UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/September-2010

e Deletions Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Mother

I don't know about you, but quite frankly I think this page is offensive. Maybe this is the wrong place to report this, but I don't think this sort of Content that offends people should be allowed on our Wiki... -Dezonus- ^(talk) 08:45, 29 September 2010 (BST)

It should be noted that the content has been manually moved by the user to Your Mother. When I finish what I'm doing, I'll delete that as a result of this vote, as it's essentially the page that was voted on below.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 20:14, 29 September 2010 (BST)

1. move - it isn't offensive, but it is bad. i suggest, if it isn't a group, move to user's userspace. -- LEMON #1 08:52, 29 September 2010 (BST)
2. Move - offensive? For reals? 09:21, 29 September 2010 (BST)

   Yes I think It's downright offensive. Here's some Highlights:

   • "Your mum, in a rare sighting out of whoring"
   • "Your Mom (born roughly twelve years before you and eleven before her mom)"
   • "Your mother followed suit (Slut!)."
   • "After marrying your dad directly following getting totally wasted after her nightclub job, your mom had you and your brother."
   • "your mom progressed to become dumber, followed by massive weight gain."

   —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dezonus (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.

   If offensive I can tone it down. It was meant as a Satire, and isn't finished. I was going to include a long list of yomomma jokes (and all info before that is to be explained in them). Nobody is supposed to take offence. It's a joke. It's not pointed at any specific person, either. --Officer Mead Sheaffer 17:20, 29 September 2010 (BST)

   Scratch that. This isn't Uncyclopedia, I'm deleting this and re-making it. --Officer Mead Sheaffer 17:40, 29 September 2010 (BST)

   I didn't really find the yo mamma stuff very offensive but the Black Guy eating fried chicken comments was uncalled for. I see the page has been blanked now. --~ 17:41, 29 September 2010 (BST)

   Dezonus, we can read it as well as you can. No need to quote it here. Also, please format your comments so that they don't break the voting. —Aichon— 17:59, 29 September 2010 (BST)

   I hate to cause a blamestorm here but it really kind of appears that Officer Mead Sheaffer created an intentionally offensive page so that he had an excuse to use his "classy disapproval" pseudo-template. I guess that's just speculative but c'mon...really? --~ 18:05, 29 September 2010 (BST)

   Actually I made that template straight off the bat, when the page was viewed before it was finished and finessed with. The page was intentionally meant to be offensive to everyone, but not to any specific person. It had a lot of offensive content. I humbly apologize however, due to I created it with the mindset of an Uncyclopedian, something that cost me a bit of credibility on this wiki for humor. Therefore I'm re-making the article. --Officer Mead Sheaffer 18:13, 29 September 2010 (BST)

3. Speedy Delete - It's Crit 2 since none of the content is relevant. This isn't a personal blog. Pages in the main namespace are supposed to have value to the regular UD player, meaning that they should either be about the game, a group, or something else of general interest. "Your momma" jokes are not pertinent, and either belong in personal namespaces or not on the wiki at all. —Aichon— 17:59, 29 September 2010 (BST)
4. Speedy Delete - As Aichon --~ 18:06, 29 September 2010 (BST)
5. Speedy - I'll get this some time within the hour if nobody objects.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:48, 29 September 2010 (BST)
6. Move and Keep I had something similar happen to me, where my page was speedied before I had even a chance to respond. I later had to undelete and move it to my userpage. While technically a crit 2, and thus eligible for Speedy, I'd prefer a precedent where we automatically move that stuff to the userpage, or at the very least give author time to save it. I guess this nullifies the Speedy itself, but I can't say I dig crit 2. --Thadeous Oakley 20:29, 29 September 2010 (BST)

   Also the entire discussion about this being offensive or not is irrelevant. It also makes want to scream PURITAN!1! I have seen far worse. --Thadeous Oakley 20:32, 29 September 2010 (BST)

   Sorted.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 23:36, 29 September 2010 (BST)

   Which explains why he recreated it again in the main space despite knowing full weel about namespaces.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 20:55, 29 September 2010 (BST)

   Sorry, how do my words explain that?--Thadeous Oakley 21:07, 29 September 2010 (BST)

   =P Poor phrasing on my part. What I mean to say is, if he intended to have it as a userspace article within his space, such as in your case, he would have put it in his namespace either on the first time he made it or when he remade it after this deletion reuqest began.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:12, 29 September 2010 (BST)

   Then it should be explained to him that off-topic content should not be in the main-space. Crit 2 is true, I just don't like it's being used for speedies. Just delete the main stuff, move to his own space and give a polite warning not to do this again.--Thadeous Oakley 21:26, 29 September 2010 (BST)

   I would, but I'm not going to countermand a vote on Deletions, because I'm pretty sure that's against protocol (as in the case of that ridiculous scheduled deletion below).--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:31, 29 September 2010 (BST)

   It was explained to him on his talk page, but he deleted that message. Check the history if you don't believe. Also, it was mentioned here on speedy deletions, and he's been a part of the discussion. --~ 21:32, 29 September 2010 (BST)

   I know, I'd just what I would have done if this wiki was authoritarian dictatorship, and I were it's leader, or if my name was Kevan.--Thadeous Oakley 21:38, 29 September 2010 (BST)

   We need Grim back. He'd do it, and nobody would blink an eye.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:39, 29 September 2010 (BST)

7. Keep but Move - This is no more offensive than the time Mis said my mom was doing it wrong, not that offensiveness has anything at all to do with whether we should allow a page to live. Even though it's unfunny. --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 23:25, 29 September 2010 (BST)
8. Speedy --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:45, 29 September 2010 (BST)

Deleted by DDR a few hours back as a Crit 7 after a request on A/SD which preceded any of the Keep votes. —Aichon— 06:02, 30 September 2010 (BST)

Bunch of unused Images

Sorting through Uncategorised images, found a lot of similar ones to User:Dracula's name, Most unused. I asked him about it,
"I am only using those which are linked either to my user page, or The Order of Dracula page. The others can be deleted." (Copied from User talk:Dracula)

Suggesting that the following be deleted:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

-Dezonus- ^(talk) 01:32, 23 September 2010 (BST)

1. Delete - Not speedy by crit 7, since the author didn't come to us here. --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 02:19, 23 September 2010 (BST)
2. Delete. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 17:27, 23 September 2010 (BST)
3. Scheduled Deletion - Crit 7 by proxy. Can I just whip through them, or should I wait for the vote to do its thing?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 17:40, 23 September 2010 (BST)

   Letter of the law, it wouldn't be since the author did not leave a note on a sysop's talk, just his own talk in response to a question from someone who is not a sysop. Unless you believe in crazy, possibly Anti-Freedom, Pro-Terrorist things like spirit of the law. -MHSstaff 00:24, 24 September 2010 (BST)

4. Delete - As VVV -MHSstaff 00:25, 24 September 2010 (BST)
5. Scheduled Deletion - anyone with a memory more efficient than a goldfish would remember we delete these as a pseudo crit 7. Typically, if it's on his talk page it might as well be on ours. -- LEMON #1 04:18, 24 September 2010 (BST)

I already deleted these a few days ago as unused... So done I guess. -- LEMON #1 08:48, 29 September 2010 (BST)

Journal:PsychoPhil

Misplaced user page that hasn't been edited since '06 (Rooster did lately but unsure why), and that user has made no contribs since '08. I dont think it's quite speedy, but I may be wrong. -Dezonus- ^(talk) 10:15, 27 September 2010 (BST)

1. Speedy - Kill --Thadeous Oakley 10:30, 27 September 2010 (BST)
2. Speedy c1 -- LEMON #1 10:33, 27 September 2010 (BST)
3. Speedy - It's a Journal page, not a misplaced User page, and I see no reason to go around deleting arbitrary Journal pages for no good reason. That said, it is Crit 1. —Aichon— 10:35, 27 September 2010 (BST)

Speedy Deleted. —Aichon— 10:35, 27 September 2010 (BST)

Lockettside Behemoth Army

- User:Officer Mead Sheaffer 23:51, 19 September 2010 (BST)

1. Speedy - Crit 7 --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 23:58, 19 September 2010 (BST)
2. Speedy - Crit 7, as Trips said. —Aichon— 00:05, 20 September 2010 (BST)

Deleted - This is as good as a crit 7 by proxy you doofi (that's plural for doofus ;] ) -- LEMON #1 00:35, 20 September 2010 (BST)

I was watching X-Files when I saw this. It was a season-ending cliffhanger episode! That's my excuse. —Aichon— 00:41, 20 September 2010 (BST)

Which one? I've currently only got as far as season four's "Gethsemane". 15:48, 20 September 2010 (BST)

I was finishing season 6 at the time. Been watching it on Netflix for the last 2-3 months in between other stuff. —Aichon— 20:28, 20 September 2010 (BST)

Example_page

1. Delete - Page serves no real purpose and is spam -Dezonus- ^(talk) 14:08, 17 September 2010 (BST)
2. Keep - page is linked all over the wiki and serves the purpose of forming links when needed in admin page descriptions.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 14:12, 17 September 2010 (BST)
3. keep not another poodle... -- LEMON #1 14:20, 17 September 2010 (BST)
4. Keep - As yon. 15:25, 17 September 2010 (BST)
5. Keep Hold it right there, donkey hater. -- Spiderzed▋ 15:29, 17 September 2010 (BST)
6. Keep better to have one spam page than lots of them. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 15:39, 17 September 2010 (BST)
7. Keep - These pages make use of it already. It's helpful. It's not spam. Keep it. —Aichon— 15:52, 17 September 2010 (BST)
8. Keep - It's the generic "I need a fake blue link" page. Everything on the page and talk page is basically spam, but there you go. --  RoosterDragon  17:42, 17 September 2010 (BST)
9. Keep - As Red. --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 00:14, 18 September 2010 (BST)

   This page doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being deleted. If a sysop wants to throw their weight around and prematurely rule keep, I won't complain. --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 04:31, 18 September 2010 (BST)

   Lucky no one cares what u think -- LEMON #1 14:57, 18 September 2010 (BST)

   Fucking hell I'm a dickhead when I've been drinking. Sorry. -- LEMON #1 02:52, 19 September 2010 (BST)

   Best Friends Forever! --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 08:06, 19 September 2010 (BST)

10. A/VB - is where this guy should be taken for wasting all of our valuable thyme! xoxo 02:41, 18 September 2010 (BST)

Kept early. This isn't getting deleted. It is a page that is used to give example links -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:59 18 September 2010 (BST)

UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive/Mistakes

It's an archive of mistakes added to A/M, yet it appears to have only been used once and never again. In general, we just delete these sorts of mistakes, rather than archiving them, so having it seems pointless to me.

1. Delete - Said my piece above. —Aichon— 13:24, 18 August 2010 (BST)
2. Delete - Was going to keep, but Aichon's right. We've missed about 30 cases that are like the above which we've just deleted. No point archiving. Same should probably happen with UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Scinfaxi (maybe move this to a talk page archive and delete the original) and UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Criterion 12. --
    
    
    
    
   13:44, 18 August 2010 (BST)
3. Delete --User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 11:30, 22 August 2010 (BST)
4. Delete - Useless and pointless. -- Spiderzed▋ 12:07, 22 August 2010 (BST)
5. Delete. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 22:49, 28 August 2010 (BST)
6. Delete - It's a nice concept, but it would require effort. Do not want! --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 04:51, 31 August 2010 (BST)
7. Delete - Because sysops are flawless and never make mistakes Linkthewindow  Talk  13:21, 31 August 2010 (BST)
8. Delete ☒ ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 06:02, 1 September 2010 (BST)

Deleted. —Aichon— 19:34, 3 September 2010 (BST)