UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Jjames vs 1 4 of CDF

Jjames Vs. 1 4 of CDF

Called me scinfaxi despite current arbitration case. Clearly bad faith. Also, I am not a racist. [1] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jjames (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.

OK, this is getting ridiculous. Are you gonna tie up the arb system for everyone that calls you a bad name? Would that not be your loosely defined 'bad faith' itself? - --Zod Rhombus 17:00, 23 September 2006 (BST)

My record is clearly defined on this. I don't mind people making fun of me. You don't see people in here for calling me a skinhead during OWS, do you? The reason I have brought people to arbitration, is for claiming I am an alt of scinfaxi. That is clearly against the rules and is bad faith. 14 knew this when he posted.Jjames 17:53, 23 September 2006 (BST)

Wow, you have some nerve. Starting Operation White Storm, wtf is that for? Dude you are racist, stop denying it. When you joke around about it, as if it was nothing, you are in fact revealing you true self. You may be able to fool others but not me. --1 4 of CDF 07:29, 25 September 2006 (BST)

Do you even know what satire is?Jjames 07:58, 25 September 2006 (BST)

Cause' we do (we being jjamesfaxi). It's time for me to admit something. We're a two headed monster snake and we happened to acquire another computer. Sort of like that show Cat Dog except we're horrible looking and have to pay for sex. Me, being the ass end, took the original computer and jjames is down the hallway. We're both logged in and posting at the same time though, even though we're actually the same person. Or you're a liar obsessed with us being the same person. I say use the check user function while we're both logged in and posting. The IP addresses should not be exactly the same. Scinfaxi 08:08, 25 September 2006 (BST)

I hate cat dog. That show is probably the worst ren and stimpy rip off ever.Jjames 08:15, 25 September 2006 (BST)

There was 7 minutes between those posts: plenty of time for Jjames to get to another computer.--Gage 17:41, 25 September 2006 (BST)

How much time between these?Jjames 20:18, 25 September 2006 (BST)

I don't know. Scinfaxi 20:19, 25 September 2006 (BST)

Well, since obviously you are not the same person (because lord knows anyone as non-computer savvy as Jjames couldn't opt-up two computers) it must be HA-HA FUNNY EXAGGERATION! --Karlsbad 20:24, 25 September 2006 (BST)

Are you familiar with Occam's Razor, Karl? Is it more likely that we are two different people or that we are the same person and i have been feigning ignorance of proper wiki usage my entire time here, working often at cross purposes, and using two computers to do so. Of course I use a similar IP adress for both and the same IP adress for my alt, bubba, but I use a proxy for other vandal alts that work against my case rather than for it by creating drama rather than reaching a favorable conclusion for me. Which one sounds more logical?Jjames 21:33, 25 September 2006 (BST)

I don't doubt your persistance or your ability to act stupid. However I observe that if what you say is true than the act of calling you scinfaxi is a comedic exaggeration and as such is not vandalization. --Karlsbad 22:23, 25 September 2006 (BST)

No, the act of calling me scinfaxi is still an accusation, just a false allegation. Just because you're incorrect and base your reasoning on biased fallacies, doesn't mean you aren't claiming it is a fact. Seeing you back pedal makes it clear that you realize accusing me is vandalism.Jjames 22:29, 25 September 2006 (BST)

Dear Scinfaxi and/or Jjames, please realize that even if I called one of you Jjames and one of you Scinfaxi or both of you Scinfaxi or both of you Jjames, or possibly given the pair/singular grouping of incredably awesomeness "JJAMESFAXI", there is no supposition of fact; I breach no conclusion- such as "Jjames is a whiny bitch, all whiny bitches are named Scinfaxi, therefore Scinfaxi = Jjames" or "Scinfaxi = Jjames, Jjames is a whiny bitch, therefore Scinfaxi = Whiny bitch" which means that even though I am riddiculing you for processing these group of cases, there is no actual fuel for a case against me. And the fact that you admit you are too *ahem* non-computer savvy (which can also mean stupid) to read or research tools about the wiki and computer-IPs should also apply to the consideration of your position of everyone making a "factual statement" by saying a pithy phrase. --Karlsbad 22:36, 25 September 2006 (BST)

Calling me Scinfaxi is a supposition of fact. The supposittion being that I am Scinfaxi. That is as clear as can be. It is only made worse by the fact that you have claimed we are one in the same and even called on us both to be banned as a result. Don't you see why this makes you unfit to rule on cases with people calling me scinfaxi?Jjames 22:43, 25 September 2006 (BST)

Your inability to understand that calling you Scinfaxi is comedic hampers your ability to comment on my ability to rule on your cases. You shall now grow up and do some Coke off the Ass of a Stripper, because that is what all the cool grown-up people do. --Karlsbad 22:49, 25 September 2006 (BST)

I am only offended that you don't talk to me Karl. That's pretty fucked up. Scinfaxi 22:59, 25 September 2006 (BST)

But you tried to get me banned. Was that a joke, because you said you were serious then. Were you lying then or are you lying now?Jjames 22:51, 25 September 2006 (BST)

I still want you banned. I want your children banned. I will knee cap your grandmother if given half the chance. However calling you Scinfaxi is not wanting you banned, idiot. You = Scinfaxi is not a crime, it is only a funny realization that Scinfaxi is so pathetic that even his only real-life accomplishment of finding a friend is fake too. Put that in your misconduct case that I'll ignore again- just because I don't like you doesn't make me wrong. And don't call someone a liar when you've already proven yourself incapabile of keeping a promise of civility (see your whining after realizing that no one supports you for Mod). --Karlsbad 00:54, 26 September 2006 (BST)

Now you are lying. Right now. If I was scinfaxi, I'd be banned for double voting. Also in our arbitration you said you wanted me banned for using scinfaxi as a vandal alt and to double vote. My promise of civility was if I was made mod, and the theatrics after it was a joke playing on peoples characterizations of me. You are in fact a liar.Jjames 03:12, 26 September 2006 (BST)

It would be a warning for the original account and a perma-ban on the alternate account, but since you would be the same person it would not matter. And are you so busy calling me a liar that you forgot to respond to the "Calling you Scinfaxi is not a crime" bit, or do you simply have nothing to say? --Karlsbad 05:22, 26 September 2006 (BST)

Your poor writing skills made it seem like you were saying it wasn't illegal for me to be scinfaxi. A mod has already laid out why it is a crime. And you called for us both to be banned on arbitration, so you're still a liar.Jjames 05:26, 26 September 2006 (BST)

Heh, my poor writing skills have earned more respect than your entire existance; I can understand that you hoped against hope that you could avoid adressing the fact that while you were told that the cases should be put in M/VB, no one also said that they'd be cleared quicker than an arbitration hearing; there is NOTHING that can't be settled in Arbitration, but M/VB is faster. Are you so dull as to not know that? By the way; could you whine more? It's funny. --Karlsbad 05:34, 26 September 2006 (BST)

Ha ha, but you see. You use a proxy for me to fool other users, and to give yourself some credibility you use one IP for your the rev. I'm going to find out once and for all if you really are me jjames. It's going to require some deep soul searching. I should write a journal. It will be like that terrible movie with Johnny Depp. The Secret Window or something. Scinfaxi 22:05, 25 September 2006 (BST)