Talk:2 Cool/Bob's Epic Fails
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
classic?
generals 2nd A/RE
- Against - The General was an excellent wiki contributor and sysop. However, he is not nearly active enough to be considered for the position any more.-- Adward 16:45, 2 May 2010 (BST)
- no sorry he was always a literal 13 year old mouth breather Cyberbob Talk 17:35, 2 May 2010 (BST)
- Hmm...I seem to recall hearing you say something else not too long ago. "Vouch...I don't think the sysop team could do without him." :P —Aichon— 20:22, 2 May 2010 (BST)
- bitch got owned -- Adward 22:28, 2 May 2010 (BST)
- if he'd been demoted then there would've been like 2 or 3 sysops left (including crats). BITCH GOT OWNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Cyberbob Talk 03:50, 3 May 2010 (BST)
- u mad? (ps. that pretty much explains nothing nice excuse) -- 04:24, 3 May 2010 (BST)
- actually it does as bad decisions on misconduct cases and vb ones where a sysop can't rule due to involvement is better than physically not being able to make any decision at all due to low numbers :) Cyberbob Talk 04:27, 3 May 2010 (BST)
- So you COULD imagine what the sysop team would be like without him then (we had that anyway and he WAS here, there were 9 ops around at the time) :) -- 04:33, 3 May 2010 (BST)
- so then imagine how much worse it would have been with 8! wow that would have been pretty bad Cyberbob Talk 04:55, 3 May 2010 (BST)
- Stop making things up to look less wrong, it's quite obvious you accidentally made a u-turn, like it's that much of a big deal.--
Thadeous Oakley 16:58, 6 May 2010 (BST)
- Stop making things up to look less wrong, it's quite obvious you accidentally made a u-turn, like it's that much of a big deal.--
- so then imagine how much worse it would have been with 8! wow that would have been pretty bad Cyberbob Talk 04:55, 3 May 2010 (BST)
- So you COULD imagine what the sysop team would be like without him then (we had that anyway and he WAS here, there were 9 ops around at the time) :) -- 04:33, 3 May 2010 (BST)
- actually it does as bad decisions on misconduct cases and vb ones where a sysop can't rule due to involvement is better than physically not being able to make any decision at all due to low numbers :) Cyberbob Talk 04:27, 3 May 2010 (BST)
- u mad? (ps. that pretty much explains nothing nice excuse) -- 04:24, 3 May 2010 (BST)
- Hmm...I seem to recall hearing you say something else not too long ago. "Vouch...I don't think the sysop team could do without him." :P —Aichon— 20:22, 2 May 2010 (BST)
- no sorry he was always a literal 13 year old mouth breather Cyberbob Talk 17:35, 2 May 2010 (BST)
