UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Duce Nauks vs Certified=Insane

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Padlock.png Administration Services — Protection.
This page has been protected against editing. See the archive of recent actions or the Protections log.

Dakerstown Issues

In an effort to difuse the situation in Dakerstown I am STRONGLY encouraging the following parties to figure out their differnces and discontinue their in game tete-a-tete on the Wiki. I've been watching the Dakerstown page and some of the CRAP that has appeared on that page is ridiculous.
Duce Nauks and the Imperial War Machine vrs Certified=Insane and Urban Guerillas
Please, work it out. Once all of the parties with intrest agree to arbitration, I ask that another arbitrator help them work this out because I for one am tired of the calls of Vandalism (valid or not) that is coming up because of the personality conflict. Conndrakamod T CFT 17:46, 13 October 2006 (BST)

IWM Input

Ok, if Insane want's to dump blame on me to make himself look better, go for it. All I know is I'm not going to scream "Waaah! It's all HIS fault! all of it! I didn't do a thing! Waaah!". I do not agree to arbitration.--Duce Nauks 21:12, 13 October 2006 (BST)

UG Input

Ummmm, I gave up on this a while ago. Just look at Duce Nauks' history of edits, he's been doing this ever since he got here. I tried to reason with him, but I lost patience soon enough. It's rediculous what went on there, and I tried not to feed the trolls, but at some point, when someone lies to degrade my group, I stand behind anyone who steps up to them. I don't feel like having a big discussion here, just look at his history and you'll know what I'm talking about. Hell, look at the moved section in the Dakerstown Talk page ^.-. I posted some input as requested, if you want anything else, just drop another message in my talk page... -Certified=Insane 20:56, 13 October 2006 (BST)

For the record, I refuse arbitration by Taco Death (saying this as he just added himself to the arbitrator list). Anyhow, perhaps clearer rules as to what is and isn't acceptable on those pages would be appreciated, as I'm sure we can agree both parties have been stretching the limits of the rules. That being said, I would like to point out that my entries were generally done with NPOV in mind (exept responses to outrageous lies), and the mud-slinging fest started with Duce Nauks comparing us to Stalin, comparing himself to Freedom Fighters, then from then on it deteriorated to the "special olympics" remark, getting one of my members involved as he wouldn't take that crap, and I support him. While claiming that my entries fully respected NPOV would be a stretch, I would like to say that I tried to limit what I said to what we DID, as well as what we THOUGHT, which was clearly marked in my opinion. -Certified=Insane 23:05, 14 October 2006 (BST)
This This gives me every reason to believe Taco Death to be part of, or closely associated to, the IWM. Kick this guy out of here. -Certified=Insane 04:07, 15 October 2006 (BST)

Arbitratators Input

In response to the statement by the "Urban Guerillas", This is pretty much what's happening when smart people read what you write. . .
http://www.youtube.com/v/dywGykKrAwk
There ya go buddy. --Taco Death 03:35, 15 October 2006 (BST)

Excuse me, but were you ever mentioned as a possible arbitrator? Were you agreed upon by both sides to arbitrate? 'Sides, that comment don't look very neutral to me. Cyberbob  Talk  03:38, 15 October 2006 (BST)
And looking at the comment by Certified just above, you were specifically refused. Exit's on your right. Cyberbob  Talk  03:42, 15 October 2006 (BST)
Lol, I'm not arbitrating dumbass, I'm making fun of stupid people. People like you.--Taco Death 03:46, 15 October 2006 (BST)
I'm not the one who can't indent properly. Cyberbob  Talk  03:56, 15 October 2006 (BST)

I would be willing to arbitrate.--Gage 03:39, 15 October 2006 (BST)

Are you guys fucking stupid? Lol, there is NO arbitration case until both sides agree. From what I'm seeing, the IWM doesn't want arbitration.--Taco Death 03:46, 15 October 2006 (BST)

Are you fucking stupid? Read the rules of this page. If even one group wants it, the arbitration is a go.--Gage 03:48, 15 October 2006 (BST)

Heheheh, good luck with that one buddy.--Taco Death 03:50, 15 October 2006 (BST) Sockpuppet comments struck. Conndrakamod T CFT 05:34, 15 October 2006 (BST)