UDWiki:Administration/Protections/2009/February

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Protections Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019



Suggestions

Not actually requesting the edit to be made yet, just trying to poke more discussion at this. --Midianian|T|DS|C:RCS| 12:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

As I said over there, it's fine. Went silent though. Linkthewindow  Talk  20:06, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Both times I've tried to start discussion about this, there's been a dramaxplosion at A/M. First hagnat, now all sysops :(. --Midianian¦T¦DS¦C:RCS¦ 20:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
If you want, I'm willing to transfer this to here and fix all links. From that discussion it seems that noone is against it and I personally think it's a very good idea. If we want to make any changes, we can discuss them but I think the basic idea is complete enough to try out. -- Cheese 20:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, stick it up there. If we get hordes of people saying "OMG dis fails!!!!," then we know something has been done wrong. Sometimes, it's the only way to get some discussion. Linkthewindow  Talk  06:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

This seems to be finished. --ZsL 02:43, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

The Apocalypse Horde

As above. --Janus talk 15:16, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Done--– Nubis NWO 15:37, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

The Gingerbread Men

For some reason their talkpage is protected and the resposible syops apperantly forget putting up the template. Anyway we, of the suburb group massacare, need it unprotected in order to ask for their activity.

Isn't there a historical group by that name also? Let me look into this. I think that's what happened.--– Nubis NWO 18:14, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Here it is. They are historical just forgot the template.--– Nubis NWO 18:18, 13 February 2009 (UTC)


Axes High (Historic)

Shouldn't this be protected? :| --Janus talk 14:56, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Done. --– Nubis NWO 15:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

The Sidebar

i want UHUB under the community subheading. Some discussion regarding it took place over at Talk:User Hub. Any takers?--xoxo 06:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Done. -- Cheese 23:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thanks cheesy :) --xoxo 12:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Np. =) -- Cheese 20:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

UDWiki:Administration/Bureaucrat Promotions/November 2007

Scheduled, admin archive. Linkthewindow  Talk  23:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Done -- boxy talkteh rulz 03:36 8 February 2009 (BST)

UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive/LibrarianBrent

Can someone fix my misconduct page to properly show that the February 2006 case *was* misconduct? Thanks! --LibrarianBrent 02:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Done -- boxy talkteh rulz 03:36 8 February 2009 (BST)