User talk:Jedaz/Archive1

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Random Comments

This page is not for voting on wiki policy, it is for voting on page suggestion. This just clogs up space. --Zaruthustra 07:33, 14 Dec 2005 (GMT)

Thanks for the format fix on my suggestion, sorry you didn't like it though. --Jack-Swithun 05:28, 29 Dec 2005 (GMT)


I added proper links on your front page. Hope you don't mind. -- Andrew McM W! 12:15, 9 April 2006 (BST)

Well on principal I'm not happy because you didn't ask me. But heck I don't mind it being changed (well too much), it doesn't realy matter much to me because I don't look after this page much. Thanks for dropping in on by - Jedaz 13:55, 9 April 2006 (BST)

Greetings. Thanks for cycling the suggestions page today. I slept in overlong. Hopefully i will be awake to do the cycling myself tomorrow. I typically leave it for several hours after the deadline to give the suggestions made at the end of the day some exposure on the front page. You did, however, forget to move the page for the 8th of April to the closed suggestions section. Each page remains open for 14 days, 13 in previous days, and one on the main page. Just some advice for the future if you ever have to do it again. --Grim s-Mod 14:32, 22 April 2006 (BST)

Ah yep sorry about forgeting that. But thanks for the advice. Yeah I probaly would have left it for longer except the page was very cluttered. - Jedaz 14:45, 22 April 2006 (BST)

Vandalism

Hey Jedaz. There's a discussion on the Vandalism page about my changing your vote on the Bounty Hunter suggestion in the 10th of April page. Was your vote intended to be a Kill, or a Keep? Check the wording carefully, and please post on the Vandalism page under my section. I'm really sorry if it was a mistake. --Cyberbob240 02:06, 12 April 2006 (BST) I'm really sorry Jedaz. It was just a stupid mistake by me. --Cyberbob240 10:23, 12 April 2006 (BST)

Not so random comments

OMG a table of contents

Yep as you can see I added a table of contents, no one cares and this page hardly gets looked at but hey, I just had to - Jedaz 15:22, 21 April 2006 (BST)

Suggestions

nice work with the peer review suggestions page. it might be really easier to keep track on things there now. but... this FeaturedSuggestion template of yours... great idea! It could have room even in the main page. I just edited it a bit to look like all the other templates already being used for navigation and stuff that we are working on recently in the wiki. If you look at your user page you will find a golden Featured Suggestion box, showing how much i liked your idea. --hagnat mod 04:32, 7 May 2006 (BST)


Do whatever you want, but i really think that the whole thing is unneccessary and would serve only to add more clutter to an already cluttered page. --Grim s-Mod 12:49, 7 May 2006 (BST)

Wiki sort

Could you send me the latest version of your wiki sort program?--The General W! Mod 14:11, 7 May 2006 (BST)

It's good, the only problem is that it doesn't list the number of votes for peer reviewed suggestions.--The General W! Mod 16:28, 7 May 2006 (BST)

One minor thing, when it tallies the votes for the rejected suggestions it starts putting the votes as larger than they actually are, this becomes worse for each consequtive suggestion and it ends up telling me that a suggestion has over 300 Spam votes! It fixes itself when you close the program and open it again, so i'm guessing it's caused by leftover database entries.--The General W! Mod 20:52, 17 May 2006 (BST)

For some reason it doesn't seem to be listing the number of votes for peer reviewed suggestions, but i'm positive it did earlier. Am I going mad or does it really not convert the template for peer reviewed suggestions?--The General W! Mod 20:54, 28 May 2006 (BST)

featured template

perhaps turning featured suggestion in a link to the page itself in the template can't hurt? may get some more usesr interested.--Vista W! 16:08, 15 May 2006 (BST)

Lexicon

Just mentioning to you that your Meteor Storm article isn't complete--it only has one citation to a future round, and it needs two. If it's not done by the end of today you'll get dropped, and there's a guy who's waiting on an empty slot...--'STER-Talk-Mod 00:40, 27 May 2006 (BST)

Yep, there you go, I added a little bit to it. It was kinda hard getting ideas about it when I first did it but now it's good. - Jedaz 05:59, 27 May 2006 (BST)

Families of Malton

As a member of the Outbreak Lexicon team I thought you might be interested in looking at and/or helping with the Families of Malton project. Conndrakamod T W! 01:48, 30 May 2006 (BST)

Congratulations

On your promotion. –Xoid S•T•FU! 12:12, 2 June 2006 (BST)

Thanks. - Jedaz 12:13, 2 June 2006 (BST)

Congratulations on the promotion, and welcome to the Moderation team. Please make sure to go through Moderation/Guidelines, so you know the general guidelines, and make sure to re-read instructions on each of the Moderation pages, so you know the specifics of each. -- Odd Starter talk Mod W! 12:38, 2 June 2006 (BST)

Will do, and thank you. - Jedaz 12:39, 2 June 2006 (BST)

Third to say Welcome to the Mod team... Conndrakamod T W! 14:44, 2 June 2006 (BST)

Welcome to the moderation team.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 14:50, 2 June 2006 (BST)

*blatantly ignoring accepting The General's comment, says* Fourth Fifth. Well done! --A Bothan Spy Mod WTF U! 14:55, 2 June 2006 (BST)

Thanks everyone. - Jedaz 22:47, 2 June 2006 (BST)


A bit late, but here it is. Congratulations. good for you.--Vista 00:46, 4 June 2006 (BST)

Thats ok, and thanks. - Jedaz 07:26, 4 June 2006 (BST)

Moderator question

I would appreciate it if I could get your feedback on this. Thanks. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 09:10, 4 June 2006 (BST)

Private Discussion

Go to http://modofmod.proboards99.com/index.cgi for Mod Discussions Conndrakamod T W! 19:17, 4 June 2006 (BST)

I think we would be better of using the private board on my forum for mod chat, rather than creating a new board using proboards.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 20:10, 4 June 2006 (BST)
Well I'll sign up for both ones any way. Thanks for dropping on by and letting me know - Jedaz 04:03, 5 June 2006 (BST)
Hmm... Pro-boards won't give me my activation code. So I don't know whats happening with that, but I've signed up with almighty forums fine. - Jedaz 05:57, 5 June 2006 (BST)
I just pned you the password for the private disscussion on AF.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 19:48, 8 June 2006 (BST)

Huh?

The 5th of June's suggestions voting has been CLOSED? –Xoid S•T•FU! 04:59, 6 June 2006 (BST)

Whoops, my bad, I accidently selected the wrong text to copy. It's fixed now though, lol. Thanks for pointing it out. - Jedaz 05:03, 6 June 2006 (BST)
Isn't there a template to do that? I'm sure there is… –Xoid S•T•FU! 05:05, 6 June 2006 (BST)
Well yeah, but I copied the wrong template text if you kinda get what I mean. (I've GTG now, so I won't reply back for a bit) - Jedaz 05:08, 6 June 2006 (BST)

Suggestions in progress

These are my suggestions that are in progress, please leave your comments about what you think about it and how it could be improved. - Jedaz 09:40, 8 June 2006 (BST)

Lurching Gait Change

Timestamp:09:40, 8 June 2006 (BST)
Type:Skill alteration, balance change (hopefuly)
Scope:Zombies and newly killed survivors
Description:What I’m purposing is changing the way new Zombies moves and how Lurching Gait acts. When a new Zombie rises (a new Zombie being either from a new player or Survivor dying) for the next 10 times they move it costs 2 AP. This would mean that it would cost a total of twenty AP before the new Zombie could move normally again. This would benefit newer Zombies as they wouldn’t get as frustrated with the high AP cost of being a Zombie. Also it would mean that survivors who wish to play as pure survivors would need to spend more AP to get to their revive point.

This wouldn’t hurt the more dedicated Zombies either as they wouldn’t be revived often enough for this to be more then a minor nuisance. Now, Lurching Gait would need to be changed as well. I purpose that not only does it allow for the lower AP cost but for it to also act as Slam Barricades which is already in peer reviewed. This would be a much needed boost for Zombies as it would assist the newer Zombies while keeping things interesting for the older Zombies.

A possible role playing reason for this is 

“As the heat continues rise the blood in the Zombies 
is taking longer to solidify meaning that they are able 
to move without as much restriction. They have now been 
seen slamming themselves into barricades as the heat 
allows them for more movement.�?

Before any kills because of "Don't link suggestions" that guideline is only referring to suggestions that are still under voting and have not made it into peer reviewed and thus is not a very good reason to kill. I also didn't place the Slam Barricades suggestion into this one to save on space on the suggestions page.

Votes
Votes here

Jedaz, this idea is terrible. I don't know where to start, each subsequent part seems worse than the other. –Xoid S•T•FU! 13:57, 8 June 2006 (BST)

Sorry, but I have to agree with Xoid here. Now that I can actually read it, I realise how bad this is. It's giving me goosebumps just thinking about this being implemented. I'd have to say just let it die, before you suffer the embarrassment of having a suggestion of yours get spaminated again. Sorry, but it's the honest truth. Cyberbob  Talk  14:19, 8 June 2006 (BST)
He he. Anyway it didn't recive spam votes before, and I removed it myself so yeah. Hmmm, yeah I think I'll let this die, I thought it was a good idea when I made it. Ok, well thanks for the input though. I better have a good think again about how to make Zombies more playable... - Jedaz 14:25, 8 June 2006 (BST)
After reading the edit summary, I couldn't resist:
Ralphchocolate.gif SPELING LOL
Yuo fayl Englesh? That's unpossablle!
(Yes there still is an error.) –Xoid S•T•FU! 14:28, 8 June 2006 (BST)
:D --A Bothan Spy Mod WTF U! 14:30, 8 June 2006 (BST)
I seriously can't see it, please point it out for me. O_o - Jedaz 14:32, 8 June 2006 (BST)
Well, then you deserve to "recive" it again:
Ralphchocolate.gif SPELING LOL
Yuo fayl Englesh? That's unpossablle!
 :D --A Bothan Spy Mod WTF U! 14:34, 8 June 2006 (BST)
Oh, lol. Well I wasn't looking there. Hmm... oh well. I geuss that means it's probably a good time for me to get some sleep, lol. - Jedaz 14:37, 8 June 2006 (BST)
O_o Stop giving me ammo Jedaz! It's killing me!
Ralphchocolate.gif SPELING LOL
Yuo fayl Englesh? That's unpossablle!
Cyberbob  Talk  14:39, 8 June 2006 (BST)
lol, hmm... maybe thats a way to get rid of you. By giving you a very poorly constructed misspelt sentence. Hmm... lat meh sea whot I kan thnik of... oh well, that'll do it for me. I'm going to sleep and I'll be clearing this whole suggestion from my talk page tomorrow when I'm thinking strait. (Well I'll archive it but yeah...) - Jedaz 14:47, 8 June 2006 (BST)
I'm going to ignore the deliberately misspelt sentence, but you still managed to include a mistake in there, so...
Ralphchocolate.gif SPELING LOL
Yuo fayl Englesh? That's unpossablle!
Cyberbob  Talk  14:50, 8 June 2006 (BST)
lol, well I'm going to sleep on it and see what I got wrong tomorrow. (And I did get all correct spelling in these sentences so don't even try to use that template on this response, I made sure of it, lol) - Jedaz 14:55, 8 June 2006 (BST)
Since there is still an error, I'll continue to gang up on you.
Ralphchocolate.gif SPELING LOL
Yuo fayl Englesh? That's unpossablle!
(Smaller one this time, it's only a minor error after all.) :-p –Xoid S•T•FU! 15:05, 8 June 2006 (BST)
Is it grammatical in nature? Because I can't spot any purely spelling-related mistakes... Cyberbob  Talk  15:09, 8 June 2006 (BST)
Heh. It's the same one I awarded him the first template for. It's easy to spot, if you just have hope. –Xoid S•T•FU! 15:10, 8 June 2006 (BST)
Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User_talk:Jedaz/Archive1"
Personal tools
advertising
project wonderful