UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Prohibit Sysop Misconduct Self-Punishment

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

The coloured text will be added to the last paragraph of the section Guidelines for System Operator Misconduct Reporting" so that it will read as follows:

"All discussion of misconduct should occur on this page, not the talk page - any discussion on the talk page will be merged into this page once discovered. Once a misconduct case has been declared closed, a member of the sysop team other than the sysop named in the case will mete out the punishment (if deemed necessary), and then move the case to the Archive."

Voting

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
  • # comments ~~~~
    or
  • # ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop.

The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

For

  1. ~Dr Frank (t) (DF) [P] (Sb) 05:40, 14 September 2009 (BST)
    Okay i think this vote is invalid as it was placed by User:The Second linking to another user. That isn't okay as per sig policy.--xoxo 06:26, 14 September 2009 (BST)
    No, it's him, checkuser confirmed that he just lost his accoutn password.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:12, 14 September 2009 (BST)
  2. Hagnat jew gold in basket.--xoxo 05:52, 14 September 2009 (BST)
  3. Yeah, I could see this in real life: "No, that's alright your honour. I'll just take myself to jail!" I could see why this could be important... -Poodle of doom 05:55, 14 September 2009 (BST)
    I think a better analogy is nubis refusing to show up to court, and when teh cops are sent coz he's been skipping bail he'd answer the door and be like "don't worry guys, i put myself under house arrest"--xoxo 05:59, 14 September 2009 (BST)
  4. In an ideal world this would be unneccessary as any self-punishment would just be ignored by the oher sysops, but sometimes you have to be pragmatic. Cyberbob  Talk  05:56, 14 September 2009 (BST)
  5. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:01, 14 September 2009 (BST)
  6. --Bob Boberton TF / DW Littlemudkipsig.gif 06:12, 14 September 2009 (BST)
  7. --SirArgo Talk 06:23, 14 September 2009 (BST)
  8. Sure why not? It can't do any harm.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:12, 14 September 2009 (BST)
  9. The only people I can see being against it would be incompetent sysops and former sysops of the same calibre. -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 11:21, 14 September 2009 (BST)
  10. makes sense for so many reasons its almost a mystery why this isn't already the case. --Honestmistake 11:45, 14 September 2009 (BST)
  11. Good idea. --ZsL 11:56, 14 September 2009 (BST)

Against

  1. Sometimes its easier to just say..."My Bad, I'll take care of this myself." If SOME folks could keep their underwear from getting knotted up, this would take care of itself more often than not. ConndrakaTAZM CFT 04:41, 14 September 2009 (BST)
    I like my underwear well knotted.--xoxo 05:52, 14 September 2009 (BST)
    I think he was talking about relevant people. Cyberbob  Talk  05:54, 14 September 2009 (BST)
    And here i was thinking he was talking about my vendetta cases with no merit..--xoxo 05:55, 14 September 2009 (BST)