UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2009 10

This page is for the reporting of vandalism within the Urban Dead wiki, as defined by vandalism policy. On this wiki, the punishment for Vandalism is temporary banning, but due to security concerns, the ability to mete out this punishment is restricted to System Operators. As such, regular users will need to lodge a report for a Vandal to be banned from the wiki. For consistency and accountability, System Operators are requested to note on this board their actions in dealing with Vandals.

Guidelines for Vandalism Reporting

In dealing with Vandalism, time is often of the essence. As such, we ask that all users include the following information in a Vandalism report:

• A link to the pages in question.

Preferably bolded for visibility. If the Vandalism is occurring over a sufficiently large number of pages, instead include a time range of the vandalism attempt, or alternatively, a link to the first vandalised page. This allows us to quickly find the damage so we can quickly assess the situation.

• The user name of the Vandal.

This allows us to more easily identify the culprit, and to check details.

• A signed datestamp.

For accountability purposes, we ask that you record in your request your user name and the time you lodged the report.

• Please report at the top.

There's conflict with where to post and a lot of the reports are missed. If it's placed at the top of the page it's probably going to be seen and dealt with.

If you see Vandalism in progress, don't wait for System Operators to deal with it, as there may be no System Operator online at the time. Lodge the report, then start reverting pages back to their original form. This can be done by going to the "History" tab at the top of the page, and finding the last edit before the Vandal's attack. When a System Operator is available, they'll assess the situation, and if the report is legitimate, we will take steps to either warn the vandal, or ban them if they are on their second warning.

If the page is long, you can add new reports by editing the top report and placing your new report above its header in the edit screen.

Before Submitting a Report

• This page, Vandal Banning, deals with bad-faith breaches of official policy.
• Interpersonal complaints are better sorted out at UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration.
• As much as is practical, assume good faith and try to iron out problems with other users one to one, only using this page as a last resort.
• Avoid submitting reports which are petty.

Vandalism Report Space

Administration Notice Talk with the user before reporting or accusing someone of vandalism for small edits. In most cases it's simply a case of a new user that doesn't know how this wiki works. Sometimes assuming good faith and speaking with others can avoid a lot of drama, and can even help newbies feel part of this community. Administration Notice If you are not a System Operator, the user who made the vandal report, the user being reported, or directly involved in the case, the administration asks that you use the talk page for further discussion. Free-for-all commenting can lead to a less respectful environment. Administration Notice Warned users can remove one entry of their warning history every one month and 250 edits after their last warning. Remember to ask a sysop to remove them in due time. You are as responsible for keeping track of your history as the sysops are; In case of a sysop wrongly punishing you due to an outdated history, he might not be punished for his actions.

Spambots

Spambots are to be reported on this page. New reports should be added to the top. Reports may be purged after one week.

October 2009

User:Suicidalangel

Suicidalangel (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandalism
Action taken	Warning

For this garbage, which has created certain unrest among the overly defensive jackasses in the Flowers of Disease clan. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 03:27, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

This as well. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 03:49, 30 October 2009 (BST)

Vandalism - Warned. Cyberbob  Talk  03:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

What, seriously? God damn you guys have gotten up tight. Not to mention you're bringing in shit thats over a week old. Especially when A) in the Historical voting rules and policy document, it does not state that there can't be multi-votes. Neener neener! :)

B) Multi-votes are generally struck, and the user is left alone. I've done it bunches of times and people have just stuck them instead of, you know, trying to warn me over it.

Seriously guys. Wiki for a BBMMO.-- SA 09:49, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Also don't care about the warning btw.-- SA 09:50, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

So don't complain >=D --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:51, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

And What say you do the disgusting display of vandalism on my talk page? xoxo 09:56, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

HiteiKan

HiteiKan (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandal
Action taken	Permaban

lolb&. 3 edit rule.-- SA 01:23, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

N3D

N3D (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandal
Action taken	Permaban

Permabanned under the 3 edit rule for tampering with Vandal Banning here and here before duping the A/VB page onto his own userspace. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 10:15, 23 October 2009 (BST)

I can't help but feel i have a fan. And you do too by the looks of it charlie :) Any others? Oh so can someone IP this dude, the KKI guy and any others? xoxo 08:22, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Next time you want to make a dumb comment like this just put it on the talk page. That way you won't have to come up with a pithy question/comment to pad it out and make it "relevant". Cyberbob  Talk  08:37, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

As Cyberbob, except the "relevant" comment was completely redundant. Of course we IP checked him, though once again it wouldn't affect you either way J3D, so why bother asking? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 10:46, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

User:LAZURMAN IV

LAZURMAN IV (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandal alt
Action taken	Permaban

For being awesome (and helpful) --LAZURMAN IV 15:33, 9 October 2009 (BST)

apart from the penis changes to the front page, obviously. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 15:39, 9 October 2009 (BST)

Got it. Cyberbob  Talk  15:53, 9 October 2009 (BST)

User:Dusky

Dusky (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandal alt
Action taken	Permaban

Another proxy alt. The message he wrote on his user page (check the history) makes his identity pretty obvious. Cyberbob  Talk  04:07, 6 October 2009 (BST)

User:Screw teh rules i have money

Screw teh rules i have money (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandal alt
Action taken	Permaban

Banned. Cyberbob  Talk  04:00, 6 October 2009 (BST)

User:Really?

Really?‎ (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandal alt
Action taken	Permaban

The IP address used by this account is coming up as a proxy, so I banned it. The account hasn't committed any "vandalism" (though those page names are incredibly annoying) however so I've left it alone. Cyberbob  Talk  03:50, 6 October 2009 (BST)

I've banned it. Using a proxy + his initial contribution = an alt, hence userspace trash is bad faith etc. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 03:52, 6 October 2009 (BST)

Ah, I see it ousted itself as an alt. DDR got it. Cyberbob  Talk  03:51, 6 October 2009 (BST)

See the talk page Cyberbob  Talk  09:52, 6 October 2009 (BST)

User:Tommis the tank engine‎

Tommis the tank engine‎ (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandal alt
Action taken	Permaban

For vandalising A/VB -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 00:52 6 October 2009 (BST)

IP tracking shows this account posting from the same IP as Ginger dead Ginger dead (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:04 6 October 2009 (BST)

I was considering warning Tommis for vandalism and leaving Ginger on his way, since the alt had nothing to do with the vandalism, but I'm leaning towards permabanning Tommis as a vandal alt of Ginger, and warning him. Thoughts? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 02:48, 6 October 2009 (BST)

Tommis banned, Ginger dead warned. DDR don't be dumb please. Cyberbob  Talk  02:51, 6 October 2009 (BST)

QQ. Had lots to do this morning. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 03:29, 6 October 2009 (BST)

not crying, just telling you not to be dumb Cyberbob  Talk  03:30, 6 October 2009 (BST)

Ok, really? You both are being dumb. I thought you would have learned this by now. When someone makes dozens of vandal edits in a row, the correct response is permaban. Especially if its a new account that has only made a few other pretend edits to trick you. Also, if another new account magically pops up, with a different IP address, its probably the same person. Its called a proxy. I mean comon guys. Get your act together. Really? 03:40, 6 October 2009 (BST)

There are things called Guidelines that we are obliged to follow. Including "assume good faith", thanks. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 03:48, 6 October 2009 (BST)

Look at me, I've become Conndraka! --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 03:47, 6 October 2009 (BST)

User:Lolcatz

Lolcatz (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandalism
Action taken	Warning + Permban for alts

Check his contribs. Mass spamming of random shit in pages. I would post a link, but I am reverting his edits as I type.--SirArgo ^Talk 23:44, 5 October 2009 (BST)

Perma -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 00:52 6 October 2009 (BST)

IP tracking shows alts User:Lolcat z and User:Tummytums, but gotta run, hope I didn't stuff anything up -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:05 6 October 2009 (BST)

• Lolcat z (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
• Tummytums (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

I've unblocked Tummytums, and will warn him for vandalism with alternate accounts -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 02:31 6 October 2009 (BST)