UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Aichon/2013-06-21 Re-Evaluation

Administration » Sysop Archives » Aichon » 2013-06-21 Re-Evaluation

Aichon

• Aichon (talk | contribs | UDWiki contribs | vndl data)

I believe it's that time, so have at it. And to knock out the question up front in case anyone is curious, no, I'm not burned out yet (the 'crat seat was definitely burning me out, but I'm not a 'crat any more, thankfully), and yes, I do plan to be around for awhile longer, otherwise I'd save everyone this hassle and ask for a demotion prior to my A/RE. I may leave before another term is completed, but I currently have no immediate plans to leave, so I may make it the full term. Feel free to ask a question if you have something on your mind. —Aichon— 14:26, 21 June 2013 (BST)

• Obvious vouch is obvious. ~ _{14:47, 21 June 2013 (UTC)}
• Vouch for one of the most active and helpful sysops on the wiki. Bob Moncrief ^EBD•W! 16:30, 21 June 2013 (BST)
• If I opened you up, what would I find? --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 16:44, 21 June 2013 (BST)

  I'll get back to you on this. Right now I'm thinking far too literally, and you deserve a better answer than "blood and guts". —Aichon— 17:36, 21 June 2013 (BST)

  You'd find a little tiny genie who occasionally grants me wishes I don't want and won't let me get to sleep. —Aichon— 07:44, 22 June 2013 (BST)

  Is the genie blue? --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 19:10, 22 June 2013 (BST)

  Sometimes. —Aichon— 21:28, 22 June 2013 (BST)

  So it's tie-dye. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 22:30, 22 June 2013 (BST)

  More like the horse of many colors. —Aichon— 00:02, 23 June 2013 (BST)

• Spam -- err, i mean vouch --hagnat 19:01, 21 June 2013 (BST)
• Vouch Aichon for everything? ♥ Moonie ^{Talk Testimonials} 01:42, 22 June 2013 (BST)

  Please no. —Aichon— 07:44, 22 June 2013 (BST)

• Voouch has earned boxy and ross status. perma sysop!--User:Sexualharrison10:24, 22 June 2013
• Voucher→Son of Sin← 14:38, 22 June 2013 (BST)
• Question What's your opinion on the current debate on my talk page? --Rosslessness 15:58, 23 June 2013 (BST)

  You have a talk page? Lame. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 16:09, 23 June 2013 (BST)

  I think it's nice to see a debate occurring where both sides can engage one another constructively. Too often, they escalate into something silly. —Aichon— 23:23, 23 June 2013 (BST)

  Oh, wait, did you want my stance in the debate? :P

  Generally speaking, I purposefully stay out of Deletions voting unless I don't think I can afford to sit it out, just because most of it is fairly petty stuff that doesn't matter one way or the other. With regards to group pages, my personal opinion (which, I'll admit, might contradict previous opinions I've expressed) is that unless there is a specific reason to delete them, they should be left alone, but I won't get in the way of others seeking to delete them unless there's evidence that the group once had a decent number of members or the page has a decent amount of content (where "decent" is an entirely arbitrary measure that I use). In this particular case, I was already planning to put in my 2¢ when I saw your question here, since it's clear to me that some of these pages should not have been nominated. —Aichon— 23:25, 23 June 2013 (BST)

  You see? I'd never have used the word arbitrary. Class act. --Rosslessness 23:29, 23 June 2013 (BST)

  Eh, I guess. Honestly, I may have overstated it, since there is quite a bit of thought that goes into it, but it can definitely look arbitrary at times, since sometimes 2 members is enough and other times 50 members isn't enough. For instance, Abh Star Forces apparently had 50-60 members at one point, but it sounds like they were zerging, so I wouldn't consider them important to a large number of people, meaning that they're not worth saving on the basis of members alone. Similarly, some of the other groups listed only had 1-3 members, yet they put together pages with quite a bit of content, so I would really hate to destroy their work. Calling it a gut feeling based on a holistic consideration of the factors involved would probably be more accurate than "arbitrary", if I were to be honest, but it also takes a lot longer to explain, obviously. —Aichon— 23:48, 23 June 2013 (BST)

• Vouch - Bandwagoning --^A_O^R_D^M_O^P_R^I _! ^T 16:59, 24 June 2013 (BST)
• Yes - Vouch or Keep, this guy is the best guy. (I must disclaim that I am nowhere near active/wise enough to be listened to). -- Rahrah has a signature that won't become obsolete. 15:33, 26 June 2013 (BST)
• vouch - ... -- 09:51, 28 June 2013 (BST)
• Kill with FIRE Vouch For great justice!        14:59, 28 June 2013 (BST)

Blah, blah, blah, retained. -- Spiderzed█ 12:44, 29 June 2013 (BST)