UDWiki:Administration/Protections

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
Administration Services

Sysop List | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat)

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning | Vandal Data

Protections | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion

Contents

This page is for the request of page protection within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to philosophical concerns, the ability to protect pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a protection from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.

[edit] Guidelines for Protection Requests

All Protection Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:

  • A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility.
  • A reason for protection. This should be short and to the point.
  • A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.

Any protection request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.

Once the protection request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be reviewed by a member of the Sysop team, and action taken accordingly. Once action has been taken, the system operator will add a comment including a signed datestamp detailing his course of action, and the request will be moved into the Recent Actions queue, where it will remain for one week. After that week is up, it may be moved to the archive (see navigation box below). If the Protection has been granted, the system operator should place the tag {{protect}} on the page(s) that have been protected.

In the event of a system operator requesting a Protection, all the previous points will apply, excepting that a system operator other than the requestor shall review and take action on the request.

Protections Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec



[edit] Protection Queue

Place pages requiring protection here.

[edit] Requested Edits

Place pages requiring editing here.

[edit] Recent Actions

[edit] New suggestion templates layout

Its not perfect by any means, but all parts of both templates now seem to be in agreement about what the procedure is. Corss posted from talk suggestions. --Rosslessness "Borehamwood's High Profile Celebrity" 20:09, 1 June 2009 (BST)

What exactly are you requesting? -- boxy talkteh rulz 11:24 9 June 2009 (BST)
Edits to each of the two templates. I'll junk the suggestions example and repost the two templates. hold on. --Rosslessness "Borehamwood's High Profile Celebrity" 11:27, 9 June 2009 (BST)

Let's go back to this request, it's gone stagnant. Because I'm short on time, Ross, could you please produce the template which is to be changed also, and (I'm pretty sure it's out there) a dif on the old template and your proposed edits, please? DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION TALK -- OFFLINE 03:39, 23 June 2009 (BST)

yep. Later today. --Rosslessness "Borehamwood's High Profile Celebrity" 13:11, 25 June 2009 (BST)

Denied! Come back later Ross, when you have the time to bring me those dif links, etc. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION TALK -- OFFLINE 03:50, 1 July 2009 (BST)

[edit] Suggestion:20090701_Laser_Beam_Eyes_for_Fiffy

Humourous suggestion. I'd do it myself but given the number of people that obviously want it to stay that would be pretty much begging for a Misconduct case and I don't feel like the drama. --Cyberbob 03:34, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Done. My net was lagging so I couldn't get to this sooner. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION TALK -- OFFLINE 03:42, 1 July 2009 (BST)
Why protect it so quickly? It's only been up for an hour. -- UBCS Haliman  Leave me a message! Bob, I know you will read this. Yep. 03:44, 1 July 2009 (BST)
Why not? MoonShine is free to resubmit it in Humorous Suggestions but it can't remain as a standalone page. --Cyberbob 03:46, 1 July 2009 (BST)
Oh sorry. I'm not familiar with the rules with Humorous suggestions. *Walks out of page.* -- UBCS Haliman  Leave me a message! Bob, I know you will read this. Yep. 03:47, 1 July 2009 (BST)
Perhaps acquainting yourself with the ruleset involved in a situation you wish to get outraged over before spitting the dummy might be a good idea in future. --Cyberbob 03:50, 1 July 2009 (BST)
Yep. -- UBCS Haliman  Leave me a message! Bob, I know you will read this. Yep. 03:50, 1 July 2009 (BST)

[edit] Protections Scheduling Queue

Protection Scheduling requests should be requested in the same general format as Deletions. Votes will occur in the same general manner, and like deletion scheduling requests will be voted on for two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. Valid votes are:

  • Yea - Approval of Schedule Request
  • Nay - Disapproval of Schedule Request

[edit] Finished Arby Cases

With the new arbitration format, we'll need to protect the pages once the case is closed. Just so we can protect them if someone's forgot to put in a request for us to do so. -- Cheese WTF!RandomSysOp?

Personal tools
advertising
project wonderful