UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Reevaluation for Bureaucrats

From The Urban Dead Wiki
< UDWiki:Administration‎ | Policy Discussion
Revision as of 17:20, 30 November 2015 by Aichon (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
Green check.png Guidelines — Policy Document
This page is a statement of official UDWiki Policies and Rules. See Policy Discussion for policy additions and changes.
Padlock.png Administration Services — Protection.
This page has been protected against editing. See the archive of recent actions or the Protections log.
Notice
Due to a more recent policy change, terms have been further reduced to 6 months, making this policy effectively void.

This line of A/BP will be changed to reflect the 8 months cycle.

said:
If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 12 months, then an election is called after that period.


New Text would be

said:
If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 8 months, then an election is called after that period.

Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
  • # comments ~~~~
    or
  • # ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop.

The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

For

  1. Author Vote - This just makes sense. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 15:30, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  2. Down with the cats! Srsly, it would just get rid of a needless complication in the current system. --Oh, and vote on Project Funny, by the way. -- Spiderzed█ 15:39, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  3. Makes sense. -- Cheese 15:49, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  4. For. I also find DDR's point moot, as the current system supersedes A/RE anyway, why would an amended length not do the same? Nothing to be done! 19:28, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  5. For - Fair enough.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 21:03, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  6. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)
  7. Clearly part of Karke's plan for eventual domination of the wiki through seemingly innocent policy alterations. Clearly. Yes. --Funt Solo QT Scotland flag.JPG 23:49, 17 May 2011 (BST)
    Mod Conspiracy. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 23:58, 17 May 2011 (BST)
  8. For - As discussed on the talk page. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 23:58, 17 May 2011 (BST)
  9. For - Agree - Louis Vernon 11:08 18 May 2011 (BST)
  10. FORE!-- HEY! HANDS OFF MAH BOOBS!   bitch  16:04, 18 May 2011 (utc)
  11. Makes better sense. —Aichon— 08:51, 24 May 2011 (BST)
  12. meh --hagnat 17:05, 24 May 2011 (BST)
  13. Frankly Crats just generally offend me. Oh and down with cats. --Rosslessness 20:00, 26 May 2011 (BST)
    For --Michalesonbadge.pngTCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 15:08, 30 May 2011 (BST) Vote after deathline struck -- Spiderzed█ 17:14, 30 May 2011 (BST)

Against

incomplete. if said crat has not faced an election in 8 months they will find themselves up for evaluation as per A/RE policy. it should specify that an election will replace the A/RE evaluation, rather accompany it. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 17:52, 13 May 2011 (BST)
That is actually already in the A/RE policy itself as documented on the talk page. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 21:17, 13 May 2011 (BST)
Right you are. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)
Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Reevaluation_for_Bureaucrats&oldid=2272561"