2 Cool/Bob's Epic Fails

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Revision as of 00:07, 16 September 2010 by J3D (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Back to 2 Cool

And here they shall be. Feel free to add your own if you are a member of 2C or 2CFC, otherwise use the talk!

Nubis' Talk


I'm assuming by your reason for deletion in the logs, File:2cola100.jpeg was somehow pornographic? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 14:37, 3 September 2009 (BST)

My reason was a copyright violation. --– Nubis NWO 15:07, 3 September 2009 (BST)
If it's the one I'm thinking of it came pretty damn close to it. I can easily see how a reasonable person would want it gone. Cyberbob  Talk  14:46, 3 September 2009 (BST)
An Image, copyrighted to a porn-tube sight? One things Nubis just picked any site out of a hat to put on there... I wonder where all the entries in the "hat" came from ;) --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 14:51, 3 September 2009 (BST)
My tastes do not run in the "random object insertion" vein, I can assure you. I googled the elements in the image and located the image in a series of images on a pay site with that very clear copyright information on the front page. I should probably check the other coke themed images because more than likely unless they are taking the images in their bedrooms they are all from sites with copyrights.--– Nubis NWO 15:07, 3 September 2009 (BST)
And so starts the copyright jihad again? Or is this the supposed jed jihad which he keeps complaining about? Either way, use the correct channels this time *sigh* and I won't care. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 15:11, 3 September 2009 (BST)
Copyrighted images are a scheduled deletion.--– Nubis NWO 15:48, 3 September 2009 (BST)
Sorry, I was mistaken. I didn't know this pornotube website contacted you about it. My mistake. May you and your tight bonds with said company stay strong. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 16:01, 3 September 2009 (BST)
Allow me to point out a little flaw in your sarcasm. It says Copyrighted images OR otherwise images taken directly from a copyrighted source (such as a movie's snapshots) that have been requested to be removed by the copyright's holder or its representatives abroad. I CAN HAZ WIKILAWYERINGZ. Stings a little, doesn't it? --– Nubis NWO 21:46, 3 September 2009 (BST)
are you fucking blind? Copyrighted images OR otherwise images taken directly from a copyrighted source (such as a movie's snapshots) THAT have been requested to be removed by the copyright's holder or its representatives abroad. They need to be requested. I don't have a clue how you learned to argue but it definitely wasn't with anyone over 5. Holy God. Again, you're just so easy, every time. I don't know how you became an op. And while you'll probably say the same about me, at leased I can fucking read, and hence follow the rules that I read. Stings a little, doesn't it? No? It doesn't sting? Didn't think so- you don't care enough about anybody on the wiki enough to give a shit about their 'stings'. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 02:27, 4 September 2009 (BST)
He knows it said "that", he lied and used it as a basis of an argument. Sign of a person with no integrity in a position where integrity is needed.--CyberRead240 02:39, 4 September 2009 (BST)
Not too sure why you're making this personal. Cyberbob  Talk  16:09, 3 September 2009 (BST)
I can't help it- every time... He's just so easy. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 16:12, 3 September 2009 (BST)
Nubis hasn't said anything that could even vaguely be said to be inflammatory. You are the one trying to start shit, so no - you are the "easy" one here. Cyberbob  Talk  16:22, 3 September 2009 (BST)
Oh, I thought you meant fighting him over the red tape that we all follow but he can just magically trample through. The above references to porn and such were just jokes. I guess, for consistencies sake, he'll be deleting every single copyright violation on the wiki now? Or can horribly misinterpreting the guidelines only happen when it so suites him? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 16:25, 3 September 2009 (BST)
Hm, yes, "jokes". Which is why you're still pressing forward with the attacks on her character over the legal deletion of a single image which just happened to be on a page owned by two of your IRL friends. I'm sure that has nothing to do with anything though and it's just a coincidence - your objectivity is positively legendary. Cyberbob  Talk  16:31, 3 September 2009 (BST)
Always out to assume petty bias when it suits you, eh? Well I'll admit this: The only thing I consider myself biased towards is my hatred towards Nubis' disregard for following simple procedure, and the fact that you and I do it for the sake of harmony and peace, and sir clicksalot here just can't wait to find something to just fuck about with and then justify it with a half-arsed response that he not only demonstrates he knows practically no understanding of wiki policy or guidelines, but won't back down from it either. I don't give a shit about the image, for all I know or care it could have been Nick and Jed fucking each other. The fact is, we got rid of a porn deletion so things like this could go through the book, so (assuming that this image was porn), Jed should be escalated now, the image should be deleted anyway, and Nubis wouldn't have had to have gone to the effort to find a new incorrect justification to delete an image unilaterally. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 16:38, 3 September 2009 (BST)
Aaand out comes the text wall of doom. Have you ever considered a change of routine? Cyberbob  Talk  16:40, 3 September 2009 (BST)
Ditto. Is this the part where it just got too serious for you, but rather than address anything I've had to say, or even back out, admitting you've journeyed too far into an argument that has nothing to do with you, you'd rather just keep it up with snotty nonserious remarks until I give up? You've won already. Congrats. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 16:44, 3 September 2009 (BST)
Well actually I'd love to go EVEN FURTHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 into the rabbit hole but you see it is nearly 2 in the morning and people at this time tend to get kind of tired. Being tired means you can't always work up the energy to write so many words as you might normally. Cyberbob  Talk  16:53, 3 September 2009 (BST)
Goodnight. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 16:55, 3 September 2009 (BST)
Love the choice of colour in your sig ddr! Reminds me of an enjoyable night with User:Nallan and User:Evieman. Also cyberbob i've seen you get absosmashed in more arguments on this wiki than i'd care to name, but this could just about take the cake. And charlie, just so you know nick uploaded it not me, so next time don't go about promoting my escalation or i might just have to call sysop bias.--xoxo 05:14, 4 September 2009 (BST)

J3D's talk

nicks drunk promotion bid

is there really no way to read it? i wanna read it so bad. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 09:53, 1 July 2009 (BST)

It's a shame it wasn't archived properly. It should've been put under Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies or something. It just got deleted and I think someone got a/vbed. P.S. Just checked and it was me.--Nallan (Talk) 04:55, 2 July 2009 (BST)
Good thing you checked, I thought it was someone else. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:50, 2 July 2009 (BST)
Zing. But it was at Curley's house so I was expecting to see his account appear somewhere.--Nallan (Talk) 06:30, 2 July 2009 (BST)
ooohk. everything was done at Curleys house amirite? ;) DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 06:34, 2 July 2009 (BST)
most things. except blowjobs, obviously.--Nallan (Talk) 06:47, 2 July 2009 (BST)
I was just on #batshit relaying the story of how we went to that tech store in jesmond and used a display iphone to buy brain rot for table. good times. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 06:51, 2 July 2009 (BST)
lol. just wanted to get in on this convo
oh and bj's can happen at curleys house, if i'm not mistaken 2 of the womens live there.--xoxo 22:16, 2 July 2009 (BST)
getting beejays from internets
the height of desperateness? i would say yes --Cyberbob 22:22, 2 July 2009 (BST)
Wut? curleys house is a real place bob....--xoxo 22:25, 2 July 2009 (BST)
nooooo relllyyy??? my question to you is would you know about curleys house without internet --Cyberbob 22:28, 2 July 2009 (BST)
yes. i knew about it since before broadband was invented...--xoxo 22:30, 2 July 2009 (BST)
well i knew about it since before even the whole internet was invented........ --Cyberbob 22:39, 2 July 2009 (BST)
dayem.--xoxo 00:29, 3 July 2009 (BST)
yeh it was like infinity years ago so you probly wouldnt know what that was like --Cyberbob 00:35, 3 July 2009 (BST)
Good recovery.--Nallan (Talk) 01:08, 3 July 2009 (BST)
hello? hello? i cant hear you speak directly into the receiver --Cyberbob 01:17, 3 July 2009 (BST)
No I want the last word!--Nallan (Talk) 01:24, 3 July 2009 (BST)

General's A/RE

Not so much an "epic" fail, but he sure doesn't make much sense and seems to be armed with a single line. Also you know when bob doesn't bother getting the last word he's obvious trying to save face for something else ;)

  • Against - i don't like people who are so inactive being able to make important decisions about issues that have no idea about.--xoxo 01:00, 25 August 2009 (BST)
    what you mean like every "community" vote ever??? why do you hate democracy???????? Cyberbob  Talk  00:41, 27 August 2009 (BST)
    hmmmm not bad. although it's not really a fair comparison until misconduct votes are opened to every user. I'm more than okay with the general being allowed to keep his status as a community member and thus he can continue to meatpuppet away policy votes and suggestions to his hearts content.--xoxo 04:16, 27 August 2009 (BST)
    please provide evidence that the general meatpuppets policy votes and suggestions thanks in advance. Cyberbob  Talk  14:31, 27 August 2009 (BST)
    mildly amusing at best.--xoxo 08:26, 2 September 2009 (BST)
    yeah it's not too amusing to be exposed as a liar is it Cyberbob  Talk  08:42, 2 September 2009 (BST)
    you dont actually want me to rebut you because you know how flawed your argument is, hence i'm not going to bother. Say what you like about that and please, continue exposing me.--xoxo 10:57, 2 September 2009 (BST)

generals 2nd A/RE

  • Against - The General was an excellent wiki contributor and sysop. However, he is not nearly active enough to be considered for the position any more.-- Adward  16:45, 2 May 2010 (BST)
    no sorry he was always a literal 13 year old mouth breather Cyberbob  Talk  17:35, 2 May 2010 (BST)
    Hmm...I seem to recall hearing you say something else not too long ago. "Vouch...I don't think the sysop team could do without him." :P Aichon 20:22, 2 May 2010 (BST)
    bitch got owned -- Adward  22:28, 2 May 2010 (BST)
    if he'd been demoted then there would've been like 2 or 3 sysops left (including crats). BITCH GOT OWNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Cyberbob  Talk  03:50, 3 May 2010 (BST)
    u mad? (ps. that pretty much explains nothing nice excuse) -- 04:24, 3 May 2010 (BST)
    actually it does as bad decisions on misconduct cases and vb ones where a sysop can't rule due to involvement is better than physically not being able to make any decision at all due to low numbers :) Cyberbob  Talk  04:27, 3 May 2010 (BST)
    So you COULD imagine what the sysop team would be like without him then (we had that anyway and he WAS here, there were 9 ops around at the time) :) -- 04:33, 3 May 2010 (BST)
    so then imagine how much worse it would have been with 8! wow that would have been pretty bad Cyberbob  Talk  04:55, 3 May 2010 (BST)
    Stop making things up to look less wrong, it's quite obvious you accidentally made a u-turn, like it's that much of a big deal.--Umbrella-White.pngThadeous OakleyUmbrella-White.png 16:58, 6 May 2010 (BST)

courtesy of DDR <3


Personal tools