Difference between revisions of "UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/New Criterion for Speedy Deletion"

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
m (Protected "UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/New Criterion for Speedy Deletion": Re-protecting [edit=sysop:move=sysop])
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Policy Document}}
+
{{Policy Document|New Criterion for Speedy Deletion}}
 
{{protect}}
 
{{protect}}
  

Latest revision as of 19:00, 6 January 2013

Green check.png Guidelines — Policy Document
This page is a statement of official UDWiki Policies and Rules. See Policy Discussion for policy additions and changes.
Padlock.png Administration Services — Protection.
This page has been protected against editing. See the archive of recent actions or the Protections log.

This policy change would update Speedy Delete Criterion 1 to include un-useful duplication of pages (including images), and add a Criterion 13 to clean up any sub-pages from previous deletions (except where they serve an individual purpose despite being orphaned). The changes would be:


1. No Content: The page contains no more than a line or two of content that cannot clearly be expanded, consists of random or incoherent content , or is duplicated elsewhere to no purpose. Pages created by Spambots typically fall under this category.
13. Missed sub-page: The page is a sub-page from a previous deletion request that has not been deleted with the request, and that serves no individual purpose (please note the relevant deletion request).

Changes to Crit. 1 are in blue italics, Crit. 13 is new.

Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
  • # comments ~~~~
    or
  • # ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop.

The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

For

  1. So that more useless stuff can be legitimately speedydeleted -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 05:12, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  2. a good policy. it appears it would help make things go more smoothly.--Blood Panther 05:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  3. More reasons to delete shit. --Cap'n Silly T/W/P/CAussieflag.JPG 05:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  4. Common sense, really. --Hubrid Nox Sys WTF U! B! 05:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  5. Gage 05:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  6. Heh, didn't expect me to do otherwise I hope? -Certified=InsaneQuébécois 05:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  7. This will make things a lot easier.Vantar 06:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  8. Sure --Matthew Fahrenheit YRCT+1 06:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  9. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 11:45, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  10. Sounds great. --ZombieSlay3rSig.png 19:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  11. Good idea. --Unknowen9000 23:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  12. Woo! More excuses to use the nuclear option! --Darth Sensitive Talk W! 02:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  13. Well, it doesn't INCREASE potential abuse, and clarity is good...hope I don't regret this? --MorthBabid 09:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  14. as long as important information doesn't suffer I think it's agreeable. .--nRnRQBBAN 18.30 CET 18th February
  15. Looks like it clarifies, now if people will just fix Crit 12.--The Envoy 17:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  16. Seems harmless enough. --Specialist290 22:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
  17. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 14:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
  18. I agree. --Xtralife | Talk·SCA·FLT | Hammertime.gif 21:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
  19. Bandwagonin'. --Toejam 21:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  20. Sounds good. --Roinator 23:35. 26 Febuary 2007
  21. -- Pillsy FT 16:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
  22. -- yes -- Asheets 18:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
  23. Fine by me --BelmondTMZ 01:58, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
  24. all good. Muadib 12:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
  25. Choo Choo! --CaptainM 22:16, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Voting closed

Against

Voting closed

Personal tools
advertisements