UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Mpaturet/2006-11-18 Promotion

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Administration » Sysop Archives » Mpaturet » 2006-11-18 Promotion


Browse the Sysop Archives
Bureaucrat Promotions | Demotions | Misconduct (TBD) | Promotions | Re-Evaluations
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018

This page is an archive of Mpaturet's Promotions candidacy, which was unsuccessful. If you wish to speak with this candidate, please use their Talk page.

Mpaturet

Hi there UDwiki! You may know me as Mpaturet or Admiral Ackbar. I have been on this wiki for a very long time and have a large (But forgotten) amount of edits. I truly do support this wiki and everything it's done for UD. Also gold in your collective baskets if I am elected--Admiral Ackbar U! WTF 23:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Against - You aren't very active, and I think you were involved pretty heavily in the Amazing wiki drama back in the day. I don't remember any significant wiki contributions from you either. Sorry. --Gage 23:51, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - I'm sorry, I don't see a large or forgotten amount of edits in your contributions history. I see about 750 total (yes, I know there was some purging earlier this year), and maybe 150 total over the past six months. There are several periods of a month or two during which you haven't made a single edit. Not for nothing, but we have enough vanishing sysops already. It's also been several months since you've been active in any sort of maintenance role on the wiki, and even then you don't seem to have been very active. Mostly what I see in your history are usertalk entries, and a couple of those that I viewed bothered me a bit. Since I wasn't around for the Amazing soap opera, I'm likely not qualified to give an opinion as to your involvement, as Gage mentioned above, but you certainly (and might I add still) have an assload of Amazing templates on your page, don't you? That said, if you could show me some renewed commitment to staying here and contributing in a meaningful sense, I might be persuaded to change my mind if you should take another run at this down the road. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 00:58, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Vouch - He hasn't been active because he had computer troubles since like July. And who wasn't involved in the Amazing Saga? It's like blaming countries for getting involved in WWII, you had to to survive. Bo-vine here always did what's right. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 01:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Vouch - he once gave me saurkraut. it was good. not too pickly, and it had tomatoes. He's also very smart, and good at math. He's popular. He makes me laugh. I once laughed so hard, I sneezed. I needed a tissue. He gave me one. I thought it was sweet. So I asked him out. He told me he didn't like me like that. I respected his choice. He'd make a good wikimod. Grilled cheese for BoVine!--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 02:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Vouch - One of the funniest guys ever, and one who I believe would be trustworthy with the extra responsibility of modship. Cyberbob  Talk  02:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - I heard something about Amazing wiki drama, and that's reason enough for me.--Labine50 MH|ME|P 04:25, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
    You're serious? Everyone was involved in Amazing Drama. Everyone. Only those living under a rock or not on the wiki were not involved. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 04:37, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
    I wasn't involved, but I'm quickly building my time machine so that I can be!--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 04:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - Just no evidence of prior commitment to maintaining the wiki. -- ∀lan Watson T·RPM 07:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Abstain - I don't really know who you are and you have not provided any evidence of your previous contribution to the wiki. Do that and I'll see if I change my vote accordingly. Pillsy FT 11:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - I vaguely recall seeing your name here or there... but that's it, I can't vouch someone if I don't have the slightest idea who he really is. -Certified=InsaneQuébécois 17:26, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 23:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - I just haven't seen enough out of you. --Darth Sensitive Talk W! 02:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    Because he's been gone for the past few months. You gonna blame computer problems on him? --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 02:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    No - because he didn't do a ton of notable work before his computer issues, and he hasn't done a ton recently. And I would rather he instead of you was involved in discussions on his promotion here. --Darth Sensitive Talk W! 03:43, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - it would've been abstain, because I don't know you, but Sonny's involvement makes me vote against.--Funt Solo 12:54, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    • That is really reasonable, Funt. Cyberbob  Talk  12:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
      • That is really sarcastic, Cyberbob. I notice you voted Vouch as well. That's another nail in the coffin of trust. --Funt Solo 13:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - I don't see you contributing to the wiki. Come back again when you at least contributed something. Sorry. --Axe Hack 12:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Vouch - Akbar FTW! --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 22:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - Believe it or not, people make mistakes. The Amazing drama needs to stop being a reason to vote Against, unless they have done other evil things since. Major evil I see not, as I have seen no more drama about certain assholes, but I see a lack of a reason for Mod. Why do you want to be a mod? Being involved is a sticky reason. - 343 16:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - I don't remember you contributing anything except for drama.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 14:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - When you actually do something for the wiki, try again. 'Til then? Not a chance in hell. –Xoid MTFU! 16:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Vouch- If he's good enough for Ron, He's good enough for me --Dickholeguy 19:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
    Ron... didn't vote for this guy. Unless he did so invisibly. That Burgundy is a tricky fellow. -- ∀lan Watson T·RPM 11:03, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Tally= 5 Vouch 12 Against 1 Abstain
  • Against - One of the least mature and most unpleasant individuals i have ever had the misfortune of associating with. --Grim s-Mod U! 09:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Again, I vote against anybody who nominates himself. Asheets 18:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  • It's a trap! - I'm gonna have to abstain, I don't know you. I just wanted to make the obvious joke there.--_Vic D'Amato__Dead vs Blue_ 16:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Voting Ended - 2nd December 2006

Final Tally 5 Vouches 14 Against 2 Abstain

Personal tools
advertisements