UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/The General vs Terminator 484

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Administration Services — Protection. This page has been protected against editing. See the archive of recent actions or the Protections log.

The General v Terminator 484

Actually, i've changed my mind, you're rejected. An arbitrator who reports me to vandal banning for an honest mistake probably isn't the best person to judge this case.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 14:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Want some more cheese with that whine? Cyberbob  Talk  14:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

No, I just don't think that an arbitrator who's constantly out to try and get me warned/banned, doesn't bother to revert my so called "vandalism" and then insults me, is going to be very unbiased in this case.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 15:38, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

I forgot to revert it. Why wouldn't I revert it, had I remembered to? Cyberbob  Talk  15:45, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Because you don't care, you were just trying to get me warned. And you've continued commenting on it yet, still haven't reverted it!--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 15:46, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Reverting is standard practice when reporting vandalism. To be frank, I was happy when you made that fuckup, but I didn't try and set you up. I treated it as any other case - I just forgot to revert it. Cyberbob  Talk  15:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, and you've forgotten twice while still talking about it? Smells fishy to me.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 15:50, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

No... I was talking to Xoid. I wasn't in a rush. Cyberbob  Talk  15:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

So, you could reply to me but couldn't revert the "vandalism". Anyway, lets stop this. We're spamming the M/A page with irrelevant crap.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 16:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

The General said:

So, you could reply to me but couldn't revert the "vandalism".

Yes, that's right. Like I said. It slipped my mind. Cyberbob  Talk  16:03, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Ruling

• The General is never allowed to visit Terminator 484's page ever again, visiting it will constitute a violation of this arbitration and will result in a warning.
• The General must issue an apology to the UD community for abusing the arbitration page.

So penned. -- Rueful 20:20, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Moved to talk page, as Rueful is just being a timewasting dick.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 20:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

General, seriously. Don't bring people to arbitration because their user page is too wide for your tastes. -Certified=Insane^☭ 23:32, 18 December 2006 (UTC

It's not "too wide for my taste" it's double the fucking width of a normal page! I'd say it almost qualifies as a page outside text area exploit. It is quite obvious that that sort of page is not within the spirit of a wiki.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 23:37, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Not within the spirit of a wiki? wtf? Arbitration is not to place for that. And if indeed it is not within the "spirit of a wiki", then it'd be considered vandalism, and would belong on the vandal report page. But we are talking about his own page, so this belongs nowhere. It's his page, doesn't effect anyone that it's wide. I looked at it, and I couldn't care less about it's width. -Certified=Insane^☭ 01:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Don't wtf what is perfectly clear. There is no way that deliberately stretching a page like that is good faith.Shall I make my page impossible to navigate from an 10gb wide? By your logic I could, but I bet you'd complain.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 01:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Why would I complain? I don't give a shit about your page. And if you really do insit on the matter, I'm sure that header that logs you out if you click on it can't be considered good faith either, now can it? Seriously, shut up. This is just retarded. -Certified=Insane^☭ 01:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Hehe, maybe it was a made example, maybe your the retarded one in not understanding it. Anyway, isn't it a bit rich of you to stick your nose in here and tell me to shut up? By your own logic, you don't have to look at the page, so you shouldn't complain about what's on it.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 01:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm saying I don't give a shit about neither your page nor his, but you can hardly whine about his with what you've got on your page. And bringing this to arbitration is both inappropriate and childish. Grow up, let him have his user page as he wants. -Certified=Insane^☭ 02:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Hehe, we'll see what the arbitrator says. Terminator has given even worse reasoning then me (generally boarding on the "because I can" link of arguament.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 02:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)