Difference between revisions of "Talk:Uniform Barricading Policy/Plan Reviews"

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 49: Line 49:


I will be starting soon a project to get some of the plans up for review over and done with, updating templates and so forth.  Please continue posting revision requests as normal on this page, and contact me for any specific concerns.  Intra-DEM communications, please send to my Brainstock forum inbox; you should be able to find my handle quite easily. [[User:PreacherTheodore|PreacherTheodore]] 21:38, 20 July 2009 (BST)
I will be starting soon a project to get some of the plans up for review over and done with, updating templates and so forth.  Please continue posting revision requests as normal on this page, and contact me for any specific concerns.  Intra-DEM communications, please send to my Brainstock forum inbox; you should be able to find my handle quite easily. [[User:PreacherTheodore|PreacherTheodore]] 21:38, 20 July 2009 (BST)
I also plan on doing some updated UBP reviews, as many of the reviews listed are out-dated by over a year.  I will be in contact with [[User:PreacherTheodore|PreacherTheodore]] and hopefully we can get a consensus on how to revamp the page and clean it up. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 06:43, 6 October 2009 (BST)

Revision as of 05:43, 6 October 2009

If you have comments about a plan review, please make them here.

Old review comments can be found in the archives. Thanks! --Gilant talk-DEM 19:58, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Greentown

The policy on file at the Suburb is sound during peacetime, it provides access to vital resources and housing for those in need. I see no reason it should not be approved. -- Detective Lane grate 19:01, 23 August 2008 (BST) MPD Badge#407

What the heck? Are we trying to be nice to the zombies?! 26 places unenterable! So are all of us supposed to hidein a few far apart places? How are we supposed to leave messages semi-permanently without Spray Cans? Or enforce the plan? Seriously?! Thats just my view..... Sorakairi 03:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Chancelwood

There is a real lack of compliance for the Chancelwood Barricade Plan. I would like to see the barricade plan enforced, even if i have to do it myself. --Wiiwantxbox 23:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

DartSide

i think there should be a plan for dartside, i would do it but im not sure i would have enough time, or even be able to figure it out. someone should help make a plan for this, i would like to be involved.--truemaggot 10:41am 4,March 2008 Anti-zombie_squad

Police Departments

Shouldn't their be at least one Police Department Entry Point (VSB++) for people who start as Military (Besides Scout) to get ammo in Havercroft? --The Gecko PKer 00:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

If you're starting out in Havercroft, my suggestion is that you get out ASAP. It's not a newbie-friendly suburb, and very frequently it's hotly contested. Most of the revives that I give out are to newbies that get caught in the crossfire. GeraldThompson 05:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Southall Mansion

Southall mansion has become a revive point. By having 8 spaces for reviving, there is no way the undead can prevent survivors from reviving those who want it. This building should be left wide open and never barricaded.

Starlingtown

I have edited the barricading plan for Starlingtown.

The changes are:

Crosbie Grove Railway Station – EH to VSB Crump Cinema – EH – VSB Finchley Museum – VSB – EH Hartry Arms – EH – VSB Ponting Building – EH – VSB Nix Arms – EH – VSB Mackworth Building – EH - VSB --EzriSun 02:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Both Hospitals are EHB. At least one should be taken down to VSB. --Duk3luk3 12:17, 28 April 2008 (BST)

NT Buildings in South Blythville

The proposed South Blythville plan has all NT buildings set to EHB. The Pippard Building is being used as a rotter revive point due to its proximity to St. George's Hospital in Greentown. Operationally the building has recently been VSB++ so it would make sense to update the plan. --Dmorenus 01:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Danversbank

The 'provisional' unreviewed Danversbank plan has been in place and working for the last 2 years. I can't see Danversbank ever being UBP compliant given the split suburb, the NT access problem and the general lack of people willing to maintain a suburb so far from malls. 2+ years in the suburb have shown that the provisional plan works well. R33F3RM4N 18:38, 2 April 2009 (BST)

Updating Plan Reviews

I will be starting soon a project to get some of the plans up for review over and done with, updating templates and so forth. Please continue posting revision requests as normal on this page, and contact me for any specific concerns. Intra-DEM communications, please send to my Brainstock forum inbox; you should be able to find my handle quite easily. PreacherTheodore 21:38, 20 July 2009 (BST)

I also plan on doing some updated UBP reviews, as many of the reviews listed are out-dated by over a year. I will be in contact with PreacherTheodore and hopefully we can get a consensus on how to revamp the page and clean it up. --Maverick Talk - OBR Praise Knowledge! 404 06:43, 6 October 2009 (BST)