UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Derp. Totally forgot to uncheck that raw signature checkbox in the preferences.)
 
(91 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
  -->
  -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
===[[NWO]] vs [[Cobra]], [[User:Aichon]] and [[User:RadicalWhig]]===
I'm calling this arbitration because of the endless flame war, instigations, manipulating and trolling of [[NWO]] members. [[The_Best_of_NWO| Here]] is an example of the slander we get from these users. This page should be deleted and any that have been clearly made to defame and insult [[NWO]]. Most of the information on this page can not be edited by members of NWO and quotes are taken out of context. Anyone supporting to keep this page is openly supporting the trolling of a group on this wiki. This page wasn't originally a "Parody group", it was made to insult [[NWO]] and it's users. Does deleting [[RadicalWhig-An analysis|This page]] for being too short and insulting seem logical when [[The_Best_of_NWO]] gets to stay because they recently changed the page into a "Parody" with some advice from a Sysop [[Deletions#The_Best_of_NWO|Here]] to make it into a "Group parody" and that it's a longer insult? Basically the deletion request turned into a move request during the deletion process, skipping protocol.  These users have made talking with other users on the wiki hard and very unpleasant by continuously instigating us by means of vulgar name calling and foul language.  Furthermore, these players  have begun to edit [[Krinks_Power_Station]] with false, needless and biased information on a NPOV page. The edits to this page stating our "focus" is [[NWO#Krinks_Power_Station| false if you read here]]; keeping a public record of NWO sightings in Krinks on the Krinks page is irrelevant and even if it was relevant, pointless because nobody is going to update the page everytime a [[NWO]] member leaves or enter Krinks; Stating how many [[NWO]] were "slain" is off topic to the entire page, especially the "inhabitants" section and should be considered biased.
Users I would gladly accept to Arbitrate if [[User:TripleU]] isn't acceptable:
*[[User:Chief Seagull]]
Many users on the wiki are not what I would consider neutral, so the list is short. [[User:CyberOpposition|-.-]] 06:26, 11 September 2013 (BST)
:I throw my name in as potential arbitrator. My credentials? I haven't played Urban Dead since St. Patrick's Day 2013, almost half a year ago. Hell, this is my first post on the wiki since...What? Almost a year, year and a half? That should qualify me as neutral. --[[User:Axe Hack|Axe Hack: The Legend Returns to the Wiki]] 07:07, 11 September 2013 (BST)
::With no personal offense intended, Axe Hack, I have had a not-insignificant-not-completely-friendly past interacting with you, so I strongly doubt you could be fully neutral in this case. --[[User:RadicalWhig|RadicalWhig]] 07:13, 11 September 2013 (BST)
:Ahem. Let me, RadicalWhig, make a few comments.
:*"Most of the information on this page can not be edited by members of NWO and quotes are taken out of context." <br>
:Putting aside the fact that most of those quotes are quite damning regardless of any possible mitigating context, your quotes on the wiki are 100% public and thus not protected. And of course the information on BoNWO page cannot be edited, ''just like I can't edit the NWO page without your permission.'' Unless you want that to change? I wouldn't mind being able to edit the NWO page if you could edit best of NWO. :)
:*"Anyone supporting to keep this page is openly supporting the trolling of a group on this wiki" <br>
:Lord no. You mean there has been the presence of TROLLING on the UDwiki? Heavens, such outrage, how could this possibly happen.
:*"Does deleting [[RadicalWhig-An analysis|This page]] for being too short and insulting seem logical " <br>
:No one cares that RadicalWhig-An analysis is too short or insulting, no one made any arguments about that. In fact, though I didn't comment on keeping/deleting it, I would have preferred it be kept. The point is that the page was clearly off topic.  There's precedence for Parody groups to be kept on the wiki mainspace, and that precedent does not apply to RW-AA. Also, Paynetrain agreeing to the deletion of the RW-AA page pretty much torpedoed your chances there. You're welcome to take another swing at your retort, though, if that makes you feel better about not understanding UD wiki civics.
:*" Basically the deletion request turned into a move request during the deletion process, skipping protocol.  " <br>
:Uh, no. You can vote move, delete, keep or speedy. It says that clear as day on the A/D page. Jebus, do some light reading buddy. Spiderzed voted move, and he's the only one who did. It's a perfectly valid choice.
:*" These users have made talking with other users on the wiki hard and very unpleasant by continuously instigating us by ''means of vulgar name calling and foul language.''" <br>
:I think I will just submit this:
{{NWO stfu}}
:Posted by you too, no less.
:*" Krinks blah blah blah blah blah" <br>
:Not my business, so I'll avoid going into depth. But you do realize that you are also partially at fault, because it takes two to make an edit war, right?
:*"Many users on the wiki are not what I would consider neutral, so the list is short. " <br>
:Yeah, your comments on [[The_Best_of_NWO#THE_CROWNER|little girls being raped]] and [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Rosslessness&diff=2072382&oldid=2072380 flipping off random sysops] has endeared the populace, I would assume.
:With love, --[[User:RadicalWhig|RadicalWhig]] 07:04, 11 September 2013 (BST)
===User:Misanthropy vs User:Misanthropy===
That motherfucker stole my jam, fucked my missus and unmade my bed. I demand a talk page ban. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 20:56, 17 August 2013 (BST)
:God damn you, you bastarding cuntfuck, that was ''my'' jam and you know it. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig2}} 20:56, 17 August 2013 (BST)
::Eat shit, fuck tits. You owe me. You owe me big time. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 20:57, 17 August 2013 (BST)
:::Don't even talk to me, you spastic bell-end. I demand arbitration. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig2}} 20:57, 17 August 2013 (BST)
::::Fine by me. I'll settle for Sonny, Cornhole or Misanthropy. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 20:58, 17 August 2013 (BST)
:::::No fucking way am I letting that jam-thieving dickbag Misanthropy handle this thing. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig2}} 20:59, 17 August 2013 (BST)
I offer to arbitrate --{{User:Sexualharrison/sig}}<small>03:37, 18 August 2013 </small>
:I object to anyone using a name that's a clear reference to Indiana Jones with Han Solo slashfiction. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 04:58, 18 August 2013 (BST)
=Arbitration Cases in Progress=
=Arbitration Cases in Progress=
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
<!--
<!--
If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases''
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
''There are currently no cases under consideration''


=Recently Concluded cases=
=Recently Concluded cases=
 
<!--
''There are no recently concluded cases.''
If there are no recently concluded cases, please add the following text to this header
''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases.''
-->
''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases.''


=Archives=
=Archives=
*[[:Category:Arbitration Cases|List of Arbitration Cases]]
*[[:Category:Arbitration Cases|List of Arbitration Cases]]

Latest revision as of 15:11, 7 January 2015

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

While the wiki community attempts to work on the basis of encouragement and cooperation, there are occasions where wiki users find themselves unable to reach accord. In the event of this happening, the Arbitration Team may be called upon to intervene, and attempt to find a reasonable compromise that, while perhaps not satisfying both parties, may at least assist in defusing the situation, thanks to the unbiased third party.

Guidelines for Arbitration Requests

In assisting in Arbitration, we generally suggest that both parties agree to the Arbitration. This is not, by any means, a requirement, but we do require that both parties be represented in proceedings.

Any Arbitration request should provide at least the following:

  • The aggrieved parties. Either person vs person, or [list of people] vs [list of people].
  • The reason for the arbitration. This should very specifically be without reference to people, as that information has already been provided. It should be a short paragraph indicating the causes of the aggrievement, and why both parties feel it requires arbitration
  • Any pages affected by the aggrievement. This should be a simple list of links.

Once the Arbitration commences, the Arbitrator will request statements from all parties involved. Any evidence to back up one's statement should be provided in link form. Each party will then have an opportunity to rebut their opponent's statement. After these two steps, the Arbitrator will then consider the case, and reach a conclusion, and determine the outcome that is required. It's the duty of the Arbitrator to move a case he accepted to a subpage of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration, and to update the status of the arbitration case in the Arbitration Cases in Progress section.

As a note, by requesting an Arbitration, all parties are thus obliged to accept the outcome of the Arbitration. Not doing will be considered Vandalism, and such vandalism attempts will be treated as if the vandal has already received two warnings.

After the Arbitration is over, it will then be moved to an archive page. As publicly accessible pages, they may be used to establish precedent in further, applicable cases.

Current Arbitrators

For guidelines on how to arbitrate, see Arbitration Guidelines.

The following users have placed their hand up as users who are willing to be contacted to act as an Arbitrator. The role of Arbitrator is not restricted to the Administration Team; any user can be contacted as an Arbitrator (even if not listed below) and use this page for the arbitration, so long as both parties agree to the Arbitrator. Users who wish to place their hand up as an Arbitrator should place their name below on the list, using *{{usr|YourUserPage}}

Also note that not all listed Arbitrators are active on the Wiki.

Volunteer Arbitrators in Alphabetical Order

Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration

Administration Notice
Use this header to create new arbitration cases. Once all sides have chosen an arbiter, move the case to a sub-page of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration and update its status in the Arbitration Cases in Progress section.


Arbitration Cases in Progress

There are currently no cases under consideration

Recently Concluded cases

There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the archives for older cases.

Archives