Difference between revisions of "Suggestion:20100505 Smashing the place up"

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 45: Line 45:
#:I'm not saying remove the current mechanic. If a building was only ransacked, then you could ransack a beaver as usual. Its only after that 5th ransack, when the whole place is ruined when everything left is destroyed. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 13:19, 7 May 2010 (BST)
#:I'm not saying remove the current mechanic. If a building was only ransacked, then you could ransack a beaver as usual. Its only after that 5th ransack, when the whole place is ruined when everything left is destroyed. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 13:19, 7 May 2010 (BST)
#:: Ah, in which case, forget I spoke. My zambah doesn't do beavers anyway. He's far happier nomnom'ing on a snake. {{User:Kempy/sig}} 13:36, 7 May 2010 (BST)
#:: Ah, in which case, forget I spoke. My zambah doesn't do beavers anyway. He's far happier nomnom'ing on a snake. {{User:Kempy/sig}} 13:36, 7 May 2010 (BST)
#'''Personal Kill''' -
'''Spam/Dupe Votes'''
'''Spam/Dupe Votes'''



Revision as of 13:38, 8 May 2010

Suggestion Navigation
Suggestion Portal
Current SuggestionsSuggestions up for VotingClothes Suggestions
Cycling SuggestionsPeer ReviewedUndecidedPeer RejectedHumorous
Suggestion AdviceTopics to Avoid and WhyHelp, Developing and Editing


20100505 Smashing the place up

RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 16:14, 5 May 2010 (BST)


Suggestion type
Slight Zombie change.


Suggestion scope
Zombies.


Suggestion description
So say I'm ransacking a mall, As I spend ap, I get messages like

You smash through window displays and pull shelves from the wall.


Put simply, I'm tearing the place to shreds, yet all those Decorative items remain intact. I have to expend an AP (and gain an 1XP) to destroy each of them individually.

Simply put. When a building is ruined all decorative items are automatically destroyed, and the zombie who ruined the building gets 1xp for every decorative item destroyed this way. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 16:14, 5 May 2010 (BST)

Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
# justification ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.


Keep Votes

  1. Keep THIS is my justification. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 16:14, 5 May 2010 (BST)
  2. Keep Anything for the zombies. --Devorac 17:04, 5 May 2010 (BST)
  3. Keep Saves a lot of clicking for some minor crap. -- Spiderzed 17:19, 5 May 2010 (BST)
  4. Keep Good.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 17:36, 5 May 2010 (BST)
  5. Keep As I said before, this works. Nothing to be done! 17:53, 5 May 2010 (BST)
  6. Keep In its original form, I'd have needed to give more thought to smashing gennies and the like, but if it's just decorative items, as it is now, I see no issue at all. Aichon 19:59, 5 May 2010 (BST)
  7. Keep Makes perfect sense -- Sage|Carr Cobra 22:04, 5 May 2010 (BST)
  8. Keep - Sure, why not. --ZiPbeep boopMH+LUE 22:09, 5 May 2010 (BST)
  9. snooP ING AS usual, I see - Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 22:24, 5 May 2010 (BST)
  10. Keep - Balance? Logic? Barhah? It's yours, my friend, as long as you have enough rupees... Sorry Ross, I can't give discredit. Come back when you're a little, MMMM, richer. --VVV RPGMBCWS 02:39, 6 May 2010 (BST)
  11. Keep - Pass it through. --Maverick Talk - OBR Praise Knowledge! 404 05:14, 6 May 2010 (BST)
  12. Keep - I guess this makes sense. -- 06:18, 6 May 2010 (BST)
  13. keep - It's so obvious that it shouldn't even need suggesting --Honestmistake 11:50, 6 May 2010 (BST)
  14. Keep - This suggestion doesn't imbalance anything, it removes frustration from the game, and it makes logical sense. Good job!--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 11:45, 7 May 2010 (BST)
  15. Keep BoboTalkClown 14:37, 8 May 2010 (BST)

Kill Votes

  1. Kill - In theory it's a sound idea and makes perfect sense. Why would vases and the like remain intact if you're going all Incredible Hulk on the place? But consider the AP spent in searching and installing those decorative items. If they were all automatically destroyed by simply ransacking the building it would be quite disheartening to the art collectors out there who've spent a lot of time building their mini Louvre. The more experienced Zambah will likely not bother to waste the AP in trashing them, but the babahs may need that extra XP oomph to gain that vital skill, so why take that away from them? Besides, we wouldn't get such lovely's as this
    You smash a stuffed beaver.
    ...and that would be tragic. Finethen.gif ~ Kempy “YaketyYak” | ◆◆◆ | CAPD | 13:12, 7 May 2010 (BST)
    I'm not saying remove the current mechanic. If a building was only ransacked, then you could ransack a beaver as usual. Its only after that 5th ransack, when the whole place is ruined when everything left is destroyed. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 13:19, 7 May 2010 (BST)
    Ah, in which case, forget I spoke. My zambah doesn't do beavers anyway. He's far happier nomnom'ing on a snake. ~ Kempy “YaketyYak” | ◆◆◆ | CAPD | 13:36, 7 May 2010 (BST)

Spam/Dupe Votes




Voting Rules
Current Suggestions

Advice to Suggesters

  1. Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so.
  2. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed.
  3. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes.

Advice to Voters

  1. You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated.
  2. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote.
  3. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion.
  4. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam).
  5. It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion.
  6. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found.
  7. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.
Rules for Discussions

Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20100505 Smashing the place up). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes
  • Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit.
  • Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page.
  • Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions.
Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied.
  • Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion.
Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied.
  • Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}}
Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
Invalid Votes
  • Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide.
  • X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others.
  • Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.
Comments
  • Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting.
  • Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.
All Caps

Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES

Keep Votes

  1. Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  3. Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Kill Votes

  1. Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
    • Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
      • Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)
    • Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Spam/Dupe Votes

  1. Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)