User talk:RadicalWhig/Altabuse Evidence Locker

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Hey leave me out of this!

Philip Oliver Holes (POH) here. I left a note on Peng's talk page but I'll mention it here too. I don't run any alts and I'm not sure how/why I have been associated with someone in TCC.

It's not like anyone can really offer any proof that they are not running alts...but to be fair the burden of proof should be on the accuser. So in the absence of anything resembling proof, please don't associate me with this TCC character or anyone else. Thanks. --POH (talk) 21:10, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

I already replied on my talk page, but I will say it here too, just for the record. I have removed direct accusations of your alts, but you are still guilty of freely and knowingly assisting alt abusers without complaint or critique. It's willing accomplices like you that enable zergers to enjoy what they do. --RWSig1.png RWSig2.pngFoD PK Praise Rando!18:57, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
What is this, judge appointed ? lol Oh Peng, take a head butt and move on. Or better yet, come join our crew, maybe this time you'll stick around ;) --Murderess (talk) 20:18, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
That desperate for members huh? --RWSig1.png RWSig2.pngFoD PK Praise Rando!03:57, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

I doth protest

I noticed in the caption for the screenshot regarding the 'crat elections that you mentioned how many votes everyone else received, yet you made no mention of my withdrawal from the election, nor the fact that I received...*goes to check*...7 votes (again, despite withdrawing my candidacy within hours). As a result of your grievous omission, the only inference an informed, well educated reader can possibly draw is that I ran the full term of the election but am such a failure at life that I couldn't even muster a single vote, neither of which is actually the case!

I demand that you make note in the caption of the fact that I withdrew my candidacy and further demand your acknowledgement that I would have handily won the election had I not withdrawn*. And, as recompense for your omission and as compensation for inferred libel, I additionally demand $3,267.23 USD**.

Should you take longer than 36 hours to respond, know that I will bring the full weight of WIKI LAW*** to bear on this matter.

I expect your prompt response****, good sir.

*Had the votes for me continued pouring in at the rate they were at the time I withdrew.
**To be paid exclusively in $2 bills and Sacagawea dollars.
***I.e. I'll leave this small wall of text here and will expect Bob and maybe a few other lurkers to one day notice it, shake their heads, and then move along.
**** be suitably dismissive of my claims, derogatory in nature, and swift in its escalation of perceived sleights.
Aichon 00:05, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

I miss wikilaw. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 22:20, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Whoops, didn't see this until it was too late. I thought any response to this page would have been within a few weeks of posting it, so I neglected to notice this talk page even existed. Fortunately, your claims here are absurdist comedy, you are a meanie mean-butt, and how dare you, sir. Pistols, at dawn. Flare guns acceptable. Rules and restrictions may apply, consult your local franchise owner for details. --RWSig1.png RWSig2.pngFoD PK Praise Rando!18:57, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Its interesting how you just let things "go" and they solve themselves. Most of you guys are buying into the troll, shame on you. I've run in game for years and if anything you'd be jealous about the intel I get. Not the trolls I toss out. Peng here is one crazy MF and thinks he can keep up. He lost with me head on and is still trying to offend. Good luck old man, you bypassed your capabilities. WE DON'T CARE ! ;) --Murderess (talk) 19:48, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Whatever. --RWSig1.png RWSig2.pngFoD PK Praise Rando!03:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
This is me noticing, shaking my head, and moving along. Bob Moncrief EBDW! 17:48, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

I doth approve

n/t Aichon 13:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)