UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/February-2008

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Speedy Deletions Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions. This page represents all Speedy Deletions archived in February, 2008.


ProjDev Example Pages

User:Karek/ProjDev/Example and User:Karek/ProjDev/Example2, Crit 7s, I don't need them anymore.--Karekmaps?! 02:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

done and done. Nice trading with you. Will trade again. A+++++ --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 12:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Monroeville/map

Monroeville/map. This page tells little information that isnt available in/parsed into somewhere else. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 11:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Done, Crit 1, Duke used that information to format his map stuff.(while checking it against multiple other sources).--Karekmaps?! 12:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced User Page

Content has been moved to his talk page and a helpful note for next time left. :) -- Cheese 22:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

You're kidding right? Next time do a page move so it can be deleted under the scheduled deletion, by you. Deleting as a Crit 1.--Karekmaps?! 23:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Read up on scheduled deletion in the guidelines, cheeseman -- boxy talki 12:30 29 February 2008 (BST)
I have now. :D No more n00by sysoping for me. -- Cheese 12:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Monroville Groups

Category:Survivor Groups and Category:Zombie Hordes. I already linked all groups to Cateogory:Monroeville Survivor Groups and Category:Monroeville Zombie Groups, so these two categories are useless. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 20:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Aye, yours makes more sense than mine, their going.--Karekmaps?! 23:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Video Diary: dopesmokr

don't want it anymore :p --Stoner24 ELT 17:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

done --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 20:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

The dead of Dunell Hills, The Dead of Dunnell Hills, The dead of Dunnel Hills

Why, it can't be! Surely the dead of Dunell Hills page was deleted just yesterday! But now it's back, and it brought friends! Request for speedy deletion for all three on account of the fact that, again, we want no wiki page and making wiki pages on behalf of those few members who cannot spell "Dunell" right is a travesty. Nobody in the group wants a damn wiki page, and nobody outside of the group really has a say in the matter. --Katthew 15:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

As an aside, the pages were created again, blank, because someone of the DHPD and/or moderator staff felt it within their power to redirect the pages/terms to their stub on the group, rather than requiring people actually look for it. This was a pretty shit move on their part, and adding the blank pages was the better option.--Gregarious Instigator 17:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

DELETE: Do these few problem administrators have anything better to do than concoct cheesy workarounds to overturn valid arbitration decisions and vandalize their own wiki? Addison Strack 18:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC) 18:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

In most cases, groups have wiki pages to tell a little about them, some have a short NPOV statement, maybe a group listing while others are quite extravagant. In your groups case, there really needs to be an NPOV, doesn't have to be anything special, about the group. A lot of people seem to think the dead of Dunell Hills is just a zerg group. Is it all that much to ask that there is a short little sentance describing what you're all about? --  AHLGTG 18:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree with your sentiment, but I also think they just prefer to maintain a little mystery for a while, for fright effect. I think that part of the reason that they don't want a page is to emulate the mystery and terror which surrounded "The Many," which was their first incarnation. In that case, I think rather than an NPOV, they'd find a highly speculative article written in a hysterical, frightened tone of a clueless survivor to be the most appropriate article. However, now that a few personally invested admins have started throwing their weight around and making their own private pages to "represent" the group and squirreling them away in areas where they can exert complete editorial control and lock out members of the group from even editing their own group description page, things are clearly out of hand. I think any chance at a public, NPOV article went out the window as soon as these people in a position to lock out members of the group from editing their own page made it clear that they would exert complete and personal editorial control over the content of any page that was written. No content at all is better than that. Addison Strack 18:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - pages can be expanded, if not by users in the group by users who edit a simple NPOV line or two about the group for the general wiki user to know about them. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 19:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  • We don't want a page, and we don't want anyone else giving us a page. Are you seriously saying we have no right to not have a page? --Katthew 19:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Exactly that. You don't. Once a user decided to create a page about your group, it's there. There shouldnt be censorship in a wiki. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 19:10, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  • I must be confused because I thought this was a ruling on the redirection links from a page that was already speedy deleted and two of its near doppelgangers, seeing as how that's what the title of this section is and all. --Riseabove 19:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
This is a totally ridiculous workaround and a redirect link allows the group to be represented entirely by a third party. Keep it as a blank page if you're that concerned about "the general wiki user" being able to click a blue link (protip: you're not) --Riseabove 19:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Quick question. You guys are not a sub-group of DHPD? Otherwise the redirect is entirely misleading. --  AHLGTG 22:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Not a redirect no more, and probably best not reverted to one.--Karekmaps?! 22:25, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Link 2 and 3: The Dead of Dunnell Hills, The dead of Dunnel Hills redirect the the DHPD sub-page. The first one does not.--  AHLGTG 22:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC) Oop, there we go. Krazy is reading mah thoughts.
Ok, now that is done, would a member of the group add just a wee bit of content? A brief description about what you're about? --  AHLGTG 22:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
I doubt they will, nor do they need to. As long as people keep in mind that they don't want to actively recruit or such and the page should only exist for the purpose of stating what they are in game in a factual and neutral manner it will, hopefully, be fine.--Karekmaps?! 22:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh shit, did someone say precedent? http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Data/Heathers Very simple, their page is dead of Dunell Hills (covering any spelling/capitilsation) and they can according to the above precedent choose not to have a wiki page. Like the heathers did for abotu a year. It is ridiculous, how would it go down if I made /red_rum a redirect to /DHPD/killers/Red_Rum.

--Thekooks 22:25, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

The Heathers never objected. Besides which, here is a bit more UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2007_02#Calliope_Grieve precedence for you. The dead of dunnel hills have objected, and so they have the right to have a blank page. Explanations can be given on the talk page if necessary, which is where non members should post stuff about groups -- boxy talki 02:52 26 February 2008 (BST)

Image:DeadofDunell.png

This image is a clear copyright violation, as the author never gave their permission for the image to be used. It needs to be removed. --Zombified 02:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Done.--Karekmaps?! 02:20, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Criterion 1

Vandalism spree. --Z. slay3rT 00:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Aw... :( You beat me here by like seconds. -- Cheese 00:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Gone, Not only are they giving me something to do but, they're also going to help me prove a point in the future.--Karekmaps?! 00:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

DHPD/the_dead_of_Dunell_Hills

This is very clearly a deletion workaround of Deletions#The_dead_of_Dunell_Hills. Not only that, its creator was the one who originally requested the speedy deletion of the first page. There's some pretty shady moderating going on someone might want to look into. --Laughing Man 16:58, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete --Gregarious Instigator 17:20, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete --Elwood Dowd 17:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Kept, meets no SD crits, Groups are perfectly allowed to keep informational resources on other groups.--Karekmaps?! 17:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Appeal. How nice of you to allow an entire half hour of debate before stepping in and making a fiat declaration. It would be unacceptable for a neutral administrator to cut the decision short after so little chance for debate and fair hearing. It is doubly shameful for an administrator who is [b]personally interested in the outcome[/b] to step in and abuse his powers in such a blatantly self-interested way. Your administrator powers are meant to improve the Wiki, not to selfishly abuse for the advantage of your private group. Shame. Addison Strack 19:03, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
You're in Speedy Deletion, it's called Speedy for a reason. If you want a prolonged debate that's what Normal Deletion is for, Speedy exists purely for a Sysop to review the request and then to delete it if it meets any of the criteria listed above.--Karekmaps?! 22:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
You can call it what you want, that doesn't change the fact that it is the exact same fucking page. Or do rules only apply when it's not a moderator abusing his status? Oh wait, looks like you've got your own problems with abusing power, don't you? That certainly explains a few things. UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive/Karek --Laughing Man 17:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit one

  • Warehouse 37,85 does not exist in the game, this page was made by mistake, no pages link to it
  • Rhodenbank Libraries somebody unmerged this page and left nothing useful, no pages link here

--Scotw 16:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. --Daranz.t.mod janitor.W(M)^∞. 22:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Criterion 7

Knights of Pius Group reform --RMinRED 07:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Inelible for speedydeletion. Other users have edited the page. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 10:28, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Critimication 11

User:Sandra - Content shifted to author's talk page plus a helpful WelcomeNewbie template as well. :) -- Cheese 23:47, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The welcomenewbie template isnt helpful in the slightest, but deleted. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 10:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit One

there does not need to be disambiguation pages for these, pages have no links either--Scotw 19:24, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The above have all been kept as I'm not quite sure disambigs can be crit 1s, someone else can rule on that or, it can be brought to A/D and, if the majority votes Deletion/Speedy Delete I'll be willing to do it.--Karekmaps?! 20:11, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The few that I checked are unused. Disambigs (other than specific locations like Tikhon General Hospital) should be deleted when they are no longer in-use. --  AHLGTG 21:16, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

when i think of disambig pages, i think of two locations that have the same name, this is not the case. if somebody were to create a page for all of the factories in pegton, thats fine, but why do we need disambig pages? perhaps we could just illiminate the disambig parts.--Scotw 22:34, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

These are all deletable under crit 1.They are unexpandable since expanding them further would create merged locations pages which are deletable when they have no incoming links. - Vantar 22:57, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


And Done.--Karekmaps?! 23:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 3s

following are unused redirects for crit 3--Scotw 19:24, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1

9A

Both crit 1's, wiped by author -- boxy talki 09:05 23 February 2008 (BST)

Done.--Karekmaps?! 12:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1 Unused Images

I did the ones that were left. These don't need to come to speedydeletions, they get deleted when a sysops happens by -- boxy talki 09:05 23 February 2008 (BST)

Crit 1

Babletedified. --  AHLGTG 03:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1/2

Whatevacategoleted. --  AHLGTG 03:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 7/4

Hippoleted. --  AHLGTG 03:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit Broken Redirect one because I forgot the number 3

Deleted? --  AHLGTG 03:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


A Helpful Little Gnome can delete things faster then I can list them

Oh give User:Hibernaculum more than 2 hours. :) --  AHLGTG 04:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

And content added, the page no longer qualifies. See Vantar. ;) --  AHLGTG 18:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Grmgf. Kept. --  AHLGTG 03:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I went though 3 edit conflicts to post even More stuff from Special:Uncategorizedpages

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vantar (talkcontribs) at an unknown time.

Offended repeteadly :D. --  AHLGTG 04:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Even More stuff from Special:Uncategorizedpages

Efficiently-inefficiently deleted. --  AHLGTG 04:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

More stuff from Special:Uncategorizedpages

Inefficiently deleted.--  AHLGTG 04:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Stuff from Special:Uncategorizedpages

Uncategorically deleted. --  AHLGTG 04:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1

REaL_gAmERz_FTW and it's coresponding talk page. - Jedaz - 00:21/20/02/2008

Deleted -- boxy talki 13:11 20 February 2008 (BST)

Crit 1s

What links here. Don't have the time at the momment. --  AHLGTG 18:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Ignore all the links having to do with {{BuildingStatus}}, page didn't exist when I made those links.--Karekmaps?! 05:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I've redirected it to example page, it avoids having red links and it being recreated. Feel free to delete it if that's not appropriate -- boxy talki 13:11 20 February 2008 (BST)

User:DangerReport/Somerton Building

moved information to User:DangerReport/the Somerton Building--Scotw 00:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Done - Vantar 07:36, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Suggestion

Don't know why he did it, but it looks like he took the template from the Talk:Suggestions page and used it to make a suggestion with. :S Either way, the real suggestion version is here --> Suggestion:20080218 "Blood tag" skill. I'm thinking Crit 1 as it has been duplicated elsewhere. And consists of random content. :) -- Cheese 23:49, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Done - Vantar 07:36, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1,2 and 3

Vandal created as an attempt to mine the wiki. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 10:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Done, it has a deletion history too.--Karekmaps?! 12:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1

User:9A I have no idea if this is in the right place. I quit playing. You can delete me. Thanks.--9A 02:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

We can't delete accounts.--Karekmaps?! 03:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I believe he's asking you to delete his user page under Crit 7 (and possibly 8), not his character. There's a short discussion on the page itself which may shed some light (he put the template there himself).--Mister Nathan Marbles 20:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted...as much as a Wiki account can be deleted that is....Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 07:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


Crit 1 and 13

Some missed DHS pages from the list below --TheFireChief 17:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Done.--Karekmaps?! 05:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit One

Vinetown Factories there does not need to be a disambiguation page for this, also no pages link to it --Scotw 12:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Done.--Karekmaps?! 05:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

crit one

Character image -- boxy talki 12:03 16 February 2008 (BST)

It looks like the Philisophe Knights are using it as an example page.--Karekmaps?! 12:09, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
It's not an example page. KF created his page, and instead of changing [[Character Image]] to [[Image:KFPKer.jpg]], he clicked on the red link, mistakenly creating this page. When he worked out how to include images, he changed the link properly -- boxy talki 12:24 16 February 2008 (BST)
Done.--Karekmaps?! 05:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 9

William Reynalds - he has a user page about this character -- boxy talki 11:40 16 February 2008 (BST)

Done, although I seem to have said Crit 1 in the logs.--Karekmaps?! 11:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 11

User:Http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=411726. --Karekmaps?! 17:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

I can't actually delete it. Can you provide a direct URL to the delete action? Also, this is a scheduled deletion. --  AHLGTG 20:14, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I can't seem to see the page anymore.--Karekmaps?! 03:15, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

It's here which worked, I've deleted as a Monumental Screw Up it as it's inaccessible through normal linking methods.--Karekmaps?! 03:21, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1

DangerReport/St Polycarp's Hospital duped at User:DangerReport/St Polycarp's Hospital - Vantar 00:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Done.--Karekmaps?! 03:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1

The final loadout of DHS subpages:

Wiped by author TheFireChief 00:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Done- Vantar 00:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Wiped by author--TheFireChief 23:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Done.--Karekmaps?! 23:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1

Done--Karekmaps?! 00:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Orr Building should have been changed to point to The Orr Building. Those types of redirects are there to stop people trying to create Orr Building, thereby duplicating the Orr Building page -- boxy talki 08:45 14 February 2008 (BST)
You could have always done that yourself you know. Not all of us follow the LSG, or even read it for that matter, anyway, it's done now.--Karekmaps?! 09:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1

  • Osmondville News Archive Because I am slowly trying remove all mention of the suburb froim the wiki, until it fades from history so that I can then lay claim to the area. Also it is a dupe of Osmondville/News Archive and I have already moved all content to the correct archive - Vantar
Done, although I could have sworn I had all those pages deleted when I moved the archives.--Karekmaps?! 00:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1

Carbonleted. --  AHLGTG 04:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Category:Places with interesting names, crit 1

It's a category I created about a half-year ago, added about six pages to it, then gave up on. Now Amusing Locations in Malton fulfills the role (and does it really well), so because there's no point in content being duplicated into two places, I'd like to see this category deleted. (I took out the entries that I had added, it's also a crit 4 now.) --Toejam 23:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Done -- boxy talki 23:44 12 February 2008 (BST)
Merci beaucoup, monsieur. --Toejam 00:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1 images

There was a revision that wasn't bugged in the last image, but it was re-uploaded. 4o4rleted. --  AHLGTG 18:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1, 2 and 6

Uranus

I've talked with him. Further recreations without a really good reason should be considered vandalism under criteria 6. --  AHLGTG 05:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I'd say so. It's gone again.--Karekmaps?! 06:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 7s

User:Moran/Sandbox/tt4wnext
User:Moran/Sandbox/tt4wnext/Members
User:Moran/Sandbox/tt4wnext/News
User:Moran/Sandbox/tt4wnext/Allies
User:Moran/Sandbox/tt4wnext/PreviousRPs

Used these to construct our new grouppage. As old page has been overwritten, these can be removed. Moran 17:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted under Crit 7.--Karekmaps?! 17:43, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1, 2 and 6

Uranus

Someone talk to the guy, please. --  AHLGTG 00:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I chose you, also redeleted.--Karekmaps?! 00:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Rrg, who did it now? Dedling? --  AHLGTG 01:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1&2

Uranus

Burn it please.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 23:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

I was just about to put that up... --Sonny Corleone RRF DORIS CRF pr0n 23:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Done.--Karekmaps?! 23:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 7

User:Suicidalangel/Xardion32

I was drunk when I made it.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 17:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Done.--Karekmaps?! 23:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced user pages for non existent user

User:Chairman Davis was attempting to make a template sig for himself but placed them in subpages that weren't his own. I've rectified this and bring the ones he made to be deleted.

--

Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 23:36, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Done.--Karekmaps?! 23:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Reuploads of Images with useless names

I'm going to begin sorting through the images here and reuploading those with useless and unhelpful titles as well as the ones with long titles so that other folks can come along and find an image they're after, as its pretty likely many have already been uploaded several times but under different names. I'll post the results below as and when I have reuploaded them.

-- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 22:18, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Uhm. I'm not going to delete Image:1-army_of_darkness.jpg or Image:5139.jpg, as the difference for the reuploads isn't significant. Probably won't do Image:884sr0.jpg or Image:6oq46l2.jpg either as all the reuploads did was lengthen the file name and put the upload in your name instead of the original authors(which can actually make it harder for them to find if they are looking through their own upload logs or user contribs.). I'd recomend, at the very least, informing those people when you do the reupload or before(whoever the original uploader may be).--Karekmaps?! 01:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Ok, Image:119947728938.gif is also staying as it's used, yours isn't, not to mention that for future reference the name is Epic Fail Guy, not VMaskMan. I did delete Image:5139.jpg though.--Karekmaps?! 01:53, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Aw well. I didn't notice the Epic Fail guy one was used. :S Can you just delete the reuploads I made then? -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 10:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
And Done, deleted those under Crit 7.--Karekmaps?! 17:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

A random assortment of unused stuff I found when clearing out the Special pages

  • Crit 4 - Looks like Boxy made it back in December but its got nothing in it and seems a bit redundant.
  • Another Crit 4 - Looks the author misspelled this one and made another here.
  • More Crit 4 - Another case of a group page being stuck on a Category instead of in the main namespace. No edits since November.
  • One more Crit 4 - Made in May last year, blanked by author end of December.

Ok, fair enough they're all Crit 4, but I could give you the entire contents of Unused Images if you wanted. :P -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 21:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted - the Helljumpers category page has been moved to Helljumpers -- boxy talki 01:37 9 February 2008 (BST)

Criterion 1

One line of content and no real purpose. --Z. slay3r Talk  20:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Keep - It's an example page. --  AHLGTG 21:37, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept - -- boxy talki 01:37 9 February 2008 (BST)

Some more Crit 1 images

-- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 19:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Killed. --Z. slay3r Talk  20:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

And this asshat is at it again

If she does it again, I'm taking it to arbies. I'm fed up reuploading them just for her to upload more!!!! >:( It doesn't let other people use them if they don't know what they are!! -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 19:36, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

OMFG!! Two minutes later what the hell?! Image:52337963747a76a29b21d7.jpg to Image:WomanDoctor(Small).jpg. Thats it. I'm going to arbitration. -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 19:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Both terminated. --Z. slay3r Talk  20:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit many

More Crit 1 Images

--Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 13:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Gorn. --Z. slay3r Talk  15:49, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Some more Crit 1 image reuploads

--Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 21:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Done--Karekmaps?! 21:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 3

Couple of broken redirects that I found with no pages to link to:

I'm assuming the pages they belonged to have been deleted as I can't find any trace of them. -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 20:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Yup, both were recently deleted as Crit 1s.--Karekmaps?! 20:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 8

I meant for this to be a template, not a category... That's what I get for not drinking my coffee today. --Vandr 19:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

For Crit 8 it needs to be in the User Namespace, it is, however, both a Crit 7(author only edit) and a Crit 4(unused Category), and has been deleted as such.--Karekmaps?! 20:12, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Crti 1

List of images that I've reuploaded due to their idiotically long filenames.

I'll do more later when I have some more time. -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 18:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to make you do more work, but we also need the reuploads, and if possible please say which ones correspond to each other. Also, for your convenience, you can actually link images with an internal link, [[:Image:Imagename]], just put the :, colon, in front of Image(signifies main namespace, same trick works with linking Categories and Templates).--Karekmaps?! 18:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
No probs. Tis done. -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 18:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
All done.--Karekmaps?! 19:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 7

Misspelling of what I wanted: Category:Images_with_stupidly_long_filename. I'm categorising images with long file names so they don't spam up the lists. -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 17:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Done and a better system for handling these files has been developed- Vantar 17:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 9

Raining Fire - I've stuck the text on his talk page along with a WelcomeNewbie template. Tis all set for speedily deleting, apart from the fact that I forgot the speedy template which I shall do now. -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 16:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Done- Vantar 17:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Rick best - And this one too. Content has been moved to his talk page. -- Cheeseman W!RandomTalk 17:24, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Done- Vantar 17:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit 1s

Baleeted. --Z. slay3r Talk  15:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Arbitration Archives

Content moved to separate pages for each cases, and links listed on Category:Arbitration Cases. Front pages only, talk pages (when they exist) should be kept, have it's content merged into UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/Archive or moved to their respective cases. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 17:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Keep - Until links are fixed, or better yet, make them redirects to UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Archive, as that would automatically fix all the links(I think, I base this off of how A/G links work.--Karekmaps?! 17:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


User:Nny7229/Zaos

Crit 1, wiped by owner. It was a character page in the main namespace that I moved into the authors user space, but he was editing it for someone else. It's now at User:Zaos -- boxy talki 22:03 5 February 2008 (BST)

Zableted. --  AHLGTG 22:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

dupes and a blank

All crit 1's -- boxy talki 12:33 5 February 2008 (BST)

Done.--Karekmaps?! 12:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Crit. 1

Bashing_Back:_The_Battles_of_Pitneybank

Same thing as "Nali's" Battle of Pitneybank. Just with a slightly different name.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 23:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

And now he's wiped the page, so I guess that means he doesn't want it, or the entire thing was an accident.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 00:42, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Done.--Karekmaps?! 09:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Blank pages

All blanked by the creator or a member of the relevant group

- Vantar 11:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Done.--Karekmaps?! 12:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

nonblank crit 1

Test page 2 the author has been pointed to the sandbox - Vantar 12:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Gone, it was also a Crit 7, in the history/page summary he requested deletion --Karekmaps?! 12:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

SuburbNavigation

SuburbNavigation should be deleted completely. I've moved the contents to Suburb_Navigation_Map instead. Thanks --Father Bigley 01:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

  1. Deleted under Crit 1 In the future please include what Speedy Delete Crit it is in the request.--Karekmaps?! 02:15, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Drool

Drool - wiped by author, crit 1 -- boxy talki 14:25 1 February 2008 (BST)

Drooled on? --  AHLGTG 16:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Personal tools
advertisements