User talk:Nosimplehiway

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

FYI: I like an uncluttered page. Just a thing of mine. Every once in a while, on a whim, I will clear the page out. If you have a comment up, see it go poof and feel slighted, well, let me know and I will repost it I guess, if you really care.--Nosimplehiway 04:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


Musket

Thanks for your support. I posted an improved version on the suggestion page, why don't you have a look? -Danny lee

Concerning your question.

In the Suggestions discussion page, that is. When suggestions are spaminated, they cease to exist. They're removed because they're so bad, they shouldn't last through all the voting. Unfortunately, people tend to Spam for any suggestion they don't like in any way. Kill is disregarded. -Mark 01:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Ahem - they don't cease to exist - spaminated suggestions are moved to Peer Rejected Suggestions, where they sit for eternity and a day. --Funt Solo Scotland flag.JPG 13:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Awesome

"I am pretty new here, but looking around it looks like there are three ways to vote. Keep means Yes. Kill means No. Spam means No, and I stomp my foot!"
:-D I think you hit the nail on the head. --Toejam 17:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

I have to stop you there - Keep means yes. Kill means 'no because...', ie you disagree not with the whole thing, just bits of it. So according to your opinion, it could be a 'keep' in the future with a few tweaks or an overhaul. 'Spam' simply means that you think it is a ridiculous or stupid suggestion, or you disagree with it, or there has been a past suggestion very similar--Ducis DuxSlothTalk 06:27, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
"Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied." - Suggestions Page--Nosimplehiway 13:45, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Hunting

It'd never need to show negative AP because it just shows how much AP they had left after they've just killed/destroyed something. Since attacking is a 1AP action they'd never have a negative amount.

And yeah, Gage and I are having a stupid wiki fight. I don't want to.--Jon Pyre 16:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Yet Another GPS Idea

I was wondering if I could recruit your keep vote for Yet Another GPS Idea, currently in previous days and en route to being Undecided. It needs one more vote. I hope you like it enough to lend your support, thanks! --Jon Pyre 15:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Population Statistics

Yeah, I agree. The way I see if someone wants to be revived usually can before too long, and anyone can be a zombie anytime they can. Any population imbalance is probably reflected by personal preference, not winning or losing. I don't think it's possible to win or lose this game. Maybe zombies should have a few more fun things to do to increase interest in that side, even if it doesn't make them significantly more powerful. --Jon Pyre 20:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Your voting

Concerning your voting on 'flak jacket'-renaming: Wouldn't it be far better to actually start following the voting rules, ignoring those who do not, rather than actively sabotaging the entire effort by voting under diferent rules than everyone else. I like the statement, but anarchy isn't a usefull alternative to some people not following the rules. - BzAli 20:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I was making a point, in a sarcastic and humorous way, after having made it several times before in a serious way. I was actually rather hoping to start a discussion on the nature of Spam votes and why simply ignoring what the voting rules are is counterproductive to the suggestions process. --Nosimplehiway 21:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
I see your point, and totally agrees with your reasoning. Do you think any of the spamabusers got the message? - BzAli 15:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Nope.--Nosimplehiway 06:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Peppardville's UBP

Just to let you know: I've ceased to play Urban Dead, so if you have an issue with the barricade plan, take it up with the Department of Emergency Management. Or, in theory, you could just alter the file and pretend it was always supposed to be that way. Either way, I no longer have a hand in the DEM. PotatoEngineer 13:01, 9 April 2007 (BST)

Personal tools