UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/Feb 2008

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
Deletions Archive
2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec
Years 2015 2016 2017 2018

This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Deletions. This page represents all Deletions archived in the month of February 2008.


Colorblind

I wouldn't call this a Crit 1 but it as close to one as you can get without being one- Vantar 04:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Keep - Slightly in-use, and I found it a bit informative. --  AHLGTG 04:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Keep - useful. --PdeqTalk* 04:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
    It needs to be moved and linked in with the help section then -- boxy talki 05:11 13 February 2008 (BST)
    Moved to where and linked to where? As long as the info is kept, I don't care what page it's on. --PdeqTalk* 05:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
    Moved to Help:Colourblind and linked somewhere from the advanced editing section. I don't know where, just somewhere where telling people to consider the colours they use is appropriate -- boxy talki 05:33 13 February 2008 (BST)
    Okay, I vote move...is that a valid vote? --PdeqTalk* 05:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Keep - It should be a subpage of the Phone Mast Page, not on the help pages, something for colorblindness can be done in the help pages later but this isn't it and doesn't provide any useful information for making pages useful to the colorblind.--Karekmaps?! 07:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. expand I am colour blind and i can't see any point to the page unless it has a whole lot more info linked to it! What it seems to do is show those who are not colour blind what the map looks like to those who are. What use that is is another question! --Honestmistake 16:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Keep - Informative, and has potential for expansion. --Z. slay3r Talk  17:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Keep - Could be rather useful and there is room for expansion. -- Cheese 23:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. keep - move or rename. --WanYao 19:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept --Z. slay3rT 15:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

The bash stops here

It didn't, this page has only two edits from over a month ago, no incoming links. I see no reason to keep it. - Vantar 03:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Keep - But it has a cute little border! :'(--  AHLGTG 04:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Keep - so add some incoming links, and maybe rename the page The Bash Stops Here. --PdeqTalk* 04:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete - Unused, It should have been a group subpage in the first place but, since no one is going to really be able to find out which group it belonged too deletion is the best and most practical option.--Karekmaps?! 07:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Delete - Abandoned by author after 2 days, and the Bash didn't stop. --Z. slay3r Talk  17:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Delete - As above. --Sonny Corleone RRF DORIS CRF MOB pr0n 18:12, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Delete - as per karek. if it wasn't so thoroughly abandoned i'd want it moved to a subpage. --WanYao 19:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. delete - as per karek. it's basically abandoned and factually inaccurate (the bash did not begin in January). if someone wants to claim it, then Merge it with a user or group talk page. otherwise, get rid of it. --WanYao 05:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted --Z. slay3rT 15:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Randoms Enterprises/Future

I'm merging the content with Randoms Enterprises after it's moved to a sub page of our group. I've copied to content to my sandbox till I've got time to merge it. - Cheese 15:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete - I'm reworking the Randoms pages. This is one of them. -- Cheese 15:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete - I know you're not the origonal author, but seeing as you're putting in a lot of work to sort it all out you might get away with filing a speedydelete for this.--SeventythreeTalk 20:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete - You're a well known member of the group, that's enough for me. Although, wouldn't it be easier just to move it to a subpage of Randoms Enterprises and then transclude it?--Karekmaps?! 20:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Delete - Sure. --Z. slay3r Talk  02:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted --Z. slay3rT 21:58, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Category:THe_tagging_chEf

Looks like a misplaced user page, in a category. One page in the category, the author's user page. --Druuuuu OcTRR 06:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Merge into the author's userspace. --Druuuuu OcTRR 06:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Keep - The tagging chef is my group page and a guy named boxy said he put my page in that category, I was trying to put it in the human groups page when he did that. I am using this page for my group!--Jamie Cantwell3 21:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Merge as above. Its not your group page thats getting nominated, its the category which is duplicating the content. -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 22:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Merge - as Cheese/Monkey. --PdeqTalk* 22:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Delte it is a copy of a group page in the wrong name space the page is already at THe tagging_chEf - Vantar 23:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Merge - As above--SeventythreeTalk 20:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. Delete - There's nothing in the category. --Z. slay3r Talk  02:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Merged And kept for categorization purposes. --Z. slay3rT 21:58, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

The dead of Dunell Hills

We don't want no stinkin' page, we don't need no stinkin' page! As duly elected representative of the group, I deliver the message that we refuse to have a page and give a massive middle-finger to the DHPD for continuing to make pages for our groups without our permission. Are they in charge of our group? Are they in charge of this wiki? The Hell they are. Delete this Goddamn page right now. --Katthew 20:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete This page should be deleted and should not be remade until the group self-publishes one.
  2. Delete What's the point of a page full of sinful lies and inappropriate touching of bottoms? --DCC 20:57, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete I AGREE WITH WHOEVER POSTED THIS AS THEY ARE OBVIOUSLY THE GREATEST --Katthew 20:59, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Delete Keep 'em in the dark. --asuhdds 13:59, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Speedy DeleteDelete - Although there is a way someone could get my keep, show a benefit that will come from it being made now instead of later.--Karekmaps?! 21:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC) Crit 1 it meets it does, as long as Conndraka doesn't mind.--Karekmaps?! 21:34, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Speedy Delete This page should be deleted and should not be remade until the group self-publishes one.Randyest 21:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. Speedy Delete When I created the page it wasn't meant as an insult...which some have taken it to mean. There were post on a couple of forums which were accusing the DoDH of Zerging, And I thought the creation of this page would remove some of that since not every user is familiar with the logistics and reach of the SA. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 21:29, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  8. Speedy Delete See Conndraka and Karek. - W 21:41, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deleted per request. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 21:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Discussion moved to the talk page -- boxy talki 03:55 26 February 2008 (BST)

Lamportians

No expandable content.It went through speedy delete a month ago and was told to come here, but it never quite made it - Vantar 17:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete- Vantar 17:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Speedy Delete Crit 1. Virtually nothing there. -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 18:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Speedy Delete - Meh, Crit 1, can't be expanded, even though I have a sneaking suspicion I'm, probably, the one that voted keep on it.--Karekmaps?! 01:41, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Keep - it's a pseudo group page, and their forum was used a couple of weeks ago (perhaps even more recently, but that's the last one visible without registering) -- boxy talki 01:43 9 February 2008 (BST)
    Well, there's been no reply to that request for a while, so they may be a dead group by now -- boxy talki 01:49 9 February 2008 (BST)
    No, This is the group page, Lamportians was never a group, just a term that one group used frequently.--Karekmaps?! 02:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Keep - For lack of better excuse, disk space=cheep! --User:Axe27/Sig 13:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Delete - They can always build it up again if they realy want to, not like there's a wealth of information on it.--SeventythreeTalk 20:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. Delete - Not really expandable. --Z. slay3r Talk  02:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  8. Delete - no content, just a link. WanYao 19:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted --Z. slay3rT 18:53, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The Juggazombie

Orphanaged and uncategorized, this page has no real use and isn't really expandable by anyone despite it being on topic. Also almost nothing on this page is true. - Vantar 17:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete - Vantar 20:47, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. --Z. slay3r Talk  15:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Comment - If this gets kept, it could go in Category:Chronicle. --Toejam 23:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Delete - Pointless and wrong.--SeventythreeTalk 20:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted --Z. slay3rT 22:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

ZSG crap

All crit 1, no content, and not even in the "group" sub-space -- boxy talki 13:04 21 February 2008 (BST)

If they're crit 1s then why bring them here?--Karekmaps?! 13:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
To give the community a chance to object, seeing as they are technically group sub pages. "A user may choose to move a request from the Speedy Deletion queue to the Deletion Request Queue should they feel that the deletion may attract controversy within the wiki community, but do not wish to cast a Keep vote for the request." I just moved it here without going straight to the SD page -- boxy talki 20:25 21 February 2008 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Checked them all, they are all crit 1s, three days is enough and even if he loses the single revision to the page it won't matter as he can recreate them when they have content. Place holders serve no purpose.--Karekmaps?! 13:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy going to trust Karek here as there is no way i am checking them all. No content = no point and no real effort to recreate when he actually needs them! --Honestmistake 14:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Spelete - Crap, and even if he decided to expand them, it'd still be crap.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 15:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deleted --Karekmaps?!

Brock Hardbottom

There is something off about this page. It is some combination of Crit 9 (User page out side of User Namespace) and Crit 11 (User page of a Non real User) The only incoming link is from BobHammero's Sandbox, who as far as I can tell, never edited this page. On the sandbox the link is part of a list of characters, who by whave been deleted one by one after they each made a bizarre series of page moves that seem to have resulted from confusion about if they where about characters or players. - Vantar 11:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Speedy Delete - Strange criteria 9 and 11 combo. --Z. slay3r Talk  18:10, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Speedydelete - As above --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 00:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Speedy Delete - As Grimchy and Zombie Slayer -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 10:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Keep - It's pretty obviously an example page. I'm voting keep to stop Speedy Deletion but, I do believe it should be removed as it's an unused page. It meets no Speedy Delete Crits, especially not 9 and 11 as those require it being in the User Namespace.--Karekmaps?! 00:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
    It is impossible to have a Crit 9 in the User namespace. Crit 9 is User/Character pages outside of the User namespace - Vantar 20:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
    Doesn't make this any less invalid as a crit 9 for the same reasons mentioned in my vote. --Karekmaps?! 20:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted --Z. slay3rT 00:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

The Battle For Pitneybank

Redirects to the Bashing Back: The Battle of Pitneybank, despite the fact that it is not the first "Battle for Pitneybank" and likely will not be the last. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 02:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Speedy Delete - Crit 3. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 02:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Keep He's fucking with me again. And I'll accept the redirects being broken, until this vote fails.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  02:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Speedy Delete - Crit 3, unused redirect. Not to mention that no one uses this term. And Nali, Stop Spamming Redirects to this horrible article.--Karekmaps?! 02:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Delete - Pick one Nali, and put in a move request for your page if you don't like the title any more -- boxy talki 02:33 3 February 2008 (BST)
    I removed the spam addition, but I believe it can be summed up with the words "It's not my page". Nali didn't create the page, although what that has to do with filing a move request I'll never know.--Karekmaps?! 03:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
    OK, I referred to it as his page. Still, if you think it would be better with one of these names, put in a move request for it -- boxy talki 03:07 3 February 2008 (BST)
    None of the redirects' titles would be acceptable for the reasons I outlined in the deletion submissions. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 03:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. speedy delete - as karek --~~~~ [talk] 19:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Speedy Delete - Crit 3. --Sonny Corleone RRF DORIS CRF pr0n 00:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. Speedydelete - As above --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 00:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  8. If there is more than one "Battle of Pitneybank", change this page to a disambiguation page. --Toejam 08:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  9. Keep -Work with Nali once he gets off his "break" (or before) if you want a less survivor-biased report. Create a disambig page if you want more than one Battle of Pitneybank to be recorded. --SeventythreeTalk 20:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
    That doesn't justify keeping an unused redirect that will never see use on the wiki. As is obviously the case with most all of these.--Karekmaps?! 20:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
    O.K, clearly Nalikill is going to want to keep one of these, so I guess that we wait till he says which page he wants for it.--SeventythreeTalk 20:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
    Redirects are a very simple matter and, as he obviously knows how to make them, they can be recreated when they have a use instead of popping up as search results for no reason other than to get search results and causing tons of confusion. Right now it's basically just search spam.--Karekmaps?! 00:17, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted --Z. slay3r Talk  18:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

The Battle for Pitneybank

Redirects to the Bashing Back: The Battle of Pitneybank, despite the fact that it is not the first "Battle for Pitneybank" and likely will not be the last. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 02:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Keep He's fucking with me again.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  02:11, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Speedy Delete - Crit 3. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 02:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Speedy Delete - Crit 3, unused redirect. Not to mention that no one uses this term. And Nali, Stop Spamming Redirects to this horrible article.--Karekmaps?! 02:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. speedy delete - as karek --~~~~ [talk] 19:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Speedy Delete - Crit 3. --Sonny Corleone RRF DORIS CRF pr0n 00:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Speedydelete - As above --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 00:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. If there is more than one "Battle of Pitneybank", change this page to a disambiguation page. --Toejam 08:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  8. Keep -Work with Nali once he gets off his "break" (or before) if you want a less survivor-biased report. Create a disambig page if you want more than one Battle of Pitneybank to be recorded. --SeventythreeTalk 20:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
    That doesn't justify keeping an unused redirect that will never see use on the wiki. As is obviously the case with most all of these.--Karekmaps?! 20:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted --Z. slay3r Talk  18:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Battle for Pitneybank

Redirects to the Bashing Back: The Battle of Pitneybank, despite the fact that it is not the first "Battle for Pitneybank" and likely will not be the last. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 02:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Keep Because he's fucking with me again.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  02:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
    And thank you for giving me new redirects with your shitty links.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  02:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Speedy Delete - Crit 3, unused redirect. Not to mention that no one uses this term--Karekmaps?! 02:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Speedy Delete - Crit 3. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 02:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. speedy delete - as karek --~~~~ [talk] 19:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Speedy Delete - Crit 3. --Sonny Corleone RRF DORIS CRF pr0n 00:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Speedydelete - As above --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 00:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. If there is more than one "Battle of Pitneybank", change this page to a disambiguation page, or make it redirect to a disambiguation page. --Toejam 08:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  8. Keep -Work with Nali once he gets off his "break" (or before) if you want a less survivor-biased report. Create a disambig page if you want more than one Battle of Pitneybank to be recorded. --SeventythreeTalk 20:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
    That doesn't justify keeping an unused redirect that will never see use on the wiki. As is obviously the case with most all of these.--Karekmaps?! 20:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted --Z. slay3r Talk  18:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

The Battle of Pitneybank

Redirects to the Bashing Back: The Battle of Pitneybank, despite the fact that it is not the first "Battle for Pitneybank" and likely will not be the last. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 02:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Keep Because he's fucking with me again.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  02:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Speedy Delete - Crit 3, unused redirect. Not to mention that no one uses this term--Karekmaps?! 02:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Speedy Delete - Crit 3. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 02:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. speedy delete - as karek --~~~~ [talk] 19:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Speedy Delete - Crit 3. --Sonny Corleone RRF DORIS CRF pr0n 00:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Speedydelete - As above --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 00:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. Change this page to a disambiguation page, or make it redirect to a disambiguation page. --Toejam 08:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  8. Keep -Work with Nali once he gets off his "break" (or before) if you want a less survivor-biased report. Create a disambig page if you want more than one Battle of Pitneybank to be recorded. --SeventythreeTalk 20:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
    That doesn't justify keeping an unused redirect that will never see use on the wiki. As is obviously the case with most all of these.--Karekmaps?! 20:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted --Z. slay3r Talk  18:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

The Second Seige of Giddings Mall

Duplicated at Bashing Back: The Battle of Pitneybank. Should be deleted and BB:TBoP moved there.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  03:04, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Keep - And don't try and delete other peoples work so you can claim creation of the page. the Bashing Back pages is completely useless for anything other than survivor braggadocio.--Karekmaps?! 05:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Keep - As karek. EDIT: Of course, the name is wrong. The Second battle of Giddings resulted in the DDLM slaughter on the 1st of November 2005. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 05:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete Far worse than the BB:TBoP for POV.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  05:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Keep - As Karek.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 06:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Delete - this is like, the tenth siege. The second was Dia de Los Muertos.--Jorm 08:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept --Z. slay3r Talk  18:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Peppardville Factories

The vote on the LSG is in and the merged pages are on there way out. All the factories here now have there own pages this page has no other incoming links- Vantar 01:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. SpeedyDelete - crit 1 We need a speedydelete, or a scheduled deletion for the new LSG, assuming all content has been moved and "what links here" yields no results. --  AHLGTG 04:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Speedydelete - Crit 1, duplicated elsewhere for no purpose -- boxy talki 05:08 13 February 2008 (BST)
  3. Speedy Delete - Crit 1, duplicated elsewhere. All these types of pages should meet that category Gnome.--Karekmaps?! 07:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deleted Crit 1.--Karekmaps?! 00:19, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Maltons Holy Brigade

It is pages like this that make me miss Crit 13. A single sentence written almost a month ago this is either an attempt at a group or an attempt at back story.I see no reason to keep it unless someone is willing to expand/develop it further - Vantar 17:31, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete- Vantar 17:31, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Speedy Delete - Crit 1. There's only about a sentence on the page. I don't think it will be missed. -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 18:49, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Speedy Delete - Crit 1, no content, only used on one page.--Karekmaps?! 01:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Speedydelete - and get rid of that history story on Crowbank -- boxy talki 01:54 9 February 2008 (BST)

Speedy Deleted - And Gone.--Karekmaps?! 02:02, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Lots of Spam pages

The following pages were created by Xela798 as part of some super group. However, to my knowledge this group isn't even off the ground and all the pages have the exact same content with only about 3 lines of text that is different. Every time she makes a new one, she goes and changes it in the other ones, spamming the Recent Changes page making it hard to see anything useful. As a result, I'm nominating all these spam filled pages for deletion, leaving only her original Sinclair Hotels page as that was what she started with. There's also the fact that many of the images he's using for the groups are copyrighted. To be honest, I don't think she's going to stop making them until someone does something. Its just a heap of crap.

Dr. Sinclair

These pages are mine and are needed to run myu company properly. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xela798 (talkcontribs) 19:41, 8 February 2008.


-- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 13:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete - Useless and contribute nothing to the wiki. Basically, a spam bot makes more useful pages than these. Speedy Delete - Just noticed this was crit 1. :) Thanks guys. -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 18:46, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete - Enough already -- boxy talki 13:23 8 February 2008 (BST)
  3. Speedy Delete, Criterion 1 --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 13:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Speedy Delete - Duplication of content. --Z. slay3r Talk  15:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Delete- Vantar 17:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Speedydelete crit 1 - Duplicate content. --  AHLGTG 18:20, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deleted --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 18:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:ClipArtBrokebackMountainGyllenhaalLedgerAiming.gif

Found this when I was sorting out the uploaded images. I would reupload it...but is it actually needed? -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 20:47, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete - Kind of wrong... -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 20:47, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Revert - to what if was originally, before this version was put up. Changing it to this version changes the image on pages that were put there long ago. This was already on a number of suburb pages as a guy in a cowboy hat... now it's a gay guy holding his togger -- boxy talki 03:22 8 February 2008 (BST)
  3. Revert - why is this even being discussed? The change is obviously vandalism, even if the it was done by the original uploader.--Jorm 08:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Reverted - People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 10:39, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Large Row Police Station

Nothing links to this page, and i moved anything usefull to the correct page Large Row Police Department --Scotw 11:38, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Speedydelete - crit 1, duplicated to no purpose -- boxy talki 13:01 2 February 2008 (BST)
  2. Speedy Delete - Crit 1, duplicate of the other page, content less, etc.--Karekmaps?! 13:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Speedy delete --Toejam 13:49, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deleted --Karekmaps?! 14:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools
advertisements