User Page Rules

Inspired by (copying) Vista and badgered by SuicidalAngel, my Userpage is now free for community editing. Basically I'm going to let you do all the hard work of making it look nice (or not so nice). Try not to delete any of my original content (see original page here), but feel free to go crazy with the formatting and colour schemes, etc. Bonus points for adding stuff that makes me laugh.

I will make a template to give to anyone who gives a *positive* contribution to my User Page.

Talk Page Rules

Just added a new section at the top, level 2 header (==Title==).

I'll be fair, friendly, and I won't censor you (unless you're a vandal). However I might occasionally fix a typo - sometimes I just need to.

Talk away:

New Stuff Here

Armareum Where R U?

Thought I saw you on the Extinction forum but no? Be fun to have you back, I've hacked a new barricade reporting system and rebuilt the Taccon, adds a new dimension to being an Extinction Commander. Be interested to see what you think.--Zeug 08:26, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Speaking Freely

Thanks... It was late, i had just finished a bottle of wine and I couldn't resist! Hope he thinks its funny too, if not then I am sure Grim will defend my right of free speech ;) --Honestmistake 11:10, 27 September 2007 (BST)

Powered ruins suggestions

You know, the rules says you can only make ONE suggestion per day. Beyond that being vandalism and the suggestion removed. I'll let this one pass, seeing that we don't have the same ammount of suggestions that it used to have when this rule was created. But let this be a warning, do NOT abuse this freedom the administration staff is just giving you. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 17:12, 25 September 2007 (BST)

and then i find the line that say you can revise a removed suggestion once per day. You goota love this wiki rules backholes, 'aight ? You are officially in the clear. Move along people, there is nothing to see here. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 17:15, 25 September 2007 (BST)

Yeah, I checked before I went ahead as I knew about the one-suggestion-per-day rule. You know, you might not like me (it can't just be the 'sysop abuse' comment you came here about last, can it?) - but you don't have to assume I run around in blind naive good faith, fucking up the wiki and needing additional freedom from sysops. 'arm . 17:33, 25 September 2007 (BST)

huh, that ? was that you ? i didnt even remembered that :P I have a really short memory span for trivial stuff, and i totally forgot about that :P I am lucky to have people with better memory than myself to remind me of this kind of stuff, though. And, beyond this thing you just remind me, i have no quarrels with you, good sir knight :P

Anyway... no, my comments were made completly to favor you and your suggestion, since another user could easily pop in and start calling you a vandal for something as trivial as making a suggestion. In my opinion, making or revising an honest suggestion should NEVER be considered vandalism, and this rule should only be used to prevent abuse :P But if you'd rather ask me to mind my own business than try to help you out, hey, good going ass-hat. Now i have two things against you, that might stick in my mind for a little longer. Next time i'll just let you fuck yourself. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 21:26, 25 September 2007 (BST)

Hmmm, maybe it's because English is not your first language, but you *did* initially give me a warning not to abuse sysop leniency. To me, this means you expect that I *would* abuse this leniency - which gives me the impression that you have a low opinion of me. Hence the "you might not like me, but you don't have to think that I'm an idiot" comment. There was possibly a translation error/communication barrier in our last correspondence too, if you are saying that it was trivial stuff. 'arm . 03:12, 26 September 2007 (BST)

Don't mind Karek, his clutter in here would not trouble the reading, since i am not looking foward to carry on with this discussion. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 13:57, 26 September 2007 (BST)

Ooh, burn! Well, I don't care much for grudges - so regardless of whether you are holding any, I'm just going to put any previous problems down to a "translation error/communication barrier" on whoever's side, and let bygones be bygones. 'arm . 14:07, 26 September 2007 (BST)

I played with your user page

I hope you like the changes! ;) ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 06:50, 25 September 2007 (BST)

Yeah, changing link colours is a major pain due to lack of proper CSS. Ugh. Oh, and I totally didn't put in anything you can't see. Nope. fnord ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 12:53, 29 September 2007 (BST)

Data for Search Odds

Ok, some problems. (1) I assume "Search" is unlit and "Search (+)" is for lit buildings? (2) You don't have list of all items possibly found in locations, it might be that you just didn't find them and that you didn't save data. but for search odds it's better to know was it nothing or some item. (so with your comment that you don't record newspapers and books there's no sense to take data for those buildings to the search odds)

i processed so far Factory, Mall (Gun Store), (Hardware Store), PD (all from search (+)), but there are still concerns stated above. --~~~~ [talk ] 18:00, 20 September 2007 (BST)

In Hardware Store did you not filed wirecutters or not found any? Ditto about radios in PD, DNA Ext's and GPS in NT --~~~~ [talk ] 19:39, 24 September 2007 (BST)

In fact it might be used for overall percentages for that exact item, but it cannot be added directly to tables. You might have really not found any radios, especially in unlit buildings. No wirecutters in 102 lit hardware store searches? well... i'll leave it added for now, but might also discard. I've added info for unlit PD (assuming you didn't find radios) and Auto Repair (assuming 2 fuel cans in 7 searches is lucky enough so there barely could be other items found). Looks like that is all "marked red" data that could be added to the moment.

Anyway, more important at this time info would be for ransacked/ruined locations, so i'm looking forward to see another tab sometime --~~~~ [talk ] 20:08, 24 September 2007 (BST)

Attempting to search ruins has some extra consequences... For example, i already died 2 times today --~~~~ [talk ] 20:32, 24 September 2007 (BST)

OK. everything addable before the vertical line added. --~~~~ [talk ] 20:51, 24 September 2007 (BST)

Barfspamlives

Hey, this is Barfspamlives.. I did answer some of the questions on the discussion page of the wiki.. just haven't gotten to yours yet. Currently we don't have a forum... I access from work and those sites are usually blocked.. However, since I checked your ID.. I'm not sure I would tell you if we had a forum or not since it looks like your mostly a zed character out to disrupt what we strive to succeed upon.. retaking malls.. that's just my observation though... and how you pretty much describe your characters.. Let me know. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Barfspamlives (talk • contribs) at 18:17, 13 September 2007.

Zombie Skills

Sorry, I should have put something in the comment or the talk page. The data that I removed was bite attack data for the skill set Vigour Mortis, Death Grip and Rend Flesh. For a bite, the attack would be just the same as for V.M. on it's own, and the table had some random number. I'd just done some research on the Tangling Grasp probabilites (for the Unarmed Attacks page, and found that this wasn't a real attack at all. It looked like it was trying to use Tanglinsg Grasp calculations on a skill set without Tangling Grasp. Sorry again for the mixup. --xensyria^T 15:34, 17 September 2007 (BST)

Yeah - no probs - that table's some good work!

You, a mod ?

With this kind of thought i will be completly against your nomination, and will urge all others to follow. This page has been screened, so dont bother editing/removing it. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 20:15, 8 August 2007 (BST)

User Page

Man that green really hurts my eyes. Oh and it has been brought to my attention that a member of extinction is in BARHAHville killing zombies, aren't you guys a zombie group? Would think you know better than to have breathers in the homeland. Anyway, back to the green, way too bright, mild tones do wonders for looks and don't blind people in the process. ;-)--Karek^maps?! 10:02, 3 August 2007 (BST)

That was the point Karek. He said he was thinking about opening his page to public editing, so I took the first step and made it blindingly annoying. :).-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 10:10, 3 August 2007 (BST)

You get bonus points for making me laugh, btw. It sure makes me look like an idiot, but I like the fact people are seeing and going "aaargh, my eyes!!". At least there is no blinking yet, I can't stand that. I have to physically cover it up with my hand to be able to read the page. 'arm . 10:24, 3 August 2007 (BST)

I'll be sure to change it then. Oh and if you are wondering the guy I was talking about uses the name damnall and is claiming to lead one of your quadrants.--Karek^maps?! 10:35, 3 August 2007 (BST)

BetRAR.--Karek^maps?! 10:41, 3 August 2007 (BST)

:).-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 10:48, 3 August 2007 (BST)

Luckily I know what's written on that page, and so don't have to read it :P. 'arm . 10:56, 3 August 2007 (BST)

Removal

Yeah, I'd like to withdraw my Putrefaction suggestion to work out the percentages and stuff some more. Thanks--Steakfish 02:21, 1 August 2007 (BST)

Thank you again...

I just wanted to thank you and Swiers - who are really the co-authors of the Motion being put to vote now about Non-author REs. Regardless of how the vote turns out, I really respect both of you for your help and critically constructive comments. Thank you so much, and if you need any help on something - feel free to let me know. Cheers! --Ryiis 05:50, 31 July 2007 (BST)

A Question I pose to you

Query:How would I go about putting a link to my talk page next to my user link? Clarification:I just think it would help people to get to my talk page faster.Also I retract that last bit about not wishing to see you. Painful Admission:It was...immature of me.(HK-47 reference in case you didn't get it.) Chill 04:32, 31 July 2007 (BST)

Well...

You're still a workaholic. :).-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 19:33, 27 July 2007 (BST)

Not really jealousy, so much as boredom. I can't help it I'm waiting for a download or two to finish, and that I stalk RC. ;).-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 04:52, 31 July 2007 (BST)

Has anyone ever told you that you are a workaholic? :). I'd be pretty sad if UD was taken away from me again. I lost my internet for about a month during the Christmas season, and I was pretty depressed because of it. Without UD, I have to actually find ways to keep myself occupied at work.*Laughs*-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 05:00, 31 July 2007 (BST)

Ha ha, I was considering nominating it myself, but alas! I'm too lazy to do that. The reason why I get to look at the wiki is because I'm the co-founder of the place. We repair, make and provide technical support for computers, so if I'm on one during work, it isn't much of a big deal. All my friends live near my parents house, and after I left, I swore I'd never go there again. I don't see them all as much any more, but hey, things happen. Any reason is reason enough for me to go to bed, problem is, I just can't fall asleep!*Laughs* Later, workaholic. ;).-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 05:28, 31 July 2007 (BST)

Oh, and do something about your userpage already! It looks too, I don't know, white maybe!?!-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 05:28, 31 July 2007 (BST)

Hope you're prepared to have your page go through a pissload of different looks. :).-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 05:45, 31 July 2007 (BST)

I looked through there, but I didn't see anything. That board is dull. We average about 70 posts a day in our "Count to a million" thread, let alone the entire board. Anyway, I don't think he's ever even played a zombie. If he had, I believe he'd see how stupid that suggestion would be. And then we have that Kvso...something...trying to punish people for playing zombies! Does he not know without zombies, he'd be better off playing the accursed Neopets? Gah! Attack of the fools!-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 07:47, 3 August 2007 (BST)

WORD OF THE DAY!

Arrogant. Definition: Makes you look like an asshat.

Used in a sentence: Niche was acting like an arrogant prick!

Well, as long as they don't become vandals, I guess we can tolerate their foolishness. :).-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 08:58, 3 August 2007 (BST)

unsigned

I wouldn't go around adding signatures for people, armareum, that's what {{unsigned}} is for (hell, I'd rather strike unsigned votes myself... but you bleeding hearts, meh ;)). Basically, don't sign for people, if they can't remember to do it, they shouldn't expect others to... makes 'em lazy -- boxy ^{T Nuts block it! DA} 18:02, 27 July 2007 (BST)

Hmmm, thanks. It must have gotten added into the part I was removing...Oh well, you fixed it. Workaholic. :).-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 18:49, 27 July 2007 (BST)

Hey, while I've got you two together... what's with the reverts to this image? I see armareum set it back to the wolf afterwards, and then suicide set it back again... but why the thought that it should have been the trannies at all? -- boxy ^{T Nuts block it! DA} 09:40, 28 July 2007 (BST)

Twas an accident, good sir. I completely set my elbow down in hot soup, and while it was scalding my flesh, I accidentally clicked revert, along with 5 or six other screw ups. Did I screw it up? It looked the same as before, so I figured I didn't...-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 03:14, 30 July 2007 (BST)

Thank you for the correction

I really appreciate the change on my Motion as I am trying to make it as "professional" as possible. I look forward to any discussion that you may bring to the table. Cheers! --Ryiis 23:19, 24 July 2007 (BST)

thanks

thanks for the help with the suggestion template.--'BP^Tmz 23:13, 24 July 2007 (BST)

Not sure

What you mean by your message. Could you please explain further? --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 04:01, 21 July 2007 (BST)

Sorry...again

I'm teaching my 7 yr. old sis to use a PC/wiki, and I asked her to put the vote in.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 22:08, 30 June 2007 (BST)

No problem! 7yo? - now that's ambitious! Did she pick much up okay? And you can reply on your own talk page, by the way. I watch ever page I edit, and I'd definitely come back to read a reply! armareum 03:19, 2 July 2007 (BST)

Hell yeah, I'm thinking of showing her HTML. That way when my friends ask me to code something for them, I'll shove her at them ^^. I'd reply on my page, but after following the same thing for a few years, you get used to it. Which means I probably wouldn't reply on my page unless asked specifically to reply there.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 05:09, 2 July 2007 (BST)

Bah, so I did! Well, I'm distracted from the 4th of July. I was trying to fix the order, because it started the count over the first time it was fixed. Kudos for the swift catch.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:04, 4 July 2007 (BST)

I hate edit conflicts. They make you have to read more, and reply to what was conflicted with you.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:10, 4 July 2007 (BST)

Hey, not our faults that half the wiki stalks the recent changes page :P.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:14, 4 July 2007 (BST)

I couldn't think of anything witty to say. My brain is dead right now.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 20:29, 19 July 2007 (BST)

4 (days)? Maybe? I don't know. I was trying to sleep just now, but alas, I couldn't.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 01:46, 21 July 2007 (BST)

I went without my pc for around six months once. I still couldn't sleep worth shit.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 02:00, 21 July 2007 (BST)

You saw that on my snazzy sidebar. Which you are perfectly allowed to steal if you want. I'm going back to my doctor again, last time he managed to get it to stop for a week or two, without drugs or anything. He said give it a month or so to see what happens, then come back. I'm in the process of scheduling it now...-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 04:32, 21 July 2007 (BST)

ransacked NT and generators

Your vote seems to be a keep as the changes you ask for are exactly what the author is asking for. Nowhere does it seem to say you can't put down a generator just that you should not get to use NT special functions while the building is ransacked. Think its dead in the water anyway and the author is an arse but still....--Honestmistake 10:02, 8 June 2007 (BST)

Re: Well, not only did you not give the author much time to reply, you are wrong. His words are "Currently you can setup a generator in a ransacked building ... and it should not be allowed as it neither makes logical sense nor abides by the spirit of the ransack skill". His choice of phrase means that he is objecting to being able to setup a generator in a ransacked building. That is also the scope he gives for the suggestion (Generators in Ransacked buildings). armareum 10:16, 8 June 2007 (BST)

OK my bad, but the point is that its the syringe manufacture and rotter revives that he is trying to stop rather than use of generators per say. If those abilities were yaken away then placing the generator is a moot point as i very much doubt anyone ever would! --Honestmistake 13:28, 8 June 2007 (BST)

Your spam vote

Hey you messed up on your spam vote. I fixed it for ya though. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 23:17, 10 June 2007 (BST)

No problem. I often have to re-edit my posts because of a small something I notice just as I press post. Maybe I should preview more often! I try to fix other's too. Go team-wiki, I guess.. :S :)

Thats why there is a preview button :P. Which even though i use it too, I still screw things up every once in a while. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 23:29, 10 June 2007 (BST)

Suburb Redirections

do you think they are really needed ? i think people will disagree a lot with them. Like, RB could stand either for Ruddlebank and Ridleybank, and RW could stand as Roywood and Roftwood. In both these cases you have choosen the less known suburbs to be redirected by their acronyms. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 20:11, 24 June 2007 (BST)

No, they aren't really needed, strictly speaking. But I visit the suburb pages of those suburbs often, and within the UD group I operate we refer to those suburbs by two-letter acronyms. It occurred to me that there might be some conflict later on, but then that's what a disambiguation page is for.
Hopefully I won't get too many objections - it's not as if those pages are being used at the moment by anything else.
Instead of relying on a disambiguation page, how about "RudB" and "RidB" for Ruddlebank and Ridleybank, and "RoyW" and "RofW" for Roywood and Roftwood. Most suburbs will be able to be shortened without problems. But for that will conflict, as slightly longer acronym will suffice. armareum 20:21, 24 June 2007 (BST)

actually, if your group is the only using these redirections, i dont think there will be a problem with them. If anyone else ever thought about using them, then they would have been already created. Like in Militant Order of Barhah vs. The Malton Mob, you were the one that created the redirects first and then you have prior rights to it. Unless more people start using this redirections, then we will have to change it somehow. For now, its ok the way it is. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 20:51, 24 June 2007 (BST)

as you can see, I've changed some of it already. RB is now a disambiguation page, and I've added RudB and RidB as acronym redirections. I'll do the same for the others you pointed out later, and I'll keep on top of other conflicts as we come across them. Thanks for voicing your concern - best to get these things out of the way early on. armareum 21:11, 24 June 2007 (BST)

Suggestion

There's no need for that really. Kevan uses the system to check and modify his own ideas for possible abuses. Having a popular idea with the potential abuses pointed out might almost be as good as a version were they're all solved. You could point out some solutions in a re to me or just make a new suggestion about them. -I'd advice making a new suggestion out of your solutions... that way you'd have two in peer :) -- Vista +1 18:51, 3 July 2007 (BST) ps, thanks for appreciating my criticism. I meant it constructively so I'm very glad it's picked up as such...

Suggestion fixes

Thanks friend, i thought i got it right this time! What exactly was i doing wrong with it all though? Was it on the actual site which said my suggestion's details, or was it current suggestions page?

thanks for your help :)--Acoustic Pie 21:12, 4 July 2007 (BST)

Thank you for adding my sig!

Sometimes I just get so caught up reading stuff, and then writing, I forget the most important part of my vote - the sig. Thanks for adding my sig on the "Death Rattle Tweak" dupe. --Ryiis 23:09, 4 July 2007 (BST)

No problem. I forget my sig sometimes too. I just wanted to get the dupe gone, and I'd seen Vista add people's sig recently, so I added it. And then {{duped}} it goodbye. 'arm . 18:10, 5 July 2007 (BST)

RE: Lie Down

Yeah, I realize it's a developing suggestions page but for the love of God I couldn't figure out how to get it to just say "Suggestions" instead of kill/keep/spam. Something with the template eludes me but I hadn't the patience or intelligence to solve it. Anyway, I started it over and I think the problem is fixed, despite my overwhelming incompetence.-Insomniac By Choice 23:27, 7 July 2007 (BST)

Thanks for figuring that out for me. I'm not a big sugggestor, but hopefully I won't do it again.--Insomniac By Choice 03:08, 14 July 2007 (BST)

RE:Qaurelsbank

Oops my bad sorry about that

OK will do Da Grif 20:07, 10 July 2007 (BST)

Good work

Just wanted to let you know it isn't going unnoticed.-- Vista +1 01:12, 15 July 2007 (BST)

Stop it, you're making me blush! (Which work, btw? The suggestions pages? What can I say - I like rules and admin like that is incredibly easy. I'd like to get around to making all the suggestions pages fit in with the 2.0 you've had since April. Think I might help with that soon.) 'arm . 01:22, 15 July 2007 (BST)

Don't look at me, I'm too busy lording it over at the clothes suggestion page. (and all the other little things I'm compelled to do as well)-- Vista +1 01:32, 15 July 2007 (BST)

Yeah, the clothes page is well organised. You sorted it out pretty quickly. I have no interest in developing that flavour though.
I'll be submitting the Necrotic Bite 2.0 to the Talk:Suggestions page soon, so keep an eye out for it. 'arm . 03:24, 15 July 2007 (BST)

Organized? It's a mess! and proud of it... And I will look out for it, although I think we got most of the problems out of it between ourselves-- Vista +1 12:49, 15 July 2007 (BST)

RE:Voting on Suggestions

Why bother putting them in? They have their separate sections now. It seems like a waste of time putting it in. And the time on each suggestion? I just skim through it and the votes... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{^{^{^{^{#nerftemplatedsigs}}}}} 02:52, 17 July 2007 (BST)

Uh...usually...when I'm voting dupe, I put in dupe, or if there's already a dupe vote, I tell the reader to look at it without putting in dupe... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{^{^{^{^{#nerftemplatedsigs}}}}} 20:23, 27 July 2007 (BST)

For You! It be a Gift!

	The Zergling
	May this scary little bastard serve you well. And I wanted to fill your page with more templates.

-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 03:20, 17 July 2007 (BST)

Alright, I'll remember to do that next time. And if people call you a Zerger, tell 'em whats wrong with mobbing a 'Tosser with 50 Mutas. :P.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 03:28, 17 July 2007 (BST)

There was a typo, but I fixed it and acknowledged it in the edit summary. And if other people don't spam your page with templates, then I will.^^.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 03:38, 17 July 2007 (BST)

Joining Extinction/ Alt Chars

Alright, so I have an alt character that is a zombie, and I'd like to play from the zed side as well as the survivor. He's a level 2 and I was wondering if I could join? I also just want to get this out of the way, I do not spy. I know I'm fighting for Caiger Mall as well, but I want the game to be fair (notice I support the fair tactics, I have the template to prove it hehe). It's Molly Milnktoast, and there is a link to the profile on my wiki. Let me know what I can do... Thanks --Big Bur 03:27, 17 July 2007 (BST)

Alright, it's understandable that you'd be apprehensive, considering the fact that you don't really know anything about me. Basically though, I think playing only as a survivor would essentially leave half of the game unplayed. What I was aiming to do, was join an up and coming zombie group and therefore, I'd have a goal to work for. Whereas working with LUE would just be, well, LUE. I'd join and I'd stumble around, the end. Do you know what I mean? I don't know if I'm explaining my intentions well.--Big Bur 05:57, 17 July 2007 (BST)

Okay, good deal. Sorry about accusing you of being apprehensive, it just sounded like you were because of the tiny speech you gave on being a spy. That's true though, what's the point of playing both sides of a chess game. I can go everywhere besides Caiger, which leaves many a possibility open. I joined the forum. The 20 GMT thing might not work out for me though because I have to work. We'll see.--Big Bur 10:11, 18 July 2007 (BST)

Withdrawn suggestion.

Just go ahead I'd say. He voted kill on his own suggestion, that counts as a withdrawal. He's relatively new so he probably doesn't know how to properly remove one..-- Vista +1 13:02, 19 July 2007 (BST)

are you a moderator

are you a mod? are you allowed to delete other users edits? i thought that was a big no-no on here. it seems its a really good way to scare away players. obviously you are easily offended and a bully. that sucks because i was starting to like this game and now i'm out. i guess maybe you should think about that next time you encounter someone new. i made a couple mistakes and you bullied me. that is so fricken lame. you won't hear from me again. later.--Lectrespectre 17:12, 22 July 2007 (BST)

Actually users are allowed to delete POV news and such, although you could always settle edit disputes in Arbitration, I believe that is exactly what that place was made for. --Karek^maps?! 19:25, 22 July 2007 (BST)

Yup, told him as much on his own talkpage. 'arm . 19:47, 22 July 2007 (BST)

More to the question, would you like to be one?-- Vista +1 16:42, 24 July 2007 (BST)

Two months active is the minimum. you've got around 1500 edits I guess, which is on the lower end but enough. You've been assuming the sort of duties on the suggestions page simular to what a sysop normally does for the wiki as a whole. So it's easier to see how you would do. the duties are all voluntary but there is little need to give you sysop powers if you're not going to use them at all of course.

(striking trolling votes, vandal banning, the deletion of pages, the powers to edit protected pages and to moving them, those sort of things)

So if you're still interested I'll nominate you over a week and we'll see what happens.-- Vista +1 17:10, 25 July 2007 (BST)

No, don't worry I'll do it after the second of august. You'll have to stay patience a bit longer.-- Vista +1 06:07, 27 July 2007 (BST)

I've got the flue. If you don't mind I'll wait a day or two with nominating you. It won't hurt either seeing that Boxy already nominated somebody. Sorry.-- Vista +1 15:44, 3 August 2007 (BST)

Actually, I think you should just nominate yourself when you feel like it. Some people voting on swiers bid seem to think it's close to nepotism if you're nominated by a sysop. I'm still willing to nominate you if you'd like though, just give me a ping when you're ready.-- Vista +1 16:50, 6 August 2007 (BST)

The quality of nominated candidates tend to be more consistent as well. A nominated candidates definitely have to have a track record to draw attention to himself. While a lot of unsuited candidates put their own name up and tried to get promoted out of pure self promotion. I haste to add that a lot of good sysops have stepped forward themselves as well though. Dux Ducis for example. so asking for sysop status for yourself certainly isn't a disqualifier. (I did as well, twice in fact.)-- Vista +1 21:34, 6 August 2007 (BST)

Extinction/Danger Reports

I was reading some of the wiki entries for the NW corner of Malton because I knew Extinction was operating out of there. The reports for places like Roywood and Quarlesbank make it sound like the suburbs were completely devastated, but I don't remember the suburbs turning red to match that. So did I just miss when it happened or is there a reason the suburbs aren't being considered Very Dangerous when you guys are in town?--Insomniac By Choice 21:39, 25 July 2007 (BST)

Thank you thank you thank you--Insomniac By Choice 16:39, 6 August 2007 (BST)

My Suggestion

I have re-thought it and I put in some new requirements.Please look at it again.Chill 22:29, 26 July 2007 (BST)

Put this kinda stuff on my TALK PAGE in future. 'arm . 02:26, 27 July 2007 (BST)

Good Evening

I do believe that you and your friends would be interested in this policy. If we have a way of encouraging the sysops to behave better, then we can show the rest of the wiki how they should behave. --Akule ^{School's in session.} 23:42, 12 September 2007 (BST)

ARMAREUM

Your not being reasonable. Please come back to the irc channel and discuss this. I promise things will be different. ALOT different. --Brainz 23:37, 16 September 2007 (BST)

Its boring spamming without you in IRC... (>"_")>Kirby

A special offer

Hi, Armareum. I' am impress at your work on your User Page and nice temlates you got there too. Would you like to join the Special Zombie Extermination Squad? We are a specialized Survivor Group that we hunt down zombies and player killers, also we treat each other respect and always have are backs covered. Would you like to join the group? Tell me your answer on my talk page. And take a look on the Group page, it is very instresting.

-- Soldier 00:43, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Armareum