UDWiki:Administration/Move Requests

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

This page is for the requesting of page moves by normal users. The average user's ability to move pages has been rescinded due to frequent abuse by vandals; as such, users will need to submit requests (similar in nature to those on Speedy Deletions and Protections) for pages to be moved by a sysop.

Guidelines for requesting a Page Move

Copy the template below (Or just type it), replace the text in red with the relevant details, and paste the template under the Move Request Queue heading. A day after a sysop has taken action on the request, move requests should be moved to the Archive.

===[[PAGENAME]]===
*[[MOVE TO HERE]]
*~~~~

Move Request Queue

UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Vapor

Whoever came up with the idea of creating unlinked pages as a part of an archival system needs to be shot. Unfortunately, redoing the A/PM archives in the style of the A/M archives and A/RE archives makes no sense since there are so many more users in it than there are in the other two. If anything, I'm more inclined to simply delete all of those sorts of archive pages and then move the "(1)" entries into their places, since that's in keeping with the wiki software's own behavior (e.g. it doesn't add numbers until after the first one if you have multiple headings with the same name), as well as what is standard practice with the other wiki archives we have. Thoughts? I suspect boxy may disagree. ;) Aichon 20:50, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
I like the consistency of having each one have a number if there are more than one, although that does mean moving everyone's first candidacy to a _(1) once they've got a _(2). (We could just start everyone off with Username_(1), although that would be a bunch of move work now to save some later.) I don't see the reason for maintaining the list of all of a user's candidacies at their base page, though, since they're all listed (and ctrl+F'able) in the templates at Category:Promotions Candidacies, and no one has more than 5 total candidacies, which are listed in the alphabetical list at the bottom of that page anyway. Bob Moncrief EBDW! 01:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Does anyone else have comments on this? Bob Moncrief EBDW! 00:20, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
MEH --Rosslessness 00:25, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
I concur with Ross on this. Whether to add a (1) or not isn't really a matter. -- Spiderzed 00:26, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
  1. Delete. ~Vsig.png 00:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
  2. Leave it be, unless the op whose promotion it is prefers it the other way (in which case they can move it themselves). It's meaningless so uniformity isn't really a concern worth bothering about. For hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee 02:48, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
    If you want to foolishly leave it up to me, I say move it to UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Vapor_(0). At least then it looks like some kind weird fuckin emoticon or something. ~Vsig.png 06:09, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
    Can mine be expressed as vulgar fractions? It seems fitting. For hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee 06:11, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
    Shh. Don't give away all the good ideas. I'm about to approach you in private about a custom promotion title racket if this thing actually passes. We'll make a killing. ~Vsig.png 06:17, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
    I dunno, man. I think Sofie Gråbøl already made a couple of those. For hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee 06:26, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

A fun history lesson: There never used to be A/PM/Archive/User:XXXX (1) pages. It was User:XXXX for their first promotion, and User:XXXX (2) for their second, and so on. Then sometime in maybe 2010 Boxy just decided to change them all, rearrange the system and make User:XXXX portals to all their promotion bids. No one really made a fuss. I like boxy but I always thought it was a bit of a dumb idea and the other system is just simpler to manage. A ZOMBIE ANT 05:44, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

I'm surprised box hasn't split a seam over the nav templates, then. Oh dear, oh my. Don't look down. ~Vsig.png 06:09, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Not a lot outside of me can get him to split a seam. Particularly these days and I really have to work at it now. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 07:26, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Recent Actions

Darkone217

Done. Also, it's time to cycle the admin archives. Unfortunately I don't have time for that tonight. -- Spiderzed 18:53, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Done (mostly). Bob Moncrief EBDW! 20:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Archives

Move Requests Archive
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2014 H1 H2
Years 2015 2016 2017 2018