Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Historical Groups"
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(On ne passe pas!) |
|||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
#'''No''' - To quote C. Montgomery Burns, "Who the Hell are ''you''?" --[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 19:51, 4 December 2009 (UTC) | #'''No''' - To quote C. Montgomery Burns, "Who the Hell are ''you''?" --[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 19:51, 4 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
#'''Nay''' - You shall not pass. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 19:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC) | #'''Nay''' - You shall not pass. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 19:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
#:[http://www.argonautbookshop.com/images/No%20One%20Shall%20Pass.jpg On ne passe pas!]{{User:Rorybob/Sig}}21:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Recent Nominations== | ==Recent Nominations== |
Revision as of 21:32, 4 December 2009
Obtaining Historical Status
A policy is in place which outlines the method to attain historical status.
|
Nominations for Historical Status
When nominating a group, please add a note to Template:Wiki News and add {{HistoricalGroupVoting}} to the top of the group's page.
New Nominations
Guardians of the YRC
I am nominating Guardians of the YRC for historical group status for the following raesons: it was mostly due to their contribution that Yagoton was one of the safest suburbs in Malton at that time. Also, they were the first group to publicly protest against the RG. Lastly, the group founder, Gasbanit brought Urbandead notoriety in the blogosphere.Axel27 13:51, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Against - Zergers get no recognition here. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 13:56, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Yes - For the raesons mentioned above.Axel27 13:58, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Against - Never heard of them, but a look over the page shows me I'm glad I haven't. 14:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- They were active in 2006 and early 2007. Axel27 15:00, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Against. having read the article linked from the groups talk page I don't know why we should be rewarding them for what they did. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 15:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Against - Zergers. --Private Mark 15:53, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Against - Oh, I say. Who were these fellows again? -- Adward 16:20, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Against - After a very interesting read, it has to be said, I can't find much that makes the group noteworthy other than it is built off Zerging. Which is bad. --RahrahCome join the #party!16:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Against – Zergs Not Welcome. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 17:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Strongly Against - Who? And WTF? Everyone should read
thisthe link here. Immature, selfish, clueless, not historical, not even a group.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 17:34, 4 December 2009 (UTC)- Yes, because giving it more links for Google to add to its rating is a good idea... -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 17:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't consider google. I just thought it important for anyone voting to know the score.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 17:43, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- It's linked on their page, the guy's page and talk page and everywhere else he can. He's trying to push the rating up, might want to 'unlink' that bit of your post. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 17:45, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Fuck Google. Get a life. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 18:42, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't consider google. I just thought it important for anyone voting to know the score.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 17:43, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, because giving it more links for Google to add to its rating is a good idea... -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 17:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Fuck Off --Paddy DignamIS DEAD 17:39, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Nay - Even when ignoring the self-admitted zerging, this group hasn't really made an impact or sufficiently contributed to Malton history.--Thadeous Oakley 18:05, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- No - GTFO. --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 18:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- No --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 18:42, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- No - I never heard of them other then what i saw on the zerg list ;) -- 18:56, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- No - To quote C. Montgomery Burns, "Who the Hell are you?" --Papa Moloch 19:51, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Nay - You shall not pass. —Aichon— 19:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- On ne passe pas!--RahrahCome join the #party!21:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Recent Nominations
- Assylum - Ineligible and therefore Failed
- The Church Of The Beyonder - Failed
Previous Discussions
There are 3 archives for this page.
General Discussion
Things Best Forgotten | |
This Category talk page has an archive. |
Voting Succeeded
Things Best Forgotten | |
This Category talk page has an archive. |
Voting Failed
Things Best Forgotten | |
This Category talk page has an archive. |