Category talk:Historical Groups

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Obtaining Historical Status

A policy is in place which outlines the method to attain historical status.

  1. Groups must no longer actively contribute to the game.
  2. A nomination should be made on Category talk:Historical Groups.
  3. Voting will last for exactly two weeks following nomination. To be successful, a group must be approved by 2/3 of eligible voters to pass. A minimum of 15 votes must be cast for the vote to be valid. The only allowable votes are Yes and No.
  4. Groups that pass will be added to the category as described below.
  5. Groups must allow a week to pass between nominations.
  6. Groups must allow 4 months in between when the group disbands and when they can be nominated for Historical Status. (Note: Only for Malton-based groups)


Nominations for Historical Status

When nominating a group, please add a note to Template:Wiki News and add {{HistoricalGroupVoting}} to the top of the group's page. Also, please add {{HistoricalVotingRules}} under the group's application for historical status.

New Nominations

Malton College of Medicine

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
  • # comments ~~~~
    or
  • # ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a moderator.

The only valid voting sections are Yes and No. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

MCM has been inactive since November 2018, making them eligible to voted for historical group now. -- Spiderzed 21:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Yes

  1. Yes - MCM had a great concept as a learning institution for new players that hasn't been there before, and never been copied after. A very widely respected group across the entire spectrum of play-styles, from survivors to zombies to PKers. Definitively one of the most remarkable groups in UD history, and definitively worthy of historical status. -- Spiderzed 21:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  2. Yes Bob Moncrief EBDW! 02:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
  3. Yes -- SomethingSomething.gif 14:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
  4. Yes --AORDMOPRI ! T 19:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
  5. Yes ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 05:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
  6. Yes - Even though they revoked my ZhD degree. Bastards. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 16:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
  7. Yes --Grimeynick (talk) 16:15, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
  8. Yes --KingJabbaDaButt (talk) 15:34, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
  9. Yip What killed them off? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 22:46, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
  10. Of course Hate Crime 🎭 (talk) 20:42, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
  11. yES hajen (talk) 20:45, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
  12. OuiI'm all riggered up (talk) 21:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
  13. Yes (Ross, if you want to know, DM me on discord) stelar Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge 21:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
  14. Yes Richardskull16 (talk) 22:49, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
  15. Yes, seeing as the Trotters dunked so hard that MCM died. --ooɹd ǝʌɐɥ sʇɐoƃ sʍoʅʚ ǝɹɔuoɯ uǝɹɐʞWe're going to destroy everything, and you can't stop usYou rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 03:45, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
  16. Yes, obviously PB&J 05:46, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
  17. Yes--Akbar (talk) 20:17, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
  18. Yes - I consider them a far better version of Quartly Study Group and have fond memories of murdering Violet Begonia. Worthy candidates. --LordMoloch (talk) 17:12, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

No

  1. I'm just here for my +1. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 02:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Recent Nominations

There are no recent nominations.

Previous Discussions

There are 3 archives for this page.

General Discussion

Books.jpg Things Best Forgotten
This Category talk page has an archive.

Voting Succeeded

Books.jpg Things Best Forgotten
This Category talk page has an archive.

Voting Failed

Books.jpg Things Best Forgotten
This Category talk page has an archive.