Difference between revisions of "Talk:RRF/Malton Herald & Sun"

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:


{{TOCright}}
{{TOCright}}
==Note==
'''Note:''' I am only semi-around until probably April/May so it might be a while until someone gets back to you. -[[MHS|<span style="color: Black">'''MHS'''</span>]][[User_Talk:MHSstaff|<span style="color: DarkBlue">'''staff'''</span>]] 17:19, 3 February 2011 (UTC)


==Back-up Talk / Talk Archive==
==Back-up Talk / Talk Archive==
Original talk page (now archive) is at [[RRF/Malton Herald & Sun/BackupTalk]] and will be moved back here after this is done. -[[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 20:56, 22 September 2010 (BST)
Original talk page (now archive) is at [[RRF/Malton Herald & Sun/BackupTalk]]. -[[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 20:56, 22 September 2010 (BST)


My work in process "real" talk archive is at [[RRF/Malton Herald & Sun/TalkArchive]]. -[[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 17:33, 28 October 2010 (BST)
My work in process "real" talk archive is at [[RRF/Malton Herald & Sun/TalkArchive]]. -[[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 17:33, 28 October 2010 (BST)
 
<br>
<hr>
<br>
<br>
<center><font size=5>Please leave messages below using a Level 2 header. Thanks! </font></center>
<center><font size=5>Please leave messages below using a Level 2 header. Thanks! </font></center>
Line 25: Line 28:
I'll see if we can get it linked on our group page. The marbling is one of our best points. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:40, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
I'll see if we can get it linked on our group page. The marbling is one of our best points. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:40, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
:Thanks. I like your group a lot btw. -[[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 21:16, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
:Thanks. I like your group a lot btw. -[[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 21:16, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
==Do I ''have'' to?==
Is there any particular reason articles are written in chunks of ~6? Because I think they should be written whenever news surfaces, and replace the oldest article in the current issue, and then whenever there's 6 unarchived articles in the issue, it's archived. For example:
ABCDEF - This issue contains 6 articles, titled A-F.
ABCDEF
ABCDEF - Because there are 6 unarchived articles, they are archives as an issue.
GBCDEF - A new article, titled G, is written. It replaces article A on the 'current issue' page.
ABCDEF
GHCDEF - Article H is written, replacing article B.
ABCDEF
GHIDEF - Article I is written, replacing article C.
ABCDEF
GHIJEF - Article J is written, replacing article D.
ABCDEF
GHIJKF - Article K is written, replacing article E.
ABCDEF
GHIJKL - Article L is written, replacing article F.
ABCDEF
GHIJKL
GHIJKL - Because there are 6 unarchived articles, they are archives as an issue.
ABCDEF
MHIJKL - Article M is written, replacing article G.
GHIJKL
ABCDEF
...And so on...
This would enable near-instant coverage of breaking news without removing the issue-style archival. Thoughts? --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 07:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
:I missed this apparently. There is no real reason. And this is a good idea. -[[MHS|<span style="color: Black">'''MHS'''</span>]][[User_Talk:MHSstaff|<span style="color: DarkBlue">'''staff'''</span>]] 02:11, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
::Excellent. If I ever get the inspiration and time to write something, its good to know it can be published before its outdated. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 02:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
:::It's more a case that issues in the past had a lot of articles. The original format though was just a one-shot article that was released every couple of weeks or week.-[[MHS|<span style="color: Black">'''MHS'''</span>]][[User_Talk:MHSstaff|<span style="color: DarkBlue">'''staff'''</span>]] 02:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
|-
|-
| style="background:#FCFAF9; border-bottom:solid 10px #2a1818; border-left:solid 10px #2a1818; border-right:solid 10px #2a1818; padding-left:100px; padding-right:100px; text-align:justify"|
| style="background:#FCFAF9; border-bottom:solid 10px #2a1818; border-left:solid 10px #2a1818; border-right:solid 10px #2a1818; padding-left:100px; padding-right:100px; text-align:justify"|
== It would be neat... ==
if this was still updated. :( --[[Image:Kirsty_Cotton_Header.png|60px|Open the Box|link=User:Kirsty_cotton]] <sub>[[Organization_XIII|<span style="color: grey">Org XIII</span>]]</sub> <sup>[[User:Kirsty_cotton/alts|<span style="color: blue">Alts</span>]]</sup> 03:57, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:57, 17 November 2012

Mhsbanner.png

Note

Note: I am only semi-around until probably April/May so it might be a while until someone gets back to you. -MHSstaff 17:19, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Back-up Talk / Talk Archive

Original talk page (now archive) is at RRF/Malton Herald & Sun/BackupTalk. -MHSstaff 20:56, 22 September 2010 (BST)

My work in process "real" talk archive is at RRF/Malton Herald & Sun/TalkArchive. -MHSstaff 17:33, 28 October 2010 (BST)



Please leave messages below using a Level 2 header. Thanks!


Like a test post or something?

OMG! It's like a talk page or something for like some totally hot paper, where you can like, talk and stuff, you know? I know, right! I mean, like yesterday, this paper was all like "Graaaghhh Zambah Graaggghh" but that was SO LAST YEAR and LAME, and now it is like "Graaaghhh Zambah Graaggghh" which is like the HOTTEST PROM DREAMBOAT EVER! Totally! -MHSstaff 17:51, 28 October 2010 (BST)

Loving the 404 Article.

I'll see if we can get it linked on our group page. The marbling is one of our best points. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 20:40, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I like your group a lot btw. -MHSstaff 21:16, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Do I have to?

Is there any particular reason articles are written in chunks of ~6? Because I think they should be written whenever news surfaces, and replace the oldest article in the current issue, and then whenever there's 6 unarchived articles in the issue, it's archived. For example:

ABCDEF - This issue contains 6 articles, titled A-F.

ABCDEF
ABCDEF - Because there are 6 unarchived articles, they are archives as an issue.

GBCDEF - A new article, titled G, is written. It replaces article A on the 'current issue' page.
ABCDEF 

GHCDEF - Article H is written, replacing article B.
ABCDEF

GHIDEF - Article I is written, replacing article C.
ABCDEF

GHIJEF - Article J is written, replacing article D.
ABCDEF

GHIJKF - Article K is written, replacing article E.
ABCDEF

GHIJKL - Article L is written, replacing article F.
ABCDEF

GHIJKL
GHIJKL - Because there are 6 unarchived articles, they are archives as an issue.
ABCDEF

MHIJKL - Article M is written, replacing article G.
GHIJKL
ABCDEF

...And so on...

This would enable near-instant coverage of breaking news without removing the issue-style archival. Thoughts? --VVV RPGMBCWS 07:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

I missed this apparently. There is no real reason. And this is a good idea. -MHSstaff 02:11, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Excellent. If I ever get the inspiration and time to write something, its good to know it can be published before its outdated. --VVV RPGMBCWS 02:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
It's more a case that issues in the past had a lot of articles. The original format though was just a one-shot article that was released every couple of weeks or week.-MHSstaff 02:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

It would be neat...

if this was still updated. :( --Open the Box Org XIII Alts 03:57, 17 November 2012 (UTC)