Talk:Eastonwood Confederation

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

To Anyone reading this Wiki... Please help Our Cause and Join the Fight in Eastonwood... Any Questions post em here!

A Plan

Hello i am a Warseer as well as a Gingerbread Man, as part of a larger GBM operation, i have come up with a plan that will allow a group of survivors to retake Eastonwood in a couple of minutes. The plan is nearly completed, what i am looking for is 'bums on seats' so to speak, this plan requires a minimum number of people to allow it to work, now if all of the groups in the EC help we should be able to reach these numbers. This operation will also allow each group in the EC to gain confedence and respect in each other.

If you or your groups are intrested leave a reply here and i will get incontact with you/your group. If we can get enough numbers this plan will work, as the GBM have already shown with the 'Candyland' operation in Ridleybank last year. -Night Haunter 00:10, 15 September 2006 (BST)

In a couple of minutes? Is that so? Well, by all means I'm willing to hear you out squire, but I couldn't have any more respect or confidence in my fellow allies of the EC already. Non the less, this seems like a plan that we should be open to, so if you'd like to e-mail me at just to ensure that the EF will not be able to see what could possibly be in Eastonwood's future... Regards... --Chopper 20:34, 15 September 2006 (BST)

Hi, Thanks for the invitation, I need to discuss this with my group members...but we will probably join in!! --Ailton 12:00, 18 September 2006 (BST)

If you need help deciding, as far as the EF is concerned all warseer, neo-warseer, RMBMB and Abandoned forces are EC and treated as premium targets during raids anyway ;) --Obeah-Man 22:13, 19 October 2006 (BST)

Neo-Warseers Comms

  • Greetings once more from the Neo-Warseers, we've been fighting in Caiger for the past week but it seems that cause is lost, whats the situation with the EC in Eastonwood now? It does'nt appear to be looking too bright back home, I really hope you guys are planning an offensive! Col.gravis 11:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Good to hear from the Neo-Warseers. As Caiger has fallen, the DEM crews in NW Malton are retreating from the mall itself, but still operating in cleanups around it. The 'Wood crew is operating in and around Eastonwood. The Reavers are currently engaged in Ridleybank. New operations in the 'Wood are certain and imminent, but we're gonna have to clear up the situation a bit first. Keep in touch, Colonel. For d 23:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Right you are, the majority of our lot are rearming, only two or three got caught in Caiger itself thankfully, theyve joined a small group who have returned to Eastonwood already and are now carrying out revivification. Seems the Graveyards are rather full, nothing like as bad as back at Caiger but for the moment that seems like a pointless endevour until the horde disperses a bit. Col.gravis 09:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Eastonwood Ferals

Bullcrap - and you know it. Eastonwood lies in ruins for a month now and I personally watch the suburb - fighting against 1 level meat shields and scouts as well as the usual treaspasser. -you "chopper" on the other hand don’t know shit about the suburb and claiming victory is the most hilarious thing I've ever heard. Stop making up bull, please. We actually earned that victory through hard work and coordinated attacks and our members are very upset that some guy is simply editing some wiki and makes false claims. be modest and fair. --Sgt Milton 23:38, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi Chopper, what crap is this? How can you claim you won a war in which you did not fight for 2 month? The EC wiki is proof that no operation was undertaken by the EC since oktober 18th. Therefore no "inevitable progress" was made against us or anyone. The Fact that you number several groups which left and did not fight against us for reason whatsoever is another proof that no operation was done in that time. You even say that the EC was not willing to fight against us during that time. How can you claim victory although the EC was inactive for 2 months, was not willing or able to fight us and although the suburb was totaly unbarricaded for several days and the survivor number as whole was far lesser than the numbers of the EF alone, not to mention other ferals? And if barriceded (IF) it was always less than 24 hours. I mean did the germans declare victory over stalingrad 2 month after they left it because they had better things to do on the western front? Your argumentation gives plenty reason why a victory of the EC is impossible. and the fact that we did not drove you out of Eastonwood but other reasons is no argument for you you being victorious but rather an excuse why you were inactive (could not have been victorious) the last 2 month. Just because you made ONE successful attack on Eastonwood is no reason for being victorious.

In fact your argumentations gives plenty of reasons why we are victorious, too. The EF did NOT leave due to anything whatsoever to do with the Eastonwood Confederation, their main force left because of commitments that meant more to the EF than defending a suburb against a(n inactive) survivor group (battle in Caigar, support shacknews), as friendly as they are. Due to all the information on hand and after reflecting back on what had happened through the Eastonwood war (no human character in eastonwood several days an no building barricaded more than 24 hours for the same time and no attack of the EC for 2 months); Victory was declared!

I hope this argumentation is understandable. --Zawa o' Draugr 18:29, 13 December 2006 (GMT)

On a side note, our friend forgets that our horde or at least some few members (in case of the Blackmore Building) participated in all of the “commitments that meant more to them” than actually fighting in Eastonwood and as far as I recall the EF stood among the victors of all the fore mentioned events. Supremacy through better coordination with our very powerful allies I call that. There is no question that we couldn’t have done it alone but I fail to see the difference between us, the RRF and Shacknews compared to the early EC and DHPD allies.
According to his logic the EF did beat the EC on every turf they picked, be it Caiger, Shearbank, or Blackmore. Victory is absolute then?--Foxfire 19:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Just remembered something else: Had the EC been able to force the EF out of Eastonwood, then the living could have claimed victory. But alas, they were incapable of such. I am sorry but you see, your explanations keep contradicting themselves. Also, stating that keeping a draw over a time period chosen by yourself (not the whole war, which lasted until you proclaimed Victory(12 December 2006) concerning EC politics) does not make it a victory... this is german war logic and i know what i am talking about. Zawa o' Draugr 01:00, 14 December 2006 (GMT)

The war is not over and you know it. --William Spurlock 21:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools