Difference between revisions of "UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations"

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Spiderzed: Four score and several years ago…)
(74 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
-->
-->


===A Helpful Little Gnome===
''There are currently no open Re-Evaluations.''
{{bid|A Helpful Little Gnome}}


*'''For''' - Gnome isn't as often around as he used to be, but he is there when you need him, which is good enough for me. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 21:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
==Recent Re-Evaluations==
*'''For''' {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 22:48, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
See [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/2019-08-06 Re-Evaluations|2019 Re-Evaluations]]
 
===Aichon===
{{bid|Aichon}}
 
*'''For''' - But only when he runs for crat again next time. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 21:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
*'''For''' - {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 22:48, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
*'''For''' - He's a demigod on this wiki and I've never seen him do anything that would warrant another vote than this one. {{User:Peralta/Signature}} 13:26, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
 
===Bob Moncrief===
{{bid|Bob Moncrief}}
 
Hey! An initial message — I recently did an AMA over at [[NecroConnect]] in conjunction with the bureaucrat elections, so if you'd like some background info, feel free to head over there and check it out. I'll be at a conference and off UD for a chunk of the middle of the A/RE period, but if you leave questions I'll answer them as soon as I get back. Cheers! {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 05:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 
*'''For''' - I initially didn't put up Bob for A/RE as per precedent under the old system, and I think it would be very silly to dismiss a crat mere weeks after election. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 21:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
*'''For''' - I still think he's too soft when vandalism occurs but it's not like it's a big deal. Bob still does a large share of the work on the wiki which is fantastic. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 22:48, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
*'''For''' - He's my hero on all things concerning the wiki. {{User:Peralta/Signature}} 13:25, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
 
===Boxy===
{{bid|Boxy}}
 
*'''For''' - Boxy isn't an op anymore, he is part of our inventory. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 21:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
*'''For''' - {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 22:48, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 
===Misanthropy===
{{bid|Misanthropy}}
 
*My vote depends on whether he appears again during the A/RE or not. 3 months of complete absence are extreme even under current circumstances. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 21:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
*'''For''' - If he came back after demotion he'd just run again and get in. Just cut out the middle step. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 22:48, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
*'''Question''' — Are you around? {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 00:36, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
 
===Spiderzed===
{{bid|Spiderzed}}
*'''For''' - although, since its time for reflection, I'll never forget the Jonny Rotten case and the baffling decision by many sysops here to defend SZ and co's actions to defy logic and precedent.  {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 22:48, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
*'''For'''— And as one of “& co” I was glad to see sense win out over “logic” and “precedent”. {{:P}} <sub><small>Seriously duder, coming up on 5 years and you’re still not over it?</small></sub> <span style="border: 1px solid #414A4C; <!-- Outer Space --> background-color: #253529; <!-- Black leather jacket--> color: #E23D28; <!-- Chili red --> font-size: 14px;">[[User:Revenant{{Switch|{{FULLPAGENAME}}|case: User:Revenant=/Sig}}|<span style="color: #E23D28;">ᚱᛖᚢᛖᚾᚨᚾ</span>]][[User talk:Revenant|<span style="color: #E23D28;">ᛏ</span>]]</span> <span style="font-size:xx-small; letter-spacing: -2px; text-shadow: #cc4444 1px 1px 10px">[[File:555Manbabies.gif|You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|link=User:Example User]][[User:ShaqFu|<span style="color:#FF0018">&#124;</span>]][[User:Katthew|<span style="color:#33DD33">&#124;</span>]][[User:Ryu|<span style="color:#FF0048">&#124;</span>]][[User:SprCobra|<span style="color:#FF0060">&#124;</span>]][[User:Laughing Man|<span style="color:#FF0078">&#124;</span>]][[User:Revenant|<span style="color:#FF0090">&#124;</span>]][[User:underisk|<span style="color:#FF00A8">&#124;</span>]][[User:I WARNED YOU ABOUT TEMPLATES BRO|<span style="color:#FF00C0">&#124;</span>]][[User:DeRathi|<span style="color:#FF00D8">&#124;</span>]][[User:DerpDerp|<span style="color:#FF00F0">&#124;</span>]][[User:Abd al-Rahim ibn al-Husain al-'Iraqi|<span style="color:#FF00ff">&#124;</span>]][[User:Sykic|<span style="color:#E700ff">&#124;</span>]][[User:Vaporware|<span style="color:#CF00ff">&#124;</span>]][[User:Nubis |<span style="color:#9F00ff">&#124;</span>]][[User:Riseabove|<span style="color:#8700ff">&#124;</span>]][[User:Teehee McGee |<span style="color:#6F00ff">&#124;</span>]][[User:Anothergenericzombie|<span style="color:#5700ff">&#124;</span>]][[User:Ryu|<span style="color:#0048ff">&#124;</span>]][[User:Mortimer Wiley|<span style="color:#0044DD">&#124;</span>]][[User:Deadone|<span style="color:#3F00ff">&#124;</span>]][[User:woland37|<span style="color:#2700ff">&#124;</span>]][[User:Colbear|<span style="color:#0000dd">&#124;</span>]][[User:Oh no!|<span style="color:#27ff00">&#124;</span>]][[User:Bender Bending Rodriguez|<span style="color:#0F00ff">&#124;</span>]][[User:Gardenator|<span style="color:#808000">&#124;</span>]][[User:ephphatha |<span style="color:#0000ff">&#124;</span>]][[User:SA|<span style="color:#0018ff">&#124;</span>]]</span> 04:10, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 
===Other Comments===
 
I support keeping all these.  We should add more, gotta collect them all.--<sub>[[User:Kirsty_cotton|<span style="color: lightgrey">K</span>]]</sub><sup>[[CLZA|<span style="color: lightgrey">CLZA</span>]]</sup><sub>[[NecroConnect|<span style="color: lightgrey">NecroConnect</span>]]</sub> 08:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 
Everyone listed above should be demoted. --[[User:Rosslessness|Rosslessness]]<sup> ; the shambling custodian of UD's past...</sup>  14:36, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 
Why is bob part of this if he's a newly picked crat? {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 22:31, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
:I'm submitting myself (see [[User talk:Bob Moncrief#A/RE and crats|here]]) as I think it's unfair that I'd go pretty much two years with no regular A/RE under the new system. (Longer if I'm a crat in July 2017 etc too.) {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 00:35, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
::That makes sense. Good idea and my apologies. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 06:10, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
:::No need for apologies! ^_^ {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 12:58, 4 July 2016 (UTC)


==Archived Re-Evaluations==
==Archived Re-Evaluations==

Revision as of 10:53, 18 August 2019

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

Once a year, all sitting sysops will come up for re-evaluation by the community. The idea of this re-evaluation is to ensure that each sysop still has the trust of the community, which is vital for a sysop to have. This will give the community a chance to voice their opinions about how the sysops have been doing, and re-affirm or decline their trusted user status.

The idea of a sysop being a trusted user is a part of the guidelines for the general conduct of a sysop. The guidelines for the re-evaluation is the same as for being promoted to a sysop (which is reposted below), but with a few minor changes in wording.

Guidelines for System Operator Re-Evaluations

Once a year, on Urban Dead's birthday (July 3rd), all sysops will be subject to a community discussion. Sysops may also put themselves up for re-evaluation at any time (see below). All users are asked to comment on each candidate in question, ask questions of the candidate, and discuss the candidate's suitability for continuing to be a System Operator. This is not a vote. It is instead merely a request for comments from the wiki community. This will continue for two weeks, as all users get a chance to air their opinions on the candidate.

Once the two weeks are up, the Bureaucrats will review the community discussion and make a decision for each candidate based upon it. The user will be notified of the status of their re-evaluation, and will be retained in their position should it appear that the community is willing to continue to accept them as a System Operator. In the event that the decision is negative, then the sysop will be demoted back to regular user status, where after a month's time, the user can re-submit themself for promotion.

Before users voice their opinions on the candidate who wishes to continue their System Operator status, the following guidelines should be reviewed by the user:

General User Guidelines for System Operator Re-Evaluations

Before voicing their opinion on a candidate's re-evaluation bid, a user should consider some of the following questions:

  • Has the candidate spent significant time within the community as a sysop?
We define this as the candidate having made at least one edit in the past 3 months. It is recommended that a user look over the the sysop activity check and last 500 edits to determine the level of activity of the candidate.
Note: The Truly Inactive Sysops policy dictates that a sysop who hasn't made an edit within four months is automatically demoted. Therefore, for a sysop to be re-evaluated, they need to have made an edit before that time-frame is up.
  • Has the candidate maintained significant activity within the community?
We define this as at least 50 edits under the candidate's name since their last re-evaluation. It is recommended that a user look over the candidate's last 50 edits in order to get a feel for the activity of a candidate.
Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history used to be periodically purged on this wiki.
  • Has the candidate expressed interest in maintaining the community?
We define this as clear evidence that the candidate is already performing maintenance tasks and continuing taking a leadership role on the wiki.
  • Has the candidate expressed a desire to continue to be a System Operator?
We define this simply as indicating in the candidate's request their desire to continue to maintain the position.
  • Is there an indication of trust in the candidate.
We define this as a minimum of three other users (preferably users with at least 200 edits under their name and at least one System Operator), willing to vouch for the candidate's suitability for the role.

If a candidate is highly exemplary in one guideline, a certain level of flexibility should be extended to the other guidelines. Other guidelines for qualifications may be used, these are just a few suggested things to consider before a user voices their opinion.

Re-Evaluations Being Discussed

There are currently no open Re-Evaluations.

Recent Re-Evaluations

See 2019 Re-Evaluations

Archived Re-Evaluations

For earlier re-evaluations, see the following:

Re-Evaluations Scheduling

User Position Last Contribution Seat Available
A Helpful Little Gnome (Contribs) Bureaucrat 2021-10-29 2021-12-01
DanceDanceRevolution (Contribs) Bureaucrat 2021-10-28 2021-12-01
Rosslessness (Contribs) Sysop 2021-10-14 N/A
Stelar (Contribs) Sysop 2021-10-29 N/A

Total Sysops: 4 (excluding Kevan, LeakyBocks and Urbandead)

Last updated at: 03:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)