UDWiki:Administration/De-Escalations
From The Urban Dead Wiki
| Administration Services |
|
Sysop List | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations) Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion |
|
Guidelines for De-Escalation Requests
All De-Escalation Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:
- A link to the user in question. Preferably bolded for visibility.
- A criteria for de-escalation. This should be short and to the point, including relevant links A/VD and A/VB if available.
- A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding
~~~~to the end of your request.
Any de-escalation request that does not contain these pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.
De-Escalation Eligibility
To be eligible for a De-Escalation Request, the user must fall under one of the following criteria:
- 1 Month and 250 Edits: At least 1 month has passed since the user's last vandalism infraction, and they have made 250 good-faith edits to the wiki since the last infraction/striking a user has received.
- Invalid Vandalism Ruling: The vandalism data on the user's record is incorrect, because the specific vandalism ruling in question has been subsequently reversed.
Cycle of Warnings and Bans
The cycle of warnings and bans is laid out in these guidelines. De-Escalations will be administered starting with the 2nd warning, then working backwards through bans, and finally ending with the first warning, provided there are no acts of vandalism committed by the user in the interim period.
Permaban Appeals
Users who have been permabanned on UDWiki may have their bans appealed here on the De-Escalations page. To do this, a user must submit a case under the permabanned user's name, preferably with usage of the {{vndl}} template and an explanation regarding why the user should be unbanned. The case will also be noted on the main page via {{Wiki News}}.
Voting will commence for 2 weeks, and a majority of 2/3rds is needed. After the voting period is up, a sysop will review the vote and take appropriate action. If 2/3rds majority has been reached for rescinding the ban, the user will have their A/VD adjusted, and their permaban escalation will be struck, with an added link to the permaban vote. If the user was banned as per the "3 edit rule", they will have the permaban escalation struck but will be left with 2 warnings.
A permabanned user must be permabanned for at least 6 months before they can have the ban appealed. If an appeal does not fit this rule, it may be immediately cycled by a sysop without warning.
Appeals are considered a serious vote. Misuse of this privilege, eg. multiple submissions over a short time, may result in abusers being brought to vandal banning.
De-Escalation Queue
Pending De-Escalations
There are currently no pending de-escalation requests in the queue Add your requests UNDER the next line.
Recent Actions
User:Johnny Rotten
case
...shouldn't have been permanently banned for text-rape a.k.a. role-playing. --
-- 05:32, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- fuck off you mongtard. he is perma banned for a good reason.--
bitch
05:51, 26 January 2012 (bst)
- I second Harrison. Gordon 10:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- The vandal banning was confirmed in the resulting Misconduct case by the remaining sys-ops. Also, what Vapor says. Try again in 4 months (or maybe better not). -- Spiderzed█ 18:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- I second Harrison. Gordon 10:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Closed Per policy, a permabanned individual must be banned for more than 6 months before an appeal may be made to unban them. User:Johnny Rotten was banned only 2 months ago. ~
14:45, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- fuck a policy ...he was banned before all the sysops voted, so i'm not waiting 6 months to appeal shit. unban Johnny Rotten. --
-- 09:51, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- or else what? you or you're imaginary wife going to have another break down? yet another pathetic cry for attention? you are almost as big a loser as that fake nazi that runs around here. --
bitch
14:44, 27 January 2012 (bst)
- or else what? you or you're imaginary wife going to have another break down? yet another pathetic cry for attention? you are almost as big a loser as that fake nazi that runs around here. --
- fuck a policy ...he was banned before all the sysops voted, so i'm not waiting 6 months to appeal shit. unban Johnny Rotten. --

1 of our seeds ...a biracial boy ...and you see that woman? what color is her skin? brown. what's the texture of her hair? coarse. my wife is Black as I stated months ago before she ever tried to get me banned. [1] --
-- 20:35, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
you are all semi retarded cunts DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:31, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- when i have a ever claimed to be a raciest? i happen to love black girls. and if you look on my user page.. i have a women also. still proves nothing. i'm not the one who had a public break down on a gamer wiki for zombies. now what were you saying about projection? fucking loser.--
bitch
23:02, 27 January 2012 (bst)
What?, lets ignore a policy, on a page created by said policy. --Rosslessness 17:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
User:Generaloberst
for this GEN卐RALOBERST One Nation, one Race, one Folk, one Faith 14:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
|
De-Escalation Archive | ||||
|