Suggestion:20100814 'Search X Times' Dropdown Box: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:
#'''Weak Keep/Strong Change''' - Just put a simple "x5" button after the search button. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 02:35, 19 August 2010 (BST)
#'''Weak Keep/Strong Change''' - Just put a simple "x5" button after the search button. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 02:35, 19 August 2010 (BST)
#'''Keep''' - Even though it would probably help zergers, counting an IP hit for each search would mostly negate that. I think this would be extremely useful, at least if you don't want to spam the search button till you find something useful. Just a x5 option would make searching incredibly easy compared to the current system. --[[User:IEsa|IEsa]] 16:42, 19 August 2010 (BST)
#'''Keep''' - Even though it would probably help zergers, counting an IP hit for each search would mostly negate that. I think this would be extremely useful, at least if you don't want to spam the search button till you find something useful. Just a x5 option would make searching incredibly easy compared to the current system. --[[User:IEsa|IEsa]] 16:42, 19 August 2010 (BST)
#'''Keep! Moo-Hoo!''' As above. I hate the current system.--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 03:09, 20 August 2010 (BST)


'''Kill Votes'''
'''Kill Votes'''

Revision as of 02:09, 20 August 2010

Suggestion Navigation
Suggestion Portal
Current SuggestionsSuggestions up for VotingClothes Suggestions
Cycling SuggestionsPeer ReviewedUndecidedPeer RejectedHumorous
Suggestion AdviceTopics to Avoid and WhyHelp, Developing and Editing


20100814 'Search X Times' Dropdown Box

Hyper Anthony 05:53, 14 August 2010 (BST)


Suggestion type
Game Mechanic/Efficiency


Suggestion scope
Search Interface/Server Load


Suggestion description
The search feature in-game presently requires a page hit for each search, which seems wasteful. A 'Search the area (1-MAX CURRENT AP) times' box would be much more efficient, allowing a player to search the area a number of times in one go -- with 1 being the default and their maximum current AP being the top limit. After entering the value and searching, a single page load would describe how many of which items the player recovered, and also if they discarded any as useless or were otherwise over-encumbered.

Searching is something of a unique feature because it has minimum real-time value as compared to active combat actions against players or barricades, and is really the only in game function that is commonly used repeatedly. I don't ever recall being in a situation where a couple of minutes gained by not having to reload the page 30 times while searching would have turned the tide for me in an in-game situation.

Encumbrance mechanics would remain the same, and if a player reached 100% encumbrance any items they continually picked up would be discarded (as they presently are in-game). If this were implemented I would expect that it would place some ease on the server and allow players with alts more IP hits every day.


Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
# justification ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.


Keep Votes

  1. Keep - I am the author of this suggestion and find it to be very handy. --Hyper Anthony 05:57, 14 August 2010 (BST)
  2. Keep - I said I'd support this on DS, I like it, it makes sense, it's convenient, and I don't really want to think about it beyond that- If it makes IP hits imba just add 1 for each individual search, etc. I think this suggestion is "unlike UD" and its style of design, but that's mainly the reason I left it in 2009 for other text based zombie games *coughpandemic* which actually have functions like this. -- 06:31, 14 August 2010 (BST)
  3. Keep - As above. --Dawkins DAWKINS IS WATCHIN' [T][P!][W!][] is currently: having his arm torn off by a zombie. 12:27, 14 August 2010 (BST)
  4. Keep/Change - Limited functionality please. Maximum of five at a time.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 19:58, 14 August 2010 (BST)
  5. Keep/Change as Yonnua - having a button with "Search" and another with "Search (x5)" sounds good for me. -- Spiderzed 22:42, 14 August 2010 (BST)
  6. Weak Keep/Strong Change - Just put a simple "x5" button after the search button. --VVV RPGMBCWS 02:35, 19 August 2010 (BST)
  7. Keep - Even though it would probably help zergers, counting an IP hit for each search would mostly negate that. I think this would be extremely useful, at least if you don't want to spam the search button till you find something useful. Just a x5 option would make searching incredibly easy compared to the current system. --IEsa 16:42, 19 August 2010 (BST)
  8. Keep! Moo-Hoo! As above. I hate the current system.-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 03:09, 20 August 2010 (BST)

Kill Votes

  1. Kill - Given how URL rejiggering has, in the past, allowed for all sorts of nonsense, I'm not convinced this couldn't be used to search a massive number of times beyond current AP - show me a non-numerical way to do it up to 50 times and I could get on board. When I fall, I'll weep for happiness 19:06, 14 August 2010 (BST)
  2. Kill - As Mis, plus I'm not keen on the zerging implications of condensing searching to a simple drop-down menu. --Maverick Talk - OBR Praise Knowledge! 404 20:50, 14 August 2010 (BST)
  3. Kill - As Maverick. Let the zergers spend extra time and IP hits. For roughly the same effort it currently takes a zerger to log into 2 accounts and search 50 times, they could now log into 100 accounts and search 50 times on each account. This would be a deadly, deadly weapon in the hands of a zerger with hundreds of accounts and no IP limit, they could stock up on ammo etc cheaply and then go on a crazy rampage with their army.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 14:06, 16 August 2010 (BST)
  4. Kill its not that I don't like it, but I think it will open the door to 100 of suggestions about speed attacks, speed barricading, speed healing and the like. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 14:24, 16 August 2010 (BST)
  5. As other Kill votes. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 05:30, 18 August 2010 (BST)

Spam/Dupe Votes




Voting Rules
Current Suggestions

Advice to Suggesters

  1. Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so.
  2. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed.
  3. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes.

Advice to Voters

  1. You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated.
  2. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote.
  3. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion.
  4. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam).
  5. It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion.
  6. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found.
  7. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.
Rules for Discussions

Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20100814 'Search X Times' Dropdown Box). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes
  • Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit.
  • Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page.
  • Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions.
Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied.
  • Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion.
Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied.
  • Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}}
Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
Invalid Votes
  • Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide.
  • X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others.
  • Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.
Comments
  • Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting.
  • Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.
All Caps

Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES

Keep Votes

  1. Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  3. Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Kill Votes

  1. Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
    • Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
      • Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)
    • Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Spam/Dupe Votes

  1. Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)