User talk:DanceDanceRevolution/archive/2011/H2

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Archives

2007

2008

2009

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

2010

H1

H2

2011

Q1

Q2

H2

MORE

2012

2013

2014-2017


cause that what we call them round here!

dude, just leave it as spambits. whats the big fucking deal? it's our inside joke. the page still functions as designed. i'm just going to keep reverting it till you take me VB and i really doubt that case would go anywhere. xoxoxoox still luv you tho. -- HEY! HANDS OFF MAH BOOBS!   bitch   COBRA!   אמת 21:06, 3 July 2011 (bst)

If you really want to be that gay then fine, I won't stop anyone but the more it's forced the less funny it gets. -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 03:02, 4 July 2011 (BST)
coming from the queen of the gays that means a lot. kiss kiss.-- HEY! HANDS OFF MAH BOOBS!   bitch   COBRA!   אמת 03:48, 4 July 2011 (bst)
Actually I will. This is an admin page and this is your equivalent warning that it's not ok to change it on a whim because of a "joke". --Karekmaps 2.0?! 06:21, 4 July 2011 (BST)
Unsurprisingly ditto.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 09:47, 4 July 2011 (BST)
eat my shorts.-- HEY! HANDS OFF MAH BOOBS!   bitch   COBRA!   אמת 11:43, 4 July 2011 (bst)
Why would I do that, you sick and twisted individual?--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 15:27, 4 July 2011 (BST)

dohohoho

Because we don't really consider it a success? They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 16:32, 9 July 2011 (BST)

Aw man, my poor feelings. I'll go cry in a corner now. No, seriously. -- Cat Pic.png Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:37, 9 July 2011 (BST)
Cool. They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 16:39, 9 July 2011 (BST)

It was me that was supposed to have done it too -.- and no one corrected me -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 16:42, 9 July 2011 (BST)

I forgive you. -- Cat Pic.png Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:43, 9 July 2011 (BST)

Banned Alt Page Scheduled

Hey I was going on a janitorial spree and thought I'd tackle some scheduled deletion of banned alt user pages. For some reason it occurred to me to check the voting behind the scheduled and I noticed something. In the vote it mentions user page mustn't be linked anywhere except on A/VB or A/VB/B. It didn't occur to me while deleting to check what links here for the pages I deleted since it only mentions no contirbutions showing. Anyway it was kind of a dumb mistake not checking the what links here but really just wondering if these pages are still considered valid scheduled deletions. ~Vsig.png 17:30, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Well, some of them still have one or two occasional and meaningless links (obviously, else you wouldn't be here), but I would hardly press for a reversal. Maybe User:Hunk apple because he appears on Witch Hunters page, and it might be worth leaving the page there to demonstrate why he was burned as a witch? Just my two cents, beyond that almost all of the rule-invalidating links that go to those users are janitorial or referral links which we often have had the right to disregard when qualifying a page for a scheduled or speedy. -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 02:30, 13 July 2011 (BST)
Alright, well there's loads more where they came from so if it is pretty much considered consensus that janitorial type links can be disregarded I'll just run with it. I guess if there are any other questionable pages I can just put it up on A/SD and if anyone else has a problem, they can kiss my ass take it to A/M. ~Vsig.png 15:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Warning

Stop hand.png
Please do not vandalize this wiki with that stick up your tight ass. Continuing this behavior may lead to bad constipation.-JohnnyCakes 11:11, 17 July 2011 (BST)
That's not a stick, it's Cornholio's finger. They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 17:05, 17 July 2011 (BST)
wrong again! It's my hand. You're all meatpuppets. --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 13:17, 18 July 2011 (BST)

status

I would like a the status thing. Arg... on my phone... User:Scout

G+

I have added you to my Circle of Shame. Just thought you should know. Cheers. ~Vsig.png 20:01, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Raeg

Vapor, you are becoming inactive. This is simply unacceptable, and I demand that you return to 100million edits a day.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 17:26, 4 August 2011 (BST)

Still check the wiki, lots. lots, RC is still my homepage. But I've had bigger fish to fry lately unfortunately -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 06:10, 5 August 2011 (BST)
Alright, I'll bite. When did Yon start calling DDR Vapor? This is not the first time I've seen Yon do this. I suspect I missed an irc joke or something. ~Vsig.png 06:27, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
its the first time i've seen it, I don't know what it's supposed to mean. -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 06:31, 5 August 2011 (BST)
Perhaps Yon is simply struggling to reshape his image as most humourless sysop. ~Vsig.png 06:42, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Like the thad persecution I think the humourless yon thing is a bit blown out of proportion. especially when most of us have a shit sense of humour to begin with.. -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 06:56, 5 August 2011 (BST)
Obviously you do otherwise you'd have known I was joking :p. Or maybe that means I'm not funny. No, fuck that. I'm a funny mother fucker. ~Vsig.png 07:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Lol. It would be more of a reflection that I have no sense of humour than you I'd think ahah. -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 07:02, 5 August 2011 (BST)
I do agree that the Thad thing got out of hand, though it doesn't help much that he has done very little with the buttons since his promotion.~Vsig.png 07:19, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Read this.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 09:16, 5 August 2011 (BST)
I did, but I'm still just as confused. ~Vsig.png 14:33, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello.

Yes i log on here aswell as another handful of games.

I log in 2-3 times a day and am looking to join a clan/group and wondered if i could join you guys hopefully picking a couple of tips up along the way...?


Thanks for reading, Liam.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Contains nuts (talkcontribs) at an unknown time.

Hey Liam, I assume you mean if you're talking to me that you mean ~EVIL~. If so, I'm afraid my better half and I, who make up Every Villain Is Lemons, have stopped playing temporarily. It's a phase thing for us. But if you're interested in a bunch of groups that may be able to help you out, I recommend any group that features on Recruitment page. Good luck mate, whether or not you go with a group, hopefully you'll understand the game soon and remember, there's always plenty of help or guidance on the wiki. -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 11:19, 25 August 2011 (BST)

thought of you when i saw this for some reason

Zombie hobo.jpg-- HEY! HANDS OFF MAH BOOBS!   bitch   COBRA!   אמת 12:03, 25 August 2011 (bst)

I'm not black... but I did have a spouse or two taken by the hordes. Thanks! -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 13:31, 25 August 2011 (BST)
are you sure you are not black? xD -- HEY! HANDS OFF MAH BOOBS!   bitch   COBRA!   אמת 15:12, 25 August 2011 (bst)


ARE YOU SURE

I was going to do you and Yon at the same time. --"Workshed" 11:18, 26 August 2011 (BST)

Whoa. you might need a fair bit of lube for that. (yeah i'm sure bru) -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 14:44, 26 August 2011 (BST)
no ur not. U stay. U play. --hagnat 15:44, 26 August 2011 (BST)

Hi

Can you help me out a little on the forum aspect of the game please?

I can't get to grips with it properly... thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Contains nuts (talkcontribs) at an unknown time.

Not sure whatcha mean here. UDWiki or Urban Dead don't have official forums (that are in use, I think some were made years ago and were never accessed). The active forums belong to proper groups or organisations. They aren't official. They are located here or by just searching "forum" in the sidebar. You can register there, post, request to join a certain group and engage in discussions related to the game. I don't go on forums so I don't know the ins and outs of them, you'd be much better off posting a topic on one of them if you want help understanding. -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 07:23, 29 August 2011 (BST)

MMI

Yo, email me a list of potential invites for the Manhunt Masters Invitational.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 13:22, 1 September 2011 (BST)

Yo, let's coordinate our invites with the others just to make sure we don't happen to send duplicate recommendations. I offer up Organization XIII's irc channel (server: irc.nexuswar.net, channel: #OrgXIII) for our coordination. Organization XIII is low on members, so that channel's not really in use at the moment. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 20:01, 1 September 2011 (BST)

I'm banned from Nexuswar because of ongoing butthurt from Jorm. I'll support any people you guys invite. Obvs my preference would be a return of any of the Manhunt All-Stars but beyond that I'm not fussy. -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 07:53, 2 September 2011 (BST)
lol-- HEY! HANDS OFF MAH BOOBS!   bitch   COBRA!   אמת 08:48, 2 September 2011 (bst)
No, the point is the people with the most nominations get in, if you all nominate hundreds of people, then there'll be no way to know who to put in. :/ If you want to co-ordinate three people and a back-up then that would be awesome.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 10:54, 2 September 2011 (BST)
If I understand it correctly, each of us have 3 invites. Why go with the least amount of folks when you can max it at 18? Of course, Zipo did say that Sophie and Kempy might not be able to attend... :( --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 18:37, 2 September 2011 (BST)
I'm pretty sure that only 3 total will be invited and that's based on input from the seeds. That's why it's called an invitational. BTW I'll be an event planner on at least one of the qualifying events and likely won't be participating in the hunt (I don't think MH planners should participate in their own events) so y'all should just go ahead and invite me :) ~Vsig.png 18:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Vapor has it correct. There will only be three (maybe four, dependant on another thing that's happening) invites, and they will be the most popular from among the seeds suggestions.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:02, 2 September 2011 (BST)
In that case, all seeds should still coordinate to see which 3-4 folks we would like to invite. It's gonna be quite a difficult decision (seeing that everyone probably have their own invites in mind and whatnot). From my discussion with Tash in irc, I think we might end up with at least 6 or 7 invites. She has 3 SDN-ers in mind. Coincidentally, I happen to have two of those SDN-ers in mind. I'm almost certain Al's invites involves at least 1 or 2 SDN-ers as well. DDR here wants MHAS-ers, which I'm almost certain Ross would probably want to bring in some MHAS-ers as well...Zipo did state in irc that Kempy and Sophie might not be able to join, so I'm not entirely too certain who he'll pick...CAPD-ers, perhaps? All in all, I place my money on at least 6 or 7 folks getting tied for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd popular votes. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:20, 2 September 2011 (BST)
Ey, hang on, I wasn't here the last couple months and only just found out about this the other day. I spoke to YoKo on email yesterday about jumping on, so aye, I'm in if there's still a spot? And I'll certainly try and seduce Soph into playing along too, although I can't guarantee or speak for her atm. So... get me name on that list. Flashy teeth guy, naturally. Y'all getting chomped to buggery this time. ~ Kempy “YaketyYak” | ◆◆◆ | CAPD | 22:11, 2 September 2011 (BST)
Yeah, I accepted Kempy as a late seventh seed (he was originally going to be seeded 4th), and so he'll naturally help decide invites. Sophie too, if she changes her mind. But yeah, I don't care how it happens, but so long as I get a list of three people and a couple of back-ups for mitigating circumstances, I'll be happy. Oh, and so that you know, ZIPO sent me a couple of recommendations a day or two ago, which were: Luke the least, Dante Bosch, Bobby Pegleg. Consider these as well while you all make decisions. :p --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:55, 2 September 2011 (BST)


Question

I don't suppose I could ask you to play nice if I leave you well enough alone can I? -Poodle of DoomT*C 00:43, 24 September 2011 (BST)

What the fuck is this? You call me an antagonist but come back and within 5 contributions you've already taken me to arbitration. How is that leaving me alone 'well enough'? Is the arbitration simply a means to threaten me? -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 07:47, 24 September 2011 (BST)
Well, as you've admitted, I've been back for all of what? Five contibutions, and you've already began with old bullshit again? Had it not been for this, would it still be continuing now? Seriously dude, I don't care what your deal is with me, it's time that this stops. I'd like to put it behind us. That's all I want. Do you wish to take part in arbitration, or not? If you do, then we can use Yonnua. -Poodle of DoomT*C 15:30, 24 September 2011 (BST)
Stop what? It hasn't started. Nothing's started. The only thing that's started is an arbitration case from you claiming hostility. If you want everything to be fucking dandy and full of rainbows and unicorns watch a Disney movie. This is the internet. Now fuck off and learn to take a quick joke, else things will get alot worse. I come here like once or twice a week. I don't come here much anymore and don't give a shit about what goes on. If you wanna give me a reason to go back here, however, I'm more than tempted to come back and pester you. So just fuck off and stop being such a butthurt faggot and claiming victimisation. I said 'IT'S BEGUN' because you made a request and completely fucked up the header because you are shit at formatting and headers. Don't say you're not cause you are, it's a given. Maybe instead of crying you should learn to make things easier for the other users of this wiki by not fucking up and making little annoying mistakes to begin with. THAT'S what I meant. You thinking I meant something else is nothing other than you projecting your own insecurities and guilt, I'd assume. Cause it has nothing to do with me. Now fuck off and watch your disney movie, cry over Mufasa or fucking hate on Gaston or something cause you'll get a much less hostile reaction from them that you'll get from me if you push my buttons. -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 15:57, 24 September 2011 (BST)
As I said before, I want nothing more than to put this behind us. I'm sorry for whatever I've done. I thought you were playing at everything that went down the last time I left. I'm sorry for making you angry. As I said in the arby, I'm simply here on a limited bases. As far as I'm concerned, if it doesn't directly deal with my group, I won't be on here at all. Sorry for irritating you. -Poodle of DoomT*C 16:01, 24 September 2011 (BST)
Alright in that case I'm sorry for worrying you and bringing out the worst in both of us just now. I barely come here either, and when I do I just like to have fun. Let's just be on our way and have fun while we're at it yeah? -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 17:40, 24 September 2011 (BST)
You know what, Apology Accepted. However, in light of having put up the latest arby, I would like to see it through. I'm really trying not to be that guy anymore. Normally, I'm a little bullheaded to begin with, and more so when stressed (regardless of the reason). I hope you understand, I'm not trying to urk you, and I'm just trying not to be prodded anymore. I'm really not up for the politics, and petty bullshit. I do believe that I'm above that, and I'm sure you feel the same in regards to yourself. So, lets do the arbitration, and have ourselves a defusing session. Who knows what we'll gain from it. -Poodle of DoomT*C 04:15, 26 September 2011 (BST)
No fucking way. Arbitration is only going to exacerbate things more. I don't know why you'd wanna try and ease things but try and coerce me into such an obnoxious arbitration case. I don't spend the amount of time here to make an arbitration case worthwhile. Lets just ignore each other, seriously -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 05:19, 26 September 2011 (BST)
As much as it may be to our mutual dismay, I do believe it would be mutually beneficial to clear the air, and be done with it. At that, I wish to be taken seriously, even if only slightly more so, in the future. Filing the request, and promptly pulling it accomplishes nothing, and taints any credibility I have any hopes of reestablishing. But I digress, this will be the overall agreement in the future, going forward. It would be to ignore each other for a period of time, and refrain from hostility as much as possible going forward after that. I'm not sure how you think things will be exacerbated by this. Obviously there was tension in the past. It seems to me, though I've attempted to do nothing to offend you (or anyone else), that there still is tension. In regards to that, I'd really like to put it all behind us as much as possible, and think it would be a way to clear the air? Do you have a suggestion as an alternitive to arbitration? Alas, I'm prodding now, which is what I levied in my original talks with you. -Poodle of DoomT*C 06:27, 26 September 2011 (BST)
If you wanted to be taken seriously you wouldn't pounce on ONE tiny comment, assume the worse and take someone to arbitration over it (especially since you were the first of us to mention our history not I). And taking into account your history with arbitration and other metaphorical self-immolation tactics you've used in the past, IMO it's safe to assume the time for taking you seriously is over for now. At least to those whos opinions actually matter wiki-wise. I don't want to have anything to do with you being taken seriously and I'd probably argue that I never did. You are the master of your own destiny and I don't have any interest whatsoever in intervening with that. It was ONE comment, just build a bridge, get over it, and be happy enough that I'm happy to walk away from my personal issues with you and leave you be rather than try and get under your skin for months on end.
Really I still have no idea why the arbitration case even exists, lest why you think its the best option. It's worth noting that its totally uncalled for since things have only gotten BETTER between us since your ones a year ago that fell through. I have no interest in taking it seriously or co-operating with it in any way -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 07:35, 26 September 2011 (BST)
I do suppose there was that, though it was my attempt at humor. When I left, you did say that I would be back, and would form another group. I did. It' my way of saying you were right, which you were, and still are. The fact of the matter is, the comment on the SD page simply wasn't right. But I digress. It's cheap of me to mention it again, soley based on the fact that an apology has been issued for said statement, and as such, I should disregard it for the sake of sanity. Regardless, of your position, I am looking to move forward. I'd love to have you there, but I suppose it's not necessary. Thanks for speaking with me, and sorry my attempts to difuse the situation failed your expectations, and have angered you. -Poodle of DoomT*C 19:59, 26 September 2011 (BST)
You havent angered me thus far, but pestering me to join the arbitration will. Because I don't have the time nor effort for something we've basically fixed right here and now. -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 02:50, 27 September 2011 (BST)
Honestly, it's not. The hostility has been there throughout the entire conversation. I'd like to apologize again for whatever I've done to anger you so much. However, I am going through with this. I think it would do us some good. Unless there's a compelling reason for me to comment further on the subject, this will be the last you'll hear of it from me. I'd like to invite you to come along again. If not, I'm ready to confirm someone as an arbitrator now, and move on without you. I'd like you to be there, even if the process is drawn out a little longer due to you not being around as much. -Poodle of DoomT*C 04:15, 27 September 2011 (BST)
No, there isn't hostility but there is about to be. You just don't fucking get it do you? Fucking read into it. I am not going to arbitration, you fucking little speck. The notion that you think you're worth an arbitration case sickens me. And if I had any ounce of effort in my body I would take the case on and use it against you to stop harassing me with fucking frivolous and bullshit cases like this one WHICH STARTED OFF 2 WORDS WHICH YOU HAVE ONLY PROVEN WERE CORRECT WITH YOUR FUCKING STUPID REACTIONS. Holy fucking shit. If you refuse to discuss this like a mature person and only try and deal with it via arbitration, I'll continue to do the exact opposite. I'm not going to arbitration. I've given you a fucking chance for us to live and let live, and if that's not enough for you I guess I'll just have to stall the arbitration and harass the pants off you and your group. Congratulations, hope you like the result! -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 04:37, 27 September 2011 (BST)

Genius

Since I was going to rule that he needed to get over it and not try and misuse arbitration. You always were a thinker. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 18:56, 28 September 2011 (BST)

Aww I wanted a reaction but I didn't want that one.... -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 01:58, 29 September 2011 (BST)
I would have emailed you both noods. Of me. They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 02:10, 29 September 2011 (BST)
What's stopping you from doing that anywayyyyyy eh eh? -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 02:11, 29 September 2011 (BST)
If I do it as an arby ruling, it's acceptable. If I do it for funsies then there's lists I get put on. They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 02:38, 29 September 2011 (BST)


Who do you think laughed more?

Me or you? I come back for all of five edits, got under your skin, created a stink your still bitching about a total of 15 or so days later, essientially created a fictious arby, in the hopes that someone would take it more seriously than I ever did, only so I could refuse to take part, and all so that I could piss in your cheerios,... but the joke was on me... I see how that works. -Poodle of DoomT*C 06:10, 16 October 2011 (BST)

You know we all forgot about you again the second you stopped posting, right? They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 12:02, 16 October 2011 (BST)
The true definition of Meh. --Hey Sweden! 12:13, 16 October 2011 (BST)
Yeah the joke was on me. You flip the fuck out when I say 3 words, make an arbitration case which everyone literally pisses on for 4 days, you delete your newly created "awesome returning!" group and fuck back off. yeah jokes on me annoying 12:27, 16 October 2011 (BST)
And the only reason I felt inclined to rub it into your wholly overswollen vagina was because someone mentioned it and I realised how much you got owned annoying 12:28, 16 October 2011 (BST)
Poodle, if you were just joking around, why did you send me an email begging me to be a fair and unbiased arbitrator while at the same time expressing your fears that the community was plotting against you and planning to set up a biased ruling in the arbies case?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 13:07, 16 October 2011 (BST)
bitch got owned? annoying 23:34, 16 October 2011 (BST)
Ahahahahahahahahhahahahahaha
hahahahahahah
ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahah
Now that we have settled it is, in fact, I who laughed most, I'd like to take the time to point out that "I was a puppetmaster all along, only pretending to be retarded!" is the most laughable excuse. This whingy, whining paragraph you posted here is much funnier than the whole case. Thankyou! --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 12:56, 17 October 2011 (BST)

Well hello thar

Dun with being annoying, I see? -- Cat Pic.png Thadeous Oakley Talk 06:57, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

I hope to dance on the fine line between being helpful and annoying. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

can't make headers, cant indent

I have explanation in the discussion, and this is fact, not opinion. If you have someone with better than I understand to let someone else do it or I can't say it at least, but if you have the Red Rum statistic there you are showing proof for a guild, I am only showing proof for a player instead. But the proof is still there --Krazyxman 01:50, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

You're that guy? I don't see any subtantial proof at all. You're willing to tell me that proof of 11 screenshots is worth calling yourself the piñata king? I would highly suggest getting more proof before making this claim because at this stage, like on the talk page, I really think this will end up with your claim being refuted and you being laughed off the case DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
and btw, I also did not make this change for a long time until I have the proof on my profile to back up the claim. --Krazyxman 01:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Again, I have done 35 more than that already, but without screenshots, the rest of the new ones I have screenshots for, so if someone else has more, then I will agree with your judgement, but if no one else has more then making the judgement is wrong from you --Krazyxman 02:02, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Definitely. I just hope with your 11 proven piñatas you just enjoy that 18.4 seconds of fame. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:08, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
it is 14 actually and it is increasing the more i play --Krazyxman 02:09, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
14! Make that 25 seconds. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:10, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
again, if others are so mad about it they want to just get 15 in a row in a few min. just to try to prove me wrong, then fine, I'll accept it, but if people want to play the real honest way, i have always been honest, even with all the ones i did before even though i wasn't keeping track of them at the time, but i have no reason to lie and if you saw my game profile at that time you will see I change it by one only every time i do it.....again, the only reason i start doing screenshots is to show i am not lying when i make my claim, otherwise i would say i did 1000 pinatas, but i never did it so why should i say it. --Krazyxman 02:16, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
even on the discussion page you can see people admitting i did many of the pinatas, so it is not like i am just making it out of thin air, just the exact number is in dispute, but i have always been honest about that--Krazyxman 02:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
No idea what you're proving by going on about this, I don't actually care, as long as you have proof for your 'mammoth' achievement DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 03:07, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Personal tools