UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Scheduling/Archive

From The Urban Dead Wiki

This page contains all previous requests for Protection Scheduling.

Administrative Templates

Templates with administrative only purposes which have been categorized as such in the Administration Templates category.

1. Yes ~ _{18:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)}
2. Yes - Why Not.--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 18:30, 8 May 2011 (BST)

• Passed unanimously with 2 (two) whole yes votes. ~ _{16:20, 24 May 2011 (UTC)}

Concluded Polls

Polls which are held through UDWiki:Poll and have been concluded. Conclusion is defined as the point at which the author of the poll posts their conclusions (this should happen shortly after the poll closes). The talk page of the poll would remain unprotected. Abandoned or withdrawn polls would be protected without the need for author conclusions.~ 04:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

1. Yea - ~ 04:41, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
2. Yes --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
3. Yes -- Spiderzed█ 00:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
4. Yarp - Makes sense. -- Cheese 16:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
5. NEIN first combo breaker in a long ass time--
   
   bitch 04:32 10 March 2011 (UTC)
6. Yes --^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 23:03, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
7. Yes --Ross^lessness 15:32, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
8. Yes —Aichon— 02:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

• Passed 8 7 to 1 in favour. -- Cheese 01:53, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

  Seven to one, surely?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 00:19, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

  Yeah...I think I was on the lash that night. -- Cheese 15:49, 29 March 2011 (BST)

Historical Events

I'm not sure why historical groups are scheduled protections but historical events aren't. In a historical sense they both have the same principles behind why they should be protected upon becoming classed as Historical.

Basically, I'm proposing that all current and future events that are Historical (as per Historical Events voting) are to be protected on sight. --ϑϑℜ 10:57, 20 July 2009 (BST)

1. Yep - I'm pretty sure no one would throw a fit if we protected them anyway, however. Linkthewindow  Talk  14:25, 20 July 2009 (BST)
2. Yes --ϑϑℜ 14:26, 20 July 2009 (BST)

   I also apologise for the overuse of the historical word 'historical' in my historical proposal. Historical. --ϑϑℜ 17:45, 20 July 2009 (BST)

   ;')--Thadeous Oakley 18:06, 22 July 2009 (BST)

3. Yes--C Whitty 17:03, 20 July 2009 (BST)
4. Yes --Ross^lessness 17:31, 20 July 2009 (BST)
5. Yes --SirArgo ^Talk 17:37, 20 July 2009 (BST)
6. Yes --Orange Talk 18:37, 20 July 2009 (BST)
7. Yes Ans link said, there shouldn't be a problem with this. It's historical for pete's sake. -Poodle of doom 19:13, 20 July 2009 (BST)
8. Yes - Leave the talk pages open though maybe? --Darth Sensitive ^W! 04:36, 21 July 2009 (BST)
9. Yes as Darth. Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 07:34, 21 July 2009 (BST)
10. Yes - as above --Brian ^{Talk to me} 12:26, 21 July 2009 (BST)
11. No - talk pages should stay open. I'm assuming you plan on protecting them to based on your reference to historical groups, correct me if i'm wrong.--xoxo 12:33, 21 July 2009 (BST)

    I actually intended on keeping talk pages open (hence why they aren't specified in the request, I forgot about them), because events don't theoretically fall under the ownership of any user or page, unlike historical groups, who have protection, because as a matter of principle there should be no members to maintain the talk page. --ϑϑℜ 10:50, 27 July 2009 (BST)

12. Yes --Thadeous Oakley 18:06, 22 July 2009 (BST)
13. Yes --Kamden^T|^RRF|^W| 21:16, 23 July 2009 (BST)
14. y--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 21:25, 23 July 2009 (BST)

Passed with 13 for, 1 against. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 02:36, 12 August 2009 (BST)