UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2006 10

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Vandal Banning Archive

2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019


Contents

Vandalism Report Space

Master B8

Master B8 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Makes a suggestion, then it gets xoid-spaminated, then he makes it again. I don't think he's paying attention. --Funt Solo 21:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I will speak to him, yet again.--Gage 22:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Master B8

Master B8 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Diff comparision. He's a newbie, probably didn't intend to impersonate. I'd suggest making a note of it (but not warning him) and having a quick word as to why doing that sort of thing isn't a wise idea. Not my call though. –Xoid MTFU! 15:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I will speak to him.--Gage 17:39, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Grau Fox

Grau Fox (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) O M G - H E - S P A M S ! --Niilomaan GRR!M! 19:27, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

His last 150 edits or so (I didn't go any farther back) have been concerned with the placing of that template. Warned.--Gage 19:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Lmao.--Lol 10:45, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Mrmooge88

Mrmooge88 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) I don't think this was bad faith - it seems more like ignorance - but he altered the vote counts on several Peer Undecided suggestions, some of which are now archived and so I can't fix them. --Funt Solo 23:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

I think he may have been thinking this was how he voted. I will just roll back the page.--Gage 00:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Well someone else has edited the page since, and I am busy right now so forget I said anything about fixing it.--Gage 00:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Lots of vandals

Owned

Owned (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) I suppose there should be an entry for this guy as well. Permabanned for repeated vandalism of the Philosophe Knights webpage. -- Alan Watson T·RPM 19:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Again Again

Again Again (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permaban.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 17:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Once more

Once more (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Ban-Perma.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 17:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Sharp

Sharp (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permanent banhammered.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 17:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Why? He has nothing in his contribs!--The General T Sys U! P! F! 18:51, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
You'll have to ask Conndraka on his talk page, he's the one who banned sharp. However currently Conndrakas talk page is locked so I can't ask him myself. - JedazΣT ΞD GIS S! 21:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Same person as Again Again, Once More, Bathtime, et al... Conndrakamod T CFT 01:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Ouroboros

Ouroboros (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Blocked.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 17:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Bath Time

Bath Time (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Crushed.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 17:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Dinglewar

Dinglewar (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permaslaughtered.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 17:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks - I banned the top two and started on rolling back edits, but I lost internet access midway through. --Darth Sensitive Talk W! 17:36, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

DarkStar2374383

DarkStar2374383 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Violation of this arbitration ruling, diff comparison, Farewell UDWiki. --DarkStar2374383 Talk | LDY | LOE 08:39, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

sigh, banned for 48 hours. (One warning + "as if two warnings were already issued" = 48 hours). Also, you do realise that your record isn't long enough to get you permabanned, right? (I assume you're trying for that, for some unfathomable reason.) Who wants to bet this happens again on the 31st? What a waste of time. –Xoid STFU! 08:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
If you want to leave the wiki DarkStar, do me a favor and don't waste our time again. Just leave.--Gage 08:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Elias Taylor

Elias Taylor (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Elias Taylor has edited the [Crabapple] page several times, which is contentious enough already, adding a rather incorrect history of this 'non-group'. That my personal page has been edited with references to neo-nazism is particularly galling -- Harald von Holzapfel

Warned Conndrakamod T CFT 02:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

IndyGoat

IndyGoat (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Not vandalism, but does IndyGoat share the same IP Duce Nauks has? My gut instinct says "yes", and that would mean a glorious promotion to permaban, wouldn't it now... -Certified=InsaneQuébécois 18:25, 28 October 2006 (BST)

Actually, I banned every IP that Duce or alts used to post on the wiki for a year, so nobody could share an IP with him by definition.--Gage 19:02, 28 October 2006 (BST)
Interesting then... Well, If he that account later gives sufficient evidence to say it's a proxy, I'll report it again then... Untill then, well... I'll just move along... -Certified=InsaneQuébécois 21:37, 28 October 2006 (BST)

Reptileus

Reptileus (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) This. Editing someone else's userpage. Or is there more to this (hi)story? -- Atticus Rex AMP ' T 00:49, 28 October 2006 (BST)

Reptileus seems to be a member of the Confederacy of Malton that he is saying Katthew is leader of. Hmmm... I just don't see bad faith here. I will leave a message on each of their talk pages and see what is said. Until then, probably not vandalism.--Gage 00:58, 28 October 2006 (BST)
Fair enough. Thanks, Gage. -- Atticus Rex AMP ' T 01:05, 28 October 2006 (BST)

Mistress Katthew No longer uses the wiki due to poeple dislikeing her, she also no longer uses her real e-mail in anything. I am her messager, anything you wish to ask her you come directly to me. I'm sorry for any inconvenance. --Reptileus 19:15, 28 October 2006 (BST)

On second thought, Katthew hasn't been on the wiki for 6 months, and has never even touched the Confederacy of Malton page. What kind of group leader never touches the page? As such, I am having a hard time believing the validity of this statement. I am warning Reptileus and the warning will be overturned only if Katthew decides to show up and verify the edit.--Gage 07:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

On third thought, that "warning" was actually a 48 hour ban.--Gage 07:13, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Maxwell Hammer

Maxwell Hammer (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Owner of ReeToric. Banned. Cyberbob  Talk  17:06, 27 October 2006 (BST)

Um, so? Are you not allowed to have alts? Did he do voting fraud or something? Policymakerman 22:55, 27 October 2006 (BST)
He Used Said alt to circimvent an arbitration ruling against him, and in the process not only committed vandalism but issues against the TOS as well. Alts are still legal as of this point but not if used to go around rulings or policies. Conndrakamod T CFT 22:58, 27 October 2006 (BST)
Hello sockpuppet of Agradera. Wait, he is probably a sockpuppet too.--Gage 22:59, 27 October 2006 (BST)
my bad, it jsut was not explained previously what he actually did wrong. carry on. Policymakerman 23:01, 27 October 2006 (BST)

Tiger Striped Dog

Tiger Striped Dog (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

This. Removing pages from the speedy delete queue made by him in order to keep them from being deleted.--Gage 15:37, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Warned.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 19:56, 26 October 2006 (BST)


Alan Watson

Impersonation--Gage 07:30, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Frankly, I'm a little stumped by that edit. I know I didn't write the "umm... alex" vote, but I really have no explanation for how else it could have gotten there. -- Alan Watson T·RPM 08:04, 26 October 2006 (BST)
This is voting fraud of the most flagrant kind. Did you think you would get away with this? How stupid do you think we are?--Gage 08:29, 26 October 2006 (BST)
If I was intent on committing voting fraud, why would I in effect cancel out my own vote? It doesn't make any sense. Nonetheless, there's absolutely no evidence in my favor so I'll just swallow the warning, though this leaves me frankly disturbed about my account's security. -- Alan Watson T·RPM 08:35, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Not impersonation. Alan didn't do that part of the edit, it merely looks like that because there was some revisions deleted from history. For mods: Check here. --Brizth M T 09:59, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Ah, yes. I thought it would be a good idea to remove the vandl edits while we had the opprtunity. Sorry that i caused this trouble.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 10:12, 26 October 2006 (BST)
Well, it was my mistake with the deletion template that caused this undeletion mess to begin with so it's no big deal. -- Alan Watson T·RPM 10:15, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Sorry for the trouble guys.--Gage 17:26, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Rueful, Mia Kristos

Created this and this policy respectively. Don't you dare use the "Not vandalism. Not bad faith .: not vandalism" quote from the previous one Mia, because we all know that this edit shows that this is all just a pathetic attempt to make a point.--Gage 03:51, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Mia's policy is spiteful, yet Rueful's brings up a good point, although in a reactionary way to comment on Alan Watson's policy, just as Alan was countering The General and Mia. Mia's is iffy and condescending, Rueful's seems OK once you get past the frivolous name. --Zod Rhombus 04:33, 26 October 2006 (BST)
What is that? Three warning for me now, if this goes through? God, I hope so. --SirensT RR 04:35, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Why was mia's policy deleted? Theres nothing on either of the deletions pages!--The General T Sys U! P! F! 10:14, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Check the Served Speedy Deletions. Mia Crit 7'd it herself. -- Alan Watson T·RPM 10:17, 26 October 2006 (BST)
Hurr. Cyberbob  Talk  10:20, 26 October 2006 (BST)
Oops *Blushes bright red*.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 12:41, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Wow, it's been a while since I've been here. Hey everyone! -- Rueful 14:14, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Make a report for everyone who types something you disagree with. Though Mia is actually pushing it. Basil 20:40, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Mia's bad faith in this instance is evidenced by the report below this one, where she alluded to creating this policy out of spite. --Zod Rhombus 23:04, 26 October 2006 (BST)

The_General

Haha, very cute. Created a policy to bring back Amazing, presumably when it became clear that the first one was failing. I don't see this as good faith. --SirensT RR 02:21, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Buzz off. Not vandalism. Not bad faith .: not vandalism.--Gage 02:24, 26 October 2006 (BST)
Fine. My turn then. --SirensT RR 02:26, 26 October 2006 (BST)

709394

709394 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Sole contribution: deleting news items in bad faith (i.e., probably one of the zergers listed). Rheingold 00:31, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Permabanned--Gage 00:35, 26 October 2006 (BST)
Wow, it doesn't go to warning first? Rheingold 01:45, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Silkentresses

Silkentresses (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Well, I debated this but it is editing another users page without apparent permission. Seems to beher first edit too. Pillsy FT 15:32, 25 October 2006 (BST)

After seeing her recent edits then I think just a polite note about editing other users pages. Pillsy FT 20:45, 25 October 2006 (BST)
Polite cautionary note left, edit reverted.--Gage 00:39, 26 October 2006 (BST)

KingStoph

KingStoph (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) For being stupid. I had welcomed him before and here's the thanks? --Niilomaan GRR!M! 14:39, 25 October 2006 (BST)

warned--Gage 14:53, 25 October 2006 (BST)

W00tw00tw00t

W00tw00tw00t (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permabanned.--Gage 01:47, 25 October 2006 (BST)

Um... alex

Um... alex (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) This and the previous one both have the same IP. It is owned by AOL. Sockpuppet anyone?--Gage 01:33, 25 October 2006 (BST)

This user does not share an IP with any other user? --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 03:05, 25 October 2006 (BST)
It does not share an IP address, no, but it certainly shares an internet provider with the user below. Both of their only edits are on the policy. Coincidence? I think not.--Gage 03:09, 25 October 2006 (BST)

Pro-tec

Pro-tec (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) (sockpuppet)2--Gage 07:44, 24 October 2006 (BST)

Mr vandal

Mr vandal (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) This guy was embedding a large number of template calls in pages, stopping the page from being displayed due to overload of the server. example Permabanned him. --Daranz. talk . mod . 01:24, 24 October 2006 (BST)

Ouch, that must have hurt the server. He linked the templates together as well!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by The General (talkcontribs) .

Many Vandals

Someone else can list them. I am too busy blocking them. Rest assured, all will be blocked (IP too).--Gage 01:16, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Gage is a wanker

Gage is a wanker (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permabanned vandal.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 01:47, 23 October 2006 (BST)

I masturbute to a picture of gage

I masturbute to a picture of gage (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permabanned vandal.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 01:47, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Hello

Hello (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permabanned vandal.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 01:47, 23 October 2006 (BST)

I was going to distract you with moving pages but you fucking cunts have disabled it

I was going to distract you with moving pages but you fucking cunts have disabled it (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permabanned vandal.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 01:47, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Egag

Egag (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permabanned vandal.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 01:47, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Gauge

Gauge (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permabanned vandal. --Axe Hack 03:45, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Gaged

Gaged (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permabanned vandal. --Axe Hack 03:45, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Evil Thud

Evil Thud (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permabanned--Gage 07:27, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Alevins

Alevins (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) messing with the DORIS page--Gage 00:37, 23 October 2006 (BST)

did it again--The Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Talk | CC CPFOAS DOЯIS Judge LOE ZHU 00:38, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Warned.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 00:42, 23 October 2006 (BST)

...and again--Gage 00:44, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Gage is a wanker

Gage is a wanker (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) This guy edited Gage's user page. --Axe Hack 00:02, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Blocked by Gage. --Axe Hack 00:13, 23 October 2006 (BST)

202.155.73.142, misconduct starter

202.155.73.142 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss), misconduct starter (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Confirmed zombie or open proxy. Permabanned. –Xoid STFU! 07:36, 22 October 2006 (BST)

Bug me not2, Fukmanditoryregristration

Bug me not2 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss),Fukmanditoryregristration (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Fukmanditoryregristration has been banned, what should we do with Bug me not2?--Gage 06:46, 22 October 2006 (BST)

Perma ban? It's a site to avoid registration, basically inviting vandalism. --CaptainM 06:48, 22 October 2006 (BST)
I will go with that, and am considering banning the IP as well.--Gage 06:50, 22 October 2006 (BST)
An ip ban is ridiculous, that guy's done nothing wrong!--The General T Sys U! P! F! 07:17, 22 October 2006 (BST)
IP bans are standard for permabanned users. Laying one on. Cyberbob  Talk  07:21, 22 October 2006 (BST)

It's a site that bypasses mandatory registration. Thing is? He's breaking their own rules about it, not just ours. This is the third time he's done this, and there is another account called "fuck you gage!" ready to be used. In other words? Bad faith sockpuppeteering. Permaban and IP ban remain. –Xoid STFU! 07:28, 22 October 2006 (BST)

You can report any site to be blacklisted in the bugmenot system so that the login data is removed and new logins can't be created: http://www.bugmenot.com/report.php . I reported wiki.urbandead.com already.--Bonefiver 17:49, 22 October 2006 (BST)

12 year old AOLer

12 year old AOLer (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permabanned--Gage 01:04, 22 October 2006 (BST)

NB Admin

NB Admin (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Removed another group's post from the North Blythville page. Cyberbob  Talk  14:34, 20 October 2006 (BST)

He inserted a space in the page. And removed something that he himself had just added. For future reference guys, Inserting spaces into a page is totally legal--Gage 15:34, 20 October 2006 (BST)
Y'know, a reasonable response goes down a lot better with other people than being abusively "humourous". Cyberbob  Talk  15:50, 20 October 2006 (BST)

Another OAR multi

Another OAR multi (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Proxy-using alt. Banned. Cyberbob  Talk  13:38, 20 October 2006 (BST)


DJSMITH

Diff. Editing a comment in such a fashion as to negate the meaning/wording/etc. of another's reply. Petty? Yes, but I doubt anyone wants to see this sort of shit become common place. –Xoid STFU! 19:31, 19 October 2006 (BST)

Warned--Gage 19:37, 19 October 2006 (BST)
You are warning me for an edit made nearly four weeks ago? --DJSMITHCDF 20:45, 19 October 2006 (BST)
Aparently so, thats the way things work around here I guess. --Agradera 20:48, 19 October 2006 (BST)
If you have nothing useful to add, do not add it at all. –Xoid STFU! 21:10, 19 October 2006 (BST)
That was four weeks ago? I know I'm operating damn near blind at this hour, but I wouldn't have bothered over something this trivial and old if you had not done it (surreptiously? maliciously? damnit... what's that word I'm looking for...). But... this edit proves you did not. I'm gonna stop editing the wiki at 6 in the mornin'. Warning retracted. –Xoid STFU! 21:10, 19 October 2006 (BST)
Thank you --DJSMITHCDF 21:14, 19 October 2006 (BST)

Ken irons

Ken irons (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Vadalising the DHP Front Office and editing with a proxy --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 20:00, 17 October 2006 (BST)

Account banned for a week, proxy permabanned.--Gage 22:12, 17 October 2006 (BST)

Not Duce

Not Duce (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Another permabanned alt of Duce Nauks. Let's make it a year.--Gage 15:20, 17 October 2006 (BST)

so let it be written, so let it be done...Conndrakamod T CFT 15:38, 17 October 2006 (BST)
This is pathetic. Almost hillareously so... -Certified=InsaneQuébécois 01:10, 18 October 2006 (BST)
Honestly? I hope he does it again.--Gage 02:51, 18 October 2006 (BST)
Meh, If you ban his IP for a year I'm not even sure he'll ever come back... If he does, well, I don't think his group will exist anymore, so he probably won't have anything to vandalise for (though he'd do it anyways). -Certified=InsaneQuébécois 04:11, 18 October 2006 (BST)

Jon_Pyre

Jon_Pyre (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Breaking Rule 12 of Suggestions - one suggestion a day: first suggestion, second suggestion (12 hours later) and then changing the time-stamp after I pointed out he'd broken the rules.

The ambiguity of day vs. 24-hours is coming into play here again. Nearly everyone else (including MrA, our most prolific suggester) interprets it as 24-hours, but Jon is interpreting it as a day of the week. Even there, though, he's posted both suggestions in the same day. If he's allowed to get away with doing this, then the other 1-a-day suggesters are going to want to play to - which makes a mockery of the intention of the rules, and increases the workload for those people who edit the suggestion system pages, by allowing people to post ill-thought out suggestions at an increased rate.--Funt Solo 08:34, 17 October 2006 (BST)

Actually, it doesn't come into play here at all. Either way of looking at it he broke rule twelve. Warned.Xoid STFU! 08:48, 17 October 2006 (BST)

Pinkfloyd224

Pinkfloyd224 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Alt of Duce Nauks. Should we up his ban length?--Gage 22:17, 16 October 2006 (BST)

I have permabanned the sockpuppet.--Gage 22:18, 16 October 2006 (BST)
Is there anyone here? Oh god, I am talking to myself!--Gage 00:18, 17 October 2006 (BST)
Yes you are. ;) I'm not gonna state my opinion on this, as I hardly have a neutral position on him, but you can pretty well guess it. -Certified=InsaneQuébécois 00:22, 17 October 2006 (BST)
I will warn Duce Nauks another time (bringing him up to a month ban) and possibly ban his IP until such time as the ban is over in a few hours if no mod has anything to say about this. What say everyone else?--Gage 00:31, 17 October 2006 (BST)
Yes, the Alt is Permabanned and Duce should be banned for the next level. This should include his IP as well. Conndrakamod T CFT 00:46, 17 October 2006 (BST)
Evading a ban is a bannable offence. Amusing when worded that way, but it is true. –Xoid STFU! 06:36, 17 October 2006 (BST)

Scrapped, Captain Rickety

Scrapped (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss), Captain Rickety (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Yet again.--Gage 18:40, 15 October 2006 (BST)

Looks to be an SBC Dial up provider rather than an actual proxy service. Conndrakamod T CFT 18:52, 15 October 2006 (BST)
Although I doubt you'd believe me, that's my brother. There'd be no reason why I'd create another account. --| scrapped | 00:17, 16 October 2006 (BST)
Does your brother vote? If not, there's no problems here. If he does, then… then I'm not sure. An experienced and constructive editor is a helluva lot more trustworthy than some fresh account that showed up out of nowhere, or some drama whore. I know I'd be willing to give you the benefit of the doubt in this regard. Unless anyone objects, I'd say you're good to go. Just be aware that if any vandalism comes from an IP you two share you may get inadvertantly banned. (Or vice-versa.) I don't see vandalism from either of you two as being a likely occurance though. –Xoid STFU! 20:25, 16 October 2006 (BST)

Shamus Oakshod, Martin Flamenco

Shamus Oakshod (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss), Martin Flamenco (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Another group of people using the same IP address.--Gage 18:28, 15 October 2006 (BST)

Looks to be an Asian Pacific Dial up provider rather than an actual proxy service. Conndrakamod T CFT 18:57, 15 October 2006 (BST)
Oh hey there. Yep, "we're" both faces of one truely charismatic guy. I only use Shamus as my front-man on the wiki, except if Martin has something to say in a group/context he's in. Also, Martin had a brush with the Malton Bounty Emo Hunters, and just case they are vindictive by nature I had hoped to keep Shamus and Martin seperate (Still admire your work EMOH btw, from afar aka out of pistol range!). Shamus Oakshod 21:00, 18 October 2006 (BST)
Wait. You're the same person? Cyberbob  Talk  22:16, 18 October 2006 (BST)
Yes. Had Scotland Yard fooled for ages. Shamus Oakshod 05:25, 19 October 2006 (BST)
Love sentence fragments. Just don't use them for voting twice, or I promise we will get midevil on your ass.--Gage 05:30, 19 October 2006 (BST)
Much as I love old-fasioned buttock whipping methods, you can be sure I won't double-vote. If I ever do that, I'd deserve to get booted. Shamus Oakshod 08:42, 19 October 2006 (BST)

Theseveredband & Harald von Holzapfel

Theseveredband (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss), Harald von Holzapfel (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Probable sockpuppets, and users of multiple IPs. Cyberbob  Talk  05:02, 15 October 2006 (BST)

I say we ask him to stick to one account. He doesn't seem to be being deceptive or anything, but if one is to be banned it should be Theseveredband as that account has fewer edits.--Gage 07:04, 15 October 2006 (BST)
Might be a coincidence, but Harald von Holzapfel started editing once TheLibrarian stopped, and they posted very similar topics. Just thought you should check out if they are related. -Certified=Insane 17:08, 15 October 2006 (BST)

Duce Nauks, Taco Death, and Hendrix224

Duce Nauks (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss), Taco Death (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss), Hendrix224 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) They are all using the same IP.--Gage 04:09, 15 October 2006 (BST)

Are you sure they're not using AOL? Cyberbob  Talk  04:10, 15 October 2006 (BST)
I googled the IP address, and nothing came up about it being from AOL, but it did come up as a proxy on several lists.--Gage 04:15, 15 October 2006 (BST)
Hrm. I'm not 100% sure on how to proceed. Cyberbob  Talk  04:20, 15 October 2006 (BST)
Hahahaha!!! No wonder Taco Death talks in the name of the IWM but Duce Nauks denied his affiliation!!! Even got himself a spot in the arbitrator list! Ah common, permaban his ass, he never was up yo any good anyhow. And how many rules did he break in the last few days, considering he was using those accounts... -Certified=Insane 04:21, 15 October 2006 (BST)

The IP address is from Boston MA, and it is on Comcast, which IIRC is one of the non proxy using ones. I say we ban the sockpuppet accounts.--Gage 04:24, 15 October 2006 (BST)

That's a plan. The main will be warned as well - bringing him to a weeklong ban. Cyberbob  Talk  04:34, 15 October 2006 (BST)

User:Dzme14

Dzme14 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Filed a report on suburb danger levels for Judgewood which was completly wrong and would be seen as misleading to people near the area. Here it is. Judgewood is practilly empty from zombies and anyway there is only one PD there. Users only two edits. --MarieThe Grove 16:33, 14 October 2006 (BST)

Can you prove bad faith, or is this guy just a n00b?--Gage 19:05, 14 October 2006 (BST)
Whats good faith in telling people a resource building in a completely safe suburb is being seiged by 250 zombies? Not even the balckmore building had that for most of the seige. Judgewood is struggling slightly with a lack of survivors from the invasion of the supposed Feral Undead and scaring people away again isn't going to help. --MarieThe Grove 20:08, 14 October 2006 (BST)
It is possible that he's reporting his own experiences as being a fact for the whole suburb and exagerrating them. I suggest we give him a polite warning to be more careful next time.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 20:16, 14 October 2006 (BST)
Well OK but I don't know how he could have found that. I've just walked round. Theres less than 10 zeds there who aren't waiting for a revive. --MarieThe Grove 20:17, 14 October 2006 (BST)

Maxwell Hammer

has recreated Rabbit Hole serveral times, a violation of this policy.--Gage 03:41, 14 October 2006 (BST)

Please see UDWiki:Moderation/Speedy Deletions for an explanation of this and to see how the mods are screwing me over because Conndraka doesn't like me in game. --Maxwell Hammer 03:48, 14 October 2006 (BST)

Not Vandalisim - Although it occured repeatedly before winding itself over to M/U I noticed that they never seemed to recieve a polite warning. I have left them one now. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 06:59, 14 October 2006 (BST)

Incorrect Max. A nice little timeline:
What Happened When it happened Proof
Initial Deletion 11:49, October 14, 2006 Gage (Talk | contribs) deleted "Rabbit Hole" (criterion 1) Log
Deletion of Recreation 12:13, October 14, 2006 Gage (Talk | contribs) deleted "Rabbit hole" (deletion workaround) Log
Polite warning Revision as of 12:14, October 14, 2006 Gage (Talk | contribs) Diff
Recreation 12:20, October 14, 2006 . . Maxwell Hammer (Talk | contribs) Undelete Link
Third Deletion 12:38, October 14, 2006 Gage (Talk | contribs) deleted "Rabbit Hole" (deletion workaround) Log
Getting told to stop doing it... Again. Revision as of 12:31, October 14, 2006 (edit) Gage (Talk | contribs),
Revision as of 12:46, October 14, 2006 (edit) Gage (Talk | contribs)
Diff, Diff
Restored by Gage 14:35, October 14, 2006 Gage (Talk | contribs) restored "Rabbit Hole" (2 revisions restored) Log
Edit 14:44, October 14, 2006 . . Maxwell Hammer (Talk | contribs) Undelete Link
The rule explicitly states that the person needs to be told to not do it again. He was told not to do it again. It was a polite warning. All criteria were met ∴ Maxwell gets warned. –Xoid STFU! 12:37, 14 October 2006 (BST)
I saw and walked myself through the timeline. Placing a warning for someone on a page they have never edited is in neither polite or fair. IF he was meant to be comunnicated with it should have taken place on his talk page. Never happened. It is reasonable to assume that gage, bob and condrakka all knew where maxwell's user page was. It is not reasonable to assume that the noob knew where the speedy deletions page was. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 16:48, 14 October 2006 (BST)
Why should we coddle him if he couldn't be bothered to take the time to acquaint himself with the wiki? Cyberbob  Talk  16:51, 14 October 2006 (BST)
To demonstarte that the rules as they are laid out are adequate and effective. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 17:31, 14 October 2006 (BST)
Ah Ha! I see what I missed I did not pay attention to the time at which max editied M/U. Xoid is absoulutely right thanks for fixing my mistake. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 17:56, 14 October 2006 (BST)

You guys might want to check out this as well. -- Alan Watson T·RPM 18:49, 14 October 2006 (BST)

Codename V

Codename V (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Insane amounts of unnecesary spam on Group talk pages and user talk pages . --Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 05:28, 13 October 2006 (BST)

Okay, he has posted on about 60 or so group pages. The difference from before? This time, all those he edited on had signed up on the 5th of November page. By signing up, they asked to be kept abreast of news and recent happenings. As such, I find no wrong doing here. He hasn't hurt anyone, and he is just trying to make the game fun (a badly needed change).--Gage 05:36, 13 October 2006 (BST)

Scrapped

Scrapped (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Apparently, editing another persons posts are not allowed, this guy edited mine taking away the impact of the statement "And I find it unacceptable". So, go ahead, do your thing.--Duce Nauks 01:53, 13 October 2006 (BST) http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Dakerstown&diff=423806&oldid=423804 Heres the proof.--Duce Nauks 01:55, 13 October 2006 (BST)

If you'll also see, the reason that happened, was another damned edit conflict. I've gotten so many of those today, it totally ticked me off. I was being just a little blunt, so I simply copied the lower box and pasted it on the upper. But if Duce wants to call me a retard, go ahead and put it back. My bad. Also, if that wasn't enough, I just got an edit conflict right now. --| scrapped | 01:58, 13 October 2006 (BST)

Good for you--Duce Nauks 02:03, 13 October 2006 (BST)

Ummm, Duce... You change others' wordings. He simply removed a picture that (along with the rest), had no place in the news section of a suburb page. -Certified=Insane 02:39, 13 October 2006 (BST)

Aww, do you need a tissue? Or maybe this will help you stop Crying Image:For Hayduke.jpg--Duce Nauks 03:00, 13 October 2006 (BST)

Scrapped was removing an image that was spammming up a suburb page. It had absolutely no place there. He is pretty new, so I will assume that he didn't know that you could replace [[Image:R-tard.jpg]] with [[:Image:R-tard.jpg]] in order to link to the image (as I have done here). I see this as a good faith edit, and as such Scrapped will only receive an unofficial warning. I am sick and tired of the drama between these two groups, and I strongly recommend an arbitration case. You guys do NOT own the Dakerstown page, and this is getting out of hand. If you want to argue with me about this case, do it on my talk page because you have thoroughly pissed me off between the spamming of this page and Dakerstown. --Gage 05:19, 13 October 2006 (BST)

MrAushvitz

MrAushvitz (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Suggestions. Continually ignores the Rules for Discussions, which state "Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters." I think he should be warned to tone it down a little. --Funt Solo 16:23, 11 October 2006 (BST)

Give me a fucking break, Don't you have ANYTHING better to do? Not. Vandalism.. --Gage 17:22, 11 October 2006 (BST)
Crap moved to talk page.--Gage 19:44, 11 October 2006 (BST)
Welcome to our world, Gage. Cyberbob  Talk  01:22, 12 October 2006 (BST)

Andrew McM

Andrew McM (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Edited a signed comment after it was replied to. Should probably be warned that this is against wiki guidelines. Rheingold 21:29, 10 October 2006 (BST)

Not Vandalism - We will endeavor to assume good faith in this community. This user has less than 500 edits so I think that is a safe assumption. In the future don't bother us with this kind of stuff, just tell the user what we typically do here. It is that simple.--Gage 22:05, 10 October 2006 (BST)
Re Thanks for your good faith. I had actually been discussing my vote on the suggestion in question with the author, and he understood why I voted, and I assume he didn't mind me changing the reason for my vote. By the way, I've been here since roughly October last year. I understand all the rules in the wiki, it was just a minor slip. The reason I have less than 500 edits is merely because I don't edit much. -- Andrew McM W! 22:17, 10 October 2006 (BST)
Regardless of how long you have been here, I can't imagine punishing a contributive user for something so trivial. I will make this wiki a nice place if I have to do it myself. The days of witch hunts and banning users for no reason are things of the past.--Gage 22:28, 10 October 2006 (BST)
Then I salute you good sir. -- Andrew McM W! 22:30, 10 October 2006 (BST)
As the supposedly injured party, I'd like to say there was clearly no bad faith involved here from Andrew - just sensible editing and avoidance of drama. (Be a different matter if he'd spammed me, though ... *mutter* *mumble*) --Funt Solo 22:47, 10 October 2006 (BST)
Let me know how that works out, Gage. --Kiki Lottaboobs 08:38, 16 October 2006 (BST)
I never assumed bad faith; that's why I asked that a mod only tell him that it is not appropriate to edit a comment after it's been replied to, which is exactly what Gage did. I could have done it myself but I couldn't find the rule written down anywhere. Also a comment from a mod has more weight. Thanks, Gage. Rheingold 23:52, 10 October 2006 (BST)

Duce Nauks

Duce Nauks (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Modifying another's content. Unacceptable in my opinion, it changes the message, doesn't correct it. -Certified=InsaneUG 23:02, 9 October 2006 (BST)

I hit him with my banhammer. He should be out for the next 48 hours.--Gage 23:12, 9 October 2006 (BST)

Jeda

Jeda (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Proxy alt of Jedaz. Banned. Cyberbob  Talk  11:36, 9 October 2006 (BST)

I would like to request this account to be kept unbanned for the length of the voting process in the poll to unban Jedaz. I believe its utter nonsense to ban all this alt accounts that jedaz have to create to reply in this poll, since accounts are easily created and to ban them will do nothing but fill available user names. Once the poll is over, Jeda (and any other alt account owned by Jedaz) can be banned and his main account unbanned (if doing so the poll results). This account, of course, will be limited only to reply in the poll, and i believe Jedaz will follow this. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 17:26, 9 October 2006 (BST)
Yes, because he will break the rules anyway let us ignore the rules in response to him. Why should we even ban a 3pwv account for that reason?
Okay, I'll be less flippant: The issue is that we have a banned user appropriating comments to a page which innately concerns him, which is not the problem- however it does not belong on the Wiki page itself but rather in the talk page, for one- he is TALKING about the case, not opening or changing the case (as that would result in a new vote). Secondly, if the vote looks like it is heading directly towards him remaining to be banned, what is to stop him from using said account to vandalize as he has nothing to lose? I would say that even if Jedaz was alotted an account for just the talk page (where he can discuss to his heart's content without getting into conflict with the poll itself) he should be re-banned for the 24 hrs leading up to the vote itself.
Reply to Obvious arguement; yes, Jedaz might be a good person. However if he is a good person than taking a 24hr break of editing before he is rightfully unbanned because of how good a person he is should not be such a sacrifice. --Karlsbad 18:08, 9 October 2006 (BST)
If he is the vandal everyone claims he is, what is keeping him from creating other accounts and vandalizing the wiki ? All i ask is to give the guy a chance to defend himself. How harmfull can be one account when you can create a thousand of them ? --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 18:28, 9 October 2006 (BST)
The thing that is keeping him, at the moment, is the fact that he is attempting to prove himself a good person at this very moment. He could create a thousand accounts and proxy-slam the wiki and not be charged if he called himself the 3pwv. If he really wanted to defend himself he could attempt to get the "club" over at Scroll Wars to stop using "wiki-terror vandalism" as a valid political tool, proving that he is actually for the preservation of a wiki. But since he is proven to be more apt to give a proxy-switching account to his Buddy-Pal-for-Life 3pwv, I won't hold my breath. --Karlsbad 18:33, 9 October 2006 (BST)


Master Cheif

Master Cheif (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) CheckUser and his spelling "abilities" indicate he is Gold Blade. What's the matter, GB? Have you run out of proxies? Cyberbob  Talk  22:24, 8 October 2006 (BST)

And tonight's entrée, a Covenant Elite a l'oignon gratinée in a duck sauce... Rheingold 01:24, 9 October 2006 (BST)
Do not insult the vandals. It validates their activities.--Gage 01:28, 9 October 2006 (BST)

Nobodya

Nobodya (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Just another vandal by the looks of it. Permabanned. –Xoid STFU! 10:47, 8 October 2006 (BST)

Lip

Another Proxy IP, banned as per policy; would it be out of place to request that people not vote using proxy accounts because they only strive to embarrass the cause they vote for? --Karlsbad 06:42, 8 October 2006 (BST)

Wanker

Wanker (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)--Wanker 23:25, 7 October 2006 (BST)

Kinda handy that he reported himself, don't you think?--The General T Sys U! P! F! 23:34, 7 October 2006 (BST)
Banned. --Brizth M T 23:34, 7 October 2006 (BST)


Mayor Fitting

Mayor Fitting (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Edited Cisisero's user page. And from the content of the edit, I'm assuming it's without permission. Cyberbob  Talk  02:30, 7 October 2006 (BST)

wow, is that really vandalism? i responded to him just not on his talk page...wow--Mayor Fitting 03:05, 7 October 2006 (BST)

I can't see any vandalism here. He was only telling him that he did something wrong. --Solamnic Knight 03:30, 7 October 2006 (BST)

The Issue is he Edited the Page itself and not on the Talk/Discussion page. If he had said the same on the "Talk Page" it wouldn't be considered Vandalism, but since it was on the User page itself it is. However I do think it wasn't in Bad faith necessarily... Conndrakamod T CFT 03:39, 7 October 2006 (BST)
Not vandalism - in the future, only use the talk pages, not the main user page. --Darth Sensitive Talk W! 04:03, 7 October 2006 (BST)

Cisisero

Cisisero (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) See here take note that no previous contact with this user was made.

Vandalized the predators talk page. Put up un-provoked harrassment comments. --Mayor Fitting 02:12, 7 October 2006 (BST)

Unfortunately, talk pages aren't protected from harassment. If you really want him to stay off the page, start up an Arby's case. Cyberbob  Talk  02:29, 7 October 2006 (BST)

Bah

Bah (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Attacked this page, permabanned. --Darth Sensitive Talk W! 22:53, 6 October 2006 (BST)

"Gold Blade" etc etc

The account and character of GoldBlade should be warned again for a work-around of a ban. Therefore he is to be banned for 4 days (the time he had left on the current ban) infinity (the time alotted to him from the permaban) and a month (the punishment of a 5th warning). Why? Basically: Being a shithead when you get disciplined gets you in more trouble. --Karlsbad 07:54, 6 October 2006 (BST)

Thank you for that edit, Gold Blade. You just proved everything. Fuckwit. Is that the sweet sound of vindication I hear? Yes it is. –Xoid STFU! 21:52, 6 October 2006 (BST)

*does a little jig*--Gage 22:30, 6 October 2006 (BST)
Seriously folks, this is pure Gold (Blade):
A) That doesn\'t even make sense, B) How can you get your account into more trouble when its permabanned, C) This place i\'nt worth my attention anymore. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talkcontribs) at an unknown time.
Because he was mocking you, idiot. Stab at ye2 admitting he was Gold Blade (x1) –Xoid STFU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST)


Then why do I have an email from the place saying that they were paid to shut it down? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talkcontribs) at an unknown time.

Because you are blowing smoke out of your arse. You seriously think I would pay money for that? I'm a fucking pensioner. I need money for food, not to foil the eeeeeevil plot of a pack of retards who can be easily countered anyway. –Xoid STFU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST)


Correction: Alt of New 3 page —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talkcontribs) at an unknown time.

Correction: Gold Blade. –Xoid STFU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST)


Correction: Alt of New 3 page —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talkcontribs) at an unknown time.

Correction: Gold Blade. –Xoid STFU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST)


No, keep your nose clean until you get it chopped off for no reason. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talkcontribs) at an unknown time.

Correction: You vandalise repeatedly and get caught. Then you get punished. –Xoid STFU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST)


Why should I care if I can\'t fix my sig? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talkcontribs) at an unknown time.

Stab at ye2 admitting he is Gold Blade (x2) You might also like to note that Gold Blade was having problems properly using his template style signature on the SW Wiki recently. This seems familiar. I wonder why. –Xoid STFU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST)


This idiot cant count. It says 3 vandals, when I count 5. GB, 3P, N3P, Meow, and Stallone. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talkcontribs) at an unknown time.

Admitting Gold Blade is a vandal? Lets see, how many is that now? –Xoid STFU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST)


Xoid, don\'t make accounts that have my name on that vandal forum and I won\'t do the \"I was impersonated\" thing. Don\'t play stupid, I acessed the IP check on both This page and the Forum\'s. Its the exact same thing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talkcontribs) at an unknown time.

LMFAO. Oh, sure. I have absolutely no fear of it confirming that I impersonated you. That would be because I didn't. I'll email Clickdev and ask for the records if you wish. Hell, why not get Kevan to do it? I'm sure he'll really bend over backwards for your "resetting the wiki" bullshit after he finds out you're lying through your teeth. Oh yeah? Admitting he was Gold Blade (x3)
Oh yeah, would anyone like the email he sent me where he claims the exact same shit? He also claims that this account was his? This is a comedy of errors, folks. –Xoid STFU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST)


Sure as hell I can use proxies. No this is Stallone. Axe hack, have you recieved those emails or are you ignoring/blocking me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talkcontribs) at an unknown time.

Most likely. Undoubtedly, he sees you for the scum you are. Stallone? The same Stallone who vigorously denied vandalism? The same Stallone that despite being the biggest zerger in the history of the game, seems to have some standards? I think not. You story seemed consistent so far, why change it? –Xoid STFU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST)


Yes there is IP checking there. No it was not a proxy. Yes it was Xoid. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talkcontribs) at an unknown time.

Hilarious. Really, this is too rich. First it was Cyberbob, then it was me. Can't quite make up your mind, can you? Allow me to get my popcorn. Hey! Anyone got some butter? –Xoid STFU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST)

GоІd ΒІаdе

GоІd ΒІаdе (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) My job is done. GоІd ΒІаdе 20:14, 15 October 2006 (BST)

Double permaban by Gage and Conndraka.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 00:26, 16 October 2006 (BST)
No comments please. --GоІd ΒІadе 00:47, 16 October 2006 (BST)
Not quite sure where you get off ordering people around. Stay on the SW wiki, please. Cyberbob  Talk  07:01, 16 October 2006 (BST)

GoldBlade

GoldBlade (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Do not insult the vandals. It encourages them.--Gage 05:38, 9 October 2006 (BST)

Gold Blade would vandalize if the mood struck him. He enjoys being talked about, and so therefore I hope that this sentance calling him pathetic gives him a girlish titter. PermaBanned --Karlsbad 07:53, 9 October 2006 (BST)

Stab_at_ye3

Stab_at_ye3 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Sockpuppet - banned. --Darth Sensitive Talk W! 04:21, 6 October 2006 (BST)

GOLD BLADE

GOLD BLADE (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Just check the contributions. Also, I suck at wiki. -Blig 03:37, 6 October 2006 (BST)

I'm pretty sure he's already banned, but banned again. I also find it laughable that he thinks I paid to have it shut down. I merely asked nicely. Didn't require much, they were violating the terms of service they signed up for. Idiots. –Xoid STFU! 03:46, 6 October 2006 (BST)

Gold Blade

Gold Blade (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) I saw we make it a permaban, look at that vandalism forum: Check this post here.--Gage 03:35, 3 October 2006 (BST)

Tch tch tch......good friend goes vandal.... --Axe Hack 03:37, 3 October 2006 (BST)
Sadly, I don't see him getting permabaned for that, we can't prove that's GB. That's why he posted that there instead of posting it on SW.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 03:41, 3 October 2006 (BST)
I bet that since The Devil made a comment on there about seeing that it was a proxy IP, that it's not GB and someone trying to fuck him over yet more. --CaptainM 05:09, 3 October 2006 (BST)
Gee, I wonder whether it's because he's trying to cover for his friend. Cyberbob  Talk  07:14, 3 October 2006 (BST)
I don't know that he could have Gold Blade's IP for reference. That comment is sketchy to me.--Gage 07:18, 3 October 2006 (BST)
That's a good point, but if the wiki can use evidence off the wiki against people, when's it stop? I'm positive that if you knew what to google, you could find alot of dirt on ME, outside sites shouldn't be used as condeming evidence against Wikizens. --CaptainM 07:26, 3 October 2006 (BST)
He *could* have looked it up and proven it to be a proxy, but I'll bet that it really was GB, and 3page is trying to cover up his fairly major fuckup. Cyberbob  Talk  07:23, 3 October 2006 (BST)
...when's it stop? A damn sight further than a forum specifically created to discuss how to vandalise this particular wiki, I'd say. Cyberbob  Talk  07:34, 3 October 2006 (BST)
Can we contact the host of that forum and get it shut down?--Gage 07:36, 3 October 2006 (BST)
NFI. Would be worth looking into, though. Cyberbob  Talk  07:41, 3 October 2006 (BST)
We can bitch here, I can't find the exact spot, though.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 07:58, 3 October 2006 (BST)
Here ya go. --Lucero Talk U! 18:44, 3 October 2006 (BST)
Considering that the person who owns it is paying to have it hosted, I doubt it. --Steel Laser 22:23, 3 October 2006 (BST)
I already know what to do for the supposed Halloween Vandal Attack, we have someone save the important pages of the Wiki unto they're computer, so then when the dust clears they can just Cut and Paste.--Canuhearmenow Hunt! 22:33, 3 October 2006 (BST)
You dont even have to cut and paste, there is a little thing called export pages.... --DarkStar2374383 Talk | LDY | LOE 00:30, 4 October 2006 (BST)
Don't worry guys, it's being taken care of. Cyberbob  Talk  11:05, 4 October 2006 (BST)
Problem being that the import pages feature is only available to moderators. –Xoid STFU! 11:53, 4 October 2006 (BST)

Gold Blade

Advertising a vandalism forum.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 00:17, 3 October 2006 (BST)

He asked for a link. I gave him one, seeing as the vandal got banned. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 00:18, 3 October 2006 (BST)
Thanks for doing a vandal's job.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 00:20, 3 October 2006 (BST)
Well, he wanted a link. I gave it to him. It was neutral. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 00:21, 3 October 2006 (BST)
And I am the Queen of England. Come on, that is advertising. Advertising a vandalism board is as bad as doing the vandalism yourself.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 00:23, 3 October 2006 (BST)
No you arent, and I would know, seeing as I am the queen's advisor. But when someone asks for something, isnt it a good thing to help them? HURRR. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 00:25, 3 October 2006 (BST)
hath legalized it. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 00:26, 3 October 2006 (BST)
That logic would be great if it applied here. This is vandalism. That is the wiki equivalent of helping someone kill someone and then saying "I was only being helpful LAWL."--Gage 00:28, 3 October 2006 (BST)
No, if someone asked me for poisoned food, I would give it to them. I have no idea what they plan to do with it. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 00:29, 3 October 2006 (BST)

Ok, that was wrong of me. But nowhere in the rules does it say anything bout this being bannable. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 00:31, 3 October 2006 (BST)

You quoted Odd Starter in saying that there is no Accidental Vandalism. This means that there is no "incorrect Good Faith". Warned. --Karlsbad 00:33, 3 October 2006 (BST)

You can get warned for advertising a site where vandals are talking? Really? Oookay. --Kiki Lottaboobs 10:43, 3 October 2006 (BST)

No, the entire site is about vandalism of this wiki - not just a place where they happen to hang out. Cyberbob  Talk  10:59, 3 October 2006 (BST)
I HAVE NO IDAE WAHT TEHY PLANS 2 DO WIT IT!!!! Rheingold 15:38, 3 October 2006 (BST)
This entire page is about vandalism of this wiki. Can linking to M/VB be a bannable offense? I thought precedent was clear, you are innocent until you do something wrong. When did that change? --Kiki Lottaboobs 00:34, 4 October 2006 (BST)
Actually Kiki, this entire Page is about the PEOPLE who vandalize the wiki. Gold Blade already admits that he was guilty of attributing to this wiki in Bad Faith: the rule was minted as soon as he admitted that he was a vandal- are you actually going to argue that advertising a forum CREATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF VANDALISM is in Good Faith? Really? --Karlsbad 01:21, 5 October 2006 (BST)
No, I was just considering that since Gage and Baddass also linked to the site, it might be a good idea to clarify what he's being banned for. Was it that he linked to the site (and therefore we should file vandalism cases on both of them, too), or was it the language tht he used to invite people to the forum, or was it for some thoughtcrime that hasn't quite happened yet, but he should still be punished for. What is he guilty of? Planning to do vandalism? Participating in a discussion about vandalism? Encouraging others to talk about vandalism? --Kiki Lottaboobs 00:17, 6 October 2006 (BST)
Oh for the love of god, will you fuck off? Encouraging someone to commit vandalism is quite different from giving evidence. Bad faith editing is vandalism. Giving evidence is not bad faith, encouraging vandalism and then enticing someone to go participate on a site that is specifically about organised vandalising of this wiki? That's vandalism. –Xoid STFU! 02:53, 6 October 2006 (BST)
Okay, so telling someone to vandalize not bed faith. But, telling someone to go to a web page where they're told to vandalise the wiki is bad faith. At least that's consistant. --Kiki Lottaboobs 04:59, 6 October 2006 (BST)
You dropped something, oh look, it was the word between web-page-told and vandalize wiki bad faith- its the HOW. Advertising HOW to vandalize and linking to a place where the entire PURPOSE is to vandalize is Bad Faith. I don't see why you are stupid about this. --Karlsbad 07:50, 6 October 2006 (BST)
He did do something wrong, hurr.--Gage 02:03, 4 October 2006 (BST)

Impersonators

CyberΒοb240

CyberΒοb240 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Banned. Cyberbob  Talk  07:01, 2 October 2006 (BST)


Dаranz

Devils Night Vandal:Banned Conndrakamod T CFT 02:06, 3 October 2006 (BST)

Xoіd

Xoіd (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Banned. Cyberbob  Talk  06:42, 2 October 2006 (BST)

Xоid

Xоid (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) --Gage 04:15, 2 October 2006 (BST)

He got banhammered--Gage 04:20, 2 October 2006 (BST)
User:Соnndrаkа

User:Соnndrаkа (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Conndrakamod T CFT 03:34, 2 October 2006 (BST)

Ban --Karlsbad 03:48, 2 October 2006 (BST)
BobHаmmero

BobHаmmero (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Conndrakamod T CFT 03:34, 2 October 2006 (BST)

Ban --Karlsbad 03:48, 2 October 2006 (BST)
Kеvаn

Kеvаn (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) --Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 02:08, 2 October 2006 (BST)

Ban --Karlsbad 03:48, 2 October 2006 (BST)
Gаge

Gаge (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) --Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 02:08, 2 October 2006 (BST)

Ban --Karlsbad 03:48, 2 October 2006 (BST)
Cybеrbоb240

Cybеrbоb240 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) please?--Gage 01:27, 2 October 2006 (BST)

Ban --Karlsbad 03:48, 2 October 2006 (BST)

Solamnic Knight

Solamnic Knight (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Under check user uses an IP adress (66.90.73.113) that is is banned by MetaWiki's list of Proxy IPs, which is illegal according to the new policy HERE. ABecause of the nature of the account being only two days old, said account shall be permabanned. It is recommended that the user should re-apply with a new login using a non-proxy IP, if it is at all possible. --Karlsbad 06:04, 7 October 2006 (BST)

'Twas Gold Blade. He admitted it on the SW wiki. Cyberbob  Talk  11:18, 8 October 2006 (BST)

Echo

Another one. Permabanned. –Xoid STFU! 03:22, 6 October 2006 (BST)

Don't forget GOLD BLADE. -Blig 03:33, 6 October 2006 (BST)

Baddass

Alt of Gold Blade. Permabanned. –Xoid STFU! 02:26, 6 October 2006 (BST)

◙╬┼■■▌Ω☻☺☼♫♪▲►▼◄

◙╬┼■■▌Ω☻☺☼♫♪▲►▼◄ (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) This is proxy use, I think - the edits are causing backslashes to occur. --Funt Solo 23:35, 5 October 2006 (BST)

Yeah. Permabanned. --Brizth M T 23:37, 5 October 2006 (BST)
For future reference - how do I revert a page to get rid of stuff like this? --Funt Solo 23:52, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Go to page's history, open the last good revision, click edit, note the warning at the top about old revision, hit save (without actually editing the content) and it's done. But if someone else, non-vandal, has edited the page after the vandal, remember to either merge back their edits, or don't revert but just fix the problems by hand. --Brizth M T 23:57, 5 October 2006 (BST)

Steel Laser

Steel Laser (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) this edit--Gage 22:43, 5 October 2006 (BST)

No shit sherlock. gage, I always hated you. Yes, It really is Gold Blade. You cannot destroy me! I thank you for letting me off the hook before. Moron.Template:UserGold Blade/sig 22:46, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Who is the moron who cannot fix his signature? Oh right, it is you.--Gage 22:46, 5 October 2006 (BST)

Banned as Vandal Alt. Conndrakamod T CFT 22:49, 5 October 2006 (BST)

Banned x2 --Brizth M T 22:49, 5 October 2006 (BST)

Upsetting

Upsetting (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) A sockpuppet. Has only made 13 edits, yet somehow manages to possess an intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Guidelines. I suspect this user to be Amazing, since his very first edit was to vote against the policy to remove the advertisements for Scroll Wars from the front page. It's interesting to note that his signature has a heart in it; on the SW wiki, many users use other shapes from the 4 suits of a pack of cards. Cyberbob  Talk  22:28, 5 October 2006 (BST)

This looks like a user of the SW wiki for sure. As long as he doesn't cause trouble, I say we leave him if we cannot prove he is Amazing.--Gage 22:32, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Ah, but in voting, he's set himself up for a ban. Subverting the democratic process and all that. Besides, he has been stirring up trouble. Did you see the recent Misconduct case? Cyberbob  Talk  22:35, 5 October 2006 (BST)
He may not be a sockpuppet, but just a user from the SW wiki who wants to influence this wiki. In that way he would not be "subverting" any voting, but only giving his opinion. I see no malice or vandalism here. If there is, please point it out to me.--Gage 22:39, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Woah, didn't even noticed this was going on. I haven't vandalized a single page. Isn't the first thing someone new to the wiki should do is... read the rules? That's all I did. I'm not an alt of Amazing, and I haven't broken a rule, so why are you coming after me? --♥UpsettingNot a Moderator 23:16, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Only the guilty proclaim innocence... You're dealing with the Witch Hunters now. --Kiki Lottaboobs 00:11, 6 October 2006 (BST)
Kiki? Come back when you've got something insightful to add. Until then? Fuck off. –Xoid STFU! 02:22, 6 October 2006 (BST)
Hey, man, I'm just talking about Wiki Witches here... I thought that was how it was played. --Kiki Lottaboobs 04:22, 6 October 2006 (BST)
You expect me to swallow that after your continual venomous assertions earlier? Unlikely. –Xoid STFU! 04:26, 6 October 2006 (BST)

I don't really care who you are. Keep your nose clean and you can stay. –Xoid STFU! 02:22, 6 October 2006 (BST)

Monicle

Monicle (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Placed a humorous suggestion on the suggestions page, breaking rule 13. --Funt Solo 21:42, 5 October 2006 (BST)

Warned. Cyberbob  Talk  22:14, 5 October 2006 (BST)

Brownst

Brownst (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Placed a humorous suggestion on the suggestions page, breaking rule 13. --Funt Solo 12:48, 5 October 2006 (BST)

Warned. –Xoid STFU! 13:29, 5 October 2006 (BST)

Honorary mem

Honorary mem (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Seems to be a sockpuppet to cause difficulties related to the below case. --Darth Sensitive Talk W! 04:01, 5 October 2006 (BST)

Look at the misconduct page. This guy even started a case against Xoid. --Axe Hack 04:06, 5 October 2006 (BST)
It's where I first saw him. He is using the same IP as Baddass --Darth Sensitive Talk W! 04:08, 5 October 2006 (BST)
No, I am just using a different account because if I used my main account then the mods would get angry at it and stalk it till the end of time to get it banned. Thats what happened to gold blade and Jedaz, they pissed off the mods. Honorary mem 04:09, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Jedaz was caught actively helping vandals. GB...well....did you see his nice long list of vandalisms? Including the vandal forum he posted on? He agreed to help vandals vandalize the wiki on Halloween. But since that forum was shutted down...that evidence is long gone... --Axe Hack 04:12, 5 October 2006 (BST)
None of these things are against the rules you know. Jedaz could reveal a surefire way of hacking into and deleting the entire wiki to everyone and it would not be against the rules unless he actually did that. Show me the rule where it say that you can't help vandals. And for goldblade he for one could have EASILY been impersinated, and even if he was not he can still say that he is going to destroy the wiki but its not against the rules until he actually does. And don't tell me that cyberbob wasn't stalking Jedaz for the last couple weeks after he made that evil text thing. Honorary mem 04:19, 5 October 2006 (BST)
What rules? Look, who needs rules? Not this wiki. Rule from your gut. Rules just complicate things and tie down mods to one definition of them. --Kiki Lottaboobs 00:10, 6 October 2006 (BST)
That's exactly the problem; hard and fast rules prevent proper action from being taken. Remember how Amazing was called a pedophile repeatedly? Because of imbeciles like yourself with your constant "But the rules say in subsection 47…" we couldn't do a thing about it. But, just because your policy is getting voted against we suddenly want to ensure that no rules are codified. Nevermind that most rules are codified and the ones we are leery about? They're the tricky ones that people use technicalities to weasel their way out of even if they did do something grievously wrong. –Xoid STFU! 03:18, 6 October 2006 (BST)
"Show me the rule where it say that you can't help vandals." — Bad faith covers that. –Xoid STFU! 03:18, 6 October 2006 (BST)
Hmmm, maybe he was stalking him because of the evil text. It was a tool for helping vandals after all. What would you think if Morgana started helping vandals?--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 04:22, 5 October 2006 (BST)
And destroying the wiki would count as vandalism. --Axe Hack 04:24, 5 October 2006 (BST)
YES IT WOULD! I agree! But NO ONE ever destroyed the wiki. and to thari i agree with you also, Jedaz pissed off a mod (with the evil text), so he got banned. Honorary mem 04:26, 5 October 2006 (BST)
who's Morgana? Honorary mem 04:34, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Oh, you know ;).--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 04:36, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Helping you destroy it is just as bad. Do you think arms dealers don't get punished for selling weapons to a hostile force? You have got to be kidding me. Edit: Jedaz didn't piss me off with that. Not a lot anyway. It was his constant efforts in assisting vandals to damage this wiki which earned him his ban. I did ask him to stay on, hoping that he would and prove that he was just bitching and moaning on the SW Wiki, but instead he leaves and gets bitter. –Xoid STFU! 03:18, 6 October 2006 (BST)

Banned. Obvious sockpuppet of either Gold Blade or Jedaz. Which one, I don't particularly care. Cyberbob  Talk  07:37, 5 October 2006 (BST)

More likely of 3 Page, but whatever. –Xoid STFU! 07:41, 5 October 2006 (BST)
What makes you say that? Cyberbob  Talk  07:44, 5 October 2006 (BST)
If you had read the case, you would have seen that Darth already said he was Baddass.--Gage 07:50, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Hey, we're pretty sure he's somebody, and that sombody obviously needs to get banned. You can take your facts and stick 'em, we got mods banning folks over here. Just quit butting in and let them ban Amazing again, or whoever. You're either with us or against us... Next thing you know, you'll be asking for proof before a permaban is issued and facts just get in the way. --Kiki Lottaboobs 00:10, 6 October 2006 (BST)
I did read it, but either never encountered Baddass, or have forgotten who he is. Cyberbob  Talk  07:54, 5 October 2006 (BST)
So you are saying they are both sockpuppets 0_o? Why would one use a sockpuppet to protect the reputation of a sockpuppet?--Gage 07:57, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Badass was just 3 Page trying to insert himself into the wiki again, so he was trying to protect it. –Xoid STFU! 08:06, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Notice how all these alts for misconduct case reporting show up, and have been doing so for a long time? 3 Page has admitted that he does this and this fits his MO. ∴ 3 Page. –Xoid STFU! 08:06, 5 October 2006 (BST)

Mine. User:Gold Blade/Sig22:38, 5 October 2006 (BST)

3 Vandals in a Pear Tree

Jedaz

Jeda%F0%9D%9A%A3 Jeda%F0%9D%9A%A3 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Jedaz Jedaz (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Item 1
Actively assisting a known vandal
Jedaz said:
Actually Cyberbob, I was E-mailing him a tool that allows you to change proxies quickly…I wanted him to test it out and see if I programed it correctly.
Actively assisting a vandal
Item 2
Keeping proof of a vandal's identity to himself
Jedaz said:
It seems like a few of the mods have had a bit of fun on the UD wiki with you and Gold Blade.
He knows that Gold Blade has been vandalising, yet did nothing about it.
Item 3
Planning bad faith exploitation of the rules

His plan

Jedaz said:
In fact I can "vandalise" hundreds of pages AND have them kept that way due to the rules.
Jedaz said:
Then this type of vandalism will stick on every page I've sown my seeds onto.

More deliberate deception

Jedaz said:
Well I noticed that a certain page of mine was deleted on the Urban Dead Wiki which I wouldn't have minded if people asked me before they deleted it and explained why.

(Much later)

Jedaz said:
…if you and BobHammero felt that the "evil text" was so dangerous why didn't either one of you just ask me before if you's could get rid of it? I know why it was an issue and I would have been quite happy for it to go…
Xoid said:
"…planting evil seeds…" ring a bell? The evil text was one of them, I'm not stupid Jedaz. It's clear you made up your mind to get some kind of "revenge" for people not stroking your ego enough when you went to Scroll Wars, a bad day or talking about hpyotheticals I could understand, 72 hours of rhetoric is not "a bad day". You would have contested it on the grounds of there needing to be an example.
Jedaz said:
Hmm... I see your point. Although the actual evil text page wasn't actually what I was thinking about, although the template calling was.

I'd like to note that for some time, Jedaz protested his innocence, yet we can clearly see here that he has not only admitted his plans, but also his guilt. (Through agreeing with my take on what happened.)

Jedaz has deliberately created alts, given out technical expertise to a vandal, including assisting said vandal with "tools of the trade", has vowed to vandalise this wiki and he has. He deliberately created (and recreated) a page in order to educate vandals on how to better vandalise the wiki. As such, I am permabanning Jedaz as a frequent vandal. –Xoid STFU! 13:05, 4 October 2006 (BST)

Why do we STILL link to scrollwars? Correct me if I'm wrong, but this isn't the first time that it's been used as an offsite place to discuss how to vandalize the UD wiki and their moderator(s) seem to have no problem with it. -- Rueful 19:38, 4 October 2006 (BST)

There is something you are forgetting Xoid. Something so basic that it is something we ALL have forgotten. It is the simple definition of vandalism from wikipedia. Here it is: Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. There you go. Basically, he has to do something to be banned and he did not do anything. Honorary mem 03:39, 5 October 2006 (BST)

It sure is a good thing we aren't Wikipedia! Blig 04:08, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Yeah! Sure is a bad thing™ that we are allowed to block people when it is strictly in the community's interest. Sorta like Wikipedia, who also can ban people when it's in the community's interest. Your point was, 3 Page? –Xoid STFU! 09:24, 5 October 2006 (BST)

Could you provide links to the quotes? With an action as significant as permabanning a long-time editor, it's important that this case is open and transparent. --Toejam 15:25, 5 October 2006 (BST)

As you wish. I've already cropped the quotes here but if you want to see them in context… note that the numbers do not correspond to each "item" above, just read through the lot, it is an "interesting" read. Feel free to read the rest of the pages as well, their arguments may seem convincing with only a cursory inspection but they hold no water.
This conversation was split over two talk pages. My talk page, then Jedaz', then back and forth.
Xoid STFU! 15:50, 5 October 2006 (BST)

Gold Blade

Gold Blade (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Gold Blade. He has comitted vandalism on numerous occasions, his pal let it slip that Gold Blade was responsible for some of the vandalism, and has most recently spammed his vandal forums link about. Combining this with his history of proxy abuse and his post on the vandal forums, I am permabanning Gold Blade as a frequent vandal. –Xoid STFU! 13:05, 4 October 2006 (BST)

I only let him off the hook once......and that was when he took a chunk off my talk page... --Axe Hack 13:11, 4 October 2006 (BST)
I actually wasn't referring to you, I had all but forgotten that incident. I was actually referring to Jedaz and The Devil's posts on the SW Wiki alluding to the fact that they knew for a fact that Gold Blade was one of our vandals. –Xoid STFU! 13:17, 4 October 2006 (BST)
Ding dong the witch is dead!--Gage 14:32, 4 October 2006 (BST)
So... who's the third vandal? Rheingold 17:50, 4 October 2006 (BST)
Jedaz, Jedaz, and Gold Blade. I had to have that one explained to me to :P--Gage 17:54, 4 October 2006 (BST)

*sighs in contentment* Cyberbob  Talk  22:34, 4 October 2006 (BST)

Sorry, was any proof posted for this case? I didn't see any links. --Kiki Lottaboobs 00:10, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Did you see his last VB case? He's been publicizing links for a plan cooked up by some SW people to vandalize, server-crash and database-delete the wiki on Halloween. Very mature :rolleyes: Rheingold 01:53, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Uh...about that Halloween Vandal attack....how many people do you think we can get defending the wiki on a Tuesday? In case you didn't notice, Halloween is on a Tuesday this year. --Axe Hack 02:06, 5 October 2006 (BST)
We don't have to defend anything, I'll say this ONCE. This is a wiki, not a fucking battlefield.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 03:23, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Well...what are we gonna do on Halloween? Just watch the vandals take over the wiki? Too bad we won't be getting anymore information from that vandal forum....that vandal shutted it down...and it was a hell of a good lead....2nd to the SW wiki. --Axe Hack 03:29, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Get a costume of your favourite Power Ranger and go house by house asking for candies. The witches are dead.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 03:31, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Eh...I got plans for Halloween. Too many people in my neighborhood leaves the candy on the front steps unauthorized, so me and some friends are gonna do what we do every year, grab all the candy and run for it. No costumes needed! If those little kiddies whine and moan because there's no candy, too bad for them! --Axe Hack 03:46, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Hey, credit where credit is due. That forum was shut down for illegal activities, not because the vandal wanted it to be. –Xoid STFU! 09:29, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Yeah I agree with Kiki, where is the proof here? Did he ever admit or allude the to fact that he was a vandal, how do you know someone was not just trying to get him banned? Honorary mem 03:42, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Yes, he did - in a convo I had with him on the SW wiki. Go away. Cyberbob  Talk  07:40, 5 October 2006 (BST)
Kiki, you have a history of questioning every little decision and being proven wrong on every occasion. Do you like wasting other people's time?
Regardless, here:
Couple that with his knowledge in using proxies, his history of vandalsim and how vandalism "magically" started when he got his knickers in a knot and his post on the Vandalism forum… and you were saying, Kiki? –Xoid STFU! 09:29, 5 October 2006 (BST)
OMFG! HE WAS COMPLIMENTED?!?! Well, that settles it, I say we go to his house and have him arrested. As far as you re-posting his advertisemtne here, what should your punishment be? I mean, can I go to all kinds of pages and say Look What Gold Blade Said! just like you did and that's okay? What rule did he break by posting it and why aren't you guilty of the same thing? Oh, I forgot, there aren't any published rules, that would be stupid. --Kiki Lottaboobs 00:30, 6 October 2006 (BST)
Could you try to, gee, put it in context? Oh, I forgot, that would be stupid. Put it in context, troll. It was not what was said, but how it was. –Xoid STFU! 02:12, 6 October 2006 (BST)
I'm trying to put it in context, but I'm coming up short on actual offenses. It's been shown that a member of this wiki can encourage another to vandalize it with no penalties. That's established precedent. I also see that if posting a link is vandalism, then certainly some other user posting the link again is also vandalism. Now, the Mr Auschwitz thing I understand, that's a warnable/banable offense. The lie about his account getting hacked is not against the rules. If lying was against the rules... well, there'd be a lot more bans handed out. So, you have a compliment, a link, vandalism, and a lie. 1 offense out of 4. --Kiki Lottaboobs 04:20, 6 October 2006 (BST)
If he wasn't hacked, he was committing vandalism at the time, which would put him at a month's ban now. The compliment indicates that 3 Page knew Gold Blade was guilty of impersonating Cyberbob, the timing may be coincidental but the sheer number of coincidences with Gold Blade in the past makes this one of either two things: either he's guilty or he has the worst luck of any person, bar none. Apply Occam's Razor. The difference between this case and God's is how there was not an open dialogue between the two. Gold Blade, out of the blue, posted that there. This wasn't discussing vandalism in some philosophical debate, this was part of his large scale attempt to get people to get behind The Devil's Night vandalism event. Gold Blade has made mistakes before when switching proxies and accounts. This is just another case of it. –Xoid STFU! 07:05, 6 October 2006 (BST)

Considering the fact that I was already banned for the above mentioned stuff, that you use the same piece of evidence twice, and the fact that you cannot prove that I was the one doing spamming or even proxy accounts, added to the fact that Cyberbob impersonated me on the UD vandalisim forums, and the fact that since it is so important to have on wiki evidence, as you so used against me when I moved axe hack's stuff, that this is the biggest piece of fucked up shit V/B case I have ever seen. Lets review: 1The only conclusive evidence there is I have already been banned for, 2 It has to be on this wiki, (Meaning which, I could go on SW and tell Cyberbob that he has done a good job for being the 3pw and nobody noticed), 3 you attempt to use the fact that I really did get hacked and use more stuff during which. If this wiki uses this kind of shit to permaban users, WHICH ISNT IN THE MODERATOR GUIDELINES ANYWHERE! YOU YOULD PROBABLY READ IT, then this wiki isnt worth my attention. I couldn't care less if you permabanned this sockpuppet, so good bye and good riddance. See you on halloween! (Burning and dying, because I am joining the vandals). Oh, and I am going to pay Kevan to shut off this wiki permanently. --User:Gold Blade/Sig 22:37, 5 October 2006 (BST)

NERD RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE! Seriously, you are coming off as a huge idiot, and this is the most hilarious thing I have ever read. SOME PEOPLE DIDN'T LIKE ME ON THE INTERNET I AM GOING TO PAY THE WIKI MAINTAINER TO SHUT THE PLACE DOWN AFTER I GET SPLOOGE ALL OVER EVERYTHING. I lol'd. (Edit: CAPS LOCK OF RAGE) -Blig 00:38, 6 October 2006 (BST)
She asked for proof of the accusations, and I provided it. It's not a case of using the same evidence twice. And now? You've admitted that you've made multiple sockpuppets. Don't bother trying the "I'm going off to help the vandals now. LOLOLOL." routine, or the "I was impersonated on that forum!" routine. 3 Page knowing just by looking at the IPs that it wasn't you? Yeah. Right. He didn't, he suspected it wasn't you because, guess what, you were using a proxy. What have you done dozens of times on this wiki? Oh, I know. You've used a proxy. If you want to protest your innocence, try something half believeable. –Xoid STFU! 02:12, 6 October 2006 (BST)

Jeda%F0%9D%9A%A3

Jeda%F0%9D%9A%A3 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

I'm not to sure if this counts as it, but I think it's impersonation. User page redirects to Jedaz's page. I see that Xoid has talked to him some, am I just jumping the reporting when this is really Jedaz showing how easy it is to impersonate? --CaptainM 04:29, 4 October 2006 (BST)

Sorry to burst your bubbles CaptainM, but this guy is Jedaz. How do I know you ask? Well now...if you were on the wiki at 8AM EST checking recent changes you will know. --Axe Hack 04:37, 4 October 2006 (BST) Nevermind..... --Axe Hack 04:39, 4 October 2006 (BST) Ugh...now that I read what you said clearly....I take the Nevermind part back..... --Axe Hack 04:42, 4 October 2006 (BST)
Alright, I was just double checking, it didn't appear to me that anyone was on at the time, so I figured it could have been vandalism and just not been spotted really, yet. --CaptainM 05:12, 4 October 2006 (BST)

It's Jedaz. CheckUser confirmed it, that's why he's not banned yet. –Xoid STFU! 05:19, 4 October 2006 (BST)

Cuchana

Cuchana (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Obviously alt of Gold Blade, trying to prove a point.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 05:11, 3 October 2006 (BST)

Mods! IP check please! Oh wait...that won't work...GB knows how to use proxies.....(When good friends goes bad...) --Axe Hack 05:17, 3 October 2006 (BST)
Maybe it's better to make the link a little less IP tracking, you know? Gold Blade, you are not bad, you are an idiot. A young idiot. Grow up.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 05:23, 3 October 2006 (BST)
I think the admins their would not have any intrests in revealing the ips of their vandal friends. ANd i can truefully say that I am not gold blade, really. Chimichanga 05:27, 3 October 2006 (BST)
U R FUNNAY YONG M4N!--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 05:31, 3 October 2006 (BST)
YES INDEED! (Bad boy bad boy whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?....) --Axe Hack 05:32, 3 October 2006 (BST)
Halloween? What are you? Some sort of tipster that has spied on those vandals or something? --Axe Hack 05:38, 3 October 2006 (BST)

Banned Conndrakamod T CFT 06:08, 3 October 2006 (BST)



Sonic

http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=The_Big_Bash&oldid=412879

he deleted the Big Bash's Trail of Destruction. --DJSMITHCDF 16:15, 2 October 2006 (BST)

Diff.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 16:17, 2 October 2006 (BST)
Warned. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 16:42, 2 October 2006 (BST)


Vandal1091

Vandal1091 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Here. We both know who you are. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 23:34, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Blocked --Brizth M T 00:29, 2 October 2006 (BST)

Bangadesh

Bangadesh (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Banned for 24h for vandalism of Talk:Lockettside Defense Squad here --Daranz . talk . mod . 22:44, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Azn4life

Azn4life (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Warned for vandalism of the Kleptocracy page here. --Daranz . talk . mod . 22:44, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Crashed

Crashed (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Vandalism on a galactic scale. Brizth got him. I'd say he's either 3page, Gold Blade or Jedaz. Cyberbob  Talk  15:36, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Excuse me, I have not vandalised this wiki yet and I don't plan on doing so. But with people like you smearing my good name I'm half tempted to do so. I don't understand why you continually attack me even though I haven't done anything wrong. It's time for you to grow up Cyberbob. - Jedaz - 05:25/24/01/2019 16:11, 1 October 2006 (BST)
I never said you did it, just that I think it's one of those three people. I'll keep an eye out for any suspicious alt accounts, though, in light of your admitted desire to. Thanks for the warning! Cyberbob  Talk  16:14, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Don't pull this bullshit with me Jedaz, you have done something wrong, just not anything that we can actually punish you for. I'm sure 3 page and Gold Blade loved your advice. –Xoid STFU! 16:17, 1 October 2006 (BST)
He never gave me advice. Jedaz, what have you been telling 3page? Jk lol. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 16:23, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Yesssss, sure we believe you. The mountain of "coincidences" is just that, 'eh? You're so transparent it's not funny. –Xoid STFU! 16:36, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Actually, it is. And I'm not. The reason: Why should I waste my time making vandal alts? Want another? 85.234.144.215. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 16:40, 1 October 2006 (BST)
I haven't really spoke to Gold Blade. 3 page, sure I've said a few things. He did ask me about the template calls and I did answer his question. So yeah, I guess I did do something wrong by answering peoples questions. But hey, you know thats just the kind of person I am, I just like doing wrong all of the time by answering peoples questions. So tell me Xoid, what makes you so damn innocent if answering peoples questions is wrong? - Jedaz - 05:25/24/01/2019 16:30, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Speeking of which, here's a proxy Ip to block: 66.7.193.187 --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 16:32, 1 October 2006 (BST)
If answering that question means giving a known serial vandal an extra-destuctive method of vandalising the wiki, then yes. I'd say there's a few things wrong with it. Cyberbob  Talk  16:34, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Well what does it matter anyway? It's not like it's hard to revert that sort of vandalism and it is very obvious as well. Ok, ok, I'm sorry, I thought that the users of the Urban Dead Wiki would be capable of reverting a little bit of obvious vandalism. I was obviously mistaken. I didn't realize that the whole UD Wiki Community was so fragile. - Jedaz - 05:25/24/01/2019 16:42, 1 October 2006 (BST)
That "easy to revert" vandalism crashed mine, Xoid's and Brizth's browsers, tool. Cyberbob  Talk  16:50, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Wow, what crapy browsers. They can't handle a simple lack of data coming in. It must really suck to be you. - Jedaz - 05:25/24/01/2019 16:59, 1 October 2006 (BST)
It effectively crashed mine as well (it just kept loading and loading), so what browser does it work in?--The General T Sys U! P! F! 17:09, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Well infact it's not crashed, the wiki's just trying to load it. After 30 seconds the parser of the wiki just decides it's enough and sends back a page saying that it couldn't complete the request. - Jedaz - 05:25/24/01/2019 17:12, 1 October 2006 (BST)
…and you've all but handed us a signed confession with your latest tirade. Say what you will, but don't think for a second that anyone would believe you innocent. –Xoid STFU! 17:04, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Well, that proves it's not me. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 17:06, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Last time I checked having technical knowledge about something wasn't a crime, but then again I haven't kept track of all of the new policies on the Urban Dead Wiki since I've been relatively inactive (although I haven't been that inactive). Well I'm sure that if it isn't then you'll come up with something against me. - Jedaz - 05:25/24/01/2019 17:09, 1 October 2006 (BST)
The truth angers people more than insults. Lets see how they handle this. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 17:11, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Well I'm heading off for bed, sleep is usually good as far as things are concerned. I'll be back some time tomorrow to see how this has all played out. Don't stay up too late trying to catch me for something that I didn't do. - Jedaz - 05:25/24/01/2019 17:21, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Night jedaz. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 17:23, 1 October 2006 (BST)
G'night, vandal. –Xoid STFU! 17:25, 1 October 2006 (BST)
The moment you're willing to start telling it, I'm willing to listen. –Xoid STFU! 17:25, 1 October 2006 (BST)
That the wiki is on course for a mojor train wreck. Probably involving Kevan ending up resetting the wiki. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 17:31, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Lawlz. GBTSW. Rheingold 19:30, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Uhhhhhh.....what? --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 21:01, 1 October 2006 (BST)
There is a difference between jokingly telling someone to "I dare you to vandalise tha wiki, I double dare you motherfucker, vandalise it one more time…" and giving them detailed information about how to do it most effectively. Guess which one you did? Or did you forget how you recreated evil text? Oh, of course not. –Xoid STFU! 17:25, 1 October 2006 (BST)

YOU'LL NEVER BAN ME

YOU'LL NEVER BAN ME (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Banned. Cyberbob  Talk  08:45, 1 October 2006 (BST)

IronicJjames 08:56, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Deliciously. Cyberbob  Talk  08:58, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Note - I live in Illinois, USA. These cases happened at two o clock in the morning for me, while I was asleep. I apologise for apparently walking down two sets of stairs, opening two doors, turning on the computer, clicking on the internet button, typing in the adress of proxy sites, using those proxy sites to acess this website, and vandalizing, all in my sleep. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 21:06, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Thanks for admitting it. In fact, that isn't proof of anything. I live in Argentina and I was editing stuff at 0400, but hey, we all go to sleep at ten.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 22:28, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Proxys ruel!

Proxys ruel! (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Banned. Cyberbob  Talk  08:02, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Haha, I have a lot of proxys

Haha, I have a lot of proxys (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Banned. Cyberbob  Talk  07:54, 1 October 2006 (BST)

The Cyberbοb240 impersonator

The Cyberbοb240 impersonator (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) banhammer?--Gage 07:44, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Banhammered by Cyberbob.--Gage 07:45, 1 October 2006 (BST)
One minuted before I got him.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 07:46, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Gold Blade

Gold Blade (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) I have reason to believe that he was behind my impersonator. Cyberbob  Talk  07:10, 1 October 2006 (BST)

The test was not of impersonation, but how good I can be at making people want to strangle me. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 07:12, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Wouldn't have happened if not for the impersonator. Why don't you go show all this to Amazing and your other buddies (eg. 3page) and have a laugh with them? Since you were always going to? Cyberbob  Talk  07:13, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Actually, no. If I had impersonated you, what I would have done is make you look like you had done threats, ban people, etc. I wouldn't do trolling. Not my style. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 07:15, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Sure. And you would never deliberately go against your usual style (since you've never ever used proxies before...) to try and mask your guilt, would you? Cyberbob  Talk  07:18, 1 October 2006 (BST)
For newgrounds? No. I use proxies to make additional Newgrounds profiles to add more flash. That is because I hate the two a day rule. Plus, I could say Wow cyberbob, impersonating yourself really confused everyone, good job! and use that as similar evidence. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 07:21, 1 October 2006 (BST)

So let me get this straight: You want to ban me for apologizing to you. Interesting. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 07:22, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Note - The string of proxy-wielding vandals above are also suspected to be Gold Blade. Cyberbob  Talk  08:53, 1 October 2006 (BST)

AOL RUL3S!!

AOL RUL3S!! (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Vandal alt. Permabanned. Cyberbob  Talk  06:57, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Assassins guild assassin

Assassins guild assassin (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Vandalised the Philosophe Knights' page. Cyberbob  Talk  06:36, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Banned for 24 hours. –Xoid STFU! 11:58, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Cyberbοb240

Cyberbοb240 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Cyberbob smote his impersonator--Gage 06:15, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Certified=Insane

Impersonation of Duce Nauks.--Gage 04:21, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Gage, read through it. Duce made the original, although Certified edited it. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 04:24, 1 October 2006 (BST)
No shit, that is impersonation.--Gage 04:27, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Warned. –Xoid STFU! 05:19, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Just as clarification, seeing as no standards exist for what impersonation is. Didn't this user just remove something from their own talk page? That's impersonations because he didn't erase the whole comment, just part of it? Or is it that he actually replaced text? Man, it sure would be good if some of this stuff was written down somewhere. Oh well. --Kiki Lottaboobs 05:38, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Editing another user's comments= impersonation. Hurr.--Gage 05:39, 1 October 2006 (BST)
So acording to that logic, you have vandalized/impersonated lots and lots of times. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 05:42, 1 October 2006 (BST)
O'RLY? Show us where he did.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 05:43, 1 October 2006 (BST)
heres two: [4] and [5]. Dont say blasgh, he edited another user's edits, and accordidng to what he says, that's impersonation. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 05:48, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Blasgh, he was being helpful and fixing Suggestions's page.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 05:51, 1 October 2006 (BST)
I'm applying the same logic though. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 05:54, 1 October 2006 (BST)
No, you aren't. Certified=Insane removed a line of text from someone's comment and thats vandalism. Gage moved a couple of suggestions to the right spots without editing their contents, that's good faith.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 05:56, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Although Certified Insane did it on his own talk page? That means that it's also illegal to delete drama and trolling from your talk page. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 06:00, 1 October 2006 (BST) Actually, he was deleting drama from his talk page. That means that lots and lots of people have impersonated. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 06:03, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Deleting drama? No, it's perfectly fine. Deleting part of comments, on the other hand, it's impersonation.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 06:06, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Thari's right. You have to either delete all of a comment, or none of it. And if there have been replies to said comment, you have to delete those too. Cyberbob  Talk  06:10, 1 October 2006 (BST)
And you tell me to mind my own buisiness...--Gold BladeVote Abstain! 06:11, 1 October 2006 (BST)
I've got every right to contribute to a VB case, being a mod and all. Cyberbob  Talk  06:16, 1 October 2006 (BST)
That has nothing to do with it. The point is, you are constantly telling me to MYOB, and yet you actively move against me at just about any possible moment.--Gold BladeVote Abstain! 06:17, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Are you fucking insane? I'd step in for anyone. Thari's right, you're wrong. Don't take it personally. Cyberbob  Talk  06:21, 1 October 2006 (BST)
I'd have to back cyberbob on this one. He's stuck up for me more than a couple of times and shot me down when he thought I was wrong. Funny, since he was such a drama queen when he started here. (See, if you guys had made me a mod, I would have been like cyberbob, only without any knowledge of how to properly edit the wiki. My behavior is everyone's fault but my own.) If you are accusing him of bias, you've probably lost all perspective. If your mod bid goes worse than the guy that tried to start a race war, you're probably doing something wrong goldie.Jjames 06:27, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Nah, I just wanted to see if anyone thought me good for the job. I did want to, nut I wasnt going to go emo if I didnt get it. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 06:36, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Because if you actually did he wouldn't be hounding you, would he? You continually butt in and troll with some of the most uninsightful, ill-conceived commentary ever witnessed, small wonder why Cyberbob gives you shit. –Xoid STFU! 12:11, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Gage, Editing another user's comments = Impersonation? What about spelling? --Kiki Lottaboobs 06:33, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Kiki? Drop it. You, like Gold Blade, know damn well why this guy was warned. Here's a hint: this sort of shit from you is why Cyberbob gave you (and continues to give Gold Blade) such a hard time. –Xoid STFU! 12:11, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Hey, Xoid, what can I say? I'm a Witch Supporter, remember? But, you know... it's odd, because both you and Gold Blade are Witch Burners, and that's the last place I'd expect to find vandals... And what "shit" from me? Asking questions? Trying to understand the rulings? --Kiki Lottaboobs 22:18, 4 October 2006 (BST)

Duce Nauks

Duce Nauks (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Removing a group and users comments from the Dakerstown page.--Gage 03:44, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Aren't these the same idiots that blanked Roywood's news page before? Ugh. --Flareblade77 RKZHUDORIS 03:47, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Banned for 24 hours. –Xoid STFU! 05:19, 1 October 2006 (BST)

Assassins_guild_assassin

Defacing PhK's group page.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 02:59, 1 October 2006 (BST)

definitly looks like vandalism to me. Baddass 03:07, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Warned. –Xoid STFU! 05:19, 1 October 2006 (BST)
Personal tools
advertisements