} 01:32, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Delete''' - Not speedy by crit 7, since the author didn't come to us here. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 02:19, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# Delete. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 17:27, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Scheduled Deletion''' - Crit 7 by proxy. Can I just whip through them, or should I wait for the vote to do its thing?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 17:40, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Letter of the law, it wouldn't be since the author did not leave a note on a sysop's talk, just his own talk in response to a question from someone who is not a sysop. Unless you believe in crazy, possibly Anti-Freedom, Pro-Terrorist things like spirit of the law. -[[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 00:24, 24 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete''' - As VVV -[[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 00:25, 24 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Scheduled Deletion''' - anyone with a memory more efficient than a goldfish would remember we delete these as a pseudo crit 7. Typically, if it's on his talk page it might as well be on ours. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 04:18, 24 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
I already deleted these a few days ago as unused... So done I guess. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:48, 29 September 2010 (BST)<br />
===[[Journal:PsychoPhil]]===<br />
Misplaced user page that hasn't been edited since '06 (Rooster did lately but unsure why), and that user has made no contribs since '08. I dont think it's quite speedy, but I may be wrong. {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 10:15, 27 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
#'''Speedy''' - Kill --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 10:30, 27 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Speedy''' c1 -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:33, 27 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Speedy''' - It's a Journal page, not a misplaced User page, and I see no reason to go around deleting arbitrary Journal pages for no good reason. That said, it ''is'' Crit 1. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 10:35, 27 September 2010 (BST)<br />
'''Speedy Deleted'''. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 10:35, 27 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Lockettside Behemoth Army]]===<br />
- [[User:Officer Mead Sheaffer]] 23:51, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Speedy''' - Crit 7 --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 23:58, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Speedy''' - Crit 7, as Trips said. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 00:05, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
'''Deleted''' - This is as good as a crit 7 by proxy you doofi (that's plural for doofus ;] ) -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 00:35, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:I was watching X-Files when I saw this. It was a season-ending cliffhanger episode! That's my excuse. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 00:41, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Which one? I've currently only got as far as season four's "Gethsemane". {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 15:48, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I was finishing season 6 at the time. Been watching it on Netflix for the last 2-3 months in between other stuff. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 20:28, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Example_page]]===<br />
# '''Delete''' - Page serves no real purpose and is spam {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 14:08, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Keep''' - page is linked all over the wiki and serves the purpose of forming links when needed in admin page descriptions.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 14:12, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''keep''' not another poodle... -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 14:20, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Keep''' - As yon. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 15:25, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Keep''' Hold it right there, donkey hater. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 15:29, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Keep''' better to have one spam page than lots of them. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:39, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Keep''' - [[Special:Whatlinkshere/Example_page|These pages]] make use of it already. It's helpful. It's not spam. Keep it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:52, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Keep''' - It's the generic "I need a fake blue link" page. Everything on the page and talk page is basically spam, but there you go. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 17:42, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Keep''' - As [[Example Page|Red]]. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 00:14, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:This page doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being deleted. If a sysop wants to throw their weight around and prematurely rule keep, I won't complain. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:31, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#::Lucky no one cares what u think -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 14:57, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:::Fucking hell I'm a dickhead when I've been drinking. Sorry. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:52, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#::::Best Friends Forever!<!--<br />
<br />
And by forever, I mean until I get close enough to eat your brain. Friends don't let friends breath.<br />
<br />
--> --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 08:06, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''A/VB''' - is where this guy should be taken for wasting all of our valuable thyme! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:41, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
'''Kept''' early. This isn't getting deleted. It is a page that is used to give example links <small>-- <span style="text-shadow: #bbb 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em">[[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 10:59 18 September 2010 (BST)</span></small><br />
<br />
===[[UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive/Mistakes]]===<br />
It's an archive of mistakes added to [[A/M]], yet it appears to have only been used once and never again. In general, we just delete these sorts of mistakes, rather than archiving them, so having it seems pointless to me.<br />
<br />
#'''Delete''' - Said my piece above. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 13:24, 18 August 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete''' - Was going to keep, but Aichon's right. We've missed about 30 cases that are like the above which we've just deleted. No point archiving. Same should probably happen with [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Scinfaxi]] (maybe move this to a talk page archive and delete the original) and [[UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Criterion 12]]. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:44, 18 August 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete''' --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 11:30, 22 August 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete''' - Useless and pointless. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 12:07, 22 August 2010 (BST)<br />
#Delete. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 22:49, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete''' - It's a nice concept, but it would require effort. Do not want! --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:51, 31 August 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete''' - Because sysops are flawless and never make mistakes <!--- Sarcasm ----> {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 13:21, 31 August 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete ☒''' {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 06:02, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
Deleted. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 19:34, 3 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Archive==<br />
{{Deletearchivenav}}</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DanceDanceRevolution&diff=1784685
User talk:DanceDanceRevolution
2010-09-23T12:22:43Z
<p>J3D: /* Chick Chick BOOM! */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/talkn}}<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
==Way too Evil==<br />
[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1295703 Friend of yours?] Check his real name link (NSFW). I think that's more then enough to get him on a Text Rape list. Might wanna talk to him. I'm also scarred for life now :( --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:20, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, mate in EVIL. What do you mean by NSFW? I don't want to force him out of having his own crap on his profile, he's probably had it there as long as he's been playing, which is a while. I don't really mind tbh, his loss if he's anti-text-raped. lol. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:29, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Not Safe For Work. Ring a bell? Did you follow the link? But okay, it's not like I'm going to report him, I don't really care but I know some people do and I thought I'd bring it up. Anyway, now I have accidentally bumped into you guys I'm deciding whether or not I send a surprise down there.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:35, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Lol! Just so you know, we'll run away from any PKing attacks, we are all wimps atm. Yeah, I've seen lemonparty, it's pretty common, it's like meatspin or any shock website IMO, you're going to see it one way or another and the sooner you do the sooner you can identify the link as something you're never going to click again. Either way, thanks for the heads up, I'll pass the message onto him and see what he thinks. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:37, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== First ==<br />
<br />
Since you archived the page.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 11:49, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:(diff) (hist) . . User talk:DanceDanceRevolution; 10:43 . . (-57,746) . . DanceDanceRevolution (Talk | contribs | block)<br />
:^^^ Evidence.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 11:50, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Doesn't count unless he empties it completely. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 12:12, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::It coutns for me... Also, I like where this Radioactive thing is going.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 12:19, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Don't mind me, just maintaining my page presence... ;) --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 13:55, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==I spy...==<br />
...a stalker not more than 30 seconds ago... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 14:34, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Great minds think alike! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 14:35, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::I'm completely not sure if you remember her, but [[User:Tselita|Tselita]] was in that very same building. Also, my friend, [[User:Zensaga|Zensaga]] was in there as well... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 14:52, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==ZL==<br />
Unless they go the "guilt by association" rule for GTF's fit,it should be done for sure. As for learning about it, you'd have learned about it at least as soon the first zerg hunter had PKed you. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 15:38, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:What is the guilt by association?? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 17:13, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::The powers that be generally don't like if appealers get abusive and foul-mouthed. (And I probably wouldn't like it as well, looking how they had and have to deal with the likes of Finis Valorum, Dead Bunnies and TZH.) It's some difference though if some lying scumbags like the Dead Bunnies throw out a barrage of insults while denying even basic facts, or if a single member out of several snaps slightly in a case that has been weak to begin with. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 01:22, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Yeah fair. I hoped they would overlook that since we obvs aren't zerging and I just assumed the IP was important so I didn't force the words out of any of their mouths, I just let them say whatever. And it's a ZERG LIST they maintain, if they can't handle abuse from wrongly accused people then they shouldn't be there IMO. One more question: It appears that Guy's response was moved to another thread, is that right? And why? :/ -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:29, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::The mods are running the ZL in their spare time and are basically providing a public service, at which 90% of all work _should_ already be done by Kevan (if the auto-measures were worth anything), so I grant them any right to refuse appeals on the base of "being something we don't wanna put up with". As for moving it, I have no idea if GTF's comment has been moved, and why. If it has any effect will be seen at least as soon as the next list update comes in. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 01:42, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::It buttfucks objectivity up the arsehole if they refuse 100% watertight appeals from a group who is ''absolutely'' not zerging if someone says the F word in them. Just saying. Thought we would have been 100% in the clear, ahh well. Thanks for everything. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:09, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::{{quote|3=[[User:Spiderzed|I told you so:]]|2=It's some difference though if some lying scumbags like the Dead Bunnies throw out a barrage of insults while denying even basic facts, or if a single member out of several snaps slightly in a case that has been weak to begin with.}}<br />
::::::For actual answers on that, you have to grab an actual operator (like TheHuntsman or MarcusCaesar). I'm just a lone zerg hunter and not involved with ZL maintenance. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 02:17, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Yeah fair, soz. Again, thanks for the help through this. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:42, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::Essentially, if somebody takes pains to heap abuse the ZL Mods in their removal request then we take that as a clear indication that they do not in fact wish to be removed. (Otherwise they would abide by the removal rules, in which this situation is specifically called out.) It's like someone's face giving the lie to their words, but an online equivalent. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 04:59, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Yeah, fair enough. Thanks for the clarification Rev. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 05:01, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::I suppose I should really ask what the context is <small>(in case there is something I should be doing)</small>… but I kinda don't want to <small>(in case there is something I should be doing)</small>. {{shifty}} {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 09:51, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Oh, just in the zerg liste 9 thread my new group EVIL was submitted to be added because we all defended a break-in with very quick precision and execution. To make sure there was no chance of us being actually added, I got the suspected players to post on the appeals thread so their IP's could be logged. Out of the 5 of us that were considered, the last person to post chucked a shitty over us being added (he didn't realise we had only been submitted, not added) over something so trivial in his eyes. The post itself while embarrassing wasn't anything ''too'' over the top in itself, and since I have a lack of knowledge of the zerg liste methods so I'm pretty paranoid about being added, since it would create a massive dark cloud over our groups morale etc. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:29, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::Yeah, you should be fine, mate. Suspicion is not proof, and you've definitely done the right thing in your response. If I were you, I'd do as [[Mostly Harmless]] did and view it as a badge of honour. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 16:50, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== The Wyke Hills/Wykewood confusion ==<br />
<br />
You know, those can happen when you are updating a dozen EMRs alone. And the fact that there were two reports for Wyke Hills and one for Wykewood on that particular update didn't help either. And yet when you found it, you decided to point and laugh at it instead of fixing it. I wonder how that could help. -- [[User:Kittithaj|Kittithaj]] 16:48, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:People make mistakes. I make lots. Don't go all butthurt on me for it. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 06:58, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Thought you'd like to know ==<br />
<br />
It [[User:Aichon/Sandbox/Demo10|looks like]] your DanceDance arrows sig might be one of the ones causing issues for A/VB (the current month's archive isn't showing up on it since it has too much inclusion data), since it's a decent amount larger than the norm. This isn't a warning to fix it or anything of the sort, merely a friendly notification, since I figured you'd want to be aware of something like this. What you do with this info is your call. My best guess is that it's the images causing the issues, since the other big culprit was Mis' sig with the images in it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:45, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, I've noticed that in IE both your sig and Mis's sig are appearing vertically. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 06:56, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Ah, yeah, that's an unfortunate side affect of the code that they're using to get links over their images (it's my fault, since I wrote the code). IE7 and earlier doesn't understand the "display: inline-box" stuff, I believe, so it does a "display: box" equivalent instead, which means each image gets its own line. I haven't figured out a fix yet, though I'll readily admit I haven't been looking too hard since I'm not reminded of the issue during daily use (I use something other than IE, of course). IE8 is better (so long as Compatibility Mode is disabled), in that they don't use multiple lines, but the link aspect of the code simply doesn't work in IE8 (yet? Rooster was working on it as recently as yesterday or so). {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 07:04, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Thanks heaps for that info guys. I do like the arrows sig but I've always understood there'd most likely be some sort of unfixable problem with them, so I have no issue removing it and just redirecting it to my current lemon signature. is it just affecting the inclusion ''on'' the A/VB page? Or did the signatures in the archive itself also refuse to display? If the former was the only issue, I might wait till the month is over, revert the sig back to the arrows and just continue from there on with my current sig. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:22, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Just a note on the arrows sig, you can use [[Template:ClickInternal]] for the images now. Good news is that it works (thank Aichon), bad news is that it's weighty so using it on several images is bad, mmmkay? Also you have to use it because I said so or I'll get all sig policy on your ass. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 07:16, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:K cool thanks Rooster. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:57, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== recruitment ad ==<br />
<br />
i appreciate the help in conforming my attempt at a recruitment ad. at least ya helped me with it instead of being a jerk about it. i need to brush up on my wiki. {{unsigned|Nuerotoxic2213|01:07, 1 September 2010}}<br />
:That was actually me that fixed it up for you, though DDR was kinda enough to remove a stray character from the page that was making it look a bit off. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:20, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==sup biatch==<br />
<br />
whats teh lowdown on the game updates? bellow + that scout safehouse skill is that all?? also - scout safehouse, do the actions have to be completed in the safehouse? how the frack does the game measure that? Also there should be a link of the news page to a page that explains the updates in non-zombieapoc style. Ie outlines what we know of the actual changes. if that already exists; link me and make the link more obvious for others. sick1 {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:28, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:[[Safehouses]]--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 12:07, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::dunke!{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:20, 4 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== POLGNOAK ==<br />
<br />
You realise that you just commented on the main page, not the talk page, right?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 07:59, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Haha!!! I didn't even notice :( Thanks for the heads up! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:11, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::=P Don't worry about it, I thought it was a talk at first too. Probably because they brought the votes across from the talk.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 08:13, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== hey papi ==<br />
<br />
can you move [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Quartly_Lecture_Group this] under the QSG name space? thanks?----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 14:46, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeboi -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 17:33, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::and [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Wolfgang_Puck%27s_Address_to_the_Quartly_Library#Remedial_Zombese_With_Wolfgang_Puck dis]----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 16:39, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I was directed to a header halfway down the page so I figured you meant to move the whole thing, so I did. Also, I had a dream about you last night. Yeah, I dream about UD. And you. I was in your group but I kept getting killed by people. And now you're here. You're planting Inception, I know it! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 22:29, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::yeah i meant everything. i just want to get everything cleaned up and organized before i take my leave of UD. and getting killed by stupid people is just part of being in the QSG. FUCK HOW DID YOU FIGURE OUT MY PLAN? THE ARCHITECT IS STILL SLEEPING?----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 14:22, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== RITA ==<br />
<br />
Do [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1774575 I] have all the skills I'm gonna need for the manhunt? What with Lurching Gait and Ankle grab, I think I'm about done now.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 17:40, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Vinetown scout approves of this. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:52, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::They were skeptical! They said I couldn't level a Dinosaur based character before October! They were wrong! </smug> --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 18:59, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::: I hate to point this out but my [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1776190 discosaur] gained all his XP from shooting people not zombies. No needles or FAK's either. Its not gonna be hard to get the remainder before October. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 19:32, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Hell yeah! We're gonna eat some humans!--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<font color="purple">The Big T</font>]] 22:31, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Scroll boxes ==<br />
<br />
Such as the one in your main sandpit. Can they be placed side by side? Or, for that matter, can anything be placed alongside them?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 09:41, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:I imagine if you confined each one to an (absolute?) div and specified the divs to go side by side like one would normally, it'd be possible, but you'd have to obviously smallen their set width. I haven't touched those scrollboxes in over a year pretty much and I originally got them from my ex-boyfriend op [[User:Linkthewindow]], and you can see his speakbox is easily confined within simple tables so I don't think something you're mentioning is outside of reason. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:03, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Yeah I already looked at Link's code. I'll have a crack at what you suggested now. Thanks!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:05, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::If you have troubles, come back sometime and hit me up, back then I knew so little about DIV overlays mine was practically just a steal of Links. Between us and Aichon I'd be very surprised if we couldn't make what you want to work. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:06, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Yeah, I just went to have a look, and I realised I don't actually know how to put divs side by side. I'm working up a trial at [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Stub|my stub page]], but I've pretty much hit a brick wall. If you could help get those side by side, I'd be very appreciative. :P --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:10, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::I'll be able to, but semi finals footy is on so I'll come back in an hour and a half to have a squiz. Wouldn't be surprised if either you or aichon did it that time. In the meantime, look at the divs for the INFO and TALK div boxes for [[Every Villain Is Lemons]] which I also stole from [[BB3]] page if I remember right. Play around with the positions and notice how one is relative to the other, that might help. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:42, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Just sorted it. Thanks loads!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:51, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Just checking ==<br />
<br />
To make sure you saw [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:Aichon/Sandbox/Demo12&diff=1774587&oldid=1774584 this] since I never heard confirmation that you'd seen it. It does fix the issue of centering the image, but it comes at the cost of having hidden text on the page. I offered some more explanation on my talk page a few days back. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:25, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== wiki noob needs a mentor ==<br />
<br />
Hi. I'm new to wiki editing and only know the most basic of stuff. I've wanted to learn for a while so when I found Project Mentor I figured I'd give you a shout. HAAAAAAAAAAAALP! I suck at this. Thanks [[User:Skynet Defense Network|Skynet Defense Network]] 16:18, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:I could help if DDR isn't available. Or anyone else for that matter. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 16:19, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::i'll do it! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:35, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Greetings ==<br />
<br />
Hello, Mr. Revolution. I cordially come to you to ask you a simple question regarding your edits to our screenshots. Why do you insinuate we [[zerg]]? Is it because we have screen captures of our own events? If that is the case, it can easily be explained. We do have members just waiting to record our... successes. --[[User:Dracula|Dracula]] 06:31, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Nup. It's just cause when I have a hundred or so images/pages to categorise in one sitting I just put funny edit summaries down. I'm deprived of fun or amusement in this "hobby" nowadays and want a reaction. No fault to you for enquiring either, zerging is a bad allegation and one I had to go through much stress to stomp down of my group from some butthurt zombie on the Zerg Liste forums. As for the origination of the call? I heard lots of things from Umbrella's wenches about you guys. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 09:14, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Ah, I see. Good to know it's not personal. Haha, now that you mention Umbrella, they love to throw the zerging accusations around when they're defeated/owned. They love to spread lies. Seems like they have members that partake in zerging, but I'm not going to worry about that. Just killing them. I'm grateful for the fast reply. --[[User:Dracula|Dracula]] 11:31, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::No probs, and it's great to see you didn't take it personally straight off the bat- respect. I was just being immature. Have a good one. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:36, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Passing Through ==<br />
<br />
Just thought to stop by and say hello. And ask an unsolicited personal question.<br />
<br />
On a serious note, DDR, I think you've gotten far more...eh, Cyberbobish. Grimish. Less tolerant. Looking at a random sampling of your edits, you seem a lot more prone to assuming general incompetence of the people you talk to, as compared to a year+ ago. Yes, people change, hell Grim was nice once...a long time ago, in a wiki far, far, away, true. My comment about jadedness was meant as a mild tweak at best, but your response I took to be far more virulent then I was honestly expecting. <br />
<br />
I am not your friend, so I realise this is presumptive, but I would appreciate an answer. I do think you do good work and have a pretty good record as an admin, but my memory of your seeming wiki persona a year ago is at serious odds with your present one. Has adminship caused this, or just overexposure to general asshattery and the grind of the wiki? -[[User:Wulfenbach|Wulfenbach]] 06:56, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:No prob. I think it's a mixture of things. The main one is my current lifestyle IRL, I'm having much less time I can call my own and I'm constantly strung out and burned out from work and university and I think my willingness to spend my small amount of time arguing on UDWiki is waning. I still like to come around because I'm still playing the game with IRL friends, but I no longer bother pretending that if UDWiki was a real life establishment it'd be one I'd attend in a suit and tie. My focus is on fixing up the place as a resource for players, and to stop vandalism and help users interested in coding or events. Beyond that I've been really intolerant towards extraneous arguing even if it's within these realms of my interests. You're right, I've become a lot more retarded of late, but it's a personal problem, not actually an in-wiki problem I think. I also got burned out from my reign as a bureaucrat in early 2010 and that's when I decided the wiki was something I could no longer spend hours a day on. Also, when I was a sysop a year ago there was a reason to take this place and my position seriously from a managerial point of view because between the inept ops, the inactive ones and the dickheads it was a fight to have this place running properly. At one point, for a month, Cyberbob and I were the only ops managing A/VB or any other admin pages. Now, we are (imo) a much better team and all of them have a great presence and work hard for the members, so the need to go over the top with rhetoric and arguing isn't as imperative now, especially since the wiki has been so drama free in the last month or so. <br />
:From the sysop side I still follow protocol and respect the rules in place and I don't want to leave UDWiki, op or otherwise. In the end though, any real behavioural issues on UDWiki just culminated from IRL circumstances and hopefully it's just a phase. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:36, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
::Well, here's to your recovery then. I had the luxury of a forced departure (twice now) of RL more or less demanding my absolute presence, so I suppose that's why I can still come back here and want to be productive without necessarily Grimish (I think you know what I mean by that).<br />
<br />
::You know, a while ago...a long time ago, when I was actually actively helping out here and really trying to be a better wiki-person, I gave thought to app'ing for sysop. I looked at the existing crew, looked at their postings as early as I could go back and compared them to their then-present ones. I realized that the difference mimic'd the difference I see in the LARP community among organizers. Namely: LARPer -> Organizer -> Eager -> Helpful -> HELPFUL -> Wise -> Opinionated -> Protective -> Vindictive -> Jaded -> Ex-LARPer. Since I had just reached the jaded phase with that, I figured that going back over that path with UD would mean that I wouldn't ever want to come back. Which would be sad, I think, since I do like the RRF's people. They tend, IMO, to be pretty fun and enjoyable as a web-group, and to walk away from UD would have to have me leaving them permanently. So I didn't app, which in hindsight, was for the best.<br />
<br />
::Have you thought about pulling away, yourself, now that the team is in your opinion, stable? Taking a six month break from UD to get RL sorted, maybe? -[[User:Wulfenbach|Wulfenbach]] 07:51, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I tried, I still found myself coming back daily for bugging the sysops for the small jobs I didn't think they did right, plus I was still spending just as much time here anyway so I was put back up to be sysop. I think behaviour like that indicates that I still wanted to be around the place, and now I'm more involved in the actual game than I have been in two years, so it's a weird situation at the moment for me to be in. Since I'm still convinced it's a phase, I'm just going to linger around doing the chores and helping out and being a bug to guys like you before something breaks on the wiki's side or mine ;D -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:01, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::See, that's the real infection here. It's not Necrotech fuckupery, it's this damn game. We need to find Kevan and get trenchie on this ass. Headshot RL for me, will he? >:D -[[User:Wulfenbach|Wulfenbach]] 09:31, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Lol! I still bitterly hate how he created an entire universe inside a wiki for me to be so heavily enthralled :( -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 12:38, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== User page rights ==<br />
<br />
Right, on my user and talk pages, the use of the click template (The one in Mis' sig and your old one) essentially destroys the page by making a massive white space at the bottom of the page. Do I therefore have the right to replace people's signatures with the <nowiki>{{usr}}</nowiki> template? I wanted to have a check before I did anything.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:26, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:It technically is your own page. You could edit whatever you see fit. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 18:28, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Its your page, as long as you don't alter what they have said, and make it clear they said it, I don't see a problem. I'd probably add a note explaining why though. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:28, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Alright, sounds like a plan. It's just with the recent change to my archive page, it's a little bit essential.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:34, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Also, it should be noted that neither of those sigs actually uses that template, but I would imagine that template would have the same issue anyway. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 18:35, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Its fine. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 23:28, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== I'm Interested in becoming a Sysop ==<br />
<br />
Hey Dance,<br />
<br />
We've spoken once or twice on here, and I saw that you are one so i thought it best to ask you. I rather like contributing and helping out on here, and I think I'd like to become a Sysop. I haven't quite been here 2 months, and only have 420 contribs, so not sure I can apply yet...<br />
<br />
Anyway, whats involved? Any tips? {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 15:23, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Trust me when I say this, I've went through your contribs. What you have so far is not enough to warrant a good SysOps bid. If you really, really want to be a SysOps, start by sulking around the Admin pages more often, cycling news archives and suggestions, etc. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 15:33, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:[[User talk:Jerrel Yokotory#Helpful Advice|Read this]].--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 15:52, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:We always love having interested users in becoming a Sysop, but first they need to understand the system in which they work. This includes the administration pages like [[A/MR|Move Requests]], [[A/D|Deletions]], [[A/SD|Speedy Deletions]], and others like [[A/VB|Vandal Banning]]. You have to understand the job you're asking for and we need to be convinced that you do. Besides that, it's always recommended that you know the community well and integrate well with their projects and tasks that try and make the wiki a better information resource. I'm not sure if Yonnua's link to previous advice is specifically the best thing for you to read literally because it's what ''he'' may do, but you need to be able to do your ''own'' thing on the wiki and still be able to help out in your own ways and with your own opinions. But the intention is the same- you need to exhibit your (obviously) keen interest in the community by involving yourself more in many of the wiki's facets. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:35, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Tip #1, and I don't mean this with any discourtesy or rudeness (really, I honestly don't), but research the answers yourself, rather than asking questions like "what's involved" to become a sysop (the answer is posted on [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions#Guidelines_for_System_Operator_Requests|A/PM]]). Asking questions like that is an immediate signal to all of us that you don't understand the system well enough...''yet''. Eager folks like you can and do learn the system eventually by reading through the policies, admin pages, and archives, so that shouldn't be a discouragement to you in the least. But sysops are expected (though it's not part of the official job description) to be decently knowledgeable about the way the wiki works, and that means understanding both the bureaucracy and some of the technical stuff better than the average user.<br />
<br />
::As for other advice, I'd agree with Yonn's suggestion to look for a project. There are always things that need cleaning up around here and discussions to be had where opinions are solicited (e.g. there's talk of an RP List redesign on [[UDWiki:General Discussion#hurdles|General Discussion]] right now, I've been working (very slowly) on rethinking the Suggestions system, there are always ideas on Developing Suggestions in need of thoughtful advice, Ross is working (also slowly) on redesigning the Zombie Skills pages, etc.). Getting involved on the admin pages, especially by expressing your opinion in the proper places (always be sure to do it in the proper places, since doing it in the wrong place is once again a signal to us that you don't yet understand how things work) is also a great way to let us get a feel for how you think and form opinions, which you'll be expected to do regularly as a sysop. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 04:26, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:::I Thank you all immensely for your help in this matter. I had read through the [A/PM] page, the main thing was that it wasn't quite clear where you apply to, but reading what you guys have written, I'm not quite ready just yet. <br />
:::As for a project, I wasn't quite sure what somebody who is not a sysop is permitted to do. I've noticed in a few subburbs, the "Suburb Group Listing" and "Active Groups" are very different. South Blythville, for example, has 3 groups in "Suburb Group Listing" and 12 in "Active groups". If I'm allowed to, I would like to follow up with the groups, and remove those inactive off the Active groups. I know similar has been done for Suburb Group listing. {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 13:54, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Want to run a contest for the Urban Dead Wiki ==<br />
<br />
i was wondering if i could run a contest on the Urban Dead Wiki. most notably a contest of art. i am look to put an advert for my in-game group on the UD page, via spending ten bucks. i was wondering if i could have a contest to who can come up with the best artwork for said advert. notably a prize of me spending the extra 5 bucks to make that persons in-game character immune to the IP limit seems sufficient enough. what do you think {{unsigned|Nuerotoxic2213}}<br />
:Sounds good. Just make a page for it and add it onto the Community Announcements page [[Template:Community Projects|here]], so it appears on the main page. From there you will get enough attention to hopefully have the comp succeed. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:28, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
i haven't had much of a response yet. is there anything(or anyone) i could contact, or you could contact to maybe spur this thing a bit lol. i don't actually know any of the artists that would patrol this forum [[User:Nuerotoxic2213|Nuerotoxic2213]] 16:02, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:I would suggest making the event page look eye-catching instead of it just being a wall of text. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 00:57, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Days in Urban Dead ==<br />
<br />
Aww man, I'd have liked to see a new one. This isn't because we have gaps is it? Because I can envisage some sort of crazy bot (always the best kind, the crazy sort) that could fill in the gaps. Unless you meant something else?<br />
<br />
I want a video dammit! {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 18:00, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:^This--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:42, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Mate, if you could do that, then making one more video would really be within my grasp. I have a few harrowing problems that have also come up, the biggest being that it's 80% likely that I don't even have the original 220 images anymore anymore, so I'll have to do my best to trawl through old backups to see if I still have them. Between searching for the backups and the old .avi versions I have I ''should'' be able to get a working version of the original 200 days to use. Once I've done that, I'll hit you up and see if you can make a crazy bot to help me get them images. Thanks man. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:30, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Alright, I've lost all the 220 original images and I dont have the original video but I've managed to nab the Youtube FLV that is embedded onto the video page, I should be able to make a more or less functional replacement from that. As for your crazy bot, if you're still keen, we'll need images from April 28th 2008 to whenever you see fit. See, after 200 days I didn't do ANY screencapping so I don't have any single screenshots at all from April 2008. How do you envision the bot will operate? Do you think it's possible when this many screenshots are needed? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 06:20, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Well I left the bot running today and let it slowly load each revision page, so I've got the info now. Seeing as we need like 700 images, I'll see if I can just have it fake an image that looks like a dangermap so we don't have to take screencaps from the wiki ourselves. I'll post an example if I get it to work. Also, the last purge only seems to have left us with stuff from about September 08, so... yeah. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 17:45, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Horrific time dealing with fonts. Anyway: [[:Image:DangerMap 20100919.png|yesterday's map]]. The original has nicer anti-aliased text but it's so huge on filesize I'll stick with the plainer one. I'll get around to automating the others at some point. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 11:04, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::That should be more than adequate, looks great and shouldn't look ''any'' different from the original 200 days. I've thought about the 6 month gap in images we'll have lost by the time this is through, what are your thoughts? Should I start from my old 2007 archive and go straight through to today? Or should we just start straight from Sep 2008 where your collection starts? Advantages of having them both is that that 200 day period had a lot of rich history displayed and there was a fairly significant lack of events for a year and a bit from mid-2008 too. Cons include the fact it's been seen before anyway, and it'd be hard to incorporate them into one another with a 6 month gap. Leaning towards the latter, thoughts? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:23, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::I think I'd go for a separate video given the gap. Shame really, because if you combine the wayback machine, manual coverage and current revisions, that gap is pretty much the only big gap is the history. Man if only we had those old revisions. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 11:45, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Yeah. Actually, Suburb/History ''does'' have about 20 or so. It covers the process hideously sporadically but if sped up it probably won't look that bad. But I'll see which route should ultimately be taken by trial and error once I get a few images together. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 12:59, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Well the bots working on it ''right now'', uploading as fast as pngout can compress the things down to size. Once it's done I can zip up the whole set and e-mail them if you like, less hassle than using the wiki for each and every one. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 13:17, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::And now would be a ''bad'' time to realise that there's a template called "MapDanger" which means all the old "MapVeryDanger" have been mapped wrongly. Fuuuuu - at least the more recent stuff works since the system isn't retarded anymore. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 13:24, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::Fuck. Surely no one would mind us recreating it ;D. As for the emailing option, sounds much better than doing ti via wiki. I'll email you just now so you can grab my email without me later having to go through the future hassle of eradicating my email from google search indexes. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:26, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Actually, simple redirection to the new ones could suffice... right? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:27, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Oh no, it's my fault, not the wiki's :P. Anytime a "VeryDanger" was the status in a revision it got recorded as orange not red because I didn't know of the clash. It resulted in some very orange maps as you can tell. I'll have to rebuild the revision history so that'll take the better part of a day. Gives me a chance to poke around the old templates though, that's good fun. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 13:43, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::No worries. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:58, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
E-mail sent. Expecting great things...''great things''. Actually, just a video without the crappy film grain would rock.<br />
<br />
Also, [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRRDk5jACMk Hilter Joins Escape] - Ahahahaha, awesome. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 06:50, 22 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Omg I know, classic. Anyways, now begins the task of putting them all into an animation. While I'm here, check out how Vegas makes the images appear when they are crushed together:<br />
<br />
:[[Image:Udabstract.jpg|1000px]]<br />
<br />
:It's 2 year UD Map art! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:04, 22 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
::That's cool, that gives me an idea, a graph showing the total amount of each danger level over time. Hey you could even roll it onto the relative graph on [[SZI]]. ...I need to update that graph too! {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 08:08, 22 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Can I run a small scale Suburb Massacre? ==<br />
<br />
Hey there,<br />
<br />
So I'm asking you, because I'm not sure whether I'd be allowed to or not, and I also get the impression certain other sysops don't like me...<br />
<br />
I'm thinking of running a small scale Suburb Massacre, of a 1 suburb radius around South Blythville, covering "Suburb Group Listing" and "Active Groups" (In suburbs that have that further down in their page)<br />
<br />
Can I do it? {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 01:56, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yes, I recommend it. Those pages that have second group listings further down the page on suburb pages are REALLY out of date and should be cleaned up. You really know what you should do though? Make it a project for the entirety of Malton and see if anyone is willing to help, and IN the project you can just organise and focus on the subrubs you care about but others can do the rest. That way you fix all of malton. That's just a thought, but you are free to do whatever you want from here when it comes to cleaning up suburb pages. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:16, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::If you would like to help out? [[The_Great_Suburb_Group_Massacre/2010-Round_2]] {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 07:03, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Photo Upload ==<br />
<br />
Hello DDR! Just wanted to know I saw you changing some pages on maps I uploaded. What do I miss when uploading? Where should I put categorising? --{{User:DiSm/sig}} 09:57, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Hey- A summary of what to do and how to do it is [[:Category:Images|here]]. Basically, we just have a few categories we use to file all our images under. You'll have already been familiar with [[:Category:Maps]] and [[:Category:Screenshots]] as that is what I categorised some of your images as. To do this, just add <nowiki>[[Category:XXXXXXX]]</nowiki> anywhere on the image description.<br />
<br />
:You don't need to do categorise as you upload- practically no one does, that's why I tend to do it. But if you do it saves us the trouble of doing it later. You're free to choose whether you want to do it or not in the long run, I won't mind either way. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:48, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Give it a go, then ask DDR if you did it right. He knows the system better than most of us, plus I still get flashbacks from the 9000+ images I sorted. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:54, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==wtf==<br />
<br />
hey whats the deal with your antixx on good pages? some people voted in a manner you didn't like? L2puppet or gtfo. i'll let you explain and revert until i next drop by then i'll avb and let the ops be bullied into letting you get away with it. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:13, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:fair enough I guess. I'm simply keeping a consistent high standard filter over the voting procedure that Cheese and later I attempted to keep going since the beginning- if RHO is misinformed enough to accidentally cycle it as successful and it's rightfully reverted, that ain't my fault. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:27, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Make mycock a ga and i'll pull some strings to get you into [[2CFC]].. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:34, 21 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:But.... [http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1101979] -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:38, 21 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Ghost Pages...WTF? ==<br />
<br />
What do i do about: [[7th_Fallschirmjäger_Div]], [[Fantôme_Tequila_De_Serpents]], [[St D’s Bar & Grill]] and [[La_Révolution]]? {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 14:18, 22 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Nothing. They're unrecognisable because of errors in the wiki's code. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 14:20, 22 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Bring in Max Von Sydow and see what he can do. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 15:16, 22 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::: I see dead people @_@ --{{User:DiSm/sig}} 19:11, 22 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Haha! Yeah, they are weird, huh? They are remnants of pages that have since been deleted, the wiki glitched them up and now they always appear as uncategorised and stuff. There's more documentation on their pages. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 23:28, 22 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Chick Chick BOOM! ==<br />
<br />
Yeah, uh huh, Thats right, [[Special:Uncategorizedimages]] and [[Special:Uncategorizedpages]] are cleared (except the Ghost stuff)<br />
<br />
For Future reference, using [[User:Dezonus/Storage]] as a Copy and paste reference saves lots of time. You're welcome to use it, and welcome to add to it ;) {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 10:00, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Nice idea. I know the wiki pretty well, so I won't need to use it, but I'll surely add to it when I find more examples of categories you may need to use. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:36, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Clare Weberdoff or whatever her fucking name was. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:22, 23 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==yerr==<br />
<br />
i cbf with arbies/whatever over the whole good articles thing. But i hope someone with more energy for this old place picks up the crusade because that system is absolutely fucked! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:22, 23 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DanceDanceRevolution&diff=1782719
User talk:DanceDanceRevolution
2010-09-21T01:34:05Z
<p>J3D: /* wtf */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/talkn}}<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
==Way too Evil==<br />
[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1295703 Friend of yours?] Check his real name link (NSFW). I think that's more then enough to get him on a Text Rape list. Might wanna talk to him. I'm also scarred for life now :( --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:20, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, mate in EVIL. What do you mean by NSFW? I don't want to force him out of having his own crap on his profile, he's probably had it there as long as he's been playing, which is a while. I don't really mind tbh, his loss if he's anti-text-raped. lol. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:29, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Not Safe For Work. Ring a bell? Did you follow the link? But okay, it's not like I'm going to report him, I don't really care but I know some people do and I thought I'd bring it up. Anyway, now I have accidentally bumped into you guys I'm deciding whether or not I send a surprise down there.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:35, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Lol! Just so you know, we'll run away from any PKing attacks, we are all wimps atm. Yeah, I've seen lemonparty, it's pretty common, it's like meatspin or any shock website IMO, you're going to see it one way or another and the sooner you do the sooner you can identify the link as something you're never going to click again. Either way, thanks for the heads up, I'll pass the message onto him and see what he thinks. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:37, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== First ==<br />
<br />
Since you archived the page.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 11:49, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:(diff) (hist) . . User talk:DanceDanceRevolution; 10:43 . . (-57,746) . . DanceDanceRevolution (Talk | contribs | block)<br />
:^^^ Evidence.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 11:50, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Doesn't count unless he empties it completely. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 12:12, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::It coutns for me... Also, I like where this Radioactive thing is going.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 12:19, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Don't mind me, just maintaining my page presence... ;) --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 13:55, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==I spy...==<br />
...a stalker not more than 30 seconds ago... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 14:34, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Great minds think alike! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 14:35, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::I'm completely not sure if you remember her, but [[User:Tselita|Tselita]] was in that very same building. Also, my friend, [[User:Zensaga|Zensaga]] was in there as well... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 14:52, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==ZL==<br />
Unless they go the "guilt by association" rule for GTF's fit,it should be done for sure. As for learning about it, you'd have learned about it at least as soon the first zerg hunter had PKed you. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 15:38, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:What is the guilt by association?? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 17:13, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::The powers that be generally don't like if appealers get abusive and foul-mouthed. (And I probably wouldn't like it as well, looking how they had and have to deal with the likes of Finis Valorum, Dead Bunnies and TZH.) It's some difference though if some lying scumbags like the Dead Bunnies throw out a barrage of insults while denying even basic facts, or if a single member out of several snaps slightly in a case that has been weak to begin with. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 01:22, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Yeah fair. I hoped they would overlook that since we obvs aren't zerging and I just assumed the IP was important so I didn't force the words out of any of their mouths, I just let them say whatever. And it's a ZERG LIST they maintain, if they can't handle abuse from wrongly accused people then they shouldn't be there IMO. One more question: It appears that Guy's response was moved to another thread, is that right? And why? :/ -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:29, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::The mods are running the ZL in their spare time and are basically providing a public service, at which 90% of all work _should_ already be done by Kevan (if the auto-measures were worth anything), so I grant them any right to refuse appeals on the base of "being something we don't wanna put up with". As for moving it, I have no idea if GTF's comment has been moved, and why. If it has any effect will be seen at least as soon as the next list update comes in. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 01:42, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::It buttfucks objectivity up the arsehole if they refuse 100% watertight appeals from a group who is ''absolutely'' not zerging if someone says the F word in them. Just saying. Thought we would have been 100% in the clear, ahh well. Thanks for everything. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:09, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::{{quote|3=[[User:Spiderzed|I told you so:]]|2=It's some difference though if some lying scumbags like the Dead Bunnies throw out a barrage of insults while denying even basic facts, or if a single member out of several snaps slightly in a case that has been weak to begin with.}}<br />
::::::For actual answers on that, you have to grab an actual operator (like TheHuntsman or MarcusCaesar). I'm just a lone zerg hunter and not involved with ZL maintenance. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 02:17, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Yeah fair, soz. Again, thanks for the help through this. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:42, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::Essentially, if somebody takes pains to heap abuse the ZL Mods in their removal request then we take that as a clear indication that they do not in fact wish to be removed. (Otherwise they would abide by the removal rules, in which this situation is specifically called out.) It's like someone's face giving the lie to their words, but an online equivalent. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 04:59, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Yeah, fair enough. Thanks for the clarification Rev. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 05:01, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::I suppose I should really ask what the context is <small>(in case there is something I should be doing)</small>… but I kinda don't want to <small>(in case there is something I should be doing)</small>. {{shifty}} {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 09:51, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Oh, just in the zerg liste 9 thread my new group EVIL was submitted to be added because we all defended a break-in with very quick precision and execution. To make sure there was no chance of us being actually added, I got the suspected players to post on the appeals thread so their IP's could be logged. Out of the 5 of us that were considered, the last person to post chucked a shitty over us being added (he didn't realise we had only been submitted, not added) over something so trivial in his eyes. The post itself while embarrassing wasn't anything ''too'' over the top in itself, and since I have a lack of knowledge of the zerg liste methods so I'm pretty paranoid about being added, since it would create a massive dark cloud over our groups morale etc. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:29, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::Yeah, you should be fine, mate. Suspicion is not proof, and you've definitely done the right thing in your response. If I were you, I'd do as [[Mostly Harmless]] did and view it as a badge of honour. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 16:50, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== The Wyke Hills/Wykewood confusion ==<br />
<br />
You know, those can happen when you are updating a dozen EMRs alone. And the fact that there were two reports for Wyke Hills and one for Wykewood on that particular update didn't help either. And yet when you found it, you decided to point and laugh at it instead of fixing it. I wonder how that could help. -- [[User:Kittithaj|Kittithaj]] 16:48, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:People make mistakes. I make lots. Don't go all butthurt on me for it. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 06:58, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Thought you'd like to know ==<br />
<br />
It [[User:Aichon/Sandbox/Demo10|looks like]] your DanceDance arrows sig might be one of the ones causing issues for A/VB (the current month's archive isn't showing up on it since it has too much inclusion data), since it's a decent amount larger than the norm. This isn't a warning to fix it or anything of the sort, merely a friendly notification, since I figured you'd want to be aware of something like this. What you do with this info is your call. My best guess is that it's the images causing the issues, since the other big culprit was Mis' sig with the images in it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:45, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, I've noticed that in IE both your sig and Mis's sig are appearing vertically. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 06:56, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Ah, yeah, that's an unfortunate side affect of the code that they're using to get links over their images (it's my fault, since I wrote the code). IE7 and earlier doesn't understand the "display: inline-box" stuff, I believe, so it does a "display: box" equivalent instead, which means each image gets its own line. I haven't figured out a fix yet, though I'll readily admit I haven't been looking too hard since I'm not reminded of the issue during daily use (I use something other than IE, of course). IE8 is better (so long as Compatibility Mode is disabled), in that they don't use multiple lines, but the link aspect of the code simply doesn't work in IE8 (yet? Rooster was working on it as recently as yesterday or so). {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 07:04, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Thanks heaps for that info guys. I do like the arrows sig but I've always understood there'd most likely be some sort of unfixable problem with them, so I have no issue removing it and just redirecting it to my current lemon signature. is it just affecting the inclusion ''on'' the A/VB page? Or did the signatures in the archive itself also refuse to display? If the former was the only issue, I might wait till the month is over, revert the sig back to the arrows and just continue from there on with my current sig. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:22, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Just a note on the arrows sig, you can use [[Template:ClickInternal]] for the images now. Good news is that it works (thank Aichon), bad news is that it's weighty so using it on several images is bad, mmmkay? Also you have to use it because I said so or I'll get all sig policy on your ass. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 07:16, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:K cool thanks Rooster. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:57, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== recruitment ad ==<br />
<br />
i appreciate the help in conforming my attempt at a recruitment ad. at least ya helped me with it instead of being a jerk about it. i need to brush up on my wiki. {{unsigned|Nuerotoxic2213|01:07, 1 September 2010}}<br />
:That was actually me that fixed it up for you, though DDR was kinda enough to remove a stray character from the page that was making it look a bit off. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:20, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==sup biatch==<br />
<br />
whats teh lowdown on the game updates? bellow + that scout safehouse skill is that all?? also - scout safehouse, do the actions have to be completed in the safehouse? how the frack does the game measure that? Also there should be a link of the news page to a page that explains the updates in non-zombieapoc style. Ie outlines what we know of the actual changes. if that already exists; link me and make the link more obvious for others. sick1 {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:28, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:[[Safehouses]]--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 12:07, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::dunke!{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:20, 4 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== POLGNOAK ==<br />
<br />
You realise that you just commented on the main page, not the talk page, right?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 07:59, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Haha!!! I didn't even notice :( Thanks for the heads up! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:11, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::=P Don't worry about it, I thought it was a talk at first too. Probably because they brought the votes across from the talk.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 08:13, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== hey papi ==<br />
<br />
can you move [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Quartly_Lecture_Group this] under the QSG name space? thanks?----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 14:46, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeboi -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 17:33, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::and [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Wolfgang_Puck%27s_Address_to_the_Quartly_Library#Remedial_Zombese_With_Wolfgang_Puck dis]----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 16:39, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I was directed to a header halfway down the page so I figured you meant to move the whole thing, so I did. Also, I had a dream about you last night. Yeah, I dream about UD. And you. I was in your group but I kept getting killed by people. And now you're here. You're planting Inception, I know it! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 22:29, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::yeah i meant everything. i just want to get everything cleaned up and organized before i take my leave of UD. and getting killed by stupid people is just part of being in the QSG. FUCK HOW DID YOU FIGURE OUT MY PLAN? THE ARCHITECT IS STILL SLEEPING?----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 14:22, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== RITA ==<br />
<br />
Do [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1774575 I] have all the skills I'm gonna need for the manhunt? What with Lurching Gait and Ankle grab, I think I'm about done now.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 17:40, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Vinetown scout approves of this. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:52, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::They were skeptical! They said I couldn't level a Dinosaur based character before October! They were wrong! </smug> --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 18:59, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::: I hate to point this out but my [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1776190 discosaur] gained all his XP from shooting people not zombies. No needles or FAK's either. Its not gonna be hard to get the remainder before October. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 19:32, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Hell yeah! We're gonna eat some humans!--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<font color="purple">The Big T</font>]] 22:31, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Scroll boxes ==<br />
<br />
Such as the one in your main sandpit. Can they be placed side by side? Or, for that matter, can anything be placed alongside them?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 09:41, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:I imagine if you confined each one to an (absolute?) div and specified the divs to go side by side like one would normally, it'd be possible, but you'd have to obviously smallen their set width. I haven't touched those scrollboxes in over a year pretty much and I originally got them from my ex-boyfriend op [[User:Linkthewindow]], and you can see his speakbox is easily confined within simple tables so I don't think something you're mentioning is outside of reason. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:03, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Yeah I already looked at Link's code. I'll have a crack at what you suggested now. Thanks!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:05, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::If you have troubles, come back sometime and hit me up, back then I knew so little about DIV overlays mine was practically just a steal of Links. Between us and Aichon I'd be very surprised if we couldn't make what you want to work. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:06, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Yeah, I just went to have a look, and I realised I don't actually know how to put divs side by side. I'm working up a trial at [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Stub|my stub page]], but I've pretty much hit a brick wall. If you could help get those side by side, I'd be very appreciative. :P --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:10, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::I'll be able to, but semi finals footy is on so I'll come back in an hour and a half to have a squiz. Wouldn't be surprised if either you or aichon did it that time. In the meantime, look at the divs for the INFO and TALK div boxes for [[Every Villain Is Lemons]] which I also stole from [[BB3]] page if I remember right. Play around with the positions and notice how one is relative to the other, that might help. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:42, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Just sorted it. Thanks loads!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:51, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Just checking ==<br />
<br />
To make sure you saw [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:Aichon/Sandbox/Demo12&diff=1774587&oldid=1774584 this] since I never heard confirmation that you'd seen it. It does fix the issue of centering the image, but it comes at the cost of having hidden text on the page. I offered some more explanation on my talk page a few days back. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:25, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== wiki noob needs a mentor ==<br />
<br />
Hi. I'm new to wiki editing and only know the most basic of stuff. I've wanted to learn for a while so when I found Project Mentor I figured I'd give you a shout. HAAAAAAAAAAAALP! I suck at this. Thanks [[User:Skynet Defense Network|Skynet Defense Network]] 16:18, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:I could help if DDR isn't available. Or anyone else for that matter. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 16:19, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::i'll do it! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:35, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Greetings ==<br />
<br />
Hello, Mr. Revolution. I cordially come to you to ask you a simple question regarding your edits to our screenshots. Why do you insinuate we [[zerg]]? Is it because we have screen captures of our own events? If that is the case, it can easily be explained. We do have members just waiting to record our... successes. --[[User:Dracula|Dracula]] 06:31, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Nup. It's just cause when I have a hundred or so images/pages to categorise in one sitting I just put funny edit summaries down. I'm deprived of fun or amusement in this "hobby" nowadays and want a reaction. No fault to you for enquiring either, zerging is a bad allegation and one I had to go through much stress to stomp down of my group from some butthurt zombie on the Zerg Liste forums. As for the origination of the call? I heard lots of things from Umbrella's wenches about you guys. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 09:14, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Ah, I see. Good to know it's not personal. Haha, now that you mention Umbrella, they love to throw the zerging accusations around when they're defeated/owned. They love to spread lies. Seems like they have members that partake in zerging, but I'm not going to worry about that. Just killing them. I'm grateful for the fast reply. --[[User:Dracula|Dracula]] 11:31, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::No probs, and it's great to see you didn't take it personally straight off the bat- respect. I was just being immature. Have a good one. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:36, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Passing Through ==<br />
<br />
Just thought to stop by and say hello. And ask an unsolicited personal question.<br />
<br />
On a serious note, DDR, I think you've gotten far more...eh, Cyberbobish. Grimish. Less tolerant. Looking at a random sampling of your edits, you seem a lot more prone to assuming general incompetence of the people you talk to, as compared to a year+ ago. Yes, people change, hell Grim was nice once...a long time ago, in a wiki far, far, away, true. My comment about jadedness was meant as a mild tweak at best, but your response I took to be far more virulent then I was honestly expecting. <br />
<br />
I am not your friend, so I realise this is presumptive, but I would appreciate an answer. I do think you do good work and have a pretty good record as an admin, but my memory of your seeming wiki persona a year ago is at serious odds with your present one. Has adminship caused this, or just overexposure to general asshattery and the grind of the wiki? -[[User:Wulfenbach|Wulfenbach]] 06:56, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:No prob. I think it's a mixture of things. The main one is my current lifestyle IRL, I'm having much less time I can call my own and I'm constantly strung out and burned out from work and university and I think my willingness to spend my small amount of time arguing on UDWiki is waning. I still like to come around because I'm still playing the game with IRL friends, but I no longer bother pretending that if UDWiki was a real life establishment it'd be one I'd attend in a suit and tie. My focus is on fixing up the place as a resource for players, and to stop vandalism and help users interested in coding or events. Beyond that I've been really intolerant towards extraneous arguing even if it's within these realms of my interests. You're right, I've become a lot more retarded of late, but it's a personal problem, not actually an in-wiki problem I think. I also got burned out from my reign as a bureaucrat in early 2010 and that's when I decided the wiki was something I could no longer spend hours a day on. Also, when I was a sysop a year ago there was a reason to take this place and my position seriously from a managerial point of view because between the inept ops, the inactive ones and the dickheads it was a fight to have this place running properly. At one point, for a month, Cyberbob and I were the only ops managing A/VB or any other admin pages. Now, we are (imo) a much better team and all of them have a great presence and work hard for the members, so the need to go over the top with rhetoric and arguing isn't as imperative now, especially since the wiki has been so drama free in the last month or so. <br />
:From the sysop side I still follow protocol and respect the rules in place and I don't want to leave UDWiki, op or otherwise. In the end though, any real behavioural issues on UDWiki just culminated from IRL circumstances and hopefully it's just a phase. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:36, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
::Well, here's to your recovery then. I had the luxury of a forced departure (twice now) of RL more or less demanding my absolute presence, so I suppose that's why I can still come back here and want to be productive without necessarily Grimish (I think you know what I mean by that).<br />
<br />
::You know, a while ago...a long time ago, when I was actually actively helping out here and really trying to be a better wiki-person, I gave thought to app'ing for sysop. I looked at the existing crew, looked at their postings as early as I could go back and compared them to their then-present ones. I realized that the difference mimic'd the difference I see in the LARP community among organizers. Namely: LARPer -> Organizer -> Eager -> Helpful -> HELPFUL -> Wise -> Opinionated -> Protective -> Vindictive -> Jaded -> Ex-LARPer. Since I had just reached the jaded phase with that, I figured that going back over that path with UD would mean that I wouldn't ever want to come back. Which would be sad, I think, since I do like the RRF's people. They tend, IMO, to be pretty fun and enjoyable as a web-group, and to walk away from UD would have to have me leaving them permanently. So I didn't app, which in hindsight, was for the best.<br />
<br />
::Have you thought about pulling away, yourself, now that the team is in your opinion, stable? Taking a six month break from UD to get RL sorted, maybe? -[[User:Wulfenbach|Wulfenbach]] 07:51, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I tried, I still found myself coming back daily for bugging the sysops for the small jobs I didn't think they did right, plus I was still spending just as much time here anyway so I was put back up to be sysop. I think behaviour like that indicates that I still wanted to be around the place, and now I'm more involved in the actual game than I have been in two years, so it's a weird situation at the moment for me to be in. Since I'm still convinced it's a phase, I'm just going to linger around doing the chores and helping out and being a bug to guys like you before something breaks on the wiki's side or mine ;D -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:01, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::See, that's the real infection here. It's not Necrotech fuckupery, it's this damn game. We need to find Kevan and get trenchie on this ass. Headshot RL for me, will he? >:D -[[User:Wulfenbach|Wulfenbach]] 09:31, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Lol! I still bitterly hate how he created an entire universe inside a wiki for me to be so heavily enthralled :( -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 12:38, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== User page rights ==<br />
<br />
Right, on my user and talk pages, the use of the click template (The one in Mis' sig and your old one) essentially destroys the page by making a massive white space at the bottom of the page. Do I therefore have the right to replace people's signatures with the <nowiki>{{usr}}</nowiki> template? I wanted to have a check before I did anything.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:26, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:It technically is your own page. You could edit whatever you see fit. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 18:28, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Its your page, as long as you don't alter what they have said, and make it clear they said it, I don't see a problem. I'd probably add a note explaining why though. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:28, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Alright, sounds like a plan. It's just with the recent change to my archive page, it's a little bit essential.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:34, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Also, it should be noted that neither of those sigs actually uses that template, but I would imagine that template would have the same issue anyway. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 18:35, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Its fine. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 23:28, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== I'm Interested in becoming a Sysop ==<br />
<br />
Hey Dance,<br />
<br />
We've spoken once or twice on here, and I saw that you are one so i thought it best to ask you. I rather like contributing and helping out on here, and I think I'd like to become a Sysop. I haven't quite been here 2 months, and only have 420 contribs, so not sure I can apply yet...<br />
<br />
Anyway, whats involved? Any tips? {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 15:23, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Trust me when I say this, I've went through your contribs. What you have so far is not enough to warrant a good SysOps bid. If you really, really want to be a SysOps, start by sulking around the Admin pages more often, cycling news archives and suggestions, etc. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 15:33, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:[[User talk:Jerrel Yokotory#Helpful Advice|Read this]].--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 15:52, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:We always love having interested users in becoming a Sysop, but first they need to understand the system in which they work. This includes the administration pages like [[A/MR|Move Requests]], [[A/D|Deletions]], [[A/SD|Speedy Deletions]], and others like [[A/VB|Vandal Banning]]. You have to understand the job you're asking for and we need to be convinced that you do. Besides that, it's always recommended that you know the community well and integrate well with their projects and tasks that try and make the wiki a better information resource. I'm not sure if Yonnua's link to previous advice is specifically the best thing for you to read literally because it's what ''he'' may do, but you need to be able to do your ''own'' thing on the wiki and still be able to help out in your own ways and with your own opinions. But the intention is the same- you need to exhibit your (obviously) keen interest in the community by involving yourself more in many of the wiki's facets. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:35, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Tip #1, and I don't mean this with any discourtesy or rudeness (really, I honestly don't), but research the answers yourself, rather than asking questions like "what's involved" to become a sysop (the answer is posted on [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions#Guidelines_for_System_Operator_Requests|A/PM]]). Asking questions like that is an immediate signal to all of us that you don't understand the system well enough...''yet''. Eager folks like you can and do learn the system eventually by reading through the policies, admin pages, and archives, so that shouldn't be a discouragement to you in the least. But sysops are expected (though it's not part of the official job description) to be decently knowledgeable about the way the wiki works, and that means understanding both the bureaucracy and some of the technical stuff better than the average user.<br />
<br />
::As for other advice, I'd agree with Yonn's suggestion to look for a project. There are always things that need cleaning up around here and discussions to be had where opinions are solicited (e.g. there's talk of an RP List redesign on [[UDWiki:General Discussion#hurdles|General Discussion]] right now, I've been working (very slowly) on rethinking the Suggestions system, there are always ideas on Developing Suggestions in need of thoughtful advice, Ross is working (also slowly) on redesigning the Zombie Skills pages, etc.). Getting involved on the admin pages, especially by expressing your opinion in the proper places (always be sure to do it in the proper places, since doing it in the wrong place is once again a signal to us that you don't yet understand how things work) is also a great way to let us get a feel for how you think and form opinions, which you'll be expected to do regularly as a sysop. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 04:26, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:::I Thank you all immensely for your help in this matter. I had read through the [A/PM] page, the main thing was that it wasn't quite clear where you apply to, but reading what you guys have written, I'm not quite ready just yet. <br />
:::As for a project, I wasn't quite sure what somebody who is not a sysop is permitted to do. I've noticed in a few subburbs, the "Suburb Group Listing" and "Active Groups" are very different. South Blythville, for example, has 3 groups in "Suburb Group Listing" and 12 in "Active groups". If I'm allowed to, I would like to follow up with the groups, and remove those inactive off the Active groups. I know similar has been done for Suburb Group listing. {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 13:54, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Want to run a contest for the Urban Dead Wiki ==<br />
<br />
i was wondering if i could run a contest on the Urban Dead Wiki. most notably a contest of art. i am look to put an advert for my in-game group on the UD page, via spending ten bucks. i was wondering if i could have a contest to who can come up with the best artwork for said advert. notably a prize of me spending the extra 5 bucks to make that persons in-game character immune to the IP limit seems sufficient enough. what do you think {{unsigned|Nuerotoxic2213}}<br />
:Sounds good. Just make a page for it and add it onto the Community Announcements page [[Template:Community Projects|here]], so it appears on the main page. From there you will get enough attention to hopefully have the comp succeed. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:28, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
i haven't had much of a response yet. is there anything(or anyone) i could contact, or you could contact to maybe spur this thing a bit lol. i don't actually know any of the artists that would patrol this forum [[User:Nuerotoxic2213|Nuerotoxic2213]] 16:02, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Days in Urban Dead ==<br />
<br />
Aww man, I'd have liked to see a new one. This isn't because we have gaps is it? Because I can envisage some sort of crazy bot (always the best kind, the crazy sort) that could fill in the gaps. Unless you meant something else?<br />
<br />
I want a video dammit! {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 18:00, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:^This--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:42, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Mate, if you could do that, then making one more video would really be within my grasp. I have a few harrowing problems that have also come up, the biggest being that it's 80% likely that I don't even have the original 220 images anymore anymore, so I'll have to do my best to trawl through old backups to see if I still have them. Between searching for the backups and the old .avi versions I have I ''should'' be able to get a working version of the original 200 days to use. Once I've done that, I'll hit you up and see if you can make a crazy bot to help me get them images. Thanks man. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:30, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Alright, I've lost all the 220 original images and I dont have the original video but I've managed to nab the Youtube FLV that is embedded onto the video page, I should be able to make a more or less functional replacement from that. As for your crazy bot, if you're still keen, we'll need images from April 28th 2008 to whenever you see fit. See, after 200 days I didn't do ANY screencapping so I don't have any single screenshots at all from April 2008. How do you envision the bot will operate? Do you think it's possible when this many screenshots are needed? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 06:20, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Well I left the bot running today and let it slowly load each revision page, so I've got the info now. Seeing as we need like 700 images, I'll see if I can just have it fake an image that looks like a dangermap so we don't have to take screencaps from the wiki ourselves. I'll post an example if I get it to work. Also, the last purge only seems to have left us with stuff from about September 08, so... yeah. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 17:45, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Horrific time dealing with fonts. Anyway: [[:Image:DangerMap 20100919.png|yesterday's map]]. The original has nicer anti-aliased text but it's so huge on filesize I'll stick with the plainer one. I'll get around to automating the others at some point. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 11:04, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::That should be more than adequate, looks great and shouldn't look ''any'' different from the original 200 days. I've thought about the 6 month gap in images we'll have lost by the time this is through, what are your thoughts? Should I start from my old 2007 archive and go straight through to today? Or should we just start straight from Sep 2008 where your collection starts? Advantages of having them both is that that 200 day period had a lot of rich history displayed and there was a fairly significant lack of events for a year and a bit from mid-2008 too. Cons include the fact it's been seen before anyway, and it'd be hard to incorporate them into one another with a 6 month gap. Leaning towards the latter, thoughts? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:23, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::I think I'd go for a separate video given the gap. Shame really, because if you combine the wayback machine, manual coverage and current revisions, that gap is pretty much the only big gap is the history. Man if only we had those old revisions. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 11:45, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Yeah. Actually, Suburb/History ''does'' have about 20 or so. It covers the process hideously sporadically but if sped up it probably won't look that bad. But I'll see which route should ultimately be taken by trial and error once I get a few images together. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 12:59, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Well the bots working on it ''right now'', uploading as fast as pngout can compress the things down to size. Once it's done I can zip up the whole set and e-mail them if you like, less hassle than using the wiki for each and every one. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 13:17, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::And now would be a ''bad'' time to realise that there's a template called "MapDanger" which means all the old "MapVeryDanger" have been mapped wrongly. Fuuuuu - at least the more recent stuff works since the system isn't retarded anymore. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 13:24, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::Fuck. Surely no one would mind us recreating it ;D. As for the emailing option, sounds much better than doing ti via wiki. I'll email you just now so you can grab my email without me later having to go through the future hassle of eradicating my email from google search indexes. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:26, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Actually, simple redirection to the new ones could suffice... right? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:27, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Oh no, it's my fault, not the wiki's :P. Anytime a "VeryDanger" was the status in a revision it got recorded as orange not red because I didn't know of the clash. It resulted in some very orange maps as you can tell. I'll have to rebuild the revision history so that'll take the better part of a day. Gives me a chance to poke around the old templates though, that's good fun. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 13:43, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::No worries. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:58, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Can I run a small scale Suburb Massacre? ==<br />
<br />
Hey there,<br />
<br />
So I'm asking you, because I'm not sure whether I'd be allowed to or not, and I also get the impression certain other sysops don't like me...<br />
<br />
I'm thinking of running a small scale Suburb Massacre, of a 1 suburb radius around South Blythville, covering "Suburb Group Listing" and "Active Groups" (In suburbs that have that further down in their page)<br />
<br />
Can I do it? {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 01:56, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yes, I recommend it. Those pages that have second group listings further down the page on suburb pages are REALLY out of date and should be cleaned up. You really know what you should do though? Make it a project for the entirety of Malton and see if anyone is willing to help, and IN the project you can just organise and focus on the subrubs you care about but others can do the rest. That way you fix all of malton. That's just a thought, but you are free to do whatever you want from here when it comes to cleaning up suburb pages. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:16, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::If you would like to help out? [[The_Great_Suburb_Group_Massacre/2010-Round_2]] {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 07:03, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Photo Upload ==<br />
<br />
Hello DDR! Just wanted to know I saw you changing some pages on maps I uploaded. What do I miss when uploading? Where should I put categorising? --{{User:DiSm/sig}} 09:57, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Hey- A summary of what to do and how to do it is [[:Category:Images|here]]. Basically, we just have a few categories we use to file all our images under. You'll have already been familiar with [[:Category:Maps]] and [[:Category:Screenshots]] as that is what I categorised some of your images as. To do this, just add <nowiki>[[Category:XXXXXXX]]</nowiki> anywhere on the image description.<br />
<br />
:You don't need to do categorise as you upload- practically no one does, that's why I tend to do it. But if you do it saves us the trouble of doing it later. You're free to choose whether you want to do it or not in the long run, I won't mind either way. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:48, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Give it a go, then ask DDR if you did it right. He knows the system better than most of us, plus I still get flashbacks from the 9000+ images I sorted. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:54, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==wtf==<br />
<br />
hey whats the deal with your antixx on good pages? some people voted in a manner you didn't like? L2puppet or gtfo. i'll let you explain and revert until i next drop by then i'll avb and let the ops be bullied into letting you get away with it. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:13, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:fair enough I guess. I'm simply keeping a consistent high standard filter over the voting procedure that Cheese and later I attempted to keep going since the beginning- if RHO is misinformed enough to accidentally cycle it as successful and it's rightfully reverted, that ain't my fault. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:27, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Make mycock a ga and i'll pull some strings to get you into [[2CFC]].. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:34, 21 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Featured_Articles/Good_Articles&diff=1782129
UDWiki:Featured Articles/Good Articles
2010-09-20T14:40:54Z
<p>J3D: /* No */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{Navigation (header)}}<br />
{|style="background: #E6F2FF;border:solid 1px #A3B1BF;padding:10px;width:100%"<br />
|-<br />
|{{Shortcut|[[GA]]}}<span style="font-size:16pt">Good Article Voting</span><br>Here, we determine which articles are deemed to be "Good" Articles. These are seen as some of the best the wiki has to offer and can include virtually any page on the wiki. <br />
<br />
Articles which have been given good article status, become eligible to become [[UDWiki:Featured Articles|Featured Articles]] with a new Good Article being voted to receive that honour every week.<br />
<br />
<big>'''Criteria'''</big><br />
*'''NPOV''' - The article must be from a [[UDWiki:NPOV|neutral point of view]] and not show significant bias. Possible exceptions may be made, depending on the article and community opinion. <br />
*'''Complete''' - It neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context.<br />
*'''Well Written''' - The article uses good English, such as proper grammar and spelling and is written in a clear and highly readable style.<br />
*'''Generally Awesome''' - Here at the wiki, we're after stuff that's awesome.<br />
<br />
Any main namespace article (also including user pages and journal pages if they are thought to fulfil the above criteria) can be nominated for good article status. The nomination will be discussed and if there are no major issues raised at the end of 7 days, the article is promoted to Good status and will be added to the Featured Article Pool for the coming week. <br />
<br />
Articles that are deemed "good" will be placed in the [[:Category:Good Articles|Good Article Category]] for easy findage. The page will also have the <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:GA|GA]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki> template placed onto it. If a nomination is declined by the page owner then the nomination should be cycled without the page being added to the Good Article Category.<br />
<br />
|}<br />
{| align="right"<br />
|-<br />
|__TOC__<br />
|}<br />
==Example==<br />
===[[Example page|Good Article candidate]]===<br />
Good Article candidate has recently undergone a lot of improvement from various editors. It's NPOV, it's concise and informative. I also believe it to be generally awesome, just take a look at the talk page discussion, people love it! --[[Example page|GA Suggester]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I see only a few minor issues, but those seem to be fixed readily. Otherwise it's good. --[[Example page|OptimistBob]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
# Love it! --[[Example page|Few Words Joe]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Maintains good article balance, strong intro, accurate information, good grammar and spelling. Well wikified. --[[Example page|Overly Technical Jim]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Much better than all the other candidates. --[[Example page|BetterMuch Ralph]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - I like this part [[Example page|here]]. --[[Example page|Specific Jen]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
Please add {{[[Template:GoodArticleNom|GoodArticleNom]]}} to any page that has been nominated.<br />
<br />
==New Nominations==<br />
<br />
===[[Zombie anonymity]]===<br />
NPOV and borderline eloquent. The topic itself may not be central to the game, but the article is probably the best it could be. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 00:16, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
# '''Yes''' - We need more featured articles, before we have to start looping them! --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 00:16, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' - I'll give it a comb through in a tick to clean it up, but it's solid enough. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:27, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' - Well written and explained...I'd say thats a good article for you {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 14:02, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:41, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 06:29, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
<br />
#guys stop going all alim on good articles and letting any old drivel in .{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:43, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Have seen better articles going to the Failed section. --{{User:DiSm/sig}} 10:18, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Jed couldn't have said it better, but I'll try anyway. This article is severely sub-par for a GA if you ask me. Bland, short(ish), has no flavour-adding images or text which I think should be standard for "good" glossary articles, and the worst bit is it's about a concept I've always thought is stupid and was overused in the suggestions system to insta-kill otherwise decent suggestions. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:54, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#As Jed and DDR. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:44, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#As DDR.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 08:02, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Recent Nominations==<br />
''Older nominations can be found in the [[UDWiki:Featured Articles/Good Articles/Archive|archive]].''<br />
<br />
===[[Banana Tactics]]===<br />
<br />
Well-written, delivers information in a concise and easy-read manner, and does not arse around with NPOV or pointlessness. This article has shown itself to be beloved by the community and perhaps now is the time to give it the spotlight it deserves.<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - Superb article. Bravo Karl. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 15:16, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Direct and to the point, no need for overdoing it with complex words or phrases.--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 22:20, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Our job here is not ''just'' to inform newbs about UD, but to make the overall gaming experience more enjoyable. People need to be shown the well-developed sense of humor that this community can produce, and this article is a superb example of it. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:30, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
#'''Die in a fire''' --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 15:39, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#As Thad. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:51, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Not worthy. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 16:28, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#It's really old by now. Leave the dead horse in its ditch. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:42, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#hahahaha no -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:02, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#No. After reading it thoroughly, and close examination of the second paragraph (or lack there of) I dont think it should be. {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 06:56, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Speedy Deletion Crit 1/2'''.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:34, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Viewing the archives... I take it this is [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/May-2010#Some_stubby_stuff|take]] [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/August-2010#Banana_Tactics|three]]? --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 09:19, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:After a week, this has '''Failed''' with 3 yes votes and 8 "no"s. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:25, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Mycock Building|Mycock]]===<br />
Mycock is amazing! everyone loves mycock, why not put mycock on the main page? Then everyone can ogle at the glory of mycock.--{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 21:35, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
# '''Yes''' - Who doesn't love mycock? --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 21:35, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Mycock deserves to be featured. Mycock is that big a deal. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 21:37, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#We need featured locations. Mycock is one of the best locations in town to be. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 21:42, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#I hardly had to think. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 21:50, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Hmmm... What can be said about Mycock? Mycock is impressive. Mycock is the best by miles. Mycock is generally awesome, and Mycock isn't a stub. I think mycock should definitely be featured. I also want to see Ross writing about Mycock, and a picture of Mycock on the front page.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 21:58, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Innuendo...sexual innuendo!--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 22:04, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#The only official building to bring the radio filter into its knees. Or rather her knees? --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:06, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# I'm surprised no one recommended mycock before. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 22:59, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# fucking [[ALiM]] IN DA HOUZZZZ {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:10, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# After everything mycock has done for this wiki, I think this is the least we could do for it ;) --{{User:Nallan/sig}} 02:49, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
# At least until someone turns it from a factual piece into a hilarious play on words. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 14:54, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Boring, not worthy. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 15:08, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#not v lengthy or interesting. unlike mycock. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 15:18, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#No, it's ridiculous and has more or less been done over and over again. --[[User:Huntress|Huntress]] 15:24, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:I agree with you on one thing. Mycock is used quite a lot. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 05:13, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Just no. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:54, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:<S>After a week, this has '''Passed''' with 10 yes votes and 5 "no"s. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:25, 16 September 2010 (BST)</S><br />
::I'm taking control of the cycling of this for now and archiving it as '''Failed'''. GA's aren't cycled on quantitative grounds, check the early archives. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 00:33, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::On what grounds? Because democracy has failed you? There may be precedent (i didn't bother to check) but this is rediculous! It got 15 votes, and even if you take out the alim ppl (ie nick and myself) this would still havepassed with flying colours. Stop running this place like you're own personal fiefdom noob. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:11, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I think you'll find that the precedents of the system (which I didn't make BTW, simply upkept) is a strong pro-qualitative feedback method. Think of it as A/PM except any legitimate criticisms brought by anyone is enough to reject a potential GA. If you don't think the criticism here counts as legitimate, it's because it was obviously considered so ''not'' GA potential they didn't bother explaining. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:25, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Yeah A/PM is a good analogy. Only instead of crat's choosing it's you. People critise all the suggestions that get any votes. And their opinions are valid. However they're the opinions of 33%. We all know i usually fail to see the bigger picture on the wiki but this screams vendetta. Arbs? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:31, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::This has always been at the discretion of the people who can be fucked to monitor it. DDR is well within his rights to keep out a page which is quite clearly a joke.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 13:36, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::While I agree on that, if Jed is willing to push this through, arbs is the least harmful and most logical route so I'd prefer to do it on there before edit war or vandal accusations begin. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:41, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::I try not to start battles i can't wit. And an edit war with the most prolifically active user on the wiki is definately a battle i can't win!! I'll see if i can be fucked with this. Also i'd have no idea who to choose these days and would probably inadvertantly choose some cronie of yours. But yeah, i'll get back to you in the next few days, don't get comfortable ;) {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:40, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[TUMBLEWEED-aikido-river'n-stuff Tactics]]===<br />
This shit be epic, faggots.<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#-- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:57, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#The most used tactic in all of UD. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:07, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
# '''No''' - But there really should be more nominations. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 19:21, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''No''' - The main problem with this article is that it is hard to tell if it is a guide/strategy or a subtle parody of a guide / strategy. If it was purely a guide with better formatting and information, it would be pure awesomeness. If it was entirely a parody, it would be liquid sex. Unfortunately, it tries to be both and fails at becoming either. - [[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 20:17, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''No''' - We don't want to give newbies the wrong impression. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:52, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Yes, the article's message is that not metaing and just fucking about by yourself and not working in a team is bad. Yeah, let's not give newbies that impression. I read you. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:04, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#::Oh, oops. I was working off of my (bad) memory of the article. Still, "no", since it just isn't that great anyway, however. It's kinda funny and kinda useful, but there are much better ones than it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 03:12, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:::Damnit!! ;) -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 04:40, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Not helpful. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 16:31, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:After a week, this has '''Failed''' with 2 yes votes and 4 "no"s. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:25, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Actually DDR has taken control of this. And it has now <s>'''passed'''</s>. These votes aren't supposed to be quantative and WTF man, he created this page he should be allowed to choose what gets and and ignore the majority of users. He'll be by shortly to overturn your opinions and place the good article template rightfully on the page.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:15, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I didn't create this page. I've struck your "passed" since you are trying to create drama, confusion, and didn't even add <nowiki>{{GA}}</nowiki> to the page, so please only cycle these if you are serious about doing the job please. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:30, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Malton Incident]]===<br />
It may be fanmade, but it provides some good backstory to how the zombie incident in Malton started. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:12, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I'm offended that you think being fanmade is a bad thing. This thing is a vital piece of our history. Without it, we'd have no way of knowing how this all started. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 02:54, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
====No====<br />
#This is a no with a but - it's a good page, but it just look amateurish. I might give it an overhaul soon to have things like paragraphs, headers, more interwiki links, etc, though I don't know how that would affect this vote. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:56, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
#Very similar to [[Possible Causes for the Situation]], they are the two pages on the wiki that ''should'' be considered the best in the entire place, but just fall a bit short. Both of these pages added to my fascination with the rich history of Malton when I started many years ago but they need some basic formatting before being accepted IMO. It's not cause I don't think they shouldn't be GA's at this point, it's that with a simple 20 minutes of work, they won't only qualify but will also be miles ahead of what they are now. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 03:07, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
'''Failed''' -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:57, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Spawning]]===<br />
Just finished writing it. Feedback please, want to make sure its correct. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC) <br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I think it's a well made article.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:So do I,... I'll change my vote to yes sometime before his seven days are up. Just curious to have an answer to the questions presented. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 21:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - I think every article is a good one. --{{User:Moctezuma/sig}} 22:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Very thorough. --[[User:TripleU|TripleU]] 23:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Weak Yes''' - It really meets all criteria and pretty interesting. But the accuracy of the article is under the question. it'd be cool to gather statistics on a distance somehow, but it's kind of abuse to the system. --[[User:Fe328|fe328]] 23:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Maybe not an article that I will read often, but then again that has no bearing on its quality. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 09:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' A well written article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''yep''' liked it.. easy to follow.----[[User:Sexualharrison|sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 16:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#Rubber stamp it.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Very easy to follow. And I can't think of anything that is missing. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 09:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - well rounded, good stuff. -[[User:Jack Kolt|Jack Kolt]] 14:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - A surprisingly good article indeed. --[[User:Karloth_vois|Karloth Vois]] <sup>[[¯\(°_o)/¯]]</sup> 18:22, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - A lot of effort was put into this as well as many charecter names.--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 00:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
<s>'''Against'''</s> I think that the article needs to address the issue of 'what happens if the building requirments aren't met?' For example: under the [[Spawning#NecroTech Lab Assistant|Lab Assistant]] section,... what happens if there are no NT buildings that fit the crieria? Granted, this may never be the case,... in fact, I doubt that this would ever be the case,... but what if? Is there a really good answer for this? BTW, my vote can easily be swayed to a yes vote,... it's just that this is something I notice, and was hoping it could be addressed in some way... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 20:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Hmm. Probably something I can't do with spadework, unless I spend a day creating Necrotech assistant Alts and then throwing barricades at the relevant NT's. Probably a question for Kevan. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Maybe not now anymore, but that could have been the case during the March of the Dead. No Necrotechs meeting requirements I mean.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 20:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::I see, so this issue would have to be addressed through a case study,... Perhaps such a thing should be noted in the article somewhere? Personally, I've got a similar, also interesting take on this subject. Considering the priority of NT buildings within the game, and the community as a whole, and inversly, being the big target they are for zombie groups,... how often do you think conditions like this exist? And is it VSB or lower? At that, when it comes to spawning, is this really a luck of the draw sort of thing, or is it something thats vastly affected by the actions of the people playing the game? I think that that's worth noting in the article to, simply because that last point I made is the whole allure of the game to a great many people... everything is situational, and all outcomes are affected solely by the individuals playing... and thus, so are the spawning locations in a way. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 21:04, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::[[User:Kevan|Our Lord and Saviour has answered on his talk page]]. I'll add to the page, today. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:00, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::Vote struck, and changed to yes. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<s>Questionable accuracy and the minor need to test what happens if there are no valid spawnpoints.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 03:39, 2 March 2010 (UTC)</s><br />
:No valid spawnpoints query answered. Now explain how I can improve on the so called ''questionable'' accuracy? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::I was just rather dubious that there would be a complex method of spawning when you could have someone just spawn anywhere but...well...eh. Kevan replied and didn't try to knock you down so I'll change my vote.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#Poodle and SS's reasons are so utterly stupid; if they think the reason for a glossary/player-resource article like this is to just prove what would happen in extreme hypothetical situations, then they are wrong. Having said that, this article is useful to show interested users the nature of spawning; and that is all. GA's in general should have the ability to interest any user into reading at leased a bit of it, but I don't think this has it. Narrow/special interest works don't generally fit my idea of a GA. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 05:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:I just felt the article needed to be 'complete'. It's 'complete', so that's why the Keep. I don't see a GA needing to personally interest anyone, as long as it's a Good Article (NPOV, Compelte, Well Written, "Awesome"), it suffices.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::By personally interest people, I mean it needs something in it that does inherently make it "awesome". This is boring. It covers a concept that is experienced within the first two clicks of making an UD account for ''everyone'', I think this sort of coverage isn't ''unnecessary'', but not groundbreaking enough to be a GA at all. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 23:52, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:::I think its range is more than that. It adds another reason for cading TRP's to only VSB and shows another benefit of emitting a [[feeding groan]] (which needs a major rewrite). I also think that its important to note that some suburbs underpopulation might be due to their lack of Firestations and Necrotechs. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::::Also why there might be a lower zed presence within the same suburbs,.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:23, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
This be '''Successful'''. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
===[[Guides:A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead|A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead]]===<br />
This article has been accessed over 80,000 times,.... has been cited by many other users as still being an important peice of information (as can be seen [[Heytown/News Archive#June 20th|here]], [[Guides:First Day in Malton#For more information|here]], [[User:Darculianar#UsefullPages|here]], and [[Malton_College_of_Medicine/library#Textbooks|here]]), as well as having been cited for information (like [[Suggestion talk:20070928 More Knives|here]] for example). That said, many users, and pages not listed above, link to it, having thought it was important to keep. Also, when it was reveiwed [[Guides/Review/Archive#Guides:A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead|here]], it seemed to have some support as long as it was updated. These are the reasons why I think the article should be a Featured Article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' As Above. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Nice article - easy to read, good information. --[[User:Fe328|fe328]] 11:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' It provides an excellent and highly detailed guide; I wish I knew half this stuff when I was starting out! --[[User:Oldharry101|Oldharry101]] <sup>[[Project Welcome|W!]]</sup> 18:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' A little lacking regarding zombies, and understates the importance of malls, but has all the info a fresh slab of meat would need. --[[User:TripleU|TripleU]] 21:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' OOOhhh.. Ids ddis de beoqqqwww. BEOWWW!!! Get Fit mutha fucka get fit!!! Heeaaywhooo. HOOOO! ShiaaAAAA. i'M About to take a shia lebouf on ya HOOOO!!! HOOO!!!!!!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 01:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:I don't know what you just said other than yes.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - although it could do with being split up into subpages. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 08:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' Its not really a guide, just a lot of important glossary pages all stuck together in one place. Still an excellent resource mind. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Helped some of my friends get into the game, wored for them will work for anybody. --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 00:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
#POV much? Lacking basic information and vague when it comes to its own declarations. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 12:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:Vague in it's declarations, and non neutral POV.... hmmm....? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''No''' - I don't really like the layout of it. Perhaps some tables for some of the information, or just links to separate pages with the information (for example Building types). I'm not really a big fan of a huge amount of information on the one page. Don't see why the information on building types needs to be repeated on this page as well, especially ''useless'' information like interior and exterior descriptions. It just builds up the page more. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 06:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:Really,.... you'd rather have it look like '''[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Guides:A_Beginners_Guide_to_Urban_Dead&oldid=1215404 this?]''' -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:21, 9 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::No I wouldn't like it like that. '''You know what I meant''' Don't be a smart-arse. '''But''' just in case I didn't make it clear the first time... '''The beginners guide should give relevant information that beginners need. Just the basics, some details where needed. But NOT a complete guide on the entire game.''' The details are included on other pages, and people can access them by searching if need be. Rather then clotting up a beginners guide with ''useless'' information. On top of that, some basic information that beginners '''would''' need isn't included as well. Thats why I don't like it. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 11:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:::I do know what you mean,... however,.... I know being new to a game, I like to waltz in with everything on the table, and a good working knowledge of what I should be doing, or what the working aspects of a game are. Not just having my character spawn someplace... and not know what I should be looking at, or how to get into a building.... or why I should even give a rats ass about libraries,... which you seem to think are absolutly frivolous, amongst other things I've included. Obviously this isn't the case, both from an RP perspective, as well as a strategic perspective, both of which are touched on within the article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I'm gonna cycle this as '''Successful''' too. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
[[Category:Good Article Nominees]]</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Featured_Articles/Good_Articles&diff=1782019
UDWiki:Featured Articles/Good Articles
2010-09-20T12:31:22Z
<p>J3D: /* No */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{Navigation (header)}}<br />
{|style="background: #E6F2FF;border:solid 1px #A3B1BF;padding:10px;width:100%"<br />
|-<br />
|{{Shortcut|[[GA]]}}<span style="font-size:16pt">Good Article Voting</span><br>Here, we determine which articles are deemed to be "Good" Articles. These are seen as some of the best the wiki has to offer and can include virtually any page on the wiki. <br />
<br />
Articles which have been given good article status, become eligible to become [[UDWiki:Featured Articles|Featured Articles]] with a new Good Article being voted to receive that honour every week.<br />
<br />
<big>'''Criteria'''</big><br />
*'''NPOV''' - The article must be from a [[UDWiki:NPOV|neutral point of view]] and not show significant bias. Possible exceptions may be made, depending on the article and community opinion. <br />
*'''Complete''' - It neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context.<br />
*'''Well Written''' - The article uses good English, such as proper grammar and spelling and is written in a clear and highly readable style.<br />
*'''Generally Awesome''' - Here at the wiki, we're after stuff that's awesome.<br />
<br />
Any main namespace article (also including user pages and journal pages if they are thought to fulfil the above criteria) can be nominated for good article status. The nomination will be discussed and if there are no major issues raised at the end of 7 days, the article is promoted to Good status and will be added to the Featured Article Pool for the coming week. <br />
<br />
Articles that are deemed "good" will be placed in the [[:Category:Good Articles|Good Article Category]] for easy findage. The page will also have the <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:GA|GA]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki> template placed onto it. If a nomination is declined by the page owner then the nomination should be cycled without the page being added to the Good Article Category.<br />
<br />
|}<br />
{| align="right"<br />
|-<br />
|__TOC__<br />
|}<br />
==Example==<br />
===[[Example page|Good Article candidate]]===<br />
Good Article candidate has recently undergone a lot of improvement from various editors. It's NPOV, it's concise and informative. I also believe it to be generally awesome, just take a look at the talk page discussion, people love it! --[[Example page|GA Suggester]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I see only a few minor issues, but those seem to be fixed readily. Otherwise it's good. --[[Example page|OptimistBob]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
# Love it! --[[Example page|Few Words Joe]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Maintains good article balance, strong intro, accurate information, good grammar and spelling. Well wikified. --[[Example page|Overly Technical Jim]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Much better than all the other candidates. --[[Example page|BetterMuch Ralph]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - I like this part [[Example page|here]]. --[[Example page|Specific Jen]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
Please add {{[[Template:GoodArticleNom|GoodArticleNom]]}} to any page that has been nominated.<br />
<br />
==New Nominations==<br />
<br />
===[[Zombie anonymity]]===<br />
NPOV and borderline eloquent. The topic itself may not be central to the game, but the article is probably the best it could be. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 00:16, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
# '''Yes''' - We need more featured articles, before we have to start looping them! --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 00:16, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' - I'll give it a comb through in a tick to clean it up, but it's solid enough. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:27, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' - Well written and explained...I'd say thats a good article for you {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 14:02, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:41, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 06:29, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
<br />
#guys stop going all alim on good articles and letting any old drivel in .{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:43, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Have seen better articles going to the Failed section. --{{User:DiSm/sig}} 10:18, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Jed couldn't have said it better, but I'll try anyway. This article is severely sub-par for a GA if you ask me. Bland, short(ish), has no flavour-adding images or text which I think should be standard for "good" glossary articles, and the worst bit is it's about a concept I've always thought is stupid and was overused in the suggestions system to insta-kill otherwise decent suggestions. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:54, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#As Jed and DDR. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:44, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#As DDR.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 08:02, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Recent Nominations==<br />
''Older nominations can be found in the [[UDWiki:Featured Articles/Good Articles/Archive|archive]].''<br />
<br />
===[[Banana Tactics]]===<br />
<br />
Well-written, delivers information in a concise and easy-read manner, and does not arse around with NPOV or pointlessness. This article has shown itself to be beloved by the community and perhaps now is the time to give it the spotlight it deserves.<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - Superb article. Bravo Karl. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 15:16, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Direct and to the point, no need for overdoing it with complex words or phrases.--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 22:20, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Our job here is not ''just'' to inform newbs about UD, but to make the overall gaming experience more enjoyable. People need to be shown the well-developed sense of humor that this community can produce, and this article is a superb example of it. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:30, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
#'''Die in a fire''' --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 15:39, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#As Thad. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:51, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Not worthy. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 16:28, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#It's really old by now. Leave the dead horse in its ditch. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:42, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#hahahaha no -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:02, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#No. After reading it thoroughly, and close examination of the second paragraph (or lack there of) I dont think it should be. {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 06:56, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Speedy Deletion Crit 1/2'''.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:34, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Viewing the archives... I take it this is [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/May-2010#Some_stubby_stuff|take]] [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/August-2010#Banana_Tactics|three]]? --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 09:19, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:After a week, this has '''Failed''' with 3 yes votes and 8 "no"s. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:25, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Mycock Building|Mycock]]===<br />
Mycock is amazing! everyone loves mycock, why not put mycock on the main page? Then everyone can ogle at the glory of mycock.--{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 21:35, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
# '''Yes''' - Who doesn't love mycock? --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 21:35, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Mycock deserves to be featured. Mycock is that big a deal. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 21:37, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#We need featured locations. Mycock is one of the best locations in town to be. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 21:42, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#I hardly had to think. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 21:50, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Hmmm... What can be said about Mycock? Mycock is impressive. Mycock is the best by miles. Mycock is generally awesome, and Mycock isn't a stub. I think mycock should definitely be featured. I also want to see Ross writing about Mycock, and a picture of Mycock on the front page.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 21:58, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Innuendo...sexual innuendo!--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 22:04, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#The only official building to bring the radio filter into its knees. Or rather her knees? --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:06, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# I'm surprised no one recommended mycock before. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 22:59, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# fucking [[ALiM]] IN DA HOUZZZZ {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:10, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# After everything mycock has done for this wiki, I think this is the least we could do for it ;) --{{User:Nallan/sig}} 02:49, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
# At least until someone turns it from a factual piece into a hilarious play on words. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 14:54, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Boring, not worthy. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 15:08, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#not v lengthy or interesting. unlike mycock. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 15:18, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#No, it's ridiculous and has more or less been done over and over again. --[[User:Huntress|Huntress]] 15:24, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:I agree with you on one thing. Mycock is used quite a lot. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 05:13, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Just no. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:54, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:<S>After a week, this has '''Passed''' with 10 yes votes and 5 "no"s. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:25, 16 September 2010 (BST)</S><br />
::I'm taking control of the cycling of this for now and archiving it as '''Failed'''. GA's aren't cycled on quantitative grounds, check the early archives. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 00:33, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::On what grounds? Because democracy has failed you? There may be precedent (i didn't bother to check) but this is rediculous! It got 15 votes, and even if you take out the alim ppl (ie nick and myself) this would still havepassed with flying colours. Stop running this place like you're own personal fiefdom noob. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:11, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I think you'll find that the precedents of the system (which I didn't make BTW, simply upkept) is a strong pro-qualitative feedback method. Think of it as A/PM except any legitimate criticisms brought by anyone is enough to reject a potential GA. If you don't think the criticism here counts as legitimate, it's because it was obviously considered so ''not'' GA potential they didn't bother explaining. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:25, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Yeah A/PM is a good analogy. Only instead of crat's choosing it's you. People critise all the suggestions that get any votes. And their opinions are valid. However they're the opinions of 33%. We all know i usually fail to see the bigger picture on the wiki but this screams vendetta. Arbs? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:31, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[TUMBLEWEED-aikido-river'n-stuff Tactics]]===<br />
This shit be epic, faggots.<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#-- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:57, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#The most used tactic in all of UD. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:07, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
# '''No''' - But there really should be more nominations. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 19:21, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''No''' - The main problem with this article is that it is hard to tell if it is a guide/strategy or a subtle parody of a guide / strategy. If it was purely a guide with better formatting and information, it would be pure awesomeness. If it was entirely a parody, it would be liquid sex. Unfortunately, it tries to be both and fails at becoming either. - [[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 20:17, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''No''' - We don't want to give newbies the wrong impression. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:52, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Yes, the article's message is that not metaing and just fucking about by yourself and not working in a team is bad. Yeah, let's not give newbies that impression. I read you. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:04, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#::Oh, oops. I was working off of my (bad) memory of the article. Still, "no", since it just isn't that great anyway, however. It's kinda funny and kinda useful, but there are much better ones than it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 03:12, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:::Damnit!! ;) -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 04:40, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Not helpful. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 16:31, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:After a week, this has '''Failed''' with 2 yes votes and 4 "no"s. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:25, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Actually DDR has taken control of this. And it has now <s>'''passed'''</s>. These votes aren't supposed to be quantative and WTF man, he created this page he should be allowed to choose what gets and and ignore the majority of users. He'll be by shortly to overturn your opinions and place the good article template rightfully on the page.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:15, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I didn't create this page. I've struck your "passed" since you are trying to create drama, confusion, and didn't even add <nowiki>{{GA}}</nowiki> to the page, so please only cycle these if you are serious about doing the job please. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:30, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Malton Incident]]===<br />
It may be fanmade, but it provides some good backstory to how the zombie incident in Malton started. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:12, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I'm offended that you think being fanmade is a bad thing. This thing is a vital piece of our history. Without it, we'd have no way of knowing how this all started. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 02:54, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
====No====<br />
#This is a no with a but - it's a good page, but it just look amateurish. I might give it an overhaul soon to have things like paragraphs, headers, more interwiki links, etc, though I don't know how that would affect this vote. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:56, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
#Very similar to [[Possible Causes for the Situation]], they are the two pages on the wiki that ''should'' be considered the best in the entire place, but just fall a bit short. Both of these pages added to my fascination with the rich history of Malton when I started many years ago but they need some basic formatting before being accepted IMO. It's not cause I don't think they shouldn't be GA's at this point, it's that with a simple 20 minutes of work, they won't only qualify but will also be miles ahead of what they are now. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 03:07, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
'''Failed''' -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:57, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Spawning]]===<br />
Just finished writing it. Feedback please, want to make sure its correct. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC) <br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I think it's a well made article.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:So do I,... I'll change my vote to yes sometime before his seven days are up. Just curious to have an answer to the questions presented. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 21:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - I think every article is a good one. --{{User:Moctezuma/sig}} 22:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Very thorough. --[[User:TripleU|TripleU]] 23:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Weak Yes''' - It really meets all criteria and pretty interesting. But the accuracy of the article is under the question. it'd be cool to gather statistics on a distance somehow, but it's kind of abuse to the system. --[[User:Fe328|fe328]] 23:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Maybe not an article that I will read often, but then again that has no bearing on its quality. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 09:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' A well written article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''yep''' liked it.. easy to follow.----[[User:Sexualharrison|sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 16:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#Rubber stamp it.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Very easy to follow. And I can't think of anything that is missing. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 09:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - well rounded, good stuff. -[[User:Jack Kolt|Jack Kolt]] 14:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - A surprisingly good article indeed. --[[User:Karloth_vois|Karloth Vois]] <sup>[[¯\(°_o)/¯]]</sup> 18:22, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - A lot of effort was put into this as well as many charecter names.--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 00:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
<s>'''Against'''</s> I think that the article needs to address the issue of 'what happens if the building requirments aren't met?' For example: under the [[Spawning#NecroTech Lab Assistant|Lab Assistant]] section,... what happens if there are no NT buildings that fit the crieria? Granted, this may never be the case,... in fact, I doubt that this would ever be the case,... but what if? Is there a really good answer for this? BTW, my vote can easily be swayed to a yes vote,... it's just that this is something I notice, and was hoping it could be addressed in some way... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 20:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Hmm. Probably something I can't do with spadework, unless I spend a day creating Necrotech assistant Alts and then throwing barricades at the relevant NT's. Probably a question for Kevan. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Maybe not now anymore, but that could have been the case during the March of the Dead. No Necrotechs meeting requirements I mean.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 20:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::I see, so this issue would have to be addressed through a case study,... Perhaps such a thing should be noted in the article somewhere? Personally, I've got a similar, also interesting take on this subject. Considering the priority of NT buildings within the game, and the community as a whole, and inversly, being the big target they are for zombie groups,... how often do you think conditions like this exist? And is it VSB or lower? At that, when it comes to spawning, is this really a luck of the draw sort of thing, or is it something thats vastly affected by the actions of the people playing the game? I think that that's worth noting in the article to, simply because that last point I made is the whole allure of the game to a great many people... everything is situational, and all outcomes are affected solely by the individuals playing... and thus, so are the spawning locations in a way. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 21:04, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::[[User:Kevan|Our Lord and Saviour has answered on his talk page]]. I'll add to the page, today. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:00, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::Vote struck, and changed to yes. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<s>Questionable accuracy and the minor need to test what happens if there are no valid spawnpoints.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 03:39, 2 March 2010 (UTC)</s><br />
:No valid spawnpoints query answered. Now explain how I can improve on the so called ''questionable'' accuracy? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::I was just rather dubious that there would be a complex method of spawning when you could have someone just spawn anywhere but...well...eh. Kevan replied and didn't try to knock you down so I'll change my vote.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#Poodle and SS's reasons are so utterly stupid; if they think the reason for a glossary/player-resource article like this is to just prove what would happen in extreme hypothetical situations, then they are wrong. Having said that, this article is useful to show interested users the nature of spawning; and that is all. GA's in general should have the ability to interest any user into reading at leased a bit of it, but I don't think this has it. Narrow/special interest works don't generally fit my idea of a GA. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 05:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:I just felt the article needed to be 'complete'. It's 'complete', so that's why the Keep. I don't see a GA needing to personally interest anyone, as long as it's a Good Article (NPOV, Compelte, Well Written, "Awesome"), it suffices.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::By personally interest people, I mean it needs something in it that does inherently make it "awesome". This is boring. It covers a concept that is experienced within the first two clicks of making an UD account for ''everyone'', I think this sort of coverage isn't ''unnecessary'', but not groundbreaking enough to be a GA at all. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 23:52, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:::I think its range is more than that. It adds another reason for cading TRP's to only VSB and shows another benefit of emitting a [[feeding groan]] (which needs a major rewrite). I also think that its important to note that some suburbs underpopulation might be due to their lack of Firestations and Necrotechs. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::::Also why there might be a lower zed presence within the same suburbs,.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:23, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
This be '''Successful'''. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
===[[Guides:A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead|A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead]]===<br />
This article has been accessed over 80,000 times,.... has been cited by many other users as still being an important peice of information (as can be seen [[Heytown/News Archive#June 20th|here]], [[Guides:First Day in Malton#For more information|here]], [[User:Darculianar#UsefullPages|here]], and [[Malton_College_of_Medicine/library#Textbooks|here]]), as well as having been cited for information (like [[Suggestion talk:20070928 More Knives|here]] for example). That said, many users, and pages not listed above, link to it, having thought it was important to keep. Also, when it was reveiwed [[Guides/Review/Archive#Guides:A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead|here]], it seemed to have some support as long as it was updated. These are the reasons why I think the article should be a Featured Article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' As Above. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Nice article - easy to read, good information. --[[User:Fe328|fe328]] 11:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' It provides an excellent and highly detailed guide; I wish I knew half this stuff when I was starting out! --[[User:Oldharry101|Oldharry101]] <sup>[[Project Welcome|W!]]</sup> 18:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' A little lacking regarding zombies, and understates the importance of malls, but has all the info a fresh slab of meat would need. --[[User:TripleU|TripleU]] 21:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' OOOhhh.. Ids ddis de beoqqqwww. BEOWWW!!! Get Fit mutha fucka get fit!!! Heeaaywhooo. HOOOO! ShiaaAAAA. i'M About to take a shia lebouf on ya HOOOO!!! HOOO!!!!!!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 01:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:I don't know what you just said other than yes.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - although it could do with being split up into subpages. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 08:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' Its not really a guide, just a lot of important glossary pages all stuck together in one place. Still an excellent resource mind. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Helped some of my friends get into the game, wored for them will work for anybody. --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 00:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
#POV much? Lacking basic information and vague when it comes to its own declarations. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 12:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:Vague in it's declarations, and non neutral POV.... hmmm....? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''No''' - I don't really like the layout of it. Perhaps some tables for some of the information, or just links to separate pages with the information (for example Building types). I'm not really a big fan of a huge amount of information on the one page. Don't see why the information on building types needs to be repeated on this page as well, especially ''useless'' information like interior and exterior descriptions. It just builds up the page more. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 06:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:Really,.... you'd rather have it look like '''[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Guides:A_Beginners_Guide_to_Urban_Dead&oldid=1215404 this?]''' -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:21, 9 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::No I wouldn't like it like that. '''You know what I meant''' Don't be a smart-arse. '''But''' just in case I didn't make it clear the first time... '''The beginners guide should give relevant information that beginners need. Just the basics, some details where needed. But NOT a complete guide on the entire game.''' The details are included on other pages, and people can access them by searching if need be. Rather then clotting up a beginners guide with ''useless'' information. On top of that, some basic information that beginners '''would''' need isn't included as well. Thats why I don't like it. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 11:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:::I do know what you mean,... however,.... I know being new to a game, I like to waltz in with everything on the table, and a good working knowledge of what I should be doing, or what the working aspects of a game are. Not just having my character spawn someplace... and not know what I should be looking at, or how to get into a building.... or why I should even give a rats ass about libraries,... which you seem to think are absolutly frivolous, amongst other things I've included. Obviously this isn't the case, both from an RP perspective, as well as a strategic perspective, both of which are touched on within the article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I'm gonna cycle this as '''Successful''' too. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
[[Category:Good Article Nominees]]</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Featured_Articles/Good_Articles&diff=1781929
UDWiki:Featured Articles/Good Articles
2010-09-20T09:15:50Z
<p>J3D: /* No */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{Navigation (header)}}<br />
{|style="background: #E6F2FF;border:solid 1px #A3B1BF;padding:10px;width:100%"<br />
|-<br />
|{{Shortcut|[[GA]]}}<span style="font-size:16pt">Good Article Voting</span><br>Here, we determine which articles are deemed to be "Good" Articles. These are seen as some of the best the wiki has to offer and can include virtually any page on the wiki. <br />
<br />
Articles which have been given good article status, become eligible to become [[UDWiki:Featured Articles|Featured Articles]] with a new Good Article being voted to receive that honour every week.<br />
<br />
<big>'''Criteria'''</big><br />
*'''NPOV''' - The article must be from a [[UDWiki:NPOV|neutral point of view]] and not show significant bias. Possible exceptions may be made, depending on the article and community opinion. <br />
*'''Complete''' - It neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context.<br />
*'''Well Written''' - The article uses good English, such as proper grammar and spelling and is written in a clear and highly readable style.<br />
*'''Generally Awesome''' - Here at the wiki, we're after stuff that's awesome.<br />
<br />
Any main namespace article (also including user pages and journal pages if they are thought to fulfil the above criteria) can be nominated for good article status. The nomination will be discussed and if there are no major issues raised at the end of 7 days, the article is promoted to Good status and will be added to the Featured Article Pool for the coming week. <br />
<br />
Articles that are deemed "good" will be placed in the [[:Category:Good Articles|Good Article Category]] for easy findage. The page will also have the <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:GA|GA]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki> template placed onto it. If a nomination is declined by the page owner then the nomination should be cycled without the page being added to the Good Article Category.<br />
<br />
|}<br />
{| align="right"<br />
|-<br />
|__TOC__<br />
|}<br />
==Example==<br />
===[[Example page|Good Article candidate]]===<br />
Good Article candidate has recently undergone a lot of improvement from various editors. It's NPOV, it's concise and informative. I also believe it to be generally awesome, just take a look at the talk page discussion, people love it! --[[Example page|GA Suggester]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I see only a few minor issues, but those seem to be fixed readily. Otherwise it's good. --[[Example page|OptimistBob]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
# Love it! --[[Example page|Few Words Joe]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Maintains good article balance, strong intro, accurate information, good grammar and spelling. Well wikified. --[[Example page|Overly Technical Jim]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Much better than all the other candidates. --[[Example page|BetterMuch Ralph]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - I like this part [[Example page|here]]. --[[Example page|Specific Jen]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
Please add {{[[Template:GoodArticleNom|GoodArticleNom]]}} to any page that has been nominated.<br />
<br />
==New Nominations==<br />
<br />
===[[Zombie anonymity]]===<br />
NPOV and borderline eloquent. The topic itself may not be central to the game, but the article is probably the best it could be. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 00:16, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
# '''Yes''' - We need more featured articles, before we have to start looping them! --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 00:16, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' - I'll give it a comb through in a tick to clean it up, but it's solid enough. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:27, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' - Well written and explained...I'd say thats a good article for you {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 14:02, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:41, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 06:29, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
<br />
#guys stop going all alim on good articles and letting any old drivel in .{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:43, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Have seen better articles going to the Failed section. --{{User:DiSm/sig}} 10:18, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Jed couldn't have said it better, but I'll try anyway. This article is severely sub-par for a GA if you ask me. Bland, short(ish), has no flavour-adding images or text which I think should be standard for "good" glossary articles, and the worst bit is it's about a concept I've always thought is stupid and was overused in the suggestions system to insta-kill otherwise decent suggestions. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:54, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#As Jed and DDR. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:44, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#As DDR.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 08:02, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Recent Nominations==<br />
''Older nominations can be found in the [[UDWiki:Featured Articles/Good Articles/Archive|archive]].''<br />
<br />
===[[Banana Tactics]]===<br />
<br />
Well-written, delivers information in a concise and easy-read manner, and does not arse around with NPOV or pointlessness. This article has shown itself to be beloved by the community and perhaps now is the time to give it the spotlight it deserves.<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - Superb article. Bravo Karl. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 15:16, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Direct and to the point, no need for overdoing it with complex words or phrases.--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 22:20, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Our job here is not ''just'' to inform newbs about UD, but to make the overall gaming experience more enjoyable. People need to be shown the well-developed sense of humor that this community can produce, and this article is a superb example of it. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:30, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
#'''Die in a fire''' --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 15:39, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#As Thad. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:51, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Not worthy. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 16:28, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#It's really old by now. Leave the dead horse in its ditch. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:42, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#hahahaha no -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:02, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#No. After reading it thoroughly, and close examination of the second paragraph (or lack there of) I dont think it should be. {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 06:56, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Speedy Deletion Crit 1/2'''.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:34, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Viewing the archives... I take it this is [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/May-2010#Some_stubby_stuff|take]] [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/August-2010#Banana_Tactics|three]]? --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 09:19, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:After a week, this has '''Failed''' with 3 yes votes and 8 "no"s. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:25, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Mycock Building|Mycock]]===<br />
Mycock is amazing! everyone loves mycock, why not put mycock on the main page? Then everyone can ogle at the glory of mycock.--{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 21:35, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
# '''Yes''' - Who doesn't love mycock? --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 21:35, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Mycock deserves to be featured. Mycock is that big a deal. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 21:37, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#We need featured locations. Mycock is one of the best locations in town to be. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 21:42, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#I hardly had to think. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 21:50, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Hmmm... What can be said about Mycock? Mycock is impressive. Mycock is the best by miles. Mycock is generally awesome, and Mycock isn't a stub. I think mycock should definitely be featured. I also want to see Ross writing about Mycock, and a picture of Mycock on the front page.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 21:58, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Innuendo...sexual innuendo!--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 22:04, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#The only official building to bring the radio filter into its knees. Or rather her knees? --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:06, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# I'm surprised no one recommended mycock before. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 22:59, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# fucking [[ALiM]] IN DA HOUZZZZ {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:10, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# After everything mycock has done for this wiki, I think this is the least we could do for it ;) --{{User:Nallan/sig}} 02:49, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
# At least until someone turns it from a factual piece into a hilarious play on words. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 14:54, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Boring, not worthy. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 15:08, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#not v lengthy or interesting. unlike mycock. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 15:18, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#No, it's ridiculous and has more or less been done over and over again. --[[User:Huntress|Huntress]] 15:24, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:I agree with you on one thing. Mycock is used quite a lot. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 05:13, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Just no. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:54, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:<S>After a week, this has '''Passed''' with 10 yes votes and 5 "no"s. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:25, 16 September 2010 (BST)</S><br />
::I'm taking control of the cycling of this for now and archiving it as '''Failed'''. GA's aren't cycled on quantitative grounds, check the early archives. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 00:33, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::On what grounds? Because democracy has failed you? There may be precedent (i didn't bother to check) but this is rediculous! It got 15 votes, and even if you take out the alim ppl (ie nick and myself) this would still havepassed with flying colours. Stop running this place like you're own personal fiefdom noob. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:11, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[TUMBLEWEED-aikido-river'n-stuff Tactics]]===<br />
This shit be epic, faggots.<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#-- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:57, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#The most used tactic in all of UD. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:07, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
# '''No''' - But there really should be more nominations. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 19:21, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''No''' - The main problem with this article is that it is hard to tell if it is a guide/strategy or a subtle parody of a guide / strategy. If it was purely a guide with better formatting and information, it would be pure awesomeness. If it was entirely a parody, it would be liquid sex. Unfortunately, it tries to be both and fails at becoming either. - [[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 20:17, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''No''' - We don't want to give newbies the wrong impression. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:52, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Yes, the article's message is that not metaing and just fucking about by yourself and not working in a team is bad. Yeah, let's not give newbies that impression. I read you. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:04, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#::Oh, oops. I was working off of my (bad) memory of the article. Still, "no", since it just isn't that great anyway, however. It's kinda funny and kinda useful, but there are much better ones than it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 03:12, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:::Damnit!! ;) -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 04:40, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Not helpful. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 16:31, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:After a week, this has '''Failed''' with 2 yes votes and 4 "no"s. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:25, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Actually DDR has taken control of this. And it has now '''passed'''. These votes aren't supposed to be quantative and WTF man, he created this page he should be allowed to choose what gets and and ignore the majority of users. He'll be by shortly to overturn your opinions and place the good article template rightfully on the page.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:15, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Malton Incident]]===<br />
It may be fanmade, but it provides some good backstory to how the zombie incident in Malton started. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:12, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I'm offended that you think being fanmade is a bad thing. This thing is a vital piece of our history. Without it, we'd have no way of knowing how this all started. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 02:54, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
====No====<br />
#This is a no with a but - it's a good page, but it just look amateurish. I might give it an overhaul soon to have things like paragraphs, headers, more interwiki links, etc, though I don't know how that would affect this vote. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:56, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
#Very similar to [[Possible Causes for the Situation]], they are the two pages on the wiki that ''should'' be considered the best in the entire place, but just fall a bit short. Both of these pages added to my fascination with the rich history of Malton when I started many years ago but they need some basic formatting before being accepted IMO. It's not cause I don't think they shouldn't be GA's at this point, it's that with a simple 20 minutes of work, they won't only qualify but will also be miles ahead of what they are now. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 03:07, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
'''Failed''' -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:57, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Spawning]]===<br />
Just finished writing it. Feedback please, want to make sure its correct. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC) <br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I think it's a well made article.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:So do I,... I'll change my vote to yes sometime before his seven days are up. Just curious to have an answer to the questions presented. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 21:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - I think every article is a good one. --{{User:Moctezuma/sig}} 22:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Very thorough. --[[User:TripleU|TripleU]] 23:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Weak Yes''' - It really meets all criteria and pretty interesting. But the accuracy of the article is under the question. it'd be cool to gather statistics on a distance somehow, but it's kind of abuse to the system. --[[User:Fe328|fe328]] 23:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Maybe not an article that I will read often, but then again that has no bearing on its quality. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 09:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' A well written article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''yep''' liked it.. easy to follow.----[[User:Sexualharrison|sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 16:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#Rubber stamp it.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Very easy to follow. And I can't think of anything that is missing. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 09:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - well rounded, good stuff. -[[User:Jack Kolt|Jack Kolt]] 14:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - A surprisingly good article indeed. --[[User:Karloth_vois|Karloth Vois]] <sup>[[¯\(°_o)/¯]]</sup> 18:22, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - A lot of effort was put into this as well as many charecter names.--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 00:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
<s>'''Against'''</s> I think that the article needs to address the issue of 'what happens if the building requirments aren't met?' For example: under the [[Spawning#NecroTech Lab Assistant|Lab Assistant]] section,... what happens if there are no NT buildings that fit the crieria? Granted, this may never be the case,... in fact, I doubt that this would ever be the case,... but what if? Is there a really good answer for this? BTW, my vote can easily be swayed to a yes vote,... it's just that this is something I notice, and was hoping it could be addressed in some way... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 20:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Hmm. Probably something I can't do with spadework, unless I spend a day creating Necrotech assistant Alts and then throwing barricades at the relevant NT's. Probably a question for Kevan. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Maybe not now anymore, but that could have been the case during the March of the Dead. No Necrotechs meeting requirements I mean.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 20:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::I see, so this issue would have to be addressed through a case study,... Perhaps such a thing should be noted in the article somewhere? Personally, I've got a similar, also interesting take on this subject. Considering the priority of NT buildings within the game, and the community as a whole, and inversly, being the big target they are for zombie groups,... how often do you think conditions like this exist? And is it VSB or lower? At that, when it comes to spawning, is this really a luck of the draw sort of thing, or is it something thats vastly affected by the actions of the people playing the game? I think that that's worth noting in the article to, simply because that last point I made is the whole allure of the game to a great many people... everything is situational, and all outcomes are affected solely by the individuals playing... and thus, so are the spawning locations in a way. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 21:04, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::[[User:Kevan|Our Lord and Saviour has answered on his talk page]]. I'll add to the page, today. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:00, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::Vote struck, and changed to yes. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<s>Questionable accuracy and the minor need to test what happens if there are no valid spawnpoints.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 03:39, 2 March 2010 (UTC)</s><br />
:No valid spawnpoints query answered. Now explain how I can improve on the so called ''questionable'' accuracy? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::I was just rather dubious that there would be a complex method of spawning when you could have someone just spawn anywhere but...well...eh. Kevan replied and didn't try to knock you down so I'll change my vote.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#Poodle and SS's reasons are so utterly stupid; if they think the reason for a glossary/player-resource article like this is to just prove what would happen in extreme hypothetical situations, then they are wrong. Having said that, this article is useful to show interested users the nature of spawning; and that is all. GA's in general should have the ability to interest any user into reading at leased a bit of it, but I don't think this has it. Narrow/special interest works don't generally fit my idea of a GA. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 05:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:I just felt the article needed to be 'complete'. It's 'complete', so that's why the Keep. I don't see a GA needing to personally interest anyone, as long as it's a Good Article (NPOV, Compelte, Well Written, "Awesome"), it suffices.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::By personally interest people, I mean it needs something in it that does inherently make it "awesome". This is boring. It covers a concept that is experienced within the first two clicks of making an UD account for ''everyone'', I think this sort of coverage isn't ''unnecessary'', but not groundbreaking enough to be a GA at all. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 23:52, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:::I think its range is more than that. It adds another reason for cading TRP's to only VSB and shows another benefit of emitting a [[feeding groan]] (which needs a major rewrite). I also think that its important to note that some suburbs underpopulation might be due to their lack of Firestations and Necrotechs. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::::Also why there might be a lower zed presence within the same suburbs,.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:23, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
This be '''Successful'''. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
===[[Guides:A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead|A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead]]===<br />
This article has been accessed over 80,000 times,.... has been cited by many other users as still being an important peice of information (as can be seen [[Heytown/News Archive#June 20th|here]], [[Guides:First Day in Malton#For more information|here]], [[User:Darculianar#UsefullPages|here]], and [[Malton_College_of_Medicine/library#Textbooks|here]]), as well as having been cited for information (like [[Suggestion talk:20070928 More Knives|here]] for example). That said, many users, and pages not listed above, link to it, having thought it was important to keep. Also, when it was reveiwed [[Guides/Review/Archive#Guides:A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead|here]], it seemed to have some support as long as it was updated. These are the reasons why I think the article should be a Featured Article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' As Above. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Nice article - easy to read, good information. --[[User:Fe328|fe328]] 11:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' It provides an excellent and highly detailed guide; I wish I knew half this stuff when I was starting out! --[[User:Oldharry101|Oldharry101]] <sup>[[Project Welcome|W!]]</sup> 18:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' A little lacking regarding zombies, and understates the importance of malls, but has all the info a fresh slab of meat would need. --[[User:TripleU|TripleU]] 21:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' OOOhhh.. Ids ddis de beoqqqwww. BEOWWW!!! Get Fit mutha fucka get fit!!! Heeaaywhooo. HOOOO! ShiaaAAAA. i'M About to take a shia lebouf on ya HOOOO!!! HOOO!!!!!!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 01:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:I don't know what you just said other than yes.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - although it could do with being split up into subpages. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 08:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' Its not really a guide, just a lot of important glossary pages all stuck together in one place. Still an excellent resource mind. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Helped some of my friends get into the game, wored for them will work for anybody. --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 00:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
#POV much? Lacking basic information and vague when it comes to its own declarations. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 12:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:Vague in it's declarations, and non neutral POV.... hmmm....? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''No''' - I don't really like the layout of it. Perhaps some tables for some of the information, or just links to separate pages with the information (for example Building types). I'm not really a big fan of a huge amount of information on the one page. Don't see why the information on building types needs to be repeated on this page as well, especially ''useless'' information like interior and exterior descriptions. It just builds up the page more. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 06:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:Really,.... you'd rather have it look like '''[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Guides:A_Beginners_Guide_to_Urban_Dead&oldid=1215404 this?]''' -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:21, 9 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::No I wouldn't like it like that. '''You know what I meant''' Don't be a smart-arse. '''But''' just in case I didn't make it clear the first time... '''The beginners guide should give relevant information that beginners need. Just the basics, some details where needed. But NOT a complete guide on the entire game.''' The details are included on other pages, and people can access them by searching if need be. Rather then clotting up a beginners guide with ''useless'' information. On top of that, some basic information that beginners '''would''' need isn't included as well. Thats why I don't like it. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 11:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:::I do know what you mean,... however,.... I know being new to a game, I like to waltz in with everything on the table, and a good working knowledge of what I should be doing, or what the working aspects of a game are. Not just having my character spawn someplace... and not know what I should be looking at, or how to get into a building.... or why I should even give a rats ass about libraries,... which you seem to think are absolutly frivolous, amongst other things I've included. Obviously this isn't the case, both from an RP perspective, as well as a strategic perspective, both of which are touched on within the article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I'm gonna cycle this as '''Successful''' too. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
[[Category:Good Article Nominees]]</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DanceDanceRevolution&diff=1781925
User talk:DanceDanceRevolution
2010-09-20T09:13:08Z
<p>J3D: /* Photo Upload */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/talkn}}<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
==Way too Evil==<br />
[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1295703 Friend of yours?] Check his real name link (NSFW). I think that's more then enough to get him on a Text Rape list. Might wanna talk to him. I'm also scarred for life now :( --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:20, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, mate in EVIL. What do you mean by NSFW? I don't want to force him out of having his own crap on his profile, he's probably had it there as long as he's been playing, which is a while. I don't really mind tbh, his loss if he's anti-text-raped. lol. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:29, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Not Safe For Work. Ring a bell? Did you follow the link? But okay, it's not like I'm going to report him, I don't really care but I know some people do and I thought I'd bring it up. Anyway, now I have accidentally bumped into you guys I'm deciding whether or not I send a surprise down there.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:35, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Lol! Just so you know, we'll run away from any PKing attacks, we are all wimps atm. Yeah, I've seen lemonparty, it's pretty common, it's like meatspin or any shock website IMO, you're going to see it one way or another and the sooner you do the sooner you can identify the link as something you're never going to click again. Either way, thanks for the heads up, I'll pass the message onto him and see what he thinks. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:37, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== First ==<br />
<br />
Since you archived the page.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 11:49, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:(diff) (hist) . . User talk:DanceDanceRevolution; 10:43 . . (-57,746) . . DanceDanceRevolution (Talk | contribs | block)<br />
:^^^ Evidence.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 11:50, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Doesn't count unless he empties it completely. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 12:12, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::It coutns for me... Also, I like where this Radioactive thing is going.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 12:19, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Don't mind me, just maintaining my page presence... ;) --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 13:55, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==I spy...==<br />
...a stalker not more than 30 seconds ago... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 14:34, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Great minds think alike! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 14:35, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::I'm completely not sure if you remember her, but [[User:Tselita|Tselita]] was in that very same building. Also, my friend, [[User:Zensaga|Zensaga]] was in there as well... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 14:52, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==ZL==<br />
Unless they go the "guilt by association" rule for GTF's fit,it should be done for sure. As for learning about it, you'd have learned about it at least as soon the first zerg hunter had PKed you. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 15:38, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:What is the guilt by association?? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 17:13, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::The powers that be generally don't like if appealers get abusive and foul-mouthed. (And I probably wouldn't like it as well, looking how they had and have to deal with the likes of Finis Valorum, Dead Bunnies and TZH.) It's some difference though if some lying scumbags like the Dead Bunnies throw out a barrage of insults while denying even basic facts, or if a single member out of several snaps slightly in a case that has been weak to begin with. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 01:22, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Yeah fair. I hoped they would overlook that since we obvs aren't zerging and I just assumed the IP was important so I didn't force the words out of any of their mouths, I just let them say whatever. And it's a ZERG LIST they maintain, if they can't handle abuse from wrongly accused people then they shouldn't be there IMO. One more question: It appears that Guy's response was moved to another thread, is that right? And why? :/ -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:29, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::The mods are running the ZL in their spare time and are basically providing a public service, at which 90% of all work _should_ already be done by Kevan (if the auto-measures were worth anything), so I grant them any right to refuse appeals on the base of "being something we don't wanna put up with". As for moving it, I have no idea if GTF's comment has been moved, and why. If it has any effect will be seen at least as soon as the next list update comes in. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 01:42, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::It buttfucks objectivity up the arsehole if they refuse 100% watertight appeals from a group who is ''absolutely'' not zerging if someone says the F word in them. Just saying. Thought we would have been 100% in the clear, ahh well. Thanks for everything. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:09, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::{{quote|3=[[User:Spiderzed|I told you so:]]|2=It's some difference though if some lying scumbags like the Dead Bunnies throw out a barrage of insults while denying even basic facts, or if a single member out of several snaps slightly in a case that has been weak to begin with.}}<br />
::::::For actual answers on that, you have to grab an actual operator (like TheHuntsman or MarcusCaesar). I'm just a lone zerg hunter and not involved with ZL maintenance. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 02:17, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Yeah fair, soz. Again, thanks for the help through this. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:42, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::Essentially, if somebody takes pains to heap abuse the ZL Mods in their removal request then we take that as a clear indication that they do not in fact wish to be removed. (Otherwise they would abide by the removal rules, in which this situation is specifically called out.) It's like someone's face giving the lie to their words, but an online equivalent. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 04:59, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Yeah, fair enough. Thanks for the clarification Rev. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 05:01, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::I suppose I should really ask what the context is <small>(in case there is something I should be doing)</small>… but I kinda don't want to <small>(in case there is something I should be doing)</small>. {{shifty}} {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 09:51, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Oh, just in the zerg liste 9 thread my new group EVIL was submitted to be added because we all defended a break-in with very quick precision and execution. To make sure there was no chance of us being actually added, I got the suspected players to post on the appeals thread so their IP's could be logged. Out of the 5 of us that were considered, the last person to post chucked a shitty over us being added (he didn't realise we had only been submitted, not added) over something so trivial in his eyes. The post itself while embarrassing wasn't anything ''too'' over the top in itself, and since I have a lack of knowledge of the zerg liste methods so I'm pretty paranoid about being added, since it would create a massive dark cloud over our groups morale etc. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:29, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::Yeah, you should be fine, mate. Suspicion is not proof, and you've definitely done the right thing in your response. If I were you, I'd do as [[Mostly Harmless]] did and view it as a badge of honour. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 16:50, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== The Wyke Hills/Wykewood confusion ==<br />
<br />
You know, those can happen when you are updating a dozen EMRs alone. And the fact that there were two reports for Wyke Hills and one for Wykewood on that particular update didn't help either. And yet when you found it, you decided to point and laugh at it instead of fixing it. I wonder how that could help. -- [[User:Kittithaj|Kittithaj]] 16:48, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:People make mistakes. I make lots. Don't go all butthurt on me for it. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 06:58, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Thought you'd like to know ==<br />
<br />
It [[User:Aichon/Sandbox/Demo10|looks like]] your DanceDance arrows sig might be one of the ones causing issues for A/VB (the current month's archive isn't showing up on it since it has too much inclusion data), since it's a decent amount larger than the norm. This isn't a warning to fix it or anything of the sort, merely a friendly notification, since I figured you'd want to be aware of something like this. What you do with this info is your call. My best guess is that it's the images causing the issues, since the other big culprit was Mis' sig with the images in it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:45, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, I've noticed that in IE both your sig and Mis's sig are appearing vertically. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 06:56, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Ah, yeah, that's an unfortunate side affect of the code that they're using to get links over their images (it's my fault, since I wrote the code). IE7 and earlier doesn't understand the "display: inline-box" stuff, I believe, so it does a "display: box" equivalent instead, which means each image gets its own line. I haven't figured out a fix yet, though I'll readily admit I haven't been looking too hard since I'm not reminded of the issue during daily use (I use something other than IE, of course). IE8 is better (so long as Compatibility Mode is disabled), in that they don't use multiple lines, but the link aspect of the code simply doesn't work in IE8 (yet? Rooster was working on it as recently as yesterday or so). {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 07:04, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Thanks heaps for that info guys. I do like the arrows sig but I've always understood there'd most likely be some sort of unfixable problem with them, so I have no issue removing it and just redirecting it to my current lemon signature. is it just affecting the inclusion ''on'' the A/VB page? Or did the signatures in the archive itself also refuse to display? If the former was the only issue, I might wait till the month is over, revert the sig back to the arrows and just continue from there on with my current sig. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:22, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Just a note on the arrows sig, you can use [[Template:ClickInternal]] for the images now. Good news is that it works (thank Aichon), bad news is that it's weighty so using it on several images is bad, mmmkay? Also you have to use it because I said so or I'll get all sig policy on your ass. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 07:16, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:K cool thanks Rooster. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:57, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== recruitment ad ==<br />
<br />
i appreciate the help in conforming my attempt at a recruitment ad. at least ya helped me with it instead of being a jerk about it. i need to brush up on my wiki. {{unsigned|Nuerotoxic2213|01:07, 1 September 2010}}<br />
:That was actually me that fixed it up for you, though DDR was kinda enough to remove a stray character from the page that was making it look a bit off. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:20, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==sup biatch==<br />
<br />
whats teh lowdown on the game updates? bellow + that scout safehouse skill is that all?? also - scout safehouse, do the actions have to be completed in the safehouse? how the frack does the game measure that? Also there should be a link of the news page to a page that explains the updates in non-zombieapoc style. Ie outlines what we know of the actual changes. if that already exists; link me and make the link more obvious for others. sick1 {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:28, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:[[Safehouses]]--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 12:07, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::dunke!{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:20, 4 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== POLGNOAK ==<br />
<br />
You realise that you just commented on the main page, not the talk page, right?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 07:59, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Haha!!! I didn't even notice :( Thanks for the heads up! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:11, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::=P Don't worry about it, I thought it was a talk at first too. Probably because they brought the votes across from the talk.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 08:13, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== hey papi ==<br />
<br />
can you move [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Quartly_Lecture_Group this] under the QSG name space? thanks?----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 14:46, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeboi -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 17:33, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::and [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Wolfgang_Puck%27s_Address_to_the_Quartly_Library#Remedial_Zombese_With_Wolfgang_Puck dis]----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 16:39, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I was directed to a header halfway down the page so I figured you meant to move the whole thing, so I did. Also, I had a dream about you last night. Yeah, I dream about UD. And you. I was in your group but I kept getting killed by people. And now you're here. You're planting Inception, I know it! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 22:29, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::yeah i meant everything. i just want to get everything cleaned up and organized before i take my leave of UD. and getting killed by stupid people is just part of being in the QSG. FUCK HOW DID YOU FIGURE OUT MY PLAN? THE ARCHITECT IS STILL SLEEPING?----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 14:22, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== RITA ==<br />
<br />
Do [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1774575 I] have all the skills I'm gonna need for the manhunt? What with Lurching Gait and Ankle grab, I think I'm about done now.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 17:40, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Vinetown scout approves of this. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:52, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::They were skeptical! They said I couldn't level a Dinosaur based character before October! They were wrong! </smug> --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 18:59, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::: I hate to point this out but my [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1776190 discosaur] gained all his XP from shooting people not zombies. No needles or FAK's either. Its not gonna be hard to get the remainder before October. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 19:32, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Hell yeah! We're gonna eat some humans!--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<font color="purple">The Big T</font>]] 22:31, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Scroll boxes ==<br />
<br />
Such as the one in your main sandpit. Can they be placed side by side? Or, for that matter, can anything be placed alongside them?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 09:41, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:I imagine if you confined each one to an (absolute?) div and specified the divs to go side by side like one would normally, it'd be possible, but you'd have to obviously smallen their set width. I haven't touched those scrollboxes in over a year pretty much and I originally got them from my ex-boyfriend op [[User:Linkthewindow]], and you can see his speakbox is easily confined within simple tables so I don't think something you're mentioning is outside of reason. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:03, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Yeah I already looked at Link's code. I'll have a crack at what you suggested now. Thanks!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:05, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::If you have troubles, come back sometime and hit me up, back then I knew so little about DIV overlays mine was practically just a steal of Links. Between us and Aichon I'd be very surprised if we couldn't make what you want to work. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:06, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Yeah, I just went to have a look, and I realised I don't actually know how to put divs side by side. I'm working up a trial at [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Stub|my stub page]], but I've pretty much hit a brick wall. If you could help get those side by side, I'd be very appreciative. :P --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:10, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::I'll be able to, but semi finals footy is on so I'll come back in an hour and a half to have a squiz. Wouldn't be surprised if either you or aichon did it that time. In the meantime, look at the divs for the INFO and TALK div boxes for [[Every Villain Is Lemons]] which I also stole from [[BB3]] page if I remember right. Play around with the positions and notice how one is relative to the other, that might help. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:42, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Just sorted it. Thanks loads!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:51, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Just checking ==<br />
<br />
To make sure you saw [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:Aichon/Sandbox/Demo12&diff=1774587&oldid=1774584 this] since I never heard confirmation that you'd seen it. It does fix the issue of centering the image, but it comes at the cost of having hidden text on the page. I offered some more explanation on my talk page a few days back. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:25, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== wiki noob needs a mentor ==<br />
<br />
Hi. I'm new to wiki editing and only know the most basic of stuff. I've wanted to learn for a while so when I found Project Mentor I figured I'd give you a shout. HAAAAAAAAAAAALP! I suck at this. Thanks [[User:Skynet Defense Network|Skynet Defense Network]] 16:18, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:I could help if DDR isn't available. Or anyone else for that matter. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 16:19, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::i'll do it! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:35, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Greetings ==<br />
<br />
Hello, Mr. Revolution. I cordially come to you to ask you a simple question regarding your edits to our screenshots. Why do you insinuate we [[zerg]]? Is it because we have screen captures of our own events? If that is the case, it can easily be explained. We do have members just waiting to record our... successes. --[[User:Dracula|Dracula]] 06:31, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Nup. It's just cause when I have a hundred or so images/pages to categorise in one sitting I just put funny edit summaries down. I'm deprived of fun or amusement in this "hobby" nowadays and want a reaction. No fault to you for enquiring either, zerging is a bad allegation and one I had to go through much stress to stomp down of my group from some butthurt zombie on the Zerg Liste forums. As for the origination of the call? I heard lots of things from Umbrella's wenches about you guys. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 09:14, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Ah, I see. Good to know it's not personal. Haha, now that you mention Umbrella, they love to throw the zerging accusations around when they're defeated/owned. They love to spread lies. Seems like they have members that partake in zerging, but I'm not going to worry about that. Just killing them. I'm grateful for the fast reply. --[[User:Dracula|Dracula]] 11:31, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::No probs, and it's great to see you didn't take it personally straight off the bat- respect. I was just being immature. Have a good one. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:36, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Passing Through ==<br />
<br />
Just thought to stop by and say hello. And ask an unsolicited personal question.<br />
<br />
On a serious note, DDR, I think you've gotten far more...eh, Cyberbobish. Grimish. Less tolerant. Looking at a random sampling of your edits, you seem a lot more prone to assuming general incompetence of the people you talk to, as compared to a year+ ago. Yes, people change, hell Grim was nice once...a long time ago, in a wiki far, far, away, true. My comment about jadedness was meant as a mild tweak at best, but your response I took to be far more virulent then I was honestly expecting. <br />
<br />
I am not your friend, so I realise this is presumptive, but I would appreciate an answer. I do think you do good work and have a pretty good record as an admin, but my memory of your seeming wiki persona a year ago is at serious odds with your present one. Has adminship caused this, or just overexposure to general asshattery and the grind of the wiki? -[[User:Wulfenbach|Wulfenbach]] 06:56, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:No prob. I think it's a mixture of things. The main one is my current lifestyle IRL, I'm having much less time I can call my own and I'm constantly strung out and burned out from work and university and I think my willingness to spend my small amount of time arguing on UDWiki is waning. I still like to come around because I'm still playing the game with IRL friends, but I no longer bother pretending that if UDWiki was a real life establishment it'd be one I'd attend in a suit and tie. My focus is on fixing up the place as a resource for players, and to stop vandalism and help users interested in coding or events. Beyond that I've been really intolerant towards extraneous arguing even if it's within these realms of my interests. You're right, I've become a lot more retarded of late, but it's a personal problem, not actually an in-wiki problem I think. I also got burned out from my reign as a bureaucrat in early 2010 and that's when I decided the wiki was something I could no longer spend hours a day on. Also, when I was a sysop a year ago there was a reason to take this place and my position seriously from a managerial point of view because between the inept ops, the inactive ones and the dickheads it was a fight to have this place running properly. At one point, for a month, Cyberbob and I were the only ops managing A/VB or any other admin pages. Now, we are (imo) a much better team and all of them have a great presence and work hard for the members, so the need to go over the top with rhetoric and arguing isn't as imperative now, especially since the wiki has been so drama free in the last month or so. <br />
:From the sysop side I still follow protocol and respect the rules in place and I don't want to leave UDWiki, op or otherwise. In the end though, any real behavioural issues on UDWiki just culminated from IRL circumstances and hopefully it's just a phase. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:36, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
::Well, here's to your recovery then. I had the luxury of a forced departure (twice now) of RL more or less demanding my absolute presence, so I suppose that's why I can still come back here and want to be productive without necessarily Grimish (I think you know what I mean by that).<br />
<br />
::You know, a while ago...a long time ago, when I was actually actively helping out here and really trying to be a better wiki-person, I gave thought to app'ing for sysop. I looked at the existing crew, looked at their postings as early as I could go back and compared them to their then-present ones. I realized that the difference mimic'd the difference I see in the LARP community among organizers. Namely: LARPer -> Organizer -> Eager -> Helpful -> HELPFUL -> Wise -> Opinionated -> Protective -> Vindictive -> Jaded -> Ex-LARPer. Since I had just reached the jaded phase with that, I figured that going back over that path with UD would mean that I wouldn't ever want to come back. Which would be sad, I think, since I do like the RRF's people. They tend, IMO, to be pretty fun and enjoyable as a web-group, and to walk away from UD would have to have me leaving them permanently. So I didn't app, which in hindsight, was for the best.<br />
<br />
::Have you thought about pulling away, yourself, now that the team is in your opinion, stable? Taking a six month break from UD to get RL sorted, maybe? -[[User:Wulfenbach|Wulfenbach]] 07:51, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I tried, I still found myself coming back daily for bugging the sysops for the small jobs I didn't think they did right, plus I was still spending just as much time here anyway so I was put back up to be sysop. I think behaviour like that indicates that I still wanted to be around the place, and now I'm more involved in the actual game than I have been in two years, so it's a weird situation at the moment for me to be in. Since I'm still convinced it's a phase, I'm just going to linger around doing the chores and helping out and being a bug to guys like you before something breaks on the wiki's side or mine ;D -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:01, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::See, that's the real infection here. It's not Necrotech fuckupery, it's this damn game. We need to find Kevan and get trenchie on this ass. Headshot RL for me, will he? >:D -[[User:Wulfenbach|Wulfenbach]] 09:31, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Lol! I still bitterly hate how he created an entire universe inside a wiki for me to be so heavily enthralled :( -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 12:38, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== User page rights ==<br />
<br />
Right, on my user and talk pages, the use of the click template (The one in Mis' sig and your old one) essentially destroys the page by making a massive white space at the bottom of the page. Do I therefore have the right to replace people's signatures with the <nowiki>{{usr}}</nowiki> template? I wanted to have a check before I did anything.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:26, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:It technically is your own page. You could edit whatever you see fit. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 18:28, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Its your page, as long as you don't alter what they have said, and make it clear they said it, I don't see a problem. I'd probably add a note explaining why though. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:28, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Alright, sounds like a plan. It's just with the recent change to my archive page, it's a little bit essential.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:34, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Also, it should be noted that neither of those sigs actually uses that template, but I would imagine that template would have the same issue anyway. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 18:35, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Its fine. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 23:28, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== I'm Interested in becoming a Sysop ==<br />
<br />
Hey Dance,<br />
<br />
We've spoken once or twice on here, and I saw that you are one so i thought it best to ask you. I rather like contributing and helping out on here, and I think I'd like to become a Sysop. I haven't quite been here 2 months, and only have 420 contribs, so not sure I can apply yet...<br />
<br />
Anyway, whats involved? Any tips? {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 15:23, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Trust me when I say this, I've went through your contribs. What you have so far is not enough to warrant a good SysOps bid. If you really, really want to be a SysOps, start by sulking around the Admin pages more often, cycling news archives and suggestions, etc. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 15:33, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:[[User talk:Jerrel Yokotory#Helpful Advice|Read this]].--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 15:52, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:We always love having interested users in becoming a Sysop, but first they need to understand the system in which they work. This includes the administration pages like [[A/MR|Move Requests]], [[A/D|Deletions]], [[A/SD|Speedy Deletions]], and others like [[A/VB|Vandal Banning]]. You have to understand the job you're asking for and we need to be convinced that you do. Besides that, it's always recommended that you know the community well and integrate well with their projects and tasks that try and make the wiki a better information resource. I'm not sure if Yonnua's link to previous advice is specifically the best thing for you to read literally because it's what ''he'' may do, but you need to be able to do your ''own'' thing on the wiki and still be able to help out in your own ways and with your own opinions. But the intention is the same- you need to exhibit your (obviously) keen interest in the community by involving yourself more in many of the wiki's facets. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:35, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Tip #1, and I don't mean this with any discourtesy or rudeness (really, I honestly don't), but research the answers yourself, rather than asking questions like "what's involved" to become a sysop (the answer is posted on [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions#Guidelines_for_System_Operator_Requests|A/PM]]). Asking questions like that is an immediate signal to all of us that you don't understand the system well enough...''yet''. Eager folks like you can and do learn the system eventually by reading through the policies, admin pages, and archives, so that shouldn't be a discouragement to you in the least. But sysops are expected (though it's not part of the official job description) to be decently knowledgeable about the way the wiki works, and that means understanding both the bureaucracy and some of the technical stuff better than the average user.<br />
<br />
::As for other advice, I'd agree with Yonn's suggestion to look for a project. There are always things that need cleaning up around here and discussions to be had where opinions are solicited (e.g. there's talk of an RP List redesign on [[UDWiki:General Discussion#hurdles|General Discussion]] right now, I've been working (very slowly) on rethinking the Suggestions system, there are always ideas on Developing Suggestions in need of thoughtful advice, Ross is working (also slowly) on redesigning the Zombie Skills pages, etc.). Getting involved on the admin pages, especially by expressing your opinion in the proper places (always be sure to do it in the proper places, since doing it in the wrong place is once again a signal to us that you don't yet understand how things work) is also a great way to let us get a feel for how you think and form opinions, which you'll be expected to do regularly as a sysop. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 04:26, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:::I Thank you all immensely for your help in this matter. I had read through the [A/PM] page, the main thing was that it wasn't quite clear where you apply to, but reading what you guys have written, I'm not quite ready just yet. <br />
:::As for a project, I wasn't quite sure what somebody who is not a sysop is permitted to do. I've noticed in a few subburbs, the "Suburb Group Listing" and "Active Groups" are very different. South Blythville, for example, has 3 groups in "Suburb Group Listing" and 12 in "Active groups". If I'm allowed to, I would like to follow up with the groups, and remove those inactive off the Active groups. I know similar has been done for Suburb Group listing. {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 13:54, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Want to run a contest for the Urban Dead Wiki ==<br />
<br />
i was wondering if i could run a contest on the Urban Dead Wiki. most notably a contest of art. i am look to put an advert for my in-game group on the UD page, via spending ten bucks. i was wondering if i could have a contest to who can come up with the best artwork for said advert. notably a prize of me spending the extra 5 bucks to make that persons in-game character immune to the IP limit seems sufficient enough. what do you think {{unsigned|Nuerotoxic2213}}<br />
:Sounds good. Just make a page for it and add it onto the Community Announcements page [[Template:Community Projects|here]], so it appears on the main page. From there you will get enough attention to hopefully have the comp succeed. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:28, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
i haven't had much of a response yet. is there anything(or anyone) i could contact, or you could contact to maybe spur this thing a bit lol. i don't actually know any of the artists that would patrol this forum [[User:Nuerotoxic2213|Nuerotoxic2213]] 16:02, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Days in Urban Dead ==<br />
<br />
Aww man, I'd have liked to see a new one. This isn't because we have gaps is it? Because I can envisage some sort of crazy bot (always the best kind, the crazy sort) that could fill in the gaps. Unless you meant something else?<br />
<br />
I want a video dammit! {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 18:00, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:^This--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:42, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Mate, if you could do that, then making one more video would really be within my grasp. I have a few harrowing problems that have also come up, the biggest being that it's 80% likely that I don't even have the original 220 images anymore anymore, so I'll have to do my best to trawl through old backups to see if I still have them. Between searching for the backups and the old .avi versions I have I ''should'' be able to get a working version of the original 200 days to use. Once I've done that, I'll hit you up and see if you can make a crazy bot to help me get them images. Thanks man. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:30, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Alright, I've lost all the 220 original images and I dont have the original video but I've managed to nab the Youtube FLV that is embedded onto the video page, I should be able to make a more or less functional replacement from that. As for your crazy bot, if you're still keen, we'll need images from April 28th 2008 to whenever you see fit. See, after 200 days I didn't do ANY screencapping so I don't have any single screenshots at all from April 2008. How do you envision the bot will operate? Do you think it's possible when this many screenshots are needed? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 06:20, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Well I left the bot running today and let it slowly load each revision page, so I've got the info now. Seeing as we need like 700 images, I'll see if I can just have it fake an image that looks like a dangermap so we don't have to take screencaps from the wiki ourselves. I'll post an example if I get it to work. Also, the last purge only seems to have left us with stuff from about September 08, so... yeah. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 17:45, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Can I run a small scale Suburb Massacre? ==<br />
<br />
Hey there,<br />
<br />
So I'm asking you, because I'm not sure whether I'd be allowed to or not, and I also get the impression certain other sysops don't like me...<br />
<br />
I'm thinking of running a small scale Suburb Massacre, of a 1 suburb radius around South Blythville, covering "Suburb Group Listing" and "Active Groups" (In suburbs that have that further down in their page)<br />
<br />
Can I do it? {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 01:56, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yes, I recommend it. Those pages that have second group listings further down the page on suburb pages are REALLY out of date and should be cleaned up. You really know what you should do though? Make it a project for the entirety of Malton and see if anyone is willing to help, and IN the project you can just organise and focus on the subrubs you care about but others can do the rest. That way you fix all of malton. That's just a thought, but you are free to do whatever you want from here when it comes to cleaning up suburb pages. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:16, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::If you would like to help out? [[The_Great_Suburb_Group_Massacre/2010-Round_2]] {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 07:03, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Photo Upload ==<br />
<br />
Hello DDR! Just wanted to know I saw you changing some pages on maps I uploaded. What do I miss when uploading? Where should I put categorising? --{{User:DiSm/sig}} 09:57, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Hey- A summary of what to do and how to do it is [[:Category:Images|here]]. Basically, we just have a few categories we use to file all our images under. You'll have already been familiar with [[:Category:Maps]] and [[Category:Screenshots]] as that is what I categorised some of your images as. To do this, just add <nowiki>[[Category:XXXXXXX]]</nowiki> anywhere on the image description.<br />
<br />
:You don't need to do categorise as you upload- practically no one does, that's why I tend to do it. But if you do it saves us the trouble of doing it later. You're free to choose whether you want to do it or not in the long run, I won't mind either way. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:48, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Give it a go, then ask DDR if you did it right. He knows the system better than most of us, plus I still get flashbacks from the 9000+ images I sorted. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:54, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
==wtf==<br />
<br />
hey whats the deal with your antixx on good pages? some people voted in a manner you didn't like? L2puppet or gtfo. i'll let you explain and revert until i next drop by then i'll avb and let the ops be bullied into letting you get away with it. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:13, 20 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Featured_Articles/Good_Articles&diff=1781923
UDWiki:Featured Articles/Good Articles
2010-09-20T09:11:46Z
<p>J3D: /* No */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{Navigation (header)}}<br />
{|style="background: #E6F2FF;border:solid 1px #A3B1BF;padding:10px;width:100%"<br />
|-<br />
|{{Shortcut|[[GA]]}}<span style="font-size:16pt">Good Article Voting</span><br>Here, we determine which articles are deemed to be "Good" Articles. These are seen as some of the best the wiki has to offer and can include virtually any page on the wiki. <br />
<br />
Articles which have been given good article status, become eligible to become [[UDWiki:Featured Articles|Featured Articles]] with a new Good Article being voted to receive that honour every week.<br />
<br />
<big>'''Criteria'''</big><br />
*'''NPOV''' - The article must be from a [[UDWiki:NPOV|neutral point of view]] and not show significant bias. Possible exceptions may be made, depending on the article and community opinion. <br />
*'''Complete''' - It neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context.<br />
*'''Well Written''' - The article uses good English, such as proper grammar and spelling and is written in a clear and highly readable style.<br />
*'''Generally Awesome''' - Here at the wiki, we're after stuff that's awesome.<br />
<br />
Any main namespace article (also including user pages and journal pages if they are thought to fulfil the above criteria) can be nominated for good article status. The nomination will be discussed and if there are no major issues raised at the end of 7 days, the article is promoted to Good status and will be added to the Featured Article Pool for the coming week. <br />
<br />
Articles that are deemed "good" will be placed in the [[:Category:Good Articles|Good Article Category]] for easy findage. The page will also have the <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:GA|GA]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki> template placed onto it. If a nomination is declined by the page owner then the nomination should be cycled without the page being added to the Good Article Category.<br />
<br />
|}<br />
{| align="right"<br />
|-<br />
|__TOC__<br />
|}<br />
==Example==<br />
===[[Example page|Good Article candidate]]===<br />
Good Article candidate has recently undergone a lot of improvement from various editors. It's NPOV, it's concise and informative. I also believe it to be generally awesome, just take a look at the talk page discussion, people love it! --[[Example page|GA Suggester]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I see only a few minor issues, but those seem to be fixed readily. Otherwise it's good. --[[Example page|OptimistBob]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
# Love it! --[[Example page|Few Words Joe]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Maintains good article balance, strong intro, accurate information, good grammar and spelling. Well wikified. --[[Example page|Overly Technical Jim]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Much better than all the other candidates. --[[Example page|BetterMuch Ralph]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - I like this part [[Example page|here]]. --[[Example page|Specific Jen]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
Please add {{[[Template:GoodArticleNom|GoodArticleNom]]}} to any page that has been nominated.<br />
<br />
==New Nominations==<br />
<br />
===[[Zombie anonymity]]===<br />
NPOV and borderline eloquent. The topic itself may not be central to the game, but the article is probably the best it could be. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 00:16, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
# '''Yes''' - We need more featured articles, before we have to start looping them! --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 00:16, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' - I'll give it a comb through in a tick to clean it up, but it's solid enough. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:27, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' - Well written and explained...I'd say thats a good article for you {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 14:02, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:41, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 06:29, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
<br />
#guys stop going all alim on good articles and letting any old drivel in .{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:43, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Have seen better articles going to the Failed section. --{{User:DiSm/sig}} 10:18, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Jed couldn't have said it better, but I'll try anyway. This article is severely sub-par for a GA if you ask me. Bland, short(ish), has no flavour-adding images or text which I think should be standard for "good" glossary articles, and the worst bit is it's about a concept I've always thought is stupid and was overused in the suggestions system to insta-kill otherwise decent suggestions. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:54, 19 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#As Jed and DDR. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:44, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#As DDR.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 08:02, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Recent Nominations==<br />
''Older nominations can be found in the [[UDWiki:Featured Articles/Good Articles/Archive|archive]].''<br />
<br />
===[[Banana Tactics]]===<br />
<br />
Well-written, delivers information in a concise and easy-read manner, and does not arse around with NPOV or pointlessness. This article has shown itself to be beloved by the community and perhaps now is the time to give it the spotlight it deserves.<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - Superb article. Bravo Karl. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 15:16, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Direct and to the point, no need for overdoing it with complex words or phrases.--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 22:20, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Our job here is not ''just'' to inform newbs about UD, but to make the overall gaming experience more enjoyable. People need to be shown the well-developed sense of humor that this community can produce, and this article is a superb example of it. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:30, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
#'''Die in a fire''' --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 15:39, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#As Thad. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:51, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Not worthy. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 16:28, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#It's really old by now. Leave the dead horse in its ditch. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:42, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#hahahaha no -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:02, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#No. After reading it thoroughly, and close examination of the second paragraph (or lack there of) I dont think it should be. {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 06:56, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Speedy Deletion Crit 1/2'''.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:34, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Viewing the archives... I take it this is [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/May-2010#Some_stubby_stuff|take]] [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/August-2010#Banana_Tactics|three]]? --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 09:19, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:After a week, this has '''Failed''' with 3 yes votes and 8 "no"s. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:25, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Mycock Building|Mycock]]===<br />
Mycock is amazing! everyone loves mycock, why not put mycock on the main page? Then everyone can ogle at the glory of mycock.--{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 21:35, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
# '''Yes''' - Who doesn't love mycock? --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 21:35, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Mycock deserves to be featured. Mycock is that big a deal. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 21:37, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#We need featured locations. Mycock is one of the best locations in town to be. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 21:42, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#I hardly had to think. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 21:50, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Hmmm... What can be said about Mycock? Mycock is impressive. Mycock is the best by miles. Mycock is generally awesome, and Mycock isn't a stub. I think mycock should definitely be featured. I also want to see Ross writing about Mycock, and a picture of Mycock on the front page.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 21:58, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Innuendo...sexual innuendo!--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 22:04, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#The only official building to bring the radio filter into its knees. Or rather her knees? --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:06, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# I'm surprised no one recommended mycock before. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 22:59, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# fucking [[ALiM]] IN DA HOUZZZZ {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:10, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# After everything mycock has done for this wiki, I think this is the least we could do for it ;) --{{User:Nallan/sig}} 02:49, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
# At least until someone turns it from a factual piece into a hilarious play on words. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 14:54, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Boring, not worthy. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 15:08, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#not v lengthy or interesting. unlike mycock. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 15:18, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#No, it's ridiculous and has more or less been done over and over again. --[[User:Huntress|Huntress]] 15:24, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:I agree with you on one thing. Mycock is used quite a lot. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 05:13, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Just no. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:54, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:<S>After a week, this has '''Passed''' with 10 yes votes and 5 "no"s. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:25, 16 September 2010 (BST)</S><br />
::I'm taking control of the cycling of this for now and archiving it as '''Failed'''. GA's aren't cycled on quantitative grounds, check the early archives. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 00:33, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::On what grounds? Because democracy has failed you? There may be precedent (i didn't bother to check) but this is rediculous! It got 15 votes, and even if you take out the alim ppl (ie nick and myself) this would still havepassed with flying colours. Stop running this place like you're own personal fiefdom noob. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:11, 20 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[TUMBLEWEED-aikido-river'n-stuff Tactics]]===<br />
This shit be epic, faggots.<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#-- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:57, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#The most used tactic in all of UD. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:07, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
# '''No''' - But there really should be more nominations. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 19:21, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''No''' - The main problem with this article is that it is hard to tell if it is a guide/strategy or a subtle parody of a guide / strategy. If it was purely a guide with better formatting and information, it would be pure awesomeness. If it was entirely a parody, it would be liquid sex. Unfortunately, it tries to be both and fails at becoming either. - [[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 20:17, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''No''' - We don't want to give newbies the wrong impression. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:52, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Yes, the article's message is that not metaing and just fucking about by yourself and not working in a team is bad. Yeah, let's not give newbies that impression. I read you. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:04, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#::Oh, oops. I was working off of my (bad) memory of the article. Still, "no", since it just isn't that great anyway, however. It's kinda funny and kinda useful, but there are much better ones than it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 03:12, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:::Damnit!! ;) -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 04:40, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Not helpful. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 16:31, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:After a week, this has '''Failed''' with 2 yes votes and 4 "no"s. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:25, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Malton Incident]]===<br />
It may be fanmade, but it provides some good backstory to how the zombie incident in Malton started. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:12, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I'm offended that you think being fanmade is a bad thing. This thing is a vital piece of our history. Without it, we'd have no way of knowing how this all started. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 02:54, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
====No====<br />
#This is a no with a but - it's a good page, but it just look amateurish. I might give it an overhaul soon to have things like paragraphs, headers, more interwiki links, etc, though I don't know how that would affect this vote. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:56, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
#Very similar to [[Possible Causes for the Situation]], they are the two pages on the wiki that ''should'' be considered the best in the entire place, but just fall a bit short. Both of these pages added to my fascination with the rich history of Malton when I started many years ago but they need some basic formatting before being accepted IMO. It's not cause I don't think they shouldn't be GA's at this point, it's that with a simple 20 minutes of work, they won't only qualify but will also be miles ahead of what they are now. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 03:07, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
'''Failed''' -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:57, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Spawning]]===<br />
Just finished writing it. Feedback please, want to make sure its correct. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC) <br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I think it's a well made article.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:So do I,... I'll change my vote to yes sometime before his seven days are up. Just curious to have an answer to the questions presented. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 21:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - I think every article is a good one. --{{User:Moctezuma/sig}} 22:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Very thorough. --[[User:TripleU|TripleU]] 23:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Weak Yes''' - It really meets all criteria and pretty interesting. But the accuracy of the article is under the question. it'd be cool to gather statistics on a distance somehow, but it's kind of abuse to the system. --[[User:Fe328|fe328]] 23:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Maybe not an article that I will read often, but then again that has no bearing on its quality. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 09:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' A well written article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''yep''' liked it.. easy to follow.----[[User:Sexualharrison|sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 16:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#Rubber stamp it.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Very easy to follow. And I can't think of anything that is missing. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 09:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - well rounded, good stuff. -[[User:Jack Kolt|Jack Kolt]] 14:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - A surprisingly good article indeed. --[[User:Karloth_vois|Karloth Vois]] <sup>[[¯\(°_o)/¯]]</sup> 18:22, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - A lot of effort was put into this as well as many charecter names.--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 00:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
<s>'''Against'''</s> I think that the article needs to address the issue of 'what happens if the building requirments aren't met?' For example: under the [[Spawning#NecroTech Lab Assistant|Lab Assistant]] section,... what happens if there are no NT buildings that fit the crieria? Granted, this may never be the case,... in fact, I doubt that this would ever be the case,... but what if? Is there a really good answer for this? BTW, my vote can easily be swayed to a yes vote,... it's just that this is something I notice, and was hoping it could be addressed in some way... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 20:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Hmm. Probably something I can't do with spadework, unless I spend a day creating Necrotech assistant Alts and then throwing barricades at the relevant NT's. Probably a question for Kevan. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Maybe not now anymore, but that could have been the case during the March of the Dead. No Necrotechs meeting requirements I mean.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 20:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::I see, so this issue would have to be addressed through a case study,... Perhaps such a thing should be noted in the article somewhere? Personally, I've got a similar, also interesting take on this subject. Considering the priority of NT buildings within the game, and the community as a whole, and inversly, being the big target they are for zombie groups,... how often do you think conditions like this exist? And is it VSB or lower? At that, when it comes to spawning, is this really a luck of the draw sort of thing, or is it something thats vastly affected by the actions of the people playing the game? I think that that's worth noting in the article to, simply because that last point I made is the whole allure of the game to a great many people... everything is situational, and all outcomes are affected solely by the individuals playing... and thus, so are the spawning locations in a way. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 21:04, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::[[User:Kevan|Our Lord and Saviour has answered on his talk page]]. I'll add to the page, today. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:00, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::Vote struck, and changed to yes. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<s>Questionable accuracy and the minor need to test what happens if there are no valid spawnpoints.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 03:39, 2 March 2010 (UTC)</s><br />
:No valid spawnpoints query answered. Now explain how I can improve on the so called ''questionable'' accuracy? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::I was just rather dubious that there would be a complex method of spawning when you could have someone just spawn anywhere but...well...eh. Kevan replied and didn't try to knock you down so I'll change my vote.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#Poodle and SS's reasons are so utterly stupid; if they think the reason for a glossary/player-resource article like this is to just prove what would happen in extreme hypothetical situations, then they are wrong. Having said that, this article is useful to show interested users the nature of spawning; and that is all. GA's in general should have the ability to interest any user into reading at leased a bit of it, but I don't think this has it. Narrow/special interest works don't generally fit my idea of a GA. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 05:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:I just felt the article needed to be 'complete'. It's 'complete', so that's why the Keep. I don't see a GA needing to personally interest anyone, as long as it's a Good Article (NPOV, Compelte, Well Written, "Awesome"), it suffices.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::By personally interest people, I mean it needs something in it that does inherently make it "awesome". This is boring. It covers a concept that is experienced within the first two clicks of making an UD account for ''everyone'', I think this sort of coverage isn't ''unnecessary'', but not groundbreaking enough to be a GA at all. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 23:52, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:::I think its range is more than that. It adds another reason for cading TRP's to only VSB and shows another benefit of emitting a [[feeding groan]] (which needs a major rewrite). I also think that its important to note that some suburbs underpopulation might be due to their lack of Firestations and Necrotechs. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::::Also why there might be a lower zed presence within the same suburbs,.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:23, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
This be '''Successful'''. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
===[[Guides:A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead|A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead]]===<br />
This article has been accessed over 80,000 times,.... has been cited by many other users as still being an important peice of information (as can be seen [[Heytown/News Archive#June 20th|here]], [[Guides:First Day in Malton#For more information|here]], [[User:Darculianar#UsefullPages|here]], and [[Malton_College_of_Medicine/library#Textbooks|here]]), as well as having been cited for information (like [[Suggestion talk:20070928 More Knives|here]] for example). That said, many users, and pages not listed above, link to it, having thought it was important to keep. Also, when it was reveiwed [[Guides/Review/Archive#Guides:A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead|here]], it seemed to have some support as long as it was updated. These are the reasons why I think the article should be a Featured Article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' As Above. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Nice article - easy to read, good information. --[[User:Fe328|fe328]] 11:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' It provides an excellent and highly detailed guide; I wish I knew half this stuff when I was starting out! --[[User:Oldharry101|Oldharry101]] <sup>[[Project Welcome|W!]]</sup> 18:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' A little lacking regarding zombies, and understates the importance of malls, but has all the info a fresh slab of meat would need. --[[User:TripleU|TripleU]] 21:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' OOOhhh.. Ids ddis de beoqqqwww. BEOWWW!!! Get Fit mutha fucka get fit!!! Heeaaywhooo. HOOOO! ShiaaAAAA. i'M About to take a shia lebouf on ya HOOOO!!! HOOO!!!!!!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 01:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:I don't know what you just said other than yes.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - although it could do with being split up into subpages. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 08:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' Its not really a guide, just a lot of important glossary pages all stuck together in one place. Still an excellent resource mind. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Helped some of my friends get into the game, wored for them will work for anybody. --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 00:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
#POV much? Lacking basic information and vague when it comes to its own declarations. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 12:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:Vague in it's declarations, and non neutral POV.... hmmm....? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''No''' - I don't really like the layout of it. Perhaps some tables for some of the information, or just links to separate pages with the information (for example Building types). I'm not really a big fan of a huge amount of information on the one page. Don't see why the information on building types needs to be repeated on this page as well, especially ''useless'' information like interior and exterior descriptions. It just builds up the page more. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 06:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:Really,.... you'd rather have it look like '''[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Guides:A_Beginners_Guide_to_Urban_Dead&oldid=1215404 this?]''' -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:21, 9 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::No I wouldn't like it like that. '''You know what I meant''' Don't be a smart-arse. '''But''' just in case I didn't make it clear the first time... '''The beginners guide should give relevant information that beginners need. Just the basics, some details where needed. But NOT a complete guide on the entire game.''' The details are included on other pages, and people can access them by searching if need be. Rather then clotting up a beginners guide with ''useless'' information. On top of that, some basic information that beginners '''would''' need isn't included as well. Thats why I don't like it. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 11:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:::I do know what you mean,... however,.... I know being new to a game, I like to waltz in with everything on the table, and a good working knowledge of what I should be doing, or what the working aspects of a game are. Not just having my character spawn someplace... and not know what I should be looking at, or how to get into a building.... or why I should even give a rats ass about libraries,... which you seem to think are absolutly frivolous, amongst other things I've included. Obviously this isn't the case, both from an RP perspective, as well as a strategic perspective, both of which are touched on within the article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I'm gonna cycle this as '''Successful''' too. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
[[Category:Good Article Nominees]]</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DanceDanceRevolution/Cornlolio&diff=1780543
User talk:DanceDanceRevolution/Cornlolio
2010-09-18T01:57:02Z
<p>J3D: </p>
<hr />
<div>another win----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 19:16, 19 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
you're alright. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:57, 18 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Featured_Articles/Good_Articles&diff=1780522
UDWiki:Featured Articles/Good Articles
2010-09-18T01:43:51Z
<p>J3D: /* No */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{Navigation (header)}}<br />
{|style="background: #E6F2FF;border:solid 1px #A3B1BF;padding:10px;width:100%"<br />
|-<br />
|{{Shortcut|[[GA]]}}<span style="font-size:16pt">Good Article Voting</span><br>Here, we determine which articles are deemed to be "Good" Articles. These are seen as some of the best the wiki has to offer and can include virtually any page on the wiki. <br />
<br />
Articles which have been given good article status, become eligible to become [[UDWiki:Featured Articles|Featured Articles]] with a new Good Article being voted to receive that honour every week.<br />
<br />
<big>'''Criteria'''</big><br />
*'''NPOV''' - The article must be from a [[UDWiki:NPOV|neutral point of view]] and not show significant bias. Possible exceptions may be made, depending on the article and community opinion. <br />
*'''Complete''' - It neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context.<br />
*'''Well Written''' - The article uses good English, such as proper grammar and spelling and is written in a clear and highly readable style.<br />
*'''Generally Awesome''' - Here at the wiki, we're after stuff that's awesome.<br />
<br />
Any main namespace article (also including user pages and journal pages if they are thought to fulfil the above criteria) can be nominated for good article status. The nomination will be discussed and if there are no major issues raised at the end of 7 days, the article is promoted to Good status and will be added to the Featured Article Pool for the coming week. <br />
<br />
Articles that are deemed "good" will be placed in the [[:Category:Good Articles|Good Article Category]] for easy findage. The page will also have the <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:GA|GA]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki> template placed onto it. If a nomination is declined by the page owner then the nomination should be cycled without the page being added to the Good Article Category.<br />
<br />
|}<br />
{| align="right"<br />
|-<br />
|__TOC__<br />
|}<br />
==Example==<br />
===[[Example page|Good Article candidate]]===<br />
Good Article candidate has recently undergone a lot of improvement from various editors. It's NPOV, it's concise and informative. I also believe it to be generally awesome, just take a look at the talk page discussion, people love it! --[[Example page|GA Suggester]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I see only a few minor issues, but those seem to be fixed readily. Otherwise it's good. --[[Example page|OptimistBob]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
# Love it! --[[Example page|Few Words Joe]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Maintains good article balance, strong intro, accurate information, good grammar and spelling. Well wikified. --[[Example page|Overly Technical Jim]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Much better than all the other candidates. --[[Example page|BetterMuch Ralph]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - I like this part [[Example page|here]]. --[[Example page|Specific Jen]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
Please add {{[[Template:GoodArticleNom|GoodArticleNom]]}} to any page that has been nominated.<br />
<br />
==New Nominations==<br />
<br />
===[[Zombie anonymity]]===<br />
NPOV and borderline eloquent. The topic itself may not be central to the game, but the article is probably the best it could be. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 00:16, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
# '''Yes''' - We need more featured articles, before we have to start looping them! --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 00:16, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' - I'll give it a comb through in a tick to clean it up, but it's solid enough. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:27, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' - Well written and explained...I'd say thats a good article for you {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 14:02, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:41, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
<br />
#guys stop going all alim on good articles and letting any old drivel in .{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:43, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Recent Nominations==<br />
''Older nominations can be found in the [[UDWiki:Featured Articles/Good Articles/Archive|archive]].''<br />
<br />
===[[Banana Tactics]]===<br />
<br />
Well-written, delivers information in a concise and easy-read manner, and does not arse around with NPOV or pointlessness. This article has shown itself to be beloved by the community and perhaps now is the time to give it the spotlight it deserves.<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - Superb article. Bravo Karl. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 15:16, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Direct and to the point, no need for overdoing it with complex words or phrases.--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 22:20, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Our job here is not ''just'' to inform newbs about UD, but to make the overall gaming experience more enjoyable. People need to be shown the well-developed sense of humor that this community can produce, and this article is a superb example of it. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:30, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
#'''Die in a fire''' --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 15:39, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#As Thad. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:51, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Not worthy. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 16:28, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#It's really old by now. Leave the dead horse in its ditch. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:42, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#hahahaha no -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:02, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#No. After reading it thoroughly, and close examination of the second paragraph (or lack there of) I dont think it should be. {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 06:56, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Speedy Deletion Crit 1/2'''.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:34, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Viewing the archives... I take it this is [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/May-2010#Some_stubby_stuff|take]] [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/August-2010#Banana_Tactics|three]]? --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 09:19, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:After a week, this has '''Failed''' with 3 yes votes and 8 "no"s. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:25, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Mycock Building|Mycock]]===<br />
Mycock is amazing! everyone loves mycock, why not put mycock on the main page? Then everyone can ogle at the glory of mycock.--{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 21:35, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
# '''Yes''' - Who doesn't love mycock? --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 21:35, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Mycock deserves to be featured. Mycock is that big a deal. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 21:37, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#We need featured locations. Mycock is one of the best locations in town to be. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 21:42, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#I hardly had to think. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 21:50, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Hmmm... What can be said about Mycock? Mycock is impressive. Mycock is the best by miles. Mycock is generally awesome, and Mycock isn't a stub. I think mycock should definitely be featured. I also want to see Ross writing about Mycock, and a picture of Mycock on the front page.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 21:58, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Innuendo...sexual innuendo!--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 22:04, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#The only official building to bring the radio filter into its knees. Or rather her knees? --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:06, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# I'm surprised no one recommended mycock before. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 22:59, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# fucking [[ALiM]] IN DA HOUZZZZ {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:10, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# After everything mycock has done for this wiki, I think this is the least we could do for it ;) --{{User:Nallan/sig}} 02:49, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
# At least until someone turns it from a factual piece into a hilarious play on words. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 14:54, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Boring, not worthy. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 15:08, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#not v lengthy or interesting. unlike mycock. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 15:18, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#No, it's ridiculous and has more or less been done over and over again. --[[User:Huntress|Huntress]] 15:24, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:I agree with you on one thing. Mycock is used quite a lot. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 05:13, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Just no. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:54, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:After a week, this has '''Passed''' with 10 yes votes and 5 "no"s. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:25, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[TUMBLEWEED-aikido-river'n-stuff Tactics]]===<br />
This shit be epic, faggots.<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#-- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:57, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#The most used tactic in all of UD. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:07, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
# '''No''' - But there really should be more nominations. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 19:21, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''No''' - The main problem with this article is that it is hard to tell if it is a guide/strategy or a subtle parody of a guide / strategy. If it was purely a guide with better formatting and information, it would be pure awesomeness. If it was entirely a parody, it would be liquid sex. Unfortunately, it tries to be both and fails at becoming either. - [[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 20:17, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''No''' - We don't want to give newbies the wrong impression. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:52, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Yes, the article's message is that not metaing and just fucking about by yourself and not working in a team is bad. Yeah, let's not give newbies that impression. I read you. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:04, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#::Oh, oops. I was working off of my (bad) memory of the article. Still, "no", since it just isn't that great anyway, however. It's kinda funny and kinda useful, but there are much better ones than it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 03:12, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:::Damnit!! ;) -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 04:40, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Not helpful. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 16:31, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:After a week, this has '''Failed''' with 2 yes votes and 4 "no"s. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:25, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Malton Incident]]===<br />
It may be fanmade, but it provides some good backstory to how the zombie incident in Malton started. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:12, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I'm offended that you think being fanmade is a bad thing. This thing is a vital piece of our history. Without it, we'd have no way of knowing how this all started. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 02:54, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
====No====<br />
#This is a no with a but - it's a good page, but it just look amateurish. I might give it an overhaul soon to have things like paragraphs, headers, more interwiki links, etc, though I don't know how that would affect this vote. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:56, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
#Very similar to [[Possible Causes for the Situation]], they are the two pages on the wiki that ''should'' be considered the best in the entire place, but just fall a bit short. Both of these pages added to my fascination with the rich history of Malton when I started many years ago but they need some basic formatting before being accepted IMO. It's not cause I don't think they shouldn't be GA's at this point, it's that with a simple 20 minutes of work, they won't only qualify but will also be miles ahead of what they are now. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 03:07, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
'''Failed''' -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:57, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Spawning]]===<br />
Just finished writing it. Feedback please, want to make sure its correct. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC) <br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I think it's a well made article.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:So do I,... I'll change my vote to yes sometime before his seven days are up. Just curious to have an answer to the questions presented. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 21:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - I think every article is a good one. --{{User:Moctezuma/sig}} 22:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Very thorough. --[[User:TripleU|TripleU]] 23:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Weak Yes''' - It really meets all criteria and pretty interesting. But the accuracy of the article is under the question. it'd be cool to gather statistics on a distance somehow, but it's kind of abuse to the system. --[[User:Fe328|fe328]] 23:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Maybe not an article that I will read often, but then again that has no bearing on its quality. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 09:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' A well written article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''yep''' liked it.. easy to follow.----[[User:Sexualharrison|sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 16:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#Rubber stamp it.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Very easy to follow. And I can't think of anything that is missing. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 09:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - well rounded, good stuff. -[[User:Jack Kolt|Jack Kolt]] 14:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - A surprisingly good article indeed. --[[User:Karloth_vois|Karloth Vois]] <sup>[[¯\(°_o)/¯]]</sup> 18:22, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - A lot of effort was put into this as well as many charecter names.--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 00:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
<s>'''Against'''</s> I think that the article needs to address the issue of 'what happens if the building requirments aren't met?' For example: under the [[Spawning#NecroTech Lab Assistant|Lab Assistant]] section,... what happens if there are no NT buildings that fit the crieria? Granted, this may never be the case,... in fact, I doubt that this would ever be the case,... but what if? Is there a really good answer for this? BTW, my vote can easily be swayed to a yes vote,... it's just that this is something I notice, and was hoping it could be addressed in some way... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 20:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Hmm. Probably something I can't do with spadework, unless I spend a day creating Necrotech assistant Alts and then throwing barricades at the relevant NT's. Probably a question for Kevan. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Maybe not now anymore, but that could have been the case during the March of the Dead. No Necrotechs meeting requirements I mean.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 20:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::I see, so this issue would have to be addressed through a case study,... Perhaps such a thing should be noted in the article somewhere? Personally, I've got a similar, also interesting take on this subject. Considering the priority of NT buildings within the game, and the community as a whole, and inversly, being the big target they are for zombie groups,... how often do you think conditions like this exist? And is it VSB or lower? At that, when it comes to spawning, is this really a luck of the draw sort of thing, or is it something thats vastly affected by the actions of the people playing the game? I think that that's worth noting in the article to, simply because that last point I made is the whole allure of the game to a great many people... everything is situational, and all outcomes are affected solely by the individuals playing... and thus, so are the spawning locations in a way. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 21:04, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::[[User:Kevan|Our Lord and Saviour has answered on his talk page]]. I'll add to the page, today. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:00, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::Vote struck, and changed to yes. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<s>Questionable accuracy and the minor need to test what happens if there are no valid spawnpoints.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 03:39, 2 March 2010 (UTC)</s><br />
:No valid spawnpoints query answered. Now explain how I can improve on the so called ''questionable'' accuracy? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::I was just rather dubious that there would be a complex method of spawning when you could have someone just spawn anywhere but...well...eh. Kevan replied and didn't try to knock you down so I'll change my vote.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#Poodle and SS's reasons are so utterly stupid; if they think the reason for a glossary/player-resource article like this is to just prove what would happen in extreme hypothetical situations, then they are wrong. Having said that, this article is useful to show interested users the nature of spawning; and that is all. GA's in general should have the ability to interest any user into reading at leased a bit of it, but I don't think this has it. Narrow/special interest works don't generally fit my idea of a GA. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 05:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:I just felt the article needed to be 'complete'. It's 'complete', so that's why the Keep. I don't see a GA needing to personally interest anyone, as long as it's a Good Article (NPOV, Compelte, Well Written, "Awesome"), it suffices.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::By personally interest people, I mean it needs something in it that does inherently make it "awesome". This is boring. It covers a concept that is experienced within the first two clicks of making an UD account for ''everyone'', I think this sort of coverage isn't ''unnecessary'', but not groundbreaking enough to be a GA at all. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 23:52, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:::I think its range is more than that. It adds another reason for cading TRP's to only VSB and shows another benefit of emitting a [[feeding groan]] (which needs a major rewrite). I also think that its important to note that some suburbs underpopulation might be due to their lack of Firestations and Necrotechs. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::::Also why there might be a lower zed presence within the same suburbs,.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:23, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
This be '''Successful'''. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
===[[Guides:A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead|A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead]]===<br />
This article has been accessed over 80,000 times,.... has been cited by many other users as still being an important peice of information (as can be seen [[Heytown/News Archive#June 20th|here]], [[Guides:First Day in Malton#For more information|here]], [[User:Darculianar#UsefullPages|here]], and [[Malton_College_of_Medicine/library#Textbooks|here]]), as well as having been cited for information (like [[Suggestion talk:20070928 More Knives|here]] for example). That said, many users, and pages not listed above, link to it, having thought it was important to keep. Also, when it was reveiwed [[Guides/Review/Archive#Guides:A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead|here]], it seemed to have some support as long as it was updated. These are the reasons why I think the article should be a Featured Article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' As Above. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Nice article - easy to read, good information. --[[User:Fe328|fe328]] 11:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' It provides an excellent and highly detailed guide; I wish I knew half this stuff when I was starting out! --[[User:Oldharry101|Oldharry101]] <sup>[[Project Welcome|W!]]</sup> 18:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' A little lacking regarding zombies, and understates the importance of malls, but has all the info a fresh slab of meat would need. --[[User:TripleU|TripleU]] 21:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' OOOhhh.. Ids ddis de beoqqqwww. BEOWWW!!! Get Fit mutha fucka get fit!!! Heeaaywhooo. HOOOO! ShiaaAAAA. i'M About to take a shia lebouf on ya HOOOO!!! HOOO!!!!!!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 01:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:I don't know what you just said other than yes.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - although it could do with being split up into subpages. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 08:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' Its not really a guide, just a lot of important glossary pages all stuck together in one place. Still an excellent resource mind. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Helped some of my friends get into the game, wored for them will work for anybody. --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 00:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
#POV much? Lacking basic information and vague when it comes to its own declarations. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 12:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:Vague in it's declarations, and non neutral POV.... hmmm....? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''No''' - I don't really like the layout of it. Perhaps some tables for some of the information, or just links to separate pages with the information (for example Building types). I'm not really a big fan of a huge amount of information on the one page. Don't see why the information on building types needs to be repeated on this page as well, especially ''useless'' information like interior and exterior descriptions. It just builds up the page more. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 06:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:Really,.... you'd rather have it look like '''[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Guides:A_Beginners_Guide_to_Urban_Dead&oldid=1215404 this?]''' -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:21, 9 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::No I wouldn't like it like that. '''You know what I meant''' Don't be a smart-arse. '''But''' just in case I didn't make it clear the first time... '''The beginners guide should give relevant information that beginners need. Just the basics, some details where needed. But NOT a complete guide on the entire game.''' The details are included on other pages, and people can access them by searching if need be. Rather then clotting up a beginners guide with ''useless'' information. On top of that, some basic information that beginners '''would''' need isn't included as well. Thats why I don't like it. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 11:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:::I do know what you mean,... however,.... I know being new to a game, I like to waltz in with everything on the table, and a good working knowledge of what I should be doing, or what the working aspects of a game are. Not just having my character spawn someplace... and not know what I should be looking at, or how to get into a building.... or why I should even give a rats ass about libraries,... which you seem to think are absolutly frivolous, amongst other things I've included. Obviously this isn't the case, both from an RP perspective, as well as a strategic perspective, both of which are touched on within the article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I'm gonna cycle this as '''Successful''' too. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
[[Category:Good Article Nominees]]</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/2011_06&diff=1780521
UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/2011 06
2010-09-18T01:41:49Z
<p>J3D: /* Example_page */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{Shortcut|[[A/D]]}}<br />
<br />
{{Moderationnav}}<br />
<br />
{| cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 style="margin-bottom: .5em; float: right; padding: .5em 0 .8em 1.4em; width: 33%"<br />
|__TOC__<br />
|}<br />
<br />
This page is for the request of page deletions within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to concerns about loss of data, the ability to delete pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a deletion from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.<br />
<br />
==Guidelines for Deletion Requests==<br />
<br />
All Deletion Requests '''must''' contain the following information in order to be considered:<br />
<br />
* '''A link to the page in question.''' Preferably bolded for visibility. Note that Category and Image links need a colon at the front to turn them into links (ie <code><nowiki>[[:Category:Category]]</nowiki></code> and <code><nowiki>[[:Image:Image.jpg]]</nowiki></code>).<br />
* '''A reason for deletion.''' This should be short and to the point.<br />
* '''A signed datestamp.''' This can be easily done by adding <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> to the end of your request.<br />
<br />
In addition to placing a request on this page, please place the '''''<nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki>''''' tag on the top of the page that is being recommended for deletion. Please make sure that the original content remains on the page, so that others can judge whether the page is worthy of deletion.<br />
<br />
Any deletion request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.<br />
<br />
Once the deletion request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be voted on for a period of two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. At the conclusion of this two weeks, the appropriate action will be taken by a system operator, and at the end of that day the request will be moved into the [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive|Archive]].<br />
<br />
Certain types of pages may be better being scheduled for deletion in order to reduce the amount of red tape and stop this page getting too cluttered. To lodge a request for scheduled deletions, go to [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling]].<br />
<br />
Deletion of pages that match a certain criteria may be better serviced by a request for a Speedy Deletion. Speedy Deletions are for removal of pages that are clearly of no value to the wiki, and do not incur the two week voting requirement. Speedy Deletion requests can be lodged at [[UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions]].<br />
<br />
{{speedydeletioncriteria}}<br />
<br />
==Guidelines for Voting on Deletion Requests==<br />
<br />
* One vote per user.<br />
* Voting should take place underneath the request, and each vote should be started with a {{CodeInline|#}} with no empty lines inbetween votes.<br />
* There are four vote types:<br />
** '''Delete'''. For agreement with the deletion request<br />
** '''Merge'''. For indication that the content on the page should be merged with another page (includes an implicit '''Delete''').<br />
** '''Speedy Delete'''. For indication that the page meets one of the [[UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions|Speedy Deletions]] Criteria (includes an implicit '''Delete''').<br />
** '''Keep'''. For disagreement with the deletion request.<br />
<br />
* The specific vote keyword should be bolded within the lodged vote. Any relevant comments are also allowed, but these should not be bolded.<br />
* At least one '''Delete''' vote must be entered by the deadline in order for a page to be deleted. System operators may not use their own vote after the deadline to delete a page.<br />
* If more '''Delete''' votes are entered than '''Keep''' votes, the page will be deleted. In any other circumstance, the page is kept.<br />
* If 3 '''Speedy Delete'''s are lodged, and there are no '''Keep''' Votes, the page will be deleted as per [[UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions|Speedy Deletions]].<br />
<br />
==Deletion Queue==<br />
<!-- Please place new requests directly below this message. <br />
If there are no requests, place the following message below.<br />
''There are no pages in the deletion queue''<br />
--><br />
===[[Example_page]]===<br />
# '''Delete''' - Page serves no real purpose and is spam {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 14:08, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Keep''' - page is linked all over the wiki and serves the purpose of forming links when needed in admin page descriptions.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 14:12, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete''' not another poodle... -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 14:20, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Keep''' - As yon. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 15:25, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Keep''' Hold it right there, donkey hater. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 15:29, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Keep''' better to have one spam page than lots of them. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:39, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Keep''' - [[Special:Whatlinkshere/Example_page|These pages]] make use of it already. It's helpful. It's not spam. Keep it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:52, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Keep''' - It's the generic "I need a fake blue link" page. Everything on the page and talk page is basically spam, but there you go. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 17:42, 17 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Keep''' - As [[Example Page|Red]]. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 00:14, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''A/VB''' - is where this guy should be taken for wasting all of our valuable thyme! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:41, 18 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Recent Actions==<br />
===[[UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive/Mistakes]]===<br />
It's an archive of mistakes added to [[A/M]], yet it appears to have only been used once and never again. In general, we just delete these sorts of mistakes, rather than archiving them, so having it seems pointless to me.<br />
<br />
#'''Delete''' - Said my piece above. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 13:24, 18 August 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete''' - Was going to keep, but Aichon's right. We've missed about 30 cases that are like the above which we've just deleted. No point archiving. Same should probably happen with [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Scinfaxi]] (maybe move this to a talk page archive and delete the original) and [[UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Criterion 12]]. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:44, 18 August 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete''' --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 11:30, 22 August 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete''' - Useless and pointless. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 12:07, 22 August 2010 (BST)<br />
#Delete. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 22:49, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete''' - It's a nice concept, but it would require effort. Do not want! --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:51, 31 August 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete''' - Because sysops are flawless and never make mistakes <!--- Sarcasm ----> {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 13:21, 31 August 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Delete ☒''' {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 06:02, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
Deleted. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 19:34, 3 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Archive==<br />
{{Deletearchivenav}}</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:J3D&diff=1780520
User talk:J3D
2010-09-18T01:39:47Z
<p>J3D: /* Talk:2 Cool/Bob's Epic Fails */</p>
<hr />
<div>='''READ ME!'''=<br />
*Post at the bottom (press the little + button at the top of the page) unless continuing a previous conversation.<br />
*Three words: '''Sign your posts!'''<br />
*Looking for something that was here before the 20<sup>th</sup> of March 2008? Try [[User_talk:J3D/Archive|here]]. What about between the 21<sup>st</sup> of March and the 18<sup>th</sup> of August 2008? Because that would be [[User_talk:J3D/Archive2|here]]! Or perhaps what you need is from the period between the 19<sup>th</sup> of August and the 19<sup>th</sup> of December? Coz that shiznat can be grabbed just over [[User talk:J3D/Archive3|here]], ya dig?<br />
<br />
== Lulz ==<br />
<br />
ic wat u did thar. --{{User:WOOT/sig}} 19:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:whar? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:48, 20 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
::HAR! DURR!--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 04:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not impersonate other users, especially on admin pages on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 06:18 21 December 2008 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
== Hollomstown ==<br />
<br />
Rid of merged pages. :)--[[User:Lithedarkangel|Lithedarkangel]] 23:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:noice! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Missed one ==<br />
<br />
[[Candy Avenue]]. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 02:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:Missed what?--<span>[[User:Lithedarkangel|<span style="color: Red ">Li</span>]][[User_Talk:Lithedarkangel|<span style="color: Black">thedark</span>]][[Location Nuts|<span style="color: Black">angel</span>]][[User:Lithedarkangel/Works|<span style="color: Red"><small>Meth!</small></span>]]</span> 03:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
== You are creating History ==<br />
<br />
Grim made a coupe, tried to take over the wiki.<br />
<br />
You lol'd at an account creation you knew nothing of.<br />
<br />
Surely if they go through with this, you can make some sort of flashy template stating how you were the first person to have this happen?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Oh, oh, me me! Lemme make it!--[[User:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>]] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== lol. ==<br />
<br />
<span class="plainlinks">[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct&curid=2730&diff=1359677&oldid=1359674 lol.]</span> {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 01:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:evidently i can be more wrong ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Yus, I gnoh Bub and Kevan, I'm interesting in their profiles and activity, location might come later. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 04:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Irony?==<br />
hahaha oh wow you're delusional. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:you just noticed? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Yeah? ==<br />
<br />
[[User_talk:Iscariot#Run_for_sysop|Nominate?]]<br />
--{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 00:46, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I'm up for it if you and SA are.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::do eeet --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 00:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Nao. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 01:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I'm waiting for SA to say something since his name was mentioned. Now kindly [[GTFO]] ma talk page.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::That goes for all of you. Or none of you. I mean it is a free wiki...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:06, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
hai. i here u liek mudkipz --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Mudkipz suck. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 01:10, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Where's axehack?? I want him back :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Axehack is no more... --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 01:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::He was briefly more on the 6th of jan..why is this happening? I, for one, blame the current sysop team ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::: I blame the previous sysop team. Grim s, to be more precise. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
Iscariot...Whoooooo....Now THAT would be one hell of a promotions bid. I'd honestly say give it a while for everything that's around him to die down some, but it might not happen anyway. Its up to you guys on what happens. Just saying it might be more prudent to wait a bit.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:yeah agree, it's a bit chaotic atm. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I'll be ready to do it when you guys are ready... I think it will be interesting to see what reasons people give for voting against, and how many people outside the sysop team are opposed to it. I personally think Iscariot would be a very good sysop. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 01:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::of course! It's not just a show for a shows sake. I wouldn't nominate someone i didn't genuinely want as sysop. Still i think it's best if we wait til the wiki is a bit quieter. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::His actions in the few places where they've given him power over users say much to the contrary. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 05:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I can haz links? Or examples? --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 21:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I doubt he'd accept the nomination... I mean, if he were a sysop, he couldn't post to his own Talk page LOL. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 05:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::LOL he'd be what he must have always hated!!! xD [[User:Liberty|Liberty]] 05:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Iscariot doesn't hate Sysops altogether, he just hates the way the current sysops teams acts and handles things. He's pointed that out occasionally.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 11:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::No, he hates that we don't dance to his tune. Also read [[Recruitment/Archive2]] for a bit Pestolence, then check the [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Kristi_of_the_Dead_vs_Recruitment|arbitration case that relates to it.]](talk page too), there's also a few little snipes because of [[:Category_talk:Recruitment#Category:Recruitment_Rules_Discussion|this]] he's been making about me throughout the wiki claiming that I'm going against the consensus of the community or twisting recruitment to my own ends. He's a paranoid delusional, we're all out to get him and opposing him is the same as opposing the community in his eyes. You can see some of that [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_01#User:Iscariot|here]]. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 01:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::According to [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Kevan&curid=1072&diff=1363855&oldid=1363854&rcid=1393374 this bit] on Kevan's page, the "community" he is referring to are the folk who aren't actually on the wiki. =/ Convenient eh? -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 01:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::It's funny cause I know that community, I know more people in it than him and the reason is actually the kinda things he's doing and the related drama/rules abuse. I know people in that same community that have expressed problems with his behavior here after seeing it for themselves even. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]], self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All</span> 02:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::So basically he's got the wrong end of the stick completely and is now making an even bigger arse of himself because of it? =/ Clever. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 02:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::I think thats a bit harsh, yes Iscariot is an arse and out to cause trouble for troubles sake but his attacks are not without valid points. The current Admin team does do a (mostly) good job but the assumption by some that they are above community review and that those that disagree with them are trouble making malcontents is far from the truth. Despite the claims to the contrary "Sysopship" no longer suggests a mere janitorial role, rather it designates some users as being in positions of judgment over other users. Until the sysop position recognizes a difference between users that the community trusts to do routine maintenance etc... and to hold a position of authority and judgment over others then drama will always ensue. As is, the sysop role really does seem to be turning into an exclusive club type thing, true or not that is not an image that is good for the position or the community at large!--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::1)You're preaching to the choir. Who do you think started the debate over the claims to being just janitors? 2) The system was set up originally to ''not'' have community review for a reason. That reason is still somewhat valid and more reasons connecting to that one have caused the failure of every proposition for regular review. 3) Iscariot only has points when he accidentally stumbles upon then in the midst of his attempts to make everyone fall in line, I used to think it was intentional but his behavior has long since made it clear to me that he doesn't actually believe the "points" he has except for as a means to an end. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 02:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::::The last thing that made the third one ridiculously clear to me was the RRF move drama.--<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 02:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::::::1) not really aware of who started it... just know its been grumbling on for ever and a day. 2) community review has many things in its favour foremost of which is that it confirms that the sysops are "trusted" by the current userbase, its also very open to abuse by all and sundry and '''yes''' it would also make it hard for sysops to do the contentious stuff that makes them unpopular but still needs doing! 3)Just because the valid points he hits upon are not the ones he is aiming at doesn't make them any less valid, it does however make him look stupid and petty.--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 08:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::::Actually spirit of the rule is as important as the law. The reason it's being enforced more so. You don't give native americans repirations for slavery because they were both referred to with the same term back in the day. For #2 please read the comment on my talk page to pestolence, I don't think we should be starting another massive discussion on J3D's talk page without him being a part of it. --[[User:Karek|Judge&nbsp;Karke]],&nbsp;self-proclaimed&nbsp;Decider&nbsp;of&nbsp;Everything&nbsp;and&nbsp;Ruler&nbsp;of&nbsp;All 10:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::Wow i didn't expect all this upon my return. Now to catch up on whats happened elsewhere....--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::Yup. INMNSHO that's why he's so worried about constant proper English. If he ever used slang or slipped up, the holes in his ideas would be clear as day. He creates a false air of authority and correctives.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 02:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Can I get some input?==<br />
I've been working on a policy that I believe is sorely needed [[User:Pestolence/001|here]], and I'd appreciate your input on it. How can it be improved, and is it even needed right now? A potential problem is what to do about current sysops: put them all up for review now (leading to a massive backlog of admin page drama), postpone the review until six months from now (simply staving off the inevitable drama till later), or something else glaringly obvious that I've overlooked? See you around. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 02:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Never mind, thanks. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 16:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:<nowiki>:</nowiki>( I feel unwanted...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Aw. =( We still love you Jed! -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::pwomise? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Uh huh. =) Without you the wiki would asplode. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::i suspected as much, now back to work. There be vandalism cases to rule on ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Meh. S'pose. I could take a couple of minutes out of my busy revision schedule to take a mosey on over for a look. =p -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 01:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::OMGMISCONBULATIONCHEESEISLAZYIMASOGONNATELLISCARIOT --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
kidding.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:you little... heh --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::did i getcha? huh? well? did i?? did i?? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== star wars ==<br />
<br />
its not that i liek it, but its public knoweledge... like the brother grimm tales in 19th century. Anyway, why dont you liek star wars ? --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 00:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:hint:begins with f, ends with inis. But i didn't particularly like it before that anyway.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::what does [http://files.usgwarchives.net/tx/floyd/vitals/births/1937/floyb37.txt f floyd inis] has to do with star wars ? --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup><br />
:::what the [[2 Cool]] is that?? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
fpenis?--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span></small> 03:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:[[User:DanceDanceRevolution/Fenis|fpenis.]]--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== RE: Classic lulz ==<br />
<br />
Truer words never were spoken - unless someone once said cyberbob was a cunt, then that would be truer. Lol, truer is a weird-looking word.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Cyberbob is a cunt--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Did you guys like the presents i left you? The wiki has been awesome lately, reminds me of the grim days. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
DOHOHOHO --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:merry january! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== I need your advice ==<br />
<br />
Hello. It's me again. I need your advice on something. Neice has not edited the Dead Dudes page again. However, he has now posted some extremely anti-DD propaganda on [[The Sidney Arms]] page. Please have a look and tell me what you think. In my opinion (which i have stated to Neice),such statements have no place on a location page. he should put them on his own group's page. It is becoming tiresome to myself and our group, as he is nothing more than a griefer in-game and apparently feels compelled to bring it into the wiki. Anyways, have a look and let me know. Thanks again for any help you can give. --[[User:Wast0id|Wast0id]] 19:59, 20 January (CST)<br />
:''The Arms is still under attack from the wonderful group Malton Maulers. We have continued to battle for the area and will now go all out for it and have broken into the Arms daily''. Is that what you find so offensive Wastoid? {{User:Liberty/Sign}} 07:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I think [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=The_Sidney_Arms&diff=1368228&oldid=1367540 this] is his problem. I removed it before I actually saw this because it was POV on a neutral page. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 20:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::--Yes, thank you Pestolence, that was exactly my problem. And I expect more of the same from this user in the future and was hoping someone in authotity would set him straight. As I said previously, I simply wish he would keep his in-game grudge in the game, or at least on his own group page. --[[User:Wast0id|Wast0id]] 18:44, 21 January 2009 (CST)<br />
::::If he continues to slander your group, contact him on his talk page and ask him to stop, and if he continues (or if you've already asked him to stop and he's ignored you), take him to [[A/A|arbitration]]. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 02:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Uranium ==<br />
<br />
BOMBS--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 02:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Read's ban ==<br />
<br />
Time for an open discussion regarding the ''"it is expected that a system operator be prepared to reverse a warning/ban should the community desire it"'' section of [[UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines|this policy]] do you think? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 09:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:What makes you think the community does desire it? The only people contesting it at all number like 4. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::That would be why we'd have an ''Open'' Discussion. I'm pretty sure I can find some people that would support it. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 13:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::That depends on how low on the IQ range you'e prepared to go. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Well I would vote to keep the ban which means you will have Bobs support as he can't ever be seen to side with me these days. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 13:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::You keep bringing me into your comments honest, do you have a crush or something? If so take it elsewhere... I hear there are corners of the internet dedicated to that sort of thing. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 14:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::touché... but i already removed that comment as i felt it a little unfair.--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 14:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::xbox live or myspace? ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Is anyone else amused by the fact that he doesn't know that he can't unban people through meatpuppeting a vote? It's been tried before and over-ruled by the appropriate party. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 08:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:then whys it in the policy?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Because we don't update policies every time Kevan steps in and says differently. There needs to be some legitimacy to giving the user a second chance for such a thing to actually be done, and then only in the more extreme cases is it even likely. Cases like Amazing or Izumi, not any case Iscariot seems to think this is valid for(as I'm sure you know well which those will obviously be). And I'm sure we all know by this point Iscariot is just doing this now to try and cause drama so he can scream about how biased the sysops are regardless of whether he is correct in the slightest, he's not trying to get Read's ban revoked or even claiming what happened to him was unfair, those are irrelevant to his point. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 02:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Does anyone notice that it's fine when Karek likes a mass of support, but meatpuppeting when it's something he doesn't? Odd that... -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 20:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Signature ==<br />
<br />
I'm not after drama, but I'm asking if you'd change your signature back to J3D, please. Thanks. {{User:Extropymine/sig}} 09:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:hows that for compromise? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::[http://www.milkandcookies.com/link/58827/detail/ You used the N word?] :| --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 14:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Y helo thar ==<br />
<br />
There's an important thingy over here --> [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Semi-protection|this bit]], that you should have a look at. We're at 14 votes but we need 20 for a proper majority. Your time and energy will be rewarded with cookies and mudkips (if u liek dat sort of ting) =) -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 21:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==:)==<br />
Can you please refrain from vouching a single candidate MULTIPLE times? Please? :/ --<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Suicidal Angel,</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 00:00, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:If you can refrain from showing nothing but blatent disregard for the rules of this talkpage ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Oh... ==<br />
<br />
You're still around. When are you gonna give up on this shit and go back to Nationstates? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 11:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:fuck nationstates.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::booyah!--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Hi, i'm not sure if i'm replying to you right, i answered your question on my page but i'm still learning here. I am everything zombie, i opened that account/page by mistake under the wrong name. I wanted one for Drunkmonkey, which i opened and have been working on today. Feel free to delete the everything zombie page and account as i won't be using it thank you.<br />
Derek<br />
(http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:Drunkmonkey)<br />
<br />
==ALiM template==<br />
<br />
Are you happy with it? Cause if I fix it from overlapping the text, I have to use the flagbox template which doesn't make it look as good. the LUL isn't as big, which really detracts from the.. LUL, you know? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 07:45, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:I like it how it is(and i luuuurve the colour scheme) i can deal if the lul gets smaller tho. stuff happens.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:54, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
::I'll leave it then, I think the original is the best, {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:26, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Vandal Banning==<br />
<br />
I almost laughed a vital organ off. LulZ'LoLz--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 15:27, 6 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== [[User:DanceDanceRevolution/status/game]] ==<br />
<br />
Just for you. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 13:49, 8 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Plus, if you don't vouch the Eastwood Museum, I won't vouch ALiM for good article status. Tit for tat. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 12:23, 11 May 2009 (BST)<br />
:It just makes me think of the suburb of Eastwood, which fyi is a dump. But you sure do know how to treat a girl, so you're on.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:32, 12 May 2009 (BST)<br />
::Yeah, Eve told me she hated Eastwood. She calls it Eastwoo for some reason. Is that a Sydney thing? Btw, come for a sysop party soon? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:31, 30 May 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Nah i just call it eastwood...and yeah i've got a 3 day block off later in june so we can get fucked up alim style.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:18, 31 May 2009 (BST)<br />
::::I dig.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:39, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Come watch a buce match, too. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 05:04, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Hurry up and put Eastwood on ALiM!!! Before you get banned! ;D {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 16:25, 8 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:Theres not some underground movement to have me permaed brewing is there?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:01, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not shout offensive names on admin pages on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 02:52 8 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />And again <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 03:28 9 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:Gimme another stop hand. lazy cunt.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:57, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::u relly need 2 do smethin about dat temper --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 10:00, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::maybz l8a.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:02, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Oh i forgot the bit where i'm only making these edits to get up to 500 in the next 2 months.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:04, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::hmmm thanks for giving me an idea for a policy proposal --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 10:35, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I r supa srs now. Good luck on getting that upper-middle management job, bob.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 17:30, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I can't actually take credit for it, i got it off Conn (see SA's talk), good luck with a coherent policy on the issue though...in the end who gives a fuck? Most people will either make the 250 in a month or just not get another warning anytime soon anyway, or get more bans til they leave the wiki, for the remaining about 2 people, just let them be.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:06, 13 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I wouldn't worry about it so much - I'm in the middle of midyears at the moment and can't be bothered. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 06:16, 13 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::Here, have 2 [[Image:6vmixh1b9.gif]] <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 10:51 10 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
==lol==<br />
qq bitch --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:21, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:see if you can beat 3 months.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:23, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::I already did - I was a sysop from May 2006 through to May 2007. suck it --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:27, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Was your demotion scandalous and awesome though?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:30, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::nah - I got tricked into putting myself up for review and at that point promotion bids pretty much were votes. people are whiny babies so I got da boot --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:35, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I see. Votes better than 2 randoms just decide. The whole process is largely pointless...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:37, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::May I introduce you to the principles of representative democracy? {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:39, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I'm from NSW, i'm familiar with it and i hate it.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:44, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::That's why there aren't only two candidates for crat elections, like there are in elections in our state (I'm from NSW too.) Also:<br />
::::::::"Democracy is the worst form of government. It's simply better then all the others that have been tried" - Winston Churchill. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:46, 21 June 2009 (BST) <br />
:::::::::That misquote is contradictory... :P It's "''democracy is the worst form of government '''except''' all the others that have been tried''" <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:59 21 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
::::::::you might want to take some time to learn about politics before thinking you know enough to have a valid opinion about it hth --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:51, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You should be less lame.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:54, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::yes. I should be less lame than getting drunk while online instead of partying with my friends as well as getting online while being hungover rather than being hungover at a mate's place where I've crashed after a night out<br />i'm definitely lamer than that right now; i should lift my game --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:00, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::lol --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 22:00, 21 June 2009 (BST) <br />
::::::vote is infinitely worse than 2 randoms because then meatpuppetry enters into the equation and people are still pretty whiny babies who don't know how to make userpages let alone know who should and should not be a sysop --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:41, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Time to Vote!==<br />
I found a building I thought would be a good addition to the [[ELiM]] list. Go to [[Talk:Amusing_Locations_in_Malton/Edible_Locations_in_Malton#The_Gumm_Building_.2842.2C_40.29|the ELiM talk page]] to vote on whether The Gumm Building should be added. --{{User:Blake Firedancer/sig}} 13:00, 30 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== nicks drunk promotion bid ==<br />
<br />
is there really no way to read it? i wanna read it so bad. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 09:53, 1 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:It's a shame it wasn't archived properly. It should've been put under Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies or something. It just got deleted and I think someone got a/vbed. P.S. Just checked and it was me.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:55, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::Good thing you checked, I thought it was someone else. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 05:50, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Zing. But it was at Curley's house so I was expecting to see his account appear somewhere.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:30, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::ooohk. everything was done at Curleys house amirite? ;) {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 06:34, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::most things. except blowjobs, obviously.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:47, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I was just on #batshit relaying the story of how we went to that tech store in jesmond and used a display iphone to buy brain rot for table. good times. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 06:51, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::lol. <small>just wanted to get in on this convo</small><br />
:::::::oh and bj's can happen at curleys house, if i'm not mistaken 2 of the womens live there.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:16, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::getting beejays from internets<br />the height of desperateness? i would say yes --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:22, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Wut? curleys house is a real place bob....--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:25, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::nooooo relllyyy??? my question to you is would you know about curleys house without internet --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:28, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::yes. i knew about it since before broadband was invented...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:30, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::well i knew about it since before even the whole internet was invented........ --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:39, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::dayem.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:29, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::yeh it was like infinity years ago so you probly wouldnt know what that was like --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 00:35, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::Good recovery.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:08, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::hello? hello? i cant hear you speak directly into the receiver --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:17, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::No I want the last word!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:24, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
<s>[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not post on the A/VB main page when you are uninvolved in the case on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]]<sup>[[Template_talk:VandalBanningNotice|POST HERE]]</sup> 11:09, 15 July 2009 (BST)</s><br />
<br />
This verdict has been overruled and the warning stuck. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:26, 17 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Ban==<br />
<s>You have been banned from editing this wiki for 24 hours for vandalism. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 15:28, 16 July 2009 (BST)</s><br />
<br />
This ruling has been overruled and the ban overturned. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:27, 17 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==ban?==<br />
well it looks like they at least saw sense on your case... i suspect my ban will stand but what the hey... its not like i didn't expect it :) --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 01:52, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
DDR was going to post "'''Phew J3D, lucky Honest saved you from that one. Shame he had to be banned because of it. ''' but thought better of it because i clearly was not banned. Why? well that would be because in so many years of valid contribution to the wiki i have only ever faced 3 A/VB cases all but this one thrown out. Hmm guess that makes me the newest wikimartyr... --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:33, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Lol! You fuckiing moron! Did you even read your ''own'' comment that I replied to? '''YOU''' called it a ban, hence why I had ''ban'' in ''italics'', something you must have overlooked.<br />
:I gave up on arguing because you never give up, you fight to the death with the same fucked up, stupid points. I thought you'd bow down after Nubis didn't come to save you, but hey, looks like your desperation in saving your skin can surprise everyone. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<span style="color:black"><u><big>ϑϑℜ</big></u></span>]] 03:19, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::el oh el pwnt?--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 03:23, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::One would think so. He wouldn't admit it. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<span style="color:black"><u><big>ϑϑℜ</big></u></span>]] 03:45, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== yo ==<br />
<br />
Please don't submit [[:Image:2cola.jpg]] for SD. I want to use it as an example when I put 0x0 images up for scheduled deletions. What did you upload to make it come up as 0x0? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:54, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Ah i'm half asleep and i forgot how to make a bmp a jpg so i just changed the file name which turns out doesn't work :P So maybe you get a 0x0 if you try uploading any bmp? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:55, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::Yeah, thanks. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't a problem on my end before submitting it as a scheduled. ty. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:58, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::np.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:02, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
[[:Image:2cola.jpg]] - FTFY {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 18:02, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Heh, thanks but i already made [[:Image:2cola.JPG]] and if you read the above DDR wanted that kept as an example or something...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:55, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::I reverted it. Hope you don't mind. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 03:04, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Nvm. I didn't know you cited the fix in your scheduling vote so I put it back. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 03:06, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
hay ur not an stysops. u r an x sysops. quit lyin yo--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 04:04, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:i had teh exact same templat on 4 da hole tiem i wasnt an sysops. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 04:09, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::thats cause you never edit yyour page so it doesn't show up on the recent changes. faeget.--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 04:23, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Guys, guys. I'm sorry but the spelling and grammar here is just atrocious. Please clean up your act.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:51, 2 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::nou--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> High Overlord and Lead Conspirator of the Administrative Rebellion.</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Want</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">help?</span>]] 16:33, 2 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== <s>birth</s>fagday ==<br />
<br />
is it alim's 2nd yet? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 10:41, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:first, what's a birthfagday? and second, no - it's on the 2nd of october.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 11:51, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::as an overrated singersongwriter once said, "The times they are'a changin'"--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:50, 7 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::how are they changing? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:57, 7 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Well considering the Earth is in a constant state of evolution and change, it is impossible for that quote to be ever inaccurate.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 02:21, 8 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not impersonate sysops on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 01:18, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:You really need to stop telling me it's my last warning. It sounds so, ''final''...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:04, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::It's the [[Template:warning2|template's]] fault. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 02:53, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== YOU ==<br />
<br />
ARE GOD--[[User:Shakey60|Shakey]] <sup>[[Beatbox_Kids|BBK]] </sup> 12:46, 16 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:i know right --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:16, 26 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Sysops==<br />
I thought you were a sysops nigger? And you and cyberbob were best butt buddies?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 10:35, 23 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:I was, until early january :\ --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:45, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::Wat happen--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 00:49, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Conspiracy. Nubis organised my sacking during the new year period when i wasn't checking the wikiz :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:51, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::What? Nubis got you demoted? Har har. Specifically for what?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 01:01, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Drunk wiki editing. Not towing the party line. Usual reasons ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:03, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::HAH. So what happen with you and cyberbob?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 01:43, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I hate lemons. Jed's just a wee bit too bitter. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:41, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I didn't know there was ever anything between us? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:37, 26 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==The Sysop template==<br />
So I hear you still have it on there. Please take it down as per the warning you were issued or I will do it for you. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 09:18, 28 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== omfg ==<br />
So happy bob permabanned this "buzz killington" thinking it was one of you two, or one of the bbk. I can feel a massive misconduct coming on if anyone decides to take it further.<br />
What I am saying is, please take it further.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:53, 29 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:fucking lol hey.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:02, 29 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Ciggies==<br />
Good god man, make the link to your user page findable, ffs <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 11:48 2 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:He's had it like that for a week or so. And this signature ''should'' only be up for 24 hours, right? ;) --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 12:09, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::Well the ALaMe one was at least preceded by some non-link stuff, but was bad enough... this is another level again. He just keeps pushing on the boundary until someone can be bothered to react <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:28 2 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:::Fair enough- he's the one who will be VB'd so I don't really care. I just think for a day-long fag celebration, just let him have his giggles. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 12:30, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::I put my cursor on the main part, and it underlined all but the exclamation mark, so then i clicked on the exclamation mark, and it bought me here!!--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Also, your name is coxy--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::<nowiki>*</nowiki>you're ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:41, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::TAKING YOU TO A/A FOR WINKING OMG--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:46, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::USING CAPS TO HILARIOUSLY RIDICULE BY LAMPOONING A PERCEIVED "ANGER" WHILE TOTALLY GETTING ALL PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE UP IN THIS SHIT BY MEANS OF HUMOUROUSLY EXAGGERATING AN ENEMY'S POST AT THE SAME TIME {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You are WAY to easy these days--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:17, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::last word {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::nah uh--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::u mad?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::You are WAY to easy these days {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:19, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Learn to spell, both of you. any more posts in this thread will be deleted and i might take you to a/vb. unless its not bob or read.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:21, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! that is all.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 14:31, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::I'm special, <small>special</small>, so special, <small>special</small>. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 14:35, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
== You ==<br />
Are that fucking inconsistent on FB and IRC and any chat medium. I cannot work out your patterns m'lday--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:01, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:I'm on from 1pm til 6pm. And i'll sign into msn now just for you. But don't fucking facebook chat me coz my compy can't handle it :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:04, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Nam nam, bra!nz!!! ==<br />
<br />
You tasted good. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 01:46, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== You have all been rolled ==<br />
<br />
You are all my muppets! I am your muppetmaster. '''JIM HENSON IS ALIVE!!!''' <br />
<br />
As of December 24, 2012 I shall control all the accounts of 2 Cool. ALiM is/will be MINE! --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 06:13, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arbitration==<br />
Has started. Please proceed [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool here] --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:35, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Uhh, thanks I guess. By the way, shouldn't it be "nicknames given by 2 Cool", instead of "given to 2 Cool"?--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:01, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::No because you gave them to us, they aren't given by us.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:06, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Oh sorry, I get it, misunderstood for a sec.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:18, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Category:Group Subpages ==<br />
<br />
Revert it again and I'll put up an A/VB case against you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Silver}}-- 08:00, 9 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Link me plox to the policy where it says i have to allow you to categorise my group subpages, then compliance you shall receive.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:03, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::The policy on '''bad faith''' where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::You have every obligation to present evidence for your assertion. I provide the following [[UDWiki:Specific_Case_Editing_Guidelines|link]], which ensures that a group may control the content of their page excepting a NPOV lead-in paragraph. A category, by definition, is not part of a prose paragraph and is therefore not covered by this exemption. I await this 'policy' on 'refusing administrative edits', the wording of which is straying close to using the administration status as a badge of authority. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:02, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::And while you're there, you might want to run an IP check on [[User:Insane1]], voting on one suggestion and not the other up for voting during a first edit seems suspicious to me. It won't be enough to sway the vote but is probably worth checking out. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:05, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::It wasn't his first edit at all. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:10, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I seem to have omitted the "in the suggestions system" portion of that sentence. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:20, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Hardly. Anyone can do administrative edits. I only have the obligation to present evidence if I take him to A/VB. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:08, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Indeed, anyone can, but editing here repeatedly quoting some policy you don't present for review and then expecting a user who has clear ownership of the page (as I ''have'' presented) seems inconsistent to a good faith approach. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:20, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Read the policy document, it is as consistent in defending J3D as it would save any bad faith action a user makes in his own space; ''Groups, for the most part, have sole property of their Group page on the wiki'' is an example, nothing in the policy is black and white, it allows for exceptions to the ownership clause, and I assume none of what is in that policy will defend J3D against the blanket ruling of "bad faith". J3D has also specified that he only gives a shit about ''me'' adding the category (something I do daily to every page on the wiki) onto the subpage, and you expect people to believe ''I'm'' acting in bad faith? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:34, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::Given the fact that you admit there's bad faith between the two of you, the good faith response would be to leave it alone and not incite drama as you are doing by threatening vandalism rulings. Why don't you see if someone else will apply it? And answer me this, what does the wiki lose, or in what way is it harmed by this lack of category? It may appease your sense of CDO, but does nothing to assist the wiki in general or even help important pages, you know, like A/VD which you seem perfectly happy to leave in a false manner. Your comment on 'doing it everyday' I hope is incorrect as well given that's not the category that should be going on there either. And you've still yet to produce this 'policy' you harp on about. I've provided mine and am quite happy that the statement that groups may control the content of the page sufficient to cover this, or we'd be having massive drama wars on this when the Malton Marshalls were added to Category:PKer Groups. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 08:16, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::1. I never once said there was any bad faith on my end. 2. Look below. I already did suggest someone else do it, but at the moment he hasn't even reverted it. 3. Get your head out of your arse and stop pressing fallacies like I "need" a "policy" that says we can warn users for bad faith, you parasitical moron. 4. Specialpages like the one involved in this is specifically called a "maintenance page" by Mediawiki, hence of course it is an important part of maintenence. And in response to your lack of concern for anything less than an "important page", look at A/D and see your fucked up stance on "unimportant pages" yourself, and see who has the double standards here. 5. Don't say I have OCD because at leased ''my'' case of it goes towards a greater good, rather than your unfulfilling and pestering belief that you were brought on this earth to shit people off with your 'holy' ways. 6. You are the only user unhappy with the A/VD edits so shut the fuck up and actually consider that your opinion on them probably shouldn't be treated as the be-all of truth on this wiki.<br />
:::::::::So actually consider what you are doing just now, Iscariot, you are watching a little shit-stirrer try and mess with the only thing on this wiki that shouldn't generally be messed with, Mediawiki maintenance, no doubt waiting for this to flip out of control (thanks to a certain meddling user, you, moreso than me) and then cry vendetta if he actually gets punished for his immature, counter-productive, butthurt and overall unnecessary behaviour. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:32, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Wait, you want to go into a barrage of obscenities and then try and appeal to my sense of reason. Your 'productive' CDO may be clouding your logic. Given that the majority of your emotional tirade belongs on other pages, the only one I'll respond to is that concerning A/VD, there is a problem, it's not opinion, it's fact based on the escalations policy. Boxy's actions are no different to Nubis' that caused the situation. Given you are a sysop and one of the few users able to rectify the problem I'd be considerably more impressed if you applied your energies to that rather than engage in this case of edit warring, drama stirring and vandalism threatening over an inconsequential page.<br />
<br />
::::::::::Finally, I didn't start the policy here, you did. And I quote ''"The policy on bad faith where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) "'' You have made a claim, the burden of proof is ''always'' on the claimant. I'm simply asking you to prove what you have said. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 08:43, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Sorry. I read the first sentence and stopped indefinitely, learn that I have no intention of appealing to your sense of ''anything'', full stop. I no longer have an interest in this, and hence I have no more interest in arguing with you. Unlike yourself, users like Boxy at leased have initiative in fixing problems rather than inflaming them, so I consider this topic closed and I'm treating it as such. Bleat to someone new. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 09:02, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Why is it so hard for you to provide a link to something you say exists? Is it so hard for a sysop on this wiki to demonstrate their own claims? Or have you just started inventing policies like Hagnat used to? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:38, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::I just had a read through the vandalism policy (because none of the others are really relevant here), and there isn't anything about this type of edit. The situation isn't helped by the vagueness of the policy. The only thing that the policy actually DOES say about it is that they should go to Arbies, which we all know would be a pointless waste of time. There's nothing about admin edits, there's nothing about user page rights over-ruling the advancement of the wiki. Neither side is covered by policy, but, as Iscariot noted, the burden of proof IS unfortunately on the claimant.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:52, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::Why is it so hard for you to understand that after ''what I want'' is fixed, I have ''no intention'' of arguing with you? I have no, NO interest in continuing this once someone has stepped in a mediated this issue and since Boxy has, I have absolutely no interest in continuing the argument. Learn to actually care for the wiki rather than fix your desire to cause trouble and 'show up' the sysops. I'm the one with OCD, by the way. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:22, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::And by the way, [[UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines#General_Conduct|shut the fuck up now]], will you? Second last clause. we have the authority to destroy any value in the effort to crust "Bad Faith", ie. the umbrella ruling that can theoretically serve any purpose in aid of ridding of loopholes in the wiki. Deal with it. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:22, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::No, that's not what you said. You said ''"The policy on bad faith where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) "''. Please show me the ''"policy on bad faith"'', not the section on sysop conduct guidelines put in there for emergency situations. Please give me a link to the policy that you claimed exist that explicitly states a user cannot ''"(refuse) administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki"''. Please show how the sentence ''"You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing"'' in '''any''' way shows good faith on your part and acceptable conduct on your part. If not (and I don't think you can) then you have now become the new version of Hagnat, claiming policy where none exists and then falling back "I can do it because I is sysops and teh guidelines say I can so I'm not listening to you". -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 03:42, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::No, you shut the fuck up because an Admin document that supports what I say. You honestly don't get it do you? You make me sick with your personal harrassment, and you really can't take a hint. So much for sucking my cock to have any chance of being a sysop, yes? And now it'll turn into a "Boxy and DDR are BOTH to immature to consider me for sysop" story now. I can't wait. Conversation closed a day ago, learn to read. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:02, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::::You see, that's the difference, I'm not telling you to stop talking. I'm asking you to provide the policy you claim existed in the beginning. You can't, and the guidelines do not back you up on this. You cannot claim that a condition put in to prevent harm to the wiki entitles you to engage in an edit war with a user you aren't getting along with. Own up, apologise to J3D for saying there was such a policy when they're isn't and then the conversation is over. How hard is it? I'm not sure where this idea about me going for sysop came from, but as you well know there are only three users I will accept a nomination from, and two are inactive. Don't believe me? Go nominate me right now like Anime did and watch how quickly it gets archived. However none of this changes the fact that you were claiming a policy that doesn't exist, you were using your status as a sysop to attempt to get your own way and that you are now running to what should be an emergency condition for when the wiki is subject to extreme disruption to garnish your error with some semblance of credibility. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 05:16, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::Wait, what? For all I know, it could exist in 50,000 policy documents and you could be bluffing for all I care, I never actually looked to verify the claim. You know why? It was a figure of speech, hence the bolding of '''Bad Faith''' to outline what he would have been banned for. Obviously you knew this because you aren't a moron but you are such a parasite in that way you behave that the thought wouldn't pass me by, that you pretend to think that I'm using my sysop status as a badge for anything, when rather it is more my status as an actual member of the community, whereas you are just a little piddling child who will struggle to find one logical fallacy in an argument he has nothing to do with, then bounce in, using it as the doomsday weapon of the decade. Say what you want after this, I won't be replying to your cesspit-creating nonsense. The page is fixed, you are not. I'm fulfilled. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:36, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::::So we have "<b>The policy on bad faith</b> where refusing administrative edits on your page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. <b>You can find the link yourself</b>, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) " where you state there is a policy and there is a link to be found, contrasted with "For all I know, <b>it could exist</b> in 50,000 policy documents and you could be bluffing for all I care, <b>I never actually looked to verify the claim</b>." where there isn't a policy and you didn't even look before demanding a user leave your preferred edit to his owned page. You can quibble about semantics and logical fallacies all you want. You lied. You lied to try and get your own way and won't even have the good grace and dignity to apologise to J3D for this. ''"that you pretend to think that I'm using my sysop status as a badge for anything"'' Erm, '''you''' were the one who just tried to claim that the Sysop Guidelines were applicable in making you right, you can't invoke them if you're being a normal user. Therefore you're either trying to use your status to get your own way (as evidenced by invoking the clause in the sysop guidelines) or you're trying to get your own way by inventing a new policy/quoting one that can in no way apply. Which is it?<br />
<br />
:::::::::::::::::::::I further note that you in no way continue to try and paint me as having promotion prospects since you do not appear to have put up a nomination. Another attempt to divert attention from what's happened here failing? I think so. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 05:54, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
I actually think you guys might have found the pettiest possible thing to threaten each other with A/VB over. Just take it to Arby's or something and be done with it because I don't think anybody really believes they're going to ''convince'' the other side of their argument. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:26, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Arbie's isn't needed in regards to the '''maintenence''' of the wiki, only over its content. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:34, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::It can quite literally be about whatever you want it to be about. That's the whole point. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 08:01, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Fair enough. But the point of this isn't to make a large amount of drama, which is why I'm making this simple: If he reverts it, I'll ask someone to just put it there themselves and hopefully he'll keep it up there, considering he's stated numerous times that he's only interested in keeping me off the page, not some random user who has similar intentions. If he reverts that, he can go to A/VB for all I care. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:08, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
/section, thanks to boxy. I no longer have any desire to pursue this at the current time. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:37, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Someone wanna bring me up to date on what the fuck has happened? In the meantime i'm rereverting charlies edit.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 17:01, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:oh wow boxy did, was that what his a/m case was for? If so epic,. i might go check now..brb--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 17:05, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Witch Hunt == <br />
I have been wiki absent for a couple of days due to other shit so I had a look through the archive to see what happened with boxys misconduct and I decided to read up on [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive/J3D/2009 this]. I really do feel for you dude, the way those who didn't want you in in the first place twisted and turned all of it just to get you demoted, when the original misconduct case was brought about 1 thing only.... You really did get the hard end of this stick and I am not posting this out of butthurt, I just hope others go back and have a look at some of the actions of the people in there and despite their opinion of you, maybe form some opinions on the poor form of some of the current admin team in this time.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:23, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Box is the only current admin that had any sort of authority in that anyway, so why rag on them? And it's weird, and it's hard for people who know Jed and Nick IRL to fathom (trust me), but it's actually a common ''truth'' that somehow Nick ''always'' did have access to Jed's account, so if you actually think about it from their point of view, it has its grounds, no matter how ridiculous it seems to you and me. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:26, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 10:41, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::get some original material bob, I hahaha'd you off the ballpark the other day when you pulled your cannons on DDR, you arent very useful hey....And DDR, no, it isnt about what access they had or WHY he got demoted, it is more about how the misconduct case was for one thing, and then escalated into a million other things that were completely irrelevant and basically the sysops opinion on whether Jed should be a Sop or not...not if he had committed misconduct with the act that Cyberfag brought to fruition. If people thought that Nick and Jed were sharing accounts or whatever, and no, I personally do not see a crime in sitting next to a sysop while he uses his account, then those people should have made a misconduct or demotions case with the appropriate information and proof at hand, rather than using an offbeat joke comment as an excuse to bring out the big guns and debate his worthyness. Regardless of if he was fit to be a sysop or not, when the case was brought forward for an off colour joke, and the sysops at hand decide they are going to bring forward unrelated things and then manipulate it into a vote for demotion, all over a joke that was laughed off by the first 3 sysops, then yeah, it is the definition of a witch hunt. Also you don't have to have been a sysop then to have been part of the Witch Hunt at hand, honestly. This wasn't even aimed at you it is just that Jed will check this now that they are in Thailand.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:01, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::the tl;dr is that, the case wasnt about what Jed got demoted for, so basically it was a witch hunt from box and others, because they didnt have the authority that the crats who bought him into the team did, this was the only way to get him out without going through the proper avenues, ie the people who were elected to be Crats--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:03, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::tbh I saw it as no different as anything they pinged mighty Grim for in ''that'' misconduct case, and as a Sysop I think there is nothing wrong with ''calling'' (a vote for) demotion over long-term issues despite the one case being completely different... I know it sounds harsh and abusive but that's just how I see it, if you can be called for promotion at any time based on long-standing good efforts then the opposite shouldn't be totally shunned just because it's 'unfair'. Whether it should have been used for J3D is irrelevant (though I'm not surprised given the circumstances around his pm bid) but yes. More power to the hungry ops. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 12:43, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::''"Box is the only current admin that had any sort of authority in that anyway, so why rag on them?"'' The. General. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 03:46, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Though you are correct, I mostly just mean the major players in the demotion, the 'instigators'. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:14, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:fair, at least something of worth comes out of you, which is more I can say for certain others--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
sexy you are the best poster on the whole wiki. serious. you own {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:47, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
i reckon we should demote the cunt {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:51, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I don't have to be a good poster, I'm not a System Operator--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::neither do i, maggot {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:14, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I don't really know where your superiority complex comes from in life, I guess you get online and it is a world away from irl amirite?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:46, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::whoa there with all the hemmin and the hawwin and the birdsong {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:52, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGq5FeUv3zk I found your youtube channel], you were sure it would be a secret hey? There are people who can help you bob. You are not alone out there, never alone. I wont help you though, you're too much of a fag for me to be associated with.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:02, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::OH MY GOD ''how did you find itttttttttt'' {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:03, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::i feel so exposed... nobody is safe from messr. Read's detectiv skillz {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:08, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::: *smug*--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
''I personally do not see a crime in sitting next to a sysop while he uses his account,'' This made me LOL because that is why Nubis was demoted. At least Nubis and I were never accused of abusing check user... --[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 16:24, 22 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Untrue. Not only was jed demoted for stuff relating to that ''anyway'', There was also evidence to support that you had permanent access to the nubis account from locations other than her/his own, something your initial claim entailed. Sheesh. You are actually a troll with all of these claims that you make, right? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 16:33, 22 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==those stupid groups that include people whom you know don't want to be a part of your shitty jokes==<br />
next time you make one of them you'll earn yourself an A/VB case {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:16, 17 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:well considering it's not vandalism, I am sure you will earn one for shitting up the admin pages. Take him to A/A over it, so he can't make any groups like that again or something, but don't try and be an internet tuff guy now.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 11:06, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::wrong! but thanks anyways {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:00, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Arbitration ==<br />
An interim [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool#Interim_Ruling Ruling] has been made.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 10:58, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:and so has my response.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:03, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
hey duder thad made his final ruling. I'd like to "claim" that I'm not a part of the hate club so remove me from the page. cheers {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:36, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:but you hate 2 Cool do you not? Anyway you shalt have compliance but i do think you belong there.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:10, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Racist Flame ==<br />
<br />
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, assuming you were ''making a good faith edit when you recently unloaded a slew of racial slurs''. Actually, typing that sentence demonstrates the absurdity of it. Particularly in the context of the [[The Southern Cross Club|the group page]], where you commented, [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:The_Southern_Cross_Club&diff=1582137&oldid=1582065 your flame] is in poor taste, to put it mildly. Do you agree?<br />
<br />
Rather than make a vandalism case out of it, I'd like to give you an opportunity to make a brief and sincere retraction alongside your original comment. Or at the very least, use this space to explain your reasoning behind making such an edit.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 02:20, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:he was pretty clearly being ironic, hope this helps. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 02:59, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Might as well add yourself. [[User:Giles Sednik/List of Wiki Puritans|Now.]] --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 03:02, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::lmao {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:08, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::well done good sir.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:03, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Its a talk page, i'm allowed to be racist and yeah, ask bob why i say things next time, he seems to know.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:03, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::If we ever get around to that TOS bullshit you might not be! bloop bloop bloop --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 07:23, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
[[User:Giles_Sednik/List_of_Wiki_Puritans#The_List|Done.]] And I love using "irony" as an excuse to vent all the crap you wish you could say in public. Yeh that was cutting edge humor there. But like you said, it's the internet and you're allowed to be a racist. *golf clap* --{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 11:37, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I don't think you quite get what irony is. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:09, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::[http://www.answers.com/topic/irony Yeh yeh yeh definition 1a]. I get it. But I don't buy it, particularly as an excuse. It has become all too commonplace for people say something indefensible and then claim irony as their defense. Example: ''"You're such a fucking (insert racial slur). Durr haha I was being ironic don't get upset."''<br />
::Also, while we're on the subject, irony is more that the dictionary definition, and there '''is''' a difference between sarcasm and irony. And there's a BIG difference between using irony to demonstrate the absurdity of an idea or argument, and the way cybertrolls use racial slurs without being able to articulate what they think they're being ironic about.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 13:08, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::you think you're super astute but you're really not. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:29, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Nu uh. YOU!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 14:18, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::fix'd--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 14:53, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::So wait was that edit vandalism or what? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::yeah. I'd delete SA's own post but you've just replied to it, so I'll leave it up to you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:10, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::fuck charlie you're getting too good at picking up on my plans....since you've foiled me i'll in turn leave it up to giles. 09:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC) {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::lol. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Lol'd@N3D ==<br />
<br />
Some of your finest work my friend ;)--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== awww ==<br />
<br />
You just missed a really funny A/M case, SA started trolling finis' talk page without knowing that it was protected. I especially loved it because it used to be what we all joked about getting ops for, so we could harass finis even after he A/PT'd his talk page. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 07:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah, it was pretty funny, especially when DDR was all "uh uh SA you're a dumbass and the page is protected" and shit. :D --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 13:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::And when I snuck my own snide asshole message in the edit summary so Finy could see it anyway :D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 14:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Yeah...Dick.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 16:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Ohi was watching from the depths. Just becausei'm not editing doesn't mean your every move isn't being monitored. So was it at a slap on the wrist or what? I think he deserved a good ol' spanking.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 16:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I have a second warning now. I can't do anything semi-bad for a bit D: --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 16:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Oh as if you were watching from the depths. I know you. If you watch, you ''have'' to comment. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 23:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::^--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 23:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::It was one night charlie! it didn't mean anything, stop acting like you understand me!! *storms out of the room sobbing* {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:18, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Why ==<br />
[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87_%D9%85%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AE%D8%AF%D9%85%D8%A9]...Why my profile? I don't even know you. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 05:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Why is this comment on Jed's talk? Also, I translated that heading, and it reads: "The Enemies of God". I'd assume he doesn't like you.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Oh, now I get it. That looked like a user page aty first. Strange.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I think its actually something different, can't remember. I think they meant something else when they made it. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Someone I know translated it, it says something about allah in all that stuff (I didnt pay attention) and then it says Enemies of God: Colonel Cunt. I was just curious who i killed so i can do it again :D --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 23:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::OH, I thought you guys were talking about the group name. They all have arab names and spam derka derka and shit, classic xD --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 23:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Oh that, yeah you killed me, just look for a sandmonkey and kill them, its probably me. although i'm inactive atm. how'd you find that page btw? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Probably searched his UD profile through the wiki I bet. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::What a self indulgent prick, lucky he's on the kill list! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::lol. Btw I just got back from work and while I was there I thought of [[Negronet]], and thought of you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Does that have any context aside from that its similar to necronet? Either way its still amusing...{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:10, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::I dont even remember where i found it to be honest...i might have hit random page, i was pretty bored a few days ago and it came up with one profile on that page so naturally i clicked that. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 03:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== OMFG DONT COMMENT ON MY TALK PAGE OMG WTF ==<br />
<br />
Ull maek me sew mahd!! Il have 2 delyt it u babbeh--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Unfortunately he gave me no other opportunity than to pursue justice via administration pages. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== awesome ==<br />
<br />
I found this in the Unused Templates bin:<br />
<br />
{{Template:NoJ3D}}<br />
<br />
Nice. I might actually start using it too, hilarious ;D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 11:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:was only unused because bob added me to his. He cant handle the Pwnage.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:36, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I never used that template; I have the code straight on my talk page. J3D made that a few minutes after I posted it. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::I caught a largemouth bass, a koi and a cyberbob today--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::J3D would love to be important enough to command his own "no j3d" template... pretty lame he's got to create it himself though :D <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:21 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:::::lol, [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Template:NoJ3D&action=history not awesome]... actually quite the opposite <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:23 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
::::::I think you are missing the classic "take the piss out of yourself, but make people slightly offput by your pretend arrogance" thing that Jed has been working on for a long, long time now.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:26, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::And always will be. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::lol, "classic"... :D <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 14:04 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
So anyways, new vote now, who votes [[Template:NoJ3D]] replace [[Template:Verdict]] on A/VB from now on? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 22:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I vote to merge the two.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 01:37, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I was gonna link from my sig and have a disclaimer stating that having that template isn't binding, but then the share mass of the job queue killed the net :( and yeah boxy i'm totally cool with thefact i made it myself :) plus all i really did was take the code from bobs page and cp it. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:10, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah. I had no qualms about you making it yourself, just find it a surprisingly fitting template for how I feel about you. Zing! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I'll keep that in mind next time i "post" you a letter :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not use admin pages to harass people on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 11:16, 19 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:what the fuck is this shit? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:07, 25 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== ban ==<br />
<br />
if u get banned again, you still have 5 hours 56 minutes of wrongly used ban time which I'm pretty sure you haven't used. [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_07#User:J3D_.282.29]]. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 02:37, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:that's dumb, you're dumb. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:10, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Remember how well the 'ban credit' idea worked out the last time? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 06:24, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Nup, cause I never saw it used properly in practice. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 06:59, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I will nevar be banned again! But yes i do have that in the bank. i tried to use it but its kinda hard when you're banned to inform s'ops that you have ban credit. Perhaps we need [[A/BC]] (might copyright that actually, groovy name) which even when banned you can still post on. Or just more up to the minute banners? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:17, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Ban Credit is such a rare case that it would not be worth it ''at all''. And Misanthropy the reason this is different from the rest is that he was banned legitimately but the vote was overruled later, the reason it wasn't applicable before was because when nubis and I both were misconducted for it, it was because we fucked up the data and banned them when they shouldn't have been at all. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 09:02, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
By the way, making a group soon with me, guy, a bunch of kids at MHS who are still into UD and maybe a few more guys from the [[ATO]], will be pretty casual, interested? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 09:02, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:yeah sure hit me up with the deets. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:22, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::No prob nig I'll fbook them too you and here too, once I make the group, should be a week at the most from here on, so basically at worst case scenario i can talk to you about it next weekend when you hit up procastle. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:13, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::lolcastle.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:14, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== bbk ==<br />
<br />
i found a mid-2007 version of the BBK page which had our full memberlist in all its glory, etc.<br />
<br />
what do you think of me reverting the BBK page and (most of) its info back to just when we initially broke up? imo it serves the group better to have the glorious version of the page up there instead. just some food for thought? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:36, 12 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:As opposed the penny heights version??? Hmmm i guess i cuold work with that. If the penny heights version was moved to a subpage. Link us the version you want. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:31, 12 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::[http://web.archive.org/web/20071013182832/wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Beatbox_kids]. The penny heights version was gay tbh -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:11, 12 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
btw lol @ us nigs meatpuppeting ahlg and cheese into crat. looking at old archives, i forgot all that shit, only remembered us getting SA in -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:23, 13 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:hahahah we did???? sweet!!! those are two that elected me to op i think..{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:39, 22 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::yeah they did, then everyone raged so hard AHLG self demoted. silly old willy look what you've done. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:35, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Fun ==<br />
''Can you guess who is who? Answer on our talk page, and win a fabulous prize*''<br />
<br />
I [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Image:BBK!.jpg say] 6, if only for the irony of certain vandal escalations you received in the past. If not, then I take my chances with 3 >:D. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 12:17, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Nah, I reckon J3d's 7, although he could be 15. It's hard to tell from the photo.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 12:29, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::He's the mysterious arm behind 16. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 13:31, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Yeah, I noticed that funny thing as well. Looks like he's completely covering another guy up. 10 looks like he's going to kill someone btw.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 13:52, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::The guy behind 16 is 17; he just has a really long neck.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 13:55, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::You;re al wrong but I implore your to keep trying!! If you keep tring i'll give you epic hints as to which one is read or me `-- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 16:27, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Read is 10, J3d is 4.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 16:39, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::I thought I read somewhere Read was of aboriginal origin, but that may have been a joke. Since DDR is da leader, we have to look for the alpha male in there. <s>17</s> 2. Also, is it me or do the way 3 and 4 hold hands suggest something more then friendship? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 17:03, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== [[Talk:2 Cool/Bob's Epic Fails]] ==<br />
<br />
you like? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 14:10, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:i do. I'll put it on. honestly if you just stayed in the [[2CFC]] you could have put it on yourself. speaking of which, fucking lol at the all the 2 cool fanclub bullshit, good thymes.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:06, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Yup. Can I join now plz? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 05:01, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::zomgz happiest day of my life. i'll have to consult with nick. this comment counts as your desire to be a member and you CAN NEVER CHANGE YOUR MIND. ps srsly 250 edits is sof ucking much, must have been an ep wiki whore back in the day to smash it in under a month. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:39, 18 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Nallan&diff=1779397
User talk:Nallan
2010-09-16T00:21:22Z
<p>J3D: /* thyme for a new featured lolcation */</p>
<hr />
<div><div align=center><br />
{| style="background: silver; border-spacing: 1px; clear: both; font-style: italic; margin-bottom: 20px; text-align: center; width: 180px; -moz-border-radius:12px; fontcolor: black"<br />
|<br />
<font color=white><nowiki>*</nowiki>DING!<nowiki>*</nowiki></font><br />
<br><br />
Current floor: '''CP'''<br />
<br><br />
On this floor: '''Talk page'''<br />
|}<br />
</div align=center><br />
{{User:Nallan/nav}}<br />
{{UserTemplate|<br />
borderwidth=2px|<br />
bordercolor=black|<br />
width=300px|<br />
background=#993300|<br />
image=Stop_hand.png|<br />
headerbackground=black|<br />
headercolor=yellow|<br />
headertext=Please read first!|<br />
mainbackground=#3399cc|<br />
maincolor=Black|<br />
maintext=New posts at the bottom please (press the + symbol at the top of the page), unless continuing a previous conversation. If it is a bilateral conversation I will place all responses on the other party's talk page. If it is multilateral all responses should be kept on this page for clarity.<br />
}}<br />
<br><br />
<br />
== IRC ==<br />
<br />
Get back on it. I know how to fix your problem. --{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 11:11, 20 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Before you try and move the nomination again==<br />
I suggest you read up on what Criterion 9 is. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 07:52, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:Those guys are deliberately trying to subvert the system. Until we get a sysop's comment on the issue I think it would be better if it stayed where it is. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 07:56, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::Rules are indeed rules. Criterion 9 is fairly explicit, and those Keep votes are violating it. As far as I'm concerned ''they'' are in violation of the rules. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 08:00, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::I wasn't aware that I was replying to myself. That's generally what the colons are used for. Oh well. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 08:03, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::We shall see. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 08:04, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning (but only a cuddly, soft one ^.^==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]] Stop agitating sysops and making them look stupid, but not actually breaking any rules. Doing so will result in an abundance of Soft Warnings, so that we can keep those self esteems in check.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:34, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:Nooo! It's alright, I've got Toto's hit "I Won't Hold You Back" to comfort me. srsly you guys.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:35, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==[[A/D]]==<br />
Regarding your vote on several user redirect pages i have separated the case into individual cases, if you feel so inclined please recast your vote on each page relevant to how you feel about that particular redirect being kept on the wiki. Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== U r a [[Caunt Street Police Department]] ==<br />
<br />
[[ALiM]] [[2 Cool|style]], [[User:Nallan|ya]] dig?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:44, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Hey ==<br />
<br />
I think I am coming down with something.<br />
<br />
{{*}}cough*--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
:aawww.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:16, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Whats good with you DAAAAAWWWWGGG!!! ==<br />
<br />
hey how do you/could you make a kick ass template for my groups page?--[[User:Pyro1499|CJ]] 23:46, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==CUNT==<br />
I FUCKIGN HATE FUCKING CROSSOVER IT NEVER FUCKING WORKS FOR ME--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== nationstates 2 ==<br />
<br />
is ere {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 21:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== p--==hey ==<br />
<br />
heyhnik u t charlies house, its it ogogd/? i am at hem cool party but it wa shit niggers dancin luz--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Quiz Prize ==<br />
<br />
There you go. <br />
<br />
{{QuizPrize12}}<br />
<br />
--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 12:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Hey Dude ==<br />
<br />
Wana go on a vandalism spree tonight? I mean now that Jed is Sysop we can TOTALLY do what we want, without risk of punishment. I mean, imagine the havoc we could wreak by changing pages up in an unorganized fashion? Man the few minutes until someone reverted them would be GOLDEN.<br />
<br />
So, you in?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
:HELL YEAH!!!!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 08:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==A/VD==<br />
I struck a warning of yours. I think this is the bit where i tell you to be a good boy and don't end up on the [[A/VB|wrong side of the tracks]].--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
:with the niggers. Sorry i almost left this post here without including a racist comment...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Welcome home==<br />
I got you a [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2008_10|present]] ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Go vote==<br />
On the ALiM awards that i unanimously decided required it. Voting will be Me, Nallan, Read, Ross and anyone i deem sufficiently alim to vote who rolls up in the near future.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Classic lulz==<br />
right [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Deletions#The_Mighty_Republic_of_Lolz|har]].--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== You want some? ==<br />
<br />
[[Malton Manhunt/Axe Hack's Manhunt 2]]. If you're still interested. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 13:43, 19 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:[[User:Finis Valorum/Archive]]. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 17:22, 24 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==[[Malton Manhunt/Axe Hack's Manhunt 2]]==<br />
<br />
This is just a reminder to tell you, and the other contestants, that [[Malton Manhunt/Axe Hack's Manhunt 2|Axe Hack's 2nd Manhunt]] is commencing on the 20th of June. The [[Malton Manhunt/Axe Hack's Manhunt 2|playing area]] will be the suburbs around [[East Becktown]], so start moving there and run around the place to get used to your arena, if you don't, it could cost you your life! You are expected to be in the fighting area by the start of June 20th, so don't forget! {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 07:07, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:It's been delayed till 1st July, just so you know. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 02:22, 20 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Found this lolcaunt in my sandbox==<br />
{{Template Help|<br />
trying=to be awesome|<br />
yes=2 Cool|<br />
no=Special:Listusers/sysop|<br />
}}<br />
<br />
i dont want to hurt your feelings jed and nick but......<br />
<br />
if you need help being awesome, doesnt that make you un-awesome?<br />
and on the contrary, if you didnt need help, wouldnt that mean you were already awesome?<br />
<br />
in no way do i think that the sysops are awesome or that you guys arent, im just saying that currently, the template is incorrect--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:09, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:nick jed and read, locked in an immortal struggle against The Sysops... I like that it has a nice ring to it. We could be looking at a fantasy series here... talkin 6 figure sums here. call me {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:14, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::You need to stop having these fantasies about us, im sure its not great for your health, bob. Its not going to happen, we're not going to let you into our clique your not cool enough, nor popular enough.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:16, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::how did the minor edits thing work out btw, are you still BEING OPPRESSED? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:18, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Changing the subject wont change the sticky sheets you awaken to after your wet dreams and fantasies about being in the clique. Im sorry but your just not good enough.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:20, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::actually I got edit conflicted and didn't feel like writing up a whole new response so I just tacked on a couple of extra colons, would it make you feel better if I did? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:25, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::You need to stop worrying about making me feel good and start realizing that there isn't a chance for us. Not now, not ever.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:27, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::hm yes I guess I really do want to be part of your clique.... ps no I don't, "start realising" that you actually aren't impressive. I talk to you because I still hold out hope that you might be driven to quit again (LOLLLLL) over it {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:34, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::Typical anger, can happen when someone is so blatantly rejected. Many people suffer from it, you can google it if you wish. For the record, I didnt quit, I moved out of home, and posted under an alias for a while, but ultimately my heart/time wasnt in it :(. Right now I have a week off, before I move home again for personal reasons.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:45, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::An alias? Why would you do that? What was wrong with posting with your original account? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:58, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Wanted to stir some trouble with a clean slate, but after about a day of editing, I couldnt be bothered, and worries of rent, work, studies took over. Stop caring about me though its kind of gay--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:10, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::lolstudies.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:35, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::I dont actually "care" I'm just subtly changing the subject.... dont tell read he'd laugh {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:36, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
lulz. p.s it does make sense. coz the person is trying to be awesome, so obviously they aren't at the point in which the template is given to them. and then if they want help they should talk to 2C coz they know how to be awesome. and the ops dont so talk to them if you dont want to be awesome. also wtf i put this up like a year ago why we all talking about it now?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:22, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:Oh I don't know... maybe because it's [[ALIM'S SECOND FUCKING BIRTHDAY]] in like [[2 Cool|2]] months!!!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 22:14, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php?title=Urban_dead&diff=1998138564&oldid=1998135250 tough guy] ==<br />
<br />
Your idiotic Vb case of old, somehow made it onto the Urban Dead article on ED. Congrats, bitch ;) --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 15:12, 31 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:lollllll {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 15:25, 31 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::fucking sweet! internet tough guy!!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:00, 1 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:It's not idiotic you're idiotic so there {{unsigned|J3D|06:38, 1 September 2009 (BST)}}<br />
::K --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 08:48, 1 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== lol remember this doozy? ==<br />
<br />
{{Black Hole}}--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 06:28, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:lol yeah.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:49, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::we were what? 12?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:58, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
{{Warning}} <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 04:28 5 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:I maintain that it was tastefully censored.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 10:40, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arbitration==<br />
Has started. Please proceed [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool here] --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:36, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Oh good, you're back. Now you can write something over at that Arby's case or I will push for Thadeous to finish up without you. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:42, 2 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I will also make mention of that delightful new page; no doubt that will end up being factored into his decision as well. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:44, 2 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::I was going to wait until the one month mark, which I believe was the 6th. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Silver}}-- 07:40, 2 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Arbitration ==<br />
An interim [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool#Interim_Ruling Ruling] has been made.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 10:58, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arbitraton==<br />
Oi turn around cunt i need to talk to you{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:41, 20 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Haha, I tried to visualise this IRL and laughed. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 09:42, 20 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Say it to my face (ie. my talk page).--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:43, 20 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Thanks for the revive ==<br />
<br />
If that was you (am currently to dumb to find your profile link on your wiki page, sorry, must be the lingering effects of zombification), which I'm just going to assume. Much appreciated! -[[User:Pinkgothic|pinkgothic]] 21:01, 31 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==thyme for a new featured lolcation==<br />
<br />
probably. to give alim some more street cred. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:30, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:can do this if you'd trsut me-- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 16:37, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::what would you pick, charlie?--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:24, 3 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I guess I'd cycle through the bolded ones, in order of best names -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 17:15, 3 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::i trust you to the do the description. butttt also of importance is a good description and at least one decent pic. Being [[2 Cool]] is a harder job than you might have first thought charles. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:19, 4 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::True dis. I am going to fix up [[Maul Walk]] when I can to make some gay star wars references. RIP finis </3 -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 15:30, 4 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Actually I take that back. [[Fyfhyde Plaza]] is amazing and should be featured everywhere. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:50, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Name=ok, but too much like a welsh hyde park. the article fucking sucks. do a better job at choosing the featured lolcation or you're fired. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:14, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==happy 30th==<br />
<br />
30,000th hit on [[ALiM]] that is!! Well not quite yet but we're getting damned close. New featured location (charlie) should seel the deal. Hazzah{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:21, 16 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Developing_Suggestions&diff=1779395
Developing Suggestions
2010-09-16T00:19:32Z
<p>J3D: /* Discussion (Sleeping bag) */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{Developing Suggestions Intro}}<br />
==Suggestions==<br />
<!--Put your new suggestion immediately under this line--><br />
===Digestion update===<br />
{|<br />
|'''Timestamp:''' --[[User:Chris Ortego|Chris Ortego]] 06:57, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
|-<br />
|'''Type:''' Skill<br />
|-<br />
|'''Scope:''' Zombies<br />
|-<br />
|'''Description:''' I think it would be great if zombies with digestion could gain a chance for bonus hp for successful biting attacks. It would be wise if they accept this and use it when the zombie count #'s drop more.<br />
====Discussion (Digestion Update)====<br />
<br />
I actually think most of the survivor count is from people with multiple accounts creating those level one firemen GKers or PKers everyday. I think its either spying sabotage or for flavour like if someone went crazy and attacked randomly in a situation, like when people run over each other because they begin to panic. --[[User:Chris Ortego|Chris Ortego]] 07:01, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Zombies with digestion already gain HP for successful biting attacks. Is there anything I miss? --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 08:19, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:As Spiderzed. Zombies already gain HP, so what is this suggestion for? {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 08:21, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
I was thinking about a bonus amount of hp but i guess I should incorporate that more --[[User:Chris Ortego|Chris Ortego]] 16:30, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Well they already gain 4HP per bite, just like using digestion on a corpse. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 17:02, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Maybe a bonus upon finishing a survivor off with a bite. Easier to eat when the meat is no longer struggling. [[User:Whitehouse]] 17:11, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
I thought it was saying that the zombie could go above the maximum HP limit. Either way, I have to admit that digestion HP recovery is mostly good for when there isn't a corpse in sight to eat. Also, I think a lot of people only use bite to infect survivors. (usually there is a corpse in sight...)--[[User:Kakashi on crack|Gat]] 06:05, 15 September 2010 (BST) <br />
----<br />
<br />
===Sentry Duty Skill===<br />
{|<br />
|'''Timestamp:''' --[[User:Chris Ortego|Chris Ortego]] 06:40, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
|-<br />
|'''Type:''' Skill<br />
|-<br />
|'''Scope:''' Skilled Survivors<br />
|-<br />
|'''Description:''' I am reintroducing the "sentry" idea to fit more properly with the new scouting skills of the survivors. The "Sentry Duty" skill.<br />
<br />
<br />
This is how it will work:<br />
<br />
You can buy this skill if you have bought the scout safehouse skill. You must be within your scouted safe house for the skill to work. When you buy the skill a new button will be available to you but it can only be used in your scouted safehouse. The function of the sentry skill is making the player guard the barricades and attack any zombies that may damage the barricade (for example a zombie clawing the barricade from EHB to VHB++)the player automatically attacks the zombie with the selected weapon (BUT THE PLAYER CAN ONLY BLOCK FIVE TIMES MAX).<br />
<br />
<br />
Here is a good example:<br />
<br />
John is happy. John just purchased the "Sentry Duty" skill today. John is preparing to leave the computer for the day and stopped in his safehouse with 16AP to spare(11 + 5 extra). John new he would be alone in that safe house for a long time tonight so he chose to click the drop down menu's next to the "Begin Sentry Duty" button. The first; how much time he wanted to guard for and the second; what weapon he was going on sentry duty with. John chose 24 hours and Shotgun(2)(This was a great choice for John because he had Advanced shotgun training). As John proceeded to click the "Begin Sentry Duty" button he realized there was a warning in red next to the button. John clicked the "Begin Sentry Duty" button. John could now automatically attack the next zombie that damages the barricades.<br />
<br />
<br />
2AP per hour - 1AP per hour = 1AP per hour so durring sentry duty john regenrates 1 AP an hour<br />
<br />
x = # of hours<br />
<br />
16AP - 15AP = 1AP + 1APx<br />
<br />
<br />
Within 13 hours there was a zombie that broke John's barricades down one level. John's character emediatelly jumped into action and shot the zombie intruder(gaining xp for the # of hours at post and the XP for the combat). But at any moment john could click the "End Sentry Duty" button that replaced the begin sentry duty button or preform an action besides talking and is refunded the AP used to pay every hour that hasn't been payed yet(saves the AP not used yet).<br />
<br />
<br />
1AP + (1AP * 13hours) = 14AP<br />
<br />
then after sentry duty ends<br />
<br />
14AP + 2APx<br />
====Discussion (Sentry Duty Skill)====<br />
I stopped reading after a paragraph. The fact that this means I missed 80% of the suggestion instantly means you're trying too hard with it. Simple things is better. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 06:47, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Thanks! I'll work on it. I thought that someone was gonna have to think this all out :D. --[[User:Chris Ortego|Chris Ortego]] 07:05, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
A few minor details (I also only read the first paragraph). First, it doesn't give you 5AP, it gives you a 10% chance that your 1AP action will cost 0AP. Secondly, this looks alot like firing through barricades.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:34, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Also, auto-attacks. And auto-attacks alone are a big red glaring suggestion no-no. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 08:20, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::As Mis, Yonn, and Spiderzed. Too long, attacking through barricades is almost always bad, and auto-attacks are something to avoid. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 08:23, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Lets see, we got... shooting through barricades, auto-attacks, auto-HITS (from what I read) and improper AP loss. The way I see this, it states a survivor can set up base in a building, create a sentry, sleep that night, check the sentry in the morning to make sure they are still blocking, spend a few AP searching/restarting sentry duty, and continuosly do this over and over again by simply checking the server every couple hours. On top of that, a CRAPTON of survivors could all set up this same thing at the same time, allowing them all to shoot the same zombie. Also includes multiple by a thousand rule now. Do headshots apply? *facepalms* I realize a lot of people aren't satisfied with Kevan's new skill, but how about we just say "this skill sucks" rather than try to ammend it with a million different ideas, like how we did such with certain zombie skills which are considered generally pointless until later on (or vice versa). Anyone, anyone? --[[User:Kakashi on crack|Gat]] 05:58, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:I'll give you credit though, you spelled guard right! (a lot of people spell it gaurd.) --[[User:Kakashi on crack|Gat]] 06:01, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
So, we have shooting through barricades, Auto hits and Multiply it by a billion? Yeah no.<br />
--[[User:TheWritingWriter|TheWritingWriter]] 00:44, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
----<br />
<br />
===Add "/" to the zombie vernacular===<br />
{|<br />
|'''Timestamp:''' {{User:Vapor/sig}} 21:25, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
|-<br />
|'''Type:''' Flavor<br />
|-<br />
|'''Scope:''' Zombies<br />
|-<br />
|'''Description:''' I'd like to see the inclusion of "/" (forwardslash) to the zombie vernacular. Why? So that some day zombies too may share links in-game as survivors do. How? Well were fowardslash added, it would only be a matter of time before someone came up with something similar to [http://tr.im tr.im] or [http://bit.ly bit.ly] that uses only characters found in the zamgrh alphabet. Why can't we do it now? Because I honestly can't think of a way of doing it without a forwardslash.<br />
<br />
====Discussion (Add "/" to the zombie vernacular)====<br />
I see no problem with this, nor do I see a reason to allow zombies to spam my screen with links that will rickroll me, and give my computer viruses. It is easy to overuse, and troll with, but at the same time could have significance. --[[User:Kakashi on crack|Gat]] 05:59, 15 September 2010 (BST) <br />
<br />
Zombies can now surf the internets? NecroTech never ceases to amaze. --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 08:12, 15 September 2010 (BST) <br />
<br />
You cant post links as a zombie? I never knew that, nor have I ever tried. Id put this in.<br />
--[[User:TheWritingWriter|TheWritingWriter]] 00:46, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
----<br />
<br />
===Sleeping bag===<br />
{|<br />
|'''Timestamp:''' {{unsigned|ErichZann|22:17, 12 September 2010 (BST)}}<br />
|-<br />
|'''Type:''' Item<br />
|-<br />
|'''Scope:''' <br />
|-<br />
|'''Description:''' A means of getting more HP/AP faster, at a slight cost of safety. Here's my Idea: It allows the user to gain <br />
<br />
A) 3 AP/ Hour(Max 24)<br />
<br />
B) 10 HP(Max)<br />
(whatever Kev wants)<br />
<br />
But the user must be inactive for at least, say eight hours straight(No Logging in), must have sleeping bag and the cost is being 20%(WKW)more vulnerable. <br />
<br />
The survivor is thought to be groggy/suprised and unable to outmanouvre the assailant(s)as easily. This is based on the idea of being active while attacked instead of just sitting still and getting hit. <br />
<br />
This suggestion is just something to add detail to the game. I don't have a good grasp on statistics, so I'll leave it to those better equipped.<br />
<br />
The personal motivation behind this is motivate less frequent use on the server, people who are logging in and logging out, spending just a couple of points at a time.<br />
|}<br />
====Discussion (Sleeping bag)====<br />
Nothing stops me logging on before I go to sleep, spending all my AP and then doing this, so that I'll have half my AP back by the time I wake up?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 22:29, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Seems like a good idea, as long as attacks either are more accurate against this person or do more damage. --[[User:Zamins|Zamins]] 00:09, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Only if you give the zombies an equivelant. Everyone should have an equal amount of playtime. [[User:Whitehouse]] 00:17, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
I'd say zombies currently have more playtime. I mean if a zombie gets killed they can just stand back up for 6 AP. If a survivor gets killed they have to wait at a revive point. Which pretty much takes a day or more to get revived. --[[User:Zamins|Zamins]] 00:28, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:It's your choice to stand around waiting for a revive, it doesn't however mean that the zombie form should be limited because of that. [[User:Whitehouse]] 00:42, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Survivors already sleep when they run out of AP. And if they recharge more AP than the usual rate it would go head-to-head with Kevan's [http://www.urbandead.com/faq.html#50ap rationale] on AP gain. I think you'll have better luck if it just regained HP very slowly (around +1 HP every two hours), and only for non-infected individuals. --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 01:54, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
1: Oh, geeze, I didn't know there was a secret way to not wait for a revive and still be a human. Please do tell us all the secret. 2: Limiting zombies, LIMITING ZOMBIES? How the hell is that limiting zombies? --[[User:Zamins|Zamins]] 09:01, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:By applying unbalanced buffs to one side, the other becomes limited in its capabilities. I want to be able to play my characters equally, no matter which side of the conflict they happen to be on when I log in. [[User:Whitehouse]] 10:07, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Where can I get one of these magic healing sleeping bags? I want one.--{{User:Mallrat/sig}} 11:04, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Ok, So i spend all my ap, go back into my safehouse which is EHB, then i go to sleep in real life, and BOOM almost all my AP is back. This is a terrible idea, you may as well have just suggested we get an increase in AP per half hour instead of masking it behind a sleeping bag.<br />
--[[User:TheWritingWriter|TheWritingWriter]] 20:42, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Unbalanced buffs? Zombies are way more powerful then humans. Zombies spend 6 ap to get up. Although this idea probably isn't the best to balance it, as it is overpowerd. --[[User:Zamins|Zamins]] 02:41, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Uh huh, and survivors only spend 10AP to put them down, versus 3-4 times that for zambah-ahn-harman agzahn. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:50, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Fine, back to the drawingboard... {{unsigned|ErichZann}}<br />
:Make it only usable outside buildings and offer an equivalent item/skill to zombies and I might agree with it. Otherwise, I think it creates unbalance (see TheWritingWriter's comment abaove). {{User:Vapor/sig}} 22:25, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
yawn has been suggested before. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:19, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
----<br />
<br />
===Necro-Chemical Recycling===<br />
{|<br />
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Kakashi on crack|Gat]] 01:54, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
|-<br />
|'''Type:''' Zombie Skill<br />
|-<br />
|'''Scope:''' Zombies<br />
|-<br />
|'''Description:''' '''*The hoards of Undead slowly lurch over the area, systematically destroying the buildings held by survivors. The oldest of the hoard who attack in the heavily scientist-based communities have learned to adapt to the syringe, and use it to increase their natural regeneration, making survivors be more cautious with improper use of the syringe.*'''<br />
<br />
Before I go any further into detail, specs and such, let me explain how I feel this works: A zombie is capable of "getting up off the ground" even after being shot in the head because the zombie "virus" gives them a natural form of regeneration which keeps their bodies working. This is plausible since in all actuality, the zombie wouldn't be able to get up if they were shot in the head, and if they didn't naturally regenerate, they would eventually rot into nothing. (and the term metagaming them getting up for fun purposes isn't a decent reason in my opinion) This regenerative process is triggered through the brain, which releases the correct chemical balances and particles to allow the zombie to get back up. This explains why a "headshot" makes the zombie have to pay more AP to stand up, because the brain has to repair itself first before repairing other areas of the body.<br />
<br />
The necrotech syringe "shuts down" the zombie virus, and uses regenerative effects to turn them human again. When a zombie bites them, the virus begins to leave its hibernated state. (I.E. infection)This also explains how when a PKer kills someone, they become a zombie, and not just "dead."<br />
<br />
What this stat does, is say that the zombie has rotted so much, and they have adapted enough, that they potentially have created a natural resistance to the virus-quelling part of the syringe, and are capable of using the regenerative properties within it to their advantage.<br />
<br />
So, anyways, the idea.<br />
<br />
A zombie can take the skill "Necro-Chemical Recycling" after obtaining brain rot, and flesh rot. (and preferably after reaching level 10 to prevent zerge abuse.) <br />
<br />
This skill adds a new stat to the zombie, it's called a "necro-bar" and provides three actions: Revive, Regenerate, and Resurrection<br />
<br />
<br />
The necro-bar has specs similar to the encumberance meter. Whenever a survivor uses a necrotech syringe on a zombie, the zombie gains 2% in this stat if they have the skill. (similar to a 2% encumberance) The stat goes up to 150% technically. (I.E. "Bob the zombie is injected with a syringe to no avail, his necro-bar is at 2%)<br />
<br />
When the zombie is brought back to life (for instance, in a powered necrotech lab, or in the revive part I'll explain later) they lose ALL points they had obtained in their necro-bar.<br />
<br />
'''Regenerate'''<br />
The most basic form of the Necro-Chemical Recycling is the ability to regenerate health. When the necro-chemical bar is at 30% or more, they can trade in 10%, and 1 AP for the equivalent of a FAK, healing 5 HP. (realize that 30% = 15 revive syringes they have been injected with.)<br />
<br />
Basically they recycle a small amount of the necrotech syringe stuff to increase their health slightly.<br />
<br />
'''Revive'''<br />
The more advanced form of Necro-Chemical Recycling is the ability to stand up for less AP when they have been killed. The Necro-chemical bas must be at 50% or higher, and uses up 25%. The zombie stands up for 5 less AP that one time, but stands up with 10 less HP. (that means they have to be injected 25 times to reach 50%, and it costs 12.5 syringes basically.)<br />
<br />
Basically, they take a large amount of the regenerative chemicals produced by the syringe to regenerate their brain enough to produce the correct things without having to wait for the brain to regenerate as long. (I.E. the -5 AP)<br />
<br />
'''Resurrection''' (small part that was nothing more than brainstorming)<br />
When at 100-150%, the zombie can spend 10 AP, and remove all necro-bar % to return to the survivor state. (they would fall to the ground as if they had been injected with an actual syringe.)<br />
<br />
The large chemical imbalance would shut down the virus starting the process basically.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Before you comment, let me say this... Please, PLEASE If you dislike the idea, just say "I dislike the idea" you hate it, just say "I f*ing* hate this idea!" but don't use the abuse excuse. It won't hurt my feelings, or anyone elses feelings if you just tell the truth.<br />
|}<br />
====Discussion (Necro-Chemical Recycling)====<br />
I read it all and I still think it's too complicated. And the term 'necro-bar' gives me a different kind of imagery.<br>A trenchcoater, a death cultist, and a brain rotter walk into a bar... --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 02:02, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Two things. What if the PKer's target had never been infected? Also, the HP healing factor is a partial dupe of the existing Digestion skill. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:17, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Whatever Maltonians were not infected early in the outbreaks have died a long time ago, and are not playable characters. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:32, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Far simpler solution that'll keep the same flavour - a skill, bought after flesh rot, that causes the zombie to gain, say, 5-10 HP when injected with a syringe, provided that syringe doesn't revive them (so in a raid on an NT, if it's powered then CRs work, and if it's not, shit just got serious). {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:22, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yes. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:32, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:: This suggestion is goddamn awesome. Sorry to be a downer, however, but things this complicated never get introduced. I like the idea that the syringes would heal rotted zombies though; if you put that up, it'll almost certainly go through. So yes, awesome idea, but too complicated for this game methinks. --[[User:Karloth_vois|Karloth Vois]] <sup>[[¯\(°_o)/¯]]</sup> 07:44, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
You got the canon completely right, what a rare treat. However, the idea is overcomplicated and underpowered. You need to {{KISS}}, especially when zombies are involved. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:32, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Surprisingly enough, I really like this. I'd prefer a few minor tweaks, e.g. points instead of a %, and renaming a couple of the things involved to fit more with what we've got: Necro-Bar becomes NP (Necro points). But all in all, I really like this idea. Brain rotted survivor players (or dual nature) can be revived slightly more easily, and zombies can have FAK equivalents. The standing more easily one I presume doesn't go below 1ap?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 09:56, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yep, standup cost would not go below 1 AP, making it generally useless to use said skill unless you were headshotted/don't have ankle grab.--[[User:Kakashi on crack|Gat]] 17:53, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
As VVV - too complicated for the actual results IMO. Zombies aren't really bothered about restoring HP or reducing stand-up costs as those have little impact in any case, and the rationale given doesn't really do it for me, or add much flavour.--{{User:Mallrat/sig}} 10:52, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
I'd lose it all apart from the stand up cost one. Its the one that best benefits zombies, which is what you want as a zombie skill. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:58, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Thanks for all the comments/suggestions! I was kinda surprised actually. This was more or less a rough draft, I'll probably submit a simplified version in DS in a few days with maybe a chart, or something like that to represent the data better.--[[User:Kakashi on crack|Gat]] 17:54, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
This is a great idea, Id vote for it. But as other people have mentioned, I think its a tad complicated for our little point and click game.--[[User:TheWritingWriter|TheWritingWriter]] 04:49, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
----<br />
<br />
===Hard Mode===<br />
{|<br />
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:TheWritingWriter|TheWritingWriter]] 00:54, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
|-<br />
|'''Type:''' Zombie Class<br />
|-<br />
|'''Scope:''' Zombies<br />
|-<br />
|'''Description:''' Zombie starts with Brain Rot<br />
|}<br />
====Discussion (Hard Mode)====<br />
<br />
Theres a good chance these were dupped, but what do you guys think? could add some interesting twists to being a zombie. --[[User:TheWritingWriter|TheWritingWriter]] 00:54, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:I think you should check before you post them, since otherwise you're wasting folks' time. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 01:19, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
You could discuss all the classes under one header you know. Anyhow, the problem is that zombies need skills which will help them earn XP at a decent pace. Ransack, Scent Fear, Digestion, Brain Rot, none of those help zombies earn nearly enough XP for the next level. Memories of Life might help, but very rarely. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 01:30, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:[[Suggestion:20071001_Military,_and_Scientist_Zombies%3F|This]] and [[PR_Class_New:_Survivor_%26_Zombie|this]] might interest you, already passed voting. [[User:Whitehouse]] 01:45, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
I deleted all the previous entries except this one. I kinda like the idea of starting the game with brain rot, adds moar challenge to the game. Sorta like the consumer class.--[[User:TheWritingWriter|TheWritingWriter]] 02:32, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Sounds like an easy multiple character opportunity to clog up revive points all over the city. --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 02:34, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
: Very easy chance for an asshole to abuse with multis... At the same time, I would have killed to have an alternate zombie class with brain rot, since personally, I like the idea of a harder chance at surviving as a zombie at lower levels. I mean heck, I got all the skills generally considered useless before getting the good skills as my first zombie for the reason of making the game more interesting. If there's a small note attached to it warning people who are new to UD about the effects the class has, (such as... "Hey, this class makes playing as a zombie just a tad bit harder early on, but is great for those who want a bit of a challenge." or something along those lines) then I would be perfectly fine with it. --[[User:Kakashi on crack|Gat]] 00:25, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Make it an option for all character classes - start normally, or start w/ brain rot. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:30, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Perhaps new characters could choose between Corpse (Vigor Mortis) or Rotten Corpse (Vigor Mortis ''and'' Brain Rot). No need to fool new survivors into ruining their lives, amusing as it would be. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:37, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
----<br />
<br />
===Scout Supplies===<br />
{|<br />
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Redoubt|Redoubt]] 22:33, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
|-<br />
|'''Type:''' New Skill<br />
|-<br />
|'''Scope:''' Survivors<br />
|-<br />
|'''Description:''' <br />
<br />
(Added as a subset to the Military Skill "Scout SafeHouse")<br />
<br />
As Kevan has introduce the new Scout Safehouse skill there has been some talk about the possible use for such a skill. Scout Safehouse requires the user to spend 31 AP to set and scout a safehouse which gives him 5 Extra AP per day in that building. Given that the skill requires such a large amount of AP, a subsequent skill can be added. This is where Scout Supplies comes in as a subset of Scout Safehouse: In a established safe house, a survivor has an increased chance of finding supplies because he knows the layout of the safehouse. <br />
<br />
This should only increase the search probability by ~5-8%, as to not unbalance the game.<br />
<br />
While there is always some concern with altering search probabilities, the large amount of AP expended and the ability of zombies to ruin a safehouse, thus requiring another 31AP, would make the establishment of a safehouse more worthwhile.<br />
|}<br />
<br />
====Discussion (Scout Supplies)====<br />
It doesn't actually give you 5AP a day. It just averages out to 5AP per day if you spend all 50 if your AP each day in your safehouse since it's a 10% chance per AP spent in the building to have it be free. Anyway, I'm a bit torn on the idea you present. I don't see the point in adding another skill to an already worthless one (Scout Safehouse is virtually useless to survivors, since it will rarely break even on the cost in dangerous areas, and it'll give you unnecessary AP in safe areas), but at the same time I don't want your idea to outright replace Scout Safehouse, since it's applicable in even less situations and locations than the current skill is (i.e. the current skill, while it rarely does pay off, at least has the ''potential'' to pay off in non-TRPs or in places where you aren't searching, whereas yours lacks even that). {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 23:07, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
'''RE''' I agree that Scout Safehouse is quite useless in dangerous areas. However, what I'm suggesting would give the Scout safehouse skill some practical use by allowing for immediate increased search rates in the building. If my group is using a hospital deep in hostile territory as a safehouse while restoring a suburb, then scouting it the first day allows that every subsequent day I am alive, and it remains unruined, I benefit from the increased search percentage. It wouldn't take a week in one location for the scouting to be useful. In non-TRPs, the skill would be less useful, but as you said, Scout Safehouse is worthless as it is. || [[User:Redoubt|Redoubt]] 06:50, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
I think this is a great idea. Increasing Search percentages would help some, especially since you already used so much AP for that safehouse to scout it.--[[User:TheWritingWriter|TheWritingWriter]] 00:35, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Not a fan of the safehouse skill. I'm not sure there is much which can redeem it. This just reinforces the sit tight mentality which wont help survivors in the long run. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 00:45, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
----<br />
<br />
===Pistol Whip===<br />
{|<br />
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:TheWritingWriter|TheWritingWriter]] 23:21, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
|-<br />
|'''Type:''' Melee<br />
|-<br />
|'''Scope:''' New Players, or Players who have run out of ammo.<br />
|-<br />
|'''Description:''' Ever find yourself holding an empty weapon? Well here we have the pistol whip. You can now use your guns to attack the zombies with, but they have the same hit percentages as a baseball bat and only do about 2 damage at max. Not effected by hand to hand combat.<br />
<br />
Zombies holding empty firearms are effected the same way.<br />
<br />
Sorry if this was discussed before, I checked the duped suggestions and couldnt find an entry.<br />
--[[User:TheWritingWriter|TheWritingWriter]] 21:46, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
|}<br />
====Discussion (Pistol Whip)====<br />
Definitly a dupe. Looking for it now. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 23:54, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
More importantly than it being a dupe, it's relatively useless. It's far less efficient than an axe or knife, and guns will always be geared towards ranged combat. The only thing I see is a roleplay purpose, but I would be happy with pretty much anything in the area of purposeless roleplaying, up to the ability to paint myself like a clown and enter buildings using balloons to float.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 23:56, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Younna has a good point about it only serving a roleplaying purpose. Also, there is this one which is shotgun specific: [[Suggestions/27th-Mar-2006#Shotgun_Smash|link]]. This one which is so unspecific it's hardly fair to call it a dupe: [[Suggestions/24th-Nov-2005#bludgeoning_with_guns|link]]. There was another one in the search results, but it had been spaminated and removed.. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 00:06, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
This idea was mainly to help noobs who had choosen a firearm specific class and had run out of ammo. Or people who ran out of ammo, and the RNG hates them. Of course this would be useless to higher ranked people, but then again alot of skills are. --[[User:TheWritingWriter|TheWritingWriter]] 21:46, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Could also be for anyone who would rather carry an extra pistol clip rather than a knife. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 00:09, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Well, carrying around a knife, fire axe or many other in the constant onslaught of weapons would be just as good (usually better) as this. I still see no need beyond flavour. I could like this if it was no damage and a newspaper slap dupe.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 07:45, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Also, I think it fits the theme nicely. In an apocolyptic world, your going to be desperate for survival. If you are holding an empty gun, but are facing zombies or crazy people. You need something to defend yourself with. It also probably wouldnt be that much of a stretch code wise either. Its also realistic. --[[User:TheWritingWriter|TheWritingWriter]] 21:46, 8 September 2010 (BST){{unsigned|TheWritingWriter}}<br />
<br />
I think I posted this suggestion a while back and it was immediatly dumped off in the developing suggestions page... So I like this idea due to the roleplaying possibilities. (and having suggested it before.) --[[User:Kakashi on crack|Gat]] 04:35, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::I second that, this has some good flavour - Cutey's always looking for new ways to add to her collections! <span style="font-family: Segoe Script, Comic Sans MS, sans-serif;text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.4em">[[User:Chief Seagull|<span style="color: green;">Chief&nbsp;Seagull</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Chief Seagull|<small>squawk</small>]]</span><sup>[http://chzgifs.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/parkour_sg.gif ''Free running!''</sup>] 08:45, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
----<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
===Instinctive Gait===<br />
{|<br />
|'''Timestamp:''' {{User:Lelouch/sig}} 19:22, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
|-<br />
|'''Type:''' ffs<br />
|-<br />
|'''Scope:''' Starting Zombies<br />
|-<br />
|'''Description:''' Why not give newbies who start as zombies Lurching Gait? They already have it pretty rough trying to find food and taking 15AP headshots, and it's not like this is any worse than giving scouts Free Running. Maybe add LG to the RM, maybe replace it, I'm not sure. Discuss.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 19:22, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
|}<br />
<br />
====Discussion (Instinctive Gait)====<br />
Vigour Mortis is definitively the most important skill (as it's the means to gain XP at all), so it shouldn't be taken away at all. I'd be favourable towards a single extra skill for zombies, but I think it's a dupe. (One of the many suggestions for military and scientist zombies had extra skills depending on class linked to it, I think.) --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 19:29, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Found [[Suggestion:20071001_Military%2C_and_Scientist_Zombies%3F|a dupe]], although I'm certain there were more. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 21:14, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
How about just removing the daft 2AP cost altogether?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 20:38, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Well we now have a new function where we get directions to the nearest groan, why not add a follow button which when clicked moves you one step towards the groan for 1AP with or without Lurching Gait. It would help newbies be able to level without giving them another skill. On the other hand, it would suck to follow it and find a closed door, but at least you moved somewhere. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 21:15, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:+1 --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 22:50, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
I like the concept. Don't touch VM, but make LG more available. Maybe start with both, maybe import [[rage]], maybe allow babahz to lurch in sync with their instincts. Either make it easier to get or make it less vital. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 22:50, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:I like the idea of using the rage mechanic, as the code for that is already around and as it helps babahs retrocactively. It also encourages to search out survivors when dead, rather than to head to the next cemetery. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 05:57, 31 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
This NEEEEEEDS to be done in some form. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:58, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
I might put this up then (as spiderzed just has my idea loosely represented as an option for part of it). Whitehouse, if you want to put that idea up, by all means go ahead.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 19:11, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
I like the idea, but some folks might not if it was totally free. How about a discount? Like if you start as the Corpse class the first two zombie skills you buy are only 50 XP, after that they cost the normal 100 XP. That way they can quickly gain Lurching Gait + another zombie skill on their first 100 XP, which taken from another point of view makes LG somewhat free. --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 01:02, 31 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Newbies shouldn't have to stagger feebly around malton while actually paying 2AP per sad, sad click to do so. At least, that's the idea I've based this suggestion on.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 01:49, 31 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Oh no worries, I'll keep your suggestion as is, think of my idea as a back-up plan. I just thought the double AP cost for moving simulates the slowness aspect of zombie travel. How will you represent that in-game once LG is made free? --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 09:44, 31 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Slow zombies are a dying breed, and that's adequately represented by the hordes of zombies you can run past safely; they're too slow to catch you. Besides, when has anyone ever "escaped" from a zombie without using doors or barricades anyway?{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 22:08, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Lurching Gait never made sense to me. If zombies are supposed to be slow, how did they suddenly get fast? I think they should eliminate it from the game entirely. And by IT i mean the taking 2 ap to move. {{unsigned|TheWritingWriter}}<br />
:<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0363547/ It's] [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0289043/ totally] [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1082868/ out] [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1038988/ of] [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089885/ genre] [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103873/ after] [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120804/ all], right?</span> {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:13, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
----<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
==Suggestions up for voting==<br />
<br />
[[Suggestion:20100908 Death by Dropped Museum Object]]</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki_talk:Open_Discussion/Welcome_templates&diff=1779393
UDWiki talk:Open Discussion/Welcome templates
2010-09-16T00:16:33Z
<p>J3D: /* Bump */</p>
<hr />
<div>Comments here {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 11:50, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
DDR just pointed me at his [[User:DanceDanceRevolution/sandpit/4|sandbox]] which has some suggestions in it too. Again, what I've posted on the page is just a suggestion, if anyone's got any others, it would be more then welcome. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 11:57, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
==Starship troopers==<br />
Most people dont read it anyway, and I dont believe in it. Personally I'd lose it all but the headings, which would have links next to them saying, ''would you like to know more''... --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:58, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:I'm basically aiming for what you are suggesting, but keep the ''really'' important stuff like how to sign. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:03, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::I never looked at mine, but I can definitely see the need for what Link has proposed.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 12:10, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==atm no need to add, just remove==<br />
<br />
Quickly adding to what I said at [[User talk:Linkthewindow/Making WN Useful]]:<br />
<br />
*Streamline "general editing" section so it emcompases important stuff like vandalism and outsource the rest to relevant help links<br />
*Remove project mentor, merge it with the "additional contacts" section at the bottom.<br />
*Remove "Your page" and "talk pages" section and replace them with links to [[Help:Creating Pages]], [[Help:Making a Group or Character Page]] and probably [[UDWiki:Vandalism]]<br />
*Remove 80% of the information under "suggestion pages" because it's already in the suggestion namespace. This was probably because 70% of all suggestions were made in 2007, a further 20% of those in 2008, but the wiki's changed, the number of noob suggestions has dropped dramatically.<br />
*Remove all the sysops names from "additional contacts". Don't see why they were ever there, it seems forced and makes Axe Hack sad, it also makes me sad. A simple link to [[Special:Listusers/sysop]] is good enough. Make a bigger deal out of Project Mentor instead.<br />
<br />
That's systematically saying what I think should be done with each section of current WN.<br />
--{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:29, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, suggestions is something that really needs to go, although I do see some value in keeping the DS link so they really know to look at that page. Will need help in simplyfying the rules, although the only one that a newbie really needs to know is something along the lines of ''act in good faith.'' It's probably also worth giving impersonation a mention, too. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:38, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
I like the trimmed down welcome template. Basically the more simplified it is, the better it will work.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 13:28, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== One more thing... ==<br />
<br />
[/uncle] I prefer the background not being white, because the yellow stands out more. If it's white it doesn't seem as important.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 17:24, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:A colour, but not yellow. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:25, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Yeah, that was just an example, but I really don't like plain background.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 17:32, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::blue, --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 17:35, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::: CornflowerBlue (6495ED) for a header and LightSkyBlue (87CEFA) for the main body?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 17:42, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::LightSkyBlue hurts my eyes. [[User:Technical Pacifist|Technical Pacifist]] 17:51, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Alternative? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:54, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::White. Make it look less like a template. Research shows templates get ignored faster than what seems like standard messages. I've ditched the use of {{tl|WelcomeNewbie}} entirely as a result, and have started using more plain-text drops, as you can see [[User:Misanthropy/Sandboxes|here, number 13 a-c]]. Projects Mentor and Welcome are quite dead, and instead of pointing people towards them, I've found it much better to point them towards the sysop team, given that the current crop is very active and mostly helpful to new users. If you're going to focus on Projects Mentor and Welcome, you ''need'' to make sure they're going to be trafficked more heavily than they are. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:14, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::What about adding a link to the signature changeing page? I couldn't find that for nothing.--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 01:44, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::The what? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:46, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::The page that tells you how to do all that fancy stuff to your sig. last time i tried to change mine I couldn't for Nothin!--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 02:23, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::[[Help:Templated Signatures]]. It's one of, if not ''the'', first search result for "signatures". {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:40, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::Exactly why I didn't make it in the style of the current WN templates. Yellow/blue makes it look too much like an automatic message/spam, and less likely to be read. <br />
::::::::I'm open to suggestions for the "places to look for help" section. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 02:30, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::I think mentor is fine. I hear mentor references being used all the time when a newbie asks for help. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 03:21, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Project welcome is pretty fail though. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 03:22, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::True, its probably also worth keeping the Mentor list more activily pruned. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 07:05, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::This. Also colors is a bad idea. It's already annoying enough without messing with page formatting if they happen to have it. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 16:23, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Indeed. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 01:04, 12 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
I like. Although i'd get rid of everything bar how to sign and a 'feel free to drop by my talk page' thingy. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:25, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:You forgot a link to ALIM! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 03:41, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::ALiM is still somehow getting a plethora of daily visits with pretty much no help from the 2C boiz. Like seeing your favourite child grow up i feel a mixture of sadness that i'm no longer needed and satisfaction for what a great job i did raising my baby. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:34, 12 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Oh get out. You whored that shit hard, alim is the Linsday Lohan of udwiki, ruined and drugfucked and addicted now, not respected at all. I hope you're proud of what you've done. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:05, 12 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Hey, alim still has some class. in between the dross there's the occasional mean girls. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:08, 12 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::And lindsay's mum couldn't be prouder.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:35, 13 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== If you have anything ==<br />
<br />
It should be subst'd, not just a template you slap down. When I (used to) welcome people to Wikipedia I tended to relate it to something I'd seen them doing, which is how I'd found them anyway.<br/><br/>Bug [[User:Jorm|Jorm]] if you really want the skinny according to MediaWiki studies on how welcome templates should be done (short version: they shouldn't). {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 08:18, 16 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Agree that they should be subsisted and malleable. I ''might'' just leave the text I've got on the front to use as a template (in the literal sense) and recommend people use it as a starting point for welcoming a user (ie: include tips on creating a group page if that's what they are doing.) {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 09:13, 16 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Gimme twenty minutes to finish pooping and get dressed. I'll knock up some subst templates using plain text, applying to specific things you've seen the new user doing. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 14:54, 16 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Right, we should definitely have one for group pages and suggestions, and keep the general one on the main page. I suggest we either add a couple of lines of text to the one I've already set up, or make a whole new one, I don't really care. However, we should probably have something on basic formatting on all templates.<br />
:::On another note, anyone think it's a good idea to whack up a "Basic Wiki Rules" page. Although, to do that, we might need to reform the system <tt>:P</tt> {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 15:26, 16 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
Uhm, you guys do know that the system automatically gives newcomers this info anyway right? Has for years. Just finally be done with it, don't even bother with this you're just wasting everyone's time really. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 15:58, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:More advanced wikis do autodrops based on the root admin's account, this one will let newbies linger unaided without manual input. Of course the proposed upgrades could probably fix that, but then again that'd turn this debate into one centred on what the autodrop would be. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 21:24, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::You don't need that just ooptimize the interface in the mediawiki page. Again I reiterate, This Wiki Already Welcomes New Users With An Information Page. One the sysops can edit even. Developing what amounts to a bot is a waste of time and about as annoyingly worthless as welcome newbie already is/was. "Yay! Some helpful a-hole just put the thing I already didn't want to read on my page! How helpful, maybe he can tell me how to enlarge my penis in six easy steps too!" Go go more incensere and actuall unhelpful spam. Just be a good member of the community and watch recent changes new editor section and contact people if they actually seem to need help insted of encouraging a bot to autogreet people. You know, like welcomenewbie does. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 00:48, 21 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== This Procedure Should be Discontinued. ==<br />
<br />
I posted this on the Template talk itself, and Mis said I should put it here. You may find it interesting; you may not.<br />
<br />
So, as some of you may or may not know, I work for the [http://www.wikimediafoundation.org/ Wikimedia Foundation], which, as you are aware, writes this wiki software and runs Wikipedia. As you might be able to derive from that bit of information, I, uh, know a lot about wikis, wiki communities, and the research that goes into what's going on with them.<br />
<br />
A couple weeks ago we had an interesting talk with a couple researchers who were studying the patterns of editor retention on en, de, and fr. Specifically, they tracked the life-cycle of editors from first edit to never returning. This cycle could (and did) include editors moving into administrators. However, even administrators quit eventually.<br />
<br />
One thing they discovered was that, surprisingly, "welcomenewbie" templates ''turned more people away'' than they helped to retain. There is a clear correlation about this. In fact, simply doing ''nothing'' is better than splatting a template onto a user's page: mechanically inserted text (such as welcome templates) give users the impression that the wiki is not a community but rather a system of software, which is typically the exact ''opposite'' impression desired.<br />
<br />
When welcoming new editors, it was shown that the best thing to do is to write personal notes in a positive tone. The next best thing is to simply say ''nothing''. <br />
<br />
The fastest way to get an editor to leave is to revert them and leave a negative template on their talk page; the next fastest is to revert without response; the next level is to leave a template of any kind.<br />
<br />
You can read their paper [http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/groups/connect/cscw_10/docs/p107.pdf here] if it is of interest to you.<br />
<br />
Something to think about. --[[User:Jorm|jorm]] 02:22, 23 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Bump ==<br />
<br />
This really needs to be dealt with. WN is probably one of the dodgiest issues on this wiki. I'd recommend we carry out a vote on something by the end of the month. Continue this discussion, I command you!--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<span style="color: DarkOrange">Yonnua Koponen</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yonnua Koponen| <span style="color:Gold">T</span>]][[DvB| <span style="color: Goldenrod">G</span>]]</sup><sup><span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=840689 <span style="color: DarkGoldenrod"> P</span>] </span></sup> [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Sandbox|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[Discosaurs|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#Donkey|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]] 17:30, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:I stand by my original assertion that {{Tl|WN}} should be phased out in favour of plain text. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 18:51, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Plain text in the form of a template, or plain text written at the time?--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<span style="color: DarkOrange">Yonnua Koponen</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yonnua Koponen| <span style="color:Gold">T</span>]][[DvB| <span style="color: Goldenrod">G</span>]]</sup><sup><span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=840689 <span style="color: DarkGoldenrod"> P</span>] </span></sup> [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Sandbox|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[Discosaurs|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#Donkey|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]] 18:58, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::The former, what Axe and Mis do, seem just as plastic as the WN template to begin with IMO. ESPECIALLY since 70% of the time when the user makes a bad/vandal/namespacefail edit, all they get is the plain text template and no actual guidance. If they aren't used properly, they are just as bad as the original yellow text monster. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 05:57, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Ditch this. No templates. Just text. Trust me.--[[User:Jorm|jorm]] 05:40, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::I'm definitely leaning towards that, but should we have some kind of outlawing on WNing? If it isn't helpful (And therefore shouldn't be considering a good faith edit), should it be the case that it's considered spamming (and punishable as such)?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:37, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::No need to outlaw it, ''per se'', just start enforcing it as spam, as you suggested. Obviously we'll allow for some transition time, as people may not be aware of this discussion and a decision to start considering it vandalism. But yeah, we either need carefully tailored plain text that is specific to different situations, or else no templates at all. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 18:10, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Well, the reason I was supporting a vote is that it would be linked to the main page.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 20:08, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::True, but I'd prefer avoiding policies over minutiae, especially when a new solution may present itself later that might be against that policy if we word it poorly. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 04:02, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
::::Oh come on there's no need to make putting the template there a vandal worthy offence. honestly if people want to post it they can (within the rules of spam; ie 20 pages or whatever it is) but perhaps just let WN people know that you'd prefer they did it like 'x'. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:16, 16 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Nallan&diff=1779392
User talk:Nallan
2010-09-16T00:14:42Z
<p>J3D: /* thyme for a new featured lolcation */</p>
<hr />
<div><div align=center><br />
{| style="background: silver; border-spacing: 1px; clear: both; font-style: italic; margin-bottom: 20px; text-align: center; width: 180px; -moz-border-radius:12px; fontcolor: black"<br />
|<br />
<font color=white><nowiki>*</nowiki>DING!<nowiki>*</nowiki></font><br />
<br><br />
Current floor: '''CP'''<br />
<br><br />
On this floor: '''Talk page'''<br />
|}<br />
</div align=center><br />
{{User:Nallan/nav}}<br />
{{UserTemplate|<br />
borderwidth=2px|<br />
bordercolor=black|<br />
width=300px|<br />
background=#993300|<br />
image=Stop_hand.png|<br />
headerbackground=black|<br />
headercolor=yellow|<br />
headertext=Please read first!|<br />
mainbackground=#3399cc|<br />
maincolor=Black|<br />
maintext=New posts at the bottom please (press the + symbol at the top of the page), unless continuing a previous conversation. If it is a bilateral conversation I will place all responses on the other party's talk page. If it is multilateral all responses should be kept on this page for clarity.<br />
}}<br />
<br><br />
<br />
== IRC ==<br />
<br />
Get back on it. I know how to fix your problem. --{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 11:11, 20 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Before you try and move the nomination again==<br />
I suggest you read up on what Criterion 9 is. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 07:52, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:Those guys are deliberately trying to subvert the system. Until we get a sysop's comment on the issue I think it would be better if it stayed where it is. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 07:56, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::Rules are indeed rules. Criterion 9 is fairly explicit, and those Keep votes are violating it. As far as I'm concerned ''they'' are in violation of the rules. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 08:00, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::I wasn't aware that I was replying to myself. That's generally what the colons are used for. Oh well. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 08:03, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::We shall see. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 08:04, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning (but only a cuddly, soft one ^.^==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]] Stop agitating sysops and making them look stupid, but not actually breaking any rules. Doing so will result in an abundance of Soft Warnings, so that we can keep those self esteems in check.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:34, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:Nooo! It's alright, I've got Toto's hit "I Won't Hold You Back" to comfort me. srsly you guys.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:35, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==[[A/D]]==<br />
Regarding your vote on several user redirect pages i have separated the case into individual cases, if you feel so inclined please recast your vote on each page relevant to how you feel about that particular redirect being kept on the wiki. Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== U r a [[Caunt Street Police Department]] ==<br />
<br />
[[ALiM]] [[2 Cool|style]], [[User:Nallan|ya]] dig?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:44, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Hey ==<br />
<br />
I think I am coming down with something.<br />
<br />
{{*}}cough*--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
:aawww.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:16, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Whats good with you DAAAAAWWWWGGG!!! ==<br />
<br />
hey how do you/could you make a kick ass template for my groups page?--[[User:Pyro1499|CJ]] 23:46, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==CUNT==<br />
I FUCKIGN HATE FUCKING CROSSOVER IT NEVER FUCKING WORKS FOR ME--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== nationstates 2 ==<br />
<br />
is ere {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 21:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== p--==hey ==<br />
<br />
heyhnik u t charlies house, its it ogogd/? i am at hem cool party but it wa shit niggers dancin luz--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Quiz Prize ==<br />
<br />
There you go. <br />
<br />
{{QuizPrize12}}<br />
<br />
--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 12:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Hey Dude ==<br />
<br />
Wana go on a vandalism spree tonight? I mean now that Jed is Sysop we can TOTALLY do what we want, without risk of punishment. I mean, imagine the havoc we could wreak by changing pages up in an unorganized fashion? Man the few minutes until someone reverted them would be GOLDEN.<br />
<br />
So, you in?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
:HELL YEAH!!!!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 08:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==A/VD==<br />
I struck a warning of yours. I think this is the bit where i tell you to be a good boy and don't end up on the [[A/VB|wrong side of the tracks]].--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
:with the niggers. Sorry i almost left this post here without including a racist comment...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Welcome home==<br />
I got you a [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2008_10|present]] ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Go vote==<br />
On the ALiM awards that i unanimously decided required it. Voting will be Me, Nallan, Read, Ross and anyone i deem sufficiently alim to vote who rolls up in the near future.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Classic lulz==<br />
right [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Deletions#The_Mighty_Republic_of_Lolz|har]].--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== You want some? ==<br />
<br />
[[Malton Manhunt/Axe Hack's Manhunt 2]]. If you're still interested. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 13:43, 19 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:[[User:Finis Valorum/Archive]]. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 17:22, 24 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==[[Malton Manhunt/Axe Hack's Manhunt 2]]==<br />
<br />
This is just a reminder to tell you, and the other contestants, that [[Malton Manhunt/Axe Hack's Manhunt 2|Axe Hack's 2nd Manhunt]] is commencing on the 20th of June. The [[Malton Manhunt/Axe Hack's Manhunt 2|playing area]] will be the suburbs around [[East Becktown]], so start moving there and run around the place to get used to your arena, if you don't, it could cost you your life! You are expected to be in the fighting area by the start of June 20th, so don't forget! {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 07:07, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:It's been delayed till 1st July, just so you know. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 02:22, 20 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Found this lolcaunt in my sandbox==<br />
{{Template Help|<br />
trying=to be awesome|<br />
yes=2 Cool|<br />
no=Special:Listusers/sysop|<br />
}}<br />
<br />
i dont want to hurt your feelings jed and nick but......<br />
<br />
if you need help being awesome, doesnt that make you un-awesome?<br />
and on the contrary, if you didnt need help, wouldnt that mean you were already awesome?<br />
<br />
in no way do i think that the sysops are awesome or that you guys arent, im just saying that currently, the template is incorrect--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:09, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:nick jed and read, locked in an immortal struggle against The Sysops... I like that it has a nice ring to it. We could be looking at a fantasy series here... talkin 6 figure sums here. call me {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:14, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::You need to stop having these fantasies about us, im sure its not great for your health, bob. Its not going to happen, we're not going to let you into our clique your not cool enough, nor popular enough.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:16, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::how did the minor edits thing work out btw, are you still BEING OPPRESSED? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:18, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Changing the subject wont change the sticky sheets you awaken to after your wet dreams and fantasies about being in the clique. Im sorry but your just not good enough.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:20, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::actually I got edit conflicted and didn't feel like writing up a whole new response so I just tacked on a couple of extra colons, would it make you feel better if I did? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:25, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::You need to stop worrying about making me feel good and start realizing that there isn't a chance for us. Not now, not ever.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:27, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::hm yes I guess I really do want to be part of your clique.... ps no I don't, "start realising" that you actually aren't impressive. I talk to you because I still hold out hope that you might be driven to quit again (LOLLLLL) over it {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:34, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::Typical anger, can happen when someone is so blatantly rejected. Many people suffer from it, you can google it if you wish. For the record, I didnt quit, I moved out of home, and posted under an alias for a while, but ultimately my heart/time wasnt in it :(. Right now I have a week off, before I move home again for personal reasons.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:45, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::An alias? Why would you do that? What was wrong with posting with your original account? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:58, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Wanted to stir some trouble with a clean slate, but after about a day of editing, I couldnt be bothered, and worries of rent, work, studies took over. Stop caring about me though its kind of gay--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:10, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::lolstudies.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:35, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::I dont actually "care" I'm just subtly changing the subject.... dont tell read he'd laugh {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:36, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
lulz. p.s it does make sense. coz the person is trying to be awesome, so obviously they aren't at the point in which the template is given to them. and then if they want help they should talk to 2C coz they know how to be awesome. and the ops dont so talk to them if you dont want to be awesome. also wtf i put this up like a year ago why we all talking about it now?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:22, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:Oh I don't know... maybe because it's [[ALIM'S SECOND FUCKING BIRTHDAY]] in like [[2 Cool|2]] months!!!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 22:14, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php?title=Urban_dead&diff=1998138564&oldid=1998135250 tough guy] ==<br />
<br />
Your idiotic Vb case of old, somehow made it onto the Urban Dead article on ED. Congrats, bitch ;) --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 15:12, 31 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:lollllll {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 15:25, 31 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::fucking sweet! internet tough guy!!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:00, 1 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:It's not idiotic you're idiotic so there {{unsigned|J3D|06:38, 1 September 2009 (BST)}}<br />
::K --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 08:48, 1 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== lol remember this doozy? ==<br />
<br />
{{Black Hole}}--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 06:28, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:lol yeah.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:49, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::we were what? 12?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:58, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
{{Warning}} <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 04:28 5 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:I maintain that it was tastefully censored.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 10:40, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arbitration==<br />
Has started. Please proceed [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool here] --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:36, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Oh good, you're back. Now you can write something over at that Arby's case or I will push for Thadeous to finish up without you. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:42, 2 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I will also make mention of that delightful new page; no doubt that will end up being factored into his decision as well. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:44, 2 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::I was going to wait until the one month mark, which I believe was the 6th. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Silver}}-- 07:40, 2 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Arbitration ==<br />
An interim [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool#Interim_Ruling Ruling] has been made.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 10:58, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arbitraton==<br />
Oi turn around cunt i need to talk to you{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:41, 20 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Haha, I tried to visualise this IRL and laughed. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 09:42, 20 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Say it to my face (ie. my talk page).--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:43, 20 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Thanks for the revive ==<br />
<br />
If that was you (am currently to dumb to find your profile link on your wiki page, sorry, must be the lingering effects of zombification), which I'm just going to assume. Much appreciated! -[[User:Pinkgothic|pinkgothic]] 21:01, 31 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==thyme for a new featured lolcation==<br />
<br />
probably. to give alim some more street cred. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:30, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:can do this if you'd trsut me-- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 16:37, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::what would you pick, charlie?--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:24, 3 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I guess I'd cycle through the bolded ones, in order of best names -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 17:15, 3 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::i trust you to the do the description. butttt also of importance is a good description and at least one decent pic. Being [[2 Cool]] is a harder job than you might have first thought charles. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:19, 4 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::True dis. I am going to fix up [[Maul Walk]] when I can to make some gay star wars references. RIP finis </3 -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 15:30, 4 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Actually I take that back. [[Fyfhyde Plaza]] is amazing and should be featured everywhere. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:50, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Name=ok, but too much like a welsh hyde park. the article fucking sucks. do a better job at choosing the featured lolcation or you're fired. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:14, 16 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Featured_Articles/Good_Articles&diff=1779391
UDWiki:Featured Articles/Good Articles
2010-09-16T00:10:23Z
<p>J3D: /* Yes */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{Navigation (header)}}<br />
{|style="background: #E6F2FF;border:solid 1px #A3B1BF;padding:10px;width:100%"<br />
|-<br />
|{{Shortcut|[[GA]]}}<span style="font-size:16pt">Good Article Voting</span><br>Here, we determine which articles are deemed to be "Good" Articles. These are seen as some of the best the wiki has to offer and can include virtually any page on the wiki. <br />
<br />
Articles which have been given good article status, become eligible to become [[UDWiki:Featured Articles|Featured Articles]] with a new Good Article being voted to receive that honour every week.<br />
<br />
<big>'''Criteria'''</big><br />
*'''NPOV''' - The article must be from a [[UDWiki:NPOV|neutral point of view]] and not show significant bias. Possible exceptions may be made, depending on the article and community opinion. <br />
*'''Complete''' - It neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context.<br />
*'''Well Written''' - The article uses good English, such as proper grammar and spelling and is written in a clear and highly readable style.<br />
*'''Generally Awesome''' - Here at the wiki, we're after stuff that's awesome.<br />
<br />
Any main namespace article (also including user pages and journal pages if they are thought to fulfil the above criteria) can be nominated for good article status. The nomination will be discussed and if there are no major issues raised at the end of 7 days, the article is promoted to Good status and will be added to the Featured Article Pool for the coming week. <br />
<br />
Articles that are deemed "good" will be placed in the [[:Category:Good Articles|Good Article Category]] for easy findage. The page will also have the <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:GA|GA]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki> template placed onto it. If a nomination is declined by the page owner then the nomination should be cycled without the page being added to the Good Article Category.<br />
<br />
|}<br />
{| align="right"<br />
|-<br />
|__TOC__<br />
|}<br />
==Example==<br />
===[[Example page|Good Article candidate]]===<br />
Good Article candidate has recently undergone a lot of improvement from various editors. It's NPOV, it's concise and informative. I also believe it to be generally awesome, just take a look at the talk page discussion, people love it! --[[Example page|GA Suggester]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I see only a few minor issues, but those seem to be fixed readily. Otherwise it's good. --[[Example page|OptimistBob]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
# Love it! --[[Example page|Few Words Joe]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Maintains good article balance, strong intro, accurate information, good grammar and spelling. Well wikified. --[[Example page|Overly Technical Jim]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Much better than all the other candidates. --[[Example page|BetterMuch Ralph]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - I like this part [[Example page|here]]. --[[Example page|Specific Jen]] 20:29, 3 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
Please add {{[[Template:GoodArticleNom|GoodArticleNom]]}} to any page that has been nominated.<br />
<br />
==New Nominations==<br />
<br />
===[[Zombie anonymity]]===<br />
NPOV and borderline eloquent. The topic itself may not be central to the game, but the article is probably the best it could be. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 00:16, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
# '''Yes''' - We need more featured articles, before we have to start looping them! --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 00:16, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''Yes''' - I'll give it a comb through in a tick to clean it up, but it's solid enough. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:27, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
<br />
===[[Banana Tactics]]===<br />
<br />
Well-written, delivers information in a concise and easy-read manner, and does not arse around with NPOV or pointlessness. This article has shown itself to be beloved by the community and perhaps now is the time to give it the spotlight it deserves.<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - Superb article. Bravo Karl. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 15:16, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Direct and to the point, no need for overdoing it with complex words or phrases.--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 22:20, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Our job here is not ''just'' to inform newbs about UD, but to make the overall gaming experience more enjoyable. People need to be shown the well-developed sense of humor that this community can produce, and this article is a superb example of it. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:30, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
#'''Die in a fire''' --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 15:39, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#As Thad. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:51, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Not worthy. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 16:28, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#It's really old by now. Leave the dead horse in its ditch. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:42, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#hahahaha no -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:02, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#No. After reading it thoroughly, and close examination of the second paragraph (or lack there of) I dont think it should be. {{User:Dezonus/sig}} 06:56, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''Speedy Deletion Crit 1/2'''.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:34, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Viewing the archives... I take it this is [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/May-2010#Some_stubby_stuff|take]] [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/August-2010#Banana_Tactics|three]]? --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 09:19, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Mycock Building|Mycock]]===<br />
Mycock is amazing! everyone loves mycock, why not put mycock on the main page? Then everyone can ogle at the glory of mycock.--{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 21:35, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
# '''Yes''' - Who doesn't love mycock? --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 21:35, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Mycock deserves to be featured. Mycock is that big a deal. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 21:37, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#We need featured locations. Mycock is one of the best locations in town to be. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 21:42, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#I hardly had to think. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 21:50, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Hmmm... What can be said about Mycock? Mycock is impressive. Mycock is the best by miles. Mycock is generally awesome, and Mycock isn't a stub. I think mycock should definitely be featured. I also want to see Ross writing about Mycock, and a picture of Mycock on the front page.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 21:58, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Innuendo...sexual innuendo!--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 22:04, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#The only official building to bring the radio filter into its knees. Or rather her knees? --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:06, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# I'm surprised no one recommended mycock before. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 22:59, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# fucking [[ALiM]] IN DA HOUZZZZ {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:10, 16 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
# At least until someone turns it from a factual piece into a hilarious play on words. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 14:54, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Boring, not worthy. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 15:08, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#not v lengthy or interesting. unlike mycock. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 15:18, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#No, it's ridiculous and has more or less been done over and over again. --[[User:Huntress|Huntress]] 15:24, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:I agree with you on one thing. Mycock is used quite a lot. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 05:13, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Just no. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:54, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[TUMBLEWEED-aikido-river'n-stuff Tactics]]===<br />
This shit be epic, faggots.<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#-- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:57, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#The most used tactic in all of UD. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:07, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
# '''No''' - But there really should be more nominations. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 19:21, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
# '''No''' - The main problem with this article is that it is hard to tell if it is a guide/strategy or a subtle parody of a guide / strategy. If it was purely a guide with better formatting and information, it would be pure awesomeness. If it was entirely a parody, it would be liquid sex. Unfortunately, it tries to be both and fails at becoming either. - [[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 20:17, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#'''No''' - We don't want to give newbies the wrong impression. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 15:52, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:Yes, the article's message is that not metaing and just fucking about by yourself and not working in a team is bad. Yeah, let's not give newbies that impression. I read you. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:04, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#::Oh, oops. I was working off of my (bad) memory of the article. Still, "no", since it just isn't that great anyway, however. It's kinda funny and kinda useful, but there are much better ones than it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 03:12, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#:::Damnit!! ;) -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 04:40, 8 September 2010 (BST)<br />
#Not helpful. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 16:31, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Recent Nominations==<br />
''Older nominations can be found in the [[UDWiki:Featured Articles/Good Articles/Archive|archive]].''<br />
<br />
===[[Malton Incident]]===<br />
It may be fanmade, but it provides some good backstory to how the zombie incident in Malton started. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:12, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I'm offended that you think being fanmade is a bad thing. This thing is a vital piece of our history. Without it, we'd have no way of knowing how this all started. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 02:54, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
====No====<br />
#This is a no with a but - it's a good page, but it just look amateurish. I might give it an overhaul soon to have things like paragraphs, headers, more interwiki links, etc, though I don't know how that would affect this vote. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:56, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
#Very similar to [[Possible Causes for the Situation]], they are the two pages on the wiki that ''should'' be considered the best in the entire place, but just fall a bit short. Both of these pages added to my fascination with the rich history of Malton when I started many years ago but they need some basic formatting before being accepted IMO. It's not cause I don't think they shouldn't be GA's at this point, it's that with a simple 20 minutes of work, they won't only qualify but will also be miles ahead of what they are now. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 03:07, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
'''Failed''' -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:57, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Spawning]]===<br />
Just finished writing it. Feedback please, want to make sure its correct. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC) <br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' - I think it's a well made article.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:So do I,... I'll change my vote to yes sometime before his seven days are up. Just curious to have an answer to the questions presented. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 21:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - I think every article is a good one. --{{User:Moctezuma/sig}} 22:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Very thorough. --[[User:TripleU|TripleU]] 23:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Weak Yes''' - It really meets all criteria and pretty interesting. But the accuracy of the article is under the question. it'd be cool to gather statistics on a distance somehow, but it's kind of abuse to the system. --[[User:Fe328|fe328]] 23:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Maybe not an article that I will read often, but then again that has no bearing on its quality. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 09:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' A well written article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''yep''' liked it.. easy to follow.----[[User:Sexualharrison|sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 16:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#Rubber stamp it.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Very easy to follow. And I can't think of anything that is missing. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 09:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - well rounded, good stuff. -[[User:Jack Kolt|Jack Kolt]] 14:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - A surprisingly good article indeed. --[[User:Karloth_vois|Karloth Vois]] <sup>[[¯\(°_o)/¯]]</sup> 18:22, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - A lot of effort was put into this as well as many charecter names.--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 00:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
<s>'''Against'''</s> I think that the article needs to address the issue of 'what happens if the building requirments aren't met?' For example: under the [[Spawning#NecroTech Lab Assistant|Lab Assistant]] section,... what happens if there are no NT buildings that fit the crieria? Granted, this may never be the case,... in fact, I doubt that this would ever be the case,... but what if? Is there a really good answer for this? BTW, my vote can easily be swayed to a yes vote,... it's just that this is something I notice, and was hoping it could be addressed in some way... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 20:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Hmm. Probably something I can't do with spadework, unless I spend a day creating Necrotech assistant Alts and then throwing barricades at the relevant NT's. Probably a question for Kevan. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Maybe not now anymore, but that could have been the case during the March of the Dead. No Necrotechs meeting requirements I mean.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 20:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::I see, so this issue would have to be addressed through a case study,... Perhaps such a thing should be noted in the article somewhere? Personally, I've got a similar, also interesting take on this subject. Considering the priority of NT buildings within the game, and the community as a whole, and inversly, being the big target they are for zombie groups,... how often do you think conditions like this exist? And is it VSB or lower? At that, when it comes to spawning, is this really a luck of the draw sort of thing, or is it something thats vastly affected by the actions of the people playing the game? I think that that's worth noting in the article to, simply because that last point I made is the whole allure of the game to a great many people... everything is situational, and all outcomes are affected solely by the individuals playing... and thus, so are the spawning locations in a way. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 21:04, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::[[User:Kevan|Our Lord and Saviour has answered on his talk page]]. I'll add to the page, today. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:00, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::Vote struck, and changed to yes. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<s>Questionable accuracy and the minor need to test what happens if there are no valid spawnpoints.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 03:39, 2 March 2010 (UTC)</s><br />
:No valid spawnpoints query answered. Now explain how I can improve on the so called ''questionable'' accuracy? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::I was just rather dubious that there would be a complex method of spawning when you could have someone just spawn anywhere but...well...eh. Kevan replied and didn't try to knock you down so I'll change my vote.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#Poodle and SS's reasons are so utterly stupid; if they think the reason for a glossary/player-resource article like this is to just prove what would happen in extreme hypothetical situations, then they are wrong. Having said that, this article is useful to show interested users the nature of spawning; and that is all. GA's in general should have the ability to interest any user into reading at leased a bit of it, but I don't think this has it. Narrow/special interest works don't generally fit my idea of a GA. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 05:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:I just felt the article needed to be 'complete'. It's 'complete', so that's why the Keep. I don't see a GA needing to personally interest anyone, as long as it's a Good Article (NPOV, Compelte, Well Written, "Awesome"), it suffices.--[[User:ShadowScope|ShadowScope]]<sup>[[User:Kevan|'the true enemy']]</sup> 23:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::By personally interest people, I mean it needs something in it that does inherently make it "awesome". This is boring. It covers a concept that is experienced within the first two clicks of making an UD account for ''everyone'', I think this sort of coverage isn't ''unnecessary'', but not groundbreaking enough to be a GA at all. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 23:52, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:::I think its range is more than that. It adds another reason for cading TRP's to only VSB and shows another benefit of emitting a [[feeding groan]] (which needs a major rewrite). I also think that its important to note that some suburbs underpopulation might be due to their lack of Firestations and Necrotechs. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::::Also why there might be a lower zed presence within the same suburbs,.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:23, 3 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
This be '''Successful'''. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
===[[Guides:A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead|A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead]]===<br />
This article has been accessed over 80,000 times,.... has been cited by many other users as still being an important peice of information (as can be seen [[Heytown/News Archive#June 20th|here]], [[Guides:First Day in Malton#For more information|here]], [[User:Darculianar#UsefullPages|here]], and [[Malton_College_of_Medicine/library#Textbooks|here]]), as well as having been cited for information (like [[Suggestion talk:20070928 More Knives|here]] for example). That said, many users, and pages not listed above, link to it, having thought it was important to keep. Also, when it was reveiwed [[Guides/Review/Archive#Guides:A Beginners Guide to Urban Dead|here]], it seemed to have some support as long as it was updated. These are the reasons why I think the article should be a Featured Article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====Yes====<br />
#'''Yes''' As Above. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Nice article - easy to read, good information. --[[User:Fe328|fe328]] 11:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' It provides an excellent and highly detailed guide; I wish I knew half this stuff when I was starting out! --[[User:Oldharry101|Oldharry101]] <sup>[[Project Welcome|W!]]</sup> 18:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' A little lacking regarding zombies, and understates the importance of malls, but has all the info a fresh slab of meat would need. --[[User:TripleU|TripleU]] 21:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' OOOhhh.. Ids ddis de beoqqqwww. BEOWWW!!! Get Fit mutha fucka get fit!!! Heeaaywhooo. HOOOO! ShiaaAAAA. i'M About to take a shia lebouf on ya HOOOO!!! HOOO!!!!!!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 01:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:I don't know what you just said other than yes.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - although it could do with being split up into subpages. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 08:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' Its not really a guide, just a lot of important glossary pages all stuck together in one place. Still an excellent resource mind. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''Yes''' - Helped some of my friends get into the game, wored for them will work for anybody. --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 00:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
====No====<br />
#POV much? Lacking basic information and vague when it comes to its own declarations. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 12:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:Vague in it's declarations, and non neutral POV.... hmmm....? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#'''No''' - I don't really like the layout of it. Perhaps some tables for some of the information, or just links to separate pages with the information (for example Building types). I'm not really a big fan of a huge amount of information on the one page. Don't see why the information on building types needs to be repeated on this page as well, especially ''useless'' information like interior and exterior descriptions. It just builds up the page more. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 06:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:Really,.... you'd rather have it look like '''[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Guides:A_Beginners_Guide_to_Urban_Dead&oldid=1215404 this?]''' -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:21, 9 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#::No I wouldn't like it like that. '''You know what I meant''' Don't be a smart-arse. '''But''' just in case I didn't make it clear the first time... '''The beginners guide should give relevant information that beginners need. Just the basics, some details where needed. But NOT a complete guide on the entire game.''' The details are included on other pages, and people can access them by searching if need be. Rather then clotting up a beginners guide with ''useless'' information. On top of that, some basic information that beginners '''would''' need isn't included as well. Thats why I don't like it. {{User:UnholyReign/Sig}} 11:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
#:::I do know what you mean,... however,.... I know being new to a game, I like to waltz in with everything on the table, and a good working knowledge of what I should be doing, or what the working aspects of a game are. Not just having my character spawn someplace... and not know what I should be looking at, or how to get into a building.... or why I should even give a rats ass about libraries,... which you seem to think are absolutly frivolous, amongst other things I've included. Obviously this isn't the case, both from an RP perspective, as well as a strategic perspective, both of which are touched on within the article. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I'm gonna cycle this as '''Successful''' too. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
[[Category:Good Article Nominees]]</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Yonnua_Koponen&diff=1779390
User talk:Yonnua Koponen
2010-09-16T00:08:56Z
<p>J3D: you [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Cockburn_Plaza_Railway_Station&diff=1779189&oldid=1708659 scallywag!]</p>
<hr />
<div>__NOTOC__<br />
{| style="width:920px; font-family: verdana; font-size:90%; border:solid 1px #7F7F7F" align=center cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0<br />
|-<br />
| style="padding:10px; vertical-align:top; background-color:PowderBlue; border:LightBlue 12px solid" |<br />
{{User:Yonnua Koponen/Accessbar}}<br />
== '''Discussion''' ==<br />
=====Click <span class="stealthexternallink">[[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Yonnua_Koponen&action=edit&section=new <font color=CadetBlue>+</font>]]</span> to comment=====<br />
<br />
<font color="SteelBlue">''Post any comments you have below this line, and post new comments at the bottom. Any signatures that use the "Click" template or similar code will be replaced with blank signatures.''</font><br />
<br />
[[User_talk:Yonnua_Koponen/Archive|<font color="SteelBlue">Archive</font>]]<br />
<br />
<div style="float: left; height: 550px; width: 500px; border: thin solid black; overflow:scroll; border: 1px solid #FFFFFF); padding: 5px 5px; background-color: #87CEEB; margin: 10px 0px 0px 10px; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana;" align=left><br />
<br />
== Test ==<br />
<br />
Will it work?--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<span style="color: DarkOrange">Yonnua Koponen</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yonnua Koponen| <span style="color:Gold">T</span>]][[DvB| <span style="color: Goldenrod">G</span>]]</sup><sup><span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=840689 <span style="color: DarkGoldenrod"> P</span>] </span></sup> [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Sandbox|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[Discosaurs|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#Donkey|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]] 16:54, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Third ==<br />
<br />
That is all --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 16:54, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
== Your talk page ==<br />
Looks Snazzy --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 16:56, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Thanks. Also, it won't space out at the bottom now. I really like it. :D Scroll Bars FTW!!--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<span style="color: DarkOrange">Yonnua Koponen</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yonnua Koponen| <span style="color:Gold">T</span>]][[DvB| <span style="color: Goldenrod">G</span>]]</sup><sup><span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=840689 <span style="color: DarkGoldenrod"> P</span>] </span></sup> [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Sandbox|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[Discosaurs|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#Donkey|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]] 16:57, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:: Is that a Donkey in you sig?--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 16:59, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Already claimed 1100 times by Misanthropy.--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<span style="color: DarkOrange">Yonnua Koponen</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yonnua Koponen| <span style="color:Gold">T</span>]][[DvB| <span style="color: Goldenrod">G</span>]]</sup><sup><span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=840689 <span style="color: DarkGoldenrod"> P</span>] </span></sup> [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Sandbox|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[Discosaurs|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#Donkey|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]] 17:00, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::: Should have guessed it XD--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 17:00, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== + works? ==<br />
<br />
fantastic, well done. I assume you just did it by leaving divs open at the bottom, kewl. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 17:16, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yup. Let's have a test of the scroll feature...--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<span style="color: DarkOrange">Yonnua Koponen</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yonnua Koponen| <span style="color:Gold">T</span>]][[DvB| <span style="color: Goldenrod">G</span>]]</sup><sup><span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=840689 <span style="color: DarkGoldenrod"> P</span>] </span></sup> [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Sandbox|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[Discosaurs|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#Donkey|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]] 17:21, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
this is all very strange and confusing and i dont like it {{User:Misanthropy/Sig2}} 17:53, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Experiment ==<br />
<br />
Can I break it? Like the DiL wiki?<br />
<br />
[[Image:Battle Royale Banner.png]]<br />
<br />
--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:59, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:You can break nothing. And I didn't break DiL, it was a complete coincidence. :P --[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<span style="color: DarkOrange">Yonnua Koponen</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yonnua Koponen| <span style="color:Gold">T</span>]][[DvB| <span style="color: Goldenrod">G</span>]]</sup><sup><span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=840689 <span style="color: DarkGoldenrod"> P</span>] </span></sup> [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Sandbox|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[Discosaurs|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#Donkey|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]] 19:03, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==...==<br />
Now if only you can change the colors of the scroll bars... --{{usr|Axe Hack}} 19:10, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:well, right now I'm on safari, so they're blue and they sync up really nicely with the colours.--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<span style="color: DarkOrange">Yonnua Koponen</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yonnua Koponen| <span style="color:Gold">T</span>]][[DvB| <span style="color: Goldenrod">G</span>]]</sup><sup><span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=840689 <span style="color: DarkGoldenrod"> P</span>] </span></sup> [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Sandbox|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[Discosaurs|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#Donkey|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]] 19:12, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Well what about those using Firefox and only see those plain white ones? --{{usr|Axe Hack}} 19:16, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::One more thing. Too many scroll bars on a single page tend to drive me crazy. Your userpage is now at the top of my disliked pages list. =P --{{usr|Axe Hack}} 19:24, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:::They can go to hell.--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<span style="color: DarkOrange">Yonnua Koponen</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yonnua Koponen| <span style="color:Gold">T</span>]][[DvB| <span style="color: Goldenrod">G</span>]]</sup><sup><span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=840689 <span style="color: DarkGoldenrod"> P</span>] </span></sup> [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Sandbox|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[Discosaurs|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#Donkey|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]] 19:40, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I'll be sure they drag you down with them. ;) --{{usr|Axe Hack}} 19:45, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Dw, I'll cling to my scroll bar to make it back up again.--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<span style="color: DarkOrange">Yonnua Koponen</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yonnua Koponen| <span style="color:Gold">T</span>]][[DvB| <span style="color: Goldenrod">G</span>]]</sup><sup><span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=840689 <span style="color: DarkGoldenrod"> P</span>] </span></sup> [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Sandbox|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[Discosaurs|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#Donkey|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]] 19:49, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Scroll bar vandalism...We just need to make it bend just a little... =P --{{usr|Axe Hack}} 19:50, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Templated signature is back.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 20:09, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Gah! ==<br />
<br />
Trust you to make a fancy shmancy confusing talk page. Thank fuck I'm sober today. {{User:Kempy/sig}} 19:15, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Just click the plus symbol. :P --[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<span style="color: DarkOrange">Yonnua Koponen</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yonnua Koponen| <span style="color:Gold">T</span>]][[DvB| <span style="color: Goldenrod">G</span>]]</sup><sup><span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=840689 <span style="color: DarkGoldenrod"> P</span>] </span></sup> [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Sandbox|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[Discosaurs|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#Donkey|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]] 19:40, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== User page ==<br />
<br />
Letting you know that your user page exceeds the boundaries of the page and covers the text of revisions if looking at the diffs. Should check into that. :P {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 20:52, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Not on IE or Safari. :P That's enough for me not to care.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 20:55, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Actually, it does on Safari. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 20:57, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Just checked safari and it didn't. :/--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 20:57, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Might be your screen sizes, probably. --{{usr|Axe Hack}} 20:59, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::[[Image:UserpageYonnK.PNG|50px]] --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:01, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::[http://d.aichon.com/yanniproof.png Pic]. Maybe you have extensions installed that change its behavior? Or maybe I do? Or maybe Axe is right (he probably is). But if it's broken in Chrome (which it is), then it should be broken in Safari too, since Chrome's rendering engine is WebKit, just like Safari's. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:02, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::I have no extensions and I've checked on both widescreen and normal screens. :P --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:04, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::Axe is right, and widescreen doesn't matter if it's not wide enough, which apparently yours isn't. Once it gets around 12-1300px wide, your page breaks since you have a fluid width for it. Just fix the width of your main container for the page at 1076px and you'll be fine. Otherwise, if users have larger resolutions, it either goes off the top of the page or the divs start to overlap each other. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:06, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Done.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:08, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::As extra added info, the size of this screen appears to be 680px by 1250px.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:12, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Mine is 1900x1080, but when I shrink the window down to a size approximating yours, I see how it's all supposed to look, which is much different than it did look, since the scrollboxes had all gone in a row, rather than above, below, and to the side. Anyway, the 1076 trick worked (once I fixed it for you :P ). {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:23, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::You know, if I were drunk, I may just VB you for that. ;P Nah, I'll do it the day before the next history purge.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:26, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::I'd return the favor with a VB case for breaking the policy about content outside of the page area. After that, I'd just say I was correcting a vandal edit on your part. ;) {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:30, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::Also, the scrollbox doesn't handle lots of indentations too well, does it? {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:30, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::Then that'll teach people to be concise. :P--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:37, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Also, did you know that if someone uses a <code><nowiki></div></nowiki></code> it'll really screw with your page? {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 20:53, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::I wanna test that, but I won't say when... >=D --{{usr|Axe Hack}} 20:58, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Your signature seems to have broken his page too. I can scroll way beyond the bottom of the main container for the page, and there's hidden text in it with links to the stuff in your sig. Quite weird. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:32, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Did it? Everything looks fine from Firefox. --{{usr|Axe Hack}} 21:34, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I don't think his sig is what's causing the massive space at the bottom, but I can't find what is. I noticed it on my main page earlier, <s>and axe's sig isn't on there</S>.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:37, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Don't tempt it. I know you have open edits on your news section... ;) --{{usr|Axe Hack}} 21:45, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Ah, but I'll pre-empt it second before with a message saying they are forbidden. You cannot risk it. Hahahahaha!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:47, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::It's his sig all right, just as its Misanthropy's on the main page. Apparently it's an issue with the way that the old ClickInternal code works (no idea if the current ClickInternal breaks with this). If you break the link to the archived news on the front page, you'll see that the extra space goes away, as do the hidden links to Misanthropy's stuff. My best guess for what's happening is that it's displaying the divs with the links in whatever place they would normally display if you didn't have the separate scrollbar, hence why they're growing the page downwards. It's likely the result of using position:absolute with them. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 23:37, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Ah, i see. Is it going to do anything destructive? If not, then it doesn't really bother me.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 23:40, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::I doubt it will cause issues, other than aesthetic and a little bit of usability stuff. Shouldn't be a problem if you're okay with it, I think. I might poke around the ClickInternal code some more to see if it can be made to work with pages like yours, but I doubt it can be, since it depends on that position:absolute to do what it does. Perhaps if your page had a closing div it would work, but that's understandably not an option. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 23:44, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==PSP==<br />
Your scroll bar is an inconvinence to those browsing via PSP and some smart phones (like the BlackBerry Pearl). Just sayin'. --{{usr|Axe Hack}} 23:49, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Yonnua Koponen is David Cameron's secret bastard son. ==<br />
<br />
<br />
About your talk page. Looks nice but I would really increase the width, so it can sustain longer conversations. That is all. <br />
P.S A [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Democratic_Appeal sign] of aspirations >:D. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:56, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Good enough?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:33, 13 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==DiL Wiki Spambits==<br />
If you're on, it's time to put those SysOps powers of yours to use. --{{usr|Axe Hack}} 22:04, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Done. Satisfactory timing?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 22:08, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::You're a fast one, you. --{{usr|Axe Hack}} 22:13, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Well, I'm sitting here writing my speech for the [[User:Yonnua Koponen/DulstonAllianceAwards/2010|Dulston Alliance Awards]] results announcement, so I've got plenty of time.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 22:15, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Speech? Screw the speech! Just pop the champagne! ;D --{{usr|Axe Hack}} 22:19, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Lol. Nah, there's got to be a speech because basically we've trounced our local opposition.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 22:20, 14 September 2010 (BST)<br />
Make sure you aren't idle in DiL. Ecce has anounced to run the election script again. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 06:51, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:If he's not around, vote for me. =P {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 06:56, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Organization XIII==<br />
If I recall, you told me you were interested. Well, if you're gonna join, care to help around the [http://organizationxiiiud.proboards.com/index.cgi forums]? I think it needs some work. --{{usr|Axe Hack}} 01:34, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Oi==<br />
Don't specify a template if you mean a general formatting - "Users whose sigs contain <div> coding..." would be a better disclaimer. {{Grr}} {{User:Misanthropy/Sig2}} 18:40, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:div coding doesn't break it, it's the absolute positioning used pretty much exclusively by that template.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:43, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Yes but specify the coding and not a named template. I'm not using click, after all, nor did DDR's old one if I remember right. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig2}} 18:46, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::A win for pedantry! {{User:Misanthropy/Sig2}} 18:49, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== you [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Cockburn_Plaza_Railway_Station&diff=1779189&oldid=1708659 scallywag!] ==<br />
<br />
Why i was already preparing my arbitration and a/vb cases! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:08, 16 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:J3D&diff=1779388
User talk:J3D
2010-09-16T00:06:09Z
<p>J3D: /* Talk:2 Cool/Bob's Epic Fails */</p>
<hr />
<div>='''READ ME!'''=<br />
*Post at the bottom (press the little + button at the top of the page) unless continuing a previous conversation.<br />
*Three words: '''Sign your posts!'''<br />
*Looking for something that was here before the 20<sup>th</sup> of March 2008? Try [[User_talk:J3D/Archive|here]]. What about between the 21<sup>st</sup> of March and the 18<sup>th</sup> of August 2008? Because that would be [[User_talk:J3D/Archive2|here]]! Or perhaps what you need is from the period between the 19<sup>th</sup> of August and the 19<sup>th</sup> of December? Coz that shiznat can be grabbed just over [[User talk:J3D/Archive3|here]], ya dig?<br />
<br />
== Lulz ==<br />
<br />
ic wat u did thar. --{{User:WOOT/sig}} 19:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:whar? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:48, 20 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
::HAR! DURR!--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 04:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not impersonate other users, especially on admin pages on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 06:18 21 December 2008 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
== Hollomstown ==<br />
<br />
Rid of merged pages. :)--[[User:Lithedarkangel|Lithedarkangel]] 23:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:noice! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Missed one ==<br />
<br />
[[Candy Avenue]]. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 02:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:Missed what?--<span>[[User:Lithedarkangel|<span style="color: Red ">Li</span>]][[User_Talk:Lithedarkangel|<span style="color: Black">thedark</span>]][[Location Nuts|<span style="color: Black">angel</span>]][[User:Lithedarkangel/Works|<span style="color: Red"><small>Meth!</small></span>]]</span> 03:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
== You are creating History ==<br />
<br />
Grim made a coupe, tried to take over the wiki.<br />
<br />
You lol'd at an account creation you knew nothing of.<br />
<br />
Surely if they go through with this, you can make some sort of flashy template stating how you were the first person to have this happen?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Oh, oh, me me! Lemme make it!--[[User:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>]] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== lol. ==<br />
<br />
<span class="plainlinks">[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct&curid=2730&diff=1359677&oldid=1359674 lol.]</span> {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 01:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:evidently i can be more wrong ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Yus, I gnoh Bub and Kevan, I'm interesting in their profiles and activity, location might come later. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 04:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Irony?==<br />
hahaha oh wow you're delusional. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:you just noticed? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Yeah? ==<br />
<br />
[[User_talk:Iscariot#Run_for_sysop|Nominate?]]<br />
--{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 00:46, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I'm up for it if you and SA are.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::do eeet --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 00:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Nao. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 01:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I'm waiting for SA to say something since his name was mentioned. Now kindly [[GTFO]] ma talk page.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::That goes for all of you. Or none of you. I mean it is a free wiki...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:06, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
hai. i here u liek mudkipz --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Mudkipz suck. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 01:10, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Where's axehack?? I want him back :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Axehack is no more... --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 01:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::He was briefly more on the 6th of jan..why is this happening? I, for one, blame the current sysop team ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::: I blame the previous sysop team. Grim s, to be more precise. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
Iscariot...Whoooooo....Now THAT would be one hell of a promotions bid. I'd honestly say give it a while for everything that's around him to die down some, but it might not happen anyway. Its up to you guys on what happens. Just saying it might be more prudent to wait a bit.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:yeah agree, it's a bit chaotic atm. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I'll be ready to do it when you guys are ready... I think it will be interesting to see what reasons people give for voting against, and how many people outside the sysop team are opposed to it. I personally think Iscariot would be a very good sysop. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 01:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::of course! It's not just a show for a shows sake. I wouldn't nominate someone i didn't genuinely want as sysop. Still i think it's best if we wait til the wiki is a bit quieter. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::His actions in the few places where they've given him power over users say much to the contrary. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 05:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I can haz links? Or examples? --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 21:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I doubt he'd accept the nomination... I mean, if he were a sysop, he couldn't post to his own Talk page LOL. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 05:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::LOL he'd be what he must have always hated!!! xD [[User:Liberty|Liberty]] 05:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Iscariot doesn't hate Sysops altogether, he just hates the way the current sysops teams acts and handles things. He's pointed that out occasionally.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 11:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::No, he hates that we don't dance to his tune. Also read [[Recruitment/Archive2]] for a bit Pestolence, then check the [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Kristi_of_the_Dead_vs_Recruitment|arbitration case that relates to it.]](talk page too), there's also a few little snipes because of [[:Category_talk:Recruitment#Category:Recruitment_Rules_Discussion|this]] he's been making about me throughout the wiki claiming that I'm going against the consensus of the community or twisting recruitment to my own ends. He's a paranoid delusional, we're all out to get him and opposing him is the same as opposing the community in his eyes. You can see some of that [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_01#User:Iscariot|here]]. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 01:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::According to [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Kevan&curid=1072&diff=1363855&oldid=1363854&rcid=1393374 this bit] on Kevan's page, the "community" he is referring to are the folk who aren't actually on the wiki. =/ Convenient eh? -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 01:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::It's funny cause I know that community, I know more people in it than him and the reason is actually the kinda things he's doing and the related drama/rules abuse. I know people in that same community that have expressed problems with his behavior here after seeing it for themselves even. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]], self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All</span> 02:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::So basically he's got the wrong end of the stick completely and is now making an even bigger arse of himself because of it? =/ Clever. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 02:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::I think thats a bit harsh, yes Iscariot is an arse and out to cause trouble for troubles sake but his attacks are not without valid points. The current Admin team does do a (mostly) good job but the assumption by some that they are above community review and that those that disagree with them are trouble making malcontents is far from the truth. Despite the claims to the contrary "Sysopship" no longer suggests a mere janitorial role, rather it designates some users as being in positions of judgment over other users. Until the sysop position recognizes a difference between users that the community trusts to do routine maintenance etc... and to hold a position of authority and judgment over others then drama will always ensue. As is, the sysop role really does seem to be turning into an exclusive club type thing, true or not that is not an image that is good for the position or the community at large!--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::1)You're preaching to the choir. Who do you think started the debate over the claims to being just janitors? 2) The system was set up originally to ''not'' have community review for a reason. That reason is still somewhat valid and more reasons connecting to that one have caused the failure of every proposition for regular review. 3) Iscariot only has points when he accidentally stumbles upon then in the midst of his attempts to make everyone fall in line, I used to think it was intentional but his behavior has long since made it clear to me that he doesn't actually believe the "points" he has except for as a means to an end. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 02:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::::The last thing that made the third one ridiculously clear to me was the RRF move drama.--<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 02:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::::::1) not really aware of who started it... just know its been grumbling on for ever and a day. 2) community review has many things in its favour foremost of which is that it confirms that the sysops are "trusted" by the current userbase, its also very open to abuse by all and sundry and '''yes''' it would also make it hard for sysops to do the contentious stuff that makes them unpopular but still needs doing! 3)Just because the valid points he hits upon are not the ones he is aiming at doesn't make them any less valid, it does however make him look stupid and petty.--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 08:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::::Actually spirit of the rule is as important as the law. The reason it's being enforced more so. You don't give native americans repirations for slavery because they were both referred to with the same term back in the day. For #2 please read the comment on my talk page to pestolence, I don't think we should be starting another massive discussion on J3D's talk page without him being a part of it. --[[User:Karek|Judge&nbsp;Karke]],&nbsp;self-proclaimed&nbsp;Decider&nbsp;of&nbsp;Everything&nbsp;and&nbsp;Ruler&nbsp;of&nbsp;All 10:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::Wow i didn't expect all this upon my return. Now to catch up on whats happened elsewhere....--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::Yup. INMNSHO that's why he's so worried about constant proper English. If he ever used slang or slipped up, the holes in his ideas would be clear as day. He creates a false air of authority and correctives.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 02:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Can I get some input?==<br />
I've been working on a policy that I believe is sorely needed [[User:Pestolence/001|here]], and I'd appreciate your input on it. How can it be improved, and is it even needed right now? A potential problem is what to do about current sysops: put them all up for review now (leading to a massive backlog of admin page drama), postpone the review until six months from now (simply staving off the inevitable drama till later), or something else glaringly obvious that I've overlooked? See you around. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 02:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Never mind, thanks. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 16:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:<nowiki>:</nowiki>( I feel unwanted...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Aw. =( We still love you Jed! -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::pwomise? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Uh huh. =) Without you the wiki would asplode. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::i suspected as much, now back to work. There be vandalism cases to rule on ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Meh. S'pose. I could take a couple of minutes out of my busy revision schedule to take a mosey on over for a look. =p -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 01:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::OMGMISCONBULATIONCHEESEISLAZYIMASOGONNATELLISCARIOT --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
kidding.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:you little... heh --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::did i getcha? huh? well? did i?? did i?? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== star wars ==<br />
<br />
its not that i liek it, but its public knoweledge... like the brother grimm tales in 19th century. Anyway, why dont you liek star wars ? --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 00:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:hint:begins with f, ends with inis. But i didn't particularly like it before that anyway.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::what does [http://files.usgwarchives.net/tx/floyd/vitals/births/1937/floyb37.txt f floyd inis] has to do with star wars ? --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup><br />
:::what the [[2 Cool]] is that?? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
fpenis?--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span></small> 03:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:[[User:DanceDanceRevolution/Fenis|fpenis.]]--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== RE: Classic lulz ==<br />
<br />
Truer words never were spoken - unless someone once said cyberbob was a cunt, then that would be truer. Lol, truer is a weird-looking word.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Cyberbob is a cunt--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Did you guys like the presents i left you? The wiki has been awesome lately, reminds me of the grim days. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
DOHOHOHO --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:merry january! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== I need your advice ==<br />
<br />
Hello. It's me again. I need your advice on something. Neice has not edited the Dead Dudes page again. However, he has now posted some extremely anti-DD propaganda on [[The Sidney Arms]] page. Please have a look and tell me what you think. In my opinion (which i have stated to Neice),such statements have no place on a location page. he should put them on his own group's page. It is becoming tiresome to myself and our group, as he is nothing more than a griefer in-game and apparently feels compelled to bring it into the wiki. Anyways, have a look and let me know. Thanks again for any help you can give. --[[User:Wast0id|Wast0id]] 19:59, 20 January (CST)<br />
:''The Arms is still under attack from the wonderful group Malton Maulers. We have continued to battle for the area and will now go all out for it and have broken into the Arms daily''. Is that what you find so offensive Wastoid? {{User:Liberty/Sign}} 07:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I think [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=The_Sidney_Arms&diff=1368228&oldid=1367540 this] is his problem. I removed it before I actually saw this because it was POV on a neutral page. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 20:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::--Yes, thank you Pestolence, that was exactly my problem. And I expect more of the same from this user in the future and was hoping someone in authotity would set him straight. As I said previously, I simply wish he would keep his in-game grudge in the game, or at least on his own group page. --[[User:Wast0id|Wast0id]] 18:44, 21 January 2009 (CST)<br />
::::If he continues to slander your group, contact him on his talk page and ask him to stop, and if he continues (or if you've already asked him to stop and he's ignored you), take him to [[A/A|arbitration]]. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 02:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Uranium ==<br />
<br />
BOMBS--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 02:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Read's ban ==<br />
<br />
Time for an open discussion regarding the ''"it is expected that a system operator be prepared to reverse a warning/ban should the community desire it"'' section of [[UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines|this policy]] do you think? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 09:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:What makes you think the community does desire it? The only people contesting it at all number like 4. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::That would be why we'd have an ''Open'' Discussion. I'm pretty sure I can find some people that would support it. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 13:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::That depends on how low on the IQ range you'e prepared to go. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Well I would vote to keep the ban which means you will have Bobs support as he can't ever be seen to side with me these days. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 13:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::You keep bringing me into your comments honest, do you have a crush or something? If so take it elsewhere... I hear there are corners of the internet dedicated to that sort of thing. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 14:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::touché... but i already removed that comment as i felt it a little unfair.--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 14:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::xbox live or myspace? ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Is anyone else amused by the fact that he doesn't know that he can't unban people through meatpuppeting a vote? It's been tried before and over-ruled by the appropriate party. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 08:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:then whys it in the policy?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Because we don't update policies every time Kevan steps in and says differently. There needs to be some legitimacy to giving the user a second chance for such a thing to actually be done, and then only in the more extreme cases is it even likely. Cases like Amazing or Izumi, not any case Iscariot seems to think this is valid for(as I'm sure you know well which those will obviously be). And I'm sure we all know by this point Iscariot is just doing this now to try and cause drama so he can scream about how biased the sysops are regardless of whether he is correct in the slightest, he's not trying to get Read's ban revoked or even claiming what happened to him was unfair, those are irrelevant to his point. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 02:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Does anyone notice that it's fine when Karek likes a mass of support, but meatpuppeting when it's something he doesn't? Odd that... -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 20:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Signature ==<br />
<br />
I'm not after drama, but I'm asking if you'd change your signature back to J3D, please. Thanks. {{User:Extropymine/sig}} 09:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:hows that for compromise? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::[http://www.milkandcookies.com/link/58827/detail/ You used the N word?] :| --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 14:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Y helo thar ==<br />
<br />
There's an important thingy over here --> [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Semi-protection|this bit]], that you should have a look at. We're at 14 votes but we need 20 for a proper majority. Your time and energy will be rewarded with cookies and mudkips (if u liek dat sort of ting) =) -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 21:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==:)==<br />
Can you please refrain from vouching a single candidate MULTIPLE times? Please? :/ --<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Suicidal Angel,</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 00:00, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:If you can refrain from showing nothing but blatent disregard for the rules of this talkpage ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Oh... ==<br />
<br />
You're still around. When are you gonna give up on this shit and go back to Nationstates? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 11:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:fuck nationstates.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::booyah!--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Hi, i'm not sure if i'm replying to you right, i answered your question on my page but i'm still learning here. I am everything zombie, i opened that account/page by mistake under the wrong name. I wanted one for Drunkmonkey, which i opened and have been working on today. Feel free to delete the everything zombie page and account as i won't be using it thank you.<br />
Derek<br />
(http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:Drunkmonkey)<br />
<br />
==ALiM template==<br />
<br />
Are you happy with it? Cause if I fix it from overlapping the text, I have to use the flagbox template which doesn't make it look as good. the LUL isn't as big, which really detracts from the.. LUL, you know? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 07:45, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:I like it how it is(and i luuuurve the colour scheme) i can deal if the lul gets smaller tho. stuff happens.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:54, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
::I'll leave it then, I think the original is the best, {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:26, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Vandal Banning==<br />
<br />
I almost laughed a vital organ off. LulZ'LoLz--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 15:27, 6 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== [[User:DanceDanceRevolution/status/game]] ==<br />
<br />
Just for you. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 13:49, 8 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Plus, if you don't vouch the Eastwood Museum, I won't vouch ALiM for good article status. Tit for tat. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 12:23, 11 May 2009 (BST)<br />
:It just makes me think of the suburb of Eastwood, which fyi is a dump. But you sure do know how to treat a girl, so you're on.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:32, 12 May 2009 (BST)<br />
::Yeah, Eve told me she hated Eastwood. She calls it Eastwoo for some reason. Is that a Sydney thing? Btw, come for a sysop party soon? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:31, 30 May 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Nah i just call it eastwood...and yeah i've got a 3 day block off later in june so we can get fucked up alim style.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:18, 31 May 2009 (BST)<br />
::::I dig.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:39, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Come watch a buce match, too. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 05:04, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Hurry up and put Eastwood on ALiM!!! Before you get banned! ;D {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 16:25, 8 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:Theres not some underground movement to have me permaed brewing is there?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:01, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not shout offensive names on admin pages on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 02:52 8 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />And again <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 03:28 9 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:Gimme another stop hand. lazy cunt.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:57, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::u relly need 2 do smethin about dat temper --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 10:00, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::maybz l8a.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:02, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Oh i forgot the bit where i'm only making these edits to get up to 500 in the next 2 months.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:04, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::hmmm thanks for giving me an idea for a policy proposal --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 10:35, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I r supa srs now. Good luck on getting that upper-middle management job, bob.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 17:30, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I can't actually take credit for it, i got it off Conn (see SA's talk), good luck with a coherent policy on the issue though...in the end who gives a fuck? Most people will either make the 250 in a month or just not get another warning anytime soon anyway, or get more bans til they leave the wiki, for the remaining about 2 people, just let them be.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:06, 13 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I wouldn't worry about it so much - I'm in the middle of midyears at the moment and can't be bothered. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 06:16, 13 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::Here, have 2 [[Image:6vmixh1b9.gif]] <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 10:51 10 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
==lol==<br />
qq bitch --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:21, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:see if you can beat 3 months.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:23, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::I already did - I was a sysop from May 2006 through to May 2007. suck it --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:27, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Was your demotion scandalous and awesome though?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:30, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::nah - I got tricked into putting myself up for review and at that point promotion bids pretty much were votes. people are whiny babies so I got da boot --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:35, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I see. Votes better than 2 randoms just decide. The whole process is largely pointless...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:37, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::May I introduce you to the principles of representative democracy? {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:39, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I'm from NSW, i'm familiar with it and i hate it.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:44, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::That's why there aren't only two candidates for crat elections, like there are in elections in our state (I'm from NSW too.) Also:<br />
::::::::"Democracy is the worst form of government. It's simply better then all the others that have been tried" - Winston Churchill. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:46, 21 June 2009 (BST) <br />
:::::::::That misquote is contradictory... :P It's "''democracy is the worst form of government '''except''' all the others that have been tried''" <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:59 21 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
::::::::you might want to take some time to learn about politics before thinking you know enough to have a valid opinion about it hth --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:51, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You should be less lame.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:54, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::yes. I should be less lame than getting drunk while online instead of partying with my friends as well as getting online while being hungover rather than being hungover at a mate's place where I've crashed after a night out<br />i'm definitely lamer than that right now; i should lift my game --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:00, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::lol --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 22:00, 21 June 2009 (BST) <br />
::::::vote is infinitely worse than 2 randoms because then meatpuppetry enters into the equation and people are still pretty whiny babies who don't know how to make userpages let alone know who should and should not be a sysop --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:41, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Time to Vote!==<br />
I found a building I thought would be a good addition to the [[ELiM]] list. Go to [[Talk:Amusing_Locations_in_Malton/Edible_Locations_in_Malton#The_Gumm_Building_.2842.2C_40.29|the ELiM talk page]] to vote on whether The Gumm Building should be added. --{{User:Blake Firedancer/sig}} 13:00, 30 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== nicks drunk promotion bid ==<br />
<br />
is there really no way to read it? i wanna read it so bad. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 09:53, 1 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:It's a shame it wasn't archived properly. It should've been put under Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies or something. It just got deleted and I think someone got a/vbed. P.S. Just checked and it was me.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:55, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::Good thing you checked, I thought it was someone else. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 05:50, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Zing. But it was at Curley's house so I was expecting to see his account appear somewhere.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:30, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::ooohk. everything was done at Curleys house amirite? ;) {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 06:34, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::most things. except blowjobs, obviously.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:47, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I was just on #batshit relaying the story of how we went to that tech store in jesmond and used a display iphone to buy brain rot for table. good times. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 06:51, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::lol. <small>just wanted to get in on this convo</small><br />
:::::::oh and bj's can happen at curleys house, if i'm not mistaken 2 of the womens live there.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:16, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::getting beejays from internets<br />the height of desperateness? i would say yes --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:22, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Wut? curleys house is a real place bob....--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:25, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::nooooo relllyyy??? my question to you is would you know about curleys house without internet --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:28, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::yes. i knew about it since before broadband was invented...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:30, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::well i knew about it since before even the whole internet was invented........ --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:39, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::dayem.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:29, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::yeh it was like infinity years ago so you probly wouldnt know what that was like --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 00:35, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::Good recovery.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:08, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::hello? hello? i cant hear you speak directly into the receiver --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:17, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::No I want the last word!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:24, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
<s>[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not post on the A/VB main page when you are uninvolved in the case on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]]<sup>[[Template_talk:VandalBanningNotice|POST HERE]]</sup> 11:09, 15 July 2009 (BST)</s><br />
<br />
This verdict has been overruled and the warning stuck. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:26, 17 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Ban==<br />
<s>You have been banned from editing this wiki for 24 hours for vandalism. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 15:28, 16 July 2009 (BST)</s><br />
<br />
This ruling has been overruled and the ban overturned. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:27, 17 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==ban?==<br />
well it looks like they at least saw sense on your case... i suspect my ban will stand but what the hey... its not like i didn't expect it :) --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 01:52, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
DDR was going to post "'''Phew J3D, lucky Honest saved you from that one. Shame he had to be banned because of it. ''' but thought better of it because i clearly was not banned. Why? well that would be because in so many years of valid contribution to the wiki i have only ever faced 3 A/VB cases all but this one thrown out. Hmm guess that makes me the newest wikimartyr... --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:33, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Lol! You fuckiing moron! Did you even read your ''own'' comment that I replied to? '''YOU''' called it a ban, hence why I had ''ban'' in ''italics'', something you must have overlooked.<br />
:I gave up on arguing because you never give up, you fight to the death with the same fucked up, stupid points. I thought you'd bow down after Nubis didn't come to save you, but hey, looks like your desperation in saving your skin can surprise everyone. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<span style="color:black"><u><big>ϑϑℜ</big></u></span>]] 03:19, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::el oh el pwnt?--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 03:23, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::One would think so. He wouldn't admit it. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<span style="color:black"><u><big>ϑϑℜ</big></u></span>]] 03:45, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== yo ==<br />
<br />
Please don't submit [[:Image:2cola.jpg]] for SD. I want to use it as an example when I put 0x0 images up for scheduled deletions. What did you upload to make it come up as 0x0? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:54, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Ah i'm half asleep and i forgot how to make a bmp a jpg so i just changed the file name which turns out doesn't work :P So maybe you get a 0x0 if you try uploading any bmp? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:55, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::Yeah, thanks. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't a problem on my end before submitting it as a scheduled. ty. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:58, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::np.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:02, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
[[:Image:2cola.jpg]] - FTFY {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 18:02, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Heh, thanks but i already made [[:Image:2cola.JPG]] and if you read the above DDR wanted that kept as an example or something...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:55, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::I reverted it. Hope you don't mind. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 03:04, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Nvm. I didn't know you cited the fix in your scheduling vote so I put it back. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 03:06, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
hay ur not an stysops. u r an x sysops. quit lyin yo--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 04:04, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:i had teh exact same templat on 4 da hole tiem i wasnt an sysops. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 04:09, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::thats cause you never edit yyour page so it doesn't show up on the recent changes. faeget.--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 04:23, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Guys, guys. I'm sorry but the spelling and grammar here is just atrocious. Please clean up your act.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:51, 2 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::nou--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> High Overlord and Lead Conspirator of the Administrative Rebellion.</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Want</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">help?</span>]] 16:33, 2 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== <s>birth</s>fagday ==<br />
<br />
is it alim's 2nd yet? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 10:41, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:first, what's a birthfagday? and second, no - it's on the 2nd of october.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 11:51, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::as an overrated singersongwriter once said, "The times they are'a changin'"--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:50, 7 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::how are they changing? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:57, 7 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Well considering the Earth is in a constant state of evolution and change, it is impossible for that quote to be ever inaccurate.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 02:21, 8 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not impersonate sysops on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 01:18, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:You really need to stop telling me it's my last warning. It sounds so, ''final''...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:04, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::It's the [[Template:warning2|template's]] fault. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 02:53, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== YOU ==<br />
<br />
ARE GOD--[[User:Shakey60|Shakey]] <sup>[[Beatbox_Kids|BBK]] </sup> 12:46, 16 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:i know right --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:16, 26 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Sysops==<br />
I thought you were a sysops nigger? And you and cyberbob were best butt buddies?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 10:35, 23 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:I was, until early january :\ --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:45, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::Wat happen--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 00:49, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Conspiracy. Nubis organised my sacking during the new year period when i wasn't checking the wikiz :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:51, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::What? Nubis got you demoted? Har har. Specifically for what?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 01:01, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Drunk wiki editing. Not towing the party line. Usual reasons ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:03, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::HAH. So what happen with you and cyberbob?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 01:43, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I hate lemons. Jed's just a wee bit too bitter. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:41, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I didn't know there was ever anything between us? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:37, 26 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==The Sysop template==<br />
So I hear you still have it on there. Please take it down as per the warning you were issued or I will do it for you. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 09:18, 28 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== omfg ==<br />
So happy bob permabanned this "buzz killington" thinking it was one of you two, or one of the bbk. I can feel a massive misconduct coming on if anyone decides to take it further.<br />
What I am saying is, please take it further.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:53, 29 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:fucking lol hey.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:02, 29 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Ciggies==<br />
Good god man, make the link to your user page findable, ffs <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 11:48 2 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:He's had it like that for a week or so. And this signature ''should'' only be up for 24 hours, right? ;) --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 12:09, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::Well the ALaMe one was at least preceded by some non-link stuff, but was bad enough... this is another level again. He just keeps pushing on the boundary until someone can be bothered to react <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:28 2 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:::Fair enough- he's the one who will be VB'd so I don't really care. I just think for a day-long fag celebration, just let him have his giggles. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 12:30, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::I put my cursor on the main part, and it underlined all but the exclamation mark, so then i clicked on the exclamation mark, and it bought me here!!--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Also, your name is coxy--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::<nowiki>*</nowiki>you're ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:41, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::TAKING YOU TO A/A FOR WINKING OMG--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:46, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::USING CAPS TO HILARIOUSLY RIDICULE BY LAMPOONING A PERCEIVED "ANGER" WHILE TOTALLY GETTING ALL PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE UP IN THIS SHIT BY MEANS OF HUMOUROUSLY EXAGGERATING AN ENEMY'S POST AT THE SAME TIME {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You are WAY to easy these days--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:17, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::last word {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::nah uh--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::u mad?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::You are WAY to easy these days {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:19, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Learn to spell, both of you. any more posts in this thread will be deleted and i might take you to a/vb. unless its not bob or read.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:21, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! that is all.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 14:31, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::I'm special, <small>special</small>, so special, <small>special</small>. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 14:35, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
== You ==<br />
Are that fucking inconsistent on FB and IRC and any chat medium. I cannot work out your patterns m'lday--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:01, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:I'm on from 1pm til 6pm. And i'll sign into msn now just for you. But don't fucking facebook chat me coz my compy can't handle it :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:04, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Nam nam, bra!nz!!! ==<br />
<br />
You tasted good. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 01:46, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== You have all been rolled ==<br />
<br />
You are all my muppets! I am your muppetmaster. '''JIM HENSON IS ALIVE!!!''' <br />
<br />
As of December 24, 2012 I shall control all the accounts of 2 Cool. ALiM is/will be MINE! --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 06:13, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arbitration==<br />
Has started. Please proceed [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool here] --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:35, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Uhh, thanks I guess. By the way, shouldn't it be "nicknames given by 2 Cool", instead of "given to 2 Cool"?--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:01, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::No because you gave them to us, they aren't given by us.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:06, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Oh sorry, I get it, misunderstood for a sec.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:18, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Category:Group Subpages ==<br />
<br />
Revert it again and I'll put up an A/VB case against you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Silver}}-- 08:00, 9 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Link me plox to the policy where it says i have to allow you to categorise my group subpages, then compliance you shall receive.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:03, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::The policy on '''bad faith''' where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::You have every obligation to present evidence for your assertion. I provide the following [[UDWiki:Specific_Case_Editing_Guidelines|link]], which ensures that a group may control the content of their page excepting a NPOV lead-in paragraph. A category, by definition, is not part of a prose paragraph and is therefore not covered by this exemption. I await this 'policy' on 'refusing administrative edits', the wording of which is straying close to using the administration status as a badge of authority. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:02, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::And while you're there, you might want to run an IP check on [[User:Insane1]], voting on one suggestion and not the other up for voting during a first edit seems suspicious to me. It won't be enough to sway the vote but is probably worth checking out. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:05, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::It wasn't his first edit at all. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:10, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I seem to have omitted the "in the suggestions system" portion of that sentence. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:20, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Hardly. Anyone can do administrative edits. I only have the obligation to present evidence if I take him to A/VB. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:08, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Indeed, anyone can, but editing here repeatedly quoting some policy you don't present for review and then expecting a user who has clear ownership of the page (as I ''have'' presented) seems inconsistent to a good faith approach. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:20, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Read the policy document, it is as consistent in defending J3D as it would save any bad faith action a user makes in his own space; ''Groups, for the most part, have sole property of their Group page on the wiki'' is an example, nothing in the policy is black and white, it allows for exceptions to the ownership clause, and I assume none of what is in that policy will defend J3D against the blanket ruling of "bad faith". J3D has also specified that he only gives a shit about ''me'' adding the category (something I do daily to every page on the wiki) onto the subpage, and you expect people to believe ''I'm'' acting in bad faith? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:34, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::Given the fact that you admit there's bad faith between the two of you, the good faith response would be to leave it alone and not incite drama as you are doing by threatening vandalism rulings. Why don't you see if someone else will apply it? And answer me this, what does the wiki lose, or in what way is it harmed by this lack of category? It may appease your sense of CDO, but does nothing to assist the wiki in general or even help important pages, you know, like A/VD which you seem perfectly happy to leave in a false manner. Your comment on 'doing it everyday' I hope is incorrect as well given that's not the category that should be going on there either. And you've still yet to produce this 'policy' you harp on about. I've provided mine and am quite happy that the statement that groups may control the content of the page sufficient to cover this, or we'd be having massive drama wars on this when the Malton Marshalls were added to Category:PKer Groups. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 08:16, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::1. I never once said there was any bad faith on my end. 2. Look below. I already did suggest someone else do it, but at the moment he hasn't even reverted it. 3. Get your head out of your arse and stop pressing fallacies like I "need" a "policy" that says we can warn users for bad faith, you parasitical moron. 4. Specialpages like the one involved in this is specifically called a "maintenance page" by Mediawiki, hence of course it is an important part of maintenence. And in response to your lack of concern for anything less than an "important page", look at A/D and see your fucked up stance on "unimportant pages" yourself, and see who has the double standards here. 5. Don't say I have OCD because at leased ''my'' case of it goes towards a greater good, rather than your unfulfilling and pestering belief that you were brought on this earth to shit people off with your 'holy' ways. 6. You are the only user unhappy with the A/VD edits so shut the fuck up and actually consider that your opinion on them probably shouldn't be treated as the be-all of truth on this wiki.<br />
:::::::::So actually consider what you are doing just now, Iscariot, you are watching a little shit-stirrer try and mess with the only thing on this wiki that shouldn't generally be messed with, Mediawiki maintenance, no doubt waiting for this to flip out of control (thanks to a certain meddling user, you, moreso than me) and then cry vendetta if he actually gets punished for his immature, counter-productive, butthurt and overall unnecessary behaviour. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:32, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Wait, you want to go into a barrage of obscenities and then try and appeal to my sense of reason. Your 'productive' CDO may be clouding your logic. Given that the majority of your emotional tirade belongs on other pages, the only one I'll respond to is that concerning A/VD, there is a problem, it's not opinion, it's fact based on the escalations policy. Boxy's actions are no different to Nubis' that caused the situation. Given you are a sysop and one of the few users able to rectify the problem I'd be considerably more impressed if you applied your energies to that rather than engage in this case of edit warring, drama stirring and vandalism threatening over an inconsequential page.<br />
<br />
::::::::::Finally, I didn't start the policy here, you did. And I quote ''"The policy on bad faith where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) "'' You have made a claim, the burden of proof is ''always'' on the claimant. I'm simply asking you to prove what you have said. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 08:43, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Sorry. I read the first sentence and stopped indefinitely, learn that I have no intention of appealing to your sense of ''anything'', full stop. I no longer have an interest in this, and hence I have no more interest in arguing with you. Unlike yourself, users like Boxy at leased have initiative in fixing problems rather than inflaming them, so I consider this topic closed and I'm treating it as such. Bleat to someone new. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 09:02, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Why is it so hard for you to provide a link to something you say exists? Is it so hard for a sysop on this wiki to demonstrate their own claims? Or have you just started inventing policies like Hagnat used to? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:38, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::I just had a read through the vandalism policy (because none of the others are really relevant here), and there isn't anything about this type of edit. The situation isn't helped by the vagueness of the policy. The only thing that the policy actually DOES say about it is that they should go to Arbies, which we all know would be a pointless waste of time. There's nothing about admin edits, there's nothing about user page rights over-ruling the advancement of the wiki. Neither side is covered by policy, but, as Iscariot noted, the burden of proof IS unfortunately on the claimant.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:52, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::Why is it so hard for you to understand that after ''what I want'' is fixed, I have ''no intention'' of arguing with you? I have no, NO interest in continuing this once someone has stepped in a mediated this issue and since Boxy has, I have absolutely no interest in continuing the argument. Learn to actually care for the wiki rather than fix your desire to cause trouble and 'show up' the sysops. I'm the one with OCD, by the way. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:22, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::And by the way, [[UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines#General_Conduct|shut the fuck up now]], will you? Second last clause. we have the authority to destroy any value in the effort to crust "Bad Faith", ie. the umbrella ruling that can theoretically serve any purpose in aid of ridding of loopholes in the wiki. Deal with it. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:22, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::No, that's not what you said. You said ''"The policy on bad faith where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) "''. Please show me the ''"policy on bad faith"'', not the section on sysop conduct guidelines put in there for emergency situations. Please give me a link to the policy that you claimed exist that explicitly states a user cannot ''"(refuse) administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki"''. Please show how the sentence ''"You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing"'' in '''any''' way shows good faith on your part and acceptable conduct on your part. If not (and I don't think you can) then you have now become the new version of Hagnat, claiming policy where none exists and then falling back "I can do it because I is sysops and teh guidelines say I can so I'm not listening to you". -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 03:42, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::No, you shut the fuck up because an Admin document that supports what I say. You honestly don't get it do you? You make me sick with your personal harrassment, and you really can't take a hint. So much for sucking my cock to have any chance of being a sysop, yes? And now it'll turn into a "Boxy and DDR are BOTH to immature to consider me for sysop" story now. I can't wait. Conversation closed a day ago, learn to read. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:02, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::::You see, that's the difference, I'm not telling you to stop talking. I'm asking you to provide the policy you claim existed in the beginning. You can't, and the guidelines do not back you up on this. You cannot claim that a condition put in to prevent harm to the wiki entitles you to engage in an edit war with a user you aren't getting along with. Own up, apologise to J3D for saying there was such a policy when they're isn't and then the conversation is over. How hard is it? I'm not sure where this idea about me going for sysop came from, but as you well know there are only three users I will accept a nomination from, and two are inactive. Don't believe me? Go nominate me right now like Anime did and watch how quickly it gets archived. However none of this changes the fact that you were claiming a policy that doesn't exist, you were using your status as a sysop to attempt to get your own way and that you are now running to what should be an emergency condition for when the wiki is subject to extreme disruption to garnish your error with some semblance of credibility. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 05:16, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::Wait, what? For all I know, it could exist in 50,000 policy documents and you could be bluffing for all I care, I never actually looked to verify the claim. You know why? It was a figure of speech, hence the bolding of '''Bad Faith''' to outline what he would have been banned for. Obviously you knew this because you aren't a moron but you are such a parasite in that way you behave that the thought wouldn't pass me by, that you pretend to think that I'm using my sysop status as a badge for anything, when rather it is more my status as an actual member of the community, whereas you are just a little piddling child who will struggle to find one logical fallacy in an argument he has nothing to do with, then bounce in, using it as the doomsday weapon of the decade. Say what you want after this, I won't be replying to your cesspit-creating nonsense. The page is fixed, you are not. I'm fulfilled. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:36, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::::So we have "<b>The policy on bad faith</b> where refusing administrative edits on your page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. <b>You can find the link yourself</b>, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) " where you state there is a policy and there is a link to be found, contrasted with "For all I know, <b>it could exist</b> in 50,000 policy documents and you could be bluffing for all I care, <b>I never actually looked to verify the claim</b>." where there isn't a policy and you didn't even look before demanding a user leave your preferred edit to his owned page. You can quibble about semantics and logical fallacies all you want. You lied. You lied to try and get your own way and won't even have the good grace and dignity to apologise to J3D for this. ''"that you pretend to think that I'm using my sysop status as a badge for anything"'' Erm, '''you''' were the one who just tried to claim that the Sysop Guidelines were applicable in making you right, you can't invoke them if you're being a normal user. Therefore you're either trying to use your status to get your own way (as evidenced by invoking the clause in the sysop guidelines) or you're trying to get your own way by inventing a new policy/quoting one that can in no way apply. Which is it?<br />
<br />
:::::::::::::::::::::I further note that you in no way continue to try and paint me as having promotion prospects since you do not appear to have put up a nomination. Another attempt to divert attention from what's happened here failing? I think so. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 05:54, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
I actually think you guys might have found the pettiest possible thing to threaten each other with A/VB over. Just take it to Arby's or something and be done with it because I don't think anybody really believes they're going to ''convince'' the other side of their argument. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:26, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Arbie's isn't needed in regards to the '''maintenence''' of the wiki, only over its content. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:34, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::It can quite literally be about whatever you want it to be about. That's the whole point. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 08:01, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Fair enough. But the point of this isn't to make a large amount of drama, which is why I'm making this simple: If he reverts it, I'll ask someone to just put it there themselves and hopefully he'll keep it up there, considering he's stated numerous times that he's only interested in keeping me off the page, not some random user who has similar intentions. If he reverts that, he can go to A/VB for all I care. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:08, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
/section, thanks to boxy. I no longer have any desire to pursue this at the current time. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:37, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Someone wanna bring me up to date on what the fuck has happened? In the meantime i'm rereverting charlies edit.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 17:01, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:oh wow boxy did, was that what his a/m case was for? If so epic,. i might go check now..brb--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 17:05, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Witch Hunt == <br />
I have been wiki absent for a couple of days due to other shit so I had a look through the archive to see what happened with boxys misconduct and I decided to read up on [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive/J3D/2009 this]. I really do feel for you dude, the way those who didn't want you in in the first place twisted and turned all of it just to get you demoted, when the original misconduct case was brought about 1 thing only.... You really did get the hard end of this stick and I am not posting this out of butthurt, I just hope others go back and have a look at some of the actions of the people in there and despite their opinion of you, maybe form some opinions on the poor form of some of the current admin team in this time.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:23, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Box is the only current admin that had any sort of authority in that anyway, so why rag on them? And it's weird, and it's hard for people who know Jed and Nick IRL to fathom (trust me), but it's actually a common ''truth'' that somehow Nick ''always'' did have access to Jed's account, so if you actually think about it from their point of view, it has its grounds, no matter how ridiculous it seems to you and me. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:26, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 10:41, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::get some original material bob, I hahaha'd you off the ballpark the other day when you pulled your cannons on DDR, you arent very useful hey....And DDR, no, it isnt about what access they had or WHY he got demoted, it is more about how the misconduct case was for one thing, and then escalated into a million other things that were completely irrelevant and basically the sysops opinion on whether Jed should be a Sop or not...not if he had committed misconduct with the act that Cyberfag brought to fruition. If people thought that Nick and Jed were sharing accounts or whatever, and no, I personally do not see a crime in sitting next to a sysop while he uses his account, then those people should have made a misconduct or demotions case with the appropriate information and proof at hand, rather than using an offbeat joke comment as an excuse to bring out the big guns and debate his worthyness. Regardless of if he was fit to be a sysop or not, when the case was brought forward for an off colour joke, and the sysops at hand decide they are going to bring forward unrelated things and then manipulate it into a vote for demotion, all over a joke that was laughed off by the first 3 sysops, then yeah, it is the definition of a witch hunt. Also you don't have to have been a sysop then to have been part of the Witch Hunt at hand, honestly. This wasn't even aimed at you it is just that Jed will check this now that they are in Thailand.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:01, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::the tl;dr is that, the case wasnt about what Jed got demoted for, so basically it was a witch hunt from box and others, because they didnt have the authority that the crats who bought him into the team did, this was the only way to get him out without going through the proper avenues, ie the people who were elected to be Crats--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:03, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::tbh I saw it as no different as anything they pinged mighty Grim for in ''that'' misconduct case, and as a Sysop I think there is nothing wrong with ''calling'' (a vote for) demotion over long-term issues despite the one case being completely different... I know it sounds harsh and abusive but that's just how I see it, if you can be called for promotion at any time based on long-standing good efforts then the opposite shouldn't be totally shunned just because it's 'unfair'. Whether it should have been used for J3D is irrelevant (though I'm not surprised given the circumstances around his pm bid) but yes. More power to the hungry ops. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 12:43, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::''"Box is the only current admin that had any sort of authority in that anyway, so why rag on them?"'' The. General. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 03:46, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Though you are correct, I mostly just mean the major players in the demotion, the 'instigators'. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:14, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:fair, at least something of worth comes out of you, which is more I can say for certain others--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
sexy you are the best poster on the whole wiki. serious. you own {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:47, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
i reckon we should demote the cunt {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:51, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I don't have to be a good poster, I'm not a System Operator--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::neither do i, maggot {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:14, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I don't really know where your superiority complex comes from in life, I guess you get online and it is a world away from irl amirite?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:46, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::whoa there with all the hemmin and the hawwin and the birdsong {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:52, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGq5FeUv3zk I found your youtube channel], you were sure it would be a secret hey? There are people who can help you bob. You are not alone out there, never alone. I wont help you though, you're too much of a fag for me to be associated with.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:02, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::OH MY GOD ''how did you find itttttttttt'' {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:03, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::i feel so exposed... nobody is safe from messr. Read's detectiv skillz {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:08, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::: *smug*--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
''I personally do not see a crime in sitting next to a sysop while he uses his account,'' This made me LOL because that is why Nubis was demoted. At least Nubis and I were never accused of abusing check user... --[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 16:24, 22 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Untrue. Not only was jed demoted for stuff relating to that ''anyway'', There was also evidence to support that you had permanent access to the nubis account from locations other than her/his own, something your initial claim entailed. Sheesh. You are actually a troll with all of these claims that you make, right? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 16:33, 22 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==those stupid groups that include people whom you know don't want to be a part of your shitty jokes==<br />
next time you make one of them you'll earn yourself an A/VB case {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:16, 17 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:well considering it's not vandalism, I am sure you will earn one for shitting up the admin pages. Take him to A/A over it, so he can't make any groups like that again or something, but don't try and be an internet tuff guy now.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 11:06, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::wrong! but thanks anyways {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:00, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Arbitration ==<br />
An interim [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool#Interim_Ruling Ruling] has been made.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 10:58, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:and so has my response.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:03, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
hey duder thad made his final ruling. I'd like to "claim" that I'm not a part of the hate club so remove me from the page. cheers {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:36, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:but you hate 2 Cool do you not? Anyway you shalt have compliance but i do think you belong there.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:10, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Racist Flame ==<br />
<br />
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, assuming you were ''making a good faith edit when you recently unloaded a slew of racial slurs''. Actually, typing that sentence demonstrates the absurdity of it. Particularly in the context of the [[The Southern Cross Club|the group page]], where you commented, [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:The_Southern_Cross_Club&diff=1582137&oldid=1582065 your flame] is in poor taste, to put it mildly. Do you agree?<br />
<br />
Rather than make a vandalism case out of it, I'd like to give you an opportunity to make a brief and sincere retraction alongside your original comment. Or at the very least, use this space to explain your reasoning behind making such an edit.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 02:20, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:he was pretty clearly being ironic, hope this helps. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 02:59, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Might as well add yourself. [[User:Giles Sednik/List of Wiki Puritans|Now.]] --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 03:02, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::lmao {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:08, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::well done good sir.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:03, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Its a talk page, i'm allowed to be racist and yeah, ask bob why i say things next time, he seems to know.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:03, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::If we ever get around to that TOS bullshit you might not be! bloop bloop bloop --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 07:23, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
[[User:Giles_Sednik/List_of_Wiki_Puritans#The_List|Done.]] And I love using "irony" as an excuse to vent all the crap you wish you could say in public. Yeh that was cutting edge humor there. But like you said, it's the internet and you're allowed to be a racist. *golf clap* --{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 11:37, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I don't think you quite get what irony is. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:09, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::[http://www.answers.com/topic/irony Yeh yeh yeh definition 1a]. I get it. But I don't buy it, particularly as an excuse. It has become all too commonplace for people say something indefensible and then claim irony as their defense. Example: ''"You're such a fucking (insert racial slur). Durr haha I was being ironic don't get upset."''<br />
::Also, while we're on the subject, irony is more that the dictionary definition, and there '''is''' a difference between sarcasm and irony. And there's a BIG difference between using irony to demonstrate the absurdity of an idea or argument, and the way cybertrolls use racial slurs without being able to articulate what they think they're being ironic about.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 13:08, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::you think you're super astute but you're really not. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:29, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Nu uh. YOU!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 14:18, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::fix'd--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 14:53, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::So wait was that edit vandalism or what? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::yeah. I'd delete SA's own post but you've just replied to it, so I'll leave it up to you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:10, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::fuck charlie you're getting too good at picking up on my plans....since you've foiled me i'll in turn leave it up to giles. 09:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC) {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::lol. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Lol'd@N3D ==<br />
<br />
Some of your finest work my friend ;)--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== awww ==<br />
<br />
You just missed a really funny A/M case, SA started trolling finis' talk page without knowing that it was protected. I especially loved it because it used to be what we all joked about getting ops for, so we could harass finis even after he A/PT'd his talk page. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 07:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah, it was pretty funny, especially when DDR was all "uh uh SA you're a dumbass and the page is protected" and shit. :D --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 13:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::And when I snuck my own snide asshole message in the edit summary so Finy could see it anyway :D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 14:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Yeah...Dick.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 16:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Ohi was watching from the depths. Just becausei'm not editing doesn't mean your every move isn't being monitored. So was it at a slap on the wrist or what? I think he deserved a good ol' spanking.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 16:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I have a second warning now. I can't do anything semi-bad for a bit D: --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 16:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Oh as if you were watching from the depths. I know you. If you watch, you ''have'' to comment. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 23:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::^--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 23:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::It was one night charlie! it didn't mean anything, stop acting like you understand me!! *storms out of the room sobbing* {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:18, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Why ==<br />
[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87_%D9%85%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AE%D8%AF%D9%85%D8%A9]...Why my profile? I don't even know you. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 05:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Why is this comment on Jed's talk? Also, I translated that heading, and it reads: "The Enemies of God". I'd assume he doesn't like you.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Oh, now I get it. That looked like a user page aty first. Strange.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I think its actually something different, can't remember. I think they meant something else when they made it. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Someone I know translated it, it says something about allah in all that stuff (I didnt pay attention) and then it says Enemies of God: Colonel Cunt. I was just curious who i killed so i can do it again :D --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 23:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::OH, I thought you guys were talking about the group name. They all have arab names and spam derka derka and shit, classic xD --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 23:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Oh that, yeah you killed me, just look for a sandmonkey and kill them, its probably me. although i'm inactive atm. how'd you find that page btw? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Probably searched his UD profile through the wiki I bet. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::What a self indulgent prick, lucky he's on the kill list! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::lol. Btw I just got back from work and while I was there I thought of [[Negronet]], and thought of you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Does that have any context aside from that its similar to necronet? Either way its still amusing...{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:10, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::I dont even remember where i found it to be honest...i might have hit random page, i was pretty bored a few days ago and it came up with one profile on that page so naturally i clicked that. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 03:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== OMFG DONT COMMENT ON MY TALK PAGE OMG WTF ==<br />
<br />
Ull maek me sew mahd!! Il have 2 delyt it u babbeh--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Unfortunately he gave me no other opportunity than to pursue justice via administration pages. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== awesome ==<br />
<br />
I found this in the Unused Templates bin:<br />
<br />
{{Template:NoJ3D}}<br />
<br />
Nice. I might actually start using it too, hilarious ;D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 11:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:was only unused because bob added me to his. He cant handle the Pwnage.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:36, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I never used that template; I have the code straight on my talk page. J3D made that a few minutes after I posted it. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::I caught a largemouth bass, a koi and a cyberbob today--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::J3D would love to be important enough to command his own "no j3d" template... pretty lame he's got to create it himself though :D <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:21 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:::::lol, [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Template:NoJ3D&action=history not awesome]... actually quite the opposite <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:23 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
::::::I think you are missing the classic "take the piss out of yourself, but make people slightly offput by your pretend arrogance" thing that Jed has been working on for a long, long time now.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:26, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::And always will be. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::lol, "classic"... :D <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 14:04 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
So anyways, new vote now, who votes [[Template:NoJ3D]] replace [[Template:Verdict]] on A/VB from now on? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 22:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I vote to merge the two.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 01:37, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I was gonna link from my sig and have a disclaimer stating that having that template isn't binding, but then the share mass of the job queue killed the net :( and yeah boxy i'm totally cool with thefact i made it myself :) plus all i really did was take the code from bobs page and cp it. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:10, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah. I had no qualms about you making it yourself, just find it a surprisingly fitting template for how I feel about you. Zing! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I'll keep that in mind next time i "post" you a letter :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not use admin pages to harass people on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 11:16, 19 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:what the fuck is this shit? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:07, 25 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== ban ==<br />
<br />
if u get banned again, you still have 5 hours 56 minutes of wrongly used ban time which I'm pretty sure you haven't used. [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_07#User:J3D_.282.29]]. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 02:37, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:that's dumb, you're dumb. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:10, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Remember how well the 'ban credit' idea worked out the last time? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 06:24, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Nup, cause I never saw it used properly in practice. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 06:59, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I will nevar be banned again! But yes i do have that in the bank. i tried to use it but its kinda hard when you're banned to inform s'ops that you have ban credit. Perhaps we need [[A/BC]] (might copyright that actually, groovy name) which even when banned you can still post on. Or just more up to the minute banners? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:17, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Ban Credit is such a rare case that it would not be worth it ''at all''. And Misanthropy the reason this is different from the rest is that he was banned legitimately but the vote was overruled later, the reason it wasn't applicable before was because when nubis and I both were misconducted for it, it was because we fucked up the data and banned them when they shouldn't have been at all. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 09:02, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
By the way, making a group soon with me, guy, a bunch of kids at MHS who are still into UD and maybe a few more guys from the [[ATO]], will be pretty casual, interested? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 09:02, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:yeah sure hit me up with the deets. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:22, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::No prob nig I'll fbook them too you and here too, once I make the group, should be a week at the most from here on, so basically at worst case scenario i can talk to you about it next weekend when you hit up procastle. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:13, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::lolcastle.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:14, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== bbk ==<br />
<br />
i found a mid-2007 version of the BBK page which had our full memberlist in all its glory, etc.<br />
<br />
what do you think of me reverting the BBK page and (most of) its info back to just when we initially broke up? imo it serves the group better to have the glorious version of the page up there instead. just some food for thought? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:36, 12 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:As opposed the penny heights version??? Hmmm i guess i cuold work with that. If the penny heights version was moved to a subpage. Link us the version you want. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:31, 12 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::[http://web.archive.org/web/20071013182832/wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Beatbox_kids]. The penny heights version was gay tbh -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:11, 12 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
btw lol @ us nigs meatpuppeting ahlg and cheese into crat. looking at old archives, i forgot all that shit, only remembered us getting SA in -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:23, 13 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:hahahah we did???? sweet!!! those are two that elected me to op i think..{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:39, 22 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::yeah they did, then everyone raged so hard AHLG self demoted. silly old willy look what you've done. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:35, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Fun ==<br />
''Can you guess who is who? Answer on our talk page, and win a fabulous prize*''<br />
<br />
I [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Image:BBK!.jpg say] 6, if only for the irony of certain vandal escalations you received in the past. If not, then I take my chances with 3 >:D. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 12:17, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Nah, I reckon J3d's 7, although he could be 15. It's hard to tell from the photo.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 12:29, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::He's the mysterious arm behind 16. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 13:31, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Yeah, I noticed that funny thing as well. Looks like he's completely covering another guy up. 10 looks like he's going to kill someone btw.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 13:52, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::The guy behind 16 is 17; he just has a really long neck.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 13:55, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::You;re al wrong but I implore your to keep trying!! If you keep tring i'll give you epic hints as to which one is read or me `-- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 16:27, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Read is 10, J3d is 4.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 16:39, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::I thought I read somewhere Read was of aboriginal origin, but that may have been a joke. Since DDR is da leader, we have to look for the alpha male in there. <s>17</s> 2. Also, is it me or do the way 3 and 4 hold hands suggest something more then friendship? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 17:03, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== [[Talk:2 Cool/Bob's Epic Fails]] ==<br />
<br />
you like? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 14:10, 15 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:i do. I'll put it on. honestly if you just stayed in the [[2CFC]] you could have put it on yourself. speaking of which, fucking lol at the all the 2 cool fanclub bullshit, good thymes.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:06, 16 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:Every_Villain_Is_Lemons&diff=1777892
Talk:Every Villain Is Lemons
2010-09-13T11:38:06Z
<p>J3D: /* A neutral report */</p>
<hr />
<div><center><div style="background-color: #663366; width: 850px; padding: 0px; min-width: 850px;"><br />
<div style="margin-bottom: -10px;">[[Image:4020talkhead.png|850px|4020]]</div><br />
<div style="float: left; width: 80px; border: 1px solid #FFFFFF); padding: 5px 0px; background-color: #FFFFFF; margin: 60px 0px 0px 35px; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana;" align=center ><br />
[[Every Villain Is Lemons|{{c|black|MAIN}}]]<br />
</div><br />
<div style="float: left; width: 80px; border: 1px solid #FFFFFF); padding: 5px 0px; background-color: #FFFFFF; margin: 120px 0px 0px -80px; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana;" align=center ><br />
<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:Every_Villain_Is_Lemons&action=edit&section=new <span style="font-size: 3em; color: #000000;">+</span>]</span><br />
</div><br />
<div align="right"><div style="background-color: #FFFFFF; width: 700px; padding: 0px; min-width: 700px; font-size: 1em; -moz-border-radius:280px 0 0 0/52px 0 0 0; -webkit-border-radius:280px 0 0 0/52px 0 0 0; border-bottom: 4px solid #663366; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana"><br />
<div align="right"><div style="background-color: #000000; width: 700px; padding: 0px; min-width: 700px; font-size: 1.7em; -moz-border-radius:280px 0 0 0/70px 0 0 0; -webkit-border-radius:280px 0 0 0/70px 0 0 0; border-bottom: 4px solid #663366; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana"><font color="#FFFFFF"><p align="center">EVERY '''TALK''' IS LEMONS</p></font></div></div><br />
<div align="left"><div style="padding: 5px 5px"><br />
<br />
<p align="center">press the +</p><br />
<br><br />
<br><br />
<br />
<br />
== Can I join? ==<br />
<br />
Seriously. I'll make a new alt. Any group with a page this cool needs me in it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 11:20, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
It certainly looks unique, haven't seen anything like this before, and I mean it in a good way. Now start stealing some [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=EVIL&redirect=no redirects]. Though I wonder, this is survivor, pk or zombie? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:31, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Currently we are survivor, nurturing the newer members and helping them understand the game and levelling up. Could take a month or two, but once that's done, we aren't sure what we will do. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:48, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Survivors!?! It is my duty to insult you! You are a foolhardy, shortsighted, and truly meaningless <s>group</s> individual who lacks the mental capacity to even begin to grasp anything that even resembles a big picture. Go die, cold and alone, in some barhah-forsaken hole. It's more than you lousy breathers deserve. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 12:18, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I considered un-idling A Cyberdemon for this but it's pro survivors and that makes me sad. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 16:33, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Damn, I want to join this so badly. I will admit that the graphics and awesome page layout got me, <small><s>but the fact that it's currently pro-survivor is somewhat an incentive to me.</s></small> --{{User:Chirurgien/Signature}} 22:59, 3 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Can we have sex?==<br />
<br />
Seriously. PS where the fuck were you on autoday you cunt? !{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:45, 11 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Man, fucking... was working all weekend, I actually totally forgot you were up until monday arvo and I raged. come back -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:30, 11 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::It's true he did rage. I was there.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 12:28, 16 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::yeah ican totes imagine, i'm sure it was serious. and by work you mean udwiki. i bet if i check the logs you spent more time here than anywher eelse that weekend *tear* {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:42, 22 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Cool page and images! ==<br />
<br />
Just wanted to know... Did you made the images? They're really cool. Would have loved to get them HI-RES. For a wallpaper, why not? --{{User:DiSm/sig}} 12:54, 16 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:I didn't make them unfortunately, but by coincidence the originals are actually wallpaper, so here's a chrissy treat: [http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/181/1252845289065.jpg], [http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/90/1280223737590.jpg], [http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/9012/1281359130777.jpg]. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:05, 16 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Really nice! Thanks. Got to use that soon. By the way, just something : In my preferences I clicked ''Add pages I edit to my watchlist''. Then I edit your page to ask for images... and I don't get notified when you answer! :/ --{{User:DiSm/sig}} 14:40, 16 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::How strange... -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:43, 16 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I don't really care. It's ok ^^. Damn the wallpapers are cool for my 13" laptop but are really fig leaf for my 23" computer! :D--{{User:DiSm/sig}} 18:27, 20 August 2010 (BST)<br />
Yeah, this is definitely the coolest group page I've ever seen. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 19:47, 20 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
I have to concur with the above comments, and thank you so much for my new wallpaper. 8D --{{User:Chirurgien/Signature}} 10:50, 3 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Zerg Liste ==<br />
<br />
It seems like some of your members are currently discussed for inclusion on the zerg liste [http://zombies.dementiastudios.org/boards/index.php?topic=12.msg55720#msg55720 here]. If those claims aren't true, then what you should do is to go to the appeals thread and let the player of every mentioned alt post (allowing the mods to IP check). --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 20:58, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Sigh. Thanks for the heads up. I'll go and clear that up. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:00, 26 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==So...==<br />
...Not recruiting, huh? That's a shame. I was gonna try registering [[User:Axe Hack/Yuki Onna|Yuki Onna]] in this group. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 15:11, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:The lemons have changed their stride and as things heat up within the group (and they actually keep doing stuff, not just bumming around), we are happy to take members in- come down to [[Dibbings Plaza Police Department|dibbings]] and share the load against [[SFHNAS]] if you'd like :) -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 04:44, 26 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Hm...Let's see...I won't be running Yuki until January, but I'll just keep this as an early recruitment request...Like what I'm doing for OBR... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 23:43, 26 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
Because I've already asked the other two groups, so I'm gonna ask it here. If you do accept that early recruitment request, answer this: What makes EVIL stand out from Tikhon Medical and OBR? --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 01:36, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:we don't want to compete with those groups in terms of recruitment because we know you might not like your stay, and if you don't, that's all we can have offered. we will most likely continue to disappoint you again and again unless you are just happy going at the EVIL pace of life and taking back survivor strongholds for GLORY and FAME -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 15:13, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Too wide ==<br />
<br />
Scrolls off the page at 1024x. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 07:44, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:{{Grr}} Stop having a broken wiki, Rev! {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 07:51, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:True dat!! Just tested, and it only just pops of the edge. honestly, I'm barely ready to break my philosophy of "if it works for me it should work for most who matter" for 10px going over the edge ;D -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:07, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Seriously. I was telling folks that when I was designing some pages. It looked ''fine'' in 1080p, but all I heard was grousing about how the maps forced them to horizontally scroll and the text seemed to be all over the place. Whine, grouse, complain, moan, that's all I ever hear. Why isn't everyone using 1920x1080 at a minimum yet? Preferably 1920x1200, in fact. Even my bajillion year-old laptop does 1440x960, which is plenty. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 08:40, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==MoreBlack==<br />
I hear you may be writing this up. Ive got loads of dumbwits from days one and two --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:01, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Of what, sorry? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:18, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::I had heard Red was handling it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 10:18, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Oh, blackmore. Nah, I'm just watching, in a day or two EVIL might be joining for some fun (which means I'll be bailing and my alt will be coming in instead a day later), then we might write our own small piece. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:20, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx6fwfBKCIQ ?] {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 10:21, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:BTW, after this thing is over give me some dumbwits and I'll write up an event, battle or something. I've always wanted to do that. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 12:02, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::I was toying with the idea of trying to create it in a Max Brooks oral history stylee. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 12:10, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::So now we have THREE people trying to write up a history. Go figure. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 22:54, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::DW everyone can help each other out on the event if they'd like. Sept I don't think I know who Max Brooks is so I might just hide in the corner watching. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:45, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::He wrote the zombie survival guide. And stuff. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:24, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Oh yeah!! I remember his name now. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:08, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Your Page is wrong==<br />
Just realised. In Williamsville you were fighting [[SFTA]] not [[SFHNAS]] --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:24, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:god ddr how could you do that?!?!? also, 250 edits is A SHIT LOAD ZOMGZ{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:31, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Meh. I got this off in-game zombie scan data, not wiki data. I maintain our claim! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 16:37, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Really? Who? I know Bobby Spoons was down there, but who else did you get scans for? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:59, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Gah, I know this seems fake and gay, but I didn't record names, just groups. Whoever's name was revealed we'd take a look, and SFHNAS' name came up loike 90% of the time as far as I saw. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 18:57, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Thats so fake and gay. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:09, 3 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Your group is fake and gay! The DPSO guys were pissing on our parade so much, we were going to massacre them all, announce it to the zombie brethren, and watch as the PD got torn down but you beat us to it by a day ;_; -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 15:17, 4 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Seriously, send us some alts. Dartside has some of the worst survivors we've ever seen. Their latest strategy to remove us is...... zerging. We can take this place! --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:19, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Zerging presence in Dartside now? How sad. It's worth noting that the DPSO fags from Dibbings claim the other side is zerging. I there's a bit of paranoia around those parts Ross ;D -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:58, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::Well if they weren't created several days apart, 3 years ago, with names differentiated by a single number, and wiki pages existing for both accounts admitting they are run by the same person I'd call it paranoia too. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:23, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Hi from SLC ==<br />
<br />
Well, since we've allied now, thought I'd mention it here on your talk too. Hello there from [[Sweet_like_Chocolate|Sweet like Chocolate]] :D. {{User:Shadok/sig}} 07:42, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Fantastic! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 09:15, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== A neutral report ==<br />
<br />
{{udspan|You are inside Dibbings Plaza Police Dept. The doors to the street have been secured. Also here is Momma Bear.<br /><br />
Somebody has spraypainted ''Dibbings PD HQ... no lemons. K.O.S.'' onto a wall.<br /><br />
There are four zombies here.}}<br />
<br />
- [[User:Whitehouse]] 14:45, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:LOL! We didn't even do anything except bag them out for being retards!! Oh well, we ''do'' leave people feeling... ''bitter''.. bam! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 15:13, 7 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::I thought lemons were sour! What is this madness!?! --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 05:56, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Us australians have yet to decide whether our lemons taste either sour or bitter or both. It's the uranium in the ground we think. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 14:07, 11 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::it's totes bitter. like that bickfords bitter lemon cordial.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:38, 13 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DanceDanceRevolution&diff=1777891
User talk:DanceDanceRevolution
2010-09-13T11:35:14Z
<p>J3D: /* wiki noob needs a mentor */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/talkn}}<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
==Way too Evil==<br />
[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1295703 Friend of yours?] Check his real name link (NSFW). I think that's more then enough to get him on a Text Rape list. Might wanna talk to him. I'm also scarred for life now :( --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:20, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, mate in EVIL. What do you mean by NSFW? I don't want to force him out of having his own crap on his profile, he's probably had it there as long as he's been playing, which is a while. I don't really mind tbh, his loss if he's anti-text-raped. lol. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:29, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Not Safe For Work. Ring a bell? Did you follow the link? But okay, it's not like I'm going to report him, I don't really care but I know some people do and I thought I'd bring it up. Anyway, now I have accidentally bumped into you guys I'm deciding whether or not I send a surprise down there.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:35, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Lol! Just so you know, we'll run away from any PKing attacks, we are all wimps atm. Yeah, I've seen lemonparty, it's pretty common, it's like meatspin or any shock website IMO, you're going to see it one way or another and the sooner you do the sooner you can identify the link as something you're never going to click again. Either way, thanks for the heads up, I'll pass the message onto him and see what he thinks. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:37, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== First ==<br />
<br />
Since you archived the page.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 11:49, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:(diff) (hist) . . User talk:DanceDanceRevolution; 10:43 . . (-57,746) . . DanceDanceRevolution (Talk | contribs | block)<br />
:^^^ Evidence.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 11:50, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Doesn't count unless he empties it completely. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 12:12, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::It coutns for me... Also, I like where this Radioactive thing is going.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 12:19, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Don't mind me, just maintaining my page presence... ;) --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 13:55, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==I spy...==<br />
...a stalker not more than 30 seconds ago... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 14:34, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Great minds think alike! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 14:35, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::I'm completely not sure if you remember her, but [[User:Tselita|Tselita]] was in that very same building. Also, my friend, [[User:Zensaga|Zensaga]] was in there as well... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 14:52, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==ZL==<br />
Unless they go the "guilt by association" rule for GTF's fit,it should be done for sure. As for learning about it, you'd have learned about it at least as soon the first zerg hunter had PKed you. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 15:38, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:What is the guilt by association?? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 17:13, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::The powers that be generally don't like if appealers get abusive and foul-mouthed. (And I probably wouldn't like it as well, looking how they had and have to deal with the likes of Finis Valorum, Dead Bunnies and TZH.) It's some difference though if some lying scumbags like the Dead Bunnies throw out a barrage of insults while denying even basic facts, or if a single member out of several snaps slightly in a case that has been weak to begin with. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 01:22, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Yeah fair. I hoped they would overlook that since we obvs aren't zerging and I just assumed the IP was important so I didn't force the words out of any of their mouths, I just let them say whatever. And it's a ZERG LIST they maintain, if they can't handle abuse from wrongly accused people then they shouldn't be there IMO. One more question: It appears that Guy's response was moved to another thread, is that right? And why? :/ -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:29, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::The mods are running the ZL in their spare time and are basically providing a public service, at which 90% of all work _should_ already be done by Kevan (if the auto-measures were worth anything), so I grant them any right to refuse appeals on the base of "being something we don't wanna put up with". As for moving it, I have no idea if GTF's comment has been moved, and why. If it has any effect will be seen at least as soon as the next list update comes in. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 01:42, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::It buttfucks objectivity up the arsehole if they refuse 100% watertight appeals from a group who is ''absolutely'' not zerging if someone says the F word in them. Just saying. Thought we would have been 100% in the clear, ahh well. Thanks for everything. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:09, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::{{quote|3=[[User:Spiderzed|I told you so:]]|2=It's some difference though if some lying scumbags like the Dead Bunnies throw out a barrage of insults while denying even basic facts, or if a single member out of several snaps slightly in a case that has been weak to begin with.}}<br />
::::::For actual answers on that, you have to grab an actual operator (like TheHuntsman or MarcusCaesar). I'm just a lone zerg hunter and not involved with ZL maintenance. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 02:17, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Yeah fair, soz. Again, thanks for the help through this. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:42, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::Essentially, if somebody takes pains to heap abuse the ZL Mods in their removal request then we take that as a clear indication that they do not in fact wish to be removed. (Otherwise they would abide by the removal rules, in which this situation is specifically called out.) It's like someone's face giving the lie to their words, but an online equivalent. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 04:59, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Yeah, fair enough. Thanks for the clarification Rev. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 05:01, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::I suppose I should really ask what the context is <small>(in case there is something I should be doing)</small>… but I kinda don't want to <small>(in case there is something I should be doing)</small>. {{shifty}} {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 09:51, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Oh, just in the zerg liste 9 thread my new group EVIL was submitted to be added because we all defended a break-in with very quick precision and execution. To make sure there was no chance of us being actually added, I got the suspected players to post on the appeals thread so their IP's could be logged. Out of the 5 of us that were considered, the last person to post chucked a shitty over us being added (he didn't realise we had only been submitted, not added) over something so trivial in his eyes. The post itself while embarrassing wasn't anything ''too'' over the top in itself, and since I have a lack of knowledge of the zerg liste methods so I'm pretty paranoid about being added, since it would create a massive dark cloud over our groups morale etc. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:29, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::Yeah, you should be fine, mate. Suspicion is not proof, and you've definitely done the right thing in your response. If I were you, I'd do as [[Mostly Harmless]] did and view it as a badge of honour. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 16:50, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== The Wyke Hills/Wykewood confusion ==<br />
<br />
You know, those can happen when you are updating a dozen EMRs alone. And the fact that there were two reports for Wyke Hills and one for Wykewood on that particular update didn't help either. And yet when you found it, you decided to point and laugh at it instead of fixing it. I wonder how that could help. -- [[User:Kittithaj|Kittithaj]] 16:48, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:People make mistakes. I make lots. Don't go all butthurt on me for it. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 06:58, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Thought you'd like to know ==<br />
<br />
It [[User:Aichon/Sandbox/Demo10|looks like]] your DanceDance arrows sig might be one of the ones causing issues for A/VB (the current month's archive isn't showing up on it since it has too much inclusion data), since it's a decent amount larger than the norm. This isn't a warning to fix it or anything of the sort, merely a friendly notification, since I figured you'd want to be aware of something like this. What you do with this info is your call. My best guess is that it's the images causing the issues, since the other big culprit was Mis' sig with the images in it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:45, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, I've noticed that in IE both your sig and Mis's sig are appearing vertically. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 06:56, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Ah, yeah, that's an unfortunate side affect of the code that they're using to get links over their images (it's my fault, since I wrote the code). IE7 and earlier doesn't understand the "display: inline-box" stuff, I believe, so it does a "display: box" equivalent instead, which means each image gets its own line. I haven't figured out a fix yet, though I'll readily admit I haven't been looking too hard since I'm not reminded of the issue during daily use (I use something other than IE, of course). IE8 is better (so long as Compatibility Mode is disabled), in that they don't use multiple lines, but the link aspect of the code simply doesn't work in IE8 (yet? Rooster was working on it as recently as yesterday or so). {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 07:04, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Thanks heaps for that info guys. I do like the arrows sig but I've always understood there'd most likely be some sort of unfixable problem with them, so I have no issue removing it and just redirecting it to my current lemon signature. is it just affecting the inclusion ''on'' the A/VB page? Or did the signatures in the archive itself also refuse to display? If the former was the only issue, I might wait till the month is over, revert the sig back to the arrows and just continue from there on with my current sig. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:22, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Just a note on the arrows sig, you can use [[Template:ClickInternal]] for the images now. Good news is that it works (thank Aichon), bad news is that it's weighty so using it on several images is bad, mmmkay? Also you have to use it because I said so or I'll get all sig policy on your ass. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 07:16, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:K cool thanks Rooster. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:57, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== recruitment ad ==<br />
<br />
i appreciate the help in conforming my attempt at a recruitment ad. at least ya helped me with it instead of being a jerk about it. i need to brush up on my wiki. {{unsigned|Nuerotoxic2213|01:07, 1 September 2010}}<br />
:That was actually me that fixed it up for you, though DDR was kinda enough to remove a stray character from the page that was making it look a bit off. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:20, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==sup biatch==<br />
<br />
whats teh lowdown on the game updates? bellow + that scout safehouse skill is that all?? also - scout safehouse, do the actions have to be completed in the safehouse? how the frack does the game measure that? Also there should be a link of the news page to a page that explains the updates in non-zombieapoc style. Ie outlines what we know of the actual changes. if that already exists; link me and make the link more obvious for others. sick1 {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:28, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:[[Safehouses]]--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 12:07, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::dunke!{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:20, 4 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== POLGNOAK ==<br />
<br />
You realise that you just commented on the main page, not the talk page, right?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 07:59, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Haha!!! I didn't even notice :( Thanks for the heads up! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:11, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::=P Don't worry about it, I thought it was a talk at first too. Probably because they brought the votes across from the talk.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 08:13, 6 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== hey papi ==<br />
<br />
can you move [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Quartly_Lecture_Group this] under the QSG name space? thanks?----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 14:46, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeboi -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 17:33, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== RITA ==<br />
<br />
Do [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1774575 I] have all the skills I'm gonna need for the manhunt? What with Lurching Gait and Ankle grab, I think I'm about done now.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 17:40, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Vinetown scout approves of this. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:52, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::They were skeptical! They said I couldn't level a Dinosaur based character before October! They were wrong! </smug> --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 18:59, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::: I hate to point this out but my [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1776190 discosaur] gained all his XP from shooting people not zombies. No needles or FAK's either. Its not gonna be hard to get the remainder before October. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 19:32, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Hell yeah! We're gonna eat some humans!--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<font color="purple">The Big T</font>]] 22:31, 9 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Scroll boxes ==<br />
<br />
Such as the one in your main sandpit. Can they be placed side by side? Or, for that matter, can anything be placed alongside them?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 09:41, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:I imagine if you confined each one to an (absolute?) div and specified the divs to go side by side like one would normally, it'd be possible, but you'd have to obviously smallen their set width. I haven't touched those scrollboxes in over a year pretty much and I originally got them from my ex-boyfriend op [[User:Linkthewindow]], and you can see his speakbox is easily confined within simple tables so I don't think something you're mentioning is outside of reason. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:03, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Yeah I already looked at Link's code. I'll have a crack at what you suggested now. Thanks!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:05, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::If you have troubles, come back sometime and hit me up, back then I knew so little about DIV overlays mine was practically just a steal of Links. Between us and Aichon I'd be very surprised if we couldn't make what you want to work. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:06, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Yeah, I just went to have a look, and I realised I don't actually know how to put divs side by side. I'm working up a trial at [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Stub|my stub page]], but I've pretty much hit a brick wall. If you could help get those side by side, I'd be very appreciative. :P --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:10, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::I'll be able to, but semi finals footy is on so I'll come back in an hour and a half to have a squiz. Wouldn't be surprised if either you or aichon did it that time. In the meantime, look at the divs for the INFO and TALK div boxes for [[Every Villain Is Lemons]] which I also stole from [[BB3]] page if I remember right. Play around with the positions and notice how one is relative to the other, that might help. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:42, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Just sorted it. Thanks loads!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:51, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Just checking ==<br />
<br />
To make sure you saw [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:Aichon/Sandbox/Demo12&diff=1774587&oldid=1774584 this] since I never heard confirmation that you'd seen it. It does fix the issue of centering the image, but it comes at the cost of having hidden text on the page. I offered some more explanation on my talk page a few days back. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:25, 10 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== wiki noob needs a mentor ==<br />
<br />
Hi. I'm new to wiki editing and only know the most basic of stuff. I've wanted to learn for a while so when I found Project Mentor I figured I'd give you a shout. HAAAAAAAAAAAALP! I suck at this. Thanks [[User:Skynet Defense Network|Skynet Defense Network]] 16:18, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:I could help if DDR isn't available. Or anyone else for that matter. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 16:19, 12 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::i'll do it! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:35, 13 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Nubis&diff=1773733
User talk:Nubis
2010-09-05T13:56:03Z
<p>J3D: /* Badge help */</p>
<hr />
<div><center>[[Image:EFuberzombie.png]]<br><br />
*[[Image:Dead-killdozer.gif|25px]] [[The Dead]]<br />
[[Image:dead_like_zed.gif]] </center><br />
<br />
==MAN AXE TORNADO==<br />
its me {{User:Nubis/sig}} 19:25, 19 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:JESUS FUCKING CHRIST --{{User:Katthew/Sig}} 19:26, 19 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
::KATTHEW BABY I LOVE YOUR SIG {{User:Nubis/sig}} 19:26, 19 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::I LOVE YOUR BONER --{{User:Katthew/Sig}} 19:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::IT IS P. BIG {{User:Nubis/sig}} 19:43, 19 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::COME RUB YOUR BONER ALL OVER [[User:Katthew/Super Cool Zombie Improvements|MY SUPER COOL NEW PAGE]] PLEASE --{{User:Katthew/Sig}} 00:24, 20 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Stop edit conflicting me you douchebags.--[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 19:27, 19 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Demoted==<br />
I've temporarily demoted you until this is sorted out <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 21:50 10 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:maybe you should do something productive like secure my account jeez {{User:Nubis/sig}} 22:28, 13 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::They can't protect, Nubis. They want to hang you out to dry.--[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 22:32, 13 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::just like i did to you, lol! {{User:Nubis/sig}} 22:33, 13 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Mess==<br />
apparently some goons stole my password and got into my account ( i haven't touched this shit in years )<br />
<br />
oh god what a mess {{User:Nubis/sig}} 19:35, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:what is that nwo crap in my sig {{User:Nubis/sig}} 19:35, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::would somebody please tell me whats going on {{User:Nubis/sig}} 19:41, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::strange co-incidence for you to come back right now if you have not been here for so long... --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 23:58, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::This is ridiculous. This is Nubis? Um-huh.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:05, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I think at this point, this isn't Nubis. Then again, maybe it's not me. MAYBE ITS NOT ANYBODY. MAYBE I DIED IN A FIRE IN 1455 AND IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT FIVE MORE TIMES A CLOWN WILL KILL YOU. (/obvious)--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 00:45, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:What? Being an idiot and revealing my secrets can actually get me demoted? Holy god, I never expected this! Save me! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|Chartreuse}}-- 00:50, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Uhm, stop being faggots guys. Its very easily possible that one of Nubis's UDwiki friends that is still active emailed or IMed him this shit and Nubis went "DA FUCK" and checked himself. Its not automatically "OMG STARANGE COINCEDENCE LOL UR NOT HIM"--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 01:29, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== You have all been trolled.==<br />
'''PS I'm Really Nubis*. I am the puppetmaster. You are all my puppets.''' <br />
Nubis gave me this account right after the March of the Dead when Grimmy posted that "which Sysops Do you trust?" and I had to jump in there and save poor old Nubis. <br />
<br />
Any foul mouthed hate mongering thing I said was directly from Nubis just posted by me so I could add more obscenities. I hate almost every last one of you motherfuckers on here. <br />
<br />
<br />
<nowiki>*</nowiki>Check User should confirm this.--[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 02:48, 9 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:But I love you, DCC... ;_; --[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]] <sup>[[DORIS]] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pXfHLUlZf4 I jizzed in my pants] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91a8pHj7V9k pr0n]</sup> 02:59, 9 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:And so it does. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|Chartreuse}}-- 03:10, 9 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::I don't think this makes you a puppet master, I think it makes you a guy who has 2 accounts and posted as two different egos who eventually merged in to the one bullshit-machine that nobody really gave a toss about anyway.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:16, 9 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I wouldn't get too judgemental about using multiple accounts if I were you. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 09:37, 9 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Why? I've never used multiple accounts. I've sat next to friends who have used their own accounts, but I've never used multiples personally.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:39, 9 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::That's an incredibly fine distinction. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 09:42, 9 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Maybe I know more about your Interweb Relay Chatz behaviour during certain times, than you think I do.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:44, 9 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Regardless of your eagerness to disprove anything I say, who knows why it means so much to you, you can agree with my disgust when someone claims an "epic tr00l" where they haven't really done anything special. I mean I noticed Nubis wasnt the same, he was way more LOLMEMES when I got back from my break. I'm pretty sure a retard could "troll" people if they got into someone elses account and pretended to be them..--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:54, 9 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::That would actually be lolarious though.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 00:47, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
Who the fuck is Nubis?--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:55, 9 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:more like "Who-bis"--[[User:Shakey60|Shakey]] <sup>[[Beatbox_Kids|BBK]] </sup> 10:53, 9 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Wait, so you've been Nubis since middle of last year and we never noticed? =o Smooth. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 01:07, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:It actually looks more and more like Nubis ''is'' DCC. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|Chartreuse}}-- 03:34, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Wouldn't that be hilarious if Nubis created DCC to act as a way to vent on you stupid fuck head policy up your ass red tape loving motherfuckers? Especially, since DCC sprang up right around the time of the Dead when Nubis wasn't as active... Could be he/she /it wanted to join in with the trolling good times. ???--[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 18:52, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::Links or it didn't happen. <br />
::If this isn't some lame practical joke, where's the sockpuppetry ban and Misconduct/demotion for nubis? --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 03:35, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::What vandalism has DCC performed? What sysop ability has Nubis abused? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:48, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::(hint: one does not equal the other) {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 08:03, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Nubies then would have abused his sysop status, by sharing his account. It's like unjustfully promoting another user, only instead of actually promoting you give your account away.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 08:17, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::You can't prove that Nubis and I didn't live together though... So, other than a pointless IP trail - you have no proof of who was in control of that account at anytime. Just like we don't know who is posting under your name. The real Thad or one of the other fucking 8 year retards in your group home, :IIAM:--[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 18:50, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Ah, I hadn't actually considered that. Good point. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 08:43, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::[[UDWiki:Administration/Bureaucrat_Promotions/August_2009|also sock puppet voting]]? --{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 08:50, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::That was all I needed. To A/M! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|Chartreuse}}-- 08:55, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Or A/VB, actually. If they are the same person, then he is only A/VBable... --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|Chartreuse}}-- 09:01, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Sockpuppet voting has nothing do with Misconduct in any way shape or form. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 09:03, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Sockpuppetry is an act of vandalism, yes. However, either way, Nubis has broken one rule; sharing his account (if they are different people) or multi-voting (if they are the same) so one of the punishment systems must be used in the end. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|Chartreuse}}-- 09:13, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I can't provide you links because you aren't a sysop. I'm establishing my conclusion from checkuser. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|Chartreuse}}-- 07:59, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
===Slow clap.===<br />
Well played, sir. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 14:53, 10 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:I lol'd heartily. Everything bad I've ever said about you DCC/Nubis is taken back.--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 01:24, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Just Wondering ==<br />
<br />
What's the real Nubis like? Considering I joined here in July '08, I may have never knew the real Nubis person.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 01:01, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:Check the archives. After checking them out myself I assume he was able to string together a ruling ''and'' an explanation that wasn't simply a collection of vulgar moronic obscenities. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|Chartreuse}}-- 01:11, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::Yes, because that IS SO TRUE of Nubis! YOU ARE IN NO WAY CONFUSING DCC WITH NUBIS AT ALL, NOPE , NOT AT ALL, NONE IN THE LEAST. --[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 18:48, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Oh argo, you were the reason i put "almost everyone" ... --[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 02:46, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:Thank you. I think.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 02:58, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
Well i got on with him until one point when he became a total cunt. I assumed that was just because we had more to do with each other and realised we didn't like each other, but you never know...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:32, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:You never fucking got on with me or us, did you ?--[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 18:48, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::I got on with nubis until maybe march last year...can't remember exactly...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 23:57, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
You know. Looking back, I really have no idea how we didn't figure this out sooner. =/ -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 18:51, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:Because almost every user here changes their demeanor in a bi-polar like way every few months.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 20:21, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::Fuck off you n*gger cunt.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:03, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
DCC, in the vandalism case, appears to be denying that any of this is even true. i.e., "I blanked a talk page and made a ridiculous claim that you are all supporting". I was skeptical of the whole thing from the outset. But that doesn't mean people should get off scott-free. But.. meh, whatever.. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 22:36, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:No, I'm saying that Nubis was (almost) always in control of the Nubis account while he lived here. I didn't touch his computer, he didn't touch mine... Until it got ugly. I almost feel bad about this, but then I remember why we broke up. --[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 17:29, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::Jerry! Jerry! --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 15:22, 13 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Dibs being Steve! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|Chartreuse}}-- 15:31, 13 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:i'm really a cool guy i swear :( {{User:Nubis/sig}} 22:25, 13 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Bro==<br />
<br />
Bro, if you're here I need your help in Miscontribution. --[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]] <sup>[[DORIS]] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pXfHLUlZf4 I jizzed in my pants] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91a8pHj7V9k pr0n]</sup> 21:29, 23 May 2010 (BST)<br />
: But he is not a syop, how is he meant to help? --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 22:06, 23 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::By causing drama, thats all sonny care about. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 00:47, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
I'd help, Sonny, but I am enjoying the power trips of the new Ops and waiting to see which one will continue Grim's work. Starting with a ban of anything fun and restricting free speech is a wonderful start. Better post your rants now before they enact a retro-vandal policy that bans for thought crimes. Poor W00T. He was amusing. --{{User:Nubis/sig}} 13:46, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:he was amusing when he actually posted amusing stuff. spamming crap, particularly (or should i say exclusively) on a/pm isn't amusing, even for non-sysops. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:56, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::ps i continue grims work u wait --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:58, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::: :O --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 14:07, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::::ye boi, except this time, boxy won't make a misconduct case when I demote everyone. Cause today's op team is such a clique and all, they'll suck my dick while I take over the wiki bro. simple. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:12, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::For the record, I was against your promotion bid because I thought you were in with a bad crowd. I guess I was right. heh.--{{User:Nubis/sig}} 14:19, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::You were part of the crowd at the time, and you vouched simply because I helped you with your wiki hobby collection :/ --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:22, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::I did want to see that work rewarded because it was something I was really into. Like when Ross helped with the images. I still think there should be moderators and sysops on the wiki. Moderators to "police" behavior and sysops to do the work. When you mix the two you get this mess of cliques and backlash thinking it is "personal" on all levels. Ops should do the moves, edits, and janitor crap while mods do A/M and A/VB so that you have a consistent upholding of rules and not "whomever gets to it first". I think it would give more stability to enforcement (and VB should be punishment for real "crimes" not the "rehabilitation" of bad users). I still think they should enforce the "post on that user's page" before you take it to A/VB and try to work it out yourself. But that was the NWO...--{{User:Nubis/sig}} 14:33, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Your name has come up... ==<br />
<br />
...in relation to a Misconduct case. I apologize for not having mentioned it earlier, but it completely slipped my mind to notify the affected parties at the time that I posted the case. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 04:46, 29 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==End of the road?==<br />
Not coming back, huh? I never knew you that well, but I did have some respect for ya, so...<br />
<br />
'''RIP Nubis'''<br />
<br />
'''??? - 7/29/10'''<br />
<br />
=( --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 16:29, 29 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Oh yeah, while you were gone, it turned out Nubis ceased being Nubis a long time ago. Just in case you weren't aware of that. He was DCC for pretty much a year.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 16:30, 29 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::You mean DCC was him, not the other way around.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 16:36, 29 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Pull the other one! --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 16:41, 29 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Badge help ==<br />
<br />
Hey there,<br />
<br />
I saw your name on the edit list for the NecroBadges Template, so I thought I'd ask you. I want to make something similar for my group, but am really unsure as to how to do it. Is there any guides or anything that I can look at to help me?<br />
<br />
Thanks in Advance,<br>{{User:Dezonus/sig}} 06:21, 5 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:Forward correspondance [[User_talk:DCC|here]], LOL! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:56, 5 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DanceDanceRevolution&diff=1773100
User talk:DanceDanceRevolution
2010-09-04T14:20:14Z
<p>J3D: /* sup biatch */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/talkn}}<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
==Way too Evil==<br />
[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1295703 Friend of yours?] Check his real name link (NSFW). I think that's more then enough to get him on a Text Rape list. Might wanna talk to him. I'm also scarred for life now :( --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:20, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, mate in EVIL. What do you mean by NSFW? I don't want to force him out of having his own crap on his profile, he's probably had it there as long as he's been playing, which is a while. I don't really mind tbh, his loss if he's anti-text-raped. lol. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:29, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Not Safe For Work. Ring a bell? Did you follow the link? But okay, it's not like I'm going to report him, I don't really care but I know some people do and I thought I'd bring it up. Anyway, now I have accidentally bumped into you guys I'm deciding whether or not I send a surprise down there.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:35, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Lol! Just so you know, we'll run away from any PKing attacks, we are all wimps atm. Yeah, I've seen lemonparty, it's pretty common, it's like meatspin or any shock website IMO, you're going to see it one way or another and the sooner you do the sooner you can identify the link as something you're never going to click again. Either way, thanks for the heads up, I'll pass the message onto him and see what he thinks. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:37, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== First ==<br />
<br />
Since you archived the page.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 11:49, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:(diff) (hist) . . User talk:DanceDanceRevolution; 10:43 . . (-57,746) . . DanceDanceRevolution (Talk | contribs | block)<br />
:^^^ Evidence.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 11:50, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Doesn't count unless he empties it completely. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 12:12, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::It coutns for me... Also, I like where this Radioactive thing is going.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 12:19, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Don't mind me, just maintaining my page presence... ;) --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 13:55, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==I spy...==<br />
...a stalker not more than 30 seconds ago... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 14:34, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Great minds think alike! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 14:35, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::I'm completely not sure if you remember her, but [[User:Tselita|Tselita]] was in that very same building. Also, my friend, [[User:Zensaga|Zensaga]] was in there as well... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 14:52, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==ZL==<br />
Unless they go the "guilt by association" rule for GTF's fit,it should be done for sure. As for learning about it, you'd have learned about it at least as soon the first zerg hunter had PKed you. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 15:38, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:What is the guilt by association?? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 17:13, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::The powers that be generally don't like if appealers get abusive and foul-mouthed. (And I probably wouldn't like it as well, looking how they had and have to deal with the likes of Finis Valorum, Dead Bunnies and TZH.) It's some difference though if some lying scumbags like the Dead Bunnies throw out a barrage of insults while denying even basic facts, or if a single member out of several snaps slightly in a case that has been weak to begin with. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 01:22, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Yeah fair. I hoped they would overlook that since we obvs aren't zerging and I just assumed the IP was important so I didn't force the words out of any of their mouths, I just let them say whatever. And it's a ZERG LIST they maintain, if they can't handle abuse from wrongly accused people then they shouldn't be there IMO. One more question: It appears that Guy's response was moved to another thread, is that right? And why? :/ -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:29, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::The mods are running the ZL in their spare time and are basically providing a public service, at which 90% of all work _should_ already be done by Kevan (if the auto-measures were worth anything), so I grant them any right to refuse appeals on the base of "being something we don't wanna put up with". As for moving it, I have no idea if GTF's comment has been moved, and why. If it has any effect will be seen at least as soon as the next list update comes in. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 01:42, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::It buttfucks objectivity up the arsehole if they refuse 100% watertight appeals from a group who is ''absolutely'' not zerging if someone says the F word in them. Just saying. Thought we would have been 100% in the clear, ahh well. Thanks for everything. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:09, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::{{quote|3=[[User:Spiderzed|I told you so:]]|2=It's some difference though if some lying scumbags like the Dead Bunnies throw out a barrage of insults while denying even basic facts, or if a single member out of several snaps slightly in a case that has been weak to begin with.}}<br />
::::::For actual answers on that, you have to grab an actual operator (like TheHuntsman or MarcusCaesar). I'm just a lone zerg hunter and not involved with ZL maintenance. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 02:17, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Yeah fair, soz. Again, thanks for the help through this. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:42, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::Essentially, if somebody takes pains to heap abuse the ZL Mods in their removal request then we take that as a clear indication that they do not in fact wish to be removed. (Otherwise they would abide by the removal rules, in which this situation is specifically called out.) It's like someone's face giving the lie to their words, but an online equivalent. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 04:59, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Yeah, fair enough. Thanks for the clarification Rev. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 05:01, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::I suppose I should really ask what the context is <small>(in case there is something I should be doing)</small>… but I kinda don't want to <small>(in case there is something I should be doing)</small>. {{shifty}} {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 09:51, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Oh, just in the zerg liste 9 thread my new group EVIL was submitted to be added because we all defended a break-in with very quick precision and execution. To make sure there was no chance of us being actually added, I got the suspected players to post on the appeals thread so their IP's could be logged. Out of the 5 of us that were considered, the last person to post chucked a shitty over us being added (he didn't realise we had only been submitted, not added) over something so trivial in his eyes. The post itself while embarrassing wasn't anything ''too'' over the top in itself, and since I have a lack of knowledge of the zerg liste methods so I'm pretty paranoid about being added, since it would create a massive dark cloud over our groups morale etc. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:29, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::Yeah, you should be fine, mate. Suspicion is not proof, and you've definitely done the right thing in your response. If I were you, I'd do as [[Mostly Harmless]] did and view it as a badge of honour. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 16:50, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== The Wyke Hills/Wykewood confusion ==<br />
<br />
You know, those can happen when you are updating a dozen EMRs alone. And the fact that there were two reports for Wyke Hills and one for Wykewood on that particular update didn't help either. And yet when you found it, you decided to point and laugh at it instead of fixing it. I wonder how that could help. -- [[User:Kittithaj|Kittithaj]] 16:48, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:People make mistakes. I make lots. Don't go all butthurt on me for it. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 06:58, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Thought you'd like to know ==<br />
<br />
It [[User:Aichon/Sandbox/Demo10|looks like]] your DanceDance arrows sig might be one of the ones causing issues for A/VB (the current month's archive isn't showing up on it since it has too much inclusion data), since it's a decent amount larger than the norm. This isn't a warning to fix it or anything of the sort, merely a friendly notification, since I figured you'd want to be aware of something like this. What you do with this info is your call. My best guess is that it's the images causing the issues, since the other big culprit was Mis' sig with the images in it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:45, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, I've noticed that in IE both your sig and Mis's sig are appearing vertically. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 06:56, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Ah, yeah, that's an unfortunate side affect of the code that they're using to get links over their images (it's my fault, since I wrote the code). IE7 and earlier doesn't understand the "display: inline-box" stuff, I believe, so it does a "display: box" equivalent instead, which means each image gets its own line. I haven't figured out a fix yet, though I'll readily admit I haven't been looking too hard since I'm not reminded of the issue during daily use (I use something other than IE, of course). IE8 is better (so long as Compatibility Mode is disabled), in that they don't use multiple lines, but the link aspect of the code simply doesn't work in IE8 (yet? Rooster was working on it as recently as yesterday or so). {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 07:04, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Thanks heaps for that info guys. I do like the arrows sig but I've always understood there'd most likely be some sort of unfixable problem with them, so I have no issue removing it and just redirecting it to my current lemon signature. is it just affecting the inclusion ''on'' the A/VB page? Or did the signatures in the archive itself also refuse to display? If the former was the only issue, I might wait till the month is over, revert the sig back to the arrows and just continue from there on with my current sig. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:22, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Just a note on the arrows sig, you can use [[Template:ClickInternal]] for the images now. Good news is that it works (thank Aichon), bad news is that it's weighty so using it on several images is bad, mmmkay? Also you have to use it because I said so or I'll get all sig policy on your ass. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 07:16, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:K cool thanks Rooster. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:57, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== recruitment ad ==<br />
<br />
i appreciate the help in conforming my attempt at a recruitment ad. at least ya helped me with it instead of being a jerk about it. i need to brush up on my wiki. {{unsigned|Nuerotoxic2213|01:07, 1 September 2010}}<br />
:That was actually me that fixed it up for you, though DDR was kinda enough to remove a stray character from the page that was making it look a bit off. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:20, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==sup biatch==<br />
<br />
whats teh lowdown on the game updates? bellow + that scout safehouse skill is that all?? also - scout safehouse, do the actions have to be completed in the safehouse? how the frack does the game measure that? Also there should be a link of the news page to a page that explains the updates in non-zombieapoc style. Ie outlines what we know of the actual changes. if that already exists; link me and make the link more obvious for others. sick1 {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:28, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:[[Safehouses]]--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 12:07, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::dunke!{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:20, 4 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Nallan&diff=1773099
User talk:Nallan
2010-09-04T14:19:54Z
<p>J3D: /* thyme for a new featured lolcation */</p>
<hr />
<div><div align=center><br />
{| style="background: silver; border-spacing: 1px; clear: both; font-style: italic; margin-bottom: 20px; text-align: center; width: 180px; -moz-border-radius:12px; fontcolor: black"<br />
|<br />
<font color=white><nowiki>*</nowiki>DING!<nowiki>*</nowiki></font><br />
<br><br />
Current floor: '''CP'''<br />
<br><br />
On this floor: '''Talk page'''<br />
|}<br />
</div align=center><br />
{{User:Nallan/nav}}<br />
{{UserTemplate|<br />
borderwidth=2px|<br />
bordercolor=black|<br />
width=300px|<br />
background=#993300|<br />
image=Stop_hand.png|<br />
headerbackground=black|<br />
headercolor=yellow|<br />
headertext=Please read first!|<br />
mainbackground=#3399cc|<br />
maincolor=Black|<br />
maintext=New posts at the bottom please (press the + symbol at the top of the page), unless continuing a previous conversation. If it is a bilateral conversation I will place all responses on the other party's talk page. If it is multilateral all responses should be kept on this page for clarity.<br />
}}<br />
<br><br />
<br />
== IRC ==<br />
<br />
Get back on it. I know how to fix your problem. --{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 11:11, 20 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Before you try and move the nomination again==<br />
I suggest you read up on what Criterion 9 is. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 07:52, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:Those guys are deliberately trying to subvert the system. Until we get a sysop's comment on the issue I think it would be better if it stayed where it is. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 07:56, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::Rules are indeed rules. Criterion 9 is fairly explicit, and those Keep votes are violating it. As far as I'm concerned ''they'' are in violation of the rules. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 08:00, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::I wasn't aware that I was replying to myself. That's generally what the colons are used for. Oh well. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 08:03, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::We shall see. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 08:04, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning (but only a cuddly, soft one ^.^==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]] Stop agitating sysops and making them look stupid, but not actually breaking any rules. Doing so will result in an abundance of Soft Warnings, so that we can keep those self esteems in check.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:34, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:Nooo! It's alright, I've got Toto's hit "I Won't Hold You Back" to comfort me. srsly you guys.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:35, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==[[A/D]]==<br />
Regarding your vote on several user redirect pages i have separated the case into individual cases, if you feel so inclined please recast your vote on each page relevant to how you feel about that particular redirect being kept on the wiki. Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== U r a [[Caunt Street Police Department]] ==<br />
<br />
[[ALiM]] [[2 Cool|style]], [[User:Nallan|ya]] dig?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:44, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Hey ==<br />
<br />
I think I am coming down with something.<br />
<br />
{{*}}cough*--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
:aawww.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:16, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Whats good with you DAAAAAWWWWGGG!!! ==<br />
<br />
hey how do you/could you make a kick ass template for my groups page?--[[User:Pyro1499|CJ]] 23:46, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==CUNT==<br />
I FUCKIGN HATE FUCKING CROSSOVER IT NEVER FUCKING WORKS FOR ME--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== nationstates 2 ==<br />
<br />
is ere {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 21:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== p--==hey ==<br />
<br />
heyhnik u t charlies house, its it ogogd/? i am at hem cool party but it wa shit niggers dancin luz--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Quiz Prize ==<br />
<br />
There you go. <br />
<br />
{{QuizPrize12}}<br />
<br />
--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 12:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Hey Dude ==<br />
<br />
Wana go on a vandalism spree tonight? I mean now that Jed is Sysop we can TOTALLY do what we want, without risk of punishment. I mean, imagine the havoc we could wreak by changing pages up in an unorganized fashion? Man the few minutes until someone reverted them would be GOLDEN.<br />
<br />
So, you in?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
:HELL YEAH!!!!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 08:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==A/VD==<br />
I struck a warning of yours. I think this is the bit where i tell you to be a good boy and don't end up on the [[A/VB|wrong side of the tracks]].--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
:with the niggers. Sorry i almost left this post here without including a racist comment...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Welcome home==<br />
I got you a [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2008_10|present]] ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Go vote==<br />
On the ALiM awards that i unanimously decided required it. Voting will be Me, Nallan, Read, Ross and anyone i deem sufficiently alim to vote who rolls up in the near future.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Classic lulz==<br />
right [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Deletions#The_Mighty_Republic_of_Lolz|har]].--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== You want some? ==<br />
<br />
[[Malton Manhunt/Axe Hack's Manhunt 2]]. If you're still interested. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 13:43, 19 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:[[User:Finis Valorum/Archive]]. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 17:22, 24 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==[[Malton Manhunt/Axe Hack's Manhunt 2]]==<br />
<br />
This is just a reminder to tell you, and the other contestants, that [[Malton Manhunt/Axe Hack's Manhunt 2|Axe Hack's 2nd Manhunt]] is commencing on the 20th of June. The [[Malton Manhunt/Axe Hack's Manhunt 2|playing area]] will be the suburbs around [[East Becktown]], so start moving there and run around the place to get used to your arena, if you don't, it could cost you your life! You are expected to be in the fighting area by the start of June 20th, so don't forget! {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 07:07, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:It's been delayed till 1st July, just so you know. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 02:22, 20 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Found this lolcaunt in my sandbox==<br />
{{Template Help|<br />
trying=to be awesome|<br />
yes=2 Cool|<br />
no=Special:Listusers/sysop|<br />
}}<br />
<br />
i dont want to hurt your feelings jed and nick but......<br />
<br />
if you need help being awesome, doesnt that make you un-awesome?<br />
and on the contrary, if you didnt need help, wouldnt that mean you were already awesome?<br />
<br />
in no way do i think that the sysops are awesome or that you guys arent, im just saying that currently, the template is incorrect--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:09, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:nick jed and read, locked in an immortal struggle against The Sysops... I like that it has a nice ring to it. We could be looking at a fantasy series here... talkin 6 figure sums here. call me {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:14, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::You need to stop having these fantasies about us, im sure its not great for your health, bob. Its not going to happen, we're not going to let you into our clique your not cool enough, nor popular enough.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:16, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::how did the minor edits thing work out btw, are you still BEING OPPRESSED? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:18, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Changing the subject wont change the sticky sheets you awaken to after your wet dreams and fantasies about being in the clique. Im sorry but your just not good enough.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:20, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::actually I got edit conflicted and didn't feel like writing up a whole new response so I just tacked on a couple of extra colons, would it make you feel better if I did? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:25, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::You need to stop worrying about making me feel good and start realizing that there isn't a chance for us. Not now, not ever.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:27, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::hm yes I guess I really do want to be part of your clique.... ps no I don't, "start realising" that you actually aren't impressive. I talk to you because I still hold out hope that you might be driven to quit again (LOLLLLL) over it {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:34, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::Typical anger, can happen when someone is so blatantly rejected. Many people suffer from it, you can google it if you wish. For the record, I didnt quit, I moved out of home, and posted under an alias for a while, but ultimately my heart/time wasnt in it :(. Right now I have a week off, before I move home again for personal reasons.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:45, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::An alias? Why would you do that? What was wrong with posting with your original account? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:58, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Wanted to stir some trouble with a clean slate, but after about a day of editing, I couldnt be bothered, and worries of rent, work, studies took over. Stop caring about me though its kind of gay--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:10, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::lolstudies.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:35, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::I dont actually "care" I'm just subtly changing the subject.... dont tell read he'd laugh {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:36, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
lulz. p.s it does make sense. coz the person is trying to be awesome, so obviously they aren't at the point in which the template is given to them. and then if they want help they should talk to 2C coz they know how to be awesome. and the ops dont so talk to them if you dont want to be awesome. also wtf i put this up like a year ago why we all talking about it now?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:22, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:Oh I don't know... maybe because it's [[ALIM'S SECOND FUCKING BIRTHDAY]] in like [[2 Cool|2]] months!!!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 22:14, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php?title=Urban_dead&diff=1998138564&oldid=1998135250 tough guy] ==<br />
<br />
Your idiotic Vb case of old, somehow made it onto the Urban Dead article on ED. Congrats, bitch ;) --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 15:12, 31 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:lollllll {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 15:25, 31 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::fucking sweet! internet tough guy!!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:00, 1 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:It's not idiotic you're idiotic so there {{unsigned|J3D|06:38, 1 September 2009 (BST)}}<br />
::K --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 08:48, 1 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== lol remember this doozy? ==<br />
<br />
{{Black Hole}}--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 06:28, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:lol yeah.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:49, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::we were what? 12?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:58, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
{{Warning}} <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 04:28 5 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:I maintain that it was tastefully censored.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 10:40, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arbitration==<br />
Has started. Please proceed [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool here] --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:36, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Oh good, you're back. Now you can write something over at that Arby's case or I will push for Thadeous to finish up without you. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:42, 2 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I will also make mention of that delightful new page; no doubt that will end up being factored into his decision as well. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:44, 2 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::I was going to wait until the one month mark, which I believe was the 6th. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Silver}}-- 07:40, 2 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Arbitration ==<br />
An interim [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool#Interim_Ruling Ruling] has been made.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 10:58, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arbitraton==<br />
Oi turn around cunt i need to talk to you{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:41, 20 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Haha, I tried to visualise this IRL and laughed. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 09:42, 20 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Say it to my face (ie. my talk page).--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:43, 20 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Thanks for the revive ==<br />
<br />
If that was you (am currently to dumb to find your profile link on your wiki page, sorry, must be the lingering effects of zombification), which I'm just going to assume. Much appreciated! -[[User:Pinkgothic|pinkgothic]] 21:01, 31 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==thyme for a new featured lolcation==<br />
<br />
probably. to give alim some more street cred. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:30, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:can do this if you'd trsut me-- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 16:37, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::what would you pick, charlie?--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:24, 3 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I guess I'd cycle through the bolded ones, in order of best names -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 17:15, 3 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::::i trust you to the do the description. butttt also of importance is a good description and at least one decent pic. Being [[2 Cool]] is a harder job than you might have first thought charles. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:19, 4 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:Amusing_Locations_in_Malton&diff=1773098
Talk:Amusing Locations in Malton
2010-09-04T14:18:58Z
<p>J3D: /* Standlick Walk */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{ArchiveNotice|ArchiveName=Archive}}<br />
<br />
<center>''All General Discussion should be moved there as well as rejected locations.''</center><br />
<br />
<br />
=<span style="color: limegreen">New Location Ideas</span>=<br />
''Please suggest a location under the "New Location Ideas" section along with square brackets, equals signs (to make a subtitle), and your signature in this format:''<br />
<br />
<nowiki>===[[your suggestion]]===</nowiki><br />
<br>The reason(s) you think your suggestion is worthy of being on the list.<nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki><br />
<br />
''The "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>" adds your signature and timestamp to the suggestion so we know who you are. Alternatively, you can click the [[Image:Button sig.png]] button.''<br />
<br />
''Vote either "Keep", "Kill", or "Undecided" in bold font (<nowiki>'''your vote'''</nowiki>) on the next available line under the suggestion and any previous votes. Remember to add your signature after your vote.''<br />
<br />
eg)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<nowiki>==[[Suggestion Road]]==<br />
Reasons--[[A random user]] 04:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)<br />
:'''Keep'''. I like it.--[[Another random user]] 04:28, 13 December 2007<br />
::'''Kill'''. I don't find it that funny.--[[Yet another random user]] 04:28, 13 December 2007<br />
:::'''Undecided'''. I just don't know!! Try and convince me to vote either way.--~~~~ (<---- that's your vote!)</nowiki><br />
<br />
''All suggestions are an automatic "keep" vote by the suggester, unless otherwise indicated by the suggester. A suggestion will remain under voting for at least seven days (depending on the balance of votes) and must have at least 2/3 majority "keep" votes for it to be inducted onto the list. If you come across a suggestion that has been up for seven days and has at least a two thirds majority of "keep" votes, please feel free to add it to the agreed upon category on the [[ALiM]] list. Thankyou.''<br />
<br />
----<br />
==Add new locations directly below this line==<br />
===[[Standlick Walk]]===<br />
Odd enough to get on ALiM. Maybe it's just me, but I'm imagining a bunch of people doing a ''standlick'' (or a lickstand, mayhaps) instead of headstands. --<small>{{User:Chirurgien/Signature}} 13:06, 3 September 2010 (BST)</small><br />
:I was thinking of this as instructions; Stand, lick, walk.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 16:19, 3 September 2010 (BST)<br />
::Works better than what I came up with, I guess. --{{User:Chirurgien/Signature}} 01:04, 4 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:::'''keeep'''' yon you sold me{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:18, 4 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Hussey Building]]===<br />
Whoever wrote the history had some kind of idea this was made for ALiM. -- <small>[[User:Rorybob| <span style="color: #FF9933">Rahrah</span>]] [[Malton_Manhunt/Axe_Hack's_Manhunt_3|<span style="color: #FF9933">is pumped that he's going to lose another Manhunt.</span>]] </small> 08:31, 18 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:I'd like to see this added in, especially since we have the [[Hussey Lane]] and [[The Hussey Monument]]. --{{User:Chirurgien/Signature}} 13:04, 3 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Cummings Building]]===<br />
<br />
For obvious reasons. --{{:User:Alexander Dawkins/Sig}} 15:27, 11 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:We have club cummings and cummings bank. Was teh verdict that we keep multiples or don't bother? i remember cheese brought it up, can't recall the concensus. i'm inclinded to '''auto add''' {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:33, 12 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Weary Building]]===<br />
Hahahaha, get it? The building is tired? oh fuck you guys. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:11, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:for a guy that complains about all the drivel on alim you sure suggest a lot of it. It's a '''keep''' for my admitedly low standards but i would have thought it'd be a '''WTF YOU GUIZ SUK ND RUINED ALIM IT COULD HAVE BEEN GOOD''' from you, oh dear. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:20, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::You guys killed ALiM a week into it's creation. I'll never forget suggesting Cuant Drive and having you guys reject it, then coming back a year later to find it there by your own request. I still haven't forgotten how heartbroken I felt. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:41, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Organ Arms]]===<br />
THIS IS THE FUCKING BEST WORDPLAY EVER --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:34, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:'''Vouch/Keep/Wait what?''' [[User:Technical Pacifist|Technical Pacifist]] 17:32, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Is this like piano fingers sort of thing? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:35, 15 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::No fucking idea, it just has organs and arms as a name. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:01, 15 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:I second the motion to '''Vouch/Keep/Wait what?''' Probably one of the best ALiMs I've seen in a while. --{{User:Chirurgien/Signature}} 13:02, 3 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Cayme Drive]]===<br />
''You are at Cayme Drive. Somebody has spraypainted LOL I CAYME onto a wall.''<br />
<br />
All class...--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 12:29, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:'''yea boi''' --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:39, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::howevermanyyearsitsbeen on and theres still an abundance of undiscovered alim. this made me cayme :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD and yes charlie stfu the poor grammar was intentional. fuck off you niggardly cunt. PS my lecturer said niggardly the other week, classic lerlz!!!! ~!{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:27, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::lol i can't believe my lecturer said niggardly! shits fucking [[2C]] ya dig?? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:18, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Pudsey Park]]===<br />
It's named after a God damn giant yellow cripple bear. Sod dick jokes, ''that''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s comedy. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:51, 19 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:I had to google Pudsey to get it. Therefore, '''kill'''.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 12:29, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::'''no''' sorry i dont get it --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:40, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Spankling Building]]===<br />
Surprised this was never nominated? Cmon. You know what this building was made for!!! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:'''lol yeah'''--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 08:51, 11 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Sadley Way Fire Station]]===<br />
Sadley, ''waaay'' fire station...--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:01, 23 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:wtf is this bullshit ngger cunt crap? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:32, 26 April 2010 (BST)<br />
::AGAINT --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
===[[Cutmore Avenue]]===<br />
It's just so deliciously emo! --[[User:Wyndfyre|Wyndfyre]] 18:53, 4 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*Fuck yes! Vouch! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:34, 5 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*Agreed. It's too late at night to think of something for the page, but there's bound to be a good 'across the steet/along the road' joke to be made. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:49, 5 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Keep'''--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:01, 23 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Keep''' --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Oh shit, I was the first to vouch on it. damn, I'm too fast for mahself. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:55, 11 May 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Keep''' - i read it as cuntmore, got uber excited, then saw it was just cutmore. whatever. i'll ignore all of you and make its description about how it vaguely resembles cuntmore and THEN WE'LL SEE WHOS LAUGHING {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:31, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
*:FUCK i did it again!!!! Damn you past jed! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:21, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Chitty Hotel]]===<br />
--<span style="border: 3px black">[[User:Alcatraz311|<span style= "color: white; background-color: #527508">'''Alcatraz'''</span>]][[User:Alcatraz311|<span style="color: white; background-color: black">'''311''']]</span></span><sup>[[User_talk:Alcatraz311|<span style="color: black">'''T'''</span>]]|[[Army Control Corps|<span style="color: black">'''ACC'''</span>]]|[[Alliance 45|<span style="color: black">'''A45'''</span>]]</sup> 22:14, 15 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
*'''Autoadd'''--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:01, 23 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Shaft Grove]]===<br />
The page needs lolification. It currently focuses on some kind of commercial history rather than phallic innuendo.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:23, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:That's just sad.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:30, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:the history, not you thinking it should be phallic lol.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:30, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::I'll have you know a fine, upstanding member of the wiki wrote that. Like most of vinetown its a broad history of depression, and a thriving club scene. There's even a mention of a panda at one point. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:26, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I'll have you know i didn't actually read it, let alone look at the page :P Hey, it's the alim crowd, what'd you expect? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:40, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Don't bow down to superior contributors, that's not the alim way! --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:13, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::You don't even know what the alim way is anymore man. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:31, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I never knew the fucking alim way, i was never part of your stupid clique. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:32, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::...denial. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:43, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::You try to suck me in so I can like, ban cunts for you and, like, make u not get vandal warning but i'm just too responsible. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:54, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You don't honestly think that's true, do you?--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 22:22, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Of course he's kdding, even ddr knows he's not responsible ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:03, 6 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::put Eastwood Museum on ALiM already or i'll use sysop as badge and threaten ban u. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 14:14, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::It's in the queue. I'll put these on soon. Chill nigger. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:17, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::full of suspense!!!!!!! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 14:32, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Mallrats added some slightly wrong flavour that I think works well. Well done mallrat. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:06, 18 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:Haha just read it. Very [[The Mycock Building|mycock building]] - love it.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 08:46, 19 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::'''SHAFT!!!''' --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 09:28, 19 August 2009 (BST) PS... shaft means to con to give someone the shotr end of the stick (a common complain from j3d's girlfriends)... it's also a famous blacksploitation flick. that's much more lolzy than a retarded penis reference --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 09:29, 19 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I love myself a shaft, will vote '''Keep''' but why the fuck is nobody else voting--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:08, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Gillycuddy Boulevard]]===<br />
wtf?--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:43, 31 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:'''lulz'''.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:13, 31 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::What the fuck? I'd '''vouch''' this. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:22, 31 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::'''kill''' sessanach! --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 09:25, 19 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Funny name but '''kill tbh''' over it--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:09, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:I'm changing vote to '''kill''' so i dont have to add 2 more locations.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:46, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:EH i just dont know if this is that brillers...any more thoughtAs{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:50, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
=<span style="color: red">Locations Under Review</span>=<br />
''All suggestions are an automatic "kill" vote by the suggester, unless otherwise indicated by the suggester. A suggestion will remain under voting for at least fourteen days (depending on the balance of votes) and must have at least 2/3 majority "kill" votes for it to be removed from the list. If you come across a suggestion that has been down for fourteen days and has at least a two thirds majority of "kill" votes, please feel free to remove it from the [[ALiM]] list and remove the ALiM template from its page. Thankyou.''<br />
<br />
''I guess no one wants anything removed from ALiM at the moment :)''<br />
<br />
=<span style="color: orange">Category Changes</span>=<br />
''The following are nominated for a change in their category, not for their merit on the list itself. Entries must include the location in question and the suggested category to which it would be moved. Please vote either '''Keep''' in current category or '''Move''' to category suggested.''<br />
<br />
=General Discussion=<br />
<br />
I'm trying to get the [[Great Profiles]] page to stop being horrible, so I've called a vote, and I thought y'all might want to have a say in it, as the foremost humor authorities on the wiki. -{{User:Ornithopter/sig}} 20:19, 3 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:lol, i tried that about maybe 18 months ago....not enough people care about the page for it to work. And most of the people who added them probably don't still pay attention to it, hence my advice to you would be go through and delete all the ones you ''know'' are shit, and chuck the ones you think could be funny on the talk (or just delete them too). Since anyone can make one i think they need to be pretty spesh to be great profiles. So yeah, fuck the community and get shoveling through that shitty page! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Well, I guess this page proves that since there's already a Fücking, Austria . . . there's no problem with a little Fücking Tower. :D <br />
[[User:Douglas Summers|Douglas Summers]] 06:50, 2 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah i breifly wanted to make a real world alim's, but theres too damned many! Its still oneofmy dreams to visit them all and make a lonely planet style travel guide about them, but more lulzy and less lame.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:47, 25 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
You still around, man?--[[User:Sandsun|Sandsun]] 02:06, 10 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:sandsun! whats happening!? short answer is no - but i come on here every few weeks to have a look. I'm not really playing the game at the moment but i might get back into it with a groupless character, maybe azombie... what about you? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:00, 10 April 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:Every_Villain_Is_Lemons&diff=1772174
Talk:Every Villain Is Lemons
2010-09-02T10:31:57Z
<p>J3D: /* Your Page is wrong */</p>
<hr />
<div><center><div style="background-color: #663366; width: 850px; padding: 0px; min-width: 850px;"><br />
<div style="margin-bottom: -10px;">[[Image:4020talkhead.png|850px|4020]]</div><br />
<div style="float: left; width: 80px; border: 1px solid #FFFFFF); padding: 5px 0px; background-color: #FFFFFF; margin: 60px 0px 0px 35px; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana;" align=center ><br />
[[Every Villain Is Lemons|{{c|black|MAIN}}]]<br />
</div><br />
<div style="float: left; width: 80px; border: 1px solid #FFFFFF); padding: 5px 0px; background-color: #FFFFFF; margin: 120px 0px 0px -80px; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana;" align=center ><br />
<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:Every_Villain_Is_Lemons&action=edit&section=new <span style="font-size: 3em; color: #000000;">+</span>]</span><br />
</div><br />
<div align="right"><div style="background-color: #FFFFFF; width: 700px; padding: 0px; min-width: 700px; font-size: 1em; -moz-border-radius:280px 0 0 0/52px 0 0 0; -webkit-border-radius:280px 0 0 0/52px 0 0 0; border-bottom: 4px solid #663366; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana"><br />
<div align="right"><div style="background-color: #000000; width: 700px; padding: 0px; min-width: 700px; font-size: 1.7em; -moz-border-radius:280px 0 0 0/70px 0 0 0; -webkit-border-radius:280px 0 0 0/70px 0 0 0; border-bottom: 4px solid #663366; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana"><font color="#FFFFFF"><p align="center">EVERY '''TALK''' IS LEMONS</p></font></div></div><br />
<div align="left"><div style="padding: 5px 5px"><br />
<br />
<p align="center">press the +</p><br />
<br><br />
<br><br />
<br />
<br />
== Can I join? ==<br />
<br />
Seriously. I'll make a new alt. Any group with a page this cool needs me in it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 11:20, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
It certainly looks unique, haven't seen anything like this before, and I mean it in a good way. Now start stealing some [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=EVIL&redirect=no redirects]. Though I wonder, this is survivor, pk or zombie? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:31, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Currently we are survivor, nurturing the newer members and helping them understand the game and levelling up. Could take a month or two, but once that's done, we aren't sure what we will do. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:48, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Survivors!?! It is my duty to insult you! You are a foolhardy, shortsighted, and truly meaningless <s>group</s> individual who lacks the mental capacity to even begin to grasp anything that even resembles a big picture. Go die, cold and alone, in some barhah-forsaken hole. It's more than you lousy breathers deserve. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 12:18, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I considered un-idling A Cyberdemon for this but it's pro survivors and that makes me sad. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 16:33, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Can we have sex?==<br />
<br />
Seriously. PS where the fuck were you on autoday you cunt? !{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:45, 11 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Man, fucking... was working all weekend, I actually totally forgot you were up until monday arvo and I raged. come back -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:30, 11 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::It's true he did rage. I was there.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 12:28, 16 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::yeah ican totes imagine, i'm sure it was serious. and by work you mean udwiki. i bet if i check the logs you spent more time here than anywher eelse that weekend *tear* {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:42, 22 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Cool page and images! ==<br />
<br />
Just wanted to know... Did you made the images? They're really cool. Would have loved to get them HI-RES. For a wallpaper, why not? --{{User:DiSm/sig}} 12:54, 16 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:I didn't make them unfortunately, but by coincidence the originals are actually wallpaper, so here's a chrissy treat: [http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/181/1252845289065.jpg], [http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/90/1280223737590.jpg], [http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/9012/1281359130777.jpg]. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:05, 16 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Really nice! Thanks. Got to use that soon. By the way, just something : In my preferences I clicked ''Add pages I edit to my watchlist''. Then I edit your page to ask for images... and I don't get notified when you answer! :/ --{{User:DiSm/sig}} 14:40, 16 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::How strange... -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:43, 16 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I don't really care. It's ok ^^. Damn the wallpapers are cool for my 13" laptop but are really fig leaf for my 23" computer! :D--{{User:DiSm/sig}} 18:27, 20 August 2010 (BST)<br />
Yeah, this is definitely the coolest group page I've ever seen. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 19:47, 20 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Zerg Liste ==<br />
<br />
It seems like some of your members are currently discussed for inclusion on the zerg liste [http://zombies.dementiastudios.org/boards/index.php?topic=12.msg55720#msg55720 here]. If those claims aren't true, then what you should do is to go to the appeals thread and let the player of every mentioned alt post (allowing the mods to IP check). --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 20:58, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Sigh. Thanks for the heads up. I'll go and clear that up. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:00, 26 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==So...==<br />
...Not recruiting, huh? That's a shame. I was gonna try registering [[User:Axe Hack/Yuki Onna|Yuki Onna]] in this group. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 15:11, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:The lemons have changed their stride and as things heat up within the group (and they actually keep doing stuff, not just bumming around), we are happy to take members in- come down to [[Dibbings Plaza Police Department|dibbings]] and share the load against [[SFHNAS]] if you'd like :) -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 04:44, 26 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Hm...Let's see...I won't be running Yuki until January, but I'll just keep this as an early recruitment request...Like what I'm doing for OBR... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 23:43, 26 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
Because I've already asked the other two groups, so I'm gonna ask it here. If you do accept that early recruitment request, answer this: What makes EVIL stand out from Tikhon Medical and OBR? --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 01:36, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:we don't want to compete with those groups in terms of recruitment because we know you might not like your stay, and if you don't, that's all we can have offered. we will most likely continue to disappoint you again and again unless you are just happy going at the EVIL pace of life and taking back survivor strongholds for GLORY and FAME -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 15:13, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Too wide ==<br />
<br />
Scrolls off the page at 1024x. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 07:44, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:{{Grr}} Stop having a broken wiki, Rev! {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 07:51, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:True dat!! Just tested, and it only just pops of the edge. honestly, I'm barely ready to break my philosophy of "if it works for me it should work for most who matter" for 10px going over the edge ;D -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:07, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Seriously. I was telling folks that when I was designing some pages. It looked ''fine'' in 1080p, but all I heard was grousing about how the maps forced them to horizontally scroll and the text seemed to be all over the place. Whine, grouse, complain, moan, that's all I ever hear. Why isn't everyone using 1920x1080 at a minimum yet? Preferably 1920x1200, in fact. Even my bajillion year-old laptop does 1440x960, which is plenty. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 08:40, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==MoreBlack==<br />
I hear you may be writing this up. Ive got loads of dumbwits from days one and two --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:01, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Of what, sorry? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:18, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::I had heard Red was handling it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 10:18, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Oh, blackmore. Nah, I'm just watching, in a day or two EVIL might be joining for some fun (which means I'll be bailing and my alt will be coming in instead a day later), then we might write our own small piece. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 10:20, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx6fwfBKCIQ ?] {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 10:21, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:BTW, after this thing is over give me some dumbwits and I'll write up an event, battle or something. I've always wanted to do that. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 12:02, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::I was toying with the idea of trying to create it in a Max Brooks oral history stylee. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 12:10, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::So now we have THREE people trying to write up a history. Go figure. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 22:54, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::DW everyone can help each other out on the event if they'd like. Sept I don't think I know who Max Brooks is so I might just hide in the corner watching. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:45, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::He wrote the zombie survival guide. And stuff. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:24, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Oh yeah!! I remember his name now. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:08, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Your Page is wrong==<br />
Just realised. In Williamsville you were fighting [[SFTA]] not [[SFHNAS]] --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:24, 2 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:god ddr how could you do that?!?!? also, 250 edits is A SHIT LOAD ZOMGZ{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:31, 2 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Nallan&diff=1772173
User talk:Nallan
2010-09-02T10:30:52Z
<p>J3D: /* Thanks for the revive */</p>
<hr />
<div><div align=center><br />
{| style="background: silver; border-spacing: 1px; clear: both; font-style: italic; margin-bottom: 20px; text-align: center; width: 180px; -moz-border-radius:12px; fontcolor: black"<br />
|<br />
<font color=white><nowiki>*</nowiki>DING!<nowiki>*</nowiki></font><br />
<br><br />
Current floor: '''CP'''<br />
<br><br />
On this floor: '''Talk page'''<br />
|}<br />
</div align=center><br />
{{User:Nallan/nav}}<br />
{{UserTemplate|<br />
borderwidth=2px|<br />
bordercolor=black|<br />
width=300px|<br />
background=#993300|<br />
image=Stop_hand.png|<br />
headerbackground=black|<br />
headercolor=yellow|<br />
headertext=Please read first!|<br />
mainbackground=#3399cc|<br />
maincolor=Black|<br />
maintext=New posts at the bottom please (press the + symbol at the top of the page), unless continuing a previous conversation. If it is a bilateral conversation I will place all responses on the other party's talk page. If it is multilateral all responses should be kept on this page for clarity.<br />
}}<br />
<br><br />
<br />
== IRC ==<br />
<br />
Get back on it. I know how to fix your problem. --{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 11:11, 20 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Before you try and move the nomination again==<br />
I suggest you read up on what Criterion 9 is. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 07:52, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:Those guys are deliberately trying to subvert the system. Until we get a sysop's comment on the issue I think it would be better if it stayed where it is. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 07:56, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::Rules are indeed rules. Criterion 9 is fairly explicit, and those Keep votes are violating it. As far as I'm concerned ''they'' are in violation of the rules. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 08:00, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::I wasn't aware that I was replying to myself. That's generally what the colons are used for. Oh well. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 08:03, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::We shall see. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 08:04, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning (but only a cuddly, soft one ^.^==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]] Stop agitating sysops and making them look stupid, but not actually breaking any rules. Doing so will result in an abundance of Soft Warnings, so that we can keep those self esteems in check.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:34, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:Nooo! It's alright, I've got Toto's hit "I Won't Hold You Back" to comfort me. srsly you guys.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:35, 24 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==[[A/D]]==<br />
Regarding your vote on several user redirect pages i have separated the case into individual cases, if you feel so inclined please recast your vote on each page relevant to how you feel about that particular redirect being kept on the wiki. Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== U r a [[Caunt Street Police Department]] ==<br />
<br />
[[ALiM]] [[2 Cool|style]], [[User:Nallan|ya]] dig?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:44, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Hey ==<br />
<br />
I think I am coming down with something.<br />
<br />
{{*}}cough*--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
:aawww.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:16, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Whats good with you DAAAAAWWWWGGG!!! ==<br />
<br />
hey how do you/could you make a kick ass template for my groups page?--[[User:Pyro1499|CJ]] 23:46, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==CUNT==<br />
I FUCKIGN HATE FUCKING CROSSOVER IT NEVER FUCKING WORKS FOR ME--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== nationstates 2 ==<br />
<br />
is ere {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 21:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== p--==hey ==<br />
<br />
heyhnik u t charlies house, its it ogogd/? i am at hem cool party but it wa shit niggers dancin luz--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Quiz Prize ==<br />
<br />
There you go. <br />
<br />
{{QuizPrize12}}<br />
<br />
--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 12:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Hey Dude ==<br />
<br />
Wana go on a vandalism spree tonight? I mean now that Jed is Sysop we can TOTALLY do what we want, without risk of punishment. I mean, imagine the havoc we could wreak by changing pages up in an unorganized fashion? Man the few minutes until someone reverted them would be GOLDEN.<br />
<br />
So, you in?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
:HELL YEAH!!!!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 08:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==A/VD==<br />
I struck a warning of yours. I think this is the bit where i tell you to be a good boy and don't end up on the [[A/VB|wrong side of the tracks]].--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
:with the niggers. Sorry i almost left this post here without including a racist comment...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Welcome home==<br />
I got you a [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2008_10|present]] ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Go vote==<br />
On the ALiM awards that i unanimously decided required it. Voting will be Me, Nallan, Read, Ross and anyone i deem sufficiently alim to vote who rolls up in the near future.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Classic lulz==<br />
right [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Deletions#The_Mighty_Republic_of_Lolz|har]].--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== You want some? ==<br />
<br />
[[Malton Manhunt/Axe Hack's Manhunt 2]]. If you're still interested. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 13:43, 19 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:[[User:Finis Valorum/Archive]]. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 17:22, 24 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==[[Malton Manhunt/Axe Hack's Manhunt 2]]==<br />
<br />
This is just a reminder to tell you, and the other contestants, that [[Malton Manhunt/Axe Hack's Manhunt 2|Axe Hack's 2nd Manhunt]] is commencing on the 20th of June. The [[Malton Manhunt/Axe Hack's Manhunt 2|playing area]] will be the suburbs around [[East Becktown]], so start moving there and run around the place to get used to your arena, if you don't, it could cost you your life! You are expected to be in the fighting area by the start of June 20th, so don't forget! {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 07:07, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:It's been delayed till 1st July, just so you know. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 02:22, 20 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Found this lolcaunt in my sandbox==<br />
{{Template Help|<br />
trying=to be awesome|<br />
yes=2 Cool|<br />
no=Special:Listusers/sysop|<br />
}}<br />
<br />
i dont want to hurt your feelings jed and nick but......<br />
<br />
if you need help being awesome, doesnt that make you un-awesome?<br />
and on the contrary, if you didnt need help, wouldnt that mean you were already awesome?<br />
<br />
in no way do i think that the sysops are awesome or that you guys arent, im just saying that currently, the template is incorrect--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:09, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:nick jed and read, locked in an immortal struggle against The Sysops... I like that it has a nice ring to it. We could be looking at a fantasy series here... talkin 6 figure sums here. call me {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:14, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::You need to stop having these fantasies about us, im sure its not great for your health, bob. Its not going to happen, we're not going to let you into our clique your not cool enough, nor popular enough.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:16, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::how did the minor edits thing work out btw, are you still BEING OPPRESSED? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:18, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Changing the subject wont change the sticky sheets you awaken to after your wet dreams and fantasies about being in the clique. Im sorry but your just not good enough.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:20, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::actually I got edit conflicted and didn't feel like writing up a whole new response so I just tacked on a couple of extra colons, would it make you feel better if I did? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:25, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::You need to stop worrying about making me feel good and start realizing that there isn't a chance for us. Not now, not ever.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:27, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::hm yes I guess I really do want to be part of your clique.... ps no I don't, "start realising" that you actually aren't impressive. I talk to you because I still hold out hope that you might be driven to quit again (LOLLLLL) over it {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:34, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::Typical anger, can happen when someone is so blatantly rejected. Many people suffer from it, you can google it if you wish. For the record, I didnt quit, I moved out of home, and posted under an alias for a while, but ultimately my heart/time wasnt in it :(. Right now I have a week off, before I move home again for personal reasons.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:45, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::An alias? Why would you do that? What was wrong with posting with your original account? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:58, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Wanted to stir some trouble with a clean slate, but after about a day of editing, I couldnt be bothered, and worries of rent, work, studies took over. Stop caring about me though its kind of gay--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:10, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::lolstudies.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:35, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::I dont actually "care" I'm just subtly changing the subject.... dont tell read he'd laugh {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:36, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
lulz. p.s it does make sense. coz the person is trying to be awesome, so obviously they aren't at the point in which the template is given to them. and then if they want help they should talk to 2C coz they know how to be awesome. and the ops dont so talk to them if you dont want to be awesome. also wtf i put this up like a year ago why we all talking about it now?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:22, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:Oh I don't know... maybe because it's [[ALIM'S SECOND FUCKING BIRTHDAY]] in like [[2 Cool|2]] months!!!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 22:14, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== [http://encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php?title=Urban_dead&diff=1998138564&oldid=1998135250 tough guy] ==<br />
<br />
Your idiotic Vb case of old, somehow made it onto the Urban Dead article on ED. Congrats, bitch ;) --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 15:12, 31 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:lollllll {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 15:25, 31 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::fucking sweet! internet tough guy!!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:00, 1 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:It's not idiotic you're idiotic so there {{unsigned|J3D|06:38, 1 September 2009 (BST)}}<br />
::K --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 08:48, 1 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== lol remember this doozy? ==<br />
<br />
{{Black Hole}}--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 06:28, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:lol yeah.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:49, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::we were what? 12?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:58, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
{{Warning}} <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 04:28 5 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:I maintain that it was tastefully censored.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 10:40, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arbitration==<br />
Has started. Please proceed [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool here] --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:36, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Oh good, you're back. Now you can write something over at that Arby's case or I will push for Thadeous to finish up without you. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:42, 2 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I will also make mention of that delightful new page; no doubt that will end up being factored into his decision as well. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:44, 2 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::I was going to wait until the one month mark, which I believe was the 6th. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Silver}}-- 07:40, 2 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Arbitration ==<br />
An interim [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool#Interim_Ruling Ruling] has been made.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 10:58, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arbitraton==<br />
Oi turn around cunt i need to talk to you{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:41, 20 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Haha, I tried to visualise this IRL and laughed. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 09:42, 20 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Say it to my face (ie. my talk page).--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:43, 20 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Thanks for the revive ==<br />
<br />
If that was you (am currently to dumb to find your profile link on your wiki page, sorry, must be the lingering effects of zombification), which I'm just going to assume. Much appreciated! -[[User:Pinkgothic|pinkgothic]] 21:01, 31 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==thyme for a new featured lolcation==<br />
<br />
probably. to give alim some more street cred. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:30, 2 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DanceDanceRevolution&diff=1772172
User talk:DanceDanceRevolution
2010-09-02T10:28:09Z
<p>J3D: /* recruitment ad */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/talkn}}<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
==Way too Evil==<br />
[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1295703 Friend of yours?] Check his real name link (NSFW). I think that's more then enough to get him on a Text Rape list. Might wanna talk to him. I'm also scarred for life now :( --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:20, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, mate in EVIL. What do you mean by NSFW? I don't want to force him out of having his own crap on his profile, he's probably had it there as long as he's been playing, which is a while. I don't really mind tbh, his loss if he's anti-text-raped. lol. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:29, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Not Safe For Work. Ring a bell? Did you follow the link? But okay, it's not like I'm going to report him, I don't really care but I know some people do and I thought I'd bring it up. Anyway, now I have accidentally bumped into you guys I'm deciding whether or not I send a surprise down there.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:35, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Lol! Just so you know, we'll run away from any PKing attacks, we are all wimps atm. Yeah, I've seen lemonparty, it's pretty common, it's like meatspin or any shock website IMO, you're going to see it one way or another and the sooner you do the sooner you can identify the link as something you're never going to click again. Either way, thanks for the heads up, I'll pass the message onto him and see what he thinks. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:37, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== First ==<br />
<br />
Since you archived the page.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 11:49, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:(diff) (hist) . . User talk:DanceDanceRevolution; 10:43 . . (-57,746) . . DanceDanceRevolution (Talk | contribs | block)<br />
:^^^ Evidence.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 11:50, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Doesn't count unless he empties it completely. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 12:12, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::It coutns for me... Also, I like where this Radioactive thing is going.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 12:19, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Don't mind me, just maintaining my page presence... ;) --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 13:55, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==I spy...==<br />
...a stalker not more than 30 seconds ago... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 14:34, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Great minds think alike! -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 14:35, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::I'm completely not sure if you remember her, but [[User:Tselita|Tselita]] was in that very same building. Also, my friend, [[User:Zensaga|Zensaga]] was in there as well... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 14:52, 25 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==ZL==<br />
Unless they go the "guilt by association" rule for GTF's fit,it should be done for sure. As for learning about it, you'd have learned about it at least as soon the first zerg hunter had PKed you. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 15:38, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:What is the guilt by association?? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 17:13, 27 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::The powers that be generally don't like if appealers get abusive and foul-mouthed. (And I probably wouldn't like it as well, looking how they had and have to deal with the likes of Finis Valorum, Dead Bunnies and TZH.) It's some difference though if some lying scumbags like the Dead Bunnies throw out a barrage of insults while denying even basic facts, or if a single member out of several snaps slightly in a case that has been weak to begin with. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 01:22, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Yeah fair. I hoped they would overlook that since we obvs aren't zerging and I just assumed the IP was important so I didn't force the words out of any of their mouths, I just let them say whatever. And it's a ZERG LIST they maintain, if they can't handle abuse from wrongly accused people then they shouldn't be there IMO. One more question: It appears that Guy's response was moved to another thread, is that right? And why? :/ -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:29, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::The mods are running the ZL in their spare time and are basically providing a public service, at which 90% of all work _should_ already be done by Kevan (if the auto-measures were worth anything), so I grant them any right to refuse appeals on the base of "being something we don't wanna put up with". As for moving it, I have no idea if GTF's comment has been moved, and why. If it has any effect will be seen at least as soon as the next list update comes in. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 01:42, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::It buttfucks objectivity up the arsehole if they refuse 100% watertight appeals from a group who is ''absolutely'' not zerging if someone says the F word in them. Just saying. Thought we would have been 100% in the clear, ahh well. Thanks for everything. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 02:09, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::{{quote|3=[[User:Spiderzed|I told you so:]]|2=It's some difference though if some lying scumbags like the Dead Bunnies throw out a barrage of insults while denying even basic facts, or if a single member out of several snaps slightly in a case that has been weak to begin with.}}<br />
::::::For actual answers on that, you have to grab an actual operator (like TheHuntsman or MarcusCaesar). I'm just a lone zerg hunter and not involved with ZL maintenance. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 02:17, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Yeah fair, soz. Again, thanks for the help through this. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 03:42, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::Essentially, if somebody takes pains to heap abuse the ZL Mods in their removal request then we take that as a clear indication that they do not in fact wish to be removed. (Otherwise they would abide by the removal rules, in which this situation is specifically called out.) It's like someone's face giving the lie to their words, but an online equivalent. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 04:59, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Yeah, fair enough. Thanks for the clarification Rev. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 05:01, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::I suppose I should really ask what the context is <small>(in case there is something I should be doing)</small>… but I kinda don't want to <small>(in case there is something I should be doing)</small>. {{shifty}} {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 09:51, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Oh, just in the zerg liste 9 thread my new group EVIL was submitted to be added because we all defended a break-in with very quick precision and execution. To make sure there was no chance of us being actually added, I got the suspected players to post on the appeals thread so their IP's could be logged. Out of the 5 of us that were considered, the last person to post chucked a shitty over us being added (he didn't realise we had only been submitted, not added) over something so trivial in his eyes. The post itself while embarrassing wasn't anything ''too'' over the top in itself, and since I have a lack of knowledge of the zerg liste methods so I'm pretty paranoid about being added, since it would create a massive dark cloud over our groups morale etc. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:29, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::Yeah, you should be fine, mate. Suspicion is not proof, and you've definitely done the right thing in your response. If I were you, I'd do as [[Mostly Harmless]] did and view it as a badge of honour. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 16:50, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== The Wyke Hills/Wykewood confusion ==<br />
<br />
You know, those can happen when you are updating a dozen EMRs alone. And the fact that there were two reports for Wyke Hills and one for Wykewood on that particular update didn't help either. And yet when you found it, you decided to point and laugh at it instead of fixing it. I wonder how that could help. -- [[User:Kittithaj|Kittithaj]] 16:48, 28 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:People make mistakes. I make lots. Don't go all butthurt on me for it. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 06:58, 29 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Thought you'd like to know ==<br />
<br />
It [[User:Aichon/Sandbox/Demo10|looks like]] your DanceDance arrows sig might be one of the ones causing issues for A/VB (the current month's archive isn't showing up on it since it has too much inclusion data), since it's a decent amount larger than the norm. This isn't a warning to fix it or anything of the sort, merely a friendly notification, since I figured you'd want to be aware of something like this. What you do with this info is your call. My best guess is that it's the images causing the issues, since the other big culprit was Mis' sig with the images in it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:45, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, I've noticed that in IE both your sig and Mis's sig are appearing vertically. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 06:56, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Ah, yeah, that's an unfortunate side affect of the code that they're using to get links over their images (it's my fault, since I wrote the code). IE7 and earlier doesn't understand the "display: inline-box" stuff, I believe, so it does a "display: box" equivalent instead, which means each image gets its own line. I haven't figured out a fix yet, though I'll readily admit I haven't been looking too hard since I'm not reminded of the issue during daily use (I use something other than IE, of course). IE8 is better (so long as Compatibility Mode is disabled), in that they don't use multiple lines, but the link aspect of the code simply doesn't work in IE8 (yet? Rooster was working on it as recently as yesterday or so). {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 07:04, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Thanks heaps for that info guys. I do like the arrows sig but I've always understood there'd most likely be some sort of unfixable problem with them, so I have no issue removing it and just redirecting it to my current lemon signature. is it just affecting the inclusion ''on'' the A/VB page? Or did the signatures in the archive itself also refuse to display? If the former was the only issue, I might wait till the month is over, revert the sig back to the arrows and just continue from there on with my current sig. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:22, 30 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Just a note on the arrows sig, you can use [[Template:ClickInternal]] for the images now. Good news is that it works (thank Aichon), bad news is that it's weighty so using it on several images is bad, mmmkay? Also you have to use it because I said so or I'll get all sig policy on your ass. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 07:16, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
:K cool thanks Rooster. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 07:57, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== recruitment ad ==<br />
<br />
i appreciate the help in conforming my attempt at a recruitment ad. at least ya helped me with it instead of being a jerk about it. i need to brush up on my wiki. {{unsigned|Nuerotoxic2213|01:07, 1 September 2010}}<br />
:That was actually me that fixed it up for you, though DDR was kinda enough to remove a stray character from the page that was making it look a bit off. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:20, 1 September 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==sup biatch==<br />
<br />
whats teh lowdown on the game updates? bellow + that scout safehouse skill is that all?? also - scout safehouse, do the actions have to be completed in the safehouse? how the frack does the game measure that? Also there should be a link of the news page to a page that explains the updates in non-zombieapoc style. Ie outlines what we know of the actual changes. if that already exists; link me and make the link more obvious for others. sick1 {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:28, 2 September 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:Every_Villain_Is_Lemons&diff=1763463
Talk:Every Villain Is Lemons
2010-08-22T14:42:24Z
<p>J3D: /* Can we have sex? */</p>
<hr />
<div><center><div style="background-color: #663366; width: 850px; padding: 0px; min-width: 850px;"><br />
<div style="margin-bottom: -10px;">[[Image:4020talkhead.png|850px|4020]]</div><br />
<div style="float: left; width: 80px; border: 1px solid #FFFFFF); padding: 5px 0px; background-color: #FFFFFF; margin: 60px 0px 0px 35px; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana;" align=center ><br />
[[Every Villain Is Lemons|{{c|black|MAIN}}]]<br />
</div><br />
<div style="float: left; width: 80px; border: 1px solid #FFFFFF); padding: 5px 0px; background-color: #FFFFFF; margin: 120px 0px 0px -80px; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana;" align=center ><br />
<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:Every_Villain_Is_Lemons&action=edit&section=new <span style="font-size: 3em; color: #000000;">+</span>]</span><br />
</div><br />
<div align="right"><div style="background-color: #FFFFFF; width: 700px; padding: 0px; min-width: 700px; font-size: 1em; -moz-border-radius:280px 0 0 0/52px 0 0 0; -webkit-border-radius:280px 0 0 0/52px 0 0 0; border-bottom: 4px solid #663366; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana"><br />
<div align="right"><div style="background-color: #000000; width: 700px; padding: 0px; min-width: 700px; font-size: 1.7em; -moz-border-radius:280px 0 0 0/70px 0 0 0; -webkit-border-radius:280px 0 0 0/70px 0 0 0; border-bottom: 4px solid #663366; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana"><font color="#FFFFFF"><p align="center">EVERY '''TALK''' IS LEMONS</p></font></div></div><br />
<div align="left"><div style="padding: 5px 5px"><br />
<br />
<p align="center">press the +</p><br />
<br><br />
<br><br />
<br />
<br />
== Can I join? ==<br />
<br />
Seriously. I'll make a new alt. Any group with a page this cool needs me in it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 11:20, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
It certainly looks unique, haven't seen anything like this before, and I mean it in a good way. Now start stealing some [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=EVIL&redirect=no redirects]. Though I wonder, this is survivor, pk or zombie? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:31, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Currently we are survivor, nurturing the newer members and helping them understand the game and levelling up. Could take a month or two, but once that's done, we aren't sure what we will do. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:48, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Survivors!?! It is my duty to insult you! You are a foolhardy, shortsighted, and truly meaningless <s>group</s> individual who lacks the mental capacity to even begin to grasp anything that even resembles a big picture. Go die, cold and alone, in some barhah-forsaken hole. It's more than you lousy breathers deserve. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 12:18, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I considered un-idling A Cyberdemon for this but it's pro survivors and that makes me sad. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 16:33, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Can we have sex?==<br />
<br />
Seriously. PS where the fuck were you on autoday you cunt? !{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:45, 11 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Man, fucking... was working all weekend, I actually totally forgot you were up until monday arvo and I raged. come back -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:30, 11 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::It's true he did rage. I was there.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 12:28, 16 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::yeah ican totes imagine, i'm sure it was serious. and by work you mean udwiki. i bet if i check the logs you spent more time here than anywher eelse that weekend *tear* {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:42, 22 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Cool page and images! ==<br />
<br />
Just wanted to know... Did you made the images? They're really cool. Would have loved to get them HI-RES. For a wallpaper, why not? --{{User:DiSm/sig}} 12:54, 16 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:I didn't make them unfortunately, but by coincidence the originals are actually wallpaper, so here's a chrissy treat: [http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/181/1252845289065.jpg], [http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/90/1280223737590.jpg], [http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/9012/1281359130777.jpg]. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:05, 16 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Really nice! Thanks. Got to use that soon. By the way, just something : In my preferences I clicked ''Add pages I edit to my watchlist''. Then I edit your page to ask for images... and I don't get notified when you answer! :/ --{{User:DiSm/sig}} 14:40, 16 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::How strange... -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:43, 16 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I don't really care. It's ok ^^. Damn the wallpapers are cool for my 13" laptop but are really fig leaf for my 23" computer! :D--{{User:DiSm/sig}} 18:27, 20 August 2010 (BST)<br />
Yeah, this is definitely the coolest group page I've ever seen. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 19:47, 20 August 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:J3D&diff=1763462
User talk:J3D
2010-08-22T14:39:54Z
<p>J3D: /* bbk */</p>
<hr />
<div>='''READ ME!'''=<br />
*Post at the bottom (press the little + button at the top of the page) unless continuing a previous conversation.<br />
*Three words: '''Sign your posts!'''<br />
*Looking for something that was here before the 20<sup>th</sup> of March 2008? Try [[User_talk:J3D/Archive|here]]. What about between the 21<sup>st</sup> of March and the 18<sup>th</sup> of August 2008? Because that would be [[User_talk:J3D/Archive2|here]]! Or perhaps what you need is from the period between the 19<sup>th</sup> of August and the 19<sup>th</sup> of December? Coz that shiznat can be grabbed just over [[User talk:J3D/Archive3|here]], ya dig?<br />
<br />
== Lulz ==<br />
<br />
ic wat u did thar. --{{User:WOOT/sig}} 19:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:whar? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:48, 20 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
::HAR! DURR!--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 04:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not impersonate other users, especially on admin pages on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 06:18 21 December 2008 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
== Hollomstown ==<br />
<br />
Rid of merged pages. :)--[[User:Lithedarkangel|Lithedarkangel]] 23:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:noice! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Missed one ==<br />
<br />
[[Candy Avenue]]. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 02:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:Missed what?--<span>[[User:Lithedarkangel|<span style="color: Red ">Li</span>]][[User_Talk:Lithedarkangel|<span style="color: Black">thedark</span>]][[Location Nuts|<span style="color: Black">angel</span>]][[User:Lithedarkangel/Works|<span style="color: Red"><small>Meth!</small></span>]]</span> 03:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
== You are creating History ==<br />
<br />
Grim made a coupe, tried to take over the wiki.<br />
<br />
You lol'd at an account creation you knew nothing of.<br />
<br />
Surely if they go through with this, you can make some sort of flashy template stating how you were the first person to have this happen?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Oh, oh, me me! Lemme make it!--[[User:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>]] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== lol. ==<br />
<br />
<span class="plainlinks">[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct&curid=2730&diff=1359677&oldid=1359674 lol.]</span> {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 01:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:evidently i can be more wrong ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Yus, I gnoh Bub and Kevan, I'm interesting in their profiles and activity, location might come later. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 04:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Irony?==<br />
hahaha oh wow you're delusional. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:you just noticed? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Yeah? ==<br />
<br />
[[User_talk:Iscariot#Run_for_sysop|Nominate?]]<br />
--{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 00:46, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I'm up for it if you and SA are.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::do eeet --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 00:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Nao. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 01:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I'm waiting for SA to say something since his name was mentioned. Now kindly [[GTFO]] ma talk page.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::That goes for all of you. Or none of you. I mean it is a free wiki...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:06, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
hai. i here u liek mudkipz --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Mudkipz suck. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 01:10, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Where's axehack?? I want him back :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Axehack is no more... --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 01:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::He was briefly more on the 6th of jan..why is this happening? I, for one, blame the current sysop team ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::: I blame the previous sysop team. Grim s, to be more precise. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
Iscariot...Whoooooo....Now THAT would be one hell of a promotions bid. I'd honestly say give it a while for everything that's around him to die down some, but it might not happen anyway. Its up to you guys on what happens. Just saying it might be more prudent to wait a bit.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:yeah agree, it's a bit chaotic atm. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I'll be ready to do it when you guys are ready... I think it will be interesting to see what reasons people give for voting against, and how many people outside the sysop team are opposed to it. I personally think Iscariot would be a very good sysop. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 01:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::of course! It's not just a show for a shows sake. I wouldn't nominate someone i didn't genuinely want as sysop. Still i think it's best if we wait til the wiki is a bit quieter. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::His actions in the few places where they've given him power over users say much to the contrary. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 05:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I can haz links? Or examples? --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 21:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I doubt he'd accept the nomination... I mean, if he were a sysop, he couldn't post to his own Talk page LOL. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 05:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::LOL he'd be what he must have always hated!!! xD [[User:Liberty|Liberty]] 05:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Iscariot doesn't hate Sysops altogether, he just hates the way the current sysops teams acts and handles things. He's pointed that out occasionally.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 11:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::No, he hates that we don't dance to his tune. Also read [[Recruitment/Archive2]] for a bit Pestolence, then check the [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Kristi_of_the_Dead_vs_Recruitment|arbitration case that relates to it.]](talk page too), there's also a few little snipes because of [[:Category_talk:Recruitment#Category:Recruitment_Rules_Discussion|this]] he's been making about me throughout the wiki claiming that I'm going against the consensus of the community or twisting recruitment to my own ends. He's a paranoid delusional, we're all out to get him and opposing him is the same as opposing the community in his eyes. You can see some of that [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_01#User:Iscariot|here]]. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 01:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::According to [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Kevan&curid=1072&diff=1363855&oldid=1363854&rcid=1393374 this bit] on Kevan's page, the "community" he is referring to are the folk who aren't actually on the wiki. =/ Convenient eh? -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 01:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::It's funny cause I know that community, I know more people in it than him and the reason is actually the kinda things he's doing and the related drama/rules abuse. I know people in that same community that have expressed problems with his behavior here after seeing it for themselves even. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]], self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All</span> 02:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::So basically he's got the wrong end of the stick completely and is now making an even bigger arse of himself because of it? =/ Clever. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 02:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::I think thats a bit harsh, yes Iscariot is an arse and out to cause trouble for troubles sake but his attacks are not without valid points. The current Admin team does do a (mostly) good job but the assumption by some that they are above community review and that those that disagree with them are trouble making malcontents is far from the truth. Despite the claims to the contrary "Sysopship" no longer suggests a mere janitorial role, rather it designates some users as being in positions of judgment over other users. Until the sysop position recognizes a difference between users that the community trusts to do routine maintenance etc... and to hold a position of authority and judgment over others then drama will always ensue. As is, the sysop role really does seem to be turning into an exclusive club type thing, true or not that is not an image that is good for the position or the community at large!--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::1)You're preaching to the choir. Who do you think started the debate over the claims to being just janitors? 2) The system was set up originally to ''not'' have community review for a reason. That reason is still somewhat valid and more reasons connecting to that one have caused the failure of every proposition for regular review. 3) Iscariot only has points when he accidentally stumbles upon then in the midst of his attempts to make everyone fall in line, I used to think it was intentional but his behavior has long since made it clear to me that he doesn't actually believe the "points" he has except for as a means to an end. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 02:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::::The last thing that made the third one ridiculously clear to me was the RRF move drama.--<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 02:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::::::1) not really aware of who started it... just know its been grumbling on for ever and a day. 2) community review has many things in its favour foremost of which is that it confirms that the sysops are "trusted" by the current userbase, its also very open to abuse by all and sundry and '''yes''' it would also make it hard for sysops to do the contentious stuff that makes them unpopular but still needs doing! 3)Just because the valid points he hits upon are not the ones he is aiming at doesn't make them any less valid, it does however make him look stupid and petty.--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 08:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::::Actually spirit of the rule is as important as the law. The reason it's being enforced more so. You don't give native americans repirations for slavery because they were both referred to with the same term back in the day. For #2 please read the comment on my talk page to pestolence, I don't think we should be starting another massive discussion on J3D's talk page without him being a part of it. --[[User:Karek|Judge&nbsp;Karke]],&nbsp;self-proclaimed&nbsp;Decider&nbsp;of&nbsp;Everything&nbsp;and&nbsp;Ruler&nbsp;of&nbsp;All 10:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::Wow i didn't expect all this upon my return. Now to catch up on whats happened elsewhere....--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::Yup. INMNSHO that's why he's so worried about constant proper English. If he ever used slang or slipped up, the holes in his ideas would be clear as day. He creates a false air of authority and correctives.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 02:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Can I get some input?==<br />
I've been working on a policy that I believe is sorely needed [[User:Pestolence/001|here]], and I'd appreciate your input on it. How can it be improved, and is it even needed right now? A potential problem is what to do about current sysops: put them all up for review now (leading to a massive backlog of admin page drama), postpone the review until six months from now (simply staving off the inevitable drama till later), or something else glaringly obvious that I've overlooked? See you around. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 02:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Never mind, thanks. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 16:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:<nowiki>:</nowiki>( I feel unwanted...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Aw. =( We still love you Jed! -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::pwomise? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Uh huh. =) Without you the wiki would asplode. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::i suspected as much, now back to work. There be vandalism cases to rule on ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Meh. S'pose. I could take a couple of minutes out of my busy revision schedule to take a mosey on over for a look. =p -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 01:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::OMGMISCONBULATIONCHEESEISLAZYIMASOGONNATELLISCARIOT --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
kidding.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:you little... heh --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::did i getcha? huh? well? did i?? did i?? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== star wars ==<br />
<br />
its not that i liek it, but its public knoweledge... like the brother grimm tales in 19th century. Anyway, why dont you liek star wars ? --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 00:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:hint:begins with f, ends with inis. But i didn't particularly like it before that anyway.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::what does [http://files.usgwarchives.net/tx/floyd/vitals/births/1937/floyb37.txt f floyd inis] has to do with star wars ? --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup><br />
:::what the [[2 Cool]] is that?? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
fpenis?--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span></small> 03:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:[[User:DanceDanceRevolution/Fenis|fpenis.]]--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== RE: Classic lulz ==<br />
<br />
Truer words never were spoken - unless someone once said cyberbob was a cunt, then that would be truer. Lol, truer is a weird-looking word.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Cyberbob is a cunt--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Did you guys like the presents i left you? The wiki has been awesome lately, reminds me of the grim days. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
DOHOHOHO --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:merry january! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== I need your advice ==<br />
<br />
Hello. It's me again. I need your advice on something. Neice has not edited the Dead Dudes page again. However, he has now posted some extremely anti-DD propaganda on [[The Sidney Arms]] page. Please have a look and tell me what you think. In my opinion (which i have stated to Neice),such statements have no place on a location page. he should put them on his own group's page. It is becoming tiresome to myself and our group, as he is nothing more than a griefer in-game and apparently feels compelled to bring it into the wiki. Anyways, have a look and let me know. Thanks again for any help you can give. --[[User:Wast0id|Wast0id]] 19:59, 20 January (CST)<br />
:''The Arms is still under attack from the wonderful group Malton Maulers. We have continued to battle for the area and will now go all out for it and have broken into the Arms daily''. Is that what you find so offensive Wastoid? {{User:Liberty/Sign}} 07:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I think [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=The_Sidney_Arms&diff=1368228&oldid=1367540 this] is his problem. I removed it before I actually saw this because it was POV on a neutral page. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 20:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::--Yes, thank you Pestolence, that was exactly my problem. And I expect more of the same from this user in the future and was hoping someone in authotity would set him straight. As I said previously, I simply wish he would keep his in-game grudge in the game, or at least on his own group page. --[[User:Wast0id|Wast0id]] 18:44, 21 January 2009 (CST)<br />
::::If he continues to slander your group, contact him on his talk page and ask him to stop, and if he continues (or if you've already asked him to stop and he's ignored you), take him to [[A/A|arbitration]]. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 02:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Uranium ==<br />
<br />
BOMBS--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 02:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Read's ban ==<br />
<br />
Time for an open discussion regarding the ''"it is expected that a system operator be prepared to reverse a warning/ban should the community desire it"'' section of [[UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines|this policy]] do you think? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 09:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:What makes you think the community does desire it? The only people contesting it at all number like 4. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::That would be why we'd have an ''Open'' Discussion. I'm pretty sure I can find some people that would support it. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 13:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::That depends on how low on the IQ range you'e prepared to go. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Well I would vote to keep the ban which means you will have Bobs support as he can't ever be seen to side with me these days. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 13:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::You keep bringing me into your comments honest, do you have a crush or something? If so take it elsewhere... I hear there are corners of the internet dedicated to that sort of thing. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 14:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::touché... but i already removed that comment as i felt it a little unfair.--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 14:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::xbox live or myspace? ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Is anyone else amused by the fact that he doesn't know that he can't unban people through meatpuppeting a vote? It's been tried before and over-ruled by the appropriate party. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 08:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:then whys it in the policy?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Because we don't update policies every time Kevan steps in and says differently. There needs to be some legitimacy to giving the user a second chance for such a thing to actually be done, and then only in the more extreme cases is it even likely. Cases like Amazing or Izumi, not any case Iscariot seems to think this is valid for(as I'm sure you know well which those will obviously be). And I'm sure we all know by this point Iscariot is just doing this now to try and cause drama so he can scream about how biased the sysops are regardless of whether he is correct in the slightest, he's not trying to get Read's ban revoked or even claiming what happened to him was unfair, those are irrelevant to his point. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 02:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Does anyone notice that it's fine when Karek likes a mass of support, but meatpuppeting when it's something he doesn't? Odd that... -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 20:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Signature ==<br />
<br />
I'm not after drama, but I'm asking if you'd change your signature back to J3D, please. Thanks. {{User:Extropymine/sig}} 09:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:hows that for compromise? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::[http://www.milkandcookies.com/link/58827/detail/ You used the N word?] :| --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 14:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Y helo thar ==<br />
<br />
There's an important thingy over here --> [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Semi-protection|this bit]], that you should have a look at. We're at 14 votes but we need 20 for a proper majority. Your time and energy will be rewarded with cookies and mudkips (if u liek dat sort of ting) =) -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 21:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==:)==<br />
Can you please refrain from vouching a single candidate MULTIPLE times? Please? :/ --<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Suicidal Angel,</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 00:00, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:If you can refrain from showing nothing but blatent disregard for the rules of this talkpage ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Oh... ==<br />
<br />
You're still around. When are you gonna give up on this shit and go back to Nationstates? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 11:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:fuck nationstates.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::booyah!--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Hi, i'm not sure if i'm replying to you right, i answered your question on my page but i'm still learning here. I am everything zombie, i opened that account/page by mistake under the wrong name. I wanted one for Drunkmonkey, which i opened and have been working on today. Feel free to delete the everything zombie page and account as i won't be using it thank you.<br />
Derek<br />
(http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:Drunkmonkey)<br />
<br />
==ALiM template==<br />
<br />
Are you happy with it? Cause if I fix it from overlapping the text, I have to use the flagbox template which doesn't make it look as good. the LUL isn't as big, which really detracts from the.. LUL, you know? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 07:45, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:I like it how it is(and i luuuurve the colour scheme) i can deal if the lul gets smaller tho. stuff happens.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:54, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
::I'll leave it then, I think the original is the best, {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:26, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Vandal Banning==<br />
<br />
I almost laughed a vital organ off. LulZ'LoLz--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 15:27, 6 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== [[User:DanceDanceRevolution/status/game]] ==<br />
<br />
Just for you. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 13:49, 8 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Plus, if you don't vouch the Eastwood Museum, I won't vouch ALiM for good article status. Tit for tat. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 12:23, 11 May 2009 (BST)<br />
:It just makes me think of the suburb of Eastwood, which fyi is a dump. But you sure do know how to treat a girl, so you're on.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:32, 12 May 2009 (BST)<br />
::Yeah, Eve told me she hated Eastwood. She calls it Eastwoo for some reason. Is that a Sydney thing? Btw, come for a sysop party soon? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:31, 30 May 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Nah i just call it eastwood...and yeah i've got a 3 day block off later in june so we can get fucked up alim style.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:18, 31 May 2009 (BST)<br />
::::I dig.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:39, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Come watch a buce match, too. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 05:04, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Hurry up and put Eastwood on ALiM!!! Before you get banned! ;D {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 16:25, 8 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:Theres not some underground movement to have me permaed brewing is there?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:01, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not shout offensive names on admin pages on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 02:52 8 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />And again <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 03:28 9 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:Gimme another stop hand. lazy cunt.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:57, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::u relly need 2 do smethin about dat temper --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 10:00, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::maybz l8a.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:02, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Oh i forgot the bit where i'm only making these edits to get up to 500 in the next 2 months.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:04, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::hmmm thanks for giving me an idea for a policy proposal --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 10:35, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I r supa srs now. Good luck on getting that upper-middle management job, bob.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 17:30, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I can't actually take credit for it, i got it off Conn (see SA's talk), good luck with a coherent policy on the issue though...in the end who gives a fuck? Most people will either make the 250 in a month or just not get another warning anytime soon anyway, or get more bans til they leave the wiki, for the remaining about 2 people, just let them be.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:06, 13 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I wouldn't worry about it so much - I'm in the middle of midyears at the moment and can't be bothered. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 06:16, 13 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::Here, have 2 [[Image:6vmixh1b9.gif]] <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 10:51 10 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
==lol==<br />
qq bitch --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:21, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:see if you can beat 3 months.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:23, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::I already did - I was a sysop from May 2006 through to May 2007. suck it --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:27, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Was your demotion scandalous and awesome though?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:30, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::nah - I got tricked into putting myself up for review and at that point promotion bids pretty much were votes. people are whiny babies so I got da boot --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:35, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I see. Votes better than 2 randoms just decide. The whole process is largely pointless...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:37, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::May I introduce you to the principles of representative democracy? {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:39, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I'm from NSW, i'm familiar with it and i hate it.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:44, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::That's why there aren't only two candidates for crat elections, like there are in elections in our state (I'm from NSW too.) Also:<br />
::::::::"Democracy is the worst form of government. It's simply better then all the others that have been tried" - Winston Churchill. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:46, 21 June 2009 (BST) <br />
:::::::::That misquote is contradictory... :P It's "''democracy is the worst form of government '''except''' all the others that have been tried''" <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:59 21 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
::::::::you might want to take some time to learn about politics before thinking you know enough to have a valid opinion about it hth --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:51, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You should be less lame.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:54, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::yes. I should be less lame than getting drunk while online instead of partying with my friends as well as getting online while being hungover rather than being hungover at a mate's place where I've crashed after a night out<br />i'm definitely lamer than that right now; i should lift my game --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:00, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::lol --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 22:00, 21 June 2009 (BST) <br />
::::::vote is infinitely worse than 2 randoms because then meatpuppetry enters into the equation and people are still pretty whiny babies who don't know how to make userpages let alone know who should and should not be a sysop --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:41, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Time to Vote!==<br />
I found a building I thought would be a good addition to the [[ELiM]] list. Go to [[Talk:Amusing_Locations_in_Malton/Edible_Locations_in_Malton#The_Gumm_Building_.2842.2C_40.29|the ELiM talk page]] to vote on whether The Gumm Building should be added. --{{User:Blake Firedancer/sig}} 13:00, 30 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== nicks drunk promotion bid ==<br />
<br />
is there really no way to read it? i wanna read it so bad. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 09:53, 1 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:It's a shame it wasn't archived properly. It should've been put under Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies or something. It just got deleted and I think someone got a/vbed. P.S. Just checked and it was me.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:55, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::Good thing you checked, I thought it was someone else. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 05:50, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Zing. But it was at Curley's house so I was expecting to see his account appear somewhere.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:30, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::ooohk. everything was done at Curleys house amirite? ;) {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 06:34, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::most things. except blowjobs, obviously.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:47, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I was just on #batshit relaying the story of how we went to that tech store in jesmond and used a display iphone to buy brain rot for table. good times. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 06:51, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::lol. <small>just wanted to get in on this convo</small><br />
:::::::oh and bj's can happen at curleys house, if i'm not mistaken 2 of the womens live there.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:16, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::getting beejays from internets<br />the height of desperateness? i would say yes --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:22, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Wut? curleys house is a real place bob....--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:25, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::nooooo relllyyy??? my question to you is would you know about curleys house without internet --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:28, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::yes. i knew about it since before broadband was invented...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:30, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::well i knew about it since before even the whole internet was invented........ --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:39, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::dayem.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:29, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::yeh it was like infinity years ago so you probly wouldnt know what that was like --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 00:35, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::Good recovery.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:08, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::hello? hello? i cant hear you speak directly into the receiver --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:17, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::No I want the last word!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:24, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
<s>[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not post on the A/VB main page when you are uninvolved in the case on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]]<sup>[[Template_talk:VandalBanningNotice|POST HERE]]</sup> 11:09, 15 July 2009 (BST)</s><br />
<br />
This verdict has been overruled and the warning stuck. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:26, 17 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Ban==<br />
<s>You have been banned from editing this wiki for 24 hours for vandalism. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 15:28, 16 July 2009 (BST)</s><br />
<br />
This ruling has been overruled and the ban overturned. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:27, 17 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==ban?==<br />
well it looks like they at least saw sense on your case... i suspect my ban will stand but what the hey... its not like i didn't expect it :) --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 01:52, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
DDR was going to post "'''Phew J3D, lucky Honest saved you from that one. Shame he had to be banned because of it. ''' but thought better of it because i clearly was not banned. Why? well that would be because in so many years of valid contribution to the wiki i have only ever faced 3 A/VB cases all but this one thrown out. Hmm guess that makes me the newest wikimartyr... --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:33, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Lol! You fuckiing moron! Did you even read your ''own'' comment that I replied to? '''YOU''' called it a ban, hence why I had ''ban'' in ''italics'', something you must have overlooked.<br />
:I gave up on arguing because you never give up, you fight to the death with the same fucked up, stupid points. I thought you'd bow down after Nubis didn't come to save you, but hey, looks like your desperation in saving your skin can surprise everyone. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<span style="color:black"><u><big>ϑϑℜ</big></u></span>]] 03:19, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::el oh el pwnt?--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 03:23, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::One would think so. He wouldn't admit it. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<span style="color:black"><u><big>ϑϑℜ</big></u></span>]] 03:45, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== yo ==<br />
<br />
Please don't submit [[:Image:2cola.jpg]] for SD. I want to use it as an example when I put 0x0 images up for scheduled deletions. What did you upload to make it come up as 0x0? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:54, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Ah i'm half asleep and i forgot how to make a bmp a jpg so i just changed the file name which turns out doesn't work :P So maybe you get a 0x0 if you try uploading any bmp? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:55, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::Yeah, thanks. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't a problem on my end before submitting it as a scheduled. ty. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:58, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::np.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:02, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
[[:Image:2cola.jpg]] - FTFY {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 18:02, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Heh, thanks but i already made [[:Image:2cola.JPG]] and if you read the above DDR wanted that kept as an example or something...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:55, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::I reverted it. Hope you don't mind. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 03:04, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Nvm. I didn't know you cited the fix in your scheduling vote so I put it back. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 03:06, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
hay ur not an stysops. u r an x sysops. quit lyin yo--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 04:04, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:i had teh exact same templat on 4 da hole tiem i wasnt an sysops. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 04:09, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::thats cause you never edit yyour page so it doesn't show up on the recent changes. faeget.--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 04:23, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Guys, guys. I'm sorry but the spelling and grammar here is just atrocious. Please clean up your act.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:51, 2 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::nou--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> High Overlord and Lead Conspirator of the Administrative Rebellion.</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Want</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">help?</span>]] 16:33, 2 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== <s>birth</s>fagday ==<br />
<br />
is it alim's 2nd yet? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 10:41, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:first, what's a birthfagday? and second, no - it's on the 2nd of october.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 11:51, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::as an overrated singersongwriter once said, "The times they are'a changin'"--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:50, 7 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::how are they changing? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:57, 7 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Well considering the Earth is in a constant state of evolution and change, it is impossible for that quote to be ever inaccurate.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 02:21, 8 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not impersonate sysops on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 01:18, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:You really need to stop telling me it's my last warning. It sounds so, ''final''...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:04, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::It's the [[Template:warning2|template's]] fault. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 02:53, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== YOU ==<br />
<br />
ARE GOD--[[User:Shakey60|Shakey]] <sup>[[Beatbox_Kids|BBK]] </sup> 12:46, 16 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:i know right --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:16, 26 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Sysops==<br />
I thought you were a sysops nigger? And you and cyberbob were best butt buddies?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 10:35, 23 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:I was, until early january :\ --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:45, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::Wat happen--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 00:49, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Conspiracy. Nubis organised my sacking during the new year period when i wasn't checking the wikiz :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:51, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::What? Nubis got you demoted? Har har. Specifically for what?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 01:01, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Drunk wiki editing. Not towing the party line. Usual reasons ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:03, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::HAH. So what happen with you and cyberbob?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 01:43, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I hate lemons. Jed's just a wee bit too bitter. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:41, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I didn't know there was ever anything between us? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:37, 26 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==The Sysop template==<br />
So I hear you still have it on there. Please take it down as per the warning you were issued or I will do it for you. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 09:18, 28 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== omfg ==<br />
So happy bob permabanned this "buzz killington" thinking it was one of you two, or one of the bbk. I can feel a massive misconduct coming on if anyone decides to take it further.<br />
What I am saying is, please take it further.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:53, 29 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:fucking lol hey.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:02, 29 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Ciggies==<br />
Good god man, make the link to your user page findable, ffs <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 11:48 2 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:He's had it like that for a week or so. And this signature ''should'' only be up for 24 hours, right? ;) --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 12:09, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::Well the ALaMe one was at least preceded by some non-link stuff, but was bad enough... this is another level again. He just keeps pushing on the boundary until someone can be bothered to react <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:28 2 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:::Fair enough- he's the one who will be VB'd so I don't really care. I just think for a day-long fag celebration, just let him have his giggles. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 12:30, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::I put my cursor on the main part, and it underlined all but the exclamation mark, so then i clicked on the exclamation mark, and it bought me here!!--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Also, your name is coxy--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::<nowiki>*</nowiki>you're ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:41, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::TAKING YOU TO A/A FOR WINKING OMG--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:46, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::USING CAPS TO HILARIOUSLY RIDICULE BY LAMPOONING A PERCEIVED "ANGER" WHILE TOTALLY GETTING ALL PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE UP IN THIS SHIT BY MEANS OF HUMOUROUSLY EXAGGERATING AN ENEMY'S POST AT THE SAME TIME {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You are WAY to easy these days--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:17, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::last word {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::nah uh--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::u mad?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::You are WAY to easy these days {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:19, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Learn to spell, both of you. any more posts in this thread will be deleted and i might take you to a/vb. unless its not bob or read.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:21, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! that is all.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 14:31, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::I'm special, <small>special</small>, so special, <small>special</small>. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 14:35, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
== You ==<br />
Are that fucking inconsistent on FB and IRC and any chat medium. I cannot work out your patterns m'lday--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:01, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:I'm on from 1pm til 6pm. And i'll sign into msn now just for you. But don't fucking facebook chat me coz my compy can't handle it :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:04, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Nam nam, bra!nz!!! ==<br />
<br />
You tasted good. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 01:46, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== You have all been rolled ==<br />
<br />
You are all my muppets! I am your muppetmaster. '''JIM HENSON IS ALIVE!!!''' <br />
<br />
As of December 24, 2012 I shall control all the accounts of 2 Cool. ALiM is/will be MINE! --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 06:13, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arbitration==<br />
Has started. Please proceed [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool here] --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:35, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Uhh, thanks I guess. By the way, shouldn't it be "nicknames given by 2 Cool", instead of "given to 2 Cool"?--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:01, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::No because you gave them to us, they aren't given by us.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:06, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Oh sorry, I get it, misunderstood for a sec.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:18, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Category:Group Subpages ==<br />
<br />
Revert it again and I'll put up an A/VB case against you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Silver}}-- 08:00, 9 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Link me plox to the policy where it says i have to allow you to categorise my group subpages, then compliance you shall receive.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:03, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::The policy on '''bad faith''' where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::You have every obligation to present evidence for your assertion. I provide the following [[UDWiki:Specific_Case_Editing_Guidelines|link]], which ensures that a group may control the content of their page excepting a NPOV lead-in paragraph. A category, by definition, is not part of a prose paragraph and is therefore not covered by this exemption. I await this 'policy' on 'refusing administrative edits', the wording of which is straying close to using the administration status as a badge of authority. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:02, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::And while you're there, you might want to run an IP check on [[User:Insane1]], voting on one suggestion and not the other up for voting during a first edit seems suspicious to me. It won't be enough to sway the vote but is probably worth checking out. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:05, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::It wasn't his first edit at all. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:10, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I seem to have omitted the "in the suggestions system" portion of that sentence. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:20, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Hardly. Anyone can do administrative edits. I only have the obligation to present evidence if I take him to A/VB. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:08, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Indeed, anyone can, but editing here repeatedly quoting some policy you don't present for review and then expecting a user who has clear ownership of the page (as I ''have'' presented) seems inconsistent to a good faith approach. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:20, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Read the policy document, it is as consistent in defending J3D as it would save any bad faith action a user makes in his own space; ''Groups, for the most part, have sole property of their Group page on the wiki'' is an example, nothing in the policy is black and white, it allows for exceptions to the ownership clause, and I assume none of what is in that policy will defend J3D against the blanket ruling of "bad faith". J3D has also specified that he only gives a shit about ''me'' adding the category (something I do daily to every page on the wiki) onto the subpage, and you expect people to believe ''I'm'' acting in bad faith? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:34, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::Given the fact that you admit there's bad faith between the two of you, the good faith response would be to leave it alone and not incite drama as you are doing by threatening vandalism rulings. Why don't you see if someone else will apply it? And answer me this, what does the wiki lose, or in what way is it harmed by this lack of category? It may appease your sense of CDO, but does nothing to assist the wiki in general or even help important pages, you know, like A/VD which you seem perfectly happy to leave in a false manner. Your comment on 'doing it everyday' I hope is incorrect as well given that's not the category that should be going on there either. And you've still yet to produce this 'policy' you harp on about. I've provided mine and am quite happy that the statement that groups may control the content of the page sufficient to cover this, or we'd be having massive drama wars on this when the Malton Marshalls were added to Category:PKer Groups. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 08:16, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::1. I never once said there was any bad faith on my end. 2. Look below. I already did suggest someone else do it, but at the moment he hasn't even reverted it. 3. Get your head out of your arse and stop pressing fallacies like I "need" a "policy" that says we can warn users for bad faith, you parasitical moron. 4. Specialpages like the one involved in this is specifically called a "maintenance page" by Mediawiki, hence of course it is an important part of maintenence. And in response to your lack of concern for anything less than an "important page", look at A/D and see your fucked up stance on "unimportant pages" yourself, and see who has the double standards here. 5. Don't say I have OCD because at leased ''my'' case of it goes towards a greater good, rather than your unfulfilling and pestering belief that you were brought on this earth to shit people off with your 'holy' ways. 6. You are the only user unhappy with the A/VD edits so shut the fuck up and actually consider that your opinion on them probably shouldn't be treated as the be-all of truth on this wiki.<br />
:::::::::So actually consider what you are doing just now, Iscariot, you are watching a little shit-stirrer try and mess with the only thing on this wiki that shouldn't generally be messed with, Mediawiki maintenance, no doubt waiting for this to flip out of control (thanks to a certain meddling user, you, moreso than me) and then cry vendetta if he actually gets punished for his immature, counter-productive, butthurt and overall unnecessary behaviour. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:32, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Wait, you want to go into a barrage of obscenities and then try and appeal to my sense of reason. Your 'productive' CDO may be clouding your logic. Given that the majority of your emotional tirade belongs on other pages, the only one I'll respond to is that concerning A/VD, there is a problem, it's not opinion, it's fact based on the escalations policy. Boxy's actions are no different to Nubis' that caused the situation. Given you are a sysop and one of the few users able to rectify the problem I'd be considerably more impressed if you applied your energies to that rather than engage in this case of edit warring, drama stirring and vandalism threatening over an inconsequential page.<br />
<br />
::::::::::Finally, I didn't start the policy here, you did. And I quote ''"The policy on bad faith where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) "'' You have made a claim, the burden of proof is ''always'' on the claimant. I'm simply asking you to prove what you have said. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 08:43, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Sorry. I read the first sentence and stopped indefinitely, learn that I have no intention of appealing to your sense of ''anything'', full stop. I no longer have an interest in this, and hence I have no more interest in arguing with you. Unlike yourself, users like Boxy at leased have initiative in fixing problems rather than inflaming them, so I consider this topic closed and I'm treating it as such. Bleat to someone new. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 09:02, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Why is it so hard for you to provide a link to something you say exists? Is it so hard for a sysop on this wiki to demonstrate their own claims? Or have you just started inventing policies like Hagnat used to? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:38, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::I just had a read through the vandalism policy (because none of the others are really relevant here), and there isn't anything about this type of edit. The situation isn't helped by the vagueness of the policy. The only thing that the policy actually DOES say about it is that they should go to Arbies, which we all know would be a pointless waste of time. There's nothing about admin edits, there's nothing about user page rights over-ruling the advancement of the wiki. Neither side is covered by policy, but, as Iscariot noted, the burden of proof IS unfortunately on the claimant.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:52, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::Why is it so hard for you to understand that after ''what I want'' is fixed, I have ''no intention'' of arguing with you? I have no, NO interest in continuing this once someone has stepped in a mediated this issue and since Boxy has, I have absolutely no interest in continuing the argument. Learn to actually care for the wiki rather than fix your desire to cause trouble and 'show up' the sysops. I'm the one with OCD, by the way. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:22, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::And by the way, [[UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines#General_Conduct|shut the fuck up now]], will you? Second last clause. we have the authority to destroy any value in the effort to crust "Bad Faith", ie. the umbrella ruling that can theoretically serve any purpose in aid of ridding of loopholes in the wiki. Deal with it. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:22, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::No, that's not what you said. You said ''"The policy on bad faith where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) "''. Please show me the ''"policy on bad faith"'', not the section on sysop conduct guidelines put in there for emergency situations. Please give me a link to the policy that you claimed exist that explicitly states a user cannot ''"(refuse) administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki"''. Please show how the sentence ''"You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing"'' in '''any''' way shows good faith on your part and acceptable conduct on your part. If not (and I don't think you can) then you have now become the new version of Hagnat, claiming policy where none exists and then falling back "I can do it because I is sysops and teh guidelines say I can so I'm not listening to you". -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 03:42, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::No, you shut the fuck up because an Admin document that supports what I say. You honestly don't get it do you? You make me sick with your personal harrassment, and you really can't take a hint. So much for sucking my cock to have any chance of being a sysop, yes? And now it'll turn into a "Boxy and DDR are BOTH to immature to consider me for sysop" story now. I can't wait. Conversation closed a day ago, learn to read. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:02, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::::You see, that's the difference, I'm not telling you to stop talking. I'm asking you to provide the policy you claim existed in the beginning. You can't, and the guidelines do not back you up on this. You cannot claim that a condition put in to prevent harm to the wiki entitles you to engage in an edit war with a user you aren't getting along with. Own up, apologise to J3D for saying there was such a policy when they're isn't and then the conversation is over. How hard is it? I'm not sure where this idea about me going for sysop came from, but as you well know there are only three users I will accept a nomination from, and two are inactive. Don't believe me? Go nominate me right now like Anime did and watch how quickly it gets archived. However none of this changes the fact that you were claiming a policy that doesn't exist, you were using your status as a sysop to attempt to get your own way and that you are now running to what should be an emergency condition for when the wiki is subject to extreme disruption to garnish your error with some semblance of credibility. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 05:16, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::Wait, what? For all I know, it could exist in 50,000 policy documents and you could be bluffing for all I care, I never actually looked to verify the claim. You know why? It was a figure of speech, hence the bolding of '''Bad Faith''' to outline what he would have been banned for. Obviously you knew this because you aren't a moron but you are such a parasite in that way you behave that the thought wouldn't pass me by, that you pretend to think that I'm using my sysop status as a badge for anything, when rather it is more my status as an actual member of the community, whereas you are just a little piddling child who will struggle to find one logical fallacy in an argument he has nothing to do with, then bounce in, using it as the doomsday weapon of the decade. Say what you want after this, I won't be replying to your cesspit-creating nonsense. The page is fixed, you are not. I'm fulfilled. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:36, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::::So we have "<b>The policy on bad faith</b> where refusing administrative edits on your page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. <b>You can find the link yourself</b>, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) " where you state there is a policy and there is a link to be found, contrasted with "For all I know, <b>it could exist</b> in 50,000 policy documents and you could be bluffing for all I care, <b>I never actually looked to verify the claim</b>." where there isn't a policy and you didn't even look before demanding a user leave your preferred edit to his owned page. You can quibble about semantics and logical fallacies all you want. You lied. You lied to try and get your own way and won't even have the good grace and dignity to apologise to J3D for this. ''"that you pretend to think that I'm using my sysop status as a badge for anything"'' Erm, '''you''' were the one who just tried to claim that the Sysop Guidelines were applicable in making you right, you can't invoke them if you're being a normal user. Therefore you're either trying to use your status to get your own way (as evidenced by invoking the clause in the sysop guidelines) or you're trying to get your own way by inventing a new policy/quoting one that can in no way apply. Which is it?<br />
<br />
:::::::::::::::::::::I further note that you in no way continue to try and paint me as having promotion prospects since you do not appear to have put up a nomination. Another attempt to divert attention from what's happened here failing? I think so. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 05:54, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
I actually think you guys might have found the pettiest possible thing to threaten each other with A/VB over. Just take it to Arby's or something and be done with it because I don't think anybody really believes they're going to ''convince'' the other side of their argument. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:26, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Arbie's isn't needed in regards to the '''maintenence''' of the wiki, only over its content. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:34, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::It can quite literally be about whatever you want it to be about. That's the whole point. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 08:01, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Fair enough. But the point of this isn't to make a large amount of drama, which is why I'm making this simple: If he reverts it, I'll ask someone to just put it there themselves and hopefully he'll keep it up there, considering he's stated numerous times that he's only interested in keeping me off the page, not some random user who has similar intentions. If he reverts that, he can go to A/VB for all I care. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:08, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
/section, thanks to boxy. I no longer have any desire to pursue this at the current time. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:37, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Someone wanna bring me up to date on what the fuck has happened? In the meantime i'm rereverting charlies edit.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 17:01, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:oh wow boxy did, was that what his a/m case was for? If so epic,. i might go check now..brb--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 17:05, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Witch Hunt == <br />
I have been wiki absent for a couple of days due to other shit so I had a look through the archive to see what happened with boxys misconduct and I decided to read up on [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive/J3D/2009 this]. I really do feel for you dude, the way those who didn't want you in in the first place twisted and turned all of it just to get you demoted, when the original misconduct case was brought about 1 thing only.... You really did get the hard end of this stick and I am not posting this out of butthurt, I just hope others go back and have a look at some of the actions of the people in there and despite their opinion of you, maybe form some opinions on the poor form of some of the current admin team in this time.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:23, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Box is the only current admin that had any sort of authority in that anyway, so why rag on them? And it's weird, and it's hard for people who know Jed and Nick IRL to fathom (trust me), but it's actually a common ''truth'' that somehow Nick ''always'' did have access to Jed's account, so if you actually think about it from their point of view, it has its grounds, no matter how ridiculous it seems to you and me. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:26, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 10:41, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::get some original material bob, I hahaha'd you off the ballpark the other day when you pulled your cannons on DDR, you arent very useful hey....And DDR, no, it isnt about what access they had or WHY he got demoted, it is more about how the misconduct case was for one thing, and then escalated into a million other things that were completely irrelevant and basically the sysops opinion on whether Jed should be a Sop or not...not if he had committed misconduct with the act that Cyberfag brought to fruition. If people thought that Nick and Jed were sharing accounts or whatever, and no, I personally do not see a crime in sitting next to a sysop while he uses his account, then those people should have made a misconduct or demotions case with the appropriate information and proof at hand, rather than using an offbeat joke comment as an excuse to bring out the big guns and debate his worthyness. Regardless of if he was fit to be a sysop or not, when the case was brought forward for an off colour joke, and the sysops at hand decide they are going to bring forward unrelated things and then manipulate it into a vote for demotion, all over a joke that was laughed off by the first 3 sysops, then yeah, it is the definition of a witch hunt. Also you don't have to have been a sysop then to have been part of the Witch Hunt at hand, honestly. This wasn't even aimed at you it is just that Jed will check this now that they are in Thailand.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:01, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::the tl;dr is that, the case wasnt about what Jed got demoted for, so basically it was a witch hunt from box and others, because they didnt have the authority that the crats who bought him into the team did, this was the only way to get him out without going through the proper avenues, ie the people who were elected to be Crats--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:03, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::tbh I saw it as no different as anything they pinged mighty Grim for in ''that'' misconduct case, and as a Sysop I think there is nothing wrong with ''calling'' (a vote for) demotion over long-term issues despite the one case being completely different... I know it sounds harsh and abusive but that's just how I see it, if you can be called for promotion at any time based on long-standing good efforts then the opposite shouldn't be totally shunned just because it's 'unfair'. Whether it should have been used for J3D is irrelevant (though I'm not surprised given the circumstances around his pm bid) but yes. More power to the hungry ops. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 12:43, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::''"Box is the only current admin that had any sort of authority in that anyway, so why rag on them?"'' The. General. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 03:46, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Though you are correct, I mostly just mean the major players in the demotion, the 'instigators'. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:14, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:fair, at least something of worth comes out of you, which is more I can say for certain others--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
sexy you are the best poster on the whole wiki. serious. you own {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:47, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
i reckon we should demote the cunt {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:51, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I don't have to be a good poster, I'm not a System Operator--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::neither do i, maggot {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:14, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I don't really know where your superiority complex comes from in life, I guess you get online and it is a world away from irl amirite?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:46, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::whoa there with all the hemmin and the hawwin and the birdsong {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:52, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGq5FeUv3zk I found your youtube channel], you were sure it would be a secret hey? There are people who can help you bob. You are not alone out there, never alone. I wont help you though, you're too much of a fag for me to be associated with.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:02, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::OH MY GOD ''how did you find itttttttttt'' {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:03, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::i feel so exposed... nobody is safe from messr. Read's detectiv skillz {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:08, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::: *smug*--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
''I personally do not see a crime in sitting next to a sysop while he uses his account,'' This made me LOL because that is why Nubis was demoted. At least Nubis and I were never accused of abusing check user... --[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 16:24, 22 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Untrue. Not only was jed demoted for stuff relating to that ''anyway'', There was also evidence to support that you had permanent access to the nubis account from locations other than her/his own, something your initial claim entailed. Sheesh. You are actually a troll with all of these claims that you make, right? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 16:33, 22 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==those stupid groups that include people whom you know don't want to be a part of your shitty jokes==<br />
next time you make one of them you'll earn yourself an A/VB case {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:16, 17 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:well considering it's not vandalism, I am sure you will earn one for shitting up the admin pages. Take him to A/A over it, so he can't make any groups like that again or something, but don't try and be an internet tuff guy now.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 11:06, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::wrong! but thanks anyways {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:00, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Arbitration ==<br />
An interim [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool#Interim_Ruling Ruling] has been made.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 10:58, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:and so has my response.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:03, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
hey duder thad made his final ruling. I'd like to "claim" that I'm not a part of the hate club so remove me from the page. cheers {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:36, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:but you hate 2 Cool do you not? Anyway you shalt have compliance but i do think you belong there.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:10, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Racist Flame ==<br />
<br />
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, assuming you were ''making a good faith edit when you recently unloaded a slew of racial slurs''. Actually, typing that sentence demonstrates the absurdity of it. Particularly in the context of the [[The Southern Cross Club|the group page]], where you commented, [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:The_Southern_Cross_Club&diff=1582137&oldid=1582065 your flame] is in poor taste, to put it mildly. Do you agree?<br />
<br />
Rather than make a vandalism case out of it, I'd like to give you an opportunity to make a brief and sincere retraction alongside your original comment. Or at the very least, use this space to explain your reasoning behind making such an edit.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 02:20, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:he was pretty clearly being ironic, hope this helps. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 02:59, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Might as well add yourself. [[User:Giles Sednik/List of Wiki Puritans|Now.]] --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 03:02, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::lmao {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:08, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::well done good sir.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:03, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Its a talk page, i'm allowed to be racist and yeah, ask bob why i say things next time, he seems to know.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:03, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::If we ever get around to that TOS bullshit you might not be! bloop bloop bloop --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 07:23, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
[[User:Giles_Sednik/List_of_Wiki_Puritans#The_List|Done.]] And I love using "irony" as an excuse to vent all the crap you wish you could say in public. Yeh that was cutting edge humor there. But like you said, it's the internet and you're allowed to be a racist. *golf clap* --{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 11:37, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I don't think you quite get what irony is. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:09, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::[http://www.answers.com/topic/irony Yeh yeh yeh definition 1a]. I get it. But I don't buy it, particularly as an excuse. It has become all too commonplace for people say something indefensible and then claim irony as their defense. Example: ''"You're such a fucking (insert racial slur). Durr haha I was being ironic don't get upset."''<br />
::Also, while we're on the subject, irony is more that the dictionary definition, and there '''is''' a difference between sarcasm and irony. And there's a BIG difference between using irony to demonstrate the absurdity of an idea or argument, and the way cybertrolls use racial slurs without being able to articulate what they think they're being ironic about.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 13:08, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::you think you're super astute but you're really not. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:29, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Nu uh. YOU!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 14:18, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::fix'd--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 14:53, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::So wait was that edit vandalism or what? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::yeah. I'd delete SA's own post but you've just replied to it, so I'll leave it up to you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:10, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::fuck charlie you're getting too good at picking up on my plans....since you've foiled me i'll in turn leave it up to giles. 09:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC) {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::lol. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Lol'd@N3D ==<br />
<br />
Some of your finest work my friend ;)--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== awww ==<br />
<br />
You just missed a really funny A/M case, SA started trolling finis' talk page without knowing that it was protected. I especially loved it because it used to be what we all joked about getting ops for, so we could harass finis even after he A/PT'd his talk page. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 07:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah, it was pretty funny, especially when DDR was all "uh uh SA you're a dumbass and the page is protected" and shit. :D --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 13:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::And when I snuck my own snide asshole message in the edit summary so Finy could see it anyway :D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 14:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Yeah...Dick.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 16:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Ohi was watching from the depths. Just becausei'm not editing doesn't mean your every move isn't being monitored. So was it at a slap on the wrist or what? I think he deserved a good ol' spanking.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 16:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I have a second warning now. I can't do anything semi-bad for a bit D: --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 16:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Oh as if you were watching from the depths. I know you. If you watch, you ''have'' to comment. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 23:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::^--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 23:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::It was one night charlie! it didn't mean anything, stop acting like you understand me!! *storms out of the room sobbing* {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:18, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Why ==<br />
[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87_%D9%85%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AE%D8%AF%D9%85%D8%A9]...Why my profile? I don't even know you. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 05:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Why is this comment on Jed's talk? Also, I translated that heading, and it reads: "The Enemies of God". I'd assume he doesn't like you.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Oh, now I get it. That looked like a user page aty first. Strange.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I think its actually something different, can't remember. I think they meant something else when they made it. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Someone I know translated it, it says something about allah in all that stuff (I didnt pay attention) and then it says Enemies of God: Colonel Cunt. I was just curious who i killed so i can do it again :D --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 23:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::OH, I thought you guys were talking about the group name. They all have arab names and spam derka derka and shit, classic xD --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 23:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Oh that, yeah you killed me, just look for a sandmonkey and kill them, its probably me. although i'm inactive atm. how'd you find that page btw? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Probably searched his UD profile through the wiki I bet. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::What a self indulgent prick, lucky he's on the kill list! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::lol. Btw I just got back from work and while I was there I thought of [[Negronet]], and thought of you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Does that have any context aside from that its similar to necronet? Either way its still amusing...{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:10, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::I dont even remember where i found it to be honest...i might have hit random page, i was pretty bored a few days ago and it came up with one profile on that page so naturally i clicked that. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 03:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== OMFG DONT COMMENT ON MY TALK PAGE OMG WTF ==<br />
<br />
Ull maek me sew mahd!! Il have 2 delyt it u babbeh--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Unfortunately he gave me no other opportunity than to pursue justice via administration pages. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== awesome ==<br />
<br />
I found this in the Unused Templates bin:<br />
<br />
{{Template:NoJ3D}}<br />
<br />
Nice. I might actually start using it too, hilarious ;D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 11:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:was only unused because bob added me to his. He cant handle the Pwnage.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:36, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I never used that template; I have the code straight on my talk page. J3D made that a few minutes after I posted it. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::I caught a largemouth bass, a koi and a cyberbob today--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::J3D would love to be important enough to command his own "no j3d" template... pretty lame he's got to create it himself though :D <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:21 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:::::lol, [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Template:NoJ3D&action=history not awesome]... actually quite the opposite <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:23 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
::::::I think you are missing the classic "take the piss out of yourself, but make people slightly offput by your pretend arrogance" thing that Jed has been working on for a long, long time now.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:26, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::And always will be. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::lol, "classic"... :D <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 14:04 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
So anyways, new vote now, who votes [[Template:NoJ3D]] replace [[Template:Verdict]] on A/VB from now on? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 22:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I vote to merge the two.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 01:37, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I was gonna link from my sig and have a disclaimer stating that having that template isn't binding, but then the share mass of the job queue killed the net :( and yeah boxy i'm totally cool with thefact i made it myself :) plus all i really did was take the code from bobs page and cp it. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:10, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah. I had no qualms about you making it yourself, just find it a surprisingly fitting template for how I feel about you. Zing! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I'll keep that in mind next time i "post" you a letter :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not use admin pages to harass people on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 11:16, 19 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:what the fuck is this shit? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:07, 25 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== ban ==<br />
<br />
if u get banned again, you still have 5 hours 56 minutes of wrongly used ban time which I'm pretty sure you haven't used. [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_07#User:J3D_.282.29]]. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 02:37, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:that's dumb, you're dumb. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:10, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Remember how well the 'ban credit' idea worked out the last time? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 06:24, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Nup, cause I never saw it used properly in practice. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 06:59, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I will nevar be banned again! But yes i do have that in the bank. i tried to use it but its kinda hard when you're banned to inform s'ops that you have ban credit. Perhaps we need [[A/BC]] (might copyright that actually, groovy name) which even when banned you can still post on. Or just more up to the minute banners? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:17, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Ban Credit is such a rare case that it would not be worth it ''at all''. And Misanthropy the reason this is different from the rest is that he was banned legitimately but the vote was overruled later, the reason it wasn't applicable before was because when nubis and I both were misconducted for it, it was because we fucked up the data and banned them when they shouldn't have been at all. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 09:02, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
By the way, making a group soon with me, guy, a bunch of kids at MHS who are still into UD and maybe a few more guys from the [[ATO]], will be pretty casual, interested? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 09:02, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:yeah sure hit me up with the deets. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:22, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::No prob nig I'll fbook them too you and here too, once I make the group, should be a week at the most from here on, so basically at worst case scenario i can talk to you about it next weekend when you hit up procastle. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:13, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::lolcastle.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:14, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== bbk ==<br />
<br />
i found a mid-2007 version of the BBK page which had our full memberlist in all its glory, etc.<br />
<br />
what do you think of me reverting the BBK page and (most of) its info back to just when we initially broke up? imo it serves the group better to have the glorious version of the page up there instead. just some food for thought? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:36, 12 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:As opposed the penny heights version??? Hmmm i guess i cuold work with that. If the penny heights version was moved to a subpage. Link us the version you want. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:31, 12 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::[http://web.archive.org/web/20071013182832/wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Beatbox_kids]. The penny heights version was gay tbh -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:11, 12 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
btw lol @ us nigs meatpuppeting ahlg and cheese into crat. looking at old archives, i forgot all that shit, only remembered us getting SA in -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:23, 13 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:hahahah we did???? sweet!!! those are two that elected me to op i think..{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:39, 22 August 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:Amusing_Locations_in_Malton&diff=1757903
Talk:Amusing Locations in Malton
2010-08-12T07:33:37Z
<p>J3D: /* The Cummings Building */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{ArchiveNotice|ArchiveName=Archive}}<br />
<br />
<center>''All General Discussion should be moved there as well as rejected locations.''</center><br />
<br />
<br />
=<span style="color: limegreen">New Location Ideas</span>=<br />
''Please suggest a location under the "New Location Ideas" section along with square brackets, equals signs (to make a subtitle), and your signature in this format:''<br />
<br />
<nowiki>===[[your suggestion]]===</nowiki><br />
<br>The reason(s) you think your suggestion is worthy of being on the list.<nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki><br />
<br />
''The "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>" adds your signature and timestamp to the suggestion so we know who you are. Alternatively, you can click the [[Image:Button sig.png]] button.''<br />
<br />
''Vote either "Keep", "Kill", or "Undecided" in bold font (<nowiki>'''your vote'''</nowiki>) on the next available line under the suggestion and any previous votes. Remember to add your signature after your vote.''<br />
<br />
eg)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<nowiki>==[[Suggestion Road]]==<br />
Reasons--[[A random user]] 04:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)<br />
:'''Keep'''. I like it.--[[Another random user]] 04:28, 13 December 2007<br />
::'''Kill'''. I don't find it that funny.--[[Yet another random user]] 04:28, 13 December 2007<br />
:::'''Undecided'''. I just don't know!! Try and convince me to vote either way.--~~~~ (<---- that's your vote!)</nowiki><br />
<br />
''All suggestions are an automatic "keep" vote by the suggester, unless otherwise indicated by the suggester. A suggestion will remain under voting for at least seven days (depending on the balance of votes) and must have at least 2/3 majority "keep" votes for it to be inducted onto the list. If you come across a suggestion that has been up for seven days and has at least a two thirds majority of "keep" votes, please feel free to add it to the agreed upon category on the [[ALiM]] list. Thankyou.''<br />
<br />
----<br />
==Add new locations directly below this line==<br />
<br />
===[[The Cummings Building]]===<br />
<br />
For obvious reasons. --{{:User:Alexander Dawkins/Sig}} 15:27, 11 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:We have club cummings and cummings bank. Was teh verdict that we keep multiples or don't bother? i remember cheese brought it up, can't recall the concensus. i'm inclinded to '''auto add''' {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:33, 12 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Weary Building]]===<br />
Hahahaha, get it? The building is tired? oh fuck you guys. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:11, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:for a guy that complains about all the drivel on alim you sure suggest a lot of it. It's a '''keep''' for my admitedly low standards but i would have thought it'd be a '''WTF YOU GUIZ SUK ND RUINED ALIM IT COULD HAVE BEEN GOOD''' from you, oh dear. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:20, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::You guys killed ALiM a week into it's creation. I'll never forget suggesting Cuant Drive and having you guys reject it, then coming back a year later to find it there by your own request. I still haven't forgotten how heartbroken I felt. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:41, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Organ Arms]]===<br />
THIS IS THE FUCKING BEST WORDPLAY EVER --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:34, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:'''Vouch/Keep/Wait what?''' [[User:Technical Pacifist|Technical Pacifist]] 17:32, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Is this like piano fingers sort of thing? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:35, 15 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::No fucking idea, it just has organs and arms as a name. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:01, 15 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Cayme Drive]]===<br />
''You are at Cayme Drive. Somebody has spraypainted LOL I CAYME onto a wall.''<br />
<br />
All class...--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 12:29, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:'''yea boi''' --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:39, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::howevermanyyearsitsbeen on and theres still an abundance of undiscovered alim. this made me cayme :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD and yes charlie stfu the poor grammar was intentional. fuck off you niggardly cunt. PS my lecturer said niggardly the other week, classic lerlz!!!! ~!{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:27, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::lol i can't believe my lecturer said niggardly! shits fucking [[2C]] ya dig?? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:18, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Pudsey Park]]===<br />
It's named after a God damn giant yellow cripple bear. Sod dick jokes, ''that''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s comedy. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:51, 19 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:I had to google Pudsey to get it. Therefore, '''kill'''.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 12:29, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::'''no''' sorry i dont get it --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:40, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Spankling Building]]===<br />
Surprised this was never nominated? Cmon. You know what this building was made for!!! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:'''lol yeah'''--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 08:51, 11 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Sadley Way Fire Station]]===<br />
Sadley, ''waaay'' fire station...--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:01, 23 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:wtf is this bullshit ngger cunt crap? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:32, 26 April 2010 (BST)<br />
::AGAINT --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
===[[Cutmore Avenue]]===<br />
It's just so deliciously emo! --[[User:Wyndfyre|Wyndfyre]] 18:53, 4 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*Fuck yes! Vouch! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:34, 5 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*Agreed. It's too late at night to think of something for the page, but there's bound to be a good 'across the steet/along the road' joke to be made. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:49, 5 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Keep'''--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:01, 23 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Keep''' --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Oh shit, I was the first to vouch on it. damn, I'm too fast for mahself. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:55, 11 May 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Keep''' - i read it as cuntmore, got uber excited, then saw it was just cutmore. whatever. i'll ignore all of you and make its description about how it vaguely resembles cuntmore and THEN WE'LL SEE WHOS LAUGHING {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:31, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
*:FUCK i did it again!!!! Damn you past jed! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:21, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Chitty Hotel]]===<br />
--<span style="border: 3px black">[[User:Alcatraz311|<span style= "color: white; background-color: #527508">'''Alcatraz'''</span>]][[User:Alcatraz311|<span style="color: white; background-color: black">'''311''']]</span></span><sup>[[User_talk:Alcatraz311|<span style="color: black">'''T'''</span>]]|[[Army Control Corps|<span style="color: black">'''ACC'''</span>]]|[[Alliance 45|<span style="color: black">'''A45'''</span>]]</sup> 22:14, 15 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
*'''Autoadd'''--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:01, 23 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Shaft Grove]]===<br />
The page needs lolification. It currently focuses on some kind of commercial history rather than phallic innuendo.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:23, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:That's just sad.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:30, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:the history, not you thinking it should be phallic lol.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:30, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::I'll have you know a fine, upstanding member of the wiki wrote that. Like most of vinetown its a broad history of depression, and a thriving club scene. There's even a mention of a panda at one point. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:26, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I'll have you know i didn't actually read it, let alone look at the page :P Hey, it's the alim crowd, what'd you expect? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:40, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Don't bow down to superior contributors, that's not the alim way! --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:13, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::You don't even know what the alim way is anymore man. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:31, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I never knew the fucking alim way, i was never part of your stupid clique. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:32, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::...denial. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:43, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::You try to suck me in so I can like, ban cunts for you and, like, make u not get vandal warning but i'm just too responsible. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:54, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You don't honestly think that's true, do you?--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 22:22, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Of course he's kdding, even ddr knows he's not responsible ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:03, 6 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::put Eastwood Museum on ALiM already or i'll use sysop as badge and threaten ban u. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 14:14, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::It's in the queue. I'll put these on soon. Chill nigger. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:17, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::full of suspense!!!!!!! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 14:32, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Mallrats added some slightly wrong flavour that I think works well. Well done mallrat. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:06, 18 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:Haha just read it. Very [[The Mycock Building|mycock building]] - love it.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 08:46, 19 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::'''SHAFT!!!''' --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 09:28, 19 August 2009 (BST) PS... shaft means to con to give someone the shotr end of the stick (a common complain from j3d's girlfriends)... it's also a famous blacksploitation flick. that's much more lolzy than a retarded penis reference --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 09:29, 19 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I love myself a shaft, will vote '''Keep''' but why the fuck is nobody else voting--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:08, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Gillycuddy Boulevard]]===<br />
wtf?--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:43, 31 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:'''lulz'''.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:13, 31 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::What the fuck? I'd '''vouch''' this. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:22, 31 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::'''kill''' sessanach! --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 09:25, 19 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Funny name but '''kill tbh''' over it--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:09, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:I'm changing vote to '''kill''' so i dont have to add 2 more locations.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:46, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:EH i just dont know if this is that brillers...any more thoughtAs{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:50, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
=<span style="color: red">Locations Under Review</span>=<br />
''All suggestions are an automatic "kill" vote by the suggester, unless otherwise indicated by the suggester. A suggestion will remain under voting for at least fourteen days (depending on the balance of votes) and must have at least 2/3 majority "kill" votes for it to be removed from the list. If you come across a suggestion that has been down for fourteen days and has at least a two thirds majority of "kill" votes, please feel free to remove it from the [[ALiM]] list and remove the ALiM template from its page. Thankyou.''<br />
<br />
''I guess no one wants anything removed from ALiM at the moment :)''<br />
<br />
=<span style="color: orange">Category Changes</span>=<br />
''The following are nominated for a change in their category, not for their merit on the list itself. Entries must include the location in question and the suggested category to which it would be moved. Please vote either '''Keep''' in current category or '''Move''' to category suggested.''<br />
<br />
=General Discussion=<br />
<br />
I'm trying to get the [[Great Profiles]] page to stop being horrible, so I've called a vote, and I thought y'all might want to have a say in it, as the foremost humor authorities on the wiki. -{{User:Ornithopter/sig}} 20:19, 3 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:lol, i tried that about maybe 18 months ago....not enough people care about the page for it to work. And most of the people who added them probably don't still pay attention to it, hence my advice to you would be go through and delete all the ones you ''know'' are shit, and chuck the ones you think could be funny on the talk (or just delete them too). Since anyone can make one i think they need to be pretty spesh to be great profiles. So yeah, fuck the community and get shoveling through that shitty page! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Well, I guess this page proves that since there's already a Fücking, Austria . . . there's no problem with a little Fücking Tower. :D <br />
[[User:Douglas Summers|Douglas Summers]] 06:50, 2 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah i breifly wanted to make a real world alim's, but theres too damned many! Its still oneofmy dreams to visit them all and make a lonely planet style travel guide about them, but more lulzy and less lame.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:47, 25 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
You still around, man?--[[User:Sandsun|Sandsun]] 02:06, 10 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:sandsun! whats happening!? short answer is no - but i come on here every few weeks to have a look. I'm not really playing the game at the moment but i might get back into it with a groupless character, maybe azombie... what about you? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:00, 10 April 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:J3D&diff=1757902
User talk:J3D
2010-08-12T07:31:02Z
<p>J3D: /* bbk */</p>
<hr />
<div>='''READ ME!'''=<br />
*Post at the bottom (press the little + button at the top of the page) unless continuing a previous conversation.<br />
*Three words: '''Sign your posts!'''<br />
*Looking for something that was here before the 20<sup>th</sup> of March 2008? Try [[User_talk:J3D/Archive|here]]. What about between the 21<sup>st</sup> of March and the 18<sup>th</sup> of August 2008? Because that would be [[User_talk:J3D/Archive2|here]]! Or perhaps what you need is from the period between the 19<sup>th</sup> of August and the 19<sup>th</sup> of December? Coz that shiznat can be grabbed just over [[User talk:J3D/Archive3|here]], ya dig?<br />
<br />
== Lulz ==<br />
<br />
ic wat u did thar. --{{User:WOOT/sig}} 19:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:whar? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:48, 20 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
::HAR! DURR!--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 04:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not impersonate other users, especially on admin pages on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 06:18 21 December 2008 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
== Hollomstown ==<br />
<br />
Rid of merged pages. :)--[[User:Lithedarkangel|Lithedarkangel]] 23:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:noice! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Missed one ==<br />
<br />
[[Candy Avenue]]. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 02:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:Missed what?--<span>[[User:Lithedarkangel|<span style="color: Red ">Li</span>]][[User_Talk:Lithedarkangel|<span style="color: Black">thedark</span>]][[Location Nuts|<span style="color: Black">angel</span>]][[User:Lithedarkangel/Works|<span style="color: Red"><small>Meth!</small></span>]]</span> 03:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
== You are creating History ==<br />
<br />
Grim made a coupe, tried to take over the wiki.<br />
<br />
You lol'd at an account creation you knew nothing of.<br />
<br />
Surely if they go through with this, you can make some sort of flashy template stating how you were the first person to have this happen?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Oh, oh, me me! Lemme make it!--[[User:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>]] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== lol. ==<br />
<br />
<span class="plainlinks">[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct&curid=2730&diff=1359677&oldid=1359674 lol.]</span> {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 01:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:evidently i can be more wrong ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Yus, I gnoh Bub and Kevan, I'm interesting in their profiles and activity, location might come later. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 04:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Irony?==<br />
hahaha oh wow you're delusional. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:you just noticed? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Yeah? ==<br />
<br />
[[User_talk:Iscariot#Run_for_sysop|Nominate?]]<br />
--{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 00:46, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I'm up for it if you and SA are.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::do eeet --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 00:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Nao. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 01:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I'm waiting for SA to say something since his name was mentioned. Now kindly [[GTFO]] ma talk page.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::That goes for all of you. Or none of you. I mean it is a free wiki...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:06, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
hai. i here u liek mudkipz --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Mudkipz suck. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 01:10, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Where's axehack?? I want him back :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Axehack is no more... --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 01:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::He was briefly more on the 6th of jan..why is this happening? I, for one, blame the current sysop team ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::: I blame the previous sysop team. Grim s, to be more precise. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
Iscariot...Whoooooo....Now THAT would be one hell of a promotions bid. I'd honestly say give it a while for everything that's around him to die down some, but it might not happen anyway. Its up to you guys on what happens. Just saying it might be more prudent to wait a bit.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:yeah agree, it's a bit chaotic atm. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I'll be ready to do it when you guys are ready... I think it will be interesting to see what reasons people give for voting against, and how many people outside the sysop team are opposed to it. I personally think Iscariot would be a very good sysop. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 01:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::of course! It's not just a show for a shows sake. I wouldn't nominate someone i didn't genuinely want as sysop. Still i think it's best if we wait til the wiki is a bit quieter. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::His actions in the few places where they've given him power over users say much to the contrary. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 05:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I can haz links? Or examples? --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 21:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I doubt he'd accept the nomination... I mean, if he were a sysop, he couldn't post to his own Talk page LOL. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 05:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::LOL he'd be what he must have always hated!!! xD [[User:Liberty|Liberty]] 05:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Iscariot doesn't hate Sysops altogether, he just hates the way the current sysops teams acts and handles things. He's pointed that out occasionally.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 11:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::No, he hates that we don't dance to his tune. Also read [[Recruitment/Archive2]] for a bit Pestolence, then check the [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Kristi_of_the_Dead_vs_Recruitment|arbitration case that relates to it.]](talk page too), there's also a few little snipes because of [[:Category_talk:Recruitment#Category:Recruitment_Rules_Discussion|this]] he's been making about me throughout the wiki claiming that I'm going against the consensus of the community or twisting recruitment to my own ends. He's a paranoid delusional, we're all out to get him and opposing him is the same as opposing the community in his eyes. You can see some of that [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_01#User:Iscariot|here]]. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 01:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::According to [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Kevan&curid=1072&diff=1363855&oldid=1363854&rcid=1393374 this bit] on Kevan's page, the "community" he is referring to are the folk who aren't actually on the wiki. =/ Convenient eh? -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 01:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::It's funny cause I know that community, I know more people in it than him and the reason is actually the kinda things he's doing and the related drama/rules abuse. I know people in that same community that have expressed problems with his behavior here after seeing it for themselves even. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]], self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All</span> 02:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::So basically he's got the wrong end of the stick completely and is now making an even bigger arse of himself because of it? =/ Clever. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 02:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::I think thats a bit harsh, yes Iscariot is an arse and out to cause trouble for troubles sake but his attacks are not without valid points. The current Admin team does do a (mostly) good job but the assumption by some that they are above community review and that those that disagree with them are trouble making malcontents is far from the truth. Despite the claims to the contrary "Sysopship" no longer suggests a mere janitorial role, rather it designates some users as being in positions of judgment over other users. Until the sysop position recognizes a difference between users that the community trusts to do routine maintenance etc... and to hold a position of authority and judgment over others then drama will always ensue. As is, the sysop role really does seem to be turning into an exclusive club type thing, true or not that is not an image that is good for the position or the community at large!--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::1)You're preaching to the choir. Who do you think started the debate over the claims to being just janitors? 2) The system was set up originally to ''not'' have community review for a reason. That reason is still somewhat valid and more reasons connecting to that one have caused the failure of every proposition for regular review. 3) Iscariot only has points when he accidentally stumbles upon then in the midst of his attempts to make everyone fall in line, I used to think it was intentional but his behavior has long since made it clear to me that he doesn't actually believe the "points" he has except for as a means to an end. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 02:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::::The last thing that made the third one ridiculously clear to me was the RRF move drama.--<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 02:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::::::1) not really aware of who started it... just know its been grumbling on for ever and a day. 2) community review has many things in its favour foremost of which is that it confirms that the sysops are "trusted" by the current userbase, its also very open to abuse by all and sundry and '''yes''' it would also make it hard for sysops to do the contentious stuff that makes them unpopular but still needs doing! 3)Just because the valid points he hits upon are not the ones he is aiming at doesn't make them any less valid, it does however make him look stupid and petty.--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 08:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::::Actually spirit of the rule is as important as the law. The reason it's being enforced more so. You don't give native americans repirations for slavery because they were both referred to with the same term back in the day. For #2 please read the comment on my talk page to pestolence, I don't think we should be starting another massive discussion on J3D's talk page without him being a part of it. --[[User:Karek|Judge&nbsp;Karke]],&nbsp;self-proclaimed&nbsp;Decider&nbsp;of&nbsp;Everything&nbsp;and&nbsp;Ruler&nbsp;of&nbsp;All 10:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::Wow i didn't expect all this upon my return. Now to catch up on whats happened elsewhere....--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::Yup. INMNSHO that's why he's so worried about constant proper English. If he ever used slang or slipped up, the holes in his ideas would be clear as day. He creates a false air of authority and correctives.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 02:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Can I get some input?==<br />
I've been working on a policy that I believe is sorely needed [[User:Pestolence/001|here]], and I'd appreciate your input on it. How can it be improved, and is it even needed right now? A potential problem is what to do about current sysops: put them all up for review now (leading to a massive backlog of admin page drama), postpone the review until six months from now (simply staving off the inevitable drama till later), or something else glaringly obvious that I've overlooked? See you around. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 02:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Never mind, thanks. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 16:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:<nowiki>:</nowiki>( I feel unwanted...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Aw. =( We still love you Jed! -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::pwomise? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Uh huh. =) Without you the wiki would asplode. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::i suspected as much, now back to work. There be vandalism cases to rule on ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Meh. S'pose. I could take a couple of minutes out of my busy revision schedule to take a mosey on over for a look. =p -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 01:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::OMGMISCONBULATIONCHEESEISLAZYIMASOGONNATELLISCARIOT --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
kidding.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:you little... heh --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::did i getcha? huh? well? did i?? did i?? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== star wars ==<br />
<br />
its not that i liek it, but its public knoweledge... like the brother grimm tales in 19th century. Anyway, why dont you liek star wars ? --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 00:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:hint:begins with f, ends with inis. But i didn't particularly like it before that anyway.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::what does [http://files.usgwarchives.net/tx/floyd/vitals/births/1937/floyb37.txt f floyd inis] has to do with star wars ? --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup><br />
:::what the [[2 Cool]] is that?? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
fpenis?--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span></small> 03:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:[[User:DanceDanceRevolution/Fenis|fpenis.]]--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== RE: Classic lulz ==<br />
<br />
Truer words never were spoken - unless someone once said cyberbob was a cunt, then that would be truer. Lol, truer is a weird-looking word.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Cyberbob is a cunt--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Did you guys like the presents i left you? The wiki has been awesome lately, reminds me of the grim days. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
DOHOHOHO --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:merry january! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== I need your advice ==<br />
<br />
Hello. It's me again. I need your advice on something. Neice has not edited the Dead Dudes page again. However, he has now posted some extremely anti-DD propaganda on [[The Sidney Arms]] page. Please have a look and tell me what you think. In my opinion (which i have stated to Neice),such statements have no place on a location page. he should put them on his own group's page. It is becoming tiresome to myself and our group, as he is nothing more than a griefer in-game and apparently feels compelled to bring it into the wiki. Anyways, have a look and let me know. Thanks again for any help you can give. --[[User:Wast0id|Wast0id]] 19:59, 20 January (CST)<br />
:''The Arms is still under attack from the wonderful group Malton Maulers. We have continued to battle for the area and will now go all out for it and have broken into the Arms daily''. Is that what you find so offensive Wastoid? {{User:Liberty/Sign}} 07:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I think [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=The_Sidney_Arms&diff=1368228&oldid=1367540 this] is his problem. I removed it before I actually saw this because it was POV on a neutral page. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 20:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::--Yes, thank you Pestolence, that was exactly my problem. And I expect more of the same from this user in the future and was hoping someone in authotity would set him straight. As I said previously, I simply wish he would keep his in-game grudge in the game, or at least on his own group page. --[[User:Wast0id|Wast0id]] 18:44, 21 January 2009 (CST)<br />
::::If he continues to slander your group, contact him on his talk page and ask him to stop, and if he continues (or if you've already asked him to stop and he's ignored you), take him to [[A/A|arbitration]]. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 02:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Uranium ==<br />
<br />
BOMBS--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 02:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Read's ban ==<br />
<br />
Time for an open discussion regarding the ''"it is expected that a system operator be prepared to reverse a warning/ban should the community desire it"'' section of [[UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines|this policy]] do you think? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 09:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:What makes you think the community does desire it? The only people contesting it at all number like 4. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::That would be why we'd have an ''Open'' Discussion. I'm pretty sure I can find some people that would support it. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 13:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::That depends on how low on the IQ range you'e prepared to go. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Well I would vote to keep the ban which means you will have Bobs support as he can't ever be seen to side with me these days. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 13:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::You keep bringing me into your comments honest, do you have a crush or something? If so take it elsewhere... I hear there are corners of the internet dedicated to that sort of thing. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 14:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::touché... but i already removed that comment as i felt it a little unfair.--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 14:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::xbox live or myspace? ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Is anyone else amused by the fact that he doesn't know that he can't unban people through meatpuppeting a vote? It's been tried before and over-ruled by the appropriate party. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 08:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:then whys it in the policy?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Because we don't update policies every time Kevan steps in and says differently. There needs to be some legitimacy to giving the user a second chance for such a thing to actually be done, and then only in the more extreme cases is it even likely. Cases like Amazing or Izumi, not any case Iscariot seems to think this is valid for(as I'm sure you know well which those will obviously be). And I'm sure we all know by this point Iscariot is just doing this now to try and cause drama so he can scream about how biased the sysops are regardless of whether he is correct in the slightest, he's not trying to get Read's ban revoked or even claiming what happened to him was unfair, those are irrelevant to his point. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 02:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Does anyone notice that it's fine when Karek likes a mass of support, but meatpuppeting when it's something he doesn't? Odd that... -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 20:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Signature ==<br />
<br />
I'm not after drama, but I'm asking if you'd change your signature back to J3D, please. Thanks. {{User:Extropymine/sig}} 09:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:hows that for compromise? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::[http://www.milkandcookies.com/link/58827/detail/ You used the N word?] :| --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 14:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Y helo thar ==<br />
<br />
There's an important thingy over here --> [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Semi-protection|this bit]], that you should have a look at. We're at 14 votes but we need 20 for a proper majority. Your time and energy will be rewarded with cookies and mudkips (if u liek dat sort of ting) =) -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 21:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==:)==<br />
Can you please refrain from vouching a single candidate MULTIPLE times? Please? :/ --<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Suicidal Angel,</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 00:00, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:If you can refrain from showing nothing but blatent disregard for the rules of this talkpage ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Oh... ==<br />
<br />
You're still around. When are you gonna give up on this shit and go back to Nationstates? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 11:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:fuck nationstates.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::booyah!--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Hi, i'm not sure if i'm replying to you right, i answered your question on my page but i'm still learning here. I am everything zombie, i opened that account/page by mistake under the wrong name. I wanted one for Drunkmonkey, which i opened and have been working on today. Feel free to delete the everything zombie page and account as i won't be using it thank you.<br />
Derek<br />
(http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:Drunkmonkey)<br />
<br />
==ALiM template==<br />
<br />
Are you happy with it? Cause if I fix it from overlapping the text, I have to use the flagbox template which doesn't make it look as good. the LUL isn't as big, which really detracts from the.. LUL, you know? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 07:45, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:I like it how it is(and i luuuurve the colour scheme) i can deal if the lul gets smaller tho. stuff happens.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:54, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
::I'll leave it then, I think the original is the best, {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:26, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Vandal Banning==<br />
<br />
I almost laughed a vital organ off. LulZ'LoLz--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 15:27, 6 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== [[User:DanceDanceRevolution/status/game]] ==<br />
<br />
Just for you. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 13:49, 8 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Plus, if you don't vouch the Eastwood Museum, I won't vouch ALiM for good article status. Tit for tat. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 12:23, 11 May 2009 (BST)<br />
:It just makes me think of the suburb of Eastwood, which fyi is a dump. But you sure do know how to treat a girl, so you're on.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:32, 12 May 2009 (BST)<br />
::Yeah, Eve told me she hated Eastwood. She calls it Eastwoo for some reason. Is that a Sydney thing? Btw, come for a sysop party soon? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:31, 30 May 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Nah i just call it eastwood...and yeah i've got a 3 day block off later in june so we can get fucked up alim style.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:18, 31 May 2009 (BST)<br />
::::I dig.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:39, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Come watch a buce match, too. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 05:04, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Hurry up and put Eastwood on ALiM!!! Before you get banned! ;D {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 16:25, 8 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:Theres not some underground movement to have me permaed brewing is there?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:01, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not shout offensive names on admin pages on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 02:52 8 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />And again <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 03:28 9 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:Gimme another stop hand. lazy cunt.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:57, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::u relly need 2 do smethin about dat temper --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 10:00, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::maybz l8a.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:02, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Oh i forgot the bit where i'm only making these edits to get up to 500 in the next 2 months.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:04, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::hmmm thanks for giving me an idea for a policy proposal --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 10:35, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I r supa srs now. Good luck on getting that upper-middle management job, bob.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 17:30, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I can't actually take credit for it, i got it off Conn (see SA's talk), good luck with a coherent policy on the issue though...in the end who gives a fuck? Most people will either make the 250 in a month or just not get another warning anytime soon anyway, or get more bans til they leave the wiki, for the remaining about 2 people, just let them be.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:06, 13 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I wouldn't worry about it so much - I'm in the middle of midyears at the moment and can't be bothered. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 06:16, 13 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::Here, have 2 [[Image:6vmixh1b9.gif]] <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 10:51 10 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
==lol==<br />
qq bitch --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:21, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:see if you can beat 3 months.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:23, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::I already did - I was a sysop from May 2006 through to May 2007. suck it --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:27, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Was your demotion scandalous and awesome though?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:30, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::nah - I got tricked into putting myself up for review and at that point promotion bids pretty much were votes. people are whiny babies so I got da boot --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:35, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I see. Votes better than 2 randoms just decide. The whole process is largely pointless...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:37, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::May I introduce you to the principles of representative democracy? {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:39, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I'm from NSW, i'm familiar with it and i hate it.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:44, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::That's why there aren't only two candidates for crat elections, like there are in elections in our state (I'm from NSW too.) Also:<br />
::::::::"Democracy is the worst form of government. It's simply better then all the others that have been tried" - Winston Churchill. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:46, 21 June 2009 (BST) <br />
:::::::::That misquote is contradictory... :P It's "''democracy is the worst form of government '''except''' all the others that have been tried''" <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:59 21 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
::::::::you might want to take some time to learn about politics before thinking you know enough to have a valid opinion about it hth --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:51, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You should be less lame.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:54, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::yes. I should be less lame than getting drunk while online instead of partying with my friends as well as getting online while being hungover rather than being hungover at a mate's place where I've crashed after a night out<br />i'm definitely lamer than that right now; i should lift my game --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:00, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::lol --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 22:00, 21 June 2009 (BST) <br />
::::::vote is infinitely worse than 2 randoms because then meatpuppetry enters into the equation and people are still pretty whiny babies who don't know how to make userpages let alone know who should and should not be a sysop --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:41, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Time to Vote!==<br />
I found a building I thought would be a good addition to the [[ELiM]] list. Go to [[Talk:Amusing_Locations_in_Malton/Edible_Locations_in_Malton#The_Gumm_Building_.2842.2C_40.29|the ELiM talk page]] to vote on whether The Gumm Building should be added. --{{User:Blake Firedancer/sig}} 13:00, 30 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== nicks drunk promotion bid ==<br />
<br />
is there really no way to read it? i wanna read it so bad. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 09:53, 1 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:It's a shame it wasn't archived properly. It should've been put under Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies or something. It just got deleted and I think someone got a/vbed. P.S. Just checked and it was me.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:55, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::Good thing you checked, I thought it was someone else. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 05:50, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Zing. But it was at Curley's house so I was expecting to see his account appear somewhere.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:30, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::ooohk. everything was done at Curleys house amirite? ;) {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 06:34, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::most things. except blowjobs, obviously.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:47, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I was just on #batshit relaying the story of how we went to that tech store in jesmond and used a display iphone to buy brain rot for table. good times. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 06:51, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::lol. <small>just wanted to get in on this convo</small><br />
:::::::oh and bj's can happen at curleys house, if i'm not mistaken 2 of the womens live there.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:16, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::getting beejays from internets<br />the height of desperateness? i would say yes --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:22, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Wut? curleys house is a real place bob....--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:25, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::nooooo relllyyy??? my question to you is would you know about curleys house without internet --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:28, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::yes. i knew about it since before broadband was invented...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:30, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::well i knew about it since before even the whole internet was invented........ --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:39, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::dayem.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:29, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::yeh it was like infinity years ago so you probly wouldnt know what that was like --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 00:35, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::Good recovery.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:08, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::hello? hello? i cant hear you speak directly into the receiver --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:17, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::No I want the last word!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:24, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
<s>[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not post on the A/VB main page when you are uninvolved in the case on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]]<sup>[[Template_talk:VandalBanningNotice|POST HERE]]</sup> 11:09, 15 July 2009 (BST)</s><br />
<br />
This verdict has been overruled and the warning stuck. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:26, 17 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Ban==<br />
<s>You have been banned from editing this wiki for 24 hours for vandalism. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 15:28, 16 July 2009 (BST)</s><br />
<br />
This ruling has been overruled and the ban overturned. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:27, 17 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==ban?==<br />
well it looks like they at least saw sense on your case... i suspect my ban will stand but what the hey... its not like i didn't expect it :) --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 01:52, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
DDR was going to post "'''Phew J3D, lucky Honest saved you from that one. Shame he had to be banned because of it. ''' but thought better of it because i clearly was not banned. Why? well that would be because in so many years of valid contribution to the wiki i have only ever faced 3 A/VB cases all but this one thrown out. Hmm guess that makes me the newest wikimartyr... --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:33, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Lol! You fuckiing moron! Did you even read your ''own'' comment that I replied to? '''YOU''' called it a ban, hence why I had ''ban'' in ''italics'', something you must have overlooked.<br />
:I gave up on arguing because you never give up, you fight to the death with the same fucked up, stupid points. I thought you'd bow down after Nubis didn't come to save you, but hey, looks like your desperation in saving your skin can surprise everyone. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<span style="color:black"><u><big>ϑϑℜ</big></u></span>]] 03:19, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::el oh el pwnt?--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 03:23, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::One would think so. He wouldn't admit it. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<span style="color:black"><u><big>ϑϑℜ</big></u></span>]] 03:45, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== yo ==<br />
<br />
Please don't submit [[:Image:2cola.jpg]] for SD. I want to use it as an example when I put 0x0 images up for scheduled deletions. What did you upload to make it come up as 0x0? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:54, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Ah i'm half asleep and i forgot how to make a bmp a jpg so i just changed the file name which turns out doesn't work :P So maybe you get a 0x0 if you try uploading any bmp? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:55, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::Yeah, thanks. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't a problem on my end before submitting it as a scheduled. ty. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:58, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::np.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:02, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
[[:Image:2cola.jpg]] - FTFY {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 18:02, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Heh, thanks but i already made [[:Image:2cola.JPG]] and if you read the above DDR wanted that kept as an example or something...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:55, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::I reverted it. Hope you don't mind. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 03:04, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Nvm. I didn't know you cited the fix in your scheduling vote so I put it back. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 03:06, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
hay ur not an stysops. u r an x sysops. quit lyin yo--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 04:04, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:i had teh exact same templat on 4 da hole tiem i wasnt an sysops. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 04:09, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::thats cause you never edit yyour page so it doesn't show up on the recent changes. faeget.--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 04:23, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Guys, guys. I'm sorry but the spelling and grammar here is just atrocious. Please clean up your act.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:51, 2 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::nou--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> High Overlord and Lead Conspirator of the Administrative Rebellion.</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Want</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">help?</span>]] 16:33, 2 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== <s>birth</s>fagday ==<br />
<br />
is it alim's 2nd yet? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 10:41, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:first, what's a birthfagday? and second, no - it's on the 2nd of october.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 11:51, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::as an overrated singersongwriter once said, "The times they are'a changin'"--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:50, 7 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::how are they changing? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:57, 7 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Well considering the Earth is in a constant state of evolution and change, it is impossible for that quote to be ever inaccurate.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 02:21, 8 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not impersonate sysops on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 01:18, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:You really need to stop telling me it's my last warning. It sounds so, ''final''...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:04, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::It's the [[Template:warning2|template's]] fault. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 02:53, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== YOU ==<br />
<br />
ARE GOD--[[User:Shakey60|Shakey]] <sup>[[Beatbox_Kids|BBK]] </sup> 12:46, 16 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:i know right --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:16, 26 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Sysops==<br />
I thought you were a sysops nigger? And you and cyberbob were best butt buddies?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 10:35, 23 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:I was, until early january :\ --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:45, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::Wat happen--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 00:49, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Conspiracy. Nubis organised my sacking during the new year period when i wasn't checking the wikiz :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:51, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::What? Nubis got you demoted? Har har. Specifically for what?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 01:01, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Drunk wiki editing. Not towing the party line. Usual reasons ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:03, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::HAH. So what happen with you and cyberbob?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 01:43, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I hate lemons. Jed's just a wee bit too bitter. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:41, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I didn't know there was ever anything between us? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:37, 26 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==The Sysop template==<br />
So I hear you still have it on there. Please take it down as per the warning you were issued or I will do it for you. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 09:18, 28 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== omfg ==<br />
So happy bob permabanned this "buzz killington" thinking it was one of you two, or one of the bbk. I can feel a massive misconduct coming on if anyone decides to take it further.<br />
What I am saying is, please take it further.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:53, 29 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:fucking lol hey.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:02, 29 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Ciggies==<br />
Good god man, make the link to your user page findable, ffs <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 11:48 2 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:He's had it like that for a week or so. And this signature ''should'' only be up for 24 hours, right? ;) --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 12:09, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::Well the ALaMe one was at least preceded by some non-link stuff, but was bad enough... this is another level again. He just keeps pushing on the boundary until someone can be bothered to react <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:28 2 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:::Fair enough- he's the one who will be VB'd so I don't really care. I just think for a day-long fag celebration, just let him have his giggles. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 12:30, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::I put my cursor on the main part, and it underlined all but the exclamation mark, so then i clicked on the exclamation mark, and it bought me here!!--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Also, your name is coxy--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::<nowiki>*</nowiki>you're ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:41, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::TAKING YOU TO A/A FOR WINKING OMG--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:46, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::USING CAPS TO HILARIOUSLY RIDICULE BY LAMPOONING A PERCEIVED "ANGER" WHILE TOTALLY GETTING ALL PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE UP IN THIS SHIT BY MEANS OF HUMOUROUSLY EXAGGERATING AN ENEMY'S POST AT THE SAME TIME {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You are WAY to easy these days--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:17, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::last word {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::nah uh--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::u mad?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::You are WAY to easy these days {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:19, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Learn to spell, both of you. any more posts in this thread will be deleted and i might take you to a/vb. unless its not bob or read.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:21, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! that is all.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 14:31, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::I'm special, <small>special</small>, so special, <small>special</small>. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 14:35, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
== You ==<br />
Are that fucking inconsistent on FB and IRC and any chat medium. I cannot work out your patterns m'lday--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:01, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:I'm on from 1pm til 6pm. And i'll sign into msn now just for you. But don't fucking facebook chat me coz my compy can't handle it :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:04, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Nam nam, bra!nz!!! ==<br />
<br />
You tasted good. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 01:46, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== You have all been rolled ==<br />
<br />
You are all my muppets! I am your muppetmaster. '''JIM HENSON IS ALIVE!!!''' <br />
<br />
As of December 24, 2012 I shall control all the accounts of 2 Cool. ALiM is/will be MINE! --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 06:13, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arbitration==<br />
Has started. Please proceed [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool here] --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:35, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Uhh, thanks I guess. By the way, shouldn't it be "nicknames given by 2 Cool", instead of "given to 2 Cool"?--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:01, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::No because you gave them to us, they aren't given by us.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:06, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Oh sorry, I get it, misunderstood for a sec.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:18, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Category:Group Subpages ==<br />
<br />
Revert it again and I'll put up an A/VB case against you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Silver}}-- 08:00, 9 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Link me plox to the policy where it says i have to allow you to categorise my group subpages, then compliance you shall receive.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:03, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::The policy on '''bad faith''' where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::You have every obligation to present evidence for your assertion. I provide the following [[UDWiki:Specific_Case_Editing_Guidelines|link]], which ensures that a group may control the content of their page excepting a NPOV lead-in paragraph. A category, by definition, is not part of a prose paragraph and is therefore not covered by this exemption. I await this 'policy' on 'refusing administrative edits', the wording of which is straying close to using the administration status as a badge of authority. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:02, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::And while you're there, you might want to run an IP check on [[User:Insane1]], voting on one suggestion and not the other up for voting during a first edit seems suspicious to me. It won't be enough to sway the vote but is probably worth checking out. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:05, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::It wasn't his first edit at all. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:10, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I seem to have omitted the "in the suggestions system" portion of that sentence. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:20, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Hardly. Anyone can do administrative edits. I only have the obligation to present evidence if I take him to A/VB. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:08, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Indeed, anyone can, but editing here repeatedly quoting some policy you don't present for review and then expecting a user who has clear ownership of the page (as I ''have'' presented) seems inconsistent to a good faith approach. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:20, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Read the policy document, it is as consistent in defending J3D as it would save any bad faith action a user makes in his own space; ''Groups, for the most part, have sole property of their Group page on the wiki'' is an example, nothing in the policy is black and white, it allows for exceptions to the ownership clause, and I assume none of what is in that policy will defend J3D against the blanket ruling of "bad faith". J3D has also specified that he only gives a shit about ''me'' adding the category (something I do daily to every page on the wiki) onto the subpage, and you expect people to believe ''I'm'' acting in bad faith? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:34, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::Given the fact that you admit there's bad faith between the two of you, the good faith response would be to leave it alone and not incite drama as you are doing by threatening vandalism rulings. Why don't you see if someone else will apply it? And answer me this, what does the wiki lose, or in what way is it harmed by this lack of category? It may appease your sense of CDO, but does nothing to assist the wiki in general or even help important pages, you know, like A/VD which you seem perfectly happy to leave in a false manner. Your comment on 'doing it everyday' I hope is incorrect as well given that's not the category that should be going on there either. And you've still yet to produce this 'policy' you harp on about. I've provided mine and am quite happy that the statement that groups may control the content of the page sufficient to cover this, or we'd be having massive drama wars on this when the Malton Marshalls were added to Category:PKer Groups. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 08:16, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::1. I never once said there was any bad faith on my end. 2. Look below. I already did suggest someone else do it, but at the moment he hasn't even reverted it. 3. Get your head out of your arse and stop pressing fallacies like I "need" a "policy" that says we can warn users for bad faith, you parasitical moron. 4. Specialpages like the one involved in this is specifically called a "maintenance page" by Mediawiki, hence of course it is an important part of maintenence. And in response to your lack of concern for anything less than an "important page", look at A/D and see your fucked up stance on "unimportant pages" yourself, and see who has the double standards here. 5. Don't say I have OCD because at leased ''my'' case of it goes towards a greater good, rather than your unfulfilling and pestering belief that you were brought on this earth to shit people off with your 'holy' ways. 6. You are the only user unhappy with the A/VD edits so shut the fuck up and actually consider that your opinion on them probably shouldn't be treated as the be-all of truth on this wiki.<br />
:::::::::So actually consider what you are doing just now, Iscariot, you are watching a little shit-stirrer try and mess with the only thing on this wiki that shouldn't generally be messed with, Mediawiki maintenance, no doubt waiting for this to flip out of control (thanks to a certain meddling user, you, moreso than me) and then cry vendetta if he actually gets punished for his immature, counter-productive, butthurt and overall unnecessary behaviour. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:32, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Wait, you want to go into a barrage of obscenities and then try and appeal to my sense of reason. Your 'productive' CDO may be clouding your logic. Given that the majority of your emotional tirade belongs on other pages, the only one I'll respond to is that concerning A/VD, there is a problem, it's not opinion, it's fact based on the escalations policy. Boxy's actions are no different to Nubis' that caused the situation. Given you are a sysop and one of the few users able to rectify the problem I'd be considerably more impressed if you applied your energies to that rather than engage in this case of edit warring, drama stirring and vandalism threatening over an inconsequential page.<br />
<br />
::::::::::Finally, I didn't start the policy here, you did. And I quote ''"The policy on bad faith where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) "'' You have made a claim, the burden of proof is ''always'' on the claimant. I'm simply asking you to prove what you have said. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 08:43, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Sorry. I read the first sentence and stopped indefinitely, learn that I have no intention of appealing to your sense of ''anything'', full stop. I no longer have an interest in this, and hence I have no more interest in arguing with you. Unlike yourself, users like Boxy at leased have initiative in fixing problems rather than inflaming them, so I consider this topic closed and I'm treating it as such. Bleat to someone new. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 09:02, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Why is it so hard for you to provide a link to something you say exists? Is it so hard for a sysop on this wiki to demonstrate their own claims? Or have you just started inventing policies like Hagnat used to? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:38, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::I just had a read through the vandalism policy (because none of the others are really relevant here), and there isn't anything about this type of edit. The situation isn't helped by the vagueness of the policy. The only thing that the policy actually DOES say about it is that they should go to Arbies, which we all know would be a pointless waste of time. There's nothing about admin edits, there's nothing about user page rights over-ruling the advancement of the wiki. Neither side is covered by policy, but, as Iscariot noted, the burden of proof IS unfortunately on the claimant.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:52, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::Why is it so hard for you to understand that after ''what I want'' is fixed, I have ''no intention'' of arguing with you? I have no, NO interest in continuing this once someone has stepped in a mediated this issue and since Boxy has, I have absolutely no interest in continuing the argument. Learn to actually care for the wiki rather than fix your desire to cause trouble and 'show up' the sysops. I'm the one with OCD, by the way. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:22, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::And by the way, [[UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines#General_Conduct|shut the fuck up now]], will you? Second last clause. we have the authority to destroy any value in the effort to crust "Bad Faith", ie. the umbrella ruling that can theoretically serve any purpose in aid of ridding of loopholes in the wiki. Deal with it. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:22, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::No, that's not what you said. You said ''"The policy on bad faith where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) "''. Please show me the ''"policy on bad faith"'', not the section on sysop conduct guidelines put in there for emergency situations. Please give me a link to the policy that you claimed exist that explicitly states a user cannot ''"(refuse) administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki"''. Please show how the sentence ''"You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing"'' in '''any''' way shows good faith on your part and acceptable conduct on your part. If not (and I don't think you can) then you have now become the new version of Hagnat, claiming policy where none exists and then falling back "I can do it because I is sysops and teh guidelines say I can so I'm not listening to you". -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 03:42, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::No, you shut the fuck up because an Admin document that supports what I say. You honestly don't get it do you? You make me sick with your personal harrassment, and you really can't take a hint. So much for sucking my cock to have any chance of being a sysop, yes? And now it'll turn into a "Boxy and DDR are BOTH to immature to consider me for sysop" story now. I can't wait. Conversation closed a day ago, learn to read. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:02, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::::You see, that's the difference, I'm not telling you to stop talking. I'm asking you to provide the policy you claim existed in the beginning. You can't, and the guidelines do not back you up on this. You cannot claim that a condition put in to prevent harm to the wiki entitles you to engage in an edit war with a user you aren't getting along with. Own up, apologise to J3D for saying there was such a policy when they're isn't and then the conversation is over. How hard is it? I'm not sure where this idea about me going for sysop came from, but as you well know there are only three users I will accept a nomination from, and two are inactive. Don't believe me? Go nominate me right now like Anime did and watch how quickly it gets archived. However none of this changes the fact that you were claiming a policy that doesn't exist, you were using your status as a sysop to attempt to get your own way and that you are now running to what should be an emergency condition for when the wiki is subject to extreme disruption to garnish your error with some semblance of credibility. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 05:16, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::Wait, what? For all I know, it could exist in 50,000 policy documents and you could be bluffing for all I care, I never actually looked to verify the claim. You know why? It was a figure of speech, hence the bolding of '''Bad Faith''' to outline what he would have been banned for. Obviously you knew this because you aren't a moron but you are such a parasite in that way you behave that the thought wouldn't pass me by, that you pretend to think that I'm using my sysop status as a badge for anything, when rather it is more my status as an actual member of the community, whereas you are just a little piddling child who will struggle to find one logical fallacy in an argument he has nothing to do with, then bounce in, using it as the doomsday weapon of the decade. Say what you want after this, I won't be replying to your cesspit-creating nonsense. The page is fixed, you are not. I'm fulfilled. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:36, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::::So we have "<b>The policy on bad faith</b> where refusing administrative edits on your page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. <b>You can find the link yourself</b>, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) " where you state there is a policy and there is a link to be found, contrasted with "For all I know, <b>it could exist</b> in 50,000 policy documents and you could be bluffing for all I care, <b>I never actually looked to verify the claim</b>." where there isn't a policy and you didn't even look before demanding a user leave your preferred edit to his owned page. You can quibble about semantics and logical fallacies all you want. You lied. You lied to try and get your own way and won't even have the good grace and dignity to apologise to J3D for this. ''"that you pretend to think that I'm using my sysop status as a badge for anything"'' Erm, '''you''' were the one who just tried to claim that the Sysop Guidelines were applicable in making you right, you can't invoke them if you're being a normal user. Therefore you're either trying to use your status to get your own way (as evidenced by invoking the clause in the sysop guidelines) or you're trying to get your own way by inventing a new policy/quoting one that can in no way apply. Which is it?<br />
<br />
:::::::::::::::::::::I further note that you in no way continue to try and paint me as having promotion prospects since you do not appear to have put up a nomination. Another attempt to divert attention from what's happened here failing? I think so. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 05:54, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
I actually think you guys might have found the pettiest possible thing to threaten each other with A/VB over. Just take it to Arby's or something and be done with it because I don't think anybody really believes they're going to ''convince'' the other side of their argument. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:26, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Arbie's isn't needed in regards to the '''maintenence''' of the wiki, only over its content. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:34, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::It can quite literally be about whatever you want it to be about. That's the whole point. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 08:01, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Fair enough. But the point of this isn't to make a large amount of drama, which is why I'm making this simple: If he reverts it, I'll ask someone to just put it there themselves and hopefully he'll keep it up there, considering he's stated numerous times that he's only interested in keeping me off the page, not some random user who has similar intentions. If he reverts that, he can go to A/VB for all I care. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:08, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
/section, thanks to boxy. I no longer have any desire to pursue this at the current time. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:37, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Someone wanna bring me up to date on what the fuck has happened? In the meantime i'm rereverting charlies edit.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 17:01, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:oh wow boxy did, was that what his a/m case was for? If so epic,. i might go check now..brb--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 17:05, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Witch Hunt == <br />
I have been wiki absent for a couple of days due to other shit so I had a look through the archive to see what happened with boxys misconduct and I decided to read up on [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive/J3D/2009 this]. I really do feel for you dude, the way those who didn't want you in in the first place twisted and turned all of it just to get you demoted, when the original misconduct case was brought about 1 thing only.... You really did get the hard end of this stick and I am not posting this out of butthurt, I just hope others go back and have a look at some of the actions of the people in there and despite their opinion of you, maybe form some opinions on the poor form of some of the current admin team in this time.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:23, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Box is the only current admin that had any sort of authority in that anyway, so why rag on them? And it's weird, and it's hard for people who know Jed and Nick IRL to fathom (trust me), but it's actually a common ''truth'' that somehow Nick ''always'' did have access to Jed's account, so if you actually think about it from their point of view, it has its grounds, no matter how ridiculous it seems to you and me. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:26, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 10:41, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::get some original material bob, I hahaha'd you off the ballpark the other day when you pulled your cannons on DDR, you arent very useful hey....And DDR, no, it isnt about what access they had or WHY he got demoted, it is more about how the misconduct case was for one thing, and then escalated into a million other things that were completely irrelevant and basically the sysops opinion on whether Jed should be a Sop or not...not if he had committed misconduct with the act that Cyberfag brought to fruition. If people thought that Nick and Jed were sharing accounts or whatever, and no, I personally do not see a crime in sitting next to a sysop while he uses his account, then those people should have made a misconduct or demotions case with the appropriate information and proof at hand, rather than using an offbeat joke comment as an excuse to bring out the big guns and debate his worthyness. Regardless of if he was fit to be a sysop or not, when the case was brought forward for an off colour joke, and the sysops at hand decide they are going to bring forward unrelated things and then manipulate it into a vote for demotion, all over a joke that was laughed off by the first 3 sysops, then yeah, it is the definition of a witch hunt. Also you don't have to have been a sysop then to have been part of the Witch Hunt at hand, honestly. This wasn't even aimed at you it is just that Jed will check this now that they are in Thailand.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:01, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::the tl;dr is that, the case wasnt about what Jed got demoted for, so basically it was a witch hunt from box and others, because they didnt have the authority that the crats who bought him into the team did, this was the only way to get him out without going through the proper avenues, ie the people who were elected to be Crats--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:03, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::tbh I saw it as no different as anything they pinged mighty Grim for in ''that'' misconduct case, and as a Sysop I think there is nothing wrong with ''calling'' (a vote for) demotion over long-term issues despite the one case being completely different... I know it sounds harsh and abusive but that's just how I see it, if you can be called for promotion at any time based on long-standing good efforts then the opposite shouldn't be totally shunned just because it's 'unfair'. Whether it should have been used for J3D is irrelevant (though I'm not surprised given the circumstances around his pm bid) but yes. More power to the hungry ops. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 12:43, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::''"Box is the only current admin that had any sort of authority in that anyway, so why rag on them?"'' The. General. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 03:46, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Though you are correct, I mostly just mean the major players in the demotion, the 'instigators'. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:14, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:fair, at least something of worth comes out of you, which is more I can say for certain others--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
sexy you are the best poster on the whole wiki. serious. you own {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:47, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
i reckon we should demote the cunt {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:51, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I don't have to be a good poster, I'm not a System Operator--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::neither do i, maggot {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:14, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I don't really know where your superiority complex comes from in life, I guess you get online and it is a world away from irl amirite?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:46, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::whoa there with all the hemmin and the hawwin and the birdsong {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:52, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGq5FeUv3zk I found your youtube channel], you were sure it would be a secret hey? There are people who can help you bob. You are not alone out there, never alone. I wont help you though, you're too much of a fag for me to be associated with.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:02, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::OH MY GOD ''how did you find itttttttttt'' {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:03, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::i feel so exposed... nobody is safe from messr. Read's detectiv skillz {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:08, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::: *smug*--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
''I personally do not see a crime in sitting next to a sysop while he uses his account,'' This made me LOL because that is why Nubis was demoted. At least Nubis and I were never accused of abusing check user... --[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 16:24, 22 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Untrue. Not only was jed demoted for stuff relating to that ''anyway'', There was also evidence to support that you had permanent access to the nubis account from locations other than her/his own, something your initial claim entailed. Sheesh. You are actually a troll with all of these claims that you make, right? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 16:33, 22 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==those stupid groups that include people whom you know don't want to be a part of your shitty jokes==<br />
next time you make one of them you'll earn yourself an A/VB case {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:16, 17 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:well considering it's not vandalism, I am sure you will earn one for shitting up the admin pages. Take him to A/A over it, so he can't make any groups like that again or something, but don't try and be an internet tuff guy now.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 11:06, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::wrong! but thanks anyways {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:00, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Arbitration ==<br />
An interim [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool#Interim_Ruling Ruling] has been made.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 10:58, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:and so has my response.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:03, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
hey duder thad made his final ruling. I'd like to "claim" that I'm not a part of the hate club so remove me from the page. cheers {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:36, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:but you hate 2 Cool do you not? Anyway you shalt have compliance but i do think you belong there.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:10, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Racist Flame ==<br />
<br />
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, assuming you were ''making a good faith edit when you recently unloaded a slew of racial slurs''. Actually, typing that sentence demonstrates the absurdity of it. Particularly in the context of the [[The Southern Cross Club|the group page]], where you commented, [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:The_Southern_Cross_Club&diff=1582137&oldid=1582065 your flame] is in poor taste, to put it mildly. Do you agree?<br />
<br />
Rather than make a vandalism case out of it, I'd like to give you an opportunity to make a brief and sincere retraction alongside your original comment. Or at the very least, use this space to explain your reasoning behind making such an edit.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 02:20, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:he was pretty clearly being ironic, hope this helps. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 02:59, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Might as well add yourself. [[User:Giles Sednik/List of Wiki Puritans|Now.]] --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 03:02, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::lmao {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:08, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::well done good sir.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:03, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Its a talk page, i'm allowed to be racist and yeah, ask bob why i say things next time, he seems to know.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:03, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::If we ever get around to that TOS bullshit you might not be! bloop bloop bloop --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 07:23, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
[[User:Giles_Sednik/List_of_Wiki_Puritans#The_List|Done.]] And I love using "irony" as an excuse to vent all the crap you wish you could say in public. Yeh that was cutting edge humor there. But like you said, it's the internet and you're allowed to be a racist. *golf clap* --{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 11:37, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I don't think you quite get what irony is. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:09, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::[http://www.answers.com/topic/irony Yeh yeh yeh definition 1a]. I get it. But I don't buy it, particularly as an excuse. It has become all too commonplace for people say something indefensible and then claim irony as their defense. Example: ''"You're such a fucking (insert racial slur). Durr haha I was being ironic don't get upset."''<br />
::Also, while we're on the subject, irony is more that the dictionary definition, and there '''is''' a difference between sarcasm and irony. And there's a BIG difference between using irony to demonstrate the absurdity of an idea or argument, and the way cybertrolls use racial slurs without being able to articulate what they think they're being ironic about.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 13:08, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::you think you're super astute but you're really not. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:29, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Nu uh. YOU!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 14:18, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::fix'd--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 14:53, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::So wait was that edit vandalism or what? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::yeah. I'd delete SA's own post but you've just replied to it, so I'll leave it up to you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:10, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::fuck charlie you're getting too good at picking up on my plans....since you've foiled me i'll in turn leave it up to giles. 09:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC) {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::lol. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Lol'd@N3D ==<br />
<br />
Some of your finest work my friend ;)--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== awww ==<br />
<br />
You just missed a really funny A/M case, SA started trolling finis' talk page without knowing that it was protected. I especially loved it because it used to be what we all joked about getting ops for, so we could harass finis even after he A/PT'd his talk page. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 07:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah, it was pretty funny, especially when DDR was all "uh uh SA you're a dumbass and the page is protected" and shit. :D --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 13:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::And when I snuck my own snide asshole message in the edit summary so Finy could see it anyway :D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 14:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Yeah...Dick.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 16:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Ohi was watching from the depths. Just becausei'm not editing doesn't mean your every move isn't being monitored. So was it at a slap on the wrist or what? I think he deserved a good ol' spanking.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 16:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I have a second warning now. I can't do anything semi-bad for a bit D: --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 16:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Oh as if you were watching from the depths. I know you. If you watch, you ''have'' to comment. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 23:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::^--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 23:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::It was one night charlie! it didn't mean anything, stop acting like you understand me!! *storms out of the room sobbing* {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:18, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Why ==<br />
[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87_%D9%85%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AE%D8%AF%D9%85%D8%A9]...Why my profile? I don't even know you. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 05:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Why is this comment on Jed's talk? Also, I translated that heading, and it reads: "The Enemies of God". I'd assume he doesn't like you.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Oh, now I get it. That looked like a user page aty first. Strange.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I think its actually something different, can't remember. I think they meant something else when they made it. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Someone I know translated it, it says something about allah in all that stuff (I didnt pay attention) and then it says Enemies of God: Colonel Cunt. I was just curious who i killed so i can do it again :D --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 23:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::OH, I thought you guys were talking about the group name. They all have arab names and spam derka derka and shit, classic xD --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 23:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Oh that, yeah you killed me, just look for a sandmonkey and kill them, its probably me. although i'm inactive atm. how'd you find that page btw? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Probably searched his UD profile through the wiki I bet. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::What a self indulgent prick, lucky he's on the kill list! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::lol. Btw I just got back from work and while I was there I thought of [[Negronet]], and thought of you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Does that have any context aside from that its similar to necronet? Either way its still amusing...{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:10, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::I dont even remember where i found it to be honest...i might have hit random page, i was pretty bored a few days ago and it came up with one profile on that page so naturally i clicked that. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 03:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== OMFG DONT COMMENT ON MY TALK PAGE OMG WTF ==<br />
<br />
Ull maek me sew mahd!! Il have 2 delyt it u babbeh--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Unfortunately he gave me no other opportunity than to pursue justice via administration pages. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== awesome ==<br />
<br />
I found this in the Unused Templates bin:<br />
<br />
{{Template:NoJ3D}}<br />
<br />
Nice. I might actually start using it too, hilarious ;D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 11:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:was only unused because bob added me to his. He cant handle the Pwnage.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:36, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I never used that template; I have the code straight on my talk page. J3D made that a few minutes after I posted it. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::I caught a largemouth bass, a koi and a cyberbob today--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::J3D would love to be important enough to command his own "no j3d" template... pretty lame he's got to create it himself though :D <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:21 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:::::lol, [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Template:NoJ3D&action=history not awesome]... actually quite the opposite <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:23 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
::::::I think you are missing the classic "take the piss out of yourself, but make people slightly offput by your pretend arrogance" thing that Jed has been working on for a long, long time now.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:26, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::And always will be. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::lol, "classic"... :D <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 14:04 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
So anyways, new vote now, who votes [[Template:NoJ3D]] replace [[Template:Verdict]] on A/VB from now on? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 22:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I vote to merge the two.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 01:37, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I was gonna link from my sig and have a disclaimer stating that having that template isn't binding, but then the share mass of the job queue killed the net :( and yeah boxy i'm totally cool with thefact i made it myself :) plus all i really did was take the code from bobs page and cp it. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:10, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah. I had no qualms about you making it yourself, just find it a surprisingly fitting template for how I feel about you. Zing! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I'll keep that in mind next time i "post" you a letter :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not use admin pages to harass people on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 11:16, 19 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:what the fuck is this shit? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:07, 25 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== ban ==<br />
<br />
if u get banned again, you still have 5 hours 56 minutes of wrongly used ban time which I'm pretty sure you haven't used. [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_07#User:J3D_.282.29]]. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 02:37, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:that's dumb, you're dumb. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:10, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Remember how well the 'ban credit' idea worked out the last time? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 06:24, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Nup, cause I never saw it used properly in practice. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 06:59, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I will nevar be banned again! But yes i do have that in the bank. i tried to use it but its kinda hard when you're banned to inform s'ops that you have ban credit. Perhaps we need [[A/BC]] (might copyright that actually, groovy name) which even when banned you can still post on. Or just more up to the minute banners? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:17, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Ban Credit is such a rare case that it would not be worth it ''at all''. And Misanthropy the reason this is different from the rest is that he was banned legitimately but the vote was overruled later, the reason it wasn't applicable before was because when nubis and I both were misconducted for it, it was because we fucked up the data and banned them when they shouldn't have been at all. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 09:02, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
By the way, making a group soon with me, guy, a bunch of kids at MHS who are still into UD and maybe a few more guys from the [[ATO]], will be pretty casual, interested? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 09:02, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:yeah sure hit me up with the deets. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:22, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::No prob nig I'll fbook them too you and here too, once I make the group, should be a week at the most from here on, so basically at worst case scenario i can talk to you about it next weekend when you hit up procastle. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:13, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::lolcastle.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:14, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== bbk ==<br />
<br />
i found a mid-2007 version of the BBK page which had our full memberlist in all its glory, etc.<br />
<br />
what do you think of me reverting the BBK page and (most of) its info back to just when we initially broke up? imo it serves the group better to have the glorious version of the page up there instead. just some food for thought? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:36, 12 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:As opposed the penny heights version??? Hmmm i guess i cuold work with that. If the penny heights version was moved to a subpage. Link us the version you want. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:31, 12 August 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:Every_Villain_Is_Lemons&diff=1757130
Talk:Every Villain Is Lemons
2010-08-11T07:45:32Z
<p>J3D: /* Can I join? */</p>
<hr />
<div><center><div style="background-color: #663366; width: 850px; padding: 0px; min-width: 850px;"><br />
<div style="margin-bottom: -10px;">[[Image:4020talkhead.png|850px|4020]]</div><br />
<div style="float: left; width: 80px; border: 1px solid #FFFFFF); padding: 5px 0px; background-color: #FFFFFF; margin: 60px 0px 0px 35px; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana;" align=center ><br />
[[Every Villain Is Lemons|{{c|black|MAIN}}]]<br />
</div><br />
<div style="float: left; width: 80px; border: 1px solid #FFFFFF); padding: 5px 0px; background-color: #FFFFFF; margin: 120px 0px 0px -80px; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana;" align=center ><br />
<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:Every_Villain_Is_Lemons&action=edit&section=new <span style="font-size: 3em; color: #000000;">+</span>]</span><br />
</div><br />
<div align="right"><div style="background-color: #FFFFFF; width: 700px; padding: 0px; min-width: 700px; font-size: 1em; -moz-border-radius:280px 0 0 0/52px 0 0 0; -webkit-border-radius:280px 0 0 0/52px 0 0 0; border-bottom: 4px solid #663366; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana"><br />
<div align="right"><div style="background-color: #000000; width: 700px; padding: 0px; min-width: 700px; font-size: 1.7em; -moz-border-radius:280px 0 0 0/70px 0 0 0; -webkit-border-radius:280px 0 0 0/70px 0 0 0; border-bottom: 4px solid #663366; font-family:trebuchet ms, verdana"><font color="#FFFFFF"><p align="center">EVERY '''TALK''' IS LEMONS</p></font></div></div><br />
<div align="left"><div style="padding: 5px 5px"><br />
<br />
<p align="center">press the +</p><br />
<br><br />
<br><br />
<br />
== Can I join? ==<br />
<br />
Seriously. I'll make a new alt. Any group with a page this cool needs me in it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 11:20, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
It certainly looks unique, haven't seen anything like this before, and I mean it in a good way. Now start stealing some [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=EVIL&redirect=no redirects]. Though I wonder, this is survivor, pk or zombie? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:31, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Currently we are survivor, nurturing the newer members and helping them understand the game and levelling up. Could take a month or two, but once that's done, we aren't sure what we will do. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:48, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Survivors!?! It is my duty to insult you! You are a foolhardy, shortsighted, and truly meaningless <s>group</s> individual who lacks the mental capacity to even begin to grasp anything that even resembles a big picture. Go die, cold and alone, in some barhah-forsaken hole. It's more than you lousy breathers deserve. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 12:18, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I considered un-idling A Cyberdemon for this but it's pro survivors and that makes me sad. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 16:33, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Can we have sex?==<br />
<br />
Seriously. PS where the fuck were you on autoday you cunt? !{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:45, 11 August 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Poodle_of_doom&diff=1751248
User talk:Poodle of doom
2010-08-02T06:43:37Z
<p>J3D: /* code */</p>
<hr />
<div><div class="usermessage">You have a <span class="stealthexternallink">[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Special:Userlogout&returnto=Special:Userlogin new message]</span> (<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Special:Userlogout&returnto=Special:Userlogin last change]</span>). </div><br />
[[Category:Poodle of Doom]]<br />
----<br />
{{Discussion}}<br />
<br><font size=4>Please add all new post to the bottom of this list. If I want it someplace else, I will put it there. If you can't follow this rule,.... don't post here. Thanks. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 23:51, 29 September 2009 (BST)</font><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
==End of Pking==<br />
How are things in Kempsterbank, Poodle of Doom? [[The Hellfighters]] migrated north to attack the zombie hordes. If you haven't noticed, the zombies have doubled in strength over these last couple weeks. In response, we have abandoned Pking and have focused on countering the advance of the zombies. We are now the [[Sons of Liberty]]. We now reside in Shackleville and were hoping that we could be allies. Let's work together in preventing the spread of the zombie scourge. --[[User:Gehennanow|Gehennanow]] 23:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Have you noticed that all the generators and radios in Kempsterbank are failing? It's due to a bunch of Gkers known as the Knights of the New Order. I know that you are upset with me and you have every right to be, but things have changed now. You told me once that it is better to make allies then make war. It is crucial for us both that the NT buildings in Kempsterbank remain fully functional. I apologize for causing trouble last year and even if you remain angry with me, I will still help out the best that I can. --{{User:Gehennanow/sig}} 21:24, 5 April 2007 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
::Hey,... long time no see.... one of my other colleges said he talked to you. I'm very interested in letting you be in my neck of the woods until your on you heels again. (We're setting up a special ops team,... maybe they could take a run a building and secure it for you if needed?) On that note, the only request I make is to help support our gennies, and radios. Keep the radios to our frequency (27.55). And follow our cade plan, and revive point plan. So long as you do that,... you're welcome here with us. --[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 00:02, 6 April 2007 (BST)<br />
<br />
== If you want a mentor as bad as me... ==<br />
Feel free to ask me anything you want in my talk page, ANYTHING. I'll leave you some tips here: read them, especially the part about how to sign with a timestamp, and do it always. Anyways, let me tell you that I may not be the guy you'll want to befriend in order to be a popular guy on the community ^_^, as you can see [[Wiki Monitors|here]]. --{{User:Matthewfarenheit/Signature}} 02:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
:Thanks for welcoming me. I'm going to get into the newbie help program. Thanks a lot for everything. --[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 02:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Do not ==<br />
Do [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Moderation/Promotions&diff=next&oldid=517101 this] again, please. Old mod bids are archived, not deleted wholesale. –[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] <sup>[[Special:Listusers/sysop|M]]•[[User talk:Xoid|T]]•<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://urbandeadwiki.th7.net F]</span>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]]</sup> 07:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
== Group Stuff ==<br />
Hmmm, those poor Hellfighter guys are straight up newbies. How about you let them run that NT place, since no one else in your suburb bothers to sleep there (though NT buildings should be protected, but I digress)? I bet those guys don't even have Construction, so they can't mess with 'cade plans anyway. Let them hold that building, learn how everything works, and maybe one day you'll have a lovely ally. Do it for the newbs, man.--[[User:Lachryma|Lachryma]] 01:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
::No.... these guys just can't waltz in and demand that we bow to them. They work with us, and at the very least.... for us. And even at that, being noobs and all! How dare they tell us what we're going to be doing! You'd think it would be the other way around, with them being noobs and all!--[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 01:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I will admit that these fools claimed a building in the worst way possible. When my group started, we chose a random building as a HQ and didn't even bother to check if anyone else was using that. We got lucky, but at least these guys gave you the courtesy of letting you know they were moving in. Now, as for your claim that they work for you...are you saying that because you have a larger group? The [[PTT]] thought it was above PKing lists because of its size, but that pride just pissed people off. If you are throwing your group's weight around to bully smaller groups, that's fascism, which is bad for everybody's health. All they told you was that they'd be living in that building. They did it in a horrible, stupid, insulting way, but you don't slaughter people for that. You teach them that such behavior is not acceptable by ''ignoring their stupidity''. Start killing them and they know they got a rise out of you, but ignore their little group and maybe they'll just wither away...But hey, it's your suburb, so deal with miscreants as you see fit. Don't forget the zombies though!--[[User:Lachryma|Lachryma]] 01:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
::I think that you missed my point entirly. I didn't say they worked for us. I used a metaphore. My point was that they can't just stumble in and expect to call all the shots,... espcially being noobs. And by no means are we going to slaughter them. We don't pk! We won't attack anyone unprovoked! Even then, we require all our members provide a screen shot to prove what they have said about other people before we attack them. We only fight zeds. My overal point in all of this is that they can't tell us what to do, since we're the head honcho's around here. And they certainly can't be that forceful with us. They implyed they'd fight over it,... if thats the case... my group will defend itself. Nothing more.--[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 01:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Gotcha. Well, GC supports you guys %100, then.--[[User:Lachryma|Lachryma]] 02:13, 10 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
::I'm glad you understand then. Sorry I wasn't clear before. Who's the GC?--[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 02:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<nowiki>*</nowiki>drops head in despair* [[Ghetto Cow]]. You know, one of your esteemed allies? The one I'm cofounder of? Can't you keep track of your friends?! (I'm just joking. I'm sure you have other concerns).--[[User:Lachryma|Lachryma]] 02:30, 10 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
::You wouldn't know this, but in my defense, I figured it out after the fact. It's just everything happend so fast that my head spun, and I had gone to about 3 other pages before I figured it out.--[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 02:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I believe you, as I saw you putting stuff on various group talk pages...Yeah, I'm addicted to [[Special:Recentchanges|Recent Changes]]. That's pretty funny though.--[[User:Lachryma|Lachryma]] 02:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
::Thanks for telling me though. Sorry I didn't figure it out sooner. --[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 02:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Dark Chuckle ==<br />
Those newbs have struck again. Check [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Talk:Minions_of_the_Apocalypse#Kempterbank_is_vulnerable this] out. I wouldn't worry though. Zed groups have lots of targets, as there are many tempting safe suburbs in Malton, and I won't listen to some fool who posted on my group's talk page telling me where to go. And look how he tries to be anonymous, even though anyone can check the history. Durr.--[[User:Lachryma|Lachryma]] 22:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
PS: Oh, he's gone to the [[RRF]] for help! I'm sure that giant zombie horde will just come running to help some random guy! Maybe he'll even drag [[Shacknews]] out of retirement to come trash Kempsterbank!--[[User:Lachryma|Lachryma]] 23:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
::Thanks for the update. I have let my group know. It's hilarious. Ever since I have said on the [[Knights Templar]] talk page that I would annihilate them, and me and my allies would make them permantly dead if they ever wanted to step up and go,... I haven't been able to locate any of them in [[Kempsterbank]]. Thats Funny,.... where'd they go? (Sense the sarcasm there?) Enjoy the laugh! --[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 04:46, 11 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I convinced them to leave Kempersterbank and come to Caiger Mall. Now there's a few less newbs in your suburb...Hell, maybe I can whip them into shape one day! Or the zombies will...--[[User:Lachryma|Lachryma]] 05:00, 11 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
::And to believe what I just offered them on our talk page! Their going to be wondering whats up now! I was hoping to whoop them into shape! --[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 05:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Yeah, well, you were too late...or something. Who knows what goes through their minds? Well, I got some more meat shields...er, brave defenders of Caiger, and maybe one day they'll come back to Kempersterbank, ready to fight for you. Or they'll join my group ;)--[[User:Lachryma|Lachryma]] 05:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
::Whatever the case may be,... I wish them the best of luck! --[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 05:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==My bad==<br />
<br />
OK, you're right. I made a boo-boo, but I think others will too. Perhaps you should work on the wording to prevent 'stupid' votes from killing it in the future? The wording was unclear. Here is the suggestion:<br />
<br />
===Familiar Zeds vs. Non Familiar Zeds===<br />
{{suggestionNew|<br />
suggest_time=[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 05:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)|<br />
suggest_type=Improvement to game mechanics.|<br />
suggest_scope=Everyone who ever wished to differentiate between a zed they don't know, and a zed who is their fallen commarade. See below for details.|<br />
suggest_description=I think that it would be wonderous to be able to differentiate between a zed that you are familar with, and one you aren't familar with. As it stands right now, the game will say "You reconize [insert name here]". However, if you were going to attack some of the zeds in that spot, you have no clue who your shooting at. If there is a zed that you reconize, you have the option of targeting them directly. However, the oppistite is not true. This is what my suggestion pertains to. I believe that it would be helpful to be able to chose not to shoot a certain zed. Instead of firing randomly, and finding out later, you shot someone in your group, or your best bud, I think that a game improvement is needed here. One that allows you to differentiate between zeds, and be capable of targeting unfamilar zeds, rather then zeds at random.|<br />
suggest_for_votes=<br />
<!-- VOTE **BELOW** THIS LINE IF FOR - DO NOT DELETE THIS LINE --><br />
For Votes here<br />
<!-- VOTE **ABOVE** THIS LINE IF FOR - DO NOT DELETE THIS LINE --><br />
|<br />
suggest_against_votes=<br />
<!-- VOTE **BELOW** THIS LINE IF AGAINST - DO NOT DELETE THIS LINE --><br />
Against Votes here<br />
<!-- VOTE **ABOVE** THIS LINE IF AGAINST - DO NOT DELETE THIS LINE --><br />
|<br />
suggest_other_votes=<br />
<!-- VOTE **BELOW** THIS LINE IF SPAM OR DUPE - DO NOT DELETE THIS LINE --><br />
Spam/Dupe Votes here<br />
<!-- VOTE **ABOVE** THIS LINE IF SPAM OR DUPE - DO NOT DELETE THIS LINE --><br />
}}<br />
<br />
Please reword it to where your intent is more clear. I had to IM a few other moderators to see what you meant here. I'm sorry.--{{User:Gage/sig}} 03:26, 20 January 2007 (UTC)<br />
:I was going to re-write this suggestion, because I thought it may be a good idea, but it suddenly dawned on me why it would be unacceptable... it nerfs [[brainrot]] by allowing you to add any rotter to your contact list, and then missing by missing them, you can get to the rest of the pile underneath them -- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] <sup>[[User_talk:boxy|T]] [[User:Boxy/Locations|L]] [[Zombie Squad|ZS]] [[Location Nuts|Nuts2U]] [[Dead Animals/Redux|DA]]</sup> 12:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
::I think you noticed something I didn't. I think its still a good suggestion. Perhaps you and I could rewrite the suggestion togethor, so that it doesn't nerf the rot, but follows the inteneded purpose? --[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 23:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Use the template==<br />
I took your suggestion off the suggestions page because you didn't use the template. Here it is back for you. --[[User:Funt Solo|Funt Solo]] [[Image:Scotland flag.JPG|20px]] 21:22, 9 April 2007 (BST)<br />
<br />
::'''IF YOU LOOK CLOSLY,.... I DID....!!!!!''' --[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 21:39, 9 April 2007 (BST)<br />
:::I'm sorry, but no you did not. Funt was referring to the instructions and template [[Suggestions#Suggestion_Template|here]]. It is fixed, so don't worry about it. I hate to sound mean/condescending/like an ass, but please read the instructions next time. --[[Image:ZombieSlay3rSig.png]]<sup>[[User talk:Zombie slay3r|T]]</sup> 21:51, 9 April 2007 (BST)<br />
::::Look again... it's right.<br />
<br />
<br />
'''Familiar Zeds vs. Non Familiar Zeds'''<br />
<br />
Timestamp: --[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 21:15, 9 April 2007 (BST) <br />
Type: Improvement to game mechanics.<br />
<br />
Scope: Everyone who ever wished to differentiate between a zed they don't know, and a zed who is their fallen commarade. See below for details.<br />
<br />
Description: I think that it would be wonderous to be able to differentiate between a zed that you are familar with, and one you aren't familar with. As it stands right now, the game will say "You reconize [insert name here]". However, if you were going to attack some of the zeds in that spot, you have no clue who your shooting at. If there is a zed that you reconize, you have the option of targeting them directly. However, the oppistite is not true. This is what my suggestion pertains to. I believe that it would be helpful to be able to chose not to shoot a certain zed. Instead of firing randomly, and finding out later, you shot someone in your group, or your best bud, I think that a game improvement is needed here. One that allows you to differentiate between zeds, and be capable of targeting unfamilar zeds, rather then zeds at random.<br />
<br />
The mechanic I am addressing is that you can't choose not to attack a specific zombie when you attack a random zombie. For example, that when you attack a group of zombies, the specific zombies that you recognize should be excluded so that you don't accidentally hit a zombified teammate. It would be an "Unfamiliar Zombie" function. Example: "I have three known pker's in this stack of zombies, 7 people I do not know, four syringes, and want to actively avoid sticking the guys I do not want to revive."<br />
<br />
Basically, this would allow you to target individuals specifically without having them in your contacts list. Make sense?<br />
<br />
'''Keep Votes'''<br />
For Votes here<br />
<br />
'''Kill Votes'''<br />
Against Votes here<br />
<br />
'''Spam/Dupe Votes'''<br />
Spam/Dupe Votes here<br />
<br />
==RE: Templates==<br />
*Step One- Make the template- <br />
{| style="color:#F00; border:solid #00F 2px;"<br />
|-<br />
|[[Image:WHO_logo.gif|20px]]<br />
|'''Lyk, template, lol.'''<br />
|}<br />
*Step Two- Create a page for it, using the "Template:" prefix.<br />
[[Template:template name]]<br />
*Step Three- Post it onto the page you want it on.<br />
<nowiki>{{template name}}</nowiki><br />
<br />
It's pretty simple, really.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[Malton Emergency Medical Service|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[Tour Necrotech|TNT'07]]'''</sup> 05:02, 10 April 2007 (BST)<br />
<br />
::Thank you. I've been trying so hard to get people to help me learn to make one. I appreciate the help. --[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 05:07, 10 April 2007 (BST)<br />
Any time.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[Malton Emergency Medical Service|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[Tour Necrotech|TNT'07]]'''</sup> 05:09, 10 April 2007 (BST)<br />
<br />
Also, your "template" doesn't have to be named "Template:NameHere". As you may have noticed from updating the NT Status map, any old page can be used as a template. The map uses 100 pages called "User:NT Status/Suburb" as templates, for example. ANY page can be used as a template; by slapping the curly brackets around the page name, you insert everything that is on that page. The "Template:" namespace is just reserved for such use, and has the special feature that you can ignore the word "template" when making a call to it. --[[User:Swiers|Seb_Wiers]] <small>[[Vita ex Mors|VeM]]</small> 20:07, 6 May 2007 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Recruitment page==<br />
<br />
I regret to inform you that I had to cut your ad to 200 words as it was over 300 words. I also removed the group box as I do not allow them on the page, your ad is meant to lead to your groups page. Not act as it. Feel free to edit your ad as long as you keep it under 200 words. Feel free to ad an image as long as you do not use your groupbox. If you feel this is unjust then take it to the recruitment talk page and we can discuss. [[User:Whitehouse|Whitehouse]] 15:39, 28 April 2007 (BST)<br />
<br />
==[[NT Mappers]]==<br />
<br />
{{NTmapper}}<br />
<br />
Thanks! --[[User:Swiers|Seb_Wiers]] <small>[[Vita ex Mors|VeM]]</small> 20:03, 6 May 2007 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
== Great Job ==<br />
<br />
The begginers guide looks great. A lot of info and very well organized. Im sure it will be usefull to anyone who reads it.<br />
<br />
==Templates==<br />
<br />
Well I've finally gotten around to sprucing up my wiki page, and I thought I'd drop you a template that you could use on your:<br />
{{flagbox|#000000|Templar01.jpg|Knights Templar supporter|The Knights Templar, fighting zombies in nightshirts since 1119.}}<br />
Feel free to edit the text or color if you want, 'cause I sure have! - [[User:BigJD|JD]] 08:30, 14 May 2007 (BST)<br />
DDDD00<br />
<br />
== Suggestion Cycling ==<br />
Anyone can cycle the antiquated suggestions, but cycling them w/ the old format takes a lot of time, so not very many people want to do it. I cycled a few days once, and then I quit because I ran out of patience. ;) --[[Image:ZombieSlay3rSig.png]]<sup>[[User talk:Zombie slay3r|T]]</sup> 16:14, 4 June 2007 (BST)<br />
::Oh,.... I see,... Any one cued up to cycle the last little bit of it? --[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 23:45, 4 June 2007 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Wierd==<br />
<br />
Your help page may actually come in handy. Lucky! --{{User:Axe27/Sig}} 04:18, 20 June 2007 (BST)<br />
:I assume by help page, you mean my Begginers guide? --[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 04:32, 20 June 2007 (BST)<br />
<br />
== 151st Brigade ==<br />
<br />
The crisis of the zombie hordes destroying Surviving human efforts. It would be great if you joined our cause as allies and plot against these hordes and future events. Please message me back once you get this message.<br />
<br />
[[User:B0ba Fett|B0ba Fett]] 17:25, 5 August 2007 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Actually,... I can no longer be of any service to you, as I have been displaced as leadership, and am currently no longer with this particular group. I am, however, establishing another group. Perhaps we could talk then. --[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 19:54, 5 August 2007 (BST)<br />
<br />
::Alright, please message me when you do have a group. We will willingly help you out. [[User:B0ba Fett|B0ba Fett]] 21:12, 6 August 2007 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Hello from a current KT ==<br />
<br />
Hi Poodle, I'm Roddy Winters. I am currently in the KT, which I understand you had much to do with in the early days. I'm trying to put together a history of KT, and I was wondering if you would be kind enough to share some info, stories, details etc? Please let me know. Thanks! [[User:Roddy Winters|Roddy Winters]] 02:13, 28 May 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Hello from a retired KT ==<br />
<br />
What's up Poodle? I'm glad to hear you are still at it. As for me, I'm pretty much retired from Malton. [[User:Ablesentinel|AbSent]] 13:52, 11 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== '''[[EVIL]]''' ==<br />
<br />
Why are you adding unnecessary templates and categories onto a redirect page? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 17:11, 14 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:Group advertisement..... -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 17:13, 14 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::That is a very poor type of group advertisement... If anyone saw your group through these means, it would be circumstantial and therefore lead to nothing... And the only people that would see it from the ensuing drama wouldn't be interested. I would suggest actually doing some awesome stuff, posting it on suburb news pages and then trying to impress people, rather than annoy them by adding your redirect to a couple of categories. If you're desperate you could rely on untrue propaganda, but this isn't the way to go about it. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 17:20, 14 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Ahhh, what do you know? -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 17:24, 14 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Yeah, I could know nothing, but I'm still trying to just help out. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 17:27, 14 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::One missed the sarcasm? -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 17:31, 14 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Re: Allies ==<br />
I would very much like to have EVIL as allies. Sorry for the long reply, been busy IRL and the Coats have been through hell. --[[User:Blanemcc|Blanemcc]] 23:27, 17 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:From which group do you hail? -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 00:53, 19 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::[[Browncoats]], dude ;) --[[User:Blanemcc|Blanemcc]] 00:22, 20 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::We shall add you to our list of allies. Do you have any templates you use for your group? -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 01:46, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::I'll make one someday :p For now, just add up our name somewhere and we'll do likewise. --[[User:Blanemcc|Blanemcc]] 17:32, 22 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::We've already done that. Thank you for being allies. Please join us on our forums. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 18:35, 23 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Hi! Currently, I'm indeed interested in such an alliance! To be honest, I'm interested in everything that would make my newly founded group grow a bit ;) Being the only member and not knowing anyone becomes somewhat boring after a time^^ --[[User:TheMastermind|TheMastermind]] 18:25, 10 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:And from which group do you hail good sir? -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 21:22, 10 August 2009 (BST)<br />
Oh, sorry that I didn't mention it, but I thought you would remember because of your message on the group page... I was talking about [[The Malton Droogs]] --[[User:TheMastermind|TheMastermind]] 23:07, 10 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:Actually, it is I who owe you an apology. As of late, I've done a lot of soliciting with a lot of groups. Say,... do you have an email account,... Perhaps we could speak in email,... I'd like to personally offer to let you join our forums, as your groups represenative. I would also like to speak to you about joining us on a few upcoming missions. Perhaps we could really set the ball rolling on this new alliance of ours. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 23:19, 10 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Re: Joining Evil ==<br />
I'm in the process of starting my own group, The Acolytes of Satan. However; as soon as it's up, I'd like to add EVIL as an Ally. --[[User:Groundpounder|Groundpounder]] 22:27, 25 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:We'll discuss it when we get there.... :) -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 16:50, 26 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
I do not want to join EVIL. I am Pro-Survivor and I have a join request that I sent to the AZS<br />
:Please sign all your posts!!!! -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 21:26, 26 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== REVOLUTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ==<br />
<br />
{{Revolution}}<br />
DONT FORGET SUPPORT THE WIKIREVOLUTION!!!!!!! DOWN WITH THE CRATS!!!!!!!!!--[[User:Imthatguy|Imthatguy]] 05:08, 4 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Recruitment ==<br />
<br />
You can right click on the images and view their properties to get their filesize. The skull is fine at 14K but those rose animations are 59K and 42K. You might want to replace the animations with still images. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 13:10, 4 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Sounds great. Thank you. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 23:01, 4 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Martyr ==<br />
<br />
It's very obvious that [[User:Martyr]] is an alt of Izumi, and will almost certainly be banned promptly. Please let new users sit a while before trying to recruit them, and check their contribs - unless you're a fan of recruiting permabanned serial vandals. :P --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' 01:53, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Not a fan of recruting people like him, but would rather have the advertisment there for all who show up when the Drama Llama comes.... -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 01:56, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::Your ad is way too big to throw on someones page too. Make it smaller, ja?--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 01:57, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::She's a "her," by the way. :P Also, what the heck do you mean, "rather have it around for everyone who shows up when the Drama Llama comes?" That doesn't make any sense. When that user's banned, their talk page is going to get wiped (heck SA wiped your ad off it already)... nobody's going to see it. You've already got one on the [[Recruitment]] page, and honestly the active recruiting of every newer user you see is getting kind of old. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' 02:02, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I'll take the hint and stop then. For the sake of clarification though,... is it okay that I visit they're talk page, and ask if they're in a group, and invite them to join mine, instead of posting the advertisment?<br />
::::Of course. It's just your ad was huge and obnoxious, if it was a small template, it'd have been pretty fine as long as you weren't spamming it on ''everyones'' page.--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 02:08, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Thanks. And yes, of course you can ask if they want to join a group - it's just that using that large obnoxious ad on talk pages of what could be total newbies might confuse and confound them - using something smaller or just basic text would be better. Hivemind of SA. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' 02:10, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::<font face=chiller><font size=4>For the Swarm!</font></font>--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 02:13, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::If you look on [[User talk:Linkthewindow|Link]]'s user page now regarding Martyr, you'll see what I mean about the Drama Llama... and would using the following template I've created for my group be acceptable as well?<br />
{{EIG}}-[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 02:48, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::A lot more acceptable. Just don't go throwing it on peoples pages left and right ya' know? also, don't forget to sign. :P --[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 02:36, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::please excuse me but didnt i get in trouble for posting my template of other ppls accounts? --[[User:Imthatguy|Imthatguy]] 02:39, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You apparently spammed it, which is why I'm warning this guy against it. Duh. :) --[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 02:42, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::: :P DOWN WITH THE CRATS!!!!!!!!!, FIGHT THE POWER!!!!!!!, ece., ect. --[[User:Imthatguy|Imthatguy]] 02:44, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::What did I do that was so bad?--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 02:46, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::Sorry for not signing my post earlier.... It's signed now.... So let me ask you this,.... Is this an official warning, or like the "I'm just letting you know..." Kind of warning? Oh,.... he's already spammed my groups page, and my talk page once with that "Fight The Power" Bull Shit, so shouldn't he get another warning for having just spammed my talk page with it again? -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 02:48, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::this has just been a "Hey, letting you know now because I'm a nice guy that if you go and thorw this on a bunch of pages, someone will bring you up for vandalism" type warning, nothing official. As for Imthatguy, no, I wouldn't warn him for this becaus eit wasn't spamming, this time it was more of a joking poke at his earlier vandalism and me because I'm a 'crat.--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 02:50, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::: Nothin you did just some of 'em can be asses --[[User:Imthatguy|Imthatguy]] 02:53, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::: Well Thank you for letting me know. I do greatly appreciate that. I will severly retard my advertisments. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 03:03, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== A/VB editing ==<br />
<br />
Apparently you missed the giant "All non-admin members please keep your comments to the talk page for the remainder of this case. Thank you" at the bottom of the User:Martyr section. :P --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' 03:12, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Apparently I did. No need to be an asshole about it,.... I just came back to apologize to you for having posted it after it go removed. I just thought someone was screwing with my stuff. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 03:13, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::It was someone screwing with it - Cyberbob, and he's not mistake-friendly. He didn't really explain why he removed it ("u dumb?"), haha. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' 03:15, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::It's nice to have an explanation, so I won't make it again. Thanks for having cleared it up for me... :) -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 03:17, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Rat of Steel's "Inaccurate" edits ==<br />
<br />
You do realize that RoS is only quoting the [[External Military]], and that the numbers cited are zombies, right? :P --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 22:33, 2 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:No I did not. Thanks for informing me. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 22:36, 2 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Comics==<br />
The [[The Urban Dead Wiki Comics Page]] has been kept, if you'd like to work on it. I've [[:Category:Comics|categorised]] as many comics as I could find, if you'd like to use any of them <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 03:09 4 August 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:Sounds great. I will get to work to see what I can't do with the page when I get some free time later on this week. Thanks for letting me know. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 05:10, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::Good luck Poodle. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 05:12, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Thanks. I have the feeling I am going to need it on this project! -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 05:16, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Evil League of Evil ==<br />
<br />
For answers to your questions about the League, I refer you to <span class="plainlinks">[http://drhorrible.com/ Dr Horrible]</span>. If you've any remaining questions, please feel free to contact me again. {{User:Revenant/Duke_D'oeuvre/Sig}} 04:39, 7 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Jesus -_- ==<br />
<br />
Does each suburb need a whole new page for you KOS list? --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 03:55, 8 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:I know you say this with sincerity, and that it's irritating to see. But for what it's worth,.... I hope you'll laugh as hard as I am right now. But no,... really,.... no. The logic behind it though is that my group operates in multiple suburbs. <p>I could have 100 different post on our forums for it. And they'd all be unorganized peices of crap, that run on, and you'd never know really who was supposed to be where. However, doing it this way, you could update each suburb as things change,... At that, I'm the only administrator on my board. I'd have to edit every post out of those 100 to make them accurate. This way, each of my group members can participate. Hope you'll understand where I'm coming from. :) -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 04:01, 8 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::Would not one page with one hundred subheadings suffice? {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 04:02, 8 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Check A/MR. I replied there.--{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 04:03, 8 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Rooster,... the problem in that lies in a warning I see everytime I edit a large page. That being said, I get the same general warning on my own talk page: "WARNING: This page is 33 kilobytes long; some browsers may have problems editing pages approaching or longer than 32kb. Please consider breaking the page into smaller sections." -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 04:10, 8 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Do what everyone else does when they get that message... ignore it ;) <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 04:14 8 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:::::::Just click the edit link that appears to the right of any heading. Then you need only edit a tiny bit. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 04:17, 8 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Have you really thought this through? If you want to see if someone is on your KOS list, you'll have to check multiple pages, with no clue which suburb they were first reported in. Just put them all on the one page, in a wiki-sortable table, listing the suburb they were last seen in. That way you can sort it by name, and by suburb, with just the click of a button <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 04:13 8 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
::I don't know how to create a table at all,..... and at that, would basically revert back to what I said above. It would be a huge page which some browsers have a problem with. At that,.... it would be like a crop shoot,.... you'd see names and groups all over, and have to sort everything out in your head. Here,... you just click a link, and you know who to watch out for in the suburb your in. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 04:18, 8 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Same with subheadings. Just click the link in the contents and bam, you're there. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 04:21, 8 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::I like the idea, and it's not that I'm dead set against it. What you need to understand here is that there is a warning: <br>"WARNING: This page is 33 kilobytes long; some browsers may have problems editing pages approaching or longer than 32kb. Please consider breaking the page into smaller sections."<br>This is exactly what I've done here. And each page has subsections on it that have that little "EDIT" button near them. The sections that exist aren't that hard to edit the way I have it set up now. Everything being on one page makes it hard to edit, i.e., searching the table of contents, editing, the fact that it's longer than 32kb, and your browser has to search the code, and read only the code to edit one section. My brower even has problems like that with larger pages,.... where it takes a long time to load individual sections on pages over something like 50kb, when I'm editing them. And mind you, the section I'm editing half the time isn't even a tenth of that size. That's why I did what I did. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 04:29, 8 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::If you're having trouble with having it all on one page, you could always break the city into quadrents.--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 04:32, 8 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::What's the diffence between quadrants, to individual suburbs, rather than by suburbs the way I've done it? The only difference is that I have 25 surburbs in 4 different links. I have 4 more things I have to write up that way, in addition to the same 100 suburbs. The only thing different is you don't have 100 links. Big whoopy do. At that rooster, if I can click a link here and see who to watch out for in my suburb, and in your suggetion, all I do is click a link (in the table of contents), and I get to see who to watch out for in my suburb,.... what's the difference? -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 04:37, 8 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::The difference is you only have four pages to maintain instead of one-hundred. Since you didn't template your intro text, you would need to make 100 edits to fix the typos. Such as "will me listed" instead of "will be listed" and the six misspellings of "actively" per page. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 04:44, 8 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::I never knew you could template the text of a page... how do you do that? And at that,.... I'm still editing 100 surburbs worth of information, it's just that I have to go to four locations to do it now. Besides,.... this is just more searching for a little bit of information,.... I do not plan on changing anything. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 04:49, 8 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::In the end it is your call, all we're saying is that 100 pages will be, in the long run, rather impracticle. Consolidating the information usually is much easier to maintain.<br />
::::::::: To template text, create a page called "Template:namehere", type whatever you want to have templated, and then put <nowiki>{{namehere}}</nowiki> on the page you want to have the templated-whatever on.--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 04:56, 8 September 2009 (BST)<br />
Sweet deal!!! I never knew you could template text like that for a page. Let me ask you this,.... could I template the format I have for the page, but still have editable sections like what I have now? -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 04:59, 8 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:Yes, you can set variables. I can't remember how off the top of my head, but there should be instructions for that [[Help:Templates|here]].--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:05, 8 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::Sounds great. I'll see what I can't do to figure it out. Thanks!!! -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 03:40, 9 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== I have a question. ==<br />
<br />
Excuse me for posting this and i'm sorry if this isn't where i should post it but i saw your guide for beginners and wondered if i could ask you something since you have a guide.You can ignore this if it shouldn't be here.Anyway,i started playing UD yesterday.About the question.Can you refresh to see if any recent action has been done or do you have to move or do something?Like right now i'm in a church in Galbraith Hills and there's this guy with me...i don't know if he's still here since he might of left because i haven't done anything waiting for my AP to recharge...i tried refreshing the page but it doesn't seem to work.[[User:George The Awesome|George The Awesome]] 11:54, 14 September 2009 (BST) George The Awesome.<br />
:I don't mind you asking any questions at all. In fact,.... that's what I'm here for. To answer your quetion, you could refresh if you wanted to, but I wouldn't recommend it. Refreshing will often lead to you repeating the last action taken, and therefore, a waste in AP... which you happen to be waiting on to recharge. My recommendation is to simply do what I do,.... log out and immediatly right back in. This waste nothing more than a couple seconds of your time. All actions since your last move will be noted on your screen as usual. On a side note, you don't see people having moved as an action statement, upon logging in. And if you are asleep (out of AP),.... you won't see anything that happened to you since your last "log in" until you have at least one AP. Thanks for you question! -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 05:06, 16 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::Actually, a much easier method is to hit the "settings" or "buy skill" tab, then the "back to city" button on the bottom of the page. After that, you can refresh without risking AP (unless you perform another action).--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:16, 16 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::This is true as well. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 05:20, 16 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::: I hope you don't mind if I add my 2 cents here.I happened along and felt a need to contribute.Refreshing pages in UD is an important tactic to always get the latest update on what has happened. There is a handy dandy UD Greasemonkey script that creates a "refresh" button along side all the others. You click it, the page refreshes and there is no AP spendage. Alternately you can just click "Speak" and that will refresh the page as well without charging you an AP.Here is the link to the [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:Midianian/Userscripts#UDRB Refresh Button FireFox Script] If you go to the main wiki page and search for external links, that page has a tonnage of super cool stuff to customize your FireFox browser for Urban Dead.--[[User:Psychotic Pantomime|Pantomime]] 00:23, 17 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::At that, it's important to keep in mind that not all people have Fire Fox,... some of us actually still use Internet Explorer. :) -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 00:29, 17 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::: *GASP!* You have no soul! :P --[[User:Psychotic Pantomime|Pantomime]] 00:35, 17 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::: *GASP!* NEITHER DO YOU! :p -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 00:47, 17 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== re:New template ==<br />
<br />
Cheers --[[User:Blanemcc|Blanemcc]] 21:25, 21 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:Thanks Blane. Have you decided when you are going to come back to the game yet? -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 23:44, 29 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Revenants==<br />
What an interesting situation! I am starting a group called The Revenants based on what has actually happened to the in game alt I am running. I am working out the ethos of the group and who should come visit but the group EVIL. I must say Mr "Doom", I am impressed with the site and although there may be some things that are not perfectly alighned, I do think there could be common ground between the groups. Groups may be overstating the case as The Revenants are currently a group of exactly 1. However, as I get this thing figured out I think that "bad guys as the good guys" will be fist in glove with what I am aiming for....Let me know what you think here, at The Revenants or Drop me an email if you like Belisarius17@hotmail.com.<br />
Regards,--[[User:Belisarius17|Belisarius17]] 21:16, 29 September 2009 (BST)<br />
PS- To the Malton Droogs-Clockwork Orange was Awesome!!!<br />
<br />
==Politics==<br />
<br />
If you hate Ralph Nader, it probably means either one of two things...that you are a corporate-loving Republican who wishes that seat belts and airbags were introduced, and airports didn't have to pay for your ticket when they bump you (all done thanks to Ralph Nader.) The second possibility is that you're a complete Democrat, and hate Nader for the 2000 election. In that case, it is ridiculous that Nader should not have been allowed into the debate because he was said to be not a factor, but when Gore lost you say he was a factor. Even if he was a factor, a wise person once said "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." To vote for the lesser of two evils is a possibility. But the lesser of two evils is still evil. --[[User:Ralph Nader|Ralph Nader]]<br />
: Ralph Nader..... meh.... rather have him than bush or kerry or any one who ran last year..... --<b>[[User:Imthatguy|<span style="color:#000000">Imthatguy</span>]] is on the wiki looking at ur pagez </b> 13:22, 7 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
I was actually talking to Poodle of Doom, who said on my talk page that he hated Nader. But your response is most welcome - and I'm happily surprised that you like Nader. Yet you do not express great support of him; so I can't be sure of what you are. I'm guessing that you're a very open-minded Democrat who is unhappy with the current candidates, or of another "radical" view such as libertarianism or communism, so you at least appreciate that he is bringing some attention to third parties and independents. What is your political view?<br />
<br />
Also, I would like for Poodle of doom to respond to my statement. --[[User:Ralph Nader|Ralph Nader]]<br />
<br><br />
<br><br />
'''RESPONSE:'''<br />
<br>What I consider myself to be is a Conservative Republican. For example,.... When it came to Bush, I agreed with funding a war in Afghanistan,.... but not in Iraq.<br />
<br />
On another note, when it came to the bail outs,.... I liked the idea, as long as the stipulation that the people in charge of ruining the companies were either:<br />
<br />
A) Fired<br />
<br />
B) Had their wages reviewed<br />
<br />
C) Allowed the company, and future actions, to remain under the scrutiny of the government, until such funds could be repaid<br />
<br />
And at that,.... I like the idea of the loans being repaid. (Which I believe they are.)<br />
<br />
However, certain things I disagreed with Bush on were:<br />
<br />
1) Iraq<br />
<br />
2) Patriot Act<br />
<br />
Simply because there was no, and never will be, any proof supporting the idea that Iraq had WMD's,.... and that diminishing the rights of all American citizens will make them safer.<br />
<br />
Again, as I've stated,.... I consider myself to be a Conservative Republican. I don't believe in throwing bull shit idea's at a problem until one sticks. It needs to be investigated before it's implemented. And at that, all situations, and ideas relating to them should be in a constant state of evaluation, and re-evaluation. But I'm for the spending of money as an incentive for progress, thus making me both Republican and Conservative,... if I'm not mistaken.<br />
<br />
At that... I really don't hate Nader. I was just trying to provoke some sort of a response out of you. For what it's really worth.... I know very little about Nader, and wouldn't really be interested in learning any more about him. He seems a little to glum, and whiny for my taste. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 23:04, 7 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
'''NEW RESPONSE:'''<br />
Hm...you seem to be quite different from the average Republican. I agree with you on Iraq and the Patriot Act especially, which is a gross and indefensible stain on our democracy. However, I disagree with your take on the bailout - this bailout will be funding companies that work in their own self interests, and not in their workers' interests. If you think about it, it just make sense; <br />
why should the executives give a damn about how the company is doing 20, 30 years from now? Acting selfishly is, logically, the only way that large corporations will function. As for what you say about reviewing wages or firing executives - it just doesn't matter. You don't randomly get a company with corrupt executives. Psychology dictates that, given large numbers of people, certain actions will happen, with the rate of error inversely proportional to the number of people. <br />
<br />
Many of these companies helped by the bailout were insurance and auto companies, as well - does it really make sense, with environmental pollution and global warming increasing as we speak, to sponsor ''more'' pollution, albeit indirectly? Money should be spent on more environmental sources of energy such as solar energy and wind energy. And though you may say how damaging it would be to the economy if such companies were not helped, consider how much longer they will have prospered, and how much more damaging it will be, when pollution becomes so high that we will be ''forced'' to abandon them? <br />
<br />
As for insurance companies, they will only continue to work towards profit and not actual care, by only insuring the healthy, ignoring preexisting conditions, and finding loopholes and other ways to let innocent people die. Taxes may be raised by creating government single payer health insurance, but what of the lives that will be spared? Innocent lives, doomed to the fate of a corporation-corrupted government? <br />
<br />
So, I suppose I've elongated my diatribe enough now. At least you don't hate Nader. Not sure what you mean by gloomy and whiny, though. --[[User:Ralph Nader|Ralph Nader]]<br />
<br />
'''Response:'''<br />
<br />
I never said that the companies should be made to work in their workers interest. What I said was that companies should be made to work under the scrutiny of the government. What I mean by that is that there was a reason why these companies are ran into the ground. There is absolutely no reason why I should pay someone hundreds of millions of dollars a year to run my company into the ground, just to cut them a $125 million dollar severance package. My point being, there should be salary caps imposed on businesses that take loans of this type from the government. The money they could have saved simply by doing this themselves, and over the course of many years, would equal an amount large enough to pay back their loans.<br />
<br />
And I think I know what you might say: "Why not just let these companies go then?" Because doing so would be more detrimental to our society then trying to save them.<br />
<br />
And you misunderstood, yet again. The companies that were lent money, had certain terms they had to meet. For example, When GM was lent money, I believe they were told they would have to meet the CFC standards for 2017, by no later than 2015. And that they'd have to make a sustainable, affordable, gasoline alternative by 2020. How do you figure we're fueling pollution there?<br />
<br />
At that, the renewable sources you mention, fail in comparison to things like Fusion power. The company I work for just had wind turbines put on the roof of the building. 10 of them to be exact. It will take in excess of 15 years to get any form of pay off for the cost of these turbines (and that's counting just startup cost in the here and now, not maintenance cost in the future). These types of energy sources, though nice to have, aren't financially sound,.... nor is the energy output provided worth the overall cost, and couldn't sustain anything large. It wouldn't be supplemental basically. Just in addition too.<br />
<br />
And of course, Obama's taking care of insurance agencies with his new health care bill. What would Nader have done? -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 02:14, 8 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
'''NEW RESPONSE:'''<br />
<br />
Salary caps would be nice, actually. But when did I say that you said companies should work in their workers' interests? I just said that they do not do so. They obviously will not do so, given the choice, which is why unions are so vital to our nation. They allow the workers to get fair working conditions and decent salaries while keeping corporations' power in check. Unfortunately there are not enough of them, for fear of corporations.<br />
<br />
If GM is able to create a new gasoline alternative by 2020, as you apparently believe they will, then I will be happier - but I am somewhat skeptical. And even if we do dodge this obstacle, companies like these will continue to scheme and throw obstacles at us over and over again. You must remember, GM was the company that hired investigators to follow Ralph Nader, hired prostitutes to compromise him, sent his family threats, and more. If they had been more careful (and I wouldn't be surprised if they still do this to enemies, without failure) they would have discredited him. <br />
<br />
As for alternative energy sources - fusion power? I don't really have any opposition, but that's quite a daunting prospect. However, I agree that solar and wind energy are not very efficient right now. That is why we must spend money on research - for all kinds of alternative energy, even nuclear fusion if you like. The key element, though, is that we get rid of our current energy sources and find new ones. This does '''NOT MEAN''' nuclear energy (fission), though, or "clean" coal. We would be replacing our problem with new ones - nuclear waste is not exactly quick to clean up.<br />
<br />
What you last said, though...Obama isn't taking care of insurance companies if by "taking care" you mean not spending billions of our tax money on bailing them out (AIG in particular). But of course you mean the bill - and it does help a bit, but the fact remains that corporations reap profits from health insurance, and a single payer health plan is not created. And I have ''no'' idea what you mean that Nader would not take steps to have government pay for health insurance. [[User:Ralph Nader|Ralph Nader]] 02:56, 8 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
'''Response:'''<br />
<br />
This is why I'd refuse to vote for Nader. Your just as big of an Idiot as he is. Show me one unbiased media outlet that reported on the stuff you claimed the former GM company did. And the new '''<u>Goverment Owned</u>''' GM probably wouldn't do this.<br />
<br />
Second of all,... I meant Fission. I mispoke. And the waste you'd have depends on which isotope you use. If you use the neuclear bomb version (don't quote me on this, but I think it's isotope 139), you'd end up with neuclear waste which would poison the ground water, and the like. There is another isotope (138?) that doesn't do this. I don't know the exact physics behind this,... I do, however, know there is a difference.<br />
<br />
When I referenced Obama's bill,... I was no longer refering to the bailout of AIG. What I was refering to was the Health Care bill which would put caps on malpractice suits, limit profits insurance agencies can claim,.... open up the goverment as another low cost competetor (another insurance provider aside from Blue Cross),.... and would require all citizens to have '''"Basic Health Care Coverage"''', which many Americans currently do not have (This would help keep all cost aquired by these individuals from being writen off by Hospitals, (Loss of Profitability, requiring aditional aide from goverment funding), and thus, need support from tax payers). Overall, health care cost would come down, due in part to competion, regulation, reduced risk of lawsuits, and user funding (as opposed to taxpayer funding, which we know is in short supply due to economic turmoil!!).<br />
<br />
And when I asked what Ralph Naider would do,...I asked because I truly did not know. I ment no offense. But now,... I honestly do.<br />
<br />
Let me ask you streight out: What would Ralph Naider do to help protect the American people from the gross incompetence, steming from greed, that led to the bailout of so many companies, and economic downward spiral caused by the failure of several others, in the future? Would he impose as many goverment oversites, when giving such stimulus funds? And how would he help curb health care cost? What reform would he deliver to the Automotive, Banking, Healthcare, and Insurance industries, that would be so much better than the steps being taken by the current Congress, and Senate? And what would he do that the current elected officials, Obama included, are currently not doing? Or would he just worry about seat belts, airbags, and whoopee cushions? -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 03:34, 8 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
'''NEW RESPONE:'''<br />
<br />
First of all - how can you deny what they did to Nader??!! He won a lawsuit against them, which is independent of the media, and do you know how good GM's lawyers are? This is outrageous!<br />
<br />
Second, I will not fault you in that you do not understand nuclear fission, but I will fault you for not knowing and pretending you do. 138 and 139 are isotopes of lanthanum, which is almost never used for fission. Basically all of the elements ever used in fission are uranium-233, uranium-235, and plutonium-239. Which all create nuclear waste.<br />
<br />
And how can you say that Nader wouldn't have done as much? Look at Nader's website - perhaps you will gain some much needed understanding of who he is and what he stands for. And whoopee cushions? I'm assuming that's meant to be provocative. [[User:Ralph Nader|Ralph Nader]] 12:54, 8 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
'''RESPONSE:'''<br />
<br />
Got proof of the lawsuit?<br />
<br />
139 -> 239....?.... o.0 whoopee,.... off by one number..... 135 -> 133.... again..... considering I don't deal with physics even remotely.... I had a pretty good '''BASIC''' idea didn't I? And since when are you a nuclear physicist,... Mr. Politician?<br />
<br />
And I refuse to go to his website. I wouldn't want the old man to shit his pants with glee because someone finally made it there. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 13:38, 8 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
'''NEW RESPONSE:'''<br />
<br />
Are you serious? I thought your last response was outrageous, but this? This has degenerated from a political discussion to a game of "let's see who can up with a better insult". First of all, I don't blame you for not knowing about fission - not many people do. But you instead called me a fool and said that "isotope 138" did not create nuclear waste. Despite any rumors you may have heard, there is no new revolutionary way to generate nuclear fission without any waste. Waste is inevitable; what do you expect from radioactivity? <br />
<br />
Second, who said that a politician could not have any knowledge of nuclear fission? If you don't believe me (which I assume you don't) you can look it up online. I'm not a politician, anyways.<br />
<br />
Third; it is ridiculous that, without any knowledge of Ralph Nader or his policies, you should treat him in such a respect. And for not going to his website, I will only say..."There are none so blind as those who will not see."<br />
<br />
Fourth, do you even understand what you're talking about when you say the lawsuit was fake? I completely assure you it happened - he settled the lawsuit for $284,000, a lot of money in 1966. Yet I suppose you do not trust me, so here it is on Wikipedia, on the entry for his book Unsafe at any Speed: "GM responded to Nader's criticism of the Corvair by both trying to destroy Nader's image and silence him by "(1) conducted a series of interviews with acquaintances of the plaintiff, "questioning them about, and casting aspersions upon [his] political, social, racial and religious views; his integrity; his sexual proclivities and inclinations; and his personal habits"; (2) kept him under surveillance in public places for an unreasonable length of time; (3) caused him to be accosted by girls for the purpose of entrapping him into illicit relationships (4) made threatening, harassing and obnoxious telephone calls to him; (5) tapped his telephone and eavesdropped, by means of mechanical and electronic equipment, on his private conversations with others; and (6) conducted a "continuing" and harassing investigation of him."<br />
<br />
If you want more proof, look at this, from [http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/401434/Ralph-Nader this site]: "GM went to exceptional lengths to discredit Nader, including hiring a private detective to follow him. Nader sued for invasion of privacy, and the case was settled after GM admitted wrongdoing before a U.S. Senate committee. With the funds he received from the lawsuit and aided by impassioned activists, who became known as Nader’s Raiders, he helped establish a number of advocacy organizations, most notably Public Citizen."<br />
<br />
If you want any more proof, you are even more hopeless than I thought (which isn't even possible). But if you finally decide to listen to wisdom instead of ignorance, and truth instead of lies, you would do well to go to [http://www.votenader.org/issues/ Nader's site].<br />
<br />
Also, Imthatguy should feel free to post his opinion on the issues here. I'm curious as to his political view.<br />
<br />
<br />
'''I call your bluff, where did I ever say I believed the lawsuit was fake? Second of all, I asked for an unbias source. Wikipedia can be used to reflect personal beliefs, and media bias. Third, All I said is that I thought there was one that didn't creat such waste. Fourth of all,... if his supporters can't stay focused on the simplest of tasks during an arguement, and would try as often, and as hard to derail the arguement all together as what you did,.... why should I even consider the man? Besides, it was you who got pissy with me when it came time to play hard ball above. After playing the role of a shifty bastard throughout this entire arguement, dodging to the left, then to the right,.... and refusing to answer the questions I posed all togethor, thus facing the conflict head on, I hope your proud of yourself, and your cause. Don't bother responding on my page to this... I don't care to know your worthless opinion.''' -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 04:53, 9 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br><br />
The above post by [[User:Ralph Nader|Ralph Nader]] are considered to be [[Template:Notfunny|Not Funny]], and therefore deemed to be a:<br />
<p><br />
<br />
{{Notfunny}}<br />
<br />
== [[User_talk:Prep#Sorry_bout_that....|Re: Sorry bout that....]] ==<br />
<br />
Hey, no problem, I've just been setting up a bunch of junk lately. It wouldn't surprise me if I actually did commit some wiki taboo! o.O {{User:Prep/sig}}04:43, 8 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== That Last Argument About Politics Was Useless ==<br />
<br />
That Last Argument Was Useless. You guys probably spent a lot of time just getting angry at each other because they had a different opinion than you. CHILL OUT, BOTH OF YOU!!!--[[User:Beowulf661|Beowulf661]] 21:25, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Uh...okay...but I didn't get angry because of a difference in opinion. Poodle of doom insulted me, and accused me of sidestepping questions. It was not a political discussion. [[User:Ralph Nader|Ralph Nader]] 21:35, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
YOU ARE THE MOST STUBBORN PERSON I HAVE EVER MET--[[User:Beowulf661|Beowulf661]] 22:25, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Um...okay. I wasn't accusing Poodle of doom, though, I was just explaining to you what we were arguing about. [[User:Ralph Nader|Ralph Nader]] 23:34, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Um,.... '''kiss my ass'''? It's my talk page, and I'll discuss what I like here. If you don't like it, go blubber to somebody else about it. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 04:42, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Are you talking to me or to beowulf? If it's me, then I'm sorry if I insulted your intelligence by correcting you about fission, if that's what you're angry about. If it's beowulf...well, you have the right to kick him off your page, but I don't think that such an angry retort was necessary. [[User:Ralph Nader|Ralph Nader]] 12:46, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
I wasn't talking to you. Second of all, didn't I tell you not to respond to anything on my talk page? -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 13:36, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Oh, sorry, I forgot. You can delete this post if you like - I won't post anything more on your page. [[User:Ralph Nader|Ralph Nader]] 21:22, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Ahh....whom I kidding... I guess I don't mind anymore. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 00:08, 15 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Random Edit==<br />
<br />
Exactly as rory said, the two lines were overlapping on normal monitors, but yeah, revert if you want, I dont mind either way. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:42, 24 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:No that's fine. I reverted it back to the way you had it. I was just curious as to why it was done. Thanks. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 13:36, 24 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Re: Fight ==<br />
<br />
Sorry for the late reply. We're actually busy right now with PKA stuff, maybe some other time. --[[User:Blanemcc|Blanemcc]] 23:31, 28 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:No problem.... maybe another time. -'''[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of Doom]]'''<sup>[[Project Mentor|<span style="color: CornflowerBlue">'''M!'''</span style>]]</sup> <sup>[[Image:Hazard.jpg|12px|Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.]]</sup> 04:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== User page redirects ==<br />
<br />
Because some silly people got all worked up over them, they're delete-on-site: [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletion Schedule]], see "User page redirects". {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 15:39, 1 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Oh! Sounds good to me! Sorry 'bout that... didn't realize. -'''[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of Doom]]'''<sup>[[Project Mentor|<span style="color: CornflowerBlue">'''M!'''</span style>]]</sup> <sup>[[Image:Hazard.jpg|12px|Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.]]</sup> 15:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Deal ==<br />
Alright fine. I'll help you defend [[Fort Perryn]]. But [[Wulves/Second Company]] might come with me on this mission. Don't kill us and we'll help you fort perryn. --[[User:Rogue Medic|Rogue Medic]] 02:53 6 November, 2009 (GMT)<br />
<br />
== ZL stuff ==<br />
Poodle, I was referring to the I EAT X BRAINS characters, not Cmistom. Sorry if that confused anyone. --[[User:AmberRose|Amber Rose]] 03:49, 7 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:No problem. I shall reley the message. Thanks for your time and patients. -'''[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of Doom]]'''<sup>[[Project Mentor|<span style="color: CornflowerBlue">'''M!'''</span style>]]</sup> <sup>[[Image:Hazard.jpg|12px|Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.]]</sup> 04:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Thank You==<br />
Thank you for being kind enough to revive me. I was originally at the revive point located at 20,83 but this asshole[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1086402] kept walking up and killing me. So I moved to a new RP and hoped for better luck. If you see him can you do me a favor and kill him or something? But anyway thank you again for the revive.[[User:Necrowanderer|Necrowanderer]] <sup>'''[[TJ|TJ!]]'''</sup> 02:34, 8 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I'm sorry.... What the hell are you even talking about? And if you want me to assassinate that dude for you.... sure. I'd be happy to have my group help. -'''[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of Doom]]'''<sup>[[Project Mentor|<span style="color: CornflowerBlue">'''M!'''</span style>]]</sup> <sup>[[Image:Hazard.jpg|12px|Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.]]</sup> 02:41, 8 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Fort Perryn ==<br />
Trust me, I want to help you defend the fort, but I just don't trust you completely yet. I'm afraid you might try to kill me afterwards. --[[User:Rogue Medic|Rogue Medic]] 15:59 7 November 2009 (GMT)<br />
:Your friend [[User:Belisarius17|Belisarius17]] is helping us out too. Give it some more thought. I assure you, nothing will happen to you, or other survivors while this opereation is taking place. -'''[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of Doom]]'''<sup>[[Project Mentor|<span style="color: CornflowerBlue">'''M!'''</span style>]]</sup> <sup>[[Image:Hazard.jpg|12px|Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.]]</sup> 00:48, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Re: my page==<br />
Hey PoD, I guess I can't call ya L... on the wiki, but you could've just asked me to erase it instead of breaking out the black marker on my page yourself. Oh, and I wanted to say you should probably ask Roddy about coming into Kempsterbank, I don't make requests for the group nowadays, I'm semi-retired like Able. Also, I've played a couple games of catch the bullet with EVIL members around Kempsterbank, and have seen some odd KT bashing graffiti signed EVIL around town. You know any thing about it? [[User:BigJD|JD]] 03:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:To be honest with you, we've not been in Kempster since we left West Grayside just before the MOB hit last. I hope your not offended that I took a black marker to it. I figured while I was there, adding content, you know? I can honestly say that anyone who is in your neighborhood, claiming to be an '''[[EVIL]]''' member actually isn't one. All my members are actually in [[Lockettside]] with me right now. Thanks for your help... I'll get in contact with Roddy. -'''[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of Doom]]'''<sup>[[Project Mentor|<span style="color: CornflowerBlue">'''M!'''</span style>]]</sup> <sup>[[Image:Hazard.jpg|12px|Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.]]</sup> 05:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::No big deal, just would have liked you to drop me a line to editing my page, you've got my IM and email. Oh, and I was just killed by BillyGates again about 18 hours ago, took a screenshot this time if you want it. [[User:BigJD|JD]] 21:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Why would we even think about helping you with ANYthing Poodle? You've really flipped out man. What happened? [[User:Roddy Winters|Roddy Winters]] 11:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::The stupid shit your talking about was a violation of an agreement we had. The rest is all history,.... as I recall, even while flipping out, I made your group better. It was my "arbitrary" deletion of the originaly yahoo group (arbitrary is what you'd call it) that led to the current forum, and more organized group structure. This led to what you have today, which you think is so "awesome". At that, you'd think you'd all have a little more respect. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:24, 24 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::What do you think I'm talking about here? I don't remember any kind of agreement about anything with you. Please refresh my memory. In fact, you're the one who wanted to ally with us. We turned you down then, and we'll turn you down for the forseeable future as well. Again I ask, why would we help you out with anything? We're apparently on some little "Kill" list you have. You personally, and members of your group, have PK'd our members for no reason. You've lied to us. Got all bent out of shape about the font that poem of yours was put in. And yet you keep coming to us under the guise of "friendship", and asking for help. To me, and most mentally balanced folks, that is erratic behavior at best my man. That's what I'm talking about when I say "flipped out". <br />
:::::And, are you really trying to take credit for the relative success of a group that you singly-handedly tried (and failed) to ruin more than two years ago? Frankly my friend, you did more damage to the KT while you were IN it than you managed to do when you actually turned a "destructive" eye towards it. If that's the kind of accolades you're looking for, you got it! You might want to re-think this though. [[User:Roddy Winters|Roddy Winters]] 04:51, 25 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::The poem first off, is what I was talking about. The original agreement is that it could be used in it's original form only. Whether that was conveyed to you or not, is not my problem. That said, you've just agreed with me. My destructive behavior forced your group to create some of the projects, and what not, that led to what you have now. As I've said before,... my leaving, and distructive behavior in the process was for the best. Thirdly, kiss my ass. Don't post on my page again jackass. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 00:22, 26 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Thought about it ==<br />
Well, I,ve done some heavy thinking and now I fully trust you on this mission. I'll talk to [[User:Belisarius17|Belisarius17]] and see when we'll attack the fort.-- [[User:Rogue Medic|Rogue Medic]] 14:27 10 November 2009<br />
:Like I stated before. All groups participating with us shall be safe until our mission is over. Feel free to jump in on any conversations about the mission, and add whatever you feel necessary, by '''<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://z3.invisionfree.com/URBAN_DEAD_EVIL/index.php?showtopic=81&st=0&#entry2132586 clicking here.]</span>''' -'''[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of Doom]]'''<sup>[[Project Mentor|<span style="color: CornflowerBlue">'''M!'''</span style>]]</sup> <sup>[[Image:Hazard.jpg|12px|Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.]]</sup> 23:33, 10 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==[[EVIL]] Reply==<br />
<br />
I found out because I stalk [[Special:Recentchanges]]. I was interested in the KOS list as im a long term resident of Kempsterbank, wanted to know who you were targetting and have seen your graffiti. I think you're amibtious because because you created KOS lists for every suburb in the game. Thats 100 pages. Was that all you asked? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:36, 11 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah I think so. Thank's for the response. I appreciate it. Say, are you in a group at all? -'''[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of Doom]]'''<sup>[[Project Mentor|<span style="color: CornflowerBlue">'''M!'''</span style>]]</sup> <sup>[[Image:Hazard.jpg|12px|Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.]]</sup> 13:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Half and half at the moment. [[SFHNAS]] and [[404]] and occasionally [[BSLS]]. I have a long term vinetown resident, that most vinetonians know of, and an up and coming punk waging a one man war on extinction. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Perhaps [[BSLS]] would be interested in helping us with a little mission we have going on. They're a survivor group, yes? -'''[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of Doom]]'''<sup>[[Project Mentor|<span style="color: CornflowerBlue">'''M!'''</span style>]]</sup> <sup>[[Image:Hazard.jpg|12px|Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.]]</sup> 00:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::They are, but they're [[Borehamwood|a very long way away.]] --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:17, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::Really? Are we so big of a blip on the radar that everyone knows what's going on? -'''[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of Doom]]'''<sup>[[Project Mentor|<span style="color: CornflowerBlue">'''M!'''</span style>]]</sup> <sup>[[Image:Hazard.jpg|12px|Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.]]</sup> 01:52, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::It all depends who you mean by "Everyone" Im sure a lot of the regular Wikizens know who you are, but that doesn't you're well known in game. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 22:41, 23 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::Well,... even at that, the last suburb we came from still broadcast messages about us a month after the fact,.... and there have been concerns from other groups from other suburbs we haven't even visited yet. I'm wondering what the hell is going on.... I didn't think we were a big deal. -'''[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of Doom]]'''<sup>[[Project Mentor|<span style="color: CornflowerBlue">'''M!'''</span style>]]</sup> <sup>[[Image:Hazard.jpg|12px|Fear is only as deep as the mind will allow it be.]]</sup> 22:49, 23 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Any reason you're taking over names that have no similarity to your group? It's fine to have redirects, but you're taking potential names form future groups, not to mention names from groups that once were, and could come back. What would happen if Swiers decided to come back and re-make Vita? He'll have to fight for his name back? I suggest you put those redirects up for speedy deletion and use redirects that weren't once groups, or have a name that is similar to your groups.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 23:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Done deal,.... just let me finish making a few more changes to my KOS List. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 23:54, 24 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Okay, and thank you!--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 23:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::No problem..... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 23:57, 24 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Hey I...sorta remember you==<br />
Nope, Ghetto Cow is historical (thus is dead) and I no longer play UD, though I'm thinking about coming back for a bit. Hope that answers your questions!--{{User:Lachryma/sig}} 22:28, 27 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I'm glad you a least "sorta" remember me. I use to run the [[Knights Templar|KT]]. Let me know if you ever come back to play. I'd love to know what you think about all the changes to the game. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:35, 27 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::It'll probably be in like a month or so if I do in fact come back, but uh sure I'll give you my feedback.--{{User:Lachryma/sig}} 05:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Sounds cool.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:36, 28 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==I is a scientist==<br />
This guy claims to have an alt recently kicked out EVIL, i was curious if you knew him or recognized him, cared to share why he was kicked out. If it was for something like zerging i obviously care a lot, but if he just sucked as a pker maybe he can be a better survivor. The profile in question is here [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1641859]. I was informed his original name i was eat 7 brains or something like that, you can reach me back on my talk page or various other forms, that i listed on my wiki page. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 21:30, 2 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:There was a member kicked out of our group, though the profile listed is a new one. [[User:I EAT 7 BRAINS|I EAT 7 BRAINS]] was the account he used in our group. So if this is a new account, it will be in addition to the problem we had with him. He was the only member kicked out of our group.... ever! And was removed for having been a zerger. You can [[Extremely Vengeful and Irksome Laymen/KOS List/Lockettside|Click Here]] to see that he was placed on our Kill On Sight List for Lockettside, and you can [[Talk:Extremely Vengeful and Irksome Laymen/KOS List/Lockettside|Click Here]] to read all the gory details. He not only acknowledged to me in a private message in our forums that he was zerging, but later went on to admit to it again on the discussion page. <br />
:<br />
:For the record as well, our [[LoBo|friends]] accused another member of ours as being an alternate account for him. It was later disproven. Thanks for your inquiry. Please tell me how this turns out for you. Thanks! -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 00:30, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Thanks, i was told by a member of yours that they thought that was the account in question. I checked him out on the zerg list, and offered him a very large deal if he wants in, which i doubt he will take. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 00:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Could I ask you which member it was that spoke to you? And what exactly is it that we are talking about here? What do you mean by "Deal"? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 01:20, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::i dont know his name for you guys, but on our forum hes Posydon, he didn't like give away any super secret info, just that, that guy had been kicked out for zerging. The deal was Brain clears all like 6 people listed on the zerg list, and i will consider letting him into UBCS, pending what our coucil thinks (6 people get a say). I believe people can change for the better, but they need to clear their past first. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 01:30, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::That's cool,.... So,... since you've got one of my in your midst, could I get one of mine in yours? :) -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 02:27, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Technically you do :P --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 02:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::I don't know who they are though. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 02:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::I don't know either, i just know their name on my forum --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 02:54, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::imho, if he wants to keep his alts identities secret, let him. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 02:57, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::Hoe, get off my topic of discussion, go wiki something else in your push for sysop power --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 02:58, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::Yeah bitch! Let us deal it out Hali.... Seriously,.... I understand that you don't know who they are... and I wasn't clear before.... A group I had previously led had done attempted to do something I liked before. The idea was that of an exchange program. Basically, I give you one of mine, I get one of yours. They each work, aiding the functions of the other group, while only being a member of their own. I don't know if you watch NCIS,... but kind of like the Role of Ziva David (spelling of last name is off I think). I don't know if you'd be interested in that sort of thing or not,... but perhaps we could try it? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::Well...i would point to my character list and say donate for me and we will talk --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 05:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::Donate for you huh? Shouldn't we discuss the conditions and terms first? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:30, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Welcome Newbie ==<br />
<br />
Don't use the template. It makes them feel unwanted. Give a unique welcome to everyone and offer advice whenever they need it. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 02:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Tell iscariot to do the same,.... I noted he seems to do it more often then I do.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 02:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Lol. Izzy is a lost cause. I told you because you may not be as stubborn as him. :P --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 02:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Don't take this the wrong way. It's not that I'm opposed to improving, it's just that I think there is a lot of nice information contained their that new users would like to know. I wish someone had shown that to me when I first joined. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:19, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Half these users won't read it. But if you think it's best, at least add a comment WITH the template, like what I used to do :P --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 04:22, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::I think you have a deal,... have anything that you'd like to show me as an example? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:26, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Pretty much every WN I've ever done except like 5 is a place to start. Haliman is just whoring out my good advice at this point. And like I said to him on the topic of Izzy, I'm just happy he is being nice-ish at all!--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 12:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::Iscariots doesn't strike me as being the most notorious when it comes to civility, let alone anything else. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:33, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::The only reason Iscariot is spamming that template is for him to gain de-escalations. Speaking of which...--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 13:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::If he's spamming it, shouldn't he be given a warning for vandalism like [[User:Imthatguy|Imthatguy]] did for spamming his template? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::Iscariot easily makes 250 edits most months anyway. Today alone he made a few dozen or hundred edits on a legitimate cause. I'm willing to bet that it's almost always the month-long wait that holds up his de-escalations, not the edits. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 22:58, 3 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Yes! ==<br />
I did like your nav template. I admit it, I'm a Wiki Thief. --[[User:Mary Deluxe|Mary Deluxe]] 00:11, 4 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:That's cool. I wasn't sure. I like it when people see my group, admire stuff, and copy it. Thanks! -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 00:44, 4 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Images==<br />
Look, the wiki isn't supposed to be an image hosting site. Images on the wiki are to be used on a wiki page (not just linked to), otherwise it has no place being on the wiki. That's why unused images are a scheduled deletion. If you want to store screenshots that arn't used on a page, use a free image hosting site, there's plenty out there. It's ''not'' the sysops job to look at every unused image to make sure it's not linked to somewhere <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 06:41 6 December 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:Kiss my ass..... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 21:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Is it shiny and metal? <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 08:16 7 December 2009 (BST)</small><br />
::I personally use imageshack. Place never has any problems in my experience.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 11:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== EVIL spamming ==<br />
<br />
First off. I know nothing of your group's goals, nor do I know much about you personally. And whatever I say can't be held against me since I'm an old man.<br />
<br />
But if you ever do something like [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AEarletown_Rangers&diff=1624910&oldid=1624905 this] to one of my group pages, Ima open a can of whoopass. It just pisses everyone that reads it off that you're trying to intimidate them. Especially since that link i sent was a really new group. I'm nowhere involved and it makes me mad. Tone it down, k? --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 02:19, 15 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:Congrats on being the first to complain,... where does it say that anything like this is against the rules? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::You're 100% correct. Not against the rules. It just makes you and your group look like asshats. iono... I don't think I'm the only one that thinks this. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 13:49, 15 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Haliman's not. I don't think you were extremely rude, Poodle, and you certainly didn't break any rules, but I don't think the comment was in good taste necessarily. If it had just been a friendly-sounding verbal jab (e.g. "We are SO gonna kick your asses :P") I'd be cool with it, but this one is a little off-putting. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 14:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I'm still laughing over the fact Poodle nominated his own group for the Malton Murder Awards, and then actually placing the nominee template at the top of the [[Extremely Vengeful and Irksome Laymen|Evil]] page. Couldn't find anyone else to boast your own group, so you thought you did it yourself? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 14:04, 15 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::Dumbass,... Don't chastise me over this BS... Take everything I said from a RPG standpoint,... I want to antagonize... that's my mission. Second of all, screw off. If RDD can nominate themselves,.... so can I... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::I wouldn't have mind it as much if you hadn't put the template at the top of your group page, because that's just show off. Which wouldn't be a problem if someone else actually nominated you. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 16:15, 16 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::: 1: Everyone STFU and stop measuring dick sizes. He posted on the girls talk page, i found it rather funny. If she had a problem with it, she could have deleted it, also im pretty sure she can handle herself, she doesn't need a white knight. 2:Poodle is allowed to vote for whoever he wants, if he chooses to push his group then let him, RDD voted for themselves, I saw LoD voting for themselves, and even some Gore Corps voted for themselves for various things, therefore no one has any right to verbally attack Poodle just because he said his own group does a good job killing, some where, some one in Malton is tired of dying by EVIL's hands. Lastly, Thad, when was the last time anyone took anything you said seriously? Don't worry though, if there is a Malton Best Zerg award I will be sure to nominate you. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 23:35, 15 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::Who let you out of the cage? --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 23:39, 15 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::{{*}}Raises hand*--[[¯\(°_o)/¯|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> ¯\(°_o)/</span>]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkTurquoise">¯</span>]] 23:44, 15 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::Well that answers that question. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 23:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::Thank you Colonel! -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 00:36, 16 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==[[User:Vampire_Snuffleupagus|Vampire Snuffleupagus]]==<br />
It's not advertising, and it's probably not a bot. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 03:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:It hit up quite a few people in a matter of a few seconds,.... could of been a copy and paste job? Who knows,... the user page is used to advertise New Moon.... I'll remove my complaint.... Thanks! -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 03:45, 19 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Indeed... if it were a bot, the edits would've been a hell of a lot faster and the times between edits more consistent. This looks like it might be an alt of someone poking fun, or even a brand new user who is unaccustomed with wiki etiquette or they're just trying to introduce themselves. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 03:47, 19 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Well thank you for letting me know.... I used the Welcome Newbie Template on their talk page, and alls seemed to stop. [[User:Aichon|Aichon]] even pointed [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=1627512 this] out to me. Perhaps they've begun to figure it out. Now,... If I'm not mistaken, [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Bots#Vampire Snuffleupagus|this sort of thing]] gets archived right? Should I just delete my original complaint, or strike it? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 03:53, 19 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I'd just leave it be, and let a sysop take a look to do an IP check. As the note under the header says, the report will be purged in a week regardless. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 03:56, 19 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::Sounds good... thank you for paying attention, and providing assitance.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 03:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
== Win ==<br />
Your talk page is a humorous suggestion. I approve. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 07:57, 19 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:How do you figure....? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 12:35, 19 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
== Credit for help on VF's ==<br />
Well, for one thing you talked me out of doing anything stupid when I did not have the means to achieve my goals. You encouraged me to take my time planning things. You offered to help by allowing space on your groups forum when no other "survi" groups even responded. You have been patient and helpful in hearing my ideas about the game. And really it was your ideas about a couple of projects that led me to consider how "breathers" could find common ground-and EVIL's ethos of "bad guys taking justice back into their own hands" was a part of that thought about common ground.--[[User:Belisarius17|Belisarius17]] 04:17, 22 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
That's kind of cool,... Everyone in my group knew we were mentioned,... but no one knew how we inspired [[Vault fort|it]]. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:21, 22 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== GREAT EASTSIDE RP CLEANUP ==<br />
<br />
Hello there! As you can imagine we'd always be glad to have another bunch of revivers along for the trip. I'm sorry I'm not emailing you, I haven't got that function set up on the wiki. Will talk pages do at all? I'm sure we'd be happy to participate in a revive-oriented event if you've got one planned as well, since that's the core of our group. What did you have in mind? - [[User:DevOhm|Dimmswick]] 07:29, 29 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Talk pages will work for now.... We're interested in a possable cleanup effort if/when the [[MOB]] roll through [[Lockettside]]. I don't know if it will happen,... but I've heard it will be coming in the next few weeks sometime... That said... we'd be interested in helping to clean up the eastern side of [[Malton]] after that with you guys,..... and possably before that if they don't come through. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:26, 29 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Sure, we'd be down to head over to Lockettside if the MOB smashes it to bits. Let us know on our [http://bigprick.proboards.com/ forums] or on our wiki talk page if you ever want us to come through and help clean up somewhere. - [[User:DevOhm|Dimmswick]] 22:36, 4 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::Sounds great,.... We'll keep it in mind. I don't know that we'd be able to participate at the moment though. Are you going to be continuing this project afte the 14<sup>th</sup> of Febuary? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:47, 4 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::It depends on how long it ends up taking. We don't know actually know exactly how long it will take to go through every suburb in the east, taking into account accidental deaths and restocking along the way. I know the Big Prick is in it to the end though, and we'd be happy to have you all jump in whenever possible. - [[User:DevOhm|Dimmswick]] 02:10, 5 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::I will keep it in mind.... thanks for getting back with me. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 03:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== For each page you make ==<br />
<br />
A child goes hungry.<br />
<br />
[http://files.posterous.com/pourmecoffee/y0Mtvy595Evs9MXLATZDpNVs9Uv2Rd6uthcGBe19q5IEcao6jKl9ZUFLBYZj/the_more_you_know2.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=1C9REJR1EMRZ83Q7QRG2&Expires=1263148566&Signature=FQ3icKVEn6TO%2BGLv5M0dSQnpvfY%3D Den dun dennnnnnnnnnn] --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 18:31, 10 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:What difference does it make to you? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 18:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:: but I love poodle...he makes wiki pages, and isn't 'fraid of cyberbob or nuttin! Could be worse he could have this [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Category:Survivor_Groups&from=Umbrella].--{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 18:42, 10 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::What the hell? I fail to see either of your points.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 18:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::I came in to make a joke about you dominating RC, and Krauser came in to stalk my edits. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 19:02, 10 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::Neither of you two's links work. :( {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:03, 10 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::::It was an image of "The more you know!" --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 19:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::::[http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/4963/knowingn.png O RLY?] {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::::::What's RC? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 19:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::::::[http://blog.barfoo.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/ya_rly001.jpg Ya rly.] RC = Recent Changes --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 19:30, 10 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::I see,... for some reason, the only thing I could think of earlier was Reley Chat... but I've been kind of tired.... good thing I took a nap. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 21:08, 10 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Don't listen to hal, he's a faggot, and it's a wiki, make as many pages for your group as you want. As long as there in your group's namespace.--[[¯\(°_o)/¯|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> ¯\(°_o)/</span>]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkTurquoise">¯</span>]] 22:31, 10 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I love stalking the RC not your links Hal...err...[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Category:Survivor_Groups&from=Umbrella] should work since my top one doesn't...and i think i see why. Anyways my link is somewhat relevant to SA's comment as it clearly shows Hal's UBCS has 26 groups, no lie. Plus 2 personal groups on his user page >.< --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 22:53, 10 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
::@SA: I intended on doing what you've suggested, even prior to you having suggested. In fact, I'll probably just make more, just to piss him off if nothing else.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:57, 10 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::\o/--[[¯\(°_o)/¯|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> ¯\(°_o)/</span>]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkTurquoise">¯</span>]] 23:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Heads up==<br />
Hey PoD!-picking up after the MOB left and we are starting to remember other projects-ran across a Lad you may want to drop a line to:<br />
<br />
http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:Lieutenant_Ambrose<br />
<br />
I believe he shares some interest and I gave him some info.<br />
Happy New Year by the way-pretty late i know but things have been very hectic!<br />
Regards, --[[User:Belisarius17|Belisarius17]] 01:41, 14 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:Glad to hear you haven't forgotten about us yet. I'll see what I can't do to hit him up... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:12, 15 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
::Thanks alot for what you said about me-that was REALLY honorable. I guess you did not want credit for the project? Because if everything I said was "complete BS", then if you READ what I wrote it says the whole idea and planning was credited to you and your group. Well sorry for the misunderstanding. Next time you want to call me a liar, could you have the common courtesy to at least post it to me instead of about me on someone's page? You even have my email address so why you would be so frustrated to resort to public mudslinging is beyond me. And you are wrong-I do not lie. Ever.--[[User:Belisarius17|Belisarius17]] 00:07, 16 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
As I recall, you've said '''[[Vault fort|other things]]''' that '''[[Talk:Vault fort|I thought were quetionable]]''', and are still to this day, not entirly true. I've explained to you that you've been condecending via email before, and that you've hid information from us,.... it even seems as if you've '''[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Poodle_of_doom&redirect=no#Credit_for_help_on_VF.27s misconstrewed some things]''',.... now I'm just tired of it.... You've not contacted us in months. I'm begining to think you've been talking out your ass this whole time.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 00:51, 16 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Does his breath stink lololololololol --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 16:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
::...dude...wtf...--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 17:52, 16 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::Seriously Hali,... go take your flamboyant insults someplace else.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:31, 16 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::It was just a joke... I thought it was funny! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 22:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::I don't care if it's a joke,... at this point, he's just trying to instigate.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:38, 16 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::::Fair enough. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 22:55, 16 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== I'm gone ==<br />
<br />
Sorry for such a sudden disappearance. I was away from my computer for a few days and when I got back, I completely forgot about UD. I'm honestly quite amazed how active and powerful EVIL has become. However, having only half returned after months of inactivity, I'm playing with just two rotters, and thus, while EVIL would be my first choice for a PKer group, it is no longer fitting for my situation. I'm afraid I wont be returning. --[[User:TripleU|TripleU]] 06:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
:A belated response is not a problem. I wish for you to know that your account is still on the forums, and will not be removed. You have been placed on an inactive members list though, and will not be able to view the forums. I have done such out of respect for you being the last of the original founding members, aside from myself, with the group. If you should ever wish to return to us, please let me know by making such a request here on my talk page, or on the [[Talk:EVIL|groups talk page]]. You will always have a place in our ranks. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 06:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==OBR==<br />
<br />
Response on talk page. Basically yeah, swing by the forum.--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:47, 25 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Suburbs==<br />
[[Template:Nudeburb]]. That should do it. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:44, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Thank you... I appreciate the help. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 19:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::10 second job really. But as Iscariot says, play around with the code, thats the only way I learned to do anything around here. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::Tell iscariot not to be shy, and to feel free to come talk to me. Second of all,... I've been playing with the code, using the suburb template used on the page I originally commented on. I couldn't figure it out. I knew it had to use another set of coding, or template, like the one you pointed out. I just didn't know what the template was, or where to find it. Thanks again for your help. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 20:03, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::To find a template, find a page its used on and click the "Edit" button at the top of the page, below the edittng window it will give you a list of all the templates included in the page. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:06, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::I'm well aware of that. You fail though,.... [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Template:EXP_Suburbblock&action=edit take a look!] The template you suggested to me wasn't mentioned. Thanks again for the info though. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 20:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::::That's because the thing you're looking at is the blank version, nothing is applied to it with the exception of the template link for the colour scheme. The page code itself allows the use of templates when given keywords, but the version you're looking at is ''tabula rasa''. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 20:22, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::::Tabula rasa? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 20:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::::::A blank slate. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 20:30, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::Thanks,... are you trolling for drama thad? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 20:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::Nah, he's just stalking [[Special:Recentchanges|Recent Changes]] --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::Perhaps,... I just find it to be humorous when people jump into the middle of a conversation with out a whole heck of a lot of anything to say about the topic. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 20:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Dentonside ==<br />
<br />
Hi Poodle, I am indeed interested in expanding the pages in the area. I won't work very fast, but i like to add historical stuff to sites. Check my work on [[Tolman Power Station]]. Let me know if there is anything near the Tolman that needs doing. I was thinking about the Tower right next to it. --[[User:Zyckde|Zyckde]] 20:42, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Well,... I'm not looking to do it just for [[Dentonside]],... but every stub location on the wiki,.... I have an individual from my group interested, and so it would seem that you are to. Would you be interested in letting me use my group forums to host this project? At that, I'd also like to thank you for your interest. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 20:51, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::I did the [[Burges Towers]], again mostly history writing. --[[User:Zyckde|Zyckde]] 23:04, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
==Deliberately Posting at the top==<br />
So i woke up this morning and thought 'Why not deliberately post at the top of a page?'--{{User:Imthatguy/sig}} 05:18, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Then a douchebag rules-nazi will come and move it at the bottom at the page, for respect of the page owner. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 09:35, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::How about I ask DDR if this constitutes vandalism, and if it does, your a vandal waiting for punishment? If it doesn't, I'll take you to arby, and next time it happens, it will be. So,... DDR, is something like this vandalism? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::: =P --{{User:Imthatguy/sig}} 15:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Long time no see==<br />
Hey poodle, just signed into the account I have on this wiki to see that you left me a message all the way back in august :p -<font size=1>The preceeding post was made by [[User:OmishWarrior|OmishWarrior]]</font><br />
:Yeah I did old friend. How've you been? What you up to now? Are you still playing UD? And please remember to sign your posts.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 00:42, 5 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Hey Poodle==<br />
I haven't really gotten into discussion on the wiki, I guess I don't want to reveal my wiki-ignorance. I just got back into UD earlier this year and started to mess around with this whole wiki thing. I'm standing next to you at Errington Crescent RP and was curious as to how you died. Is it bad form to talk about ingame on the wiki? I suppose I feel a certain comeradery with you because you killed a zed spy(bill94) that I would have killed had I had the AP. I'm kind of a loner in the game, I haven't really put in the effort to affiliate with any group, but I've been around Tollyton/Roftwood after reestablishing my account in January...sheesh, what an akward post. Take 'er easy --[[User:MikhailKalashnikov|MikhailKalashnikov]] 03:15, 6 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:I killed him because it is what I do with my group. '''[[EVIL]]''' is a PKer group after all. Sorry for the belated response. If your interested, you're more than welcome to join up with us.... And I don't mind the in game talk... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 21:34, 7 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::I'll consider joining up with you guys; you've set up a slick wiki and I like what I've seen. I'm tired of the apathetic do-gooder survivor groups I've encountered, and I've had a few run-in's with Woodroffe whippersnappers recently(Not a Zed Spy). I suppose the forum is the best place to hit you up for discretion's sake. I guess I've got questions about you guys, but I've got to go for now. Later on. --[[User:MikhailKalashnikov|MikhailKalashnikov]] 06:07, 8 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::It really doesn't matter if you hit us up here, or on the forums. We're not that particular about it. Truth be known,... we use the forums just so there's an "Official" place for people to request to join... though if you wanted to do it on our talk page, or here, it's cool too. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 14:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==48ap Repair?==<br />
<br />
Pah! That's nothing. Survivors are terrible at reclaiming. [[Big Game Ruin Hunting]] --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Thanks for pointing it out.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 18:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Have a look at the banks in [[Miltown]] --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:23, 29 March 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I take it you're referencing [[Brancker Bank]] specifically? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 19:35, 29 March 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Re:Thaedracy ==<br />
<br />
Hey, man. I just did a quick checkuser search on Thaed, turned up two IPs accounts, though vandal activity was coming from both of these - though, oddly, all the vandalism I reported came from one IP, and all the stuff RHO caught was from a second one. I assume you know Thaed somehow if you're asking about him, and if so then I'm assuming it's through EVIL - if so, if you have any IP for him listed, on a forum perhaps, we can compare those to see if it's the same source or not. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 03:33, 15 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Honestly... I don't know Thaed, and was hoping that one of you guys actually did,.... I'd of loved to have someway to contact him, and be able to restore his account somehow.... All I know is that it really doesn't seem to be Thaed.... and I hate to see his account, and reputation sent down the shitter like that.... poor chap. As a sysop of sorts,... is it possable to tell if his email under his account has been changed recently? If it hasn't, have you tried emailing him? Or if it has, could you find the old one and email him? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 03:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Well, a scroll down his edit history shows that, aside from his vandal runs, he's almost exclusively worked on his user page. The user page has had several major shifts, including [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:Thaedracy&diff=prev&oldid=1675552 claiming to be 13, and later 12]. Based off of this I'd reckon he's either a little kid doing it "for the lulz", or a really poor troll.--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 04:58, 15 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::I could be mistaken, but if I remember correctly.... around three or so years ago,... just before I took my hiatus from UD, I thought he was a wiki mod.... Am I wrong? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 05:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::He doesn't appear to be in any of the [[A/PM]] archives, so you're probably mistaking him for someone else.--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:07, 15 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::No, there was never a sysop by the name of "Thaedracy". {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:10, 15 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::Alright then... I was mistaken. Seriously though... this guys been around for as long as I can remember,.... and I don't remember anything quite like this happening on his account before. Seems a little fishy to me. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 06:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
I'm not a sysop anymore Poodle. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Dang it! I knew that,... still handing out warnings I see... say, maybe you could still help though. Anything you could contribute to the situation? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 03:46, 15 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::I'm very sure he's an older user, I recognise his name. I originally was going to suggest he's a user that was solely created to impersonate the original Thaedracy with characters that looked similar but after seeing his talk page, it appears he's had a history of blanking pages anyway... In any case, we can't get information like passwords, emails, or logs of when they were changed. Sorry Poodle. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:47, 15 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::That really sucks,.... Like I said before, I hate to see the poor chap have his reputation ruined if someone else stole his account.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 15:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Good Articles==<br />
No idea. It's probably two weeks or something though, most votes on this site last that long. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:25, 16 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:I know it's only one week. But they haven't been cycled yet,.... I'm trying to be consicious,... and cue someone in.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 00:24, 17 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
==Clear the air==<br />
I'm coming on over here to your discussion to help clear the air, away from my peers.<br />
I've come to say sorry for all rude comments I made toward you. I've come to make amends and offer you a guest spot in our group. I'm not posting any links because you get the idea of which I'm talking about. The offer stands on my good faith and 1 or 2 other member's also. My reason for reacting harshly is because I hate false accusations a lot. I mean, you probably where kind of wondering. I would have probably come to the same conculsion as you had if the spots where reversed.<br />
It was bad taste on my part to react in such a way. If you wish to still begrudge us fine, but I offer my hand in peace. If I accidently did anything wrong on your page, I'm sorry. I'm relativly new to Wiki. --[[User:Pothead66|Pothead66]] 04:33, 17 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Trying to recruit the leader of another group.... let me think about that.... uh, No?!... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 12:24, 17 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
It wasn't as that. I'm not trying to come off as a asshole. I meant it as in if you guys want to do something with our group anytime in the future, we can do that. I'm just trying to say sorry for coming off as an asshole on our talk page. As for the guest spot, I meant it as in you can drop by and try out a mass killing with us. We have another one on our list soon. A chance for you to see how we did it and have fun doing it. Please don't think I'm trying to recruit you. If I was doing that I'd give you a spiel about dental plans and what not. We've already got plenty of others coming on in. They just need to level their alts. --[[User:Pothead66|Pothead66]] 23:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I knew you guys used alts... if you didn't, why would anyone need to level their alts? OMG! Better get back to your conversations of hairy peter, and lustrous man pecks.... I'd hate for you to miss out on the apparent fantasy! -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 23:42, 17 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Whatever, I guess I'm done here. If you didn't notice, my comment about the penis was in referance to our joke we played when we did our pking. If your set in stone on trying to troll when I'm offering just to drop it, fine. As I still say though, if you want to try doing a group corrdinated strike with us, my offer is still out there. Bai --[[User:Pothead66|Pothead66]] 23:59, 17 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
STFU douchbag... no one gives a rats behind.... zerg scum. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 03:05, 18 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::You really have some problems don't you. See you in Krinks. ;) --{{user:Monkey See monkey Do/sig}} 18:14, 20 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
=="Half Retarded"==<br />
Made me laugh. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 22:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:I'm sorry for some of the things I've said to him, but it's all true. The page is locked because of the way he's edited the page, and what he wanted to say. Two people are in arbitration with him over a Non Neutral Point of View,... and he wants to dispute all of it. When I tried to suggest that he do something similar to your "hmmm" page, and that all these problems would essentially go away, he got pissy about it. He just doesn't understand that he's not "objective" as he put it, and that's the issue,... and the issue could be resolved by taking my suggestion,... which is exactly that, a suggestion. Nothing more,.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:53, 24 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Frankly I think it's simpler than that. He wants the reaction. He wants the drama. He enjoys trolling. That's his opinion, that's his fun. As soon as that goes, so shall he. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 23:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::What do you think he'd do if I filed an arbitration case against him, trying to get him to not act like a jackass,... that being my claim in those exact words... (*dark chuckle*).... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 23:07, 24 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::I think he'd absolutely love it. Your talk page is longer than mine. Archive? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 23:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::So how can I cleverly word that, other than "jackass"? And no to the archive... I refuse to do so until the page is 1MB in length, or greater.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 23:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::::Hoping you aren't serious, cause it ain't gonna happen =[ My 09 archive was so huge i had to seperate it into 4 archives and even then it only made 300 kb total. Boxy's is also massive and he hasn't archived it for 2 years and it still is only 250 =[ --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::::You guys don't think it will happen,.... but it will. Just keep helping me out guys! -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 12:26, 25 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Its me! ==<br />
<br />
Its me, [[User:Rogue Medic|Rogue Medic]], remember, we planned to that attack on Fort Perryn with the [[Wulves]] but for some reason we just stopped contacting eachother. Sorry I forgot to tell, but I just deleted the PLAM and made this [[Red Resistance|new group]].--[[User:Rogue Medic|Rogue Medic]] 23:33, 28 March 2010 (Pacific Time US & Canada)<br />
:Keep the conversation where it [[Talk:Red Resistance|started]] please.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:43, 29 March 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Comments==<br />
<br />
From now on your comments are unwelcome on my talk page. --[[User:Cornholioo|Cornholioo]] 19:33, 12 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:Done deal jackass... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 19:37, 12 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
== Artibirationmathingabob ==<br />
I don't mind either way, if you don't want them joined they won't be joined. However I will not have Thad as an arbite --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 22:21, 12 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:After that last little bit in dutch... I won't have him either. Not for this case anyway. Regardless, It ultamatly doesn't matte if it's a joined case,... if it is, however, we need to be acting on a joined front. And with that in mind, we should talk about who we want to arbitrate, and why. We should also consider what we want to get out of it. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:36, 12 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:: I'm happy with Ross, but the clonel and Mis are good choices as well. Is there something particular you wanted? --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 22:39, 12 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I'm happy with Mis,... I don't know that they'd accept though, with the current ruling on their arbitration case. That said,... I'm not as aware of the Colonel's demenor, and overall attitude... I know how Ross acts a little bit. Would you prefer Mis over Ross? I would,... again I don't know that they'd accept. If you'd prefer, I'll ask them to arbitrate. I know a few things I'd want. Let's handle this one step at a time though. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 23:20, 12 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::: No Ross is fine, I was just suggesting alternatives, if Ross is good for you, he will be fine. --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 23:21, 12 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Sounds great... So,... should one or the other of us be the main voice of the central discussion,... or should we both go at it? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 23:26, 12 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::: You can be the main voice if it suits you, I've never been good at this sought of thing --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 23:27, 12 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Me neither,... My atitude doesn't suit matters like this either,... but okay. I'll act as the main communicator. Basically I'm expecting the following:<br />
:::::::*Minimal antagonization on cornholes part... (IE, the vandal banning cases, arbitration cases, confrontations he seems to continue long after they should be done, and the general provocation of the community)<br />
:::::::*Without restricting access to the RPG aspect of UD, a limited role of the nazi subculture on the wiki (I think he takes it to far...)<br />
:::::::*I would like to see things similar in nature to the [[Battle of Krinks]] place either under his namespace, or the group namespace in the future.<br />
<br />
:::::::Anything else you can think of? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 23:36, 12 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::: Nope, I think you nailed everything --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 23:39, 12 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::How about the general restriction of only one arbitration case at a time,... and he can't start a second one without finishing the first one? Also, if drama begins to ensue, any further posts on any talk page pertaining to him, or his group, shall be moderated as to prevent issues like this in the future? Also, could you think of a way to reword the points above, as not to provocate any further drama.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 23:44, 12 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::: They would never get passed --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 23:47, 12 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Maybe not the moderation of his group pages,... but I think everyone in the community who's aware of what's going on could appreciate the one arbitration at a time case. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 23:54, 12 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::: We could try but to be honest I have doupts about them being abled to enforced.--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 23:55, 12 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Let's go for that one too then. Next things next.... Relative to having posted on his talk page, and having incited him ourselves... what concessions are we willing to make? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 23:58, 12 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::: Sorry what does concessions mean? --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 00:01, 13 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::What are we willing to give up, or not do in the future? I think not commenting on his user talk space for one month would be appropriate. Anything else? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 00:05, 13 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::: Yes that, and possibly promising not to get involved with those battle of krinks or his group, I'd be willing to do that --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 00:08, 13 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::Sounds great. I could probably do that,... but I can't promise not to be involved in the resulting drama. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 00:55, 13 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::: Sure as sure --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 22:46, 16 April 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::: Won't happen again, liked the response, added my own response to his Points. Keep up the good work.--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 16:53, 19 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== ass of the day ==<br />
[[:Image:Eliminatedjuice.jpg]]<br />
=3 --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 23:47, 13 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:Almost choked... That's our friend cornhole... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 00:13, 14 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:: Brilliant --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 00:14, 14 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:YOU ARE AMAZING --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:59, 14 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Reply==<br />
<br />
Well. As a result of [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cornholioo vs Misanthropy]] Corn can no longer bring arbies cases without having checked them through a third party. That's going to cut down the cases to probably zero. The "proceeding without your input" clause, although existing is normally completely ignored, and as a result if arbies did begin, your input would be sought as a member of the case. The only area that could be of issue is if corn picked an arbiter you were unhappy with, but you've already made suggestions. You don't need to be a psychic to work out what the conclusion of the case will be. So work out what your move will be. You may need to give Corn a nudge that you've selected some arbiters and want to proceed. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:43, 14 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:The problem with giving him a nudge, is,... well,... ''I can't talk to him''.... He asked me not to above... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 13:39, 14 April 2010 (BST)<br />
::Want me to nudge him? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:56, 14 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Absolutly. I would appreciate it.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 23:03, 14 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Re:My Brain Being Picked==<br />
<br />
See, the chief problem with that is that recruitment ads aren't meant to include subheadings. Instead, you can achieve the effect you want simply by manipulating the font itself. Instead of <nowiki>==Header==</nowiki>, use <nowiki><font size=+1>'''Header'''</font></nowiki>, and keep your text under that. That'll take out those naughty subheadings, and also remove the edit links too. If the font doesn't look big enough with that code, you can try <nowiki><font size=5>'''Header'''</font></nowiki>, fiddling with the number as you see fit. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 04:31, 15 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:I was hoping it wouldn't come to that... thanks. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:36, 15 April 2010 (BST)<br />
::I can do the coding for it if you'd like. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 04:37, 15 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::As much as I appreciate the offer, I need to be able to do it myself. If I can't, I'll only screw stuff up in the future. Through doing it, I'll retain it, and prevent myself from goofing up in the future. Again, thanks for the offer. I really appreciate all the help. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:45, 15 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
While you guys are talking about the ad, could you knock EVIL's ad down a bit in height? The limit for [[Recruitment|that page]] is 800px in height when viewed at 800x600, but yours is closer to 1400px at the moment (and I'm viewing it at 1920x1080 at that, so it's probably worse at 800x600). Thanks. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 04:37, 18 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:God I suck at making, and editing templates... I'll try. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:39, 18 April 2010 (BST)<br />
::Nah, it's a design issue rather than a coding issue, so it shouldn't be a hard fix. Anyway, responded on my talk page. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 05:00, 18 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==To be honest==<br />
The entire business just makes my eyes glaze over. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:24, 19 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:Me to.. and like I've tried to explain in my little section on the case,... All would of been said and done had it not been for him continuing it. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 17:00, 19 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
==[[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cornholioo_vs_Michaleson_and_Poodle_of_doom#Ruling.]]==<br />
Look. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:49, 19 April 2010 (BST)<br />
: Cool story bro... now lets go poke cornholio and see what BS he says this time--{{User:Imthatguy/sig}} 18:15, 21 April 2010 (BST)<br />
::Not sure I follow what you're trying to get at.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:40, 21 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Most updated==<br />
Yeah. Caigers got almost 250, st ferreols 150 ish. But ours are funnier. look back at the edit histories. We try and entertain, my favourites include [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:DangerReport/St._Ferreol%27s_Hospital_%28Kempsterbank%29&diff=next&oldid=1448031 this] and [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:DangerReport/St._Ferreol%27s_Hospital_%28Kempsterbank%29&diff=next&oldid=1500066 this] and [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:DangerReport/St._Ferreol%27s_Hospital_%28Kempsterbank%29&diff=prev&oldid=1418985 this]. After 2 years its sometimes hard to say ''Still Ruined.'' in a new way. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:56, 28 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Yeah. I thought it was common knowledge after [[User:Rosslessness/Hmm]]. Its an amazingly efficient way to get another alt. Create a zombie. Get him to kempsterbank. Even if you are massively lazy, its still only 3ip hits a day. (Log on, stand up, go back inside hospital). Its Billy Forks group, I just do a lot of wiki work for it. As a former Templar you probably were around when he founded the group. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:50, 29 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:Be my guest. we always like random proposals. Let me know here, or register on the forum of [[SFHNAS]] --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 16:06, 29 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Cheers dude ==<br />
<br />
^ {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 05:29, 2 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:Didn't think you would.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 05:30, 2 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== pages ==<br />
<br />
[[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_09#User:A11an0n|1]], [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2008_12#User:J3D_3|2]], [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_03#User:Abcvirus|3]], [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_05#User:Happykook|4]], [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_06#User:MisterGame|5]]. some are there, if you want any more, you can easily just ctrl+F "impersonation" in A/VB archives. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:49, 11 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== its spelled ==<br />
<br />
"Kevan". --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 06:07, 31 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:WTF? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 18:07, 31 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::Your little rant on your userpage. You say "Kevin". Also, about that rant, don't be so sensitive. It you thought this place was bad now, which it isn't, you should have come here a year or 2 earlier. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 22:10, 31 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I've been a part of the wiki since about '07.... and the reason I left the first time was similar to this time. And go fuck yourselves spelling nazi's. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:12, 31 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::::''Nazis''. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 22:15, 31 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::D'oh, --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 22:17, 31 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Registering time doesn't count and your contributions don't lie, you created an account in 07, but only truely started in 09. Not that it matters.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 22:17, 31 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::I have contributed in '07.... I'm sure of it... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 22:27, 31 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::14 times. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 22:32, 31 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::In a timespan of January till June. Then a big hole till somewhere in 09.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 22:37, 31 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== If you really feel this way-why leave? ==<br />
I have heard the more experienced players-such as yourself-continue to talk about how the game is screwed up somehow (I respectfully disagree: I LIKE the game!)...and yet-it is clearly something you like...so-why not stay and try to make it better? You and I have had a misunderstanding-you have questioned my integrity as a result (believe me, that is not something I take lightly in real life; I really do not lie and where I come from those are fighting words)-and I maintain that you are mistaken about the circumstances-BUT: you were the first genuinely helpful person I ran across in this game and I respect you for that and for the patience and thought you put into the game. I really think it would be unfortunate for the rest of us that play the game if you decided to leave. Consider that this is coming from someone who you hold in low regard: I have no agenda here. But if you are frustrated then I am sorry because you are a creative, funny, intelligent person who is good at the game. I respect your decision but I hope you will reconsider. Either way: best wishes--[[User:Belisarius17|Belisarius17]] 04:05, 1 June 2010 (BST)<br />
:As much as I appreciate your comments... I'm already leaving. There's really no need to say more. My only wish would be for others to see what you've said.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:16, 1 June 2010 (BST)<br />
::I think I understand-Well, for what it's worth you leave with my respect and my thanks. If and when you come back-there is a place for you in Wulves 2nd Co. Course-you would have to give up PKing(LOL)...Anyways good luck and best wishes: --[[User:Belisarius17|Belisarius17]] 04:26, 1 June 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Late breaking news! ==<br />
<br />
{{VoteMisRev}}<br />
:What Rev said. Also, a vote for Mis is a vote against Kylepuppetry.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:39, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Every vote for kyle was by a unique person who supported it and most of them were from RRF or Randoms who i promised infinite pimp hats. The lure of the pimp hat cannot be denied, wouldn't you like a pimp hat too? Vote Kyle! :D [[Big Bash 3|<span style="color: #FF0000; font-size: 80%">&hearts;</span>]] [[User:MoonShine|<span style="color:Black">'''Moonie'''</span>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:MoonShine|Talk]] | [[Mayor_of_Malton/2010/Election#Zombiecratic Party (Incumbent)|Kyle For Mayor]]</sup></small> 11:57, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Piss off,... I've already voted. I'm happy to have voted the way I did. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 18:18, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
== For the record ==<br />
Just for the record and to state the obvious;<br />
There is no bad blood between the Wulves and EVIL (Philosophical differences perhaps, but that is as far as it goes). There is no bad blood between you and I either, I think you will agree.<br />
I mentioned to the good Dr that you do not hold me in very high regard and tried to explain why via the old wiki dialogue. I thought it appropriate, given the closely coordinated nature of their team, that he understood that you might not be comfortable seeing the wulves or me on a forum that involves the actions of your group.<br />
<br />
I am glad to see you decided to come back-welcome back to Malton--[[User:Belisarius17|Belisarius17]] 19:37, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Thanks for welcoming me back. As you can see [[Talk:Extremely Vengeful and Irksome Laymen#Clarification_Needed|here]], in the conversation between the Good Doctor, and myself, that I harbor no hard feelings, aside from not being interested in going through you, in regards to any process. We need organization, and structure, that was lacking at the time. There is no bad blood,... just an unwillingness to walk the same path again. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 19:45, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::D'accord.--[[User:Belisarius17|Belisarius17]] 19:53, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Which means? -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 19:56, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::It means "I understand and agree"-or "We are in agreement"-literally "in accord". What I meant was that I see your point of view and agree with it.--[[User:Belisarius17|Belisarius17]] 20:26, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Let's make sure that gets passed along to the good doctor then. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 20:29, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Done.--[[User:Belisarius17|Belisarius17]] 21:05, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Sounds good. Just make sure it's really releyed on, via the forums you guys use, and whatever other communications you have. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 21:12, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::I just PMed him on their forum and I asked him to post to you. We also use the Satphone because it is zero AP and is useful in real time strikes: scouteric DSS Satellite Phone NUMBER 884-1843. Regards, --[[User:Belisarius17|Belisarius17]] 21:40, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You need firefox for DSS phones right? -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 21:44, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::I received word from [[User:Belisarius17|Belisarius17]] and have sent messages to my teammates. In answer to your question about the [[DSS Satellite Phone|DSS SatPhone]], to my knowledge you either need Firefox or Google Chrome, but I have found that there is [http://www.gm4ie.com a greasemonkey extension for explorer] that may be able to run it. I am still discusing things with my group but I should be able to assit once I have fulfilled my other obligations. I will warn you that this may be a while as we are just ready to begin work on the task at hand within the next couple of days. I have arranged for a Yankee ambassador to stop by the area. He is in Gulsonside last I heard but will head to Greentown directly. Once he gets within range I will contact you and relay his information. The Yankees have a private forum and their own mini wiki but only those who are members have access. I will therefore act as the go between. --{{User:A.schwan/sig}} 22:11, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::For what it's worth, it will be a while before our current operations are complete too. Considering the present state of our two groups, I'd be happy to postpone the event for a few more weeks, until both are available. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 22:32, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::The Yankee ambassador I mentioned to you arrived in Greentown yesterday. He has been picking through the suburb from the SW and has sent me a list of repaired buildings. Since they have only one wiki editor among them (Sid Rosenburg) and he is not very active, I have updated them on the Wiki using his data. Cross-checking this list and his rout, I see that he has yet to find a ruined building. I will verify this with him. If this is the case, then the only reason why the suburb is not green is the lack of wiki editors in it. He has yet to make it to the one hospital and the Factory in the SE. I will keep you appraised of what he finds.--{{User:A.schwan/sig}} 02:05, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Deal,..... -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 03:07, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::My yankee ally scanned every building in the suburb and reports the only ruined buildings are clubs and banks. NT scans he sent me prove that there are fewer than 20 zombies in the suburb. The buildings have now all been updated and the suburb danger level has been changed to "safe" I have asked him to power the phone mast before he leaves. --{{User:A.schwan/sig}} 04:52, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Good to know. Perhaps we could aim for another Red suburb then? -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 14:11, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==????==<br />
What's up with The games/Sky Thing? -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 22:17, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:I'm making [[Template:UDGame/Guide|a game]]. It is not yet ready for use. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 22:21, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Cool. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 22:35, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Smile==<br />
Saw your edit about there not being a wiki code for a smiley face. Why don't you try [[User:Kempy/Sandpit|these]]? Compliments of Kempy. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 00:37, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:There's also {{Tl|Tongue}}, {{Tl|Grr}}, {{Tl|Huh}} and {{Tl|Wh}} for easy use. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:39, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
First off, don't ever EDIT CONFLICT me again on ''my'' talk page! Second of all, this is what I meant:<br><br />
<br />
With the <nowiki><nowiki></nowiki></nowiki> brackets:<br />
<br />
<nowiki>:)</nowiki><br />
<br />
Without:<br />
:)<br />
<br />
Hope that clarifies. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 00:54, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Asshat? ==<br />
<br />
lol dude I didn't nominate myself.<br><br />
I wan't talking about ''my'' post.<br><br />
lol?<br> Befor you delete it or whatever I went ahead and put that template on my page.<br><br />
lol it looks so out of place with all my other templates.--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 01:09, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Dude,... you're beeing an ass. Knock it off. Second of all, Your post was the inflammitory one, not Bobs. You could of backed off, but didn't. That's why you got the award and he didn't. Third... I took your comments of my Ass Hat mainspace, because there's a damn discussion page for that shit. Use it, or STFU. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 01:13, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
::I thought you had mistakinlly thought i meant to nominate myself. but apperentlly, you did it on purpose. --{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 01:22, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
I thought i had found some common ground with someone on this wiki. But apperentlly everyone hates me. I'm still the letcher, the monkey, and the moron everyone thinks i am. I was backing up grim on his page, because I hate people who cuss, and degenerate people. But whatever man...I thought it was funny when you done that, but now I don't.I'm removing that template now.--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 01:22, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Whatever dude. Learn where you should be posting and where you shouldn't be. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 01:25, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I thought ''I'' was the lecher. :( {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:27, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::No, I'm spartacus! -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 01:28, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Can I ask you something Poodle?--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 01:37, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::Permission granted. ^ Oppertunity wasted. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 01:40, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::Please delete that whole ass-hat thing on me. I don't need another reason for everyone to think I'm a moron and shouldn't be System Operator.''Please'' delete it.--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 01:43, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::No. I refuse. What are you going to do about it? -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 01:44, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::I'm currently very bored. If this goes to arbitration pick me and I will try to make it as hilarious as possible. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:45, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::No... If I wanted humor, I'd ask for cornhole. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 01:47, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Absolutlly nothing. I'm just tired of people looking down on me. ''Please''. I am absolutlly begging you. I don't want more people thinking I'm a moron.Of course, everyone already hates me. So what's it matter? I just really don't want to be thought of an ass. Please, I'm begging you, please delete it.''Please''--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 01:53, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::I'm not going to be the one to remove it.... and I don't want it gone. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 02:55, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::Part of the reason people hate you is because you insist that they shouldn't. Give up on the sysop thing. Those that are sysops have the most influence and respect, but not because they're sysops. They're sysops because they have influence and respect. Try to plan your moves in a way that avoids people calling you stupid. Maybe try to do something outside of politics, like voting on suggestions, or recording search rates, helping us launch a page for every [[district]], or killing mass amounts of typos. Something that will make people say "Gosh, that guy is helpful. I think I'll give him a little more respect than I otherwise would have." --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 03:10, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Remove the first ":"==<br />
Moar leik assassin's weed, dood! --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 01:15, 18 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Huh? You talking about the image I linked to on my front page.... I know about that. I just linked to it so I could remember the name of the image, and where it was at. I'm going to use it for a template, and not on my front page. Thanks though... -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 03:04, 18 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Template==<br />
{{Assassin|Poodle of Doom|four}}<br />
<br />
Made a new template using that picture I uploaded earlier. I figured you might make use of it too. Who knows... -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 03:57, 18 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:I saw it, and though about putting it, but I'm trying to stay as anonymous as possible right now. [[wikipedia:Peter Noone|Noone]] wants the medic to get shot. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:18, 18 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::I don't understand the reference.... -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 04:28, 18 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Neither do I. I usually don't. I think I was making fun of poor grammar. Or maybe TF2's Heavy-Medic combo. Or maybe I was just saying that I can't revive myself, and I don't expect the others to be as fast as I plan to be. This is like the time that Simon (creator of Shartak) got a little upset, and I posted an edited image of his avatar that made him look either unwavering or mean. Noone could decide what I meant by it, including myself. But now I'm rambling. Now why am I doing that? Maybe it's related to how I followed my own link, and started listening to No one. He's actually not too bad. ''Mrs. Brown, you've got a lovely daughter''... --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:49, 18 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I'm not the only one on the sauce rihgt now, am I? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 04:57, 18 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::She's been married seven times before. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 05:33, 18 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==[[User talk:Axe Hack/Sig|Axe Hack Advertisement Inc.]]==<br />
This is just a message informing you that an open slot is now available for your ad. Your ad will be removed in one week. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 12:10, 23 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Thanks. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 13:20, 23 July 2010 (BST)<br />
==DARIS==<br />
If you could spread the word about it, that could be most helpful. There's been a lot of support for this scince it became public. --[[User:Spoook|Spoook]] 05:32, 25 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Could I suggest [[User_talk:Axe_Hack/Sig|this]]? There are two slots available... -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 05:35, 25 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==[[Red Links]]==<br />
Simply put. By hand, and one at a time. A lot of them are either deletions, or on the [[PK]] page, which is intentional. Other than that, its just trawling through them all, clicking "what links here" and finding why they exist. Id start with those with the most references, and working your way through. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:08, 26 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:None of them are on the Philsophe Knights kill list, Special:Wantedpages doesn't include user pages. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 20:15, 26 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::I think you miss understood Ross... I'm happy to do it. I know how to go about it. The problem I have is that ''I'd be editing other peoples posts,'' and thats a big no-no,... So,.. any suggestions? -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 21:46, 26 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::No, I understood Ross. [[Philosophe Knights/Kill List]] ''looks'' like it'd provide a lot of redlinks, but none of them will actually show on [[Special:Wantedpages]]. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 22:07, 26 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Oh,... I wasn't responding to you... I was responding to what Ross said,... -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 01:08, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::If it were any other user I'd say "nut up and just do it rather than slump around complaining about the difficulty of the task to someone who actually does it regularly and probably doesn't care". However, after seeing the mistakes you make with making useless pages and putting several unworthy things up for deletion, I'd be hesitant in letting you fool around these pages just to help lower a specialpage that isn't even really an important one in wiki maintenance anyway. To be able to get through the red links you have to be able to understand context and this wiki's system and know when a red link is really needed and whether it can be changed to a nonlink or not. I don't think you have that capability and I recommend you look elsewhere for work. In fact, generally I recommend everywhere look elsewhere for work. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 02:00, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::You want a job? [[:Category:Pages Needing Location Block]] --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 12:10, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Text==<br />
Do you know how to upload fonts to the wiki for usage? -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 23:07, 29 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:I don't even know how to use fonts. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 23:24, 29 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Thanks... I'll keep asking. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 23:30, 29 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::You can't. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 05:12, 30 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Thanks for coming late to the party... -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 23:29, 30 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Yar soz, was never asked personally, I had to gatecrash -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:45, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==AHAI (Only because the full name is too much to write out...)==<br />
This is a notice informing you your ad for '''[[EVIL]]''' has expired. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 15:19, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Thanks... -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 22:22, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== code ==<br />
<br />
I can try and help, is there any sort of original that I could work off? Or the latest version you made before it went all crumby? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:04, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Actually,... there is. You'll have to look closly at the two copies of it I have that actually work to see the difference. Basically, the original is [[User:TripleU/Sandbox4|here]], and the copy of it that I am using that works is [[Extremely_Vengeful_and_Irksome_Laymen/Rage_in_a_Cage|here]]. The problem I had, if you look at both, is that they call on an additional template similar to the one used [[User:TripleU/Sandbox5|here]],.... and I know templates calling on templates causes undue strain on the server. I know that I am using mine on only one page, and it's probably no big deal,... but I'd like to avoid it if possable. Suggestions? -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 04:31, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::I see now. Well, my advice is to keep the templated version, not because we are both failing at copying the code but because you shouldn't worry about server strain, templates in templates (even if it's mass used on pages) doesn't actually bog the wiki very much at all. I'm having trouble substing all those template calls and stuff into one page. Having said that, I'm not fantastic at reading and adapting code either, so my advice is keep the templates (since they aren't that harmful) or ask someone better like Aichon, or, my favourite, The Rooster. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:46, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::OH COME ON!!! You've always been the nazi on this sort of shit.... In all sincerity, thank you for your help. As soon as I saw you put it back up on your page, and saw your response, I knew I was going to have to ask Rooster.... It's funny,... the one thing I tried, and I'm sure you spotted the difference immediatly, shouldn't of caused the template to break down as it should. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 04:51, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Hmm, it's so strange that a template can break if subst'd, there's probably something being overlooked. Ah well, good luck, sorry I couldn't fix the problem up for you -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:55, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::As we've both concluded, I've made it work, and ultimatly, as long as it works, I don't care. Anyway, I've asked Rooster to look at it for me to. Maybe he'll know. Just FYI, I've linked to this section, and the section on your talk page,... if you care to leave it up long enough for him to look at. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 05:02, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==250 edits==<br />
<br />
is sooo many :'( {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:43, 2 August 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DanceDanceRevolution&diff=1751246
User talk:DanceDanceRevolution
2010-08-02T06:23:42Z
<p>J3D: /* Happy Birthday */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/talkn}}<br />
<br />
<br />
== This Looks Like a Job for a Wiki Mentor! ==<br />
<br />
DDR, can you help me use my snazzy new sig, please? --[[User:Natasha Fatale|Natasha Fatale]] 23:36, 2 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:I can set your sig up for you. It'll take me about 5 minutes.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 00:13, 3 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::(Bright smile) Thank you much, Yonnua! How do we work this? I have a sig made here: http://wiki.urbandead.com/images/0/0b/Natasha_fatale_sig.png <br />
::Guess we should stop cluttering up DDR's talk page...--[[User:Natasha Fatale|Natasha Fatale]] 00:46, 3 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::DW about that, looks like you've got some help, good luck! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 03:15, 3 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== GO!! ==<br />
<br />
<font size=5>[[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Misanthropy vs Axe Hack|Let's get this party started!]]</font> -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 23:25, 3 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Those two votes ==<br />
<br />
Are not incorrectly signed. They have the indent ''which I'' put on them still left on. The votes are signed perfectly.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:23, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Right, sorry, no idea what I'm talkign about. [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Mayor_of_Malton/2010/Election&diff=next&oldid=1736357 This] one on the other hand looks awfully well signed.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:26, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Right, now I see all the reasons I'm confused. Damn people editting each other's timestamps. Thanks!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:29, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Good point, Yonnua. DDR, please stop interfering in the democratic process. There is no rule against fixing somebody's signature when they have clearly attempted to do so. See {{tl|unsigned}}. (Timestamps come from the History tab, noobs.) {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 07:32, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Revenant, those are not correctly signed, and, since it's a vote where it explicitly said they would be struck otherwise, there'll be no meddling with them.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:35, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:No, you're impersonating, which done knowingly is vandalism. You keep it up? You'll be sent to vandal banning. If you want the votes so badly you have to get the users to come back onto the wiki and add the signature and timestamp themselves. You may not make the users timestamp for them, in all votes for the wiki votes/timestamps/sigs must be 100% the voters material, always has been and at the top it's no exception and states the criterea that a valid vote must be ''when placed'' which was breached no matter how much surgery you try and pull on the votes to fix them. And I know they come from the history tab. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:43, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Gotta agree with DDR and Yonn on this one. It's standard practice and it says it in plain language that explicitly lays out what'll happen if you fail to do it properly. That said, there's more to that rule than merely striking the vote, and on the one user I did check, neither of you two followed through on it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 07:52, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::As far as I remember it said we ''should'' notify the users. I don't bother notifying meatpuppets. If it were you who screwed it up, I would notify you, not users who will only get the message when they're called back in a month. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:53, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I actually notified them both when I struck them the first time.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:57, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::There are three that have been struck, and, ironically, the only one I checked was the one you didn't notify (I since saw your two notifications on my own). Regardless, DDR is correct, it says "should", not "must". {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 08:03, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::The {{tl|unsigned}} template does not constitute impersonation. Neither does fixing someone else's timestamp. The History confirms that the comment was theirs, I am providing correct attribution. lrn2copyrite kthx {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 08:31, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::If you don't stop edit warring this, I'll be protecting the page until you've shown signs you can behave. Then we'll see who has the winning chance in you're petty election. God, I can't wait till you look back on this in a week and realise how retarded you're behaving. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:34, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::[[A/VB#Response by accused|O RLY]]? {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 18:09, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::This isn't about Revenant scrabbling for votes. I fail to see how correcting timestamps is an unreasonable thing to do; as Revenant pointed out, the comment with the correct time is clearly attributed to the original poster in the page history. Forgetting a piece of attribution that's stored elsewhere doesn't make the posters' intent any less obvious or valid. Could you explain the rationale for why this was unacceptable? {{User:Aphelion/sig}} 19:21, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::It actually does make it less valid. Not by logic but just by the rules of keeping a clean boundary between properly made votes and otherwise. I was simply basing this off voting guidelines of policy discussion and suggestions voting. I could give you a history lesson explaining in a very logical manner exactly why I'm not even pursuing this anymore, so I don't really know why you're jumping in. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 00:54, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::I brought it up because I don't understand the thought process behind your decision, and alluding vaguely to unspecified rules isn't very helpful. I see nothing wrong with fixing attributions as long as everything is correct and properly cited. I mean, yes, you should timestamp your votes, and if you do it wrong, people are under no obligation to count it--but if someone is inclined to correct it, where's the harm? Why does a "properly made" vote have more intrinsic value than one that was later corrected by someone else when both are equally clear and equally well cited? Since the issue is no longer relevant, I'm willing to drop it, but it just seems strange to me. {{User:Aphelion/sig}} 01:57, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::Ask the founding fathers of the wiki where they got their decisions from, don't make me go through the A/PD archives to answer your pointless questions, again I was just following what has been used as a rule of thumb for official wiki votes, as Yonnua did when he wrote the rules. As for citing unspecified rules, well, that's just a perk of actually spending a lot of time on this place, so don't look at me as if I'm trying to cheat you out of some sort of conversational leverage, it's just the truth, and I couldn't care less whether you "buy" its legitimacy or not. I'm sorry if this seems blunt but it's only because I really don't want to have to keep grinding on about these questions when I've been proven by sysop vote that my view does not apply in this case and have happily yielded- it's a null argument now. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:23, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Dagnabit, I only just read the last sentence of your post saying you were willing to drop it. nvm. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:33, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Promotions ==<br />
Regarding the current bids. Neither Grim or Revenant meet the criteria. It's mostly good ol spam. WOOT precedent? I didn't want to drag them to A/VB since I doubt they are aware of it. But why are the bids still on? I thought stuff likes this gets moved to the talk page, not archived as Ross apparently wants let alone be seriously considered. Yeah, I'm asking you. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:20, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Well in the case of the Woot precedent, it was his third or fourth case before he was vandalbanned. These two have done it once. The general idea is if it happens multiple times, THEN it's vandalism.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:23, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::I'm talking about vandalism, I already said they don't know about it. It's about their promotions not meeting criteria. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:34, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::''"If a user is highly exemplary in one criterion, a certain level of give may be extended to other criteria."'' <br />
:::I think that pretty much covers it for both of them don't you? --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 19:02, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Pardon me, it took me a while to understand what is going on. By no means do I mind, once the circus dies down it can be archived early (or just left to die after a long time span). As far as I see they are just tarnishing reputations and behaving like jackasses out of butthurtery, if being remembered for this is their prerogative then I don't mind. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}}<br />
::Plus I don't really think this is vandalism anyway, it strongly resembles Misanthropy's stunt, and I'm willing to back it up that way. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:20, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:It's usually only vandalism if its been spammed on the page multiple times (as Yonnua said.) Usually we don't worry about cycling inappropriate candidates unless they are ''clearly'' inappropriate (and this is usually done under the pretense of not gaining enough vouch votes, [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Jerrel_Yokotory_(1)|an example is here.]]) In most cases (and especially in this case,) it's usually not worth the effort/drama to cycle a bid early. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 05:04, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::And the obvious case of HE BROUGHT GRIM BACK FUCKING WIN --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:26, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==fyi==<br />
<br />
still pissy about the amnesia stuff. seriously that is low even for you. xoxo. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:28, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
ps what happened to cybro?{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:49, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:He demoted because he had to finish the uni semester, exams etc. hasn't come back yet. considering emailing him about grim, he might be interested. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:16, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Manhunt==<br />
Dude. What's Happening? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:36, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Haha, I've been playing daily since the start, I'm afraid I just haven't found anyone. I've had a good time though, I was PKed on the first day for being a "fake revolutionary" from french revolutionary group and just today a member of Revenant's group tried to PK me, though it seems to have been isolated to the wiki drama- I think the guy just wanted to say he did. Either way, I'm just roaming around but it appears I have a dud sense of luck atm. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:26, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Drama? Where? Still its better than getting headshot at RP's by newbs. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:36, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Yah, I guess that's true. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:26, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::In retrospect, I wish I had said that I was simply ignoring all other contestants and hunting you. Damn. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 06:46, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::You're ignoring me? You'll die for this. --{{User:Hashk/sig}} 10:50, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::I thought he was ignoring everyone. Is he even trying? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:36, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Log on and kill me already. I'm just having terrible luck in this.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 08:34, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Hi guys! Good to see we all had the same RP idea. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 08:45, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Ross is there now too? I'm gonna be patrolling that RP all month. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 08:52, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Only because I wanted to get to a RP before getting headshot again. Ill move to my favourite one later. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 08:54, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Oi Hawk! This reminds me, you scanned me but never revived me! Boo :P --{{User:Hashk/sig}} 10:50, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Alex, zed v zed doesn't count at revive points ya doofus --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:43, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Oh yeah. Ha, good thing really. I went there because Red informed me he'd be in the area.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 14:18, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Mattick Towers Image ==<br />
<br />
Hey DDR. I noticed that you had deleted an image that I uploaded a week or two ago that I was going to use for a building. Unfortunately, I was in Los Angeles on vacation during the deletion and had limited access to the internet so I didn't get the chance to appeal it then. I'd like to use it now, if you don't mind. <br />
Thanks and here's hoping you gain Sysop. --[[User:TheBardofAwesome|TheBardofAwesome]] 11:18, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:No prob. I'm already sysop and I'd be happy to reupload your image. Do you know its name at all? I can find it easier then, I'm afraid my archive is rather large. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:24, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Probably [[:Image:Mattick_Towers.jpg]], which was deleted June 28 <small>-- <span style="text-shadow: #bbb 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em">[[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 11:41 6 July 2010 (BST)</span></small><br />
::Yep, that's the one Boxy! Thanks to the both of you. --[[User:TheBardofAwesome|TheBardofAwesome]] 12:19, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Done, aaand, done. Good luck!! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:28, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== BTW ==<br />
<br />
JSYK, it is not my intention to cast any aspersions on how hard you have worked for this place – far from it! I'd just like to contend that it is sometimes better to work ''smarter'' rather than '''harder'''. There is a saying in my line of work: "Two weeks coding saves two hours' planning." <tt>;)</tt> {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 04:21, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, fair enough. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:50, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==...==<br />
I made a mistake, I know...So sue me. It's probably because I did the math first, and then realized some votes were posted after the deadline...Blame me for being too tired to do anything this morning... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 16:54, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:But even if you counted removed votes, it still comes to 13/20, so 65%... --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 16:56, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::2/3 is 66%. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 16:57, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Yeah but it wasnt 2/3 it was 13/20. Either way it's not like I mind, was just fixing is all --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 16:58, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I struck Rev's vote first before counting, so technically, I counted 13/19. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 16:59, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::LOL fair enough, though it doesn't make you any more right, just gives you a strange pattern of vote counting, haha --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 17:02, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::I still haven't have my 5 cups of coffee yet... >< --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 17:04, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
We really need a better way to handle these voting deadlines. Oh, for Parser Functions! {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 06:15, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Actually...it might be possible without them. Simple addition and subtraction is possible using switch statements, but you can only do it for preset/hardcoded ranges of numbers (at least, I've never figured out a way to do it for an arbitrary integer, but if you know a way to implement addition for an arbitrary integer using only switch statements, you let me know). In our case, however, we'd only need to go up to 31, so the arithmetic is possible. Assuming we had some way to subst in the starting month and day of the vote via a template call (which I'm not sure is possible, off the top of my head), we'd be able to add 14 days onto it. At that point, we have the end date, which we could then use for a countdown and notification, much like I did back in the earliest revisions of the [[Big Bash 3]] page. It's probably more hassle than it's worth though, since it'd likely be a few hundred or thousand lines of wikicode (e.g. some of the logic would be similar to what I used [[User:Aichon/Sandbox/Demo2|here]], which is essentially one template call away from breaking the page). A better way would be to have someone compute the end date manually then call a template that acts like a countdown/notification to that date. That'd actually be pretty simple to make. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 08:17, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::{{CodeInline| <nowiki>{{SUBST:CURRENTYEAR}}-{{SUBST:CURRENTMONTH}}-{{SUBST:CURRENTDAY}}</nowiki>}} → 2010-07-10. Howzat? {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 08:46, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::But can you do all of that from a template call rather than directly on the page itself? That's the crux of the problem. The substing won't work, I believe, though there might be some ways to finagle it by using includeonly and some creative parsing. I've experimented with it in the past, and I know Rooster has too, but I don't think we've ever found success with it, from what I recall. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 08:51, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Promotions talk page ==<br />
<br />
Yeah, it was getting kinda ridiculous there. Good move. Kinda weirded me out seeing the Vouch/Againsts there as well, but figure it helps preserve the context, right? Can't help but wonder if making it more obvious that they're quotes is a good idea, but that's more a general procedural thought than anything. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 21:22, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Hmm. Like most things, I picked up that idea from whoever moved stuff over to the talk page before me, and I think it helps preserve context for whoever needs to remember it. I think it helps, it can make it look a little superficial I but in reality, it is only ever moved like that if it crosses the line into "going too far" so ''usually'' it's discussion that is considered a little unnecessary. Of course the crats should read it, it's just a majority of people shouldn't need to do get the jist of what's going on. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 03:26, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== History ==<br />
<br />
Was putting [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Category_talk:Historical_Groups&curid=20534&diff=1740688&oldid=1740410 this] where you did intentional? {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 02:22, 13 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Ya --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 02:24, 13 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Gotcha. The wording left me wondering a bit, so I figured I'd double check. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 03:31, 13 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Recent Changes ==<br />
Stalker!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 15:30, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, it is literally the stupidest tactic I've ever read. I considered sending it to deletions but I was too lazy to fix all the links or do any of the work to make it deletable so I just added that. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 15:39, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Word. The new template is awershome. EDIT: Oh yeh, and [[Guides:The_best_skill_for_a_zombie|this thing]] has to be right up there with stupid shit.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 20:10, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== so ==<br />
[[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Historical_Voting_Time_Limit|nudge.]]--{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 15:10, 15 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Minor correction with the policy ==<br />
<br />
[[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Historical Voting Time Limit|You put the wrong template on the policy]] (read my vote.) {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 09:11, 16 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Community Portal ==<br />
<br />
You think I'd be okay switching out the old template for my new one? Ross's FA schedule starts today. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 02:46, 19 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:I still think it needs more work, for example I just fixed the colours of the borders so they match the rest of the main page, but I guess it's not harming anyone. I still think it doesn't fit with the other templates though. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:04, 19 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Heritage ==<br />
<br />
You're part Dutch? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:34, 23 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yup, all extended family. It's why I love arguing apparently. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:11, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arby==<br />
Not to kill an already dead horse... but I found [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Amazing vs Rasher|this]],.... I still think I was within my rights when I brought an arby against you. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 03:27, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Most definitely, but you don't understand. It wasn't outside your ''right'' to post the accusations and request on arbitration. It's within my right to claim Aichon has been sodomising my girlfriend, even though it isn't true. But the issue I had to it was that there are two sides to every coin and my version of the story was, from the start, that there was no ''personal'' hostility towards you that I had done bar one comment I myself considered out of line. Besides that one incidence, I was only ever doing my job and the honest truth is I was taken aback when you came out with these claims because I barely recognised who you were and our past dealings; I was just doing my day to day editing. <br />
:There are definitely some users I've had problems with in the past, that if they asked for a restraining order for a set amount of time, I wouldn't argue against it, but the day that someone comes to me and claims abuse when I've either a) not done it or b) created some sort of reaction from you when I was simply doing my day-to-day work around here, and hence a ruling of restraining order would inhibit my normal day to day work on this wiki based on unfounded claims, ''that'''s when I'm gonna argue till the cows come home.<br />
:Have things gotten more personal since then? Most probably, but I assure you that it only happened since you shot at my thresholds relentlessly for weeks while also throwing personal quips at ''me''. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 03:40, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Hey now. I heard that. Also, you may have a right to say it, but that won't save you from a libel case in civil court. :P {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 04:00, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Sig ==<br />
<br />
First Misanthropy, now you. What happened to actually using names to identify ourselves? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 14:01, 26 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Glah his is random. Mine is actually more DDR than I am. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:03, 26 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Oh name-symbolism. Smart. You know, I always threw my quarters in shooters and fighters, back in the old days. I never really thought about it, but I guess your a fan of DDR machines? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 14:08, 26 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Yeah, better than Guitar Hero anyways. I do prefer the shooters though. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:22, 26 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Really? I thought most shooters were banned by Australian law. Though there was that special Left4Dead2 Aussie edition...--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 14:27, 26 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Aus is fail and backward but not many games have actually been banned for that long at a time. GTA's have been banned but eventually released, same for Manhunt and L4D2. it's all garbage in my opinion, killing a guy in GTA4 and having no blood come out means less ramifications on my consciousness if I consider doing it IRL than if I see them bleeding like mad. I hate FPS's but arcade wise I love shooting ones. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:34, 26 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Happy Birthday ==<br />
<br />
First! --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 08:13, 28 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:It's his b-day today? Happy b-day, DDR! Now gimme my slice of cake! ;D --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 08:16, 28 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::ya, it be my bday, thanks vvv -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:41, 28 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Happy 20something birthday! --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 21:56, 28 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Ditto.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 22:07, 28 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Thanks guys <3 -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:54, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:I still want my slice. ;) --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:04, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Was it actually? I'll let you suck my cock when i come to visit next weekend coz you're daddy's special girl {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:20, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:You're coming in? Fucking party time. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 09:00, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::What kind of friend would i be if i didn't get blind drunk on the anniversary of your university's foundation? I ASK YOU THAT. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:23, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Let me guess,...==<br />
You want to share my redirect page? -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}}<br />
:Not quite, my group is in a very infant stage and as such we aren't recruiting or inviting members at the moment, so I have no interest in outsiders searching for and finding our group for now. Over the next month our older members will be nurturing and levelling up our newer members, whilst the chances of the group getting off the ground aren't spectacular I'm willing to give it a try and if that happens then yes, I'll lodge a request at [[A/PT]] to have the redirect unprotected. But until then, I'm focussing on the core members of Lemons and seeing how we go from there. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 15:15, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
::Would you be interested in running a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheers a seperat disambiguation] page instead? -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 15:34, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== poodle ==<br />
<br />
{|style="background:#EEF; border:solid 1px; float:right; text-align:center; margin:0 0 7px 7px; width:240px; -moz-border-radius:12px; font-size:75%; line-height:100%" <br />
|- <br />
| <center> <br />
|-style="height:70px; width:70px" <br />
|style="{{User:DangerReport/Kinch Heights}}; width:70px"<br />
|[[Kinch Heights]] <br />
|style="{{User:DangerReport/West Grayside}}; width:70px"<br />
|[[West Grayside]] <br />
|-style="height:70px" <br />
|style="{{User:DangerReport/Buttonville}}; width:70px"<br />
|[[Buttonville]] <br />
|style="{{User:DangerReport/Wyke Hills}}; width:70px"<br />
|[[Wyke Hills]] <br />
|} <br />
<br />
{|style="background:transparent" <br />
|{{:Kinch Heights/Minimap}} <br />
|{{:West Grayside/Minimap}} <br />
|- <br />
|{{:Buttonville/Minimap}} <br />
|{{:Wyke Hills/Minimap}} <br />
|}</center> <br />
<br />
{| style="background:#EEF; width:45%; margin-bottom:8px; text-align:center; font-size:84%" <br />
|'''Latest [[External Military Report Page#Format and Meaning of Report Summaries|EMR:]] and [[Mobile Phone Mast|Mast]] Statuses''' <br />
|- <br />
|'''Kinch Heights''' <br />
|- <br />
|<br />
{| style="background:inherit; width:100%; margin-bottom:8px; text-align:center; font-size:84%" <br />
|'''Latest [[External Military Report Page#Format and Meaning of Report Summaries|EMR:]]''' <br />
{| style="background:white; border:solid 1px black; height:60px; margin:0 auto" <br />
|{{:EMRP: Kinch Heights}} <br />
|} [[EMRP: Kinch Heights|Update EMR]] <br />
|{{User:DangerReport/{{{43,86|The Eden Museum}}}<br />
|template=SuburbMastStatus}}<br />
[[User:DangerReport/{{{43,86|The Eden Museum}}}|Update Mast]] <br />
|- <br />
|} <br />
|- <br />
|'''Buttonville''' <br />
|- <br />
| <br />
{| style="background:inherit; width:100%; margin-bottom:8px; text-align:center; font-size:84%" <br />
|'''Latest [[External Military Report Page#Format and Meaning of Report Summaries|EMR:]]''' <br />
{| style="background:white; border:solid 1px black; height:60px; margin:0 auto" <br />
|{{:EMRP: Buttonville}} <br />
|} [[EMRP: Buttonville|Update EMR]] <br />
|{{User:DangerReport/{{{44,95|Warehouse 44,95}}}|template=SuburbMastStatus}} <br />
[[User:DangerReport/{{{44,95|Warehouse 44,95}}}|Update Mast]] <br />
|} <br />
|- <br />
|'''Wyke Hills''' <br />
|- <br />
| <br />
{| style="background:inherit; width:100%; margin-bottom:8px; text-align:center; font-size:84%" <br />
|'''Latest [[External Military Report Page#Format and Meaning of Report Summaries|EMR:]]''' <br />
{| style="background:white; border:solid 1px black; height:60px; margin:0 auto" <br />
|{{:EMRP: Wyke Hills}} <br />
|} [[EMRP: Wyke Hills|Update EMR]] <br />
|{{User:DangerReport/{{{55,93|Hitchens Towers}}}<br />
|template=SuburbMastStatus}} <br />
[[User:DangerReport/{{{55,93|Hitchens Towers}}}|Update Mast]] <br />
|}<br />
|}<br />
===notes===<br />
I broke up the code into lines so it wasn't a blob, i don't know if that was intended but it seemed to fix a fair bit of the formatting. Somewhere in there, a code started working which gave the whole thing a nice yellow background but as I decompressed the code into lines it dissapeared again and for some reason the style tags just exploded and appeared as text, so I simply removed them. As for the minimap on the right, until I figure out how to fix the style problem I doubt I'll be able to fix it. TBH I'm not very fantastic at writing or modifying code, but I'm alright at reading it, so my help with this is always going to be limited I'm afraid. A really rough version of the changes I made are sort of [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADanceDanceRevolution&diff=1751193&oldid=1751029 here]. You'll notice I took out West Grayside, for some reason it was more broken than the others so rather than try and fix it, I just gave it the boot in aid of finding the problems and fixing just one of them. I also reduced the bottom (blue) template's size from 100% to 45% so it looked a bit more organised just for my sake. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:37, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Moving back to your talk page, carrying on the explination from mine,... I'm in a similar boat. I can read it so so,... but editing it to make it work is something I've always enjoyed. My problem is when I tried to substitue the actuall coding to make it work instead of calling the second template in,... the whole thing breaks down like you see above. It appears that the second template is a must. But I don't want that if I don't have to have it,... I hate placing strain on the server unnecessarily. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 04:43, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
'''FYI'''<br />
I removed it because I made it work,... but I'm still taking issue with the way I made it work. I've responded on my talk page explaining everything for you. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 04:33, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:Alright. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:37, 2 August 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:Amusing_Locations_in_Malton&diff=1751245
Talk:Amusing Locations in Malton
2010-08-02T06:21:31Z
<p>J3D: /* Cutmore Avenue */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{ArchiveNotice|ArchiveName=Archive}}<br />
<br />
<center>''All General Discussion should be moved there as well as rejected locations.''</center><br />
<br />
<br />
=<span style="color: limegreen">New Location Ideas</span>=<br />
''Please suggest a location under the "New Location Ideas" section along with square brackets, equals signs (to make a subtitle), and your signature in this format:''<br />
<br />
<nowiki>===[[your suggestion]]===</nowiki><br />
<br>The reason(s) you think your suggestion is worthy of being on the list.<nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki><br />
<br />
''The "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>" adds your signature and timestamp to the suggestion so we know who you are. Alternatively, you can click the [[Image:Button sig.png]] button.''<br />
<br />
''Vote either "Keep", "Kill", or "Undecided" in bold font (<nowiki>'''your vote'''</nowiki>) on the next available line under the suggestion and any previous votes. Remember to add your signature after your vote.''<br />
<br />
eg)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<nowiki>==[[Suggestion Road]]==<br />
Reasons--[[A random user]] 04:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)<br />
:'''Keep'''. I like it.--[[Another random user]] 04:28, 13 December 2007<br />
::'''Kill'''. I don't find it that funny.--[[Yet another random user]] 04:28, 13 December 2007<br />
:::'''Undecided'''. I just don't know!! Try and convince me to vote either way.--~~~~ (<---- that's your vote!)</nowiki><br />
<br />
''All suggestions are an automatic "keep" vote by the suggester, unless otherwise indicated by the suggester. A suggestion will remain under voting for at least seven days (depending on the balance of votes) and must have at least 2/3 majority "keep" votes for it to be inducted onto the list. If you come across a suggestion that has been up for seven days and has at least a two thirds majority of "keep" votes, please feel free to add it to the agreed upon category on the [[ALiM]] list. Thankyou.''<br />
<br />
----<br />
==Add new locations directly below this line==<br />
===[[The Weary Building]]===<br />
Hahahaha, get it? The building is tired? oh fuck you guys. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:11, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:for a guy that complains about all the drivel on alim you sure suggest a lot of it. It's a '''keep''' for my admitedly low standards but i would have thought it'd be a '''WTF YOU GUIZ SUK ND RUINED ALIM IT COULD HAVE BEEN GOOD''' from you, oh dear. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:20, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Organ Arms]]===<br />
THIS IS THE FUCKING BEST WORDPLAY EVER --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:34, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:'''Vouch/Keep/Wait what?''' [[User:Technical Pacifist|Technical Pacifist]] 17:32, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Is this like piano fingers sort of thing? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:35, 15 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::No fucking idea, it just has organs and arms as a name. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:01, 15 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Cayme Drive]]===<br />
''You are at Cayme Drive. Somebody has spraypainted LOL I CAYME onto a wall.''<br />
<br />
All class...--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 12:29, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:'''yea boi''' --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:39, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::howevermanyyearsitsbeen on and theres still an abundance of undiscovered alim. this made me cayme :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD and yes charlie stfu the poor grammar was intentional. fuck off you niggardly cunt. PS my lecturer said niggardly the other week, classic lerlz!!!! ~!{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:27, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::lol i can't believe my lecturer said niggardly! shits fucking [[2C]] ya dig?? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:18, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Pudsey Park]]===<br />
It's named after a God damn giant yellow cripple bear. Sod dick jokes, ''that''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s comedy. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:51, 19 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:I had to google Pudsey to get it. Therefore, '''kill'''.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 12:29, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::'''no''' sorry i dont get it --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:40, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Spankling Building]]===<br />
Surprised this was never nominated? Cmon. You know what this building was made for!!! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:'''lol yeah'''--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 08:51, 11 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Sadley Way Fire Station]]===<br />
Sadley, ''waaay'' fire station...--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:01, 23 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:wtf is this bullshit ngger cunt crap? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:32, 26 April 2010 (BST)<br />
::AGAINT --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
===[[Cutmore Avenue]]===<br />
It's just so deliciously emo! --[[User:Wyndfyre|Wyndfyre]] 18:53, 4 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*Fuck yes! Vouch! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:34, 5 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*Agreed. It's too late at night to think of something for the page, but there's bound to be a good 'across the steet/along the road' joke to be made. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:49, 5 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Keep'''--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:01, 23 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Keep''' --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Oh shit, I was the first to vouch on it. damn, I'm too fast for mahself. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:55, 11 May 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Keep''' - i read it as cuntmore, got uber excited, then saw it was just cutmore. whatever. i'll ignore all of you and make its description about how it vaguely resembles cuntmore and THEN WE'LL SEE WHOS LAUGHING {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:31, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
*:FUCK i did it again!!!! Damn you past jed! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:21, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Chitty Hotel]]===<br />
--<span style="border: 3px black">[[User:Alcatraz311|<span style= "color: white; background-color: #527508">'''Alcatraz'''</span>]][[User:Alcatraz311|<span style="color: white; background-color: black">'''311''']]</span></span><sup>[[User_talk:Alcatraz311|<span style="color: black">'''T'''</span>]]|[[Army Control Corps|<span style="color: black">'''ACC'''</span>]]|[[Alliance 45|<span style="color: black">'''A45'''</span>]]</sup> 22:14, 15 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
*'''Autoadd'''--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:01, 23 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Shaft Grove]]===<br />
The page needs lolification. It currently focuses on some kind of commercial history rather than phallic innuendo.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:23, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:That's just sad.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:30, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:the history, not you thinking it should be phallic lol.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:30, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::I'll have you know a fine, upstanding member of the wiki wrote that. Like most of vinetown its a broad history of depression, and a thriving club scene. There's even a mention of a panda at one point. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:26, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I'll have you know i didn't actually read it, let alone look at the page :P Hey, it's the alim crowd, what'd you expect? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:40, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Don't bow down to superior contributors, that's not the alim way! --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:13, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::You don't even know what the alim way is anymore man. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:31, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I never knew the fucking alim way, i was never part of your stupid clique. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:32, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::...denial. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:43, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::You try to suck me in so I can like, ban cunts for you and, like, make u not get vandal warning but i'm just too responsible. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:54, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You don't honestly think that's true, do you?--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 22:22, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Of course he's kdding, even ddr knows he's not responsible ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:03, 6 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::put Eastwood Museum on ALiM already or i'll use sysop as badge and threaten ban u. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 14:14, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::It's in the queue. I'll put these on soon. Chill nigger. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:17, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::full of suspense!!!!!!! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 14:32, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Mallrats added some slightly wrong flavour that I think works well. Well done mallrat. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:06, 18 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:Haha just read it. Very [[The Mycock Building|mycock building]] - love it.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 08:46, 19 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::'''SHAFT!!!''' --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 09:28, 19 August 2009 (BST) PS... shaft means to con to give someone the shotr end of the stick (a common complain from j3d's girlfriends)... it's also a famous blacksploitation flick. that's much more lolzy than a retarded penis reference --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 09:29, 19 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I love myself a shaft, will vote '''Keep''' but why the fuck is nobody else voting--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:08, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Gillycuddy Boulevard]]===<br />
wtf?--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:43, 31 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:'''lulz'''.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:13, 31 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::What the fuck? I'd '''vouch''' this. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:22, 31 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::'''kill''' sessanach! --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 09:25, 19 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Funny name but '''kill tbh''' over it--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:09, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:I'm changing vote to '''kill''' so i dont have to add 2 more locations.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:46, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:EH i just dont know if this is that brillers...any more thoughtAs{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:50, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
=<span style="color: red">Locations Under Review</span>=<br />
''All suggestions are an automatic "kill" vote by the suggester, unless otherwise indicated by the suggester. A suggestion will remain under voting for at least fourteen days (depending on the balance of votes) and must have at least 2/3 majority "kill" votes for it to be removed from the list. If you come across a suggestion that has been down for fourteen days and has at least a two thirds majority of "kill" votes, please feel free to remove it from the [[ALiM]] list and remove the ALiM template from its page. Thankyou.''<br />
<br />
''I guess no one wants anything removed from ALiM at the moment :)''<br />
<br />
=<span style="color: orange">Category Changes</span>=<br />
''The following are nominated for a change in their category, not for their merit on the list itself. Entries must include the location in question and the suggested category to which it would be moved. Please vote either '''Keep''' in current category or '''Move''' to category suggested.''<br />
<br />
=General Discussion=<br />
<br />
I'm trying to get the [[Great Profiles]] page to stop being horrible, so I've called a vote, and I thought y'all might want to have a say in it, as the foremost humor authorities on the wiki. -{{User:Ornithopter/sig}} 20:19, 3 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:lol, i tried that about maybe 18 months ago....not enough people care about the page for it to work. And most of the people who added them probably don't still pay attention to it, hence my advice to you would be go through and delete all the ones you ''know'' are shit, and chuck the ones you think could be funny on the talk (or just delete them too). Since anyone can make one i think they need to be pretty spesh to be great profiles. So yeah, fuck the community and get shoveling through that shitty page! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Well, I guess this page proves that since there's already a Fücking, Austria . . . there's no problem with a little Fücking Tower. :D <br />
[[User:Douglas Summers|Douglas Summers]] 06:50, 2 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah i breifly wanted to make a real world alim's, but theres too damned many! Its still oneofmy dreams to visit them all and make a lonely planet style travel guide about them, but more lulzy and less lame.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:47, 25 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
You still around, man?--[[User:Sandsun|Sandsun]] 02:06, 10 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:sandsun! whats happening!? short answer is no - but i come on here every few weeks to have a look. I'm not really playing the game at the moment but i might get back into it with a groupless character, maybe azombie... what about you? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:00, 10 April 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:Amusing_Locations_in_Malton&diff=1751244
Talk:Amusing Locations in Malton
2010-08-02T06:20:40Z
<p>J3D: /* The Weary Building */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{ArchiveNotice|ArchiveName=Archive}}<br />
<br />
<center>''All General Discussion should be moved there as well as rejected locations.''</center><br />
<br />
<br />
=<span style="color: limegreen">New Location Ideas</span>=<br />
''Please suggest a location under the "New Location Ideas" section along with square brackets, equals signs (to make a subtitle), and your signature in this format:''<br />
<br />
<nowiki>===[[your suggestion]]===</nowiki><br />
<br>The reason(s) you think your suggestion is worthy of being on the list.<nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki><br />
<br />
''The "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>" adds your signature and timestamp to the suggestion so we know who you are. Alternatively, you can click the [[Image:Button sig.png]] button.''<br />
<br />
''Vote either "Keep", "Kill", or "Undecided" in bold font (<nowiki>'''your vote'''</nowiki>) on the next available line under the suggestion and any previous votes. Remember to add your signature after your vote.''<br />
<br />
eg)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<nowiki>==[[Suggestion Road]]==<br />
Reasons--[[A random user]] 04:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)<br />
:'''Keep'''. I like it.--[[Another random user]] 04:28, 13 December 2007<br />
::'''Kill'''. I don't find it that funny.--[[Yet another random user]] 04:28, 13 December 2007<br />
:::'''Undecided'''. I just don't know!! Try and convince me to vote either way.--~~~~ (<---- that's your vote!)</nowiki><br />
<br />
''All suggestions are an automatic "keep" vote by the suggester, unless otherwise indicated by the suggester. A suggestion will remain under voting for at least seven days (depending on the balance of votes) and must have at least 2/3 majority "keep" votes for it to be inducted onto the list. If you come across a suggestion that has been up for seven days and has at least a two thirds majority of "keep" votes, please feel free to add it to the agreed upon category on the [[ALiM]] list. Thankyou.''<br />
<br />
----<br />
==Add new locations directly below this line==<br />
===[[The Weary Building]]===<br />
Hahahaha, get it? The building is tired? oh fuck you guys. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:11, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
:for a guy that complains about all the drivel on alim you sure suggest a lot of it. It's a '''keep''' for my admitedly low standards but i would have thought it'd be a '''WTF YOU GUIZ SUK ND RUINED ALIM IT COULD HAVE BEEN GOOD''' from you, oh dear. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:20, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Organ Arms]]===<br />
THIS IS THE FUCKING BEST WORDPLAY EVER --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:34, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:'''Vouch/Keep/Wait what?''' [[User:Technical Pacifist|Technical Pacifist]] 17:32, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Is this like piano fingers sort of thing? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:35, 15 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::No fucking idea, it just has organs and arms as a name. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:01, 15 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Cayme Drive]]===<br />
''You are at Cayme Drive. Somebody has spraypainted LOL I CAYME onto a wall.''<br />
<br />
All class...--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 12:29, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:'''yea boi''' --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:39, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::howevermanyyearsitsbeen on and theres still an abundance of undiscovered alim. this made me cayme :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD and yes charlie stfu the poor grammar was intentional. fuck off you niggardly cunt. PS my lecturer said niggardly the other week, classic lerlz!!!! ~!{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:27, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::lol i can't believe my lecturer said niggardly! shits fucking [[2C]] ya dig?? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:18, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Pudsey Park]]===<br />
It's named after a God damn giant yellow cripple bear. Sod dick jokes, ''that''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s comedy. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:51, 19 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:I had to google Pudsey to get it. Therefore, '''kill'''.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 12:29, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::'''no''' sorry i dont get it --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:40, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Spankling Building]]===<br />
Surprised this was never nominated? Cmon. You know what this building was made for!!! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:'''lol yeah'''--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 08:51, 11 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Sadley Way Fire Station]]===<br />
Sadley, ''waaay'' fire station...--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:01, 23 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:wtf is this bullshit ngger cunt crap? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:32, 26 April 2010 (BST)<br />
::AGAINT --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
===[[Cutmore Avenue]]===<br />
It's just so deliciously emo! --[[User:Wyndfyre|Wyndfyre]] 18:53, 4 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*Fuck yes! Vouch! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:34, 5 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*Agreed. It's too late at night to think of something for the page, but there's bound to be a good 'across the steet/along the road' joke to be made. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:49, 5 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Keep'''--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:01, 23 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Keep''' --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Oh shit, I was the first to vouch on it. damn, I'm too fast for mahself. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:55, 11 May 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Keep''' - i read it as cuntmore, got uber excited, then saw it was just cutmore. whatever. i'll ignore all of you and make its description about how it vaguely resembles cuntmore and THEN WE'LL SEE WHOS LAUGHING {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:31, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Chitty Hotel]]===<br />
--<span style="border: 3px black">[[User:Alcatraz311|<span style= "color: white; background-color: #527508">'''Alcatraz'''</span>]][[User:Alcatraz311|<span style="color: white; background-color: black">'''311''']]</span></span><sup>[[User_talk:Alcatraz311|<span style="color: black">'''T'''</span>]]|[[Army Control Corps|<span style="color: black">'''ACC'''</span>]]|[[Alliance 45|<span style="color: black">'''A45'''</span>]]</sup> 22:14, 15 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
*'''Autoadd'''--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:01, 23 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Shaft Grove]]===<br />
The page needs lolification. It currently focuses on some kind of commercial history rather than phallic innuendo.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:23, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:That's just sad.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:30, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:the history, not you thinking it should be phallic lol.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:30, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::I'll have you know a fine, upstanding member of the wiki wrote that. Like most of vinetown its a broad history of depression, and a thriving club scene. There's even a mention of a panda at one point. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:26, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I'll have you know i didn't actually read it, let alone look at the page :P Hey, it's the alim crowd, what'd you expect? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:40, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Don't bow down to superior contributors, that's not the alim way! --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:13, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::You don't even know what the alim way is anymore man. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:31, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I never knew the fucking alim way, i was never part of your stupid clique. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:32, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::...denial. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:43, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::You try to suck me in so I can like, ban cunts for you and, like, make u not get vandal warning but i'm just too responsible. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:54, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You don't honestly think that's true, do you?--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 22:22, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Of course he's kdding, even ddr knows he's not responsible ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:03, 6 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::put Eastwood Museum on ALiM already or i'll use sysop as badge and threaten ban u. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 14:14, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::It's in the queue. I'll put these on soon. Chill nigger. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:17, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::full of suspense!!!!!!! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 14:32, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Mallrats added some slightly wrong flavour that I think works well. Well done mallrat. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:06, 18 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:Haha just read it. Very [[The Mycock Building|mycock building]] - love it.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 08:46, 19 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::'''SHAFT!!!''' --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 09:28, 19 August 2009 (BST) PS... shaft means to con to give someone the shotr end of the stick (a common complain from j3d's girlfriends)... it's also a famous blacksploitation flick. that's much more lolzy than a retarded penis reference --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 09:29, 19 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I love myself a shaft, will vote '''Keep''' but why the fuck is nobody else voting--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:08, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Gillycuddy Boulevard]]===<br />
wtf?--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:43, 31 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:'''lulz'''.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:13, 31 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::What the fuck? I'd '''vouch''' this. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:22, 31 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::'''kill''' sessanach! --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 09:25, 19 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Funny name but '''kill tbh''' over it--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:09, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:I'm changing vote to '''kill''' so i dont have to add 2 more locations.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:46, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:EH i just dont know if this is that brillers...any more thoughtAs{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:50, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
=<span style="color: red">Locations Under Review</span>=<br />
''All suggestions are an automatic "kill" vote by the suggester, unless otherwise indicated by the suggester. A suggestion will remain under voting for at least fourteen days (depending on the balance of votes) and must have at least 2/3 majority "kill" votes for it to be removed from the list. If you come across a suggestion that has been down for fourteen days and has at least a two thirds majority of "kill" votes, please feel free to remove it from the [[ALiM]] list and remove the ALiM template from its page. Thankyou.''<br />
<br />
''I guess no one wants anything removed from ALiM at the moment :)''<br />
<br />
=<span style="color: orange">Category Changes</span>=<br />
''The following are nominated for a change in their category, not for their merit on the list itself. Entries must include the location in question and the suggested category to which it would be moved. Please vote either '''Keep''' in current category or '''Move''' to category suggested.''<br />
<br />
=General Discussion=<br />
<br />
I'm trying to get the [[Great Profiles]] page to stop being horrible, so I've called a vote, and I thought y'all might want to have a say in it, as the foremost humor authorities on the wiki. -{{User:Ornithopter/sig}} 20:19, 3 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:lol, i tried that about maybe 18 months ago....not enough people care about the page for it to work. And most of the people who added them probably don't still pay attention to it, hence my advice to you would be go through and delete all the ones you ''know'' are shit, and chuck the ones you think could be funny on the talk (or just delete them too). Since anyone can make one i think they need to be pretty spesh to be great profiles. So yeah, fuck the community and get shoveling through that shitty page! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Well, I guess this page proves that since there's already a Fücking, Austria . . . there's no problem with a little Fücking Tower. :D <br />
[[User:Douglas Summers|Douglas Summers]] 06:50, 2 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah i breifly wanted to make a real world alim's, but theres too damned many! Its still oneofmy dreams to visit them all and make a lonely planet style travel guide about them, but more lulzy and less lame.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:47, 25 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
You still around, man?--[[User:Sandsun|Sandsun]] 02:06, 10 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:sandsun! whats happening!? short answer is no - but i come on here every few weeks to have a look. I'm not really playing the game at the moment but i might get back into it with a groupless character, maybe azombie... what about you? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:00, 10 April 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:Amusing_Locations_in_Malton&diff=1751243
Talk:Amusing Locations in Malton
2010-08-02T06:18:57Z
<p>J3D: /* Cayme Drive */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{ArchiveNotice|ArchiveName=Archive}}<br />
<br />
<center>''All General Discussion should be moved there as well as rejected locations.''</center><br />
<br />
<br />
=<span style="color: limegreen">New Location Ideas</span>=<br />
''Please suggest a location under the "New Location Ideas" section along with square brackets, equals signs (to make a subtitle), and your signature in this format:''<br />
<br />
<nowiki>===[[your suggestion]]===</nowiki><br />
<br>The reason(s) you think your suggestion is worthy of being on the list.<nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki><br />
<br />
''The "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>" adds your signature and timestamp to the suggestion so we know who you are. Alternatively, you can click the [[Image:Button sig.png]] button.''<br />
<br />
''Vote either "Keep", "Kill", or "Undecided" in bold font (<nowiki>'''your vote'''</nowiki>) on the next available line under the suggestion and any previous votes. Remember to add your signature after your vote.''<br />
<br />
eg)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<nowiki>==[[Suggestion Road]]==<br />
Reasons--[[A random user]] 04:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)<br />
:'''Keep'''. I like it.--[[Another random user]] 04:28, 13 December 2007<br />
::'''Kill'''. I don't find it that funny.--[[Yet another random user]] 04:28, 13 December 2007<br />
:::'''Undecided'''. I just don't know!! Try and convince me to vote either way.--~~~~ (<---- that's your vote!)</nowiki><br />
<br />
''All suggestions are an automatic "keep" vote by the suggester, unless otherwise indicated by the suggester. A suggestion will remain under voting for at least seven days (depending on the balance of votes) and must have at least 2/3 majority "keep" votes for it to be inducted onto the list. If you come across a suggestion that has been up for seven days and has at least a two thirds majority of "keep" votes, please feel free to add it to the agreed upon category on the [[ALiM]] list. Thankyou.''<br />
<br />
----<br />
==Add new locations directly below this line==<br />
===[[The Weary Building]]===<br />
Hahahaha, get it? The building is tired? oh fuck you guys. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:11, 1 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Organ Arms]]===<br />
THIS IS THE FUCKING BEST WORDPLAY EVER --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:34, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:'''Vouch/Keep/Wait what?''' [[User:Technical Pacifist|Technical Pacifist]] 17:32, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Is this like piano fingers sort of thing? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:35, 15 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::No fucking idea, it just has organs and arms as a name. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:01, 15 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Cayme Drive]]===<br />
''You are at Cayme Drive. Somebody has spraypainted LOL I CAYME onto a wall.''<br />
<br />
All class...--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 12:29, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:'''yea boi''' --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:39, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::howevermanyyearsitsbeen on and theres still an abundance of undiscovered alim. this made me cayme :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD and yes charlie stfu the poor grammar was intentional. fuck off you niggardly cunt. PS my lecturer said niggardly the other week, classic lerlz!!!! ~!{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:27, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::lol i can't believe my lecturer said niggardly! shits fucking [[2C]] ya dig?? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:18, 2 August 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Pudsey Park]]===<br />
It's named after a God damn giant yellow cripple bear. Sod dick jokes, ''that''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s comedy. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:51, 19 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:I had to google Pudsey to get it. Therefore, '''kill'''.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 12:29, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::'''no''' sorry i dont get it --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:40, 22 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[The Spankling Building]]===<br />
Surprised this was never nominated? Cmon. You know what this building was made for!!! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:'''lol yeah'''--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 08:51, 11 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Sadley Way Fire Station]]===<br />
Sadley, ''waaay'' fire station...--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:01, 23 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:wtf is this bullshit ngger cunt crap? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:32, 26 April 2010 (BST)<br />
::AGAINT --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
===[[Cutmore Avenue]]===<br />
It's just so deliciously emo! --[[User:Wyndfyre|Wyndfyre]] 18:53, 4 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*Fuck yes! Vouch! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:34, 5 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*Agreed. It's too late at night to think of something for the page, but there's bound to be a good 'across the steet/along the road' joke to be made. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:49, 5 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Keep'''--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:01, 23 April 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Keep''' --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Oh shit, I was the first to vouch on it. damn, I'm too fast for mahself. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:55, 11 May 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Keep''' - i read it as cuntmore, got uber excited, then saw it was just cutmore. whatever. i'll ignore all of you and make its description about how it vaguely resembles cuntmore and THEN WE'LL SEE WHOS LAUGHING {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:31, 24 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Chitty Hotel]]===<br />
--<span style="border: 3px black">[[User:Alcatraz311|<span style= "color: white; background-color: #527508">'''Alcatraz'''</span>]][[User:Alcatraz311|<span style="color: white; background-color: black">'''311''']]</span></span><sup>[[User_talk:Alcatraz311|<span style="color: black">'''T'''</span>]]|[[Army Control Corps|<span style="color: black">'''ACC'''</span>]]|[[Alliance 45|<span style="color: black">'''A45'''</span>]]</sup> 22:14, 15 February 2010 (UTC)<br />
*'''Autoadd'''--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:01, 23 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Shaft Grove]]===<br />
The page needs lolification. It currently focuses on some kind of commercial history rather than phallic innuendo.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:23, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:That's just sad.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:30, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:the history, not you thinking it should be phallic lol.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:30, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::I'll have you know a fine, upstanding member of the wiki wrote that. Like most of vinetown its a broad history of depression, and a thriving club scene. There's even a mention of a panda at one point. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:26, 3 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I'll have you know i didn't actually read it, let alone look at the page :P Hey, it's the alim crowd, what'd you expect? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:40, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Don't bow down to superior contributors, that's not the alim way! --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:13, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::You don't even know what the alim way is anymore man. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:31, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I never knew the fucking alim way, i was never part of your stupid clique. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:32, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::...denial. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:43, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::You try to suck me in so I can like, ban cunts for you and, like, make u not get vandal warning but i'm just too responsible. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:54, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You don't honestly think that's true, do you?--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 22:22, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Of course he's kdding, even ddr knows he's not responsible ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:03, 6 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::put Eastwood Museum on ALiM already or i'll use sysop as badge and threaten ban u. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 14:14, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::It's in the queue. I'll put these on soon. Chill nigger. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:17, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::full of suspense!!!!!!! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 14:32, 9 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Mallrats added some slightly wrong flavour that I think works well. Well done mallrat. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:06, 18 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:Haha just read it. Very [[The Mycock Building|mycock building]] - love it.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 08:46, 19 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::'''SHAFT!!!''' --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 09:28, 19 August 2009 (BST) PS... shaft means to con to give someone the shotr end of the stick (a common complain from j3d's girlfriends)... it's also a famous blacksploitation flick. that's much more lolzy than a retarded penis reference --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 09:29, 19 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I love myself a shaft, will vote '''Keep''' but why the fuck is nobody else voting--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:08, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[Gillycuddy Boulevard]]===<br />
wtf?--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:43, 31 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:'''lulz'''.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:13, 31 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::What the fuck? I'd '''vouch''' this. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:22, 31 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::'''kill''' sessanach! --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 09:25, 19 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Funny name but '''kill tbh''' over it--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:09, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:I'm changing vote to '''kill''' so i dont have to add 2 more locations.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:46, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:EH i just dont know if this is that brillers...any more thoughtAs{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:50, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
=<span style="color: red">Locations Under Review</span>=<br />
''All suggestions are an automatic "kill" vote by the suggester, unless otherwise indicated by the suggester. A suggestion will remain under voting for at least fourteen days (depending on the balance of votes) and must have at least 2/3 majority "kill" votes for it to be removed from the list. If you come across a suggestion that has been down for fourteen days and has at least a two thirds majority of "kill" votes, please feel free to remove it from the [[ALiM]] list and remove the ALiM template from its page. Thankyou.''<br />
<br />
''I guess no one wants anything removed from ALiM at the moment :)''<br />
<br />
=<span style="color: orange">Category Changes</span>=<br />
''The following are nominated for a change in their category, not for their merit on the list itself. Entries must include the location in question and the suggested category to which it would be moved. Please vote either '''Keep''' in current category or '''Move''' to category suggested.''<br />
<br />
=General Discussion=<br />
<br />
I'm trying to get the [[Great Profiles]] page to stop being horrible, so I've called a vote, and I thought y'all might want to have a say in it, as the foremost humor authorities on the wiki. -{{User:Ornithopter/sig}} 20:19, 3 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:lol, i tried that about maybe 18 months ago....not enough people care about the page for it to work. And most of the people who added them probably don't still pay attention to it, hence my advice to you would be go through and delete all the ones you ''know'' are shit, and chuck the ones you think could be funny on the talk (or just delete them too). Since anyone can make one i think they need to be pretty spesh to be great profiles. So yeah, fuck the community and get shoveling through that shitty page! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Well, I guess this page proves that since there's already a Fücking, Austria . . . there's no problem with a little Fücking Tower. :D <br />
[[User:Douglas Summers|Douglas Summers]] 06:50, 2 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah i breifly wanted to make a real world alim's, but theres too damned many! Its still oneofmy dreams to visit them all and make a lonely planet style travel guide about them, but more lulzy and less lame.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:47, 25 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
You still around, man?--[[User:Sandsun|Sandsun]] 02:06, 10 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:sandsun! whats happening!? short answer is no - but i come on here every few weeks to have a look. I'm not really playing the game at the moment but i might get back into it with a groupless character, maybe azombie... what about you? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:00, 10 April 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:J3D&diff=1751241
User talk:J3D
2010-08-02T06:14:34Z
<p>J3D: /* ban */</p>
<hr />
<div>='''READ ME!'''=<br />
*Post at the bottom (press the little + button at the top of the page) unless continuing a previous conversation.<br />
*Three words: '''Sign your posts!'''<br />
*Looking for something that was here before the 20<sup>th</sup> of March 2008? Try [[User_talk:J3D/Archive|here]]. What about between the 21<sup>st</sup> of March and the 18<sup>th</sup> of August 2008? Because that would be [[User_talk:J3D/Archive2|here]]! Or perhaps what you need is from the period between the 19<sup>th</sup> of August and the 19<sup>th</sup> of December? Coz that shiznat can be grabbed just over [[User talk:J3D/Archive3|here]], ya dig?<br />
<br />
== Lulz ==<br />
<br />
ic wat u did thar. --{{User:WOOT/sig}} 19:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:whar? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:48, 20 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
::HAR! DURR!--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 04:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not impersonate other users, especially on admin pages on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 06:18 21 December 2008 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
== Hollomstown ==<br />
<br />
Rid of merged pages. :)--[[User:Lithedarkangel|Lithedarkangel]] 23:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:noice! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Missed one ==<br />
<br />
[[Candy Avenue]]. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 02:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:Missed what?--<span>[[User:Lithedarkangel|<span style="color: Red ">Li</span>]][[User_Talk:Lithedarkangel|<span style="color: Black">thedark</span>]][[Location Nuts|<span style="color: Black">angel</span>]][[User:Lithedarkangel/Works|<span style="color: Red"><small>Meth!</small></span>]]</span> 03:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
== You are creating History ==<br />
<br />
Grim made a coupe, tried to take over the wiki.<br />
<br />
You lol'd at an account creation you knew nothing of.<br />
<br />
Surely if they go through with this, you can make some sort of flashy template stating how you were the first person to have this happen?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Oh, oh, me me! Lemme make it!--[[User:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>]] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== lol. ==<br />
<br />
<span class="plainlinks">[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct&curid=2730&diff=1359677&oldid=1359674 lol.]</span> {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 01:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:evidently i can be more wrong ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Yus, I gnoh Bub and Kevan, I'm interesting in their profiles and activity, location might come later. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 04:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Irony?==<br />
hahaha oh wow you're delusional. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:you just noticed? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Yeah? ==<br />
<br />
[[User_talk:Iscariot#Run_for_sysop|Nominate?]]<br />
--{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 00:46, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I'm up for it if you and SA are.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::do eeet --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 00:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Nao. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 01:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I'm waiting for SA to say something since his name was mentioned. Now kindly [[GTFO]] ma talk page.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::That goes for all of you. Or none of you. I mean it is a free wiki...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:06, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
hai. i here u liek mudkipz --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Mudkipz suck. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 01:10, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Where's axehack?? I want him back :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Axehack is no more... --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 01:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::He was briefly more on the 6th of jan..why is this happening? I, for one, blame the current sysop team ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::: I blame the previous sysop team. Grim s, to be more precise. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
Iscariot...Whoooooo....Now THAT would be one hell of a promotions bid. I'd honestly say give it a while for everything that's around him to die down some, but it might not happen anyway. Its up to you guys on what happens. Just saying it might be more prudent to wait a bit.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:yeah agree, it's a bit chaotic atm. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I'll be ready to do it when you guys are ready... I think it will be interesting to see what reasons people give for voting against, and how many people outside the sysop team are opposed to it. I personally think Iscariot would be a very good sysop. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 01:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::of course! It's not just a show for a shows sake. I wouldn't nominate someone i didn't genuinely want as sysop. Still i think it's best if we wait til the wiki is a bit quieter. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::His actions in the few places where they've given him power over users say much to the contrary. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 05:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I can haz links? Or examples? --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 21:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I doubt he'd accept the nomination... I mean, if he were a sysop, he couldn't post to his own Talk page LOL. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 05:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::LOL he'd be what he must have always hated!!! xD [[User:Liberty|Liberty]] 05:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Iscariot doesn't hate Sysops altogether, he just hates the way the current sysops teams acts and handles things. He's pointed that out occasionally.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 11:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::No, he hates that we don't dance to his tune. Also read [[Recruitment/Archive2]] for a bit Pestolence, then check the [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Kristi_of_the_Dead_vs_Recruitment|arbitration case that relates to it.]](talk page too), there's also a few little snipes because of [[:Category_talk:Recruitment#Category:Recruitment_Rules_Discussion|this]] he's been making about me throughout the wiki claiming that I'm going against the consensus of the community or twisting recruitment to my own ends. He's a paranoid delusional, we're all out to get him and opposing him is the same as opposing the community in his eyes. You can see some of that [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_01#User:Iscariot|here]]. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 01:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::According to [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Kevan&curid=1072&diff=1363855&oldid=1363854&rcid=1393374 this bit] on Kevan's page, the "community" he is referring to are the folk who aren't actually on the wiki. =/ Convenient eh? -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 01:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::It's funny cause I know that community, I know more people in it than him and the reason is actually the kinda things he's doing and the related drama/rules abuse. I know people in that same community that have expressed problems with his behavior here after seeing it for themselves even. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]], self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All</span> 02:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::So basically he's got the wrong end of the stick completely and is now making an even bigger arse of himself because of it? =/ Clever. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 02:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::I think thats a bit harsh, yes Iscariot is an arse and out to cause trouble for troubles sake but his attacks are not without valid points. The current Admin team does do a (mostly) good job but the assumption by some that they are above community review and that those that disagree with them are trouble making malcontents is far from the truth. Despite the claims to the contrary "Sysopship" no longer suggests a mere janitorial role, rather it designates some users as being in positions of judgment over other users. Until the sysop position recognizes a difference between users that the community trusts to do routine maintenance etc... and to hold a position of authority and judgment over others then drama will always ensue. As is, the sysop role really does seem to be turning into an exclusive club type thing, true or not that is not an image that is good for the position or the community at large!--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::1)You're preaching to the choir. Who do you think started the debate over the claims to being just janitors? 2) The system was set up originally to ''not'' have community review for a reason. That reason is still somewhat valid and more reasons connecting to that one have caused the failure of every proposition for regular review. 3) Iscariot only has points when he accidentally stumbles upon then in the midst of his attempts to make everyone fall in line, I used to think it was intentional but his behavior has long since made it clear to me that he doesn't actually believe the "points" he has except for as a means to an end. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 02:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::::The last thing that made the third one ridiculously clear to me was the RRF move drama.--<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 02:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::::::1) not really aware of who started it... just know its been grumbling on for ever and a day. 2) community review has many things in its favour foremost of which is that it confirms that the sysops are "trusted" by the current userbase, its also very open to abuse by all and sundry and '''yes''' it would also make it hard for sysops to do the contentious stuff that makes them unpopular but still needs doing! 3)Just because the valid points he hits upon are not the ones he is aiming at doesn't make them any less valid, it does however make him look stupid and petty.--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 08:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::::Actually spirit of the rule is as important as the law. The reason it's being enforced more so. You don't give native americans repirations for slavery because they were both referred to with the same term back in the day. For #2 please read the comment on my talk page to pestolence, I don't think we should be starting another massive discussion on J3D's talk page without him being a part of it. --[[User:Karek|Judge&nbsp;Karke]],&nbsp;self-proclaimed&nbsp;Decider&nbsp;of&nbsp;Everything&nbsp;and&nbsp;Ruler&nbsp;of&nbsp;All 10:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::Wow i didn't expect all this upon my return. Now to catch up on whats happened elsewhere....--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::Yup. INMNSHO that's why he's so worried about constant proper English. If he ever used slang or slipped up, the holes in his ideas would be clear as day. He creates a false air of authority and correctives.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 02:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Can I get some input?==<br />
I've been working on a policy that I believe is sorely needed [[User:Pestolence/001|here]], and I'd appreciate your input on it. How can it be improved, and is it even needed right now? A potential problem is what to do about current sysops: put them all up for review now (leading to a massive backlog of admin page drama), postpone the review until six months from now (simply staving off the inevitable drama till later), or something else glaringly obvious that I've overlooked? See you around. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 02:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Never mind, thanks. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 16:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:<nowiki>:</nowiki>( I feel unwanted...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Aw. =( We still love you Jed! -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::pwomise? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Uh huh. =) Without you the wiki would asplode. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::i suspected as much, now back to work. There be vandalism cases to rule on ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Meh. S'pose. I could take a couple of minutes out of my busy revision schedule to take a mosey on over for a look. =p -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 01:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::OMGMISCONBULATIONCHEESEISLAZYIMASOGONNATELLISCARIOT --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
kidding.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:you little... heh --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::did i getcha? huh? well? did i?? did i?? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== star wars ==<br />
<br />
its not that i liek it, but its public knoweledge... like the brother grimm tales in 19th century. Anyway, why dont you liek star wars ? --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 00:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:hint:begins with f, ends with inis. But i didn't particularly like it before that anyway.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::what does [http://files.usgwarchives.net/tx/floyd/vitals/births/1937/floyb37.txt f floyd inis] has to do with star wars ? --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup><br />
:::what the [[2 Cool]] is that?? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
fpenis?--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span></small> 03:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:[[User:DanceDanceRevolution/Fenis|fpenis.]]--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== RE: Classic lulz ==<br />
<br />
Truer words never were spoken - unless someone once said cyberbob was a cunt, then that would be truer. Lol, truer is a weird-looking word.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Cyberbob is a cunt--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Did you guys like the presents i left you? The wiki has been awesome lately, reminds me of the grim days. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
DOHOHOHO --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:merry january! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== I need your advice ==<br />
<br />
Hello. It's me again. I need your advice on something. Neice has not edited the Dead Dudes page again. However, he has now posted some extremely anti-DD propaganda on [[The Sidney Arms]] page. Please have a look and tell me what you think. In my opinion (which i have stated to Neice),such statements have no place on a location page. he should put them on his own group's page. It is becoming tiresome to myself and our group, as he is nothing more than a griefer in-game and apparently feels compelled to bring it into the wiki. Anyways, have a look and let me know. Thanks again for any help you can give. --[[User:Wast0id|Wast0id]] 19:59, 20 January (CST)<br />
:''The Arms is still under attack from the wonderful group Malton Maulers. We have continued to battle for the area and will now go all out for it and have broken into the Arms daily''. Is that what you find so offensive Wastoid? {{User:Liberty/Sign}} 07:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I think [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=The_Sidney_Arms&diff=1368228&oldid=1367540 this] is his problem. I removed it before I actually saw this because it was POV on a neutral page. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 20:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::--Yes, thank you Pestolence, that was exactly my problem. And I expect more of the same from this user in the future and was hoping someone in authotity would set him straight. As I said previously, I simply wish he would keep his in-game grudge in the game, or at least on his own group page. --[[User:Wast0id|Wast0id]] 18:44, 21 January 2009 (CST)<br />
::::If he continues to slander your group, contact him on his talk page and ask him to stop, and if he continues (or if you've already asked him to stop and he's ignored you), take him to [[A/A|arbitration]]. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 02:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Uranium ==<br />
<br />
BOMBS--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 02:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Read's ban ==<br />
<br />
Time for an open discussion regarding the ''"it is expected that a system operator be prepared to reverse a warning/ban should the community desire it"'' section of [[UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines|this policy]] do you think? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 09:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:What makes you think the community does desire it? The only people contesting it at all number like 4. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::That would be why we'd have an ''Open'' Discussion. I'm pretty sure I can find some people that would support it. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 13:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::That depends on how low on the IQ range you'e prepared to go. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Well I would vote to keep the ban which means you will have Bobs support as he can't ever be seen to side with me these days. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 13:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::You keep bringing me into your comments honest, do you have a crush or something? If so take it elsewhere... I hear there are corners of the internet dedicated to that sort of thing. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 14:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::touché... but i already removed that comment as i felt it a little unfair.--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 14:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::xbox live or myspace? ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Is anyone else amused by the fact that he doesn't know that he can't unban people through meatpuppeting a vote? It's been tried before and over-ruled by the appropriate party. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 08:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:then whys it in the policy?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Because we don't update policies every time Kevan steps in and says differently. There needs to be some legitimacy to giving the user a second chance for such a thing to actually be done, and then only in the more extreme cases is it even likely. Cases like Amazing or Izumi, not any case Iscariot seems to think this is valid for(as I'm sure you know well which those will obviously be). And I'm sure we all know by this point Iscariot is just doing this now to try and cause drama so he can scream about how biased the sysops are regardless of whether he is correct in the slightest, he's not trying to get Read's ban revoked or even claiming what happened to him was unfair, those are irrelevant to his point. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 02:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Does anyone notice that it's fine when Karek likes a mass of support, but meatpuppeting when it's something he doesn't? Odd that... -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 20:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Signature ==<br />
<br />
I'm not after drama, but I'm asking if you'd change your signature back to J3D, please. Thanks. {{User:Extropymine/sig}} 09:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:hows that for compromise? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::[http://www.milkandcookies.com/link/58827/detail/ You used the N word?] :| --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 14:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Y helo thar ==<br />
<br />
There's an important thingy over here --> [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Semi-protection|this bit]], that you should have a look at. We're at 14 votes but we need 20 for a proper majority. Your time and energy will be rewarded with cookies and mudkips (if u liek dat sort of ting) =) -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 21:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==:)==<br />
Can you please refrain from vouching a single candidate MULTIPLE times? Please? :/ --<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Suicidal Angel,</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 00:00, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:If you can refrain from showing nothing but blatent disregard for the rules of this talkpage ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Oh... ==<br />
<br />
You're still around. When are you gonna give up on this shit and go back to Nationstates? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 11:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:fuck nationstates.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::booyah!--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Hi, i'm not sure if i'm replying to you right, i answered your question on my page but i'm still learning here. I am everything zombie, i opened that account/page by mistake under the wrong name. I wanted one for Drunkmonkey, which i opened and have been working on today. Feel free to delete the everything zombie page and account as i won't be using it thank you.<br />
Derek<br />
(http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:Drunkmonkey)<br />
<br />
==ALiM template==<br />
<br />
Are you happy with it? Cause if I fix it from overlapping the text, I have to use the flagbox template which doesn't make it look as good. the LUL isn't as big, which really detracts from the.. LUL, you know? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 07:45, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:I like it how it is(and i luuuurve the colour scheme) i can deal if the lul gets smaller tho. stuff happens.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:54, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
::I'll leave it then, I think the original is the best, {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:26, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Vandal Banning==<br />
<br />
I almost laughed a vital organ off. LulZ'LoLz--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 15:27, 6 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== [[User:DanceDanceRevolution/status/game]] ==<br />
<br />
Just for you. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 13:49, 8 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Plus, if you don't vouch the Eastwood Museum, I won't vouch ALiM for good article status. Tit for tat. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 12:23, 11 May 2009 (BST)<br />
:It just makes me think of the suburb of Eastwood, which fyi is a dump. But you sure do know how to treat a girl, so you're on.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:32, 12 May 2009 (BST)<br />
::Yeah, Eve told me she hated Eastwood. She calls it Eastwoo for some reason. Is that a Sydney thing? Btw, come for a sysop party soon? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:31, 30 May 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Nah i just call it eastwood...and yeah i've got a 3 day block off later in june so we can get fucked up alim style.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:18, 31 May 2009 (BST)<br />
::::I dig.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:39, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Come watch a buce match, too. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 05:04, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Hurry up and put Eastwood on ALiM!!! Before you get banned! ;D {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 16:25, 8 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:Theres not some underground movement to have me permaed brewing is there?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:01, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not shout offensive names on admin pages on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 02:52 8 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />And again <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 03:28 9 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:Gimme another stop hand. lazy cunt.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:57, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::u relly need 2 do smethin about dat temper --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 10:00, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::maybz l8a.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:02, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Oh i forgot the bit where i'm only making these edits to get up to 500 in the next 2 months.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:04, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::hmmm thanks for giving me an idea for a policy proposal --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 10:35, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I r supa srs now. Good luck on getting that upper-middle management job, bob.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 17:30, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I can't actually take credit for it, i got it off Conn (see SA's talk), good luck with a coherent policy on the issue though...in the end who gives a fuck? Most people will either make the 250 in a month or just not get another warning anytime soon anyway, or get more bans til they leave the wiki, for the remaining about 2 people, just let them be.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:06, 13 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I wouldn't worry about it so much - I'm in the middle of midyears at the moment and can't be bothered. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 06:16, 13 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::Here, have 2 [[Image:6vmixh1b9.gif]] <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 10:51 10 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
==lol==<br />
qq bitch --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:21, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:see if you can beat 3 months.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:23, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::I already did - I was a sysop from May 2006 through to May 2007. suck it --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:27, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Was your demotion scandalous and awesome though?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:30, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::nah - I got tricked into putting myself up for review and at that point promotion bids pretty much were votes. people are whiny babies so I got da boot --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:35, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I see. Votes better than 2 randoms just decide. The whole process is largely pointless...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:37, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::May I introduce you to the principles of representative democracy? {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:39, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I'm from NSW, i'm familiar with it and i hate it.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:44, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::That's why there aren't only two candidates for crat elections, like there are in elections in our state (I'm from NSW too.) Also:<br />
::::::::"Democracy is the worst form of government. It's simply better then all the others that have been tried" - Winston Churchill. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:46, 21 June 2009 (BST) <br />
:::::::::That misquote is contradictory... :P It's "''democracy is the worst form of government '''except''' all the others that have been tried''" <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:59 21 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
::::::::you might want to take some time to learn about politics before thinking you know enough to have a valid opinion about it hth --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:51, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You should be less lame.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:54, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::yes. I should be less lame than getting drunk while online instead of partying with my friends as well as getting online while being hungover rather than being hungover at a mate's place where I've crashed after a night out<br />i'm definitely lamer than that right now; i should lift my game --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:00, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::lol --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 22:00, 21 June 2009 (BST) <br />
::::::vote is infinitely worse than 2 randoms because then meatpuppetry enters into the equation and people are still pretty whiny babies who don't know how to make userpages let alone know who should and should not be a sysop --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:41, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Time to Vote!==<br />
I found a building I thought would be a good addition to the [[ELiM]] list. Go to [[Talk:Amusing_Locations_in_Malton/Edible_Locations_in_Malton#The_Gumm_Building_.2842.2C_40.29|the ELiM talk page]] to vote on whether The Gumm Building should be added. --{{User:Blake Firedancer/sig}} 13:00, 30 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== nicks drunk promotion bid ==<br />
<br />
is there really no way to read it? i wanna read it so bad. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 09:53, 1 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:It's a shame it wasn't archived properly. It should've been put under Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies or something. It just got deleted and I think someone got a/vbed. P.S. Just checked and it was me.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:55, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::Good thing you checked, I thought it was someone else. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 05:50, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Zing. But it was at Curley's house so I was expecting to see his account appear somewhere.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:30, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::ooohk. everything was done at Curleys house amirite? ;) {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 06:34, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::most things. except blowjobs, obviously.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:47, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I was just on #batshit relaying the story of how we went to that tech store in jesmond and used a display iphone to buy brain rot for table. good times. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 06:51, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::lol. <small>just wanted to get in on this convo</small><br />
:::::::oh and bj's can happen at curleys house, if i'm not mistaken 2 of the womens live there.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:16, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::getting beejays from internets<br />the height of desperateness? i would say yes --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:22, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Wut? curleys house is a real place bob....--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:25, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::nooooo relllyyy??? my question to you is would you know about curleys house without internet --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:28, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::yes. i knew about it since before broadband was invented...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:30, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::well i knew about it since before even the whole internet was invented........ --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:39, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::dayem.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:29, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::yeh it was like infinity years ago so you probly wouldnt know what that was like --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 00:35, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::Good recovery.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:08, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::hello? hello? i cant hear you speak directly into the receiver --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:17, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::No I want the last word!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:24, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
<s>[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not post on the A/VB main page when you are uninvolved in the case on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]]<sup>[[Template_talk:VandalBanningNotice|POST HERE]]</sup> 11:09, 15 July 2009 (BST)</s><br />
<br />
This verdict has been overruled and the warning stuck. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:26, 17 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Ban==<br />
<s>You have been banned from editing this wiki for 24 hours for vandalism. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 15:28, 16 July 2009 (BST)</s><br />
<br />
This ruling has been overruled and the ban overturned. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:27, 17 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==ban?==<br />
well it looks like they at least saw sense on your case... i suspect my ban will stand but what the hey... its not like i didn't expect it :) --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 01:52, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
DDR was going to post "'''Phew J3D, lucky Honest saved you from that one. Shame he had to be banned because of it. ''' but thought better of it because i clearly was not banned. Why? well that would be because in so many years of valid contribution to the wiki i have only ever faced 3 A/VB cases all but this one thrown out. Hmm guess that makes me the newest wikimartyr... --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:33, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Lol! You fuckiing moron! Did you even read your ''own'' comment that I replied to? '''YOU''' called it a ban, hence why I had ''ban'' in ''italics'', something you must have overlooked.<br />
:I gave up on arguing because you never give up, you fight to the death with the same fucked up, stupid points. I thought you'd bow down after Nubis didn't come to save you, but hey, looks like your desperation in saving your skin can surprise everyone. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<span style="color:black"><u><big>ϑϑℜ</big></u></span>]] 03:19, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::el oh el pwnt?--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 03:23, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::One would think so. He wouldn't admit it. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<span style="color:black"><u><big>ϑϑℜ</big></u></span>]] 03:45, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== yo ==<br />
<br />
Please don't submit [[:Image:2cola.jpg]] for SD. I want to use it as an example when I put 0x0 images up for scheduled deletions. What did you upload to make it come up as 0x0? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:54, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Ah i'm half asleep and i forgot how to make a bmp a jpg so i just changed the file name which turns out doesn't work :P So maybe you get a 0x0 if you try uploading any bmp? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:55, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::Yeah, thanks. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't a problem on my end before submitting it as a scheduled. ty. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:58, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::np.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:02, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
[[:Image:2cola.jpg]] - FTFY {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 18:02, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Heh, thanks but i already made [[:Image:2cola.JPG]] and if you read the above DDR wanted that kept as an example or something...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:55, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::I reverted it. Hope you don't mind. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 03:04, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Nvm. I didn't know you cited the fix in your scheduling vote so I put it back. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 03:06, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
hay ur not an stysops. u r an x sysops. quit lyin yo--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 04:04, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:i had teh exact same templat on 4 da hole tiem i wasnt an sysops. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 04:09, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::thats cause you never edit yyour page so it doesn't show up on the recent changes. faeget.--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 04:23, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Guys, guys. I'm sorry but the spelling and grammar here is just atrocious. Please clean up your act.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:51, 2 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::nou--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> High Overlord and Lead Conspirator of the Administrative Rebellion.</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Want</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">help?</span>]] 16:33, 2 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== <s>birth</s>fagday ==<br />
<br />
is it alim's 2nd yet? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 10:41, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:first, what's a birthfagday? and second, no - it's on the 2nd of october.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 11:51, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::as an overrated singersongwriter once said, "The times they are'a changin'"--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:50, 7 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::how are they changing? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:57, 7 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Well considering the Earth is in a constant state of evolution and change, it is impossible for that quote to be ever inaccurate.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 02:21, 8 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not impersonate sysops on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 01:18, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:You really need to stop telling me it's my last warning. It sounds so, ''final''...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:04, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::It's the [[Template:warning2|template's]] fault. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 02:53, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== YOU ==<br />
<br />
ARE GOD--[[User:Shakey60|Shakey]] <sup>[[Beatbox_Kids|BBK]] </sup> 12:46, 16 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:i know right --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:16, 26 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Sysops==<br />
I thought you were a sysops nigger? And you and cyberbob were best butt buddies?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 10:35, 23 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:I was, until early january :\ --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:45, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::Wat happen--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 00:49, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Conspiracy. Nubis organised my sacking during the new year period when i wasn't checking the wikiz :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:51, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::What? Nubis got you demoted? Har har. Specifically for what?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 01:01, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Drunk wiki editing. Not towing the party line. Usual reasons ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:03, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::HAH. So what happen with you and cyberbob?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 01:43, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I hate lemons. Jed's just a wee bit too bitter. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:41, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I didn't know there was ever anything between us? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:37, 26 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==The Sysop template==<br />
So I hear you still have it on there. Please take it down as per the warning you were issued or I will do it for you. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 09:18, 28 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== omfg ==<br />
So happy bob permabanned this "buzz killington" thinking it was one of you two, or one of the bbk. I can feel a massive misconduct coming on if anyone decides to take it further.<br />
What I am saying is, please take it further.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:53, 29 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:fucking lol hey.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:02, 29 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Ciggies==<br />
Good god man, make the link to your user page findable, ffs <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 11:48 2 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:He's had it like that for a week or so. And this signature ''should'' only be up for 24 hours, right? ;) --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 12:09, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::Well the ALaMe one was at least preceded by some non-link stuff, but was bad enough... this is another level again. He just keeps pushing on the boundary until someone can be bothered to react <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:28 2 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:::Fair enough- he's the one who will be VB'd so I don't really care. I just think for a day-long fag celebration, just let him have his giggles. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 12:30, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::I put my cursor on the main part, and it underlined all but the exclamation mark, so then i clicked on the exclamation mark, and it bought me here!!--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Also, your name is coxy--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::<nowiki>*</nowiki>you're ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:41, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::TAKING YOU TO A/A FOR WINKING OMG--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:46, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::USING CAPS TO HILARIOUSLY RIDICULE BY LAMPOONING A PERCEIVED "ANGER" WHILE TOTALLY GETTING ALL PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE UP IN THIS SHIT BY MEANS OF HUMOUROUSLY EXAGGERATING AN ENEMY'S POST AT THE SAME TIME {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You are WAY to easy these days--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:17, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::last word {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::nah uh--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::u mad?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::You are WAY to easy these days {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:19, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Learn to spell, both of you. any more posts in this thread will be deleted and i might take you to a/vb. unless its not bob or read.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:21, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! that is all.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 14:31, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::I'm special, <small>special</small>, so special, <small>special</small>. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 14:35, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
== You ==<br />
Are that fucking inconsistent on FB and IRC and any chat medium. I cannot work out your patterns m'lday--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:01, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:I'm on from 1pm til 6pm. And i'll sign into msn now just for you. But don't fucking facebook chat me coz my compy can't handle it :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:04, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Nam nam, bra!nz!!! ==<br />
<br />
You tasted good. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 01:46, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== You have all been rolled ==<br />
<br />
You are all my muppets! I am your muppetmaster. '''JIM HENSON IS ALIVE!!!''' <br />
<br />
As of December 24, 2012 I shall control all the accounts of 2 Cool. ALiM is/will be MINE! --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 06:13, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arbitration==<br />
Has started. Please proceed [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool here] --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:35, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Uhh, thanks I guess. By the way, shouldn't it be "nicknames given by 2 Cool", instead of "given to 2 Cool"?--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:01, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::No because you gave them to us, they aren't given by us.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:06, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Oh sorry, I get it, misunderstood for a sec.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:18, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Category:Group Subpages ==<br />
<br />
Revert it again and I'll put up an A/VB case against you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Silver}}-- 08:00, 9 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Link me plox to the policy where it says i have to allow you to categorise my group subpages, then compliance you shall receive.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:03, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::The policy on '''bad faith''' where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::You have every obligation to present evidence for your assertion. I provide the following [[UDWiki:Specific_Case_Editing_Guidelines|link]], which ensures that a group may control the content of their page excepting a NPOV lead-in paragraph. A category, by definition, is not part of a prose paragraph and is therefore not covered by this exemption. I await this 'policy' on 'refusing administrative edits', the wording of which is straying close to using the administration status as a badge of authority. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:02, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::And while you're there, you might want to run an IP check on [[User:Insane1]], voting on one suggestion and not the other up for voting during a first edit seems suspicious to me. It won't be enough to sway the vote but is probably worth checking out. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:05, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::It wasn't his first edit at all. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:10, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I seem to have omitted the "in the suggestions system" portion of that sentence. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:20, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Hardly. Anyone can do administrative edits. I only have the obligation to present evidence if I take him to A/VB. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:08, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Indeed, anyone can, but editing here repeatedly quoting some policy you don't present for review and then expecting a user who has clear ownership of the page (as I ''have'' presented) seems inconsistent to a good faith approach. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:20, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Read the policy document, it is as consistent in defending J3D as it would save any bad faith action a user makes in his own space; ''Groups, for the most part, have sole property of their Group page on the wiki'' is an example, nothing in the policy is black and white, it allows for exceptions to the ownership clause, and I assume none of what is in that policy will defend J3D against the blanket ruling of "bad faith". J3D has also specified that he only gives a shit about ''me'' adding the category (something I do daily to every page on the wiki) onto the subpage, and you expect people to believe ''I'm'' acting in bad faith? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:34, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::Given the fact that you admit there's bad faith between the two of you, the good faith response would be to leave it alone and not incite drama as you are doing by threatening vandalism rulings. Why don't you see if someone else will apply it? And answer me this, what does the wiki lose, or in what way is it harmed by this lack of category? It may appease your sense of CDO, but does nothing to assist the wiki in general or even help important pages, you know, like A/VD which you seem perfectly happy to leave in a false manner. Your comment on 'doing it everyday' I hope is incorrect as well given that's not the category that should be going on there either. And you've still yet to produce this 'policy' you harp on about. I've provided mine and am quite happy that the statement that groups may control the content of the page sufficient to cover this, or we'd be having massive drama wars on this when the Malton Marshalls were added to Category:PKer Groups. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 08:16, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::1. I never once said there was any bad faith on my end. 2. Look below. I already did suggest someone else do it, but at the moment he hasn't even reverted it. 3. Get your head out of your arse and stop pressing fallacies like I "need" a "policy" that says we can warn users for bad faith, you parasitical moron. 4. Specialpages like the one involved in this is specifically called a "maintenance page" by Mediawiki, hence of course it is an important part of maintenence. And in response to your lack of concern for anything less than an "important page", look at A/D and see your fucked up stance on "unimportant pages" yourself, and see who has the double standards here. 5. Don't say I have OCD because at leased ''my'' case of it goes towards a greater good, rather than your unfulfilling and pestering belief that you were brought on this earth to shit people off with your 'holy' ways. 6. You are the only user unhappy with the A/VD edits so shut the fuck up and actually consider that your opinion on them probably shouldn't be treated as the be-all of truth on this wiki.<br />
:::::::::So actually consider what you are doing just now, Iscariot, you are watching a little shit-stirrer try and mess with the only thing on this wiki that shouldn't generally be messed with, Mediawiki maintenance, no doubt waiting for this to flip out of control (thanks to a certain meddling user, you, moreso than me) and then cry vendetta if he actually gets punished for his immature, counter-productive, butthurt and overall unnecessary behaviour. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:32, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Wait, you want to go into a barrage of obscenities and then try and appeal to my sense of reason. Your 'productive' CDO may be clouding your logic. Given that the majority of your emotional tirade belongs on other pages, the only one I'll respond to is that concerning A/VD, there is a problem, it's not opinion, it's fact based on the escalations policy. Boxy's actions are no different to Nubis' that caused the situation. Given you are a sysop and one of the few users able to rectify the problem I'd be considerably more impressed if you applied your energies to that rather than engage in this case of edit warring, drama stirring and vandalism threatening over an inconsequential page.<br />
<br />
::::::::::Finally, I didn't start the policy here, you did. And I quote ''"The policy on bad faith where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) "'' You have made a claim, the burden of proof is ''always'' on the claimant. I'm simply asking you to prove what you have said. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 08:43, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Sorry. I read the first sentence and stopped indefinitely, learn that I have no intention of appealing to your sense of ''anything'', full stop. I no longer have an interest in this, and hence I have no more interest in arguing with you. Unlike yourself, users like Boxy at leased have initiative in fixing problems rather than inflaming them, so I consider this topic closed and I'm treating it as such. Bleat to someone new. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 09:02, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Why is it so hard for you to provide a link to something you say exists? Is it so hard for a sysop on this wiki to demonstrate their own claims? Or have you just started inventing policies like Hagnat used to? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:38, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::I just had a read through the vandalism policy (because none of the others are really relevant here), and there isn't anything about this type of edit. The situation isn't helped by the vagueness of the policy. The only thing that the policy actually DOES say about it is that they should go to Arbies, which we all know would be a pointless waste of time. There's nothing about admin edits, there's nothing about user page rights over-ruling the advancement of the wiki. Neither side is covered by policy, but, as Iscariot noted, the burden of proof IS unfortunately on the claimant.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:52, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::Why is it so hard for you to understand that after ''what I want'' is fixed, I have ''no intention'' of arguing with you? I have no, NO interest in continuing this once someone has stepped in a mediated this issue and since Boxy has, I have absolutely no interest in continuing the argument. Learn to actually care for the wiki rather than fix your desire to cause trouble and 'show up' the sysops. I'm the one with OCD, by the way. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:22, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::And by the way, [[UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines#General_Conduct|shut the fuck up now]], will you? Second last clause. we have the authority to destroy any value in the effort to crust "Bad Faith", ie. the umbrella ruling that can theoretically serve any purpose in aid of ridding of loopholes in the wiki. Deal with it. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:22, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::No, that's not what you said. You said ''"The policy on bad faith where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) "''. Please show me the ''"policy on bad faith"'', not the section on sysop conduct guidelines put in there for emergency situations. Please give me a link to the policy that you claimed exist that explicitly states a user cannot ''"(refuse) administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki"''. Please show how the sentence ''"You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing"'' in '''any''' way shows good faith on your part and acceptable conduct on your part. If not (and I don't think you can) then you have now become the new version of Hagnat, claiming policy where none exists and then falling back "I can do it because I is sysops and teh guidelines say I can so I'm not listening to you". -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 03:42, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::No, you shut the fuck up because an Admin document that supports what I say. You honestly don't get it do you? You make me sick with your personal harrassment, and you really can't take a hint. So much for sucking my cock to have any chance of being a sysop, yes? And now it'll turn into a "Boxy and DDR are BOTH to immature to consider me for sysop" story now. I can't wait. Conversation closed a day ago, learn to read. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:02, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::::You see, that's the difference, I'm not telling you to stop talking. I'm asking you to provide the policy you claim existed in the beginning. You can't, and the guidelines do not back you up on this. You cannot claim that a condition put in to prevent harm to the wiki entitles you to engage in an edit war with a user you aren't getting along with. Own up, apologise to J3D for saying there was such a policy when they're isn't and then the conversation is over. How hard is it? I'm not sure where this idea about me going for sysop came from, but as you well know there are only three users I will accept a nomination from, and two are inactive. Don't believe me? Go nominate me right now like Anime did and watch how quickly it gets archived. However none of this changes the fact that you were claiming a policy that doesn't exist, you were using your status as a sysop to attempt to get your own way and that you are now running to what should be an emergency condition for when the wiki is subject to extreme disruption to garnish your error with some semblance of credibility. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 05:16, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::Wait, what? For all I know, it could exist in 50,000 policy documents and you could be bluffing for all I care, I never actually looked to verify the claim. You know why? It was a figure of speech, hence the bolding of '''Bad Faith''' to outline what he would have been banned for. Obviously you knew this because you aren't a moron but you are such a parasite in that way you behave that the thought wouldn't pass me by, that you pretend to think that I'm using my sysop status as a badge for anything, when rather it is more my status as an actual member of the community, whereas you are just a little piddling child who will struggle to find one logical fallacy in an argument he has nothing to do with, then bounce in, using it as the doomsday weapon of the decade. Say what you want after this, I won't be replying to your cesspit-creating nonsense. The page is fixed, you are not. I'm fulfilled. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:36, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::::So we have "<b>The policy on bad faith</b> where refusing administrative edits on your page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. <b>You can find the link yourself</b>, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) " where you state there is a policy and there is a link to be found, contrasted with "For all I know, <b>it could exist</b> in 50,000 policy documents and you could be bluffing for all I care, <b>I never actually looked to verify the claim</b>." where there isn't a policy and you didn't even look before demanding a user leave your preferred edit to his owned page. You can quibble about semantics and logical fallacies all you want. You lied. You lied to try and get your own way and won't even have the good grace and dignity to apologise to J3D for this. ''"that you pretend to think that I'm using my sysop status as a badge for anything"'' Erm, '''you''' were the one who just tried to claim that the Sysop Guidelines were applicable in making you right, you can't invoke them if you're being a normal user. Therefore you're either trying to use your status to get your own way (as evidenced by invoking the clause in the sysop guidelines) or you're trying to get your own way by inventing a new policy/quoting one that can in no way apply. Which is it?<br />
<br />
:::::::::::::::::::::I further note that you in no way continue to try and paint me as having promotion prospects since you do not appear to have put up a nomination. Another attempt to divert attention from what's happened here failing? I think so. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 05:54, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
I actually think you guys might have found the pettiest possible thing to threaten each other with A/VB over. Just take it to Arby's or something and be done with it because I don't think anybody really believes they're going to ''convince'' the other side of their argument. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:26, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Arbie's isn't needed in regards to the '''maintenence''' of the wiki, only over its content. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:34, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::It can quite literally be about whatever you want it to be about. That's the whole point. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 08:01, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Fair enough. But the point of this isn't to make a large amount of drama, which is why I'm making this simple: If he reverts it, I'll ask someone to just put it there themselves and hopefully he'll keep it up there, considering he's stated numerous times that he's only interested in keeping me off the page, not some random user who has similar intentions. If he reverts that, he can go to A/VB for all I care. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:08, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
/section, thanks to boxy. I no longer have any desire to pursue this at the current time. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:37, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Someone wanna bring me up to date on what the fuck has happened? In the meantime i'm rereverting charlies edit.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 17:01, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:oh wow boxy did, was that what his a/m case was for? If so epic,. i might go check now..brb--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 17:05, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Witch Hunt == <br />
I have been wiki absent for a couple of days due to other shit so I had a look through the archive to see what happened with boxys misconduct and I decided to read up on [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive/J3D/2009 this]. I really do feel for you dude, the way those who didn't want you in in the first place twisted and turned all of it just to get you demoted, when the original misconduct case was brought about 1 thing only.... You really did get the hard end of this stick and I am not posting this out of butthurt, I just hope others go back and have a look at some of the actions of the people in there and despite their opinion of you, maybe form some opinions on the poor form of some of the current admin team in this time.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:23, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Box is the only current admin that had any sort of authority in that anyway, so why rag on them? And it's weird, and it's hard for people who know Jed and Nick IRL to fathom (trust me), but it's actually a common ''truth'' that somehow Nick ''always'' did have access to Jed's account, so if you actually think about it from their point of view, it has its grounds, no matter how ridiculous it seems to you and me. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:26, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 10:41, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::get some original material bob, I hahaha'd you off the ballpark the other day when you pulled your cannons on DDR, you arent very useful hey....And DDR, no, it isnt about what access they had or WHY he got demoted, it is more about how the misconduct case was for one thing, and then escalated into a million other things that were completely irrelevant and basically the sysops opinion on whether Jed should be a Sop or not...not if he had committed misconduct with the act that Cyberfag brought to fruition. If people thought that Nick and Jed were sharing accounts or whatever, and no, I personally do not see a crime in sitting next to a sysop while he uses his account, then those people should have made a misconduct or demotions case with the appropriate information and proof at hand, rather than using an offbeat joke comment as an excuse to bring out the big guns and debate his worthyness. Regardless of if he was fit to be a sysop or not, when the case was brought forward for an off colour joke, and the sysops at hand decide they are going to bring forward unrelated things and then manipulate it into a vote for demotion, all over a joke that was laughed off by the first 3 sysops, then yeah, it is the definition of a witch hunt. Also you don't have to have been a sysop then to have been part of the Witch Hunt at hand, honestly. This wasn't even aimed at you it is just that Jed will check this now that they are in Thailand.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:01, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::the tl;dr is that, the case wasnt about what Jed got demoted for, so basically it was a witch hunt from box and others, because they didnt have the authority that the crats who bought him into the team did, this was the only way to get him out without going through the proper avenues, ie the people who were elected to be Crats--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:03, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::tbh I saw it as no different as anything they pinged mighty Grim for in ''that'' misconduct case, and as a Sysop I think there is nothing wrong with ''calling'' (a vote for) demotion over long-term issues despite the one case being completely different... I know it sounds harsh and abusive but that's just how I see it, if you can be called for promotion at any time based on long-standing good efforts then the opposite shouldn't be totally shunned just because it's 'unfair'. Whether it should have been used for J3D is irrelevant (though I'm not surprised given the circumstances around his pm bid) but yes. More power to the hungry ops. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 12:43, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::''"Box is the only current admin that had any sort of authority in that anyway, so why rag on them?"'' The. General. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 03:46, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Though you are correct, I mostly just mean the major players in the demotion, the 'instigators'. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:14, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:fair, at least something of worth comes out of you, which is more I can say for certain others--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
sexy you are the best poster on the whole wiki. serious. you own {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:47, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
i reckon we should demote the cunt {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:51, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I don't have to be a good poster, I'm not a System Operator--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::neither do i, maggot {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:14, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I don't really know where your superiority complex comes from in life, I guess you get online and it is a world away from irl amirite?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:46, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::whoa there with all the hemmin and the hawwin and the birdsong {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:52, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGq5FeUv3zk I found your youtube channel], you were sure it would be a secret hey? There are people who can help you bob. You are not alone out there, never alone. I wont help you though, you're too much of a fag for me to be associated with.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:02, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::OH MY GOD ''how did you find itttttttttt'' {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:03, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::i feel so exposed... nobody is safe from messr. Read's detectiv skillz {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:08, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::: *smug*--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
''I personally do not see a crime in sitting next to a sysop while he uses his account,'' This made me LOL because that is why Nubis was demoted. At least Nubis and I were never accused of abusing check user... --[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 16:24, 22 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Untrue. Not only was jed demoted for stuff relating to that ''anyway'', There was also evidence to support that you had permanent access to the nubis account from locations other than her/his own, something your initial claim entailed. Sheesh. You are actually a troll with all of these claims that you make, right? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 16:33, 22 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==those stupid groups that include people whom you know don't want to be a part of your shitty jokes==<br />
next time you make one of them you'll earn yourself an A/VB case {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:16, 17 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:well considering it's not vandalism, I am sure you will earn one for shitting up the admin pages. Take him to A/A over it, so he can't make any groups like that again or something, but don't try and be an internet tuff guy now.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 11:06, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::wrong! but thanks anyways {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:00, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Arbitration ==<br />
An interim [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool#Interim_Ruling Ruling] has been made.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 10:58, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:and so has my response.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:03, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
hey duder thad made his final ruling. I'd like to "claim" that I'm not a part of the hate club so remove me from the page. cheers {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:36, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:but you hate 2 Cool do you not? Anyway you shalt have compliance but i do think you belong there.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:10, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Racist Flame ==<br />
<br />
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, assuming you were ''making a good faith edit when you recently unloaded a slew of racial slurs''. Actually, typing that sentence demonstrates the absurdity of it. Particularly in the context of the [[The Southern Cross Club|the group page]], where you commented, [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:The_Southern_Cross_Club&diff=1582137&oldid=1582065 your flame] is in poor taste, to put it mildly. Do you agree?<br />
<br />
Rather than make a vandalism case out of it, I'd like to give you an opportunity to make a brief and sincere retraction alongside your original comment. Or at the very least, use this space to explain your reasoning behind making such an edit.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 02:20, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:he was pretty clearly being ironic, hope this helps. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 02:59, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Might as well add yourself. [[User:Giles Sednik/List of Wiki Puritans|Now.]] --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 03:02, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::lmao {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:08, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::well done good sir.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:03, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Its a talk page, i'm allowed to be racist and yeah, ask bob why i say things next time, he seems to know.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:03, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::If we ever get around to that TOS bullshit you might not be! bloop bloop bloop --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 07:23, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
[[User:Giles_Sednik/List_of_Wiki_Puritans#The_List|Done.]] And I love using "irony" as an excuse to vent all the crap you wish you could say in public. Yeh that was cutting edge humor there. But like you said, it's the internet and you're allowed to be a racist. *golf clap* --{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 11:37, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I don't think you quite get what irony is. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:09, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::[http://www.answers.com/topic/irony Yeh yeh yeh definition 1a]. I get it. But I don't buy it, particularly as an excuse. It has become all too commonplace for people say something indefensible and then claim irony as their defense. Example: ''"You're such a fucking (insert racial slur). Durr haha I was being ironic don't get upset."''<br />
::Also, while we're on the subject, irony is more that the dictionary definition, and there '''is''' a difference between sarcasm and irony. And there's a BIG difference between using irony to demonstrate the absurdity of an idea or argument, and the way cybertrolls use racial slurs without being able to articulate what they think they're being ironic about.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 13:08, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::you think you're super astute but you're really not. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:29, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Nu uh. YOU!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 14:18, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::fix'd--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 14:53, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::So wait was that edit vandalism or what? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::yeah. I'd delete SA's own post but you've just replied to it, so I'll leave it up to you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:10, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::fuck charlie you're getting too good at picking up on my plans....since you've foiled me i'll in turn leave it up to giles. 09:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC) {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::lol. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Lol'd@N3D ==<br />
<br />
Some of your finest work my friend ;)--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== awww ==<br />
<br />
You just missed a really funny A/M case, SA started trolling finis' talk page without knowing that it was protected. I especially loved it because it used to be what we all joked about getting ops for, so we could harass finis even after he A/PT'd his talk page. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 07:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah, it was pretty funny, especially when DDR was all "uh uh SA you're a dumbass and the page is protected" and shit. :D --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 13:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::And when I snuck my own snide asshole message in the edit summary so Finy could see it anyway :D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 14:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Yeah...Dick.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 16:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Ohi was watching from the depths. Just becausei'm not editing doesn't mean your every move isn't being monitored. So was it at a slap on the wrist or what? I think he deserved a good ol' spanking.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 16:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I have a second warning now. I can't do anything semi-bad for a bit D: --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 16:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Oh as if you were watching from the depths. I know you. If you watch, you ''have'' to comment. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 23:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::^--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 23:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::It was one night charlie! it didn't mean anything, stop acting like you understand me!! *storms out of the room sobbing* {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:18, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Why ==<br />
[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87_%D9%85%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AE%D8%AF%D9%85%D8%A9]...Why my profile? I don't even know you. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 05:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Why is this comment on Jed's talk? Also, I translated that heading, and it reads: "The Enemies of God". I'd assume he doesn't like you.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Oh, now I get it. That looked like a user page aty first. Strange.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I think its actually something different, can't remember. I think they meant something else when they made it. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Someone I know translated it, it says something about allah in all that stuff (I didnt pay attention) and then it says Enemies of God: Colonel Cunt. I was just curious who i killed so i can do it again :D --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 23:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::OH, I thought you guys were talking about the group name. They all have arab names and spam derka derka and shit, classic xD --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 23:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Oh that, yeah you killed me, just look for a sandmonkey and kill them, its probably me. although i'm inactive atm. how'd you find that page btw? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Probably searched his UD profile through the wiki I bet. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::What a self indulgent prick, lucky he's on the kill list! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::lol. Btw I just got back from work and while I was there I thought of [[Negronet]], and thought of you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Does that have any context aside from that its similar to necronet? Either way its still amusing...{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:10, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::I dont even remember where i found it to be honest...i might have hit random page, i was pretty bored a few days ago and it came up with one profile on that page so naturally i clicked that. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 03:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== OMFG DONT COMMENT ON MY TALK PAGE OMG WTF ==<br />
<br />
Ull maek me sew mahd!! Il have 2 delyt it u babbeh--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Unfortunately he gave me no other opportunity than to pursue justice via administration pages. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== awesome ==<br />
<br />
I found this in the Unused Templates bin:<br />
<br />
{{Template:NoJ3D}}<br />
<br />
Nice. I might actually start using it too, hilarious ;D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 11:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:was only unused because bob added me to his. He cant handle the Pwnage.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:36, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I never used that template; I have the code straight on my talk page. J3D made that a few minutes after I posted it. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::I caught a largemouth bass, a koi and a cyberbob today--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::J3D would love to be important enough to command his own "no j3d" template... pretty lame he's got to create it himself though :D <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:21 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:::::lol, [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Template:NoJ3D&action=history not awesome]... actually quite the opposite <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:23 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
::::::I think you are missing the classic "take the piss out of yourself, but make people slightly offput by your pretend arrogance" thing that Jed has been working on for a long, long time now.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:26, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::And always will be. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::lol, "classic"... :D <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 14:04 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
So anyways, new vote now, who votes [[Template:NoJ3D]] replace [[Template:Verdict]] on A/VB from now on? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 22:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I vote to merge the two.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 01:37, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I was gonna link from my sig and have a disclaimer stating that having that template isn't binding, but then the share mass of the job queue killed the net :( and yeah boxy i'm totally cool with thefact i made it myself :) plus all i really did was take the code from bobs page and cp it. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:10, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah. I had no qualms about you making it yourself, just find it a surprisingly fitting template for how I feel about you. Zing! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I'll keep that in mind next time i "post" you a letter :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not use admin pages to harass people on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 11:16, 19 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:what the fuck is this shit? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:07, 25 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== ban ==<br />
<br />
if u get banned again, you still have 5 hours 56 minutes of wrongly used ban time which I'm pretty sure you haven't used. [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_07#User:J3D_.282.29]]. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 02:37, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:that's dumb, you're dumb. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:10, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Remember how well the 'ban credit' idea worked out the last time? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 06:24, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Nup, cause I never saw it used properly in practice. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 06:59, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I will nevar be banned again! But yes i do have that in the bank. i tried to use it but its kinda hard when you're banned to inform s'ops that you have ban credit. Perhaps we need [[A/BC]] (might copyright that actually, groovy name) which even when banned you can still post on. Or just more up to the minute banners? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:17, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Ban Credit is such a rare case that it would not be worth it ''at all''. And Misanthropy the reason this is different from the rest is that he was banned legitimately but the vote was overruled later, the reason it wasn't applicable before was because when nubis and I both were misconducted for it, it was because we fucked up the data and banned them when they shouldn't have been at all. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 09:02, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
By the way, making a group soon with me, guy, a bunch of kids at MHS who are still into UD and maybe a few more guys from the [[ATO]], will be pretty casual, interested? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 09:02, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:yeah sure hit me up with the deets. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:22, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::No prob nig I'll fbook them too you and here too, once I make the group, should be a week at the most from here on, so basically at worst case scenario i can talk to you about it next weekend when you hit up procastle. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:13, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::lolcastle.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:14, 2 August 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:J3D&diff=1750583
User talk:J3D
2010-07-31T08:22:37Z
<p>J3D: /* ban */</p>
<hr />
<div>='''READ ME!'''=<br />
*Post at the bottom (press the little + button at the top of the page) unless continuing a previous conversation.<br />
*Three words: '''Sign your posts!'''<br />
*Looking for something that was here before the 20<sup>th</sup> of March 2008? Try [[User_talk:J3D/Archive|here]]. What about between the 21<sup>st</sup> of March and the 18<sup>th</sup> of August 2008? Because that would be [[User_talk:J3D/Archive2|here]]! Or perhaps what you need is from the period between the 19<sup>th</sup> of August and the 19<sup>th</sup> of December? Coz that shiznat can be grabbed just over [[User talk:J3D/Archive3|here]], ya dig?<br />
<br />
== Lulz ==<br />
<br />
ic wat u did thar. --{{User:WOOT/sig}} 19:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:whar? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:48, 20 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
::HAR! DURR!--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 04:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not impersonate other users, especially on admin pages on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 06:18 21 December 2008 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
== Hollomstown ==<br />
<br />
Rid of merged pages. :)--[[User:Lithedarkangel|Lithedarkangel]] 23:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:noice! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Missed one ==<br />
<br />
[[Candy Avenue]]. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 02:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:Missed what?--<span>[[User:Lithedarkangel|<span style="color: Red ">Li</span>]][[User_Talk:Lithedarkangel|<span style="color: Black">thedark</span>]][[Location Nuts|<span style="color: Black">angel</span>]][[User:Lithedarkangel/Works|<span style="color: Red"><small>Meth!</small></span>]]</span> 03:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
== You are creating History ==<br />
<br />
Grim made a coupe, tried to take over the wiki.<br />
<br />
You lol'd at an account creation you knew nothing of.<br />
<br />
Surely if they go through with this, you can make some sort of flashy template stating how you were the first person to have this happen?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Oh, oh, me me! Lemme make it!--[[User:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>]] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== lol. ==<br />
<br />
<span class="plainlinks">[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct&curid=2730&diff=1359677&oldid=1359674 lol.]</span> {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 01:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:evidently i can be more wrong ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Yus, I gnoh Bub and Kevan, I'm interesting in their profiles and activity, location might come later. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 04:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Irony?==<br />
hahaha oh wow you're delusional. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:you just noticed? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Yeah? ==<br />
<br />
[[User_talk:Iscariot#Run_for_sysop|Nominate?]]<br />
--{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 00:46, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I'm up for it if you and SA are.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::do eeet --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 00:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Nao. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 01:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I'm waiting for SA to say something since his name was mentioned. Now kindly [[GTFO]] ma talk page.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::That goes for all of you. Or none of you. I mean it is a free wiki...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:06, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
hai. i here u liek mudkipz --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Mudkipz suck. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 01:10, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Where's axehack?? I want him back :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Axehack is no more... --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 01:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::He was briefly more on the 6th of jan..why is this happening? I, for one, blame the current sysop team ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::: I blame the previous sysop team. Grim s, to be more precise. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
Iscariot...Whoooooo....Now THAT would be one hell of a promotions bid. I'd honestly say give it a while for everything that's around him to die down some, but it might not happen anyway. Its up to you guys on what happens. Just saying it might be more prudent to wait a bit.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:yeah agree, it's a bit chaotic atm. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I'll be ready to do it when you guys are ready... I think it will be interesting to see what reasons people give for voting against, and how many people outside the sysop team are opposed to it. I personally think Iscariot would be a very good sysop. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 01:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::of course! It's not just a show for a shows sake. I wouldn't nominate someone i didn't genuinely want as sysop. Still i think it's best if we wait til the wiki is a bit quieter. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::His actions in the few places where they've given him power over users say much to the contrary. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 05:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I can haz links? Or examples? --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 21:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I doubt he'd accept the nomination... I mean, if he were a sysop, he couldn't post to his own Talk page LOL. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 05:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::LOL he'd be what he must have always hated!!! xD [[User:Liberty|Liberty]] 05:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Iscariot doesn't hate Sysops altogether, he just hates the way the current sysops teams acts and handles things. He's pointed that out occasionally.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 11:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::No, he hates that we don't dance to his tune. Also read [[Recruitment/Archive2]] for a bit Pestolence, then check the [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Kristi_of_the_Dead_vs_Recruitment|arbitration case that relates to it.]](talk page too), there's also a few little snipes because of [[:Category_talk:Recruitment#Category:Recruitment_Rules_Discussion|this]] he's been making about me throughout the wiki claiming that I'm going against the consensus of the community or twisting recruitment to my own ends. He's a paranoid delusional, we're all out to get him and opposing him is the same as opposing the community in his eyes. You can see some of that [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_01#User:Iscariot|here]]. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 01:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::According to [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Kevan&curid=1072&diff=1363855&oldid=1363854&rcid=1393374 this bit] on Kevan's page, the "community" he is referring to are the folk who aren't actually on the wiki. =/ Convenient eh? -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 01:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::It's funny cause I know that community, I know more people in it than him and the reason is actually the kinda things he's doing and the related drama/rules abuse. I know people in that same community that have expressed problems with his behavior here after seeing it for themselves even. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]], self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All</span> 02:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::So basically he's got the wrong end of the stick completely and is now making an even bigger arse of himself because of it? =/ Clever. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 02:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::I think thats a bit harsh, yes Iscariot is an arse and out to cause trouble for troubles sake but his attacks are not without valid points. The current Admin team does do a (mostly) good job but the assumption by some that they are above community review and that those that disagree with them are trouble making malcontents is far from the truth. Despite the claims to the contrary "Sysopship" no longer suggests a mere janitorial role, rather it designates some users as being in positions of judgment over other users. Until the sysop position recognizes a difference between users that the community trusts to do routine maintenance etc... and to hold a position of authority and judgment over others then drama will always ensue. As is, the sysop role really does seem to be turning into an exclusive club type thing, true or not that is not an image that is good for the position or the community at large!--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::1)You're preaching to the choir. Who do you think started the debate over the claims to being just janitors? 2) The system was set up originally to ''not'' have community review for a reason. That reason is still somewhat valid and more reasons connecting to that one have caused the failure of every proposition for regular review. 3) Iscariot only has points when he accidentally stumbles upon then in the midst of his attempts to make everyone fall in line, I used to think it was intentional but his behavior has long since made it clear to me that he doesn't actually believe the "points" he has except for as a means to an end. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 02:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::::The last thing that made the third one ridiculously clear to me was the RRF move drama.--<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 02:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::::::1) not really aware of who started it... just know its been grumbling on for ever and a day. 2) community review has many things in its favour foremost of which is that it confirms that the sysops are "trusted" by the current userbase, its also very open to abuse by all and sundry and '''yes''' it would also make it hard for sysops to do the contentious stuff that makes them unpopular but still needs doing! 3)Just because the valid points he hits upon are not the ones he is aiming at doesn't make them any less valid, it does however make him look stupid and petty.--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 08:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::::Actually spirit of the rule is as important as the law. The reason it's being enforced more so. You don't give native americans repirations for slavery because they were both referred to with the same term back in the day. For #2 please read the comment on my talk page to pestolence, I don't think we should be starting another massive discussion on J3D's talk page without him being a part of it. --[[User:Karek|Judge&nbsp;Karke]],&nbsp;self-proclaimed&nbsp;Decider&nbsp;of&nbsp;Everything&nbsp;and&nbsp;Ruler&nbsp;of&nbsp;All 10:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::Wow i didn't expect all this upon my return. Now to catch up on whats happened elsewhere....--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::Yup. INMNSHO that's why he's so worried about constant proper English. If he ever used slang or slipped up, the holes in his ideas would be clear as day. He creates a false air of authority and correctives.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 02:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Can I get some input?==<br />
I've been working on a policy that I believe is sorely needed [[User:Pestolence/001|here]], and I'd appreciate your input on it. How can it be improved, and is it even needed right now? A potential problem is what to do about current sysops: put them all up for review now (leading to a massive backlog of admin page drama), postpone the review until six months from now (simply staving off the inevitable drama till later), or something else glaringly obvious that I've overlooked? See you around. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 02:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Never mind, thanks. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 16:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:<nowiki>:</nowiki>( I feel unwanted...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Aw. =( We still love you Jed! -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::pwomise? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Uh huh. =) Without you the wiki would asplode. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::i suspected as much, now back to work. There be vandalism cases to rule on ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Meh. S'pose. I could take a couple of minutes out of my busy revision schedule to take a mosey on over for a look. =p -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 01:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::OMGMISCONBULATIONCHEESEISLAZYIMASOGONNATELLISCARIOT --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
kidding.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:you little... heh --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::did i getcha? huh? well? did i?? did i?? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== star wars ==<br />
<br />
its not that i liek it, but its public knoweledge... like the brother grimm tales in 19th century. Anyway, why dont you liek star wars ? --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 00:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:hint:begins with f, ends with inis. But i didn't particularly like it before that anyway.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::what does [http://files.usgwarchives.net/tx/floyd/vitals/births/1937/floyb37.txt f floyd inis] has to do with star wars ? --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup><br />
:::what the [[2 Cool]] is that?? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
fpenis?--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span></small> 03:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:[[User:DanceDanceRevolution/Fenis|fpenis.]]--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== RE: Classic lulz ==<br />
<br />
Truer words never were spoken - unless someone once said cyberbob was a cunt, then that would be truer. Lol, truer is a weird-looking word.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Cyberbob is a cunt--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Did you guys like the presents i left you? The wiki has been awesome lately, reminds me of the grim days. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
DOHOHOHO --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:merry january! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== I need your advice ==<br />
<br />
Hello. It's me again. I need your advice on something. Neice has not edited the Dead Dudes page again. However, he has now posted some extremely anti-DD propaganda on [[The Sidney Arms]] page. Please have a look and tell me what you think. In my opinion (which i have stated to Neice),such statements have no place on a location page. he should put them on his own group's page. It is becoming tiresome to myself and our group, as he is nothing more than a griefer in-game and apparently feels compelled to bring it into the wiki. Anyways, have a look and let me know. Thanks again for any help you can give. --[[User:Wast0id|Wast0id]] 19:59, 20 January (CST)<br />
:''The Arms is still under attack from the wonderful group Malton Maulers. We have continued to battle for the area and will now go all out for it and have broken into the Arms daily''. Is that what you find so offensive Wastoid? {{User:Liberty/Sign}} 07:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I think [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=The_Sidney_Arms&diff=1368228&oldid=1367540 this] is his problem. I removed it before I actually saw this because it was POV on a neutral page. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 20:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::--Yes, thank you Pestolence, that was exactly my problem. And I expect more of the same from this user in the future and was hoping someone in authotity would set him straight. As I said previously, I simply wish he would keep his in-game grudge in the game, or at least on his own group page. --[[User:Wast0id|Wast0id]] 18:44, 21 January 2009 (CST)<br />
::::If he continues to slander your group, contact him on his talk page and ask him to stop, and if he continues (or if you've already asked him to stop and he's ignored you), take him to [[A/A|arbitration]]. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 02:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Uranium ==<br />
<br />
BOMBS--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 02:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Read's ban ==<br />
<br />
Time for an open discussion regarding the ''"it is expected that a system operator be prepared to reverse a warning/ban should the community desire it"'' section of [[UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines|this policy]] do you think? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 09:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:What makes you think the community does desire it? The only people contesting it at all number like 4. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::That would be why we'd have an ''Open'' Discussion. I'm pretty sure I can find some people that would support it. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 13:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::That depends on how low on the IQ range you'e prepared to go. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Well I would vote to keep the ban which means you will have Bobs support as he can't ever be seen to side with me these days. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 13:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::You keep bringing me into your comments honest, do you have a crush or something? If so take it elsewhere... I hear there are corners of the internet dedicated to that sort of thing. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 14:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::touché... but i already removed that comment as i felt it a little unfair.--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 14:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::xbox live or myspace? ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Is anyone else amused by the fact that he doesn't know that he can't unban people through meatpuppeting a vote? It's been tried before and over-ruled by the appropriate party. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 08:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:then whys it in the policy?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Because we don't update policies every time Kevan steps in and says differently. There needs to be some legitimacy to giving the user a second chance for such a thing to actually be done, and then only in the more extreme cases is it even likely. Cases like Amazing or Izumi, not any case Iscariot seems to think this is valid for(as I'm sure you know well which those will obviously be). And I'm sure we all know by this point Iscariot is just doing this now to try and cause drama so he can scream about how biased the sysops are regardless of whether he is correct in the slightest, he's not trying to get Read's ban revoked or even claiming what happened to him was unfair, those are irrelevant to his point. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 02:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Does anyone notice that it's fine when Karek likes a mass of support, but meatpuppeting when it's something he doesn't? Odd that... -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 20:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Signature ==<br />
<br />
I'm not after drama, but I'm asking if you'd change your signature back to J3D, please. Thanks. {{User:Extropymine/sig}} 09:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:hows that for compromise? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::[http://www.milkandcookies.com/link/58827/detail/ You used the N word?] :| --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 14:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Y helo thar ==<br />
<br />
There's an important thingy over here --> [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Semi-protection|this bit]], that you should have a look at. We're at 14 votes but we need 20 for a proper majority. Your time and energy will be rewarded with cookies and mudkips (if u liek dat sort of ting) =) -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 21:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==:)==<br />
Can you please refrain from vouching a single candidate MULTIPLE times? Please? :/ --<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Suicidal Angel,</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 00:00, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:If you can refrain from showing nothing but blatent disregard for the rules of this talkpage ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Oh... ==<br />
<br />
You're still around. When are you gonna give up on this shit and go back to Nationstates? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 11:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:fuck nationstates.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::booyah!--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Hi, i'm not sure if i'm replying to you right, i answered your question on my page but i'm still learning here. I am everything zombie, i opened that account/page by mistake under the wrong name. I wanted one for Drunkmonkey, which i opened and have been working on today. Feel free to delete the everything zombie page and account as i won't be using it thank you.<br />
Derek<br />
(http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:Drunkmonkey)<br />
<br />
==ALiM template==<br />
<br />
Are you happy with it? Cause if I fix it from overlapping the text, I have to use the flagbox template which doesn't make it look as good. the LUL isn't as big, which really detracts from the.. LUL, you know? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 07:45, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:I like it how it is(and i luuuurve the colour scheme) i can deal if the lul gets smaller tho. stuff happens.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:54, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
::I'll leave it then, I think the original is the best, {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:26, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Vandal Banning==<br />
<br />
I almost laughed a vital organ off. LulZ'LoLz--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 15:27, 6 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== [[User:DanceDanceRevolution/status/game]] ==<br />
<br />
Just for you. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 13:49, 8 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Plus, if you don't vouch the Eastwood Museum, I won't vouch ALiM for good article status. Tit for tat. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 12:23, 11 May 2009 (BST)<br />
:It just makes me think of the suburb of Eastwood, which fyi is a dump. But you sure do know how to treat a girl, so you're on.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:32, 12 May 2009 (BST)<br />
::Yeah, Eve told me she hated Eastwood. She calls it Eastwoo for some reason. Is that a Sydney thing? Btw, come for a sysop party soon? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:31, 30 May 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Nah i just call it eastwood...and yeah i've got a 3 day block off later in june so we can get fucked up alim style.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:18, 31 May 2009 (BST)<br />
::::I dig.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:39, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Come watch a buce match, too. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 05:04, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Hurry up and put Eastwood on ALiM!!! Before you get banned! ;D {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 16:25, 8 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:Theres not some underground movement to have me permaed brewing is there?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:01, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not shout offensive names on admin pages on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 02:52 8 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />And again <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 03:28 9 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:Gimme another stop hand. lazy cunt.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:57, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::u relly need 2 do smethin about dat temper --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 10:00, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::maybz l8a.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:02, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Oh i forgot the bit where i'm only making these edits to get up to 500 in the next 2 months.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:04, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::hmmm thanks for giving me an idea for a policy proposal --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 10:35, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I r supa srs now. Good luck on getting that upper-middle management job, bob.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 17:30, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I can't actually take credit for it, i got it off Conn (see SA's talk), good luck with a coherent policy on the issue though...in the end who gives a fuck? Most people will either make the 250 in a month or just not get another warning anytime soon anyway, or get more bans til they leave the wiki, for the remaining about 2 people, just let them be.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:06, 13 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I wouldn't worry about it so much - I'm in the middle of midyears at the moment and can't be bothered. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 06:16, 13 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::Here, have 2 [[Image:6vmixh1b9.gif]] <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 10:51 10 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
==lol==<br />
qq bitch --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:21, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:see if you can beat 3 months.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:23, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::I already did - I was a sysop from May 2006 through to May 2007. suck it --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:27, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Was your demotion scandalous and awesome though?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:30, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::nah - I got tricked into putting myself up for review and at that point promotion bids pretty much were votes. people are whiny babies so I got da boot --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:35, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I see. Votes better than 2 randoms just decide. The whole process is largely pointless...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:37, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::May I introduce you to the principles of representative democracy? {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:39, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I'm from NSW, i'm familiar with it and i hate it.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:44, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::That's why there aren't only two candidates for crat elections, like there are in elections in our state (I'm from NSW too.) Also:<br />
::::::::"Democracy is the worst form of government. It's simply better then all the others that have been tried" - Winston Churchill. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:46, 21 June 2009 (BST) <br />
:::::::::That misquote is contradictory... :P It's "''democracy is the worst form of government '''except''' all the others that have been tried''" <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:59 21 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
::::::::you might want to take some time to learn about politics before thinking you know enough to have a valid opinion about it hth --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:51, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You should be less lame.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:54, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::yes. I should be less lame than getting drunk while online instead of partying with my friends as well as getting online while being hungover rather than being hungover at a mate's place where I've crashed after a night out<br />i'm definitely lamer than that right now; i should lift my game --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:00, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::lol --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 22:00, 21 June 2009 (BST) <br />
::::::vote is infinitely worse than 2 randoms because then meatpuppetry enters into the equation and people are still pretty whiny babies who don't know how to make userpages let alone know who should and should not be a sysop --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:41, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Time to Vote!==<br />
I found a building I thought would be a good addition to the [[ELiM]] list. Go to [[Talk:Amusing_Locations_in_Malton/Edible_Locations_in_Malton#The_Gumm_Building_.2842.2C_40.29|the ELiM talk page]] to vote on whether The Gumm Building should be added. --{{User:Blake Firedancer/sig}} 13:00, 30 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== nicks drunk promotion bid ==<br />
<br />
is there really no way to read it? i wanna read it so bad. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 09:53, 1 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:It's a shame it wasn't archived properly. It should've been put under Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies or something. It just got deleted and I think someone got a/vbed. P.S. Just checked and it was me.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:55, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::Good thing you checked, I thought it was someone else. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 05:50, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Zing. But it was at Curley's house so I was expecting to see his account appear somewhere.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:30, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::ooohk. everything was done at Curleys house amirite? ;) {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 06:34, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::most things. except blowjobs, obviously.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:47, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I was just on #batshit relaying the story of how we went to that tech store in jesmond and used a display iphone to buy brain rot for table. good times. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 06:51, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::lol. <small>just wanted to get in on this convo</small><br />
:::::::oh and bj's can happen at curleys house, if i'm not mistaken 2 of the womens live there.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:16, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::getting beejays from internets<br />the height of desperateness? i would say yes --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:22, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Wut? curleys house is a real place bob....--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:25, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::nooooo relllyyy??? my question to you is would you know about curleys house without internet --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:28, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::yes. i knew about it since before broadband was invented...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:30, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::well i knew about it since before even the whole internet was invented........ --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:39, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::dayem.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:29, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::yeh it was like infinity years ago so you probly wouldnt know what that was like --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 00:35, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::Good recovery.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:08, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::hello? hello? i cant hear you speak directly into the receiver --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:17, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::No I want the last word!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:24, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
<s>[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not post on the A/VB main page when you are uninvolved in the case on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]]<sup>[[Template_talk:VandalBanningNotice|POST HERE]]</sup> 11:09, 15 July 2009 (BST)</s><br />
<br />
This verdict has been overruled and the warning stuck. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:26, 17 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Ban==<br />
<s>You have been banned from editing this wiki for 24 hours for vandalism. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 15:28, 16 July 2009 (BST)</s><br />
<br />
This ruling has been overruled and the ban overturned. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:27, 17 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==ban?==<br />
well it looks like they at least saw sense on your case... i suspect my ban will stand but what the hey... its not like i didn't expect it :) --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 01:52, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
DDR was going to post "'''Phew J3D, lucky Honest saved you from that one. Shame he had to be banned because of it. ''' but thought better of it because i clearly was not banned. Why? well that would be because in so many years of valid contribution to the wiki i have only ever faced 3 A/VB cases all but this one thrown out. Hmm guess that makes me the newest wikimartyr... --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:33, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Lol! You fuckiing moron! Did you even read your ''own'' comment that I replied to? '''YOU''' called it a ban, hence why I had ''ban'' in ''italics'', something you must have overlooked.<br />
:I gave up on arguing because you never give up, you fight to the death with the same fucked up, stupid points. I thought you'd bow down after Nubis didn't come to save you, but hey, looks like your desperation in saving your skin can surprise everyone. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<span style="color:black"><u><big>ϑϑℜ</big></u></span>]] 03:19, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::el oh el pwnt?--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 03:23, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::One would think so. He wouldn't admit it. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<span style="color:black"><u><big>ϑϑℜ</big></u></span>]] 03:45, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== yo ==<br />
<br />
Please don't submit [[:Image:2cola.jpg]] for SD. I want to use it as an example when I put 0x0 images up for scheduled deletions. What did you upload to make it come up as 0x0? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:54, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Ah i'm half asleep and i forgot how to make a bmp a jpg so i just changed the file name which turns out doesn't work :P So maybe you get a 0x0 if you try uploading any bmp? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:55, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::Yeah, thanks. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't a problem on my end before submitting it as a scheduled. ty. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:58, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::np.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:02, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
[[:Image:2cola.jpg]] - FTFY {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 18:02, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Heh, thanks but i already made [[:Image:2cola.JPG]] and if you read the above DDR wanted that kept as an example or something...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:55, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::I reverted it. Hope you don't mind. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 03:04, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Nvm. I didn't know you cited the fix in your scheduling vote so I put it back. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 03:06, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
hay ur not an stysops. u r an x sysops. quit lyin yo--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 04:04, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:i had teh exact same templat on 4 da hole tiem i wasnt an sysops. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 04:09, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::thats cause you never edit yyour page so it doesn't show up on the recent changes. faeget.--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 04:23, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Guys, guys. I'm sorry but the spelling and grammar here is just atrocious. Please clean up your act.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:51, 2 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::nou--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> High Overlord and Lead Conspirator of the Administrative Rebellion.</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Want</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">help?</span>]] 16:33, 2 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== <s>birth</s>fagday ==<br />
<br />
is it alim's 2nd yet? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 10:41, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:first, what's a birthfagday? and second, no - it's on the 2nd of october.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 11:51, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::as an overrated singersongwriter once said, "The times they are'a changin'"--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:50, 7 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::how are they changing? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:57, 7 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Well considering the Earth is in a constant state of evolution and change, it is impossible for that quote to be ever inaccurate.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 02:21, 8 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not impersonate sysops on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 01:18, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:You really need to stop telling me it's my last warning. It sounds so, ''final''...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:04, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::It's the [[Template:warning2|template's]] fault. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 02:53, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== YOU ==<br />
<br />
ARE GOD--[[User:Shakey60|Shakey]] <sup>[[Beatbox_Kids|BBK]] </sup> 12:46, 16 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:i know right --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:16, 26 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Sysops==<br />
I thought you were a sysops nigger? And you and cyberbob were best butt buddies?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 10:35, 23 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:I was, until early january :\ --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:45, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::Wat happen--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 00:49, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Conspiracy. Nubis organised my sacking during the new year period when i wasn't checking the wikiz :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:51, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::What? Nubis got you demoted? Har har. Specifically for what?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 01:01, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Drunk wiki editing. Not towing the party line. Usual reasons ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:03, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::HAH. So what happen with you and cyberbob?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 01:43, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I hate lemons. Jed's just a wee bit too bitter. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:41, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I didn't know there was ever anything between us? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:37, 26 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==The Sysop template==<br />
So I hear you still have it on there. Please take it down as per the warning you were issued or I will do it for you. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 09:18, 28 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== omfg ==<br />
So happy bob permabanned this "buzz killington" thinking it was one of you two, or one of the bbk. I can feel a massive misconduct coming on if anyone decides to take it further.<br />
What I am saying is, please take it further.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:53, 29 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:fucking lol hey.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:02, 29 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Ciggies==<br />
Good god man, make the link to your user page findable, ffs <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 11:48 2 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:He's had it like that for a week or so. And this signature ''should'' only be up for 24 hours, right? ;) --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 12:09, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::Well the ALaMe one was at least preceded by some non-link stuff, but was bad enough... this is another level again. He just keeps pushing on the boundary until someone can be bothered to react <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:28 2 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:::Fair enough- he's the one who will be VB'd so I don't really care. I just think for a day-long fag celebration, just let him have his giggles. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 12:30, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::I put my cursor on the main part, and it underlined all but the exclamation mark, so then i clicked on the exclamation mark, and it bought me here!!--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Also, your name is coxy--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::<nowiki>*</nowiki>you're ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:41, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::TAKING YOU TO A/A FOR WINKING OMG--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:46, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::USING CAPS TO HILARIOUSLY RIDICULE BY LAMPOONING A PERCEIVED "ANGER" WHILE TOTALLY GETTING ALL PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE UP IN THIS SHIT BY MEANS OF HUMOUROUSLY EXAGGERATING AN ENEMY'S POST AT THE SAME TIME {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You are WAY to easy these days--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:17, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::last word {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::nah uh--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::u mad?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::You are WAY to easy these days {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:19, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Learn to spell, both of you. any more posts in this thread will be deleted and i might take you to a/vb. unless its not bob or read.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:21, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! that is all.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 14:31, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::I'm special, <small>special</small>, so special, <small>special</small>. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 14:35, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
== You ==<br />
Are that fucking inconsistent on FB and IRC and any chat medium. I cannot work out your patterns m'lday--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:01, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:I'm on from 1pm til 6pm. And i'll sign into msn now just for you. But don't fucking facebook chat me coz my compy can't handle it :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:04, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Nam nam, bra!nz!!! ==<br />
<br />
You tasted good. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 01:46, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== You have all been rolled ==<br />
<br />
You are all my muppets! I am your muppetmaster. '''JIM HENSON IS ALIVE!!!''' <br />
<br />
As of December 24, 2012 I shall control all the accounts of 2 Cool. ALiM is/will be MINE! --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 06:13, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arbitration==<br />
Has started. Please proceed [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool here] --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:35, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Uhh, thanks I guess. By the way, shouldn't it be "nicknames given by 2 Cool", instead of "given to 2 Cool"?--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:01, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::No because you gave them to us, they aren't given by us.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:06, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Oh sorry, I get it, misunderstood for a sec.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:18, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Category:Group Subpages ==<br />
<br />
Revert it again and I'll put up an A/VB case against you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Silver}}-- 08:00, 9 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Link me plox to the policy where it says i have to allow you to categorise my group subpages, then compliance you shall receive.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:03, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::The policy on '''bad faith''' where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::You have every obligation to present evidence for your assertion. I provide the following [[UDWiki:Specific_Case_Editing_Guidelines|link]], which ensures that a group may control the content of their page excepting a NPOV lead-in paragraph. A category, by definition, is not part of a prose paragraph and is therefore not covered by this exemption. I await this 'policy' on 'refusing administrative edits', the wording of which is straying close to using the administration status as a badge of authority. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:02, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::And while you're there, you might want to run an IP check on [[User:Insane1]], voting on one suggestion and not the other up for voting during a first edit seems suspicious to me. It won't be enough to sway the vote but is probably worth checking out. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:05, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::It wasn't his first edit at all. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:10, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I seem to have omitted the "in the suggestions system" portion of that sentence. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:20, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Hardly. Anyone can do administrative edits. I only have the obligation to present evidence if I take him to A/VB. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:08, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Indeed, anyone can, but editing here repeatedly quoting some policy you don't present for review and then expecting a user who has clear ownership of the page (as I ''have'' presented) seems inconsistent to a good faith approach. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:20, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Read the policy document, it is as consistent in defending J3D as it would save any bad faith action a user makes in his own space; ''Groups, for the most part, have sole property of their Group page on the wiki'' is an example, nothing in the policy is black and white, it allows for exceptions to the ownership clause, and I assume none of what is in that policy will defend J3D against the blanket ruling of "bad faith". J3D has also specified that he only gives a shit about ''me'' adding the category (something I do daily to every page on the wiki) onto the subpage, and you expect people to believe ''I'm'' acting in bad faith? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:34, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::Given the fact that you admit there's bad faith between the two of you, the good faith response would be to leave it alone and not incite drama as you are doing by threatening vandalism rulings. Why don't you see if someone else will apply it? And answer me this, what does the wiki lose, or in what way is it harmed by this lack of category? It may appease your sense of CDO, but does nothing to assist the wiki in general or even help important pages, you know, like A/VD which you seem perfectly happy to leave in a false manner. Your comment on 'doing it everyday' I hope is incorrect as well given that's not the category that should be going on there either. And you've still yet to produce this 'policy' you harp on about. I've provided mine and am quite happy that the statement that groups may control the content of the page sufficient to cover this, or we'd be having massive drama wars on this when the Malton Marshalls were added to Category:PKer Groups. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 08:16, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::1. I never once said there was any bad faith on my end. 2. Look below. I already did suggest someone else do it, but at the moment he hasn't even reverted it. 3. Get your head out of your arse and stop pressing fallacies like I "need" a "policy" that says we can warn users for bad faith, you parasitical moron. 4. Specialpages like the one involved in this is specifically called a "maintenance page" by Mediawiki, hence of course it is an important part of maintenence. And in response to your lack of concern for anything less than an "important page", look at A/D and see your fucked up stance on "unimportant pages" yourself, and see who has the double standards here. 5. Don't say I have OCD because at leased ''my'' case of it goes towards a greater good, rather than your unfulfilling and pestering belief that you were brought on this earth to shit people off with your 'holy' ways. 6. You are the only user unhappy with the A/VD edits so shut the fuck up and actually consider that your opinion on them probably shouldn't be treated as the be-all of truth on this wiki.<br />
:::::::::So actually consider what you are doing just now, Iscariot, you are watching a little shit-stirrer try and mess with the only thing on this wiki that shouldn't generally be messed with, Mediawiki maintenance, no doubt waiting for this to flip out of control (thanks to a certain meddling user, you, moreso than me) and then cry vendetta if he actually gets punished for his immature, counter-productive, butthurt and overall unnecessary behaviour. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:32, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Wait, you want to go into a barrage of obscenities and then try and appeal to my sense of reason. Your 'productive' CDO may be clouding your logic. Given that the majority of your emotional tirade belongs on other pages, the only one I'll respond to is that concerning A/VD, there is a problem, it's not opinion, it's fact based on the escalations policy. Boxy's actions are no different to Nubis' that caused the situation. Given you are a sysop and one of the few users able to rectify the problem I'd be considerably more impressed if you applied your energies to that rather than engage in this case of edit warring, drama stirring and vandalism threatening over an inconsequential page.<br />
<br />
::::::::::Finally, I didn't start the policy here, you did. And I quote ''"The policy on bad faith where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) "'' You have made a claim, the burden of proof is ''always'' on the claimant. I'm simply asking you to prove what you have said. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 08:43, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Sorry. I read the first sentence and stopped indefinitely, learn that I have no intention of appealing to your sense of ''anything'', full stop. I no longer have an interest in this, and hence I have no more interest in arguing with you. Unlike yourself, users like Boxy at leased have initiative in fixing problems rather than inflaming them, so I consider this topic closed and I'm treating it as such. Bleat to someone new. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 09:02, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Why is it so hard for you to provide a link to something you say exists? Is it so hard for a sysop on this wiki to demonstrate their own claims? Or have you just started inventing policies like Hagnat used to? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:38, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::I just had a read through the vandalism policy (because none of the others are really relevant here), and there isn't anything about this type of edit. The situation isn't helped by the vagueness of the policy. The only thing that the policy actually DOES say about it is that they should go to Arbies, which we all know would be a pointless waste of time. There's nothing about admin edits, there's nothing about user page rights over-ruling the advancement of the wiki. Neither side is covered by policy, but, as Iscariot noted, the burden of proof IS unfortunately on the claimant.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:52, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::Why is it so hard for you to understand that after ''what I want'' is fixed, I have ''no intention'' of arguing with you? I have no, NO interest in continuing this once someone has stepped in a mediated this issue and since Boxy has, I have absolutely no interest in continuing the argument. Learn to actually care for the wiki rather than fix your desire to cause trouble and 'show up' the sysops. I'm the one with OCD, by the way. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:22, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::And by the way, [[UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines#General_Conduct|shut the fuck up now]], will you? Second last clause. we have the authority to destroy any value in the effort to crust "Bad Faith", ie. the umbrella ruling that can theoretically serve any purpose in aid of ridding of loopholes in the wiki. Deal with it. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:22, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::No, that's not what you said. You said ''"The policy on bad faith where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) "''. Please show me the ''"policy on bad faith"'', not the section on sysop conduct guidelines put in there for emergency situations. Please give me a link to the policy that you claimed exist that explicitly states a user cannot ''"(refuse) administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki"''. Please show how the sentence ''"You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing"'' in '''any''' way shows good faith on your part and acceptable conduct on your part. If not (and I don't think you can) then you have now become the new version of Hagnat, claiming policy where none exists and then falling back "I can do it because I is sysops and teh guidelines say I can so I'm not listening to you". -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 03:42, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::No, you shut the fuck up because an Admin document that supports what I say. You honestly don't get it do you? You make me sick with your personal harrassment, and you really can't take a hint. So much for sucking my cock to have any chance of being a sysop, yes? And now it'll turn into a "Boxy and DDR are BOTH to immature to consider me for sysop" story now. I can't wait. Conversation closed a day ago, learn to read. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:02, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::::You see, that's the difference, I'm not telling you to stop talking. I'm asking you to provide the policy you claim existed in the beginning. You can't, and the guidelines do not back you up on this. You cannot claim that a condition put in to prevent harm to the wiki entitles you to engage in an edit war with a user you aren't getting along with. Own up, apologise to J3D for saying there was such a policy when they're isn't and then the conversation is over. How hard is it? I'm not sure where this idea about me going for sysop came from, but as you well know there are only three users I will accept a nomination from, and two are inactive. Don't believe me? Go nominate me right now like Anime did and watch how quickly it gets archived. However none of this changes the fact that you were claiming a policy that doesn't exist, you were using your status as a sysop to attempt to get your own way and that you are now running to what should be an emergency condition for when the wiki is subject to extreme disruption to garnish your error with some semblance of credibility. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 05:16, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::Wait, what? For all I know, it could exist in 50,000 policy documents and you could be bluffing for all I care, I never actually looked to verify the claim. You know why? It was a figure of speech, hence the bolding of '''Bad Faith''' to outline what he would have been banned for. Obviously you knew this because you aren't a moron but you are such a parasite in that way you behave that the thought wouldn't pass me by, that you pretend to think that I'm using my sysop status as a badge for anything, when rather it is more my status as an actual member of the community, whereas you are just a little piddling child who will struggle to find one logical fallacy in an argument he has nothing to do with, then bounce in, using it as the doomsday weapon of the decade. Say what you want after this, I won't be replying to your cesspit-creating nonsense. The page is fixed, you are not. I'm fulfilled. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:36, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::::So we have "<b>The policy on bad faith</b> where refusing administrative edits on your page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. <b>You can find the link yourself</b>, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) " where you state there is a policy and there is a link to be found, contrasted with "For all I know, <b>it could exist</b> in 50,000 policy documents and you could be bluffing for all I care, <b>I never actually looked to verify the claim</b>." where there isn't a policy and you didn't even look before demanding a user leave your preferred edit to his owned page. You can quibble about semantics and logical fallacies all you want. You lied. You lied to try and get your own way and won't even have the good grace and dignity to apologise to J3D for this. ''"that you pretend to think that I'm using my sysop status as a badge for anything"'' Erm, '''you''' were the one who just tried to claim that the Sysop Guidelines were applicable in making you right, you can't invoke them if you're being a normal user. Therefore you're either trying to use your status to get your own way (as evidenced by invoking the clause in the sysop guidelines) or you're trying to get your own way by inventing a new policy/quoting one that can in no way apply. Which is it?<br />
<br />
:::::::::::::::::::::I further note that you in no way continue to try and paint me as having promotion prospects since you do not appear to have put up a nomination. Another attempt to divert attention from what's happened here failing? I think so. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 05:54, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
I actually think you guys might have found the pettiest possible thing to threaten each other with A/VB over. Just take it to Arby's or something and be done with it because I don't think anybody really believes they're going to ''convince'' the other side of their argument. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:26, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Arbie's isn't needed in regards to the '''maintenence''' of the wiki, only over its content. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:34, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::It can quite literally be about whatever you want it to be about. That's the whole point. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 08:01, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Fair enough. But the point of this isn't to make a large amount of drama, which is why I'm making this simple: If he reverts it, I'll ask someone to just put it there themselves and hopefully he'll keep it up there, considering he's stated numerous times that he's only interested in keeping me off the page, not some random user who has similar intentions. If he reverts that, he can go to A/VB for all I care. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:08, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
/section, thanks to boxy. I no longer have any desire to pursue this at the current time. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:37, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Someone wanna bring me up to date on what the fuck has happened? In the meantime i'm rereverting charlies edit.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 17:01, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:oh wow boxy did, was that what his a/m case was for? If so epic,. i might go check now..brb--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 17:05, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Witch Hunt == <br />
I have been wiki absent for a couple of days due to other shit so I had a look through the archive to see what happened with boxys misconduct and I decided to read up on [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive/J3D/2009 this]. I really do feel for you dude, the way those who didn't want you in in the first place twisted and turned all of it just to get you demoted, when the original misconduct case was brought about 1 thing only.... You really did get the hard end of this stick and I am not posting this out of butthurt, I just hope others go back and have a look at some of the actions of the people in there and despite their opinion of you, maybe form some opinions on the poor form of some of the current admin team in this time.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:23, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Box is the only current admin that had any sort of authority in that anyway, so why rag on them? And it's weird, and it's hard for people who know Jed and Nick IRL to fathom (trust me), but it's actually a common ''truth'' that somehow Nick ''always'' did have access to Jed's account, so if you actually think about it from their point of view, it has its grounds, no matter how ridiculous it seems to you and me. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:26, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 10:41, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::get some original material bob, I hahaha'd you off the ballpark the other day when you pulled your cannons on DDR, you arent very useful hey....And DDR, no, it isnt about what access they had or WHY he got demoted, it is more about how the misconduct case was for one thing, and then escalated into a million other things that were completely irrelevant and basically the sysops opinion on whether Jed should be a Sop or not...not if he had committed misconduct with the act that Cyberfag brought to fruition. If people thought that Nick and Jed were sharing accounts or whatever, and no, I personally do not see a crime in sitting next to a sysop while he uses his account, then those people should have made a misconduct or demotions case with the appropriate information and proof at hand, rather than using an offbeat joke comment as an excuse to bring out the big guns and debate his worthyness. Regardless of if he was fit to be a sysop or not, when the case was brought forward for an off colour joke, and the sysops at hand decide they are going to bring forward unrelated things and then manipulate it into a vote for demotion, all over a joke that was laughed off by the first 3 sysops, then yeah, it is the definition of a witch hunt. Also you don't have to have been a sysop then to have been part of the Witch Hunt at hand, honestly. This wasn't even aimed at you it is just that Jed will check this now that they are in Thailand.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:01, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::the tl;dr is that, the case wasnt about what Jed got demoted for, so basically it was a witch hunt from box and others, because they didnt have the authority that the crats who bought him into the team did, this was the only way to get him out without going through the proper avenues, ie the people who were elected to be Crats--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:03, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::tbh I saw it as no different as anything they pinged mighty Grim for in ''that'' misconduct case, and as a Sysop I think there is nothing wrong with ''calling'' (a vote for) demotion over long-term issues despite the one case being completely different... I know it sounds harsh and abusive but that's just how I see it, if you can be called for promotion at any time based on long-standing good efforts then the opposite shouldn't be totally shunned just because it's 'unfair'. Whether it should have been used for J3D is irrelevant (though I'm not surprised given the circumstances around his pm bid) but yes. More power to the hungry ops. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 12:43, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::''"Box is the only current admin that had any sort of authority in that anyway, so why rag on them?"'' The. General. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 03:46, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Though you are correct, I mostly just mean the major players in the demotion, the 'instigators'. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:14, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:fair, at least something of worth comes out of you, which is more I can say for certain others--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
sexy you are the best poster on the whole wiki. serious. you own {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:47, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
i reckon we should demote the cunt {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:51, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I don't have to be a good poster, I'm not a System Operator--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::neither do i, maggot {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:14, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I don't really know where your superiority complex comes from in life, I guess you get online and it is a world away from irl amirite?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:46, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::whoa there with all the hemmin and the hawwin and the birdsong {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:52, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGq5FeUv3zk I found your youtube channel], you were sure it would be a secret hey? There are people who can help you bob. You are not alone out there, never alone. I wont help you though, you're too much of a fag for me to be associated with.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:02, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::OH MY GOD ''how did you find itttttttttt'' {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:03, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::i feel so exposed... nobody is safe from messr. Read's detectiv skillz {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:08, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::: *smug*--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
''I personally do not see a crime in sitting next to a sysop while he uses his account,'' This made me LOL because that is why Nubis was demoted. At least Nubis and I were never accused of abusing check user... --[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 16:24, 22 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Untrue. Not only was jed demoted for stuff relating to that ''anyway'', There was also evidence to support that you had permanent access to the nubis account from locations other than her/his own, something your initial claim entailed. Sheesh. You are actually a troll with all of these claims that you make, right? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 16:33, 22 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==those stupid groups that include people whom you know don't want to be a part of your shitty jokes==<br />
next time you make one of them you'll earn yourself an A/VB case {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:16, 17 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:well considering it's not vandalism, I am sure you will earn one for shitting up the admin pages. Take him to A/A over it, so he can't make any groups like that again or something, but don't try and be an internet tuff guy now.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 11:06, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::wrong! but thanks anyways {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:00, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Arbitration ==<br />
An interim [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool#Interim_Ruling Ruling] has been made.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 10:58, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:and so has my response.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:03, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
hey duder thad made his final ruling. I'd like to "claim" that I'm not a part of the hate club so remove me from the page. cheers {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:36, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:but you hate 2 Cool do you not? Anyway you shalt have compliance but i do think you belong there.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:10, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Racist Flame ==<br />
<br />
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, assuming you were ''making a good faith edit when you recently unloaded a slew of racial slurs''. Actually, typing that sentence demonstrates the absurdity of it. Particularly in the context of the [[The Southern Cross Club|the group page]], where you commented, [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:The_Southern_Cross_Club&diff=1582137&oldid=1582065 your flame] is in poor taste, to put it mildly. Do you agree?<br />
<br />
Rather than make a vandalism case out of it, I'd like to give you an opportunity to make a brief and sincere retraction alongside your original comment. Or at the very least, use this space to explain your reasoning behind making such an edit.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 02:20, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:he was pretty clearly being ironic, hope this helps. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 02:59, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Might as well add yourself. [[User:Giles Sednik/List of Wiki Puritans|Now.]] --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 03:02, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::lmao {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:08, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::well done good sir.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:03, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Its a talk page, i'm allowed to be racist and yeah, ask bob why i say things next time, he seems to know.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:03, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::If we ever get around to that TOS bullshit you might not be! bloop bloop bloop --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 07:23, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
[[User:Giles_Sednik/List_of_Wiki_Puritans#The_List|Done.]] And I love using "irony" as an excuse to vent all the crap you wish you could say in public. Yeh that was cutting edge humor there. But like you said, it's the internet and you're allowed to be a racist. *golf clap* --{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 11:37, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I don't think you quite get what irony is. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:09, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::[http://www.answers.com/topic/irony Yeh yeh yeh definition 1a]. I get it. But I don't buy it, particularly as an excuse. It has become all too commonplace for people say something indefensible and then claim irony as their defense. Example: ''"You're such a fucking (insert racial slur). Durr haha I was being ironic don't get upset."''<br />
::Also, while we're on the subject, irony is more that the dictionary definition, and there '''is''' a difference between sarcasm and irony. And there's a BIG difference between using irony to demonstrate the absurdity of an idea or argument, and the way cybertrolls use racial slurs without being able to articulate what they think they're being ironic about.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 13:08, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::you think you're super astute but you're really not. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:29, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Nu uh. YOU!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 14:18, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::fix'd--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 14:53, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::So wait was that edit vandalism or what? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::yeah. I'd delete SA's own post but you've just replied to it, so I'll leave it up to you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:10, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::fuck charlie you're getting too good at picking up on my plans....since you've foiled me i'll in turn leave it up to giles. 09:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC) {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::lol. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Lol'd@N3D ==<br />
<br />
Some of your finest work my friend ;)--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== awww ==<br />
<br />
You just missed a really funny A/M case, SA started trolling finis' talk page without knowing that it was protected. I especially loved it because it used to be what we all joked about getting ops for, so we could harass finis even after he A/PT'd his talk page. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 07:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah, it was pretty funny, especially when DDR was all "uh uh SA you're a dumbass and the page is protected" and shit. :D --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 13:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::And when I snuck my own snide asshole message in the edit summary so Finy could see it anyway :D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 14:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Yeah...Dick.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 16:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Ohi was watching from the depths. Just becausei'm not editing doesn't mean your every move isn't being monitored. So was it at a slap on the wrist or what? I think he deserved a good ol' spanking.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 16:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I have a second warning now. I can't do anything semi-bad for a bit D: --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 16:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Oh as if you were watching from the depths. I know you. If you watch, you ''have'' to comment. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 23:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::^--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 23:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::It was one night charlie! it didn't mean anything, stop acting like you understand me!! *storms out of the room sobbing* {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:18, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Why ==<br />
[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87_%D9%85%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AE%D8%AF%D9%85%D8%A9]...Why my profile? I don't even know you. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 05:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Why is this comment on Jed's talk? Also, I translated that heading, and it reads: "The Enemies of God". I'd assume he doesn't like you.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Oh, now I get it. That looked like a user page aty first. Strange.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I think its actually something different, can't remember. I think they meant something else when they made it. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Someone I know translated it, it says something about allah in all that stuff (I didnt pay attention) and then it says Enemies of God: Colonel Cunt. I was just curious who i killed so i can do it again :D --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 23:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::OH, I thought you guys were talking about the group name. They all have arab names and spam derka derka and shit, classic xD --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 23:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Oh that, yeah you killed me, just look for a sandmonkey and kill them, its probably me. although i'm inactive atm. how'd you find that page btw? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Probably searched his UD profile through the wiki I bet. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::What a self indulgent prick, lucky he's on the kill list! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::lol. Btw I just got back from work and while I was there I thought of [[Negronet]], and thought of you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Does that have any context aside from that its similar to necronet? Either way its still amusing...{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:10, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::I dont even remember where i found it to be honest...i might have hit random page, i was pretty bored a few days ago and it came up with one profile on that page so naturally i clicked that. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 03:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== OMFG DONT COMMENT ON MY TALK PAGE OMG WTF ==<br />
<br />
Ull maek me sew mahd!! Il have 2 delyt it u babbeh--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Unfortunately he gave me no other opportunity than to pursue justice via administration pages. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== awesome ==<br />
<br />
I found this in the Unused Templates bin:<br />
<br />
{{Template:NoJ3D}}<br />
<br />
Nice. I might actually start using it too, hilarious ;D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 11:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:was only unused because bob added me to his. He cant handle the Pwnage.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:36, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I never used that template; I have the code straight on my talk page. J3D made that a few minutes after I posted it. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::I caught a largemouth bass, a koi and a cyberbob today--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::J3D would love to be important enough to command his own "no j3d" template... pretty lame he's got to create it himself though :D <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:21 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:::::lol, [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Template:NoJ3D&action=history not awesome]... actually quite the opposite <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:23 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
::::::I think you are missing the classic "take the piss out of yourself, but make people slightly offput by your pretend arrogance" thing that Jed has been working on for a long, long time now.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:26, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::And always will be. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::lol, "classic"... :D <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 14:04 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
So anyways, new vote now, who votes [[Template:NoJ3D]] replace [[Template:Verdict]] on A/VB from now on? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 22:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I vote to merge the two.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 01:37, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I was gonna link from my sig and have a disclaimer stating that having that template isn't binding, but then the share mass of the job queue killed the net :( and yeah boxy i'm totally cool with thefact i made it myself :) plus all i really did was take the code from bobs page and cp it. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:10, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah. I had no qualms about you making it yourself, just find it a surprisingly fitting template for how I feel about you. Zing! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I'll keep that in mind next time i "post" you a letter :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not use admin pages to harass people on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 11:16, 19 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:what the fuck is this shit? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:07, 25 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== ban ==<br />
<br />
if u get banned again, you still have 5 hours 56 minutes of wrongly used ban time which I'm pretty sure you haven't used. [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_07#User:J3D_.282.29]]. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 02:37, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:that's dumb, you're dumb. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:10, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Remember how well the 'ban credit' idea worked out the last time? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 06:24, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Nup, cause I never saw it used properly in practice. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 06:59, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I will nevar be banned again! But yes i do have that in the bank. i tried to use it but its kinda hard when you're banned to inform s'ops that you have ban credit. Perhaps we need [[A/BC]] (might copyright that actually, groovy name) which even when banned you can still post on. Or just more up to the minute banners? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:17, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Ban Credit is such a rare case that it would not be worth it ''at all''. And Misanthropy the reason this is different from the rest is that he was banned legitimately but the vote was overruled later, the reason it wasn't applicable before was because when nubis and I both were misconducted for it, it was because we fucked up the data and banned them when they shouldn't have been at all. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 09:02, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
By the way, making a group soon with me, guy, a bunch of kids at MHS who are still into UD and maybe a few more guys from the [[ATO]], will be pretty casual, interested? -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 09:02, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:yeah sure hit me up with the deets. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:22, 31 July 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DanceDanceRevolution&diff=1750545
User talk:DanceDanceRevolution
2010-07-31T07:20:29Z
<p>J3D: /* Happy Birthday */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/talkn}}<br />
<br />
<br />
== This Looks Like a Job for a Wiki Mentor! ==<br />
<br />
DDR, can you help me use my snazzy new sig, please? --[[User:Natasha Fatale|Natasha Fatale]] 23:36, 2 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:I can set your sig up for you. It'll take me about 5 minutes.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 00:13, 3 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::(Bright smile) Thank you much, Yonnua! How do we work this? I have a sig made here: http://wiki.urbandead.com/images/0/0b/Natasha_fatale_sig.png <br />
::Guess we should stop cluttering up DDR's talk page...--[[User:Natasha Fatale|Natasha Fatale]] 00:46, 3 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::DW about that, looks like you've got some help, good luck! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 03:15, 3 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== GO!! ==<br />
<br />
<font size=5>[[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Misanthropy vs Axe Hack|Let's get this party started!]]</font> -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 23:25, 3 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Those two votes ==<br />
<br />
Are not incorrectly signed. They have the indent ''which I'' put on them still left on. The votes are signed perfectly.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:23, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Right, sorry, no idea what I'm talkign about. [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Mayor_of_Malton/2010/Election&diff=next&oldid=1736357 This] one on the other hand looks awfully well signed.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:26, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Right, now I see all the reasons I'm confused. Damn people editting each other's timestamps. Thanks!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:29, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Good point, Yonnua. DDR, please stop interfering in the democratic process. There is no rule against fixing somebody's signature when they have clearly attempted to do so. See {{tl|unsigned}}. (Timestamps come from the History tab, noobs.) {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 07:32, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Revenant, those are not correctly signed, and, since it's a vote where it explicitly said they would be struck otherwise, there'll be no meddling with them.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:35, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:No, you're impersonating, which done knowingly is vandalism. You keep it up? You'll be sent to vandal banning. If you want the votes so badly you have to get the users to come back onto the wiki and add the signature and timestamp themselves. You may not make the users timestamp for them, in all votes for the wiki votes/timestamps/sigs must be 100% the voters material, always has been and at the top it's no exception and states the criterea that a valid vote must be ''when placed'' which was breached no matter how much surgery you try and pull on the votes to fix them. And I know they come from the history tab. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:43, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Gotta agree with DDR and Yonn on this one. It's standard practice and it says it in plain language that explicitly lays out what'll happen if you fail to do it properly. That said, there's more to that rule than merely striking the vote, and on the one user I did check, neither of you two followed through on it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 07:52, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::As far as I remember it said we ''should'' notify the users. I don't bother notifying meatpuppets. If it were you who screwed it up, I would notify you, not users who will only get the message when they're called back in a month. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:53, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I actually notified them both when I struck them the first time.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:57, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::There are three that have been struck, and, ironically, the only one I checked was the one you didn't notify (I since saw your two notifications on my own). Regardless, DDR is correct, it says "should", not "must". {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 08:03, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::The {{tl|unsigned}} template does not constitute impersonation. Neither does fixing someone else's timestamp. The History confirms that the comment was theirs, I am providing correct attribution. lrn2copyrite kthx {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 08:31, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::If you don't stop edit warring this, I'll be protecting the page until you've shown signs you can behave. Then we'll see who has the winning chance in you're petty election. God, I can't wait till you look back on this in a week and realise how retarded you're behaving. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:34, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::[[A/VB#Response by accused|O RLY]]? {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 18:09, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::This isn't about Revenant scrabbling for votes. I fail to see how correcting timestamps is an unreasonable thing to do; as Revenant pointed out, the comment with the correct time is clearly attributed to the original poster in the page history. Forgetting a piece of attribution that's stored elsewhere doesn't make the posters' intent any less obvious or valid. Could you explain the rationale for why this was unacceptable? {{User:Aphelion/sig}} 19:21, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::It actually does make it less valid. Not by logic but just by the rules of keeping a clean boundary between properly made votes and otherwise. I was simply basing this off voting guidelines of policy discussion and suggestions voting. I could give you a history lesson explaining in a very logical manner exactly why I'm not even pursuing this anymore, so I don't really know why you're jumping in. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 00:54, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::I brought it up because I don't understand the thought process behind your decision, and alluding vaguely to unspecified rules isn't very helpful. I see nothing wrong with fixing attributions as long as everything is correct and properly cited. I mean, yes, you should timestamp your votes, and if you do it wrong, people are under no obligation to count it--but if someone is inclined to correct it, where's the harm? Why does a "properly made" vote have more intrinsic value than one that was later corrected by someone else when both are equally clear and equally well cited? Since the issue is no longer relevant, I'm willing to drop it, but it just seems strange to me. {{User:Aphelion/sig}} 01:57, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::::Ask the founding fathers of the wiki where they got their decisions from, don't make me go through the A/PD archives to answer your pointless questions, again I was just following what has been used as a rule of thumb for official wiki votes, as Yonnua did when he wrote the rules. As for citing unspecified rules, well, that's just a perk of actually spending a lot of time on this place, so don't look at me as if I'm trying to cheat you out of some sort of conversational leverage, it's just the truth, and I couldn't care less whether you "buy" its legitimacy or not. I'm sorry if this seems blunt but it's only because I really don't want to have to keep grinding on about these questions when I've been proven by sysop vote that my view does not apply in this case and have happily yielded- it's a null argument now. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:23, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Dagnabit, I only just read the last sentence of your post saying you were willing to drop it. nvm. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:33, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Promotions ==<br />
Regarding the current bids. Neither Grim or Revenant meet the criteria. It's mostly good ol spam. WOOT precedent? I didn't want to drag them to A/VB since I doubt they are aware of it. But why are the bids still on? I thought stuff likes this gets moved to the talk page, not archived as Ross apparently wants let alone be seriously considered. Yeah, I'm asking you. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:20, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Well in the case of the Woot precedent, it was his third or fourth case before he was vandalbanned. These two have done it once. The general idea is if it happens multiple times, THEN it's vandalism.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:23, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::I'm talking about vandalism, I already said they don't know about it. It's about their promotions not meeting criteria. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:34, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::''"If a user is highly exemplary in one criterion, a certain level of give may be extended to other criteria."'' <br />
:::I think that pretty much covers it for both of them don't you? --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 19:02, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Pardon me, it took me a while to understand what is going on. By no means do I mind, once the circus dies down it can be archived early (or just left to die after a long time span). As far as I see they are just tarnishing reputations and behaving like jackasses out of butthurtery, if being remembered for this is their prerogative then I don't mind. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}}<br />
::Plus I don't really think this is vandalism anyway, it strongly resembles Misanthropy's stunt, and I'm willing to back it up that way. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:20, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:It's usually only vandalism if its been spammed on the page multiple times (as Yonnua said.) Usually we don't worry about cycling inappropriate candidates unless they are ''clearly'' inappropriate (and this is usually done under the pretense of not gaining enough vouch votes, [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Jerrel_Yokotory_(1)|an example is here.]]) In most cases (and especially in this case,) it's usually not worth the effort/drama to cycle a bid early. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 05:04, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::And the obvious case of HE BROUGHT GRIM BACK FUCKING WIN --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:26, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==fyi==<br />
<br />
still pissy about the amnesia stuff. seriously that is low even for you. xoxo. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:28, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
ps what happened to cybro?{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:49, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:He demoted because he had to finish the uni semester, exams etc. hasn't come back yet. considering emailing him about grim, he might be interested. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:16, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Manhunt==<br />
Dude. What's Happening? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:36, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Haha, I've been playing daily since the start, I'm afraid I just haven't found anyone. I've had a good time though, I was PKed on the first day for being a "fake revolutionary" from french revolutionary group and just today a member of Revenant's group tried to PK me, though it seems to have been isolated to the wiki drama- I think the guy just wanted to say he did. Either way, I'm just roaming around but it appears I have a dud sense of luck atm. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:26, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Drama? Where? Still its better than getting headshot at RP's by newbs. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:36, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Yah, I guess that's true. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:26, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::In retrospect, I wish I had said that I was simply ignoring all other contestants and hunting you. Damn. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 06:46, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::You're ignoring me? You'll die for this. --{{User:Hashk/sig}} 10:50, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::I thought he was ignoring everyone. Is he even trying? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:36, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Log on and kill me already. I'm just having terrible luck in this.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 08:34, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Hi guys! Good to see we all had the same RP idea. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 08:45, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Ross is there now too? I'm gonna be patrolling that RP all month. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 08:52, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Only because I wanted to get to a RP before getting headshot again. Ill move to my favourite one later. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 08:54, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Oi Hawk! This reminds me, you scanned me but never revived me! Boo :P --{{User:Hashk/sig}} 10:50, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Alex, zed v zed doesn't count at revive points ya doofus --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:43, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Oh yeah. Ha, good thing really. I went there because Red informed me he'd be in the area.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 14:18, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Mattick Towers Image ==<br />
<br />
Hey DDR. I noticed that you had deleted an image that I uploaded a week or two ago that I was going to use for a building. Unfortunately, I was in Los Angeles on vacation during the deletion and had limited access to the internet so I didn't get the chance to appeal it then. I'd like to use it now, if you don't mind. <br />
Thanks and here's hoping you gain Sysop. --[[User:TheBardofAwesome|TheBardofAwesome]] 11:18, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:No prob. I'm already sysop and I'd be happy to reupload your image. Do you know its name at all? I can find it easier then, I'm afraid my archive is rather large. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:24, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Probably [[:Image:Mattick_Towers.jpg]], which was deleted June 28 <small>-- <span style="text-shadow: #bbb 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em">[[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 11:41 6 July 2010 (BST)</span></small><br />
::Yep, that's the one Boxy! Thanks to the both of you. --[[User:TheBardofAwesome|TheBardofAwesome]] 12:19, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Done, aaand, done. Good luck!! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:28, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== BTW ==<br />
<br />
JSYK, it is not my intention to cast any aspersions on how hard you have worked for this place – far from it! I'd just like to contend that it is sometimes better to work ''smarter'' rather than '''harder'''. There is a saying in my line of work: "Two weeks coding saves two hours' planning." <tt>;)</tt> {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 04:21, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, fair enough. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:50, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==...==<br />
I made a mistake, I know...So sue me. It's probably because I did the math first, and then realized some votes were posted after the deadline...Blame me for being too tired to do anything this morning... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 16:54, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:But even if you counted removed votes, it still comes to 13/20, so 65%... --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 16:56, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::2/3 is 66%. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 16:57, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Yeah but it wasnt 2/3 it was 13/20. Either way it's not like I mind, was just fixing is all --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 16:58, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I struck Rev's vote first before counting, so technically, I counted 13/19. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 16:59, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::LOL fair enough, though it doesn't make you any more right, just gives you a strange pattern of vote counting, haha --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 17:02, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::I still haven't have my 5 cups of coffee yet... >< --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 17:04, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
We really need a better way to handle these voting deadlines. Oh, for Parser Functions! {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 06:15, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Actually...it might be possible without them. Simple addition and subtraction is possible using switch statements, but you can only do it for preset/hardcoded ranges of numbers (at least, I've never figured out a way to do it for an arbitrary integer, but if you know a way to implement addition for an arbitrary integer using only switch statements, you let me know). In our case, however, we'd only need to go up to 31, so the arithmetic is possible. Assuming we had some way to subst in the starting month and day of the vote via a template call (which I'm not sure is possible, off the top of my head), we'd be able to add 14 days onto it. At that point, we have the end date, which we could then use for a countdown and notification, much like I did back in the earliest revisions of the [[Big Bash 3]] page. It's probably more hassle than it's worth though, since it'd likely be a few hundred or thousand lines of wikicode (e.g. some of the logic would be similar to what I used [[User:Aichon/Sandbox/Demo2|here]], which is essentially one template call away from breaking the page). A better way would be to have someone compute the end date manually then call a template that acts like a countdown/notification to that date. That'd actually be pretty simple to make. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 08:17, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::{{CodeInline| <nowiki>{{SUBST:CURRENTYEAR}}-{{SUBST:CURRENTMONTH}}-{{SUBST:CURRENTDAY}}</nowiki>}} → 2010-07-10. Howzat? {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 08:46, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::But can you do all of that from a template call rather than directly on the page itself? That's the crux of the problem. The substing won't work, I believe, though there might be some ways to finagle it by using includeonly and some creative parsing. I've experimented with it in the past, and I know Rooster has too, but I don't think we've ever found success with it, from what I recall. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 08:51, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Promotions talk page ==<br />
<br />
Yeah, it was getting kinda ridiculous there. Good move. Kinda weirded me out seeing the Vouch/Againsts there as well, but figure it helps preserve the context, right? Can't help but wonder if making it more obvious that they're quotes is a good idea, but that's more a general procedural thought than anything. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 21:22, 10 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Hmm. Like most things, I picked up that idea from whoever moved stuff over to the talk page before me, and I think it helps preserve context for whoever needs to remember it. I think it helps, it can make it look a little superficial I but in reality, it is only ever moved like that if it crosses the line into "going too far" so ''usually'' it's discussion that is considered a little unnecessary. Of course the crats should read it, it's just a majority of people shouldn't need to do get the jist of what's going on. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 03:26, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== History ==<br />
<br />
Was putting [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Category_talk:Historical_Groups&curid=20534&diff=1740688&oldid=1740410 this] where you did intentional? {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 02:22, 13 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Ya --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 02:24, 13 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Gotcha. The wording left me wondering a bit, so I figured I'd double check. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 03:31, 13 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Recent Changes ==<br />
Stalker!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 15:30, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, it is literally the stupidest tactic I've ever read. I considered sending it to deletions but I was too lazy to fix all the links or do any of the work to make it deletable so I just added that. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 15:39, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Word. The new template is awershome. EDIT: Oh yeh, and [[Guides:The_best_skill_for_a_zombie|this thing]] has to be right up there with stupid shit.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 20:10, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== so ==<br />
[[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Historical_Voting_Time_Limit|nudge.]]--{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 15:10, 15 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Minor correction with the policy ==<br />
<br />
[[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Historical Voting Time Limit|You put the wrong template on the policy]] (read my vote.) {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 09:11, 16 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Community Portal ==<br />
<br />
You think I'd be okay switching out the old template for my new one? Ross's FA schedule starts today. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 02:46, 19 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:I still think it needs more work, for example I just fixed the colours of the borders so they match the rest of the main page, but I guess it's not harming anyone. I still think it doesn't fit with the other templates though. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:04, 19 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Heritage ==<br />
<br />
You're part Dutch? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:34, 23 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yup, all extended family. It's why I love arguing apparently. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:11, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arby==<br />
Not to kill an already dead horse... but I found [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Amazing vs Rasher|this]],.... I still think I was within my rights when I brought an arby against you. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 03:27, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Most definitely, but you don't understand. It wasn't outside your ''right'' to post the accusations and request on arbitration. It's within my right to claim Aichon has been sodomising my girlfriend, even though it isn't true. But the issue I had to it was that there are two sides to every coin and my version of the story was, from the start, that there was no ''personal'' hostility towards you that I had done bar one comment I myself considered out of line. Besides that one incidence, I was only ever doing my job and the honest truth is I was taken aback when you came out with these claims because I barely recognised who you were and our past dealings; I was just doing my day to day editing. <br />
:There are definitely some users I've had problems with in the past, that if they asked for a restraining order for a set amount of time, I wouldn't argue against it, but the day that someone comes to me and claims abuse when I've either a) not done it or b) created some sort of reaction from you when I was simply doing my day-to-day work around here, and hence a ruling of restraining order would inhibit my normal day to day work on this wiki based on unfounded claims, ''that'''s when I'm gonna argue till the cows come home.<br />
:Have things gotten more personal since then? Most probably, but I assure you that it only happened since you shot at my thresholds relentlessly for weeks while also throwing personal quips at ''me''. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 03:40, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Hey now. I heard that. Also, you may have a right to say it, but that won't save you from a libel case in civil court. :P {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 04:00, 24 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Sig ==<br />
<br />
First Misanthropy, now you. What happened to actually using names to identify ourselves? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 14:01, 26 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Glah his is random. Mine is actually more DDR than I am. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:03, 26 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Oh name-symbolism. Smart. You know, I always threw my quarters in shooters and fighters, back in the old days. I never really thought about it, but I guess your a fan of DDR machines? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 14:08, 26 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Yeah, better than Guitar Hero anyways. I do prefer the shooters though. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:22, 26 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Really? I thought most shooters were banned by Australian law. Though there was that special Left4Dead2 Aussie edition...--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 14:27, 26 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Aus is fail and backward but not many games have actually been banned for that long at a time. GTA's have been banned but eventually released, same for Manhunt and L4D2. it's all garbage in my opinion, killing a guy in GTA4 and having no blood come out means less ramifications on my consciousness if I consider doing it IRL than if I see them bleeding like mad. I hate FPS's but arcade wise I love shooting ones. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:34, 26 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Happy Birthday ==<br />
<br />
First! --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 08:13, 28 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:It's his b-day today? Happy b-day, DDR! Now gimme my slice of cake! ;D --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 08:16, 28 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::ya, it be my bday, thanks vvv -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:41, 28 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Happy 20something birthday! --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 21:56, 28 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Ditto.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 22:07, 28 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Thanks guys <3 -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:54, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:I still want my slice. ;) --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:04, 31 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Was it actually? I'll let you suck my cock when i come to visit next weekend coz you're daddy's special girl {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:20, 31 July 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:J3D&diff=1750542
User talk:J3D
2010-07-31T07:17:37Z
<p>J3D: /* ban */</p>
<hr />
<div>='''READ ME!'''=<br />
*Post at the bottom (press the little + button at the top of the page) unless continuing a previous conversation.<br />
*Three words: '''Sign your posts!'''<br />
*Looking for something that was here before the 20<sup>th</sup> of March 2008? Try [[User_talk:J3D/Archive|here]]. What about between the 21<sup>st</sup> of March and the 18<sup>th</sup> of August 2008? Because that would be [[User_talk:J3D/Archive2|here]]! Or perhaps what you need is from the period between the 19<sup>th</sup> of August and the 19<sup>th</sup> of December? Coz that shiznat can be grabbed just over [[User talk:J3D/Archive3|here]], ya dig?<br />
<br />
== Lulz ==<br />
<br />
ic wat u did thar. --{{User:WOOT/sig}} 19:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:whar? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:48, 20 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
::HAR! DURR!--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 04:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not impersonate other users, especially on admin pages on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 06:18 21 December 2008 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
== Hollomstown ==<br />
<br />
Rid of merged pages. :)--[[User:Lithedarkangel|Lithedarkangel]] 23:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:noice! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Missed one ==<br />
<br />
[[Candy Avenue]]. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 02:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:Missed what?--<span>[[User:Lithedarkangel|<span style="color: Red ">Li</span>]][[User_Talk:Lithedarkangel|<span style="color: Black">thedark</span>]][[Location Nuts|<span style="color: Black">angel</span>]][[User:Lithedarkangel/Works|<span style="color: Red"><small>Meth!</small></span>]]</span> 03:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
== You are creating History ==<br />
<br />
Grim made a coupe, tried to take over the wiki.<br />
<br />
You lol'd at an account creation you knew nothing of.<br />
<br />
Surely if they go through with this, you can make some sort of flashy template stating how you were the first person to have this happen?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Oh, oh, me me! Lemme make it!--[[User:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>]] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== lol. ==<br />
<br />
<span class="plainlinks">[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct&curid=2730&diff=1359677&oldid=1359674 lol.]</span> {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 01:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:evidently i can be more wrong ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Yus, I gnoh Bub and Kevan, I'm interesting in their profiles and activity, location might come later. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 04:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Irony?==<br />
hahaha oh wow you're delusional. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:you just noticed? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Yeah? ==<br />
<br />
[[User_talk:Iscariot#Run_for_sysop|Nominate?]]<br />
--{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 00:46, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I'm up for it if you and SA are.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::do eeet --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 00:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Nao. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 01:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I'm waiting for SA to say something since his name was mentioned. Now kindly [[GTFO]] ma talk page.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::That goes for all of you. Or none of you. I mean it is a free wiki...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:06, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
hai. i here u liek mudkipz --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Mudkipz suck. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 01:10, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Where's axehack?? I want him back :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Axehack is no more... --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 01:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::He was briefly more on the 6th of jan..why is this happening? I, for one, blame the current sysop team ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::: I blame the previous sysop team. Grim s, to be more precise. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
Iscariot...Whoooooo....Now THAT would be one hell of a promotions bid. I'd honestly say give it a while for everything that's around him to die down some, but it might not happen anyway. Its up to you guys on what happens. Just saying it might be more prudent to wait a bit.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:yeah agree, it's a bit chaotic atm. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I'll be ready to do it when you guys are ready... I think it will be interesting to see what reasons people give for voting against, and how many people outside the sysop team are opposed to it. I personally think Iscariot would be a very good sysop. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 01:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::of course! It's not just a show for a shows sake. I wouldn't nominate someone i didn't genuinely want as sysop. Still i think it's best if we wait til the wiki is a bit quieter. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::His actions in the few places where they've given him power over users say much to the contrary. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 05:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I can haz links? Or examples? --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 21:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I doubt he'd accept the nomination... I mean, if he were a sysop, he couldn't post to his own Talk page LOL. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 05:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::LOL he'd be what he must have always hated!!! xD [[User:Liberty|Liberty]] 05:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Iscariot doesn't hate Sysops altogether, he just hates the way the current sysops teams acts and handles things. He's pointed that out occasionally.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 11:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::No, he hates that we don't dance to his tune. Also read [[Recruitment/Archive2]] for a bit Pestolence, then check the [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Kristi_of_the_Dead_vs_Recruitment|arbitration case that relates to it.]](talk page too), there's also a few little snipes because of [[:Category_talk:Recruitment#Category:Recruitment_Rules_Discussion|this]] he's been making about me throughout the wiki claiming that I'm going against the consensus of the community or twisting recruitment to my own ends. He's a paranoid delusional, we're all out to get him and opposing him is the same as opposing the community in his eyes. You can see some of that [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_01#User:Iscariot|here]]. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 01:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::According to [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Kevan&curid=1072&diff=1363855&oldid=1363854&rcid=1393374 this bit] on Kevan's page, the "community" he is referring to are the folk who aren't actually on the wiki. =/ Convenient eh? -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 01:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::It's funny cause I know that community, I know more people in it than him and the reason is actually the kinda things he's doing and the related drama/rules abuse. I know people in that same community that have expressed problems with his behavior here after seeing it for themselves even. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]], self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All</span> 02:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::So basically he's got the wrong end of the stick completely and is now making an even bigger arse of himself because of it? =/ Clever. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 02:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::I think thats a bit harsh, yes Iscariot is an arse and out to cause trouble for troubles sake but his attacks are not without valid points. The current Admin team does do a (mostly) good job but the assumption by some that they are above community review and that those that disagree with them are trouble making malcontents is far from the truth. Despite the claims to the contrary "Sysopship" no longer suggests a mere janitorial role, rather it designates some users as being in positions of judgment over other users. Until the sysop position recognizes a difference between users that the community trusts to do routine maintenance etc... and to hold a position of authority and judgment over others then drama will always ensue. As is, the sysop role really does seem to be turning into an exclusive club type thing, true or not that is not an image that is good for the position or the community at large!--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::1)You're preaching to the choir. Who do you think started the debate over the claims to being just janitors? 2) The system was set up originally to ''not'' have community review for a reason. That reason is still somewhat valid and more reasons connecting to that one have caused the failure of every proposition for regular review. 3) Iscariot only has points when he accidentally stumbles upon then in the midst of his attempts to make everyone fall in line, I used to think it was intentional but his behavior has long since made it clear to me that he doesn't actually believe the "points" he has except for as a means to an end. --<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 02:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::::The last thing that made the third one ridiculously clear to me was the RRF move drama.--<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]]</span> 02:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::::::::::1) not really aware of who started it... just know its been grumbling on for ever and a day. 2) community review has many things in its favour foremost of which is that it confirms that the sysops are "trusted" by the current userbase, its also very open to abuse by all and sundry and '''yes''' it would also make it hard for sysops to do the contentious stuff that makes them unpopular but still needs doing! 3)Just because the valid points he hits upon are not the ones he is aiming at doesn't make them any less valid, it does however make him look stupid and petty.--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 08:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::::Actually spirit of the rule is as important as the law. The reason it's being enforced more so. You don't give native americans repirations for slavery because they were both referred to with the same term back in the day. For #2 please read the comment on my talk page to pestolence, I don't think we should be starting another massive discussion on J3D's talk page without him being a part of it. --[[User:Karek|Judge&nbsp;Karke]],&nbsp;self-proclaimed&nbsp;Decider&nbsp;of&nbsp;Everything&nbsp;and&nbsp;Ruler&nbsp;of&nbsp;All 10:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::Wow i didn't expect all this upon my return. Now to catch up on whats happened elsewhere....--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::::::::Yup. INMNSHO that's why he's so worried about constant proper English. If he ever used slang or slipped up, the holes in his ideas would be clear as day. He creates a false air of authority and correctives.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 02:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Can I get some input?==<br />
I've been working on a policy that I believe is sorely needed [[User:Pestolence/001|here]], and I'd appreciate your input on it. How can it be improved, and is it even needed right now? A potential problem is what to do about current sysops: put them all up for review now (leading to a massive backlog of admin page drama), postpone the review until six months from now (simply staving off the inevitable drama till later), or something else glaringly obvious that I've overlooked? See you around. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 02:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Never mind, thanks. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 16:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:<nowiki>:</nowiki>( I feel unwanted...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Aw. =( We still love you Jed! -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::pwomise? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Uh huh. =) Without you the wiki would asplode. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::i suspected as much, now back to work. There be vandalism cases to rule on ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Meh. S'pose. I could take a couple of minutes out of my busy revision schedule to take a mosey on over for a look. =p -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 01:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::OMGMISCONBULATIONCHEESEISLAZYIMASOGONNATELLISCARIOT --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
kidding.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:you little... heh --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::did i getcha? huh? well? did i?? did i?? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== star wars ==<br />
<br />
its not that i liek it, but its public knoweledge... like the brother grimm tales in 19th century. Anyway, why dont you liek star wars ? --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 00:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:hint:begins with f, ends with inis. But i didn't particularly like it before that anyway.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::what does [http://files.usgwarchives.net/tx/floyd/vitals/births/1937/floyb37.txt f floyd inis] has to do with star wars ? --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup><br />
:::what the [[2 Cool]] is that?? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
fpenis?--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span></small> 03:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:[[User:DanceDanceRevolution/Fenis|fpenis.]]--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== RE: Classic lulz ==<br />
<br />
Truer words never were spoken - unless someone once said cyberbob was a cunt, then that would be truer. Lol, truer is a weird-looking word.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Cyberbob is a cunt--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Did you guys like the presents i left you? The wiki has been awesome lately, reminds me of the grim days. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
DOHOHOHO --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:merry january! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== I need your advice ==<br />
<br />
Hello. It's me again. I need your advice on something. Neice has not edited the Dead Dudes page again. However, he has now posted some extremely anti-DD propaganda on [[The Sidney Arms]] page. Please have a look and tell me what you think. In my opinion (which i have stated to Neice),such statements have no place on a location page. he should put them on his own group's page. It is becoming tiresome to myself and our group, as he is nothing more than a griefer in-game and apparently feels compelled to bring it into the wiki. Anyways, have a look and let me know. Thanks again for any help you can give. --[[User:Wast0id|Wast0id]] 19:59, 20 January (CST)<br />
:''The Arms is still under attack from the wonderful group Malton Maulers. We have continued to battle for the area and will now go all out for it and have broken into the Arms daily''. Is that what you find so offensive Wastoid? {{User:Liberty/Sign}} 07:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I think [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=The_Sidney_Arms&diff=1368228&oldid=1367540 this] is his problem. I removed it before I actually saw this because it was POV on a neutral page. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 20:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::--Yes, thank you Pestolence, that was exactly my problem. And I expect more of the same from this user in the future and was hoping someone in authotity would set him straight. As I said previously, I simply wish he would keep his in-game grudge in the game, or at least on his own group page. --[[User:Wast0id|Wast0id]] 18:44, 21 January 2009 (CST)<br />
::::If he continues to slander your group, contact him on his talk page and ask him to stop, and if he continues (or if you've already asked him to stop and he's ignored you), take him to [[A/A|arbitration]]. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 02:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Uranium ==<br />
<br />
BOMBS--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 02:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Read's ban ==<br />
<br />
Time for an open discussion regarding the ''"it is expected that a system operator be prepared to reverse a warning/ban should the community desire it"'' section of [[UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines|this policy]] do you think? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 09:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:What makes you think the community does desire it? The only people contesting it at all number like 4. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::That would be why we'd have an ''Open'' Discussion. I'm pretty sure I can find some people that would support it. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 13:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::That depends on how low on the IQ range you'e prepared to go. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Well I would vote to keep the ban which means you will have Bobs support as he can't ever be seen to side with me these days. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 13:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::You keep bringing me into your comments honest, do you have a crush or something? If so take it elsewhere... I hear there are corners of the internet dedicated to that sort of thing. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 14:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::touché... but i already removed that comment as i felt it a little unfair.--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 14:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::xbox live or myspace? ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Is anyone else amused by the fact that he doesn't know that he can't unban people through meatpuppeting a vote? It's been tried before and over-ruled by the appropriate party. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 08:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:then whys it in the policy?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Because we don't update policies every time Kevan steps in and says differently. There needs to be some legitimacy to giving the user a second chance for such a thing to actually be done, and then only in the more extreme cases is it even likely. Cases like Amazing or Izumi, not any case Iscariot seems to think this is valid for(as I'm sure you know well which those will obviously be). And I'm sure we all know by this point Iscariot is just doing this now to try and cause drama so he can scream about how biased the sysops are regardless of whether he is correct in the slightest, he's not trying to get Read's ban revoked or even claiming what happened to him was unfair, those are irrelevant to his point. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 02:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Does anyone notice that it's fine when Karek likes a mass of support, but meatpuppeting when it's something he doesn't? Odd that... -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 20:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Signature ==<br />
<br />
I'm not after drama, but I'm asking if you'd change your signature back to J3D, please. Thanks. {{User:Extropymine/sig}} 09:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:hows that for compromise? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::[http://www.milkandcookies.com/link/58827/detail/ You used the N word?] :| --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 14:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Y helo thar ==<br />
<br />
There's an important thingy over here --> [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Semi-protection|this bit]], that you should have a look at. We're at 14 votes but we need 20 for a proper majority. Your time and energy will be rewarded with cookies and mudkips (if u liek dat sort of ting) =) -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 21:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==:)==<br />
Can you please refrain from vouching a single candidate MULTIPLE times? Please? :/ --<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Suicidal Angel,</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 00:00, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:If you can refrain from showing nothing but blatent disregard for the rules of this talkpage ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Oh... ==<br />
<br />
You're still around. When are you gonna give up on this shit and go back to Nationstates? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 11:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:fuck nationstates.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::booyah!--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Hi, i'm not sure if i'm replying to you right, i answered your question on my page but i'm still learning here. I am everything zombie, i opened that account/page by mistake under the wrong name. I wanted one for Drunkmonkey, which i opened and have been working on today. Feel free to delete the everything zombie page and account as i won't be using it thank you.<br />
Derek<br />
(http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:Drunkmonkey)<br />
<br />
==ALiM template==<br />
<br />
Are you happy with it? Cause if I fix it from overlapping the text, I have to use the flagbox template which doesn't make it look as good. the LUL isn't as big, which really detracts from the.. LUL, you know? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 07:45, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:I like it how it is(and i luuuurve the colour scheme) i can deal if the lul gets smaller tho. stuff happens.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:54, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
::I'll leave it then, I think the original is the best, {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:26, 5 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Vandal Banning==<br />
<br />
I almost laughed a vital organ off. LulZ'LoLz--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 15:27, 6 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== [[User:DanceDanceRevolution/status/game]] ==<br />
<br />
Just for you. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 13:49, 8 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Plus, if you don't vouch the Eastwood Museum, I won't vouch ALiM for good article status. Tit for tat. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 12:23, 11 May 2009 (BST)<br />
:It just makes me think of the suburb of Eastwood, which fyi is a dump. But you sure do know how to treat a girl, so you're on.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:32, 12 May 2009 (BST)<br />
::Yeah, Eve told me she hated Eastwood. She calls it Eastwoo for some reason. Is that a Sydney thing? Btw, come for a sysop party soon? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:31, 30 May 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Nah i just call it eastwood...and yeah i've got a 3 day block off later in june so we can get fucked up alim style.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:18, 31 May 2009 (BST)<br />
::::I dig.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:39, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Come watch a buce match, too. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 05:04, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Hurry up and put Eastwood on ALiM!!! Before you get banned! ;D {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 16:25, 8 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:Theres not some underground movement to have me permaed brewing is there?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:01, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not shout offensive names on admin pages on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 02:52 8 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />And again <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 03:28 9 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:Gimme another stop hand. lazy cunt.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:57, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::u relly need 2 do smethin about dat temper --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 10:00, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::maybz l8a.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:02, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Oh i forgot the bit where i'm only making these edits to get up to 500 in the next 2 months.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:04, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::hmmm thanks for giving me an idea for a policy proposal --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 10:35, 10 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I r supa srs now. Good luck on getting that upper-middle management job, bob.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 17:30, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I can't actually take credit for it, i got it off Conn (see SA's talk), good luck with a coherent policy on the issue though...in the end who gives a fuck? Most people will either make the 250 in a month or just not get another warning anytime soon anyway, or get more bans til they leave the wiki, for the remaining about 2 people, just let them be.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:06, 13 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I wouldn't worry about it so much - I'm in the middle of midyears at the moment and can't be bothered. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 06:16, 13 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::Here, have 2 [[Image:6vmixh1b9.gif]] <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 10:51 10 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
==lol==<br />
qq bitch --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:21, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:see if you can beat 3 months.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:23, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::I already did - I was a sysop from May 2006 through to May 2007. suck it --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:27, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Was your demotion scandalous and awesome though?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:30, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::nah - I got tricked into putting myself up for review and at that point promotion bids pretty much were votes. people are whiny babies so I got da boot --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:35, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I see. Votes better than 2 randoms just decide. The whole process is largely pointless...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:37, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::May I introduce you to the principles of representative democracy? {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:39, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I'm from NSW, i'm familiar with it and i hate it.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:44, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::That's why there aren't only two candidates for crat elections, like there are in elections in our state (I'm from NSW too.) Also:<br />
::::::::"Democracy is the worst form of government. It's simply better then all the others that have been tried" - Winston Churchill. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:46, 21 June 2009 (BST) <br />
:::::::::That misquote is contradictory... :P It's "''democracy is the worst form of government '''except''' all the others that have been tried''" <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:59 21 June 2009 (BST)</small><br />
::::::::you might want to take some time to learn about politics before thinking you know enough to have a valid opinion about it hth --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:51, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You should be less lame.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:54, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::yes. I should be less lame than getting drunk while online instead of partying with my friends as well as getting online while being hungover rather than being hungover at a mate's place where I've crashed after a night out<br />i'm definitely lamer than that right now; i should lift my game --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:00, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::lol --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 22:00, 21 June 2009 (BST) <br />
::::::vote is infinitely worse than 2 randoms because then meatpuppetry enters into the equation and people are still pretty whiny babies who don't know how to make userpages let alone know who should and should not be a sysop --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:41, 21 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Time to Vote!==<br />
I found a building I thought would be a good addition to the [[ELiM]] list. Go to [[Talk:Amusing_Locations_in_Malton/Edible_Locations_in_Malton#The_Gumm_Building_.2842.2C_40.29|the ELiM talk page]] to vote on whether The Gumm Building should be added. --{{User:Blake Firedancer/sig}} 13:00, 30 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== nicks drunk promotion bid ==<br />
<br />
is there really no way to read it? i wanna read it so bad. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 09:53, 1 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:It's a shame it wasn't archived properly. It should've been put under Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies or something. It just got deleted and I think someone got a/vbed. P.S. Just checked and it was me.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 04:55, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::Good thing you checked, I thought it was someone else. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 05:50, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Zing. But it was at Curley's house so I was expecting to see his account appear somewhere.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:30, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::ooohk. everything was done at Curleys house amirite? ;) {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 06:34, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::most things. except blowjobs, obviously.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 06:47, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I was just on #batshit relaying the story of how we went to that tech store in jesmond and used a display iphone to buy brain rot for table. good times. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 06:51, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::lol. <small>just wanted to get in on this convo</small><br />
:::::::oh and bj's can happen at curleys house, if i'm not mistaken 2 of the womens live there.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:16, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::getting beejays from internets<br />the height of desperateness? i would say yes --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:22, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Wut? curleys house is a real place bob....--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:25, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::nooooo relllyyy??? my question to you is would you know about curleys house without internet --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:28, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::yes. i knew about it since before broadband was invented...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 22:30, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::well i knew about it since before even the whole internet was invented........ --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 22:39, 2 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::dayem.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:29, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::yeh it was like infinity years ago so you probly wouldnt know what that was like --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 00:35, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::Good recovery.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:08, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::hello? hello? i cant hear you speak directly into the receiver --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:17, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::No I want the last word!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 01:24, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
<s>[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not post on the A/VB main page when you are uninvolved in the case on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]]<sup>[[Template_talk:VandalBanningNotice|POST HERE]]</sup> 11:09, 15 July 2009 (BST)</s><br />
<br />
This verdict has been overruled and the warning stuck. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:26, 17 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Ban==<br />
<s>You have been banned from editing this wiki for 24 hours for vandalism. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 15:28, 16 July 2009 (BST)</s><br />
<br />
This ruling has been overruled and the ban overturned. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:27, 17 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==ban?==<br />
well it looks like they at least saw sense on your case... i suspect my ban will stand but what the hey... its not like i didn't expect it :) --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 01:52, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
DDR was going to post "'''Phew J3D, lucky Honest saved you from that one. Shame he had to be banned because of it. ''' but thought better of it because i clearly was not banned. Why? well that would be because in so many years of valid contribution to the wiki i have only ever faced 3 A/VB cases all but this one thrown out. Hmm guess that makes me the newest wikimartyr... --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:33, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Lol! You fuckiing moron! Did you even read your ''own'' comment that I replied to? '''YOU''' called it a ban, hence why I had ''ban'' in ''italics'', something you must have overlooked.<br />
:I gave up on arguing because you never give up, you fight to the death with the same fucked up, stupid points. I thought you'd bow down after Nubis didn't come to save you, but hey, looks like your desperation in saving your skin can surprise everyone. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<span style="color:black"><u><big>ϑϑℜ</big></u></span>]] 03:19, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::el oh el pwnt?--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 03:23, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::One would think so. He wouldn't admit it. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<span style="color:black"><u><big>ϑϑℜ</big></u></span>]] 03:45, 18 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== yo ==<br />
<br />
Please don't submit [[:Image:2cola.jpg]] for SD. I want to use it as an example when I put 0x0 images up for scheduled deletions. What did you upload to make it come up as 0x0? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:54, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Ah i'm half asleep and i forgot how to make a bmp a jpg so i just changed the file name which turns out doesn't work :P So maybe you get a 0x0 if you try uploading any bmp? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:55, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::Yeah, thanks. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't a problem on my end before submitting it as a scheduled. ty. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 14:58, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::np.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 15:02, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
[[:Image:2cola.jpg]] - FTFY {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 18:02, 28 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:Heh, thanks but i already made [[:Image:2cola.JPG]] and if you read the above DDR wanted that kept as an example or something...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:55, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
::I reverted it. Hope you don't mind. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 03:04, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Nvm. I didn't know you cited the fix in your scheduling vote so I put it back. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 03:06, 29 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
hay ur not an stysops. u r an x sysops. quit lyin yo--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 04:04, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:i had teh exact same templat on 4 da hole tiem i wasnt an sysops. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 04:09, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::thats cause you never edit yyour page so it doesn't show up on the recent changes. faeget.--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 04:23, 1 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Guys, guys. I'm sorry but the spelling and grammar here is just atrocious. Please clean up your act.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 07:51, 2 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::nou--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> High Overlord and Lead Conspirator of the Administrative Rebellion.</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Want</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">help?</span>]] 16:33, 2 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== <s>birth</s>fagday ==<br />
<br />
is it alim's 2nd yet? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 10:41, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:first, what's a birthfagday? and second, no - it's on the 2nd of october.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 11:51, 4 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::as an overrated singersongwriter once said, "The times they are'a changin'"--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:50, 7 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::how are they changing? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:57, 7 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Well considering the Earth is in a constant state of evolution and change, it is impossible for that quote to be ever inaccurate.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 02:21, 8 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not impersonate sysops on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 01:18, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:You really need to stop telling me it's my last warning. It sounds so, ''final''...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:04, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::It's the [[Template:warning2|template's]] fault. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 02:53, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== YOU ==<br />
<br />
ARE GOD--[[User:Shakey60|Shakey]] <sup>[[Beatbox_Kids|BBK]] </sup> 12:46, 16 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:i know right --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:16, 26 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Sysops==<br />
I thought you were a sysops nigger? And you and cyberbob were best butt buddies?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 10:35, 23 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:I was, until early january :\ --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:45, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::Wat happen--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 00:49, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Conspiracy. Nubis organised my sacking during the new year period when i wasn't checking the wikiz :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:51, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::What? Nubis got you demoted? Har har. Specifically for what?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 01:01, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Drunk wiki editing. Not towing the party line. Usual reasons ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:03, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::HAH. So what happen with you and cyberbob?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 01:43, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I hate lemons. Jed's just a wee bit too bitter. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:41, 25 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::I didn't know there was ever anything between us? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:37, 26 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==The Sysop template==<br />
So I hear you still have it on there. Please take it down as per the warning you were issued or I will do it for you. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 09:18, 28 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== omfg ==<br />
So happy bob permabanned this "buzz killington" thinking it was one of you two, or one of the bbk. I can feel a massive misconduct coming on if anyone decides to take it further.<br />
What I am saying is, please take it further.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 05:53, 29 August 2009 (BST)<br />
:fucking lol hey.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 09:02, 29 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Ciggies==<br />
Good god man, make the link to your user page findable, ffs <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 11:48 2 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:He's had it like that for a week or so. And this signature ''should'' only be up for 24 hours, right? ;) --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 12:09, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::Well the ALaMe one was at least preceded by some non-link stuff, but was bad enough... this is another level again. He just keeps pushing on the boundary until someone can be bothered to react <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:28 2 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:::Fair enough- he's the one who will be VB'd so I don't really care. I just think for a day-long fag celebration, just let him have his giggles. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 12:30, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::I put my cursor on the main part, and it underlined all but the exclamation mark, so then i clicked on the exclamation mark, and it bought me here!!--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Also, your name is coxy--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::<nowiki>*</nowiki>you're ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:41, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::TAKING YOU TO A/A FOR WINKING OMG--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:46, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::USING CAPS TO HILARIOUSLY RIDICULE BY LAMPOONING A PERCEIVED "ANGER" WHILE TOTALLY GETTING ALL PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE UP IN THIS SHIT BY MEANS OF HUMOUROUSLY EXAGGERATING AN ENEMY'S POST AT THE SAME TIME {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:02, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::You are WAY to easy these days--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:17, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::last word {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::nah uh--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::u mad?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:18, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::You are WAY to easy these days {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:19, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Learn to spell, both of you. any more posts in this thread will be deleted and i might take you to a/vb. unless its not bob or read.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:21, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! that is all.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 14:31, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::I'm special, <small>special</small>, so special, <small>special</small>. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 14:35, 2 September 2009 (BST)<br />
== You ==<br />
Are that fucking inconsistent on FB and IRC and any chat medium. I cannot work out your patterns m'lday--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:01, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:I'm on from 1pm til 6pm. And i'll sign into msn now just for you. But don't fucking facebook chat me coz my compy can't handle it :( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:04, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Nam nam, bra!nz!!! ==<br />
<br />
You tasted good. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 01:46, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== You have all been rolled ==<br />
<br />
You are all my muppets! I am your muppetmaster. '''JIM HENSON IS ALIVE!!!''' <br />
<br />
As of December 24, 2012 I shall control all the accounts of 2 Cool. ALiM is/will be MINE! --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 06:13, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Arbitration==<br />
Has started. Please proceed [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool here] --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:35, 11 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Uhh, thanks I guess. By the way, shouldn't it be "nicknames given by 2 Cool", instead of "given to 2 Cool"?--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:01, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::No because you gave them to us, they aren't given by us.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:06, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Oh sorry, I get it, misunderstood for a sec.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:18, 12 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Category:Group Subpages ==<br />
<br />
Revert it again and I'll put up an A/VB case against you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Silver}}-- 08:00, 9 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Link me plox to the policy where it says i have to allow you to categorise my group subpages, then compliance you shall receive.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:03, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::The policy on '''bad faith''' where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::You have every obligation to present evidence for your assertion. I provide the following [[UDWiki:Specific_Case_Editing_Guidelines|link]], which ensures that a group may control the content of their page excepting a NPOV lead-in paragraph. A category, by definition, is not part of a prose paragraph and is therefore not covered by this exemption. I await this 'policy' on 'refusing administrative edits', the wording of which is straying close to using the administration status as a badge of authority. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:02, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::And while you're there, you might want to run an IP check on [[User:Insane1]], voting on one suggestion and not the other up for voting during a first edit seems suspicious to me. It won't be enough to sway the vote but is probably worth checking out. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:05, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::It wasn't his first edit at all. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:10, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::I seem to have omitted the "in the suggestions system" portion of that sentence. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:20, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Hardly. Anyone can do administrative edits. I only have the obligation to present evidence if I take him to A/VB. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:08, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Indeed, anyone can, but editing here repeatedly quoting some policy you don't present for review and then expecting a user who has clear ownership of the page (as I ''have'' presented) seems inconsistent to a good faith approach. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:20, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Read the policy document, it is as consistent in defending J3D as it would save any bad faith action a user makes in his own space; ''Groups, for the most part, have sole property of their Group page on the wiki'' is an example, nothing in the policy is black and white, it allows for exceptions to the ownership clause, and I assume none of what is in that policy will defend J3D against the blanket ruling of "bad faith". J3D has also specified that he only gives a shit about ''me'' adding the category (something I do daily to every page on the wiki) onto the subpage, and you expect people to believe ''I'm'' acting in bad faith? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:34, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::Given the fact that you admit there's bad faith between the two of you, the good faith response would be to leave it alone and not incite drama as you are doing by threatening vandalism rulings. Why don't you see if someone else will apply it? And answer me this, what does the wiki lose, or in what way is it harmed by this lack of category? It may appease your sense of CDO, but does nothing to assist the wiki in general or even help important pages, you know, like A/VD which you seem perfectly happy to leave in a false manner. Your comment on 'doing it everyday' I hope is incorrect as well given that's not the category that should be going on there either. And you've still yet to produce this 'policy' you harp on about. I've provided mine and am quite happy that the statement that groups may control the content of the page sufficient to cover this, or we'd be having massive drama wars on this when the Malton Marshalls were added to Category:PKer Groups. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 08:16, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::1. I never once said there was any bad faith on my end. 2. Look below. I already did suggest someone else do it, but at the moment he hasn't even reverted it. 3. Get your head out of your arse and stop pressing fallacies like I "need" a "policy" that says we can warn users for bad faith, you parasitical moron. 4. Specialpages like the one involved in this is specifically called a "maintenance page" by Mediawiki, hence of course it is an important part of maintenence. And in response to your lack of concern for anything less than an "important page", look at A/D and see your fucked up stance on "unimportant pages" yourself, and see who has the double standards here. 5. Don't say I have OCD because at leased ''my'' case of it goes towards a greater good, rather than your unfulfilling and pestering belief that you were brought on this earth to shit people off with your 'holy' ways. 6. You are the only user unhappy with the A/VD edits so shut the fuck up and actually consider that your opinion on them probably shouldn't be treated as the be-all of truth on this wiki.<br />
:::::::::So actually consider what you are doing just now, Iscariot, you are watching a little shit-stirrer try and mess with the only thing on this wiki that shouldn't generally be messed with, Mediawiki maintenance, no doubt waiting for this to flip out of control (thanks to a certain meddling user, you, moreso than me) and then cry vendetta if he actually gets punished for his immature, counter-productive, butthurt and overall unnecessary behaviour. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:32, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Wait, you want to go into a barrage of obscenities and then try and appeal to my sense of reason. Your 'productive' CDO may be clouding your logic. Given that the majority of your emotional tirade belongs on other pages, the only one I'll respond to is that concerning A/VD, there is a problem, it's not opinion, it's fact based on the escalations policy. Boxy's actions are no different to Nubis' that caused the situation. Given you are a sysop and one of the few users able to rectify the problem I'd be considerably more impressed if you applied your energies to that rather than engage in this case of edit warring, drama stirring and vandalism threatening over an inconsequential page.<br />
<br />
::::::::::Finally, I didn't start the policy here, you did. And I quote ''"The policy on bad faith where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) "'' You have made a claim, the burden of proof is ''always'' on the claimant. I'm simply asking you to prove what you have said. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 08:43, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::Sorry. I read the first sentence and stopped indefinitely, learn that I have no intention of appealing to your sense of ''anything'', full stop. I no longer have an interest in this, and hence I have no more interest in arguing with you. Unlike yourself, users like Boxy at leased have initiative in fixing problems rather than inflaming them, so I consider this topic closed and I'm treating it as such. Bleat to someone new. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 09:02, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Why is it so hard for you to provide a link to something you say exists? Is it so hard for a sysop on this wiki to demonstrate their own claims? Or have you just started inventing policies like Hagnat used to? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:38, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::I just had a read through the vandalism policy (because none of the others are really relevant here), and there isn't anything about this type of edit. The situation isn't helped by the vagueness of the policy. The only thing that the policy actually DOES say about it is that they should go to Arbies, which we all know would be a pointless waste of time. There's nothing about admin edits, there's nothing about user page rights over-ruling the advancement of the wiki. Neither side is covered by policy, but, as Iscariot noted, the burden of proof IS unfortunately on the claimant.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:52, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::Why is it so hard for you to understand that after ''what I want'' is fixed, I have ''no intention'' of arguing with you? I have no, NO interest in continuing this once someone has stepped in a mediated this issue and since Boxy has, I have absolutely no interest in continuing the argument. Learn to actually care for the wiki rather than fix your desire to cause trouble and 'show up' the sysops. I'm the one with OCD, by the way. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:22, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::And by the way, [[UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines#General_Conduct|shut the fuck up now]], will you? Second last clause. we have the authority to destroy any value in the effort to crust "Bad Faith", ie. the umbrella ruling that can theoretically serve any purpose in aid of ridding of loopholes in the wiki. Deal with it. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:22, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::No, that's not what you said. You said ''"The policy on bad faith where refusing administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) "''. Please show me the ''"policy on bad faith"'', not the section on sysop conduct guidelines put in there for emergency situations. Please give me a link to the policy that you claimed exist that explicitly states a user cannot ''"(refuse) administrative edits on 'your' page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki"''. Please show how the sentence ''"You can find the link yourself, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing"'' in '''any''' way shows good faith on your part and acceptable conduct on your part. If not (and I don't think you can) then you have now become the new version of Hagnat, claiming policy where none exists and then falling back "I can do it because I is sysops and teh guidelines say I can so I'm not listening to you". -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 03:42, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::No, you shut the fuck up because an Admin document that supports what I say. You honestly don't get it do you? You make me sick with your personal harrassment, and you really can't take a hint. So much for sucking my cock to have any chance of being a sysop, yes? And now it'll turn into a "Boxy and DDR are BOTH to immature to consider me for sysop" story now. I can't wait. Conversation closed a day ago, learn to read. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:02, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::::You see, that's the difference, I'm not telling you to stop talking. I'm asking you to provide the policy you claim existed in the beginning. You can't, and the guidelines do not back you up on this. You cannot claim that a condition put in to prevent harm to the wiki entitles you to engage in an edit war with a user you aren't getting along with. Own up, apologise to J3D for saying there was such a policy when they're isn't and then the conversation is over. How hard is it? I'm not sure where this idea about me going for sysop came from, but as you well know there are only three users I will accept a nomination from, and two are inactive. Don't believe me? Go nominate me right now like Anime did and watch how quickly it gets archived. However none of this changes the fact that you were claiming a policy that doesn't exist, you were using your status as a sysop to attempt to get your own way and that you are now running to what should be an emergency condition for when the wiki is subject to extreme disruption to garnish your error with some semblance of credibility. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 05:16, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::Wait, what? For all I know, it could exist in 50,000 policy documents and you could be bluffing for all I care, I never actually looked to verify the claim. You know why? It was a figure of speech, hence the bolding of '''Bad Faith''' to outline what he would have been banned for. Obviously you knew this because you aren't a moron but you are such a parasite in that way you behave that the thought wouldn't pass me by, that you pretend to think that I'm using my sysop status as a badge for anything, when rather it is more my status as an actual member of the community, whereas you are just a little piddling child who will struggle to find one logical fallacy in an argument he has nothing to do with, then bounce in, using it as the doomsday weapon of the decade. Say what you want after this, I won't be replying to your cesspit-creating nonsense. The page is fixed, you are not. I'm fulfilled. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:36, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::::So we have "<b>The policy on bad faith</b> where refusing administrative edits on your page that benefits the maintenance of the wiki, from one user, simply to create unnecessary trauma and irritation. <b>You can find the link yourself</b>, I have no obligation to find a link to justify what I'm doing. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:51, 12 October 2009 (BST) " where you state there is a policy and there is a link to be found, contrasted with "For all I know, <b>it could exist</b> in 50,000 policy documents and you could be bluffing for all I care, <b>I never actually looked to verify the claim</b>." where there isn't a policy and you didn't even look before demanding a user leave your preferred edit to his owned page. You can quibble about semantics and logical fallacies all you want. You lied. You lied to try and get your own way and won't even have the good grace and dignity to apologise to J3D for this. ''"that you pretend to think that I'm using my sysop status as a badge for anything"'' Erm, '''you''' were the one who just tried to claim that the Sysop Guidelines were applicable in making you right, you can't invoke them if you're being a normal user. Therefore you're either trying to use your status to get your own way (as evidenced by invoking the clause in the sysop guidelines) or you're trying to get your own way by inventing a new policy/quoting one that can in no way apply. Which is it?<br />
<br />
:::::::::::::::::::::I further note that you in no way continue to try and paint me as having promotion prospects since you do not appear to have put up a nomination. Another attempt to divert attention from what's happened here failing? I think so. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 05:54, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
I actually think you guys might have found the pettiest possible thing to threaten each other with A/VB over. Just take it to Arby's or something and be done with it because I don't think anybody really believes they're going to ''convince'' the other side of their argument. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:26, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Arbie's isn't needed in regards to the '''maintenence''' of the wiki, only over its content. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 07:34, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::It can quite literally be about whatever you want it to be about. That's the whole point. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 08:01, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Fair enough. But the point of this isn't to make a large amount of drama, which is why I'm making this simple: If he reverts it, I'll ask someone to just put it there themselves and hopefully he'll keep it up there, considering he's stated numerous times that he's only interested in keeping me off the page, not some random user who has similar intentions. If he reverts that, he can go to A/VB for all I care. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:08, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
/section, thanks to boxy. I no longer have any desire to pursue this at the current time. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 08:37, 12 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Someone wanna bring me up to date on what the fuck has happened? In the meantime i'm rereverting charlies edit.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 17:01, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:oh wow boxy did, was that what his a/m case was for? If so epic,. i might go check now..brb--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 17:05, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Witch Hunt == <br />
I have been wiki absent for a couple of days due to other shit so I had a look through the archive to see what happened with boxys misconduct and I decided to read up on [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive/J3D/2009 this]. I really do feel for you dude, the way those who didn't want you in in the first place twisted and turned all of it just to get you demoted, when the original misconduct case was brought about 1 thing only.... You really did get the hard end of this stick and I am not posting this out of butthurt, I just hope others go back and have a look at some of the actions of the people in there and despite their opinion of you, maybe form some opinions on the poor form of some of the current admin team in this time.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:23, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Box is the only current admin that had any sort of authority in that anyway, so why rag on them? And it's weird, and it's hard for people who know Jed and Nick IRL to fathom (trust me), but it's actually a common ''truth'' that somehow Nick ''always'' did have access to Jed's account, so if you actually think about it from their point of view, it has its grounds, no matter how ridiculous it seems to you and me. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 10:26, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 10:41, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::get some original material bob, I hahaha'd you off the ballpark the other day when you pulled your cannons on DDR, you arent very useful hey....And DDR, no, it isnt about what access they had or WHY he got demoted, it is more about how the misconduct case was for one thing, and then escalated into a million other things that were completely irrelevant and basically the sysops opinion on whether Jed should be a Sop or not...not if he had committed misconduct with the act that Cyberfag brought to fruition. If people thought that Nick and Jed were sharing accounts or whatever, and no, I personally do not see a crime in sitting next to a sysop while he uses his account, then those people should have made a misconduct or demotions case with the appropriate information and proof at hand, rather than using an offbeat joke comment as an excuse to bring out the big guns and debate his worthyness. Regardless of if he was fit to be a sysop or not, when the case was brought forward for an off colour joke, and the sysops at hand decide they are going to bring forward unrelated things and then manipulate it into a vote for demotion, all over a joke that was laughed off by the first 3 sysops, then yeah, it is the definition of a witch hunt. Also you don't have to have been a sysop then to have been part of the Witch Hunt at hand, honestly. This wasn't even aimed at you it is just that Jed will check this now that they are in Thailand.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:01, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::the tl;dr is that, the case wasnt about what Jed got demoted for, so basically it was a witch hunt from box and others, because they didnt have the authority that the crats who bought him into the team did, this was the only way to get him out without going through the proper avenues, ie the people who were elected to be Crats--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:03, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::tbh I saw it as no different as anything they pinged mighty Grim for in ''that'' misconduct case, and as a Sysop I think there is nothing wrong with ''calling'' (a vote for) demotion over long-term issues despite the one case being completely different... I know it sounds harsh and abusive but that's just how I see it, if you can be called for promotion at any time based on long-standing good efforts then the opposite shouldn't be totally shunned just because it's 'unfair'. Whether it should have been used for J3D is irrelevant (though I'm not surprised given the circumstances around his pm bid) but yes. More power to the hungry ops. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 12:43, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::''"Box is the only current admin that had any sort of authority in that anyway, so why rag on them?"'' The. General. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 03:46, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::Though you are correct, I mostly just mean the major players in the demotion, the 'instigators'. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 05:14, 14 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:fair, at least something of worth comes out of you, which is more I can say for certain others--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
sexy you are the best poster on the whole wiki. serious. you own {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:47, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
i reckon we should demote the cunt {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:51, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I don't have to be a good poster, I'm not a System Operator--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::neither do i, maggot {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:14, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I don't really know where your superiority complex comes from in life, I guess you get online and it is a world away from irl amirite?--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:46, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::whoa there with all the hemmin and the hawwin and the birdsong {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:52, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGq5FeUv3zk I found your youtube channel], you were sure it would be a secret hey? There are people who can help you bob. You are not alone out there, never alone. I wont help you though, you're too much of a fag for me to be associated with.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:02, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::OH MY GOD ''how did you find itttttttttt'' {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:03, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::i feel so exposed... nobody is safe from messr. Read's detectiv skillz {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:08, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::: *smug*--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:11, 13 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
''I personally do not see a crime in sitting next to a sysop while he uses his account,'' This made me LOL because that is why Nubis was demoted. At least Nubis and I were never accused of abusing check user... --[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 16:24, 22 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Untrue. Not only was jed demoted for stuff relating to that ''anyway'', There was also evidence to support that you had permanent access to the nubis account from locations other than her/his own, something your initial claim entailed. Sheesh. You are actually a troll with all of these claims that you make, right? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 16:33, 22 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==those stupid groups that include people whom you know don't want to be a part of your shitty jokes==<br />
next time you make one of them you'll earn yourself an A/VB case {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:16, 17 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:well considering it's not vandalism, I am sure you will earn one for shitting up the admin pages. Take him to A/A over it, so he can't make any groups like that again or something, but don't try and be an internet tuff guy now.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 11:06, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::wrong! but thanks anyways {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:00, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Arbitration ==<br />
An interim [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob%2C_Sexylegsread_and_DanceDanceRevolution_vs._2_Cool#Interim_Ruling Ruling] has been made.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 10:58, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:and so has my response.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:03, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
hey duder thad made his final ruling. I'd like to "claim" that I'm not a part of the hate club so remove me from the page. cheers {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:36, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:but you hate 2 Cool do you not? Anyway you shalt have compliance but i do think you belong there.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:10, 18 October 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Racist Flame ==<br />
<br />
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, assuming you were ''making a good faith edit when you recently unloaded a slew of racial slurs''. Actually, typing that sentence demonstrates the absurdity of it. Particularly in the context of the [[The Southern Cross Club|the group page]], where you commented, [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:The_Southern_Cross_Club&diff=1582137&oldid=1582065 your flame] is in poor taste, to put it mildly. Do you agree?<br />
<br />
Rather than make a vandalism case out of it, I'd like to give you an opportunity to make a brief and sincere retraction alongside your original comment. Or at the very least, use this space to explain your reasoning behind making such an edit.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 02:20, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:he was pretty clearly being ironic, hope this helps. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 02:59, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Might as well add yourself. [[User:Giles Sednik/List of Wiki Puritans|Now.]] --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 03:02, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::lmao {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:08, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::well done good sir.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:03, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:Its a talk page, i'm allowed to be racist and yeah, ask bob why i say things next time, he seems to know.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:03, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::If we ever get around to that TOS bullshit you might not be! bloop bloop bloop --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 07:23, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
[[User:Giles_Sednik/List_of_Wiki_Puritans#The_List|Done.]] And I love using "irony" as an excuse to vent all the crap you wish you could say in public. Yeh that was cutting edge humor there. But like you said, it's the internet and you're allowed to be a racist. *golf clap* --{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 11:37, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:I don't think you quite get what irony is. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:09, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::[http://www.answers.com/topic/irony Yeh yeh yeh definition 1a]. I get it. But I don't buy it, particularly as an excuse. It has become all too commonplace for people say something indefensible and then claim irony as their defense. Example: ''"You're such a fucking (insert racial slur). Durr haha I was being ironic don't get upset."''<br />
::Also, while we're on the subject, irony is more that the dictionary definition, and there '''is''' a difference between sarcasm and irony. And there's a BIG difference between using irony to demonstrate the absurdity of an idea or argument, and the way cybertrolls use racial slurs without being able to articulate what they think they're being ironic about.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 13:08, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::you think you're super astute but you're really not. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:29, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Nu uh. YOU!--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 14:18, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::fix'd--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 14:53, 19 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::So wait was that edit vandalism or what? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::yeah. I'd delete SA's own post but you've just replied to it, so I'll leave it up to you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:10, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::fuck charlie you're getting too good at picking up on my plans....since you've foiled me i'll in turn leave it up to giles. 09:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC) {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::lol. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Lol'd@N3D ==<br />
<br />
Some of your finest work my friend ;)--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 14:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== awww ==<br />
<br />
You just missed a really funny A/M case, SA started trolling finis' talk page without knowing that it was protected. I especially loved it because it used to be what we all joked about getting ops for, so we could harass finis even after he A/PT'd his talk page. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 07:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah, it was pretty funny, especially when DDR was all "uh uh SA you're a dumbass and the page is protected" and shit. :D --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 13:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::And when I snuck my own snide asshole message in the edit summary so Finy could see it anyway :D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 14:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Yeah...Dick.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 16:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Ohi was watching from the depths. Just becausei'm not editing doesn't mean your every move isn't being monitored. So was it at a slap on the wrist or what? I think he deserved a good ol' spanking.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 16:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I have a second warning now. I can't do anything semi-bad for a bit D: --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 16:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Oh as if you were watching from the depths. I know you. If you watch, you ''have'' to comment. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 23:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::^--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 23:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::It was one night charlie! it didn't mean anything, stop acting like you understand me!! *storms out of the room sobbing* {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:18, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Why ==<br />
[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87_%D9%85%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AE%D8%AF%D9%85%D8%A9]...Why my profile? I don't even know you. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 05:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Why is this comment on Jed's talk? Also, I translated that heading, and it reads: "The Enemies of God". I'd assume he doesn't like you.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Oh, now I get it. That looked like a user page aty first. Strange.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I think its actually something different, can't remember. I think they meant something else when they made it. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Someone I know translated it, it says something about allah in all that stuff (I didnt pay attention) and then it says Enemies of God: Colonel Cunt. I was just curious who i killed so i can do it again :D --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 23:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::OH, I thought you guys were talking about the group name. They all have arab names and spam derka derka and shit, classic xD --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 23:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Oh that, yeah you killed me, just look for a sandmonkey and kill them, its probably me. although i'm inactive atm. how'd you find that page btw? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Probably searched his UD profile through the wiki I bet. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::What a self indulgent prick, lucky he's on the kill list! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::lol. Btw I just got back from work and while I was there I thought of [[Negronet]], and thought of you. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 10:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Does that have any context aside from that its similar to necronet? Either way its still amusing...{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:10, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::I dont even remember where i found it to be honest...i might have hit random page, i was pretty bored a few days ago and it came up with one profile on that page so naturally i clicked that. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 03:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== OMFG DONT COMMENT ON MY TALK PAGE OMG WTF ==<br />
<br />
Ull maek me sew mahd!! Il have 2 delyt it u babbeh--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 10:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Unfortunately he gave me no other opportunity than to pursue justice via administration pages. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== awesome ==<br />
<br />
I found this in the Unused Templates bin:<br />
<br />
{{Template:NoJ3D}}<br />
<br />
Nice. I might actually start using it too, hilarious ;D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 11:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:was only unused because bob added me to his. He cant handle the Pwnage.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 12:36, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I never used that template; I have the code straight on my talk page. J3D made that a few minutes after I posted it. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::I caught a largemouth bass, a koi and a cyberbob today--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::J3D would love to be important enough to command his own "no j3d" template... pretty lame he's got to create it himself though :D <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:21 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
:::::lol, [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Template:NoJ3D&action=history not awesome]... actually quite the opposite <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:23 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
::::::I think you are missing the classic "take the piss out of yourself, but make people slightly offput by your pretend arrogance" thing that Jed has been working on for a long, long time now.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 13:26, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::And always will be. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::lol, "classic"... :D <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 14:04 17 November 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
So anyways, new vote now, who votes [[Template:NoJ3D]] replace [[Template:Verdict]] on A/VB from now on? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 22:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I vote to merge the two.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 01:37, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I was gonna link from my sig and have a disclaimer stating that having that template isn't binding, but then the share mass of the job queue killed the net :( and yeah boxy i'm totally cool with thefact i made it myself :) plus all i really did was take the code from bobs page and cp it. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:10, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Yeah. I had no qualms about you making it yourself, just find it a surprisingly fitting template for how I feel about you. Zing! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I'll keep that in mind next time i "post" you a letter :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Warning==<br />
[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|35px]]Please do not use admin pages to harass people on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges ''will'' be revoked. This is your last warning. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 11:16, 19 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:what the fuck is this shit? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:07, 25 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== ban ==<br />
<br />
if u get banned again, you still have 5 hours 56 minutes of wrongly used ban time which I'm pretty sure you haven't used. [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_07#User:J3D_.282.29]]. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 02:37, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:that's dumb, you're dumb. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:10, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Remember how well the 'ban credit' idea worked out the last time? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 06:24, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Nup, cause I never saw it used properly in practice. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 06:59, 27 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::I will nevar be banned again! But yes i do have that in the bank. i tried to use it but its kinda hard when you're banned to inform s'ops that you have ban credit. Perhaps we need [[A/BC]] (might copyright that actually, groovy name) which even when banned you can still post on. Or just more up to the minute banners? {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:17, 31 July 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Bonghit420&diff=1745612
User talk:Bonghit420
2010-07-22T06:51:06Z
<p>J3D: /* The Kraken got me... */</p>
<hr />
<div>Current status: fucking druuuuuuuuuuunk!<br />
<br />
<br />
{{User:Bonghit420/nav}}<br />
new stuff at bottom please.<br />
<br />
'''SIGN YOUR POSTS'''<br />
<br />
[[User:Bonghit420/Archive_2009]]<br />
|<br />
[[User:Bonghit420/sig]]<br />
==Dont touch nothing above this!==<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
==About Ackland==<br />
<br />
Hello. I read your message. Most of the zombies are dead on the floor, so I couldn't scan them. Now I'm out of AP. Sorry I couldn't be of help. I'll try again tomorrow, though.<br />
--[[User:Colette Hart|Colette Hart]] 07:30, 24 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
== [[Ackland Mall Noise Abatement Society]] ==<br />
<br />
<br />
{{yorphan|Ackland Mall Noise Abatement Society}}<br />
--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 11:52, 9 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:yes it is, on my main page dumbass.--[[User:Bonghit420|Dirty]] 22:49, 9 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::Before you start calling people dumbasses you might want to figure out wiki links versus URL links. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 22:57, 9 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::same as usual, go fuck yourself :D --[[User:Bonghit420|Dirty]] 00:40, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::[[Special:Whatlinkshere/Ackland_Mall_Noise_Abatement_Society|This]] is the list of pages that officially link to Ackland Mall Noise Abatement Society. The only page on the list is ''this page'', because Yonnua was courteous enough to link it for you. He did you a favor, Misanthropy did you a favor, and I'm doing you a favor. I'm guessing you'll ignore me and piss on my comment as well. That's your business, and you're welcome to do it, even though it reflects poorly on you. After all, what sort of person, offered a gift, fails to even recognize it as a gift and slaps the hand that's offering it, not just once, but twice (and likely a third time as well)? {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 02:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Thanks for you input, I thought they came here to start shit with me for reasons unknown. It seems as though the only time people ever use this page is to try to prove somthing. :P and stop with all this reflections talk, your starting to make me have concerns about my mental health. *unbundles the gift* a teddy bear!!! <3 *cuddles with the teddy*. Some times people have bad days and bring it with them to the interwebz. :S *licks Aichon's hand.*--[[User:Bonghit420|Dirty]] 03:10, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Dood, I have logs of some of the stuff you've said on IRC. You DO have mental health issues, I swear :D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:31, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Is this the same DDR from like 8 months ago? omg like wow! I thought I lost you to the pages of history. --[[User:Bonghit420|Dirty]] 09:39, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::No way baby, you ain't losing me, and I definitely didn't lose you. Some of the shit you said was PRICELESS! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 15:18, 5 June 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Your siggy ==<br />
<br />
It's breaking pages... --{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 07:04, 8 June 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yer, I was looking at that and thinking that it might. was it the <sup>sup</sup>code?--{{User:Bonghit420/sig}} 07:08, 8 June 2010 (BST)<br />
::yikes, I have no idea why it is bordering the timestamp..--[[User:Bonghit420|&#123;&#123;SUBST:Nosubst&#124;User:Bonghit420/sig}}]] 07:13, 8 June 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I thought I had it, but nope. There was a line break in there but removing it didn't seem to help. I'll have another look after I get a bit of sleep. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 07:17, 8 June 2010 (BST)<br />
::::sigh, I am combing through it and can't find it.--{{User:Bonghit420/sig}} 07:31, 8 June 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::You're missing <code><nowiki></span></nowiki></code> tag for the "ur". {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 07:39, 8 June 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Deletions==<br />
<br />
You'll need to post them on [[A/SD]], I can't handle them without them going through the system there. It should be no hassle once they're there though. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 21:07, 8 June 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Make sure you sign your deletion requests in the future. Also, you can put them all under one header, rather than having them all separate. Makes it easier to process. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 00:36, 9 June 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Images ==<br />
<br />
The following images you've uploaded have recently gone unused:<br />
<br />
#[[:Image:Dddeee.JPG]]<br />
#[[:Image:BabahAgunin.JPG]] <br />
#[[:Image:Agunininote.JPG]] <br />
#[[:Image:Flavorshit.JPG]] <br />
#[[:Image:Flavorshit2.JPG]] <br />
#[[:Image:Level1july20th.JPG]] <br />
#[[:Image:Level2July23.JPG]] <br />
#[[:Image:Level3july26.JPG]] <br />
#[[:Image:Level4july28.JPG]]<br />
<br />
Do you still want any of them? If not, they will be deleted. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 00:58, 11 June 2010 (BST)<br />
:you can deleat them --{{User:Bonghit420/sig}} 05:11, 11 June 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== The Kraken got me... ==<br />
<br />
...and it was good. Just thought you'd like a nicer [http://iamscott.net/1276338145603.html victim shot], as that looks better than breaking everything down into single taunts and kills. By the way, mind if I file that as a bounty claim with the RG? --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 11:31, 12 June 2010 (BST)<br />
: Praise the Kraken, he has devliverd another soul to a worthy place.--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 12:23, 12 June 2010 (BST)<br />
::If you could wait a week that would be nice, but do as you plese, I'm not sure that it would matter seeing as how the rg is moving at a slow speed recently. --{{User:Bonghit420/sig}} 19:52, 12 June 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I'm in no hurry to file that, I have up to 2 weeks time. And it will matter insofar in that it will reduce my bounty to zero once the list is updated, making me once again capable of dragging triggerhappy trenchies on the RG :D --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 20:30, 12 June 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Go ahead man, do ya thing--{{User:Bonghit420/sig}} 21:06, 12 June 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
n*ggercunt{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:44, 22 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:was going thru my a/vd record and masterbating over my awesanity when i found that apparently racism is banned on the wiki, even on talk pages. fucking nazis taking over fucking cunt shit. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:51, 22 July 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Kevan&diff=1745611
User talk:Kevan
2010-07-22T06:48:40Z
<p>J3D: /* Offensive in-game names? */</p>
<hr />
<div>If you want to report a bug, put it up on the [[Bug Reports]] page for review.<br />
<br />
If you've got a question about the Wiki, use the [[Wiki Questions]] and another user will see it and answer it.<br />
<br />
If you want to discuss game balance or the future of the game, try a [[Unofficial UD Forums|discussion forum]].<br />
<br />
If you'd like to respond to someone who's posted here, you should do so on their talk page.<br />
<br />
If you're from the future, there are a [[User Talk:Kevan/Archive|couple]] of [[User Talk:Kevan/Archive2|archives]].<br />
<br />
If you'd like to speak to an operator, please hold.<br />
<br />
==Three Minutes...==<br />
...Since anyone last commented you on here. Very upsetting. How's everything going with the game? Is everything good?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:40, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:What are you talking about? Scroll down to the bottom, haha. --{{User:BobBoberton/sig}} 21:42, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:You're a funny one. Also, the page's confusing because Kevan doesn't state to put new stuff at the bottom or top, unfortunately, so people go with wherever their own preference is. --{{User:BobBoberton/sig}} 21:59, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::I tend to look for a trend. Unfortunately, it turns out that the trend i followed only applied for the two posts i read.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 20:06, 13 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Monroeville Badges==<br />
Just so you know there are survivors (although very few) that are still roaming around in Monroeville. It would be nice if you could give some kind of emblematic badge of appreciation for the few that made it this far. I hope thats not asking too much, but for staying alive this long its quiet a feat to accomplish and deserves some kind of reward.<br />
--[[User:Evildiehard|Evildiehard]] 02:53, 3 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Monroeville Airlift==<br />
Hi Kevan,<br />
I am one of the few remaining survivors in Monroeville. With the Christmas update being implemented, I was curious to know if I set up a Christmas tree and some lights in a building for a few days, would a Helicopter come by and take my character to Malton? I don't want to do something in vain that could end up killing my character that has survived for ten months... <br />
--[[User:Evildiehard|Evildiehard]] 06:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:hey Evildiehard, i'm The Last Unlucky Guy, we were in harvey's group together, i like that idea, can i get in on it too? Getting my character out of Monroeville would be great, i've grown too attached to him and if i got killed, especially after going solo, and survivng for this time, it would really suck :( --[[User:An unlucky guy|Three Dog]] 19:41, 3 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==clothing suggestions==<br />
<br />
Hi, long time no see. I've got another question about clothing. I see that you haven't implemented any new clothing for almost a year and the pages in question are receiving little to no traffic. Are you still in need of new Clothing ideas [[Clothes/Suggestions|Suggestions]] or can I close the page and move everything into their relevant archives?--<small><span style="border: 2px solid #DDD">[[User:Vista|'''<span style="background-color: Ivory; color:Black">&nbsp;Vista&nbsp;</span>''']][[User_talk:Vista|<span style="background-color: #DDD; color: Ivory ">&nbsp;T&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 00:35, 28 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Will donate for awesome clothing ==<br />
<br />
Basically, I was just wondering that if I donated $50AU or something, that maybe you might code in some blood-proof clothing, just for moi? I mean, it's a decent chunk of funds as all... --{{User:Medico/sig}} 01:30, 26 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Broken Wiki page ==<br />
http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=5th_of_November%2F2008&diff=1271116&oldid=1270525<br />
<br />
The page I want is the last edit that I made for if, and I have no idea what went wrong. Someone directed me here... --<font face="arial black"><span style="background-color:#000000; border: 1px solid red">[[User:Haliman111|<span style="color:White">/\'''Haliman'''/\</span>]]</span></font><sup> [[User_talk:Haliman111|T]] | [[Project Wiki Patrol|P!]] | [[Project Welcome|W!]] </sup> 00:44, 11 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
==Iwitness typo==<br />
<br />
Got really bored, and noticed there was a typo.<br />
<br />
"What does it mean if a record is PUBLIC or PRIVATE?<br />
<br />
Public records are just that- anybody can (if they take the time to look) find them and look at the information they contain. Private records are hidden in directories whose contents are not open to the public view, and the random number string appended to the end of the file name makes it impossible for anybody to find them through luck or accident. "Private" records are in fact so hard to locate that if you don't record their location, '''you'll never them again'''. That's OK when you just want to share a quick secret with some friends in a private chat room or secure forum, though- just copy the link and paste it somewhere you and you friends can find it, but others will not see it!<br />
User accounts do provide a way to retrieve all of the private records a user creates while logged into that account, so while still quite private, they are not going to vanish. User accounts also potentially allow for other levels of security; all of these are essentially private records that only certain people can see, or which do not display all of the details of the record in order to protect the privacy and safety of "innocent bystanders". <br />
<br />
http://www.urbandead.info/iwitness/iwitness_FAQ.php#security<br />
<br />
--<font face="arial black"><span style="background-color:#000000; border: 1px solid red">[[User:Haliman111|<span style="color:White">/\'''Haliman'''/\</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User_talk:Haliman111|<span style="color:Blue">T</span>]] | [[Project Wiki Patrol|P!]] | [[Project Welcome|W!]]</sup></font> 15:38, 1 September 2008 (BST)<br />
:Check your talk page, {{usr|Haliman111}}. {{User:Swiers/Sig}} 01:36, 2 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Suicide Repair ==<br />
Most of the time it isn't easy to let a building reach the higher levels of decay and takes the effort of multiply zombie players. Lately as more buildings reach higher level of decay we see a raise in suicide repairs. Where survivors just spent all their AP and more to repair a long time ruined building and prepare to get eaten and revived. If suicide repairing was not what you where going for with the implemention of decay, please consider changes like: <br />
<br />
a)Make it impossible to spent more AP on repairing than are left to this character, and probably setting a cap at 45AP as a maximum for decay. <br />
<br />
or b)Repair only removes some part of the decay level and not all at once. Probably like tearing down barricades.<br />
--[[User:Experiment211|Experiment211]] 21:15, 13 July 2008 (BST)<br />
:I second option B. Option A could be exploited by people who wait until they have 2 or 3 AP left before running in to repair for 1 or 2 AP. B makes a lot of sense, I think. --[[User:Drugsanimudongs|Drugsanimudongs]] 17:14, 15 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
::Errr... I read your suggestion wrong, Experiment211. Ignore my exploit theory! I still support B, though.<br />
<br />
== Database error on the wiki ==<br />
<br />
I have been getting the following message after making edits: <br />
<br />
<pre><br />
A database query syntax error has occurred. This may indicate a bug in the software. The last attempted database query was:<br />
<br />
(SQL query hidden)<br />
<br />
from within function "SearchMySQL4::update". MySQL returned error "1062: Duplicate entry '20534' for key 1 (localhost)".<br />
Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Category_talk:Historical_Groups"<br />
</pre> <br />
<br />
The edits seem to be working, however. This bug just took place twice on the Historical Groups Talk/Voting page. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 11:13, 25 July 2008 (BST)<br />
:I just got one on the same page. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 15:51, 25 July 2008 (BST)<br />
::Ditto. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 21:06, 25 July 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
Happened to me too today.--[[User:Gamestriker4|Gamestriker4]] 21:57, 25 July 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
<pre><br />
Database error<br />
<br />
A database query syntax error has occurred. This may indicate a bug in the software. The last attempted database query was:<br />
(SQL query hidden)<br />
from within function "". MySQL returned error "1194: Table 'searchindex' is marked as crashed and should be repaired (localhost)".<br />
</pre><br />
Is also appearing when searching brain rot in the Suggestions and Talk Suggestions namespaces.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 19:02, 26 July 2008 (BST)<br />
:Erg. I've had some server trouble lately, I'll take a look at it. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 12:21, 27 July 2008 (BST)<br />
::Yesterday it was still doing this... It's rare as of late, it seems-- it was happening with almost every edit for a bit there -- but it *did* happen yesterday again.... --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
:::Just hit the same after searching for brain in images. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:21, 3 August 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
I've repaired the database, it should be okay now. Let me know if any error messages still creep through, though. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 10:54, 4 August 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==A Little Idea for Group Affiliations==<br />
<br />
I've had an idea and would like to submit it for your consideration. Would it be possible to add in the option of a URL link added to a player's group affiliation, a la the current system with the 'Real Name' links? This would be very useful for players looking to join a group and for groups looking to recruit players, especially zombie groups who lack the ability to spray-paint places without death-culting. Whilst the RN link is used by some, myself included, for recruitment, more likely than not the majority will simply not bother clicking it after the first few times they have done that on a profile have taken them to YouTube songs or Rick-rolls. A link under the group affiliation would draw more desirable attention. <br />
<br />
There are two ways in which I could see this working: The first is to have the group affiliation act in the same way as the Real Life link, with the player choosing the URL; the second would be to have the GA act as the list of confirmed groups on the stats page does: An automatic link to the wiki page of said confirmed group. My personal belief is that the latter would be the superior option, so as to avoid abuse via unsavoury links which would undermine trust in the system (this is of course going under the assumption that you have a system which makes the links appear automatically on the stats page, rather than having to add them all in yourself of course).<br />
<br />
Just my thought for the early morning. <br />
<br />
Regards. --[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 04:37, 4 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:Please make your suggestions here: [[:Category:Current Suggestions]]. Seriously Moloch, you have been around long enough to know how suggestions are handled. --[[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 04:40, 4 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::FWIW, my personal version of 'ActOnProfile' already modifies the group name to be a link to the wiki page for that group. Its pretty handy, even if just to find out the group has no page. A fancier GM script could easily determine if the page actually exists, and not make it a link if it doesn't, which would be nice. Server side code could likely do the same thing better. {{User:Swiers/Sig}} 05:02, 4 August 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Copyright question ==<br />
<br />
after playing Urban dead I had an idea making it into a warcraft 3 map and before I release 1: may I release a map made by maps and the same idea of urban dead and with its name/s 2: are there any requires you want? for example I could advertise for the site every 5 mins(I can have the map do that for me)I have all ready given credit to Urban dead and if you want I can give direct credit to you also<small>—The preceding {{wikipedia|Wikipedia:Sign_your_posts_on_talk_pages|unsigned}} comment was added by [[User:Undeadpope|Undeadpope]] ([[User talk:Undeadpope|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Undeadpope|contribs]]) 23:42, 6 August 2008.</small><br />
:l2english.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:34, 7 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:If it's clearly presented as an unofficial fan project, and isn't making any money, then I wouldn't have a problem with it. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 11:51, 7 August 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==IP hits and construction==<br />
<br />
If I repair a badly damaged building (15ap etc.) Is that one IP hit or 15? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:32, 9 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:It'd be one. it's a measure of how many times you refresh the map page not ap. The only exception (as far as i'm aware) is syringe manufacture which is 20.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:53, 10 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::I thought i was getting more than my regular action. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:32, 10 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:::Is that confirmed or just a guess?--<span style="cursor:crosshair">Kooks</span> 22:50, 13 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::It's certainly incorrect. I repaired a building costing 134ap and still had more than enough IP hits to play my other characters.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:11, 14 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Monroeville and headshot==<br />
<br />
All the high level survivors I know (about 30) have been holding out for the return of perma-death headshot with the quarantine. I see the quarantine is back, but everything still says that headshot is not permanent. Is this the case? If you're not bringing it back then you might as well close down the server or at least tell us officially. Because as currently constituted only one side can win, and though we could probably prolong things indefinitely I fail to see the point.<br />
--[[User:Babe's Ghost|Babe&#39;s Ghost]] 03:59, 17 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:I couldn't agree more with this post. Staying alive as a member of an organized group in Monroeville is possible but it takes a large amount of coordination and effort. I fail to see the "game" part of current Monroeville on the survivor side, something permanent headshot would bring to the table. If balance is an issue, I'm sure the zombie side would love to have non-curable Infectious Bite. --[[User:Calem|Calem]] 10:09, 17 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::The evidence of the most recent opening of Monroeville suggests that it takes about 6 weeks for the city to go from totally survivor-dominated to totally destroyed with the survivors on the run and hiding in the wreckage. Therefore, it seems to me that the most fun and interesting way to do it would be to run Monroeville in cycles. Every five to six weeks or so switch the rules to give one side or the other the advantage. So, having now had an extened Zombie Friendly period of time, you allow the Survivors to have their turn for a month and a half with closed borders and "permanent" (until the next cycle) headshot. Then re-open it to new admissions with the usual "Zombies stand back up" rules for a month and a half, then close it again and so on and so forth. That way, both sides always have something to look forward to and there's always something to plan for. Frankly, this solution still favors the Zombies somewhat in that a dead Survivor still never gets a chance to come back to life, but its significantly more fair than the current situation where Survivors can never repair a building for more than a couple of days before getting buried under a tide of zombies. While that may accurately reflect the desperate conditions of the later Dead movies and some of the supporting fiction, its not much fun to be a Survivor under these circumstances, and this is a game. --[[User:jng2058|jng2058]] 12:54, 17 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:::Agreed. Right now Monroeville is only a game of attrition with an inevitable (tedious) end. Maybe that's in keeping with Romero's cannon, but it puts survivors in an unwinnable position and leaves the zombies without enough challenge to stave off boredom. If the game's going to be left open, then since zombies are in the advantage right now (by 4:1) why not restore headshot and see what happens? [[User:CoopVancer|CoopVancer]] 21:34, 17 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:::: Actually Coop- if you think about it- zombie take over isn't necessary canon in the zombie/post-apoc genre nor Romero canon, but merely an outcome of the core theme. What destroys the humans isn't the zombies, which are fairly weak, but their failure to overcome their individual self interest and cooperate. Restoring headshot would work now consistent with the canon. Headshot is something survivors learn with experience. At present, most of the survivors, don't have the XP to have headshot. <br />
::::: So I guess this is down to a test of wills then? Of humanity? How long can humans survive before break down, succumb to anarchy, or make a mistake and get eaten? '''We will not.''' Survivors will not descend into madness. We will survive under these horrible conditions! '''We will be ever vigilant!''' ''(until an emergency comes up in real life, then we're pretty much zombie-food)'' [[User:Bystander|Bystander]] 22:30, 20 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::: Bystander, I recommend the buddy system. Give someone in your group your PW so they can move you in an emergency.--[[User:Babe's Ghost|Babe&#39;s Ghost]] 00:01, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:Yes, your reading is correct that perma-headshot isn't returning.--[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 16:59, 18 August 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Will there be any type of reward for x number of survivors remaining? ==<br />
<br />
I'm just going to say the only reason to ask this is because what the point of trying to survive if the hoard of zombies will eventually take over all? All i want to know is there anything that actually would give hope to the survivors?<br />
<br />
:Yeah, it would be nice if the last 100 survivors were transported to Malton with text like "NAME survived the second Monroeville quarantine." or "NAME was one of the last 100 to die in Monroeville." on their profile page. --[[User:BetterLuck|BetterLuck]] 23:23, 18 August 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
::I hope something happens that's good at least for survivors, now they outnumber us way too much now--[[User:Kazypoo1|Kazypoo1]] 15:44, 19 August 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Monroeville Characters ==<br />
<br />
I was just wondering if you had any plans for allowing players to have their Monroeville character's account moved to Malton. I just want to know because I happen to really like my MV character from an RP perspective and would like to play as him in a city that isn't completely ruined and dead... or at least use his name for a character in Malton.--[[User:William Told|William Told]] 03:08, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:No - you can transfer donation flags, but not characters. If you want to roleplay the same character in Malton, just create a new account with a slightly different name. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 09:33, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
How do you transfer donation flags from a Monroeville character to a Malton one? Thanks. --[[User:Alias81|Alias81]] 13:10, 1 September 2008 (BST)<br />
:Just go to your "settings" page and enter a name. I've now added this to the [http://urbandead.com/faq.html#monroedonate FAQ]. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 15:09, 3 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Don't fucking jimmy me, jules. ==<br />
<br />
# (diff) (hist) . . User:Vigeous/Group Pages; 18:25 . . (-2) . . Vigeous (Talk | contribs) (→Folie à Famille - )<br />
# (diff) (hist) . . Category talk:Historical Groups; 17:01 . . (+319) . . WanYao (Talk | contribs) (→Drunken Dead - )<br />
<br />
I swear that 84 minutes almost pushed me over the brink...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:34, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:Yeah, it looks like the wiki backups are pushing the server over the brink as well, from sheer weight of data, to the point of actually overheating the machine. I'm going to have to do another archive-history purge, as it's been a long time since the last one. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 10:24, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::NOOOOOO! Not the memories! Take anything but the memories! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:30, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:::What about all teh lulz?!?!?!?!? Jed! ACTIVATE LULZ PRESERVATION PROCEDURES. CODE RED!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 10:44, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::::OMG DID YOU SAY <big><big><big><big><font color="red">CODE RED?!?!?!?!</font></big></big></big></big>--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:47, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::Good man. You'll do me proud yet. btw Kevan we just bought UD shirts so hopefully that means you don't have to go ahead with this "purging" business...--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 10:48, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::Yeah i've thrown my best days into UD and my best money too. The least you could do is buy more server space so that a purge need never happen again. What if we need to check back over to see who made an edit? Or find long lost lulz? I mean [[2 Cool]] have a variety of quality projects using that space. [[ALiM]], [[ELiM]], [[Great Fire of 1912]], [[Sir Dick Longman]], [[Suburb Nicknames]], [[Colloquialisms]] and [[Malton Girl on Girl Parade]] all spring to mind. Of course there are many many more worthy pages created in the name of [[Kevanism|Kevan]], this is just a tasty sampling.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:53, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::Stop blatantly spamming your endless vomit pile of useless wiki projects.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 11:02, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::Quality projects using the ''page history'' space? If there's something good in there that's been deleted for wiki policy reasons, can't you host it somewhere else where people will actually find it? --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 11:07, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::::Well if there is that's what we'll do. By the way - whilst I'm here, can I get your thoughts on [[ALiM|this page]]. Totally just out of interest and not fishing for an endorsement to stick in the first sentence of the article... And did you purposely give some of the locations amusing names or was it all the result of some cosmic event?--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 11:22, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Also thanks for the recognition that they are in fact quality. And yes page history contains lols and should be kept for this reason. For example [[User:J3D/lol@finis|this particular work]] would never have been possible if page histories weren't kept. [[Save Page Histories]], i think i smell a 2C wikiproject coming on...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:32, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::::::Ah that smell. I know her well.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 11:33, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
Just wondering if there's a time-frame for this, there's an administrative Archive of Two we need to finish up before it happens, shouldn't take more than a few hours each.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 16:59, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:Turns out that it might just be the A/VB talk archives.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 17:03, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::What in the name of all things holy is an archive history purge? Do i need to be in the brace position? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:11, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:::Look at the contribs of an older member, like myself. Ive ben around and posting since october 2005. you will see pretty much nothingb that old. A history purge is just that, a deletion of all revisions older than a certain age from the database. Its one of the reasons we make archive pages. Histories can get seriously huge, especially on larger, more active pages. For examples of the biggest, try A/VB and Talk:Suggestions --[[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 18:02, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::::Cheers Grimbo. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:06, 21 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::Couldn't Kev just get rid of the bigs one then? Talk suggestions is a particularly useless page...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:08, 22 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:It'll be some time during September, and it'll be clearing out to a specific date (probably everything over a year old). If you need me to hold off while some admin archives are made, let me know. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 17:37, 27 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::I believe we finally got them all done.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 01:17, 2 September 2008 (BST)<br />
:::Thanks. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 15:09, 3 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
# (diff) (hist) . . m Talk:Undeadites; 18:20 . . (-629) . . Creeping Crud (Talk | contribs)<br />
# (diff) (hist) . . The Drifters; 17:02 . . (0) . . Robot clean (Talk | contribs)<br />
Maybe we do need to lose some of our precious memories...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 09:48, 5 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Is barricading affected in dark buildings? ==<br />
<br />
Would you be able to resolve [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Talk:Dark#barricading_success_is_also_affected_by_dark this question], please? (i.e. is there an effect in dark buildings on barricading success?) --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 12:05, 27 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:As Midi said, you should try doing your own research on this inquiry first. It seems like you haven't even checked by yourself. --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 14:21, 27 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::It's based on chance - sorta hard to get solid evidence when it could just be called "bad luck". Sometimes you have to go to the source to find out if you're just having a shitty day or if it's some game mechanic that's actually stopping you from hitting all those zeds at the local RP... I mean... er...--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 14:53, 27 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:::Aeon, I ''did'' "check for myself"... As in. I've experienced it numerous times in-game... Then I went to Brainstock, asked around for a second opinion, and got one... But that wasn't good enough for you people... So I decided to ask Kevan, himself -- especially since Nallan kind of has a point, and since it's not easy to find the conditions to conduct the experiment... In any event, I managed to find a place to try it: I posted the results on the Darkness talk page. However, a quick word, yea or nay, from the designer really would be appreciated... Now... none of this "discussion" was necessary, not here, stop spamming this page, sheeesh. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 23:14, 27 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::::You typed more than the first three comments combined. And you complain about spamming? --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 01:31, 28 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:Yes, there is an effect. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 15:09, 3 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== theres 98 survivors in monroeville what now? ==<br />
<br />
what is going to happen now? is there anything left for the survivors other than to just run or make a last stand? is there anything for staying alive till the end. --[[User:Kazypoo1|Kazypoo1]] 19:13, 27 August 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
Stay alive I guess. --[[User:Federationtrooper|Federationtrooper]] 22:49, 27 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:umm the count jumped UP TO 100, what just happened? --[[User:Kazypoo1|Kazypoo1]] 03:50, 28 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::And it's 101 now. --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 05:44, 28 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:::Idled characters standing up, most likely. Hellooooo. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 06:11, 28 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::::Yes, idlers. So, will all characters be deleted completely? Should we make a last stand? What will happen to the accounts? Will there be permaneny links to the diaries, that can still be obtained after the accounts are deleted? Knowing the basic plan will help us figure out what we should be doing.--[[User:Kolechovski|Kolechovski]] 20:37, 28 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::If I recall correctly, at some point the game will be shut down. I mean ''shut down''. At which point Kevan has said that any donations on MV alts will be transferable to Malton. He has hinted that he might allow MV alts to be moved to Malton once it's shut right down -- although I haven't noticed anything like this in a while, maybe he's changed his mind? I dunno... My advice, personally is to wait and see... Possibly Kevan doesn't even know yet how he'll wrap it up. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 22:44, 28 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::I'm [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User_talk:Kevan#Monroeville_Characters pretty sure] that MV characters won't be transferable to Malton.--[[User:William Told|William Told]] 01:49, 31 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::Okay, but what will happen to the actual accounts though? What would happen if I tried to login with it after the map ends? Will the diary be preserved?--[[User:Kolechovski|Kolechovski]] 20:59, 2 September 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::Aren't they (donation tags) already transferable? i'm pretty sure they should be. --[[User:Duke Garland|<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>]] [[LCD|<nowiki>[</nowiki>]][[User talk:Duke Garland|talk]][[Signature Race|<nowiki>]</nowiki>]] 21:02, 2 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
Donations are transferrable, and accounts aren't - it was always going to be one or the other, and donations seemed more appropriate. Profiles and diaries will be kept in perpetuity. And given how little difference there is between shutting the city down entirely and leaving it open for zombies to mill aimlessly around in, I might just leave it open. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 15:09, 3 September 2008 (BST)<br />
:Fair enough? Any chance of us active zeds getting another tag in our profiles? Ive noticed those survivors still active have got one. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:49, 5 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
For what? --[[User:Deadblast|Deadblast]] 19:36, 5 September 2008 (BST)<br />
:It looks like this [[http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1147825]], one like ''blah was an active zombie one month into the 2nd quarantine. '' --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:49, 5 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
Again, I ask, "For what?" For staying active? --[[User:Deadblast|Deadblast]] 23:35, 5 September 2008 (BST)<br />
:Sorry. yep.--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 21:29, 8 September 2008 (BST)<br />
::You knew when you signed up that it was not going to be a permanent map. And you knew the basic rules of the game, as well. You ''knew''... Now, deal with it. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 21:57, 8 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== FAQs addition? ==<br />
<br />
I don't know why you haven't gotten around to it, but here you can even find a pretyped one to add. It's a quick, simple addition...<br />
<br />
http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Talk:Suggestions#Add_encumbrance_section_to_the_FAQs<br />
<br />
Also, I'm not trying to bother you, but could you check the bugs page and try to deal with some of those issues? I noticed my moved-outside reports already in the known bugs section, and that sounds like a creepy one that's been happening to a number of people. I also see a number of other bugs commonly happening, with no hint of what's going on. Thanks.<br />
--[[User:Kolechovski|Kolechovski]] 20:44, 28 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:Once again...[[PR_UI:_Sub_Pages#Tips_about_encumbrance|dupe]]. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 19:28, 30 August 2008 (BST)<br />
::That's why I wondered why he hasn't gottena round to it yet. It's been around a while, and it seems pretty needed.--[[User:Kolechovski|Kolechovski]] 21:04, 2 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Enough is enough ==<br />
<br />
I know you don't want to deal with this kind of stuff... yeah yeah yeah... But please just ''look'' at [http://zombies.dementiastudios.org/boards/index.php?topic=12.180 this post]. Just quickly... <br />
<br />
Enough is enough, already. '''Please''' ban open proxies from accessing Urban Dead, because this is just too common -- and if anything is going to kill this game and the community it's zerging. There is a massive level of frustration over zerging, though honestly it's not brought up because people are fatalistic, figuring you're not going to do anything about it. But there are people willing and able to assist with the coding, with helping to set this up, you just need to say "Yes" to getting the ball rolling. Please consider it, consider ''something''... Because it's a serious problem ((that is, the use of proxies). And, unfortunately -- unless there is something huge we are all missing -- it's a problem that your abuse detection algorithms just can't deal with... --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 12:55, 31 August 2008 (BST)<br />
:Just to add... This guy in the post I linked to likely had his alts banned, and just kept making more and more to replace them... which, if true, shows that algorithm works against ''"normal" multi-abusers.'' But when you're dealing with proxies, you can completely circumvent those algorithms. And that's the problem... Active players usually encounter at least a couple ''obvious'' "zerg teams" every week... And a lot more less obvious but suspicious ones... It's very frustrating for those who try to play "by the book"... And while we generally just "shrug and bear it", still... I'm not going to bother you with this anymore now, but I really felt it was high time to bring this your attention, and to speak out for the many people who are so frustrated by the prevalence of zerging in Urban Dead. Thanks for your attention. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 13:17, 31 August 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
I'm going to take the liberty of seconding the above on behalf of both the [[Ridleybank Resistance Front]] and [[Columbine Kids]], two fair-playing teams that I lead who encounter zerg teams weekly. Whether something comes of this or not, I just want to add our voices. --[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 18:38, 1 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
Ha. The only topic on the page not address by Kev on Sept 3. Come on man an least a reply saying you cbf would be nice...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:03, 5 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Sure, I'll take a look at any ideas or technologies people have got. I'm not aware of any silver bullets that don't also turn up false-positives for people on weird ISPs or who have a misleadingly-configured home network, but would be happy to be proven wrong. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 11:29, 5 September 2008 (BST)<br />
::Interesting Tangent: Speaking of silver bullets, i recently found out that all that stuff from days yonder referring to silver bullets and there use in banishing monsters is actually ambiguous as to if it's talking about actual silver, or mercury (which was known as quicksilver at the time). so yeah, you may in fact be unaware of any mercury bullets. Just keep that in mind when banishing foes.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:36, 5 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
There was a discussion on Beerhah.com about this... Where some people were attempting to seriously address the issue and then come to you with some solutions. Sadly, interest seemed to wane once Finis Valorum apparently left the game... However, I am going to copy what was probably the most relevant and hopefully most useful post in that discussion. As you'll see, the solution was not an algorithm and/or set of "suspicious" IPs, etc. -- which I gather was you were talking about above? Rather, the main idea it was using a list of known proxies and simply banning them. I actually think the wiki sysops have a pretty long list of banned proxies, for a start perhaps that could be used... <br />
<br />
And, no solution is going to perfect. There will ''always'' be holes, always ways around whatever measures you impliment. As the post I'll copy discusses. That, I think, is pretty well understood. However, the point is to make it as difficult as possible for people to cheat. Open proxies are just ''too easy'' to find and use... Now, I don't know if paying for a proxy list is going to be effective, or a waste of money, considering how much these things change, apparently -- that's something someone with the right knowledge would have to decide. Anyway, I'm place the text of the post on [[User talk:WanYao| my Talk page]] for you to look at. Thanks for your time. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 13:21, 5 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
Sadly, we've got no follow up response yet... Kevan, are you listening? Just as another case in point, look at this... yeah I ''know'' what you say... But just look... I think you need to... I don't want to be a "bitch" about this... But I am really, really hoping we can find some way to address the zerging issue, and this requires a dialogue with you... <br />
<br />
http://iwrecords.urbandead.info/09-12-08_2000hrs_PRIVATE/IN_7-1__644-f97-77b.html<br />
http://iwrecords.urbandead.info/09-12-08_2000hrs_PRIVATE/IN_8-1__0c7-19c-2b9.html<br />
<br />
LOLz at my insane typos notwithstanding (i meant "flayed alive") .... This is sadly typical... We see this stuff all the time: here, 4 alts, at least, 2 each in adjacent buildings, from someone with a whole slew of "mithra" alts, many more than these 4, many of them previously spotted together -- this guy is familiar to us... We've presented some ideas for dealing with zergs like this, there is a discussion on the [[AZM]] Talk page... Will you work on this? --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 21:08, 12 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
Kevan, please do this: community appointed UD moderators. These trusted moderators will ban obvious zerging reported by players. To investigate zerging only basic information is needed: history of when the zergs all logged in, and how long they've been around each other. 95% of zergers are stupid and lazy and will be caught this way. No permanent bans, just temporary ones. Enough to make the zergers life difficult. --[[User:Rupert|Rupert]] 19:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
:COMMUNITY appointed? You're joking, right? --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 21:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I'm kind of new, so forgive me if this is stupid... Am I correct in assuming that a lot of these zerg characters are level 1, or to a lesser degree level 2 that seldom level up or even gain XP but are used as scouts. If that's the case then I would think that any ''real'' account is going to gain XP and level up within reasonable time periods. If that's the case then would purging level 1 & 2 characters that don't level in say a month get rid of a lot of zergs? Or is there a legitimate reason for accounts within these parameters? --[[User:Mvario|mvario]] 01:59, 10 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:Most zergs (despite the name) do infact end up leveling up, check out all the [[GTFO]] zergs for an example. The one's that do stay at lvl 1 and 2 are throw aways that won't be used again anyway, so deleting them wouldn't have any effect except to free up the account name to be used by another player. And that is something Kevan has said he doesn't want as it would cause confusion. Also lol @ my post up there ^ from Sept 5.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:48, 10 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Last Major Change to this page? ==<br />
<br />
When was the last major change to this page made, the one where months pf posts were cleared off and the number of topics reset to 0 (I assume 0)?. What about the Suggestions Development Page, where the Overflow section used to be? I'm trying to find certain old stuff, and I need to know those important dates to do so...thanks.--[[User:Kolechovski|Kolechovski]] 21:07, 2 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
[[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Kevan&diff=prev&oldid=1241305]]This? You can chust check yourself by looking in the history tab at the top of each page. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 21:27, 2 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
:That link's no good.--[[User:Kolechovski|Kolechovski]] 21:00, 6 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
::There was a history purge so links to old edits don't work. However purges aside he's right, if you need to find an old version of the page use the history tab at the top.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:::When was the last purge anyhow? That would really help. Those do make thinsg confusing...looking for old stuff that's gone...--[[User:Kolechovski|Kolechovski]] 19:17, 23 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Dear Kevan: ==<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #800000; font-family: Times"><center>You may try to tear down our barricades, devour our friends and allies, destroy our home... But we ''will'' prevail. Your efforts will be met with the stalwart defense that Barrville has maintained for these three years, and with our community at our sides, you must eventually accept defeat. You will go down, Kevan... and we'll put you there. And we'll do it oldschool; With our fists, With our boots, with lead pipes...<BR>And yes, with Axes. We shall not be put down.<BR>'''We Are AXES HIGH'''<br />
<br />
E Cinerebus, Gloriam --[[User:Hardcore Rockabilly|Hardcore Rockabilly]] 16:13, 5 September 2008 (BST)</center></span><br />
<br />
:'''''HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!''''' [[User:The man|The man]] 20:31, 13 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Okay, I actually thought it was quite the honour to be eaten by Kevan... but none the less worthy of an overtly trenchy and overdramatic comment. - --[[User:Hardcore Rockabilly|Hardcore Rockabilly]] 20:46, 23 September 2008 (BST)<br />
==Database errors==<br />
We are getting some infrequent, but still painfully annoying database errors. Last night when i was trying to edit [[A/VD]] i couldnt because of them, and we lost two current revisions on a page [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User%3ASpacer_one%2FAthair_bas&diff=1270526&oldid=1270400 here] to them as well. Can you please take a look and find out whats going on? --[[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 21:51, 10 September 2008 (BST)<br />
:Noted. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 10:43, 11 September 2008 (BST)<br />
:It looks like we lost a handful of page revisions during the history purge; I'll look at restoring them this afternoon. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 14:08, 11 September 2008 (BST)<br />
::Okay, fixed, the handful of pages that were affected are stable now. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 23:25, 11 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==About the proxy issues...==<br />
this site: http://www.gmodtop100.com/ had a similar iddue which involved everyone giving themselves votes using proxyies from proxy.org Recently the website restted all the lists and when I tried to give hits to my gmod clan, I discovered that by some sort of meckanism they had managed to block proxies from being able to vote. I know they hadn't simply banned them because even my top secret proxy was blocked and I had never used it to access the website before. Maybe if you could get in contact with this "Pulsar effect" guy we could finally end this. [[User:The man|The man]] 20:31, 13 September 2008 (BST)<br />
:It's really not as simple as some people seem to think. Web-based CGI or PHP proxies, or even SOCKS/HTTP proxies, are merely the tip of the iceberg – anyone with any decent technical expertise or friends with same can bypass any proxy list you care to come up with. Sure, it might be helpful, but it won't be a silver bullet, as Kevan alluded to above. Either way, we'll need to continue with [[ZHU|community-based]] [[GTFO|solutions]], as well as any additional technological measures that may be implemented. And remember... {{cquote||It may well be doubted whether human ingenuity can construct an enigma... which human ingenuity may not, by proper application, resolve.''|Edgar Allen Poe}}{{User:Revenant/Sig}} 07:09, 15 September 2008 (BST)<br />
::And...{{cquote||Some things are not problems to be solved, they are facts to be coped with.''|Anonymous}} --[[User:Tselita|Tselita]] 17:23, 20 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Future history wipes==<br />
Would it be possible leave a few more months worth of page histories next time a wipe is done? It's making it very hard to evaluate and track deletion requests, vandal histories and the like when histories just weeks old are missing, making it especially difficult to determine who should have "ownership rights" of group pages. Loosing histories will always be a problem, but the problem can be lessened significantly if you could keep it to older edits <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[UDWiki:Image Categorisation|i]]</sup> 16:56 20 September 2008 (BST)</small><br />
:Or a portion of the oldest edits on a page(like the first 5 if possible).--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 02:42, 22 September 2008 (BST)<br />
::And maybe a backup for the suburb danger status, using that sql code i sent you last time... heh... too bad i only found out about this wipe weeks after it occured, or i would have asked you to make the backup before the wipe. Bugger. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]]</sup> 03:14, 22 September 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== I'm wishing for headshot.... ==<br />
<br />
maybe for those left in monroeville should have something, like headshot, cause look at whats left... [[User:Kazypoo1|Kazypoo1]] 19:53, 4 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:The problem with that is to use headshot, you need to interact with zombies. A lot of the zeds left metagame, and all you'd do is draw others to your location. So yes. Bring it back. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:33, 5 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::I agree, running from zeds is getting old. I imagine they must be pretty bored as well. If not perma-death, how about headshot drops AP to zero. Otherwise we'll continue this war of attrition. Also shouldn't we get new badges? It would be cool if we had an incentive to keep playing besides making the zeds look impotent.--[[User:Babe's Ghost|Babe&#39;s Ghost]] 01:02, 29 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== ALiM's Birthday Party ==<br />
<br />
You've been cordially invited to attend ALiM's birthday party at [[Club Head]] at 10am GMT on the 18th of October. Festivities will last for a full 24 hours. See [[Talk:Amusing_Locations_in_Malton#ALiM_PARTY.21.21.21|here]] for more details, oh divine master.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 02:15, 7 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Misconduct ==<br />
I figure you are already aware of whats going on [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct#User:Grim_s| Here] but figured you should be formally informed. The final decision of the community has not been reached, but the general consensus will at the very least include the Bureaucrat status being removed from Grim. More may or not follow depending upon deliberations. Thank You. [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[AZM]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 05:25, 7 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:You have provided no evidence of misconduct. This is absolutely ridiculous. --[[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 11:18, 7 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::Grim pipe down, everyone knows what you think and we also happen to know what Conn thinks. I can appreciate you're pissed off but can you not write the same boring ass one line all over the place, at least i nice tl;dr wall for old times sake ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:33, 7 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::Its not a boring arse line. Its a simple fact. All accusations of abusing the status of sysop as abadge of authority to force ones wishes on the community '''must''' come with '''clear evidence''' over a '''substancial period of time'''. So far no such evidence has been presented, and all my requests that it be have been soundly ignored by all concerned. --[[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 11:36, 7 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::Conveniently all such evidence was wiped by Kev yestermonth, so i guess it falls down to your word against his/theirs. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:39, 7 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::Evidence already posted would still be present, easily visible to all who try a basic search. In any case, as [[user:Revenant]] has said, this is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangaroo_Court Kangaroo Court], nothing more nothing less. My defense, which is logically sound, has been ignored, except where people have cherry picked points to troll. Saddam Hussein got a fairer trial than i am. In any case, without evidence, you cannot convict. --[[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 11:40, 7 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::<nowiki>*</nowiki>shrug*, shouldn't have declined my sysopship... ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:43, 7 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::You were unfit for the job, and your subsequent tantrum proved as much to even the most jaded of eyes. My job isnt to make friends, or to be popular, or to do what people want, its to do what the rules and guidelines of this wiki state is correct, and to make the best decisions for the wiki in places where the guidelines do not cover. I am the only person to have ever lived up to that responsibility. No one else has, though karek comes damned close. --[[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 11:47, 7 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::::oh come on, it was a joke! I thought even in your current state you should have picked it up. Feel free to slur away, hope it makes you feel better, xoxo. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:51, 7 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::::Im sorry, but one seldom finds entertainment when one is the victim of such obvious and gross injustice where one cannot do anything about it. I apologise. --[[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 11:54, 7 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::::::apology accepted, we shall see how it plays out...now, to leave kevan's talk page so he doesn't get pissed off and cancel my accounts!--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:59, 7 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:Yes, this page was already on my watchlist. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 11:37, 7 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::You gonna have a vote? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:39, 7 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
Contrary to Conndraka's first post, this is not a community decision at all. It is in fact a decision made by a small group of sysops. I trust the subtle difference and obvious deceit on Conndraka's part is not lost on you. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 14:59, 7 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
There being no official method or process of notification...[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct#Final_Ruling| Here] is the result. Note the community "petition" that is also currently attached to the position. There being no "Policy" in this manner, the impeachment of a sysop by the community is a nebulous proposal at best. [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[AZM]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 06:00, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:So that was you that thought that it would be a good idea to try to drive someone to vandalism as a last resort at neutrality? If it wasn't whoever added that petition should themselves be vandal escalated for misusing an administrative page to further a personal fight. Precedent matters.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 09:13, 11 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::Just for the record it was me who added the "petition" it was not intended to be used as evidence against Grim it and i thought it was pretty clear that I was asking for the communities opinion on wether Grim should face a vote. more than 1 person thought not.... apparently my intention was not clear enough and it turned into a petition while i was off-line. Should Grim have lost his Crat status? Probably... should he have lost it for the misconduct case? Absolutely not!--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 14:15, 11 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Bug, "zerg flag", or what? ==<br />
<br />
[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=951980 This alt] has recently tried searching for FAKs in a powered Mall with *no* success. 'Tis far more than bad luck... All other actions seem to working just fine, and I really can't see how a zerg flag could have been activated, even accidentally. Is this a bug, some unannounced change, or has a zerg flag somehow been activated? Anyone else had anything similar happen? But if it is a bug, then I'll report it normally... Thanks. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 05:09, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:Unannounced change, although you shouldn't be getting ''zero'' success. If it keeps up, report it as a bug and we'll get some more data on it. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 12:17, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::Can you post these things as news? not only are we in a news drought, but it'll send the mall rats scurrying to the TRPs...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:25, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::It seems a bit cheap to announce search tweaks as fully-fledged "game updates". There are some proper updates on the way. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 12:27, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::Perhaps, but it makes a difference. And considering it was suggested through the wiki suggestion system it'd a tip of the hat to the crowd over there (regardless of whether or not you actually saw that ;) ), i look forward to new updates :D something pro zombie perhaps? Things have quietened down in Malty as of late...btw kudos on the ruin update, she added a whole new dimension to the game.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:31, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::Oh good. I thought this was just me. I have been getting reduced search rates EVERYwhere. (Hospitals, Malls, NT buildings.) Quite a few days I've spend 18~23 AP in these buildings over a period of about 10~12 minutes and have found nothing at all. Recently I've used a mall-searcher and spent 20 AP in Caiger NW and have found nothing in any store. It woulda been nice to see this as an official update. [[User:Pakopako|Pakopako]] 14:35, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::Yay! Updates are ace. :D -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 17:47, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::Yes, please announce it or something. I was sad to find just 2 FAKs with 20 APs in a lightened mall with bargain hunting. Its just very less. First i thougt, it was bad luck, but others said the same too. Maybe a small view, what has been changed would be nice. --[[User:Paradoxin|Paradoxin]] 17:53, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::'''My search-statistics:'''<br />
:::::::'''Where:''' lightened Mall, searched in the Drugstore<br />
:::::::'''Skill:''' Shopping+Bargain Hunting<br />
:::::::'''APs:''' 38 / 47<br />
:::::::'''Found nothing:''' 30 / 36<br />
:::::::'''Found a FAK:''' 8 / 11<br />
:::::::'''Rate:''' 21,06% / 23,4%<br />
:::::::--[[User:Paradoxin|Paradoxin]] 18:18, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
Assuming there are no more break-ins at my safehouse, I'll post some data tomorrow. [[User:Linkthewindow|<span style="color: DodgerBlue">Linkthewindow]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Linkthewindow|<span style="color: DarkRed">Talk]] </span> </sup> 04:26, 10 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
Thanks for the reply, Kevan... No, you're right, haven't had a lot of time to play lately, but I tested it further and I did finally find some FAKs... And for everyone else... I believe I know ''exactly'' why Kevan implemented this. And it pleases me, personally, very much. :) Meanwhile, this wasn't a game-mechanic change, just a search rate nerf... Thus, I think it's cool it was left for us to discover on our own, and not as an announcement... Even if I had to resort to the cheap method of asking the big guy himself... ;) Though I did suspect it might be a search rate nerf, I just didn't ''dare'' to believe'' :D ... Thanks, Kevan, cool change... --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 07:01, 10 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:Oh... FTR limited data... but searching for guns in a mall ''seems'' the same as always... and syringe rates have been quite low for some time now... just to clear up statement made above about everything sucking... --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 07:05, 10 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
You know, there's a [[Search Odds|better place]] than Kevan's talk page to dump this data... --[[User:Midianian|Midianian]]<small><sup>&#124;[[User talk:Midianian|T]]&#124;[[Talk:Suggestions|T:S]]&#124;[[:Category:Recently Closed Suggestions|C:RCS]]&#124;</sup></small> 18:17, 10 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Coup II==<br />
I have regularly spoken to you of the abuses of adminsistrator and the flaws of the system. I have begged, and pleaded for you to become involved in fixing these problems. You have told me to do it myself. Tow/three days ago i notified you of my intent to stage a coup on this wiki and enforce a better way, at the very least as a trial run. I also informed you that you could call it off simply by telling me "no". Since you havent responded, and circumstances have cospired to make such an option impossible in the immediate future due to the very corruption that has taken root, i have been forced to go ahead earlier than i would have liked. I merely ask that you adopt a wait and see attitude towards what i am trying to do. This is my last throw of the dice. My last ditch attempt to make this a better place before i take my leave of this community forever. I apologise for the manner in which i had to bring it about however. --[[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 10:26, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:Hello Grim. I read your email as a bold request for ''permission'' to single-handedly institute "sweeping reforms" and selective sysop demotions. I didn't realise you were threatening to actually abuse bureaucrat powers and go ahead regardless, if I didn't respond quickly enough.<br />
:Yes, whenever you email me asking that I force through a change that you personally want implemented, I suggest that you take it through the proper channels - usually a policy discussion, to at least get some community feedback first. I don't see why you couldn't have done that here. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 12:17, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Coup==<br />
Could you please re-sysop all the people that Grim just demoted, please, and remove his bureaucrat status to avoid it happening again? <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[UDWiki:Image Categorisation|i]]</sup> 10:24 9 October 2008 (BST)</small><br />
:Already onto it. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 10:24, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::Thanks <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[UDWiki:Image Categorisation|i]]</sup> 10:28 9 October 2008 (BST)</small><br />
:::sooo....where do we go from here? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 11:31, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::[[Suburb Nicknames#West Becktown|PUSSY TOWN]]!--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 11:33, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
Shouldn't grim also have been demoted ? He can still do lots of damage with his sysop powers --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]]</sup> 13:41, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:Given the "effective immediately i am seizing executive power" tone of his bureaucrat abuse, and the fact that he claims to have left the wiki permanently, temporarily revoking his sysop powers seems fair enough, if only as a security issue. I'll reverse it should the [[Misconduct#User:Grim_s|new misconduct case]] decide in his favour. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 14:34, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
Hm... I think I may create a new subpage on my userspace containing as much of this stuff as I can. It will be interesting to read through and spot the points at which Grim became more and more frantic. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 14:27, 9 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
::First Katthew, now grim. There is no place for common sense is there? Maybe i'm not in possession of all the facts; all I see is one frustrated person finally snapping, after years spent as one of the very few sysops to actually work to make this a better place - rather than feather his own nest. The wiki has finally moved from being a source of information to some kind of passive-aggressive, UD version of Facebook. I'd rather have one person capable of making a mature decisions, unafraid to step on a few toes and deflate a few egos, than a gaggle of preening children. Disappointing. --[[User:Keith Drudgely|Keith Drudgely]] 17:58, 12 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::Grim was anything but "mature". Just saying. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 20:56, 12 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::you should talk, cyberbob... actually, i do think grim was someone who worked hard for the wiki... and he'd dealt with idiocy for so long, he did snap... however, if only he'd handled things better over the long haul... le sigh... for what it's worth, the drama has pretty much caused me to quit the game, too... pathetic how seriously some people (myself included) take all this sometimes... and interesting how easy it is to walk away when the bad taste gets to be too much, and how little you miss UD when you do... --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 10:36, 13 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::Biiig difference between being immature by choice and being immature by impulse, Wan. Also, WTF is with you and ellipses? --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 11:18, 13 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::~2 years till the next sysop snaps. I can understand where Grim was coming from though. It's very frustrating when people constantly attack you for no perceived reason, and eventually you *have* to snap, no one can sustain continued harassment. Grims misconduct case showed this, sysops calling for Grims demotion over something so minor was ridiculous. Unfortunately once a group of users has decided to attack you there's nowhere safe on the wiki, and eventually you are forced to leave until things cool off, which can be a long while, and difficult to do if you are a regular. - [[User:Jedaz|Jedaz]] '''- [[Signature Race|<span style="font-size:85%; color: #639">11:35/13/10/2008</span>]]'''<br />
::::::OR you could simply cease the unneccessary causticness that brought on all that ire and start acting with some degree of restraint rather than taking the easy route and trying to lay the blame on others. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 11:52, 13 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::Cyberbob's right, just because you weren't a victim of Grim's monster rampage doesn't mean it didn't happen. You should try to understand Jedaz, people didn't just rise against Grim for fun. We aren't idiots. If we were mindless idiots we would be playing Halo 3 and NFL 2009 instead of UD. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 11:58, 13 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::::It's called Madden you culturally ignorant fuck. Nah you're allllright. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:02, 13 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::::How dare you be here and not on IRC. You left me alone with those barbarians. >=[ {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 12:13, 13 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::::::sorry sorry! I was spose to go to bed 21 minutes ago...hows a week tonight for you? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:19, 13 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::::@Cyberbob - What kind of restraint are you talking about? Restraint of language? I don't see anyone else restraining themselves. Restraint of Sysop powers? Well there wern't any successful misconduct cases about misuse. If you are talking about restraining yourself once you've snapped then you must be laughing. Don't get me wrong, Grims attitude didn't help the situation, but people making a mountain out of a molehill doesn't going to help either.<br />
::::::::@DDR - What has Grim done since June to have this "uprising" occur? Personally I didn't see Grim do anything outside of his regular behaviour (ignoring this most recent case), and the community has known about his behaviour for a long time and still elected him! Would the community still have rised up if this didn't occur? If not then it's just an angry mob and it would have cooled down eventually, where as an uprising would still have occured.<br />
::::::::Anyway, if either of you wish to continue this conversation I'ld suggest we move this to my [[User_talk:Jedaz|talk page]] rather then clog up Kevans. - [[User:Jedaz|Jedaz]] '''- [[Signature Race|<span style="font-size:85%; color: #639">00:34/14/10/2008</span>]]'''<br />
:::::::::My point, Jedaz, was that if Grim was at all socially intelligent he would have realised that people weren't going to take his shit forever. If he wanted to prevent an explosion of the sort we saw he should've taken steps to improve his self-control. Blaming his completely unreasonable hissy fit (ZOMG IM GONNA LOSE MAI CRAT STATUS ALL MUST DIE) on the completely understandable reactions of everyone else is ridiculous. You need to take off the "I got yo back brotha!" goggles (you think I don't remember the circumstances of your demotion?) and take a step back to look at things realistically. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 06:37, 14 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::::::I supose you have a point. But I don't think you fully understand the reason I chose to be demoted (if you did then you wouldn't have brought it up). My point is if you don't have the support of the team you are working in then of course you are going to find it tough and eventually you are either going to quit or break. Nobody seems to care that it can actually get to this point. - [[User:Jedaz|Jedaz]] '''- [[Signature Race|<span style="font-size:85%; color: #639">02:20/16/10/2008</span>]]'''<br />
:::::::::Cyberbob's right. Do you actually have a personal history with Grimsky? He has been planning this entire explosion for a very long time. He probably stretched out the time of the case so it could build up to a bigger explosion. He deliberately did this for his own ego. And yet you don't think he was unfit to be at the position he was at? Why argue with us more? Ask the entire community which demanded what we demand right now. I don't want to disrupt Kevan (I know your reading hun =]) So I'll stop here, no need to pursue justification. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 10:40, 14 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::::::it was very calculated, there was a reason he chased away the other competent sysops, and crats, and meatpuppeted his crat "election". He was planning this "coup" for a while and was no lapse in judgement.--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 22:30, 14 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::I miss all of the good stuff. I believe what Anime is referring to is discussed [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Grimch_vs._Conndraka#Opinions/arguments/refutations/insults|here]], with a now dead reference to [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Sysop_Sub_Groups:The_Cheesy_Version#"With_less_than_10_active_sysops"|the original conversation here]]. You know, where he admits to hounding sysops such as Vista and Hagnat to get them to quit their positions. Coincidentally, after he got Hagnat to quit, he got elected as a Bureaucrat. No, obviously no long term plan in place.<br />
:::::::::::{{quote|Grim_s|Making a new sysop subclass wont solve this problem, all it will do is bloat the numbers of idiot sysops, which i have spent the last 18 months whittling away at.}}<br />
:::::::::::Whoops. I guess it ''was'' a long term plan to get into power after all, huh? [[Image:Haw.gif]] --{{User:Akule/sig}} 22:52, 14 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::No way to prove this but on IRC Grim would often criticize my "hissy fits" of pissing people off for lulz and then brag about how he could do it better. I think AS remembers it, he often hung out in #udwiki. My point, he planned this. That wasn't impulse. Impulse is "DELETE FUCKING EVERYTHING!!!" --[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]] <sup>[[DORIS]] [[MSD]] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91a8pHj7V9k pr0n]</sup> 23:07, 14 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::Maybe they are talking about on a geological timetable. Or perhaps some people need to [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/impulse%5B2%5D read more]. I do find it amusing that [[:Template:Grim Doom|this template]], which was meant as a joke, is closer to the truth than people like to believe. --{{User:Akule/sig}} 23:29, 14 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::He made [[User:Grim_s/Sandbox/Thingamajig|these notes on attempting to scrap the system]] back in July, which included the idea that my veto power was a "problem" and should be revoked. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 23:51, 14 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::That's kind of why I am confused how what [[User:Amazing|Amazing]] did was worse than this. There is a huge history of edits of Grim chasing users off of the wiki in order to attain the power he craved ([[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Grimch_vs._Conndraka#Opinions/arguments/refutations/insults|'''by his own admission''']]), then kicks off the rest of the sysop team to implement his changes when he is threatened, yet he doesn't receive the same punishment. --{{User:Akule/sig}} 00:15, 15 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::You're confusing yourself, because the Amazing and Grim situations are totally different. Amazing wasn't a sysop when he earned his permban through the established VB escalation system, and it was also a long, long time ago. Most of the sysops ruling on Grims case had nothing to do with the wikigate farce. Careful what you wish for, Akule, [[Witch Burners]] arn't that picky, as you well know <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:35 15 October 2008 (BST)</small><br />
:::::::::::::::Oh, okay, so talking with Kevan about how Grim probably should have been permabanned for chasing away several good sysops, plotting to remove Kevan's veto power, and overthrowing the other sysops results with veiled threats of forcing me off the wiki from you. Gotcha. So, when are you going to [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki_talk:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Amnesty&diff=next&oldid=1295384 "waah"] Kevan like you did Hagnat and the others? --{{User:Akule/sig}} 22:17, 15 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::I'm not threatening to force you off the wiki, Akule. I'm trying to point out that if witch burners always got their way, Grim would be out, but so would you, long ago due to copyright-gate. And why the hell would I Wah Keven, you clown... you're the one doing the waaaaahing <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:26 16 October 2008 (BST)</small><br />
:::::::::::::It's cos deep down (very deep, in some cases) we've all got a soft spot for ol' grimchy.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:12, 15 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::And the winner of the Speak For Yourself award goes to.... --{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 08:53, 15 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::Ooo! ooo! I'm a shoo in for this one! Pick me! Pick me! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:58, 15 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::Umm...Boxy? How is what Grim did similar to the Witch Burners? Our goal is to remove those who create mass amounts of drama on the wiki through vandalism, arby's, and other crap. We are the vigilantes that work where the sysops can't. Grim would have been a target of ours if we weren't so afraid of him banning us after labeling him a target. --[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]] <sup>[[DORIS]] [[MSD]] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91a8pHj7V9k pr0n]</sup> 22:25, 15 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::Well, I was referring to the way Grim has become a targeted witch, actually, but he did use similar tactics, now you mention it <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:26 16 October 2008 (BST)</small><br />
::::::::::::::::The problem Grim saw with Kevan's veto power was that Kevan's refusal to participate in the wiki and the absence of the threat of the use of that power was in and of itself damaging to the wiki and led to a lot of the crap that annoys all of us. It wasn't that Kevan had veto power but that Kevan wasn't willing to give that power any weight. You'd probably know that if you ever spoke to Grim outside of arguments.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 04:24, 16 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::I did. Usually it was go back to an argument, mostly over stupid shit. Mentioning you like Star Wars would result in a vicious attack on why TIE Fighters can't make noise in space. I for one don't give a shit. Grim loved to create trouble over stupid shit. --[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]] <sup>[[DORIS]] [[MSD]] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91a8pHj7V9k pr0n]</sup> 18:23, 16 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::That wasn't directed at you Sonny.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 02:54, 17 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::::::::::::::::BUT GODDSDAMMIT TIE FIGHTERS CAN'T MAKE A NOISE IN SPACE!!!!!!--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 18:28, 16 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::fcuk u tehy can 2!!1!!!1one! --[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]] <sup>[[DORIS]] [[MSD]] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91a8pHj7V9k pr0n]</sup> 18:30, 16 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::::::::::::::::: obviously the whole star war universe takes place in a particle rich nebula that allows for both the transmission of sound and the really spectacular explosions...DUH! [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[AZM]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 02:07, 17 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
Well at least we don't have Real Gamer ruling the wiki.Grim did make a joke about a coup earlier in 2008 around the time the the dead did their rampage I believe.And by the way, according to the History Channel,if you were in space,the Death Star firing and destroying a planet is as less loud than you clicking your computer's mouse.--[[User:Gamestriker4|Gamestriker4]] 21:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Coup Misconduct Resolution ==<br />
[[UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct#Resolution.2FFinal_Ruling| Resolution]] of the Misconduct case due to the coup, Just an FYI for official notification. [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[AZM]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 16:27, 12 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== HP? ==<br />
Just stood up after a revive... Found myself at 20 instead of 30. another one of these unannounced changes? [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[AZM]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 21:07, 12 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:That would be a bug. Report it if it happens again. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 20:24, 14 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
I like the NT scan tweak. Very classy. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:22, 14 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Grammar ==<br />
<br />
You try to add some corrugated iron to the barricade, but can't find a place for them.<br />
<br />
"Them" should be "it", or "corrugated iron" should be plural, so maybe "corrugated iron rods".<br />
<br />
Hope this is in the right place, and I know you probably don't care that much about small gramatical errors but someone needs to point them out!<br />
<br />
Feel free to downsize the image..I would but I need to run! {{User:Lemonhead7t7/Sig}} 12:24, 15 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
[[Image:Grammar.JPG|left|thumb|100px]]<br />
<br />
<br />
[[Grammatical Errors in Urban Dead]]. --[[User:Midianian|Midianian]]<small><sup>&#124;[[User talk:Midianian|T]]&#124;[[Talk:Suggestions|T:S]]&#124;[[:Category:Recently Closed Suggestions|C:RCS]]&#124;</sup></small> 12:34, 15 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
== Update ==<br />
I don't do this much and am actually on the side of criticizing updates as too much for false problems but this recent update has been something that has been long in the waiting. Thank You, this might actually get me playing my characters again.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 04:37, 16 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
I'll go along with that. Admittedly I'm far more easily-pleased than Karek and never stopped actively playing, but still, thanks for a great update. --[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 02:27, 17 October 2008 (BST).<br />
<br />
== Privacy Policy ==<br />
Hi kevan, is there any chance of a Privacy Policy being written up regarding players IP's and emails. --[[User:Thekooks|Kooks]] 18:58, 17 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:[[UDWiki:Privacy policy]] has been in the footer for a couple of years now. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 23:13, 17 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::Sorry I did not make it clear, I meant in regards to the game, not the wiki.--[[User:Thekooks|Kooks]] 10:39, 18 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Streetwalkin' cheetah with a heartful of napalm ==<br />
<br />
A ruffian headbutted me for 1 damage today, as a human. Is this a new addition or am I slow? I basically came here to ask, Kevan, how does one headbutt? Is it a random occurance that may happen instead of excecuting the punch command? Just curious. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 11:22, 18 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:Heh. That would have been me, non? Headbutt works via ?actions, i simply installed a greasemonkey script that allows me to perform said action in harman form without using the ?action. Sometimes young ddr, the only way to fight fire is well, with fire ;) . --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:50, 18 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::That would be biting with a mask while alive I assume. 'cause you can bite while alive but, for 1 damage.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 13:49, 18 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::Sounds like the shooting while a zombie cheat to me. That hasn't been fixed yet, has it? <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 14:27 18 October 2008 (BST)</small><br />
::::That was fixed just before April 1 this year, I remember because Red Rums April Fools plans were ruined.--[[User:Thekooks|Kooks]] 17:06, 18 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::::The only reason the shooting cheat got fixed was because enough people decided to whine about such a minor thing. No one really cares about this one and it's been known for a long long time. That being said the damage is reduced when trying to perform zombie actions while living, it's always punch damage and I think punch rates too.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 17:58, 18 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::::Nah no mask, just 1 damage.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 23:55, 18 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::I wish to lay claim to be the first person to be headbutted for 1 damage by a harman. Then I'll be positively famous. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 00:52, 19 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::You aren't. Unfortunately i'm not original, i got the script that allows me to do this off viktor, first person i know of who got headbutted was Fiffy i think, check with Anime, he'll know! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:06, 19 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:Take it to [[Talk:Actions via "question marks"]], thanks kids... no need to bother Kevan with this. Basically all these attacks work as a punch with different flavour: they're all 25% to hit, 1 damage. And you're very late to the party, I know I and others have been doing this for 6 months or more. Pretty much from around the time ActOnProfile came out. <tt>;)</tt> {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 03:34, 19 October 2008 (BST)<br />
::And unlike shooting while a zombie...the damage able to be inflicted by this is minimal. I've been bitten by a harman before. It was hilarious. ;) --[[User:Jen|Jen]] 04:15, 19 October 2008 (BST)<br />
:::Aha! That sneaky gorilla's secret is revealed! At last the world makes sense again. --[[User:William Told|William Told]] 05:09, 19 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
/topic. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 06:31, 19 October 2008 (BST)<br />
<br />
== so wait... new map? whats for monroeville? ==<br />
<br />
2 questions....headshot on this map or?<br />
<br />
and monroeville is at 260 poeple so im kinda wondering if theres anything left for it....<br />
<br />
[[User:Kazypoo1|Kazypoo1]] 10:22, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
:First question, the first one to level 10'll find out. Question 2, get over it, there's been nothing there for ages...new city thyme :D --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
:Kazypoo1, Monroeville ''did'' die quite a while ago, in case you didn't notice... I thought it said 'permanent zombification' somewhere, and it only lasts a month, so I'm assuming its perma headshot. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 10:30, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
::No, headshot doesn't mean permadeath in Borehamwood. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 10:35, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
Hello Kevan, quick question: The stats page currently displays the Monroeville numbers as {{udspan|(1023 standing survivors, 707 standing zombies, 43896 accounts created)}}. I take it this is Borehamwood numbers mixing with the old of Monroeville. So will we get separate stats for Borehamwood? - [[User:Whitehouse]] 14:44, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
:So. That's basically 950 survivors against 200 zombies at the moment? Still I liked getting the rage. It was fun. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 14:46, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
:Good point. Fixed. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 22:45, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
With the new locations such as railway line(s) and petrol station(s), what do they bring to the game? Is their any new weapons/items? --[[User:Alcatraz311|Alcatraz311]] 15:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Was this why the server went down last night by any chance? =P -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 22:30, 28 October 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Publicity of Big Brother house location ==<br />
<br />
Greetings. I, amongst others, would like to know your opinion on publicity of the Big Brother house location on the wiki. Should it stay hidden or be revealed? --[[User:Duke Garland|<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>]] [[User:Duke Garland/BHW|<nowiki>[</nowiki>]][[User talk:Duke Garland|talk]][[Signature Race|<nowiki>]</nowiki>]] 13:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
:Unless Kevan comes out and says otherwise, this is no different than any other location in the game. Removing it is in no way different to a group of trenchies removing [[Giddings Mall]] from the map in case [[MOB]] comes to visit. Information is free. Censorship is bad.<br />
<br />
:This wiki is a game resource, not a vehicle for censorship so that certain players can increase their chances of winning a DVD.<br />
<br />
:Also this information has already been disseminated to public UD forums and is available through public iwitnesses. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 13:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:Had this talk with the Big Man before, and he said he has no problem with it. Actually, he imagined its coordinates would have been posted in a matter of hours on the wiki, and also broadcasted through radio and stuff like that. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]]</sup> 13:51, 2 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:It's up to players how much information they share or conceal; I don't mind either way, in this case. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 17:15, 2 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Wow... as if we don't get enough of the BB franchise on the idiot box, now we get huge BB eye's looking at us as we attack a mall in Malton? <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:59 2 November 2008 (BST)</small><br />
:They'd only be there because someone chose to spraypaint them, but the graphic shouldn't have been showing up outside Borehamwood. This is now fixed. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 17:15, 2 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
::OK, thanks. I have a particular hatred of the bastardisation of the original "big brother" concept that involves housemates <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 10:56 3 November 2008 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
== Questions about your character ==<br />
<br />
I assume this UD ID is yours, correct, UD ID-11? Well, I'd like to welcome you to West Grayside, though I don't appreciate the eating of so many brains. Also, I don't appreciate the Ninja Zombie status you seem to give yourself. we all know the military covers up things, but covering up their own skills? I scanned your zombie, listed as pre-death class Military, but you lack any military skills! So is just a sick joke, or is it a bug? Picture of scan here:<br />
<br />
http://img440.imageshack.us/my.php?image=classyw6.png<br />
<br />
Thanks for checking.--[[User:Kolechovski|Kolechovski]] 21:11, 6 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:Damn, that's a pretty smart catch! Bub is pretty famous among organized zombie players, and most folks know him for not having any human skills, but I never knew he was a "military class" character, as I've never seen the "living" version of his profile.<br>I doubt its a bug; G. Romeroe's "Bub" character was military. {{User:Swiers/Sig}} 22:13, 6 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
::How did he get Military without any skills? .......... Oh wait.... Mad haxors skill... :P --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 22:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
:::Bweing god of Urban dead helped as well; being able to defy the laws of logic and the 4rth dimension and whatnot. Wait whats his human account?--[[User:Jakezing|Jakezing]] 03:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
::::So, what is his human account? --{{User:Lady Clitoria/Sig}} 17:00, 26 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::I don't think any of the survivor accounts are known, but we know he has them out there... Somewhere... --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Silver}}-- 02:41, 27 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=14 Kevan] doesn't seem to do much <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 03:11 27 September 2009 (BST)</small><br />
<br />
== Mediawiki Update ==<br />
<br />
Hi, just wondering if there any chance of getting wiki software updated? The latest version is v1.13 and there are several useful new features, including: <br />
*Expiry dates on page protections<br />
*Finer control over permissions and permission assignment (e.g. Assigning the ability to remove only certain groups)<br />
*Ability to merge page histories<br />
*AJAX-based page watching and a bunch of usability improvements (User information when viewing a deleted revision, predefined deletion reasons, useful links in various places, etc.)<br />
It's not urgent or anything, but it would be nice if you could put it on your busy to-do list :D.--{{User:The General/sig}} 14:19, 12 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
:That sounds pretty cool. =) Can we get it for Christmas? Means you'd only have to get us one present between us this year, saving you quite a lot of money. =p -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 18:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
:Image undeletion is enabled by default as well-useful for when sysops accidentally delete a useful image {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 07:31, 16 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Black Holes of Borehamwood==<br />
Evening. There's a couple of squares in [[Borehamwood]] that are seemingly unscoutable. Namely deep river sections. Can you confirm there's nothing mysterious and shiny hiding in the depths, islands and the like? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
:I'd just like to also say thank you for the charcoal briquettes barricade message. Brought a smile to my face.--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Amazing ==<br />
I'v always owndered for these 2 years; what in the hell DID amazing do anyways? What grim did is easy to see because of the publicity and recentism of it but what EXACTLY did amazing do?--[[User:Jakezing|Jakezing]] 04:36, 21 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
== Amount of characters in a broadcast ==<br />
I was wondering, Since I started the [[Galaxy News Radio]] i've found that the very small amount of characters you can use is at best, a thorn in my side, couldn't it be possible to make the transmission amount of characters the same as for speaking, it makes perfect sense really --[[User:An unlucky guy|Three Dog]] 21:35, 22 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
:If you want to make a suggestion for an in game feature, take it by [[Developing Suggestions]] and get some constructive criticism before putting it up for voting. Although as far as i'm aware the character cap exists to limit spamming of radio channels.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:49, 23 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
::Actually it's probably more of a necessary thing like the 50 people limit in normal speak is. Radio can't share that limiter because that would eliminate it's whole purpose so the only other ways to limit it is to put an upper end on how much you can say per day per channel.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 06:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
:::It's a possibility, but since character limits (as far as i'm aware) predates the need for limiting talking to 50 it seems odd.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:37, 23 November 2008 (UTC)<br />
Okie i'll take this to the development pages, thanks for the feed back though guys {{unsigned|An unlucky guy|11:00, November 23, 2008}}<br />
<br />
==Dead Set Competition== <br />
Can I assume that the prizes and all went off without a hitch so I can update the competition as a Past event? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:Yes, the winners have been selected and contacted, and talking to the cameras in the diary room no longer has any effect. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 11:18, 5 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Trade?==<br />
Sorry to bother you but I was wondering why survivors can't trade. This could lead to more eaisly avalible equipment, I think there would be a limit thou. Generators couldn't be traded etc. I think that it might help the humans in a bunch of Unbalanced claims. Players could not trade to same Ip address characters would stop cheating and it could lead to characters traveling round Malton selling there wares which would be fun to see. My regards it's a great game and I've got a bunch of my freinds playing now too. Thanks from me and them [[User:Athur birling]]<br />
:Heya. If you want to make a suggestion for an addition to the game you should go [[suggestions|here]]. In the meantime check out [[Frequently_Suggested#Giving_or_Trading_Items|this]] which explains why trading is generally seen as a bad idea. Anyway, welcome to the totally awesome UD wiki!--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
::The [http://www.urbandead.com/faq.html#trade FAQ] does hint at trading, but he also says it will take lots of thought. I imagine the coding would be nightmarish too. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 06:17, 7 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:::you know what link? you're alllllllllllllllllright.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 17:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Thanks {{unsigned|Athur birling}}<br />
<br />
==Making a list? Checking it Twice?==<br />
<br />
We getting a chrimbo update? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:53, 16 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Snow? ==<br />
<br />
Are you hiding it under your cap? Or NO SNOW FOR MALTON WINTER 08'? I miss mah flakie friends! --[[User:Sockpuppie|Jelly Otter]] 21:19, 17 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:[http://www.tshirthell.com/shirts/products/a841/a841.gif Al Gore was right]. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 21:27, 17 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
::I'd like to put in another vote for snow! I missed the fog this year at Halloween and the snow really added some nice flavour in my opinion. --[[User:Queen Mum|Queen Mum]] 00:57, 18 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:::Need moar snow. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 04:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== what, no more newspapers? ==<br />
they don't seem to be showing up in hospitals anymore. got rid of them, eh? any chance of them coming back, i love smacking people with 'em! :) --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 03:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:They should be somewhere else maybe? It was annoying with them in hospies. Luckily all ma guys have them already :) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
::Still plenty of places to find [[newspapers]], guys. lrn2wiki. <tt>:P</tt> {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 23:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::No, there are no more newspapers in Hospitals. I search them often, and not in ages have I found a newspaper therein. Update that wiki page? --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 10:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Same here. Seems safe to update. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 11:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== I can't smash Xmas lights??? ==<br />
<br />
Those darned Whos! I hate them!! But seriously, the option to smash christmas lights in a ruined building is not available. This is blatant discrimination against zombie scrooges. I protest! --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 13:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
:My apologies. I figured it out. :) --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 13:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Hi ==<br />
<br />
Hi, I'm a big fan. I finally found your talk page and I have a question, can you reinstall headshots in Monroeville as the humans think they can take down us zeds........--[[User:Jerrel Yokotory|Jerrel Yokotory]] 23:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Leaving nice messages for Kevan is fine, however we have a system for suggesting improvements. Please go to [[Developing_Suggestions|Developing Suggestions]] and suggest it there. --[[User:Thekooks|Kooks]] 19:31, 3 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Character Deleted == <br />
<br />
I wanted to make sure that this [[Fixed_Bugs#Teleport_across_Malton_and_level_0_account||bug]] was fixed but it appears that it is not fixed. If you are on the edge of Malton and go to http:urbandead.com/map.cgi?v=100-99 it will mess up your character. I did this with my charachter Yark and now whenever I log in I can't perform any actions with him, and it seems his skills have been deleted: http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=815674 --[[User:Thekooks|Kooks]] 20:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:No! Yark! =( -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 20:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Just replicated it by going from 0,99 to 0,100 in New Arkham with a random throwaway I just made: [http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1442227 Testy McTesterson]. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 20:46, 3 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::I hate to say it, I killed mister <span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=142058 password]</span>. After more poking, I have observed even more; Couple of AP and permadeath, I'm the first to go from Spicer Hills to Dakerstown instantly. I'll work out more details when my IP hits refresh, as I just used a proxy that I didn't much like. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 01:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::<nowiki>:</nowiki>'( --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:38, 6 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::password will live on. (and probably be revivificated) Also, what about 100-100? {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 05:56, 6 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::[[:Image:Testy.jpg|We're alive!!]] =D We're level 0 and we've got a zombie chewing on us, but we're alive!! -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 15:16, 6 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Fixed. I've dropped Yark into a random, secure building, and given the character 1000XP to get up and running again. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 15:05, 6 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:The bug? Or Yark? password and Testy are level 0.. The bug was interesting, odd behaviour, but it would be nice if after a server reset you could be free to move again. {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 18:21, 6 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::The bug. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 18:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Project Namespace ==<br />
<br />
we have few projects, yet i was wondering if it wouldn't be interesting to have them in their own namespace. Thus projects like [[The Great Mall Project]] and [[ALiM]] would be located in [[Project:The Great Mall Project]] and [[Project:ALiM]]. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 11:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I'm not sure if there's a way around it, but "Project" is a builtin alias for whatever the name of the wiki is (here it's "UDWiki"). e.g. [[Project:Administration]] is the same as [[UDWiki:Administration]]. --[[User:Midianian|Midianian]]<small><sup>&#124;[[User talk:Midianian|T]]&#124;[[Developing Suggestions|DS]]&#124;[[:Category:Recently Closed Suggestions|C:RCS]]&#124;</sup></small> 15:11, 9 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:: Darn, forgot about that. Maybe in the plural then, [[Projects:The Great Mall Project]] --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 15:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::That would just be confusing.--<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]], self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All</span> 00:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Just Plain Vanity ==<br />
<br />
Any chance of a {{Udspan|''' Dermot O'Leary was still alive and active one month into the Borehamwood quarantine.'''}} ? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 21:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== about the admin team ==<br />
<br />
how do you feel about the current sysop team of the wiki ? do you have any problems with how we run things ? --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 11:52, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:does he give a fuck? recent history would suggest probably not. Stop fishing for compliments hagnat. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:okay that came out a little harsh, but i don't see why you want to bring kevan into this other than for your own gratification. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Hedging much? --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:30, 15 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::It's pretty easy to predict what he's going to say. Why would he complain? You can't have nothing to do with your own games wiki then rock up and say 'i hate the way you people run it' and then disappear again. Unless he wants to get involved in the wiki again kevan ''can't'' say he has a problem with the way they run it. Although I'd be more than happy to be proven wrong. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Easier than that, last time someone asked him to weigh in on promotions his response was that he basically didn't want his opinion brought into the matter. So No Comment is probably the best bet.--<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]], self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All</span> 01:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Me? I'm just the guy who provides the hosting, here - I'll step in if there are server issues, or if a rogue bureaucrat locks the wiki down, but everything else is up to the community. If I wanted to have a say in wiki policy, or who should and shouldn't be a sysop, I'd already be doing that. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 15:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::J3D 1, haggy, zerrro. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Hey, he gives a fuck about how the community is run. He just won't say how much or what he gives a fuck about. :D --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span></small> 02:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
I think Hagnat's concerned for his sysop status. I would be too if I was a ''trusted user'' that was acting against the wishes of the community. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 01:41, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Stop right there Iscariot! I am sick and tired of you constantly saying that every sysop on the team is going agaisnt the wishes of the community! Most of the community never has a problem with the current admin team, and when they do it's rarely a huge problem. Now you come on Kevan's page and still continue the bad mouthing. Just face it, no matter what you will never be pleased with the administration and so you will constantly have to pretend that the whole community is on your side so that you will feel right in your head.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 01:45, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::How many people are there playing the game? How many are on this wiki? Yes, some people don't have time to spend on anything other than playing the game, but how many people are putting hours a day into the meta game and ''still'' won't touch this wiki without an exceptional reason? And how many of those people have told you that the current administration team is one of the primary reasons? My total ''will'' beat yours. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 01:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::The wiki is an information source. Almost everything is explained in game when you encounter it (1st death, 1st Rez. etc.) So, not every one needs to touch the wiki or even use it as a resource. <br />
::::The wiki is the worst place to organize and meta-game. Just ask DHPD. When we were just Project:T.I.M.E. (well, before the Dead/DoDH) we were seriously outnumbered by them, but because they had all of their profiles linked on here and updated where they were going to be and who they were working with and so on we knew enough about them to take them out. The wiki shouldn't be for the meta-game it should be for information. That's why most groups of note have an off site forum to metagame. You can't blame the current staff because people have figured out that giving away too much information on their groups is bad thing.--{{User:Nubis/sig}} 14:40, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::That has so little to do with what iscariot said.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 23:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Get it off Kevan's page. He doesn't need to be bothered with a dispute between users. Have it out on each others talk pages, or even mine, just don't start bringing it here. Okay?--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 01:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::I know, I'm sorry. I just wanted to counter Iscariot's comment because I know exactly what he's trying to accomplish by posting that. I, unlike Iscariot, am done here now.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 01:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Much as I hate the way Iscariot is going about his crusade I have to say he does have a point. The sysop team probably does not represent the view of even a large minority of players and that explains why so few players contribute. Not that i think its all the Admin teams fault, but the rules they follow and enforce reflect a community that no longer exist. Most sysops were promoted long before most current players even heard of the game yet the tag "trusted user" is still attached to the title "SYSOP". Few current wiki users vouched for them and fewer still of the actual player base and yet they still cling to positions claiming that "popular" votes undermine the system! They are right that popularity does not mean competence but... Franky i find it a bit odd that sysops can claim the label "trusted user" and not be willing to allow the community to confirm that label. Look back to Conn's promotion bid, or Boxy's or Hagnats or even Kareks and even without checking i can say with confidence that at least half those that vouched are no longer active.... Now i personally '''Would''' vouch for them all but my point is that they were not voted in by the current community and the claims that they are trusted users wear very thin in light of the fact that they do not seem willing to trust the communities opinion on pretty much any issue!--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::The sysop team doesn't have to represent the view of a large majority of players, it only has to represent the view of the wiki community. Whenever I play a browser game I don't always sign up to their forums/wiki/whatever they have. A large portion of users probably won't bother contributing to the wiki because so many other users already are. If I was to ask you, "what needs contributing to on the wiki?", I'm sure you probably won't have many answers. The only things of note are suggestions and suburb reports, and not everybody is interested in that (and the drama which comes with each of them). - [[User:Jedaz|Jedaz]] '''- [[Signature Race|<span style="font-size:85%; color: #639">02:26/16/01/2009</span>]]'''<br />
::::::I have a few, if you want a list feel free to pester me some time.--<span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Karek|Judge Karke]], self-proclaimed Decider of Everything and Ruler of All</span> 02:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::I agree that the only bits of the wiki that interest most players are the Maps, suggestions and suburb reports (I include maps because i assumed you had forgotten them?) that said i do think that the system is set up to support the views of long time players (contributors) rather than the new players who are actually the lifeblood of the game. While obviously the wiki needs to pay some attention to long time editors like me,wan,cyberbob,ahlg,etc... i would think it would be far more important to promote the wiki to new uers. I still play (and i hope/assume that those named do too) and i would hope that everyone on the admin team does to but it has to be said that without change the game becomes dull and people leave. If the wiki and its admin team does not reflect the changing demographic of the game it is missing what is surely a fundemental point for its existence?--[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 02:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::I remembered the maps, but I did not include them because there is very little to nothing which a new user can contribute to (which is what I'm focusing on). I agree, we should encourage new users to join and contribute, however most of the other work is maintence which doesn't exactly draw the crowd. If you have an idea which would encourage new productive users to sign up then I'ld like to hear it. I'ld be more then happy to help flesh out any ideas you may have. - [[User:Jedaz|Jedaz]] '''- [[Signature Race|<span style="font-size:85%; color: #639">02:50/16/01/2009</span>]]'''<br />
::::::::I think my wiki Urban Dead game could draw in some people to play. They could even make their own once I finish the template. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 03:41, 16 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Autoconfirmed group ==<br />
<br />
Hi Kevan. Just want to ask a quick question. We've had a couple of policies about setting up an autoconfirmed group recently and I thought it might be a good idea to check in with you about it. Depending on the result of [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Autoconfirmed Group Trial|this policy]] would you been willing to implement an autoconfirmed group on the wiki as a trial to see how we get on with it? -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 14:58, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:No problem. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 15:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Thanks. =) -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 16:02, 17 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
== Quick Questions ==<br />
Sorry to take up your time, but I'm just wandering what you think of the games on the Related Games page. (ie, Nexus War, Shartak, Outbreak, etc). Also on Shartak, Leaky Blocks (It's creator) said that you encouraged Shartak's developement and that you play shartak. Is that true?--[[User:Gamestriker4|Gamestriker4]] 15:34, 19 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Shartak's the only spinoff I've played, and yes, Simon/Leaky is an old friend of mine. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 17:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Why no chainsaws ==<br />
<br />
:''content moved to [[User_talk:Jakezing|Jakezing talk page]]''<br />
<br />
== Updating the Wiki software, 2.0 ==<br />
<br />
The wiki software, as it stands, is two years old (ish, in the coming month.) As well as the obvious bugfixes and minor changes that can't be gone into detail here, 1.13.3 of MediaWiki has some useful new features that we could use:<br />
*Expiry dates on page protections<br />
*Finer control over permissions and permission assignment (e.g. Assigning the ability to remove only certain groups)<br />
*Ability to merge page histories<br />
*AJAX-based page watching and a bunch of usability improvements (User information when viewing a deleted revision, predefined deletion reasons, useful links in various places, etc.)<br />
*Image undeletion enabled by default<br />
*A prettier [[Special:Specialpages|list of special pages]] (compare to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:SpecialPages Wikipedia's])<br />
<br />
There are heaps of other changes-you can look at the release notes linked [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/News here]. I know that updating the server will take some time, but it would be nice if you could add it to your busy schedule.<br />
<br />
<sub>I stole some of that list from [[User:The General|The General]] above</sub><br />
<br />
--{{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 07:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:Would this increase information between the server and peers= server load increase? {{User:Liberty/Sign}} 12:49, 30 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I don't think so. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 17:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I can't see how it would, but I can't say for sure. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 00:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:It's on the to-do list. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 16:31, 31 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Awesome, thanks.--<font face="Pristina"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Suicidal Angel -</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 16:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Thanks Kevan. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 00:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
What's your view on adding extensions to the wiki? I'm not talking anything specific here, just in general. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 23:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Xmas ==<br />
<br />
Xmas is over, and there are clearly no more Xmas decorations or trees, but the update message was not changed, and there is still the option to hold onto Xmas decorations if found. Perhaps removing that option (and next year posting when Xmas is over) would be helpful? Thanks.--[[User:Kolechovski|Kolechovski]] 13:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Don't take away my Christmas trees... --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 21:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Christmas trees have been a vehicle for meta-challenges and games when they do pop up. It's fun flavor even in the middle of the year. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 01:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:The [[Christmas Tree Dead Pool]] and the [[Christmas Tree Dead Pool II]] are a couple examples. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 03:32, 11 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::In sounds like you guys think I am requesting trees be removed altogether. I am not. I mean, the announcement still exists on the main page about the trees and light being available, even though they no longer are, so I am suggesting cycling the announcement to something "current".--[[User:Kolechovski|Kolechovski]] 22:09, 12 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Snow ==<br />
<br />
Perhaps I have missed something, but did the livestock and industry prevent snowfall last winter? {{User:Dr Cory Bjornson/Sig}} 22:56, 11 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Misconduct Case Feb 2009==<br />
A user has brought a case over on [[UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct#The_Entire_Sysop_Team.2C_excluding_Kevan_and_.22Urbandead.22|the Administration: Misconduct page]] that indicts every member of the administration team except your personal account and the Urban Dead admin account also controlled by yourself. Due to the obvious problems with ruling on cases in which you are also a named party, none of the current administration team may rule on the case (that is if they conform to the community's policies). Would it be possible for you to quickly look over the case and either rule misconduct or not misconduct to prevent unnecessary fall out? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 17:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Pretty sure Kevan isn't going to buy into this shit fyi --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 18:06, 12 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I think you're mistaking me for Read. Fact is, that case is going to sit there for a couple of weeks whilst you and he debate the finer points of whatever it is you discuss. If an involved sysop (as they all are) removes it then we're asking for drama. Kevan can spend five minutes and solve the whole thing for the community, even if he just states that he declines to get involved and rule, which will obviously mean that the sysops cannot be found guilty of misconduct and this will allow the case to be archived. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 18:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::I may have to agree with Iscariot here. Getting Kevan to say something, anything, will be the only way to end the case without pissing off Read and causing him to file another misconduct case to whomever is the sysop responsible for breaking procedure and then causing a '''huge''' wave of drama, and we all know he's chomping at the bit for something truly substantial to hit the administration with.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 18:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::The amount of drama someone causes is only as much as everyone else allows them to (I wasn't mistaking you for Read btw Iscariot; I wasn't intending to implicate you whatsoever). If nobody feeds the troll he will eventually starve to death. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 18:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::My opinions on Read, yourself, the sysop team and Santa Claus aren't involved here. The simple fact that allowing the precedent of an involved party to remove a case shouldn't be something we're striving for. Personally I'd rather have Kevan rule, and I think we all know which way. However provided that Kevan publicly responds in some way, even if that response is ''"I'm not ruling, I don't get involved"'', then we have a way to remove the case validly. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 18:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::kk --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 18:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Read was irrelevant, he wouldn't have continued it and Iscariot has no intentions here but to try and cause said drama. It's what he always does, jumping on something someone else made and perverting it for his own attempts at causing needless drama and faux rebellion to stroke his ego that the sysops who punish him for his actions aren't trusted by the community. The validity of the case was never relevant to his trying to stir shit, neither was the legitimacy of any action a sysop could take in response to it, to him it's all gonna be called abuse. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 04:14, 13 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Not seeing any reason to get involved here; either the misconduct system is poorly worded, or it's being misinterpreted. You shouldn't be able to accuse all but one sysop of misconduct, and allow that one sysop to judge the rest. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 23:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::yase, justice have prevailed --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 23:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Possible Massive Zerging in Dunell Hills ==<br />
<br />
About three days ago a large number of new characters all called "TheDeadDie" (i.e., TheDeadDie1 http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1467702, TheDeadDie15 http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1467737, etc.) started appearing in Dunell Hills. The first the DHPD heard of it was this iWitness report.<br />
<br />
http://iwrecords.urbandead.info/02-10-09_2000hrs_PUBLIC/IN_5-36_zergertown_a5d-400-1db.html<br />
<br />
There are now, apparently, over 100 of these characters.<br />
<br />
Obviously there is an outside possibility this is a large group of new players but, on the whole, it looks like zerging on a massive scale.<br />
<br />
The DHPD are currently trying to find out more about the situation and deal with it. We thought we should give you a heads up, however, in case there was something obvious in the server logs that would provide definitive proof of zerging and allow swift action to be taken at your end. We understand that you normally prefer to keep out of zerging cases, but this looks pretty outrageous to us and we thought you should, at least, know about it. [[User:Louise|Louise]] 11:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Aye, [[HKL]] ran into this bunch as well and were pretty put-off. [http://iwrecords.urbandead.info/02-11-09_0200hrs_PRIVATE/IN_5-36_Dead_Zerg_Rush__a51-c5d-8a0.html Another iWitness] with even more of them crowded in. Profile search for [http://profiles.urbandead.net/index.php?name=TheDeadDie* TheDeadDie*] shows 102 of them at the moment. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 12:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::zergs like that are usually a flash in the pan. 10 bucks says they all idle out before level 3--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 15:56, 13 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Possible big ass Zerg in Yagoton ==<br />
<br />
Ok: We have ALOT of Fing lvl 1 free runnerfs hiding in St. Swithuns (which i am guessing you know is a revive point), its caded thanks to the idiots trying ot take over: and I'm guessing this mass colection of lvl 1 free runners (they all have free running only) are bots? They all joined around the exact same time as well.<br />
<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471315<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471341<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471355<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471480<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471498<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471519<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=163604<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471488<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471501<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471488<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471358<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471347.<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471324<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471331<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471350<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471366<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471492<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471504<br />
*http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1471367<br />
:Those are the links, srry bout stretching but i forget which one tabs it into a Number.<br />
::Heres a picture of them all in one area. http://i43.tinypic.com/2lwr7k1.jpg<br />
:::Srry bout the mess this is making on the talk.--[[User:Jakezing|Jakezing]] 01:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Take the list to resensitized, that's about all that you can do. --[[User:Johnny Bass|Johnny Bass]] 05:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::One question about that picture. Where'd you get a version of UDToolbar that works with the latest version of Firefox? --{{User:Blake Firedancer/sig}} 08:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::I just downloaded one? What's different about it? Also theres even more zergs now.--[[User:Jakezing|Jakezing]] 13:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Jake, unlike how some folks would be I'll be nice here...Kev doesn't do anything about Zergs from info received on the wiki. as a matter of fact Kevan doesn't do a whole lot unless there was a significant amount of community input via the suggestions page and even then it is at his leisure. The Zerg issue is pretty much handled by other folks on the resens list and even then its pretty catch as catch can. [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[AZM]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 19:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::No wonder UD fail so hard.--[[User:Jakezing|Jakezing]] 00:39, 18 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::As many have said before, if you don't like it, then leave. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 00:42, 18 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::I think he has sadism issues, as we try and try to get him to leave, but he always keeps coming back for moar abuse. It's sad really.--<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Suicidal Angel,</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 00:53, 18 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::You can tell me to go but that doesnt give you the power to make it happen.--[[User:Jakezing|Jakezing]] 04:37, 18 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::I'm not telling you to leave, but it would probably be a good decision if you think UD fails. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 15:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::That's masochism, not sadism. --{{User:William Told/Sig}} 01:36, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Random Request ==<br />
<br />
Next time you create a new city, any chance of bringing back the junkyard and wirecutters combo? Cheers. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:28, 20 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:+1. I have to admit to being bitterly disappointed to find open junkyards in Monroeville. :'( {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 11:24, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==TOU/S==<br />
Do we have a Terms of use/service page? I've been looking for a while, and I don't seem to see one. It'd be nice if we did, because then we'd know things that are expressly forbidden due to hosting issues and the like.--<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Suicidal Angel,</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 16:06, 21 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:If you cannot find it: it does not exist.--[[User:Jakezing|Jakezing]] 22:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Oh piss off. No one is fooled by your act, so please just fuck off. Kevan? Do we have a list of things that are forbidden due to country laws, hosting issues, etc. or not (Not necessarily meaning it's available on this site, but one that you know about that pertains to the wiki)? I mean, yeah there are a few "duh" sort of ones, like no kiddie porn and stuff, but others I have no idea about. Any help?--<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Suicidal Angel,</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 01:50, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::[http://whois.domaintools.com/urbandead.com This site] (domain tools,) says that [http://www.as29550.net/ this] is his ISP, server located in England. The ISP has an "Abuse of TOS" email address, so presumably they have a TOS, although I can't find it. I have no idea about English law. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 02:00, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::From time on another, more combative, site I have a layman's understanding of British Law as it applies to defamation, slander, libel and the nature of physical threats and illegal actions that appertain to the settlement of the aforementioned. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 02:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::A brief education by the University of Google finds no such laws relating to death threats, but I would imagine that such a law would be buried deep in things like criminal codes. If it comes to it, I'll ask one of my teachers about the (Australian) legal system when it comes to these things, or one of my parents (both lawyers.) That said, that's ''Australian'' law, but our law is pretty similar to that of the UK. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 02:23, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
::::::Back in the Day Xoid and I had to do some research on the TOS because of a user abusing in serious violation of them. However I've gone looking and haven't been able to find the references anywhere still on the Wiki. It was probably on a talk page of some article that was deleted in an edit without being archived. The primary gist of it was this... any form of intimidation that went beyond a certain level of namecalling and usual wiki BS was a violation, ESPECIALLY if it included "real world"<sup>tm</sup> threats of harm or violence. Also included were any situation where hosted domains were used to damage the effectiveness of another website or host (as an example you couldn't use any part of the host to launch a d.o.s. attack on another domain. Not that this was really possible by anyone but Kevan. Also iirc the Wiki and the Game were on different hosts at teh time but I'm pretty sure that has changed since then. I don't know. I was never the techno-savant of the group and my memory is hazy. [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[AZM]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 05:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::Thanks Conn, that's a little bit of what I'm looking for. Just waiting for a response from the big man about all this now.--<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Suicidal Angel,</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 13:30, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::::I also thought we had some basic terms on the wiki somewhere, but maybe we don't. The Poundhost terms of service are [http://www.poundhost.com/tos/ here]. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 13:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::::::Thank you, I'll start working on a page for the wiki.--<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Suicidal Angel,</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 14:14, 1 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Semi-protection|Semi-protection]] ==<br />
<br />
...Was approved. I think all you have to do is change the autoconfirmed group to 1 week and 25 edits. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 02:51, 28 February 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Going to update the config, it turns out that [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgAutoConfirmCount $wgAutoConfirmCount] needs a later version of MediaWiki; this will either have to wait for a MediaWiki upgrade, or be reproposed without the edit count. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 13:42, 1 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::We'll wait for the MediaWiki upgrade, there's no hurry. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 17:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== [[Wiki_Questions#Time_Travel?|Time Travel]] ==<br />
<br />
Hey Kevan, we've just had a very weird thing happening with the edit histories. Where you trying to do something or was it just a bug? {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 00:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:No, I wasn't around at the time, I've no idea what that was about. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 10:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Okay, thanks. I'll do some poking at the Mediawiki help files if I have time. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 10:42, 3 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Ever gonna update the game? ==<br />
<br />
a lot of people are quitting the game.it's because you won't update the game. you need to push for 2-3 updates per month. i'm telling you so your game does not suffer. please update the game for the people's sake--[[User:Jerrel Yokotory|Jerrel Yokotory]] 23:28, 14 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:How many games do you run, Yokotory? --[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 00:21, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Well I do run track and Cross-country. I ski on the weekends.Do you run at any games or track meets?--[[User:Jerrel Yokotory|Jerrel Yokotory]] 00:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::No, rowing and weights are my sporting loves. The difference is that I'm not telling you how to run or ski, whilst you are trying to tell Kevan how to run a game which is heading toward four years of lifespan without once having had your help. --[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 00:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::I refuse to believe that Jerrel wasn't being a smartarse there. The concept of him actually taking your words in that way for real is just too retarded for words. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 06:19, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::He was kidding wasn't he?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:29, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::I believe they call it intentional misinterpretation, an example of me employing that very device is on either Boxys or kareks talk page, something to do with alim and hagnat...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::I was faced with the choice of believing that he's either cripplingly unfunny or a functionally illiterate retard. The evidence all pointed to 'Retard' so I went with that and answered as though serious.--[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 12:27, 16 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
No, I'm telling him that his game is going into despair, whilist he is doing nothing about it.--[[User:Jerrel Yokotory|Jerrel Yokotory]] 00:48, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:And you're also telling him how to 'fix' it, which amounts to exactly what I said. Care to back up your claims? How far have numbers fallen in the last six months? --[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 02:46, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I really don't think a 'lack' of updates is the reason for dropping numbers. I'm not 100% sure the balance of some of the more recent updates is quite right but that isn't my call. But the game doesn't need a barrage of updates coming out every other month. The slow progression of the game over time gives it longer life than having quick fix after quick fix to keep people with low attention spans happy.--[[User:DI Marc Sweeny|DI Sweeny]] 01:16, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::The numbers seems to have stagnated, actually. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 02:49, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
I'd like to thank you Kevan for taking your sweet time in updating the game. It's making it a little less full of people entirely incapable of self-motivation, thus making it more fun. Kudos to you sir. -- {{User:BlackReaper/sig}} 01:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Acctully Kevan is my idol. kevan is a good person for what he's doon.--[[User:Jerrel Yokotory|Jerrel Yokotory]] 02:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Isn't this the dude who nominated himself for sysop after 200 edits? Yoko, do you think you could whip us up a cross-country and/or track MMORPG? Because that would be ''awesome''. Throw in some chainsaws, too, and maybe some crucifixes that shoot laser beams. You would totally show up Kevan! --{{User:Paddy Dignam/sig}} 04:10, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Okay, Now you all think I'm a retard. Sorry for pointing out what everyone else could not see. Sorry for pointing out the obvious. Most people in this game, (the ones who are not sysops or bueruekrats, pardon me)would agree with me a think this game needs a freakin update. I take cybertonics and Coding as a special class at GU and I know it's hard to code, I've tryed it. But Kevan IS A TRAINED SPECIALIST. He could redo this entire game in a half hour if he wanted too. sooooo, whays a 1 UPDATE PER MONTH? is that so hard to ask?????<br />
add a new weopon, new builing, something. Please.--[[User:Jerrel Yokotory|Jerrel Yokotory]] 17:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Last year kevan gave us 18 updates including 2 new cities. Give him a rest. {{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::And most all of them had someone complaining about the game being made harder or more complicated. A few legitimately, most because it screwed with their status quo. I have absolutely no clue why he would want to take his time between updates.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 18:47, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Making an update is a '''lot''' more than just coding it. The balance needs to be thought of thoroughly and it needs to be tested. These things take time. Sure, Kevan could probably push out ''one update a week'' if he wanted to and wasn't lazy, but those would be unbalanced and buggy updates. Unbalanced and buggy updates are more likely to drive people away than a lack of updates. The game simply doesn't need to change every month, not even every couple of months. If you find the game boring, ''go and do something interesting and different yourself''. --[[User:Midianian|Midianian]]<small><sup>¦[[User talk:Midianian|T]]¦[[Developing Suggestions|DS]]¦[[Suggestions|SP]]¦</sup></small> 09:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Yeah. Lots of rushed, unbalanced updates would simply destroy the game (and it has nearly [[On Strike|got to that point]] before.) {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 10:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Finally someone who agrees with me!!! Why drag out updates?--[[User:Jerrel Yokotory|Jerrel Yokotory]] 21:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:"the ones who are not sysops or bueruekrats" - Just so you know, I'm neither. Carry on. -- {{User:BlackReaper/sig}} 01:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I'm actually the only sysop to comment in this conversation - and I did it [[Talk:Main_Page#Out_of_date.3F|here]] (with the exception of Karek, who'll be [[A/DM|demoted soon.]]) {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 10:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I find myself in the middle of this arguement, in terms of the two sides. On the one hand, I don't want Kevan to break the game balance every week, fix it and then break it in a different way the next week, but on the other I feel that an update is about due.<br />
<br />
Besides, I think an update every two months or so isn't much of an ask, even if its just adding an item from the PR suggestions. --{{User:Blake Firedancer/sig}} 10:53, 16 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:Can we please close this topic? Everyone wants to say something about Jerrel's ridiculous statement but I don't think it's worth the spam that it's leaving on Kevan's page. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 12:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Im sure on the 1st of april there will be an update. usually is! {{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:21, 25 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
Hey!!!! Everyone that wants an update should get together and go on strike!!!!!--[[User:Jerrel Yokotory|Jerrel Yokotory]] 17:51, 26 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Stop talking now. A strike for something as lame-assed as this is nothing short of pitiful. You are awarded no points, and may God have mercy on your soul. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 02:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
[[Image:Update.JPG]] because i had already done this and it seems a shame to waste such a half assed effort. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 00:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I agree with both sides of this. I believe we need updates BIG TIME, but I also believe Jerrel has no right blaming Kevan. He's probably a busy man. As for a strike: No. Plain and simple. Now, can we stop spamming Kevan's pages please? Kthzbye. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 03:12, 27 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br><br><br />
::What do we so badly need an update for? The game is well balanced and has a fairly complex and robust play. More fiddly little detail skills likely won't improve that play any, and won't draw in / hold onto more players. {{User:Swiers/Sig}} 06:40, 18 April 2009 (BST)<br />
Why won't Kevan Reply back to this?<br />
<br>I know i was being kind of offensive to you Kevan, so sorry.<br />
<br> But would you mind telling me WHY you won't update the game?<br />
I mean, you gave us two new cities last year!<br />
<br> and i appriciate it, but the game hasn't been updated since 2008!<br />
so, if you don't mind, i would really like to hear what you have to say.<br />
<br> (And please don't flip out on me, even though I have been a jerk)<br />
<br> And i'm also apologizing for being a jerk too.--[[User:Jerrel Yokotory|Jerrel Yokotory]] 01:33, 16 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:Making new cities brings in motherfuckin' cash money. Adding skills and what have you doesn't. Comprende? --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:28, 16 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:We had an update just 15 days ago! --[[User:Midianian|Midianian]]<small><sup>¦[[User talk:Midianian|T]]¦[[Developing Suggestions|DS]]¦[[Suggestions|SP]]¦</sup></small> 08:55, 16 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
WE DID NOT! LOOK AT THE FREAKING UD START PAGE! NO UPDATE-PREHENDA?----[[User:Jerrel Yokotory|Jerrel Yokotory]] 04:18, 18 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:Erm, the [[April Fool's]] Day update, the one that happens every year? My god you're dense. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 06:01, 18 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<nowiki>*facepalms*</nowiki><br />
<br>Sorry kevan, i usually get all my updates from the game.<br />
<br>nothing unusual happened to me on april 1st though.<br />
<br>i think i'm losing myself.<br />
<br>I AUTHERIZE TOPIC SELF-DESTRUCTION!--[[User:Jerrel Yokotory|Jerrel Yokotory]] 15:52, 18 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:In a word: Fail. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 19:59, 18 April 2009 (BST)<br />
::He spams Kevan's talk page with so much crap I want to take him to VB... {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 00:36, 19 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:::I still say kevan should get some people to help him run the game, its rather fun and large for one person ot have to run alone. Oh and I'm not saying me, no I'd abuse it by banning a 4rth of the game and making revives harder again.--[[User:Jakezing|Jakezing]] 23:58, 23 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Donated Characters == <br />
Any chance that the "This character is no longer affected by the IP limit." banner that appears on your profile if you have donated $5 could be shown to everyone that visits the profile, not just the owner of the profile.--[[User:Thekooks|Kooks]] 18:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:exhibitionist. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:28, 26 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
::And proud.--[[User:Thekooks|Kooks]] 18:46, 26 March 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::I think there's people who would not want that. Maybe if it was an option you could allow / turn off via settingas? {{User:Swiers/Sig}} 05:39, 18 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:I'd have it say "This character has been donated for.", but really, it's basically just showing off – link to your wiki page from your profile and [[Template:Donated|show off there]]. Oh, and I think you meant to post this in [[Developing Suggestions]]. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 08:12, 20 April 2009 (BST)<br />
:I would totally come back to just pk people who have donated.--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 04:37, 26 April 2009 (BST)<br />
::You've left?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 16:17, 28 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Standing Zombies ==<br />
<br />
Kevan, I can't find the topic from last time around, but the borehamwood stats. Standing zombies means literally that doesn't it. Active zombies with greater than 0 hit points? Not just active zombie characters? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 22:52, 28 April 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Question about the last Update ==<br />
<br />
"Survivors are once again looting the long-abandoned seasonal storerooms of the city's shopping malls, to find lights and trees for their safehouses." I'm assuming Christmas season in Malton is really long then, just wondering what kind of in game explanation we could use, --[[User:Jakezing|Jakezing]] 00:01, 1 May 2009 (BST)<br />
:"The snow has subsided and survivors are ready to feel bad about themselves again". Not that an explanation matters. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 03:11, 1 May 2009 (BST)<br />
::No, it's just5 that it seems awkward ot explain why we are still getting christmas trees in the middle of spring thats all: and we might wanna get a explanation, or kevan could take them out in a mini-update.--[[User:Jakezing|Jakezing]] 01:52, 2 May 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Where to suggest technical issues? ==<br />
<br />
I have gathered [[User:Tumu/GameTech|a list of technical issues]] which might need a look (as they have been unfixed since 2007), but they don't exactly fit the bug reports page either (not user visible/annoying issues). Would this be more appropriate place to get a review for them? --[[User:Tumu|Tumu]] 09:26, 25 May 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:They do seem unlike those that go to [[Bug Reports]], but I think the best place ''would'' be to take them there. I'm only suggesting that however because no one else has given you any direction, and I apoligise for that. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 10:57, 28 May 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Noted; there do seem to be a few weird oversights in there. Thanks. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 13:14, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
::Speaking of weird things, is it intentional for Flesh Rotters to get the benefits while alive? I'd have thought that since they were alive, their flesh wasn't rotting, so they wouldn't get the Flak+Body Building effects while alive. I'd like to know, because I'm going to make a suggestion to have it that way if its current effect is intended. if it's not intended, then this can be moved to Bug Reports. Thanks.--[[User:Kolechovski|Kolechovski]] 22:41, 2 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Bub's in danger! ==<br />
<br />
Just so you know, a page dedicated to your character [[Bub]] is up for deletion. --{{User:Blake Firedancer/sig}} 10:51, 28 May 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Yeah kevan please come and save that great page...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:20, 29 May 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== A few things ==<br />
<br />
Firstly, about that MediaWiki upgrade. Sorry if I'm pestering you, it's just that it would be quite useful (an upgrade to Checkuser would be nice as well, I've seen screenshots of a later version and it looks like it streamlines the process a little.)<br />
<br />
Secondly, a user asked me the other day (a few weeks ago) about a problem he was having in my chatbox:<br />
<br />
{{Quote|VI|Link, I need haaaaalp! I'm trying to make a shoutbox, here. The problem: when I, to get rid of the horizontal scrollbar, use "overflo*w:auto" instead of "overflow:scroll" the wiki's spam filter won't let me use that code. I don't know if you can edit the spamfilter (I'm wiki illiterate), but do you know how I can fix this? Thanks a ton. VI 22:05, 3 May 2009 (BST)}}<br />
<br />
I confirmed it myself, and wrote<br />
<br />
{{Quote|Linkthewindow|Hmm... that's really odd. I can't edit the spam filter (at least not what I know of,) but I need to as Kevan about something {*cough*MediaWiki upgrade*cough*) so I'll ask him then. For future reference, I'll need this [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Anti-spam_features page]. Linkthewindow Talk 22:29, 3 May 2009 (BST)}}<br />
<br />
Finally, and on a pedantic note, would it be okay if you could turn the Guides namespace into a proper one? So [[Talk:Guides:Shelter]] is rendered as Guides talk:Shelter. As far as I know, there are a few in the Guide: namespace too, so we'll have some moving to do if this is done (sysops, of course.)<br />
<br />
Thanks for your time. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:58, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:I second this nudge.--<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 13:03, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:"over<nowiki></nowiki>flow:auto" is a standard spambot trick for hiding all their links in a 1px div, which I think we were having trouble with a few years ago. The filtering is possibly hardcoded somewhere.<br />
:If there's general support for another namespace, point me at the discussion and I'll add it.<br />
:Updating MediaWiki is on the list, but below "update the actual game" at the moment. I'll fit it in when I can. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 13:12, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::Okay, then thanks. It's not a big deal about the spam filter, I'll start a discussion at [[Talk:Guides]] (although I can't see it being a big deal) and thanks about the upgrade. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 13:15, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
Kevan will doo it! Also, happy very belated birthday (13 May?) assuming your Amazon wishlist is correct!<tt>:D</tt> --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 18:24, 1 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:Oh, and don't [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Semi-protection|forget about this]] <tt>;)</tt>. And happy belated birthday! Only one month late. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:24, 4 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Suggesting Suggestions Change ==<br />
<br />
I want your opinion on a proposed change I have to the Suggestions Layout. I’d think it would be more efficient to have a normal suggestions area, a clothing suggestions area, and a humorous suggestions area, all with links listed one after the other on the main voting page. I also see the humorous suggestions layout is a bit confusing, and I would recommend splitting it into 2 parts, the funny and the non-funny, then splitting it into the many categories (areas of effect) under each heading. I’d also ask if the humorous suggestions voting process would become something similar to the normal process, with each suggestion open for 2 weeks, but no SPAM votes (just FUNNY or NOT FUNNY). Would this be a viable option? I’d think the layout changes should at least make it easier to find and view them all.<br />
<br />
I would also like to know if there’s a process for suggesting that certain stuff be added to the Frequently Suggested section on the main voting area. There seem to be some common ones I’d like to have added to the list.<br />
<br />
I also have a question about the normal voting process that only you can answer. Does SPAM=STRONG KILL? I see it’s still a common issue today, and it’s still debated if you can vote SPAM for a strong kill, or only vote SPAM if a suggestion is game-breaking or horribly unnecessary. Also, could you check the voting guidelines section and make sure it matches whatever your decision is? Thanks.--[[User:Kolechovski|Kolechovski]] 22:46, 2 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:In too many years of wasted time here I don't recal Kevan ever directly commenting on suggestions (or indeed much of anything else) so I doubt he is going to start now. Personally I wouldn't worry about where a suggestion heads just so long as its not unjustly '''SPAMMED''' and that's pretty rare. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 00:51, 3 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::He does things every once in a while, when it actually requires his attention. Normally his hands off approach works pretty well because we manage to handle everyhting.--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 00:58, 3 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Okay, well, what are your takes on this then?--[[User:Kolechovski|Kolechovski]] 18:11, 23 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Huge Ruin bug could leave the whole of [[Borehamwood]] caded in less than a month. ==<br />
<br />
Hey Kevan, <br />
<br />
Wednesday night a member of my borehamwood survivor group did a very large suicide repair, when he logged himself back on, he found he had 50ap and the building was repaired.<br />
<br />
Thursday night, I attempted my own suicide repair and yet again the same thing happened.<br />
<br />
We've done a lot of suicide repairs and as such we know that these were the highest repairs we have attempted. And they both worked. To check our findings, we asked another survivor to repeat the experiment, to confirm our spadework was correct. <br />
<br />
It was. Not only that, but this survivor was able to enact the repair, recade the building to ehb and then enact ANOTHER suicide repair, which left them BACK on 50ap. In fact the survivor managed to repeat this 6 times. With one character. In one day. Before the 300 IP for one character kicked in. <br />
<br />
At this time 4 of us survivors know the exact technique, but at least 10 others are pretty close to working it out (AP levels etc). I reckon by sunday all 51 survivors will have worked it out.<br />
<br />
As it stands the whole challenge of surviving borehamwood is moot. We can't do coma repairs on 99% of buildings without this happening, and Im not expecting zeds to hang around with this giant loophole. It also destroys the smugness us survivors have from surviving for 6 months. <br />
<br />
All 4 survivors who do know the trick have currently stopped repairing buildings within the range, but I can't control the whole population.<br />
<br />
At the minute survivors could repair the whole of NE Borehamwood, Radlett or Elstree in a day, 1 survivor could reclaim the big brother house on their own, <br />
<br />
Apologies for the lack of screenshots, but with permadeath as it is, we don't want to give away our position. <br />
<br />
It seems to be a dupe of the following case on bug reports. http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Bug_Reports#Massively_negative_AP_causes_AP_reset<br />
<br />
Apologies for posting it here, but I felt the game breaking nature of this bug warrants the intrusion. Let me know if you need more details. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 16:40, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:Thanks. Building repair has now been temporarily disabled in Borehamwood and Monroeville, while this is fixed. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 16:46, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::When you say massive repair, do you mean it's bringing you to under -255 AP? I could think of some weird wrapping thing happening when the AP gets too negative and it tries to make it positive or something, capping at the 50 AP norm. 255's the magic number for how large a single byte can represent. It's may have something to do with what type of data Kevin's storing AP with - integer, double, float, etc. (whoo edit conflicted by Kevan) --{{User:BobBoberton/sig}} 16:49, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::The cutoff point (Now its banned) is -150ap Any suicide repair that takes you below this value creates the reset. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 16:51, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::::Very strange... -150 to 50 is a range of 200, nothing particularly significant. Then again, I have no idea how Kevan coded AP regen. Now the big repair costs have come back to bite in an ironic kind of way, eh? :P --{{User:BobBoberton/sig}} 16:53, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Its quite a wide range. Theres probably been only a handful of such building in Malton's history. Borehamwood has a whole cities worth. If it takes a while kev can we have an amnesty in the cities? Those pesky zeds are always chewing on our cades. I wouldn't mind but I've only got one life. :).--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 16:55, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:This bug has now been fixed, and repairs have been enabled again in the other two cities. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 17:08, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::Thanks Kevan! Swiftly done I must say. May all your future updates be bug free.--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:10, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
::Twenty minutes... I'm hella impressed. Thanks for fixing this. --{{User:BobBoberton/sig}} 17:18, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
:::Wut? But half way up are the oldest posts, then they go up, then they go down... Thsi page is confusing ...--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:51, 12 June 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Pointless [[Borehamwood]] request == <br />
<br />
Can we have a public broadcasting system too? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:57, 3 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Thanks for updating ==<br />
<br />
Just wanted to say thanks for updating the game, I realize it's probably not high on your list of priorities. I'm sure everyone who plays appreciates it. --[[User:Mike411|Mike411]] 00:25, 4 July 2009 (BST)<br />
: Same here, Thanks Kev --[[User:Imthatguy|Imthatguy]] 04:41, 4 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== [[Known_Bugs#UDToolbar.2FDiagnosis_display_error|This bug]] ==<br />
<br />
As promised, I'm just giving you a heads up regarding [[Known_Bugs#UDToolbar.2FDiagnosis_display_error|this display error]] that happens when UDToolbar interacts with the new update. We suspected it was a clash between the UDToolbar's manual HP colouriser and the new update colouriser, and Moonshine was able to go through some code to try and give you a hand. You may have already seen it, but hopefully what Moonshine and others have done can help you. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 14:27, 6 July 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Grammar Error==<br />
Just so you know, there's a grammatical error in the Fort Transmitter broadcast message:<br />
<br />
''You broadcast [message] on 25.97 MHz, the using the fort's secure channel.''<br />
<br />
It isn't going to break the game or anything, but it does make it look a little... 'sloppy'. --{{User:Blake Firedancer/sig}} 21:54, 5 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:There is a page to report these [[Grammatical Errors in Urban Dead|here]]. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 03:30, 6 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Fixed. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 09:18, 6 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== [[UDWiki:Open Discussion/Borehamwood How Was It For You?]] ==<br />
<br />
Community opinions on Borehamwood Collected in one place. Hope it helps with future projects. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:07, 13 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Something that might give you a laugh... ==<br />
<br />
Here I was bored and tired so I wrote this, I thought it might be funny and I think you may find it even more so given it's nature, [[Developing_Suggestions#TUCOK_-BBHHN-_.28The_United_Churches_Of_Kevan.29_-Blessed_be_his_holy_name- (The United Churches Of Kevan) -Blessed be his holy name-]] -[[User:Devorac|Devorac]] 09:16, 24 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Upgrading the wiki again ==<br />
<br />
It's about that time of year. The wiki could use an upgrade, among the various features mentioned many times in the past that upgrading to a more up to date mediawiki version would provide as of [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Release_notes/1.14 1.14] there is now a NewUsers log, which would be invaluable for catching throw away and vandal alt accounts like [[User:Izumi]] and [[User:3pwv]] used to use along with actually making user efforts to be welcoming like [[Welcomenewbie]] accountable and possibly useful. [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Release_notes/1.14 1.14] also brought in the ability to view deleted user contributions(instead of just the current ones) for sysops, the ability to omit diffs after rollback, and a fix at least one particularly exploitable checkuser bug that would allow users to screw with the ability for sysops to search the logs.<br /><br />I'd mention some of the features in previous version updates but I'm sure by now you're pretty well aware of them as it's been brought up many times in the past. [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Release_notes/1.14 1.14], though, would significantly increase the ability for sysops to do their jobs when dealing with actual page vandalism and adbot spam along with helping the wiki, in general, run more smoothly from day to day.<small>([http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Release_notes/1.15 1.15])([http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Release_notes/1.14 1.14])([http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Release_notes/1.13 1.13])([http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Release_notes/1.12 1.12])([http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Release_notes/1.11 1.11])([http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Release_notes/1.10 1.10])</small>--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 17:40, 1 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== FYI re: "satellite phone" ==<br />
<br />
Hi. So I recently wrote a Greasemonkey script that adds a "satellite phone" to the game. It's a simple messaging system with a user interface that embeds itself into the game, by modifying the rendered page in the user's browser, as Greasemonkey does. The thing does resemble the in-game mobile phone quite a lot, by design. Here's [[DSS Satellite Phone|more info]].<br />
<br />
This was discussed in Brainstock [http://s1.zetaboards.com/brainstock/topic/2220895/], and some people complained about it. It was said that this unbalances the game, "overpowers" a game item, bypasses game rules by e.g. allowing zombies to send messages. This wasn't a general opinion--I certainly find it all a bit silly--but someone then suggested that what should be done would be reporting it to you, letting you decide if this extension is improper somehow.<br />
<br />
I thought that was sensible, so I'm "reporting myself," in a way. Just posting it here as an FYI, so you are aware of this. Cheers. --{{User:Hashk/sig}} 09:15, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:Sounds like the same kinda nonsense that would see forums done away with for everyone that isn't a survivor. That thread reads very much like the person who started it did so with that intent in mind. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 14:00, 4 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:: Hey that was me! I started that thread, you can clearly see my name :-( , I just started it as someone mentioned it in game and I was wondering about peoples views on it thats all.---[[User:Mightyoak|<span style="color: ForestGreen">mo</span>]] [[User talk:Mightyoak|<span style="color: DarkGreen">ヽ(´ー`)ノ </span>]] <sup>[[MCM|<span style="color: DeepSkyBlue ">MCM</span>]] [[MOB|<span style="color: DarkMagenta">MOB</span>]] [[Dribbling Beavers|<span style="color: SaddleBrown">DB</span>]]</sup> 06:35, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::karek i have ''no'' idea what you're talking about whatsoever.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:18, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::''"bypasses game rules by e.g. allowing zombies to send messages"'', the whole thread cited is mostly a few people complaining because they don't like metagaming, not particularly even regarding the tool in question. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 05:19, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::That being said, email tends to get a better response rate/time from him depending on the title/content/sender. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 05:24, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::Right, cheers Karek. Thing is, I'm not really expecting a response, and I'm not comfortable spamming his mailbox with this. I really do think this is all rather silly. I'm sure the game will survive my script long enough for him to read this at his convenience here. --{{User:Hashk/sig}} 06:14, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::From the sounds of it, it's just a script that facilitates metagaming. Like using MSN, or as we do, IRC... except done in-game. There's nothing zerg-tastic about it, nor does it collect data in ways that might be perceived as unfair, like DEMON or UDBrain. There's no reason to worry about what some git on Brainstock said (and BS is chock full of gits...), don't sweat it --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 06:20, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
:::::::Wonder what they say about us :*( --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|Chartreuse}}-- 07:15, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
::::::::They don't think about us, because they're not aware we exist. Most BSers really aren't too aware that there's a whole big world of UD players outside their little board. Well, ok, I think many are vaguely aware that zombies have this forum called bar-something-dot-something. And I think most of them are aware of the DEM subgroup called Red Rum; but this subgroup was created to give the appearance of in-game competition, to get around Malton's strong antitrust laws, so it basically counts as part of their self-enclosed milieu. Finally, many of them have used the wiki, but none of them will ever admit it, it's ''that'' taboo a subject. But other than that, to BSers, there is little other than BS. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 07:25, 5 September 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Birthday==<br />
<br />
Hello Kevan. No one pestering you on this page for over a month? Crazy. Just wondering if you were planning anything for [[Borehamwood]]'s big first birthday? Its only 2 days away after all........--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 21:19, 26 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I know! Blow it up! --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 21:26, 26 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Nuke the Big Brother House! Finally, some reality TV worth watching. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 21:33, 26 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Or halve the size of monroeville everyday. No one would suspect that! --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 21:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::-Let alone notice it. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Indigo}}-- 02:28, 27 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Kill anything and everything in Malton. That would be a TRUE surprise.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 02:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I'd be interested to see if survivors could recover. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 05:29, 27 October 2009 (BST)<br />
::Of course we could! It would take about two weeks, but we could easily do it. If you wan;t ill explain on a talk page other than the big bosses. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 21:29, 27 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Tommy guns. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 22:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Halloween update timestamps ==<br />
<br />
Seem to be missing on the new kill messages [http://iwrecords.urbandead.info/11-01-09_0100hrs_PRIVATE/IN_62-14__954-071-ba1.html example] also confirmed broken without any extensions/scripts {{User:MoonShine/Sig}} 02:43, 1 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:I realise this may very well be a feature of the halloween event but with the changing of the kill messages the missing timestamps are a bit strange, just making sure you're aware {{User:MoonShine/Sig}} 04:24, 1 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Actually, it's not just a lack of timestamps. I've noticed that all of the ones that lack timestamps are also for people that are not at my location. For instance, in [http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v196/Anubis_IV/urbandead/halloween_change_bug.png this screenshot], the ones with timestamps are for people actually at my location, while none of the ones without them were people at my location (there were more actions under those, but they all had timestamps and were for people at my location). It's also interesting that some of the groups of events that took place repeat themselves a few times, and that "to talk" showed up as a contact of mine, despite the fact that he isn't. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 05:23, 1 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::<s>i'm guessing it's part of the halloween event thingy, i thought the implementation of the weapon name killings screwed up because there's no period or timestamp following but now i think about it it actually makes sense to neglect them if you're going to mass fake kill people... OHEY IS THAT SOMETHING SHINY OVER THERE *runs* {{User:MoonShine/Sig}} 06:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)</s><br />
:::This doesn't seem to be like april fools where everything is just a joke but rather quite the serious bug, they're actual events happening elsewhere in the city {{User:MoonShine/Sig}} 11:23, 1 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Fixed. Looks like there may have been some minor echoes from kills elsewhere in the city. It was a bug, but consider it an eerie halloween event. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 11:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Could I have a clarification, please? This bug didn't create events but some simply appeared in a different location from where they actually occurred. Correct? --{{User:Lois_Millard/sig}} 12:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::As it was a bug, I can't be 100% sure. Don't kill anyone over it. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 20:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::Awww, man... Alright, then! *grins* Fair enough! --{{User:Lois_Millard/sig}} 05:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Question about Malton ==<br />
<br />
Is Malton considered a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_borough metropolitan borough] and a city similar to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchester Manchester] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liverpool Liverpool] or is it considered a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_county metropolitan county] with each suburb being a metropolitan borough? --{{User:Akule/sig}} 22:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Leave it to Akule to bring up a question like that. :/ --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 22:57, 12 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::I always thought of it as a city state. Like, I don't know, Monaco or something. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 23:06, 12 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::The same wiki that gives you the examples also gives the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malton,_North_Yorkshire answer]. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 23:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::...yes, but I didn't think the fictional city of Malton was actually the real city of Malton. You know, based on the fact it is nothing [http://www.ryedale.co.uk/ryedale/malton/malton.html like it]. --{{User:Akule/sig}} 23:46, 12 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:::Well, there has been hints that it was based in England, but I was just curious to know how much of it was based on being located in England. --{{User:Akule/sig}} 23:46, 12 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
::You've never thought to know more about Malton? ;) --{{User:Akule/sig}} 23:46, 12 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::D'eh...MAYBE?!?--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 23:56, 12 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Borehamwood throws up even more questions, as being based on dead set IT IS based in england. Borehamwood has no gun stores in its shopping centres, and only 2 railway stations and supermarkets, so it would appear Malton IS somewhere different. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:29, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Strike time==<br />
<br />
I am hearby requesting a striking of a ban from my vandal record as i have reached the requirements as per policy. I will be placing this request on an assortment of your peers talk pages so as to insure that this time, my striking isn't mysteriously postponed so as to further tarnish my record despite no wrong doing on my part. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:46, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Oh you dumb ass. :/ --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 15:46, 14 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Update-ah==<br />
So, what's the word on the updates being done to the wiki? Just making sure you don't forget ;) --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 18:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Oh you dumb ass >:| {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:45, 18 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Are you in support of the Copenhagen Summit?==<br />
<br />
Bascially I'm asking if we're having snow this year. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:43, 18 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:It's on its way. And I'm fairly comfortable with the carbon footprint of a zombie apocalypse. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 12:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::Cheers. I was wondered that the server itself was snowbound, swindon being as cold as it is. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 12:29, 22 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::Just realised how badly this might screw perma death survivors. Hmm. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 12:32, 22 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::Hmm. How long is '''temporary''' Kevan? How many hours do they take to fade? Also some of the fields in permadeath cities don't look that snowy. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:17, 22 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::I can confirm this. Only one of the field colours has turned white.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 17:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:::::It's random, but averages to six hours. Fields should be fixed now. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 17:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::::::The fields are fixed.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 17:48, 22 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
:Any chance of bloody snow for outdoor deaths? --[[User:Johnny Bass|Papa Johnny]] 02:26, 23 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
::it exists check it out [http://iwrecords.urbandead.info/12-22-09_2100hrs_PRIVATE/OUT_15-78__210-11a-044.html] "thick snow splashed with blood" "Blood <br />
soaks into the snow." --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 02:50, 23 December 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
== urbandead.org ==<br />
<br />
I presume you have probably seen this but it looks like a phishing site for peoples log in, just thought I inform you of it incase you want to take action.--[[User:Mightyoak|<span style="color: ForestGreen">mo</span>]] [[User talk:Mightyoak|<span style="color: DarkGreen">ヽ(´ー`)ノ </span>]] <sup>[[MCM|<span style="color: DeepSkyBlue ">MCM</span>]] [[MOB|<span style="color: DarkMagenta">MOB</span>]] [[Dribbling Beavers|<span style="color: SaddleBrown">DB</span>]]</sup> 01:37, 15 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
: If you check out the "revive que" there are [[MoB]] members as well as this gentlemen [[User:GasCandle]] who is banned from editing the wiki. I didn't dig much further into the "revive list" once I saw that gentlemen. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 01:52, 15 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:: I looked a little further and the /whois looks made up http://whois.domaintools.com/urbandead.org which is why a few people have mentioned it might be a scam. --[[User:Mightyoak|<span style="color: ForestGreen">mo</span>]] [[User talk:Mightyoak|<span style="color: DarkGreen">ヽ(´ー`)ノ </span>]] <sup>[[MCM|<span style="color: DeepSkyBlue ">MCM</span>]] [[MOB|<span style="color: DarkMagenta">MOB</span>]] [[Dribbling Beavers|<span style="color: SaddleBrown">DB</span>]]</sup> 02:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::The person who created the suspicious website has changed it. If you want to see screenshots from before it was changed, or see his explanation, see [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning#User:Ripf22|the A/VB case]]. --{{User:Jasonjason/sig}} 22:27, 15 January 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==[[Spawning]]==<br />
Just finished writing an article on it. I have a question that I can't really find out from spadework. If there were no Necrotech's in Malton below Heavily Barricaded, where would new Necrotech Assistant's spawn?<br />
<br />
Also, UD is still only copyrighted until 2009 and I discovered a grammatical error I posted on the relevant page. Thanks. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:19, 1 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Typos fixed. Under the current code, NecroTech staff would just start on the streets somewhere. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 08:54, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Cheers fearless leader. I wish you well with the April 1st update. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 08:56, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Hey, lazybones! ==<br />
<br />
When the fuck are you going to get around to fixing the Goddamn game? Love 'n' kisses --{{User:Katthew/Sig}} 08:21, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
While you're at it, try to get urbandead popular again, the number of active characters is starting to drop below 20000, maybe it's time for some advertising, eh? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 15:54, 7 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Urban Dead might be popular if it wasn't such a broken game! What with the radical, nigh-unplayable imbalance that makes it utterly pointless to play a zombie. Oh, and that worthlessness carrying over to making it such a breeze to play a survivor. I mean there's absolutely no point in being a survivor when you can just stroll around the city without risking your neck. I mean even a large, dedicated horde of zombies (of which the game has, like, ''two'') can't hold back one tenth their number in survivors.<br />
:For a zombie apocalypse game, there are fuck all zombies and there is fuck all apocalypse. The only way anyone really has fun is either griefing or sitting around roleplaying all day. And who the fuck can grief properly when the game is a buggy, unfinished pile of shit that makes it literally impossible for one of the sides to win? Not to mention that if all you're doing in game is roleplaying, what's to stop you from just doing it on a forum? Oh wait, nothing whatsoever, which is why the fucking unofficial forums for this game have more action than the game itself.<br />
:Urban Dead is broken, Kevan shows no interest in even ''looking into'' the billions of problems it has, so you're better off closing your browser and playing Left 4 Dead or something. Y'know, that's the zombie apocalypse game where the survivors face a credible threat that can't simply be trounced by locking a door and pushing a vending machine in front of it. '''FIX THE FUCKING GAME.''' --{{User:Katthew/Sig}} 07:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Have you chaps considered that you're horrifically ungrateful for a ''free'' game that's meant to be a 5 minute distraction? --[[User:Karloth_vois|Karloth Vois]] <sup>[[¯\(°_o)/¯]]</sup> 20:54, 9 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Some of us have actually given money to this game, by the way. It's not unheard of that people do pay for things online. If he removes the DONATE button then maybe we won't "have the right" to complain anymore, but until then I and others are paying customers wanting some damned customer service. But you keep that smug attitude because I'm sure it's helping you go far in life!--[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 08:08, 14 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:I'm not ungrateful, but I'd like to continue to play urbandead which I won't be able to do if the numbers of players keep dropping forcing Kevan to eventually pull the plug. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 20:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Well this "chap" thinks that if you're going to release something for public consumption, it shouldn't '''suck'''. The fact remains that the game is unbalanced, which makes it unfun. If, say, World of Warcraft made it so that the Horde had 1/10th the hit rate of the Alliance, Blizzard would be fucking crucified. Free or not, lousy design is lousy design. I'm not saying this out of ''entitlement'' or anything retarded like that, I am saying it as someone who wants to play the game without being gimped to fuck just because I want to be a zombie instead of a survivor. Of course, the alternative is for me (and the thousands of others who feel this way) to stop playing a game that is basically designed at the very basest level to screw us over. Then, WHOOPS! Goodbye donations and ad revenue! --{{User:Katthew/Sig}} 23:25, 9 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::I actually think that what 'ruined' the game (at least balance wise) was zombies... The very fact that they sucked to play forced people to either leave or organize, net result mega hordes that were basically unstoppable and forced buffs for survivors to give them a chance while making it even less rewarding to play a feral zed. To all intent and purpose this game has more sides than it was ever designed for. We have survivors and zombies but each of those are split into different play styles which the mechanics struggle to balance. Basically survivors are better at killing other survivors than zombies are and zombies often end up killing other zombies more than actual survivors. Hell, some survivors max out without even seeing a zombie and the game set-up makes it an unrewarding struggle to level a new character in a city full of veterans. At the end of the day I think this game needs to evolve before it dies.... New (short lifespan) cities are probably the best way forwards in my opinion because the early days with their actual struggle to survive against 'equals' are great fun, the sense of discovery of a new place also really adds spice too. But hey, too many people seem attached to their maxed characters that they hardly ever play anymore to even contemplate such a thing! --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 00:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::I think most of us will agree that ''something'' needs to be done, which is exactly what isn't happening or at least it seems that way. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:09, 10 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::::Maybe fixing the '''ABYSMAL''' hit rates for zombies might help. I mean, ''supposedly'' I have a 30% chance of hitting with a bite attack against a given target for 1 AP. Now, I can easily spend (and have spent) 15 AP and only hit on that last, 15th attempt. What are the chances of this happening? Mathematically, you say it was (3/10)^15, or a 0.000001% chance. That isn't "bad luck", that goes beyond "bad luck" and into the realms of "your coding is so shitty if I saw it I would try to flush". There is actually more chance of me rolling the same number 10 times in a row on a regular six-sided die than there is of me missing that many attacks. But it happens, it happens frequently, and it's one of the billion reasons why this game needs a severe overhaul, and/or someone competent working on it. --{{User:Katthew/Sig}} 02:02, 12 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::::No one cares about your opinion. But is that why you've resorted to spamming Kevan rather than stick to your own 'zombie improvements' in your userspace; you realise no one cares anymore? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 02:58, 12 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
Katthew actually makes some damn good points rather than resorting to ad hominem. [[Groove Theory]] would not be possible with a properly implemented RNG, but [[Bug Reports#Groove Theory is working again|oh, whoops]]! Also, Honestmistake, what game are ''you'' playing? {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 10:50, 12 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:These days? Mostly Bobwars (wigbl.com)... What exactly is it you don't agree with in my post though? --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 11:54, 12 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:: Sadly, I kinda agree with Honest, feral zombies have it extremely hard these days. They need to follow hordes around or just lay around and wait for destruction in their suburbs. Once the horde is gone though, their goes the bulk of your food. Its almost beneficial nowadays to be a killer or a survivor and thats it (assuming your not in a horde). --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 15:41, 12 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::Or just sit tight. Even a modest number of zeds can keep most buildings ruined. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:57, 12 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:I demand that the game be "fixed" so that those who can't get laid will have something to do before and after they masturbate! HELP THEM, KEVAN! You're their only hope... --{{User:Paddy Dignam/sig}} 17:09, 12 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Well looky, a whole cluster fuck load of whining.<br />
<br />
Want more people to play? Go and fucking recruit them yourselves. Don't ask Kevan to fork out even more from his own pocket so that your enjoyment of this free game is improved. You spend the money. You put the work in. Alternately you all could shut the fuck up.<br />
<br />
Want some changes? The FAQ says quite clearly to put them through the suggestions system rather than whine here like a bunch of fucking fort dwellers. Want Kevan to build you your own city to your own ideas? He's done it before for distribution companies, just do the same thing they did. Pay the man. Kevan's a professional, pay him his hourly rate if you want something. You're entitled to shit for free. He's nice enough to continue to let the game be played for free, so let's say enough with the comparisons to the money gouging and spyware installing World of Warcrack. Ask the man nicely how much your own city would be, plus an hourly rate for any bugs that appear, plus a negotiated set figure of each major update. Then go have a bake sale, car wash or just start selling organs on the black market and give Kevan the money for the work you want him to do.<br />
<br />
Put your money where your whining is. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 19:35, 12 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:Back when I was an admin and I moderated the Suggestions page with an '''IRON FIST''', it was still a worthless piece of shit. These days it is approximately fifty gajillion times more useless and shitty. Kevan doesn't read it any more than he reads any other section of this wiki, not even just because he's lazy as sin, but also because they're not worth reading. Also, I've already dragged people into this game. Maybe you remember [[The Dead]]? You know, the 10,000-strong superhorde that practically ''wrecked the entire fucking game?'' All me, bitch. I got that shit ''going''. Because unlike you, I am one proactive motherfucker who doesn't sit around doing shit-all.<br />
:So don't you fucking talk to me about recruiting people to play this game, you measly-mouthed little cumstain. I brought in more than you could possibly imagine with that withered rectum you call your brain. But hardly any of those people stayed around. Do you know why? Because '''''THEY GOT TIRED OF PLAYING A BROKEN PIECE OF SHIT GAME WHERE THEIR CHOSEN SIDE WAS DELIBERATELY NERFED AND FUCKED OVER AT EVERY CONCEIVABLE TURN.''''' That is what killed The Dead, you scurrilous prick-hungry cockholster - the fact the game '''sucks'''. We weren't beaten by any survivor group, we never even considered any survivor group to be more than the metaphorical bug on the windshield. Ten thousand zombies, motherfucker, and even with the ridiculously low hit rates, nonexistent RNG and inverse XP curve, we ruined your pathetic little world. If it hadn't been for all the flaws that UD has, driving away almost every single new player we drafted in, we'd have killed every last survivor in the city and turned it into a true zombie apocalypse.<br />
:So fuck you a million times up your gaping, cavernous asshole. I know what I'm talking about, and I know more about what ''you're'' talking about than you could ever hope to. Now sit the fuck down while the grown-ups have their chat, sweetie. We'll get you some crayons and glue, so you can cram them into your snotty orifices until you suffer fatal brain damage. Kiss kiss! --{{User:Katthew/Sig}} 07:47, 14 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Awww, poor cutie, is it too much if someone disagrees with you? I see you missed the major point, given you're ''so'' proactive and have such a large group of minions, why haven't you rallied them to donate a sum of money so that you can pay Kevan to make the game that you believe is fair? It's a very simple question. Kevan works for money, as proven by Borehamwood and Monroeville, if you want a map with your 'improvements' incorporating then you have to provide the same incentive that two distribution companies already did. Shouldn't be hard, after all you are ''"one proactive motherfucker"''. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 22:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
::There are points on both sides, but Katthew wins for making me laugh more than Is's logic makes sense.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkTurquoise">Big</span>]][[User:Cyberbob240/Classifications|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> Cat</span>]] 08:05, 14 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::Actually, what killed the Dead was all the whining survivors that couldn't handle a "zombie apocalypse" and needed the syringe find rate to be upped to almost 100%. But come on, Katthew, don't be a bitch. Little Issy's Mall Tour had what 300 zombies? Awwwww, that was the same number as the Central horde of the Dead. You know, back when it was winding down and most people wanted to be in the East or West coast Hordes. But, no, I'm sure he knows all about running big bad zombie hordes. I'd really like to know how much money The Dead generated for Kevan with ad revenue and people buying no IP limit. --[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 08:19, 14 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:::Feeling left out DCC? Never mind, go create yourself a couple of new accounts to agree with yourself, that'll make you feel better. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 22:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Good gum, you're actually still whining. How clear does this have to be? '''Kevan doesn't owe you jackshit'''. It's a browser game that is '''free to play''' and pretty cool if you spend about 5-15 minutes on it. If you want a game that you can put all of your obsessive time into, then go ''buy'' one. --[[User:Karloth_vois|Karloth Vois]] <sup>[[¯\(°_o)/¯]]</sup> 19:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
: As for the whole "I donated, so he '''owes''' me", the key is in the name; ''donation''. --[[User:Karloth_vois|Karloth Vois]] <sup>[[¯\(°_o)/¯]]</sup> 20:05, 15 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Massively pointless question #95==<br />
The "Are you sure?" Messages received when you A) Attempt to buy brain rot, and B) Attempt to jump from a building. Do they count towards your IP hits? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:31, 27 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
:I'm going to say yes to the first (as it reloads the map screen) and no to the second as it's on the skills screen. The IP hits total is only known to count on the map screen, not on skills, settings or profile screens. Unless Kevan says different. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 12:28, 27 March 2010 (UTC)<br />
::oh, and I demand another easter egg hunt. Perhaps with bunnies this time around. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:03, 29 March 2010 (BST)<br />
:::If he gets a hunt for chocolate eggs I want a button that allows me to nail sanctimonious pricks to trees as it's a much older tradition for this time of year. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 18:19, 29 March 2010 (BST)<br />
::::''Iscariot makes sly comment about organised religion.'' --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:08, 29 March 2010 (BST)<br />
::::: I'd like to see zombies replaced with rabbits for a day. Stronger bite! EAR DAMAGE. Hop for 1AP --[[User:Karloth_vois|Karloth Vois]] <sup>[[¯\(°_o)/¯]]</sup> 19:49, 29 March 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Settling a bet==<br />
While you're here reading this, settle a bet for me, [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARapture&diff=1683378&oldid=1683265 do you enjoy all the money that zergers provide you?] -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 21:00, 30 March 2010 (BST)<br />
:If you're asking whether I give any leniency to players who've donated, when they've done something that would merit a character being disabled - no, I don't. Donation status doesn't factor into any of the alt-abuse or banning scripts. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 10:01, 31 March 2010 (BST)<br />
::I think the players in question are working off the assumption that them having more characters means more views of the ads connected in the game and that equals more money for you. It wasn't meant to question your impartiality at all, just a question of economics when connected to the game. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 10:35, 31 March 2010 (BST)<br />
:::No, this isn't a consideration when banning characters. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 11:08, 31 March 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Game updates==<br />
I'm sure things are updated regularly, for maintance, ect.,.... things that wouldn't normally be reflected in the game updates. Just out of curiosity, what is the current status of the "Game Updates" though? I noticed there seems to be a lack of them here latly (not that it's a bad thing, or that I mind), it's just that I was curious as to your thoughts, and opinions on the subject.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:27, 7 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==April Fools?==<br />
A couple days before April Fools i was surfing the wiki and decided to look it up. The pranks there were hilarious! Especially the 2008/2009 ones. I couldn't wait to see what would come out next. But nothing happened and the wiki said you didn't do anything. Any specific reason? And yes i know Kevan is busy and yes i know we're thankful its a free game i'm just curious --{{User:Gt71/Sig}} 21:52, 27 April 2010<br />
:I was actually halfway through some other updates in late March, and decided against diverting any of that development time for an April Fool's joke. In the end, I didn't have time to put anything live - April's been busy, but I hope to get back to those main updates in the next week or so. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 12:37, 28 April 2010 (BST)<br />
::Excellent. Kevan, as you're here, with the perma death cities is it fair to assume all updates are carried over into all three citys? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 13:22, 28 April 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Pretty much. If a mechanic would unduly unbalance remaining gameplay in the other cities I'd make them exempt from it, though. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] 13:29, 28 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Hey Kevan==<br />
What's up? How are things in the real world? I haven't been around Urban Dead that often in the past few weeks, but it seems like little has changed... aside from the survivor/zombie ratio being the worst it's been in years, but that's besides the point. <br />
<br />
On that note, would you happen to have an opinion on the "[[Escape]]" gathering in western Malton? <br />
Just thought I'd say hi, --[[User:Macampos|Private Mark]] 07:36, 5 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Open Accounts==<br />
Currently, in Woodborne NT in Owsleybank, there are a few characters with names that make it blindingly obvious that they're open. Their names are [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1012934 mypasswordispassword], [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1743445 mypasswordispenis], and [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1367615 mypasswordishelpme]. Knowing your stance on open or communal accounts, I decided to bring them to your attention. --[[User:Shank Case|Shank Case]] 02:06, 25 May 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
== June 1 ==<br />
It seems appropriate on this date of great expectation (Read that: ESCAPE) to reflect on a simple fact; I have taken many hours of pleasurable distraction from your game. I have enjoyed meeting people from around the world and the various schemes and factions they have created using your game as a springboard for their own creativity. While I live in New England, I have traveled to the other side of the globe and yet-I can honestly say I "know" more people around the world as a result of this little game then in all those thousands of miles of travel. So while I have "contributed" it would seem at least good manners to say thank you for what you have done. I have only been playing for close to a year, and I hear many folks voicing opinions about the "state of the game". I just thought it might be appropriate to suggest that the reason they feel so strongly about it is because it is a flexible well designed system that has added millions of hours of gaming to people worldwide. So, thanks for your efforts and creativity.--[[User:Belisarius17|Belisarius17]] 04:50, 1 June 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Nudge ==<br />
<br />
That pre April updates taking its time now. The anticipation is killing me. There's some discussion going on about changes to Monroeville. Is it something you would consider, or as it was sponsored by others are your hands tied about what you can do with it? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:57, 26 June 2010 (BST)<br />
:Well UD's 5th birthday is coming up on July 3rd, we can cross our fingers and hope it's the update we've been waiting for. I hope it's another Easter Egg hunt, but with potatoes! -- [[User:Sockpuppie|Jelly Otter]] 07:27, 29 June 2010 (BST)<br />
::my paper hat is a bit battered. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:49, 29 June 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Happy Birthday! --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:51, 3 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Update me already.... :) -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 22:32, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Radio Filter ==<br />
<br />
[[Image:RFilter.png]]<br />
<br />
Apparently, the radio filter also affects the military channel (25.96MHz). There any way to disable it on this station? {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 19:46, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Teehee. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:48, 11 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Muhahahahaha. Is it [[The Mycock Building|Mycock]] ? shits so [[ALiM]]. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:37, 12 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::ps wtf is this radio filter and where did it come from? user made or kevan made? etc etc{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 06:39, 12 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::If you broadcast something vulgar, it will replace the word with *static*. It's been this way since the introduction of radios. The problem is that many buildings contain the word cock, and thus can't be broadcast. It's been brought up before, but they didn't mention the EMR channel. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 06:51, 12 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Epic design flaw fail! If only Kevan didn't have such a dirty mind! --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 11:17, 12 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Offensive in-game names? ==<br />
<br />
Are there any rules re what one can name their character? Are there not ''any'' limits? I recently ran into NIGGERHATER88 (yes, all capitalization - that's a copy/paste) and they're not a new character by any means - really? Really?! --[[User:Swingin' Sam|Swingin&#39; Sam]] 19:00, 19 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:If you don't like someone, kill them. It shuts them up in real life, why wouldn't it work here? --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 19:07, 19 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:fuck off it's a free game suck it the fuck off or go play wow. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:10, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Just for your information, 88 means HH — the Hitler salute. This guy is definitely a Neo-Nazi.<br />
::If Kevan isn't going to ban him, then killing him is the way to go. Just treat him like a [[Ignore List|text rapist]]. I'm against PKing in general, but such despicable people deserve it.<br />
::And the above poster could benefit from [[Civility]] as well. -- [[User:Kittithaj|Kittithaj]] 22:04, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I just love you militant anti-nazi types. You never see that banning/punishing/shunning/etc someone based on their political beliefs ''is fascism itself''. Freedom from fascistic forms of rule inherently means ''allowing'' people to believe what they want, and if this guy's a neo nazi, then that's his freedom to choose. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 22:12, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Or more likely, he's simply a troll. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter, for the reasons Mis outlined. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 22:17, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::^ --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 00:18, 21 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::<3 mis. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:48, 22 July 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:You_know_you%27ve_been_playing_Urban_Dead_too_much_when&diff=1745609
Talk:You know you've been playing Urban Dead too much when
2010-07-22T06:46:19Z
<p>J3D: /* ... */</p>
<hr />
<div>I have another to add to this list (by the way this is hysterical)<br />
# 97. .... You wake up in the middle of the night and beat the hell out of your S/o because you mistook his snoring for a zombie attack . [[User:Evl kitty|Evl kitty]]<br />
<br />
Added. :) [[User:Juranas|Juranas]]16:17 11 April 2007<br />
<br />
<br />
Ahahahaha!!! Oh my god, that is friggin awesome.--[[User:Duce Nauks|Duce Nauks]] 17:51, 7 May 2006 (BST)<br />
<br />
Yeah, I've done number 13. Zombies match in Halo 2 on Xbox Live. Everyone was confused. I had to explain "Barhah" to them. --[[User:TheTeeHeeMonster|TheTeeHeeMonster]] 03:05, 8 May 2006 (BST)<br />
::::: "zombies" on xbox live is the single most amazing thing ive ever played --[[User:Chris Hollis|Chris Hollis]]<br />
<br />
Ive done 3, 11, 13, 14 and 15. --[[User:Grim s|Grim s]]-<sup>[[Moderation|Mod]]</sup> 03:09, 8 May 2006 (BST)<br />
<br />
R.O.F.L. I've done 13 through the last one. [[User:MaulMachine|MaulMachine]] 03:10, 8 May 2006 (BST)<br />
Added one.<br />
<br />
What does number 23 have to do with UD? --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob240]]<sup>[[Creedy Defense Force|CDF]] - [[Moderation/Arbitration|Arb]] - [[Project Welcome|W!]]</sup> 14:28, 8 May 2006 (BST)<br />
:An "Intervention" usually refers to separating someone from something they're addicted to. --{{User:Mia Kristos/sig}} 15:17, 8 May 2006 (BST)<br />
::I know what an intervention is, but... oh. An intervention to save you from you addiction ''to Urban Dead''. All becoming clearer now. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob240]]<sup>[[Creedy Defense Force|CDF]] - [[Moderation/Arbitration|Arb]] - [[Project Welcome|W!]]</sup> 15:46, 8 May 2006 (BST)<br />
<br />
Modified #17, and Added #18. Boo Ya!--[[User:Duce Nauks|Duce Nauks]] 00:11, 9 May 2006 (BST)<br />
<br />
Added 95 and 96. !--[[User:Juranas|Juranas]] 12:29, 28 March 2007 (BST)<br />
<br />
I'm so guilty of the last one (#31). I also softend one of mine a little bit. [[User:Gamer.g33k|Gamer.g33k]] 01:27, 11 May 2006 (BST)<br />
<br />
Dude the hell you were, just look at the history, I did the last one, poser.--[[User:Duce Nauks|Duce Nauks]] 03:44, 11 May 2006 (BST)<br />
:Is the above addresed to me?[[User:Gamer.g33k|Gamer.g33k]] 13:14, 11 May 2006 (BST)<br />
<br />
Duce, he means he did the last one, not he made the last one. [[User:MaulMachine|MaulMachine]] 16:39, 11 May 2006 (BST)<br />
<br />
He said he did number "(#31)" but I clearly did, just look here - http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=You_know_you%27ve_been_playing_Urban_Dead_too_much_when&action=history --[[User:Duce Nauks|Duce Nauks]] 20:37, 11 May 2006 (BST)<br />
<br />
I apologize for not making myself clear. What I was trying to communicate was that I agree with whoever had written #31 (now known to be Duce Nauks). I didn’t intend to take credit for writing it; I only wanted to say that I could personally relate to it. [[User:Gamer.g33k|Gamer.g33k]] 23:38, 11 May 2006 (BST)<br />
<br />
Ok, sorry, I just really, really, hate posers and that sort.--[[User:Duce Nauks|Duce Nauks]] 00:27, 12 May 2006 (BST)<br />
<br />
Just added #38! [[User:Mattiator|Mattiator]] 21:51, 25 May 2006 (BST)<br />
<br />
added #42 to #65. I have no life. ( stole and reworked a fair number of them to fit UD ) --[[User:Vykos|Vykos]] 17:24, 4 June 2006 (BST)<br />
<br />
I donno. #42 to #65 fits all zombie fanatics..not really UD. But still awesome though. --[[User:Changchad|Changchad]] <sup> [[WTF_CENTAURS|WTF]]•[[Project Welcome|W!]]•[[Sacred Ground Policy|SGP</sup>]] 17:27, 4 June 2006 (BST)<br />
<br />
lol, nice .. very good. {{Unsigned|The Cop|}}<br />
<br />
Just added 139, and 140... hope the rest of you have a sense of humor similar to mine. :) -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 02:01, 11 August 2009 (BST)<br />
<br />
== So, what are you guilty of? ==<br />
<br />
Lets find out how many of them are jokes, and how many of them are real. What things on the list apply to you?<br />
<br />
O.O...I do number 58 all the itme...even before I started playing.--[[User:KoronofHearts|KoronofHearts]] 01:58, 30 October 2007 (UTC)KoronofHearts<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
----<br />
<br />
I'm guilty of #13, #15, #16, #22 (that was just 1 time tho, I fell asleep when playing..... that doesn't help my case any does it?), #33, #37, #40, #41, #58 (for... some... reason)<br />
<br />
So thats me. Guilty of 9 out of 68. How did you do? --[[user:Teksura|Teksura]]<sup>[[User_talk:Teksura|Talk]]</sup> 03:14, 21 June 2006 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
----<br />
well... #3, #9, #13 repeatedly, #14, #15, #20, #21, #22, #30A (when you bend over the coffin imploring your friend to ?rise), #35, #40, #41, #46, #52 rewritten (Bananas just aren't the same anymore...) and #58. --[[User:Froggie|Froggie]] 19:10, 21 June 2006 (BST)<br />
<br />
==...==<br />
I think we need to go through this list and remove some of the redundant stuff. Something like #110 is outdated, and may confuse any of the new players who read it. Also, we should clear this page of any duplicates, except for 139 and 140, as well as clear the page of spelling mistakes. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 03:56, 19 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:go for it. I've tried to involve teh community in this page before. They aren't interested. :) {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 08:12, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Going through all 152 of these by myself might be a tad impossible. I possibly couldn't get the work done without rolling on the floor laughing at least twice. But all in all...I will get to it...Soon. =P --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 10:11, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::dump any you wanna kill on my talk/here and that way theres 2 of us = community agreement in peer revision. (y) {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:46, 22 July 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Bonghit420&diff=1745608
User talk:Bonghit420
2010-07-22T06:44:19Z
<p>J3D: /* The Kraken got me... */</p>
<hr />
<div>Current status: fucking druuuuuuuuuuunk!<br />
<br />
<br />
{{User:Bonghit420/nav}}<br />
new stuff at bottom please.<br />
<br />
'''SIGN YOUR POSTS'''<br />
<br />
[[User:Bonghit420/Archive_2009]]<br />
|<br />
[[User:Bonghit420/sig]]<br />
==Dont touch nothing above this!==<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
==About Ackland==<br />
<br />
Hello. I read your message. Most of the zombies are dead on the floor, so I couldn't scan them. Now I'm out of AP. Sorry I couldn't be of help. I'll try again tomorrow, though.<br />
--[[User:Colette Hart|Colette Hart]] 07:30, 24 April 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
== [[Ackland Mall Noise Abatement Society]] ==<br />
<br />
<br />
{{yorphan|Ackland Mall Noise Abatement Society}}<br />
--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 11:52, 9 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:yes it is, on my main page dumbass.--[[User:Bonghit420|Dirty]] 22:49, 9 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::Before you start calling people dumbasses you might want to figure out wiki links versus URL links. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 22:57, 9 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::same as usual, go fuck yourself :D --[[User:Bonghit420|Dirty]] 00:40, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::[[Special:Whatlinkshere/Ackland_Mall_Noise_Abatement_Society|This]] is the list of pages that officially link to Ackland Mall Noise Abatement Society. The only page on the list is ''this page'', because Yonnua was courteous enough to link it for you. He did you a favor, Misanthropy did you a favor, and I'm doing you a favor. I'm guessing you'll ignore me and piss on my comment as well. That's your business, and you're welcome to do it, even though it reflects poorly on you. After all, what sort of person, offered a gift, fails to even recognize it as a gift and slaps the hand that's offering it, not just once, but twice (and likely a third time as well)? {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 02:42, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Thanks for you input, I thought they came here to start shit with me for reasons unknown. It seems as though the only time people ever use this page is to try to prove somthing. :P and stop with all this reflections talk, your starting to make me have concerns about my mental health. *unbundles the gift* a teddy bear!!! <3 *cuddles with the teddy*. Some times people have bad days and bring it with them to the interwebz. :S *licks Aichon's hand.*--[[User:Bonghit420|Dirty]] 03:10, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::Dood, I have logs of some of the stuff you've said on IRC. You DO have mental health issues, I swear :D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:31, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
::::::Is this the same DDR from like 8 months ago? omg like wow! I thought I lost you to the pages of history. --[[User:Bonghit420|Dirty]] 09:39, 10 May 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::::No way baby, you ain't losing me, and I definitely didn't lose you. Some of the shit you said was PRICELESS! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 15:18, 5 June 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Your siggy ==<br />
<br />
It's breaking pages... --{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 07:04, 8 June 2010 (BST)<br />
:Yer, I was looking at that and thinking that it might. was it the <sup>sup</sup>code?--{{User:Bonghit420/sig}} 07:08, 8 June 2010 (BST)<br />
::yikes, I have no idea why it is bordering the timestamp..--[[User:Bonghit420|&#123;&#123;SUBST:Nosubst&#124;User:Bonghit420/sig}}]] 07:13, 8 June 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I thought I had it, but nope. There was a line break in there but removing it didn't seem to help. I'll have another look after I get a bit of sleep. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 07:17, 8 June 2010 (BST)<br />
::::sigh, I am combing through it and can't find it.--{{User:Bonghit420/sig}} 07:31, 8 June 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::You're missing <code><nowiki></span></nowiki></code> tag for the "ur". {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 07:39, 8 June 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Deletions==<br />
<br />
You'll need to post them on [[A/SD]], I can't handle them without them going through the system there. It should be no hassle once they're there though. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 21:07, 8 June 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Make sure you sign your deletion requests in the future. Also, you can put them all under one header, rather than having them all separate. Makes it easier to process. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 00:36, 9 June 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== Images ==<br />
<br />
The following images you've uploaded have recently gone unused:<br />
<br />
#[[:Image:Dddeee.JPG]]<br />
#[[:Image:BabahAgunin.JPG]] <br />
#[[:Image:Agunininote.JPG]] <br />
#[[:Image:Flavorshit.JPG]] <br />
#[[:Image:Flavorshit2.JPG]] <br />
#[[:Image:Level1july20th.JPG]] <br />
#[[:Image:Level2July23.JPG]] <br />
#[[:Image:Level3july26.JPG]] <br />
#[[:Image:Level4july28.JPG]]<br />
<br />
Do you still want any of them? If not, they will be deleted. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 00:58, 11 June 2010 (BST)<br />
:you can deleat them --{{User:Bonghit420/sig}} 05:11, 11 June 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
== The Kraken got me... ==<br />
<br />
...and it was good. Just thought you'd like a nicer [http://iamscott.net/1276338145603.html victim shot], as that looks better than breaking everything down into single taunts and kills. By the way, mind if I file that as a bounty claim with the RG? --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 11:31, 12 June 2010 (BST)<br />
: Praise the Kraken, he has devliverd another soul to a worthy place.--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 12:23, 12 June 2010 (BST)<br />
::If you could wait a week that would be nice, but do as you plese, I'm not sure that it would matter seeing as how the rg is moving at a slow speed recently. --{{User:Bonghit420/sig}} 19:52, 12 June 2010 (BST)<br />
:::I'm in no hurry to file that, I have up to 2 weeks time. And it will matter insofar in that it will reduce my bounty to zero once the list is updated, making me once again capable of dragging triggerhappy trenchies on the RG :D --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 20:30, 12 June 2010 (BST)<br />
::::Go ahead man, do ya thing--{{User:Bonghit420/sig}} 21:06, 12 June 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
niggercunt{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:44, 22 July 2010 (BST)</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Promotions&diff=1745607
UDWiki:Administration/Promotions
2010-07-22T06:43:52Z
<p>J3D: /* Thadeous Oakley */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}}<br />
{{Moderationnav}}<br />
{{Promotions Intro}}<br />
==Candidates still requiring vouches==<br />
===[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]]===<br />
{{vndl|MisterGame}}<br />
So here I am making an attempt at becoming a Sysops. I have been tinkering with the thought of doing so for a short while now and decided to give it a go. My main reason of becoming a member of the admin team is because I want to see if I can do it. Be a successful sysops. Of course, in this position I can also provide an extra helping hand to the others, though I think the current team is doing a fine job at the moment.<br />
<br />
As for my own history, well I have been here for quite a while. Made my account in late 07, and became active somewhere in mid 08. Since I have made countless edits, well okay if I count probably over 3000. My path from then to today has not always been easy, not for me and certainly not for others. Still, I learned, and have grown through the years. I have edits in most of the admin sections, I have been involved in Arbitration (both as an involved party as well as the arbitrator), A/PM, A/VB, A/M, etc. The rare janitorial edit springs out as well. <br />
<br />
As for my personality, something that obviously reflects back in my actions; I'm not afraid to speak up and give my opinion (which I frequently do). I'm not always the best diplomat out there, sometimes I'm harsh, though I'd like to call it "direct". So no, I'm not an impenetrable wall of patience like for example Aichon or Ross. In the past, I have had my conflicts with certain individuals. That said, I live by forgive and forget. I'm not one to hold grudges, and I'm not afraid to give a sincere apology if I believe that I was in the wrong.<br />
Generally speaking, I'll get along with most people. The bit above might suggest otherwise, but I'm not that impatient. If you're new, then I'll will extra nice. Good-faith and civility work best with me. On the other hand, if your name is Iscariot or Grim then I'll happily admit, no Sir I won't take your shit.<br />
<br />
So I could probably go on for a few more blocks of text but I really don't want this to turn into a wall. I think most of you probably already formed an opinion without this text anway. <br />
<br />
Tldr; I have my shortcomings, but I deem myself capable of being a sysops. Its up to you if you trust me to indeed be so, and if you do then don't hesitate to '''Vouch.''' <br />
<br />
Sincerely, --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 13:16, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
*'''Abstain''' - you'd be better than yonnua is i guess {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:21, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:An abstain coming from you instead of an against means a lot to me. Ya, rly. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 14:33, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 13:23, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:I would appreciate it if you gave me your reasoning behind this. So, tell me why plz. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 14:33, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::I've seen you do a little bit of everything, but I think you need to stay off the vandalism page, and out of the relative discusssions on the mainspace of A/VB. I also think that you're to aggressive on how you approach the involved parties considering you have nothing to do with the case, aside from wanting to comment on them. Move your comments to the talk page, and I'd be okay with this. That aside, I'd consider vouching for you. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 00:03, 22 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Question:''' In what areas do you see yourself contributing? - [[User:Whitehouse]] 13:27, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:In the beginning I'll go for being the Jack of all trades. As soon as (if) I get the powers, I'll start with janitorial work; I'll make my way through A/PT, A/MR, A/DE anywhere I'm necessary. In this manner, I'll try to learn how to use the abilities that come with sysopship. I don't expect it to be of mathematical difficulty, but I want some experience in moving, deleting and protecting stuff. After that I probably linger back to the A/VB, A/M and A/A sections.<br />
<br />
::If you look in my contributions you'll see most of edits tend to be in those parts. Once I'm done with being new on the team, I'll probably linger the most in what some call the "drama" sections. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 14:33, 20 July 2010 (BST) <br />
*Thad is the first to admit that he can be in conflict with other users, and can sometimes even be a jerk (my interpenetration of the above.) That said, I genuinely believe that he has the best interests of the wiki at heart, and he's been around here long enough now to know how the place works. Yes, he's been an asshat in the past, and yes, he's had some genuine personality conflicts with users. But if he's genuine in his statement that he will forgive and forget, this shouldn't matter. In short, he's a good guy who will be an asset to the sysop team, although like all sysops, he has his problems. Much to his credit, he shows a willingness to see these problems, and attempt to fix them ([[User:Linkthewindow/Promotions note|a note on my A/PM comments]].) {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 13:28, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Thanks for the kinds words Link, stuff like that motivates. You have quite an interesting stance on A/PM comments, haven't seen that before. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 14:33, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::It's actually a common trait with Boxy when he isn't exercising impartiality as a crat. It always annoyed me, actually. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:37, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*<s>'''Against''' Based pure and simply on the fact [http://zombies.dementiastudios.org/boards/index.php?topic=3182.msg42796#msg42796 that he has still at least one alt on the Zerg Liste]. While the game and the wiki are separate things, _promoting_ someone who breaks the only real rule of UD (or at least is incapable of proving his innocence) would do no good for the reputation of the wiki in general and the sys-op team in particular. Once he gets himself actually removed from the ZL, I'd see no major objections. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 14:16, 20 July 2010 (BST)</s> '''Abstain''' now that that matter is cleared up. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 15:17, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Ah, that's a blast from the past. Yeah, that was a stupid affair back then relating to the Umbrella/UBCS drama. I don't really see the relevance of something that old of the game to this bid, but if you insist I'll see if I can get myself off. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 14:41, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::Done. Check the relevant thread. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 15:08, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::No ZL mod reaction yet, but the screenies look legit to me (and match with the current dead/alive status of the alts). Changed my vote to Abstain. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 15:17, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::::My lord, you would have LOVED conndraka. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 15:41, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Abstain''' - This is a toughie, I have a reasons both for and against. I like Thad and in the last few months, he's been around admin areas and for the most part I agree with what he has to say or where he's coming from, in fact very much so. Behind the scenes I see little from Thad, no real work cycling things, archiving and the like, a fair bit of WN'ing newbies (before we made up I often took notes that he'd WN users without even checking their edit and following up both [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Cornholioo&oldid=1654417 housekeeping] and [[User_talk:Dirty_fridge|vandal]]-wise) but not much else. I feel obliged to mention it and add the weight its worth in my 'vote' even though as a sysop it isn't specifically necessary and I doubt he doesn't understand such processes anyway, and as far as WNing bloopers go some of the more "prestigious" users do just the same without recieving anywhere near the flak of my entire above reference. Trying to reiterate why this is still an abstain even though I spent plenty of time on negatives, I guess it's subjective but I just think he's a well-rounded decision maker, and has demonstrated little bias in the past months since the Umbrella epic has shifted elsewhere and died down. He definitely has a larger tolerance and less intimidating demeanour towards idiots than what I consider myself to have and he has exercised that quality every time it's been around lately. I still can't say whether he does what he does because he loves the place more than this position, I'd like to think it's the former but I'm used to judging that on hard behind-the-scenes work that no one else does as well as extensive proactivity, rather than just give an opinion on everything on whatever pops up on RC. Would I regret letting him onto the team? Probably not, but ideally I'd consider perhaps giving a month or two longer with some more tips in hand. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:37, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:christ shut up already {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 09:44, 21 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*<s>'''Against''' Sorry mate, I'm just not convinced.</s> [[User:Technical Pacifist|Technical Pacifist]] 14:41, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Why not? I noticed your new here, so that means you only got a first-hand impression of me, perhaps during this very bid. May I ask what it is that bothers you in regard to myself? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 15:28, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::You're correct, I only have a first-hand impression from here. In all honesty, my main concern was the zerging.. which appears to have been cleared since I made my comment. So, now that that's gone, you seem fine enough. '''Vouch'''. [[User:Technical Pacifist|Technical Pacifist]] 19:07, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' damn i knew this day would come.. where is rak or sonny when you need them? Thad is a huge asshole. always has been always will. i would hate to think what this faggot would do with any real power. '''NO NO NO NO NO NO.'''----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 15:17, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Wow. Looks like I really got him in a panic, eh? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 15:19, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:In a serious response, I really don't know who you are. Only time I remember you was from DDR's last promotion bid, during which you called me faggot or something because you disagreed with my stance on his bid (even though we both vouched). Oh, and I hope WOOT vouches for me, I always did for him :( --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 15:25, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Question''' Why do you want to be a sysop? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:35, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:There are a handful of reasons. I'd like to play a more prominent role in discussions in certain sections such A/VB A/M, of course I can give my opinion without being sysop but it does not carry the same weight, simply said I can't rule on cases. Second, I'm curious if I can and be a successful sysop, now I have the desire I can't help but feel kinda excited to start out if this goes well. Third, and this one isn't out of self-interest, so I can provide that extra to hand the current team; This can be helpful if it turns out Kevan really wants to implement some major new mechanics and actually move the game forward again, which can lead to an increase in traffic at the wiki.<br />
<br />
*:If you give me your trust, then aside from being honored, I will prove myself to be an (in)valuable asset to the team. Should I fail to do that, then I'm not going to slack and abuse around, I'll know what to [[A/DM|do]]. I know that may seem like an empty promise ("that's what your saying ''now''"), but I just want to make clear that I'm not doing this simply for having powers and the "position". I know a certain ex-sysop who believed popularity wasn't necessary in order to do his job, but I think I can't ever do a job without enough support of (in this case) both the community and the sysop team. That, and I have been here as a regular user for over 2 years, if I wanted to be a sysops so badly (with perhaps the wrong motives) I'd probably done this wayyyyy earlier. Will all that do for motivation :D ? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 19:01, 21 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
*::Probably. The number of abstains is maddening. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:45, 21 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::Yeah, I noticed it. Might actually break a record in A/PM history. I'm pretty content; I haven't seen any serious (and by serious, I mean with solid argumentation which I can understand and learn from) opposition aka "against". --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 19:53, 21 July 2010 (BST) <br />
<br />
*'''Against''' -- No offense, but I generally <s>vote</s> recommend against folk who self-nominate. [[User:Asheets|Asheets]] 15:40, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:... This makes no sense. Why is self-nomination a bad thing? Does it betray a personality or a trait that is undesirable in a Sysop? (And yes, I do realise the irony of the statement, coming from someone who, unsuccessfully at that, self-nominated.)(Also, I'm not sure I'm allowed to reply to this. So don't shoot me for doing this?) -- <small>[[User:Rorybob| <span style="color: #FF9933">Rahrah</span>]] [[Malton_Manhunt/Axe_Hack's_Manhunt_3|<span style="color: #FF9933">is pumped that he's going to lose another Manhunt.</span>]] </small> 22:44, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::It makes sense to me. If someone else nominates them, you can be sure that they've made friends and proven their worth, at least to some extent. If they self-nominate, they show a certain amount of narcissism. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 22:59, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::Still makes little sense, the two bids below this one demonstrate well what friends will do for one another if you need them too, making ahseet's system not only really unreliable, but also if you're going to vote on something so petty it's basically a null vote from a bureaucrat's point of view. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 00:17, 21 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::::People who self-nominate show that they think they can do the job (it's much easier to accept a nomination then it is to put one up,) and, additionally, that they have the self-esteem to think they can do the job. But people who are nominated show that they have friends, and someone who's willing to go as far as nominating them for the job. One is not inherently better. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 10:44, 21 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::::Well, even a null recommendation still must count for something in the final analysis. And I did vouch for you several times, so I my opinion can't be completely worthless. [[User:Asheets|Asheets]] 16:03, 21 July 2010 (BST) <br />
*'''Abstain''' - I don't think, with the current number of active users, we need more Pyschos at the moment. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 15:50, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Weak Against''' - Cyberbob makes an excellent point, but that doesn't make Thad any less controversial[http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xb40yq_rejected-9-11-party_news .]So basically, as Harrison, but a little less charged. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 19:29, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - In all my time I've not seen Thad do anything even remotely as bad as any other sysop has ever done, nor has his attitude been adverse to the position. Basically, he's done nothing to show he ''should not'' be a sysop, his only conflicts being seemingly on a personal level. I see no reason not to give him a chance at it. He's shown himself not to be unwilling to involve himself in the opinionated sides of the wiki's admin services, and I've seen times where A/M, A/VB and the like could do with another involved individual instead of an abstained vote. Of course my vouch is also conditional on him doing the usual grunt work too but with an extra set of hands that should be very light (also given that his time zone is unique to the team it'd help us reach an around-the-clock presence, which can never be a bad thing). {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 21:21, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Well yeah, you don't have anyone from mainland Europe, in fact no one who isn't native in English currently, but the timezone difference between the UK and Holland is only one hour ;) Oh and thanks for your trust. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 19:35, 21 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Following Link's Example''' - Thad has definitely come a long way. I know that just a few months back, his interpersonal issues (especially the ones with SA) were really bothering me and would've resulted in an instant Against vote. In the last few months however, it hasn't been nearly as much of an issue. He's not afraid to disagree with the sysops, but he doesn't do it arbitrarily or just for the sake of doing it. Instead, he offers a sound opinion most of the time, and generally has valid points to contribute to the discussion. He's definitely not as serious in nature as some of the folks around here, which is both good and bad. Honestly, I hadn't really considered the possibility of his promotion prior to seeing this, so I'm curious what his response will be to Ross' question as well, since motivation is a key factor. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:37, 20 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Abstain''' - People are saying he's come a long way. I haven't been around to know if this is true so I am Abstaining. But it is worth mentioning that the MisterGame I used to know was an absolutely, unqualified no-go for the sysop position. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 05:12, 21 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Abstain''' - As DDR.--{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 15:00, 21 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Abstain''' You got the attitude for the sysop, but your contribution just.... insignificant, and rarely seen helping user(for me).--{{User:Evan_Arnoldi/sig}} 15:52, 21 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Dude, not to offend you, but you have been here for 2 days. I don't really think you can judge my contributions in such a short time-span.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 19:31, 21 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
* '''Vouch''' Thadeous has contributed quite a bit and I'm positive he has the best intentions at heart. --{{User:Fanglord2/sig}}, 01:28, 22 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - kinda decent guy. In the unlikely event he gets through just turn a small issue into a major incident and demote him while he's out celebrating the turn of the year while you losers are at home on the UDWiki. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 07:43, 22 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Candidates currently under community discussion==<br />
<!--''There are currently no candidates under community discussion.''--><br />
===[[User:Grim s]]===<br />
{{vndl|Grim s}}<br />
<br />
Per [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Misanthropy_vs_Axe_Hack#Ruling|this]] and [[UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct#Supplementary_evidence|this]], I hereby nominate: <br />
:[[Image:Overlord_Grim_Magic_Card.jpg]]<br />
<br />
{{squote|"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard."|H.L. Mencken}}<br />
<br />
Come on, Grim, you know you want to. :P {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 16:42, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
:Fuck you Revenant. Fuck. you. [[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 16:44, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::Now that's one hell of an opening edit. Ill cycle this as unaccepted. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 16:46, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::Not so fast bucko. Revenant has a decision to make. [[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 16:54, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
::::right. I'll leave the existing copy in unaccepted until you two decide if you're running. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 16:55, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:::::oh... fuck you. I hope you get it. fine, guess I '''Accept''' too. let the circus commence [[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 17:00, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
Because some bombs need to be dropped:<br />
{{GrimGod}}{{Grim Doom}}{{GrimCoup}}{{GoodNightGrim}} <br />
Brought to you by the [[Project Evil|Know Your Evil Initiative]]. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 17:31, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
====Discussion====<br />
*'''Vouch'''. Grim deserves a chance to prove to the people of the world that he is in fact a cuddly little teddy bear. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 16:57, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Question''' - Would you do a coup, a coup, would you do?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 16:59, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:'''Answer:''' Only if you made me crat [[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 17:02, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::Well that's my next crat vote sorted. '''Real Question''': Are you even vaugely up to date with wiki-events?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 17:03, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::the only answer to that is "Not in the slightest". Although revenant kept dropping references to it, that sly fucker. should have known he was up to something [[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 18:22, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::::Right, I seem to recall you proposing a split of Arbitration in to Arbitration and mediation, for editting and personal conflicts respectively. It's always interested me as a policy, and would you be likely to persue this policy if you hang around?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:27, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::::If ''he'' doesn't, ''I'' will, so we'll probably be making use of his brain one way or another. <small>([http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BrainInAJar In a jar], if necessary.)</small> {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 20:06, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Question''' Upon your last appearance you felt that the wiki, its policies and administration team were inherently broken (probably massively paraphrasing and distorting you here, but hey). Has anything changed in the intervening time, or do you still feel only a complete restructuring of the wiki is the only solution? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:07, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:I plan to work from within the system. The first thing on my agenda for restructuring is your face (do I know you?) [[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 17:52, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::Sorry, sometimes I forget we are different people. :P {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 17:54, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' - Too soon. Does not meet criteria. Spam bid. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 17:39, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::You I vaguely remember. Something about fucking sheep. I wouldnt accept your approval anyway [[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 18:00, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' – Wait, do I have to do this or is it assumed since I made the nomination? {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 18:14, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - I'm at your disposal, Dark Overlord of the wiki... -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 18:36, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - Where do I have to sign for this.--{{User:Thari/sig}} 18:40, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - No, seriously 100% VOUCH! --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 18:48, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - I think it was my idea?--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 19:12, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - Whatever his past, Grim has proven that he cares about this wiki and has its best interests at heart. {{User:Aphelion/sig}} 19:58, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - I vouched for WOOT, Grim can't be much worse.--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 20:00, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Abstain''' - You're a mean one, Mr. Grimch. Also, I really don't think I've lived through enough wikidrama to have an educated opinion on this issue.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 21:49, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' mostly for all the memory's. and the impending drama storm that will come from it.----[[User:Sexualharrison|sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 22:02, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' I, for one, look forward to being under the iron fist of our cruel Overlord Grim. Also he cares more about the wikipedia than any other single user. He'll be an excellent Administrator. -- {{User:Goribus/Sig}} 22:55, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' - Terrible. The last time he was trusted with buttons he fucked up so bad that Kevan to come in and fix his mess. The fact that he didn't get permabanned is a joke, and this sysop bid is an even bigger joke, whether intentional or not. If he really "cares about the wiki" so much he can prove it by making positive contributions to the community. I suspect the only real reason he'd want to become sysop would be to see how bad he could screw up again.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 03:52, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' - but a '''vouch''' for joke promotion campaigns. glad to see this one has slipped through the ever tightening net on wikifun.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:00, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' - Too soon. Even if he was serious, the wiki has changed a lot in the past year and a half. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 04:55, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Also, as Giles. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:17, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' I'm always in for a good coup. [[User:Oidar|Oidar]] 08:06, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - Level headed and rational, will make a fantastic sysop. --[[User:Thekooks|Kooks]] 14:57, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' -- As Giles. [[User:Asheets|Asheets]] 16:22, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' -- The wiki has been missing Grim. MOAR GRIM FOR WIKI 10' -- [[User:Sockpuppie|Jelly Otter]] 19:41, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' - until yesterday, there has been no activity since October 2008. Grim s is definitely not suited to be a SysOp. [[User:G F J|G F J]] 20:18, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:That was not <s>Cuddly Bunny</s> Grim's fault, though. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 20:50, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::So? Doesn't change the fact he hasn't been active for a year and a half. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:17, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::Exactly. Someone with such an activity is simply not suited to become a SysOp, this is all that matters. [[User:G F J|G F J]] 12:42, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' -- Past deeds show he knows what is best for the wiki.--{{User:N0RDAK/Sig}} 20:26, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' -- I'd be interested in seeing how [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2010_06&diff=prev&oldid=1733450 "little Grim"] mixes with Original Strength. --{{User:Akule/sig}} 00:30, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Don't you dare compare them, Grim is rational and intelligent, DDR is an overzealous retard who is too headstrong to admit he's ever wrong, which is almost always is. --{{User:WOOT/sig}} 10:14, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - I don't see why not.--{{User:Jordan Salafack/sig}} 02:43, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - he won't get it, but this is still fucking hilarious. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:44, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' - As Giles. He broke the number one rule of the wiki: never make Kevan do anything. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 18:54, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' - I could cite the guidelines, but I'm sure it would be pointed out that that's simply an ''argument from authority''. Instead, I'll cite a better reason: I don't vouch for people I don't know. Every other candidate I've vouched for has been someone I've known, and even though we're not all friends, I at least know who they are and what I've come to expect of them. Grim, to me, is an unknown, and I don't vouch for things I don't know. It's a mistake for anyone to put their name on the line for an unknown. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 20:21, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:fair enough... but some of us are voting in the full knowledge of who and what Grim is/was.... {{unsigned|Honestmistake}}<br />
*::Of course. I was merely speaking for myself here and making a general statement about my opinion on the matter, but if you know Grim, then none of what I said applies to you. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 00:09, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*You're one of my least favorite User here, but I'm still '''Vouching'''. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 04:02, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - The last bastion of hope that this wiki will not be plagued by sysops faggotry and circle jerking. Long live the king.--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 10:14, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' - After that long hiatus, he should first contribute for a few months again. Only then an educated opinion can be formed. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:26, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Abstain''' - It's a joke, but he'd probably still make a bettter 'op than some.--{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 23:27, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' Grim would clearly make an excellent sysop. --[[User:Michael Barnaby|Michael Barnaby]] 00:28, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' - Get the fuck out you lifeless diseased afterbirth. Seriously - how have you managed to avoid suicide this long? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:43, 12 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' I've heard of you Grim! Also, Why do you got to be a HUGE JERK to everyone cyberbob? Jesus Shut up dude everyone's getting tired of you ranting. I should take you to VB for your Abusive Comments you raging jerkaholic.--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 05:45, 13 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:You vouch Grim and then take a swipe at me for being a HUGE JERK? I don't think you know anything about Grim beyond the fact that he exists (I don't think I need to explain why that is a dumb basis on which to vouch someone for sysophood). {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:51, 13 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::Well you don't have to cuss the poor guy out. If you don't like him, put'against' and leave it at that. He probabley has gone and commited suicide now. Jeez...--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 06:03, 13 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::"Poor guy", lol. Grim's posting is such that any sympathy for his shitty existence IRL is quickly wiped out by his self-righteous tirades of LOOK AT ME I CAN WRITE LOTS OF WORDS AREN'T I GOOD AT ARGUING. As far as suicide goes, I certainly hope so but somehow I doubt it. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:08, 13 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:I don't know if I've ever mentioned this, but Jerk/Annoyance/Troll ≠ Vandal. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 05:58, 13 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::And that's exactley why i didn't take him...--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 06:03, 13 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - I vouch for you only on the premise that you try and take over the wiki again, if you promise that you won't, then please remove my vote. --{{User:Ashley Valentine/sig}} 23:40, 13 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' - Even putting the coup aside there's the fact you've been away for about 2 years and you don't really seem to want this. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 22:50, 14 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' - After much consideration, I am against Grim_s getting buttons again ''at this point in time''. As many others have pointed out, you have been away from the wiki for quite the spell. Thus, regardless of how confident I may or may not be with your abilities, the fact remains that your recent contributions are most certainly out-dated and maybe even out-of-touch with the current goings on. Integrate yourself back into the wiki and come back in a couple months; then we'll talk. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 09:23, 16 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - He is needed. --[[User:Grogh|Grogh]] 21:33, 17 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<s>*'''Vouch''' - A necessary if bitter tonic? He'll actually be kept in check by the current crowd of ops. I think it'd be a good balance. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 05:09, 21 July 2010 (BST)</s> ''ignore me'' --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 07:59, 21 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
<br />
The community discussion is now '''closed.''' The bureaucrats will make their decision.--{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 18:00, 19 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
So anyway, after the usual discussion with boxy, the decision has been made to '''deny''' the bid. I could cite the coup attempt, the fact that the wiki isn't the same as it was 18 months ago, or the fact that you haven't made a single edit in the last 9 days. But the basic fact remains. Without Rev nominating you, I don't think you would have ever considered running again. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:37, 21 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
===[[User:Revenant]]===<br />
{{vndl|Revenant}}<br />
<br />
Two can play at this game. I only accept if revenant accepts. Put that in your pipe and smoke it. [[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 16:49, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
:Sigh. But I ''just'' archived it. I'll stop editing a while, so you two can come to an understanding. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 16:52, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
'''Accept''' – HARH! Fine! You'll rue this day, you bastard. <tt>:P</tt> {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 16:56, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
====Campaign statement====<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable plainlinks"<br />
|+ Revenant Sysop Campaign Assets<br />
! № !! Title !! Content<br />
|-<br />
! 00001<br />
! Logo<br />
| [[Image:BitchesWikiTemplate.jpg|"This user hates wiki bitches" by Talunex]]<br />
|-<br />
! 00002<br />
! Theme<br />
| [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1g9PFtSCKw "We Care A Lot" by Faith No More]<br />
<!-- Replaced Asset<br />
|-<br />
! 00003<br />
! Slogan<br />
| ''"Because someone better know what the fuck they're doing around here."''<br />
--><br />
|-<br />
! 00004<br />
! Dossier<br />
| "[[User:Revenant/Sysop%3F|Any questions?]]" (alternate title) by Revenant<br />
|-<br />
! 00005<br />
! Slogan<br />
| ''"If you want a thing done well, do it yourself."'' ([http://www.answers.com/topic/if-you-want-a-thing-done-well-do-it-yourself Proverb])<br />
|}<br />
:''Authorised by {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 17:13, 5 July 2010 (BST)''<br />
<br />
;Note: For the record (and because DDR expressed this concern below), I would like to note that I have resumed full-time study as of this week and am unable to check UDWiki from my current campus (at least until I set up an SSL proxy at home). However, a lot of the stuff I plan to do for UDWiki dovetails into my studies, so regardless of the outcome of this bid I plan to be around more and working on stuff to improve the wiki. Having the sysop buttons would make it easier, but then it's not ''much'' more difficult to have another sysop implement changes, and following best practices I should be getting consensus for anything sysop-only anyway. This is more of a FYI than anything, and delivered for the sake of openness. Back to your regularly-scheduled whatever! {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 09:40, 18 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
====Questions, vouches, et cetera====<br />
*'''Vouch'''. Revenant has shown himself to be commited and dedicated, and has a strong sense of right and left. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 16:53, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Question''' - Would ''you'' do a coup? A coup, would you do?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 17:00, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Considering I advised against the original, and predicted the result, I'm going to say the answer to this should be self evident. The only method of government overthrow I support is via anarchy/direct democracy, not tyranny. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 17:05, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::'''Real Question''' - What areas of the wiki do you think need imporvement?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 17:06, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::I will answer your question by directing you to my [[#Campaign statement]]. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 17:13, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::::'''Question''' - You mention a list of plans somewhere down the page. Would it be possible to give us a vague idea of such plans?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 14:06, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::::Done. <small>(Vague, as requested. <tt>:P</tt>)</small> {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 04:14, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Abstain''' - Moar work at the admin sections plz. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 17:41, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Also does not meet criteria. Spam bid. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 17:44, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::I've been busy. I now have more time on my hands and am getting to work on some projects I've nto had time for. If elected, I will probably work on as many fixes and reforms as I can, and then drop back to a general "maintenance" level of activity. I do already have pretty much the "Drama Pages" watched and know a lot more about wiki software and this wiki in particular than probably half the currently serving sysops. For what that's worth. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 17:57, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' – Now we are tied again, fucker. i still haven't forgiven you for this. Expect something epic [[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]]</sup> 18:20, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:But of course! I'll be waiting. <tt>;)</tt> {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 18:23, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 18:37, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' because bringing Grim back might be just about the most positive thing anyone has done around here since the crotchety old git left ;) --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 18:50, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - Simply because you are the number one person I love to do voiceover work for when you are drunk and can't figure out a mic.--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 19:17, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - I know Revenant well, and I can say that he cares about the rules, not just following them but also questioning and reforming them when necessary. Moreover, he's cool-headed, fair, not afraid to stand up for what he thinks is right, and not afraid to back down when he's wrong. Also, he has extensive wiki experience, not just with the UD wiki but also with other wikis, and as such he can provide an objective outsider's point of view that the sysop team would otherwise lack. In short, he's an excellent choice. {{User:Aphelion/sig}} 19:58, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:[[Vandal Banning#User:Revenant|Follow them rulz!]] -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 20:06, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::Incidentally, he did follow the rules! If you look at the vandalism policy page, his actions were not in violation, but this is an argument for that page, not this one. {{User:Aphelion/sig}} 20:13, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::For what he was originally charged with. Regardless, he still recieved a warning for vandalism. You can't dispute that. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 20:24, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::::He did, but it's my hope that it'll be overturned. The warning was unjust. But again, that discussion is for A/VB. {{User:Aphelion/sig}} 20:44, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::::It won't be. That aside though,... I look at it this way. It's only a warning. It's no big deal. He'll be able to have it struck in two months if he's active enough, and if he isn't,... he shouldn't have this job anyway. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 20:52, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::::You are wrong. I *am* [[A/VB#Response_by_accused|disputing it]]. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 21:32, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::::<small>further discussion on the [[UDWiki talk:Administration/Promotions#Revenant|talk page]] --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:27, 10 July 2010 (BST)</small><br />
*'''Against''' - Your recent vandalisums (lolz fail spelling) have made me lose faith in your abilitys.--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 20:03, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:What's even funnier is that he recieved a warning for something unrelated to what was originally brought up in A/A. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 20:05, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:I am a political prisoner and the victim of sysop bias. Hence my running against psyop corruption. Consider the source: I have never even been brought to [[A/VB]] before, whereas the ruling sysop is '''not only''' ''involved in the case'' but [[A/VD#User:DanceDanceRevolution|has a history]] of being brought there. (Also, as Poodle.) {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 20:11, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::You are the Nelson Mandela of this wiki.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 20:47, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::He can't, and shouldn't, be balmed for being in a position you put him in Rev. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 20:51, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::He is the master of his fate, and the captain of his soul--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 20:54, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::::¤Ṱḫḝ Ḩḗḷḹ?¤ <sup>[[EVIL|©]][[Talk:EVIL|®]]</sup> -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 20:59, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::::Allow me to elaborate: last I checked, DDR was a sentient being responsible for his own actions. Am I wrong? {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 21:35, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::::::So if I were to massivly vandalise the wiki, say, I took images and that were masivly used, linked to on thousands of pages,... And edited their pages to include <nowiki>{{Subst:User Talk:Poodle of doom}}</nowiki>, severly hindering the wiki's performance, and did that on all the op's pages as well, not a one of them could rule vandalism, because they'd all be involved? -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig 2}} 21:56, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::::::…No. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 04:16, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::::::::<small>further discussion on the [[UDWiki talk:Administration/Promotions#Revenant|talk page]] --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:27, 10 July 2010 (BST)</small><br />
*::::Precisely, AS. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 21:32, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' I have always liked revs.. he answers my stupid questions. and mostly does what i ask.----[[User:Sexualharrison|sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 22:03, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' Rev is one of the most respected and influential people in Urban Dead. He's an RG Mod, ZL Mod, and he's a member in high standing of far too many groups to name. I can't think of anyone else better suited for the Administration on this wiki. -- {{User:Goribus/Sig}} 22:46, 5 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Abstain''' - is awesome just the way he is. don't want him wrecked by adminality.{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:51, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:I know that you only have my best interests at heart, Eris bless your soul. But I am already an admin at way too many places – it's far too late for me. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 12:58, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - I think Rev is a pretty cool guy. eh does work and doesnt afraid of anything. -- [[User:Sockpuppie|Jelly Otter]] 06:39, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' No, for realz. You seem like a good candidate. [[User:Oidar|Oidar]] 08:09, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - Barhah! --[[User:Thekooks|Kooks]] 14:58, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' -- For his obviously joking nomination, above. [[User:Asheets|Asheets]] 16:26, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:I am as serious as cancer. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 12:38, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - Revenant has done more for the actual game than anyone sysop I can see. I think it would be good to have more sysops that actually do stuff that is beneficial for the game community and are actually respected instead of just jacking off on a power trip and wasting bandwidth. --[[User:Rapture|Rapture]] 14:58, 6 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - He does the ZL and works for the RG. I don't see the wiki being that much harder. --{{User:Akule/sig}} 00:31, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - Yeah... --{{User:Jordan Salafack/sig}} 02:42, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' - Even if he didn't fail criterion 2 and 3, his knowledge and understanding of this wiki is only as abysmal as his attempts to rectify it with his [[User_talk:Revenant#sorry|wikilawyering]], of which his talent is about on par with that of Poodle. Also, if he's going to behave like [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2010_07&diff=prev&oldid=1736570 shit] [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct&diff=prev&oldid=1736611 and] [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Promotions&diff=prev&oldid=1736670 piss] every time something goes against him, it's probably best he not have buttons. However, this week's escapade whilst annoying was totally fucking worth it because he managed to bring back Grim. But you can only revive grim once, friend. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:50, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Hey, funny coincidence: that first link is actually on my list of things to fix. I should probably write that list down so I remember to write up the policy. Cheers! {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 11:36, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::That's also another reason I'm against your promotion, you've just hit the number 1 reason on my "why not to vouch" list. As per your comment ''"I've been busy. I now have more time on my hands and am getting to work on some projects I've nto had time for. If elected, I will probably work on as many fixes and reforms as I can, and then drop back to a general "maintenance" level of activity. I do already have pretty much the "Drama Pages" watched and know a lot more about wiki software and this wiki in particular than probably half the currently serving sysops. For what that's worth."'', empty promises of the future with no evidence to assure us you'll go through with them isn't something that flys well on this wiki for obvious reasons; You haven't fulfilled criterion 2 on the sheet above and before you all say "If a user is highly exemplary in one criterion blah blah", no. Not achieving 500 edits in 6 months is poor for a wiki where the last [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Rosslessness (1)|8]] [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Suicidalangel (2)|o]][[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Linkthewindow|r]] [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/DanceDanceRevolution (2)|'''9''']] ([[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/The Rooster (2)|m]][[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Red Hawk One|o]][[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Misanthropy|r]][[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Aichon|e]][[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Yonnua Koponen (3)|e]]) promoted users all were promoted with edits in the thousands during that time frame, we've come to expect a bit more. As it stands, you're around, it's true. But you're barely around, you barely qualify for sysop in a quantitative state and this bid is only the product of a retaliatory drama-filled event which is ridiculously poor form for a "budding sysop", so I don't even know why I'm taking it as seriously as I am, so I guess you've got me there. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 12:18, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::I'd rather spend an hour or three fixing a page properly in a single edit than make 500 tiny edits. Edit whoring is pointless. I could do it, but I'd rather spend my time, y'know, '''making the place better'''. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 12:30, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::Also, please don't '''you''' tell '''me''' why '''''I did something'''''. [[wikipedia:Projection|Projection]] is an ugly habit. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 12:32, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::::This defence has the same effect if you'd called me a troll by this point. Using such an argument is ignorance not because it's plausible as a viewpoint, you're simply trying to scramble for excuses for your noncontribution. You find solace in saying such edits were "spam edits" when they in fact weren't, you are more than happy to look through any of these (maybe not SA's) edits and notice that at leased 95% of them were contributive. Yours on the other hand, well, I think yesterdays fiasco speaks enough words. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:01, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::::Please, do yourself a favour and lay off the ''ad hominem'' attacks – I have a hard time taking you seriously when you resort to logical fallacies with every comment. Can we just talk calmly, rationally, and civilly, please, and cease casting aspersions on each others' intentions? {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 04:04, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::::::No prob, but I really have nothing more to say, i've already said how I feel about the bid. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:06, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::::::Can I hold you to that? I've already got it in writing. <tt>:P</tt> {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 04:14, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' - I'm failing to find a sufficient activity and perhaps interest in the wiki during the last weeks/months. And no, this is not a matter of making major edits in contrast to lots of minor ones since apart from recent mayor stuff those "fixing a page properly"-edits seem to be rare as well. [[User:G F J|G F J]] 12:42, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:To tell the truth, I've not had much time for Urban Dead in general or the wiki specifically for a while until ''very'' recently. Partly because I've been ridiculously busy IRL, and partly because there is so much that needs fixing that I've simply written it off as a Sisyphean task. Left to my own devices, I may or may not have run for psyop eventually, but certainly not so soon. However, I am not one to back down from a challenge (especially one I am fairly prepared for anyway), and if Grim or anyone else thinks so, they are welcome to be proven wrong. Hope that addresses your misgivings. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 13:06, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - Drama retardant. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 18:54, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:You'll go far with that sense of humour! <tt>;)</tt> {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 03:57, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*''Question/Statement'' - Despite this week's actions which I disagree with, and the fact that he doesn't quite meet all of the guidelines, I do believe Revenant is a capable and extremely contributive member to the meta-game, including the wiki. While I see him as having quite a bit of disdain for the rules around the wiki, I also see that as a good thing, inasmuch as he can help to challenge them and reform them (and they are ''desperately'' in need of rethinking, so fresh perspectives are welcome). And if he gets too far out of line while doing so, there's always A/M to handle that. So, my question: do you plan to work from within the system to change it, or do you plan to merely use your new authority to circumvent the system to bring about change? {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 20:31, 7 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:I believe I have answered this with my response to Yonnua, above. <small>(Work within the system to reform the system.)</small> And I would say that rather than disdain for the rules, ''[[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Ignore_all_rules|per se]]'', I have disdain for people who believe that unwritten rules take precedence over both rational thought and those rules the community has written, examined, voted on, and approved. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 03:57, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::'''Vouch''' - This is a sincere and honest vouch, not meant in jest or otherwise, 'crats. While Revenant is by no means perfect (who is?), I do think he would be an asset to the team and would give us some much-needed perspective. We've been reading far too much into the letter of the law recently and really do need to be getting back to the roots that were the basis for those rules, rather than the monstrosities that they've become. I trust that he can bring a viewpoint that is valuable. Rev, if accepted, you definitely need to work a bit on your tact, just so you know. :P {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 04:38, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::Tact? Aich', I hate to tell you this, but '''I have been''': ''normally'' I think too much that I don't say, but I have found that the philosophy of "not giving a fuck" gets much better results and leaves me much less stressed. <tt>;)</tt> {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 04:46, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' only because. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 04:04, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*I don't doubt that if promoted, Rev would be an asset to the team - as others have alluded to, he's ''very'' active in the metagame (which can't really be said for many sysops,) has good skills with computers, and simply ''isn't a dickhead.'' Like Aichon, I agree that a fresh perspective would be good for the wiki, especially if (him/we) finally get around to overhauling the rules. That said, he's never been terribly active here - unlike DDR, I don't think every sysop needs to have several thousand edits before they can be considered for a promotion, but at the same time, a prospective sysop needs to understand the day-to-day workings of the wiki, and a bit of it's history (even if they plan to change them.) ''That said'', I've always suspected Revenant has been lurking around here, but not editing. Oh, and a '''Question''' - do you have any plans at the moment on how your would potentially reform the system? {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 05:07, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:Thank you. And ''yes''. <small>(Please see my reply to Yonnua, above.)</small> {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 05:37, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::Saw that, was wondering if you had anything a little more specific in mind <tt>;)</tt>. Still, my above comments above stand. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:21, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::Either you did not dig deep (or late) enough, or you are posting in the wrong place. <tt>:P</tt> <small>Also, thanks, man.</small> {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 14:50, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''vouch''' - You're not a faggot, and thus better than every other sysops in power right now.--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 10:10, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:<3 (no homo) {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 14:16, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''against''' - From what little I can glean by recent edits, my impression of Revenant is that he fights relentlessly to the last word on any dispute, and he makes a big stink/crusade when something doesn't go his way. Conversations and votes often tilt the wrong direction here, and I'd like to trust that a sysop can let those things roll of their back and remain objective. Maybe my impression is all wrong, but I can just see Rev misusing sysop powers because he was so sure in his mind that he was right. If I could see more examples of Revenant taking disagreements in stride I would feel happier about vouching for him.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 13:00, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:I would rather be corrected and proven wrong than continue to be wrong. Possibly as a result of this philosophy, I have a certificate from a duly appointed government official that says <real name censored> Is Always Right. What can I say? If you contend that I am wrong, I want you to prove it. It's the most honest way. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 14:04, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::Also, BTW, I proved Grim wrong on the case that became "Grimgate" and he backed down. Of course, by then it was too late because the mob were already baying for blood, but I pride myself on being able to resolve disputed by rational discourse. Tell me that's not something this wiki could use more of. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 14:15, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::You see the problem with the wiki is that there is often a fine line between "right" and "wrong" and being able to "prove" such things. Mostly, it's all just users butting heads and the best action relies on what users most agree with, and you've shown considerable problems accepting this factor on the wiki, say for example, the recent sysop vote (note vote though you still seemed to find me at fault) to have you warned on A/VB. For all we know you could be the most accepting person in the world once they've been proven wrong, but expecting to be "proven" wrong when we are simply offering the best option to compensate for the lack of a perfect result is something I think you have to learn to work with. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 15:39, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::It's true, I often expect people to be smarter than they are. P.S. I knew you couldn't resist commenting. <tt><3</tt> {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 16:20, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' - A good guy, but not sysopy.--{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 23:25, 8 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' Yay Rev! --[[User:Michael Barnaby|Michael Barnaby]] 00:38, 9 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Against''' - Literally retarded. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:42, 12 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 15:23, 12 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*::"what is hyperbole?? what is a comedic device??? please help me to understand these concepts as I am 12 years old" --u {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 16:31, 12 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:::i dun geddit? plz to b xplainin kthx {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 07:30, 16 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Abstain''' Never really heard good Or bad of you.--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 05:48, 13 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*:where the fuck have you been the last 5 or so years? not playing UD i guess.----[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">sexualharrison</span>]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] ¯\([[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]])/¯ 04:47, 16 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - Rev has promised to air mail me cookies, and, quite frankly, I really have the munchies at the moment. --{{User:Ashley Valentine/sig}} 23:41, 13 July 2010 (BST)<br />
*'''Vouch''' - He is needed, too. --[[User:Grogh|Grogh]] 21:34, 17 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
The community discussion is now '''closed.''' The bureaucrats will make their decision.--{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 18:00, 19 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
So, yeah. After the usual discussion with boxy the decision has made to '''deny''' the bid. ''However'' Rev is very active in the community, and if, as he states elsewhere he does contribute more to the wiki over the next few months, a future bid will be looked on more favourably. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:40, 21 July 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==Recently Concluded Bids==<br />
<!--''For more concluded bids, see [[:Category:Promotions Candidacies|Promotion Candidacies]].''--><br />
<br />
''For more concluded bids, see [[:Category:Promotions Candidacies|Promotion Candidacies]].''<br />
<br />
==Archived Promotions==<br />
<br />
*[[:Category:Promotions Candidacies|Complete list of Promotion Requests]]<br />
*[[:Category:Successful Promotions Candidacies|Successful Promotions Candidacies]]<br />
*[[:Category:Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies|Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies]]<br />
*[[:Category:Unaccepted Nominations|Unaccepted Nominations]]<br />
*[[:Category:Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies|Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies]]</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Amusing_Locations_in_Malton/Urban_Dead_Colloquialisms/Suburb_Nicknames&diff=1744583
Amusing Locations in Malton/Urban Dead Colloquialisms/Suburb Nicknames
2010-07-20T07:16:00Z
<p>J3D: /* Pimbank */</p>
<hr />
<div>__NOTOC__<br />
''Back to [[Guide:Colloquialisms]]''<br />
<center>{{ALiMNav}}</center><br />
This page is a list of every [[suburb]] and it's associated user given nicknames. Please add your own, no need to have widespread acceptance! But if they are nonsensical (nonsensical is fine as long as a sensifying explanation is included) they will be removed by the [[2 Cool|Management]]. Thankyou for your cooperation and please, enjoy the lolz.<br />
<br />
'''Rules for adding to the list:'''<br />
#Link to urbandictionary liberally.<br />
#Rather than timestamping please 3 tildes (<nowiki>~~~</nowiki>) to leave your sig without cluttering the page.<br />
#Keep explanations short, concise and lolicious.<br />
<br />
<br />
=Individual [[Suburbs]]=<br />
<br />
<br />
==[[Barrville]]==<br />
*"Barhahville" - Used by the followers of [[Barhah]]. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Brooke Hills]]==<br />
*"Brooke's [http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tits Hills]" - a [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Brooksey" -used by most people... probably...{{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
*"Brooke's Pills" - [[User:Dr Cory Bjornson|Dr Cory Bjornson]]<br />
<br />
==[[Brooksville]]==<br />
*"The other Brooksey" - See above. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Buttonville]]==<br />
*"Butt-ville" - several dirty-minded residents according to the suburbs [[Buttonville|wiki page]]. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"The Button" and "The Butt" - wiki page abbreviations. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*Known unofficially as "Cheeseville" for a day back in 2007. Didn't really catch on. {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Chancelwood]]==<br />
*"The Chancellery" --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]]<br />
<br />
==[[Chudleyton]]==<br />
*"The Chud" - A [[User:WanYao|WanYao]] nickname- {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Chodeleyton" - Am I ALiM worthy yet? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]]<br />
<br />
==[[Crooketon]]==<br />
*"Crooks" --{{User:Haliman111/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Crowbank]]==<br />
*"Crowbar" - That's not a crowbar, [http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v327/bo5ton/simpsonsoftheweek/theweedhomer/13.gif this] is a crowbar. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Crowskank" - A [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Dakerstown]]==<br />
*"Suburb One" according to the [[Dakerstown|wiki page]]. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Dakers" is widely used among the Crimson Clan, and probably other groups from the area. [[User:LK Oddjob|LK Oddjob]]<br />
*"Hellgate 1" [[User:Maverik115|Maverik115]]<br />
<br />
==[[Danversbank]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Dartside]]==<br />
"Fartside" - I cant believe no one else thought of this--[[User:Pyro1499|CJ]]<br />
<br />
==[[Darvall Heights]]==<br />
*"Devil's Heights" - a [[2 Cool]] nickname. {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
*"Hell" - less subtle. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Dentonside]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Dulston]]==<br />
*"Dullston" - Coined independently by thousands. [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
*"Dullstown" - An alternate spelling of the above. [[User:Bob_Fortune|Bob Fortune]] <sup>[[Red Rum|RR]]</sup><br />
*"Dull Street" - Expansion of Dullst, continuing the theme from the above entries. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Dunell Hills]]==<br />
*"Dumbell Hills" - coined independently by many different people. [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
*"[[wikipedia:Dunny|Dunny]]" - A [[2 Cool]] Nickname -{{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Dunningwood]]==<br />
"Dumpinwoods" - thats what a bear does!--[[User:Pyro1499|User is on that OTHER shit]]<br />
<br />
==[[Earletown]]==<br />
<br />
==[[East Becktown]]==<br />
<br />
==[[East Boundwood]]==<br />
<br />
==[[East Grayside]]==<br />
*"East Gayside" - A [[2 Cool]] nickname {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Eastonwood]]==<br />
*"Ew" - like EWWWWW but more [[wikipedia:valley girl|valley girl]]. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Ground Zero" [[User:Maverik115|Maverik115]]<br />
*"[[wikipedia:Clint Eastwood|Eastwood]]". FUCK YEAH! {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Edgecombe]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Foulkes Village]]==<br />
*"Fucks Village" - A [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Fryerbank]]==<br />
*"Fat City" --{{User:Dr Eddie Ashford/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Galbraith Hills]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Gatcombeton]]==<br />
*The "catacomb" since forever. [[User:Zeug|Zeug]]<br />
<br />
==[[Gibsonton]]==<br />
*"Gibs" for short by some denizens. Was also called "Queen of Malton" by the [[Gibsonton Nationals]] but that never caught on.--{{User: Garviel Loken/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Greentown]]==<br />
* "Gtown" [[User:Pyro1499|Pyro1499]] - because it just sounds gangsta like that<br />
<br />
==[[Grigg Heights]]==<br />
"Griggs" - This is the name used by the locals & ol' timers for the suburb. [[User:Sir WV|Sir WV]]<br />
<br />
"Grh!ggz" or "Grh!gg Haagz" - Death Rattle for "Griggs" & "Grigg Heights". [[User:Sir WV|Sir WV]]<br />
<br />
==[[Gulsonside]]==<br />
*"The Gully" --{{User:Haliman111/sig}}<br />
*"Ghoulsonside", by [[Clubbed to Death]]--[[User:Mallrat|Mallrat]] 16:13, 19 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==[[Havercroft]]==<br />
*"Havers" - The most popular name for the suburb. --[[user:Jsrbrunty|Jsrbrunty]]<br />
*"Lara Croft" - A 2 Cool nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Heytown]]==<br />
*"Hey now, Hey now, don't dream it's over" - Coz lyk it's a [[wikipedia:Don't Dream It's Over|song]] and the suburb makes me think of the lyrics... {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
* SafeTown - because it is almost always green or light yellow. --[[User:Justinbronze|Justinbronze]]<br />
<br />
==[[Hollomstown]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Houldenbank]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Huntley Heights]]==<br />
*"HH" - It's just the suburb's fucking acronym, okay? -{{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Cuntley Kites" - A [[2 Cool]] Nickname -{{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Jensentown]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Judgewood]]==<br />
*"The Barrister" - Not very widely used, but it does exist! --[[user:Jsrbrunty|Jsrbrunty]]<br />
*"JW" - an acronym, obviously. It has absolutely nothing to do with [[Wikipedia:Sheriff_J.W._Pepper#Sheriff_J.W._Pepper|this JW]]. --<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC, Segoe Script, Comic Sans MS, sans-serif;text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.4em">[[User:Chief Seagull|<span style="color: green;">Chief Seagull</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Chief Seagull|<small>squawk</small>]]</span> [http://tinyurl.com/yfrld3r <sup><small>don't mess with the Seagull!</small></sup>]<br />
<br />
==[[Kempsterbank]]==<br />
*"Dumpster-bank" - coined, like, just now, this very moment, by me. [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
*"Dumpyskank" - a [[2 Cool|corruption]] of the above nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Kbank"- common abbreviation. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Ketchelbank]]==<br />
*"Ketchupbank" - Everything's better with ketchup. [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
*"Brainbank" - according to [[Brainstalkers]] {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Kinch Heights]]==<br />
* "[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ginch Ginch] Heights" - Pretty obvious, no? [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
<br />
==[[Lamport Hills]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Lerwill Heights]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Lockettside]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Lukinswood]]==<br />
*"Lukin's Wood" - Those fellers over at 2 Cool inc. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Millen Hills]]==<br />
*[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=minging "Mingin' Hills"] - a [[2 Cool]] nickname. -{{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Miltown]]==<br />
*"Milftown" - I've never heard anyone else call it this but [[2 Cool]]...--{{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
*"Freaktown" - Show me on the [http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/1442/fuckingmiltowneu3.gif map] --[[User:Sockpuppie|Jelly Otter]]<br />
<br />
==[[Mockridge Heights]]==<br />
*"The Mock" coined by the [[Mockers]] <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[UDWiki:Image Categorisation|i]]</sup></small><br />
<br />
==[[Molebank]]==<br />
*The Mole, because it doesn't have a nickname yet. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Mornington]]==<br />
*"[[wikipedia:Mornington Peninsula|Mornington Peninsula]]", much easier to say. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
* "The Crescent" - by the cognoscenti. --[[User:Mallrat|Mallrat]]<br />
<br />
==[[New Arkham]]==<br />
*"NewArk" - Not quite as desolate as New Jersey... but close... [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
<br />
==[[Nixbank]]==<br />
*"[[User:Nallan|Nick]]'s Skank" - A [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[North Blythville]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Old Arkham]]==<br />
*"OArk" - An abbreviation parallelling "NewArk". [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
<br />
==[[Osmondville]]==<br />
*"Ozzy" - a handy abbreviation. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Owsleybank]]==<br />
*"The Owl's Nest" - --{{User:Dr Eddie Ashford/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Pashenton]]==<br />
*"Pashtown" - The place to be on a friday night, a [[2 Cool]] nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Bash her-town" - When my girlfriend forgets her place. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Paynterton]]==<br />
*"Pain town" --{{User:Haliman111/sig}}<br />
*"Painterton", fuck trying to spell it correctly. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Paynerton" is a common mispelling {{User: Garviel Loken/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Peddlesden Village]]==<br />
*"Pederast Village" - Coined by Wan Yao and used by all two of his friends and a few other people he bribed to with promises of PAI. [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
*"Pedo" - A Useful [[2 Cool]] abbreviation of the above. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Maltons Biggest Wasteland" - you been there lately? its kansas without the corn --[[User:Pyro1499|CJ]]<br />
*"The Village" --{{User:Haliman111/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Pegton]]==<br />
*"Pegleg" - LOL! A [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Pennville]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Penny Heights]]==<br />
*"[[wikipedia:Henny Penny (restaurant)|Penny Henny]]" - Because people in Penny Heights act like farm animals. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Henny Penny" - It's less confusing this way. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Peppardville]]==<br />
*"The Pepperpot". --[[user:Jsrbrunty|Jsrbrunty]]<br />
<br />
==[[Pescodside]]==<br />
*"Pesky" - Easier to spell correctly, ya dig? {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Pesticide" - A fair pun --[[User:Tiberius Matye|Tiberius Matye]]<br />
<br />
==[[Pimbank]]==<br />
*"Pimpskank" - a [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"[[Wikipedia:Pimm's|Pimm'sbank]]" - a delighful place for an iced afternoon bevvy. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Pitneybank]]==<br />
*"Trenchtown" - on account of the [[Trenchcoater|inhabitants]] of [[Fort Creedy]]. [[User:Bob_Fortune|Bob Fortune]] <sup>[[Red Rum|RR]]</sup><br />
<br />
==[[Quarlesbank]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Raines Hills]]==<br />
*"Brnhz! Hills" --{{User:Dr Eddie Ashford/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Randallbank]]==<br />
*[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=randy Randy]skank - A [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Reganbank]]==<br />
* "The Cultural Wasteland of Malton" [[User:Sir WV|Sir WV]]<br />
* "The Arm-pit of Malton" [[User:Sir WV|Sir WV]]<br />
<br />
==[[Rhodenbank]]==<br />
* "Robbinbank" --[[User:Pyro1499|Pyro1499]]<br />
* "Robberybank" --[[User:Pyro1499|Pyro1499]] - because of all the kick doors goin on up there<br />
<br />
==[[Richmond Hills]]==<br />
"Rich Man Hills" - Meh. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Ridleybank]]==<br />
*"The 'bank" - Many people, mostly dead, but some have a pulse. --[[User:Thekooks|KOOKY]]<br />
*"The homeland" - Many, mostly dead, people. --[[User:Thekooks|KOOKY]]<br />
*"Wrigglyskank" - A [[2 Cool]] nickname. {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
*"Ridleybonk" or the "Bonk"- RRF MUST PATROLLZ IT NOAH! --[[User:Sockpuppie|Zoey Zarg]]<br />
*"The Candyland", used by the [[Gingerbread Men]] in '06 -[[User:Hagnat|Hagnat]]<br />
*"Dead Central" - used by me on my first visit to the suburb --{{User:Dr Eddie Ashford/Sig}}<br />
*"Riddle 'Em Bank" - What you should do when you see the zeds there --[[User:Tiberius Matye|Tiberius Matye]]<br />
*"Ridley" - pretty obvious, but probably one of the most widely-used nicknames for that reason. --[[user:Jsrbrunty|Jsrbrunty]]<br />
*"DHZ: De-Humanized Zone" - Cause that what happens there. --[[User:Spoook|Spoook]] 06:18, 25 June 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==[[Roachtown]]==<br />
*It's on [[ALiM]] for fucks sake, does it really need a nickname? {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"The Stoner Capital of Malton" You know why. {{User:Sgt Martinez/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Roftwood]]==<br />
*"Rotwood" - common spelling liked by undead --[[User:Duke Garland|<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>]] [[LCD|<nowiki>[</nowiki>]][[User talk:Duke Garland|talk]][[Signature Race|<nowiki>]</nowiki>]]<br />
*"Roflwood" - a [[2 Cool]] nickname {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Rolt Heights]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Roywood]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Ruddlebank]]==<br />
*"[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ruddy Ruddy]skank" - a [[2 Cool]] nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Santlerville]]==<br />
*"The North Pole" - Used by Wan Yao, and pretty much no one else. Some kind of reference to Santler Claws and elves and Canadian Beavers. Or something... [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
*"S'ville" - Just an abbreviation...nothing witty here... {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Finisville" - named after [[User:Finis_Valorum|most of the population]]. [[User:Bob_Fortune|Bob Fortune]] <sup>[[Red Rum|RR]]</sup><br />
*"Beaverville" - after the prominate local group, [[The Dribbling Beavers]]. Used widely including on the [[Mall_Tour_2009/MallTourMap|Mall Tour '09 Map]]. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Scarletwood]]==<br />
*"[[wikipedia:Redwood|Redwood]]" -{{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Shackleville]]==<br />
*"The [[wikipedia:Love Shack|Love Shack]]" - a [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"[[Shacknews|Shacknewsville]]" - Always reminds me of that horde. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Shearbank]]==<br />
*"Sheerskank" - A [[2 Cool]] nickname.--{{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
*"Zergbank" – Used among [[ZHU|Zerg Hunters]] for reasons that should be obvious. {{User:Revenant/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Shore Hills]]==<br />
*"THA HILLS" - probably the most common name used because of the reference in the archives to this place being a Ghetto[[user:madmac356|madmac356]] <br />
*"Whore Shills" - an amusing spoonerism. [[User:Bob_Fortune|Bob Fortune]] <sup>[[Red Rum|RR]]</sup><br />
<br />
==[[Shuttlebank]]==<br />
<br />
==[[South Blythville]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Spicer Hills]]==<br />
*"The Flavour Hole" --{{User:Dr Eddie Ashford/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Spracklingbank]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Stanbury Village]]==<br />
*Stan's Village, also an acceptable abbreviation is [[Stanbury Village|StanVllg]]. -- [[User:Sir Fred of Etruria|Sir Fred of Etruria]]<br />
*Stab'n'bury Village. {{User:Revenant/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Starlingtown]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Tapton]]==<br />
*"[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tap Tap] that" - as in 'I'm tappin' that', if one is in tapton or 'let's tap that' if one wishes to go to tapton. A 2 Cool nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Tollyton]]==<br />
*"Toll Town" - You know you like it --[[User:Tiberius Matye|Tiberius Matye]]<br />
<br />
==[[Vinetown]]==<br />
*"Vinetown?" Yes. We're that cool. But it's said in the form of a question.--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}}<br />
*"V-Town". Gangsta stylee.--[[User:Mallrat|Mallrat]]<br />
<br />
==[[West Becktown]]==<br />
*"Wet Becky" - A [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Pussy Town" - apparently...{{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[West Boundwood]]==<br />
<br />
==[[West Grayside]]==<br />
*West Gayside {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Whittenside]]==<br />
* "Whittensdie" - By various, on account of the large [[Feral_Undead|FU]] enclave there. - {{User:Marcusfilby/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Williamsville]]==<br />
*"Willy" or "Willy-ville", part of the comedy duo, Willy and the Butt. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Wray Heights]]==<br />
*"Wry Heights" - why the fuck not? {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Wyke Hills]]==<br />
*"Dyke Hills" (See [[Wooman Towers]]) - a [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Why Kills" - That's what I hear in my head everytime I think of this place. It'll catch on. You'll see.--[[User:El Payaso Malo|Bishop Vagancia I]]<br />
<br />
==[[Wykewood]]==<br />
*"Dikewood"-[[User:Pyro1499|CJ]]<br />
<br />
==[[Yagoton]]==<br />
*"Dagobah" - Coined by Wan Yao in one his moments of especially inspired non-lucidity, and used by him and those unidentified two friends he keeps mentioning. [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
<br />
<br />
=Regions=<br />
<br />
==[[The Arkham Sisters]]==<br />
Made up of the twin suburbs of [[Old Arkham]] and [[New Arkham]], the term was coined by [[2 Cool]] and has caused significant public discussion and controversy in it's short history. A variety of other nicknames also exist for the twin 'burbs including (but not limited to) Arkansas, Noah's Arkham and plain ol' Arkham.<br />
<br />
==[[The Four Corners]]==<br />
<br />
An area within South East Malton populated by brave players who have managed to overcome the urge, NEVER. TO. CROSS. BOUNDARIES. {{User:Rosslessness/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Eastonwood|Easton]][[Brooke Hills|brooke]]==<br />
A [[2 Cool]] nickname used to refer to the twin suburbs of [[Eastonwood]] and [[Brooke Hills]]. As Brooke Hills is largely made up of empty blocks and lacks a 'heartland', the area near the border of Eastonwood is often considered to almost be a part of that suburb.<br />
<br />
==[[Northeast Malton]]==<br />
An area of Malton officially stretching from [[Dulston]] to [[Randallbank]] but in practice the real core of groups that consider it the Northeast consists of [[Dulston]] to [[Santlerville]]. Has had consistent problems with [[Rolt Heights War|massed]] [[Invasion of Gibsonton|PKing]] and [[User:Finis_Valorum|zergs]] aimed at the locals. Local groups are fairly independent and (try) to work together in the face of serious problems with mixed results.<br />
<br />
=Cities=<br />
==[[Malton]]==<br />
*"Mouldon" - It's just ''that'' stagnant! - {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}}<br />
*"Malt Liquor" - {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}}<br />
*"Mall Town" --{{User:TripleU/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Monroeville]]==<br />
*"M'ville" or "Mville" {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
*"Marilyn Monroe" {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
*"Moronville" --[[User:Sockpuppie|Jelly Otter]]<br />
*"Monroe" - yeah.{{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Borehamwood]]==<br />
*"B'wood" or "Bwood" {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
*"BHW" - Used by [[User:Duke Garland|the duke]] - {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"BNW" - "O brave new world, That has such people in't!" -[[User:J3D|John the Savage]]<br />
*"Boreham" - yeah.{{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Boringwood" --{{User:Haliman111/sig}}<br />
*"Borewood" --{{User:Haliman111/sig}}<br />
*It's called "Boredomwood", kids. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]]</div>
J3D
https://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Amusing_Locations_in_Malton/Urban_Dead_Colloquialisms/Suburb_Nicknames&diff=1744582
Amusing Locations in Malton/Urban Dead Colloquialisms/Suburb Nicknames
2010-07-20T07:15:34Z
<p>J3D: /* Pimbank */</p>
<hr />
<div>__NOTOC__<br />
''Back to [[Guide:Colloquialisms]]''<br />
<center>{{ALiMNav}}</center><br />
This page is a list of every [[suburb]] and it's associated user given nicknames. Please add your own, no need to have widespread acceptance! But if they are nonsensical (nonsensical is fine as long as a sensifying explanation is included) they will be removed by the [[2 Cool|Management]]. Thankyou for your cooperation and please, enjoy the lolz.<br />
<br />
'''Rules for adding to the list:'''<br />
#Link to urbandictionary liberally.<br />
#Rather than timestamping please 3 tildes (<nowiki>~~~</nowiki>) to leave your sig without cluttering the page.<br />
#Keep explanations short, concise and lolicious.<br />
<br />
<br />
=Individual [[Suburbs]]=<br />
<br />
<br />
==[[Barrville]]==<br />
*"Barhahville" - Used by the followers of [[Barhah]]. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Brooke Hills]]==<br />
*"Brooke's [http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tits Hills]" - a [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Brooksey" -used by most people... probably...{{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
*"Brooke's Pills" - [[User:Dr Cory Bjornson|Dr Cory Bjornson]]<br />
<br />
==[[Brooksville]]==<br />
*"The other Brooksey" - See above. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Buttonville]]==<br />
*"Butt-ville" - several dirty-minded residents according to the suburbs [[Buttonville|wiki page]]. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"The Button" and "The Butt" - wiki page abbreviations. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*Known unofficially as "Cheeseville" for a day back in 2007. Didn't really catch on. {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Chancelwood]]==<br />
*"The Chancellery" --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]]<br />
<br />
==[[Chudleyton]]==<br />
*"The Chud" - A [[User:WanYao|WanYao]] nickname- {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Chodeleyton" - Am I ALiM worthy yet? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]]<br />
<br />
==[[Crooketon]]==<br />
*"Crooks" --{{User:Haliman111/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Crowbank]]==<br />
*"Crowbar" - That's not a crowbar, [http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v327/bo5ton/simpsonsoftheweek/theweedhomer/13.gif this] is a crowbar. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Crowskank" - A [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Dakerstown]]==<br />
*"Suburb One" according to the [[Dakerstown|wiki page]]. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Dakers" is widely used among the Crimson Clan, and probably other groups from the area. [[User:LK Oddjob|LK Oddjob]]<br />
*"Hellgate 1" [[User:Maverik115|Maverik115]]<br />
<br />
==[[Danversbank]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Dartside]]==<br />
"Fartside" - I cant believe no one else thought of this--[[User:Pyro1499|CJ]]<br />
<br />
==[[Darvall Heights]]==<br />
*"Devil's Heights" - a [[2 Cool]] nickname. {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
*"Hell" - less subtle. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Dentonside]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Dulston]]==<br />
*"Dullston" - Coined independently by thousands. [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
*"Dullstown" - An alternate spelling of the above. [[User:Bob_Fortune|Bob Fortune]] <sup>[[Red Rum|RR]]</sup><br />
*"Dull Street" - Expansion of Dullst, continuing the theme from the above entries. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Dunell Hills]]==<br />
*"Dumbell Hills" - coined independently by many different people. [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
*"[[wikipedia:Dunny|Dunny]]" - A [[2 Cool]] Nickname -{{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Dunningwood]]==<br />
"Dumpinwoods" - thats what a bear does!--[[User:Pyro1499|User is on that OTHER shit]]<br />
<br />
==[[Earletown]]==<br />
<br />
==[[East Becktown]]==<br />
<br />
==[[East Boundwood]]==<br />
<br />
==[[East Grayside]]==<br />
*"East Gayside" - A [[2 Cool]] nickname {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Eastonwood]]==<br />
*"Ew" - like EWWWWW but more [[wikipedia:valley girl|valley girl]]. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Ground Zero" [[User:Maverik115|Maverik115]]<br />
*"[[wikipedia:Clint Eastwood|Eastwood]]". FUCK YEAH! {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Edgecombe]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Foulkes Village]]==<br />
*"Fucks Village" - A [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Fryerbank]]==<br />
*"Fat City" --{{User:Dr Eddie Ashford/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Galbraith Hills]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Gatcombeton]]==<br />
*The "catacomb" since forever. [[User:Zeug|Zeug]]<br />
<br />
==[[Gibsonton]]==<br />
*"Gibs" for short by some denizens. Was also called "Queen of Malton" by the [[Gibsonton Nationals]] but that never caught on.--{{User: Garviel Loken/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Greentown]]==<br />
* "Gtown" [[User:Pyro1499|Pyro1499]] - because it just sounds gangsta like that<br />
<br />
==[[Grigg Heights]]==<br />
"Griggs" - This is the name used by the locals & ol' timers for the suburb. [[User:Sir WV|Sir WV]]<br />
<br />
"Grh!ggz" or "Grh!gg Haagz" - Death Rattle for "Griggs" & "Grigg Heights". [[User:Sir WV|Sir WV]]<br />
<br />
==[[Gulsonside]]==<br />
*"The Gully" --{{User:Haliman111/sig}}<br />
*"Ghoulsonside", by [[Clubbed to Death]]--[[User:Mallrat|Mallrat]] 16:13, 19 November 2009 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==[[Havercroft]]==<br />
*"Havers" - The most popular name for the suburb. --[[user:Jsrbrunty|Jsrbrunty]]<br />
*"Lara Croft" - A 2 Cool nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Heytown]]==<br />
*"Hey now, Hey now, don't dream it's over" - Coz lyk it's a [[wikipedia:Don't Dream It's Over|song]] and the suburb makes me think of the lyrics... {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
* SafeTown - because it is almost always green or light yellow. --[[User:Justinbronze|Justinbronze]]<br />
<br />
==[[Hollomstown]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Houldenbank]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Huntley Heights]]==<br />
*"HH" - It's just the suburb's fucking acronym, okay? -{{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Cuntley Kites" - A [[2 Cool]] Nickname -{{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Jensentown]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Judgewood]]==<br />
*"The Barrister" - Not very widely used, but it does exist! --[[user:Jsrbrunty|Jsrbrunty]]<br />
*"JW" - an acronym, obviously. It has absolutely nothing to do with [[Wikipedia:Sheriff_J.W._Pepper#Sheriff_J.W._Pepper|this JW]]. --<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC, Segoe Script, Comic Sans MS, sans-serif;text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.4em">[[User:Chief Seagull|<span style="color: green;">Chief Seagull</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Chief Seagull|<small>squawk</small>]]</span> [http://tinyurl.com/yfrld3r <sup><small>don't mess with the Seagull!</small></sup>]<br />
<br />
==[[Kempsterbank]]==<br />
*"Dumpster-bank" - coined, like, just now, this very moment, by me. [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
*"Dumpyskank" - a [[2 Cool|corruption]] of the above nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Kbank"- common abbreviation. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Ketchelbank]]==<br />
*"Ketchupbank" - Everything's better with ketchup. [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
*"Brainbank" - according to [[Brainstalkers]] {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Kinch Heights]]==<br />
* "[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ginch Ginch] Heights" - Pretty obvious, no? [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
<br />
==[[Lamport Hills]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Lerwill Heights]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Lockettside]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Lukinswood]]==<br />
*"Lukin's Wood" - Those fellers over at 2 Cool inc. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Millen Hills]]==<br />
*[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=minging "Mingin' Hills"] - a [[2 Cool]] nickname. -{{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Miltown]]==<br />
*"Milftown" - I've never heard anyone else call it this but [[2 Cool]]...--{{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
*"Freaktown" - Show me on the [http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/1442/fuckingmiltowneu3.gif map] --[[User:Sockpuppie|Jelly Otter]]<br />
<br />
==[[Mockridge Heights]]==<br />
*"The Mock" coined by the [[Mockers]] <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[UDWiki:Image Categorisation|i]]</sup></small><br />
<br />
==[[Molebank]]==<br />
*The Mole, because it doesn't have a nickname yet. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Mornington]]==<br />
*"[[wikipedia:Mornington Peninsula|Mornington Peninsula]]", much easier to say. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
* "The Crescent" - by the cognoscenti. --[[User:Mallrat|Mallrat]]<br />
<br />
==[[New Arkham]]==<br />
*"NewArk" - Not quite as desolate as New Jersey... but close... [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
<br />
==[[Nixbank]]==<br />
*"[[User:Nallan|Nick]]'s Skank" - A [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[North Blythville]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Old Arkham]]==<br />
*"OArk" - An abbreviation parallelling "NewArk". [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
<br />
==[[Osmondville]]==<br />
*"Ozzy" - a handy abbreviation. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Owsleybank]]==<br />
*"The Owl's Nest" - --{{User:Dr Eddie Ashford/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Pashenton]]==<br />
*"Pashtown" - The place to be on a friday night, a [[2 Cool]] nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Bash her-town" - When my girlfriend forgets her place. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Paynterton]]==<br />
*"Pain town" --{{User:Haliman111/sig}}<br />
*"Painterton", fuck trying to spell it correctly. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Paynerton" is a common mispelling {{User: Garviel Loken/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Peddlesden Village]]==<br />
*"Pederast Village" - Coined by Wan Yao and used by all two of his friends and a few other people he bribed to with promises of PAI. [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
*"Pedo" - A Useful [[2 Cool]] abbreviation of the above. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Maltons Biggest Wasteland" - you been there lately? its kansas without the corn --[[User:Pyro1499|CJ]]<br />
*"The Village" --{{User:Haliman111/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Pegton]]==<br />
*"Pegleg" - LOL! A [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Pennville]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Penny Heights]]==<br />
*"[[wikipedia:Henny Penny (restaurant)|Penny Henny]]" - Because people in Penny Heights act like farm animals. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Henny Penny" - It's less confusing this way. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Peppardville]]==<br />
*"The Pepperpot". --[[user:Jsrbrunty|Jsrbrunty]]<br />
<br />
==[[Pescodside]]==<br />
*"Pesky" - Easier to spell correctly, ya dig? {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Pesticide" - A fair pun --[[User:Tiberius Matye|Tiberius Matye]]<br />
<br />
==[[Pimbank]]==<br />
*"Pimpskank" - a [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"[[Wikipedia:Pimm's|Pimsbank]]" - a delighful place for an iced afternoon bevvy. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Pitneybank]]==<br />
*"Trenchtown" - on account of the [[Trenchcoater|inhabitants]] of [[Fort Creedy]]. [[User:Bob_Fortune|Bob Fortune]] <sup>[[Red Rum|RR]]</sup><br />
<br />
==[[Quarlesbank]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Raines Hills]]==<br />
*"Brnhz! Hills" --{{User:Dr Eddie Ashford/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Randallbank]]==<br />
*[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=randy Randy]skank - A [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Reganbank]]==<br />
* "The Cultural Wasteland of Malton" [[User:Sir WV|Sir WV]]<br />
* "The Arm-pit of Malton" [[User:Sir WV|Sir WV]]<br />
<br />
==[[Rhodenbank]]==<br />
* "Robbinbank" --[[User:Pyro1499|Pyro1499]]<br />
* "Robberybank" --[[User:Pyro1499|Pyro1499]] - because of all the kick doors goin on up there<br />
<br />
==[[Richmond Hills]]==<br />
"Rich Man Hills" - Meh. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Ridleybank]]==<br />
*"The 'bank" - Many people, mostly dead, but some have a pulse. --[[User:Thekooks|KOOKY]]<br />
*"The homeland" - Many, mostly dead, people. --[[User:Thekooks|KOOKY]]<br />
*"Wrigglyskank" - A [[2 Cool]] nickname. {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
*"Ridleybonk" or the "Bonk"- RRF MUST PATROLLZ IT NOAH! --[[User:Sockpuppie|Zoey Zarg]]<br />
*"The Candyland", used by the [[Gingerbread Men]] in '06 -[[User:Hagnat|Hagnat]]<br />
*"Dead Central" - used by me on my first visit to the suburb --{{User:Dr Eddie Ashford/Sig}}<br />
*"Riddle 'Em Bank" - What you should do when you see the zeds there --[[User:Tiberius Matye|Tiberius Matye]]<br />
*"Ridley" - pretty obvious, but probably one of the most widely-used nicknames for that reason. --[[user:Jsrbrunty|Jsrbrunty]]<br />
*"DHZ: De-Humanized Zone" - Cause that what happens there. --[[User:Spoook|Spoook]] 06:18, 25 June 2010 (BST)<br />
<br />
==[[Roachtown]]==<br />
*It's on [[ALiM]] for fucks sake, does it really need a nickname? {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"The Stoner Capital of Malton" You know why. {{User:Sgt Martinez/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Roftwood]]==<br />
*"Rotwood" - common spelling liked by undead --[[User:Duke Garland|<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>]] [[LCD|<nowiki>[</nowiki>]][[User talk:Duke Garland|talk]][[Signature Race|<nowiki>]</nowiki>]]<br />
*"Roflwood" - a [[2 Cool]] nickname {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Rolt Heights]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Roywood]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Ruddlebank]]==<br />
*"[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ruddy Ruddy]skank" - a [[2 Cool]] nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Santlerville]]==<br />
*"The North Pole" - Used by Wan Yao, and pretty much no one else. Some kind of reference to Santler Claws and elves and Canadian Beavers. Or something... [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
*"S'ville" - Just an abbreviation...nothing witty here... {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Finisville" - named after [[User:Finis_Valorum|most of the population]]. [[User:Bob_Fortune|Bob Fortune]] <sup>[[Red Rum|RR]]</sup><br />
*"Beaverville" - after the prominate local group, [[The Dribbling Beavers]]. Used widely including on the [[Mall_Tour_2009/MallTourMap|Mall Tour '09 Map]]. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Scarletwood]]==<br />
*"[[wikipedia:Redwood|Redwood]]" -{{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Shackleville]]==<br />
*"The [[wikipedia:Love Shack|Love Shack]]" - a [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"[[Shacknews|Shacknewsville]]" - Always reminds me of that horde. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Shearbank]]==<br />
*"Sheerskank" - A [[2 Cool]] nickname.--{{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
*"Zergbank" – Used among [[ZHU|Zerg Hunters]] for reasons that should be obvious. {{User:Revenant/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Shore Hills]]==<br />
*"THA HILLS" - probably the most common name used because of the reference in the archives to this place being a Ghetto[[user:madmac356|madmac356]] <br />
*"Whore Shills" - an amusing spoonerism. [[User:Bob_Fortune|Bob Fortune]] <sup>[[Red Rum|RR]]</sup><br />
<br />
==[[Shuttlebank]]==<br />
<br />
==[[South Blythville]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Spicer Hills]]==<br />
*"The Flavour Hole" --{{User:Dr Eddie Ashford/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Spracklingbank]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Stanbury Village]]==<br />
*Stan's Village, also an acceptable abbreviation is [[Stanbury Village|StanVllg]]. -- [[User:Sir Fred of Etruria|Sir Fred of Etruria]]<br />
*Stab'n'bury Village. {{User:Revenant/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Starlingtown]]==<br />
<br />
==[[Tapton]]==<br />
*"[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tap Tap] that" - as in 'I'm tappin' that', if one is in tapton or 'let's tap that' if one wishes to go to tapton. A 2 Cool nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Tollyton]]==<br />
*"Toll Town" - You know you like it --[[User:Tiberius Matye|Tiberius Matye]]<br />
<br />
==[[Vinetown]]==<br />
*"Vinetown?" Yes. We're that cool. But it's said in the form of a question.--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}}<br />
*"V-Town". Gangsta stylee.--[[User:Mallrat|Mallrat]]<br />
<br />
==[[West Becktown]]==<br />
*"Wet Becky" - A [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Pussy Town" - apparently...{{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[West Boundwood]]==<br />
<br />
==[[West Grayside]]==<br />
*West Gayside {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Whittenside]]==<br />
* "Whittensdie" - By various, on account of the large [[Feral_Undead|FU]] enclave there. - {{User:Marcusfilby/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Williamsville]]==<br />
*"Willy" or "Willy-ville", part of the comedy duo, Willy and the Butt. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Wray Heights]]==<br />
*"Wry Heights" - why the fuck not? {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Wyke Hills]]==<br />
*"Dyke Hills" (See [[Wooman Towers]]) - a [[2 Cool]] Nickname. {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Why Kills" - That's what I hear in my head everytime I think of this place. It'll catch on. You'll see.--[[User:El Payaso Malo|Bishop Vagancia I]]<br />
<br />
==[[Wykewood]]==<br />
*"Dikewood"-[[User:Pyro1499|CJ]]<br />
<br />
==[[Yagoton]]==<br />
*"Dagobah" - Coined by Wan Yao in one his moments of especially inspired non-lucidity, and used by him and those unidentified two friends he keeps mentioning. [[User:WanYao|WanYao]]<br />
<br />
<br />
=Regions=<br />
<br />
==[[The Arkham Sisters]]==<br />
Made up of the twin suburbs of [[Old Arkham]] and [[New Arkham]], the term was coined by [[2 Cool]] and has caused significant public discussion and controversy in it's short history. A variety of other nicknames also exist for the twin 'burbs including (but not limited to) Arkansas, Noah's Arkham and plain ol' Arkham.<br />
<br />
==[[The Four Corners]]==<br />
<br />
An area within South East Malton populated by brave players who have managed to overcome the urge, NEVER. TO. CROSS. BOUNDARIES. {{User:Rosslessness/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Eastonwood|Easton]][[Brooke Hills|brooke]]==<br />
A [[2 Cool]] nickname used to refer to the twin suburbs of [[Eastonwood]] and [[Brooke Hills]]. As Brooke Hills is largely made up of empty blocks and lacks a 'heartland', the area near the border of Eastonwood is often considered to almost be a part of that suburb.<br />
<br />
==[[Northeast Malton]]==<br />
An area of Malton officially stretching from [[Dulston]] to [[Randallbank]] but in practice the real core of groups that consider it the Northeast consists of [[Dulston]] to [[Santlerville]]. Has had consistent problems with [[Rolt Heights War|massed]] [[Invasion of Gibsonton|PKing]] and [[User:Finis_Valorum|zergs]] aimed at the locals. Local groups are fairly independent and (try) to work together in the face of serious problems with mixed results.<br />
<br />
=Cities=<br />
==[[Malton]]==<br />
*"Mouldon" - It's just ''that'' stagnant! - {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}}<br />
*"Malt Liquor" - {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}}<br />
*"Mall Town" --{{User:TripleU/Sig}}<br />
<br />
==[[Monroeville]]==<br />
*"M'ville" or "Mville" {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
*"Marilyn Monroe" {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
*"Moronville" --[[User:Sockpuppie|Jelly Otter]]<br />
*"Monroe" - yeah.{{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
<br />
==[[Borehamwood]]==<br />
*"B'wood" or "Bwood" {{User:Nallan/sig}}<br />
*"BHW" - Used by [[User:Duke Garland|the duke]] - {{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"BNW" - "O brave new world, That has such people in't!" -[[User:J3D|John the Savage]]<br />
*"Boreham" - yeah.{{User:J3D/ciggy}}<br />
*"Boringwood" --{{User:Haliman111/sig}}<br />
*"Borewood" --{{User:Haliman111/sig}}<br />
*It's called "Boredomwood", kids. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]]</div>
J3D