UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/Jan 2008

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
Deletions Archive
2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec
Years 2015 2016 2017 2018

This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Deletions. This page represents all Deletions archived in the month of January 2008.



Category:Adbots

There have been more then 20 adbots on the wiki, if we want to keep this category then someone will need to do some deep crawling through the logs since adbots aren't filed on the Vandal data page. Or we can just delete the category since a list of banned abots isn't that useful anyway. - Vantar 20:44, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. delete aye, that can be gone --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 20:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete Seems pointless. Omega 21:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Keep - I don't see why it should be deleted, just start adding it/work it into whatever adbot banning procedures there already are. The logs aren't too hard I can do it myself sooner or later if that is the issue. --Karekmaps?! 02:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Delete - unless someone can tell me why we need to categorise them. Why would anyone want to go back finding all the banned adbots. Just ban the suckers, they're not worth the effort of categorising -- boxy talki 07:37 30 January 2008 (BST)
  5. Delete - This category doesn't seem to be useful. --Z. slay3r Talk  21:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  6. del, no reason to keep --~~~~ [talk] 18:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Deleted- Vantar 20:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Category:Arrowsmith

There is no reason for this category to exist and 3 reasons why it should not:

  • Userpages don't need categories as their sub pages handled differently then those in the main namespace.
  • The Navigation template on the users page is doing the exact same thing as this category is (providing a list of and links to all the subpages)
  • I am pretty sure this user does not exist

- Vantar 19:53, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Speedy Delete - Crit 2 and Crit 11. Non-existent user and clearly off topic as the user doesn't exist.--Karekmaps?! 02:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
    How is this a Crit. 2? It categorizes all the pages from this user who character is Urban dead relevant, crit 2 is for pages like this also crit 11 only works in the Username space, this is in the category namespace. - Vantar 17:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
    Yar, ignore me, I'm confusing myself.--Karekmaps?! 01:56, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. "Userpages don't need categories as their sub pages [are] handled differently then those in the main namespace." Could you tell me more? --Toejam 19:42, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
    Subpages of pages in the User Namespace provide their own links back to their respect main page. Attaching a subpage to A central page is one of the more common use of Categories on this wiki. The other main useage of categories is to provide a navigation system but this function almost always handled by Navigation template as it is done in this case. Lastly pages in the User namespace don't get listed on Special:Uncategorizedpages so they don't get in the way of identify pages in need of formating help, blanked pages or new created pages as uncategorized pages in the main space do.11:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Keep - If a user wants a category to keep track of their pages, I see no reason not to allow them to. However, User:Arrowsmith and all associated pages should be moved to a sub-page of the real user (yes, it is a non-existent user, it's a character page in the user namespace) -- boxy talki 08:36 31 January 2008 (BST)
  4. Merge - Move the stuff into Sparo's (the author) userspace. --Z. slay3r Talk  21:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Contents merged- Vantar 20:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:DailyTasks

Template:DailyTasks

Not in use, last edit was over a year ago. --  AHLGTG 21:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

This old suggestions page template was put up for speedydeletion (crit 10). It got a couple of keep votes there, so it's been moved here -- boxy talki 12:08 28 January 2008 (BST)

  1. Keep - I'm tempted to vote keep on this one, just as an historical comparison of just how complicated the archiving was in the old suggestions system. Hat's off to all those who did all that on a daily basis! -- boxy talki 00:59 28 January 2008 (BST)
  2. I have to agree with Boxy on this one, keep for historical purposes.--Karekmaps?! 02:30, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Keep - As boxy. --Z. slay3r Talk  18:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Keep - But must be linked to something. --  AHLGTG 18:23, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Keep and must be linked to something. also i made few months worth of that cycling... --~~~~ [talk] 20:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  6. Keep - Amusingly, some old suggestions still aren't cycled. --Toejam 19:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Kept- Vantar 20:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Medics of Malton/Applications

We've moved applications to our forums. --Pedentic 19:46, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete -- boxy talki 22:06 27 January 2008 (BST)
  2. Delete --Karekmaps?! 22:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete --  AHLGTG 22:29, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Delete--SeventythreeTalk 22:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Delete - surprised there's no criterion that would make this speedy delete. --PdeqTalk* 22:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
    We have a slight hole in the system, yes. --  AHLGTG 22:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
    Not exactly, it's an owned page they could have forced a Crit 1.--Karekmaps?! 23:11, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
    I'm not all that comfortable with page wiping group pages to get them into crit 1. It's open to misuse by disgruntled ex-members. This page doesn't get over-long all that often, so they may as well come here -- boxy talki 00:53 28 January 2008 (BST)
  6. Speedy Delete - As per owner request --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 00:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  7. Delete --Z. slay3r Talk  18:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  8. Delete - and crit 7 should be enlarged into a "author request" --~~~~ [talk] 20:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Deleted- Vantar 20:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Department of emergency management

Unused, one man group, causes conflicts and confusion due to having the same name as an already existing survivor organization the DEM, not to mention it's miss categorization. It serves no purpose as an abandoned page.--Karekmaps?! 15:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete - --Karekmaps?! 15:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Speedydelete Crit 1. Turn it into a redirect.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  20:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Speedyredirect - Should have been a redirect in the first place. If not, Crit 1. --  AHLGTG 21:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
    Even if it isn't a used group there is content, it can't be Crit 1 removed.--Karekmaps?! 01:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. keep, but Redirect - should just redirect to where DEM redirects. none worthy contents on it --~~~~ [talk] 22:03, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Delete - yet another Tomer non-group page -- boxy talki 23:09 14 January 2008 (BST)
  6. Delete - nuke it. If anything, maybe a redirect --Ryiis 20:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
  7. Delete - Can we delete anything else he makes too?-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
  8. Delete - It should probably redirect to the DEM after it has been deleted. --Z. slay3r Talk  13:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
  9. Delete - Wouldn't be such a problem if the other (first) DEM was not such an old, established group. As it is, delete.--SeventythreeTalk 16:36, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
  10. Delete - and turn it into a redirect to the original DEM. --PdeqTalk* 23:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
  11. Delete – Unnnecessary and potentially misleading. ᚱᛖᚢᛖᚾᚨᚾ 06:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
  12. Delete - Or burn it with fire. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 23:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Deleted --Z. slay3r Talk  18:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Bounty hunters-maltons outstanding warrents--department of justice

This according to the page it is not a group page, nothing links to it and it creator has started a different group leaving me to assume this is a forgotten work in progress as no one has touched it in the month since it's creation - Vantar 12:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete- Vantar 12:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete - also, looking to his contributions, he has started Department of emergency management which has kinda the same name as well-known DEM. not sure if this counts as impersonation or not... --~~~~ [talk] 15:53, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete - Z. slay3r Talk  14:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Delete --Ryiis 15:03, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Delete - He's done that a lot.--Karekmaps?! 15:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
  6. Delete - Maybe someone should point him in the direction of some advanced editing help. He seems to be at the stage where he knows just enougth to unwittingly cause problems.--SeventythreeTalk 16:39, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Deleted -- boxy talki 22:06 27 January 2008 (BST)

Red Rum Tommy Gun

I'm not neccisarily calling for this to be deleted, but if you read the post that Kevan has made here he is clearly asking for some form of action to be taken over it, either a template stating it's a hoax or deletion, so, seeing as it's his game and all, fair enougth. He's probably sick of people complaining they can't find them or something. I'm bringing this to the deletions page because I know of no other forum that would be totaly suitible for it. Thankyou.--SeventythreeTalk 23:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Didn't the Surgeon General take care of that? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 23:11, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Ah, he must have done that while I was preparing this. Never mind. --SeventythreeTalk 23:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Kept - The contributor recanted the request. --Z. slay3r Talk  00:20, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion:20071123 Fun items

A suggestion that was never voted on, probably never belonged to Category:Current Suggestions or appeared on the Current Day's Suggestions-list. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete Could possibly be considered crit 1? No notable content, was the suggestion duplicated elsewhere? As all below. --  AHLGTG 19:02, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
    Well, the one below is a dupe of this (I was going to put it to SD, but apparently forgot), but the rest aren't duplicated elsewhere. There were a couple, but they were speedied earlier. Also, everyone please note that the last suggestion on the list is slightly different as it has had some voting. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 19:38, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
    Yeah, I noticed that. But it still needs to burn in the righteous fires of deletion --Ryiis 19:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete, checked the history and that's far too long. As all below. --Boris 19:04, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Delete --Ryiis 19:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Delete --~~~~ [talk] 20:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  6. Keep - Put the {{Removed}} template on it as is the rule for removed suggestions.--Karekmaps?! 04:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
    How can they be removed if they never were in voting? I don't see any purpose in keeping these suggestions. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 10:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
    I wasn't aware removed suggestions had to have votes on them, they were still submitted but the authors decided to stop voting before it could begin and continue with discussion. That and I don't think things in the Suggestions namespace should be deleted unless they are obvious attempts to spam it or are moved/placed in the wrong namespace.--Karekmaps?! 10:38, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
    It was never put to a vote, to be removed. As you can see from the users contributions, this page was never placed on the current suggestions list... anyone who wasn't watching the recent changes at the time never got a chance to vote on this (or any of the ones below). The authors just stuffed up... -- boxy talki 07:18 12 January 2008 (BST)
    Then I'd have to say either move it to a user subpage through a move request or ask the creator why and if it can be speedied under Author Only.--Karekmaps?! 07:40, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
  7. Delete - never got placed on Category:Current Suggestions -- boxy talki 07:18 12 January 2008 (BST)

Deleted --Z. slay3r Talk  20:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion:20071123 Useless but fun items

A suggestion that was never voted on, probably never belonged to Category:Current Suggestions or appeared on the Current Day's Suggestions-list. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete --Ryiis 19:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete --~~~~ [talk] 20:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Keep - Put the {{Removed}} template on it as is the rule for removed suggestions.-Karekmaps?! 10:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Delete - never got placed on Category:Current Suggestions -- boxy talki 07:19 12 January 2008 (BST)

Deleted --Z. slay3r Talk  20:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion:20071031 Sniper ability and rifles

A suggestion that was never voted on, probably never belonged to Category:Current Suggestions or appeared on the Current Day's Suggestions-list. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete --Ryiis 19:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete --~~~~ [talk] 20:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Move to Author's user subpage and tell the author. --Toejam 20:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC) Keep - As Karek and boxy. --Toejam 01:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Keep - Put the {{Removed}} template on it as is the rule for removed suggestions.--Karekmaps?! 04:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  6. Keep - Was placed on Category:Current Suggestions, and removed. Put the removed template on it -- boxy talki 07:21 12 January 2008 (BST)

Kept --Z. slay3r Talk  20:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion:20070930 checking for healing

A suggestion that was never voted on, probably never belonged to Category:Current Suggestions or appeared on the Current Day's Suggestions-list. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete --Ryiis 19:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete --~~~~ [talk] 20:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Keep - Put the {{Removed}} template on it as is the rule for removed suggestions.--Karekmaps?! 04:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Delete - never got placed on Category:Current Suggestions -- boxy talki 07:23 12 January 2008 (BST)

Deleted --Z. slay3r Talk  20:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion:20070711 Critical Hits

A suggestion that was never voted on, probably never belonged to Category:Current Suggestions or appeared on the Current Day's Suggestions-list. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete --Ryiis 19:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete --~~~~ [talk] 20:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Keep - Put the {{Removed}} template on it as is the rule for removed suggestions.--Karekmaps?! 04:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Delete - never got placed on Category:Current Suggestions -- boxy talki 07:23 12 January 2008 (BST)

Deleted --Z. slay3r Talk  20:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion:20070630 Military starting objects

A suggestion that was never voted on, probably never belonged to Category:Current Suggestions or appeared on the Current Day's Suggestions-list. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete --Ryiis 19:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete --~~~~ [talk] 20:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Move to Author's user subpage and tell the author. --Toejam 20:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Keep - Put the {{Removed}} template on it as is the rule for removed suggestions.--Karekmaps?! 04:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  6. Keep - Place {{multi}} on the page, it was removed because it was one of 3 suggestions put up by the one person in a day -- boxy talki 07:27 12 January 2008 (BST)

Kept --Z. slay3r Talk  20:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion:20070615 Demolition Axe

A suggestion that was never voted on, probably never belonged to Category:Current Suggestions or appeared on the Current Day's Suggestions-list. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete --Ryiis 19:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete --~~~~ [talk] 20:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Keep - Put the {{Removed}} template on it as is the rule for removed suggestions.--Karekmaps?! 04:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Keep - was placed on Category:Current Suggestions, but removed -- boxy talki 07:28 12 January 2008 (BST)

Deleted --Z. slay3r Talk  20:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion:20070609 Better Death

A suggestion that was never voted on, probably never belonged to Category:Current Suggestions or appeared on the Current Day's Suggestions-list. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete --Ryiis 19:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete --~~~~ [talk] 20:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Keep - Put the {{Removed}} template on it as is the rule for removed suggestions.--Karekmaps?! 04:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Keep - Although it was put on Category:Current Suggestions, the category itself was never placed on the page, meaning it never went into the previous days suggestions, and was effectively removed from voting after a day. Put the removed template on it -- boxy talki 07:33 12 January 2008 (BST)

Deleted --Z. slay3r Talk  20:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion:20070512 Vehicles

A suggestion that was never voted on, probably never belonged to Category:Current Suggestions or appeared on the Current Day's Suggestions-list. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete --Ryiis 19:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete --~~~~ [talk] 20:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Keep - Put the {{Removed}} template on it as is the rule for removed suggestions.--Karekmaps?! 04:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Delete - never got placed on Category:Current Suggestions -- boxy talki 07:33 12 January 2008 (BST)

Deleted --Z. slay3r Talk  20:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion:20071008_Rancid_Gut's

A suggestion that recieved only minimal voting, probably never belonged to Category:Current Suggestions or appeared on the Current Day's Suggestions-list. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete --Ryiis 19:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete --~~~~ [talk] 20:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Keep - Put the {{Removed}} template on it as is the rule for removed suggestions.--Karekmaps?! 04:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Keep - the author placed it on Category:Current Suggestions, but removed it the next day -- boxy talki 07:35 12 January 2008 (BST)

Deleted --Z. slay3r Talk  20:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Template:Gun Vote

Duplicated content from User:Grim s/Sandbox/GunSuggestVote, and done for the specific purpose of plagiarising my work and pissing me off. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 00:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Keep Has content, and that argument is one everyone deserves the chance to use.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  02:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC) SpeedyDelete Crit 1, duplicates Grim S's page.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  05:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
    Note:He put it under crit 1. If he'd put it under crit 6, I wouldn't have removed it- crit 1 can be moved, crit 6 can't. But now it's gotta sit here for the 2 weeks.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  02:49, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Speedydelete Crit 1. Reread crit 1. "No Content: The page contains no more than a line or two of content that cannot clearly be expanded, consists of random or incoherent content, or is duplicated elsewhere to no purpose. Pages created by Spambots typically fall under this category.". Its a stolen duplicated page, written from my perspective and with my arguments. If you wanted something of your own, go make something of your own, instead of lifting mine word for word. You were trolling with doing what you did, the pages creation was clearly in bad faith. You stripped my signature off a signed comment and put your own on it. However, since whats written there is still what i said, i shall sign that template too. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 03:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
    You have the right to do that on your userpage and on the community template. However, you do not have that right on the version I've created for my personal use on my subpages. I reserve the right to say it exactly as you said it, using the same words and in the same order, for the principles of free speech, and for because it cannot be said any better.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  04:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
    Notice that "'to no purpose", this page has a purpose... or at least it did until you put your sig on it, to make it useless to anyone else -- boxy talki 05:32 14 January 2008 (BST)
  3. Keep has content. BTW anybody seen a DEM roster around here?--Kristi of the Dead 04:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
    Delete - it's been moved--Kristi of the Dead 10:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
    That got deleted. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 04:30, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
    The roster itself. But it survives on several user subpages.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  04:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
    Oh, oh, I have! You can find one as a sub of Sonny, or Cyberbob's user page! Do you need directions, or can you find your own way there? ;).Anyway, Grim? Get over it. You should feel proud that you came up with something good enough that people are stealing it. Now, this template can be deleted quite fairly, seeing as how Nali has created a user-sub of it. That snippet said, I'm going to try and go to sleep. See you all in a week or so.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 04:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
    Yeah, and I'd be willing to let this get crit 1'd if that wouldn't make Grim press on for a crit 6 of my subpage.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  04:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
    They could be deleted as crit 1's, actually. Well, most of them could be. In fact, i recall voting delete on most of them. I dont mind people taking the concept. What i do mind is people taking my words and claiming that they are their words. Make up your own reasons and write it yourself instead of stealing mine. I thought i made as much clear in my vote but, quite naturally, you guys are far too retarded to see such an obvious comment as that. nosirree. If anything could possibly conflict with your statements it must be ignored, and we must pretend it doesnt exist. Grow a brain you two. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 04:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
    So you'd have no problem with it if I used it and said "To quote Grim:". (Bear in mind: I can use those exact words in a vote and there's nothing you can do about it; all you can do is get the templates deleted.)  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  04:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
    No, write up your own damned vote, and your own damned reasoning, instead of stealing my signed post and sticking your signature on it. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 04:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
    So we can expect you to start filing cases against anyone voting "as above" or similar can we? --Honestmistake 10:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
    Well, by pretty much any country's law you care to name, and by the rules of the wiki, I have the right to justify my vote however I damn well please, and to say what I damn well please-the point that YOU failed to address from my response. Even if you get the pages deleted, I can continue to use your exact words on every vote and every discussion on every new gun suggestion, without crediting you if I want to.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  04:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
    The runt finally decides to show some bite. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 10:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Keep - just change it to say something similar, in your own words, Nali, for the love of god. All non-subst'ed templated replies should be outlawed on this wiki... or at least in the suggestions system, where votes are supposed to stay the same once closed -- boxy talki 05:32 14 January 2008 (BST)
    Delete - been moved to a user page -- boxy talki 10:22 14 January 2008 (BST)
    BTW, I'm voting delete on the condition that when deleted, the user page isn't put up for speedydeletion on the ground of being a deletion work around... if it wasn't there already, I would still be keeping this (even if it needs modification) -- boxy talki 10:41 14 January 2008 (BST)
  5. Speedy Delete - Crit 1, needless, and it shouldn't have it's own page anyway, it should be a user sub-page and if kept I will be filing Move Requests until it is done, it's user content on a community namespace.--Karekmaps?! 07:24, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
  6. speedy delete - Crit 1 as Karek (can I still say that?) Why bother with a seperate page when you can just paste it from Grims and switch sigs!--Honestmistake 10:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
  7. Speedy Delete - Kill it with fire. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 10:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedydeleted -- boxy talki 10:44 14 January 2008 (BST)

Category:User

This category is rather pointless. Of the 24,705 users on the wiki 101 of them are listed here while all of them are on Special:Listusers. Also all the pages that are listed in this category are in the user namespace and thus do not have any need for categories in the firstplace- Vantar 10:24, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete - Vantar 10:24, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Speedy Delete - Crit 1, useless cat and is only used in those horribly obnoxious I am insert thing here templates.--Karekmaps?! 18:16, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. SpeedyDelete - Useless. --  AHLGTG 20:44, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Speedy Delete - Crit 1 as content is pointless --~~~~ [talk] 15:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedily Deleted --Z. slay3r Talk  21:14, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Note to self: pay more attention to A/D and A/SD... i liked this category... why did you guys deleted it ? :( --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 19:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Category:Suggestion Pages

The list of suggestions (with the exception of those on userpages and sandboxes) is duplicated here, a list of all pages in the Suggestion namespace. Also, the category tag from Template:SugVoteBox will have to be removed. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 13:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

  1. Keep - Special pages aren't Crit 1 able, especially considering they are next to impossible to find for a normal user, this page is one of the most used categories on the wiki.--Karekmaps?! 14:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Keep - Swiers makes a good point. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 22:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC) Delete - The only reference to it is on Category:Suggestions, which could be easily replaced with a link to the special page. Wouldn't be any harder to find. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 15:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Keep Its similar to the special page, but not identical. And it is easier to find (hell, I can;t find that special page without a link). There's also the link to Category:Suggestion Pages at the bottom of every suggestion page, as its a category. The special page can't duplicate that. SIM Core Map.png Swiers 22:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
    Hmmm, didn't remember that there's a link to the category on each page that belongs to it. Can I remove this or does this have to stay here for the rest of the two weeks? --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 22:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Keep - Swiers nailed it, that, and the Category:Suggestion Pages is flexbile in consideration for future endeavours (if any). --Ryiis 22:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Keep - Swiers hits the nail on the head with the hammer. --User:Axe27/Sig 00:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Kept - way early, but consensus had been reached -- boxy talki 09:18 4 January 2008 (BST)

Personal tools
advertisements