Talk:Eastonwood

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Revision as of 05:33, 18 September 2008 by J3D (talk | contribs) (→‎srsly 2 Cool)
Jump to navigationJump to search

this talk page has an archive

Please read the Danger Levels descriptions

Most buildings wide open or zombie-infested; OR hostile zombie mobs of 150+. DO YOU SEE THAT "OR"?!!! --Experiment211 20:45, 16 September 2008 (BST)

NO U! But... seriously... Easton meets the criteria for a Ghost Town. Ghost Town over-rides Very Dangerous: most ghost towns have the majority of buildings wide open, but are still ghost towns because they are abandonded. Anyhoo, Funt Solo provided evidence for his change. Until counter-evidence is provided, I am reverting to the correct danger level. --WanYao 20:53, 16 September 2008 (BST)
See... I reverted the status to V/D earlier, and then asked Funt on his Talk page to back up Ghost Town status. And he did that. See the News. If there are less than 60 zombies in a suburb, and most buildings are open, it's a Ghost Town. Many Ghost Towns may be very, very, dangerous to be a breather in... but they're still ghost towns. Seriously, I did everything to avoid an edit war here... Please don't make one, Experiment211... And if you think Funt is wrong, then provide counter-evidence to support your claim. Thanks. --WanYao 21:04, 16 September 2008 (BST)

srsly 2 Cool

Your group has two memebers and claims to be activ group in two suburbs. So Please don't list yourself as an group because one of your alts runs into Eastonwood to get eaten. Show some presence get some members and than list your group again. And if if you find yourself attacking zombies while your are a zombie yourself more often than not you should think about listing yourself under hostile groups. --Experiment211 12:48, 15 September 2008 (BST)

Repaired and caded an NT building with a ruin cost of over 100ap (repaired since the update in may) - as small as that may be we are by far the most active currently pro-survivor group in the suburb. I'll send ya an iwit some time if you'd like. --xoxo 12:56, 15 September 2008 (BST)
You're not a confirmed group: you're two people... Meanwhile, as a counter example, XIII is a actually a confirmed group (even if barely), and like you were are mobile. Yet we don't list ourselves in the suburb groups. Sorry, but, yeah... 211 is right. --WanYao 19:41, 15 September 2008 (BST)
Shrug, whatever. We are the most active group in the suburb, nowhere does it state that a group must be "confirmed" (i assume you mean on the stats page) to be on a suburbs group listing, i didn't add us back onto the list AND this has nothing to do with you so myob plz.--xoxo 08:40, 16 September 2008 (BST)
I think you mean "myofb". "Confirmed"? You can take your "confirmed" status and shove it up your rectum. Here's the facts: 1. We're a group (i.e. a number of people that work together), 2. we've been in Eastonwood and Brookesy consistently for about two months, running repairs and barricading, and 3. you're both douchebags.--Nallan (Talk) 08:51, 16 September 2008 (BST)
The wiki is every concerned citizen... erm... user's business. And, I'd remove a mobile "army-of-two" with no significant presence from ANY suburb... So don't think you're being picked on -- outside of the attention your own antics bring upon you, yourselves. --WanYao 21:07, 16 September 2008 (BST)
Oh... and someday you's kids will grow up... But I am sure as hell not waiting around for that day, or coddling your antics in the meantime. So take your teenage-rebellion-without-a-clue attitude and stuff THAT up your ass. Twit. --WanYao 21:10, 16 September 2008 (BST)
Besides your ageist "grow up" comments, all you've asserted is that in your opinion, we have no significant presence in Eastonwood. Well in my opinion, the Zombiefied Republic of !zanbah have no "significant presence", because through my limited perspective I've not seen any of them around - which means they mustn't exist. Oh well I guess I'd better remove their group... You see the problem here? 2 Cool is a two man group - it will never recruit more members - get over it. We're also actively repairing Eastonwood and Brookesy (Jed you might wanna upload the full screeny of your 105ap ruin repair now), so, having met the two criteria necessary to be listed in active groups, 2 Cool will remain on the list.--Nallan (Talk) 07:02, 17 September 2008 (BST)
Suburb pages are no recruiting pages. Please use Category:Recruitment if you're looking for new members. It's also very unpolite to put your "group" as you call it on top of older, confirmed and far larger groups instead of below. --Experiment211 19:04, 17 September 2008 (BST)
You are judged by your actions, and I'd say the same thing if you were 97, I'd just say you were old. Anyhooo... cut the fucking drama already. Your army of two is not a legitimate presence in the burb. And if you wanna find ZR! members -- scan. However, groups should go in alphabetical order... period. --WanYao 19:17, 17 September 2008 (BST)
Can all of you just leave this already? I didn't think we had an issue however you both said a few wrong things i might as well address. One - survivor groups go on top, i don't know why, i was just following the convention on every other suburb page. Two - We aren't looking for new members, read what Nallan wrote again. Three - EF are disbanding in 13 days so they'll be removed off the page too leaving us as the most powerful group in the suburb, if the most powerful and relevant group in a suburb doesn't deserve listing i'm not entirely sure anymore who does. Four - Wan, We begin with a number, while sorted alphabetically numbers can go last they can also go first, also groups are sorted by category so 2 Cool would be under pro-survivor and thus the only group in the suburb thus alphabetical order (or any order for that matter) is irrelevant. Five - Wan, you bought into something that had absolutely nothing to do with you behind your role as a "concerned citizen", come over and give your two cents by all means but don't start telling other people to cut the drama, you don't like the drama, you leave, no biggy as it's nothing to do with you anyway.--xoxo 04:50, 18 September 2008 (BST)
it's totally my business. deal with that fact. other than iterating that, yes, i was calling you out on being attention whores, i do in fact have nothing further to add. CHEERS! --WanYao 06:23, 18 September 2008 (BST)
it's your business if you want it to be your business, but then you have to put up with the drama. Your choice... :P In other news 2 Cool are all about the attention whoring, no need to call it out - we've got a whole page that broadcasts it loud and clear, catchya 'round Eastonbrooke.--xoxo 06:33, 18 September 2008 (BST)

Truly contested?

I'm changing the text under 'Overview' because it's silly to say that Eastonwood is 'one of the few truly contested areas of Malton'. In Wikipedia terms, it isn't only NPOV, but it's full of weasel words. I don't know !zanbah well, but I'm pretty sure there are other contested places in Malton. Karaburma 23:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)