UDWiki:Administration/Promotions
Template:Moderationnav Template:Promotions Intro
Candidates still requiring vouches
User:Suicidalangel
I'm putting Suicidalangel up for evaluation as per his biannual promise to the community.
SA has been a sysop for 6 months, and has been a member of the community for years longer. He's been a crat for almost 3 months. As a good user does, he's helped shape/create a few policies here and there in the past, and has mostly a cool head when it comes to drama. He is often active, and always puts his all into helping out with the wiki, in all its parts.
When he can't make it to the computer because of real-life issues, he makes a continued effort to ensure his responsibilities are met punctually through other users. This evaluation bid is an example. He takes this place seriously and has always tried to help out users that need it.
- Vouch - As always, for me, a vouch comes with trust. I trust SA. --ϑϑℜ 07:42, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- Thanks for doing this DDR, but wouldn't it have been better off to wait until SA isn't a 'crat any more (so one user doesn't have to make the decision?) Linkthewindow Talk 07:45, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- He asked me to do this at this time. He'll be adding his own paragraph to the bid tomorrow. --ϑϑℜ 07:48, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- I was sure he would anyway, but I'm still not sure if it's a good idea :/. Linkthewindow Talk 07:56, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- You should talk to him then. I am simply fulfilling his request, as he wants his evaluation bid in on time. In US it's still the 29th. --ϑϑℜ 07:59, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- I know, and I doubt I'll convince him now (especially considering this bid is already under way. It's just that I don't like the idea that one crat can evaluate the other one (without any outside input from another crat,) and they'll be confusion in the (rather unlikely) event that he gets demoted. Linkthewindow Talk 10:38, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- You should talk to him then. I am simply fulfilling his request, as he wants his evaluation bid in on time. In US it's still the 29th. --ϑϑℜ 07:59, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- I was sure he would anyway, but I'm still not sure if it's a good idea :/. Linkthewindow Talk 07:56, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- He asked me to do this at this time. He'll be adding his own paragraph to the bid tomorrow. --ϑϑℜ 07:48, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- Thanks for doing this DDR, but wouldn't it have been better off to wait until SA isn't a 'crat any more (so one user doesn't have to make the decision?) Linkthewindow Talk 07:45, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- fucking no way--CyberRead240 10:04, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- Vouch - Although, if he gets demoted... and DDR gets banned then it would be Nubis' time to shine! Yeah, it's gonna be a vouch for the greater good.--– Nubis NWO 13:17, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- I'd self ban for that. The future looks bright already! --ϑϑℜ 13:25, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- Vouch - Don't really feel the need to elaborate. --Cyberbob 13:55, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- Vouch Not much to say, he has done a good job so far. - User:Whitehouse 14:36, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- Vouch --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:28, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- Eh - a little bit country, a little bit punk. --xoxo 15:35, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- vouch Its been 6 months already? Asheets 18:46, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- Vouch - As long as he wants to continue I say let him. --Roorgh 18:55, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- Vouch - Level headed, knows the job well. --Haliman - Talk 19:32, 30 July 2009 (BST)
- Vouch - In my time back from hiatus, all I've seen him do is good. He's also very friendly, if not a little random. I would recommend that he stays on as a sysop and a bureaucrat. --User:Axe27/Sig 19:48, 30 July 2009 (BST)
Candidates currently under community discussion
There are currently no candidates under community discussion
Recently Concluded Bids
For more concluded bids, see Category:Promotions Candidacies.
