Category talk:Stadiums

Strange

Does this really need to be a category? It seems sufficient as an article. All of the stadiums are mentioned in the article so there's no real benefit or extra information gained by having this as a category. Also, it reads like an article, not a category. Thoughts?--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 03:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

See Category:Malls for another example of "wait this isn't an article?" in the location cats. The category itself is more for cataloguing pages rather than being a directory in and of itself. I would also like to point out, for the benefit of the descriptions, that the UK does indeed have ice hockey too. 03:57, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Bear in mind that Template:Info buildingtype automatically categorizes the pages it is used o... Odd, Template:Info Stadium doesn't seem to do so. Regardless, uniformity dictates we have the category, and it does save an extra page. ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 04:20, 1 December 2010 (UTC)