UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Hagnat vs Suicidalangel and Cyberbob240

From The Urban Dead Wiki
< UDWiki:Administration‎ | Arbitration
Revision as of 23:27, 8 July 2009 by DanceDanceRevolution (talk | contribs) (New page: == {{usr|hagnat}} vs {{usr|suicidalangel}} and {{usr|cyberbob240}} == simple dispute in Urban Dead IRC Channels. #udwiki used to be the official channel for urban dead wiki discussion...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

hagnat vs suicidalangel and cyberbob240

simple dispute in Urban Dead IRC Channels. #udwiki used to be the official channel for urban dead wiki discussions, but with the creation of #urbandeadwiki this title is now being disputed. Originally, #urbandeadwiki was listed as the alternative chanel, but today suicidal edited the page so that #udwiki was the alternative. I reverted his edit, but cyberbob reverted it back, starting a revert war (shame on u bob, ur a sysop, u should know better).

I would like to settle this dispute quickly: no channel is the official nor the alternate, both channels are simply listed as "channel for urban dead wiki discussion", as proposed by J3D. --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 15:10, 8 July 2009 (BST)

DDR's still in the process of deciding what the 'pre edit war' state is. I think the way link had it is probably the best.--xoxo 15:12, 8 July 2009 (BST)
except that link's edit linked both channels to the same location. I am fine with this, but i liked yours better (each channel on its own line) --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 15:16, 8 July 2009 (BST)
I nominate DDR as arbitrator. --Cyberbob 15:14, 8 July 2009 (BST)
i am fine with him --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 15:16, 8 July 2009 (BST)

I accept DDR. Case commences now.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 17:00, 8 July 2009 (BST)

Round 1

Alright, let's get started. This will be Round 1, each side gets an argument (SA and Bob getting both chances to make a statement, of course), and there will be a small gap before Round 2, before a finishing round for summaries and conclusions. Let's keep this simple, if either side wants further rounds to be included to extend the length of the arbies case, I may grant it if I deem it necessary, but for now, lets keep this simple.

I would like all issues to be addressed, I have knowledge of the case, but I expect both parties to bring all they have into their arguments. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 00:27, 9 July 2009 (BST)

Hagnat

Place opening statement and arguments here

Cyberbob240

Place opening statement and arguments here

Suicidalangel

Place opening statement and arguments here