Difference between revisions of "UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct"

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Misconduct Cases Currently Under Consideration)
Line 43: Line 43:
  
 
==Misconduct Cases Currently Under Consideration==
 
==Misconduct Cases Currently Under Consideration==
''There are currently no Sysops abusing their powers.''
+
 
 +
Hi, not sure if this fits here but there is on ongoing issue with the goth store page. I am the goth store owner in game. have been running the shop since 2/2015. i decided to modify the page to reflect this. since the edit another party, realsiege22, has attempted revision excluding me claiming i am an imposter however this person the previous person it is linked to (goth store owner) notr is this person the creator of the page.
 +
I think it is an illegal alt made as now Boxy has
 +
made the same revision without cause or explanation?
 +
I have been talking about this issue on both my user page to Bob Moncrief and on the RealSiege22 user page where he is trying to link me to a bunch of other stuff that isnt true.
 +
So im wondering why is a revision being done by Boxy without explanation?
 +
goth store owner has not been seen around havercroft on a regular basis for years hence why i created the toon and am there at my post every day alive or dead. i also do not grief, pk, or zerg as goth store owner has been witnessed doing this week.
 +
it seems like realsiege22 knows the site well and maybe too well so that is why i suspect he is an illegal alt of another user here.
 +
so if this is the incorrect place for me to ask then im sorry but seemsalot of shady stuff is going on and i know that ingame cheaters help[ each other so hope this place is a bit more on the up and up [[User:The Goth Store Owner|The Goth Store Owner]] ([[User talk:The Goth Store Owner|talk]]) 10:29, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
  
 
==Concluded Misconduct Cases==
 
==Concluded Misconduct Cases==
 
Check the [[UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive|Archive]] for concluded Misconduct cases.
 
Check the [[UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive|Archive]] for concluded Misconduct cases.

Revision as of 10:29, 24 August 2015

Administration Services

Sysop List | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

This page is for the reporting of administrator (sysop) misconduct within the Urban Dead wiki. Sysops are trusted with a considerable number of powers, many of which have the capacity to be abused. In many circumstances, it is possible for a sysop to cause considerable havoc. As such, users are provided this page to report misconduct from the System Operators. For consistency and accountability, sysops also adhere to the guidelines listed here.

Guidelines for System Operator Misconduct Reporting

The charge of Administrative Misconduct is a grave charge indeed. If misconduct occurs, it is important that the rest of the sysop team be able to review the charges as necessary. Any charge of administrative misconduct must be backed up with evidence. The clearest evidence that can be provided for administrative misconduct is a clear discrepancy between the relevant action log (deletion, block, or protection log) and the archives of the relevant administration service page, and this is a minimum standard of evidence admitted in such a tribunal.

Misconduct is primarily related to specific Administrator Services, not standards of behavior. As such, situations including verbal attacks by sysops, while frowned upon, do not constitute misconduct. Sysops on a wiki are in theory supposed to have no more authority than a regular user - they merely have a greater scope of power. Personality conflicts between sysops and regular users should be treated just as a personality conflict between two regular users. If, in the course of such a conflict, a sysop abuses their administrative powers by banning a user, blocking or deleting a page without due process, that is misconduct, and should be reported to this page.

There is, however, an exception to this rule - excessive bullying, or attempts to treat the status of sysop as a badge of authority to force a sysop's wishes on the wiki may also come under misconduct. Any accusations of this should come with just as clear evidence, and for such an action to be declared misconduct, there should be a clear pattern of behavior across a considerable period of time.

All discussion of misconduct should occur on this page, not the talk page - any discussion on the talk page will be merged into this page once discovered. Once a misconduct case has been declared closed, a member of the sysop team other than the sysop named in the case will mete out the punishment (if deemed necessary), and then move the case to the Archive.

Administrative Abilities

For future reference, the following are sysop specific abilities (ie things that sysops can do that regular users cannot):

  • Deletion (ie complete removal, as opposed to blanking) of pages (including Images and any other page-like construct on this wiki), through the delete tab on the top of any deletable construct.
  • Undeletion (ie returning a page, complete with page history) of pages (including any other page-like construct on this wiki (Images are not included as deletion of an image is not undoable), through the undelete tab on the top of any undeletable construct
  • Protection of pages (ie removing the ability of regular users to edit or move a particular page), through the protect tab on the top of any protectable construct.
  • Moving of pages (ie changing a page complete with the page's history to a different namespace).
  • Warning users reported in Vandal Banning.
  • Banning of Users (ie removing the ability of a specific user to edit the wiki), through the Block User page.
  • Editing of Protected pages by any means.
  • Research IP activity using the CheckUser extension.
  • (Bureaucrats Only) Promotion (providing the above abilities) of User to Sysop/Bureaucrat status.

If none of the above abilities were abused and the case doesn't apply for the exception mentioned above, then this is a case for UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration or UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning.

Example of Misconduct Proceedings

Sysop seems to have deleted Bad Page, but I can't find it in the Archives of either the Deletion or Speedy Deletion pages. The Logs show a deletion at 18:06, October 24th 2005 by a System Operator, but this does not seem to be backed up by a request for that deletion. I would like to know why this is the case -- Reporter 13:42, 28 Oct 2005 (BST)

The deletion was asked through my talk page. I give my Talk page as proof of this. -- Sysop 13:42, 28 Oct 2005 (BST)
It looks like the page that was deleted did not belong to the requesting user, so you were in no position to delete it on sight. -- Reporter 13:42, 28 Oct 2005 (BST)
You know the rules, Sysop. All deletion requests have to go through the Speedy Delete page. Next time, please inform the user where they should lodge the request. This is a clear violation, will you accept a one-day ban as punishment? -- Sysop2 13:42, 28 Oct 2005 (BST)
I'm not liking it, but I clearly broke the rules, I'll accept the ban. I'll certainly remember due process next time... Sysop 13:42, 28 Oct 2005 (BST)
As punishment for failing to follow due process, Sysop has been banned for a period of 24 hours. This will be moved to the Archive shortly. -- Sysop2 13:42, 28 Oct 2005 (BST)

Before Reporting Misconduct

Due to a the growing number of Non-Misconduct cases popping up on this page the Administration Staff has decided to compile a basic summary of what has been viewed as Not Misconduct in the past. Please read over UDWiki:Misconduct and make sure that what you are reporting is in fact misconduct before filing a report here.

Cases made to further personal disputes should never be made here, harassment of any user through administration pages may result in vandal escalations. Despite their unique status this basic protection does still apply to Sysops.

Misconduct Cases Currently Under Consideration

Hi, not sure if this fits here but there is on ongoing issue with the goth store page. I am the goth store owner in game. have been running the shop since 2/2015. i decided to modify the page to reflect this. since the edit another party, realsiege22, has attempted revision excluding me claiming i am an imposter however this person the previous person it is linked to (goth store owner) notr is this person the creator of the page. I think it is an illegal alt made as now Boxy has made the same revision without cause or explanation? I have been talking about this issue on both my user page to Bob Moncrief and on the RealSiege22 user page where he is trying to link me to a bunch of other stuff that isnt true. So im wondering why is a revision being done by Boxy without explanation? goth store owner has not been seen around havercroft on a regular basis for years hence why i created the toon and am there at my post every day alive or dead. i also do not grief, pk, or zerg as goth store owner has been witnessed doing this week. it seems like realsiege22 knows the site well and maybe too well so that is why i suspect he is an illegal alt of another user here. so if this is the incorrect place for me to ask then im sorry but seemsalot of shady stuff is going on and i know that ingame cheaters help[ each other so hope this place is a bit more on the up and up The Goth Store Owner (talk) 10:29, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Concluded Misconduct Cases

Check the Archive for concluded Misconduct cases.

Personal tools
advertisements