Suggestion:20080318 CURE

	Removed
	This suggestion has been removed from voting at the request of the author.

20080318 CURE

M4dD mUdD 12:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

New Skill
This suggestion is for a new survivor skill.

Scope
This would apply to human characters that have paid to remove the IP limit.

Description
Cure would be a new skill available to only those characters who have paid to have the IP limit removed. Once Cure has been bought from the survivor skill tree whenever the character was killed they would stand back up as a human. An RP look at this skill would be that due to over exposure of the Necrotech Syringes has created an immunity in certain survivors. This is why I am suggesting it for paying characters only. Furthermore I think it should cost something around 1000xp for any eligible character with any zombie skills what so ever. A human character with no zombie skills should be able to get away with purchasing the skill for a mere 500xp. The only skill that I would think should be a pre-requisite would be Headshot.

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

1. Keep - I think this would be an awesome update and is needed. Also not every survivor would be able to get the skill keeping the update from unfairly giving the advantage to survivors. --M4dD mUdD 12:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Kill Votes

1. KILL - One of the reasons I like playing urban dead is that I don't have to pay for extras (aside from IP Limit). I'm pretty sure the zombies 'rise from the dead' so "whenever the character was killed" means they are DEAD, they're not jesus! The idea of some equivilent to brain rot is a good idea though, however this is permanent, brain rot is not. Something along the idea of survivors having a % to resurrect fully (as opposed to in zombie state) unless they were infected has more merit than this. --Kamikazie-Bunny 13:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
   • Re: - I had been thinking about that... perhaps something where the person got infected and died at a cemetary they came back as a zombie.
   1. • Re: Stuck my own version in discussion feel free to do the same with yours, I'll talk about it there, this is not the place.--Kamikazie-Bunny 13:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
2. Strong kill- Making every donator invincible sounds like a really bad idea.--Studoku 13:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Spam/Dupe Votes

1. Spam - I don't understand the logic at all. Why is it related to headshot? What does it have to do with paying $5? Was this taken to Talk:Suggestions first? It doesn't seem complete. What happens if you have the skill and then change your mind and want to be a zombie for a while? Are you stuck? - Headshot Hal ^Talk 12:55, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
   • Re: - The skill itself has nothing to do with paying 5 dollars, it is just a measure to keep to many people from having the skill. Headshot because of RP purposes... Most people in the cult classics that are immune to the infection kick major butt.
2. Spam - Survivor death would be meaningless if you could just stand back up. Totally overpowered. It's like giving people a 'win game' button for $5. No thanks. --Jasonjason 13:05, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
3. Spam - In the very strongest sense. 1) Urban dead should never have anything implemented through donating cash that gives a significant advantage to any player, ever. End of story. 2) What about zombie donators? 3) Allowing survivors to stand up afer death as survivors will never pass because it would totaly ruin the game and tip the balance in favour of survivors. I'm voting spam because although no part of this suggestion is salvageable, you seem to be RE'ing people a lot. I may be coming across as a little harsh here, but trust me, this is doomed. I'm just trying to save you a lot of greif. There's no point in continuing to RE people about it. Take suggestions to talk next time, you get a lot of helpful feedback there! :)--Seventythree^Talk 13:15, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
   • Re: - will do... but hey its just a suggestion :p
4. Spam - As 73. The idea is good, but the implementation is not. Very unbalanced and permenant. -- Cheese 13:36, 18 March 2008 (UTC)