Search results
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
- __NOTOC__{{Shortcut|[[A/SA]]}}{{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs}} ...the exception of the [[UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive|Misconduct archives]], which remain to be done.9 KB (1,101 words) - 05:33, 5 April 2022
- :For the archive of general misconduct discussions, check the below archives. ==Individual Archives Reorganized==2 KB (339 words) - 05:12, 15 April 2011
- ...honestly think, cf, that making a heading of LOLZ and following it with 3 sysop warnings changes the tone of it at ''all''? Someone's hit pathetic lows =p ...e replied to your case against him, at 18:36, 24 October 2008 (BST) Cheese ruled vandalism, then at 02:20, 25 October 2008 (BST), 8 hours after the ruling h15 KB (2,385 words) - 09:20, 8 June 2010
- {{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2008-12-21 Misconduct|M|2008|Ruled Not}} ...e nature of the case (evident in a split decision) and the fact that Nubis ruled based on a "larger case", boxy was premature in issuing a warning.--{{User:3 KB (466 words) - 20:56, 7 September 2015
- This is a discussion over the various administrative archives that pertain to sysops specifically and how we can try to get at least some The various archives suffer from a number of shared problems. Among them are:6 KB (1,111 words) - 11:12, 12 November 2018
- ...em going through the proper channels, then it is appropriate that they are ruled against on A/M, and if they make a habit of hampering other users use of th :well, you are the sysop with access to the misconduct archives... you can remove these trackers... it would be a start already. --[[User:H10 KB (1,729 words) - 20:23, 18 October 2008
- ...ugh I asked him directly to (we live in the same apartment). I would ask a SysOp to kindly either put the site under protection or prevent the user [[User: ===Archives===10 KB (1,573 words) - 13:21, 10 January 2011
- {{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2009-09-11 Misconduct|M|2009|Ruled Not}} .... By the wording of the policy a user could be warned on any pages where a sysop could demonstrate they had received the warning. Perhaps if the community t2 KB (362 words) - 20:54, 7 September 2015
- *In the case that the parties don't agree on an Arbitrator, an uninvolved Sysop may nominate one. *There's a Sysop's review at the end of the ruling, just in case, and to apply any warns/ban10 KB (1,638 words) - 03:09, 7 January 2008
- ...sop Archives Breadcrumbs|DanceDanceRevolution|2011-05-29 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled}} ...([[Special:Log/block|log]]). Similar to this [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Spiderzed/2011-05-04 Misconduct|case]]. It was for a minute before I unbloc5 KB (845 words) - 16:09, 9 September 2015
- {{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|BobHammero|2006-07-23 Misconduct|M|2006|Ruled Not}}2 KB (238 words) - 19:01, 7 September 2015
- ...le's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 15:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC) ...le's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 16:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC)14 KB (2,235 words) - 09:20, 8 June 2010
- {{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Vantar|2007-11-16 Misconduct|M|2007|Ruled Not}} ...y out of the [[UDWiki:Administration/Move_Requests#Automatic_Sysop_Cycling|archives]] so it could be opened up for voting - despite the fact that it had been u3 KB (451 words) - 03:59, 9 September 2015
- ...sop Archives Breadcrumbs|DanceDanceRevolution|2009-11-14 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled Not}} ...escalation (that could lead to a user being banned incorrectly) because a sysop (and I quote DDR's edit summary) feels ''"like an asshole"'' in any way goo6 KB (977 words) - 21:45, 7 September 2015
- ===misonduct archives=== ...'s Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] - [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 16:04, 28 May 2008 (BST)9 KB (1,425 words) - 13:15, 10 January 2011
- {{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2007-12-07 Misconduct|M|2007|Ruled}} ...ning] him without either a chance at defense or input from the rest of the Sysop team.4 KB (678 words) - 20:56, 7 September 2015
- ...sop Archives Breadcrumbs|DanceDanceRevolution|2010-03-12 Misconduct|M|2011|Ruled Not}} ...igger", the sysop DDR voted Vandalism. In the case against Misanthropy the sysop DDR voted not vandalism. This is a clear case of misconduct because instead7 KB (1,227 words) - 21:45, 7 September 2015
- ...o we need to say "successful" next to, e.g., [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Boxy|each of Boxy's promotions]]? {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 18:12, 13 March :::When 'crats ask for a demotion, it's oftentimes, but not always, to sysop. The majority will certainly be to user, however. If you have any suggestio13 KB (2,246 words) - 21:08, 20 September 2013
- {{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2009-11-15 Misconduct|M|2009|Ruled Not}} ...mate, and will most likely follow with an A/VB case of your own if this is ruled Not Misconduct. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 09:23,4 KB (659 words) - 20:51, 7 September 2015
- {{Sysop Archives Breadcrumbs|Boxy|2008-04-07 Misconduct|M|2008|Ruled Not}} '''Not misconduct'''. The ruling was with the power of a sysop. The comment was hardly out of bounds. And reporting a vandal case isn't a4 KB (721 words) - 20:56, 7 September 2015