Suggestion:20090113 Feral Hearing

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search


Suggestion Navigation
Suggestion Portal
Current SuggestionsSuggestions up for VotingClothes Suggestions
Cycling SuggestionsPeer ReviewedUndecidedPeer RejectedHumorous
Suggestion AdviceTopics to Avoid and WhyHelp, Developing and Editing


20090113 Feral Hearing

RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 15:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Suggestion type
Skill, subskill of Feeding Groan cost is 100xp.

Suggestion scope
Zombies.

Suggestion description
Over the last three years zombies have gotten better at recognising those telltale feeding groans. As such. If your zombie is Inside a building and another zombie feeding groans in an adjacent block you receive a message like the following. If a zombie to the East of you feeding groans, then...

You hear a groaning from the East.


Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
# justification ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.


Keep Votes

  1. Keep Je suis l'author. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 15:30, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
  2. keep its a new skill, it only works if the groan comes from one of the adjacent blocks and frankly if zombies have already eaten the neighbors and are now in your front room; brains are already on the menu! --Honestmistake 17:26, 13 January 2009 (UTC) EDIT: just agreeing that this should only work for groans over a certain level, perhaps 3 block radius or more only?--Honestmistake 14:17, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
  3. Keep/Minor change - Sure. Maybe it'd be better if it was faint: You hear a faint groaning from the East.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 17:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
    RE You hear a muffled groaning..... ? Anythings fine. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 18:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
  4. Keep/Change Something similar to the ones above. --William Told and Co. ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ 18:38, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
    I'm also not a fan of the skill. I think it would be better as a simple change to feeding groan. --William Told and Co. ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ 18:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
  5. Keep Just a good suggestion, I like it. --Nevin McAvoy(talk) 19:08, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
  6. Keep - Makes sense to me.--SirArgo Talk 20:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
  7. Keep - although the kill voter's suggestion wouldn't be too bad. Linkthewindow  Talk  21:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
  8. Keep - As Linkthewindow. A Big Dog has a good idea. Liberty 00:14, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
  9. Keep - As Link. 01:07, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
  10. Keep - I like it. --Papa Moloch 01:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
    Keep - But i really really like the kill vote idea, i just don't wanna vote kill on a nice idea.--xoxo 01:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Wan (and by extension partly boxy) has convinced me out of this.--xoxo 01:02, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  11. Keep - I like it. --BlackstarC 02:06, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
  12. Keep - Interesting really, and a good skill to learn. I vote a keep for this. Corinthias 03:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
  13. Keep - What Gnome said. --ZsL 07:03, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
  14. Keep - Needs to be an update rather than a new skill. -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 19:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
  15. Keep - Makes sense, why not? Nemesis645 23:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
  16. Keep - I agree with Iscariot though, should be an update rather than a skill. --dgw 00:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  17. Keep - I like it. --Pestolence(talk) 03:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Kill Votes

  1. Kill/Change I like it, but I think it has potential to unfairly hurt lone survivors hiding in ruins. I think it should only work with LOUD groans, caused by the presence of many survivors, not the quiet ones caused by one or two survivors. --A Big F'ing Dog 19:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
  2. Kill - not being able to hear feeding groans is annoying... but it makes the game interesting by having to chose to trade off the chance to find a new feed by maintaining the ruin. This is akin to all the spammed "portable light source" suggestions for survivors. Survivors want a limited form of genny bonus without the corresponding trade offs... this is zombies wanting to occupy buildings and mitigate the trade offs -- boxy talkteh rulz 08:27 14 January 2009 (BST)
  3. Kill - As above --Diablor1 17:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  4. Kill - As much as the idea appeals to me and would be a spiffy zombie buff, Boxy's logic is right on the money. It's something for nothing. And, it nerfs hiding in plain sight, which is a risky enough tactic as it is. --WanYao 19:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  5. Kill - As Boxy --Michaleson CAPD 00:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  6. Kill - I was going to vote keep, but then I read Boxy's vote and it pretty much hit the nail on the head. -- Cheese 01:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  7. Kill/Change - Shouldn't be heard unless the groan's louder (three or more survivors?). --Midianian|T|DS|C:RCS| 14:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  8. Kill - As boxy --Explodey 11:34, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
  9. Kill - Boxy is right, as usual. A good suggestion, though. --Ocular Druuuuu 02:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Spam/Dupe Votes




Voting Rules
Current Suggestions

Advice to Suggesters

  1. Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so.
  2. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed.
  3. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes.

Advice to Voters

  1. You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated.
  2. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote.
  3. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion.
  4. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam).
  5. It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion.
  6. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found.
  7. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.
Rules for Discussions

Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20090113 Feral Hearing). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes
  • Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit.
  • Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page.
  • Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions.
Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied.
  • Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion.
Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied.
  • Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}}
Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
Invalid Votes
  • Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide.
  • X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others.
  • Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.
Comments
  • Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting.
  • Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.
All Caps

Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES

Keep Votes

  1. Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  3. Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Kill Votes

  1. Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
    • Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
      • Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)
    • Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Spam/Dupe Votes

  1. Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)