|
|
| Line 17: |
Line 17: |
| ==New Nominations== | | ==New Nominations== |
| ===[[Guardians of the YRC]]=== | | ===[[Guardians of the YRC]]=== |
| I am nominating [[Guardians of the YRC]] for historical group status for the following reasons: it was mostly due to their contribution that Yagoton was one of the safest suburbs in Malton at that time. Also, they were the first group to [[Guardians of the YRC#Justice Denied... until you fill out form 117B in triplicate in the presence of a notary public|publicly protest against the RG]]. Lastly, the group founder, [[User:Gasbandit|Gasbanit]] brought Urbandead notoriety in the blogosphere.[[User:Axel27|Axel27]] 13:51, 4 December 2009 (UTC) | | I am nominating [[Guardians of the YRC]] for historical group status for the following reasons: it was mostly due to thei |
| | |
| #'''Against''' - Zergers get no recognition here. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 13:56, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Yes''' - For the reasons mentioned above.[[User:Axel27|Axel27]] 13:58, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Against''' - Never heard of them, but a look over the page shows me I'm glad I haven't. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 14:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:They were active in 2006 and early 2007. [[User:Axel27|Axel27]] 15:00, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Against'''. having read the article linked from the groups talk page I don't know why we should be rewarding them for what they did. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Against''' - Zergers. --[[User:Macampos|Private Mark]] 15:53, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Against''' - Oh, I say. Who were these fellows again? --{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 16:20, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Against''' - After a ''very'' interesting read, it has to be said, I can't find much that makes the group noteworthy other than it is built off Zerging. Which is bad. {{User:Rorybob/Sig}}16:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Against''' – Zergs Not Welcome. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 17:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Strongly Against''' - Who? And WTF? Everyone should read <s> this</s> [[Talk:Guardians_of_the_YRC#The_End|the link here]]. Immature, selfish, clueless, not historical, not even a group.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 17:34, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:Yes, because giving it more links for Google to add to its rating is a good idea... -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 17:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #::I didn't consider google. I just thought it important for anyone voting to know the score.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 17:43, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:::It's linked on their page, the guy's page and talk page and everywhere else he can. He's trying to push the rating up, might want to 'unlink' that bit of your post. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 17:45, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #::::[http://gasbandit.blogspot.com/2007/03/confessions-of-urban-dead-zerger.html This?] --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:05, 4 December 2009 (UTC
| |
| #::::Done.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 18:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:::Fuck Google. Get a life. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|SlateBlue|SlateGrey}}-- 18:42, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Fuck Off''' --{{User:Paddy Dignam/sig}} 17:39, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Nay''' - Even when ignoring the self-admitted zerging, this group hasn't really made an impact or sufficiently contributed to Malton history.--[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:05, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''No''' - GTFO. --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''No''' --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|SlateBlue|SlateGrey}}-- 18:42, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''No''' - I never heard of them other then what i saw on the zerg list ;) --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 18:56, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''No''' - To quote C. Montgomery Burns, "Who the Hell are ''you''?" --[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 19:51, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Nay''' - You shall not pass. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 19:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:[http://www.argonautbookshop.com/images/No%20One%20Shall%20Pass.jpg On ne passe pas!]{{User:Rorybob/Sig}}21:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''No Is''' for Niggers--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 21:33, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''No''' - <insert witty and mildly condescending remark here> --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 21:42, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''No''' - The only thing that I can recall about this group is zerg-related. --{{User:Zombie slay3r/Signature}} 00:09, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''No''' - Zergs. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 00:32, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Yes''' - I can't find any good zerg players in StarCraft anymore--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 00:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:[[Image:Emot-argh.gif]] {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:44, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:SA, we've talked about this before. Despite the fact that they both have a hive mind, the Zerg in StarCraft are not the same as the ones in Urban Dead. You really should know better by now. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 00:52, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #::But, but.... <big><big><big>;_;</big></big></big>--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 00:57, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:<s>'''Against''' - Frankly I'm surprised anybody remembered this, much less considered it worthy of historical status. The GoYRC, in the end, was nothing but smoke, mirrors and zerglings, propped up by multiple network connections and an overzealous wiki presence. As I said in the post so graciously linked above, I never came back to UD, and I still take full (unapologetic) responsibility for my actions. Nice to see the game is still suffering from the same brokeassedness it was when I turned down the dark path, though. Reaffirms, in my mind, I did the right thing, have no regrets, and was also right not to "go straight" and keep playing with a new character. Honestly, you guys can just delete the GoYRC page for all I care, but hey, Axel, thanks for the gesture. If any of you are playing Warhammer Online on Gorfang, look me up. I run a guild there, and I promise I'm not playing multiple accounts ;) --[[User:Gasbandit|Gasbandit]]<sup>([[User_talk:Gasbandit|Talk]] | [[Guardians of the YRC|GoYRC]])</sup></s> Invalid sig <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 05:57 5 December 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| #::You're welcome, bro. You played an important part in UD history and I think everyone should acknowledge that.[[User:Axel27|Axel27]] 08:27, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''No''' too much suck.----[[User:Sexualharrison|Sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] [[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]] 02:56, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''No''' Who the hell are they? --{{User:Kelly_U/sig}} 05:07, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''No''' - Only [[Category_talk:Historical_Groups/SucceededArchive#Disciples_of_Zeko|PK zergs]] get historical. Congrat's Yagoton, one more zerg group <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 05:57 5 December 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| #:Why the apostrophe? [[User:Axel27|Axel27]] 08:27, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #::''Congrat's'' is a contraction of the word ''congratulations'', the apostrophe replaces the missing letters <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 11:22 5 December 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| #:::Congrats doesn't use an apostrophe; it's an exception to the rule. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 11:36, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #::::"Congrats" is slang, so it isn't an exception to the rule; it's an intentional, but common, departure from the rule. Technically, he's correct, since it ''is'' a contraction, but I've never seen it done that way. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 11:46, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:::::It's a sociologically-conceived exception :smug: {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 11:50, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #::::::I've always been a bit of a prescriptivist when it comes to grammar, so long as it's not unwieldy. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 11:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:::::::You do know spelling and grammar are two different things, right?[[User:Axel27|Axel27]] 12:21, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #::::::::Oh, explains why you're a nazi about one but you suck at the other. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|SlateBlue|SlateGrey}}-- 12:22, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #::::::::You do know that contractions fall under the purview of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraction_(grammar) grammar], right? {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 12:27, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #::::::::Don't post. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:28, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:::::::::Congratulations is plural, when shortening you do not add an apostrophe or it would indicate a possessive. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 12:34, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #::::::::::It's only a plural when used as a noun; it is more commonly used as an interjection. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:36, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:::::::::::Can everyone give it a fucking rest? Boxy was obviously wrong, the question is, why is everyone's attention being drawn to something so trivial when the user is just as bad at English as those he preaches against? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|SlateBlue|SlateGrey}}-- 12:39, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #::::::::::::Irony is just a five letter word to you, isn't it? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 12:40, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:::::::::::::'''Irony''' Def: ''Kind of iron like'' --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 12:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:::::::::::::I invite you to explain why you are obeying these rules constitutes a difference with Cheese's rules explains the difference between what you're saying and precedence's example. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|SlateBlue|SlateGrey}}-- 12:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #::::::::::::::Are you aware of how drunk I was when I wrote that? Jesus, I'm surprised I didn't accidentally stick it in an email to whoever the President was back then. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 12:50, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:::::::::::::::So you keep professing; no fucking excuse. I am drunk off my tits right now and even the worst english-speaking noobs, when drunk, don't fail that incredibly hard. You aren't the english language incarnate. Deal with it, you fucking prig. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|SlateBlue|SlateGrey}}-- 13:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:::::::Well, I may, or may not have been wrong, but meh. I like using arn't instead of aren't as well, and people can usually understand what I'm writing regardless. Pity there's no talk page to this talk page really <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:08 5 December 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| #::::::::Just pull a Karek and delete the entire convo! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|SlateBlue|SlateGrey}}-- 13:09, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #::He doesn't need a [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Category_talk:Historical_Groups&diff=1618113&oldid=1618061 raeson]. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|SlateBlue|SlateGrey}}-- 09:01, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Against''' - Who? --{{User:Ryanon/sig}}--15:54, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #:[[Guardians of the YRC|The Guardians of the YRC]]-[[User:Axel27|Axel27]] 17:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Against''' - Who? <!-- this reason is for "i've never heard of you, why are you historical" also you're a zerger --> --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 18:07, 5 December 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' - --[[User:Hibernaculum|Hibernaculum]] 20:25, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Against''' - Zerg --[[User:KyleStyle|KyleStyle]] 20:33, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''No''' - what makes you historical. Weren't even good zergers ... Delusional maybe, then again I got you beat on that one. [[User:Matt Aries|Matt Aries]] 20:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''Yes''' You are part of the games history even if it is just for zerging--[[User:C Whitty|C Whitty]] 20:56, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''No''' - Zergers are not historical.--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 23:37, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| #'''No''' - Only ever heard of their zerging. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 12:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Recent Nominations==
| |
| *[[Category_talk:Historical_Groups/FailedArchive#Assylum|Assylum]] - '''Ineligible''' and therefore '''Failed'''
| |
| *[[Category_talk:Historical_Groups/FailedArchive#The Church Of The Beyonder|The Church Of The Beyonder]] - '''Failed'''
| |
| | |
| =Previous Discussions=
| |
| There are 3 archives for this page.
| |
| ==General Discussion==
| |
| {{ArchiveNoticeSmall|ArchiveName=Archive}}
| |
| ==Voting Succeeded==
| |
| {{ArchiveNoticeSmall|ArchiveName=SucceededArchive}}
| |
| ==Voting Failed==
| |
| {{ArchiveNoticeSmall|ArchiveName=FailedArchive}}
| |
| | |
| =Historical Groups Use Discussion=
| |
