Clothes/Suggestions/Other

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Clothes e

Clothes • Clothes Codes • Suggestions • Implemented Suggestions

Face • Head • Neck • Shirts • Jackets • Coats • Trousers • Footwear

Clothes Suggestions Archives

Face • Head • Neck • Shirt • Jacket • Coat • Trousers • Footwear • Other

Contents 1 Costumes 1.1 Yes 1.2 No 2 Gloves 2.1 Yes 2.2 No 3 In-Game items 3.1 Yes 3.2 No 4 Historical dresses and armour 4.1 Yes 4.2 No 5 New COLOR 5.1 Yes 5.2 No 6 Named Necrotech clothes 6.1 Yea 6.2 Nea 7 Finely tailored clothing 7.1 Yea 7.2 Nea 8 Zombies-specific items to be held 8.1 Yes 8.2 No 9 Prison Clothing 9.1 Yes 9.2 No 10 biohazard suit 10.1 Yes 10.2 No 11 School Uniform 11.1 Yes 11.2 No 12 Bags 12.1 Yes 12.2 No 13 Skanky Old Blanket 13.1 Yes 13.2 No 14 Add a "hands" slot! 14.1 Yes 14.2 No 15 Bracers/Armguards 15.1 yes 15.2 no 16 Upmarket clothing 16.1 Yes 16.2 No 17 Pajamas 17.1 Yes 17.2 No 18 Mexican Wrestler's Gear 18.1 Yes(Mexican Wrestler's Gear) 18.2 No(Mexican Wrestler's Gear) 19 Sandwich Boards 19.1 Yes(Sandwich Boards) 19.2 No(Sandwich Boards) 20 Club Items 20.1 Yes(Club Items) 20.2 No(Club Items) 21 Full Outfit Descriptions 21.1 Yes(Full Outfit Descriptions) 21.2 No(Full Outfit Descriptions) 22 Dog Tags / Collars / ID tattoos 22.1 YES(Dog Tags / Collars / ID tattoos) 22.2 NO(Dog Tags / Collars / ID tattoos) 23 Police Riot Gear (REVISED) 23.1 Yes(Police Riot Gear (REVISED)) 23.2 No(Police Riot Gear (REVISED)) 24 Rare clothing found in houses 24.1 Yes(Rare clothing found in houses) 24.2 No(Rare clothing found in houses) 25 Martial Arts Gi 25.1 Yes(Martial Arts Gi) 25.2 No(Martial Arts Gi) 26 Unique Clothing Rewards 26.1 Yes(Unique Clothing Rewards) 26.2 No(Unique Clothing Rewards) 27 Shinobi Shuzoku 27.1 Yes(Shinobi Shuzoku) 27.2 No(Shinobi Shuzoku) 28 Bandages 28.1 Yes(Bandages) 28.2 No(Bandages) 29 Firearms holsters 29.1 Yes(Firearms holsters) 29.2 No(Firearms holsters) 30 The Man With No Pants: Nudists in the Zombie Apocalypse 30.1 Yes(The Man With No Pants: Nudists in the Zombie Apocalypse) 30.2 No(The Man With No Pants: Nudists in the Zombie Apocalypse) 31 Umbrellas 31.1 Yes! (Umbrellas) 31.2 Nah. (Umbrellas) 32 Group Logos 32.1 Yes (Group Logos) 32.2 No (Group Logos) 33 Hands-free Radio/phone set 33.1 Yes (Hands-free Radio/phone set) 33.2 No (Hands-free Radio/phone set) 34 More than One? 34.1 Yes (More than One?) 34.2 No (More than One?) 35 Expand Color List 35.1 Yes (Expand Color List) 35.2 No (Expand Color List) 36 Wristwear 36.1 Yes (Wristwear) 36.2 No (Wristwear) 37 Store Clerk ID badges. 37.1 Yes (Store Clerk ID badges) 37.2 No (Store Clerk ID badges) 38 Arm Bands 38.1 Yes Arm Bands 38.2 No Arm Bands 39 Split Clothes 39.1 Yes (Split Clothes) 39.2 No (Split Clothes) 40 FAKE Bandolier 40.1 Yes (Bandolier) 40.2 No (Bandolier) 41 Vintage Dance Clothes! 41.1 Yes (Vintage Dance Clothes) 41.2 No (Vintage Dance Clothes 42 Earrings 42.1 Yes (Earrings) 42.2 No (Earrings) 43 Gold Crowns or something... 43.1 Yes (Gold Crowns or something...) 43.2 No (Gold Crowns or something...) 44 Holsters 44.1 Yes Holsters 44.2 No Holsters 45 Padded Clothes 45.1 YES (Padded Clothes) 45.2 NO (Padded Clothes) 46 Fat Suit 46.1 Yes (Fat Suit) 46.2 No (Fat Suit) 47 Inflatable parrot 47.1 Yes (Inflatable parrot) 47.2 No (Inflatable parrot) 48 Stereotypical Halloween Costumes 48.1 Yes (Stereotypical Halloween Costumes) 48.2 No (Stereotypical Halloween Costumes) 49 prison UNIFORMS 49.1 Yes (Prison uniform) 49.2 No (Prison uniform) 50 Cape 50.1 Yes (Cape) 50.2 No (Cape) 51 Western Attire 51.1 Yes (Western Attire) 51.2 No (Western Attire) 52 Fingerless/'Hobo' Gloves 52.1 Yes (Fingerless/'Hobo' Gloves) 52.2 No(Fingerless/'Hobo' Gloves) 53 Belts 53.1 Yes (Belts) 53.2 No (Belts) 54 Backpacks!! 54.1 Yes (Backpacks) 54.2 No (Backspacks) 55 Clown outfit 55.1 Yes (Clown outfit) 55.2 No (Clown Outfit) 56 SWAT Team Uniform 56.1 Yes (SWAT Team Uniform) 56.2 No (SWAT Team Uniform) 57 Beach Wear 57.1 Yes (Beach Wear) 57.2 No (Beach Wear) 58 Barman/Barmaids Uniform 58.1 Yes Barman/Barmaids Uniform 58.2 No Barmans.Barmaids Uniform 59 Walking Sticks/Canes 59.1 Yes (Walking Sticks/Canes) 59.2 No (Walking Sticks/Canes)

[edit] Costumes

For those sillier players amongst us. Could be mascot costumes (eg. a fullbody suit as a cow with a hockey mask and team colours, found at stadiums), animal costumes (eg. a monkey mask or bear-paw mittens, found at the zoo), or promotional advertisement costumes (eg. a giant foam banana suit, found in malls). The full body costumes would override all other options, except glasses and boots; masks and mittens etc. would just apply to those parts of the body. --c138 ^{RR - PKer} 00:25, 5 June 2007 (BST)

[edit] Yes

1. As long as you can get a panda costume from the zoo. --Uncle Bill 01:14, 5 June 2007 (BST)
2. Yes, definitely a Panda costume. Maybe some cool things you can wear at Halloween, Christmas and Easter (bunny suit). -- AHLGTH 01:22, 5 June 2007 (BST)
3. Yes. Gottspecial seasonal and animala have those costumes. -- Gunstar 01:54, 5 June 2007 (BST)
4. Giant foam banana suit? Yes! --TSG reads Daily Ruminations - You should too! 02:17, 5 June 2007 (BST)
5. I demand a cactus suit! --dudemeister 03:19, 5 June 2007 (BST)
6. Hell yeah! --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 03:25, 5 June 2007 (BST)
7. Got My Vote!! --Piotrcolossus 03:38, 5 June 2007 (BST)
8. Hell yeah, as long as there are a variety of animal and movie villain suits EddyB 05:22, 5 June 2007 (BST)
9. Oh... --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 06:46, 5 June 2007 (BST)
10. Halloween clothes, Halloween clothes! --Kaisuke 07:47, 5 June 2007 (BST)
11. Exciting -- /// goebi^{TalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/_MWP} /// 16:29, 5 June 2007 (BST)
12. Like it!--Wee Sonny MacGregor 19:14, 5 June 2007 (BST)

    Comment I think that the full body suits should come in parts, rather than a whole.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:36, 5 June 2007 (BST)

13. Aye -- TheDavibob ^T 21:44, 5 June 2007 (BST)
14. Arise, Lord Vader --Mordred^MalTel 22:59, 5 June 2007 (BST)
15. Especially a zombie costume. --Toejam 00:10, 6 June 2007 (BST)
16. Kind of like those giant bannana suits that poor idiots have to stand in and give out fliers?--Seventythree 12:06, 6 June 2007 (BST)
17. I wanna be one of those Taco Suit guys that hands out coupons to taco bell! --Ktut 13:54, 6 June 2007 (BST)
18. Some cities have costume shops, why can't Malton? --1337p5yc0 18:03, 6 June 2007 (BST)
19. Nifty :) --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 19:17, 6 June 2007 (BST)
20. I just can't stop laughing! --Lord Evans 21:24, 6 June 2007 (BST)
21. I love this, hopefully partial costumes will be included with full costumes. I'd love to see a zombie dressed up as a clown, but I'd hate to miss seeing someone in a Panda suit. -Zed Ed 23:43, 6 June 2007 (BST)
22. If I can't dress up like batman, what is the point in living in this cruel world?!? Also, we demand capes! --Mrxak 00:43, 7 June 2007 (BST)
23. The possibilities are endless. --Skitchipoo 00:46, 7 June 2007 (BST)
24. This is gonna take me a while to vote yes on almost everything. Vista, you should be shot for trying to rain on peoples parades again. Just kidding, you make a good point though. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 08:31, 7 June 2007 (BST)
25. Have you looked at the people already out there? This won't make them any less weird. --Queen Mum 00:07, 8 June 2007 (BST)
26. I agree everyone already look like morons just give them more room to look stupid without getting monotonous. --Sephikus ^T 11:19, 10 June 2007 (BST)
27. Go mascots! --JudeMaverick ^{Talk +1 Jobs} 07:37, 16 June 2007 (BST)
28. YESSSS!!!!!!!!!! --Ulysses Black 02:39, 19 June 2007 (BST)
29. May the dancing banana live! Torec _T-CC/CS 03:06, 19 June 2007 (BST)
30. As long as a Giant Lobster is included. -- Murray Jay Suskind 03:10, 19 June 2007 (BST)
31. Like that creepy bloodied bunny suit in Silent Hill... I'm for that! -- Happy 21:53, 25 July 2007
32. A BRAIN SUIT OR HAT FROM THE BRAIN MUSEUM!!!! zhodani 3:41 pm PST 8/14/07
33. Sure. Clay5x 15:50, 27 October 2007 (BST)
34. Splendid - I want to have a wallaby costume...wait.!?*§! --the wallaby^♥ 20:18, 2 December 2007 (UTC) (Vote changed)
35. Yea. BoboTalkClown 19:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] No

1. Too unrealistic. We'd have hundreds of mascots running around, while the stadiums would only stock one or two each.-- Vista  +1  15:31, 5 June 2007 (BST)
2. Too goofy. --Sonofagun18 09:30, 7 June 2007 (BST)
3. Seperate it so we are voting on each new costume seperately so I have some idea what I'm voting for and I'll probably change to keep. --karek 10:31, 10 June 2007 (BST)
4. unlike my groucho glasses suggestion (which rawks, i don't care what the sour-souled old grouchies say ;P ) this is too much. for example, while groucho glasses (and devo hats! malton needs devl hats!) are silly, but they're one small item of a whole wardrobe. this suggestion is too over top... please don't do it.... --WanYao 11:04, 30 July 2007 (BST)
5. NO FURFAGS!!1!11! --User:ottotorrens 09:50, 18 Oct 2007 (BST)
6. not so splendid! As awlays Vista got it right. You could also use your description field to describe precisely what you´r wearing. --the wallaby^♥ 20:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
7. This is one of those ideas that is great around Halloween, but seems ridiculous for the rest of the year. -- Diano 04:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Gloves

I guess that would need a new Hands slot... On the other hand, once adding it, we could have such items for it like handcuffs. Gloves would be found in Malls, Mansions, maybe Hotels/Motels. --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 06:50, 5 June 2007 (BST)

[edit] Yes

1. Woah, let's not get too complicated there Duke. One of the first things I thought about was gloves, which were not available. I certainly think this category would be good. Think about it. Firefighter's gloves, zoo-keeper gloves, <color>leather gloves, <color> mittens, etc. etc. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 07:33, 5 June 2007 (BST)
2. More hell yeah. We really need disposable gloves (to be found in hopsitals and NTs) --Hejsa 12:56, 5 June 2007 (BST)
3. nice idea, but more work then simply a new clothing item.-- Vista  +1  15:42, 5 June 2007 (BST)
4. Why not add hand gear. We'd need to have catchers gloves in baseball stadiums as well.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:22, 5 June 2007 (BST)
5. I was hoping someone would suggest this. Thank you. --Pvt De 21:44, 5 June 2007 (BST)
6. Aye -- TheDavibob ^T 21:47, 5 June 2007 (BST)
7. Perhaps the hands slot would allow for rings and bracelets, as well. --Sgt Cannon 22:33, 5 June 2007 (BST)
8. I agree. Although it might be a bit much to add a whole new slot for clothing, it's still kind of strange it wasn't there in the first place. -- Gunstar 00:59, 6 June 2007 (BST)
9. I like the idea of an item that I'd probably want to have in an outbreak, also I agree wiht Dux JD 02:49, 6 June 2007 (BST)
10. Gloves would be good. --Ktut 13:56, 6 June 2007 (BST)
11. - Sure, it sounds great. --Hhal 17:31, 6 June 2007 (BST)
12. Keep as I would like a pair of tactical gloves to go with my military stuff.--Major Striker 20:25, 7 June 2007 (BST)
13. I want gloves --1337p5yc0 18:09, 6 June 2007 (BST)
14. Just plain brilliant. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 19:23, 6 June 2007 (BST)
15. -- Sweet, lets pave the way for more suggestions of this type, huh? --Lord Evans 21:33, 6 June 2007 (BST)
16. Don't forget those rubber gloves for lab techs and doctors, in standard white and biohazard blue. --Mrxak 00:47, 7 June 2007 (BST)

    Comment - And the yellow rubber housewife gloves! XD --Hhal 01:58, 7 June 2007 (BST)

17. As number twelve voter said, we military/cops need Tac. gloves too ya' know. I mean how else would we not get blisters and other painful hand owies in the middle of an apocalypse? A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 08:35, 7 June 2007 (BST)
18. i forgot to vote for my suggestion --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 09:30, 7 June 2007 (BST)
19. This is a great idea. I would definitely wear gloves. --Sonofagun18 09:34, 7 June 2007 (BST)
20. I do tend to get blisters from my crowbar when I'm tearing my way out of over barricaded buildings... --Daeldra 18:09, 7 June 2007 (BST)
21. How about watches too? Rolexes, digital watches, ect.--Seventythree 23:50, 7 June 2007 (BST)
22. Gloves would just be sheer practicality in Malton --Queen Mum 00:07, 8 June 2007 (BST)
23. And Fingerless Gloves, too! What good glove set is complete without Fingerless Gloves? --Heiki 20:10, 6 June 2007 (AEST)
24. For it, but shouldn't this be a suggestion suggestion and not a clothing suggestion? It's a profile change not a new articly of clothing, 'least that's how I see it. --karek 10:33, 10 June 2007 (BST)
25. Definately i was gonna suggest this exact thing but saw yours so ill just add my thoughts here. How about biker gloves as well. --Sephikus ^T 11:11, 10 June 2007 (BST)
26. Good idea. There should be fingerless gloves too.
27. OOOOH! Fingerless gloves! Count me in.--DerangedFerret 05:46, 18 June 2007 (BST)
28. I think it's a great idea. Latex gloves in NT buildings and hospitals, work gloves in factories, white gloves in mansions . . . maybe even rings or brass knuckles. --Zoopers 16:32, 18 June 2007 (BST)
29. Leather fingerless gloves as well, like - <Colour> Leather Fingerless Gloves, or possibly hobo gloves to shortern it. Brass knuckles would be better introduced as a weapon though, Or some kind of bonus thing adding extra damage to punching --Amras Calmacil 17:12, 18 June 2007 (BST).
30. Didn't see this when I originally suggested my hands slot, but Gloves would be so rad! I hope either one gets implemented, I don't care so long as I get some black rubber chemist gloves! ~'~,Emily Briar`~,_♥^, 23:09, 19 June 2007 (BST)
31. This is a no brainer for me. There could be rings, too. Wedding rings, college varsity rings, ect. --EMAG TRESNI 02:37, 1 July 2007 (BST)
32. My hands are cold! --Midianian 18:12, 15 July 2007 (BST)
33. My hands are talking to me! --Commie Dog 04:35, 19 August 2007 (BST)
34. What about giant foam fingers at stadiums?
35. I'll put my vote in on the fingerless gloves and latex gloves. Latex gloves are perfect for doctors, and fingerless gloves...well, they're awesome, and that's that. --Klaus Gruber 02:18, 2 September 2007 (PDT)

    qwerty456*

36. Maybe gloves with claws attached to them? As a human, I find it difficult to disembowell a unsuspecting survivor with my hands
37. Yes. A hands slot would be nice, and gloves would be the first thing to put there. Clay5x 15:48, 27 October 2007 (BST)
38. For all the times I needed gloves... When I was punching this, or axing that... --JAston 09:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
39. Nice idea, I've been wanting to add some variety to my clothes lately and this would be a great addition to the choices at our disposal. Only point I'd make is any studded/clawed/knuckleduster type gloves people would expect to have an effect on combat, that's a no-no I think.--DI Sweeny 14:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
40. Defeniatly needs finger less gloves, as i never remove mine. Daniel camburn 16:59, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
41. I'm all for it. -- Diano 04:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
42. This idea is epic! Fingerless gloves, leather gloves, latex gloves all practical and realistic. Gets my vote. Kurt Halligan 22:05, 9 June 2008 (BST)
43. Yeah, awesome idea. -Kewabara1 18:10, 1 October 2008 (BST)
44. Yes. This is a great idea. --Alex Reynard 17:03, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] No

[edit] In-Game items

I originally wanted to put in a suggestion for binoculars to be seen around the neck and found in the forts but then it hit me, what if it was possible to have items you have in your inventory in your description. In addition to the Binoculars suggestion I suggest that there be a new item slot that acts as a "holding" slot. After the he/she is wearing texts it continues to say "and is holding *item*." just about all items can fit in, from syringes to fencing foils, and FAKs to shotguns. There is only one spot which would represent the player's weapon of choice. Also if this is the wrong place I apologize, and if I should separate the two ideas, just say so.

[edit] Yes

1. Keep - Author's Vote JD 03:15, 6 June 2007 (BST)
2. Keep I like it, I like it a lot. It'd add a little more depth to what the player does for a living. Bookies can have books, hunters have shotguns, and zombies? well they have bananas. Adds a little to role playing too. -- SgtBop 08:51, 6 June 2007 (BST)
3. Keep Good as long as it is strictly one item only (so nobody can have a shotgun in each hand for example; it's just too much). --Werewolf32 12:53, 6 June 2007 (GMT)
4. I wanna hold a generator!--Lachryma^☭ 13:31, 6 June 2007 (BST)
5. Radio aka. GhettoBlasta! -- /// goebi^{TalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/_MWP} /// 13:45, 6 June 2007 (BST)
6. Yep! Execpt only items, not weapons. Ok, maybe weapons. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 15:10, 6 June 2007 (BST)
7. we found a use for wirecutters!-- Vista  +1  15:16, 6 June 2007 (BST)
8. Yes! Yes! --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 17:57, 6 June 2007 (BST)
9. Keep, so I can walking around holding beer :)--Major Striker 18:00, 6 June 2007 (BST)
10. Sounds good to me! --1337p5yc0 18:07, 6 June 2007 (BST)
11. Hopefully this means people will stop saying they are have a katana in their hands.--Leonidas 19:32, 6 June 2007 (BST)
12. Brilliant. Just brilliant. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 19:39, 6 June 2007 (BST)
13. Great idea! --Sgt Cannon 20:29, 6 June 2007 (BST)
14. Wait, I can ACTUALLY hold the knife in my char. decription if this passes? Sweet! -Lord Evans 21:41, 6 June 2007 (BST)
15. Overall good idea.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:43, 6 June 2007 (BST)
16. It's a great idea. Hopefully it works out smooth.--Leonidas 22:50, 6 June 2007 (BST)
17. Excellent idea! --Skitchipoo 01:09, 7 June 2007 (BST)
18. Sure, but remember to add something for the zombies, like bananas (jokes aside, there are many gory posibilities I would like to see in zombies)--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 02:25, 7 June 2007 (BST)
19. If this'll let me hold a poetry book when I'm parked in a library? Yes please. --Natalya Zveda 05:16, 7 June 2007 (BST)
20. W00T! Now everyone will be able to see my sexy fencer-y-like-ness. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 08:45, 7 June 2007 (BST)
21. Oh yeah. Now I can hold beer, while I'm inside arms. --Vortexx 15:00, 7 June 2007 (BST)
22. Sounds excellent. This could be used to identify your job choice, and also give more function to the items like beer, newspapers, and crucifixes--Daeldra 18:11, 7 June 2007 (BST).
23. This is a good idea. -- Cheeseman ^W!ASBTalk 22:29, 7 June 2007 (BST)
24. A very good one. -- Gunstar 03:22, 8 June 2007 (BST)
25. It would make a lot of sense. Ruan. 07:49, 8 June 2007 (BST),
26. I think maybe two slots as in one for each hand. That way we could hold our weapon and maybe a radio or gps or whatever. --Sephikus ^T 11:17, 10 June 2007 (BST)
27. YES! This could also be useful at revive points... imagine a zombie holding a syringe and wearing a Mrh? shirt. I bet he'd get a quick revive. --Uncle Bill 21:39, 14 June 2007 (BST)
28. Definitely. --Midianian 18:14, 15 July 2007 (BST)
29. much potential. --Toejam ^{A Stats Graph} 19:58, 7 September 2007 (BST)
30. Yes. What more can I say? --Private Mark 05:12, 17 October 2007 (BST)
31. Sweet. Clay5x 15:50, 27 October 2007 (BST)
32. Awesome Idea. I say yes. -- PFC MiniMac
33. I want to hold a stuffed fish.......always --the wallaby^♥ 20:24, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
34. This is good, if the drop down list just reads straight from your inventory. -- Diano 04:14, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
35. Yes, Ja, Si, Oui, Evet, Kyllä!! There you have the same answer in 6 different languages. ;) --Johaen 21:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
36. Yea. BoboTalkClown 19:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
37. It's the best. But if implemented the Trenchies will complain because they can't pretend their pistol is a HOLY NUKE LIKEIN MONTY PYHTON!!!11!! --The D of T 15:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
38. Boots 17:30, 30 March 2008 (BST)
39. Because wandering around ruins whilst occasionly reading from a poetry book just isn't enough. --Nny The Person 01:05, 21 July 2008 (BST)

[edit] No

1. Umm... isn't that something you should just put into your description. Isn't that what the description is for? You know, saying something like, "The young man is dressed in dirty military fatigues. Sweat drips down his face, and his knuckles turn white as he clenches his pistol in fear," or, "This half-mad ballerina wields a foil so skillfully... one might actually think it a real weapon." "This lab worker clutches his needles as though they were wooden stakes and he were stuck in an Anne Rice novel. Luckily for him, he's just stuck in a zombie apocalypse." I just don't want the clothing boxes to replace creativity in the description. -- William Told 2:02, 10 May 2008

   Ps. Asch's little line test can eat me. -- William Told 2:02, 10 May 2008

[edit] Historical dresses and armour

Similar to the costumes suggestion, Museums, but only some of them (I'm thinking History museums only, but Kevan should decide) could have clothes and pieces of armour from diferent historical times and locations. How about the zombie Cleopatra dressed just like her, a lot of crazy people as Napoleon Bonaparte, A medieval knights armour, soldiers dressed in the WWI uniform... the posibilities are endless--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 02:48, 7 June 2007 (BST)

Note: I'm not incluiding historical weaponry on propouse to avoid the katana-mania ;)--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 02:48, 7 June 2007 (BST)

[edit] Yes

1. Author vote--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 02:48, 7 June 2007 (BST)
2. It might get absurd with everyone wearing full plate armor, but its good for now. -- AHLGTH 02:57, 7 June 2007 (BST)
3. Nifty idea. Interesting twist: Each History museum contains one "unique outfit" along the lines of the above. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 03:32, 7 June 2007 (BST)
4. I agree if only to make musuems more special. -- Gunstar 06:28, 7 June 2007 (BST)
5. Oh man, ancient armor with a thong. ultimate combo. --1337p5yc0 06:32, 7 June 2007 (BST)
6. Yes, but only if certain select items (such as a breastplate or helmet) are avaiable in one museum, and the same for say two or three other periods. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 13:57, 7 June 2007 (BST)
7. yes, I like the idea.--Game Master
8. I like it, maybe I could find a WWII Admirals uniform like Nimitz's uniform to run around in. That would be cool.--Major Striker 16:52, 7 June 2007 (BST)
9. Well that means I can dress up as King Arthur and go on a homicidal rampage. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:04, 7 June 2007 (BST)
10. Yes! I miss the wax museums... --Queen Mum 00:07, 8 June 2007 (BST)
11. Sure why not. We loot the museums for gnarly stuff, I'm sure we could find these in the mansion. Suit of Armors, Baby. I could be the Black Night back from the dead! This time I'll REALLY bite your arms and legs off! Daniel Hicken 03:53, 8 June 2007 (BST)
12. Sure sounds cool... --Lord Evans 04:46, 8 June 2007 (BST)
13. I think it would be nice just no armor and stuff like that. Only because it will lead to people wanting actual defense bonuses from the stuff. --Sephikus ^T 11:18, 10 June 2007 (BST)
14. Bring on the armor! This is especially good for those "religious" orders who like to think of themselves as crusaders. Have them all meet up in one place dressed in full plate, and the effect would be amazing. I'm all for it! Simon Hollows
15. Yes please! --EMAG TRESNI 20:50, 21 June 2007 (BST)
16. Meh. Historical clothing from museums, sure. But armor should really be in a normal suggestion, not clothing suggestions, because it should take a point off melee damage (but not firearms damage, and I don't think it should be wearable with flak vests). --Clay5x 06:44, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] No

1. for the same reasons as with mascotte costumes. thousands of people in fullplate or 17th century regalia would break the supsension of disbelief.-- Vista  +1  09:14, 7 June 2007 (BST)
2. I don't think it will be used enough. --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 09:17, 7 June 2007 (BST)
3. As Vista said. --Sonofagun18 10:46, 7 June 2007 (BST)
4. meh ... what vista said. already enough trenchie types like the Knights Templar or the This Knight Order Here, These Other Kinghts over There, etc. etc., ad nauseum. Give them ACTUAL armour, oh my gawd, what are you, NUTS??? ;P besides, where would you get all these suits of armour? --WanYao 11:10, 30 July 2007 (BST)
5. I'm with Vista on this one. -- Diano 04:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
6. I concur. -- William Told 2:20, 10 May 2008

[edit] New COLOR

camouflage ! In Desert, Arctic, Jungle, and Stealth (night)

[edit] Yes

1. Author vote. Many of us are military!!--Squid Boy 16:23, 6 June 2007 (BST)
2. Sure why not? It will give me more opportunities to make fun of the nerdlingers who dress themselves stupidly. --8 Bucks 16:34, 6 June 2007 (BST)
3. Stealth? Also known as Urban. --Nicholas Bashere 17:15, 6 June 2007 (BST)
4. I agree but we should have digital camo too since thats what the US Army uses and thats what kind of soldier I am on here.--Major Striker 17:59, 6 June 2007 (BST)
5. Wouldn't use it... But a good idea regardless --Lord Evans 21:43, 6 June 2007 (BST)
6. i agree... it would make some of us look more... pro? xD Aznmonkeyass99 19:28, 6 June 2007 (BST)
7. Yes please. --Vortexx 14:55, 7 June 2007 (BST)
8. Yes, I know someone who would love this.----Lucky 1uke 00:17, 8 June 2007 (BST)
9. But we need skirts too. --genie in a bottle ^{♥ - zone} 05:12, 8 June 2007 (BST)
10. Very much yes --Toast Outlaw 15:35, 9 June 2007 (BST)
11. They sell camo shirt and pant in Store...so why not!--Skritz
12. There should be forest, urban, and desert camos --PaSTAR
13. 4shur! Kyleklbecka
14. If I said this was a crap idea, I would be lying to myself! --Mr Cane 19:24, 15 October 2007 (BST)

[edit] No

1. We already have one version. And that's enough.-- Vista  +1  17:13, 6 June 2007 (BST)
2. Use your imagination. It says camo, not what kind of pattern or colour. - Whitehouse 17:46, 6 June 2007 (BST)
3. There are already camouflage clothes in Fort Storehouses and Barracks --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 17:55, 6 June 2007 (BST)
4. As above. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 19:42, 6 June 2007 (BST)
5. A little bit gung-ho testosterone powered silly. We ahve enougth camoflage, thankyou very much.--Seventythree 20:48, 6 June 2007 (BST)
6. Camo's fine the way it is. Just use your imagination. --Sonofagun18 10:18, 7 June 2007 (BST)
7. It's fine, I'd rather more clothes than colours. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 13:47, 7 June 2007 (BST)
8. had to break the tie The man 20:59, 7 June 2007 (BST)
9. I think its a great idea but its not necessary just use your normal description to add modifications to your clothes. Like if you wanted urban camo you could specify that your camo clothes are urban camo in your description. --Sephikus ^T 11:16, 10 June 2007 (BST)
10. I agree with Sephikus. What if you took a Woodland camo jacket, left the fort, and 25 blocks away decided that you wanted desert? Why waste AP going back when you can just edit your description?--Leon Vulcan 00:08, 14 June 2007 (BST)
11. desert camo will not stop a hungry cannibal from seeing you in an urban environment... Jason Cane
12. Because we already have camo clothes. We don't need that much variation- and besides, a fort in the center of town like Creedy or Perryn would only carry urban-pattern (gray, dark blue, dark gray, etc.). --Boris 02:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
13. Right. We don't need to get this detailed. -- Diano 04:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Named Necrotech clothes

As most of us know some mall clothes are named with the name of the mall, along with the dog tags and forts. What I am suggesting is that certain Necrotech clothes would be named, IE: A Inman building Lab coat, or A Inman Lab coat, or A Inman necrotech jacket. I think this could add a bit of flavor to the bland Necrotech jacket and Lab coats. this is my first suggestion so be merciful :D.

[edit] Yea

1. if it's not to much trouble.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:03, 8 June 2007 (BST)
2. I like the idea, do it. -Meatloafe

[edit] Nea

1. There are hundreds of necrotechs, a bit too much.-- Vista  +1  20:01, 7 June 2007 (BST)
2. Sorry, the reason why it works with malls is because there are only a few of them. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:36, 7 June 2007 (BST)
3. Vista's pointed out the reason. I think a little too much work for Kevan. --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 06:20, 8 June 2007 (BST)
4. There are 10x more NTs than malls --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 08:33, 10 June 2007 (BST)
5. I don't think necrotech would go around advertising the locations of their supposedly secret buildings on their workers jackets. --Sephikus ^T 11:31, 10 June 2007 (BST)
6. Would I use one? Probably. But is it worth having Kevan have a fat lot of work, in order to implement an aspect of the game that doesn't really affect the game? I think not. --Antipathy 10:51, 21 June 2007 (BST)
7. Good point about the NT locations being secret. There are also too many. Yeah. --Aleksander 03:25, 13 June 2007 (BST)
8. Too many freakin necrotechs. A load of work to make, and would push more important stuff back.--DerangedFerret 05:49, 18 June 2007 (BST)
9. There's already a skill required just to identify one of the hundreds of NT buildings around. It doesn't pay to advertise these. -- Diano 04:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Finely tailored clothing

A new section in mall clothes and mansions. the prefix 'tailored' 'Patent leather' 'silk' or 'fitted' would be added to the clothes available. The range of colours would be mostly limited to browns, blues, blacks and greys. These would essentially represent high class clothes from specialist tailors within the malls. For example, you would be able to have Tailored shirts, silk ties, tailored trousers, fitted dressed and skirts, patent leather shoes and fitted coats. Perfect for the up-and-coming zombie hunter with a sense of style.--Seventythree 22:47, 7 June 2007 (BST)

[edit] Yea

1. My vote.--Seventythree 22:47, 7 June 2007 (BST)
2. Why not, I'm sure some of the rich died in malton and need SOMETHING to remind them how they used to have it... Daniel Hicken 03:57, 8 June 2007 (BST)
3. I'm not sure if the prefix thingo would work well, but I like. Maybe restrict to a few malls, and try to make them seem more 'classy' than the rest by the selection of clothes? --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 06:24, 8 June 2007 (BST)
4. Vista is correct. The very fact that its tailored means it was adjusted to fit you and can't be purchased like that. However i vote yes because i understand what you meant. You mean more like classy clothes for the more upscale shoppers. I could see them being available in the mansions and certain malls in the higher class parts of malton --Sephikus ^T 11:37, 10 June 2007 (BST)
5. Anything fancy would count i say. =P 21:35, 13 June 2007 (BST)
6. I'm in on this one. I've started a new character who would (literally) kill to get his hands on some of this gear.--Buda Hilton 13:27, 15/06/07 (GMT)
7. I'm in favor of more class. All survivors are assumed to have been living before the outbreak, so why couldn't they still have any nice clothes they used to own? They'll be blood-splattered and tattered soon enough. --Zoopers 16:28, 18 June 2007 (BST)
8. Truly a great suggestion.But add robes to the equation like this "wearing expertly tailored black robes"Then you've got my vote!
9. I sure do like the idea of eating fellow survivors in a formal environment... Jason Cane

[edit] Nea

1. Finely tailored clothing are dependend on the measurements of the wearer. You need to have them cut for you personally or they aren't "Finely tailored". So as long as there are no tailors working in Malton, all you can get is "off the rack"-- Vista  +1  16:50, 8 June 2007 (BST)
2. No. I totally agree with Vista.--Hot pants celeste 04:29, 9 June 2007 (BST)
3. Only makes sense from an RP standpoint --Aleksander 03:26, 13 June 2007 (BST)
4. Sorry, but I don't like this idea much, mainly for the same reasons as Vista. I don't see why you couldn't just add that into your character description if your really desperate for your character to have well made clothes, to be honest.
5. As much as I hate to vote this down (as my main character is a fashionista), Vista is right. It just doesn't seem plausible. -- Diano 04:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
6. Finely tailored clothing would have to be exceedingly rare for it to be plausible. In fact, there would have to be a limited number in Malton, and they would eventually run out. -- William Told 2:24, 10 May 2008

[edit] Zombies-specific items to be held

With all of the survivors getting clothing items left and right, the wild popularity of my first suggestion of being able to hold your in game items, the inspiration of Che13, and several continuous hours of [Dead Rising]; the idea came to me. How about giving zombies something zombie specific to hold?

I propose that should the in game items suggestion pass, a zombie be able to (while standing in a square, inside or out, containing a dead body) rip off a body part to place in the holding slot. As far as body parts go I had "a severed hand", "a severed foot", "an indistinguishable body part", "a digit" (fingers or toes,) and so on down through human anatomy. Also, the zombie can choose to be "holding", OR "chewing on" said body part.

Also as a sort of badge of honor/humorous note that Che inspired me to think up, a banana could be an item too. Found inside mall food courts, any zombie, once they having come inside, will be able to pick one up in his holding slot, and then has the option of "and is holding a banana".

If you know a body part not listed that you feel should be included, add it in your comment so that it can be noted by the powers that be.

• Edit: ok the banana part was pushing it a little, and seeing how both sides are not crazy about it I'll take it out. If anyone wants to put in the humorous suggestion section be my guest. 18:11, 8 June 2007 (BST)

[edit] Yes

1. Keep - Author's vote JD 05:00, 8 June 2007 (BST)
2. You knew you had my vote, specially on the gore.--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 06:01, 8 June 2007 (BST)
3. Yeah, this is good! More gore... --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 06:27, 8 June 2007 (BST)
4. Sure. Gun, how is this disgusting? Hell Dr. 90210 is worse than TEXT saying a zombie is holding a body part. I mean come on, you don't even have to physically see the dang bloody arm. The banana thing is a bit overboard, but I still want one to sport on my zombie. Make it transition to Survivor too though. Imagine, a PKer wearing a chicken suit, holding a shotgun AND a banana. Priceless. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 07:09, 8 June 2007 (BST)
5. Keep - Way fun. Having a wide variety of entertaining parts to drag around would give zombies a fun and clever alternative to the harman clothes that just appeared. --Snuffleuff 13:10, 8 June 2007 (BST)
6. Keep - I love it! I want to be chewing on a torso! --DonTickles 15:46, 8 June 2007 (BST)
7. Keep - So for it my head hurts! --karek 15:49, 8 June 2007 (BST)
8. gore and zombie go together. And it would give them some zombie specific choices. Which is good.-- Vista  +1  16:46, 8 June 2007 (BST)
9. Keep "They are gnawing on a ruptured spleen." Slayerofmuffins 17:40, 8 June 2007 (BST)
10. Interesting, I like it. --Skitchipoo 20:58, 8 June 2007 (BST)
11. Gruesome, but kind of funny in a dark way. And if this takes place in England as a lot of people say it does, the British have very dark sences of humor. I know cause I lived there for a couple years.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:14, 8 June 2007 (BST)
12. -- A skull in one hand a Knife in another... I see my profile description is really going to come together with the suggestions here... (I also demand that skulls to be added to the list!) --Lord Evans 07:51, 9 June 2007 (BST)
13. As long as it doesn't get too ridiculous, I think this would be a nice alternative for zombies, esp. the ones with Brain-Rot who have a more difficult time getting interesting clothing. MolotovH 17:30, 9 June 2007 (BST)
14. This would definately be interesting i could already imagine the number of zombies walking around with severed body parts. --Sephikus ^T 11:46, 10 June 2007 (BST)
15. yea -- /// goebi^{TalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/_MWP} /// 13:27, 10 June 2007 (BST)
16. So cool. --Antipathy 10:51, 21 June 2007 (BST)
17. Keep - Now THAT's the kind of suggestion that would make me want to play as a zombie! --Uncle Bill 21:24, 14 June 2007 (BST)
18. Keep MANBAGZ AHN BANANAZ! --KiT 16:01, 22 June 2007 (BST)
19. Yes please - if the item holding thing passes, this makes ridiculously good sense. Also, zombies should be able to hold any item in their inventory, even if they can't use it. --Clay5x 06:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
20. Keep I'm surprised no one has suggested brains. --Darkferret 23:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
21. BRAINZ!!! BoboTalkClown 19:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] No

1. I know this is a zombie game but, I find the idea of holding body parts disgusting. Also the banana thing is a little bit ridiculous. --Sonofagun18 06:25, 8 June 2007 (BST)
2. Based on the fact that the suspension of disbelief is already in strong force when a zombie that has been head shot multiple times can be revivified and then be a survivor and not need any extra treatment, or suffer any negative buffs (temporary or not). Holding/biting body parts is fine for profile descriptions, but further than that you just mess with it too much. I like the fun-ness of the idea, but.. sorry. armareum 07:25, 8 June 2007 (BST)
3. This is the sort of flavor text that I think best fits a description, not a clothing item. -- Diano 04:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Prison Clothing

For escaped prisoners. Not every prisoner could have worn straight jackets. --SiIIyLiIIyPiIIy 07:33, 8 June 2007 (BST)

[edit] Yes

1. Definitely! --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 07:44, 8 June 2007 (BST)
2. There's still no prisons in malton, however... --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 10:34, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Not yet --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 23:51, 12 June 2007 (BST)

3. Good idea. I assume that these are for the coat/overall slot and found in Police stations, since you failed to mention any details... Werewolf32 13:55, 8 June 2007 (BST)
4. I like this but there is no place to get them from. We still don't have prisons and Police stations don't use special clothes for their holding cells.-- Vista  +1  16:40, 8 June 2007 (BST)
5. Like it!--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:18, 8 June 2007 (BST)
6. I'd suggest that they be found in PDs, since that's where they're issued prior to moving the prisoner to an out-of-town prison. MolotovH 17:30, 9 June 2007 (BST)
7. Black and white strips are fine too --Druuuuu 17:42, 9 June 2007 (BST)
8. Yes! --Antipathy 10:51, 21 June 2007 (BST)
9. YES!! --Marie^{The Grove on Tour} 15:50, 15 June 2007 (BST)
10. A definite YES! --JudeMaverick ^{Talk +1 Jobs} 03:25, 16 June 2007 (BST)
11. I'd buy it from a costume store! --karek 22:02, 16 June 2007 (BST)
12. Yes, 100%. So what if there's no prisons? It could be outside the exclusion zone. Prisoners could have broke INTO Malton to escape justice. A transport plane/van could have crashed pre-post outbreak. Escaped prisoners are part of Zombie lore!!! --Ulysses Black 02:42, 19 June 2007 (BST)
13. This would be good for rp... I escaped from an insane aslyum
14. --Toejam ^{A Stats Graph} 20:03, 7 September 2007 (BST)
15. I completely, totally agree with Ulysses Black (cool name by the way U.B.). Vezira 7:13, 9 December 2007 (PDT)
16. I'm with this one. -- Diano 04:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
17. In PDs. --BoboTalkClown 19:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] No

1. We already have orange cover alls, don't we? --Seb_Wiers Imagine 15:42, 9 June 2007 (BST)

   Comment - actually, no. There are red overalls, but no orange ones --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 17:34, 9 June 2007 (BST)

2. No prisons, no prison clothing. --Aleksander 03:30, 13 June 2007 (BST)

[edit] biohazard suit

I think NT should have some of these. But now maybe all are broken like the night vison goggles.--SiIIyLiIIyPiIIy 07:33, 8 June 2007 (BST)

[edit] Yes

1. I like it. By the way, you get an author vote on all your suggestions. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 07:42, 8 June 2007 (BST)
2. I think there would be plenty around after the quarantine. They'd most likely be broken beyond usefulness or repair though. --c138 ^{RR - PKer} 09:02, 8 June 2007 (BST)
3. my vote --SiIIyLiIIyPiIIy 20:56, 8 June 2007 (BST)
4. Definitely.--Wee Sonny MacGregor 21:19, 8 June 2007 (BST)
5. Realistic and just plain cool. --Sonofagun18 06:29, 9 June 2007 (BST)
6. as c138 said, you'd expect some lying around. perhaps not in every necrotech though.-- Vista  +1  15:54, 9 June 2007 (BST)
7. I could see having them being airdropped in by those air drops we get on occassion. Although this isnt really a biohazard zone they likely would drop biohazard suits and send in teams with biohazards suits on to prevent whatever is causing the dead to rise to not spread outside --Sephikus ^T 11:51, 10 June 2007 (BST)

   I like that concession - I find them unrealistic to be found after two years of quarantine, however if they were in drops and protected from infection or something before being destroyed, why not? --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 23:53, 12 June 2007 (BST)

8. like it -- /// goebi^{TalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/_MWP} /// 14:09, 12 June 2007 (BST)
9. Neat. --Antipathy 10:51, 21 June 2007 (BST)
10. So it'd be a torn Biohazard suit? Cool.--Seventythree 23:55, 12 June 2007 (BST)
11. A must have, but only intact ones. --Aleksander 03:39, 13 June 2007 (BST)
12. Yes, this is a cool idea--Reen 05:29, 13 June 2007 (BST)
13. A defenite must-have. One of the first things NecroTech would have given their scientists in the labs would be biohazard suits, and until it was confirmed that the virus couldn't mutate into an airborne one, many of the survivors would wear them. And after that, there's a good chance that they would leave them lying around in various buildings-viola! perfect explanation.
14. Yes. But I'd like to point at that they don't have to be "broken" to be non-functional. Zombies bite, biohazard suits tear. How could they possibly prevent infection if the contagion is literally masticating you through your delicate little suit, and the only food and water you have access to is from within the quarantine zone? Biohazard suits in malton would be a glorious monument to futility, and have a nice flavor.--Father Thompson 14:50, 18 June 2007 (BST)
15. It's a zombie survival game, people. Who wouldn't want a biohazard suit, as useless as they may be? --Klaus Gruber 02:21, 2 September 2007 (PDT)
16. Completely believable. -- Diano 04:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
17. Yea.