UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/Dec 2006: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Protected "UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/Dec 2006": Scheduled [edit=sysop:move=sysop])
 
m (fixing link)
 
Line 425: Line 425:
*'''Keep''' - If you're looking for necrotech buildings in a suburb, you should be able to come to the wiki and type in ''Necrotech Suburbname'' for any suburb, and get a page with either all the NT info on it, or like this one, with a link to all the individual NT buildings. Ideally the other buildings info should be transfered there, as there's some doubling (quadrupling) up of info -- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] <sup>[[User_talk:boxy|T]] [[User:Boxy/Locations|L]] [[PA Posse|PA]] [[Dead Animals|DA]]</sup> 03:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - If you're looking for necrotech buildings in a suburb, you should be able to come to the wiki and type in ''Necrotech Suburbname'' for any suburb, and get a page with either all the NT info on it, or like this one, with a link to all the individual NT buildings. Ideally the other buildings info should be transfered there, as there's some doubling (quadrupling) up of info -- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] <sup>[[User_talk:boxy|T]] [[User:Boxy/Locations|L]] [[PA Posse|PA]] [[Dead Animals|DA]]</sup> 03:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
*:I've actually combined the individual pages onto that page now, so it can be removed from the deletions queue, I think -- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] <sup>[[User_talk:boxy|T]] [[User:Boxy/Locations|L]] [[PA Posse|PA]] [[Dead Animals|DA]]</sup> 10:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
*:I've actually combined the individual pages onto that page now, so it can be removed from the deletions queue, I think -- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] <sup>[[User_talk:boxy|T]] [[User:Boxy/Locations|L]] [[PA Posse|PA]] [[Dead Animals|DA]]</sup> 10:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - As above. ^--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[PFTP|P]]'''</sup> 00:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - As above. ^--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[User:Labine50/Power For The People|P]]'''</sup> 00:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - As above. [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[DHPD]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 00:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - As above. [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[DHPD]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 00:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - What Labine Said. --{{User:Max Grivas/sig}} 15:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - What Labine Said. --{{User:Max Grivas/sig}} 15:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Line 692: Line 692:
#::::Once the guidelines rehashed policy comes into effect, yes. Until then, nope. –[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] <sup>[[Special:Listusers/sysop|M]]•[[User talk:Xoid|T]]•<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://urbandeadwiki.th7.net F]</span>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]]</sup> 16:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
#::::Once the guidelines rehashed policy comes into effect, yes. Until then, nope. –[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] <sup>[[Special:Listusers/sysop|M]]•[[User talk:Xoid|T]]•<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://urbandeadwiki.th7.net F]</span>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]]</sup> 16:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - While it's a keeper as it is now, I would prefer that crap gets submitted to M/SD so it can be nuked. Creating a location page after the vandalism is deleted is entirely allowable, y'know. –[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] <sup>[[Special:Listusers/sysop|M]]•[[User talk:Xoid|T]]•<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://urbandeadwiki.th7.net F]</span>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]]</sup> 16:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - While it's a keeper as it is now, I would prefer that crap gets submitted to M/SD so it can be nuked. Creating a location page after the vandalism is deleted is entirely allowable, y'know. –[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] <sup>[[Special:Listusers/sysop|M]]•[[User talk:Xoid|T]]•<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://urbandeadwiki.th7.net F]</span>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]]</sup> 16:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep?''' - It doesn't look bad now.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[PFTP|P]]'''</sup> 18:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep?''' - It doesn't look bad now.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[User:Labine50/Power For The People|P]]'''</sup> 18:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - Great Fix. --Max Grivas 12:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - Great Fix. --Max Grivas 12:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - This just needed a fixin', not a blamin'. Good job. --[[User:MorthBabid|MorthBabid]] 19:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - This just needed a fixin', not a blamin'. Good job. --[[User:MorthBabid|MorthBabid]] 19:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Line 707: Line 707:
Template COM
Template COM
found on UDWiki:Moderation/Deletions, User:Reptileus
found on UDWiki:Moderation/Deletions, User:Reptileus
#'''Delete''' - Big suprise there.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[PFTP|P]]'''</sup> 19:14, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Delete''' - Big suprise there.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[User:Labine50/Power For The People|P]]'''</sup> 19:14, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Delete''' - [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[DHPD]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 19:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Delete''' - [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[DHPD]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 19:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Delete''' - wipe this "group" off the wiki--[[User:Gage|Gage]] 19:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Delete''' - wipe this "group" off the wiki--[[User:Gage|Gage]] 19:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Line 941: Line 941:
#'''Keep''' - Deleting it won't make the problem go away.--{{User:The General/sig}} 14:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - Deleting it won't make the problem go away.--{{User:The General/sig}} 14:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - Keep the first,'''delete''' the second. The point of the first was to draw the issue to Kevan's attention. To his credit he has responded immediately, and his answer and reasoning is good enough for me. [[User:Moyes|Moyes]] 14:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - Keep the first,'''delete''' the second. The point of the first was to draw the issue to Kevan's attention. To his credit he has responded immediately, and his answer and reasoning is good enough for me. [[User:Moyes|Moyes]] 14:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - ...Because deleteing this wouldn't cause further conflict?--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[PFTP|P]]'''</sup> 14:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - ...Because deleteing this wouldn't cause further conflict?--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[User:Labine50/Power For The People|P]]'''</sup> 14:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Merge''' the second into the first. Then lock against editing It'd be good to see the complaint, the counter complaint and the offical response on one tidy page that no-one can mess up. - [[User:David Malfisto|David Malfisto]] 14:52, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Merge''' the second into the first. Then lock against editing It'd be good to see the complaint, the counter complaint and the offical response on one tidy page that no-one can mess up. - [[User:David Malfisto|David Malfisto]] 14:52, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' the first.  '''Delete''' the second. -- {{User:Atticus Rex/Sig}} 14:54, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' the first.  '''Delete''' the second. -- {{User:Atticus Rex/Sig}} 14:54, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Line 989: Line 989:
The entire group is a copyright violation. I don't know the policy on disclaimers, but i don't think that including the copyright info is enough. From my knowledge, the only legal use is with explicit consent from the holding company. --[[User:Blue_Command_Vic|Blue Command Vic]] <sup>[[Dead vs Blue|DvB]]</sup> 04:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
The entire group is a copyright violation. I don't know the policy on disclaimers, but i don't think that including the copyright info is enough. From my knowledge, the only legal use is with explicit consent from the holding company. --[[User:Blue_Command_Vic|Blue Command Vic]] <sup>[[Dead vs Blue|DvB]]</sup> 04:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Delete''' - I'm fairly certain that fair use does cover this. Regardless, companies have a penchant for suing websites at the drop of a hat. –[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] <sup>[[Special:Listusers/sysop|M]]•[[User talk:Xoid|T]]•<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://urbandeadwiki.th7.net F]</span>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]]</sup> 04:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Delete''' - I'm fairly certain that fair use does cover this. Regardless, companies have a penchant for suing websites at the drop of a hat. –[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] <sup>[[Special:Listusers/sysop|M]]•[[User talk:Xoid|T]]•<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://urbandeadwiki.th7.net F]</span>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]]</sup> 04:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Delete''' - They might have permision, but I'd like to see it in writing before I vote keep.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[PFTP|P]]'''</sup> 04:40, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Delete''' - They might have permision, but I'd like to see it in writing before I vote keep.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[User:Labine50/Power For The People|P]]'''</sup> 04:40, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - In the past, similar groups here on the wiki, namely the [[Umbrella Biohazard Countermeasure Servive|U.B.C.S]] and the [[Special Tactics And Rescue Squad]] have been deemed fair use of copyrighted material, despite their inclusion of copyrighted material, trademarks, and logos.  The inclusion of the copyright notice here in the Disclaimer was intended as a legal leg-up from the lack of notice these other groups provide in relation to intellectual property.  --[[User:Tseng_Wulong|Tseng Wulong]] 23:34, 20 November 2006 UTC
#'''Keep''' - In the past, similar groups here on the wiki, namely the [[Umbrella Biohazard Countermeasure Servive|U.B.C.S]] and the [[Special Tactics And Rescue Squad]] have been deemed fair use of copyrighted material, despite their inclusion of copyrighted material, trademarks, and logos.  The inclusion of the copyright notice here in the Disclaimer was intended as a legal leg-up from the lack of notice these other groups provide in relation to intellectual property.  --[[User:Tseng_Wulong|Tseng Wulong]] 23:34, 20 November 2006 UTC
#:They may be fair use, but all that ''really'' matters is covering our arse when it comes to getting sued. It doesn't matter if we can prove it was fair use if Urban Dead dies as a result of being offline for the duration of the trial, no? –[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] <sup>[[Special:Listusers/sysop|M]]•[[User talk:Xoid|T]]•<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://urbandeadwiki.th7.net F]</span>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]]</sup> 05:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
#:They may be fair use, but all that ''really'' matters is covering our arse when it comes to getting sued. It doesn't matter if we can prove it was fair use if Urban Dead dies as a result of being offline for the duration of the trial, no? –[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] <sup>[[Special:Listusers/sysop|M]]•[[User talk:Xoid|T]]•<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://urbandeadwiki.th7.net F]</span>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]]</sup> 05:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Line 1,010: Line 1,010:
#'''Keep''' - Why the hell is this here? –[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] <sup>[[Special:Listusers/sysop|M]]•[[User talk:Xoid|T]]•<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://urbandeadwiki.th7.net F]</span>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]]</sup> 04:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - Why the hell is this here? –[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] <sup>[[Special:Listusers/sysop|M]]•[[User talk:Xoid|T]]•<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://urbandeadwiki.th7.net F]</span>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]]</sup> 04:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
#*Because Conn put it up for Speedy Deletion, and I effectively voted Keep. Sorry for ruining your rhetorical question ^_^ {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
#*Because Conn put it up for Speedy Deletion, and I effectively voted Keep. Sorry for ruining your rhetorical question ^_^ {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 05:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Delete''' - I'm pretty sure anyone who is ever going to care knows what a bot is, either from other games, or figuring it out themselves.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[PFTP|P]]'''</sup> 04:40, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Delete''' - I'm pretty sure anyone who is ever going to care knows what a bot is, either from other games, or figuring it out themselves.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[User:Labine50/Power For The People|P]]'''</sup> 04:40, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - It's a valid entry. Odd and in the need of some work, but valid. --[[User:MorthBabid|MorthBabid]] 05:21, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - It's a valid entry. Odd and in the need of some work, but valid. --[[User:MorthBabid|MorthBabid]] 05:21, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - What is a bot?  .... is what I woulda said had I not saw that page!  Thanks [[Bot]]page!--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 05:44, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - What is a bot?  .... is what I woulda said had I not saw that page!  Thanks [[Bot]]page!--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 05:44, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Line 1,026: Line 1,026:
**They have a disclaimer on their page stating that none of it is real and not supposed to offend anyone. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 00:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
**They have a disclaimer on their page stating that none of it is real and not supposed to offend anyone. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 00:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
*::I can't really say I buy the use of a disclaimer. Are you telling me if they slapped a disclaimer on this page and template that they'd magically become acceptable? Or that if I prefaced my calling you a shitsucking ass pirate with a disclaimer that you wouldn't get offended? -- [[User:Alan Watson|∀lan Watson]] <sup>[[User_talk:Alan_Watson|T]]·[[Ridleybank Resistance Front|R]][[Philosophe Knights|P]][[Malton Telephone|M]]</sup> 04:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
*::I can't really say I buy the use of a disclaimer. Are you telling me if they slapped a disclaimer on this page and template that they'd magically become acceptable? Or that if I prefaced my calling you a shitsucking ass pirate with a disclaimer that you wouldn't get offended? -- [[User:Alan Watson|∀lan Watson]] <sup>[[User_talk:Alan_Watson|T]]·[[Ridleybank Resistance Front|R]][[Philosophe Knights|P]][[Malton Telephone|M]]</sup> 04:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Speaking of groups that have no point in existing except to grief on the wiki, and causing drama, I believe you are familiar with the [[Ridleybank Reclamation Forces|RRF]]? I vaguely remember something about an STD clinic...--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[PFTP|P]]'''</sup> 23:59, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Speaking of groups that have no point in existing except to grief on the wiki, and causing drama, I believe you are familiar with the [[Ridleybank Reclamation Forces|RRF]]? I vaguely remember something about an STD clinic...--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[User:Labine50/Power For The People|P]]'''</sup> 23:59, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
**They have a disclaimer on their page stating that none of it is real and not supposed to offend anyone. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 00:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
**They have a disclaimer on their page stating that none of it is real and not supposed to offend anyone. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 00:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
***You fail at the fact that it does offend me, and most likely the other 3 active editors of the MHG page.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[PFTP|P]]'''</sup> 00:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
***You fail at the fact that it does offend me, and most likely the other 3 active editors of the MHG page.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[User:Labine50/Power For The People|P]]'''</sup> 00:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
****Labine... honestly, what ''doesn't'' offend you? The intent is the most important issue here. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 00:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
****Labine... honestly, what ''doesn't'' offend you? The intent is the most important issue here. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 00:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
*****The word "Majuscule" doesn't offend me. Yeah, you heard me. It never offended me this entire time. We've strayed a bit off topic, I this is suposed to be about DORIS and thier enemies. I think.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[PFTP|P]]'''</sup> 00:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
*****The word "Majuscule" doesn't offend me. Yeah, you heard me. It never offended me this entire time. We've strayed a bit off topic, I this is suposed to be about DORIS and thier enemies. I think.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[User:Labine50/Power For The People|P]]'''</sup> 00:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
******Yes, it is, and I'm saying that your putting forward the Ridleybank Reclamation Forces page as "precedent" is irrelevant - that page is not intended to offend. These pages are. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 00:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
******Yes, it is, and I'm saying that your putting forward the Ridleybank Reclamation Forces page as "precedent" is irrelevant - that page is not intended to offend. These pages are. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 00:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
*******How do you know that these pages are meant to offend? And besides, regardless of the intention, an offensive page is an offensive page no matter what.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[PFTP|P]]'''</sup> 01:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
*******How do you know that these pages are meant to offend? And besides, regardless of the intention, an offensive page is an offensive page no matter what.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[User:Labine50/Power For The People|P]]'''</sup> 01:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
********How do I know these pages are meant to offend? Christ. You're a basket case. I give up. Read the goddamn template. What do you think? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 01:21, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
********How do I know these pages are meant to offend? Christ. You're a basket case. I give up. Read the goddamn template. What do you think? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 01:21, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
*********Uh...the STD clinic was a joke on myself...I called "Hospitals a poor man's Mall Drugstore and said how I ate a chick out in a hospital, joke was on me, it was the STD Clinic." So it wasn't aimed at you. And the whole group is supposed to be a joke on me too. While I'm making fun of others I go over the top with stupid crap that makes no sense. --[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]] <sup>[[ The Ridleybank Resistance Front|RRF]] [[ The Caiger Resistance Front|CRF]] [[ DORIS]] [[Witch Burners|Hunt!]]</sup> 14:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
*********Uh...the STD clinic was a joke on myself...I called "Hospitals a poor man's Mall Drugstore and said how I ate a chick out in a hospital, joke was on me, it was the STD Clinic." So it wasn't aimed at you. And the whole group is supposed to be a joke on me too. While I'm making fun of others I go over the top with stupid crap that makes no sense. --[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]] <sup>[[ The Ridleybank Resistance Front|RRF]] [[ The Caiger Resistance Front|CRF]] [[ DORIS]] [[Witch Burners|Hunt!]]</sup> 14:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
**********They could mean it in a good way. Ok, I know that's an outright lie, but if they really want to take on DORIS with their group, let them. They'll probably be swiftly killed, though.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[PFTP|P]]'''</sup> 01:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
**********They could mean it in a good way. Ok, I know that's an outright lie, but if they really want to take on DORIS with their group, let them. They'll probably be swiftly killed, though.--[[User:Labine50|Labine50]] <sup>'''[[Malton Hospitals Group|MH]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[MEMS|ME]]'''</sup><nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>'''[[User:Labine50/Power For The People|P]]'''</sup> 01:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Icky poo attack groups. If you want to kill Doris, you are an idiot. Killing any PKer group of that size is like the sacking of Daris. It only creates more drama. - [[User:343|343]] <sup>'''[[Project UnWelcome|U!]]'''</sup> 01:04, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Icky poo attack groups. If you want to kill Doris, you are an idiot. Killing any PKer group of that size is like the sacking of Daris. It only creates more drama. - [[User:343|343]] <sup>'''[[Project UnWelcome|U!]]'''</sup> 01:04, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - Seems like a common enough sentiment to get some use. --{{User:Max Grivas/sig}} 02:51, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - Seems like a common enough sentiment to get some use. --{{User:Max Grivas/sig}} 02:51, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:01, 10 June 2009

Dec 2006

Header

Deletions Archive
2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec
Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Deletions. This page represents all Deletions archived in the month of December 2006.

End

Christian_Decency_Foundation

This entire wiki entry is no more than a foul-mouthed excuse to bring religiously motivated hate-mongering into UrbanDead. --Juri Arisugawa 19:05, 19 December 2006 (EST)

Image:Arskyer.png

Copyright infringement of artwork from a movie. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Mel Gibsons' Apocalypto, I think. Not being used as a form of parody or commentary, and isn't noted as being a copyrighted file used without permission. --MorthBabid 19:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 03:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.-- AnimeSucks 06:42, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • First, how in the hell do you know what that even is, let alone where it's from? Second, every single image on this wiki is used "without permission". ZOMG you made it yourself, it's a product of Photoshop, and Adobe never said you could use it! Delete em all!!! :O --Blue Command Vic 06:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
A bit of research can prove who owns the image, Vic. Methinks thou dost protest too much. I can see why, when I look at your user page. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 17:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 16:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Because I can. --Rogue 06:02, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Kevan almost did. See here for details. --Amanu Jaku 06:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Nice Sockpuppet. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 19:09, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Arrives.jpg

Copyright infringement of artwork from a TV Series. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep 1. Its a film, not a TV series. 2. I believe this is covered under parody laws, since the image is being used to poke fun at the idea of "Channel 4" in a zombie apocolypse. A notation on the page that the image IS copywrited and used without permission, however, might be called for. --MorthBabid 19:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Uh, no. It's being used for personal purposes. If you were making fun of the movie, then it would be a parody. For example, if I wrote some sort of story about how Ronald McDonald was a cannibal zombie, I would get my ass sued off. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
And the only way anyone from McDonald's would find out about that story is...Survey says...If you tried to turn a profit! --_Vic D'Amato__Dead vs Blue_ 00:37, 26 December 2006 (UTC
If I were making fun of the movie it would be parody? Have you read anything on the page? --Ron Burgundy 06:10, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Of course he hasn't. He's too busy submitting every image on the wiki to be deleted. --_Vic D'Amato__Dead vs Blue_ 06:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep as Morth, this is allowable fair use. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 23:54, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 03:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Kiki Lottaboobs 17:16, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep No if you wrote a story about Ronald you wouldn't get sued. For more usage of Ronald see YTMND. --Rogue 06:24, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Hey guys, I hate to burst your bubble, but taking images from a movie is not illegal. What's more, it's protected as parody. --Ron Burgundy 06:10, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Wrong. The movie is copyrighted. You're not allowed to use it for your personal use. Watch the FBI trailer to movies. Also, it's not a parody, as you are just saying: "We're the Channel 4 News team. Like from the movie, but in Urban Dead!" --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™
  • Keep - because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:38, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Kept –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Archer.jpg

Copyright infringement of artwork from an anime series. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete? Not sure about this one. Doesn't seem to be parodying the actual copyrighted character shown here, but just using photo as close approximation. --MorthBabid 19:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Useless, but X-Men: Evolution sure as hell isn't anime. - CthulhuFhtagn 10:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 03:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Arbys.jpg

Copyright infringement of the Arbys Trademark. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep This logo is being used in reference to the product it legally represents, and is not being claimed as an original work. This falls under fair use in terms of news reports and commentary. You should know this, you have the link to e-copyright on your user page? --MorthBabid 19:47, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - this falls under satire as well.--Gage 20:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Actually, it's not satire. Satire would be parodying the image, but simply stating that you eat at Arbys isn't a parody or satire. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
The reference is to taking someone to an Arbitration hearing i.e. taking them to Arbys..thus An literary or artistic work (in this case the Arby's Sign)that imitates the characteristic style of an author (in this case Arby's) for comic effect. thus making it, by definition, a parody. Now earn your wings somewhere else instead of policing every damn image on this wiki...the follow up work is getting old. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 07:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Can we add that to the image's description so those who don't understand the reference can realize why the image is there? --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 17:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 03:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:44, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Under fair use in a sense of Parody. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 23:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
According to Arby's website: "The Trademarks displayed on the Site are registered and unregistered Trademarks of Arby’s Restaurant Group, Inc. Nothing contained on the Site should be construed as granting, by implication, estoppel or otherwise, any license or right to use any Trademark displayed on the Site, or any license or right to use any other trademark owned by any other third party. In the event that you misuse any Trademark in violation of these Terms and Conditions, Arby’s Restaurant Group, Inc., will aggressively enforce its intellectual property rights to the fullest extent of the law, including the seeking of criminal prosecution." --Kiki Lottaboobs 17:38, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Ok for the last time, Here we go...Under US Copyright 17 U.S.C. §107. Examples of activities that may be excused as fair use include: distributing copies of a section of an article in class for educational purposes; providing a quotation in a book review; and imitating a work for the purpose of parody or social commentary. and IS PROTECTED under fair use. btw since its a US held trademark, it falls under jurisdiction of US copyright laws sheesh...Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 18:20, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
We are not discussing the distribution of sections of an article in a class. The use of this logo is not a book review. This is not an imitation of a work. This is a copy of a corporate logo that is being used to make a joke. The fact that it is funny does not mean that it is a parody. Being funny is not a shield for copyright infringement. --Kiki Lottaboobs 19:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
read an above comment. As it is used, it is by definition, a parody. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 19:59, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
No, it's used as a cultural reference. You are making a joke, yes, but you are not making a parody. Mad Magazine, Saturday Night Live, and Robot Chicken do parodies, using Arby's as a convenient way to abbreviate arbitration isn't a parody. --Kiki Lottaboobs 20:11, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Oh I'm sorry. Did the little man pretending to be a woman, yet failing at it have something to say?--Gage 20:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
I remember something about, I think tshirt hell, created a shirt called Subway: Eat Flesh or something like that, claimed parody, got sued, and had to pull the tshirt. Using the logo, and saying something funny under it doesn't constitute parody. A image of the Arby's lasso that has a kind of rotting look to it, with text of Bararahby's would be parody.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 20:54, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Not to mention suing T-shirt Hell Pizza Slut (a parody of the Pizza Hut trademark). Arby's says they want you to ask them if you are going to use their trademark. I don't see a citation or proof that you asked to use their image. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™
  • Delete This is pretty obviously illegal. --Kiki Lottaboobs 17:17, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - I'm tired of this fucking bullshit.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 08:38, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Same here Thari same here. Can't we just ban Akule instead? --Rogue 16:40, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Kept –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Arachnia2.jpg

Copyright infringement of an artwork print. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep? Credit for the file and its source is given in the upload link for the file itself. I think thats good enough? --MorthBabid 20:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
No? I mean, I can't put up a picture of Darth Vader and claim it's my character. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Sure you can, if its a form of parody. Just don't claim the graphic as your own product. IMHO, referencing the source would be enough. Maybe we need to revise or at least clarify our definition of fair use on the UDwiki? --MorthBabid 23:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Thats a bigger issue than what we're really dealing with here; And in some countries, they're considering that very route. But in this case? Its obvious parody. --MorthBabid 23:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
How is this "obvious parody"? The image itself shows where it came from and that it is copyrighted. I'm going to email the artist and make sure that permission is allowed, as the page is copyrighted. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 19:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I hope you sent a link to the page it was on, and pointed out that the artist was credited (and praised) by the owner of the page -- boxy T L ZS PA DA 04:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 03:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - as MorthBabid, she gives credit both in the file log, and where she uses it -- boxy T L PA DA 12:17, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Because I don't agree with those who obsess about Darth Vader. --Rogue 06:16, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:40, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Kept –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Aquanut.jpg

Copyright infringement of artwork from a movie. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete? Not sure about this one. Doesn't seem to be parodying the actual copyrighted character shown here, but just using photo as close approximation. --MorthBabid 20:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 03:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Always hated Rufus!!! Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:40, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Apocalypse_horde_slow_readers_group.JPG

Copyright infringement of artwork from the movie Day of the Dead. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Yeah, they didn't at least credit the original film...though perhaps they assumed everyone knew the source? If proper ownership isn't noted, this should be deleted. --MorthBabid 20:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep- This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 03:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Anime_girl_2.jpg

Copyright infringement of artwork from an anime series. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

I think this is a fan-done artwork; May be the users own creation? Check. --MorthBabid 20:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
I was corrected by one of my friends as identifying it from a video game. I'll find out which one. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 03:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Show where it's from or don't bother wasting everyone's time. --Rogue 06:27, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Look familiar Rogue? Time to put up or shut up. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 19:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Andrei.jpg

Copyright infringement of artwork from a internet cartoon. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Unclear source; Whats the internet website this has been taken from? --MorthBabid 20:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:02, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep You provided no proof. Fail --Rogue 06:28, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Kept –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ais.jpg

Copyright infringement of artwork. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Source? Can you show this isn't the users own creation? --MorthBabid 20:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:02, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Because no one knows if it's orginal or not. unless you can prove the source don't put it up. --Rogue 06:17, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Kept –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Aberrant.jpg

Copyright infringement of the Aberrant RPG. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep This image is being used in reference to the roleplaying resource product itself, and as such is covered by news/commentary inclusions for copyright. --MorthBabid 20:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Kiki Lottaboobs 17:20, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Because Akule is too ignorant to realize that this is covered under his own laws. --Rogue 20:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Abandoned_Recruitment_Poster.png

Copyright infringement of a movie. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete 'Fraid so. No sources for the outside materials used were referenced on the site. Sorry guys! --MorthBabid 20:19, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Because this is ****ing insane. --Rogue 06:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:A101.gif

Copyright infringement of a video game. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Even the four billion sprite webcomics that abuse this sprite still at least put a qualifer for the source, and the fact that its used without permission. --MorthBabid 20:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:9e_a3_1228539.jpg

Copyright infringement of artwork. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Pretty sure thats a Boris Dij...vawhatever. Needed at least a good citation. --MorthBabid 20:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:8pac.jpg

Copyright infringement of the movie Doom. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete No citation/proper fair use. --MorthBabid 20:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Kiki Lottaboobs 17:21, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:725bigahh.jpg

Copyright infringement of a movie scene. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete No citation/proper fair use. --MorthBabid 20:27, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:46, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:7c87.jpg

Copyright infringement of an associated press picture. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep Nope, thats a public domain shot of a historical moment. Well within fair use. --MorthBabid 20:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Do you have a reference for it being a public domain picture? --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Do you have proof of copyright? --Rogue 06:20, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Kiki Lottaboobs 17:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Yet again, no proof on if this is even copyrighted or not. --Rogue 06:20, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:46, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Kept –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:6Pac.jpg

Copyright infringement of the movie Doom. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete No citation/proper fair use. --MorthBabid 20:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Kiki Lottaboobs 17:24, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:47, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:5punk.png

Copyright infringement of various video games and digital images. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete? Not so much because they failed to referenced the copyrights on the game characters, but more because it looks like they took that off a gaming websites ad banner? --MorthBabid 20:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:47, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:460456968249l.jpg

Copyright infringement of a Time Warner movie. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep? Considering the potential age and questionable clarity of that image, I'd have to guess that the this film has well passed the time restraints for fair use of older copyrighted media. But I honestly can't tell which film that IS, so... --MorthBabid 20:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Copyright lapses after 100 years (maybe more now). You can thank Disney for that. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Actualy: If a work is created by more than one person the copyright registration lasts for seventy (70) years after the last surviving author's death.For a work made for hire, anonymous and pseudonymous works, the copyright registration lasts for ninety-five (95) years from the first publication of the work, or 125 years from creation of the work, whichever is shortest. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 18:32, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:10, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Hugs and kisses. --Rogue 06:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Middle

Image:300px-Leon_S_Kennedy.jpg

Copyright infringement of a video game (Resident Evil 4). Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete ...but this makes me think we should perhaps have a policy where if a uploaded photo at least CITES the source and ownership, noting its used without permission, it won't be need to be deleted under this process. The internet is littered with people using files like this, but...t3h laws t3h law? --MorthBabid 20:40, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:44, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Kiki Lottaboobs 17:25, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Because I hate you. --Rogue 06:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:275px-MK3_Babality.png

Copyright infringement of a video game (Mortal Kombat 3). Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete More because this file doesn't actually seem to be in use on the Wiki at all. --MorthBabid 20:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Lookie here: Image:275px-MK3_Babality.png#filelinks It's not even being used. Please delete Mr. Moderator. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 21:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
It has to be two weeks old before an unused image can be deleted as such. Please familiarize yourself with policy. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 15:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Kiki Lottaboobs 17:26, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Because it serves no purpose. --Rogue 06:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:25fmwcn.jpg

Copyright infringement of a video game (PSP game). Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep? If I'm not mistaken, this is actually just a bit of classical art being used as a promotion...but I could be wrong. Someone wanna check up on me on that? --MorthBabid 20:43, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Because it's not a PSP game it's a copy of a very old painting of the fall of Troy!. --Rogue 06:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:2-1-1-.jpg

Copyright infringement of an anime artwork. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete ...Though someones gonna be pissed they can't use the same personal image as they do on their favorite Animepop forum. --MorthBabid 20:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:42, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Because I have no clue who made the artwork, therefore for all I know it could be orginal or Public Domain. --Rogue 06:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Kept –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:200px-Sardaukar_Insignia.jpg

Copyright infringement of the Dune video game. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep I consider the fact that they referenced the true source of this image file to currently protect it under the adoption of our copyright use. This may be a matter of some debate, though. --MorthBabid 20:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Actually, no. They simply are using a copyrighted image for their own purposes. They don't have permission, which means it should be removed. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Uh, thats a pretty strict interpretation of copyright law. I believe classically in this case, since the image isn't being claimed as an original work AND is being referenced, there wouldn't be an issue. That link on your own user page has a few nice case examples of this fact. Check it out. --MorthBabid 05:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Because unlike some people I took the time of reading instead of just copy paste. --Rogue 06:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Kept –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:24_vorlage.jpg

Copyright infringement of the TV Series 24. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete I don't think its even being used, too. --MorthBabid 20:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:39, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Kiki Lottaboobs 17:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Because I'm not a member of the fear culture. --Rogue 06:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Because no ones going to get sued here, EVER! Cat go meow 06:51, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Visit Scarletwood

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for developing backstory and other good stuff like that, but this has been unchanged for much too long and has almost not content on it. Find me a redeeming quality of this page and I'll reconsider. -- The Minister of Funk T 03:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Moderator: Deleted –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

NecroTech Dulston

Just a page link to the other Necrotech buildings in Dulston but no pages link to it so its no use to anyone. --MarieThe Grove 21:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - No use. --MarieThe Grove 21:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - If you're looking for necrotech buildings in a suburb, you should be able to come to the wiki and type in Necrotech Suburbname for any suburb, and get a page with either all the NT info on it, or like this one, with a link to all the individual NT buildings. Ideally the other buildings info should be transfered there, as there's some doubling (quadrupling) up of info -- boxy T L PA DA 03:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
    I've actually combined the individual pages onto that page now, so it can be removed from the deletions queue, I think -- boxy T L PA DA 10:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - As above. ^--Labine50 MH|ME|P 00:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - As above. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 00:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - What Labine Said. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - If we deleted this, we'd have to delete Dulston Streets as well.--Joe O'Wood TALKCONTRIBSUD 17:13, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Moderator: Kept –Xoid M•T•FU! 20:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)


Packard Jennings/Ackland Images

Deleted per artists request. please see Battle of the Bear Pit discussion page for details. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 02:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Continue the discussion on talk:Battle of the Bear Pit. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 02:48, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Image:Ackland4.jpg

Copyright infringement of artwork of Packard Jennings. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 15:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete? Quick google search conferms. Huh, I never knew. Figured this was user created Now the question becomes: Should we delete this, or simply properly site the sources and note that its used without permission? --MorthBabid 20:57, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Kept- Pending response from Michael Durham aka Packard Jennings. And yes, I've contacted his management services requesting permission for fair use. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 07:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted per artists request. please see Battle of the Bear Pit discussion page for details. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 02:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Image:AcklandMall3.jpg

Copyright infringement of artwork of Packard Jennings. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 15:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete? Quick google search conferms. Huh, I never knew. Figured this was user created Now the question becomes: Should we delete this, or simply properly site the sources and note that its used without permission? --MorthBabid 20:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)


Kept- Pending response from Michael Durham aka Packard Jennings. And yes, I've contacted his management services requesting permission for fair use. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 07:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted per artists request. please see Battle of the Bear Pit discussion page for details. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 02:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Image:Ackland1.jpg

Copyright infringement of artwork of Packard Jennings. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 15:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete? Quick google search conferms. Huh, I never knew. Figured this was user created Now the question becomes: Should we delete this, or simply properly site the sources and note that its used without permission? --MorthBabid 20:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)


Kept- Pending response from Michael Durham aka Packard Jennings. And yes, I've contacted his management services requesting permission for fair use. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 07:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted per artists request. please see Battle of the Bear Pit discussion page for details. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 02:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Image:Ackland2.jpg

We allow frontal nudity? Male and female? --Akule 22:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Gage 01:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --AnimeSucks 01:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - You on drugs ? This is not pr0n, they are not doing anything offensive... do you think the Statu of David is offensive ? --Hagnat 15:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Is it really worthwile to have and does it open the door for more things that skirt the edge of the rules? Can you give me a good reason of why it should be kept? --Akule 21:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Sure, since you asked. I think the three strongest points are: 1. It doesn't violate any of our community rules, as this isn't a overtly sexualized image nor is it copyrighted. 2. Its currently being used on a page denoting a major in-game event, though in a dramatic and romanticized method. 3. There is no such thing as "skirting" the rules; There is either a place where a rule is clearly broken or not broken, or an area where a rules context must be considered. The spirit of the law as well as the letter, if you will. Hence why we even have these debates. --MorthBabid 19:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
unfortuantely, it does violate copyright laws as no one contacted Packard Jennings about it. http://centennialsociety.com/mallpgeight.htm, so everyone who did vote to keep it, might want to change their vote. However, it was very informative on your viewpoints. --Akule 15:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Please don't be a censoring prude. It's Adam and Eve, for chrissakes. And a cartoon.--Jorm 09:00, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -Pillsy 12:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Because this falls under artistic merit. Now Go away. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - nothing to get worked up about -- boxy T L PA DA 00:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - They're circles with dots, not detailed pictures of genitals. No boner, no delete. --Joe O'Wood TALKCONTRIBSUD 02:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - why would someone need this? Mr. Necromancer 03:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - it's a cartoon for chrissakes. -- TexasFlag.gif BubbaT 06:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - I can't believe we're voting on this. -- Atticus Rex 17:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete? - I removed my previous vote and have resubmited, because its been shown that this is actually the work of Packard Jennings, not a Wiki members own creation. I feel compelled to vote delete, but in all honesty? If this file is simply edited to reference the proper owner and creator of this image, I think that'd make it fit under current fair-use laws. Am I wrong? --MorthBabid 21:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep it and stop trying to be the image police. You're pissing me off.--Blue Command Vic 21:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)


Kept- Pending response from Michael Durham aka Packard Jennings. And yes, I've contacted his management services requesting permission for fair use. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 07:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted per artists request. please see Battle of the Bear Pit discussion page for details. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 02:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Vidad12.PNG.jpg

No links to it, and it's a double up of Image:Vidad12.jpg (created 3 minutes earlier by the same user), it really needs speedydeleting as it's an obvious error, but doesn't seem to qualify -- boxy T L PA DA 01:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Bada Bing. -- TexasFlag.gif BubbaT 06:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - Gage 06:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Speedy Deleted - Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 23:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Agirl.jpg

Copyright infringement of an artwork print. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Source? Can you show this isn't the users own creation? --MorthBabid 20:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:03, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Lookie here: Image:Agirl.jpg#filelinks It's not even being used. Please delete Mr. Moderator. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 21:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted as unused image Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 23:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)


Image:Abc.jpg

Copyright infringement of comic book artwork. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Currently being used as group/user image as immitation and aproximation, not as parody or referenced source. --MorthBabid 20:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Lookie here: Image:Abc.jpg#filelinks It's not even being used. Please delete Mr. Moderator. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 21:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted as unused image Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 23:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC) Bold text

Image:A-team.jpg

Copyright infringement of the TV series A-Team. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Uncited and isn't being used in reference to copyrighted show...or at all, as far as far as I can tell. --MorthBabid 20:22, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Lookie here: Image:A-team.jpg#filelinks It's not even being used. Please delete Mr. Moderator. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 21:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted as unused image Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 23:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:39172802436976dfa8760.gif

Copyright infringement of an anime character. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete ...In the letter of the law, yes. But a ton of website forums are littered with the same thing, so...it makes me question the validity of doing so? Same with a lot of your other suggestions. --MorthBabid 20:36, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Is that a "other people are doing it, so why aren't we?" argument? --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Lookie here: Image:39172802436976dfa8760.gif#filelinks It's not even being used. Please delete Mr. Moderator. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 21:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted as unused image Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 23:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:2006-07-planet1-1.jpg

Copyright infringement of a movie poster. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Funny, but definetly breaks fair use. --MorthBabid 20:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Lookie here: Image:2006-07-planet1-1.jpg#filelinks It's not even being used. Please delete Mr. Moderator. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 21:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted as unused image Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 23:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:200px-PETsMART.png

Copyright infringement of the PETsMART trademark. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 17:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep In this case, its being used as a form of parody: The idea of having a 'Petsmart' in Malton. And the copyright logo is still visible and hasn't been tampered with. --MorthBabid 20:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
That's not a parody. That's simply saying "there is a petsmart in Malton". It gives people the unclear idea that Petsmart might have backed the game. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is ridiculous. These images are not being used for profit at any kind, neither in any offensive towards the people who *own* it. Yeah Yeah, mediawiki software has a set of rules about copyight, image ownership and legal stuff to protect people from using other people work in the wiki. But know what, this is a fun fun game wiki. Nothing here is to be taken serious, and those who do need medical advice. I say these images should be kept, unless those who own these images contact the moderation team of the wiki and ask us to remove it. --Hagnat 02:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
So I should upload full Star wars movies, because, like, I'm not making any money off of it. So it should totally be ok. For sure. I mean, who cares if I'm using someone's property without permission. Like, no one gets hurt. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - According to the image uploading rules, you can't upload copyrighted images. If we were going to change that, we should put forth an official policy on this matter. --Amanu Jaku 04:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Amanu.--AnimeSucks 06:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 15:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't believe I forgot to do this. --Akule 18:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Lookie here: Image:200px-PETsMART.png#filelinks It's not even being used. Please delete Mr. Moderator. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 21:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted as unused image Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 23:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)


Dunningwood_Warriors

Criterion 12 - not on the stats page, not updated since August 4th, 2006. --Akule 21:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep - The groups still active. Also it's on the stats page. - JedazΣT ΞD GIS S! 02:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
They are not on the stats page.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 04:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
I've just checked now (and when I made that comment) and we are there. Are you sure you are searching properly? Try "Dunningwood" on it's own, we are the only group with it in our name on the stats page at this moment. If not, never mind, we are still active though which I can confirm as the group leader. - JedazΣT ΞD GIS S! 10:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - if they're still playing, they should be able to keep their page, stats , or no stats -- boxy T L PA DA 05:07, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Kept-Active Group Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 03:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

RhodenbankRowdies

Criterion 12 - not on the stats page, exactly two months and no updates. --Akule 21:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep - This is one of those small groups that don't often update their wiki, but they're probably still around. The wiki has only been updated 3 times (excluding an Xoid fix), months apart (Feb, July, Oct.). I don't think we can be sure it's abandonned yet, they just update every now and then -- boxy T L PA DA 23:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)


Kept-Active Group Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 03:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

User:Xolah

Posted his scroll wars profile on the urban dead wiki. Useless, waste of space.--Thom Flask 00:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep - you can't delete somebody's user page--Gage 00:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - what do I care that his userpage is ridiculous, as long as it stays there -- boxy T L PA DA 00:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - you can post what you want on your userpage. Mr. Necromancer 03:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - even dweebs have a right to their user page. -- TexasFlag.gif BubbaT 06:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - but if there will never be a delete since this is a user page, why is this still here? -- Atticus Rex 08:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Kept asa its a users page... Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 23:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Arifle_large.jpg

Copyright infringement of a video game's gun mapping. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Which video game? Does someone known the source? Might be users own 3d creation? Unknown. --MorthBabid 19:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
That's the AR from Halo.--Blue Command Vic 04:18, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete For Vic's notation, thanks for that. --MorthBabid 05:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted as unused image per UD-Wiki Guidlines. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 09:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Animelingerie13_1.jpg

Copyright infringement of artwork from an anime series. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Delete, since no source is given for a "used without permission" to cover our butts on the copyright. --MorthBabid


Deleted as unused image per UD-Wiki Guidlines. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 09:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Alner_Mansion.jpg

Copyright infringement of the movie, Rose Red. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

I believe thats stock footage of an actual Mansion, and might fall within fair use. Check? --MorthBabid 20:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Nope, thats rose red, this page has the models used in the movie--AnimeSucksAnimeSucks 01:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - as stated above--AnimeSucks 01:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Thanks for clearing that up. --MorthBabid 05:03, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


Deleted as unused image per UD-Wiki Guidlines. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 09:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Verminsword.jpg

I uploaded this for possible use in a template just before spotting the copyright in the lower left.--J Muller 00:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete - you can nominate it for speedy delete directly I think, seeing as you're the one who created it and now want it gone -- boxy T L PA DA 00:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
I was going to, but I didn't see that copyright violation was on the Speedy Delete criteria.--J Muller 01:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Crit.7 will do it, you're the only editor -- boxy T L PA DA 01:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 7--Gage 06:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete -- Atticus Rex 08:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


Deleted as unused image per UD-Wiki Guidlines. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 09:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:-UD-Gker_Eric_Harris.JPG

Copyright infringement of a photograph from the Associated Press. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 22:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Gonna disagree with you on this one. This photo (along with all security footage) was released publically several years ago on a CD. Anyways, the Associated Press cannot hold copyright on an image that is owned by the Colorado state police.--Jorm 22:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
How about the fact that they sell it to people? http://www.co.jefferson.co.us/sheriff/sheriff_T62_R27.htm and http://www.alpinedisc.com/columbine.htm or are you saying that because they sell the image, they don't own it? Also, the wiki page you referenced said that it may be public domain. Nice source for reference, btw. Everyone should believe everything wikipedia says. --Akule 15:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm totally confused here. You said the image was owned by the Associated Press - that's your "reasoning" as to why this should be deleted. And hey, guess what: it's not. And you even provide the proof of that, pointing to the fact that the Colorado police are selling it (and I know; I got my copies from them, but it didn't cost anything when I got it back in 1999 or 2000 or whenever it was so apparently they changed their policy).
What I'm seeing is: you didn't know fuck about this image, you wanted it deleted because you wanna be a mod, made up some lie about it being owned by the associated press, and got called on it. How many other images have you gotten deleted by spewing the same bullshit?--Jorm 20:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Blah blah blah. I think I'm important because I made my own game. Blah blah blah. Okay, so it's not the associated press's copyright. It's the Jefferson County police's copyright. My bad. Still a copyrighted image and still defeats your poor argument. ;P And no, I don't want to be a moderator. I just like deleting images. I'm the picture police! --Akule 22:38, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Great comeback. You're a peach!--Jorm 23:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --AnimeSucks 01:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep --Mr yawn Scotland flag.JPG 07:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep -- Oh, yeah. Check this out: the same image on Wikipedia with the inclusion "This image is asserted as fair use as it is a historical image that cannot be reproduced in any other way." So, you know. Just saying; not Associated Press.
  • Keep - Jorm pretty much owned this one.--Gage 09:01, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep -Pillsy 12:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Yes, this counts as a historical doc. Though I wonder why anyone would want it for the wiki. >.>; --MorthBabid 19:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted as unused image per UD-Wiki Guidlines. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 09:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Start

Cotty Bank

Off-topic. Has nothing to do with Cotty Bank, just some ramblings about fire and newspapers. --Blue Command Vic 21:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

  1. Delete - As above.--Blue Command Vic 21:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  2. Keep - someone 9 block it and clean it up.--Gage 21:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
    i suggest the same is done for Cottey Way.--_Vic D'Amato__Dead vs Blue_ 21:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  3. Keep - It's a perfectly valid location stub now. Thanks, Gage. -- Atticus Rex 22:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
    Yeah, this request can be removed. I'm contemplating reporting the guy that made those two pages for vandalism, though.--Blue Command Vic 22:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
    I don't believe it can be removed, or at least that's my read of the guidelines above. Looks to me like once a valid request has been entered, the two weeks' voting has to run, but I freely admit the possibility that there may be some unwritten code that allows removal of a request. -- Atticus Rex 00:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
    I would assume that if something is modified to circumvent the needed deletion, the request can probably be removed.--Blue Command Vic 01:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
    Once the guidelines rehashed policy comes into effect, yes. Until then, nope. –Xoid M•T•FU! 16:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  4. Keep - While it's a keeper as it is now, I would prefer that crap gets submitted to M/SD so it can be nuked. Creating a location page after the vandalism is deleted is entirely allowable, y'know. –Xoid M•T•FU! 16:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  5. Keep? - It doesn't look bad now.--Labine50 MH|ME|P 18:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  6. Keep - Great Fix. --Max Grivas 12:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
  7. Keep - This just needed a fixin', not a blamin'. Good job. --MorthBabid 19:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  8. Keep - Its fixed. -- TexasFlag.gif BubbaT 06:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Kept Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 09:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Confederacy of Malton Related Stuff

There are three templates that were made for the Confed. of Malton, which was recently deleted. Yeah, a few people use them, but there is no Confed. of Malton. Template CIJ found on UDWiki:Moderation/Deletions, User:Agent White, User:Reptileus, User:Macampos, User:Apex Template ACOM found on UDWiki:Moderation/Deletions, User:Reptileus Template COM found on UDWiki:Moderation/Deletions, User:Reptileus

  1. Delete - Big suprise there.--Labine50 MH|ME|P 19:14, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  2. Delete - Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 19:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  3. Delete - wipe this "group" off the wiki--Gage 19:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  4. Delete - although "points and laughs at them" is arguably a useful template, it's time for even that joke to go. -- Atticus Rex 21:26, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  5. ledete - Gets rids of it!--AnimeSucks 01:03, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  6. Delete - I'll be glad to see this nuked. Pillsy 16:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  7. Keep - Isn't this taking it a bit far? Fair enough their page was completely stupid and full of lies and I have nothing and don't support this 'group' but their just templates and they are used by people- the first one is used by more than just the guy who created this rubbish- the other two aren't so just delete them. What does happen if you have a template and it gets deleted? Is it just a broken link? --MarieThe Grove 20:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
    Yes, it's just a broken link, and I'll be happy of cleaning them up.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 20:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
    And for ease I listed the entire list of wiki pages with those templates on them...Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 22:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  8. Delete--Thari 20:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  9. Keep the two first. It's possible to hate a defunct group, as much as it is to hate a banned wiki user... ^.- -Certified=Insane☭Québécois 22:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  10. Delete - Some groups are just so damn stupid that you never wanna hearr of them again. --Niilomaan GRR!•M! 08:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  11. Delete - Max Grivas 12:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
  12. Delete I guess we sort of have to, now. --MorthBabid 19:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  13. Keep - People USE these templates. As long as its not offensive it should be kept. What if someone took the code for these and placed them in place of the template? Would that get deleted also? Mr. Necromancer 06:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
    Re: Only Reptileus uses two of the three, and only 3 people use the other one... and since the so called confed has been deleted they are dead links/redirects. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 18:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

For Great Justice... Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 09:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)


Cezil

A character from scroll wars. Does not belong on the urban dead wiki.--Thom Flask 00:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 2--Gage 00:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - This was Xolah, he was told to keep that shite on his user page wasn't he? -- boxy T L PA DA 00:29, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Why does it matter? I thought you could make any page you want (as long as its not offensive) as long as you link it on your userpage. Mr. Necromancer 03:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
    This is a wiki about Urbandead. So no, you can't make any page about anything you want.--Gage 05:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
    Yes, I know. But what about say that sandbox page that is linked in your own userpage. Thats just talking and is not in a talk page, by your own reasoning you should not be allowed to have that page as well. Mr. Necromancer 05:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
    That sandbox is located at User:Gage/Sandbox so it is a sub page of my userpage. You are wrong man, I am a mod here; I just might know what I am talking about.--Gage 06:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
    So, is this the start (or continuation) of an inter-game war? Trying to take over each other's wiki's now that you've become bored with competeing within the game itself? -- boxy T L PA DA 06:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
    Dude, we don't have shit on their wiki, and they shouldn't get shit on ours. This is the urban dead wiki. It was created and is paid for by the creator of Urban Dead. I don't know how I can be more clear.--Gage 06:52, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Wtf. --Jorm 05:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Leaning on the DEL key. -- TexasFlag.gif BubbaT 06:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete -- Atticus Rex 08:52, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep -This is part of my character, it applies to both the UD wiki and the SW wiki, if you don't like it don't visit it, Besides it's not offensive, it's attached to my page and I'm keeping it because it's for me, not you. If you'd like me to add more to it then that's fine, I planned on it anyways, but who the heck do you think you are to tell me what kind of background story I want to write for myself anyways? If you really want to be helpful give me useful ideas on making it better instead of trying to discard my stuff as crud when it doesen't concern you. I appologise if this is a long post with many edits but I'm doing my best tgo find out how to defend myself against this, Can spmeone please aid me in this? I request an arbitrator or someone who can help champion my rights in this.-Xolah 09:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
    Then put it into your own user space, not the main space.--Jorm 10:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Moved to User:Xolah/Cezil. No need to delete anything now.--Gage 10:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:17_snow_giants.jpeg

Copyright infringement of artwork. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 22:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Gage 01:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --AnimeSucks 01:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -Pillsy 12:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:128017657_217fd2ea12_m.jpg

Copyright infringement of artwork. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 22:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Gage 01:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --AnimeSucks 01:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -Pillsy 12:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:1163718497637.jpg

Copyright infringement of artwork (Pokemon). Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 22:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Gage 01:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --AnimeSucks 01:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -Pillsy 12:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:1036997525448e67944d4bc7eg.jpg

Copyright infringement of Marvel Comics artwork (the hulk). Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 22:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Gage 01:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --AnimeSucks 01:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -Pillsy 12:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:151st2.jpg

Copyright infringement of a photograph from the Associated Press. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 22:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Gage 01:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --AnimeSucks 01:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -Pillsy 12:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:1145540716320.jpg

Copyright infringement of artwork from a video game. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 22:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Gage 01:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --AnimeSucks 01:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -Pillsy 12:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:0123urban140.jpg

Copyright infringement of a photograph from the Associated Press. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 22:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete --AnimeSucks 01:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -Pillsy 12:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:050811-N-9288T-129.jpg

Copyright infringement of a photograph from the Associated Press. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 22:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete --AnimeSucks 01:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -Pillsy 12:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:-OCT-2004_A_U.S._soldier_targets_a_building_where_insurgent.jpg

Copyright infringement of a photograph from the Associated Press. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 22:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete --AnimeSucks 01:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -Pillsy 12:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:151st.JPG

Copyright infringement of a photograph from the Associated Press. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 22:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete --AnimeSucks 01:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -Pillsy 12:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:180px-Swat.jpg

Copyright infringement of a cartoon series. Violates the image uploading rules.--Akule 22:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Gage 01:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --AnimeSucks 01:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -Pillsy 12:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Radioaktiv.jpg

Copyright infringement of the Sweedish band Black-Out's album Radioaktiv. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Gage 00:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - --AnimeSucks 09:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Toejam
  • Delete --The General 20:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Joe O'Wood 20:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Pillsy 16:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Dewberryisarealzombie.JPG

Copyright infringement of the movie Land of the Dead. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Gage 00:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - --AnimeSucks 09:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --The General 20:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Joe O'Wood 20:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Pillsy 16:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ac.paris68.jpg

Copyright infringement of a photograph from the Associated Press. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Gage 00:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - --AnimeSucks 09:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Joe O'Wood 20:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Pillsy 16:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:DA-logo.jpg

Copyright infringement of a zombie survival comic. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Gage 00:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - --AnimeSucks 09:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Joe O'Wood 20:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Pillsy 16:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:DSCN3746.jpg

Copyright infringement of a novel. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Gage 00:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - --AnimeSucks 09:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Joe O'Wood 20:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Pillsy 16:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:BubssaluteFOXHOUND.jpg

Copyright infringement of Day of the Dead. Not used with permission. Violates the image uploading rules. --Akule 18:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Gage 00:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - --AnimeSucks 09:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Joe O'Wood 20:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Pillsy 16:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


Deleted as a breach of TOS/Coppyright Violation Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Returnofthelivingdead (2).jpg

Not kosher.--Gage 09:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Gage 09:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - BOOBIES--AnimeSucks 09:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
    Deleted as a breach of TOS/copy vio--Gage 09:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Mall Tour '07

Another pack of lies cooked up by Reptileus. Akin to the now gone Confederacy of Malton. Reptileus never lead the mall tours.--Gage 01:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete - Gage 01:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --AnimeSucks 01:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep Maybe this is something Reptileus and others are trying to organize? Just like the November 5th campaign of the Harmanz? (Granted I don't know Reptileus' track record, but, if we delete this, why not Nov. 5th?) Daniel Hicken 04:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
    If you don't know who Reptileus is, don't vote. He is a liar. He said he had a group of 50+ members. The group was comprised soley of him. Xyu never signed onto this...--Gage 04:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - Reptileus' track record speaks for itself; the guy is a pathological liar. If someone wants to organise a Mall Tour '07, I have no qualms with it. As long as it isn't him - he's twisted the facts far beyond recognition one too many times for my liking. –Xoid M•T•FU! 04:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as Xoid. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 05:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
    Speedily Deleted.--Gage 08:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Black Mesa

Is there some kind of epidemic of copyright-infringing groups going around? Same reasoning for this as Shin-ra.--Blue Command Vic DvB 00:32, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

  1. Delete - As above.--Blue Command Vic DvB 00:35, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Keep - I belive in this case, the particular logos have been released to the community and commended for use in game mods, fiction, case mods and any sundry use the community has seen fit. --Max Grivas 00:49, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
    I guess if they'll allow game mods with Alyx Vance nekkid, they'll allow pretty much anything, huh?--Blue Command Vic DvB 15:31, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. Keep - Frohman, not freeman.--Thari 01:53, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  4. Keep - IANAL, but if I remeber rightly, this is considered fair use. Fair use != infringement. Next! --Sgt. John TaggartUNIT 11/5 WCDZ TJ! 17:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  5. Keep This is essentially "fan fiction", so what's the problem? It's not as if they're claiming the story of Half Life as their own or anything. As for logos, Valve have always been very willing to support community developments of mods, fan pages, etc. --Panserbjørn 11:25, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  6. Keep If this is copyright infringement, Valve would also have to prosecute the no less than two thousand user modifications and countless websites bearing the black mesa logo.--Tseng Wulong 14:34, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  7. Keep - Keep but on the same basis as Shin-ra, they change the logo. Pillsy 17:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Kept Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 14:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)


Ban In-Game Rape & Don't Ban In-Game Rape

I didn't agree with the Ban In-Game Rape as I feel people who are bothered by it shouldn't be playing the game. Creating a counter page is just going to cause more conflict. While I don't condone the actions done by these people I don't think these pages have a right to exist in their current format on the wiki. --Pillsy FT 13:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

  1. Delete - Pillsy FT 13:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Delete - Agreed. - Dark PhantomTalk 13:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. Keep the first, people are being directed to it from other sites, and it'd be good if they could see the official response. And there's some good rebuttal and conversation on the talk page. --Kevan 13:51, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  4. Keep Both, I personally think it's a good idea to have two sides of an issue, just keep any agressiveness down on both ends. --Absolution 14:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  5. Keep - As Kevan. </taking the easy way out> Cyberbob  Talk  14:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  6. Keep - It's an important subject worth referring back to --Turner Calton 14:12, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  7. Keep the first (same as Kevan), Delete the second (No real reason for it's existence thanks to Kevan's statement which basically says, "Not going to happen") --SirensT RR 14:18, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  8. Keep - No point going against the site owner. --Axe Hack 14:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  9. Keep - Deleting it won't make the problem go away.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 14:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  10. Keep - Keep the first,delete the second. The point of the first was to draw the issue to Kevan's attention. To his credit he has responded immediately, and his answer and reasoning is good enough for me. Moyes 14:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  11. Keep - ...Because deleteing this wouldn't cause further conflict?--Labine50 MH|ME|P 14:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  12. Merge the second into the first. Then lock against editing It'd be good to see the complaint, the counter complaint and the offical response on one tidy page that no-one can mess up. - David Malfisto 14:52, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  13. Keep the first. Delete the second. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 14:54, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  14. Spam - GET A GRIP, PEOPLE. If I really start thinking about it, there are any number of issues I could be overly sensitive about, but I'm not. Does shit like this bug me? A bit, but I don't let it rule my life or be in my mind every waking minute. Besides, why did no one think of the plainly obvious? If people can circumvent bans they receive for zerging, they can circumvent this. –Xoid M•T•FU! 15:03, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  15. Keep I'm with number six. Vikermac 15:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  16. Keep - I think you need to keep it, but lock the page so no more wiki drama starts up about it. and delete any subsequent page that deals with the subject following.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 16:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
    Abstain - I haven't heard of this problem before, I've certainly never seen it firsthand. Is this really that big of a problem to need two pages of opinion?--Blue Command Vic DvB 16:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
    We don't have an abstain vote on the deletions page.--Gage 20:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  17. Delete - This page is goddamn idiotic. Any time you enter an online space where other people can talk to you, there's a good chance somebody will say something horribly offensive to you. Even games that charge huge subscription fees can't afford to police all that. Why should we expect Kevan to? If you can't handle random twelve-year-olds saying rude things to you, get off the Internet. --Graaaaaaagh 17:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  18. Keep the first one, Delete the other. --Brizth M T 17:52, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  19. Delete - I can understand the concern but come on! What can you do about it? Nothing! As Xoid said, they're just gunna circumvent round whatever you throw at them.--Mr yawn Scotland flag.JPG 17:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  20. Keep 1st, Delete 2nd. I say keep the 1st as a visual example that we don't like the trend, delete the 2nd because it's reprehensible.Daniel Hicken 19:52, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
    Nix Both and Weak Keep 1st Users can block the "rapists" which will quickly end their influence on the game, negating the needs for these pages. Daniel Hicken 07:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  21. Delete - Quickly.--Gage 20:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  22. Keep 1st, Delete 2nd. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 21:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  23. Keep - It's an important issue, and deleting references to it won't make it go away. Accurrent 21:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  24. Keep 1st, Delete 2nd as Brizth and others have said. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 22:26, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  25. Keep 1st, Delete 2nd --Jorm 22:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  26. Keep the first Delete the second - Theres some good discussion on the first page, the second one is riduculous and addressed by the first --BubbaBuoy 23:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  27. After reading the pages, and finding out there's no Abstain vote here, I'm changing my vote to Delete. It's all just a ridiculous back-and-forth over something that isn't that important anyway. --Blue Command Vic DvB 23:02, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  28. Keep 1st, Delete 2nd. Obvious decision. Jake29 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  29. Keep 1st, Delete 2nd I think this is an important topic to keep reference to. As for the comment "people who are bothered by it shouldn't be playing the game", remember that not all players of this game are adults. --Panserbjørn 23:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  30. Delete - Rape is cool and I rape people in RL so delete the pages so that I can rape in the game and not in RL. Thanks.--dontaco2000}} How's that? The idea of even banning people for this is dumb.
  31. Delete - Your e-vagina cannot be mutilated by a man's e-penis. Grow the fuck up. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 02:18, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
    Keep 1, Delete 2. - One page is enough. I'm still in favor of maintaining the one page, though: it's a very good conversation and it -has- become a serious issue.
    Unsigned vote struck, much as I might agree. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 06:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  32. Keep 1st, Delete 2nd. I like the idea of a TOS being introduced, and if there is valid evidence of it being violated, the character banned. True, the player can simply create another character and resume the repulsive behaviour. But it takes weeks or months to level up a character. The prospect of losing that as a result of breaking the TOS should act as a deterrent. CaptainScarlet 13:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  33. Keep 1st, Delete 2nd - Brushing the issue under the carpet won't make it go away. --c138 RR 15:00, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  34. Keep 1st, Delete 2nd - Kevan implemented the best solution to this, but the discussion is worth saving. The second page is ridiculous. BTW to whoever's comment I accidentally mucked, my bad BubbaBuoy 17:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  35. Keep them or merge. --Leimana 18:55, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  36. Keep 1st, Delete or merge 2nd. Lock them both. Kevan's response should be preserved for future incidents. FmrPFCBob 22:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  37. Keep 1st Delete 2nd - On Strike, On Strike Again... campains and petitions are all over this wiki, they stay so should this one. --MarieThe Grove 12:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  38. Merge It's the same damn thing. --Ron Burgundy 01:52, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
  39. Merge Just merge them... --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 01:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  40. Keep 1st, Delete 2nd - As many others have stated above --GhostStalker 16:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  41. Nuke 'em both from the face of the earth. Twice. -Certified=Insane☭Québécois 22:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  42. Delete both of them. Damn whiny creatures making stupid pages. --Niilomaan GRR!•M! 07:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Ban In-Game Rape Kept with 17 Keeps 6 Deletes 3 Merge 1 Spam 1 Abstain
Don't Ban In-Game Rape Deleted with 3 keep 17 delete 3 Merge 1 Spam 1 Abstain

and from now on each item needs to be listed seperatly because counting those votes just hurt.
Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 06:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Shin-Ra Electric Power Company

The entire group is a copyright violation. I don't know the policy on disclaimers, but i don't think that including the copyright info is enough. From my knowledge, the only legal use is with explicit consent from the holding company. --Blue Command Vic DvB 04:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

  1. Delete - I'm fairly certain that fair use does cover this. Regardless, companies have a penchant for suing websites at the drop of a hat. –Xoid M•T•FU! 04:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Delete - They might have permision, but I'd like to see it in writing before I vote keep.--Labine50 MH|ME|P 04:40, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. Keep - In the past, similar groups here on the wiki, namely the U.B.C.S and the Special Tactics And Rescue Squad have been deemed fair use of copyrighted material, despite their inclusion of copyrighted material, trademarks, and logos. The inclusion of the copyright notice here in the Disclaimer was intended as a legal leg-up from the lack of notice these other groups provide in relation to intellectual property. --Tseng Wulong 23:34, 20 November 2006 UTC
    They may be fair use, but all that really matters is covering our arse when it comes to getting sued. It doesn't matter if we can prove it was fair use if Urban Dead dies as a result of being offline for the duration of the trial, no? –Xoid M•T•FU! 05:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  4. Keep - My vote is for keep the page but generate a new logo. Based partly on the beating administered to SPIDERMAN. I like fan fiction, cross-overs and such. I think we just don't want any unneeded hassles. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 04:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  5. Keep - Keep as long as they change their logo. Pillsy FT 11:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  6. Delete - Let's see...Shin-Ra sounds like Shinra, the world's name in Final Fantasy VII, and Square Enix might not be happy about this. --Axe Hack 14:21, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
    If I'm not allowed to RE this, just let me know, but Axe, the official usage of Shinra has the hyphen in it. Believe me, 3/4 of my friends in middle school were FF7 geeks. *snort* Hehe. I thought the same thing when they would write it like that, though. I found out later that the Japanese version has the hyphen for some reason. --Blue Command Vic DvB 16:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
    OK then...it's not a copyright violation for the English FF7 but a copyright violation of the Japanesse FF7. Same difference. Square Enix probably still won't like it. And my bad....Shinra isn't the world's name in FF7 but the evil corporation's name(Shinra Inc.)who's killing the planet the characters in FF7 is trying to stop(as well as the main baddy Sephiroth). --Axe Hack 22:03, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  7. Keep - For the same reason as Black Mesa. NEXT! --Sgt. John TaggartUNIT 11/5 WCDZ TJ! 21:56, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  8. Keep - I don't need a reason, right? I don't really care about minor copyright infringement, myself. Plus, Dentonside Power's motto is a trademark of an Australian company, or at least it was. TTHSK 03:52, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Kept- Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 14:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Bot

and so... Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 07:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't think that's speedy-deletable - it is NPOV, and does not provide any help or guidance in making bots. I'll move this one to M/D. Cyberbob  Talk  11:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

And... go. Cyberbob  Talk  11:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

  1. Keep - no reason to delete this.--Gage 14:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Keep - this is a reasonably informative piece. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 16:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC) EDIT: OK, I just saw that the scripts link is kosher. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 16:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. Keep - Why the hell is this here? –Xoid M•T•FU! 04:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Because Conn put it up for Speedy Deletion, and I effectively voted Keep. Sorry for ruining your rhetorical question ^_^ Cyberbob  Talk  05:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  4. Delete - I'm pretty sure anyone who is ever going to care knows what a bot is, either from other games, or figuring it out themselves.--Labine50 MH|ME|P 04:40, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  5. Keep - It's a valid entry. Odd and in the need of some work, but valid. --MorthBabid 05:21, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  6. Keep - What is a bot? .... is what I woulda said had I not saw that page! Thanks Botpage!--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 05:44, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  7. Keep - Just because something might be common knowledge to us, doesn't mean that the newbs will know. If we delete it on the grounds that most of us already know all about it's subject then we should also delete any pages explaining simple things like how barricades work and that death isn't permanent. Also, there is some information on that page that even people who have been here for a little while might not know (for example, I had never even heard of the sentinel bot until I read that page). --Reaper with no name TJ! 17:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

kept Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 19:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Doris Death Squad and {{DORIS Sucks}}

Template directed at users and group has no point in existing except to grief on the wiki, causing drama. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 21:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep - you can't put up stuff up for deletion that other people made just because they disagree with you. I am a member of DORIS, and I think this "group" should stay. By "group", I mean "one person".--Gage 21:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - You said we could delete anything we wanted. Even if a page was too pink. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 21:45, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
    You can M/D anything, but you won't get away with it. M/SD is for things that fit the criterion, which this did NOT. Off topic? It is about UD isn't it? Give me a break.--Gage 21:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Things aimed at specific people or groups have been deleted before. I direct your memories towards the infamous purging of the personal attack templates, and the group attack templates which were common during the time of Amazing. Cyberbob  Talk  23:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - I can only remember personal attack templates being removed. If we're removing pages that are vaguely offensive to groups in general, then what about the Ridleybank_Reclamation_Forces? -- ∀lan Watson T·RPM 23:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
    • They have a disclaimer on their page stating that none of it is real and not supposed to offend anyone. Cyberbob  Talk  00:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
    I can't really say I buy the use of a disclaimer. Are you telling me if they slapped a disclaimer on this page and template that they'd magically become acceptable? Or that if I prefaced my calling you a shitsucking ass pirate with a disclaimer that you wouldn't get offended? -- ∀lan Watson T·RPM 04:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Speaking of groups that have no point in existing except to grief on the wiki, and causing drama, I believe you are familiar with the RRF? I vaguely remember something about an STD clinic...--Labine50 MH|ME|P 23:59, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
    • They have a disclaimer on their page stating that none of it is real and not supposed to offend anyone. Cyberbob  Talk  00:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
      • You fail at the fact that it does offend me, and most likely the other 3 active editors of the MHG page.--Labine50 MH|ME|P 00:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
        • Labine... honestly, what doesn't offend you? The intent is the most important issue here. Cyberbob  Talk  00:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
          • The word "Majuscule" doesn't offend me. Yeah, you heard me. It never offended me this entire time. We've strayed a bit off topic, I this is suposed to be about DORIS and thier enemies. I think.--Labine50 MH|ME|P 00:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
            • Yes, it is, and I'm saying that your putting forward the Ridleybank Reclamation Forces page as "precedent" is irrelevant - that page is not intended to offend. These pages are. Cyberbob  Talk  00:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
              • How do you know that these pages are meant to offend? And besides, regardless of the intention, an offensive page is an offensive page no matter what.--Labine50 MH|ME|P 01:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
                • How do I know these pages are meant to offend? Christ. You're a basket case. I give up. Read the goddamn template. What do you think? Cyberbob  Talk  01:21, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
                  • Uh...the STD clinic was a joke on myself...I called "Hospitals a poor man's Mall Drugstore and said how I ate a chick out in a hospital, joke was on me, it was the STD Clinic." So it wasn't aimed at you. And the whole group is supposed to be a joke on me too. While I'm making fun of others I go over the top with stupid crap that makes no sense. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 14:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
                    • They could mean it in a good way. Ok, I know that's an outright lie, but if they really want to take on DORIS with their group, let them. They'll probably be swiftly killed, though.--Labine50 MH|ME|P 01:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Icky poo attack groups. If you want to kill Doris, you are an idiot. Killing any PKer group of that size is like the sacking of Daris. It only creates more drama. - 343 U! 01:04, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Seems like a common enough sentiment to get some use. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 02:51, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - One person doesn't count as a group. .... shouldnt the BME be killed on that grounds also?--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 04:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This really seems to be a personal vendetta rather than an actual threat; I question the fact that someone from a conflicting group put this up for deletion. Also, how can we really PROVE that only one person is in this group? Show me evidence, please, not just emotive claims. --MorthBabid 21:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
    Proof. Now stop being dumb. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 00:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
But thats just the publicly listed group membership; Isn't it possible they have other non-listed members or some that don't use the wiki? --MorthBabid 05:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - There's nothing in the rules about templates opposing one single group, and if you think about it, every group started with just one person. This is just another attempt by DORIS to get Dulston off their back, using dirty tactics once again. Blue Command Vic DvB 17:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    Don't confuse Sonny with DORIS.--Gage 17:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    Wow, then I guess it's really odd that it says DORIS in his signature. Someone must've put that there to confuse us! Call the authorities! Sig vandals! Oh noes! --Blue Command Vic DvB 17:47, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    What I am trying to say, if you would just listen is that Sonny does not speak for all of DORIS. You are an idiot. I am a member myself, and you will see that I voted keep. Fuck off.--Gage 17:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    I also voted differently to Sonny when you brought this shit up about DORIS trying to delete everything previously… and guess what? I'm also a member of DORIS, imbecile. Talking of dirty tactics… when is Dead vs Blue gonna do stop the zerging pandemic in your ranks? Perhaps you should go make a template about that. –Xoid M•T•FU! 04:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
    I don't zerg, and as far as I know, no one in DvB does either. Just a nasty rumor started by ZHU and conno.--Blue Command Vic DvB 04:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
    Bullshit. Several of your members have alts in the same suburb. Hell, some of you have even admitted it. It's not like the Dulston Alliance doesn't have a long, proud history of zerging and defending zergs, anyway. Who are you to buck the trend? –Xoid M•T•FU! 04:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
    If DvB zergs, it's news to me. The only accounts I currently use are http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=642288 and http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=666078, and they are in Dulston and Pitneybank, respectively.--Blue Command Vic DvB 04:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - If he can't get anyone to join, the group'll get deleted in a month or so, regardless. The template (if still being barely used by that time) might as well just be SUBST:ed in then nuked. –Xoid M•T•FU! 04:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - If we're deleting wiki pages for one-person groups specifically designed to harass other groups, someone should tend to Escendo Numerus also. It's just one guy (who has been banned twice for vandalism, btw) and his alt. --Aiden H 4H 08:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Template Kept, Other deleted by Speedy request Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 19:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

The War in Griggs

Pack of lies. I'd NPOV it myself but I'd have to rewrite the whole thing. And doing that isn't worth it since the subject is worthless anyway. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 18:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

'Scusi for butting in, but I don't see where this fits any SD criteria. Shouldn't it go on the deletions page instead? -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 18:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Indeed. Atticus is right. I'm no touching this.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 18:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Not sure. It isn't a group page so like Reptileus' false history pages it goes here first. If a mod sees it as false shit, for lack of better words, it'll get deleted. If a mod sees it can be fixed, it'll go to deletions. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 18:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
And Done So...
  1. Delete Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 19:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Delete --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 19:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. Delete What a waste of server space. Don't they know History is written by the victor? Non-NPV belongs somewhere else.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 19:04, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
    Not even the victor. Those that ran away from battle. When we left there was no one, NO ONE, in Griggs. And we couldn't stay there hunting them in other suburbs when Steve Irwin died. The dude needed to be honored. --Sonny Corleone RRF CRF DORIS Hunt! 19:11, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  4. Delete --Outstanding 19:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC) "Some will call it biased, some will call it bull, some will call it stupid. Some all three." And they will be right.
  5. Delete - fuck that!--Gage 21:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  6. Delete - what he said *points up*. Pillsy FT 10:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  7. Delete - Another crock of shit from your local Minister of Propaganda, Jackson 5. How surprising. –Xoid M•T•FU! 04:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  8. Delete - The fact that there aren't any screenshots of the event in question, the lack of inter-linking to a grander debate, the rather sophmoric language, and the almost singular list of user edits all support the need to delete this. --MorthBabid 05:16, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Deleted- Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 19:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/Dec_2006&oldid=1481954"