User talk:Spiderzed/2011Q2

LIST SZTALK.TXT
2010	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4
2011	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4
2012	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4
2013	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4

THIS!

enjoy! -- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking

bitch 18:15 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Template

If I was a template image, how many kb should I be? --Kirsty cotton 17:42, 4 April 2011 (BST)

There are no real rules on that, and it depends also on the size of the template. However, it should be as little as possible if the template is meant to be used in bulk with others (as with userspace flagboxes). Just upload it, I can always look if I can trim it some more in Gimp for you. -- Spiderzed ▋ 17:48, 4 April 2011 (BST)

Should it go in the main space or my user space? --Kirsty cotton 17:49, 4 April 2011 (BST)

Just upload it. I'll find a place in my userspace to ark it until you can put it to use. -- Spiderzed ▋ 17:52, 4 April 2011 (BST)

Don't worry about that, it's going to be on your userpage. Once I figure out how to make a template. --Kirsty cotton 17:56, 4 April 2011 (BST)

Mah userpage? D: 8kb works perfectly fine:

If you need help making a template, let me know. Given the wideness of 130px, you are probably best off with either a userbox (250px) or a largebox (350px). -- Spiderzed ▋ 18:04, 4 April 2011 (BST)

I think it is something Salwy needs and some jerk locked her page from editing. I would link you but you'll find it anyways. :P --Kirsty cotton 18:06, 4 April 2011 (BST)

Someone locked Salwy's page? Poppycocks! If I ever find out who that was... -- Spiderzed ▋ 18:18, 4 April 2011 (BST)

It would be good faith edit to go ahead and add the template to Katie Burns userpage, right? --Kirsty cotton 18:20, 4 April 2011 (BST)

Better put the template on her talk page and ask her about it. We had recently enough retarded A/VB cases. -- Spiderzed ▋ 18:21, 4 April 2011 (BST)

Something stupid happen on the wiki? NEVAR!!!!! --Kirsty cotton 18:25, 4 April 2011 (BST)

Pwnies in IRC

They are there wondering about Salwy. --Kirsty cotton 00:31, 7 April 2011 (BST)

They are very keen that Salwy brings a saddle if she's coming out to play. Because, you know, eww. User:Domino Harvey 00:32, 7 April 2011 (BST)

Does this relate to Salwy's lack of panties? --Kirsty cotton 00:44, 7 April 2011 (BST)

WTF?

who are these people?.. there needs to be a rule in historical voting. that if you started playing during the three or four mouths of inactively you should not vote on a historical vote if you had nothing to do with it. i mean had these players been around when CK was active it would be a different story.. a few of these votes seem like "hey i don't like this group sign up for the wiki and meatpuppet it with me votes" TBH.

we waz robbed!-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking

bitch 19:50 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Happened with both sides and there were experienced active users during CK's time that said they weren't historical too. --Karek^maps?! 23:11, 10 April 2011 (BST)

for the most part i don't mind that. they are entitled to their opinion. at least they were around and listed reasons why we shouldn't be historical. shadey shit and the policy should be changed.-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking

bitch 00:48 12 April 2011 (UTC)

DHPD Officer 666 and Officer Alcoholic

If I start removing any allegedly NPOV postings by these jokers am I going to cause a big fuss or will people just be glad to see them gone? We don't like having them up there, it gives too much jam to the goons but were being cautious about messing with them too much for fear of causing some big flame war. However, it looks like the goons are going to take issue anyway, in which case we might as well remove them. Sorry to trouble you, I wasn't sure where the correct place to ask would be. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 09:35, 15 April 2011 (BST)

Realised I'd forgotten to drop by and say thanks for your advice on this. I gather DHPD Officer 666-alikes are still playing games with suburb pages, just not any of the one's I've been watching as relevant to the DHPD. If (s)he does return I'll settle for posting some kind of DHPD disclaimer under his/her entry. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 13:37, 26 April 2011 (BST)

Thank you

Thanks for telling me some tips on creating User Boxes! --Suburb 22 Zombies 17:27, 17 April 2011 (BST)

Seems that lately one of your alts (Angelina) has been reviving my character, 3rd time in a row now, what a waste :D. I had a hard time finding you in-game so here it is, thanks! --Obi^{+ Talk!|TZH|MDK} 21:05, 13 May 2011 (BST)

HI!

Stop posting tia.-- ►アー・ヒュージ・ゲイピング・バジャイナ◄ ^{スナックストロング} 11:22, 18 April 2011 (BST)

A question

Given that survivors -once- controlled the a supermajority of malton not two weeks ago, how has it changed so rapidly to the present more zed friendly conditions? Corpulent Meatsack 03:49, 19 April 2011 (BST)

the dead have returned.--

bitch03:51 19 April 2011 (UTC)

^This. A zombie group of ~1.500 members can swing around a lot by sheer brute force. -- Spiderzed █ 04:11, 19 April 2011 (BST)

Wait, how can someone build such an absolute megahorde?! That's like.....wow.....massive. Corpulent Meatsack 02:01, 20 April 2011 (BST)

it's happened a few times already. usually how it works is some large gaming forum or something similar stumbles across UD. tries the game. than convinces his forum friends to join en mass. and wham-o! you have a mega horde. shacknews, Lue, something awful (the dead). etc, etc. they get the numbers because they already have them to begin with unlike naturally occurring hordes such as the RFF, FU, MOB, etc etc. hope that helps.--

bitch 03:34 20 April 2011 (UTC)

lue were the secks -- ϑ^anceϑ^ance ℜ^evolution 03:59, 20 April 2011 (BST)

Hey Bro

Fix your signature, it's too tall. The limit is 14px, you should know this already, c'mon son. Honestly, some people... --モッズはホモです 04:09, 19 April 2011 (BST)

noprotect

Hey. The suggestion was bombarded with crap from a random user, not edited after suggestion (if you know what I mean). I'm probably missing something but I've reverted it all back to its original setting and continued the vote. -- ϑ^anceϑ^ance ℜ^evolution 02:47, 1 May 2011 (BST)

for you!

	A FREE KNISH
	Sexualharrison has given Spiderzed a Knish for killing lots of Nazi's

	A FREE KNISH
	Sexualharrison has given Spiderzed a Knish for ignoring my drunk wiki coding and fixing it with out too much bother. thata boi cunt!

User:MeatPuppet

Could I get a checkuser on this user in relation to this policy vote?--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 17:24, 5 May 2011 (BST)

No. --カシュー, ザゾンビクィーン (ビープビープ)

@ 17:31, 5 May 2011 (BST)

Checkuser doesn't match with any other user, and neither points at a proxy. _Could_ still be someone abusing a second connection since it isn't a home connection, but speculating about that stands on far too flimsy ground to enforce anything. -- Spiderzed █ 17:35, 5 May 2011 (BST)

Promotion notice

As far as I've seen, most promotion bid results go unremarked on Wiki News. Mine certainly did. I agree with you, we should definitely publish the results. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 01:14, 10 May 2011 (BST)

I thought we always put them up... if they are successful, mind. -- ϑ^anceϑ^ance ℜ^evolution 01:20, 10 May 2011 (BST)

They _should_ go on wiki news - we even have a sample post for it. Can't remember if you've been missed, but if you have been, it was rather oversight. If it helps you, you are not alone with being missed - I had to congratulate myself on my own promotion :p -- Spiderzed █ 01:21, 10 May 2011 (BST)

My head is enormous enough as-is.

ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 02:23, 10 May 2011 (BST)

Cycling suggestions

FYI, I believe you're supposed to add recently cycled suggestions toCategory:Recently Closed Suggestions.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 16:46, 10 May 2011 (BST)

Woah. That page hasn't been used since November. I definitively don't remember that one, and neither is it mentioned on Suggestions:Cycling Instructions. Think we'll need to update the instructions. -- Spiderzed █ 16:53, 10 May 2011 (BST)

Well, I must admit to not having read the cycling instructions for a while (circa. 2006 :P) but I'm guessing that the fact the page exists and is linked in the portal is a good indication that we should be using it. I agree that an update to the instructions is definitely waranted.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 18:10, 10 May 2011 (BST)

A/M

Just thought I'd recommend reading the case link MisterGame just posted. You might want to rethink that ruling there considering Cheese actually overturned and ignored a whole A/M case ruling now. Also, while A/PD is a good idea, that only really applies to the action taken initially not the undelete. There was nothing iffy regarding policy clarity and the undelete request. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 22:37, 14 May 2011 (BST)

He undeleted first, and then brought the misconduct case. You cant ignore something before it happens -- boxy 00:01, 15 May 2011 (BST)

Actually you can if you're making a case with a fait accompli like that. The undeletion is the determination that the action was in the wrong. All that aside though my real issue with that whole case is the fact that it wasn't dealt deleted once the case had closed and the conclusion had been that Mis actions weren't in the wrong. This all does show it's time for us to codify it but, the problem with the case is everything that happened in response.--Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 00:55, 15 May 2011 (BST)

It's also kind of stupid that we had to go through all that other drama when you guys had already settled the case that the action was acceptable. All because certain users didn't bring it up until they felt they could use it to manipulate the discussion on the undeletion. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 06:43, 17 May 2011 (BST)

Me hate wiki

What the hell did I do to make this happen? User:Kirsty_cotton/alts Also, will you fix it? Pwease! I like the way the second one looks with the double border, can they all be inside one double border? Tanks! Err...in looking again I guess I do actually want 2 double borders. --Kirsty Cotton 22:49, 24 May 2011 (BST)

Zerg

So what we can conclude from the recent dumb stuff is that the goons are now basically forging fake screens? So much for playing fair then. Didn't think they were that serious to go so low. Are you in trouble with Resentisized now though?-- Thadeous Oakley Talk 11:08, 27 May 2011 (BST)

They'll have to submit it to Resens for their accusations to have any gravitas. I'll gladly submit myself to the rule of the ZL mods when that happens, like every fair-playing player should :) -- Spiderzed █ 12:00, 27 May 2011 (BST)

A Challenge

Hello, Mr. Spergazed. I, Ryu, the greatest warrior, would like to challenge you to a duel. In fighting games. You have a choice of Super Street Fighter 2 Super Turbo, Street Fighter 3: Third Strike, Street Fighter Alpha 2 or 3 or, if you happen to have a 360, Super Street Fighter 4. If you are interested then I will give you the details on how we will play them.--||||||||||||||||||||||||| 15:09, 27 May 2011 (BST)

wikiFU

thoughts on a panel? woot, ZL, Jorm, me, sonny --User:Sexualharrison15:38, 30 May 2011 (bst)

Iscariot might be worth a try if you can get through to him. Else, Misanthropy, Michaelson and Honestmistake would come to mind as wiki-involved non-ops. -- Spiderzed █ 15:50, 30 May 2011 (BST)

But Mis was an op?--Yonnua Koponen^{T G}^P ^^^ 15:54, 30 May 2011 (BST)

was which will provide him with a certain objectivity hence him being at the top of the list.--User:Sexualharrison15:55, 30 May 2011 (bst)

Former op. Up to SH really if that is grounds for exclusion. -- Spiderzed █ 15:56, 30 May 2011 (BST)

nay. i want syops to vote. some of the wittiest and brightest on the wiki. what would UDWiki be with out walls of text answers, and other retarded shit? (add links plz)--User:Sexualharrison15:59, 30 May 2011 (bst)

Link would be great, but I think he has become too inactive to keep tabs on last year's admin chatter. -- Spiderzed █ 16:01, 30 May 2011 (BST)

how about kath? :P--User:Sexualharrison16:04, 30 May 2011 (bst)

Would be hilarious. On a related note, I just read your newest entry as "Best Bum". -- Spiderzed █ 16:06, 30 May 2011 (BST)

can you please keep your mind off of josh clark for one sec please?--User:Sexualharrison16:11, 30 May 2011 (bst)

oi.. can you throw the grimmies up on the main page?--User:Sexualharrison13:26, 25 June 2011 (bst)

Happy? Community projects can be edited by everyone, btw. Only the main page itself is protected, but not all templates transcluded on it. -- Spiderzed █ 16:03, 25 June 2011 (BST)

Cobra

If you do bring the whole thing to arbitration for whatever reason(I noticed you considering it on A/PT) let me know. I'd be glad to take a look at the situation and arbitrate. I tend to prefer the interesting edit dispute stuffs and this sounds like it'd be very very interesting. Not to mention I do know a thing or two about wiki editing guidelines. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 08:24, 20 June 2011 (BST)

While it would be interesting to see you arbitrating a case, I know you and especially your way to arbitrate too little to entrust you with that particular case. Will keep you in mind though in case my original arbitrator proposals get rejected, as for one thing, you sure are well-versed in wikilaw. -- Spiderzed █ 18:59, 20 June 2011 (BST)

I'd link you to my previous cases but I'm not near a computer. There are at least three and as far as my treatment of arbitration, well. There are A/PDs that'd show that better. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 23:04, 20 June 2011 (BST)

i trust Karek.--User:Sexualharrison23:33, 20 June 2011 (bst)

yo

moved your arbies case to a subpage. the link is at a/a -- ϑ^anceϑ^ance ℜ^evolution 05:37, 23 June 2011 (BST)

You are a poo-poo head

For thinking I would be an impartial arbitrator. That is all. --Ash^{| T | яя |} 22:08, 28 June 2011 (BST)

I knew already. Only a poo-poo head would ever accept to become an UDWiki overlard. Everyone else would be too sane. -- Spiderzed █ 22:11, 28 June 2011 (BST)