From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Protections Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019


People are continuing to vote on this post removal. Ive already rolled back twice. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 10:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Done, although you can do it yourself if you see a problem on a suggestion page that is closed to voting -- boxytalk • 10:54 27 November 2007 (BST)


Pleas undo Nali's Edit so the page again conforms with the rest of the rules.--Karekmaps?! 00:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

It conforms with the rules now, because I reverted the rule change that was never approved by either suggestion policy vote, nor community discussion -- boxytalk • 01:00 18 November 2007 (BST)
Sorry Boxy, but if anyone shouldn't be editing those pages making those changes you're at the top of that list. The rule change was never approved by policy vote or community discussion in the first place and only causes drama.--Karekmaps?! 01:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
As has been said elsewhere. This is not the place for that discussion. Anyway, I won't rule on this case, but this page should be changed automatically to conform with the suggestions rules, when that is decided -- boxytalk • 01:14 18 November 2007 (BST)

I dont know from where did you guys raed that you cant vote whitout justifying your own vote. Saying you are against or pro a suggestion and/or policy is enough for a vote. You are not asked to explain why you voted for (name your presidential choice here), so why should we ask for people to explain why they vote in here ? Anyway, page reverted to conform prior rules. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 18:03, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Haggie, I'd advise against changing the SugVoteBox. There's currently a discussion/2 going on regarding if we want justification optional or mandatory. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 18:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Crap. The change was made already anyway. Let's wait for this discussions to be over to decide whether to keep it as it is, or change it to being obligatory to justify your vote --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 18:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to say, you people are confusing the hell out of me now. Geez.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 18:25, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Back to comply with the rules on the suggestions page. It's under voting now -- boxytalk • 10:03 19 November 2007 (BST)


How about adding

*[[External Links|more...]]

to the end of "External Links" part? --~~~~ [talk] 19:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Nubis 20:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


Can you please add this to the external links section?

Tactical Map

Thekooks stumbled across this, and created a page for it, but I feel it would be better suited in the external links section. --User:Axe27/Sig 17:19, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Done. I thought it was already in there -- boxytalk • 10:10 19 November 2007 (BST)


Serving Scheduled Protectings against Nalikill user page and sub-pages. The user can ask for these pages to be unprotected once he serves his ban period. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 20:48, 18 November 2007 (UTC)


Because it shouldn't be editable by normal users. While you're at it, you might as well make it consistent with Template:SugVoteRules or vice versa. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 19:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Soon please--Karekmaps?! 00:06, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Done -- boxytalk • 00:43 18 November 2007 (BST)


Not used any more, but newbies keep adding their suggestions there time after time --~~~~ [talk] 21:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps making it a redirect would be useful? --Toejam 22:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
No, the page exists for a reason... but maybe redirecting it to talk:suggestions with a link back to suggestions would be good.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  00:37, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
There is contend that is not dupelicated elsewhere on that page, so changinf to redirect is not an option. however nothing really should/would be added there, thus i request protection --~~~~ [talk] 15:13, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Protected --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 19:10, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Suicidal Angel's Archive of Not-So-Greatiness

So people who don't need to be, and people who I suspect are breaking rules will stay the hell off it. Obviously the giant notice at the top of the page won't stop people from editing it. And I need a new one anyway.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 00:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Don't you mean this page? --Z. slay3r Talk  00:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Bah, crappy copy-pasta job. Yes, I do mean that page. Link updated, and a big "Whoops" is being uttered!-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 00:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Protected. --Z. slay3r Talk  00:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

User:DangerReport/Stanbury Village

Edit war in progress. Despite being asked twice, neither side have gone to the discussion page to work out a concensus, and have instead repeatedly changed the status for the susburb. Ive replaced it as it was prior to the conflict and request it be locked in order to force them to that table and end this senseless bickering, or for a period of a week, whichever happens sooner. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 13:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

It looks like it died down quite quickly, so it won't be protected unless it starts up again. --Z. slay3r Talk  21:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Main Page and Template:Navigation

The newest "First time playing" template should be merged into navigation; as it is now - it's wasting space and streching page.

Please, remove it's table from Main page; for easiness i already remade how navigation template should look, here - just copypaste. I've also shuffled the Radio link in Game Information closer to phones link, as asked somewhere --~~~~ [talk] 09:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Actually personally I don't consider it an improvement as it messes the clean look of the other boxes. As it's the most trafficked page I'd say it can't hurt to discuss it on the main page' talk page first before we mess around with it.-- Vista  +1  14:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
What? Maybe there's some different browser issue, but i don't see where/how it messes other boxes. Please, provide a screenshot. As for discussing first, check here --~~~~ [talk] 17:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


Might as well, I have no plans for ever changing it in the future.--Karekmaps?! 18:40, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Done. --Z. slay3r Talk  22:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


Because you must now use the past tense to talk about either of those years; nothing else will happen in those years. No use but vandalism in allowing them to be edited.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  05:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Protected – Nubis 18:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


Utility template for the purpose of helping new users, contains an edit link because it makes a header which can lead to accidental editing of the template page, as has already happened at least once.--Karekmaps?! 20:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Protected. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 22:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


More members than just Izumi. Since she hasnt been around for a while, and I have receieved assurances she wont edit the page herself, theres no need to keep it protected. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 04:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

It's been about a month since the protection, and I have seen the assurances, so it sounds good. --Z. slay3r Talk  13:30, 1 November 2007 (UTC)